EP3008705A1 - Détecteur d'intrusion pour la surveillance d'un accès à un bâtiment à surveiller et procédé correspondant - Google Patents

Détecteur d'intrusion pour la surveillance d'un accès à un bâtiment à surveiller et procédé correspondant

Info

Publication number
EP3008705A1
EP3008705A1 EP14733542.6A EP14733542A EP3008705A1 EP 3008705 A1 EP3008705 A1 EP 3008705A1 EP 14733542 A EP14733542 A EP 14733542A EP 3008705 A1 EP3008705 A1 EP 3008705A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sensor
value
physical quantity
designed
signal
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP14733542.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3008705B1 (fr
Inventor
Christian Reichert
Julian Bartholomeyczik
Frank Schindler
Qiulu DAI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Publication of EP3008705A1 publication Critical patent/EP3008705A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3008705B1 publication Critical patent/EP3008705B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/18—Prevention or correction of operating errors
    • G08B29/185—Signal analysis techniques for reducing or preventing false alarms or for enhancing the reliability of the system
    • G08B29/188—Data fusion; cooperative systems, e.g. voting among different detectors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
    • G08B13/08—Mechanical actuation by opening, e.g. of door, of window, of drawer, of shutter, of curtain, of blind

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a burglary sensor for monitoring access to a building to be monitored, wherein the burglary sensor is disposed at the access on the inside of the building. Furthermore, the present invention relates to a method for monitoring access to a building to be monitored.
  • building alarms may include intrusion detectors located on the individual doors and windows of a building that serve to detect the opening of the door or window. If the alarm system is turned on, it can trigger an alarm in case of unauthorized opening of a door or a window of the building and an alarm signal, e.g. to a central registration office or the police.
  • the detection of unauthorized opening a door or a window of a building, so a burglary through the door or the window for example, by a sensor which is adapted to detect vibrations or vibrations caused by the burglary on the door or occur in the window.
  • DE60200401 1587T2 shows a conventional burglary sensor for monitoring a building.
  • vibrations can be caused, for example, by the burglary tool applied to the door lock or the window, eg a lockpick or other lock picking instruments. But these shocks can also, for example, by the exercise of raw violence on the door to separate the door lock of the corresponding recording in the door frame are caused. This is the case when entering the door, for example.
  • the sensor is usually attached to the inside of the door or window, so on the inside of the building.
  • the sensor usually detects accelerations in all three spatial axes at the same time and reports them to the alarm system or to a microcontroller integrated into the sensor, which transmits an intrusion signal to the alarm system.
  • a sensor is mounted on the inside of the door or the window, which monitors only a movement in the three spatial axes, false alarms can be triggered very easily because the sensor can not detect the actual cause of the vibration.
  • a child located inside the apartment on the floor encounters a door equipped with a sensor as described above, it can not be ruled out that the sensor triggers an intruder alarm, although no intrusion occurs. Since the sensor detects only the vibrations of the door, he can not differentiate whether the door was shaken by a legitimate or by an unauthorized person.
  • the present invention discloses a burglary sensor having the features of claim 1 and a method having the features of claim 6.
  • an intrusion sensor for monitoring access to a building to be monitored, the intrusion sensor being located at the access on the inside of the building, having an acceleration sensor configured to detect movements of the intrusion sensor in at least one spatial axis; in the case of a movement in the at least one axis, output a movement signal, in particular an acceleration signal, with an environment sensor which is designed to have at least one value of at least one physical variable in the surroundings of To detect burglary sensor, and with a plausibility device, which is designed to plausibilize the motion signal, in particular the acceleration signal, with the detected value of the physical quantity and output a burglary signal in a negative plausibility.
  • a method for monitoring access to a building to be monitored comprising the steps of detecting a movement of the access in at least one spatial axis and outputting a motion signal, in particular an acceleration signal, in the case of a movement in the at least one axis, detecting at least one value at least one physical quantity in the vicinity of the access on the inside of the building, plausibility of the movement signal, in particular the acceleration signal, with the detected value of the physical quantity, and output of a break-in signal in the event of a negative plausibility check.
  • An alarm system with an alarm transmitter, which is designed to issue an alarm, and with at least one burglary sensor according to the invention, which is designed to transmit a burglary signal to the alarm device.
  • the finding underlying the present invention is that detection of movements in three axes alone is not sufficient to avoid false triggering in a burglary sensor.
  • the idea underlying the present invention is now to take this knowledge into account and to provide a burglar sensor which, in addition to detecting the movements of the access to a building, detects further physical quantities in order to make the output of the acceleration sensor plausible.
  • the present invention provides physical quantities for the
  • Plausibility check which allows the sensor to infer Whether a person is on the outside of the access to the building or on the inside of the entrance to the building.
