EP1700810B1 - Dispositif et méthode de test - Google Patents
Dispositif et méthode de test Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1700810B1 EP1700810B1 EP06003864A EP06003864A EP1700810B1 EP 1700810 B1 EP1700810 B1 EP 1700810B1 EP 06003864 A EP06003864 A EP 06003864A EP 06003864 A EP06003864 A EP 06003864A EP 1700810 B1 EP1700810 B1 EP 1700810B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sensor
- connection
- testing device
- tensile
- compressive force
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 18
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 79
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 29
- 230000005540 biological transmission Effects 0.000 description 16
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 15
- 238000004804 winding Methods 0.000 description 10
- 150000001875 compounds Chemical class 0.000 description 8
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 3
- 239000004918 carbon fiber reinforced polymer Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000004973 liquid crystal related substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003380 propellant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004753 textile Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000881 depressing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000014759 maintenance of location Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011076 safety test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004904 shortening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
- B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
- B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
- B66B5/0006—Monitoring devices or performance analysers
- B66B5/0037—Performance analysers
Definitions
- the invention relates to a test device of a conveyor system, in particular an elevator system, and an associated method.
- a test device is eg off WO-A-2004103880 known.
- Object of the present invention is to simplify a safety inspection, in particular a traction on a conveyor system, such as an elevator system.
- a test device of a conveyor system, in particular an elevator installation, comprises at least one fixing point at least in an environment of the conveyor system, at least one attachment to a support means of the conveyor system, a connection between the fixing point and the attachment to the support means, at least one sensor for measuring one on the connection acting tensile or compressive force and at least one separate clamping element for tensioning the connection with a tensile or compressive force with at least one force component parallel to the support means.
- a connection between the attachment point and the attachment to the support means with a tensile or compressive force strained and determined with at least one sensor acting on the connection tensile or compressive force.
- a large test load is applied and measured on a support element of a conveyor system, in particular on a support element of a traction drive, in a compact and time-efficient design.
- a test can preferably be carried out by a single person with the help of the easily, for example in a suitcase, portable tester with relatively small overall dimensions.
- the tester is repeatably temporarily attached to the conveyor system to be tested.
- a conveyor system is, for example, a passenger or freight elevator installed in particular in a building.
- a conveyor system is generally systems which move a system part, for example a transport basket, by means of one or more drive elements in the horizontal, vertical or any direction.
- a drive element can simultaneously be a carrier.
- carrier is used.
- carrying means can be replaced or supplemented by the term propellant, if an embodiment of the conveyor system allows this.
- a point in a floor or a ceiling or a building wall or a fixed point on the conveyor system is selected for a fastening fix point.
- An attachment to a part of a building is achieved, for example, by means of a screw connection e.g. secured in a dowel or by means of a wall anchor.
- a fastening fix point is attached, for example, to a machine frame or to a traverse.
- a fastening fixing point is designed as an eyelet or as a hook.
- One of the compound associated end is preferably designed so that an attachment is repeatedly reversible solvable.
- a hook for example as a snap hook
- an eyelet in particular as a U-shaped arranged double eyelet arrangement.
- An attachment of an eyelet of the attachment point to an eyelet at one end of the connection is preferably carried out by means of a particular screw-bolt.
- a particularly reversibly releasable attachment to a support means for example by means of a clamp or by means of a clamp.
- a frictional attachment this is clamped, for example, with a preferably transverse to the carrier means arranged screwing.
- a carrying means is for example a rope, a chain, a belt or a belt.
- a cross-connection for example, a cross tube, is preferably attached to the clamp on the support means.
- this is a reversibly releasable screw, hook, ⁇ senthetic or other mechanical attachment.
- adapters are provided for various attachments on the carrier and / or various attachment points.
- a test device can be used in particular for different conveyor systems.
- connection which comprises at least one tensioning element for tensioning the connection with a tensile or compressive force with at least one force component parallel to the support means.
- a sensor arranged, for example, in the connection, a test force applied at a voltage of the connection can be measured.
- the connection comprises at least one tensile-loadable element, in particular at least one cable, a band, a chain or at least one rod.
