EP1733817B1 - Procede et dispositif de controle de roulement de diametre fixe de tube - Google Patents

Procede et dispositif de controle de roulement de diametre fixe de tube Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1733817B1
EP1733817B1 EP05721677A EP05721677A EP1733817B1 EP 1733817 B1 EP1733817 B1 EP 1733817B1 EP 05721677 A EP05721677 A EP 05721677A EP 05721677 A EP05721677 A EP 05721677A EP 1733817 B1 EP1733817 B1 EP 1733817B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
tube
pipe
prediction error
stand
rotational speed
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP05721677A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
EP1733817A1 (fr
EP1733817A4 (fr
Inventor
Takateru c/o Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd INAGE
Fumio c/o Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd OKAYAMA
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd filed Critical Sumitomo Metal Industries Ltd
Priority to EP08021885A priority Critical patent/EP2045026B1/fr
Publication of EP1733817A1 publication Critical patent/EP1733817A1/fr
Publication of EP1733817A4 publication Critical patent/EP1733817A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1733817B1 publication Critical patent/EP1733817B1/fr
Ceased legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B37/00—Control devices or methods specially adapted for metal-rolling mills or the work produced thereby
    • B21B37/78—Control of tube rolling
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B17/00—Tube-rolling by rollers of which the axes are arranged essentially perpendicular to the axis of the work, e.g. "axial" tube-rolling
    • B21B17/14—Tube-rolling by rollers of which the axes are arranged essentially perpendicular to the axis of the work, e.g. "axial" tube-rolling without mandrel, e.g. stretch-reducing mills
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B21—MECHANICAL METAL-WORKING WITHOUT ESSENTIALLY REMOVING MATERIAL; PUNCHING METAL
    • B21B—ROLLING OF METAL
    • B21B38/00—Methods or devices for measuring, detecting or monitoring specially adapted for metal-rolling mills, e.g. position detection, inspection of the product
    • B21B38/04—Methods or devices for measuring, detecting or monitoring specially adapted for metal-rolling mills, e.g. position detection, inspection of the product for measuring thickness, width, diameter or other transverse dimensions of the product

