EP1610639A1 - Concept de toile de protection depliable et refermable ou fixe - Google Patents

Concept de toile de protection depliable et refermable ou fixe

Info

Publication number
EP1610639A1
EP1610639A1 EP04722569A EP04722569A EP1610639A1 EP 1610639 A1 EP1610639 A1 EP 1610639A1 EP 04722569 A EP04722569 A EP 04722569A EP 04722569 A EP04722569 A EP 04722569A EP 1610639 A1 EP1610639 A1 EP 1610639A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sail
umbrella
arms
area
edge
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP04722569A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1610639B1 (fr
Inventor
Jürgen GENDRIESCH
Jürgen Schubert
Alexander Prang
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
StructureLab GmbH
Original Assignee
StructureLab GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE20305166U external-priority patent/DE20305166U1/de
Priority claimed from DE20305168U external-priority patent/DE20305168U1/de
Priority claimed from DE10360864A external-priority patent/DE10360864A1/de
Application filed by StructureLab GmbH filed Critical StructureLab GmbH
Publication of EP1610639A1 publication Critical patent/EP1610639A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1610639B1 publication Critical patent/EP1610639B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B19/00Special folding or telescoping of umbrellas
    • A45B19/04Special folding or telescoping of umbrellas with telescopic sticks
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B11/00Umbrellas characterised by their shape or attachment
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B23/00Other umbrellas
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B25/00Details of umbrellas
    • A45B25/02Umbrella frames
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B25/00Details of umbrellas
    • A45B25/14Devices for opening and for closing umbrellas
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B19/00Special folding or telescoping of umbrellas
    • A45B2019/004Special folding or telescoping of umbrellas with rigid ribs
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B23/00Other umbrellas
    • A45B2023/0012Ground supported umbrellas or sunshades on a single post, e.g. resting in or on a surface there below
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B23/00Other umbrellas
    • A45B2023/0012Ground supported umbrellas or sunshades on a single post, e.g. resting in or on a surface there below
    • A45B2023/0018Ground supported umbrellas or sunshades on a single post, e.g. resting in or on a surface there below with a canopy in form of an inverted cone
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B23/00Other umbrellas
    • A45B2023/0031Cantilever umbrellas or sunshades with a support arm
    • A45B2023/0037Cantilever umbrellas or sunshades with a support arm the support arm being attached to the stick or to the crown, the canopy being suspended there below
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B23/00Other umbrellas
    • A45B2023/0093Sunshades or weather protections of other than umbrella type
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B2200/00Details not otherwise provided for in A45B
    • A45B2200/10Umbrellas; Sunshades
    • A45B2200/1009Umbrellas; Sunshades combined with other objects
    • A45B2200/1018Umbrellas; Sunshades combined with other objects with illuminating devices, e.g. electrical
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B25/00Details of umbrellas
    • A45B25/06Umbrella runners
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B25/00Details of umbrellas
    • A45B25/18Covers; Means for fastening same
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A45HAND OR TRAVELLING ARTICLES
    • A45BWALKING STICKS; UMBRELLAS; LADIES' OR LIKE FANS
    • A45B3/00Sticks combined with other objects
    • A45B3/02Sticks combined with other objects with illuminating devices
    • A45B3/04Sticks combined with other objects with illuminating devices electrical

