EP0215865A1 - Procede d'ajustement des cylindres broyeurs des moulins a cylindres d'une installation de mouture de cereales, installations de mouture de cereales utilisant ce procede. - Google Patents

Procede d'ajustement des cylindres broyeurs des moulins a cylindres d'une installation de mouture de cereales, installations de mouture de cereales utilisant ce procede.

Info

Publication number
EP0215865A1
EP0215865A1 EP86901845A EP86901845A EP0215865A1 EP 0215865 A1 EP0215865 A1 EP 0215865A1 EP 86901845 A EP86901845 A EP 86901845A EP 86901845 A EP86901845 A EP 86901845A EP 0215865 A1 EP0215865 A1 EP 0215865A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
grinding
computer
values
roller
derived
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP86901845A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0215865B1 (fr
Inventor
Christian Lippuner
Werner Baltensperger
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Buehler AG
Original Assignee
Buehler AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from DE19853519625 external-priority patent/DE3519625A1/de
Application filed by Buehler AG filed Critical Buehler AG
Priority to AT86901845T priority Critical patent/ATE50163T1/de
Publication of EP0215865A1 publication Critical patent/EP0215865A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0215865B1 publication Critical patent/EP0215865B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B02—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING; PREPARATORY TREATMENT OF GRAIN FOR MILLING
    • B02C—CRUSHING, PULVERISING, OR DISINTEGRATING IN GENERAL; MILLING GRAIN
    • B02C4/00—Crushing or disintegrating by roller mills
    • B02C4/28—Details
    • B02C4/32—Adjusting, applying pressure to, or controlling the distance between, milling members

