EP1773528B1 - Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses - Google Patents

Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1773528B1
EP1773528B1 EP05782713A EP05782713A EP1773528B1 EP 1773528 B1 EP1773528 B1 EP 1773528B1 EP 05782713 A EP05782713 A EP 05782713A EP 05782713 A EP05782713 A EP 05782713A EP 1773528 B1 EP1773528 B1 EP 1773528B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
cutting
sphere
cutting tool
axis
center
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP05782713A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1773528A1 (en
Inventor
James Daniel Riall
Walter Dannhardt
Roland Mandler
Tobias Muller
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
EssilorLuxottica SA
Original Assignee
Essilor International Compagnie Generale dOptique SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=35295338&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP1773528(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Essilor International Compagnie Generale dOptique SA filed Critical Essilor International Compagnie Generale dOptique SA
Priority to EP09168326A priority Critical patent/EP2127792A1/en
Priority to PL05782713T priority patent/PL1773528T3/pl
Publication of EP1773528A1 publication Critical patent/EP1773528A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1773528B1 publication Critical patent/EP1773528B1/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B24GRINDING; POLISHING
    • B24BMACHINES, DEVICES, OR PROCESSES FOR GRINDING OR POLISHING; DRESSING OR CONDITIONING OF ABRADING SURFACES; FEEDING OF GRINDING, POLISHING, OR LAPPING AGENTS
    • B24B13/00Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor
    • B24B13/06Machines or devices designed for grinding or polishing optical surfaces on lenses or surfaces of similar shape on other work; Accessories therefor grinding of lenses, the tool or work being controlled by information-carrying means, e.g. patterns, punched tapes, magnetic tapes
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23CMILLING
    • B23C3/00Milling particular work; Special milling operations; Machines therefor
    • B23C3/16Working surfaces curved in two directions
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B23MACHINE TOOLS; METAL-WORKING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • B23QDETAILS, COMPONENTS, OR ACCESSORIES FOR MACHINE TOOLS, e.g. ARRANGEMENTS FOR COPYING OR CONTROLLING; MACHINE TOOLS IN GENERAL CHARACTERISED BY THE CONSTRUCTION OF PARTICULAR DETAILS OR COMPONENTS; COMBINATIONS OR ASSOCIATIONS OF METAL-WORKING MACHINES, NOT DIRECTED TO A PARTICULAR RESULT
    • B23Q15/00Automatic control or regulation of feed movement, cutting velocity or position of tool or work
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/18Numerical control [NC], i.e. automatically operating machines, in particular machine tools, e.g. in a manufacturing environment, so as to execute positioning, movement or co-ordinated operations by means of programme data in numerical form
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/45Nc applications
    • G05B2219/45157Grind optical lens
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/49Nc machine tool, till multiple
    • G05B2219/49074Control cutting speed
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/49Nc machine tool, till multiple
    • G05B2219/49079Control cutting torque, force
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/49Method of mechanical manufacture
    • Y10T29/49995Shaping one-piece blank by removing material
    • Y10T29/49996Successive distinct removal operations
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/51Plural diverse manufacturing apparatus including means for metal shaping or assembling
    • Y10T29/5104Type of machine
    • Y10T29/5109Lathe
    • Y10T29/511Grinding attachment
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/51Plural diverse manufacturing apparatus including means for metal shaping or assembling
    • Y10T29/5136Separate tool stations for selective or successive operation on work
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T29/00Metal working
    • Y10T29/51Plural diverse manufacturing apparatus including means for metal shaping or assembling
    • Y10T29/5176Plural diverse manufacturing apparatus including means for metal shaping or assembling including machining means
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T409/00Gear cutting, milling, or planing
    • Y10T409/30Milling
    • Y10T409/30084Milling with regulation of operation by templet, card, or other replaceable information supply
    • Y10T409/300896Milling with regulation of operation by templet, card, or other replaceable information supply with sensing of numerical information and regulation without mechanical connection between sensing means and regulated means [i.e., numerical control]
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T409/00Gear cutting, milling, or planing
    • Y10T409/30Milling
    • Y10T409/303752Process
    • Y10T409/303808Process including infeeding
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10TTECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER US CLASSIFICATION
    • Y10T409/00Gear cutting, milling, or planing
    • Y10T409/30Milling
    • Y10T409/306664Milling including means to infeed rotary cutter toward work
    • Y10T409/306776Axially
    • Y10T409/307168Plural cutters