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and device for controlling sizing mill of pipes or tubes, and in particular, to a method and device for controlling a sizing mill capable of suppressing defective thickness of a front or rear end (longitudinal end) of a pipe or tube rolled by the sizing mill effectively.
  • a sizing mill (sizer, stretch reducer or the like) comprising a plurality of stands each of which is provided with two or three grooved rolls (hereinafter referred to as rolling rolls).
  • a sizing mill applies a tensile force in a pipe or tube axis direction of the pipe or tube being rolled by giving a difference to the circumferential speeds of the rolling rolls between adjacent stands to thereby control the thickness of a pipe or tube.
  • the tensile force in the pipe or tube axis direction is not applied sufficiently comparing with the case of rolling the intermediate portion of the pipe or tube, whereby there is caused a phenomenon where the thickness of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube is thicker than the thickness of the pipe or tube intermediate portion. Therefore, the front or rear end of the pipe or tube is cut off as being a part of defective dimension, which result in a lower yield.
  • a pipe end detector 8 such as an HMD
  • a period until the front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches a first stand is To, and a period from the front or rear end of the pipe or tube ..
  • a high precision sensor such as a load measuring device may be disposed at each stand, but it requires enormous capital investment.
  • the present invention is based on the premise of using a method of predicting the time period To and the time period T i-1 (i ⁇ 2) without using a high precision sensor.
  • Japanese Patent No. 2541311 there is proposed a method in which a rolling torque is calculated from the driving current and the rotational speed of a motor for driving rolling rolls, and a timing when an front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reaches each stand (a timing when a front end bites into rolling rolls or rear end passes out of rolling rolls) is detected from the fluctuating state of the calculated rolling torque, and the rotational speed control start timing (the timing when the rotational speed control starts) of the rolling rolls for the next rolling of the pipe or tube is corrected such that the prediction error in each stand comes into a predetermined range.
  • a prediction error for rolling one pipe or tube is not always the same for the next pipe or tube to be rolled. Accordingly, it is impossible to correct the rotational speed control start timing of rolling rolls accurately for the next pipe or tube to be rolled. As a result, it is impossible to suppress the defective thickness of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube effectively.
  • the pattern of the thickness fluctuation of a front or rear end of the pipe or tube is not always the same, so defective thickness of a front or rear end of the pipe or tube cannot be suppressed fundamentally only by grasping the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches each stand accurately to thereby control the rotational speed of the rolling rolls.
  • JP 7-246414 discloses a method for controlling sizing mill of a pipe or tube in which a correction amount for the rotational speed of rolling rolls is adjusted in accordance with the amount of thickness increase produced at the front or rear end of the pipe or tube.
  • JP 58-196111 and JP 61-140317 relate to controlling rotational speeds of rolling rolls before and after a predetermined stand based on bulge-width measured values at the output side of the predetermined stand in a mandrel mill.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a method and device for controlling a sizing mill, capable of suppressing defective thickness of a front or rear end of a pipe or tube to be rolled by the sizing mill effectively.
  • the present invention provides a method for controlling sizing mill of a pipe or tube, wherein a rotational speed control start timing of rolling rolls set with respect to a predetermined stand of a sizing mill is corrected based on a thickness measured value of a front or rear end of the pipe or tube measured at an output side of the sizing mill.
  • the rotational speed control start timing of rolling rolls set with respect to a predetermined stand is corrected based on the thickness measured values of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube measured at the output side of the sizing mill, whereby it is expected to correct the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls appropriately according to the actual thickness fluctuation of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube, so it is possible to effectively suppress defective thickness of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube rolled by the sizing mill.
  • the method for controlling sizing mill comprises: a first step of calculating a prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand and a timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reaches the predetermined stand; and a second step of correcting the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand, based on the prediction error calculated and the thickness measured value of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube measured at the output side of the sizing mill.
  • the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls is corrected by using not only the thickness of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually measured but also a prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand and the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reaches the predetermined stand. Therefore, it is expected to correct the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls appropriately and accurately, so it is possible to suppress defective thickness of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube rolled by the sizing mill, more effectively.
  • the inventors of the present invention intensively studied about factors causing a prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to each stand and the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reached the stand.
  • a prediction error for the predicted period To until the front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches the first stand is caused due to a difference between the predicted carried speed and the actual carried speed of the pipe or tube due to the cross-sectional shape and a bend of the pipe or tube as well as abrasion of the carrying conveyor.
  • the prediction error for the predicted period T 0 is a component included in common in the prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to each stand and the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reaches the stand.
  • Fig. 2 the horizontal axis shows the sequence of pipes or tubes rolled, and the vertical axis shows the ratio of each prediction error component to the predicted period.
  • Fig. 2 will be described in detail.
  • the stand number was plotted in the horizontal axis X, and a prediction error (prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to each stand and the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reaches the stand) in each stand calculated as described above was plotted in the vertical axis Y.
  • ⁇ indicates a value obtained by dividing the prediction error component To' calculated as described above by the predicted period To
  • ⁇ indicates a value obtained by dividing the prediction error component ⁇ T j ' calculated as described above by the predicted period ⁇ T j , respectively.
  • data shown in Fig. 2 indicates cases where pipes or tubes of different materials were rolled (in a chance 1, A1 indicates that carbon steel is rolled and A2 indicates that 2Cr steel is rolled, and in a chance 2, B1 indicates that low alloy steel is rolled and B2 indicates that carbon steel is rolled) in two manufacturing chances (chance 1 and chance 2) where the dates of rolling the pipes or tubes were different (accordingly, various settings of the rolling mill are often different).
  • the dispersion tendency of the prediction error components To' for the predicted period To does not change a lot even though the manufacturing chance and the material of the pipe or tube differ.