- a rope is, for example, a wire or textile rope.
- the rope is designed so that it can be wound up with small radii of curvature. With a rope can be transmitted in particular large tensile forces with a relatively small cost of materials.
- a rope is used as tensile loadable element, for example, a textile tape or a chain.
- these elements are alswickelbar.
- a rod inserted in a connection is preferably made of metal or plastic.
- plastic for example, a composite plastic, in particular a carbon fiber reinforced plastic is used.
- the rod is designed as a pipe construction.
- connection comprises at least one element which can be subjected to compressive force, in particular at least one rod.
- a connection capable of compressive force is a carrier construction, in particular a tube or, as a special case, a rod.
- a metal is preferably used.
- a particular carbon fiber reinforced plastic is used.
- the support means can by an appropriate choice of an above or below the attachment to the support means Befest Trentsfixacts both with a force applied in the connection tensile force and with a force applied in the connection pressure in the support means both an upward and a downward traction be initiated.
- this consideration is analogously applicable.
- a downwardly acting tensile force is introduced into the support means.
- a downwardly acting tensile force is introduced into the support means.
- the clamping element has a power transmission.
- large test loads are thus generated on a carrier with little effort.
- test loads greater than 500 N can be generated.
- the clamping element comprises at least one lever, in particular a toggle lever.
- it is a one-sided lever with in particular different length lever arms.
- a two-sided lever is also preferably used with different length lever arms.
- a lever is in particular arranged so that it can cause a shortening or lengthening of the connection.
- the force arms can be arranged in particular at different angles to each other, preferably to meet different requirements for example, spatial conditions.
- the power arms are arranged in an elbow assembly at an angle of the order of 90 °.
- a space-saving arrangement of the lever is made possible.
- the tensioning element comprises at least one winch.
- a length adjustment of the connection over a large area is made possible by a winch.
- a winch in particular allows easy transport of a connection.
- a winch attached perpendicular to the axis of rotation a lever with which a torque can be effected on the axis.
- a winch by utilizing different torque arms for winding the connection and to initiate a torque on a power transmission.
- a winch with a backstop for example, realized by pawls.
- the tensioning element comprises at least one spindle.
- a spindle By using a spindle, a relatively large force transmission is generated with a relatively small force arm in particular by an appropriate choice of a thread pitch.
- a compact construction of a pretensioning device of a connection is realized with a spindle.
- a tensile force is achieved in the connection with a spindle.
- the tensioning element comprises at least one hydraulic system.
- a hydraulic is used in conjunction with a loadable on compressive force connection.
- a rod of the connection with a hydraulic cylinder of a hydraulic system is used.
- the compound is preferably subjected to a compressive stress.
- a hydraulic system can also be used to generate a tensile force in the connection.
- piston surfaces of the master cylinder and slave cylinder can achieve a corresponding gear ratio.
- the clamping element with at least one motor is driven.
- a winch for example, an axis of the winch is driven.
- a lever for example, an axis of a motor is connected to a pivot point of the lever and causes a torque.
- a lever arm for example by means of a pull rod moves.
- a spindle for example, a threaded rod of the spindle is driven by a motor.
- a pressure in a master cylinder is set by means of a pump.
- an electric motor is preferably used, which, in particular at low speeds, can generate a high torque.
- the sensor is preferably a mechanical sensor, in particular a tear wire, and / or an electronic sensor.
- a mechanical sensor is provided by means of a spring element, e.g. realized a spring balance.
- a mechanical sensor is also designed as a mechanical force balance.
- a mechanical sensor for example, as a tear wire is realized, which ruptures at a defined test force and thus limits the test load.
- a strain gauge is used, which is mounted for example on a part of the compound.
- a piezoresistive element is used, which is mounted in accordance or in the connection.
- the test device comprises at least one sensor sensor for exchangeable reception of at least one sensor.
- standardized sensors are used in a sensor sensor, which in particular have defined lengths.
- a mechanical connection between sensors and sensor sensor is provided.
- the connection is a plug connection or, for example, a screw connection.