Definitions

  • the invention relates to collapsible and foldable umbrella constructions that can be used to protect against weather influences such as sun and / or rain, wherein any rainwater that may occur can be discharged to the outside due to the shape of the sail surface.
  • Umbrellas are known, the sail surface of which has the shape of a pointed tent with the top directed upwards or downwards, the sail surface, as in the case of so-called funnel umbrellas, can also be curved twice in opposite directions.
  • umbrellas that discharge rainwater to the outside. It should be noted, however, that the arms of these umbrellas that span the sail area are never completely above the sail area, but rather are arranged entirely or partially below the sail area. The arms of these umbrellas are usually held on a stick and spread by diagonals. They are also often subjected to bending.
  • umbrellas that discharge rainwater inside through the stem. Design variants with arms lying above and / or below are common here. Also known from patent DE 199 19 142 is an umbrella with a sail surface which has high and low points and is stretched from arms above and below the sail surface.
  • the screen has a large overall height due to the basic geometry, the individual articulation points of the arms are at different heights, and the screen cannot therefore be folded up compactly at a low height.
  • the construction elements under the sail area hinder use close to the ground, with the result that the sail area is stretched out
  • the invention is based on the problem of creating a collapsible and collapsible, possibly occurring rainwater leading to the outside of the umbrella structure, the spanned sail surface of which has an undisturbed appearance in the bottom view.
  • Umbrellas according to the invention can also be scaled as desired: it is possible, for example, to apply the principles formulated in the protection claims to large umbrellas with a base area of, for example, more than 100 m 2 , to cafe umbrellas, to small umbrellas for private use and even to umbrellas. It is in the protection claims
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 2 is advantageous because the sail surface takes on a wavy, curved shape, appears elegant and light and, with its double curvature, has a high degree of stability against external wind influences, which also increases its service life (Fig. 2).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 3 is advantageous because the sail surface takes on a wavy, curved shape, looks elegant and light and, with its double curvature, has a high stability against external wind influences, which also increases its service life (Fig. 3). *
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 4 is advantageous, since the sail area takes on an alternately curved shape and a kinked shape at the bottom, has a striking effect due to the lines of the low arms and, with its guidance on the low arms and its double curvature in the fields, offers a high degree of stability against wind influences has (Fig. 4).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 5 is advantageous because the sail area takes on an alternately bent shape and curved shape at the bottom, cut through the lines of the high arms, broken down into segments and one with its guidance on the high arms and its double curvature in the fields has high stability against external wind influences (Fig. 5).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 6 is advantageous because the sail surface takes an alternately bent shape up and down, its folds have an extremely dynamic effect similar to a wind turbine and can be made from materials without special static properties (Fig. 6).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 7 is advantageous because the sail surface assumes a conical shape, has a particularly simple and simple effect and the rainwater that arises is evenly discharged to all sides (Fig. 7).
  • An embodiment according to claim 8 is advantageous because the sail surface takes a conical shape that is kinked along the lower arms, has a simple and reserved effect and can be made from materials without special static properties (Fig. 8).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 9 is advantageous because the sail surface assumes a wavy, curved shape, has a striking appearance due to its emphasized edges without losing its elegance and, with its edge guidance and double curvature, has a particularly high stability against external wind influences (Fig. 9 ).
  • An embodiment according to claim 10 is advantageous because the sail surface takes a wavy shape, has no sail corner points, because of its curved edge it looks exceptionally elegant and almost floating, so that it is suitable for installation as a free-standing sculpture and with its edge guide and double curvature has a particularly high stability against external wind influences (FIG. 10).
  • An embodiment according to claim 11 is advantageous because the sail surface preferably appears like a wind turbine and thus the lightness of the construction is underlined (Fig. 11).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 12 is advantageous because the appearance of the sail surface can be influenced in a targeted manner by shifting the sail axis point, is better drained by pulling up the sail axis point and has a higher stability against wind influences by fixing the sail axis point (Fig. 12).
  • An embodiment according to claim 13 is advantageous because the sail surface is preserved in its natural shape, can be sealed against rainwater at its sail axis point and has a higher stability against external wind influences due to the fixation of the sail axis point (Fig. 13).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 14 is advantageous since the sail surface appears more elegant by detaching from the umbrella axis, visibly adjusts itself in its natural form and does not require any complex fastening details at the sail axis point (FIG. 14).
  • An embodiment according to claim 15 is advantageous because the sail area without the piercing point of the stem looks particularly elegant, so that it is suitable for printing advertising in the middle, is particularly tight against rainwater in the middle and no reinforcements otherwise caused by a piercing point needed in the middle (Fig. 15).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 16 is advantageous because the sail surface has a particularly striking effect, is particularly dimensionally stable and is statically relieved by the sewn-on belt straps or sewn-in pull cables (FIG. 16).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 17 is advantageous because the sail surface is at the same time elegant and distinctive, is dimensionally stable and is statically relieved by the sewn-on belt straps or sewn-in pull cables (Fig. 17).
  • a version according to protection claim 18 is advantageous since the sail surface appears particularly elegant and does not have to be provided with additional belt straps or pulling ropes (FIG. 18).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 19 is advantageous since the curved edges make the umbrella appear more elegant and the sail area can also be pre-tensioned by its edge (Fig. 19).
  • a version according to protection claim 20 is advantageous because the screen has a more interesting design by separating the functions of high arms and low arms, has a wide range of options for clamping due to the additional degree of freedom, and also has points of the sail area that can be pulled down sharply in the case of high arms can (Fig.20).
  • An embodiment according to claim 21 is advantageous because the screen acts lighter due to the splitting of the tensile and compressive forces, is characterized at the end points of the arms held up by ropes by a particularly high tensile strength against downward vertical forces from gravity and wind and by Ropes can be stretched (Fig. 21).
