EP1628900B1 - Levier de controle - Google Patents

Levier de controle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1628900B1
EP1628900B1 EP04739204A EP04739204A EP1628900B1 EP 1628900 B1 EP1628900 B1 EP 1628900B1 EP 04739204 A EP04739204 A EP 04739204A EP 04739204 A EP04739204 A EP 04739204A EP 1628900 B1 EP1628900 B1 EP 1628900B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
test lever
test
lever
cable
lift
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP04739204A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1628900A1 (fr
Inventor
Hans Ryser
Martin Fiedler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
TUEV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH
Original Assignee
TUEV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by TUEV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH filed Critical TUEV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH
Publication of EP1628900A1 publication Critical patent/EP1628900A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1628900B1 publication Critical patent/EP1628900B1/fr
Priority to CY20071101325T priority Critical patent/CY1106932T1/el
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B5/00—Applications of checking, fault-correcting, or safety devices in elevators
    • B66B5/0087—Devices facilitating maintenance, repair or inspection tasks
    • B66B5/0093—Testing of safety devices

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a portable test lever with a load and a power arm and an associated method to determine a state of a lift, for example, as part of a security check can.
  • a checking device is known, by means of which an operating state of the elevator can be checked.
  • a force is exerted on the test device via the rope. Based on the measured values recorded by the force acting by means of the cable, it is possible to draw conclusions about the operating state of the elevator.
  • the object of the present invention is to simplify a device as well as a measuring method for checking an operating state of the elevator.
  • the present invention comprises a portable test lever with a load and a power arm for checking a carrying capacity, in particular a zip-line and / or an acceleration capacity of a lift.
  • the test lever has an integrated measuring receptacle.
  • Spaced to the power arm is a receptacle, in particular a cable receptacle and / or a fastening device, in particular a cable fastening device, arranged on the test lever.
  • the test lever on a support, preferably, for example, as a fixed point arrangement, which is preferably arranged between the cable holder and the measuring receptacle on the test lever.
  • the support for the fastening device, in particular for the cable fastening device is arranged in particular between the fixed point and the material deformation sensor.
  • the portable test lever allows it to be easily transported and used by a single person from lift to lift. In particular, the use of the portable test lever allows the waiver of several people in a security review.
  • the portable test lever makes use in particular of the principle that a test force is introduced into the cable via the test lever. This makes it possible that the test lever is compact executable and finds a variety of cable lifts as tester application.
  • the test lever on a distance between the cable holder and the fixed point arrangement, which is set defined for the parameter measurement, preferably adjustable.
  • the force is transmitted to the load arm and about in the rope via the introduction of force into the power arm and the utilization of the fixed point arrangement as a fix or pivot point .
  • On the behavior of the test lever or the rope can be due to the defined distances to achieve an evaluation of whether the existing on the cable elevator driving force is still within the tolerable range or outside of it.
  • the measuring receptacle is arranged in the power arm and / or in the load arm. Also, several Meßingn be provided, in particular at different positions.
  • test lever allows the inspection of individual ropes of the elevator.
  • that elevator rope is checked at a plurality of elevator ropes, which appears most loosely.
  • the measuring receptacle is capable of receiving the force impressed on the load arm by means of at least one suitable measuring parameter.
  • a bending of the power arm can be determined under the test load.
  • strain gauges it is possible to make a statement as to whether a cable slip already occurs at a definable test load or not yet.
  • the force measurement may additionally or alternatively be performed by means of a capacitive probe, an inductive probe, a transverse armature probe, a magnetoelastic probe, a piezoelectric probe, a photoelectric probe, a resistance probe and / or a Hall probe.
  • strain gauges especially semiconductor strain gauges
  • the Meßing on a noise suppression can be, for example, temperature, electromagnetic interference fields or else.
  • the cable receptacle on the test lever is preferably arranged at one end of the load arm.
  • the load arm may have a fork in which the elevator rope is arranged centrally.
  • the elevator cable is preferably clamped in the cable receiver, in particular a cable fastening device. As a result, a power transmission from the test lever on the rope is possible.
  • the clamping can be done for example by means of a screw. By tightening one or more screws, the elevator rope can be pressed into a guide arranged between support surfaces.
  • the fixed point arrangement, for example the cable fastening device, of the portable test lever is arranged in particular between the load and the power arm.
  • the fixed point arrangement, in particular the cable fastening device ensures that, when the test load is effective, the test lever can transmit its force to the cable.
  • the test lever in conjunction with the fixed point arrangement on the possibility, for example, to form a fixed point on a fixed part of the building or a fixed elevator part, by means of which the test lever can develop its leverage.
  • the test lever has at least one acceleration sensor.
  • the acceleration sensor is able to determine, for example, a vertical and / or horizontal acceleration of the elevator. On the one hand a conclusion on the suitability of the elevator as well as its braking behavior is possible.
  • the test lever on one or more acceleration sensors in conjunction with the same Meßing as for one or more Kraftmeßaufêt, in particular Meßdehnungsstsammlung.
  • the MeßdehnungsstMail can be arranged in a cavity of the test lever and in conjunction with a circuit board, on which the acceleration sensor is located.
  • test lever has an evaluation unit integrated in conjunction with a signaling device.
  • a specifiable parameter profile can preferably be input into the evaluation unit, in particular can be stored.