- the connection is designed so that it is detachable.
- different types of sensors can be used, in particular mechanical sensors as well as electronic sensors. Depending on the measuring range, differently dimensioned sensors are preferably used.
- At least one sensor is arranged in the connection.
- a tensile force introduced into the carrying means can be measured equivalently directly in the connection.
- a correction factor is preferably taken into account.
- a particularly expedient construction of the connection can be achieved in that at least one sensor is arranged in the clamping element.
- a sensor for measuring a torque is attached to a winch.
- a sensor for example, in particular in the form of a strain gauge on an arm levered.
- a hydraulic for example, a pressure in a master cylinder is measured.
- a spindle for example, a torque exerted on the spindle axis is measured.
- a measurement of a force acting on the carrier tensile force directly on the support means for example, by means of a two attachment points on the support means connected compound and a sensor attached thereto.
- the attachment points are in particular so attached to the support means that they lie in a portion of the support means, which is loaded by the applied by means of the tester fürkraft.
- the attachment points are seen from the attachment to the support means in one of the direction of the introduced force opposite side of the support means.
- the sensor is, for example, a strain gauge.
- a rod is used for the compound, which is due to a change in length of the support means as a result of a load also, preferably elastic, lengthened.
- a strain gauge is attached directly to the support means. Such a measurement is combined in particular with a measurement by means of a further sensor.
- the test apparatus comprises at least one evaluation device.
- this is a microcomputer.
- an evaluation device in addition to measured variables other input variables such as safety requirements are taken into account.
- a signal of a distance sensor for detecting an overcoming of a frictional connection of the loaded carrying means to a traction drive is used as a further input variable.
- data, in particular measurement data are at least storable in a memory.
- the testing device comprises at least one data transmission device for in particular wire, radio and / or infrared-bound data transmission.
- a data transmission is also used for communication with an external data processing system.
- a wired data transmission preferably known serial or parallel data transmission methods are used.
- a USB interface or a parallel or a serial interface can be used as the interface.
- a radio-bound data transmission is realized, for example, with at least one transmitting and receiving device and at least one transponder.
- several transmitting and / or receiving devices are used.
- an encryption is provided which can be combined, for example, with a data transmission.
- the test apparatus comprises a particularly visual display.
- the display is for example an acoustic display.
- a warning sound is output at, for example, a wire tear.
- an optical display is preferably at least one measured value and / or a test result is displayed.
- an optical display is a display for displaying alphanumeric and / or graphic data.
- such a display is designed as a liquid crystal display.
- a test device with a conveyor system in particular an elevator installation, is provided, wherein the test apparatus is connected to the conveyor system, in particular the elevator installation, in a repeatable releasable manner.
- a force applied for tensioning the connection is smaller than a tensile or compressive force acting in the connection.
- a force applied to the lever can cause an introduction of a force ten times greater in the carrier.
- At least one safety-related specification and / or rule is preferably taken into account when determining a test result.
- a safety-related specification is, for example, the specification of a measurement sequence.
- at least one test force is prescribed in a measurement procedure.
- safety standards and / or test specifications are taken into account when determining a test result.
- a force acting on a carrier means is measured, which is necessary to overcome a frictional engagement of a loaded carrier on a traction drive, in particular a drive wheel.
- a safety standard defines the minimum force below which no loss of traction may occur. For example, it is also checked whether an overcoming of the frictional engagement occurs in a test force defined in a test specification or standard.
- a tensile or compressive force acting in the connection is determined indirectly on the basis of a force measured on the clamping element, in particular additionally as a reference.
- a measurement is made on a lever taking advantage of particular elastic properties of a lever material.
- a measurement is made with a strain gauge, for example.
- a measurement of a drive motor torque is performed.
- a tensile and / or compressive force is measured mechanically and / or electronically.
- a measurement is made by detecting a rupture of a tearing wire.
- a measurement takes place, for example, measurement with a spring element, preferably by means of a spring balance.
- a measurement is also carried out with a mechanical force balance.
- an electronic measurement takes place, for example, based on the measurement of a resistance of a strain gauge.