  • the acceleration sensor detects a movement of the access, e.g. a jolting on a door, detected and issued an acceleration signal, a value of at least one of the physical quantities is detected and used for plausibility of the acceleration signal.
  • acceleration signal is positively plausibilized, ie if a person is located on the inside of the building in the vicinity of the access, no alarm is triggered despite the acceleration signal output by the acceleration sensor.
  • acceleration signal is negatively plausibilized, ie if no person is located on the inside of the building in the vicinity of the access, an alarm is triggered on the basis of the acceleration signal output by the acceleration sensor.
  • the present invention makes it possible to significantly reduce the number of false alarms of a burglary sensor and thereby to increase the field of application and the acceptance of such a sensor.
  • the environmental sensor is designed as a temperature sensor, which is designed to detect the temperature in the vicinity of the burglary sensor. Since a person has a body temperature of about 37 ⁇ ⁇ , using a temperature sensor, the temperature on the inside of the building in the vicinity of the access can be detected and used to determine the presence of a person. This allows a precise plausibility of the acceleration signal.
  • the environmental sensor is designed as a moisture sensor, which is designed to detect the humidity in the vicinity of the burglary sensor.
  • a person changes the temperature in their environment with their presence, as already described above.
  • the air Moisture of air in the environment of a person is designed to allow a further plausibility check of the acceleration signal.
  • the environmental sensor is designed as a sensor which is designed to detect a plurality of physical variables simultaneously in the vicinity of the intrusion sensor. By combining multiple physical quantities, the plausibility check can be further improved.
  • the plausibility checker comprises a memory and is configured to store at predetermined intervals a detected value of the physical quantity and to calculate an average of the detected values of the physical quantity. If an average value for the acquired values of the physical variable is formed, the course of the physical variable can be used over time during the plausibility check.
  • the plausibility check device is configured to calculate a long-term mean value for all detected values of the physical quantity. This makes it possible to obtain a very stable mean, e.g. to be calculated in air-conditioned rooms. Additionally or alternatively, the plausibility check device is configured to calculate a moving average for a predetermined number of detected values of the physical quantity. This allows the mean to be adjusted in changing environmental conditions, e.g. with temperature fluctuation during the course of a day.
  • the intrusion sensor has a data interface configured to communicate with an air conditioner of the building and to interrogate therefrom the current building temperature.
  • the requested building temperature can also be used for a comparison with the detected value of the physical quantity.
  • the plausibility-checking device when an acceleration signal is output by the acceleration sensor, is configured to query a current value of the physical quantity from the environmental sensor and to compare it with the average value, and to positively check the acceleration signal if the current value of the physical quantity changes less than a given Threshold deviates from the mean, and negative plausibility of the acceleration signal, if the current value of the physical quantity deviates by more than the predetermined threshold value of the mean value.
  • the threshold can be adjusted so that not only temperature changes by adults but also by children can be made plausible.
  • the threshold value may also be set such that changes in temperature or other changes in a physical quantity by animals, e.g. Cats or dogs can be used for an accurate plausibility check.
  • Fig. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a burglary sensor according to the invention
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of an embodiment of a method according to the invention
  • Fig. 3 is a block diagram of another embodiment of an inventive
  • Intrusion sensor 4 shows a flowchart of a further embodiment of a method according to the invention
  • Fig. 5 is a block diagram of a building with an embodiment of a burglary sensor according to the invention.
  • the same or functionally identical elements and devices - unless otherwise stated - have been given the same reference numerals.
  • access to a building means any access to a building which can be closed by a movable shutter.
  • Accesses according to the invention can be designed as doors, windows and the like.
  • each sensor which is adapted to absorb acceleration, movement, vibration or the like in at least one of the three spatial axes.
  • An acceleration sensor according to the invention can also record acceleration, movement, vibration or the like in all three spatial axes.
  • a positive plausibility check means that the plausibility check indicates that a person is staying on the inside of the building near the entrance, so that the presence of the person can be ascertained by the detection of the physical quantities.
  • a negative plausibility check means that the plausibility check shows that no person is on the inside of the building near the entrance.
  • FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of an embodiment of a burglary sensor 1 according to the invention.
  • the burglary sensor 1 in FIG. 1 is arranged on a door 2 and has an acceleration sensor 4, which is coupled to a plausibility check device 9. Furthermore, the burglary sensor 1 in FIG. 1 has an environmental sensor 6, which is likewise coupled to the plausibility check device 9.
  • the burglary sensor of Fig. 1 is used to monitor the door 2, which is an access to a monitored building. In this case, the burglary sensor 1 is arranged on the door 2 on the inside of the building.
