EP2879836B1 - Élément abrasif présentant des caractéristiques de forme précises, article abrasif fabriqué à partir de celui-ci et son procédé de fabrication - Google Patents

Élément abrasif présentant des caractéristiques de forme précises, article abrasif fabriqué à partir de celui-ci et son procédé de fabrication Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2879836B1
EP2879836B1 EP13826255.5A EP13826255A EP2879836B1 EP 2879836 B1 EP2879836 B1 EP 2879836B1 EP 13826255 A EP13826255 A EP 13826255A EP 2879836 B1 EP2879836 B1 EP 2879836B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
abrasive
diamond
features
precisely shaped
carbide
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP13826255.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2879836A4 (fr
EP2879836A1 (fr
Inventor
Duy K. LEHUU
Noah O. SHANTI
Junqing Xie
Kathryn R. Bretscher
Vincent W. Nehring
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
3M Innovative Properties Co
Original Assignee
3M Innovative Properties Co
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 3M Innovative Properties Co filed Critical 3M Innovative Properties Co
Publication of EP2879836A1 publication Critical patent/EP2879836A1/fr
Publication of EP2879836A4 publication Critical patent/EP2879836A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2879836B1 publication Critical patent/EP2879836B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24B—MACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B53/00—Devices or means for dressing or conditioning abrasive surfaces
    • B24B53/017—Devices or means for dressing, cleaning or otherwise conditioning lapping tools
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
    • B24D18/00—Manufacture of grinding tools or other grinding devices, e.g. wheels, not otherwise provided for
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
    • B24D18/00—Manufacture of grinding tools or other grinding devices, e.g. wheels, not otherwise provided for
    • B24D18/0009—Manufacture of grinding tools or other grinding devices, e.g. wheels, not otherwise provided for using moulds or presses
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24—GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24D—TOOLS FOR GRINDING, BUFFING OR SHARPENING
    • B24D3/00—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents
    • B24D3/02—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents the constituent being used as bonding agent
    • B24D3/04—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents the constituent being used as bonding agent and being essentially inorganic
    • B24D3/14—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents the constituent being used as bonding agent and being essentially inorganic ceramic, i.e. vitrified bondings
    • B24D3/18—Physical features of abrasive bodies, or sheets, e.g. abrasive surfaces of special nature; Abrasive bodies or sheets characterised by their constituents the constituent being used as bonding agent and being essentially inorganic ceramic, i.e. vitrified bondings for porous or cellular structure