- a force measurement is carried out by means of a measurement of a change in resistance of a piezoresistive element.
- a method for testing a conveyor system, in particular for checking a driving capability of a conveyor system, wherein a second measuring device is used redundantly for determining a state of the driving capability by means of a sensor at the same time.
- a measurement of a force applied to the clamping element for biasing force occurs.
- a measurement is carried out, for example, on a lever.
- a measurement of a motor torque on a drive to the biasing means is checked on the basis of the redundant simultaneous measurement, in particular in this way the correct attachment of the test device is checked.
- Falsification of a gear ratio can be achieved, for example, by changing an attachment angle.
- a falsification of a test result for example, by increased frictional forces, for example, a spindle or, for example, a winch can be achieved.
- increased data security is achieved with a redundant measurement.
- Fig. 1 shows a conveyor system with a first tester.
- the conveyor system comprises a traction drive 1, in particular a traction sheave with a carrying means 2 guided over it, to which an elevator load 3 and a counterweight 4 are fastened.
- the carrying means 2 in this example is a carrying part.
- a fastening 5 is provided on the carrying means 2.
- This attachment 5 is carried out in this example by means of a clamp.
- a take-up element 7 is fixed, which is rotatably mounted about its axis.
- the winding element 7 is specifically a winch.
- the winding element 7 is equipped with a backstop 8.
- a force lever 9 is attached to selbigem.
- the power lever is designed with a ratchet mechanism.
- At Aufwickelelement 7 is attached as a connection 10 aufwickelbares on the winding element 7 tension element. This tension element is a rope.
- the tension element holds a sensor sensor 11 with integrated sensor attached to the tension element.
- a fixed point device for fixing a second end of the connection 10 to a fastening fixing point 12, a fixed point device is provided, which in this example is fastened to a building element 14.
- the building element is in particular a ceiling.
- the fixed point device 13 is designed in this case as connectable to the ceiling metal plate.
- an anchor is provided as a fixed point device 13 instead of the metal plate, which is inserted and spread in a holding device provided for this purpose, for example in a ceiling opening.
- the motor 15 is arranged in this case on a motor carrier 16 such that an axis of rotation with the axis of rotation of the Winding element 7 is connectable. With the motor, the torque M is effected on the axis of the Auswickeliatas 7.
- the engine mount 16 is attachable, in particular, to a part of the elevator installation or the associated building, not shown here.
- Fig. 2 shows a second tester.
- the illustration here and below is limited to a section that extends from a fastening 5 on the support means 2 to the fixing point 12.
- a sensor sensor 11 with a sensor is arranged in a connection between the fixing point 12 and the winding element 7.
- Fig. 3 shows a third tester.
- a sensor sensor 11 is arranged with a sensor in a connection between a winding element 7 and a fastening to the support means 5.
- This connection is a transverse connection 6 designed here in particular as a right-angled transverse tube.
- Fig. 4 shows a fourth tester.
- a sensor sensor 11 is integrated with a sensor in a take-up element 7.
- the sensor measures a torque caused by the takeup element.
- Fig. 5 shows a fifth tester. This test device is arranged below a building element 14 and acts with a pulling force upwards. A sensor sensor 11 with a sensor is arranged in a connection between a fastening fixing point 12 and a winding element 7.
- Fig. 6 shows a sixth tester.
- a second lever 17 is fixed at a pivot point 18 at a right angle executed as a cross tube cross-connection 6.
- the executed as a rod second lever 17 is divided by the pivot point 18 in two different length lever arms.
- a short end of the second lever 17 is connected to a hinge 19 with a load-bearing element 20, which is fastened with its other end to a fixing point 12.
- a sensor sensor 11 is mounted with a sensor.
- the pressure-loadable element 20 is also on Traction loadable.
- Fig. 7 shows a seventh tester.
- a spindle 21 is arranged between a fixing point 12 and a fixed to a fastening 5 on the support means 2 perpendicular cross-connection 6.