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to machining high quality, three dimensional surfaces by cutting, and particularly to machining ophthalmic lenses by cutting using a constant cutting-force applied in a raster pattern.
  • Cutting is used in the manufacture of ophthalmic lenses, particularly in producing customized progressive lenses which have aspheric surfaces and cannot be made by traditional optical polishing.
  • FIG. 1 A typical three-axis lathe is shown schematically in Fig. 1 .
  • a work-piece 10 is attached to a spindle 12 by a chuck 14 and rotated about the spindle axis 16 (also known as the "C" axis).
  • the surface of work-piece 10 is shaped by moving a cutting tool 18 in toward axis 16 (along the "X-axis” direction), while adjusting its position in the "Z-axis” direction, parallel to the spindle axis 16.
  • a Computer Numerical Controlled (“CNC”) three-axis lathe may have traditional single point cutting tools, or multi-fluted, high-speed rotating cutters, similar to a milling machine. In both, the surface geometry is cut by the tool following a spiral cutting path, and the last piece of material to be cut is at the very center of the rotating work piece 10.
  • the lathe spindle 12 is typically rotated at a constant speed. This results in the surface-cutting-speed decreasing as the cutting tool 18 moves in toward the center of the work piece 10, with a corresponding change in the cutting force between the tool and the lens being formed. This change in cutting force introduces a gradual error into the shape of the surface being formed. Even if the lathe has a continuously variable spindle speed, it has an upper limit to that speed, and, therefore, a radius beyond which it is not possible to maintain a constant surface-cutting-speed. At that radius, the cutting force will change and the error will begin to be introduced.
  • This center defect is a small depression, generated because the cutting force drops suddenly to zero when the final piece of material is removed.
  • the cutting force bends the tip of the tool slightly away from the lens surface during cutting.
  • the cutting tool holder relaxes, and the tool moves in toward the still rotating lens, scooping out a small dimple at the lens center.
  • Even high precision lathes produce center defects on the order of 1 to 5 microns deep, creating blemishes that are often visible and cosmetically undesirable.
  • the sudden loss of cutting force occurs at a larger radius, but still has a noticeable effect in the form of a bump on the uphill side of the prism and a hole on the downhill side.
  • the bump is typically about 2 microns high, and the hole is typically about 2 microns deep.
  • loss-of-force defects are a complex function of tool sharpness, surface geometry, material properties and machine characteristics, they are essentially unpredictable. Attempts to compensate for them using software algorithms often produce worse defects.
  • Another problem in cutting lenses using a lathe stems from the quality of a cut surface being a function of cutting speed. For optimum efficiency, surface speed should be adjusted to produce the highest quality finish only at the lens radii where it is required. In traditional lathes, cutting speed is a fixed function of radius, and cannot be varied.
  • a further problem with lathes is that imperfections in the shape of the cutting tool (also know as “form imperfections”) are transferred to the lens surface.
  • a typical high-quality cutting tool used in a lathe is a single-point diamond chip, ground to a radius of about 2 mm. The accuracy of the edge of such a diamond is, however, only about 2 microns. This inaccuracy takes the form of scalloping (also known as "waviness”) and is transferred directly on to the lens, i.e., a waviness defect of 2 microns on a cutting tool becomes a lens surface waviness defect of 2 microns. Waviness defects are completely unpredictable and cannot be compensated for by software. Controlled Waviness Tools are available at considerably cost. They also wear or chip quickly to a point where they are outside of specification, so their advantage is costly and short lived.
  • FIG. 2 a shows a side elevation in which a work piece 10 is held in a milling chuck 20 and moved in a raster pattern in the X-Y plane, while a rotating cutting tool 22 is moved up and down along the Z-axis.
  • Fig. 2B is a plan view showing the raster pattern 24 that is the effective path of the cutting tool relative to the work piece 10.
  • FIG. 2C illustrates, in a magnified cross-section, that a typical mill cut surface 26 will frequently have a highly scalloped finish.
  • the scalloping (also known as "waviness") of a milled surface is large, typically of the order of millimeters. For this reason, such raster cutting techniques have not traditionally been used in producing optics.
