Classifications

• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
  • B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
  • B07C3/00—Sorting according to destination
  • B07C3/02—Apparatus characterised by the means used for distribution
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
  • B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
  • B07C3/00—Sorting according to destination
  • B07C3/008—Means for collecting objects, e.g. containers for sorted mail items
• • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
  • B07—SEPARATING SOLIDS FROM SOLIDS; SORTING
  • B07C—POSTAL SORTING; SORTING INDIVIDUAL ARTICLES, OR BULK MATERIAL FIT TO BE SORTED PIECE-MEAL, e.g. BY PICKING
  • B07C3/00—Sorting according to destination
  • B07C3/02—Apparatus characterised by the means used for distribution
  • B07C3/06—Linear sorting machines in which articles are removed from a stream at selected points
• • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
  • Y10—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
  • Y10S—TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
  • Y10S209/00—Classifying, separating, and assorting solids
  • Y10S209/90—Sorting flat-type mail

Definitions

• the invention relates to a method for improved sequencing of mail in mail distribution systems.
• mail in particular letters, is sorted according to a possibly preceding pre-sorting process and stored in a large number of stacking compartments.
• the achievable fineness of the distribution is determined by the number of stacking compartments to which the mail is distributed.
• a separate sorting compartment will not be required for each mail recipient. Rather, the mail is distributed to a certain number of stacking compartments in the same sequence in which it is later distributed by the deliverer during his distribution route.
• the mail item is arranged within each sorting compartment in accordance with the prescribed sequence, so that, with an appropriate arrangement of the stacking compartments, the entire mail item is arranged in accordance with the specified sequence.
• the mail several times and possibly sorted indirectly.
• Letter sorting systems are already known, in which the stacking compartments are arranged opposite the material input, so that after each sorting cycle followed by a further sorting cycle, the mail item is quickly manually returned from the stacking compartments an input module can be entered.
• the mail is handloaded handful from the compartment into containers, which are set up in a mobile frame opposite the stacking compartments. It is common for the containers to have a larger capacity than the stacks, which are emptied several times during each sorting cycle for reloading.
• a precondition for sequencing according to the procedure described above is that the sequence of the consignments after the first and for all subsequent sorting processes and during re-entry is strictly observed (sequence integrity), for which it is necessary that the containers are in the correct order after each sorting process returned with the mobile frame or additional means of transport for material input, or sorted into groups suitable for further processing after the last sorting process.
• Disadvantages of the prior art are, in particular, that at least two surgeons are required for material input and draining and that the re-stacking or intermediate stacking of the postal matter in containers requires increased space and the risk of sequence integrity violations, since the stack in the container can easily fall over If the container is only partially filled and the sequence produced could be disturbed, the stacks are accidentally loaded into the wrong container, or the order of the containers is mixed up.
• the object of the present invention is to provide a method which avoids the stated disadvantages of the prior art and which allows simple, quick and safe sequencing of the mail good while maintaining the sequence integrity.
• the method according to the invention has the advantage that only one operator is required, that practically no partially filled containers are created, that the risk of a violation of the sequence integrity is reduced and that less space is required.
• the object is achieved according to claim 1. Further advantageous embodiments of the invention are contained in the subclaims.
• the invention is based on the idea of not emptying the stacking compartments in a sequencing process during the sorting process, using a sorting plan in which no stacking compartment overflows or overflows, and the sequence of the contents of the stacking compartments directly after completing the sorting process to be loaded into a conveyor device operating the input module or into containers and fed to the input module or other processing in accordance with the sequence.
• the figure shows the sequence of the sequenced shipments in the containers at 800 stops.
• FIG. 1 schematically shows a letter sorting system for carrying out the method according to the invention, in which a number of stacking compartments 1 are opposite a conveyor device 2 with which the mail items 3 are filled into transport containers 4 have been transported to the input module 5.
• a loading and unloading bridge 6 arranged between the stacking compartments and the conveying device and movable along the row of the stacking compartments 1 serves, for example, as shown in FIG DE 42 36 507 is known.
• the invention is described below using the example of sequencing in two sorting steps, since it is obvious to the person skilled in the art how to generalize the method for more than two sorting steps.
• the first sorting process is based on the least significant digit (LSD).
• LSD least significant digit
• the sorting plan is designed in such a way that the individual stacking compartments are prevented from becoming full. Such an optimization is possible since experience has shown that the mail volume for certain destinations fluctuates only to a limited extent around statistical averages, which can be determined by measurements and used as a basis for the sorting plan.
• no compartment is emptied using the method according to the invention.
• the consignments are transferred directly from the stacking compartment 1 into the containers 4 by means of the reloading bridge 6, successive compartments being emptied one after the other into a container until it is full.
• the transfer bridge forms a continuous glide path between a stacking compartment and the conveyor arranged opposite. In this way, the formation of partially filled containers is largely avoided, which also minimizes any problems with the overturning of stacks of mail items within the containers.
• the filled containers are arranged one behind the other in the conveyor 2.
• a conveyor belt 2 is preferably provided for this, the width of which corresponds approximately to the width of the containers used. The emptying of the compartments into the containers and the arrangement of the containers within the conveyor or on the conveyor belt 2 takes place in sequence.
• the LSD contains the elements a, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i, k in descending order
• the compartments are emptied in the order k, i, as shown in FIG. 1 , h, g, f, e, d, c, b, a