- a first 22 and a second 23 screwed onto a spindle drive screw head it is possible to change a length of the connection between the attachment 5 on the support means 2 and the fixing fixed point 12.
- the second screw head 23 is non-rotatably fixed in particular at the fixing point, wherein the spindle drive in the second screw head is also fixed non-rotatably.
- a first rotary lever 24 is located on the first screw head 22 and a second rotary lever 25 on the second screw head 23, so that the first screw head 22 is fixed against the second screw head 23 with the same Spindle drive can be rotated.
- a force transmission is achieved.
- a spindle can for example also be installed in a rope, which serves as a connection.
- Fig. 8 shows an eighth tester.
- This test device is located between a fixing point 12 and a mounted on a fastening 5 on the support means 2 cross-connection 6 a hydraulic system.
- This hydraulic system comprises a hydraulic transmitter cylinder 26, a hydraulic slave cylinder 27 and a push rod 28. Attached to the push rod is a sensor sensor 11 with a sensor.
- a sensor sensor 11 Attached to the push rod is a sensor sensor 11 with a sensor.
- a downwardly directed tensile force is introduced into the carrier 2 on the attachment 5 on the carrier 2.
- a hydraulic cylinder can also be arranged correspondingly above a building element 14. Accordingly, then an upward pulling force is introduced into the support means on extension of the slave cylinder 27 on the attachment 5 on the support means 2.
- Fig. 9 shows a ninth tester.
- a structure of this test apparatus substantially corresponds to the structure of the test apparatus, which in the Fig. 1 and 2 was shown.
- a power lever 9 is attached to or in which a second sensor 29 is mounted with integrated evaluation.
- this second sensor 29 is a strain gauge, which is mounted on the power lever 9.
- An introduced into the attachment 5 on the support means 2 tensile force is measured with a mounted in a sensor sensor 11 sensor. At the same time and independently of this, an indirect measurement of this force by means of the second sensor 29 with integrated evaluation electronics is possible.
- Fig. 10 shows a sensor sensor.
- This sensor receiver comprises a first 30 and a second holding device 31.
- the holding devices are designed as sleeves with damped eyelets.
- the holding devices are connected to a first 32 and a second 33 end of a connection.
- This connection is, in particular, an element which can be subjected to tensile and / or compressive force, in particular a rope or in particular a rod.
- the holding device is constructed so that at least one sensor can be replaceable replaced.
- Fig. 11 shows a sensor sensor with a mechanical sensor 32.
- This mechanical sensor 32 is designed here as a tear wire.
- the pull wire has the property of breaking at a well-defined force.
- the tear wire is also sized so that its ends can be inserted into the fixture. For positive retention of the tear wire is here equipped with not shown in the drawing thickened ends, so that the tear wire can be clamped with fork-shaped brackets.
- Fig. 12 shows a sensor sensor with an electronic sensor 33.
- it is a strain gauge, which is mounted on a mounted between the first 30 and second holder 31 mechanical connection.
- the connection is lengthened or shortened and thus an electrical resistance of the strain gauge is changed. This resistance change can be converted into a compressive or tensile force.
- the electronic sensor 33 comprises a power supply module.
- Fig. 13 shows an evaluation of a tester.
- a force transducer 35 On a train-pressure element 34, which is mechanically, preferably elastically, deformable, in particular under the action of a tensile or compressive force, a force transducer 35 is attached.
- a force transducer 35 is for example a strain gauge or a piezoresistive element.
- an associated power supply Connected to the load cell 35 is an evaluation module 36, which is specifically an electronic evaluation module.
- a measurement signal of the force transducer is converted into a test force with this evaluation module 36.
- a test result is derived.
- the evaluation module 36 comprises at least one memory in which at least one measured value and / or at least one safety-related specification or rule can be stored.
- a display module 37 is connected to the evaluation module 36. With this display module 37 in particular a test result can be displayed.
- the display module 37 is a liquid-crystal display, in particular for displaying alphanumeric and / or graphic data.
- a transmitting / receiving device 38 is also connected to the evaluation module 36 . With the aid of this transmitting / receiving device 38. With the aid of this transmitting / receiving device 38, a data transmission is provided. In particular, measurement and / or test results are sent. For example, such data is transmitted to an external data processing system.