Definitions

  • the present invention deals with an abrasive element, an abrasive article and a method of making an abrasive article.
  • CMP chemical-mechanical planarization
  • pad conditioners have industrial diamond abrasive bonded into a matrix.
  • Typical matrix materials include nickel chromium, brazed metal, electroplating materials, and CVD diamond film. Due to the irregular size and shape distributions of diamonds as well as their random orientations, various proprietary processes have been devised to precisely sort, orient or pattern diamonds and to control their height. However, given the natural variation in diamond grit, it is not unusual that only 2-4% of the diamonds actually abrade the CMP pad ("working diamonds"). Controlling the distribution of cutting tips and edges of the abrasives is a manufacturing challenge, and contributes to variation in pad conditioner performance.
  • current matrix and bonding methods can also limit the size of diamonds that can be embedded. For example, small diamonds of less than around 45 microns can be difficult to bond without burying them within the matrix.
  • Acidic slurries for metal CMP can also pose challenges to traditional pad conditioners.
  • the acidic slurries can chemically react with the metal bonding matrix, weakening the bond between the matrix and abrasive particles. This can result in detachment of the diamond particles from the conditioner surface, resulting in high wafer defect rates and potentially scratches on the wafer. Erosion of the metal matrix can also result in metal ion contamination of the wafer.
  • GB 1 296 589 discloses an abrasive element comprising a first and a second major surfaces, wherein the first major surface comprises a plurality of precisely shaped features, and wherein the abrasive element comprises carbide ceramic and has a porosity of less than 5%.
  • GB 1 296 589 discloses an abrasive article comprising an abrasive element comprising a first and a second major surfaces, wherein the first major surface comprises a plurality of precisely shaped features, and wherein the abrasive element comprises carbide ceramic and has a porosity of less of 5%.
  • GB 1 296 589 discloses a method of making an abrasive article comprising: providing a first abrasive element and a second abrasive element, each abrasive element comprising first and second major surfaces, wherein at least the first major surface comprises a plurality of precisely shaped features and wherein the abrasive elements comprise carbide ceramic and have a porosity of less than about 5%.
  • an abrasive element including a first major surface and a second major surface. At least the first major surface includes a plurality of monolithic, precisely shaped features.
  • the abrasive element includes at least about 99% of carbide ceramic by weight and has a porosity of less than about 5%.
  • an abrasive article including a first abrasive element comprising first and second major surfaces. At least the first major surface includes a plurality of monolithic, precisely shaped features.
  • the first abrasive element includes at least about 99% of carbide ceramic by weight and has a porosity of less than about 5%.
  • a method of making an abrasive article includes providing a first abrasive element and a second abrasive element; placing the first major surfaces of the abrasive elements in contact with an alignment plate; providing a resilient element having first and second major surfaces; affixing the first major surface of the resilient element to the second major surfaces of the abrasive elements; providing a fastening element; and affixing the second major surface of the resilient element to a carrier through the fastening element.
  • Each abrasive element includes first and second major surfaces, wherein at least the first major surfaces comprise a plurality of monolithic, precisely shaped features and wherein the abrasive elements comprise at least about 99% of carbide ceramic by weight and have a porosity of less than about 5%.
  • the precisely shaped abrasive elements of the present invention are formed of about 99% carbide ceramic, have a porosity of less than about 5% and include a plurality of precisely shaped features.
  • the plurality of precisely shaped features is monolithic rather than an abrasive composite. Unlike a composite which erodes to release embedded abrasive particles, the monolith functions without the loss of embedded abrasive particles, therefore reducing the chances of scratching.
  • Abrasive articles incorporating the abrasive elements of the present invention have consistent and reproducible performance, precise alignment of the abrasive working tips against the workpiece surface, long lives, good feature integrity (including good replication, low erosion and fracture resistance), low metal ion contamination, reliability, consistent and cost effective manufacturing through design for manufacturing, and the ability to be tailored to various polishing pad configurations.
  • the abrasive article is a pad conditioner.
  • the precisely structured abrasive elements of the present invention include a first major surface, a second major surface and a plurality of precisely shaped features on at least one of the major surfaces.
  • the abrasive elements are formed of carbide and are about 99% carbide ceramic by weight.
  • the carbide ceramic is silicon carbide, boron carbide, zirconium carbide, titanium carbide, tungsten carbide or combinations thereof.
  • the 99% carbide ceramic by weight is substantially silicon carbide.
  • the abrasive elements are fabricated without the use of carbide formers and are substantially free of oxide sintering aides.
  • the abrasive elements include less than about 1% oxide sintering aides.
  • the abrasive elements are also substantially free of silicon and in particular include less than about 1% elemental silicon.
  • a substantially carbide ceramic can be molded with excellent feature integrity.
  • these compositions are sintered, they yield robust and durable abrasive elements with less than about 5% porosity.
  • the abrasive elements have a porosity of less than about 3% and more particularly less than about 1%.
  • the abrasive elements also have a mean grain size of less than about 20 microns, particularly less than about 10 microns, more particularly less than about 5 microns and even more particularly less than about 3 microns. This low porosity and grain size are significant in achieving robust and durable replicated features, which in turn results in good life and low wear rates of the abrasive element.
  • the abrasive elements include precisely shaped abrasive features, or projections in the abrasive elements that protrude toward a workpiece.
  • the abrasive features can have any shape or shapes (polygonal or non-polygonal) and can have the same or varying heights.
  • the abrasive features can have the same base size or varying base sizes.
  • the abrasive features may be spaced in a regular or irregular array and may be made into patterns comprised of unit cells.
  • the abrasive elements include abrasive features having a length of between about 1 and about 2000 microns, particularly between about 5 and about 700 microns and more particularly between about 10 and about 300 microns.
  • the abrasive element has a feature density of from about 1 to about 1000 features/mm 2 and particularly between about 10 and about 300 features/mm 2 .
  • the abrasive elements include a peripheral zone, or an area on the periphery of the abrasive element in which there are no abrasive features.
  • the abrasive elements may be coated to achieve additional wear resistance and durability, reduce the coefficient of friction, protect from corrosion, and change surface properties.
  • Useful coatings include, for example, chemical vapor deposited (CVD) or physical vapor deposited (PVD) diamond, doped diamond, silicon carbide, cubic boron nitride (CBN), fluorochemical coatings, hydrophobic or hydrophilic coatings, surface modifying coatings, anticorrosion coatings, diamond like carbon (DLC), diamond like glass (DLG), tungsten carbide, silicon nitride, titanium nitride, particle coatings, polycrystalline diamond, microcrystalline diamond, nanocrystalline diamond and the like.
  • the coating may also be a composite material, such as, for example, a composite of fine diamond particles and a vapor deposited diamond matrix.
  • these coatings are conformal, enabling the precise surface features to be seen under the coating surface.
  • the coating can be deposited by any suitable method known in the art, including chemical or physical vapor deposition, spraying, dipping and roll coating.
  • the abrasive elements may be coated with a non-oxide coating.
  • a CVD diamond coating is used, the use of the silicon carbide ceramic has the additional benefit in that there is a good match in the coefficient of thermal expansion between the silicon carbide and the CVD diamond film. Therefore, these diamond coated abrasives additionally have excellent diamond film adhesion and durability.
  • the abrasive element is fabricated from a molded green body. In such cases, the abrasive element is considered a molded abrasive element.
  • the precisely structured abrasive is ceramic pressed into a mold and sintered. The mold itself can be used in the fabrication of the precisely structured abrasive elements.
  • Precisely structured abrasive elements have maximal feature height uniformity.
  • the feature height uniformity refers to the uniformity of the height of selected features relative to the base of the feature.
  • the non-uniformity is the average of the absolute values of the difference of heights of selected features from the average height of the selected features.
  • the selected features are the set of features having maximum common design height D 0 .
  • a precisely shaped abrasive element of the invention has a non-uniformity of less than about 20% of the feature height.
  • the abrasive element has a non-uniformity of less than about 10% of the feature height, particularly less than about 5% of the feature height and more particularly less than about 2% of the feature height.
  • the abrasive element When the abrasive element is molded, it is a subset of the precisely structured abrasive element where the structure is conferred by a molding process.
  • the shape may be the inverse of the mold cavity such that the shape is retained after the abrasive element green body has been removed from the mold.
  • Various ceramic shaping processes may be used, including but not limited to: injection molding, slip casting, die pressing, hot pressing, embossing, transfer molding, gel casting and the like.
  • the die pressing process is used at room temperature, followed by sintering.
  • ceramic die pressing near room temperature is referred to as ceramic dry pressing. Ceramic dry pressing typically differs from ceramic injection molding in that it is done at lower temperature, a much smaller amount of binder is used, die pressing is used, and the materials suitable for use as binder are not necessarily limited to thermoplastics.
  • the precisely engineered abrasive articles of the present invention generally include at least one abrasive element, a fastening element and a resilient element.
  • the precisely engineered abrasive articles include a plurality of abrasive elements.
  • the fastening element is a material used to adhere one or more materials together. Examples of suitable fastening element can include, but are not limited to: a two part epoxy, pressure sensitive adhesives, structural adhesives, hot melt adhesives, B-stageable adhesives, mechanical fasteners and mechanical locking devices.
  • the resilient element functions to provide independent suspension of individual abrasive elements or global suspension of multiple structured abrasive elements.
  • the resilient element is a material that is less rigid and more compressible than the precisely structured abrasive element and/or carrier.
  • the resilient element elastically deforms under compression and can be locked into a compressed position through a fastening element, or allowed to elastically deform in use.
  • the resilient element can be segmented, continuous, discontinuous or gimbaled. Examples of suitable resilient elements include, but are not limited to: mechanical spring-like devices, flexible washers, foams, polymers, or gels.
  • the resilient element can also have a fastening character, such as foam with an adhesive backing. In one embodiment, the resilient element can also function as the fastening element.
  • abrasive features of the abrasive elements can be aligned to a reference plane.