  • the acceleration sensor 4 serves to detect movements of the burglary sensor 1 in at least one spatial axis. This is always the case when the door 2 is moved or is e.g. a burglar on the door 2 to create. In the case of a movement of the door 2, the acceleration sensor 4 outputs an acceleration signal 5 to the plausibility check device 9.
  • the environmental sensor 6 detects a value 7 of the temperature 8 in the vicinity of the burglary sensor 1.
  • the environmental sensor 6, in one embodiment, may also be configured to additionally or alternatively include other physical quantities 8, e.g. the humidity 8, to detect.
  • the detected value of the temperature 8 is provided by the environmental sensor 6 of the plausibility check device 9.
  • the environment sensor 6 may be formed in other embodiments as any sensor that is capable of detecting the presence or absence of a person or other living thing. This can e.g. be an infrared sensor.
  • the plausibility check device 9 plausibilizes the acceleration signal 5 with the aid of the detected values 7 of the temperature 8. In the case of a negative plausibility check, the plausibility check device 9 outputs a break-in signal 10. If the environmental sensor 6 is adapted to additionally or alternatively include other physical quantities 8, e.g. the humidity 8, these recorded values can also be used in the plausibility check.
  • FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of an embodiment of a method according to the invention.
  • the method according to the invention provides in a first step S1 to detect a movement of the access 2, 3 in at least one spatial axis and to output an acceleration signal 5 in the case of a movement in the at least one axis in a second step S2.
  • a third step S3 at least one value 7 of at least one physical variable 8 in the vicinity of the access 2, 3 on the inside of the building 14 is detected.
  • the method also provides for the plausibility check S4 of the acceleration signal 5 with the detected value 7 of the physical quantity 8 and the output S5 of a break-in signal 10 in the case of a negative plausibility check.
  • FIG. 3 shows a block diagram of a further embodiment of a burglary sensor 1 according to the invention.
  • the intrusion sensor 1 of FIG. 3 is based on the intrusion sensor 1 of FIG. 1 and differs therefrom in that the plausibility check device 9 has a memory 11 and is designed to store a detected value 7 of the physical quantity 8 at predetermined intervals and calculate an average value 12 of the detected values 7 of the physical quantity 8.
  • the plausibility check device 9 forms a long-term mean value 12 for all detected values 7 of the physical quantity 8.
  • the plausibility checker 9 can also calculate a moving average value 12 for a given number of detected values 7 of the physical quantity 8.
  • Plausibilmaschines worn 9 of FIG. 3 is further adapted to query when outputting an acceleration signal 5 by the acceleration sensor 4, a current value 7 of the physical quantity 8 of the environmental sensor 6 and to compare with the average value 12.
  • the plausibility checker 9 plausibly checks the acceleration signal 5 and no break-in signal 10 is output.
  • the environmental sensor 6 is designed as a sensor 6, which is designed to detect a plurality of physical variables 8 simultaneously in the vicinity of the burglary sensor 1.
  • the sensor 6 can detect temperature and humidity.
  • the burglary sensor 1 has a data interface which is designed to communicate with an air conditioning system of the building 14 and to query the current building temperature therefrom.
  • the requested building temperature can also be used for comparison with the detected value of the physical quantity 8.
  • FIG. 4 shows a flowchart of a further embodiment of a method according to the invention.
  • the method of FIG. 4 is based on and differs from the method of FIG. 2 in that the plausibility check step S4 provides for storing at predetermined intervals a detected value 7 of the physical quantity 8 S6 and a mean value 12 of the detected values 7 to calculate the physical quantity 8 S7.
  • the plausibility check step S4 provides for storing at predetermined intervals a detected value 7 of the physical quantity 8 S6 and a mean value 12 of the detected values 7 to calculate the physical quantity 8 S7.
  • a long-term mean value 12 for all detected values 7 of the physical quantity 8 can be calculated.
  • a moving average 12 can be calculated for a predetermined number of detected values 7 of the physical quantity 8.
  • the method provides that when an acceleration signal 5 is output by the acceleration sensor 4, a current value 7 of the physical quantity 8 is detected S8 and compared with the mean value 12 S9.
  • the acceleration signal 5 is positively plausibilized if the current value 7 of the physical quantity 8 deviates from the mean value 12 by more than a predetermined threshold value 13. Furthermore, the acceleration signal 5 is negatively plausibilized if the current value 7 of the physical quantity 8 deviates from the mean value 12 by less than the predetermined threshold value 13.
  • 5 shows a block diagram of an alarm system 16 with an embodiment of a burglary sensor 1 according to the invention.
  • the alarm system 16 is arranged in a building 14.
  • the building 14 of FIG. 5 is shown only schematically by two wall sections 14, which have an opening in which a window 3 is arranged, on which an inventive intrusion sensor 1 is arranged.
  • FIG. 5 By an arrow running in a curve, the opening direction of the window 3 is displayed in Fig. 5.
  • the opening direction in FIG. 5 is shown merely by way of example and does not necessarily have to be limited to the vertical spatial axis shown in FIG. 5. Should the door / window be damaged with great force, e.g. also give a rotational tilting movement, which is not exclusively described by the vertical axis of space.
  • the alarm system 16 has an alarm transmitter 15, which is coupled to the burglary sensor 1.
  • the burglary sensor 1 is designed to transmit to the alarm generator 15 a burglary signal 10, which then outputs an alarm.