  • An embodiment according to claim 22 is advantageous because the screen acts more compact due to the closer spatial guidance of the forces, is characterized by a certain elasticity at the end points of the arms held up by diagonals, which benefits the pretension of the sail area, and by the diagonals can be spanned (Fig. 22).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 23 is advantageous because the screen looks more elegant through the use of the static properties of the sail area, is characterized by a certain elasticity at the end points of the low arms held up by the sail area, in the area of its low arms by the static properties of the sail area can be spanned and requires fewer structural components (Fig. 23).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 24 is advantageous because the screen acts lighter due to the splitting of the tensile and compressive forces, is characterized at the end points of the arms braced downwards by cables by a particularly high tensile strength against upward vertical forces from wind pressure and suction and by Ropes can be pre-tensioned (Fig. 24).
  • An embodiment according to claim 25 is advantageous because the umbrella acts more compact due to the closer spatial guidance of the forces, is characterized by a certain elasticity at the end points of the arms braced down by diagonals, which benefits the pretension of the sail area, and by the diagonals can be preloaded (Fig. 25).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 26 is advantageous because the glider looks more elegant due to the use of the static properties of the sail surface. End points of the arms braced downwards by the sail area are characterized by a certain elasticity, by means of which the static properties of the sail area can be prestressed and manage with less constructive components (FIG. 26).
  • An embodiment according to claim 27 is advantageous because the screen can be opened particularly easily due to the articulation of the articulated attachment and the associated lower lifting height of the arms, and due to the articulation of the articulation of all the arms, less space is required for closing, for example below standing tables do not hinder the closing of the umbrella, and no special ones
  • An embodiment according to claim 28 is advantageous because the screen looks more elegant due to the ropes or diagonals not present on the lower arms, can be opened particularly easily due to the articulated fastening being lowered and the lower lifting height associated therewith, due to the articulated fastening being raised All arms need less space for closing, so that, for example, tables below do not hinder the closing of the umbrella, and use the existing traction of the sail area, so that no cables or diagonals are required for low arms (Fig. 28).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 29 is advantageous since when using pressure diagonals it has a low overall height, since above the node the arm does not require a handle and no special one
  • a version according to protection claim 30 is advantageous because the screen appears more elegant due to the cables or diagonals not present on the lower arms, and when using pressure diagonals it has a low overall height, since no arm is required above the node, and the existing tractive force uses the sail area so that no ropes or diagonals are required for low arms (Fig. 30).
  • An embodiment according to protection claim 31 is advantageous since the screen does not require any complex technology for moving the Umbrella tip or a sleeve is required when using pressure diagonals has a low overall height, since above the node the arm does not require a handle and does not have to have any special tensile properties of the sail area, since all arms are lifted up by the ropes or diagonals (Fig .31).
  • a version according to protection claim 32 is advantageous because the screen is more elegant due to the cables or diagonals not present on the lower arms, does not require any complex technology for moving the screen tip or a sleeve, and when using pressure diagonals it has a low overall height, since the arms are above the node no handle is required and uses the existing traction of the sail area, so that no ropes or diagonals are required for low arms (Fig. 32).
  • An embodiment according to claim 33 is advantageous since, in particular, umbrellas with high arms (31) and low arms (32) can be completely folded together (FIG. 33).
  • a version according to protection claim 35 is advantageous, because the screens in the stringing result in an elegant structure, most of the rainwater is discharged to the outside, can also be used individually at any time or can be combined to form other formations, in which stringing together with mechanical connection is less susceptible to wind and a larger one , result in a coherent, rain-protected usable area, which is even free of masts when hanging below the sail areas (Fig. 35).
  • a version according to protection claim 36 is advantageous because the screens in the grouping result in an elegant structure, most of the rainwater is discharged to the outside, can also be used individually at any time or can be combined into other formations, the grouping is less susceptible to wind and a larger one when connected mechanically , result in a coherent, rain-protected usable area that is even free of masts when hanging below the sail areas (Fig. 36).
  • a version according to protection claim 37 is advantageous because the screen illuminated by lights has a particularly futuristic effect, can even be used as a light sculpture or light and because the sail area can be printed with advertising (Fig. 37).
  • All arms of the screen are basically arranged radially around the screen axis. This is advantageous since the forces occurring in the arms are derived directly into the screen axis and the arms articulated on the screen axis can be easily folded up.
  • All or more arms point downwards when the glider is open, the end point and the associated sail corner point of at least one arm being below the sail axis point. This is advantageous because any rainwater that may occur can be drained to the outside.
  • the longitudinal axes of the arms intersect the umbrella axis at a common point.
  • your endpoints are coplanar.
  • the compact appearance and the symmetry of the forces is advantageous in these design variants.
  • the arms of the umbrellas can be made straight or curved.
  • the ' arms are mainly loaded under pressure or bending.
  • the arms can be made specifically rigid or elastic become. By varying the properties of the arms, it is possible to optimally adapt the static system to the desired appearance of the respective umbrella variant.
  • the screens can describe any geometric shapes in their supervision (Fig. 38).
  • shapes are possible in which the sail corner points are evenly distributed on a circle or an ellipse in the umbrella view, so that the sail area is preferably divided into segments with the same area dimension between each two sail corner points and the sail axis point.
  • the "circular” screen is advantageous because the screen does not specify a spatial orientation and can be dimensioned efficiently due to the rotational symmetries.
  • the "elliptical” screen is advantageous because the screen can emphasize a spatial direction and, due to its elongated shape, has a particularly dynamic and elegant effect , Shapes are also possible in which 4 + 4n sail corner points describe a square or a diamond or in which 4 + 2n sail corner points describe a rectangle.
  • the screens are preferably opened and closed with the aid of a threaded spindle, which is operated with a crank and interposed bevel gear.
  • a threaded spindle which is operated with a crank and interposed bevel gear.
  • the opening and closing process can also be supported mechanically by hydraulics, an electric motor or a gas pressure spring.
  • the mechanical design is advantageous because the canopy can be opened and closed at the push of a button, automatically closes in combination with a wind monitor in strong winds and can therefore be made slimmer.
  • the opening mechanism can also be favored by cantilevers. These spacers ensure that in the folded state of the screen there is a minimum opening angle between the arms and the cables or diagonals in order to be able to introduce the orthogonal force components necessary to open the screen into the arms. Depending on the opening mechanism, the arms or the ropes (Fig. 40) or diagonals required to open the arms are attached to the arms.