  • the reference plane is the theoretical plane through the maxima of selected features of an abrasive element or an abrasive article. Feature maxima are also referred to as feature tips or tips.
  • the selected features are the set of working features having a maximum common design height, D 0 .
  • the features that define the reference plane are the three features with the tallest height.
  • the alignment process is important to reproducibly create a defined bearing area or presentation to the workpiece or polishing pad.
  • the precisely structured abrasive elements are best aligned to using a planar surface (i.e., "alignment plate") in contact with the maxima of the features.
  • the planar surface of the alignment plate preferably has a tolerance of at least about +/- 2.5 microns per 4 inch in length (10.2 cm) or even lower, i.e. even more planar.
  • a resilient element and a fastening element are used in this assembly process in order to precisely align the elements relative to each other on the carrier substrate.
  • the abrasive article may also include one or more cleaning elements, which may be continuous or discontinuous.
  • the cleaning element has the function of providing for cleaning of a workpiece surface.
  • the cleaning element may be comprised of a brush or other material designed to sweep away debris, or may be a channel or raised area providing for removal of slurry or swarf from a surface.
  • the abrasive elements may be aligned and mounted on a precisely planar carrier.
  • suitable carrier materials include, but are not limited to: metals (e.g., stainless steel), ceramic, polymers (e.g., polycarbonate), cermet, silicon and composites.
  • the abrasive element(s) and carrier may also have a circular or non-circular perimeter, be contoured, or possess the shape of a cup or donut, etc.
  • the abrasive elements are aligned such that there is maximal feature tip coplanarity.
  • the non-coplanarity is the average of the absolute values of the distance of a selected set of tips from the ideal reference plane through the set of tips.
  • the non-coplanarity is expressed as a percentage relative to the height of the selected features, D o .
  • the abrasive elements and articles of the present invention have a precisely engineered surface, resulting in reproducible and predictable surface topology, as measured by the low defect rate and number of features that engage the workpiece.
  • the primary working features are the tallest features of essentially equal height.
  • the secondary and tertiary working features are those of first and second offset in height from the primary working features such that the offset is smaller for the secondary feature than the tertiary feature. This definition extends to other feature heights.
  • the resulting abrasive elements and articles have precise feature replication, low defects and good uniformity and planarity of the primary features.
  • a defect occurs when, for example, an unintentional depression, air-void, or bubble exists in the surface of the precisely-shaped abrasive feature, and typically varies in location and/or size from one precisely-shaped abrasive feature to the next.
  • the defects are readily discernable under a microscope when comparing the individual precisely shaped features in the array.
  • the precisely shaped abrasive element defect results in a missing apex of a precisely shaped abrasive feature.
  • the abrasive element or article has a percentage of defective features of less than about 30%, particularly less than about 15% and particularly less than about 2%.
  • the abrasive articles also have low or controlled warping or bowing of each abrasive element from processing or thermal mismatch with coated materials, resulting in good element planarity.
  • element planarity refers to the planarity of selected feature tips within a precisely structured abrasive element relative to a reference plane. The element planarity is determined in part by the mold design, fidelity of the molding tool, and uniformity of the molding and sintering processes (e.g., differential shrinkage and warpage), etc. For a single element, the planarity refers to the variability of the distance of a set of feature tips relative to a reference plane. The set of tips used to calculate planarity includes tips from all features having a common maximum design height, D 0 .
  • a reference plane is defined as the plane having the best linear regression fit of all of the selected feature tips of height D 0 .
  • the non-planarity is the average of the absolute value of the distance of the selected tips from the reference plane.
  • the planarity can be measured by carbon paper imprint test or standard topology tools, including laser profilometry, confocal imaging, and confocal scanning microscopy, combined with image analysis software, e.g., MOUNTAINSMAP V5.0 image analysis software (Digital Surf, Besantreu, France). Element topology can also be characterized by skew, kurtosis, etc.
  • a precisely shaped abrasive element of the invention has a non-planarity of less than about 20% of the feature height. In one embodiment, the abrasive element has a non-planarity of less than about 10% of the feature height, particularly less than about 5% of the feature height and more particularly less than about 2% of the feature height.
  • the abrasive articles also have accurate alignment of the precisely shaped abrasive elements such that there is substantial coplanarity.
  • the coplanarity refers to the variability of the distance of a set of feature tips from a plurality of elements relative to a reference plane.
  • This reference plane is defined as the plane having the best linear regression fit of all of the selected feature tips of maximum height D 0 .
  • the non-coplanarity is the average of the absolute values of the distance of selected tips from the reference plane. Non-coplanarity results when the separate abrasive elements are not aligned. Non-coplanarity can be seen through uneven pressure distribution, for example through a carbon imprint test.
  • the degree of coplanarity can be further quantified through standard topology tools, including laser profilometry, confocal imaging, and confocal scanning microscopy.
  • Image software e.g., MOUNTAINSMAP
  • MOUNTAINSMAP can be used to combine multiple topographic maps into a composite topographic map for analysis.
  • a collective group of features on all of the abrasive elements, having a common maximum design feature height of D 0 has a non-coplanarity of less than about 20% of the feature height.
  • the abrasive elements have a non-coplanarity of less than about 10% of the feature height, particularly less than about 5% of the feature height and more particularly less than about 2% of the feature height.
  • the abrasive elements of the present invention can be formed through machining, micromachining, microreplication, molding, extruding, injection molding, ceramic pressing, etc. such that precisely shaped structures are fabricated and are reproducible from part to part and within a part, reflecting the ability to replicate a design.
  • a ceramic die pressing process is used.
  • the ceramic die pressing process is ceramic dry pressing.
  • an abrasive article according to claim 9 including one or more abrasive elements is fabricated from a plurality of precisely shaped, engineered monoliths that are designed to have good feature integrity, are relatively non-erodible, and are fracture resistant.
  • a monolith has a continuous structure and precisely shaped topology in which the abrasive features and the regions between the abrasive features of the abrasive element are continuous and consist of the primary abrasive material without an intervening matrix, such as exists in structured abrasive composites.
  • the topology is predetermined and replicated from a material which can be formed from methods such as machining or micromachining, water jet cutting, injection molding, extrusion, microreplication or ceramic die pressing.
  • the precisely engineered abrasive article is assembled by first placing the first major surfaces of a first and a second abrasive element in contact with an alignment plate. A first major surface of a resilient element is then contacted with the second major surfaces of the abrasive elements. The second major surface of the resilient element is then affixed to a carrier through the fastening element. The assembly is then bonded together under pressure. When assembled, the plane defined by the working tips is substantially planar with respect to the backplane of the carrier.
  • the abrasive article is a single sided pad conditioner in which the precisely shaped features are located on one surface. However, the pad conditioner can also be assembled such that it is double sided, with both sides presenting precisely structured features.
  • Pad conditioners having the precisely structured abrasive elements of the invention may be used in conventional Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) processes.
  • CMP Chemical Mechanical Planarization
  • Various materials may be polished or planarized in such conventional CMP processes, including, but not limited to: copper, copper alloys, aluminum, tantalum, tantalum nitride, tungsten, titanium, titanium nitride, nickel, nickel-iron alloys, nickel-silicide, germanium, silicon, silicon nitride, silicon carbide, silicon-dioxide, oxides of silicon, hafnium oxide, materials having a low dielectric constant, and combinations thereof.
  • the pad conditioners may be configured to mount onto conventional CMP tools in such CMP processes and run under conventional operating conditions.
  • the CMP process is run at a range of rotational speeds between about 20 RPM and about 150RPM, at a range of applied load of between about 1 lb and about 90 lbs, and sweeping back and forth across the pad at a rate of between about 1 and about 25 sweeps per minute, utilizing conventional sweep profiles, such as sinusoidal sweeps or linear sweeps.
  • Abrasive articles having precisely shaped abrasive features were examined under a stereomicroscope at 63X total magnification (Model SZ60 from Olympus America Inc., Center Valley, Pennsylvania).
  • a defect was defined as a feature that was missing, possessed an unintentional depression(s), air-void, bubble or a feature that possessed a tip that appeared craterlike or truncated, rather than sharply and fully formed.
  • the percent of defective features was defined as the number of features with primary defects on an abrasive element divided by the total number of features on an abrasive element, multiplied by 100.
  • the non-planarity of an individual abrasive element with precisely shaped features was measured using laser profilometry and a Leica DCM 3D confocal microscope, combined with MOUNTAINSMAP V5.0 image analysis software (Digital Surf, Besançon, France).
  • a Micro-Epsilon OptoNCDT1700 laser profilometer (Raleigh, North Carolina) was mounted to an X-Y stage provided by B&H Machine Company, Inc. (Roberts, Wisconsin). The profilometer scan rate and increment were adjusted to provide sufficient resolution to accurately locate the feature tips, thus were dependent on the type, size and patterning of the precisely shaped features.
  • a group of features, all having the same maximum design feature height of D 0 was selected, and their height measured relative to a base plane.
  • a reference plane is defined as the plane having the best linear regression fit of all of the selected feature tips of height D 0 .
  • the non-planarity is the average of the absolute value of the distances of the selected tips from the reference plane. The non-planarity is expressed as a percentage relative to the height of the selected features, D 0 .
  • the coplanarity of an abrasive article having multiple abrasive elements was measured by a Carbon Paper Imprint test (CPI test).
  • CPI test Carbon Paper Imprint test
  • the article was placed a planar granite surface such that the precisely shaped features were facing upwards, away from the granite surface. Carbon paper was then placed against the features with carbon side facing upwards.
  • a white sheet of photo quality paper was placed on top of the carbon paper such that the carbon was in direct contact with the photo paper so as to create an image on the photo paper.
  • a planar plate was placed on top of the photopaper/carbon paper/abrasive article stack.
  • a load 120 lb (54.4 kg) was applied to the stack for 30 seconds. The load was removed and the photo paper was scanned with an image scanner to record the imprinted image.
  • a coplanar abrasive article results in images where the separate elements are of equal size and color intensity, as quantified visually and through image analysis.