Abstract

La présente invention concerne un détecteur d'intrusion servant à surveiller un accès à un bâtiment à surveiller. Le détecteur d'intrusion est disposé au niveau de l'accès à l'intérieur du bâtiment et il comprend : un capteur d'accélération qui est adapté pour détecter des mouvements du détecteur d'intrusion dans au moins un axe de l'espace et pour délivrer un signal d'accélération lorsqu'il a détecté un mouvement dans le ou lesdits axes ; un capteur d'environnement qui est adapté pour acquérir au moins une valeur d'au moins une grandeur physique dans l'environnement du détecteur d'intrusion ; et un système de plausibilisation qui est adapté pour plausibiliser le signal d'accélération avec la valeur acquise pour la grandeur physique et pour délivrer un signal d'intrusion lorsque la plausibilisation est négative. La présente invention concerne en outre un procédé correspondant ainsi qu'un système d'alarme équipé d'un détecteur d'intrusion selon l'invention.
EP14733542.6A 2013-06-10 2014-06-05 Détecteur d'intrusion pour la surveillance de l'accès à un bâtiment à surveiller, procédé et système d'alarme correspondant Active EP3008705B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102013210747.1A DE102013210747A1 (de) 2013-06-10 2013-06-10 Einbruchsensor zur überwachung eines zugangs zu einem zu überwachenden gebäude und verfahren
PCT/EP2014/061672 WO2014198621A1 (fr) 2013-06-10 2014-06-05 Détecteur d'intrusion pour la surveillance d'un accès à un bâtiment à surveiller et procédé correspondant