  • the spanned sail area can also be precisely re-tensioned using tensioning elements.
  • tensioning elements which are inserted between the sail corner points and the end points of the arms, also allow a sail surface to be subsequently retrofitted into the arms of the glider that have already been folded up.
  • the stem which denotes that part of the mast on which all are necessary to open the screen
  • the support structure is preferably designed as a mast and placed on the ground in a mobile stand or a permanently installed anchor.
  • the hanging construction reaches over the sail area and holds the umbrella from above.
  • This construction also known as a traffic light umbrella, is also placed on the floor in a mobile stand or on the floor or on the wall in a permanently installed anchor. It is advantageous to insert a joint between the handle and the support structure in order to be able to tilt the handle and thus the sail surface with the position of the sun. -. _. , ? _ _
  • FIGS. 1 to 82 Exemplary embodiments of the invention are explained with reference to FIGS. 1 to 82. This is preceded by the figure “prior art”, which is already explained in detail on page 1 of this description.
  • FIG. 1 shows the main claim of the patent: FIG. 1 shows an umbrella with arms (30) lying exclusively above the sail surface (10) in an isometric representation
  • FIG. 3 shows a wave-shaped design variant of the screen (a) isometrically from obliquely in front and (b) isometrically from diagonally above
  • FIG. 4 shows an alternately curved and bent design variant of the screen (a) isometrically from diagonally in front and (b) isometrically from diagonally above 5 shows an alternately kinked and curved design variant of the umbrella
  • FIG. 8 a conical configuration variant of the screen which is kinked along the lower arms, (a) isometrically from obliquely from the front and (b) isometrically from obliquely above, FIG of the umbrella
  • Fig. 12 shows a variant of the umbrella, in which the sail area by its attachment to the
  • FIG. 13 is an embodiment variant of the umbrella in which the sail surface is attached to the umbrella axis, but is not influenced in terms of its shape.
  • FIG. 14 is an embodiment variant of the umbrella in which the sail surface is not attached to the umbrella axis and it FIG. 15 freely surrounds an embodiment variant of the umbrella, in which the sail area is not necessarily cut out in the region of the umbrella axis.
  • FIG. 16 shows an embodiment variant of the umbrella, in which the sail surface is sewn along pull cables or Straps have straight crease lines
  • FIG. 17 shows a variant of the shield, in which the sail surface along sewn-on traction ropes or
  • Belt straps have curved fold lines (a) isometrically from obliquely in front and (b) isometrically from obliquely above
  • Fig. 18 shows an embodiment variant of the screen, in which the sail surface adjusts itself freely with regard to its shape
  • FIG. 19 shows a variant of the screen in the top view with curved sail edges
  • FIGS. 20 to 26 advantageous design variants of the arms: FIG. 20 a design variant of the umbrella as an isometric drawing, in which high arms and low arms meet at different heights on the umbrella axis; FIG. 21 a design variant of the umbrella, in which several or all arms are held up by ropes become
  • Fig. 22 shows a variant of the screen in which several or all of the arms are held up by diagonals
  • FIG. 23 shows a variant of the umbrella as an isometric drawing, in which several or all of the low arms are held up by the sail area.
  • Fig. 24 shows a variant of the umbrella as an isometric drawing, in which several or all arms are held Ropes are braced downwards
  • Fig. 25 a variant of the screen as an isometric drawing, in which several or all arms are braced downwards by diagonals
  • Fig. 26 shows a variant of the screen as an isometric drawing, in which several or all of the arms are braced downward by the sail surface
  • FIGS. 27 to 34 advantageous design variants of the opening and closing mechanisms:
  • FIG. 27 shows a variant of the screen as isometric sequences, in which the screen is opened by moving the arms down on the screen axis, in the sequence
  • Fig. 28 shows a variant of the screen as isometric sequences, in which the screen is opened by moving the arms down on the screen axis, in the sequence
  • Fig. 31 shows a variant of the umbrella as an isometric sequence, in which the umbrella is opened by shortening all the ropes, with all arms in sequence (a), (b) and (c)
  • Figure 32 shows a variant of the umbrella as an isometric sequence in which the umbrella is opened by shortening all the ropes, in sequence (a), (b) and (c) all the arms are raised by means of ropes 33 and all low arms are pulled by the tractive force of the sail area
  • Fig. 33 is a variant of the design with marked lengths of the diagonals and their points of attack on the high arms and low arms (a) isomet risch (b) cut
  • FIGS. 35 to 36 advantageous design variants of grouping several screens:
  • 35 shows a variant of the screen as an isometric drawing, in which several screens are assembled into loosely connected rows
  • Fig. 36 shows a variant of the screen as an isometric drawing, in which four screens are assembled loosely connected to form a square
  • FIG. 37 advantageous variants of the illumination:
  • FIGS. 38 to 43 selected other examples
  • Raised arms are held as isometry of the overall screen with indicated
  • FIG. 42 an embodiment variant of the stem of the umbrella in section Fig. 43 an embodiment variant of an arm of the umbrella in section Figures 1 to 37 listed below refer directly to the respective patent claims 1 to 37 with their numbering:
  • Fig. 1 shows the basic principle of the invention in an isometric representation.
  • An arbitrarily shaped sail area (10) is spanned by arms (30) lying exclusively above the sail area, here differentiated according to high arms (31) and low arms (32).
  • Fig. 3 shows two isometries of a wave-shaped design variant of the glider or its sail area (10). It can be clearly seen that the sail area (10) is alternately spanned by high points (34) and low points (35).
  • Fig. 4 shows two isometries, one alternately swung upwards and bent downwards
  • FIG. 5 shows two isometries, one alternately folded up and folded down
  • Fig. 6 shows two isometries of an alternately bent up and down design variant of the glider or its sail area (10). It can be clearly seen that the sail surface (10) is pressed or pulled alternately by the upper arms (31) and lower arms (32). Along the high arms (31) and low arms (32), the sail surface (10) each has a kink line.
  • Fig. 7 shows two isometries of a conical design variant of the umbrella or its sail area (10). It can be clearly seen that the sail surface (10) is pulled upwards at the sail axis point (13) in the direction of the screen axis (1) and downwards and outwards from low points (35).
  • FIG. 8 shows two isometries of a conical configuration variant of the glider or its sail surface (10) that is bent along the low arms. It can be clearly seen that the sail area (1) is spanned by low arms (32). Along the low arms (32), the sail surface (10) each has a crease line.
  • FIG. 9 shows two isometries of two further wave-shaped design variants of the glider or its sail area (10). It can be clearly seen that the sail surface (10) is spanned by alternately inclined sail edge bars (15). The sail edge rods (15) can be straight or curved. The arms (30) do not immediately span the sail area (10). 10 shows two isometries of a wave-shaped design variant of the screen or _ _ - - its sail area (10). It can be clearly seen that the sail surface (10) is spanned by a circularly closed, elastic, upward and downward swinging edge of the sail (16) and has no sail corner points. The arms (30) do not immediately span the sail area (10). FIG.