  • images of the individual elements may be missing, asymmetric or show significant lighter intensity areas.
  • the coplanarity can be measured by standard topology tools, including laser profilometry, confocal imaging, and confocal scanning microscope, combined with image analysis software (e.g., MOUNTAINSMAP).
  • Element topology can also be characterized by skew, kurtosis, etc.
  • the coplanarity refers to the variability of the position of a set of feature tips from a plurality of elements relative to a reference plane.
  • a reference plane is defined as the plane having the best linear regression fit of all of the selected features of height D 0 .
  • the set of feature tips used to calculate coplanarity includes tips from all features having common, maximum design height D 0 .
  • the non-coplanarity is calculated using the average of the absolute values of the distance of selected tips from the reference plane. The non-coplanarity is expressed as a percentage relative to the height of the selected features, D 0 .
  • the bulk density and apparent porosity of the abrasive elements with precisely shaped features were measured according to ASTM test method C373.
  • the total porosity was also calculated based the bulk density and an assumption of a theoretical density for an abrasive element of 3.20 g/cm 3 .
  • the calculated porosity is the following: [(theoretical density - bulk density)/ theoretical density] ⁇ 100.
  • the mean surface grain size of carbide grains of the abrasive elements with precisely shaped features was determined by examining the surface of the elements by optical microscopy or scanning electron microscopy.
  • optical microscopy a Nikon model ME600 (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used at 100X magnification.
  • scanning electron microscopy a Hitachi High-Tech model TM3000 (Hitachi Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) was used at 5,000X magnification, 15keV acceleration voltage and 4-5 mm working distance.
  • the line intercept method was used. First, 5 straight lines were drawn horizontally across the image (approximately equally spaced). Next, the number of grains intercepted by the lines was counted, excluding the first and last grains which were at the edge of the image.
  • Removal rate was calculated by determining the change in thickness of the copper layer being polished. This change in thickness was divided by the wafer polishing time to obtain the removal rate for the copper layer being polished. Thickness measurements for 300 mm diameter wafers were taken with a ResMap 168, 4 point probe Rs Mapping Tool available from Credence Design Engineering, Inc., Cupertino, California. Eighty-one point diameter scans with 5 mm edge exclusion were employed. Wafer non-uniformity (%NU) was calculated by the standard deviation of 49 wafer thickness measurements across the wafer divided by the mean wafer thickness value.
  • Removal rate was calculated by determining the change in thickness of the oxide layer being polished. This change in thickness was divided by the wafer polishing time to obtain the removal rate for the oxide layer being polished. Thickness measurements for 300 mm oxide blanket rate wafers were made using a NovaScan 3060 ellipsometer which is integrated with the REFLEXION polisher and was supplied by Applied Materials, Inc. Santa Clara, California. Oxide wafers were measured with a 25 point diameter scan with 3 mm edge exclusion. Wafer non-uniformity (%NU) was calculated by the standard deviation of 49 wafer thickness measurements across the wafer divided by the mean wafer thickness value.
  • Measurements were conducted using the laser profilometry and software analysis tools described previously in the Element Planarity Test Method.
  • a radial strip of dimension 1 inch (2.5 cm) by 16 inch (40.6 cm) pad strip was cut out of the 30.5 inch polishing pad, after processing on the 300 mm REFLEXION tool.
  • Two dimensional X-Y laser profile scans were conducted over a 1 cm 2 region at locations 3 inch (7.6 cm), 8 inch (20.3 cm) and 13 inch (33.0 cm) distance from the pad center.
  • MOUNTAINSMAP software was used to obtain the pad wear rate and surface roughness (Sa) by analyzing the change in the pad groove depth, as a function of polishing time, at these different pad positions and also by analyzing the pad surface texture, using 2D and 3D digital images.
  • Pad wear rate was calculated as the average pad wear at 3, 8, and 13 inches from the pad center divided by the total finishing time.
  • Polishing was conducted using a CMP polisher available under the trade designation REFLEXION polisher from Applied Materials, Inc., of Santa Clara, California.
  • An IC1010 pad and CSL9044C slurry were used for polishing.
  • a sample of 30% (wt basis) hydrogen peroxide, (H 2 O 2 ) was added to the slurry to obtain a H 2 O 2 concentration in the slurry of 3 % (wt basis), prior to starting the test.
  • Polishing was conducted using a CMP polisher available under the trade designation REFLEXION polisher from Applied Materials, Inc.
  • a WSP pad and 7106 slurry were used for polishing.
  • a sample of 30% (wt basis) H 2 O 2 was added to the slurry to obtain a H 2 O 2 concentration in the slurry of 3% (wt basis), prior to starting the test.
  • Polishing was conducted using a CMP polisher available under the trade designation REFLEXION polisher from Applied Materials, Inc.
  • a VP5000 pad and D6720 slurry were used for polishing.
  • the D6720 was diluted with DI water at a ratio of 3 parts water to 1 part slurry.
  • the pad was conditioned continuously throughout the test with slurry being run on the pad continuously throughout the test. At appropriate time intervals, four 300 mm thermal silicon oxide "dummy" wafers would be run, followed by a 300 mm, thermal silicon oxide wafer, 17 k ⁇ silicon oxide thickness, to monitor oxide removal rate.
  • the process conditions were as follows:
  • SCP1 A silicon carbide powder with an average particle size of 0.6 micron, available under the trade designation "HSC 490N” from Superior Graphite Co., Chicago, Illinois.
  • BCP1 A boron carbide powder with an average particle size of 0.5-0.8 micron, available under the trade designation "HSC B4C” from Superior Graphite Co.
  • BCP2 A boron carbide powder, used for a sintering powder bed, with an average particle size of 2 micron, available under the trade designation "CERAC/PURE B-1102" from Materion Advanced Chemicals, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
  • Graph 1 A graphite powder, used for a sintering powder bed, available under the trade designation "THERMOPURE GRADE 5900” from Superior Graphite Co.
  • Dura B A 55% solids (aqueous emulsion) ceramic binder available under the trade designation “DURAMAX B-1000” from the DOW Chemical Company, Midland Michigan.
  • PhRes A one-part phenolic resin available under the trade designation “DUREZ 07347A” from Sumitomo Bakelite North America, Inc., Novi, Michigan.
  • Glucose A glucose powder, available under the trade designation "BIOXTRA D-(+)-GLUCOSE,” from Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, Missouri.
  • PDMS silicone oil available under the trade designation "PST-850” from PolySi Technologies, Inc., Sanford, North Carolina.
  • PS80 A polysorbate 80 fluid available under the trade designation "Polysorbate 80" from BDH, a unit of VWR International, LLC, Radnor, Pennsylvania.
  • IC1010 A relatively hard CMP polishing pad available under the trade designation “IC1010” from DOW Chemical Company.
  • WSP A relatively soft CMP polishing pad available under the trade designation "WSP” from JSR Corporation, Tokyo, Japan.
  • VP5000 A CMP polishing pad available under the trade designation "VISIONPAD 5000” from DOW Chemical Company.
  • CSL9044C A copper CMP slurry available under the trade designation "CSL9044C” from Planar Solutions, LLC, Mesa, Arizona.
  • a positive master was prepared by diamond turning of a first metal, followed by two iterations of electroforming a second metal, producing the positive master.
  • the dimensions of the precisely shaped features of the positive master were as follows.
  • the precisely shaped features consisted of four sided, sharp tipped pyramids, 73.5% of the pyramids having a square base with a base length 390 microns and a height of 195 microns (primary feature), 2% of the pyramids having a square base with a base length 366 microns and a height of 183 microns and 25.5% of the pyramids having a rectangular base with a length of 390 microns, a width of 366 microns and a height 183 (secondary features).
  • the pyramids were arranged in a grid pattern, per Figures 1a and b; all spacing between pyramids was 5 microns at the base.
  • Polypropylene production tools were produced by compression molding from the positive master using a sheet of 20 mil (0.51 mm) thick polypropylene available from Commercial Plastics and Supply Corp., West Palm Beach, Florida. Compression molding was conducted using a model V75H-24-CLX WABASH HYDRAULIC PRESS, from Wabash MPI, Wabash, Indiana, with platens pre-heated to 165°C at a load of 5,000 lb (2,268 kg) for 3 minutes. The load was then increased to 40,000 lb (18,140 kg) for 10 minutes. The heaters were then switched off and cooling water flowed through the platens until they reached about 70°C (about 15 minutes). The load was then released and the molded polypropylene tool was removed.
  • a ceramic slurry was prepared by placing the following components into 1 L high density polyethylene jar: 458.7 g distilled water, 300.0 g SCP1, 1.5 g BCP1, and 21.9 g PhRes. Spherical, silicon carbide milling media, 0.25 inch diameter (6.35 mm) was added, and the slurry was milled on a ball mill for 15 hours at 100 rpm. After milling, 60.9 g of Dura B was added to the jar and mixed in by stirring.
  • the slurry was spray dried using a spray dryer available under the trade designation "Mini Spray Dryer B-191" from Buchi, New Castle, Delaware, producing a ceramic-binder powder composed of 85.37 wt% silicon carbide, 0.43 wt% boron carbide, 9.53 wt% polyacrylate binder, and 4.67 wt% phenolic resin with an average particle size of 32-45 microns, as measured by conventional test sieving.
  • the ceramic-binder powder may be used in the preparation of a green body ceramic element having precisely shaped features.
  • the polypropylene production tool having precisely designed cavities representing the feature type (shape), size and pattern of the desired precisely shaped features of the green body ceramic element, was placed in the die cavity on the lower press rod, with the cavities facing the upper press rod.
  • the die was charged with 1 g of the ceramic-binder powder.
  • a 10,000 lb (4,536 kg) load was applied to the upper push rod for 30 sec, pressing the ceramic-binder powder into the tool cavities. The load was removed and an additional 1 g of ceramic-binder powder was added to the die cavity.
  • a 20,000 lb (9,072 kg) load was applied to the upper push rod for 30 seconds. The load was removed and the tool with pressed ceramic-binder powder was removed from the die cavity.
  • the green body ceramic element with precisely shaped features was then removed from the tool.
  • the features were the inverse of the tool cavities.
  • the overall diameter and thickness of the green body reflected the diameter of the die cavity and the amount of ceramic-binder powder, respectively.
  • the ceramic element had a diameter of about 16.7 mm and a thickness of about 4.2 mm.
  • Five, green body ceramic elements were made by this technique.
  • the green body ceramic element with precisely shaped features may be used as an abrasive element precursor in the preparation of an abrasive element having precisely shaped features.
  • the previously prepared abrasive element precursors i.e. green body ceramic elements with precisely shaped features
  • a Lindbergh Model 51442-S retort oven available from SPX Thermal Product Solutions, a division of SPX Corporation, Rochester, New York, at room temperature.
  • the green body ceramic elements were annealed under a nitrogen atmosphere, as follows: the oven temperature was increased at a linear rate to 600°C over a 4 hour time period, followed by a 30 min isothermal hold at 600°C. The oven was then cooled to room temperature.
  • the sharp edges, i.e. flashing were removed from the annealed green body ceramic elements by abrading their outer circumference with 220-grit silicon carbide sandpaper.
  • the annealed, green body ceramic elements were loaded into a graphite crucible for sintering.
  • the elements were placed in a bed of a powder mixture, i.e. a sintering powder bed, consisting of 97 wt% Graph1 and 3 wt% BCP2.