  • the one or more measurement parameters recorded on the test lever can be compared with the predefinable parameters. For example, it can be checked whether the measurement parameters are within or outside a predefinable range.
  • the evaluation unit By connecting the evaluation unit with the signaling device, it is possible that the test lever directly an indicator is triggered, which reflects a state of the elevator. For example, you may see the recorded measuring parameters are located inside or outside a safety area. A lengthy evaluation of the recorded measurement parameters is thereby eliminated. This allows a direct check and determination of the operating state of the cable lift by means of the portable test lever.
  • the test result is displayed immediately after application of the test load.
  • test lever has a signal transmission device which enables a wireless signal transmission to a locally separated computer.
  • the test lever may have a memory unit.
  • the recorded as well as stored measurement parameters can be passed to the locally separated computer.
  • This computer may for example be a laptop that has an evaluation program. This allows an inspector of the elevator to be able to move the portable test lever also separated from the examiner with the elevator and still continue to be able to directly record and evaluate measurement parameters. This is especially aimed at an acceleration check.
  • the locally separated computer may further be a computer controlling a building device.
  • the signal transmission device also enables a remote safety check of the cable lift.
  • the recorded and transmitted signals can be used to infer whether a safety inspection of the cable lift has become necessary. In this way, in particular a regular check can be made possible without the need for a permanent on-site inspector.
  • the test lever on an integrated, replaceable power supply.
  • the power supply can, for example, by means of one or more batteries or accumulators and / or external power supply can be ensured.
  • the test lever is designed to be hollow at least in a partial area.
  • one or more batteries or accumulators can be used in this hollow region.
  • the signal transmission device can be arranged at least partially in this hollow region.
  • the measuring receptacle can be located in the hollow area.
  • the measuring lever may have a connection for an external power supply.
  • test lever to be stationary on the elevator.
  • test lever mitaustex a movement of the elevator due to its arrangement, for example on the elevator rope or on a part of the elevator car. This allows, for example, a positive and negative acceleration measurement.
  • the test lever is fixed to form a pivot point with its fixed point arrangement on a part of the building and / or the elevator. Then the test load can be impressed on the test lever in the rope. If the elevator rope slips through, it can be detected and measured. For example, the slippage is directly detectable, for example, optically, electrically or otherwise. Also, the test lever can detect a movement of the elevator rope.
  • the test lever in the context of safety examination on the possibility that the one or more measurement parameters evaluated in the test lever itself and the result is displayed by triggering a signal on the test lever.
  • a qualitative indication of the one or more measuring parameters takes place.
  • the test lever can have at least a first as well as a second display area.
  • the first display area for example, lights up red when the evaluation shows that the state of the elevator is outside a safety area.
  • the second area lights up green, for example, if the evaluation results in an elevator state in the safety area.
  • the test lever has one or more display means, in particular LEDs, which indicate a signal generated on the basis of the evaluation.
  • display means in particular LEDs, which indicate a signal generated on the basis of the evaluation.
  • a further embodiment provides that a quantitative display is possible, for example by means of a digital display.
  • test lever has an acoustic display. If, for example, an insufficient test force is applied, a warning signal is triggered. Also, in an evaluation of the or the measurement parameters, the result can be communicated acoustically, for example by different acoustic signals that are generated.
  • an arrangement of the test lever is provided on an elevator rope, in which a fixed point of the test lever is formed by a connection to a building and / or elevator part.
  • the test lever additionally comprise one or more structural components leading to a fixed point arrangement.
  • the fixed point arrangement forms, for example, the fishing or pivot point for the test lever.
  • an arrangement of a test lever on a movably arranged elevator area preferably takes place in an approximately horizontal orientation.
  • the test lever is fastened by means of the load arm.
  • one or more sensors are preferably arranged, in particular an acceleration sensor. Due to the horizontal orientation of the test lever can serve as a solid Krakarm example.
  • the measuring sensor is excited during acceleration of the test lever due to a movement of the elevator to trigger a measuring signal characterizing the acceleration. Due to the spacing of the sensors from the fixed point of the Krakarms a more sensitive acceleration measurement takes place in comparison to a directly on the moving elevator part arranged measuring sensor.
  • a test lever is arranged on a movably arranged elevator area in an approximately vertical orientation.
  • This is particularly advantageous where there is a very tight elevator shaft.
  • the test lever is also quasi-stationary connected to the elevator. In this way, it is possible to allow continued checking of the elevator for its acceleration behavior. If the rope behavior of a lift rope to be checked, then not a new test lever must be brought along. Rather, the on-site Test levers are implemented, as described above, for example, used for propulsion capability verification and the slippage of the elevator ropes or be checked.
  • a cable fastening device is preferably used for a test lever, which is equipped with a centrally arranged guide for the elevator rope for generating a direct power transmission, preferably without torque generation.
  • a centrally arranged guide can be achieved, for example, by surfaces which are arranged at an angle to one another and converge toward one another, against which the cable is pressed.
  • the cable fastening device is transportable.
  • the test lever is preferably constructed at least for the most part of a metal.
  • it may also be designed from a glass fiber reinforced plastic or a similar material, which brings the appropriate strength requirements with it.
  • the test lever is made of aluminum.
  • the test lever has one or more materials.