  • DE 42 10 381 discloses a non-axis symmetrical aspherical surface forming unit for milling a lens which has a workpiece holder and theta axis rotation unit for continuous rotation of the holder about z-axis in direction of theta coordinate axis tool holder.
  • the tool is a disc.
  • US 5,711,696 discloses an apparatus for machining a workpiece to non-revolute symmetric and aspherical surface with a rotating grinding wheel.
  • the apparatus comprises a workpiece supporting member supporting the workpiece and a wheel head providing the grinding wheel an outer peripheral surface of which takes a form of a part of a spherical shape.
  • the workpiece and the grinding wheel are relatively moved by a first drive mechanism in an infeed direction
  • the workpiece supporting member and the wheel head are relatively moved by a second drive mechanism in a traverse feed direction perpendicular to the infeed direction
  • the workpiece supporting member and the wheel head are relatively moved by a third drive mechanism in a pitch feed direction perpendicular to both of the infeed direction and the traverse feed direction.
  • What is highly desirable for the efficient cutting of lenses, particularly customized progressive lens or other aspheric lens designs, is a method of cutting that can produce the required range of aspheric, three-dimension surfaces, and overcomes one or more of the surface quality problems associated with traditional cutting techniques.
  • FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of a typical three-axis lathe.
  • FIG. 2a is a schematic representation of a typical three-axis milling machine.
  • FIG. 2b is a schematic plan view of a raster cutting pattern.
  • FIG. 2c is a schematic magnified cross-section of a scalloped surface cut by a typical three-axis milling machine cutting using a raster cutting pattern.
  • FIG. 3 is schematic representation exemplifying one embodiment of the cutting apparatus of the present invention.
  • FIG. 4 is a schematic representation exemplifying one embodiment of the cutting method of the present invention.
  • FIG. 5 is a schematic side-elevation showing the path of the cutting tool in one, exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 6 is a plan view of a raster cutting pattern adjusted to cut a spectacle lens.
  • FIG. 7 is a schematic side-elevation showing constant surface steps along the X-axis direction.
  • FIG. 8 is a schematic side-elevation showing constant surface steps along the Y-axis direction.
  • FIG. 9 is a schematic side-elevation showing a spherical tool dressing apparatus exemplifying one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 10 is a schematic view of a toroidal cutting tool, exemplifying one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 11A is an isometric view of an aspheric surface on which straight line raster paths have been projected.
  • FIG. 11B is an isometric view of an aspheric surface showing a normal vector contacting the surface at three equally spaced points along a projected straight line raster path.
  • FIG. 11C is a plan view of an aspheric surface showing a "drunken line" that the center of the cutting tool follows in order to cut along a straight line.
  • the present invention relates to a substantially constant surface cutting apparatus and methods capable of producing surfaces with a high degree of accuracy relative to a predetermined surface specification and with a surface finish that is of sufficiently high quality for use in the optical industry.
  • Such cutting methods and devices are highly desirable in the optics industry, particularly as a cost-effective way to mass produce customized aspheric surfaces, as required in, for instance, the production of progressive spectacle lenses.
  • the substantially constant cutting force apparatus comprises, consists essentially of and consists of a substantially spherically shaped cutting tool having a relatively large radius, preferably a radius of approximately 30 mm.
  • the preferred method embodiments use the preferred cutting tool rotated about a spindle axis while being moved in a raster cutting pattern relative to the surface being formed. Because of the relatively large radius of the preferred cutting tool, the path of the cutting tool in such preferred methods is determined by calculating where the center of the cutting tool sphere must be for the point of contact between the work-piece being formed to lie substantially on the required, pre-determined three-dimensional surface.
  • the cutting head is preferably then moved in a raster pattern by computer controlled servo-motors so that the center of the cutting head follows the required path.
  • the present methods compromise, consist essentially of, and consist of maintaining a substantially constant surface-cutting-speed for a substantial portion of the machine process, and even more preferably for substantially the entire machining process.