  • the dispersion tendency of the prediction error components ⁇ T j ' for the predicted period ⁇ T j changes when the material of the pipe or tube differs. This is due to the fact that the generating factors of the prediction error components of factors outside the stand and the prediction error components of factors inside the stand are different as described above.
  • the dispersion tendencies in the prediction error components of factors outside the stand and the prediction error components of factors inside the stand are different since their generation factors are different. Therefore, if the both prediction error components are divided and are provided separately (e.g., while being weighted differently) for correcting the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls, it is expected that the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls can be corrected appropriately even in a state where the prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to each stand and the timing when a front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reaches the stand varies at random, due to the fluctuations of the generation factors.
  • the second step includes the steps of: extracting a first prediction error component until the front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches a first stand and a second prediction error component after the front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches the first stand, from the prediction error calculated; applying a first weight to the first prediction error component extracted, and based on the first prediction error component applied with the first weight, correcting the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand; applying a second weight to the second prediction error component extracted, and based on the second prediction error component applied with the second weight, correcting the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand; and based on the thickness measured value of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube measured at the output side of the sizing mill, correcting the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand.
  • a prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to a predetermined stand and the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reaches the predetermined stand is calculated, and from the prediction error calculated, a first prediction error component (prediction error component of a factor outside the stand) until the front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches the first stand and a second prediction error component (prediction error component of a factor inside the stand) after the front or rear end of the pipe or tube reached the first stand are extracted.
  • a first weight set to a value of 0 to 1 for example is applied to the prediction error component of the factor outside the stand, and based on the prediction error component of the factor outside the stand applied with the first weight, the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand is corrected.
  • a second weight set to a value of 0 to 1 for example is applied to the prediction error component of the factor inside the stand, and based on the prediction error component of the factor inside the stand applied with the second weight, the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand is corrected.
  • the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls is corrected in such a manner that two prediction error components where the generation factors are different (accordingly, tendency of variation may differ) are divided, and each of the components is weighted separately (each of the prediction error components may be weighted differently). Therefore, even in such a state that a prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of rolling rolls set with respect to each stand and the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reaches the stand varies at random according to the fluctuations of the generation factors of the prediction error, the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls can be corrected appropriately, whereby it is possible to suppress defective thickness of a front or rear end of the pipe or tube rolled by the sizing mill more effectively.
  • the present invention is provided as a device for controlling sizing mill of a pipe or tube, comprising: a thickness gauge provided at an output side of a sizing mill; a timing computing unit for correcting a rotational speed control start timing of rolling rolls set with respect to a predetermined stand, based on a thickness measured value of a front or rear end of a pipe or tube measured by the thickness gauge; and a rolling controller for controlling a rotational speed of rolling rolls provided to each stand, based on the rotational speed control start timing corrected by the timing computing unit.
  • the device for controlling sizing mill further comprises a detecting unit for detecting that a front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches the predetermined stand, wherein the timing computing unit executes a computation including: a first step of calculating a prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand and a timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube actually reaches the predetermined stand detected by the detecting unit; and a second step of correcting the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand, based on the prediction error calculated and the thickness measured value of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube measured by the thickness gauge.
  • the second step includes the steps of: extracting a first prediction error component until the front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches a first stand and a second prediction error component after the front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches the first stand, from the prediction error calculated; applying a first weight to the first prediction error component extracted, and based on the first prediction error component applied with the first weight, correcting the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand; applying a second weight to the second prediction error component extracted, and based on the second prediction error component applied with the second weight, correcting the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand; and based on the thickness measured value of the front or rear end of the pipe or tube measured by the thickness gauge, correcting the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls set with respect to the predetermined stand.
  • Fig. 4 is a block diagram showing the schematic configuration of a sizing mill used for performing a method for controlling sizing mill, according to an embodiment of the present invention.
  • a pipe or tube 1 to be rolled is carried in an axial direction (direction shown by the outlined arrow in Fig. 4 ) by carrying rolls (not shown), and is sized and rolled at each stand 2.
  • a pipe or tube end detector 8 which consists of a photoelectric sensor and detects a front end and rear end of the pipe or tube 1 by the operation of the photoelectric sensor.
  • a ⁇ -ray thickness gauge 9 and a length gauge 10 consisting of a photoelectric sensor or the like are disposed.
  • An end detecting signal of the pipe or tube 1 outputted from the pipe or tube end detector 8 is inputted into a rolling controller 7 and a timing computing unit 6.
  • a thickness measured value of the pipe or tube 1 outputted from the thickness gauge 9 and a length measured value of the pipe or tube 1 outputted from the length gauge 10 are inputted into the timing computing unit 6.
  • a rolling roll 21 provided to each stand 2 is driven by a roll driving motor 3 via a reduction gear 31.
  • a roll driving motor 3 of a stand 2 in, for example, odd-number order counted from the first stand (stand disposed at the most upstream side) is provided with a current detector 32 for detecting a drive current of the roll driving motor 3 and a rotational speed detector 33 for detecting the rotational speed (the present invention is not limited to this configuration, and it is possible to adopt configurations in which the current detector 32 and the rotational speed detector 33 are provided to another predetermined stand or to the roll driving motors 3 of all stands).
  • Detection signals of the current detector 32 and the rotational speed detector 33 are inputted into a motor drive controller 4 for drive-controlling the roll driving motor 3, respectively.