- a measurement signal of a displacement sensor for detecting an overcoming of a frictional engagement with a propellant of a traction drive is received.
- a signal received by an external sensor, in particular a measurement signal is preferably transferred to the evaluation module 36, where it is preferably taken into account when determining a test result.
- data communication can take place wirelessly, wirelessly or infrared-bound.
- Fig. 14 shows a data processing system.
- this is a computer 39, which is equipped in particular with a transceiver.
- the transceiver is used for data transmission and communication with an evaluation unit.
- the data processing system is used in particular for archiving test and / or measurement results.
- a computer can also be, for example, a handheld.
Landscapes
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
- Maintenance And Management Of Digital Transmission (AREA)
- Container Filling Or Packaging Operations (AREA)
- Diaphragms For Electromechanical Transducers (AREA)
- Force Measurement Appropriate To Specific Purposes (AREA)
- Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
- Escalators And Moving Walkways (AREA)
Claims (21)
- Dispositif de contrôle d'une installation de transport, notamment d'une installation d'ascenseur, comportant au moins une fixation (5) à un élément porteur (2) de l'installation, une attache (10) entre le point fixe de fixation (12) et la fixation (5) à l'élément porteur (2), au moins un capteur pour mesurer une force de traction ou de poussée sur l'attache (10) ainsi qu'un au moins un élément de tension séparé pour appliquer à l'attache (10) une force de traction ou de poussée avec au moins une composante de force parallèle à l'élément porteur (2).
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'élément de tension présente un multiplicateur de force.
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'élément de tension comprend au moins un levier (9 ; 17) notamment un levier articulé.
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'élément de tension comprend au moins un treuil.
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'élément de tension comprend au moins une broche (21).
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'élément de tension comprend au moins un système hydraulique.
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'élément de tension comprend au moins un moteur (15).
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le capteur est un capteur mécanique (32), notamment un câble destiné à la rupture et /ou un capteur électronique (33).
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte au moins un logement de capteur (11) pour recevoir de façon interchangeable au moins un capteur.
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins un capteur est disposé dans l'attache (10).
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins un capteur est disposé dans l'élément de tension.
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte au moins un dispositif d'évaluation.
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte au moins un dispositif de transmission de données notamment pour la transmission de données par fil, par radio et/ ou par infrarouges.
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte un affichage (14) en particulier optique.
- Dispositif de contrôle selon la revendication 1 avec une installation de transport, notamment une installation d'ascenseur, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif de contrôle est lié de façon amovible reproductible à l'installation de transport.
- Procédé pour contrôler une installation de transport, notamment une installation d'ascenseur, comportant un dispositif de contrôle avec au moins un point fixe de fixation (12) et au moins une fixation (5) à un élément porteur (2) de l'installation, une attache (10) entre la fixation (5) sur l'élément porteur (2) et le point fixe de fixation (12) étant soumise à une force de tension ou de pression au moyen d'un élément de tension séparé et est définie, avec au moins un capteur, par une force de tension ou de pression appliquée à l'attache (10).
- Procédé selon la revendication 16, caractérisé en ce qu'une force de tension ou de pression est mesurée mécaniquement ou électroniquement.
- Procédé selon-la revendication 16, caractérisé en ce qu'une force appliquée pour tendre l'attache (10) est plus faible qu'une force de pression ou de traction agissant dans l'attache (10).
- Procédé selon la revendication 16, caractérisé en ce que lors de la détection d'un résultat de contrôle, au moins une prescription et/ou une règle de sécurité est observée.
- Procédé selon la revendication 16, caractérisé en ce qu'une force de pression ou de traction agissant dans l'attache (10) est définie indirectement au moyen d'une force appliquée pour tendre l'élément de tension, notamment comme référence supplémentaire.