  • FIG. 11 shows two isometries of two design variants of the glider or its sail area (10), which are broken down into sail area segments. It can be clearly seen that the sail surface (10) is dissolved in a configuration variant similar to a wind turbine. Open and closed segments alternate. In the other embodiment variant, several adjacent segments are opened. The remaining sail area (10) is stretched back over the sail edge rope (14) of the open fields. It can be clearly seen that the sail axis point (13) is fastened in the area of the umbrella axis (1) in such a way that the shape of the sail surface (10) is influenced. In the case shown, the sail surface is pulled up along the umbrella axis (1).
  • FIG. 13 shows the isometry of an embodiment variant of the screen or its sail axis point (13). It can be clearly seen that the sail axis point (13) is fastened in the area of the screen axis (1), the
  • Shape of the sail area (10) is not affected.
  • the sail axis point (13) corresponds to the natural resting point of the sail area (10).
  • 14 shows the isometric view of a variant of the design of the screen or its sail axis point (13). It can be clearly seen that the sail surface is cut out at the sail axis point (13) and freely surrounds the umbrella axis (1).
  • the sail axis point (13) corresponds to the natural resting point of the sail area (10).
  • 15 shows the isometric view of an embodiment variant of the screen or its sail axis point (13). It can be clearly seen that the sail area is not necessarily cut out in the area of its sail axis point (13), since the stem (20) already ends above the sail area (10) and is held from above.
  • the sail axis point (13) corresponds to the natural resting point of the sail area (10).
  • 16 shows two isometries of an embodiment variant of the umbrella or its sail area (10). It can be clearly seen that the sail surface (10) has a straight fold line on the direct connecting lines between the sail corner points (12) and the sail axis point (13). This is caused by strong pre-tensioned sewn-on straps or sewn-in pull cables.
  • 17 shows two isometries of an embodiment variant of the umbrella or its sail area (10). It can be clearly seen that the sail area (10) on the direct connecting lines between the
  • Sail corner points (12) and the sail axis point (13) has a curved crease line. This is caused by slightly pre-tensioned sewn-on straps or sewn-in pull cables.
  • 18 shows two isometries of an embodiment variant of the umbrella or its sail area (10). It can be clearly seen that the sail surface (10) has a wavy, curved shape and also on the direct connecting lines between the sail corner points (12) and the sail axis point
  • FIG. 20 shows the isometric view of a variant of the shield or its arms (30). It can be clearly seen that the high arms (31) and low arms (32) meet the screen axis (1) at different heights. The higher arms (30) reach steeper over the sail area (10) and reach without Sail area (10) to affect the low points (35).
  • Fig. 21 shows two isometries of an embodiment variant of the screen or its arms (30). It can be clearly seen that in the first isometry several but not all arms, in the example shown, high arms
  • Fig. 22 shows two isometries of a variant of the screen or its arms (30). It can be clearly seen that in the first isometry several but not all arms, in the example shown, high arms
  • FIG. 23 shows the isometric view of an embodiment variant of the screen or its arms (30). It can be clearly seen that all low arms are kept at the top by the static properties of the sail surface.
  • the sail area (10) in turn is held up by ropes in this example.
  • Fig. 24 shows the isometry of an embodiment variant of the screen or its arms (30). It can be clearly seen that several low arms (32) are braced downwards by ropes.
  • Fig. 25 shows the isometry of an embodiment variant of the screen or its arms (30). It can be clearly seen that several arms (30) are braced downwards by diagonals.
  • Fig. 26 shows the isometric view of a design variant of the screen or its arms (30). It can be clearly seen that several arms (30) are braced downwards by the static properties of the sail surface (10).
  • Fig. 27 shows isometric sequences of two design variants of the screen or its opening and
  • Fig. 28 shows isometric sequences of two design variants of the screen or its opening and closing mechanisms.
  • the first 3 representations clearly show that the umbrella is opened by moving down a sleeve (25) to which all the arms (31) of the umbrella are articulated.
  • the length of the ropes between the handle (20) and the high points (34) is constant.
  • the umbrella opens by lowering the stem tip (21), to which all the arms (31) of the umbrella are articulated.
  • the length of the diagonals (43) remains unchanged.
  • the low arms (32) are pulled up by the static properties of the sail surface (10).
  • Fig. 29 shows isometric sequences of two design variants of the screen or its opening and closing mechanisms. It can be clearly seen in all the representations that the screen extends through the
  • Fig. 31 shows the isometric sequence of an embodiment variant of the screen or its opening and closing mechanism. It can be clearly seen in the illustrations that the screen opens by shortening the cables (40) to which all the arms (30) of the screen are attached.
  • Fig. 32 shows the isometric sequence of an embodiment variant of the screen. its opening and
  • Fig. 33 shows an isometric view and section of a design variant of the screen or its opening and
  • Fig. 34 shows a section of a design variant of the screen or its opening and closing mechanism. It can be clearly seen that the arms (30) and the sail surface (10) are attached with their sail axis point (13) to a common sleeve (25), which means that they are moved together along the umbrella axis (1) when the umbrella is opened and closed ,
  • Fig. 35 shows the isometry of an embodiment variant of the screen or a screen group. It can be clearly seen that several umbrellas can be put together in loosely connected rows. In the example shown, umbrellas are used that only have high points (34) in the middle of the common edges, so that any rainwater that may occur is drained outward primarily through the corners formed as low points (35).
  • Fig. 36 shows the isometric view of an embodiment variant of the screen or a screen group. It is clearly recognizable that four screens can be put together to form loosely connected squares.
  • umbrellas which have two high arms (31) and two low arms (32).
  • the umbrellas are each aligned with a high arm (31) to the common center, so that any rainwater that may occur is mainly discharged to the outside via the low points (35).
  • Fig. 37 shows the isometry of an embodiment variant of the screen or a screen group. It can be clearly seen that lights (60) are installed on the handle (20) or the holding structure (50), with the aid of which the sail surface (10) can be illuminated.
  • Fig. 38 shows the top view of various design variants of the glider or its sail area (10). It can be clearly seen that the sail corner points (12) describe a wide variety of geometric shapes when viewed from above.
  • Fig. 39 shows two isometries of an embodiment variant of the screen or its arms (30). It can be clearly seen that all arms (30) are made curved.
  • the sail surface (10) is also firmly connected at its sail axis point (13) to the lower region of this sleeve (25).
  • the high arms (31) are held at the top by ropes (40) which connect the end points (33) of the high arms (31) to a boom (28) attached to the handle tip (21).
  • the low arms (32) are in turn pulled upwards by the sail edges (11) which connect high points (34) and low points (35). Due to the tensile strength of the sail surface (10) in the connecting line between the umbrella axis (1) and the low point (35), a self-contained balance of forces is created, which stabilizes the umbrella. In this case, the sail area (10) takes on static properties due to sewn-on webbing straps, integrated pulling ropes, etc.
  • the stick (20) is designed as a mast in the example shown.
  • the sleeve (25) which can be moved on the handle (20) is moved upwards. This causes the high arms (31) and with you the low arms (32) to move downwards.