  • a rotational speed control starting signal of the rolling roll 21 has been inputted from the rolling controller 7, and the motor drive controller 4 performs a rotational speed control of the roll driving motor 3 based on the rotational speed control starting signal.
  • the detection signals of the current detector 32 and the rotational speed detector 33 are also inputted into a rolling torque computing unit 5 via the motor drive controller 4.
  • the rolling torque computing unit 5 serves as a detecting unit for detecting that a front or rear end of the pipe or tube reaches a predetermined stand in the present invention.
  • the rolling torque computing unit 5 calculates rolling torque based on the detection signals of the driving current and the rotational speed inputted from the motor drive controller 4, and outputs the calculated rolling torque signal to the timing computing unit 6.
  • the timing computing unit 6 calculates the correction amount of the rotational speed control starting signal, and outputs the calculation result to the rolling controller 7 as a correction signal.
  • the rolling controller 7 To the rolling controller 7, the end detection signal from the pipe or tube end detector 8 and the correction signal from the timing computing unit 6 are inputted. Timing is started at the time when the end detection signal from the pipe or tube end detector 8 is imputed, and when the timing result reaches a stored set value of the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 of each stand 2, the rolling controller 7 outputs a rotational speed control starting signal to each motor drive controller 4 and to each timing computing unit 6. Each motor drive controller 4 lowers the rotational speed of the roll driving motor 3 based on the rotational speed control starting signal inputted. Note that a set value of the rotational speed control start timing is corrected based on the correction signal inputted from the timing computing unit 6, and is stored as a set value used for rolling the next pipe or tube 1.
  • a method of computing the correction amount of the rotational speed control starting signal (correction amount of the rotational speed control start timing) in the timing computing unit 6, based on the rolling torque signal from the rolling torque computing unit 5, the end detection signal from the pipe or tube end detector 8, the thickness measured value of the pipe or tube 1 outputted from the thickness gauge 9, the length measured value of the pipe or tube 1 outputted from the length gauge 10, and the rotational speed control starting signal of the rolling roll 21 from the rolling controller 7, will be described specifically with reference to Figs. 5 and 6 and Fig. 3 described above as appropriate.
  • the method for controlling sizing mill is configured so as to compute the correction amount of the rotational speed control starting signal while taking into account both of the correction amount based on the thickness measured value of a front or rear end of the pipe or tube 1 (hereinafter, referred to as "correction amount based on thickness result” as appropriate) and the correction amount based on a prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 and the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube 1 actually reaches (hereinafter, referred to as "correction amount based on prediction error” as appropriate).
  • the respective correction amounts will be described in sequence.
  • Fig. 5 is a diagram showing an example of a thickness measured value of the pipe or tube 1 (average thickness in a pipe or tube circumferential direction) outputted from the thickness gauge 9.
  • the timing computing unit 6 first calculates an average thickness tm in a length Lm, in the intermediate portion of the pipe or tube 1, shown by the following equation (1), based on the thickness measured value of the pipe or tube 1 outputted from the thickness gauge 9 and the length measured value of the pipe or tube 1 outputted from the length gauge 10:
  • Lm L - Lct + Lt + Lcb + Lb
  • L means the length of the pipe or tube 1 at the output side of the sizing mill
  • Lct means the crop length at the front end of the pipe or tube 1 defined in advance according to the type and dimensions of the pipe or tube 1
  • Lt means the front end length of the product part of the pipe or tube 1 defined in advance
  • Lcb means the crop length at the rear end of the pipe or tube 1 defined in advance
  • Lb means the rear end length of the product part of the pipe or tube 1 defined in advance.
  • front end length Lt and the rear end length Lb of the product part are lengths in predetermined proportional to the length (or target length) of the pipe or tube 1 at the output side of the sizing mill, or are constant lengths irrespective of the length of the pipe or tube 1.
  • the timing computing unit 6 calculates the increased thickness length Lzt of the front end.
  • tup and tlo are values which have been determined beforehand.
  • the increased thickness length Lzt of the front end means the length from a portion where the thickness first increases from the average thickness tm by tup viewed from the most inner side of the portion corresponding to the front end length Lt of the product part of the pipe or tube 1, to a portion coming inside by the crop length Lct from the tip of the pipe or tube 1, as shown in Fig. 5(a) .
  • the timing computing unit 6 calculates the increased thickness length Lzb of the rear end.
  • the increased thickness length Lzb of the rear end means the length from a portion where the thickness first increases from the average thickness tm by tup viewed from the most inner side of the portion corresponding to the rear end length Lb of the product part of the pipe or tube 1, to a portion coming inside by the crop length Lcb from the rear end of the pipe or tube 1.
  • the values of tup and tlo may take the same values in the front end and the rear end of the pipe or tube 1, or may be different.
  • Kt means a constant (weight) set to a value of 0 to 1
  • L0 means the length of the pipe or tube 1 at the input side of the sizing mill (it is measurable by arranging a length gauge on the input side of the sizing mill or by measuring the length in the step of the previous stage of the sizing mill)
  • V0 means the speed of the pipe or tube 1 at the input side of the sizing mill (it is measurable by arranging a speed meter on the input side of the sizing mill, or by arranging two pipe or tube end detectors 8 described above and dividing the distance between the pipe or tube end detectors 8 by the difference between the detection times).
  • L/L0 means the elongation percentage of the pipe or tube 1 (percentage of the pipe or tube being elongated) by the sizing mill
  • a value, obtained by dividing the increased thickness length Lzt of the front end by L/L0 corresponds to the length of the increased thickness length of the front end at the input side of the sizing mill.
  • Kb means a constant (weight) set to a value of 0 to 1.
  • Lzb ⁇ L0/L/V0 means a time period in which a portion correspond to the increased thickness length Lzb of the rear end is generated. Accordingly, it is possible to suppress generation of the portion corresponding to the increased thickness length of the rear end by setting ⁇ Tb1 shown by the above-mentioned equation (3) as the correction amount, and rolling the next pipe or tube 1 by uniformly adding the correction amount ⁇ Tb1 to the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 (advancing the rotational speed control start timing by a period corresponding to the absolute value of ⁇ Tt1).
  • the timing computing unit 6 calculates the reduced thickness length Lgt of the front end.
  • the reduced thickness length Lgt of the front end means the length from a portion where the thickness is first reduced from the average thickness tm by tlo viewed from the most inner side of the portion corresponding to the front end length Lt of the product part of the pipe or tube 1, to a portion coming inside by the crop length Lct from the tip of the pipe or tube 1.
  • the timing computing unit 6 calculates the reduced thickness length Lgb of the rear end.
  • the reduced thickness length Lgb of the rear end means the length from a portion where the thickness is first reduced from the average thickness tm by tlo viewed from the most inner side of the portion corresponding to the rear end length Lb of the product part of the pipe or tube 1, to a portion coming inside by the crop length Lcb from the rear end of the pipe or tube 1.