  • the test lever is equipped with a weight that is below four kilograms. This makes it possible that the test lever can be carried in one hand, stopped on the elevator rope and secured with the other hand.
  • the test lever consists of several components, which can preferably be inserted into one another.
  • the aspect ratio of force to load can be variable.
  • the power arm may comprise a test head, which can be arranged exchangeable.
  • the measuring sensor is interchangeable arranged in the test lever.
  • the evaluation unit and / or a memory are also interchangeable.
  • the test lever is equipped such that the software located in the test lever can be adapted.
  • the test lever have an interface through which new software or upgrades can be installed.
  • the test lever may have an interface, can be transmitted via the evaluated as well as evaluated signals.
  • the test lever for a radio transmission has an integrated antenna.
  • a further embodiment provides that a cable attachment device for the test lever has an extension.
  • the extension allows engagement of the test lever with its inclusion while supporting on the cable attachment device.
  • the cable fastening device is able to form an axis of rotation in interaction with the fixed point arrangement of the test lever.
  • the test lever rests on the fastening device.
  • the test force acts an end of the extension, in which engages the test lever. In this way, the test force can be transmitted to the rope while forming a counterforce by means of the extension.
  • test lever has a replaceable probe.
  • This probe is preferably attached.
  • the test head is designed in particular as a lever head part, which includes the fixed point arrangement of the test lever with.
  • the test head is rotatable.
  • the probe may have a lockable hinge.
  • a further embodiment provides that the probe has a mandrel.
  • the mandrel is inserted, for example, in an opening, preferably bore of the traction sheave of the cable lift.
  • the test lever is dimensioned so that an effective test load of, for example, at least 200kg, preferably up to at least 800kg can be transferred into the rope.
  • the test lever has a lever ratio> 1: 5, in particular> 1: 8, preferably in a range between 1:11 to 1:20. In this way, by applying a small test force on the power arm can bring a large-acting test load by means of the load arm in the rope.
  • the 1 shows a first embodiment of a test lever 1 with a lever head part 2, which is arranged on the test lever 1 via a locking joint 3.
  • the lever head part 2 has a cable receptacle 4.
  • the cable receptacle 4 has a first and a second leg, between which the elevator cable can be inserted.
  • the elevator rope can be immovably fixed in the cable receptacle 4, in particular clamped.
  • the test lever 1, the locking joint 3 is preferably also designed as a support 5.
  • the support 5 offers the possibility that the test lever 1 can be supported against a fixed point, this particular uses as a pivot. It should be noted in particular that the support 5 preferably has no punctiform surface, but rather a longitudinally extending support surface.
  • the lever head part 2 which is arranged pivotably on the test lever 1 by means of the locking joint 3, can thereby be brought into different positions, so that the support 5 can be supported.
  • the test lever 1 is flexibly adaptable to different premises, which finds an inspector on the elevator and in particular in the elevator shaft. Dashed lines indicated the maximum pivotable circle of the lever head part 2 to the locking joint 3.
  • a further embodiment provides that the lever head part 2 can be arbitrarily pivoted and determined only in a certain angular range. This angle range can be, for example, between 10 ° to 350 °.
  • the test lever 1 has an integrated measuring receptacle 6.
  • the measuring receptacle 6, in turn, can have integrated an evaluation unit 7, which in turn is connected to a signal device 8.
  • the signal device 8 has, for example, one or more display means, in particular light-emitting diodes.
  • the construction of the test lever 1 allows it to have a first area as a load arm 9 and a second area formed as a force arm 10. Load arm 9 and power arm 10 are preferably separated as shown by the support 5. A test force is applied to the power arm 10 and transmitted via the load arm 9 in the elevator rope. In addition, it is determined whether or not there is sufficient driving ability in a lift-pulley drive.
  • the test lever 1 utilizes the elastic spring characteristics of a material of the test lever 1. These constitute a primary sensor of the driving capability as well as the deceleration measuring device.
  • the traction measurement is preferably the temporary elongation of the material of the test lever with force on the lever head part by measurement technology integrated in the lever material material deformation sensors such as force sensors such as strain gauges, detected and evaluated electronically.
  • the test load is generated in particular by a manual depression of the test lever 1 on the power arm 10, transformed via the load arm 9 to a fixed point on the elevator rope, wherein preferably the force acting there is detected by measurement technology due to the defined physical properties on the test lever 1, in particular the lever laws acting there.
  • the test lever 1 integrally has an acceleration sensor 11.
  • an effect of the inertia force, in particular of the lever head part 2 is preferably detected.
  • the test lever is designed as a Krakarm. An acting delay as well as acceleration on the test lever 1 leads to a deflection of the test lever 1, which is fixed, for example, with respect to the lever head part 2. Since at the same time the test lever 1 also has a defined mass, a statement regarding the acceleration capacity of the elevator is possible in conjunction with the inertia force.
  • the deceleration measurement can be detected by the fact that, when braking or starting the elevator, the temporary elongation of the test lever material generated in the test lever 1 is detected by means of, for example, integrated material deformation sensors such as strain gauges and evaluated as a deceleration signal.
  • a further acceleration sensor can be firmly integrated in the test lever 1, which detects a deceleration by means of two axes, which transmits the test receptacle 6 and evaluation unit 7 integrated in the test lever 1, which generates a correlation signal.
  • the results of the driving capability measurement as well as the delay measurement can be signaled optically and / or acoustically by means of the signal device 8, in particular when the limit value is exceeded or also falls below a predefinable limit value.
  • FIG. 2 shows a first possible use of the test lever 1 from FIG. 1.
  • An elevator 12 has a traction sheave 13, via which one or more elevator cables 14 are driven.