• the items are arranged so that the highest elements of the LSD are stacked at the end of the container, the lowest at the front.
• the containers are placed on the conveyor belt so that the end of a new container placed on the conveyor belt is adjacent to the front of a container already on the conveyor belt.
• the transfer bridge has a funnel-shaped asymmetrical extension.
• the specified type of reloading is implemented in a letter sorting system according to FIG. 1 as follows:
• the reloading bridge 6 is moved by an operator along the row of stacking compartments, in such a way that the sequence k, i, h, g, f, e, d , c, b, a of the stacking compartments is moved, ie from right to left in FIG. 1.
• the operator goes behind the bridge 6, lifts the separating knife that is usually used in the stacking compartments with the right hand to stabilize the mail items, supports the stacked items with the left hand, sets the separating knife back into the starting position and then pushes the stack of mail items with both hands in the container on the bridge. If the stack of mail items no longer fits completely into the space available in the container, only a part of the stack is first removed from the compartment and the rest secured with the separating knife.
• the filled container is pivoted onto the conveyor belt, which in the case of FIG. 1 corresponds to a pivoting movement of the operator to the left, so that the mail item last inserted into the container is on the side of the container facing the input module. Then the Operator an empty container and begins to fill it with the remaining shipments.
• the conveyor belt 2 preferably ends in front of the input module so that the containers can simply be pushed into the module or reloaded.
• the mail items are sorted according to the most significant digit (MSD) and stored in the stacking compartments, whereby an appropriately optimized sorting plan ensures that the stacking compartments do not overflow in the second sorting process.
• MSD most significant digit
• the compartments are emptied into the containers in the same way and the containers are placed on the conveyor belt as in sorting pass 1.
• the containers are removed from the sorting belt in order, converted into appropriate carts and sent for further processing.
• the method according to the invention is not tied to the use of containers. Rather, it is possible to remove the mail items directly from the stacking compartments 1 after the sorting aisle 1 and to push them onto the conveyor belt 2 via a reloading bridge, so that the mail items are then fed to the input module in the correct sequence. For this it is only necessary to ensure that the mail stacks lie snugly against one another on the conveyor belt 2, so that the mail items are prevented from falling over. This can simply e.g. can be achieved by a correspondingly controlled tracking of the conveyor belt 2, through which the mail items 3 lying on the conveyor belt 2 are brought to the transfer bridge 6 when the respective pair of stacks is emptied.
• a sorting system with 200 stacking compartments with a respective stacking capacity of 350 consignments is illustrated in the case of 2,000 or 1,500 consignments per deliverer.
• a maximum of 70,000 consignments can be processed in one sequencing run.
• 70% of the maximum capacity that is to say approx.50,000 consignments, is used. It is assumed that each deliverer has to operate 800 stops. This means that, for example, if there are 2000 consignments per deliverer, 25 deliverers are required per sequencing run.
• the table shows that in example A two compartments per destination (direction) can be allocated in the first sorting cycle, in example B two compartments for every second destination. In such a case, first filled the first compartment, then switched to the second, adjacent stacking compartment.
• A the sequencing process will be described in more detail below.
• the first sorting course is in the subjects
• 199 + 200 DSN 100, 200, 300, 400, 500, 600, 700, 800
• the stops of the deliverer are numbered with DSN (delivery sequence nu ber).
• the reloading of the consignments into the containers starts from the rear, so that the highest values of the DSN are stacked at the end of the container, while the lowest values are stacked in front.
• 2 shows for example A the content 3 of a container 4 after the unloading of compartments 1 to 6, 8 being the stacking compartment with the number 1.
• the contents of stacking compartments 5 and 6 are stacked, while the contents of stacking compartments 1 and 2 are at the front. Therefore, if the mail item is removed from the container after the first sorting aisle, the contents of the stacking compartment 1 are first distributed in sorting aisle 2, and after the sorting aisle 2 lies at the front end of the respective stacking compartments into which the items have been stacked.
• each deliverer in example A has 8 compartments in which the items, as shown in FIG. 3, are sorted.
• Deliverers who only have to deliver 700 or 600 DSN need fewer subjects; with more than 800 DSN, more subjects are required.
• the goods are reloaded from the stacking compartments of FIG. 3 into the containers from right to left.
• the sequence of the mailings thus created in the containers is shown by way of example in FIG. 4. It again results that the mail items with the lowest DSN are stacked in the front part of the containers and those with higher ones are stacked in the rear part of the containers.
• a correspondingly optimized sorting plan ensures that the compartments are only overcrowded with a low probability.
• two to three freely assignable overflow compartments are provided per row of stacking compartments, which are inserted into the sequence by appropriate signaling when emptying the compartment. If a stacking compartment is therefore full, one of the free overflow compartments is assigned to this destination (direction), into which the corresponding items are stacked in the following.
• the operator is instructed to remove and acknowledge the overflow compartment.
• the stacking compartment display shows which overflow compartment can be removed.
• the stacking container known from DE 38 23 644 with a movable bottom is preferably used.
• This container enables the mail items to be stacked directly from the stacking compartment without the items being lifted by the operator or would have to be lifted over the edge of the container.
• the use of these containers also enables the mail items to be pushed directly from the container into the input compartment of the input module. Because the mail items are aligned with the stacking edge within the container, it is also not necessary to realign the mail items.
• a height-adjustable transfer bridge 6 is used in the method according to the invention, in which the sliding plane of the transfer bridge can be raised or lowered to the level of the stacking compartment floors. Accordingly, each row of stacking compartments (strands) is arranged opposite a conveyor or a conveyor belt. In order to reach the height of the input device of the input module from the different heights of the conveyor belts, a movable height compensation bridge is used.