- Procédé pour contrôler une installation de transport, selon la revendication 16, notamment pour vérifier l'efficacité d'une installation de transport, caractérisé en ce qu'un second système de mesure est mis en oeuvre en même temps en redondance à la détermination d'un état de l'efficacité au moyen du capteur.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL06003864T PL1700810T3 (pl) | 2005-03-07 | 2006-02-25 | Urządzenie kontrolne i odpowiedni do niego sposób |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102005010346A DE102005010346A1 (de) | 2005-03-07 | 2005-03-07 | Prüfvorrichtung und zugehöriges Verfahren |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1700810A1 EP1700810A1 (fr) | 2006-09-13 |
EP1700810B1 true EP1700810B1 (fr) | 2009-04-22 |
Family
ID=36378095
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP06003864A Active EP1700810B1 (fr) | 2005-03-07 | 2006-02-25 | Dispositif et méthode de test |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1700810B1 (fr) |
AT (1) | ATE429399T1 (fr) |
DE (2) | DE102005010346A1 (fr) |
ES (1) | ES2325629T3 (fr) |
PL (1) | PL1700810T3 (fr) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107000990A (zh) * | 2014-12-18 | 2017-08-01 | 因温特奥股份公司 | 升降机设备中的电能生成 |
Families Citing this family (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE102006011092A1 (de) * | 2006-03-08 | 2007-09-13 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Prüfhebel mit Auflager |
DE102007015648A1 (de) * | 2006-12-11 | 2008-06-12 | TÜV Nord Systems GmbH & Co. KG | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Prüfen von Aufzugsanlagen |
DE102007009602A1 (de) * | 2007-02-26 | 2008-08-28 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Treibfähigkeitsmessung an Treibscheibenaufzugsanlagen |
DE102009038497A1 (de) | 2009-08-21 | 2011-02-24 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Treibfähigkeitsmessung |
DE102009038498A1 (de) | 2009-08-21 | 2011-02-24 | TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Messung von Zustandsgrößen einer Aufzugsanlage |
DE102014213404A1 (de) | 2014-07-10 | 2016-01-14 | Thyssenkrupp Ag | Aufzugsanlage mit Bremseinrichtung am Fahrkorb und Verfahren zum Betrieb der Selbigen |
DE102018218161A1 (de) * | 2018-10-24 | 2020-04-30 | Contitech Antriebssysteme Gmbh | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Messung der Vorspannungskraft eines Antriebsriemens |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3911391C5 (de) * | 1989-04-07 | 2010-04-29 | TÜV SÜD Industrie Service GmbH | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Überprüfen der Treibfähigkeit |
DE4211289C2 (de) * | 1992-04-03 | 1994-01-05 | Tech Ueberwachungs Verein Hann | Verfahren zum Messen der Treibfähigkeit eines Antriebs einer Förderanlage |
DE4311011C2 (de) * | 1992-07-24 | 1994-07-14 | Arno John | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung eines Aufzugs mit Treibscheibenantrieb |
DE10042724A1 (de) * | 2000-08-31 | 2002-03-14 | Tech Ueberwachungs Ver Hannove | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Messung der Bremskraft |
DE10323175A1 (de) * | 2003-05-22 | 2004-12-23 | TÜV Industrie Service GmbH - TÜV Rheinland Group | Prüfhebel |
-
2005
- 2005-03-07 DE DE102005010346A patent/DE102005010346A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2006
- 2006-02-25 DE DE502006003508T patent/DE502006003508D1/de active Active
- 2006-02-25 PL PL06003864T patent/PL1700810T3/pl unknown
- 2006-02-25 ES ES06003864T patent/ES2325629T3/es active Active
- 2006-02-25 AT AT06003864T patent/ATE429399T1/de active
- 2006-02-25 EP EP06003864A patent/EP1700810B1/fr active Active
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN107000990A (zh) * | 2014-12-18 | 2017-08-01 | 因温特奥股份公司 | 升降机设备中的电能生成 |
CN107000990B (zh) * | 2014-12-18 | 2019-12-06 | 因温特奥股份公司 | 升降机设备中的电能生成 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ATE429399T1 (de) | 2009-05-15 |
DE102005010346A1 (de) | 2006-09-14 |
PL1700810T3 (pl) | 2009-09-30 |
DE502006003508D1 (de) | 2009-06-04 |
ES2325629T3 (es) | 2009-09-10 |
EP1700810A1 (fr) | 2006-09-13 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1700810B1 (fr) | Dispositif et méthode de test | |
DE4243878C2 (de) | Überwachungsvorrichtung für Bauelemente | |
EP2102087B1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif de vérification d'appareils d'élévation | |
DE2541928A1 (de) | Vorrichtung sowie verfahren zum anziehen eines befestigungselementes mit einem steifigkeits-messgeraet | |
WO2009024452A1 (fr) | Système d'ascenseur avec dispositif de détection de l'état d'un moyen de suspension et procédé de détection de l'état d'un moyen de suspension | |
EP3038967A1 (fr) | Dispositif de détermination du moment de dépose d'un câble de fibres ultra-résistant lorsqu'il est utilisé dans des engins de levage | |
EP1755998A1 (fr) | Procede de mesure a force reduite pour entrainements de traction, en particulier entrainements a poulie motrice d'ascenseurs | |
EP1628900B1 (fr) | Levier de controle | |