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for adjusting the distances of the grinding rollers in roller mills of a grain mill system, the roller mills each being followed by a sieving system, from which a measurement signal is tapped and fed to a computer which compares it with a stored setpoint and one Deviation by means of a control signal and adjusting devices automatically adjusts the distances between the grinding rollers.
  • the first and oldest solution is the regulation and control of the grinding rollers by the operator (Obermüller) se.bst.
  • Obermüller operator
  • complete control of the entire production process is absolutely necessary.
  • the result of the control is essentially dependent on that. respective., technical skills and experience of the operator, who is usually the supervising miller. If fewer qualified personnel have to be employed for the operation, for example during special times (vacation, night work, etc.), the mill may have a reduced result, for example due to a lower yield of light flour or the like
  • the invention is based on the object of improving a control method of the type mentioned in such a way that, with greatly reduced effort, an almost fully automatic operation with full functionality and zero risk of rocking is made possible, and a mill system for To propose implementation of such a procedure.
  • this is achieved in a method of the type mentioned at the outset in that the measurement signal is derived only from the rejection or diarrhea of the screening system and is fed to the computer from only a few selected key passages.
  • the measures according to the invention increase the ease of use, while at the same time the actual control of the overall control is left to the top miller. In this way it can first be avoided that the entire mill run "starts to oscillate", ie that rocking processes occur, which represents a relatively great danger in many interventions. The really necessary interventions can be reduced to a minimum and carried out by an experienced operator 5.
  • one or more corrections for the control specification can only be made within the framework of an overall overview are carried out since all actual values, including those of the key passages, are displayed centrally at any time and an intervention can be carried out in a very targeted manner, without any predetermined fixed correction program having to run. If an error actually occurs, the greatest error can be easily eliminated first and then the subsequent errors.
  • the method according to the invention makes use of the surprising finding that when using the. Measurement results of only a few selected key passages and their processing in a downstream computer can be used to achieve a largely automated control of the grinding roller spacing in a grain mill system without an extraordinarily large number of further measurement results having to be evaluated by correspondingly complicated computer programs, because the upper miller deliberately intervenes is scheduled.
  • the measurement signal is determined from the amount of rejection of the first shot (B passage), preferably at short intervals, during the grinding process.
  • the measurement signal is preferably likewise taken from passages B and possibly further passages (B %) from the 2 3
  • Quantity of sieve rejection or scrap derived is particularly preferably, however, in addition to the measurement signal in the B passages derived from the amount of sieve rejection or the meal, another measurement signal in the passages C derived from the amount of sieve diarrhea or the amount of flour is also preferably again in short intervals, while derived from the measurement process and fed to the computer.
  • the measurement signal is particularly preferably derived from the amount of rejection or diarrhea of the following combinations of passages:
  • a default setpoint value scheme is stored in the computer for each grain mixture or for each grinding task, in which all the values for the automatic control of the grinding roller spacings, in particular default setting values corresponding to the grinding gap, and the minimum and maximum values for the amount of shot or flour which are valid for the plan sifters recorded below are specified, within which no set values of the roller mills are changed. In this way, an undesired, too frequent correction of the roller settings can be avoided. Because, at least theoretically, a single grinding gap correction in the first shot roller mill in a larger mill system means that the conditions in all the following twenty to thirty roller mills and plan sifters are also changed.
  • a correction program which is independent, is therefore preferably assigned to the computer Correction commands by changing the working setpoints in the order from the largest to the smallest correction. If, for example, there is a strong deviation in the selection passage C, this is corrected first, only then, for example, is a necessary subsequent correction, for example, in passage B etc.
  • the computer contains a basic program that also parameters that are not automatically recorded (such as grinding pressure, force absorption, effective grinding gap width, etc.), in particular also those of the non-automatically controlled machines (ie, not automatically set) - or adjustable roller mills and derived values regarding sieving work) are recorded and can be called up at any time, so that, based on older values, controls and corresponding manual interventions can be carried out.
  • This solution particularly expresses the benefits of the automatic means for all the necessary controls and manual entries.
  • this also has the advantage that the miller can reuse the previous values for each shift in a mill. This also makes it possible to ensure a relatively constant operational management of the mill system, even with changing personnel.
  • the grinding gap is automatically preset for only a part of all the rolling mills and then only for a part of these automatically preset rolling mills the screen rejection and / or the screen diarrhea are measured and the measurement signal is derived from this.
  • the grinding gap is preferably automatically preset only in a part of all the rolling mills, and only in a part of the automatically presettable rolling mills is the sieve rejection and / or sieve diarrhea subsequently measured or the measurement signal derived therefrom, again, preferably, with less than half