  • the green bodies were then sintered, under a helium atmosphere, by heating from room temperature to 2,150°C over 5 hours, followed by a 30 min isothermal hold at 2,150 °C, using an Astro furnace HTG-7010 available from Thermal Technology LLC, Santa Rosa, California.
  • the sintered, green body ceramic elements may be used as abrasive elements with precisely shaped features. Following the sintering process, the abrasive elements were cleaned.
  • Examples 2-8 and CE11 were prepared similarly to that of Example 1, except the ceramic slurry compositions and the sintering powder bed used were varied according to Table 1.
  • a graphite crucible was used for all sintering procedures, except for that of Example 10, which employed a silicon carbide crucible.
  • Examples 9 and 10 were prepared similarly to Example 1, except that the molding of the precisely shaped features was conducted in a one step process, using a metal production tool, instead of the polypropylene production tool.
  • the metal production tool was fabricated from the positive master by an electroforming process. Two grams of ceramic-binder powder were added to the steel die cavity, and the production tool, with precisely shaped features facing downward, was added to the die cavity. A 15,000 lb (6,804 kg) load was applied to the upper push rod for 15 sec, pressing the ceramic-binder powder into the tool cavities. The load was removed and the tool with pressed ceramic-binder powder was removed from the die cavity.
  • the sintering powder bed for Example 9 was a 97/3 (wt/wt) mixture of Graph1/BCP1. Table 1.
  • Ceramic Slurry Composition and Sintering Conditions Ex. Ceramic Slurry Composition (values in grams) Sintering Powder Bed Distilled Water SCP1 BCP1 Dura B PhRes Glucose PDMS PS80 Graph1/BC P2 (wt/wt) 1 458.7 300.0 1.5 60.9 21.9 ---- ---- ---- 97/3 2 468.0 300.0 1.5 60.7 ---- 19.1 -- --- 97/3 3 458.1 300.0 1.5 609 21.9 -- 26.0 4.0 97/3 4 233.8 149.9 0.4 30.4 ---- 9.6 ---- ---- 97/3 5 233.8 149.9 0.4 30.4 ---- 9.6 ---- ---- No Bed 6 468.0 300.0 1.5 60.7 ---- 19.1 ---- ---- 100/0 7 486.4 300.0 1.1 30.4 22.3 ---- ---- ---- 97/3 8 465.6 300.0 1.1 60.8 12.3 ---- ---- ---- 97/3 9 458.7 300.0 1.5 6
  • Table 2 Physical Properties of Abrasive Elements.
  • the abrasive elements with precisely shaped features were first degreased by ultrasonic cleaning in methyl ethyl ketone, dried and then diamond seeded by immersing in an ultrasonic bath containing a nano-diamond solution, available under the trade designation 87501-01, from sp3 Diamond Technologies, Santa Clara, California. Once removed from the diamond solutions, the elements were dried using a low pressure, pure nitrogen gas flow. The elements were then loaded into a hot filament CVD reactor model HF-CVD655 available from sp3 Diamond Technologies. A mixture of 2.7% methane in hydrogen gas was used as precursors for the CVD diamond coating process.
  • the reactor pressure was kept between 6 Torr (800 Pa) and 50 Torr (6,670 Pa) and the filament temperature was between 1,900 and 2300°C, as measured by an optical pyrometer.
  • CVD diamond growth rate was 0.6 ⁇ m/hr.
  • Coating adhesion was evaluated by immersing the coated elements in liquid nitrogen followed by a DI water rinse. This procedure was repeated 5 times. All examples passed this test.
  • An abrasive article comprising five abrasive elements from Example 1 with precisely shaped features was assembled. The assembly process was developed such that the tallest, precisely shaped features on each element, all having the same design feature height, would become planar.
  • a planar granite surface was used as an alignment plate.
  • the segments were placed onto the alignment plate such that the major surfaces having precisely shaped features were in direct contact with the alignment plate (facing down) with their second flat, major surfaces facing upwards.
  • the abrasive elements were arranged in a circular pattern, such that their center points were positioned along the circumference of a circle with a radius of about 1.75 inch (44.5 mm) and spaced apart equally at about 72° around the circumference, Figure 2 .
  • a fastening element was then applied to the washers and exposed surface of the abrasive elements in the center-hole region of the washers.
  • the fastening element was an epoxy adhesive available under the trade designation 3M SCOTCH-WELD EPOXY ADHESIVE DP420 from 3M Company, St. Paul, Minnesota.
  • a circular, stainless steel carrier, having a diameter of 4.25 inch (108 mm) and a thickness of 0.22 inch (5.64 mm) was then placed face down on top of the fastening element (the back side of the carrier is machined, such that, it may be attached to the carrier arm of a REFLEXION polisher).
  • a 10 lb (4.54 kg) load was applied uniformly across the carrier's exposed surface and the adhesive was allowed to cure for about 4 hours at room temperature.
  • CE13 was prepared similarly to Example 12, except that resilient elements were not used in the fabrication process.
  • Example 14-16 The abrasive elements used in Examples 14-16 were prepared as described in Example 1. Each abrasive element had precisely shaped features having at least two different heights, a primary feature height, which was the higher of the two features, and a secondary feature height, as summarized in Table 3. The offset height is the height difference between the primary and secondary feature.
  • the precisely shaped features of Example 14 were the same as that described for Example 1.
  • the precisely shaped features of Example 15 consisted of four sided, truncated pyramids, 73.5% of the pyramids having a square base with a base length 146 microns and a height of 61 microns, with a square top 24 microns on a side (primary feature) and 26.5% of the pyramids having a square base with a base length 146 microns and a height of 49 microns, with a square top 48 microns on a side (secondary feature).
  • the pyramids were arranged in a grid pattern, per Figures 4a and b; all spacing between pyramids was 58.5 microns at the base.
  • the precisely shaped features of Example 16 consisted of four sided sharp tipped pyramids, 73.5% of the pyramids having a square base with a base length 146 microns and a height of 73 microns (primary feature), 2% of the pyramids having a square base with a base length 122 microns and a height of 61 microns and 25.5% of the pyramids having a rectangular base with a length of 146 microns, a width of 122 microns and a height 73 (secondary features).
  • the pyramids were arranged in a grid pattern, per Figures 5a and b; all spacing between pyramids was 5 microns at the base.
  • Example 14 Five abrasive elements were prepared for each of Examples 14 and 15, and ten abrasive elements were prepared for Example 16.
  • the abrasive elements were coated with CVD diamond, by the process previously described.
  • the CVD diamond coated abrasive elements were then used to form abrasive articles, using the fabrication procedure described in Example 12.
  • the abrasive articles fabricated from the abrasive elements of Examples 14 and 15 were arranged in a circular pattern, such that their center points were positioned along the circumference of a circle with a radius of about 1.75 inch (44.5 mm) and spaced apart equally at about 72° around the circumference, Figure 2 .
  • These abrasive articles are designated as Examples 14A and Example 15A, respectively.
  • Example 16A The ten abrasive elements of Example 16 were used to fabricate an abrasive article, designated Example 16A, having the abrasive elements arranged in a double star pattern, as shown in Figure 6 .
  • the larger star pattern was identical to that of Examples 14 and 15.
  • the elements of the smaller star pattern were arranged in a circular pattern, such that their center points were positioned along the circumference of a circle with a radius of about 1.5 inch (38.1 mm) and spaced apart equally at about 72° around the circumference, as shown in Figure 2 . These elements were offset by 36° relative to the outside elements.
  • Table 3 Precisely Shaped Feature Parameters of Examples 14-16.
  • CE17 was a diamond grit pad conditioner, having a diamond size of 180 microns, available under the trade designation "3M DIAMOND PAD CONDTIONER A2812" from 3M Company, St. Paul, Minnesota.
  • CE18 was a diamond grit pad conditioner, having a diamond size of 250 microns, available under the trade designation "3M DIAMOND PAD CONDTIONER A165" from 3M Company.
  • CE19 was a diamond grit pad conditioner, having a diamond size of 74 microns, available under the trade designation "3M DIAMOND PAD CONDTIONER H2AG18" from 3M Company.
  • CE20 was a diamond grit pad conditioner, having a diamond size of 74 microns, available under the trade designation "3M DIAMOND PAD CONDTIONER H9AG27" from 3M Company.
  • polishing Test Method 1 the two abrasive articles of Example 14A were tested as pad conditioners in a copper CMP process using a relatively hard CMP pad, IC1010.
  • One abrasive article was tested at a wafer head pressure of 3 psi, while the other was tested at a wafer head pressure of 1.4 psi.
  • the copper removal rate and wafer non-uniformity were measured as a function of conditioning time. Results are shown in Table 4. For both the low head pressure and high head pressure processes, good, stable removal rates and good, stable wafer non-uniformities were obtained. The precisely shaped feature tips were examined by optical microscopy after the polishing.
  • Example 17 and CE18 were run in a similar test to that of Example 14A (3 psi wafer head pressure), except the polishing time was only 0.6 hours. Copper removal rate results and wafer non-uniformity are shown in Table 5. Table 5. Copper CMP Polishing Results for Example 14A, CE17 and CE18.
  • Example 15A Using Polishing Test Method 2, the two abrasive articles of Example 15A were tested as pad conditioners in a copper CMP process using a relatively soft CMP pad, WSP. One abrasive article was tested at a wafer head pressure of 3 psi, while the other was tested at a wafer head pressure of 1.4 psi. Using the Copper Wafer Removal Rate and Non-Uniformity Test Method described above, the copper removal rate and wafer non-uniformity were measured as a function of conditioning time. Results are shown in Table 6. For both the low head pressure and high head pressure processes, good, stable removal rates and good, stable wafer non-uniformities were obtained. Table 6. Copper CMP Polishing Results for Example 15A.
  • a diamond grit pad conditioner, CE19 was also tested using Polishing Test Method 2. The copper removal rate and wafer non-uniformity were measured as a function of conditioning time. Results are shown in Table 7. By the time the 6 hour polishing time was reached, the pads were severely worn and pad groves were no longer present, indicating that the polishing pad was completely worn by the diamond grit pad conditioner. Table 7. Copper CMP Polishing Results for CE19. Conditioning Time (hrs) Head Pressure 3.0 psi Head Pressure 1.4 psi Removal Rate ( ⁇ /min) NU (%) Removal Rate ( ⁇ /min) NU (%) 0.55 8,118 8 4,967 7.5 3.62 8,265 9.7 5,382 8.2 6.68 7,191 9.6 4,484 13.5
  • Example 16A was compared to diamond grit pad conditioner, Comparative Example CE20, in an oxide process.
  • the oxide removal rate and wafer non-uniformity were measured as a function of conditioning time. Results are shown in Table 9. Higher removal rates and lower wafer non-uniformity were obtained when the polishing process employed a pad conditioner Example 16A with precisely shaped features compared to conventional diamond grit pad conditioner CE20.
  • the pad surface finish was measured at 3 (7.6 cm) inches, 7 inches (17.8 cm) and 13 inches (33.0 cm) from the pad center after 4.9 hours of conditioning.
  • Example 16A The pad surface finish for Example 16A was slightly higher than Comparative Example CE20 (8.47 microns versus 7.24 microns, respectively). The starting pad surface roughness was 12 microns.
  • the polishing test with Example 16A as the pad conditioner was continued out to 30 hours.
  • the feature heights of the abrasive elements were measured by conventional optical microscopy before and after polishing to determine the tip wear. The wear rate was determined to be about 0.1 micron/hr. There were no stains or slurry build-up on the features. Table 9. Oxide CMP Polishing Results for Example 16A and CE20.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Ceramic Engineering (AREA)
  • Inorganic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Polishing Bodies And Polishing Tools (AREA)
  • Grinding-Machine Dressing And Accessory Apparatuses (AREA)
  • Carbon And Carbon Compounds (AREA)