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3008705A1 true EP3008705A1 (fr) 2016-04-20
EP3008705B1 EP3008705B1 (fr) 2020-04-01

Family

ID=51022813

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14733542.6A Active EP3008705B1 (fr) 2013-06-10 2014-06-05 Détecteur d'intrusion pour la surveillance de l'accès à un bâtiment à surveiller, procédé et système d'alarme correspondant

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US9799209B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3008705B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN105283909B (fr)
DE (1) DE102013210747A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2014198621A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9576469B2 (en) * 2014-12-30 2017-02-21 Google Inc. Systems and methods of adaptively adjusting a sensor of a security system
DE102016118166A1 (de) 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Abus Security-Center Gmbh & Co. Kg Gebäudeüberwachungssystem
US11225821B2 (en) 2017-06-30 2022-01-18 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab Door operator
ES2935634T3 (es) * 2018-01-22 2023-03-08 Assa Abloy Ab Determinar cuándo un intento de intrusión está en proceso
EP3582196A1 (fr) * 2018-06-11 2019-12-18 Verisure Sàrl Capteur de choc dans un système d'alarme
WO2020089349A1 (fr) * 2018-10-31 2020-05-07 Assa Abloy Ab Classification de vibrations
CN109214491A (zh) * 2018-11-07 2019-01-15 李志民 电子标签、防水卷材、屋面检漏系统及其方法
DE102020126852A1 (de) * 2020-10-13 2022-04-14 Warema Renkhoff Se Verschattungsvorrichtung mit Alarmvorrichtung
FR3126804A1 (fr) 2021-09-09 2023-03-10 Artifeel Dispositif de détermination adaptative d’actions sur un objet par analyse progressive des contraintes qu’elles génèrent

Family Cites Families (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5793286A (en) * 1996-01-29 1998-08-11 Seaboard Systems, Inc. Combined infrasonic and infrared intrusion detection system
US5870022A (en) * 1997-09-30 1999-02-09 Interactive Technologies, Inc. Passive infrared detection system and method with adaptive threshold and adaptive sampling
NO312796B1 (no) * 2000-10-26 2002-07-01 Nordan As Alarmbrikke
JP3722087B2 (ja) * 2002-05-13 2005-11-30 オムロン株式会社 監視方法、監視システム、監視プログラム、および監視プログラムを記録した記録媒体
US8354927B2 (en) 2002-06-11 2013-01-15 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Shipping container monitoring based on door status
FI115931B (fi) 2003-10-10 2005-08-15 Tamtron Oy Valvontalaite ja -järjestelmä
SE0400232L (sv) 2004-02-05 2005-08-06 Vendolocus Ab Alarmsystem
EP1772833A4 (fr) * 2004-08-05 2008-11-12 Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd Dispositif de surveillance et son programme
US7218217B2 (en) * 2004-08-05 2007-05-15 Honeywell International, Inc. False alarm reduction in security systems using weather sensor and control panel logic
NO20052403A (no) * 2005-05-18 2006-09-18 Idtec Pte Ltd System og fremgangsmåte for deteksjon av innbrudd
JP2006323755A (ja) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-30 Medical Electronic Science Inst Co Ltd 不審者侵入監視システム
US20080165001A1 (en) * 2007-01-08 2008-07-10 Drake David A Methods and apparatuses for false alarm elimination
WO2011085420A1 (fr) * 2010-01-18 2011-07-21 Stefan Wieser Dispositif et procédé de surveillance d'une ouverture dans un bâtiment
CN201763180U (zh) * 2010-02-08 2011-03-16 吉林大元电子科技有限公司 智能数字防盗门
CN101866521B (zh) * 2010-07-02 2012-07-04 叶斌 一种基于行为分析的全天候设防的家庭安防报警系统
DE102010039837A1 (de) * 2010-08-26 2012-03-01 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung eines Geräts
US9311793B2 (en) * 2011-10-24 2016-04-12 Andrew Lohbihler Motion and area monitoring system and method
CN102637331B (zh) * 2012-04-13 2014-07-02 中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院 小区防盗报警系统和方法
CA2874636C (fr) * 2012-05-23 2017-08-22 Schlage Lock Company Llc Capteur de serrure de porte et alarme