  • the test lever 1 is supported by its support 5 on a cable fastening device 17.
  • the cable fastening device 17 is used for force introduction into the elevator cable 14.
  • the cable fastening device 17 is screwed or clamped, for example, by means of a fixing element, wherein the test lever 1 can be arranged rotatably on its support 5 on the cable fastening device 17.
  • a stop element 18 is arranged on the elevator 12.
  • the stop element 18 serves to generate a fixed point for the lever head part 2 of the test lever 1.
  • the stop element 18 may be attached to the traction sheave 13, for example.
  • the traction sheave may have an opening or a stop over which the test lever 1 receives a fixed point. As shown in Fig.
  • the fixed point can be formed by means of the stop member 18 and a building part 19.
  • a fixed elevator part can serve.
  • a ceiling opening, a machine frame and / or a rail holder can be used to form a fixed point.
  • the stop element 18 can be arranged at a distance from the building part 19. This is for example by means of a rope which is attached to the building part 19 and at one end of the stop element 18, executable. If the test force F1 now acts on the test lever 1, a force F2 is transmitted to the elevator cable 14. The transmitted force F2 is generated as a function of the constructively defined lever ratio as a function of the test force F1.
  • Fig. 3 shows a possibility of forming a stop element 18 via a use of a guide roller 20 over which a fastening cable 21 leads.
  • the fastening cable 21 is fastened, for example, on a building part 19 and the deflection roller 20 on an elevator part 22.
  • FIG. 4 shows an example of an electronic evaluation unit 7, which can be integrated into a test lever.
  • the structure of the elements integrated in the test lever has, for example, a first acceleration sensor 23.1, a second acceleration sensor 23.2, a respective amplifier 24, a computer and control unit 25, an area selector switch 26, a material deformation sensor 27, to which in turn an amplifier 24 is connected, a display device 28, which can display a signal, for example visually and acoustically, an analog / digital converter 29, a signal transmission device 30 and, for example, a power supply 31 as a DC power supply. Further embodiments of the evaluation unit 7 may have one or more of these components in combination with others.
  • the . Signal transmission device 30 is preferably suitable for radio transmission and has a corresponding transmission device. A radio-transmitting signal is supplied for example via a receiver 32 to a computer 33, by means of which a further evaluation can take place.
  • a driving capability measurement by means of the test lever is carried out, for example, as follows: via the material deformation sensor 27, the measuring signal is supplied via the amplifier 24 and an analog / digital converter 29 connected thereto to the computer / control unit 25 as a digitized signal.
  • the measuring range of the material deformation sensor 27 can be adjusted via the range selector switch 26.
  • the display device 28 can be optically and / or acoustically signaled whether the recorded measured value is in or out of the preset measuring range.
  • the measurement result is displayed in the form of a limit value (correct / incorrect) directly on the test lever. This can be done optically and / or acoustically.
  • the signal transmission device 30 can be activated by means of the computer and control unit 25, in particular a digital, coded, fail-safe data packet, which in the computer and control unit 25th was generated to transfer.
  • the data packet preferably has error protection and source information in addition to the measured data. In this way, it is possible in particular to ensure that, on the one hand, there is sufficient data protection.
  • this type of coding allows an unambiguous assignment of the signals received via the compatible receiver 32, which signals can be decoded and evaluated again, for example, via the computer 33. In particular, this allows a computer 33 to record and evaluate a plurality of data packets from different locations. Preferably, this system is suitable for remote inspection of elevators.
  • the transmission of the data packet can be supplied to the computer 33 in addition to transmission via a radio link, for example via a telephone network or via a power network.
  • An acceleration measurement for example by means of the test lever is carried out, for example, as follows: the test lever is fixed, for example, to a car frame of an elevator installation so that the lever head part forms a freely movable crack arm.
  • the lever head part with its defined mass detects an occurring acceleration as mass inertia force, which leads to a temporary deformation of the test lever.
  • the temporary deformation is recorded, for example, via one or more material deformation sensors 27.
  • These can in particular have an integrated measuring bridge, in which a signal triggered in accordance with the deformation is generated.
  • the measuring range can be preset via the range selector switch 26, so that the signal supplied via the amplifier 24 to the analog / digital converter 29 is preferably fed to the computer and control unit 25 for reference value formation with another two-coordinate acceleration sensor 23.3.
  • the two-coordinate acceleration sensor 23.3 determines delay values, which are transmitted via a converter stage 34 of the computer and control unit 25 as digitized signals.
  • the in the computer and Control unit 25 incoming digitized signals are weighted there, evaluated and forwarded. For example, via the display device 28, an optical as well as acoustic display can be produced, which indicates whether the recorded measured value is within or outside the measuring range set by means of the range selector switch 26.
  • the acceleration measurement described above there is also the possibility in the acceleration measurement described above of sending preferably coded data packets by means of the signal transmission device 30, which data packets can be delivered to a receiver 32 in the form of coded and fail-safe data packets.
  • These data packets can also contain digitized measurement data with error protection and source information.
  • the data packet preferably has measured data relating to the material deformation and the two-coordinate acceleration.
  • a further embodiment provides that measurement data are sent continuously to, for example, the computer 33. This can only be done if necessary. For example, a modem transmission via a mobile telephone as well as the transmission path over a fixed network is also suitable for forwarding.
  • the computer 33 may also be provided only as an addition, wherein the electronic evaluation and display alone is sufficient on the test lever itself.
  • Fig. 5 shows a possible use of the test lever 1 in interaction with the traction sheave 13.