Claims (15)

  1. Élément abrasif comprenant :
    une première surface principale ; et
    une deuxième surface principale ;
    dans lequel au moins la première surface principale comprend une pluralité de caractéristiques profilées avec précision monolithiques ; et
    dans lequel l'élément abrasif comprend au moins environ 99 % de céramique de carbure en poids et a une porosité inférieure à environ 5 %.
  2. Élément abrasif selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la céramique de carbure est du carbure de silicium, du carbure de bore, du carbure de zirconium, du carbure de titane, du carbure de tungstène ou des combinaisons de ceux-ci.
  3. Élément abrasif selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la taille moyenne des grains est inférieure à environ 5 micromètres et la porosité est inférieure à environ 3 %.
  4. Élément abrasif selon la revendication 1, dans lequel au moins certaines de la pluralité de caractéristiques profilées avec précision ont une longueur, le long d'au moins un bord de base, d'environ 1 micromètre à environ 2 000 micromètres et une densité surfacique d'environ 1 caractéristique/mm2 à environ 1 000 caractéristiques/mm2.
  5. Élément abrasif selon la revendication 1, dans lequel la pluralité de caractéristiques profilées avec précision ont un revêtement.
  6. Élément abrasif selon la revendication 5, dans lequel le revêtement inclut du diamant déposé en phase vapeur chimique ou déposé en phase vapeur physique, du diamant dopé, du carbure de silicium, du nitrure de bore cubique, des revêtements fluorochimiques, des revêtements hydrophobes ou hydrophiles, des revêtements modificateurs de surface, des revêtements anticorrosion, des revêtements polymères, du carbone de type diamant, du verre de type diamant, du carbure de tungstène, du nitrure de silicium, du nitrure de titane, des revêtements à particules, du diamant polycristallin, du diamant microcristallin, du diamant nanocristallin et des combinaisons de ceux-ci.
  7. Élément abrasif selon la revendication 1, dans lequel les 99 % de céramique de carbure en poids comprennent au moins environ 90 % de carbure de silicium en poids.
  8. Élément abrasif selon la revendication 5, dans lequel le revêtement est choisi parmi du diamant, du diamant dopé, du carbone de type diamant, du verre de type diamant, du diamant polycristallin, du diamant microcristallin, du diamant nanocristallin et des combinaisons de ceux-ci.
  9. Article abrasif comprenant :
    un premier élément abrasif comprenant des première et deuxième surfaces principales ;
    dans lequel au moins la première surface principale comprend une pluralité de caractéristiques profilées avec précision monolithiques ; et
    dans lequel le premier élément abrasif comprend au moins environ 99 % de céramique de carbure en poids et a une porosité inférieure à environ 5 %.
  10. Article abrasif selon la revendication 9, comprenant en outre un élément résilient ayant des première et deuxième surfaces principales.
  11. Article abrasif selon la revendication 9, comprenant en outre un support.
  12. Article abrasif selon la revendication 9, comprenant en outre un deuxième élément abrasif, dans lequel un groupe collectif de caractéristiques sur les premier et deuxième éléments abrasifs a une hauteur de caractéristique de conception maximale commune de D0 et une non-coplanarité inférieure à environ 20 % de la hauteur de caractéristique.
  13. Article abrasif selon la revendication 9, comprenant en outre un élément de nettoyage.
  14. Article abrasif selon la revendication 9, dans lequel la pluralité de caractéristiques profilées avec précision monolithiques ont un revêtement en diamant.
  15. Procédé de fabrication d'un article abrasif comprenant :
    la fourniture d'un premier élément abrasif et d'un deuxième élément abrasif, chaque élément abrasif comprenant des première et deuxième surfaces principales, dans lequel au moins les premières surfaces principales comprennent une pluralité de caractéristiques profilées avec précision monolithiques et dans lequel les éléments abrasifs comprennent au moins environ 99 % de céramique de carbure en poids et ont une porosité inférieure à 5 % ;
    le placement des premières surfaces principales des éléments abrasifs en contact avec une plaque d'alignement ;
    la fourniture d'un élément résilient ayant des première et deuxième surfaces principales ;
    la fixation de la première surface principale de l'élément résilient aux deuxièmes surfaces principales des éléments abrasifs ;
    la fourniture d'un élément de fixation ; et
    la fixation de la deuxième surface principale de l'élément résilient à un support à travers l'élément de fixation.
EP13826255.5A 2012-08-02 2013-07-31 Élément abrasif présentant des caractéristiques de forme précises, article abrasif fabriqué à partir de celui-ci et son procédé de fabrication Active EP2879836B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US201261678665P 2012-08-02 2012-08-02
PCT/US2013/052828 WO2014022462A1 (fr) 2012-08-02 2013-07-31 Éléments abrasifs présentant des caractéristiques de forme précise, articles abrasifs fabriqués à partir de ceux-ci et leurs procédés de fabrication