  • the grinding gap is automatically preset in all rolling mills and the sieve throughput or sieve rejection is measured in two to six subsequent plan sifters and a measurement signal is derived from this.
  • the measuring signal is derived from instantaneous values of the force components of both the inflow impulse of the product flow and its weight in a weighing vessel, the sieve diarrhea and / or the screen rejection during continuous operation is determined by recording these instantaneous values over a short period of time, a control variable is derived therefrom and is used for the automatic monitoring and possibly control of the roller mills. It is noteworthy that obviously all previous attempts based on the directly operating, continuously operating pulse measuring systems have failed. In these continuous weighing systems, the quantity of product is inferred based on the impulse of a falling product flow, which leads to relatively good results under ideal conditions.
  • a measured value (as in conventional methods), which itself represents a disturbance variable which was precisely the aim of the measurement and control used, is useless, as the past clearly showed.
  • the increase in weight in the weighing vessel is recorded without interruption of the product flow per unit of time in order to determine the control variable, the recorded value is compared with the total mill output and then communicated to the computer as parameters for the display unit.
  • a weighing is preferably in the weighing container carried out according to a pre-given "cycle, preferably about every io to 30 min., And it takes less than 10 seconds, preferably less than 5 seconds.
  • the invention further relates to a grain mill system a series of roller mills and plansifters, in which the grinding rollers
  • this grain mill installation is characterized in that the pulse viewer (s) is assigned a pulse weight measuring system for the continuous detection of the viewing work.
  • the measurement values determined in this way can be determined with the accuracy of scale measurement values without occurrence of a disturbance variable from the product properties, nevertheless they give the advantage of a continuous measurement method similar to that of a belt scale.
  • the essential difference to the belt scale lies in the very simple construction and the correspondingly low manufacturing costs, as is the case with the pulse measuring devices (which are sensitive to disturbances, on the other hand).
  • the mill system according to the invention has a combination of the advantages of the belt scales and the continuous flow meter for the purpose of the invention, without the disadvantages occurring.
  • the grinding rollers are preferably designed to be controllable or regulatable via the computer on the basis of an actual setpoint value comparison for setting or regulating corresponding working parameters that can be set via the grinding rollers (grinding roller speed and / or grinding gap), with, in turn, preferably, the adjusting devices or their drives can be remotely controlled by a central computer and a mechanical or electrical coupling is provided between the drive means and the adjusting coupling.
  • This solution is preferably used for grinding passages, ie for smooth rollers.
  • the setting device or its drive means can preferably be remote-controlled via the computer and provided with a pressure or distance or force absorption limiting device to prevent harmful inputs.
  • Figure i is a schematic representation of a device according to the invention for the automatic monitoring of a pair of grinding rollers
  • Figure 2 is a greatly simplified, basic illustration of the process of monitoring the grinding and visual work of an entire mill system
  • Figure 3 is a schematic representation of some shot and semolina passages with their starting products
  • Figure is a schematic representation of various meal passages.
  • Figure i shows a roller mill i, but only one half or a pair of grinding rollers 2, 2 * is shown.
  • a special peculiarity of the milling roller mill lies in the fact that, unlike products such as stone or coal, the product is not crushed, but also not only squeezed into it. Rather, an actual pressure-shearing process is used, which is achieved by increasing the rotational speed of a roller, such as roller 2 ', in comparison to the rotational speed of the other roller, such as roller 2.
  • the grinding rollers 2, 2 ' may therefore only be engaged if product is present, which can be determined or controlled via a product guiding device 3.
  • the grinding gap itself can be preset to a desired dimension by means of a handwheel 6 or corrected subsequently by the operator if necessary. Irrespective of this manual setting, the grinding gap can also be remotely controlled by a computer 7 with memories 8, 8 ', 8 "for setpoints.
  • the grinding gap can now, for example, as described in EP-B1-0 013 023, to a specific one , optimal value found by previous grinding automatically in the sense of a rough setting via an adjusting motor 9 -I I-
  • a respective analog value for measuring the grinding gap is determined via a production indicator 12 carried along with the chain 10 and reported back to the computer 7 via a control line 13.
  • a plan sifter 14 is shown schematically at the top right.
  • the product flow is represented as an input power in the roller mill 1 with an arrow 15, the arrow 16 shows the product transfer from the roller mill 1 into the plan sifter 14, the arrow 17 denotes the screen rejection and arrow 18 the screen diarrhea.
  • the plan sifter 14 is provided with individual sieve frames 19, 20, 21 and 22, the number of which depends on the product performance and in particular on the respective product quality.
  • FIG. 1 shows the detection of the product throughput as a function of the screen rejection (arrow 17) in a control circuit with solid lines.
  • a weighing vessel 23 is mounted separately from the fixed contact elements via elastic sleeves 27, 28; an inlet 25 and an outlet 26 are also provided.
  • the weighing vessel 23 is supported on electronic weighing elements 24, which transmit the weight signals as measurement signals to a controller 29.