  • the sleeve (25) is moved upwards on the handle until the ropes (40) attached to the extension arm (28) are vertical and thus parallel to the screen axis
  • the sleeve When unfolding, the sleeve is moved downwards, causing the high arms (31) with their high points (34) to move upward and also pulling the low arms (32) upward through the sail edge (11) and / or the sail edge ropes (14) until the pulling action between the screen axis (1) and the low points (35) begins. It is particularly noteworthy that the closing of the screen by raising the sleeve (25) also works with tables below it, because the sleeve (25) also moves the arms (30) upwards. When opened, they are moved down again and ensure good sun protection due to the short distance to the floor.
  • Fig. 41 shows the isometry of a screen with an alternately bent up and down
  • Fig. 42 shows the section of a variant of the shade or its stem (20). It can be clearly seen that a threaded spindle (22) with a spindle nut (29) is arranged within the handle (20). Pins connect the spindle nut (29) with a sleeve (25) through vertical slots in the handle (20), which can now be moved to open the screen.
  • Fig. 43 shows the section of a design variant of the screen or its arms (30). It can be clearly seen that the arm (30) has a piping profile in which the sail surface (10) is guided. LIST OF REFERENCE NUMBERS
  • the umbrella axis (1) denotes the immaterial, geometric axis of the umbrella or its stem (20). Most designs have rotational symmetries around this screen axis (1).
  • the sail area (10) denotes the material area that is spanned directly or indirectly by the arms (30). It preferably consists of foils, textile materials or other membranes and is used, for example, for sun protection and / or rain protection and / or as a reflection surface.
  • the sail edge (11) delimits the sail area (10) with an edge to the outside. The sail edge (11) can be made stronger if there are static requirements.
  • the sail corner point (12) denotes a material point on the sail edge (11) at which an arm (30) of the umbrella pulls the sail surface (10) outwards.
  • the sail axis point (13) denotes the intangible geometric intersection of the umbrella axis (1) with the sail surface (10).
  • the sail edge rope (14) denotes a pull rope which is guided outside the sail area (10), connects adjacent end points (33) of the arms (30) of the umbrella and relieves the sail edge (11) in static terms.
  • the sail edge rods (15) designate rods which are combined into a closed chain and are defined at their end points, the joints, by arms (30) in their position and span the sail surface.
  • the sail edge bow (16) denotes a preferably elastic rod which is closed to form a ring, which is defined at certain points by arms (30) in its position and which spans the sail surface (10).
  • the sail intermediate pieces (17) denote small sail areas (10) with which gaps between adjacent umbrellas can be closed.
  • the stem (20) denotes the section of the mast to which all the static elements required to open the screen are attached directly or indirectly, fixedly or displaceably. Those sections of the mast which carry the stem are not referred to as the stem (20). They are referred to as a holding structure (50), a supporting structure (51) or a hanging structure (52). However, the stem (30) and support structure (51) can be made from a continuous round tube, i.e. together as a "mast".
  • the stem tip (21) denotes the upper or lower, free end of the stem (20). The stem tip can, if required for the opening and closing mechanism, as a telescope from the stem ( 20) can be extended.
  • the threaded spindle (22) denotes a threaded rod which is guided within the handle (20), preferably operated via a bevel gear (24) with crank (23), and the components which can be moved for opening and closing the screen, such as the tip of the handle (21) or the sleeve (25).
  • the crank (23) is inserted into the bevel gear (24) or other mechanical components with a similar function to open and close the screen. It is preferably not firmly connected to the screen.
  • the bevel gear (24) is actuated by means of a crank (23) and moves the components responsible for opening and closing the screen via the rotation of the threaded spindle (22).
  • the bevel gear (24) is preferably arranged within the stem (20)
  • the sleeve (25) designates a movable mechanical member at the handle (20), on which the arms (30), ropes (40) or diagonals (43) are attached. By moving the sleeve (25), the screen opens and closes.
  • a sleeve (25) is also referred to here as a component which can be moved along the screen axis (1) and to which the diagonals (43) are fastened and which does not require an opening in the screen axis (1), since it ends at the top Stem (20) does not surround and is only connected to it via a pull rope.
  • the arms (28) designate spacers attached directly or indirectly, fixedly or displaceably to the stick (20), to which the arms (30), the ropes (40) or diagonals (43) are fastened with the objective, in the folded state of the screen, over a small opening angle between the arms (30) on the one hand and the ropes (40) or the diagonals ( 43) on the other hand, in order to facilitate the opening of the screen.
  • the spindle nut (29) denotes the mechanical component within the handle (20), which can be moved up and down in the direction of the screen axis (1) by turning the threaded spindle (22). With the help of the spindle nut (29), for example, the sleeve (25) or the stem tip (21) are moved.
  • the arms (30) denote the articulated and radially extending from the screen axis (1) pressure rods, which stretch the sail surface (10) directly or indirectly.
  • the arms (30) are held by ropes (40), diagonals (43) and / or the tensile forces of the sail area (10) in their position for stretching the sail area (10).
  • the arms (30) are loaded to bend and, if necessary, curved.
  • the high arms (31) denote those arms (30) which pull the sail surface (10) directly ' or indirectly upwards.
  • the arms (31) are inclined at any angle starting from the screen axis (1).
  • the low arms (32) denote those arms (30) which pull the sail surface (10) down directly or indirectly.
  • the low arms (32) are always inclined downwards from the screen axis (1).
  • the end points (33) denote the outer, i.e. the material ends of the arms (30) facing away from the screen axis (1).
  • the sail corner points (12) are usually attached to the end points (33).
  • the high points (34) denote the outer, i.e. the material ends of the arms (31) facing away from the screen axis (1). They also denote the upward-pointing nodes of adjacent sail edge bars (15).
  • the low points (35) denote the outer, i.e. the material ends of the low arms (32) facing away from the screen axis (1). They also denote the downward pointing nodes of adjacent sail edge bars (15).
  • the ropes (40) denote traction ropes which connect the end points (33) to the stick (20) or the brackets (28).
  • the diagonals (43) denote material pressure rods and / or traction cables, which connect any points of the arms (30) with the handle (20) or the arms (28).
  • the tensioning elements (46) denote turnbuckles which can be inserted between the sail corner points (12) and the end points (33) of the arms (30).
  • the tensioning elements are particularly suitable for umbrella groups in order to be able to hang in and tension a continuous sail area (10) after the arms (30) have been unfolded.
  • the support structure (50) denotes the static component which holds the handle (20), i.e. which connects the handle (20) down to the floor or which grips the handle (20) from above and connects to the floor or a wall with a construction which extends over the screen.
  • the support structure (51) denotes a static component which holds the handle (20) and connects it to the floor.
  • the simplest execution of a support structure (51) is a mast.
  • the hanging structure (52) denotes a static component which grips the handle from above over the screen.
  • the lights (60) preferably denote spotlights or projectors with which the sail surface (10) can be illuminated. With the help of the lights (60) the screens can be staged or advertised.