  • the timing computing unit 6 starts timing at a timing where an end (front end or rear end) detection signal is imputed from the pipe or tube end detector 8 to the timing computing unit 6 as a starting point, and based on the fluctuation state of a rolling torque signal inputted from the rolling torque computing unit 5, detects the timing where the end (front end or rear end) of the pipe or tube 1 actually reaches the predetermined stand 2 (stand in odd-number order in this embodiment) (that is, an elapsed time period starting from the time when the end detecting signal is imputed, hereinafter referred to as a "measured period" as appropriate).
  • the timing computing unit 6 detects an elapsed time period starting from the time when the end detecting signal is inputted from the pipe or tube end detector 8 to the timing computing unit 6, to the time when the rotational speed control starting signal of the rolling roll 21 is inputted from the rolling controller 7 (hereinafter, referred to as "predicted period" as appropriate), and calculates the prediction error Y j between the predicted period and the measured period.
  • the timing computing unit 6 first, based on plural pieces of data (i, Y i ) plotted by assuming the horizontal axis X being the stand number and the vertical axis Y being the prediction error between the predicted period and the measured period (see Fig. 3 ), the correlation coefficient R between X and Y is calculated (S1 in Fig. 6 ), and the calculated correlation coefficient R is determined whether it is below the predetermined value (S2 in Fig. 6 ).
  • the prediction error Y i only includes a prediction error component of the factor outside the stand, and based on (i, Y i ), a primary regression equation of Y, where X is a variable, is calculated (S3 in Fig. 6 ). Then, a Y section of the primary regression equation is defined as a prediction error To' between the predicted period and the measured period in the first stand (see S4 in Fig. 6 , and Fig. 3 ).
  • the sum of squares ⁇ (Y i - T 0 ') 2 of the difference between the prediction error Y i and the prediction error T 0 ' and the sum of squares ⁇ (Y i ) 2 of the prediction error Y i are compared (S5 in Fig. 6 ), and if ⁇ (Y ⁇ - T 0 ') 2 ⁇ ⁇ (Y i ) 2 , the computation ends since there is no need to correct the rotational speed control starting signal relating to the correction amount based on the prediction error.
  • the timing computing unit 6 multiplies the prediction error T 0 ' by a first weight (value of 0 to 1, e.g., 0.5), and outputs a correction signal in which the prediction error To' multiplied by the first weight is set as the correction amount to the rolling controller 7 (S6 in Fig. 6 ).
  • the correction amount ⁇ Tt2 based on the prediction error is added to the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 of each stand 2 uniformly (subtracting the prediction error To' multiplied by the first weight), which is used for rolling the next pipe or tube 1 (S6 in Fig. 6 ).
  • the timing computing unit 6 calculates a primary regression equation based on (i, Y i ) similar to that described above (S7 in Fig. 6 ), and sets the calculated Y section of the of the primary regression equation as the prediction error To' between the predicted period and the measured period in the first stand (see S8 in Fig. 6 and Fig. 3 ).
  • the prediction error To' is multiplied by a first weight (value of 0 to 1, e.g., 0.5), and a correction signal in which the prediction error T 0 ' multiplied by the first weight is set as the correction amount is outputted to the rolling controller 7 (S9 in Fig. 6 ).
  • the correction amount is subtracted from the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 of each stand 2 uniformly (S9 in Fig. 6 ). In other words, through the processing shown in S9 of Fig. 6 , the prediction error component of the factor outside the stand included in the prediction error Y i is corrected.
  • the correction amount is further subtracted from the rotational speed control start timing, for the next pipe or tube, of the rolling roll 21 in each stand (i th stand) (S11 in Fig. 6 ).
  • the prediction error component of the factor inside the stand, included in the prediction error Y i is corrected.
  • this embodiment has described such a configuration that, based on the data (i, Y i ) plotted on the premise that the horizontal axis X shows the stand number i and the vertical axis Y shows the prediction error Y i between the predicted period and the measured period, a primary regression equation ofY where X is variable is calculated, and with the primary regression equation, a prediction error component of a factor outside the stand and a prediction error component of a factor inside the stand are separated.
  • the present invention is not limited to this configuration.
  • N th integer of N > 1 regression equation ofY where X is variable is calculated based on data (i, Y i ), and a prediction error component of a factor outside the stand and a prediction error component of a factor inside the stand are separated.
  • first weight and the second weight the same values may be adopted in the front end and the rear end of the pipe or tube 1, or different values may be adopted.
  • ⁇ t is a constant of 0 to 1
  • ⁇ t is a constant of 1 - ⁇ t.
  • the set value of the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 relating to the front end of the pipe or tube 1 is corrected based on the correction amount ⁇ Tt stored (correction amount ⁇ Tt is added), which is used as a set value for rotating the next pipe or tube 1.
  • ⁇ Tb ⁇ b ⁇ ⁇ Tb ⁇ 1 + ⁇ b ⁇ ⁇ Tb ⁇ 2
  • ⁇ b is a constant of 0 to 1
  • ⁇ b is a constant of 1 - ab.
  • the set value of the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 relating to the rear end of the pipe or tube 1 is corrected based on the correction amount ⁇ Tb stored (correction amount ⁇ Tb is added), which is used as a set value for rotating the next pipe or tube 1.
  • the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 is corrected based on the thickness measured values of the front and rear end of the pipe or tube 1 measured at the output side of the sizing mill. Therefore, it is expected that the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 is corrected so as to be appropriate for the actual thickness fluctuations of the front and rear end of the pipe or tube.
  • the prediction error is divided into two prediction error components of different factors (a prediction error component of a factor outside the stand and a prediction error component of a factor inside the stand) which are weighted respectively (it is possible to differ first and second weights applied to the both prediction error components respectively) and are provided to correct the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21, it is possible to correct the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 appropriately in a state where the prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 and the timing when a front or rear end of the pipe or tube 1 reaches each stand 2 varies at random along with the fluctuation of the generation factors of the prediction error. Accordingly, it is possible to suppress defective front and rear end thickness of the pipe or tube 1 rolled by the sizing mill, effectively.
  • the set value of the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 relating to the front end of the pipe or tube 1 is corrected based on the stored correction amount ⁇ Tt (correction amount ⁇ Tt is added), which is used as a set value for rolling the next pipe or tube 1.
  • ⁇ Tt corrected amount
  • the set value of the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 relating to the rear end of the pipe or tube 1 is corrected based on the stored correction amount ⁇ Tb (correction amount ⁇ Tb is added), which is used as the set value for rolling the next pipe or tube 1.
  • the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 is corrected based on the thickness measured values of the front and rear end of the pipe or tube 1 measured at the output side of the sizing mill, so it is expected that the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 can be corrected so as to be appropriate for the actual thickness fluctuations of the front and rear ends of the pipe or tube.
  • the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 can be corrected so as to be appropriate for the actual thickness fluctuations of the front and rear ends of the pipe or tube.
  • a method for controlling sizing mill is configured to use a prediction error Yi between the predicted period and the measured period in each stand 2 as it is.