  • a converter 30 emits a pneumatic signal to a cylinder 31, which actuates a closing slide 32.
  • the weighing system is described in more detail in the above-mentioned EP-Bi-o 013 023, to which reference is made in full.
  • an increase in weight per unit of time is measured, for example during a fraction of a second to several seconds, and a derived measurement signal for the ratio of weight / unit of time is output to the computer 7. It is crucial in this new measuring system that the product flow 17 'into the weighing vessel 23 is not interrupted during, before and after the measurement.
  • instantaneous values are measured at intervals of time via the electronic weighing elements 24, for example the product quantity A (after a certain delay after the closing slide 32 has been closed) and the product quantity B in the weighing vessel 23.
  • the difference in fill level between the product quantities A and B corresponds exactly to the amount of product which has flowed into the container from a corresponding time assigned to product amount B to the time assigned to product amount A, from which a corresponding signal for the product throughput can thus be derived. All necessary data (such as input power 15, product mixture and specific grinding specifications) are also entered into the computer ⁇ and kept in the corresponding memories 8, 8 'or 8 ".
  • the corresponding memory locations are called up by a central computer 40 (FIG. 2) via a control line 41 and the data is made available to the computer in accordance with the desired grinding work to be carried out
  • Data are the values for the grain mixture and moisture, for the grinding work and for the input power, but in particular the associated value for the roller mill, the grinding gap, the grinding pressure or the electrical current consumption of the drive motor of the roller mill only a symbol of a pressure measuring device 33 and a current measuring device 34 are shown symbolically , in the example in FIG. 1, approximately the amount of weight per unit of time b plus the screen rejection, which is selected as the preferred key passage for the first shot passage, for example.
  • the measured value of the position indicator 12 (thus a value corresponding to the distance between the grinding rollers) is now referred to as the "roller distance" for the example shown.
  • the amount of product of the first screen rejection or the instantaneous or averaged output of the second shot or the amount of shot B obtained per unit of time is measured and compared accordingly.
  • the absolute value of the roller spacing is no longer of interest for the control to be carried out, since a corresponding numerical value can be determined from previous optimizations, but the The exact value of the shot B is very important. Are all process parameters found to be correct (moistening the grain,
  • the product to be milled is a "living" substance which, depending on the place of origin and climatic conditions or depending on its growth phase, is continuously subject to any influences.
  • the wheat grain breathes, it processes starch, the whiteness changes, and various very complex enzymatic and other processes take place. All of this affects not only the mechanical workability, but also the water absorption behavior and the strength property of the shell parts and of the flour grain.
  • the goal of good grinding is to obtain a high yield of light flour with optimal quality and economically favorable use of the mill system.
  • control means are indispensable so that a person is actually able to actually run a mill plant as a whole and to keep the necessary overview at the same time, which is the main object of the present invention.
  • the values from one or more key passages or the selected sieve diarrhea or sieve rejection as well as one or more important other measured values from the production process are now selected and monitored. For example, if the proportion of rejection of the first shot is 70 to 75% of the mill input, this is an indication for the miller that the processing is going well up to the corresponding point.
  • the control can now be built up in such a way that a narrow tolerance band is selected for the sieving value for each individual grinding task and for each individual grinding passage, within which the grinding sequence is sufficiently satisfactory, which can be indicated, for example, by a corresponding control lamp .
  • a second, larger tolerance band is provided, within which a change in the grinding gap is triggered directly by the computer and, after a corresponding period of time, 1
  • Figure 2 is used as the basic scheme 1 Q for this, only individual specimens being shown in principle as processing machines, even if a large number of such machines are used in practical milling work instead of the individual specimen shown.
  • the central computer 40 has a memory 42 for the setpoint schemes and can be connected to other computer units 43 at the same time, for example to an accounting computer. Depending on the degree of expansion of the system, the computer can be equipped with a central screen 44 and a central input printer 45. In its full expansion
  • one or more portable screens with input printer are preferably provided, which are suitable for local interventions, e.g. with a roller mill, etc., can be used at the workplace.
  • local interventions e.g. with a roller mill, etc.
  • the same reference numerals as in FIG. 1 have been chosen only in the first grinding passage B, although the
  • FIGS. 3 and 4 merely represent enlarged representations from FIG. C 2, the diagramatic connections being evident.
  • the passages labeled B are the beginning of the grinding, S denotes the semolina cleaning machines and C represents the grinding passages.
  • "Div 1" denotes a diviseur.
  • the mill input power that is to say, it is now essential that the amount will, during the entire grinding Ver ⁇ accurately detected to be processed raw grain, for example by a weighing system, denoted at B with 50th Since the reduction passes are fed from different locations at the C-sections is a measurement of the input power 5 at least in CA by a device 51 (shown only schematically) and shown at B, C, by an, in principle,