Landscapes

  • Walking Sticks, Umbrellas, And Fans (AREA)
  • Tents Or Canopies (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
  • Medicinal Preparation (AREA)
  • Holders For Apparel And Elements Relating To Apparel (AREA)
EP04722569A 2003-03-31 2004-03-23 Concept de toile de protection depliable et refermable ou fixe Expired - Lifetime EP1610639B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE20305166U DE20305166U1 (de) 2003-03-31 2003-03-31 Auf- und zusammenfaltbare Schirmkonstruktion
DE20305168U DE20305168U1 (de) 2003-03-31 2003-03-31 Auf- und zusammenfaltbare Schirmkonstruktion
DE10360864A DE10360864A1 (de) 2003-03-31 2003-12-23 Auf- und zusammenfaltbare Schirmkonstruktionen
PCT/EP2004/003065 WO2004086898A1 (fr) 2003-03-31 2004-03-23 Concept de toile de protection depliable et refermable ou fixe

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1610639A1 true EP1610639A1 (fr) 2006-01-04
EP1610639B1 EP1610639B1 (fr) 2006-09-13

Family

ID=33135451

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04722569A Expired - Lifetime EP1610639B1 (fr) 2003-03-31 2004-03-23 Concept de toile de protection depliable et refermable ou fixe