  • the traction sheave 13 has the stop element 18, by means of which the test lever 1 can transmit a force to the cable fastening device 17.
  • the traction sheave 13 may, for example, have one or more holes distributed along its circumference. One or more bolts can be inserted into these holes.
  • the test lever 1 is formed at one end so that the lever head part 2 can grip the bolt. If a test force is applied to the test lever 1, on the one hand acts Force on the cable attachment device 17, on the other hand, a counter force on the stop element 18 acts.
  • a further embodiment provides that a bolt has a stop bracket, in which the lever head part can engage.
  • the test lever 1 is designed so that it can be connected in the region of the locking joint 3 with the traction sheave 13. This can for example be done via a bolt connection.
  • the load arm 9 engages by means of its cable receptacle 4 in the elevator cable 14 and is supported on the cable fastening device 17 when impressing a test force on the test lever 1 from.
  • FIG. 7 shows an attachment of the test lever 1 to the elevator 12.
  • the elevator 12 has an elevator car 35 on which a car frame 36 is arranged.
  • the car frame 36 has a fixing 37, by means of which the test lever 1 can be fixed stationarily on the car frame 36 and thus on the elevator car 35.
  • the test lever 1 forms a freely movable Krakarm, wherein the lever head part 2 has a defined mass m, which is deflected in accordance with the negative and positive acceleration of the elevator car 35 measurable. In this way, an acceleration measurement by means of the test lever 1 can be performed.
  • Fig. 8 shows a further embodiment of the test lever with a test head 38 and an embodiment of the cable fastening device 17.
  • the cable fastening device 17 is constructed, for example, in two parts, wherein a first component 39 forms a counterpart 40 to the support 5 of the test lever 1.
  • the second component 41 is connected by screws 42 with the first component 39.
  • the screws 42 preferably have a thread 43, so that a locking nut, not shown, can act against the first component 39.
  • the first component 39 and the second component 41 clamp the elevator cable 14.
  • the cable fastening device 17 is preferably such that the elevator cable 14 is guided centrally as shown through the counterpart 40 and thus the support 5. In this way it is prevented that an introduction of force transmits lateral forces in the rope, which could lead to a falsification of the measurement result.
  • these fastening device 17 as well as the test lever 1 are designed such that between the counterpart 40 and the support 5 is given a mobility.
  • the support 5 and the counterpart 40 are equipped with different angles, so that a rolling of the support 5 on the counterpart 40 is made possible.
  • the support 5 or the counterpart 40 can be formed in particular at least partially round, bent as well as with a straight surface.
  • the test lever 1 and the cable fastening device 17 are adapted to each other so that they form an opening angle 43 in a central position, which is preferably between 10 ° and 25 °, in particular between 12.5 ° and 17.5 °, preferably 15 °.
  • the opening angle 43 is equal on both sides, different according to another embodiment.
  • Fig. 8 shows the test head 38, which forms the lever head part 2.
  • the test head 38 is inserted into a tube 44. There it is kept defined by means of a fuse 45.
  • the fuse 45 is formed for example as a screw.
  • the tube 44 in turn is preferably made of a metal.
  • the lever head part 2 has a stop element receptacle 46.
  • the stop element receptacle 46 is able to grasp a stop element 18, as can be seen for example from FIG. 2, FIG. 3 as well as from FIG. 5.
  • FIG. 9 shows the cable fastening device 17 in a plan view along the section IX - IX from FIG. 8.
  • the first component 39 and the second component 41 are secured together by means of two screws 42.
  • the screw connection is in particular such that a sufficient clamping force is exerted on the elevator cable 14.
  • the components 39, 41 pressing surfaces 47 may be completely or partially bent, round, or even straight surfaces.
  • the total pressing surface may have an angularity, preferably for centering the elevator cable 14 in the cable fastening device 17.
  • FIG. 10 shows the test head 38 of FIG. 8 detached from the tube.
  • the test head 38 has a cable receptacle 4 in the form of two spaced apart legs.
  • the lever head part 2 has the possibility of placing the stop element 18, which is indicated by dashed lines, in a targeted manner.
  • a fastening cable 21 may be attached to the stop element 18.
  • a portion of the traction sheave is arranged between the legs in test head 38.
  • Fig. 11 shows a schematic view of the traction sheave 13, run on the 4 elevator cables 14.
  • the traction sheave 13 have holes through which a bolt 18 can be passed as a stop means.
  • the test lever not shown, can then engage in the stop element 18.
  • a further embodiment provides, for example, a stop bracket 49, which runs, for example, over the entire width of the traction sheave 13 and is attached to the pin 18.
  • the test head 2 can be variably fixed for each carrying cable 14 of the elevator 12 by means of the stop bracket 49.
  • one or more markings 48 can be provided, by means of which slipping of an elevator rope can be detected. For example, this can also be done via automatic detection, for example via an optical test device.
  • Fig. 12 shows a further embodiment, by means of the test lever 1 in cooperation with the traction sheave 13 to check the driving ability of an elevator.
  • the test lever 1 can be rotated by 180 ° about its axis.
  • the lever head part 2 of the test lever 1 is supported on a bearing surface 50.
  • the support surface 50 is formed by means of a fixing element 51, which is preferably removably attached to the elevator cable 14.
  • a fixed point arrangement is formed in this embodiment in that on a relative to the elevator rope 14 fixed area 52, a connection 53 to form a fixed point 54 with the test lever 1 is present.
  • the area 52 as well as the connection 53 are preferably selected such that the test lever 1 extends with respect to the lever head part 2 of the traction sheave 13 away.
  • the region 52 is disposed opposite the traction sheave 13 such that the test lever does not extend between the elevator rope extending from the traction sheave 13 on both sides.
  • the corresponding test load F2 is impressed on the elevator cable 14.
  • the present invention makes it possible to carry out safety testing tasks for the safety inspection of elevator and conveyor systems or machines with, for example, traction drives for recurring tests, type examinations, conformity checks and the like, preferably by accredited or other testing organizations or other authorized bodies and persons.