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Crushing And Grinding (AREA)
  • Disintegrating Or Milling (AREA)

Abstract

Dans un procédé de réglage de l'écartement des cylindres broyeurs (2, 2') dans des moulins à cylindres (1) d'une installation de mouture de céréales, un signal de mesure est dérivé d'un système de tamis (14) monté en aval de chaque moulin à cylindres et transmis à un ordinateur (7). L'ordinateur compare ce signal avec une valeur enregistrée de consigne et ajuste automatiquement l'écartement des cylindres broyeurs en émettant un signal de commande de dispositifs d'ajustement (4, 5), au cas où il existe une différence entre la valeur de consigne et le signal de mesure. Le signal de mesure est dérivé uniquement du rejet (17) par le système de tamis (14) ou du produit passé (18) par le tamis, et uniquement de certains passages-clés sélectionnés, avant d'être transmis à l'ordinateur (7). Dans une installation de moulage de céréales où ce procédé est appliqué, un système de pesage par impulsions (24, 29, 30, 31) est subordonné au(x) plansichter(s) (14) afin de contrôler continuellement le tamisage.
EP86901845A 1985-03-15 1986-03-05 Procede d'ajustement des cylindres broyeurs des moulins a cylindres d'une installation de mouture de cereales, installations de mouture de cereales utilisant ce procede Expired - Lifetime EP0215865B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT86901845T ATE50163T1 (de) 1985-03-15 1986-03-05 Verfahren zum einstellen der mahlwalzen bei walzenstuehlen einer getreidemuehlenanlage sowie getreidemuehlenanlage zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens.

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CH1164/85 1985-03-15
CH116485 1985-03-15
DE19853519625 DE3519625A1 (de) 1985-03-15 1985-05-31 Verfahren zum einstellen der mahlwalzen bei walzenstuehlen einer getreidemuehlenanlage sowie getreidemuehlenanlage zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens
DE3519625 1985-05-31

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0215865A1 true EP0215865A1 (fr) 1987-04-01
EP0215865B1 EP0215865B1 (fr) 1990-02-07

Family

ID=25686852

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP86901845A Expired - Lifetime EP0215865B1 (fr) 1985-03-15 1986-03-05 Procede d'ajustement des cylindres broyeurs des moulins a cylindres d'une installation de mouture de cereales, installations de mouture de cereales utilisant ce procede

Country Status (3)

Country Link
US (1) US4881689A (fr)
EP (1) EP0215865B1 (fr)
WO (1) WO1986005416A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ES2012555A6 (es) * 1987-10-06 1990-04-01 Buehler Ag Geb Procedimiento, molino de cilindros e instalacion para la fabricacion de productos de molienda de cereales.
DE68918701T2 (de) * 1989-12-13 1995-02-09 Satake Eng Co Ltd Mahlvorrichtung und System dafür.
DE4029202A1 (de) * 1990-09-14 1992-03-19 Buehler Ag Verfahren zum sortieren von partikeln eines schuettgutes und vorrichtungen hierfuer
US5269469A (en) * 1990-11-13 1993-12-14 Buhler Ag Method for measuring the fineness or bulk density, apparatus for carrying out the method and control system with such an apparatus
CH682809A5 (de) * 1990-12-12 1993-11-30 Buehler Ag Produktspeiseautomatik, Verfahren zur Steuerung der Vermahlung eines Müllereiwalzenstuhles.
US5547133A (en) * 1993-12-23 1996-08-20 Rogers; Lynn Manufacture process for ground oat cereal
US5505974A (en) * 1993-12-23 1996-04-09 Rogers; Lynn Granular oat-based cereal
IT1288157B1 (it) * 1996-05-03 1998-09-11 Golfetto Spa Procedimento per effettuare il controllo automatico della macinazione in un impianto molitorio ed impianto per effettuare il procedimento.
DE19726551A1 (de) * 1997-06-23 1998-12-24 Buehler Ag Speisesensorik
WO2001003841A1 (fr) * 1999-07-08 2001-01-18 Imeco Automazioni S.R.L. Systeme et dispositif automoteur pour commander des processus de broyage
DE102006016323A1 (de) * 2006-04-06 2007-10-11 Wacker Chemie Ag Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Zerkleinern und Sortieren von Polysilicium
CN105149045B (zh) * 2015-10-16 2017-09-08 王毅 循环撞击磨粉机组及使用撞击磨粉机的循环撞击磨粉方法
CN107552149B (zh) * 2017-10-13 2019-04-23 中国矿业大学 一种辊式破碎机辊缝间隙自动调节装置及工作方法