  • the maintaining step comprises, consists essentially of and consists of adjusting the rotational speed of the cutting tool. For instance, an effective radius of the cutting tool may be calculated for all cutting positions, and the rotational speed of the cutting tool adjusted so that the product of the effective radius and the rotational speed remains substantially constant throughout the machining process.
  • the methods of the invention comprise, consist essentially of, and consist of the step of moving the cutting tool at a substantially constant surface velocity.
  • this moving step comprises, consists essentially of, and consists of calculating a map of the contact points between the cutting tool sphere and the three-dimensional surface being cut, and ensuring that the time to travel between two successive contact points remains in substantially constant proportion to the distance between them.
  • Servomotor driven machinery that can move a cutting tool with very high precision is well-known.
  • Such machinery can be computer controlled and can, for instance, produce a complex three-dimensional surface from a predetermined specification, generally in the form of a computer file, detailing the shape of the surface as a map of three-dimensional co-ordinates (also know as a "points file").
  • the present invention is well adapted for use with such computer driven, servomotor machinery and an appropriately shaped and accurate cutting tool, to provide a freeform surface cutting apparatus and method that is capable of producing surfaces that accurately conform to a required shape and have an optical-quality surface finish.
  • FIG. 3 shows a schematic drawing of a three-axis, two-spindle computer controlled machining center in accordance with preferred embodiments of the present invention.
  • the machine preferably comprises a lens holding stage 30 on which the lens 32 to be cut is mounted, a spindle holding stage 40 on which a rough cut spindle 36 and a fine cut spindle 38 are mounted, and a control module 41.
  • Lens holding stage 30 is capable of precision, computer controlled motion in the direction of an X-axis 34.
  • Spindle holding stage 40 is capable of precision, computer controlled motion in both a Y-axis 42 and a Z-axis 44 direction.
  • rough cut spindle 36 and fine cut spindle 38 are each capable of holding appropriate cutting tools and being rotationally driven at variable, high speed by appropriate electrical motors, under computer control.
  • cutting heads mounted on either the rough cut spindle 36 or fine cut spindle 38 are adapted for movement, preferably under computer control, in the Z-axis 44 direction, while the stages are adapted for movement in a raster pattern in a plane parallel to the X-axis 34 and the Y-axis 42. This arrangement permits the cutting heads to produce a three-dimensional surface on the upper surface of lens 32.
  • Control module 41 which may be any suitable computer module, is adapted to calculate a cutting path of the cutting tool, or any point of the cutting tool, relative to the surface being cut on lens 32, and controlling servo-motors (not shown) to produce the required motions of stages 30 and 40.
  • rough cut spindle 36 holds a rough cut milling tool with poly-crystalline diamond (“PCD”) bits, which are preferably of at least medium accuracy.
  • PCD poly-crystalline diamond
  • Fig. 4 shows a fine cutting tool 46 used in a preferred embodiment of the present invention.
  • the fine cutting tool 46 has an arcuate surface 48, and is attached to the fine cut spindle 38 capable of rotating around a spindle axis 50.
  • the fine cutting tool 46 comprises a brass sintered diamond grinding wheel, preferably dressed to have an arcuate surface 48 of minimum waviness.
  • the arcuate surface 48 comprises at least a portion of a spherical surface, and even more preferably a portion of a spherical surface having a waviness of not greater than about 0.5 microns.
  • dressing the fine cutting tool 46 is preferably automated and performed while it is attached to fine cutting spindle 38, reducing the cost of maintenance.
  • Dressing of the cutting tool while it is attached to the cutting spindle may be carried out by moving, and preferably rotating, the fine cutting tool 46 to a dressing station having a third rotating spindle.
  • Other materials may also be used for the fine cutting tool 46 including, but not limited to, an electroplated diamond wheel, though not all of them may be dressable in-situ.
  • the surface to be cut 52 may be described by a set of three dimensional co-ordinates (also known as a "points file”), detailing the surface at a number of discrete points. Because the radius of cutting tool sphere 48 is large compared to the tool tip radius of conventional lathe turning tools, preferably at least about 20 mm, and therefore comparable to radii found in the surface 52, formed by the cutting process, significant errors would result if the cutting tool were simply to be moved so that the center or the tip of the tool follows a path that is substantially parallel to the desired surface, as is done in conventional CNC machining.