Landscapes

  • Maintenance And Inspection Apparatuses For Elevators (AREA)
  • Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)
  • Force Measurement Appropriate To Specific Purposes (AREA)
  • Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
  • Push-Button Switches (AREA)
  • Arrangement Or Mounting Of Control Devices For Change-Speed Gearing (AREA)
  • Footwear And Its Accessory, Manufacturing Method And Apparatuses (AREA)
  • Control Of Throttle Valves Provided In The Intake System Or In The Exhaust System (AREA)

Claims (18)

  1. Levier de contrôle portatif (1) avec un bras de charge (9) et un levier d'entraînement (10) permettant de contrôler une capacité d'entraînement et/ou une faculté d'accélération d'un élévateur (12) avec un logement de mesure incorporé (6), un logement à distance du levier d'entraînement (10) et agencé sur le bras de charge (9), notamment au moins un logement de câble (4), et un support (5).
  2. Levier de contrôle (1) selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'une distance entre le logement, notamment le logement de câble (4), et le support (5) permettant la mesure de paramètre peut être réglée de façon précise.
  3. Levier de contrôle (1) selon la revendication 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce qu'une valeur de paramètre caractérisant le comportement de l'élévateur (12) peut être enregistrée par une force de contrôle exercée sur le levier d'entraînement (10).
  4. Levier de contrôle (1) selon la revendication 1, 2 ou 3, caractérisé en ce que le levier de contrôle (1) présente de façon intégrée au moins un détecteur de déformation de matériau (27), notamment des bandes d'allongement de mesure.
  5. Levier de contrôle (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le levier de contrôle (1) présente de façon intégrée un détecteur d'accélération (23.1).
  6. Levier de contrôle (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le levier de contrôle (1) présente de façon intégrée une unité d'évaluation (7) en liaison avec une installation de signalisation (8).
  7. Levier de contrôle (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le levier de contrôle (1) présente un dispositif de transmission de signaux (30) qui permet une transmission de signaux sans fil vers un ordinateur (33) distant.
  8. Levier de contrôle (1) selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le levier de contrôle (1) présente une alimentation en énergie intégrée et remplaçable (31).
  9. Procédé de mesure d'une capacité d'entraînement d'un câble élévateur (14) et/ou d'une faculté d'accélération d'un élévateur (12) comportant les étapes suivantes consistant à :
    - fixer un levier de contrôle (1) portable qui présente un levier de charge et un levier d'entraînement ainsi qu'un logement de mesure incorporé, avec un logement à distance du levier d'entraînement
    - produire un point fixe pour le levier de contrôle (1),
    - exercer une force de contrôle sur une partie du levier de contrôle (1) qui est transmise sur le câble élévateur (14) au moyen du levier de contrôle (1), et
    - enregistrer un paramètre de mesure caractérisant un état de l'élévateur (12).
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 9, caractérisé en ce que le paramètre de mesure est évalué dans le levier de contrôle (1) et le résultat est indiqué par un déclenchement d'un signal au moyen du levier de contrôle (1).
  11. Procédé selon la revendication 9 ou 10, caractérisé en ce qu'une indication qualitative a lieu.
  12. Procédé selon la revendication 9, 10 ou 11, caractérisé en ce qu'un signal est transmis à une installation informatique distante.
  13. Dispositif d'un levier de contrôle (1) selon la revendication 1 avec une extrémité sur une partie d'élévateur (22), notamment sur un câble d'élévateur (14), un point fixe du levier de contrôle (1) étant formé par une liaison à une partie de bâtiment et/ou une partie d'élévateur (19 ; 22).
  14. Dispositif d'un levier de contrôle (1) selon la revendication 1 sur une zone d'élévateur agencée de façon mobile.
  15. Dispositif du levier de contrôle (1) selon la revendication 14 sur une zone d'élévateur agencée de façon mobile dans un alignement approximativement vertical ou dans un alignement approximativement horizontal.
  16. Dispositif de fixation de câble (17) pour un levier de contrôle (1) selon la revendication 1 avec une glissière centrée pour un câble d'élévateur (14) permettant de former une partie opposée (40) pour le support (5) du levier de contrôle (1).
  17. Dispositif de fixation de câble (17) selon la revendication 16, caractérisé en ce qu'il présente un moyen d'engrènement pour le levier de contrôle (1).
  18. Dispositif de fixation de câble (17) selon la revendication 17, caractérisé en ce que le moyen d'engrènement forme un point de butée pour le levier de contrôle (1).
EP04739204A 2003-05-22 2004-05-14 Levier de controle Expired - Lifetime EP1628900B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CY20071101325T CY1106932T1 (el) 2003-05-22 2007-10-15 Ενας δοκιμαστικος μοχλος

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE10323175A DE10323175A1 (de) 2003-05-22 2003-05-22 Prüfhebel
PCT/EP2004/005180 WO2004103880A1 (fr) 2003-05-22 2004-05-14 Levier de controle

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1628900A1 EP1628900A1 (fr) 2006-03-01
EP1628900B1 true EP1628900B1 (fr) 2007-07-18

Family

ID=33461839

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04739204A Expired - Lifetime EP1628900B1 (fr) 2003-05-22 2004-05-14 Levier de controle

Country Status (11)