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2018496A1 (de) * 1970-04-17 1971-10-28 Hazemag Hartzerkleinerungs- und Zement-Maschinenbau GmbH, 4400 Münster Verfahren zum Betrieb einer Prallmühle
GB1415604A (en) * 1973-03-23 1975-11-26 Simon Ltd Henry Cereal milling
DE2855715C3 (de) * 1978-12-22 1982-05-19 Gebrüder Bühler AG, 9240 Uzwil Getreidemühlenanlage zur Herstellung von Mehl

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO8605416A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0215865B1 (fr) 1990-02-07
US4881689A (en) 1989-11-21
WO1986005416A1 (fr) 1986-09-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0336939B3 (fr) Procede de fabrication de l'amidon brut et moulin a amidon
DE2754527C2 (fr)
EP0539537B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de mesure nir en ligne de produits alimentaires coulants
EP0013023B1 (fr) Procédé et installation pour la mouture de céréales
EP0215865B1 (fr) Procede d'ajustement des cylindres broyeurs des moulins a cylindres d'une installation de mouture de cereales, installations de mouture de cereales utilisant ce procede
DE69320281T2 (de) Verfahren zur Überprüfung des Gewichtes von Teigabschnitten
DE4325187A1 (de) Verfahren zur Steuerung einer Walzenmühle sowie eine Steuerung zur Ausführung des Verfahrens
DE69408233T2 (de) Vibrations-kegelbrecher und verfahren zur regelung des laufs eines solchen brechers
DE2106970C3 (de) Ernte- und/oder Verarbeitungsmaschine für landwirtschaftliches Gut, insbesondere für Mähdrescher
DE69704997T2 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Netzen von Getreide
DE2359917A1 (de) Verfahren und einrichtung zum erzeugen eines kontinuierlichen, gleichmaessigen faserverbandes
DE112010003522T5 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zumn Steuern einer Wageeinrichtung fur elektronische Bandwaagen
EP0587829A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de regulation de l'etirage dans un banc d'etirage.
WO2010000816A1 (fr) Système de régulation pour une installation de transformation de céréales
DE10218424A1 (de) Schrotmühle sowie Verfahren zur Zerkleinerung von Mahlgut
WO2000035628A1 (fr) Procede pour commander le processus de meulage et commande automatisee pour meuleuse large
DE3519625A1 (de) Verfahren zum einstellen der mahlwalzen bei walzenstuehlen einer getreidemuehlenanlage sowie getreidemuehlenanlage zur durchfuehrung des verfahrens
DE69329307T2 (de) Dampfdurchflussmesser
DE2413956C2 (de) Getreidemahlverfahren
DE69213487T2 (de) Verfahren und Apparatur zur Überwachung und Kontrolle von Injektionsgeräten
DE102021206044A1 (de) Überwachung der produktion von werkstoffplatten, insbesondere holzwerkstoffplatten, insbesondere unter verwendung einer selbstorganisierenden karte
EP2524584B1 (fr) Appareil agricole
DE1507887A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Herstellen eines bestimmten Mischungsverhaeltnisses verschiedener Komponenten
DE1198177B (de) Verfahren zum Regeln von Rohrmuehlen
DE102005043445B4 (de) Bandfilterpresse zur Saftgewinnung

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19861216

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19880209

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed
GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 50163

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19900215

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3668796

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19900315

ET Fr: translation filed
GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)
NLT1 Nl: modifications of names registered in virtue of documents presented to the patent office pursuant to art. 16 a, paragraph 1

Owner name: BUEHLER AG TE UZWIL, ZWITSERLAND.

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
ITTA It: last paid annual fee
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PFA

Free format text: BUEHLER AG

EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 86901845.7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CL

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19960219

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19960220

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19960222

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19970306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19970331

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: BUHLER A.G.

Effective date: 19970331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19971001

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19971001

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 86901845.7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20010213

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20010214

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20010226

Year of fee payment: 16

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20010313

Year of fee payment: 16

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20010313

Year of fee payment: 16

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020305

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020305

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020331

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20020331

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20021001

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20020305

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20021129

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050305