  • Figure 5 shows a fine cutting tool of one embodiment of the invention at two positions during cutting a pre-defined three-dimensional surface 54.
  • the tool In the first position, the tool is cutting the surface 54 at point 56 and in a second position the tool is cutting surface 54 at point 58.
  • the cutting path 60 that the center of the cutting tool 60 follows is related to the surface to be cut 54.
  • the cutting path 60 can be calculated by, for instance, determining where a center point of a sphere of the same radius as the fine cutting tool spherical surface 48 would be if each contact point between the sphere and the work-piece 51 being cut lies substantially on the pre-defined three-dimensional surface 54 that is to be cut.
  • the cutting path 60 passes through point 62, which is the position of the center of a sphere coincident with spherical surface 48 when the spherical surface 48 is in contact with point 56 of the required surface 54.
  • the cutting path 60 passes through point 64, which is the position of the center of sphere 48 when it is in contact with point 58 of the required surface 54.
  • Figure 6 shows a plan view of an ophthalmic lens 66 being cut by a fine cutting tool in an exemplary embodiment of the invention.
  • Lens 66 is supported by stage 68, and the cutting point is moved over the surface in a raster pattern 70.
  • the present methods comprise the step of controlling the center of the cutting tool such that the point of contact between the sphere and the lens surface follows a substantially straight line.
  • the center of the cutting tool sphere 48 is preferably controlled to deviate slightly from a straight line in order that the point of contact between the sphere and the lens surface follow a straight line.
  • the cutting path is sometimes referred to a "drunken" line or "drunken" raster pattern.
  • the methods include the step of calculating this "drunken" raster pattern of the center of the cutting tool sphere 48 and supplying control to the servo-motors driving platforms 30 and 40 based on this calculation.
  • Figures 11A-11C illustrate the "drunken" path in more detail.
  • Figure11A is an isometric view of an aspheric surface 100 on which the required straight line raster paths 102 have been projected.
  • Figure 11B is an isometric view in which a vector 104 normal to the required surface 100 and having a length R equal to the radius of the of the cutting tool sphere 48 is shown. Accordingly, the vector end 106 is the position of the center of the cutting tool sphere 48.
  • Vector 104 is shown contacting aspheric surface 100 at three equally spaced points 108, 110 and 112, along the straight line raster path 102 projected onto the aspheric surface 100.
  • Figure 11C is a plan view of aspheric surface 100, showing straight line raster paths 102 and the normal vector 104 contacting the surface 100 at the three equally spaced points 108, 110 and 112.
  • the drunken line 114 is the path that the center of the cutting tool sphere 48 follows in order for the points of contact 108, 110 and 112 to be in a straight line.
  • the required lens surface 52 is defined by a predetermined specification in the form of a computer points file.
  • This computer file is translated by the computer according to known technique into a tool path file which is used to generate control signals which define a cutting path for the rough cutting tool and the fine cutting tool 46.
  • the rough cutting tool which may be mounted on rough cut spindle 36, cuts the lens based on its tool path file and the control signals created thereby, leaving a small, predefined amount of material to be removed by the fine cut tool 46.
  • the machine preferably moves the rough cutting tool in a coordinated fashion, preferably using servomotors, to control table 30 and table 40 along the X, Y and Z axis.
  • the rough cut may be done using a standard 3-axis lathe, since all the defects discussed previously are usually acceptable at the rough cut stage.
  • the present methods control the fine cut tool to follow a path, and preferably a computer generated CNC tool path, that is substantially a raster pattern.
  • the cutting step cuts along a single linear axis, preferably with substantially all cuts being substantially equally spaced parallel lines.
  • the X, Y and Z motions are preferably calculated, controlled and coordinated so that the contact point 56 of the spherical surface 48 of the cutting tool 46 moves across the surface of the lens, cutting material in substantially uniform, even rows. This substantially uniform material removal keeps the cutting loads substantially constant, thereby keeping the surface true to the desired surface, preferably as defined by a points file.