EP3038968A1 (fr) | Dispositif de détermination du moment de dépose d'un câble de fibres ultra-résistant lorsqu'il est utilisé dans des engins de levage | |
EP2192395B1 (fr) | Procédé destiné à vérifier la résistance à la traction d'une ancre se trouvant dans un mur ou un plafond | |
EP1832541B1 (fr) | Levier de vérification avec appui | |
WO2019201626A1 (fr) | Système de surveillance du fonctionnement d'une chaîne porte-câbles | |
DE102006050570B4 (de) | Prüfhebelsystem | |
DE102015200274B4 (de) | Verankerungsvorrichtung für Zugglieder und Verfahren zur Einstellung und gegebenenfalls Steuerung einer derartigen Verankerungsvorrichtung | |
DE202006015829U1 (de) | Zugkraftmessgerät | |
DE2846668A1 (de) | Dehnungsmesseinrichtung fuer schraubenspannvorrichtungen, insbesondere bei reaktordruckbehaeltern | |
DE102004020440B3 (de) | Prüfeinrichtung zur Qualitätsprüfung eines Seilzuges und geeignetes Prüfverfahren | |
DE102009038498A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Messung von Zustandsgrößen einer Aufzugsanlage | |
EP3838825B1 (fr) | Capteur d'expansion pour une bande de mesure de position d'un ascenseur | |
DE102012002511B3 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Belastungsprüfung von Befestigungselementen | |
EP3745110A1 (fr) | Dispositif et méthode pour tester et/ou calibrer un banc d'essai | |
DE202019102816U1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Prüfen und/oder Kalibrieren eines Prüfstands | |
DE102009038497A1 (de) | Treibfähigkeitsmessung | |
DE102014018781B3 (de) | Kraftmesseinrichtung | |
EP3421964A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif d'évaluation de la qualité de liaison des dispositifs d'ancrage |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060225 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL BA HR MK YU |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20061114 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502006003508 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20090604 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: RO Ref legal event code: EPE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GR Ref legal event code: EP Ref document number: 20090401790 Country of ref document: GR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2325629 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090822 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090822 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090722 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HU Ref legal event code: AG4A Ref document number: E006302 Country of ref document: HU |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20100125 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20100219 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: HU Payment date: 20100224 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: RO Payment date: 20100222 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20100226 Year of fee payment: 5 Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20100212 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: TUV RHEINLAND INDUSTRIE SERVICE G.M.B.H. Effective date: 20100228 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20100218 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20100225 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100301 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100228 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100228 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20101029 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100831 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Payment date: 20100218 Year of fee payment: 5 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100301 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100228 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100225 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20110901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110226 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110902 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110225 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110901 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20120411 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110226 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110225 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: LAPE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20100225 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090422 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 429399 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20110225 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20110225 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502006003508 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNERSCHAFT VO, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 502006003508 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: DOMPATENT VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNE, DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20240215 Year of fee payment: 19 |