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US7513267B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1610639B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2006521850A (fr)
AT (1) ATE339124T1 (fr)
DE (1) DE502004001491D1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2273237T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2004086898A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102004063154A1 (de) * 2004-12-29 2006-07-13 Structurelab Gmbh Auf- und zusammenfaltbare Schirm-, bzw. Segelkonstruktion
US7581504B1 (en) * 2005-06-17 2009-09-01 Brandbrella, Llc Printed umbrella, umbrella cover, and method of making
DE202010003954U1 (de) * 2010-03-19 2011-08-01 Günter Kaltenbach Standschirm sowie Überdachung
US8051865B1 (en) 2010-04-15 2011-11-08 Yvonne Uranga Canopy for umbrellas
US8667908B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2014-03-11 Steelcase Inc. Frame type table assemblies
US8534752B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2013-09-17 Steelcase Inc. Reconfigurable table assemblies
US9185974B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2015-11-17 Steelcase Inc. Frame type workstation configurations
US9210999B2 (en) 2010-06-02 2015-12-15 Steelcase Inc. Frame type table assemblies
ES2388627B2 (es) * 2010-07-30 2013-04-19 Universidad De Sevilla Sombrilla plana de grandes dimensiones.
US10039374B2 (en) 2016-05-13 2018-08-07 Steelcase Inc. Multi-tiered workstation assembly
US10517392B2 (en) 2016-05-13 2019-12-31 Steelcase Inc. Multi-tiered workstation assembly
USD881549S1 (en) * 2017-12-11 2020-04-21 Jalal Pashandi Aerodynamic delta shaped umbrella
KR102052273B1 (ko) * 2018-08-08 2020-01-08 남윤서 바람개비 양산

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US324581A (en) * 1885-08-18 Umbrella
US808249A (en) * 1905-03-11 1905-12-26 Michael G Mcguire Rib for umbrellas.
US2114598A (en) * 1935-06-19 1938-04-19 Susan A Grissel Umbrella
US3252469A (en) * 1964-01-10 1966-05-24 George H Peake Collapsible hyperbolic paraboloid umbrella
DE3708921A1 (de) * 1987-03-19 1988-09-29 Hubert Lennarz Grossschirm
US5611364A (en) * 1995-08-29 1997-03-18 Woods; John G. Portable shade umbrella
DE19541744A1 (de) * 1995-11-09 1997-05-15 Sl Sonderkonstruktionen Und Le Schirm
US6220265B1 (en) * 1998-09-14 2001-04-24 Patent Category Corp. Adjustable collapsible panels
DE10128940C1 (de) * 2001-06-18 2002-11-28 Clauss Markisen Trichterschirm

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2004086898A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2006521850A (ja) 2006-09-28
EP1610639B1 (fr) 2006-09-13
ATE339124T1 (de) 2006-10-15
WO2004086898A1 (fr) 2004-10-14
US7513267B2 (en) 2009-04-07
DE502004001491D1 (de) 2006-10-26
ES2273237T3 (es) 2007-05-01
US20070095374A1 (en) 2007-05-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE2239114C3 (de) Zelt
WO1997006326A1 (fr) Voute non soutenue pouvant etre tendue et toit de protection pourvu d'une telle voute
CH690087A5 (de) Sonnenschirm.
EP1610639A1 (fr) Concept de toile de protection depliable et refermable ou fixe
DE1709186A1 (de) Zeltartiges Bauwerk
AT512770B1 (de) Zelt- oder Sonnenschutzstruktur
EP2614746A1 (fr) Structure de base pour parasol et parasol doté d'une telle structure de base
EP1781873A1 (fr) Pavillon
EP2443956B1 (fr) Parasol
WO2006072419A1 (fr) Structure de parasol deployable et repliable
DE10360864A1 (de) Auf- und zusammenfaltbare Schirmkonstruktionen
DE3521820C2 (fr)
WO2007000130A2 (fr) Toit gonflable
DE102013103786B4 (de) Zeltkonstruktion
DE19919142A1 (de) Auf- und abbaubare Schirmkonstruktion zum Sonnen- und/oder Regenschutz
EP3426864A1 (fr) Tente
DE202004009814U1 (de) Auf- und zusammenfaltbares Sonnensegel/Überdachungselement mit textiler Segelfläche
DE202005011591U1 (de) Faltbarer Pavillon
DE20305168U1 (de) Auf- und zusammenfaltbare Schirmkonstruktion
DE1905153U (de) Mehrzweck-sonnenschirm.
DE20220878U1 (de) Sonnenschutz-, Sichtschutz- oder Werbeträger-Schirm
DE102006001787B4 (de) Zelt mit ausfahrbarer Zeltdachspitze
DE20305166U1 (de) Auf- und zusammenfaltbare Schirmkonstruktion
DE3718052A1 (de) Tragelement
DE19826393A1 (de) Hängezelt

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20051028

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL LT LV MK

RIN1 Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected)

Inventor name: GENDRIESCH, JUERGEN

Inventor name: SCHUBERT, JUERGEN

Inventor name: PRANG, ALEXANDER

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20060913

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502004001491

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20061026

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061213

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061213

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061213

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)

Effective date: 20070111

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070226

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
ET Fr: translation filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2273237

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20070614

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20061214

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PCAR

Free format text: SCHMAUDER & PARTNER AG PATENT- UND MARKENANWAELTE VSP;ZWAENGIWEG 7;8038 ZUERICH (CH)

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20070323

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20060913

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20070314

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120317

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20130313

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20130312

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20130325

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20130320

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20130312

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 20130312

Year of fee payment: 10

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 339124

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140323

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20140323

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20141128

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140331

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140331

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140323

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140323

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140323

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140324

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140331

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190325

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502004001491

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20201001