  • the cutting step preferably cuts on both the fore and the back stroke.
  • the raster size may vary widely within the scope of the present invention and depends, for example, on how wavy the fine cut surface is permitted to be. In general the use of smaller raster sizes is preferred to achieve a less wavy surface, but the longer the process takes, and vice versa.
  • the speed of the stroke may vary widely within the scope of the present invention, depending on factors such as the desired rate of stock removal of the fine trim, the grit coarseness, the revolutions per minute (rpm) of the cutting tool, the cutting depth and the raster size, all in accordance with the teachings contained herein in combination with known engineering principles.
  • the methods produce accurate freeform surfaces, preferably by maintaining substantially constant cutting forces with an arcuate-shaped cutting tool.
  • the step of maintaining a substantially constant cutting force removes a substantially constant volume of lens material per unit time.
  • the use of a substantially constant cutting force step is important because single micron errors in lens surface shape can substantially change the function and cosmetic appearance of a lens. If the cutting forces remain constant, the system deflections remain constant, and the lens surface remains constant.
  • the constant cutting force step cuts a substantially constant path width, preferably with a constant cutting path speed, and even more preferably with a substantially constant surface-cutting-speed.
  • Figure 7 shows how the constant cutting path 72 is measured on the surface 54 being cut, and not in the rectilinear Cartesian coordinates, as is the distance 74.
  • the radius may be constantly changing, and for each instantaneous point, the radius must be calculated and used to determine the constant cut path 60 for the center of the spherical surface 48 of the fine cutting tool 46.
  • Figure 8 shows how, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, constant cutting speed is maintained by measuring the distance covered 76 along the surface being cut 54 and not the distance 78 as measured in the Y-axis Cartesian coordinates.
  • the rectilinear speed of the servomotors is adjusted so the velocity along the surface 54 is maintained constant.
  • Figures 5 shows how in a preferred embodiment, the surface-cutting-speed of the fine cutting tool 46 is kept substantially constant.
  • the effective cutting radius 80 is the line normal to the fine spindle axis 50, from the axis to the point of contact 56.
  • the effective cutting radius 80 can be calculated as the radius of sphere 48 multiplied by the sine of the tangent angle 82.
  • the effective cutting radius is the radius of the sphere.
  • the correct cutting path, the constant path width, the constant tool speed and the constant cutting speed all rely to some extent on calculating where the center of the cutting tool sphere 48 is with respect to the point of contact between the sphere and the surface being cut. It is important in many such embodiments, therefore, to maintain an accurately shaped and dimensioned cutting tool surface 48.
  • Figure 9 shows a preferred method of dressing the cutting tool 46 to maintain an accurate spherical surface 48. By dressing rotating surface 48 on grinding stone 84, which is rotated on spindle 86 that is orthogonal to fine tool spindle 50, surface 48 is keep accurately spherical, both in form and in surface finish.
  • the grinding stone 84 may be made of alumina. Grinding stone 84 is preferably rotated while simultaneously rotating sintered diamond spherical tool 46, and lowering tool 46 in the Z-axis direction, the two wear together to an accurate sphere.
  • the final radius of the spherical surface 48 may be measured, either directly or indirectly by making a cutting impression into some lens material, and then using well known optical techniques of measuring spheres. Similarly the quality of the spherical surface can be measured using standard surface tracing techniques. The measured tool radius may then be used by the CNC machine to calculate the various required paths.
  • Figure 10 shows an alterative embodiment in which the fine cutting tool 88 has a surface that is a portion of a toroid.
  • the toroid has a minor circle 90, with a lowest center 92, which can be used in an equivalent manner, in accordance with the teachings contained herein, to the center of a sphere in calculating the various required cutting paths.
EP05782713A 2004-08-03 2005-08-03 Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses Active EP1773528B1 (en)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP09168326A EP2127792A1 (en) 2004-08-03 2005-08-03 Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses
PL05782713T PL1773528T3 (pl) 2004-08-03 2005-08-03 Technologia skrawania rastrowego dla soczewek okulistycznych