  • the correction amounts based on the prediction errors are ⁇ Tt2 and ⁇ Tb2 (in this embodiment, however, measured periods must be detected not only for the stands in odd-number order but for all stands, different from the first embodiment).
  • the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 is corrected by using not only the thickness measured values of the front and rear ends of the pipe or tube 1 measured at the output side of the sizing mill but also the prediction errors between the rotation speed control start timings of the rolling roll set with respect to each stand 2 and the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube 1 actually reach each stand 2. Therefore it is expected that the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 can be corrected so as to be more appropriate than the case of the second embodiment, whereby it is possible to suppress defective thicknesses in front and rear ends of the pipe or tube 1 rolled by the sizing mill, effectively.
  • the set value of the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 relating to the front end of the pipe or tube 1 is corrected based on the stored correction amount ⁇ Tt (the correction amount ⁇ Tt is added), which is used as the set value for rolling the next pipe or tube 1.
  • the set value of the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 set with respect to each stand 2 relating to the rear end of the pipe or tube 1 is corrected based on the stored correction amount ⁇ Tb (the correction amount ⁇ Tb is added), which is used as the set value for rolling the next pipe or tube 1.
  • the prediction error is divided into two prediction error components of different factors (a prediction error component of a factor outside the stand and a prediction error component of a factor inside the stand) which are weighted respectively (it is possible to differ first and second weights applied to the both prediction error components respectively) and are provided to correct the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21, it is possible to correct the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 appropriately in a state where the prediction errors between the rotational speed control start timings of the rolling roll 21 set to each stand 2 and the timings when front and rear ends of the pipe or tube 1 reach each stand 2 varies at random along with the fluctuations of the generation factors of the prediction errors. Accordingly, it is possible to suppress defective thicknesses in the front and rear ends of the pipe or tube 1 rolled by the sizing mill, effectively.
  • Figs. 7(a) and 7(b) show exemplary results of evaluating prediction error between the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 corrected with respect to a predetermined stand 2 and the timing when a front or rear end of the pipe or tube 1 actually reaches the predetermined stand 2, in the case of applying the method for controlling sizing mill (method for correcting rotational speed control start timing of rolling roll 21) according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention.
  • Fig. 7(a) shows a prediction error in the case of applying the method according to the fourth embodiment of the present invention, and Fig.
  • FIG. 7(b) shows a prediction error in the case of applying the conventional method (prediction error between the rotational control start timing of the rolling rolls 21 which has been set beforehand with respect to the predetermined stand 2 (including a case where correction is performed manually by the operator) and the timing when the front or rear end of the pipe or tube 1 actually reaches the predetermined stand 2).
  • the absolute value of the average value of prediction errors becomes small and the dispersion also becomes small comparing with the case of applying the conventional method ( Fig. 7(b) ), whereby it was possible to correct the rotational speed control start timing of the rolling rolls 21, appropriately.
  • the increased thickness ratio of end shown in Fig. 8 is a value indicated by (thickness at each portion of end - average thickness (tm))/average thickness (tm) ⁇ 100 (%).
  • the tolerance failure ratio of the thickness of the pipe or tube 1 after being rolled was evaluated, in the case of applying the methods for controlling sizing mill according to the first to fourth embodiments of the present invention and methods of comparative examples. More specifically, 50 to 100 pipes or tubes for each manufacturing chance were sized and rolled for three manufacturing chances in total under the following conditions of (1) to (6), and the tolerance failure ratios were evaluated for the front ends (portions corresponding to the crop lengths Lct and the front end lengths Lt of the product parts) after being rolled, for each chance.
  • tolerance failure ratio means the ratio of the number of pipes or tubes in which the average thicknesses of the front ends are out of the range of (tm - tlo) to (tm - tup) to the total number of rolled pipes or tubes:
  • Table 1 shows evaluation results. Note that Examples 1-1 and 1-2 in Table 1 show a method for controlling sizing mill, corresponding to the first embodiment.
  • Example 2, Example 3 and Example 4 are methods for controlling sizing and fixing, corresponding to the second embodiment, the third embodiment and the fourth embodiment, respectively.
  • Comparative Example 1 is a method of using a prediction error between the predicted period and the measured period in each stand as the correction mount as it is, without performing thickness measurement.
  • Comparative Example 2 is a method in which correction is performed manually by the operator, without performing thickness measurement.
  • the tolerance failure ratio was lowered in the method of Example 4, comparing with Comparative Examples 1 and 2.
  • the prediction error between the predicted period and the measured period in each stand was used as it was as the correction amount, so an influence of the measurement error of the measured period directly affected, whereby the prediction error was difficult to be solved.
  • the correction amount was approximated by a primary regression equation, whereby it was less likely to be affected by the measurement error of the measured period, so it was considered that the tolerance failure ratio was lowered consequently.
  • correction based on the thickness result was added to the method of Comparative Example 1, whereby it was possible to reduce the tolerance failure ratio comparing with the methods of Comparative Examples 1 and 2.
  • the prediction error in each stand was defined as the correction amount based on the prediction error as it was, similar to the method of Comparative Example 1, it was difficult to solve the prediction error, so the tolerance failure ratio was also somewhat difficult to be solved, consequently. Further, as for the method of Example 2, it was possible to reduce the tolerance failure ratio comparing with the methods of Comparative Examples 1 and 2, since a correction based on the thickness result was performed. However, since a correction based on the prediction error was not performed, the tolerance failure ratio was less likely to be solved comparing with the methods of Examples 1-1, 1-2 and 3.
  • Example 1-1 since a correction based on the thickness result and a correction based on the prediction error based on a primary regression equation are performed, the tolerance failure ratio was lowered and was possible to be solved quickly, comparing with not only Comparative Examples 1 and 2 but also Examples 2 to 4. Further, in the methods of Example 1-2, since different coefficients were used in the case of the same manufacturing chance and in the case of the manufacturing chance being changed (at the timing where the manufacturing chance is changed, the value of ⁇ t is increased such that the correction amount based on the thickness result contributes more), it was possible to solve the tolerance failure ratio more quickly than the method of Example 1-1. This is because the correction amount based on the thickness result may depend more on the dimensions of the pipe or tube than the manufacturing chances.
  • the correction result in the prior manufacturing chance can be utilized in a more effective manner by setting coefficients such that the correction amount based on the thickness result contributes more at timing when the manufacturing chance is changed.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Control Of Metal Rolling (AREA)