Country Link
US (1) US7677111B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1628900B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN100564218C (fr)
AT (1) ATE367352T1 (fr)
BR (1) BRPI0410567A (fr)
CA (1) CA2546175C (fr)
CY (1) CY1106932T1 (fr)
DE (2) DE10323175A1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2290722T3 (fr)
RU (1) RU2318718C2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2004103880A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102023109691A1 (de) 2023-04-18 2024-05-29 TÜV Nord Systems GmbH & Co. KG Überprüfung von Aufzugsanlagen auf der Grundlage von mehreren Messgrößen

Families Citing this family (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102004029133A1 (de) * 2004-06-17 2006-01-05 TÜV Industrie Service GmbH - TÜV Rheinland Group Kraftreduziertes Messverfahren für Traktionsantriebe, insbesondere Treibscheibenantriebe von Aufzügen
DE102005010346A1 (de) * 2005-03-07 2006-09-14 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Prüfvorrichtung und zugehöriges Verfahren
DE102006011092A1 (de) * 2006-03-08 2007-09-13 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Prüfhebel mit Auflager
DE102006011093A1 (de) * 2006-03-08 2007-09-13 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Seilschlupf-Detektor
DE102006011395B4 (de) * 2006-03-09 2014-12-31 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Messvorrichtung für eine Treibfähigkeitsmessung
DE102006050570B4 (de) * 2006-10-26 2016-08-18 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Prüfhebelsystem
DE102007009602A1 (de) 2007-02-26 2008-08-28 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Treibfähigkeitsmessung an Treibscheibenaufzugsanlagen
DE102008022416A1 (de) 2008-05-06 2009-11-12 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Beschleunigungsmessung an einer Aufzugseinrichtung
DE102009038498A1 (de) 2009-08-21 2011-02-24 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Messung von Zustandsgrößen einer Aufzugsanlage
DE102009038497A1 (de) 2009-08-21 2011-02-24 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Treibfähigkeitsmessung
DE102009042033A1 (de) 2009-09-17 2011-03-24 TÜV Rheinland Industrie Service GmbH Aufzugsprüfsystem und Aufzugsprüfsystem-Aktualisierungsverfahren für ein Aufzugsprüfsystem
EP2665483B1 (fr) 2011-01-19 2020-08-26 Laboratory Skin Care, Inc. Compositions topiques de minocycline et leurs utilisation
CN104271166B (zh) * 2012-02-22 2016-12-07 新特斯有限责任公司 基于吸收性纤维素的生物材料和植入物
CA3216966A1 (fr) 2013-09-10 2015-03-10 Southwire Company, Llc Tensiometre fonctionnant sans fil
RU2618862C2 (ru) * 2015-10-12 2017-05-11 Общество с ограниченной ответственностью "ФИРМА ПОДИЙ" ООО "ФИРМА ПОДИЙ" Способ контроля параметров движения подъемного устройства
CN107826922B (zh) * 2017-11-30 2024-01-30 广东省特种设备检测研究院珠海检测院 一种电梯液压缓冲器复位时间测量装置及方法

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5033563A (en) * 1976-05-18 1991-07-23 Cardinal Scale Manufacturing Company Apparatus for weighing a patient on a stretcher
DE9015495U1 (de) * 1990-11-12 1992-01-02 Technischer Überwachungs-Verein Bayern e.V., 8000 München Meßwertaufnehmer zum Erfassen physikalischer Kenngrößen eines Personen- und/oder Lastenaufzugs
DE4201840A1 (de) * 1992-01-24 1993-07-29 Rhein Westfael Tech Ueberwach Verfahren und vorrichtung zur pruefung der treibfaehigkeit bei aufzuegen
DE4311011C2 (de) * 1992-07-24 1994-07-14 Arno John Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Prüfung eines Aufzugs mit Treibscheibenantrieb
JP2001517107A (ja) * 1997-04-08 2001-10-02 アーゴダイン・コーポレーション 患者搬送システム
GB2384231B (en) * 1997-11-05 2005-03-02 Sunnybrook & Women S College H Patient transfer device
US6216535B1 (en) * 1999-07-26 2001-04-17 Darrell William Schapmire Apparatus for testing isoinertial lifting capacity
WO2003035184A1 (fr) * 2001-10-24 2003-05-01 The Regents Of The University Of California Systeme de support de la masse du corps commande par des forces en boucle
US6752224B2 (en) * 2002-02-28 2004-06-22 Stryker Corporation Wheeled carriage having a powered auxiliary wheel, auxiliary wheel overtravel, and an auxiliary wheel drive and control system
EP1617797B1 (fr) * 2003-02-18 2012-08-08 British Columbia Institute of Technology Dispositif portatif de relevage et de descente et equipement correspondant
ATE345107T1 (de) * 2003-05-15 2006-12-15 Ergolet As Teleskopschienen mit laufwagen zum halten einer patientenhebevorrichtung
US7354382B1 (en) * 2003-05-27 2008-04-08 Warren Ii Coy L Wheeled ambulation and lifting apparatus
US7022921B2 (en) * 2003-05-28 2006-04-04 Sr Instruments, Inc. Electronic scale assembly having incorporated spreader arm
US6964070B2 (en) * 2003-11-12 2005-11-15 Gary Lee Hawk Patient lifting apparatus
US7328467B2 (en) * 2004-04-06 2008-02-12 Aarestad Jerome K Patient lift and transfer device and method
US7657951B2 (en) * 2004-06-14 2010-02-09 Ez Way, Inc. Support and transfer apparatus for transport of an incapacitated individual
DE102004029133A1 (de) * 2004-06-17 2006-01-05 TÜV Industrie Service GmbH - TÜV Rheinland Group Kraftreduziertes Messverfahren für Traktionsantriebe, insbesondere Treibscheibenantriebe von Aufzügen