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2879836A1 EP2879836A1 (fr) 2015-06-10
EP2879836A4 EP2879836A4 (fr) 2016-05-25
EP2879836B1 true EP2879836B1 (fr) 2019-11-13

Family

ID=50028490

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13826255.5A Active EP2879836B1 (fr) 2012-08-02 2013-07-31 Élément abrasif présentant des caractéristiques de forme précises, article abrasif fabriqué à partir de celui-ci et son procédé de fabrication

Country Status (8)

Country Link
US (1) US20150224625A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP2879836B1 (fr)
JP (2) JP2015530265A (fr)
KR (1) KR20150039795A (fr)
CN (2) CN115625629A (fr)
SG (1) SG11201500713PA (fr)
TW (1) TWI660816B (fr)
WO (1) WO2014022462A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (46)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2658680B1 (fr) 2010-12-31 2020-12-09 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Objets abrasifs comprenant des particules abrasives ayant des formes particulières et procédés de formation de tels objets
EP2726248B1 (fr) 2011-06-30 2019-06-19 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Particules abrasives au carbure de silicium fritté à phase liquide
US8986409B2 (en) 2011-06-30 2015-03-24 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Abrasive articles including abrasive particles of silicon nitride
BR112014007089A2 (pt) 2011-09-26 2017-03-28 Saint-Gobain Ceram & Plastics Inc artigos abrasivos incluindo materiais de partículas abrasivas, abrasivos revestidos usando os materiais de partículas abrasivas e os métodos de formação
EP2797715A4 (fr) 2011-12-30 2016-04-20 Saint Gobain Ceramics Particule abrasive façonnée et procédé de formation de celle-ci
JP5903502B2 (ja) 2011-12-30 2016-04-13 サン−ゴバン セラミックス アンド プラスティクス，インコーポレイティド 成形研磨粒子を備える粒子材料
JP5966019B2 (ja) 2012-01-10 2016-08-10 サン−ゴバン セラミックス アンド プラスティクス，インコーポレイティド 複雑形状を有する研磨粒子およびその形成方法
US8840696B2 (en) 2012-01-10 2014-09-23 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Abrasive particles having particular shapes and methods of forming such particles
US9242346B2 (en) 2012-03-30 2016-01-26 Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. Abrasive products having fibrillated fibers
CN110013795A (zh) 2012-05-23 2019-07-16 圣戈本陶瓷及塑料股份有限公司 成形磨粒及其形成方法
IN2015DN00343A (fr) 2012-06-29 2015-06-12 Saint Gobain Ceramics
KR102089383B1 (ko) 2012-08-02 2020-03-16 쓰리엠 이노베이티브 프로퍼티즈 컴파니 정밀하게 형상화된 특징부를 갖는 연마 물품 및 그의 제조 방법
WO2014022453A1 (fr) 2012-08-02 2014-02-06 3M Innovative Properties Company Précurseur d'élément abrasif ayant des caractéristiques aux formes précises et procédé de fabrication de celui-ci
US9440332B2 (en) 2012-10-15 2016-09-13 Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. Abrasive particles having particular shapes and methods of forming such particles
CN104994995B (zh) 2012-12-31 2018-12-14 圣戈本陶瓷及塑料股份有限公司 颗粒材料及其形成方法
MX2015012492A (es) * 2013-03-12 2016-04-21 3M Innovative Properties Co Articulo abrasivo aglomerado.
CA2907372C (fr) 2013-03-29 2017-12-12 Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. Particules abrasives ayant des formes particulieres et procedes de formation de telles particules
TW201502263A (zh) 2013-06-28 2015-01-16 Saint Gobain Ceramics 包含成形研磨粒子之研磨物品
AU2014324453B2 (en) 2013-09-30 2017-08-03 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Shaped abrasive particles and methods of forming same
BR112016015029B1 (pt) 2013-12-31 2021-12-14 Saint-Gobain Abrasifs Artigo abrasivo incluindo partículas abrasivas moldadas
US9771507B2 (en) 2014-01-31 2017-09-26 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Shaped abrasive particle including dopant material and method of forming same
MX2016013465A (es) 2014-04-14 2017-02-15 Saint-Gobain Ceram & Plastics Inc Articulo abrasivo que incluye particulas abrasivas conformadas.
WO2015160855A1 (fr) 2014-04-14 2015-10-22 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Article abrasif comprenant des particules abrasives mises en forme
WO2015184355A1 (fr) 2014-05-30 2015-12-03 Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. Procédé d'utilisation d'un article abrasif comprenant des particules abrasives mises en forme
US20160144477A1 (en) * 2014-11-21 2016-05-26 Diane Scott Coated compressive subpad for chemical mechanical polishing
US9707529B2 (en) 2014-12-23 2017-07-18 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Composite shaped abrasive particles and method of forming same
US9914864B2 (en) 2014-12-23 2018-03-13 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Shaped abrasive particles and method of forming same
US9676981B2 (en) 2014-12-24 2017-06-13 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Shaped abrasive particle fractions and method of forming same
TWI634200B (zh) 2015-03-31 2018-09-01 聖高拜磨料有限公司 固定磨料物品及其形成方法
CN107636109A (zh) 2015-03-31 2018-01-26 圣戈班磨料磨具有限公司 固定磨料制品和其形成方法
EP3307483B1 (fr) 2015-06-11 2020-06-17 Saint-Gobain Ceramics&Plastics, Inc. Article abrasif comprenant des particules abrasives profilées
WO2017197002A1 (fr) 2016-05-10 2017-11-16 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Particules abrasives et leurs procédés de formation
CN109415615A (zh) 2016-05-10 2019-03-01 圣戈本陶瓷及塑料股份有限公司 磨料颗粒及其形成方法
TWI621502B (zh) * 2016-08-18 2018-04-21 中國砂輪企業股份有限公司 Double chemical mechanical polishing trimming system and method thereof
EP4349896A3 (fr) 2016-09-29 2024-06-12 Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. Articles abrasifs fixes et procédés pour les former
US10759024B2 (en) 2017-01-31 2020-09-01 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Abrasive article including shaped abrasive particles
US10563105B2 (en) 2017-01-31 2020-02-18 Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. Abrasive article including shaped abrasive particles
EP3642293A4 (fr) 2017-06-21 2021-03-17 Saint-Gobain Ceramics&Plastics, Inc. Matériaux particulaires et leurs procédés de formation
CN110914016A (zh) 2017-07-11 2020-03-24 3M创新有限公司 包括可适形涂层的磨料制品和由其制成的抛光系统
JP7300441B2 (ja) * 2017-07-11 2023-06-29 スリーエム イノベイティブ プロパティズ カンパニー 適合性コーティングを含む研磨物品及びそれらからのポリッシングシステム
CN113439010B (zh) * 2019-02-13 2024-08-27 3M创新有限公司 具有精确成形特征部的磨料元件、用其制成的磨料制品及其制造方法
CN114867582B (zh) 2019-12-27 2024-10-18 圣戈本陶瓷及塑料股份有限公司 磨料制品及其形成方法
TWI738304B (zh) * 2020-04-23 2021-09-01 台灣積體電路製造股份有限公司 半導體晶圓加工方法及清潔刷頭
CN111546247B (zh) * 2020-04-30 2022-03-25 郑州力弘超硬材料有限公司 一种用于光纤插针的金刚石磨具低温陶瓷结合剂及其制备方法
JP7167367B2 (ja) * 2020-09-07 2022-11-08 日本碍子株式会社 耐火材
WO2023060457A1 (fr) * 2021-10-13 2023-04-20 大连理工大学 Dispositif de liaison en treillis flexible pour composant plat de type disque et procédé de serrage adaptatif