Abstract

Un procédé et un dispositif de contrôle de roulement de diamètre fixe de tube. Le procédé de contrôle de roulement de diamètre fixe de tube contrôlant la vitesse de rotation de rouleaux de roulement (21) disposés sur des supports lorsque la partie terminale du tube (1) est enroulée par les supports (2) d'un laminoir de diamètre fixe est caractérisé en ce que le nombre de démarrages de contrôle de la vitesse de rotation des rouleaux de roulement réglé pour des supports spécifiques est corrigé sur la base de la valeur mesurée de l'épaisseur de paroi de la partie terminale du tube mesurée sur l’extérieur du laminoir de diamètre fixe.

Claims (6)

  1. Procédé pour commander un calibreur de tuyau ou de tube (1), caractérisé en ce que une synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation de cylindres de laminage (2) établie par rapport à un support prédéterminé d'un calibreur est corrigée sur la base d'une valeur mesurée d'épaisseur d'une extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube mesurée à un côté sortie dudit calibreur.
  2. Procédé pour commander un calibreur de tuyau ou de tube selon la revendication 1, comportant :
    une première étape consistant à calculer une erreur de prédiction entre la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport au support prédéterminé et une synchronisation lorsque l'extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube atteint réellement ledit support prédéterminé, et
    une seconde étape consistant à corriger la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport audit support prédéterminé, sur la base de ladite erreur de prédiction calculée et de la valeur mesurée d'épaisseur de l'extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube mesurée au niveau du côté de sortie dudit calibreur.
  3. Procédé pour commander un calibreur de tuyau ou de tube selon la revendication 2, dans lequel ladite seconde étape inclut les étapes consistant à :
    extraire une première composante d'erreur de prédiction jusqu'à ce que l'extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube atteigne un premier support et une seconde composante d'erreur de prédiction après que l'extrémité avant ou arrière dudit tuyau ou tube a atteint le premier support, de ladite erreur de prédiction calculée,
    appliquer une première pondération à ladite première composante d'erreur de prédiction extraite, et sur la base de la première composante d'erreur de prédiction appliquée avec la première pondération, corriger la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport audit support prédéterminé,
    appliquer une seconde pondération à ladite seconde composante d'erreur de prédiction extraite, et sur la base de la seconde composante d'erreur de prédiction appliquée avec la seconde pondération, corriger la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport audit support prédéterminé, et
    sur la base de la valeur mesurée d'épaisseur de l'extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube mesurée du côté sortie dudit calibreur, corriger la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport audit support prédéterminé.
  4. Dispositif pour commander un calibreur de tuyau ou de tube (1) comportant :
    une jauge d'épaisseur (9) agencée au niveau d'un côté sortie d'un calibreur, caractérisé par
    une unité de calcul de synchronisation (6) pour corriger une synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation de cylindres de laminage (2) établie par rapport à un support prédéterminé, sur la base d'une valeur mesurée d'épaisseur d'une extrémité avant ou arrière d'un tuyau ou d'un tube mesurée par ladite jauge d'épaisseur, et
    un dispositif de commande de laminage (7) pour commander une vitesse de rotation de cylindres de laminage agencés dans chaque support, sur la base de la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation corrigée par ladite unité de calcul de synchronisation.
  5. Dispositif pour commander un calibreur de tuyau ou de tube selon la revendication 4, comportant en outre :
    une unité de détection pour détecter qu'une extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube atteint le support prédéterminé,
    ladite unité de calcul de synchronisation exécutant un calcul incluant :
    une première étape consistant à calculer une erreur de prédiction entre la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport au support prédéterminé et une synchronisation lorsque l'extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube atteint réellement ledit support prédéterminé détecté par ladite unité de détection, et
    une seconde étape consistant à corriger la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport audit support prédéterminé, sur la base de ladite erreur de prédiction calculée et de la valeur mesurée d'épaisseur de l'extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube mesurée par ladite jauge d'épaisseur.
  6. Dispositif pour commander un calibreur de tuyau ou de tube selon la revendication 5, dans lequel
    ladite seconde étape inclut les étapes consistant à :
    extraire une première composante d'erreur de prédiction en jusqu'à ce que l'extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube atteigne un premier support et une seconde composante d'erreur de prédiction après que l'extrémité avant ou arrière dudit tuyau ou tube a atteint le premier support, de ladite erreur de prédiction calculée,
    appliquer une première pondération à ladite première composante d'erreur de prédiction extraite, et sur la base de la première composante d'erreur de prédiction appliquée avec la première pondération, corriger la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport audit support prédéterminé,
    appliquer une seconde pondération à ladite seconde composante d'erreur de prédiction extraite, et sur la base de la seconde composante d'erreur de prédiction appliquée avec la seconde pondération, corriger la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport audit support prédéterminé, et
    sur la base de la valeur mesurée d'épaisseur de l'extrémité avant ou arrière du tuyau ou du tube mesurée par ladite jauge d'épaisseur, corriger la synchronisation de début de commande de vitesse de rotation des cylindres de laminage établie par rapport audit support prédéterminé.
EP05721677A 2004-03-30 2005-03-30 Procede et dispositif de controle de roulement de diametre fixe de tube Ceased EP1733817B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP08021885A EP2045026B1 (fr) 2004-03-30 2005-03-30 Procédé et dispositif de commande du moulin de dimensionnement de tuyau ou tube

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004098841 2004-03-30
PCT/JP2005/006179 WO2005095013A1 (fr) 2004-03-30 2005-03-30 Procede et dispositif de controle de roulement de diametre fixe de tube

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08021885A Division EP2045026B1 (fr) 2004-03-30 2005-03-30 Procédé et dispositif de commande du moulin de dimensionnement de tuyau ou tube
EP08021885.2 Division-Into 2008-12-17

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1733817A1 EP1733817A1 (fr) 2006-12-20
EP1733817A4 EP1733817A4 (fr) 2008-02-20
EP1733817B1 true EP1733817B1 (fr) 2010-11-17

Family

ID=35063580

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP05721677A Ceased EP1733817B1 (fr) 2004-03-30 2005-03-30 Procede et dispositif de controle de roulement de diametre fixe de tube
EP08021885A Ceased EP2045026B1 (fr) 2004-03-30 2005-03-30 Procédé et dispositif de commande du moulin de dimensionnement de tuyau ou tube

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08021885A Ceased EP2045026B1 (fr) 2004-03-30 2005-03-30 Procédé et dispositif de commande du moulin de dimensionnement de tuyau ou tube