Landscapes

• Sorting Of Articles (AREA)
• Warehouses Or Storage Devices (AREA)
• Information Transfer Between Computers (AREA)
• Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
• Manufacturing And Processing Devices For Dough (AREA)
• Pile Receivers (AREA)
• Telephonic Communication Services (AREA)
• Radio Relay Systems (AREA)
• Eye Examination Apparatus (AREA)
• Grinding Of Cylindrical And Plane Surfaces (AREA)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=6479044

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (15)

Families Citing this family (46)

Family Cites Families (6)

• 1993
  • 1993-01-28 DE DE4302231A patent/DE4302231C2/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
• 1994
  • 1994-01-25 EP EP94906144A patent/EP0634957B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1994-01-25 AT AT94906144T patent/ATE152937T1/de not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1994-01-25 RU RU94045282/12A patent/RU94045282A/ru unknown
  • 1994-01-25 PL PL94305434A patent/PL305434A1/xx unknown
  • 1994-01-25 AU AU59992/94A patent/AU671532B2/en not_active Ceased
  • 1994-01-25 BR BR9403897-0A patent/BR9403897A/pt not_active IP Right Cessation
  • 1994-01-25 SK SK1153-94A patent/SK115394A3/sk unknown
  • 1994-01-25 CZ CZ942335A patent/CZ233594A3/cs unknown
  • 1994-01-25 DE DE59402719T patent/DE59402719D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1994-01-25 CA CA002133100A patent/CA2133100C/fr not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 1994-01-25 JP JP51667994A patent/JP3333209B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 1994-01-25 WO PCT/EP1994/000197 patent/WO1994016829A1/fr active IP Right Grant
  • 1994-01-28 US US08/187,558 patent/US5421464A/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 1994-09-27 FI FI944481A patent/FI944481A0/fi not_active Application Discontinuation
  • 1994-09-27 NO NO943590A patent/NO943590L/no unknown

Non-Patent Citations (1)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events