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/910,674 US7494305B2 (en) 2004-08-03 2004-08-03 Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses
PCT/US2005/027743 WO2006017661A1 (en) 2004-08-03 2005-08-03 Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses

Related Child Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09168326A Division EP2127792A1 (en) 2004-08-03 2005-08-03 Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1773528A1 EP1773528A1 (en) 2007-04-18
EP1773528B1 true EP1773528B1 (en) 2009-11-25

Family

ID=35295338

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05782713A Active EP1773528B1 (en) 2004-08-03 2005-08-03 Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses
EP09168326A Withdrawn EP2127792A1 (en) 2004-08-03 2005-08-03 Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09168326A Withdrawn EP2127792A1 (en) 2004-08-03 2005-08-03 Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses

Country Status (12)

Country Link
US (1) US7494305B2 (ja)
EP (2) EP1773528B1 (ja)
JP (1) JP5213442B2 (ja)
KR (1) KR101155055B1 (ja)
CN (1) CN100475394C (ja)
AT (1) ATE449656T1 (ja)
AU (1) AU2005271466B2 (ja)
DE (1) DE602005017901D1 (ja)
MY (1) MY143436A (ja)
PL (1) PL1773528T3 (ja)
TW (1) TWI359711B (ja)
WO (1) WO2006017661A1 (ja)

Families Citing this family (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4989950B2 (ja) * 2005-11-01 2012-08-01 本田技研工業株式会社 ワークの加工方法
FR2902683B1 (fr) * 2006-06-22 2008-10-10 Essilor Int Procede et machine d'usinage pour objet optique.
EP2089781B1 (en) * 2006-10-10 2018-02-28 Novartis AG Method of surface manufacture with an apex decentered from a spindle axis
WO2008120691A1 (ja) * 2007-03-29 2008-10-09 Hoya Corporation レンズ加工方法およびレンズ加工装置
US20090164008A1 (en) * 2007-12-21 2009-06-25 Xin Hong Lens surface with combined diffractive, toric, and aspheric components
JP5402391B2 (ja) * 2009-01-27 2014-01-29 信越化学工業株式会社 半導体用合成石英ガラス基板の加工方法
JP5368232B2 (ja) * 2009-09-24 2013-12-18 オークマ株式会社 振動抑制装置
US8911280B2 (en) * 2011-01-31 2014-12-16 Apple Inc. Apparatus for shaping exterior surface of a metal alloy casing
US8665160B2 (en) 2011-01-31 2014-03-04 Apple Inc. Antenna, shielding and grounding
US8587939B2 (en) 2011-01-31 2013-11-19 Apple Inc. Handheld portable device
CN102441816B (zh) * 2011-10-18 2013-06-19 常州纳乐科思光学有限公司 三维切削加工方法
US10027114B2 (en) 2012-10-25 2018-07-17 Mpowersolar Inc. Master slave architecture for distributed DC to AC power conversion
DE102014114172A1 (de) * 2014-09-30 2016-03-31 Carl Zeiss Jena Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtungen zum Bearbeiten optischer Werkstücke
JP6068423B2 (ja) * 2014-11-28 2017-01-25 ファナック株式会社 加工動作をロボットに教示するロボットプログラミング装置
JP6672466B2 (ja) * 2016-09-05 2020-03-25 三菱重工コンプレッサ株式会社 遠心式回転機械の製造方法、及びそのインペラの製造方法
JP6883966B2 (ja) * 2016-09-29 2021-06-09 三井精機工業株式会社 砥石径の推定方法及びそれを用いた工作機械
CN110308505A (zh) * 2019-07-10 2019-10-08 长春理工大学 一种采用双圆锥形圆弧刻刀进行无空行程机械刻划衍射光栅的方法
EP4276555A1 (en) * 2022-05-11 2023-11-15 Essilor International A method for surfacing a lens blank with a cutting tool

Family Cites Families (12)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CH672084A5 (ja) * 1986-10-08 1989-10-31 Starrfraesmaschinen Ag
JP3000219B2 (ja) * 1987-07-31 2000-01-17 株式会社豊田中央研究所 曲面加工用情報処理装置
US5231587A (en) * 1990-07-12 1993-07-27 Loh Optical Machinery, Inc. Computer controlled lens surfacer
EP0555818B1 (fr) * 1992-02-12 1995-12-13 Charmilles Technologies S.A. Dispositif et procédé pour usiner par électro-érosion une cavité à trois dimensions avec une électrode-outil mince et rotative
DE4210381A1 (de) 1992-03-30 1993-10-14 Seiko Epson Corp Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Bilden einer nichtachsensymmetrischen asphärischen Fläche
US5378091A (en) * 1992-06-17 1995-01-03 Makino Milling Machine Co., Ltd. Method and apparatus for machining a workpiece
JP3598534B2 (ja) * 1994-04-28 2004-12-08 豊田工機株式会社 非球面加工装置
US5895311A (en) * 1996-06-06 1999-04-20 Fuji Xerox Co., Ltd. Abrasive device that maintains normal line of contact with curved abrasive surface and method of using same
JPH10175148A (ja) * 1996-10-14 1998-06-30 Nikon Corp プラスチックレンズ用基材及びその製造装置及び製造方法
ATE227443T1 (de) * 1997-12-22 2002-11-15 Starragheckert Ag Verfahren zum abtragenden bearbeiten von werkstücken
US6077002A (en) * 1998-10-05 2000-06-20 General Electric Company Step milling process
JP2004098237A (ja) 2002-09-11 2004-04-02 Ricoh Co Ltd 精密研磨方法及び研磨装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU2005271466A1 (en) 2006-02-16
CN101001709A (zh) 2007-07-18
WO2006017661A1 (en) 2006-02-16
US7494305B2 (en) 2009-02-24
MY143436A (en) 2011-05-13
EP1773528A1 (en) 2007-04-18
JP5213442B2 (ja) 2013-06-19
JP2008509012A (ja) 2008-03-27
TWI359711B (en) 2012-03-11
PL1773528T3 (pl) 2010-05-31
EP2127792A1 (en) 2009-12-02
TW200618903A (en) 2006-06-16
AU2005271466B2 (en) 2011-05-26
KR20070037501A (ko) 2007-04-04
DE602005017901D1 (de) 2010-01-07
ATE449656T1 (de) 2009-12-15
KR101155055B1 (ko) 2012-06-12
US20060026816A1 (en) 2006-02-09
CN100475394C (zh) 2009-04-08