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (2) EP1733817B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP4697605B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN100409956C (fr)
DE (1) DE602005024782D1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005095013A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5041304B2 (ja) * 2007-03-30 2012-10-03 住友金属工業株式会社 継目無管の製造方法
EP2390016B1 (fr) * 2008-12-24 2015-01-07 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corporation Procédé de production de tuyau métallique sans soudure par laminage à froid
ITUD20120026A1 (it) * 2012-02-17 2013-08-18 Danieli Automation Spa Impianto per il controllo dell'area della sezione di un prodotto laminato e relativo procedimento
ITMI20121559A1 (it) * 2012-09-19 2014-03-20 Sms Innse Spa Miglioramento in un impianto di laminazione
DE102017220750A1 (de) * 2017-11-21 2019-05-23 Sms Group Gmbh Vorrichtung zur Steuerung eines Streckreduzierwalzwerks
DE102018214002A1 (de) * 2018-08-20 2020-02-20 Sms Group Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern eines Streckreduzierwalzwerks zwecks Wanddickenkompensation
DE102018217378B3 (de) * 2018-10-11 2020-03-26 Sms Group Gmbh Wanddickenkontrolle beim Streckreduzieren von Rohren
CN109719139B (zh) * 2019-02-11 2020-07-28 黑龙江建龙钢铁有限公司 一种无缝钢管端部壁厚自动控制系统
CN111729936B (zh) * 2020-07-06 2022-04-26 中冶赛迪重庆信息技术有限公司 一种无缝钢管切头控制方法及装置

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS58196111A (ja) * 1982-05-10 1983-11-15 Kawasaki Steel Corp 鋼管の延伸圧延方法
JPS6064717A (ja) * 1983-09-19 1985-04-13 Toshiba Corp 連続圧延スタンドの速度制御装置
JPS61140317A (ja) * 1984-12-12 1986-06-27 Kawasaki Steel Corp マンドレルミルの圧延制御方法
JP2541311B2 (ja) 1989-07-05 1996-10-09 住友金属工業株式会社 絞り圧延機の管端制御開始点学習方法
JPH06142743A (ja) * 1992-11-11 1994-05-24 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd 絞り圧延機による管端肉厚制御方法
JPH07246414A (ja) * 1994-03-10 1995-09-26 Nkk Corp ストレッチレデューサーの管端部肉厚制御方法
JP3567837B2 (ja) * 1999-12-24 2004-09-22 住友金属工業株式会社 絞り圧延機の管端肉厚制御開始時間学習方法
DE10201717C1 (de) * 2002-01-18 2003-04-10 Sms Meer Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Walzen eines Rohres
JP4013659B2 (ja) * 2002-06-13 2007-11-28 住友金属工業株式会社 管圧延機の肉厚制御方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2005095013A1 (ja) 2008-02-21
CN1909987A (zh) 2007-02-07
JP4697605B2 (ja) 2011-06-08
EP2045026B1 (fr) 2012-07-04
EP2045026A1 (fr) 2009-04-08
WO2005095013A1 (fr) 2005-10-13
DE602005024782D1 (de) 2010-12-30
EP1733817A1 (fr) 2006-12-20
CN100409956C (zh) 2008-08-13
EP1733817A4 (fr) 2008-02-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1733817B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de controle de roulement de diametre fixe de tube
JP5685208B2 (ja) 薄板用熱間圧延機の制御装置および薄板用熱間圧延機の制御方法
EP3006126A1 (fr) Dispositif de commande de laminoir en tandem et procédé de commande
EP3031541B1 (fr) Système de commande de laminoir tandem et procédé de commande d'un laminoir tandem
JP6620777B2 (ja) 圧延機のレベリング設定方法および圧延機のレベリング設定装置
JP2008272783A (ja) スキンパス圧延の形状制御方法
CN108655188A (zh) 一种板形测量误差补偿方法
EP2193855B1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle de roulement, appareil de contrôle de roulement et programme pour laminoir continu et tube ou conduit sans soudure
JP4089658B2 (ja) 鋼板の製造方法
WO2022214527A1 (fr) Appareil pour la surveillance continue d'un matériau métallique dans un procédé de laminage et procédé associé pour la surveillance continue d'un matériau métallique dans un procédé de laminage
JP5967033B2 (ja) 蛇行制御装置および蛇行制御方法
EP3957410A1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle de la sinuosité d'un matériau à laminer
JP2007330996A (ja) 金属帯の形状矯正方法及び装置
EP1322433B1 (fr) Procede de reglage de la longueur des lamelles dans un processus de laminage a chaud
JP2959426B2 (ja) 伸び率演算方法
JP5565214B2 (ja) 圧延機の板厚制御方法
JP4288757B2 (ja) 継目無鋼管の製造方法
JPH07246414A (ja) ストレッチレデューサーの管端部肉厚制御方法
JP6057774B2 (ja) 圧延機におけるミル伸び式の同定方法
JPS6036348B2 (ja) 電縫鋼管のフインパスロ−ルにおけるロ−ル間隙初期設定方法およびロ−ル間隙設定修正方法
JP2950182B2 (ja) テーパー鋼板の製造方法
JPH0471606B2 (fr)
JP2004017066A (ja) 管圧延機の肉厚制御方法
JPH0328962B2 (fr)
CN117881492A (zh) 串列式轧制机的板厚一览表计算方法以及轧制成套设备

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20060419

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): DE FR IT

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): DE FR IT

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20080123

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20080620

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR IT

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 602005024782

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20101230

Kind code of ref document: P

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20110818

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602005024782

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20110818

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION, JP

Effective date: 20131108

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005024782

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: RECHTS- UND PATENTANWAELTE LORENZ SEIDLER GOSS, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005024782

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: RECHTS- UND PATENTANWAELTE LORENZ SEIDLER GOSS, DE

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005024782

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: LORENZ SEIDLER GOSSEL RECHTSANWAELTE PATENTANW, DE

Effective date: 20140402

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602005024782

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION, JP

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: SUMITOMO METAL INDUSTRIES, LTD., OSAKA, JP

Effective date: 20140402

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 602005024782

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: LORENZ SEIDLER GOSSEL RECHTSANWAELTE PATENTANW, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602005024782

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL CORP., JP

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: NIPPON STEEL & SUMITOMO METAL CORPORATION, TOKYO, JP

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20200317

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20200221

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20200214

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602005024782

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210331

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20211001

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210330