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2014198621A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US9799209B2 (en) 2017-10-24
DE102013210747A1 (de) 2014-12-11
CN105283909B (zh) 2018-11-20
US20160117918A1 (en) 2016-04-28
CN105283909A (zh) 2016-01-27
EP3008705B1 (fr) 2020-04-01
WO2014198621A1 (fr) 2014-12-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3008705B1 (fr) Détecteur d'intrusion pour la surveillance de l'accès à un bâtiment à surveiller, procédé et système d'alarme correspondant
EP3097547B1 (fr) Procede et appareil pour determination d'une intrusion non autorisée par une porte
WO2015051942A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de détermination d'un état d'un objet à surveiller
DE102013103535A1 (de) Überwachungsvorrichtung zur Überwachung von Verschlusseinrichtungen von Objektöffnung eines Objekts, insbesondere Haus, und ein entsprechendes Verfahren
EP3323116A1 (fr) Procédé de fonctionnement d'un appareil de traitement de surfaces
WO2015000731A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé de détermination d'un état de fermeture d'une porte ou d'une fenêtre d'une maison
DE102017109628B4 (de) Verfahren zum steuern eines tors mit zugangssperrfunktion
DE3611184C1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Raumsicherung
DE102015208771B3 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Diebstahlerkennung
EP2350981B1 (fr) Système de contrôle et de commande d' accès
DE102020110695A1 (de) Durchgangsanlage
DE202008013354U1 (de) Detektionsvorrichtung sowie Verschlussvorrichtung einer Wandöffnung mit Detektionsvorrichtung
EP4105902A1 (fr) Dispositif de contrôle de passage
EP2943630B1 (fr) Ensemble capteur de proximité capacitif sur une porte d'un véhicule automobile pour détecter un mouvement d'approche approximativement horizontal d'une main d'opérateur
AT510046B1 (de) Anordnung zur überwachung von verschlusselementen
EP3481680B1 (fr) Méthode de fonctionnement d'un système d'accès passive pour véhicule avec jeton id
EP0252230B1 (fr) Procédé pour commander un détecteur de mouvement
DE102018115007A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Türraumüberwachung
AT513029B1 (de) Verfahren zum Überwachen einer eine Öffnung verschließenden Abschlusskonstruktion
DE19959883B4 (de) Antriebssteuerung
EP3985629B1 (fr) Dispositif d'ombrage pourvu de dispositif d'alarme
DE202021103449U1 (de) ESD-Kontrollanordnung
DE102016212947B4 (de) Vorrichtung, System und Verfahren zur Aktivitätsdetektion
DE102022116110A1 (de) ESD-Kontrollanordnung
WO2018091692A1 (fr) Système de tringle ou de rail et caisson de volet roulant

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160111

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20191028

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1252371

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200415

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502014013900

Country of ref document: DE

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200701

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200817

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200701

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200801

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200702

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502014013900

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210112

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200605

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200605

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1252371

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230620

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230817

Year of fee payment: 10