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4243864A1 (en) * 1991-12-24 1993-07-01 Schunk Ingenieurkeramik Gmbh Reaction bonded silicon infiltrated silicon carbide ceramic body - has continuous silicon carbide particle size distribution allowing high packing density

Family Cites Families (37)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2488276A (en) * 1943-12-28 1949-11-15 Norton Co Grinding wheel
BE758965A (fr) * 1969-11-14 1971-05-13 Norton Co Elements de meulage abrasifs
US3966855A (en) * 1974-02-22 1976-06-29 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Air Force Method of fabricating silicon carbide articles
JPS61230871A (ja) * 1985-04-05 1986-10-15 Noritake Co Ltd 可撓性樹脂を用いた砥石
KR910002578B1 (ko) * 1988-01-19 1991-04-27 닙폰 가이시 카부시키카이샤 고밀도 SiC 소결체의 제조방법
US5366523A (en) * 1992-07-23 1994-11-22 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Abrasive article containing shaped abrasive particles
US5453312A (en) * 1993-10-29 1995-09-26 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Abrasive article, a process for its manufacture, and a method of using it to reduce a workpiece surface
US5551959A (en) * 1994-08-24 1996-09-03 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Abrasive article having a diamond-like coating layer and method for making same
US5692950A (en) * 1996-08-08 1997-12-02 Minnesota Mining And Manufacturing Company Abrasive construction for semiconductor wafer modification
JPH10138120A (ja) * 1996-10-31 1998-05-26 Kyocera Corp ドレッシング用治具
US5840221A (en) * 1996-12-02 1998-11-24 Saint-Gobain/Norton Industrial Ceramics Corporation Process for making silicon carbide reinforced silicon carbide composite
CN1060424C (zh) * 1997-08-26 2001-01-10 汪宁 用于化学－机械抛光的抛光盘及其制造方法
US6214078B1 (en) * 1997-11-25 2001-04-10 Ferro Corporation High temperature ceramic filter
US20050260930A1 (en) * 1999-06-15 2005-11-24 Yuji Okuda Table of wafer of polishing apparatus, method for polishing semiconductor wafer, and method for manufacturing semiconductor wafer
US6364749B1 (en) * 1999-09-02 2002-04-02 Micron Technology, Inc. CMP polishing pad with hydrophilic surfaces for enhanced wetting
US6439986B1 (en) * 1999-10-12 2002-08-27 Hunatech Co., Ltd. Conditioner for polishing pad and method for manufacturing the same
JP2001121418A (ja) * 1999-10-29 2001-05-08 Noritake Diamond Ind Co Ltd ポリッシング用電着ドレッサ
US6451077B1 (en) * 2000-02-02 2002-09-17 3M Innovative Properties Company Fused abrasive particles, abrasive articles, and methods of making and using the same
US7384438B1 (en) * 2000-07-19 2008-06-10 3M Innovative Properties Company Fused Al2O3-Y2O3-ZrO2 eutectic abrasive particles, abrasive articles, and methods of making and using the same
WO2002033019A1 (fr) * 2000-10-16 2002-04-25 3M Innovative Properties Company Procede de fabrication de particules d'agregat de ceramique
JP2004291165A (ja) * 2003-03-27 2004-10-21 Mitsubishi Materials Corp 軟質材加工用工具
CN100356516C (zh) * 2004-05-05 2007-12-19 智胜科技股份有限公司 单层研磨垫及其制造方法
JP4661098B2 (ja) * 2004-06-18 2011-03-30 三菱マテリアル株式会社 軟質材加工用切削工具
US7309672B2 (en) * 2005-07-05 2007-12-18 Ceradyne, Inc. Lightweight boron carbide materials with improved mechanical properties and process for their manufacture
JP4624293B2 (ja) * 2006-03-31 2011-02-02 株式会社ノリタケスーパーアブレーシブ Ｃｍｐパッドコンディショナー
US7410413B2 (en) * 2006-04-27 2008-08-12 3M Innovative Properties Company Structured abrasive article and method of making and using the same
US8323072B1 (en) * 2007-03-21 2012-12-04 3M Innovative Properties Company Method of polishing transparent armor
US20080287047A1 (en) * 2007-05-18 2008-11-20 Sang Fang Chemical Industry Co., Ltd. Polishing pad, use thereof and method for making the same
US8080073B2 (en) * 2007-12-20 2011-12-20 3M Innovative Properties Company Abrasive article having a plurality of precisely-shaped abrasive composites
JP2010125567A (ja) * 2008-11-28 2010-06-10 Mitsubishi Materials Corp Ｃｍｐパッドコンディショナー
JP2010125586A (ja) * 2008-12-01 2010-06-10 Mitsubishi Materials Corp 半導体研磨布用コンディショナー及びその製造方法
WO2010063647A1 (fr) * 2008-12-03 2010-06-10 Struers A/S Disque abrasif
EP2411181A1 (fr) * 2009-03-24 2012-02-01 Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. Outil abrasif à utiliser comme conditionneur de tampon pour polissage mécano-chimique
WO2010141464A2 (fr) * 2009-06-02 2010-12-09 Saint-Gobain Abrasives, Inc. Outils de conditionnement cmp résistants à la corrosion et leurs procédés de fabrication et d'utilisation
KR101091030B1 (ko) * 2010-04-08 2011-12-09 이화다이아몬드공업 주식회사 감소된 마찰력을 갖는 패드 컨디셔너 제조방법
US20120171935A1 (en) * 2010-12-20 2012-07-05 Diamond Innovations, Inc. CMP PAD Conditioning Tool
US20130065490A1 (en) * 2011-09-12 2013-03-14 3M Innovative Properties Company Method of refurbishing vinyl composition tile

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE4243864A1 (en) * 1991-12-24 1993-07-01 Schunk Ingenieurkeramik Gmbh Reaction bonded silicon infiltrated silicon carbide ceramic body - has continuous silicon carbide particle size distribution allowing high packing density

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
TWI660816B (zh) 2019-06-01
SG11201500713PA (en) 2015-02-27
WO2014022462A1 (fr) 2014-02-06
CN104684686A (zh) 2015-06-03
KR20150039795A (ko) 2015-04-13
US20150224625A1 (en) 2015-08-13
JP2019063989A (ja) 2019-04-25
EP2879836A4 (fr) 2016-05-25
TW201410391A (zh) 2014-03-16
CN115625629A (zh) 2023-01-20
JP2015530265A (ja) 2015-10-15
EP2879836A1 (fr) 2015-06-10

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11697185B2 (en) Abrasive articles with precisely shaped features and method of making thereof
EP2879836B1 (fr) Élément abrasif présentant des caractéristiques de forme précises, article abrasif fabriqué à partir de celui-ci et son procédé de fabrication
EP2879837B1 (fr) Précurseur d'élément abrasif ayant des caractéristiques aux formes précises et procédé de fabrication de celui-ci
US20080153398A1 (en) Cmp pad conditioners and associated methods
US20220134512A1 (en) Abrasive elements with precisely shaped features, abrasive articles fabricated therefrom and methods of making thereof
WO2023126761A1 (fr) Disque de conditionnement à microéléments

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150211

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20160426

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C09K 3/14 20060101ALI20160420BHEP

Ipc: C09C 1/68 20060101ALI20160420BHEP

Ipc: B24D 3/14 20060101AFI20160420BHEP

Ipc: B24D 3/10 20060101ALI20160420BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20170926

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190628

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1201172

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20191115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602013062932

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20191113

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200213

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200213

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200214

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200313

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602013062932

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1201172

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20191113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200814

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200731

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200731

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200731

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191113

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230530

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20240620

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240619

Year of fee payment: 12

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240619

Year of fee payment: 12