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102023109691A1 (de) 2023-04-18 2024-05-29 TÜV Nord Systems GmbH & Co. KG Überprüfung von Aufzugsanlagen auf der Grundlage von mehreren Messgrößen

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US7677111B2 (en) 2010-03-16
EP1628900A1 (fr) 2006-03-01
US20070012824A1 (en) 2007-01-18
WO2004103880A1 (fr) 2004-12-02
RU2005140099A (ru) 2006-05-10
DE10323175A1 (de) 2004-12-23
WO2004103880A8 (fr) 2006-06-29
BRPI0410567A (pt) 2006-06-20
CN100564218C (zh) 2009-12-02
ES2290722T3 (es) 2008-02-16
CA2546175C (fr) 2009-11-24
RU2318718C2 (ru) 2008-03-10
ATE367352T1 (de) 2007-08-15
CN1852854A (zh) 2006-10-25
CA2546175A1 (fr) 2004-12-02
DE502004004373D1 (de) 2007-08-30
CY1106932T1 (el) 2012-09-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1628900B1 (fr) Levier de controle
EP0390972B1 (fr) Dispositif et méthode pour détecter des paramètres physiques d'un élévateur
EP0391174B2 (fr) Dispositif et méthode pour détecter des paramètres physiques d'un élévateur
DE10248298A1 (de) Setzwerk mit Mitteln zur Kontrolle von Setzvorgängen
WO2005123561A1 (fr) Procede de mesure a force reduite pour entrainements de traction, en particulier entrainements a poulie motrice d'ascenseurs
DE102013014265A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Erkennung der Ablegereife eines hochfesten Faserseils beim Einsatz an Hebezeugen
DE10144913B4 (de) Aufzugbremslast-Wägesystem
DE102013017110A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Erkennung der Ablegereife eines hochfesten Faserseils beim Einsatz an Hebezeugen
EP1469958B1 (fr) Outil de pose equipe de systemes de controle de processus de pose
EP1700810B1 (fr) Dispositif et méthode de test
WO2020115067A1 (fr) Entraînement auxiliaire pour un appareil d'exercice
EP2192395B1 (fr) Procédé destiné à vérifier la résistance à la traction d'une ancre se trouvant dans un mur ou un plafond
EP1832541B1 (fr) Levier de vérification avec appui
DE102006050570B4 (de) Prüfhebelsystem
DE202006015829U1 (de) Zugkraftmessgerät
EP2866014A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de validation d'un dilatomètre pour un essieu d'un véhicule sur rails
DE20320949U1 (de) Prüfhebel
DE102004020440B3 (de) Prüfeinrichtung zur Qualitätsprüfung eines Seilzuges und geeignetes Prüfverfahren
DE102017202589A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ermittlung der Treibfähigkeit einer Förderanlage über eine Drehmomentmessung
WO2003059550A1 (fr) Outil de pose comportant un dispositif de mesure de contrainte de traction
EP0866325B1 (fr) Méthode et dispositif pour équiliber des roues de véhicules
DE102004040438B4 (de) Kraftmesseinrichtung
EP3103537B1 (fr) Procede et systeme de mesure destine au diagnostic de dispositifs destines a transporter des charges, utilisation du systeme de mesure
DE102016113575A1 (de) Messfelge und Auswerteeinheit zum Ermitteln von Montagekräften bei der Reifenmontage
DE202014009970U1 (de) Kraftmesseinrichtung

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20051121

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: TUEV RHEINLAND INDUSTRIE SERVICE GMBH

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: FIEDLER, MARTIN

Inventor name: RYSER, HANS

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502004004373

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20070830

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref document number: 20070402952

Country of ref document: GR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: NV

Representative=s name: ZIMMERLI, WAGNER & PARTNER AG

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20071023

ET Fr: translation filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071018

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070718

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071218

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2290722

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070718

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: HU

Ref legal event code: AG4A

Ref document number: E002564

Country of ref document: HU

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070718

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070718

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070718

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20080421

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070718

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20071018

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20080531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070718

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070718

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Owner name: TUEV RHEINLAND INDUSTRIE SERVICE GMBH

Free format text: TUEV RHEINLAND INDUSTRIE SERVICE GMBH#AM GRAUEN STEIN#51105 KOELN (DE) -TRANSFER TO- TUEV RHEINLAND INDUSTRIE SERVICE GMBH#AM GRAUEN STEIN#51105 KOELN (DE)

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20100520

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20100608

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: HU

Payment date: 20100511

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: IE

Payment date: 20100520

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: LU

Payment date: 20100526

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20100520

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20100526

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 20100520

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20100525

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20100525

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20100521

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: TR

Payment date: 20100510

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Payment date: 20100513

Year of fee payment: 7

Ref country code: GR

Payment date: 20100519

Year of fee payment: 7

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: TUV RHEINLAND INDUSTRIE SERVICE G.M.B.H.

Effective date: 20110531

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: V1

Effective date: 20111201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20110514

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110531

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110531

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110515

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111201

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GR

Ref legal event code: ML

Ref document number: 20070402952

Country of ref document: GR

Effective date: 20111202

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 367352

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20110514

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20120131

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110514

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110514

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20111202

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110514

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110531

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110531

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110516

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110514

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110514

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FD2A

Effective date: 20131029

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110514

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20110515

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502004004373

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNERSCHAFT VO, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 502004004373

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: DOMPATENT VON KREISLER SELTING WERNER - PARTNE, DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230525

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 502004004373

Country of ref document: DE