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1773528B1 (en) Raster cutting technology for ophthalmic lenses
CN100562387C (zh) 用于机加工光学工件的机床
US6991525B2 (en) Method and device for the surface machining of workpieces composed of non-brittle materials in optical lens manufacturing and tool for this purpose
US6227952B1 (en) Apparatus for creating a concave surface from a spectacle blank
EP1854585B1 (en) Apparatus and method for generating an optical surface on a workpiece, for example an ophthalmic lens
EP0531299B1 (en) Method of grinding the surfaces of cutting blades and grinding wheel therefor
US8827611B2 (en) Free form cutting machine
JPH04504381A (ja) 工作物の形削り方法および装置
US4760672A (en) Simultaneously grinding and polishing preforms for optical lenses
US20100280650A1 (en) Machining apparatus and machining method
JP2009184066A (ja) 凹型フレネルレンズ形状部材の加工方法及び凹型フレネルレンズ形状部材
JP2006289566A (ja) マイクロレンズアレイの成形型の研削加工方法及び研削加工装置
JP4668872B2 (ja) 研削加工方法及び研削加工装置
EP1679154A1 (en) Method for machining aspherical surface, method for forming aspherical surface, and system for machining aspherical surface
JP2017124460A (ja) カップ状砥石による被加工物の非球面形状の連続加工方法及びその装置
JP2000237942A (ja) 研削加工方法及びその装置
JP2829103B2 (ja) プラスチックレンズの切削方法及び切削装置
JP2006055961A (ja) 平面研削盤による軸対称非球面の加工方法及び装置
JPH10328995A (ja) 曲面研削加工方法
JP2000024898A (ja) 研削加工装置および研削加工方法
JP4519618B2 (ja) 砥石の成形方法及び成形装置
JP2002160103A (ja) 曲面加工方法及び曲面加工装置
SU865619A1 (ru) Способ обработки асферических поверхностей оптических деталей
JP2003260646A (ja) 非軸対称非球面の研削加工方法及び加工装置
JP2002254280A (ja) 光学部材の研削加工方法とその装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20070115

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20071024

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005017901

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20100107

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ISLER & PEDRAZZINI AG

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20091125

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20091125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100325

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100325

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: PL

Ref legal event code: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E007561

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100225

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100308

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: SCHNEIDER GMBH & CO. KG

Effective date: 20100825

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100226

PLAF Information modified related to communication of a notice of opposition and request to file observations + time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSCOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100831

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100803

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100803

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091125

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20120705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 602005017901

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120705

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20150827

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20150728

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160804

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160831

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20160831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602005017901

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL, FR

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL (COMPAGNIE GENERALE D'OPTIQUE), CHARENTON-LE-PONT, FR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

Free format text: REGISTERED BETWEEN 20180517 AND 20180523

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Owner name: ESSILOR INTERNATIONAL, FR

Effective date: 20180601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230525

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230828

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Payment date: 20230719

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230825

Year of fee payment: 19

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230829

Year of fee payment: 19