EP0143775B1 - Projectile perforant sous-calibré et son procédé de fabrication - Google Patents

Projectile perforant sous-calibré et son procédé de fabrication Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0143775B1
EP0143775B1 EP84890215A EP84890215A EP0143775B1 EP 0143775 B1 EP0143775 B1 EP 0143775B1 EP 84890215 A EP84890215 A EP 84890215A EP 84890215 A EP84890215 A EP 84890215A EP 0143775 B1 EP0143775 B1 EP 0143775B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
penetrator
area
tip
deformation
temperature
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired
Application number
EP84890215A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP0143775A2 (fr
EP0143775A3 (en
Inventor
Ekkehard Dipl.-Ing. Auer
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Voestalpine AG
Original Assignee
Voestalpine AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Voestalpine AG filed Critical Voestalpine AG
Publication of EP0143775A2 publication Critical patent/EP0143775A2/fr
Publication of EP0143775A3 publication Critical patent/EP0143775A3/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0143775B1 publication Critical patent/EP0143775B1/fr
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B12/00Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material
    • F42B12/02Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect
    • F42B12/04Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of armour-piercing type
    • F42B12/06Projectiles, missiles or mines characterised by the warhead, the intended effect, or the material characterised by the warhead or the intended effect of armour-piercing type with hard or heavy core; Kinetic energy penetrators
    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B14/00Projectiles or missiles characterised by arrangements for guiding or sealing them inside barrels, or for lubricating or cleaning barrels
    • F42B14/06Sub-calibre projectiles having sabots; Sabots therefor
    • F42B14/061Sabots for long rod fin stabilised kinetic energy projectiles, i.e. multisegment sabots attached midway on the projectile

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a sub-caliber penetrator for a sabot projectile consisting essentially of heavy metal, such as tungsten heavy metal or uranium, in particular depleted uranium, the body of the penetrator being formed in one piece from its tip region to its rear region, and to methods for producing one such penetrators.
  • a depleted uranium is understood to be a natural uranium depleted of 235 U, which accumulates as a residue when enriching natural uranium.
  • the penetrator which is essentially arrow-shaped and has a much smaller diameter than the gun barrel, is surrounded by a larger diameter cage, which is also referred to as a sabot, through which the projectile is guided in the gun barrel.
  • a larger diameter cage which is also referred to as a sabot.
  • the sabot detaches from the penetrator. Since the area on which the propellant charge acts is considerably enlarged by the propellant cage, it is possible to transmit very large propellant forces to the penetrator.
  • the exit speed of the penetrator at the end of the gun barrel can be 1 000-3 500 m / s. Since the penetrator is made of heavy metal, its impact force is very high and such penetrators therefore have an armor-piercing effect.
  • the penetrator must have great strength or hardness. This great strength, which enables the penetrator to penetrate the armor, again results in a great brittleness of the penetrator in the known penetrators.
  • shock-like forces arise when the penetrator penetrates through the armor, which, given the brittleness of the material of the penetrator, entails a risk of breakage, which primarily affects the central area thereof. It has therefore been shown that the shaft of the penetrator often breaks. In this case the kinetic energy of the back part of the shaft of the penetrator is lost and the tip of the penetrator does not get through the armor.
  • GB-A-1 514 908 discloses a full-caliber armor-piercing projectile sintered from tungsten, the diameter of which corresponds to the inside diameter of the barrel and which can be guided in the barrel with swirl and having guide rings.
  • this known projectile has great strength in its tip and great toughness and therefore low strength in its rear region and middle region.
  • the diameter is very small in relation to its length.
  • the propellants When fired, the propellants now act on the relatively weak rear part and if this rear part is as soft as the middle part, there is a risk of the rear part being crushed, which on the one hand affects the external ballistic properties of the penetrator and on the other hand also the risk of the same being jammed in the Sabot exists, so that the release of the sabot is hindered when leaving the barrel.
  • the object of the invention is to reduce the risk of breakage of a penetrator and thus to improve the penetration effect of the penetrator without impairing the mechanical properties when fired.
  • the invention consists essentially in the fact that the penetrator, as is known from GB-A-1 514908, has high strength and low toughness in its tip area and lower strength and greater toughness in its middle area than in its tip area and that the penetrator has a greater strength and less toughness in its rear area than in its central area, but a lower strength and greater toughness than in its tip area.
  • the strength of the tip with the greater strength being accompanied by greater hardness, is essential for penetration of the penetrator into armor and this strength is maintained.
  • the risk of breakage in the known penetrators mainly existed in the central area of the penetrator.
  • this central region has a lower strength and, due to this lower strength, a greater toughness, a risk of breakage is avoided or at least reduced in this region. It is thus ensured that the kinetic energy of the rear part of the penetrator is maintained for the penetration effect, and penetration of the penetrator through the entire armor is therefore at least promoted.
  • the propellant gases result in a very high load on the rear area of the penetrator. If this rear area of the penetrator is now just as tough and therefore soft as is required for the central area to avoid the risk of breakage, a squeeze in the rear area can occur under the effect of the propellant gases.
  • a such squeezing affects the external ballistic properties of the penetrator and disrupts the trajectory. Apart from this, such a crushing can also disrupt the detachment of the penetrator from the sabot when leaving the barrel, as a result of which the trajectory of the penetrator is changed as soon as it is fired. All of these moments affect the accuracy of the penetrator. However, the fact that the rear region of the penetrator has a greater strength than the central region ensures that the rear part withstands the stress caused by the propellant gases when it is fired.
  • the strength in the rear part is lower and therefore the toughness is greater than in the tip area, such chipping in the rear part is avoided.
  • the strength can increase up to 1 300 N / mm 2 in the rear area, for example, whereby the toughness decreases.
  • At least one pre-core can be connected to the tip region of the penetrator. This pre-core penetrates the armor first.
  • the penetrator After the first penetration path has been covered, the penetrator is not stuck in the punched hole, but at the beginning of the penetration path only the preliminary core or the preliminary cores have penetrated into the armor.
  • the penetrator persists in its direction due to its inertia, but tilting moments still occur which, however, since the penetrator is not stuck in the hole, cannot lead to a break in the tip region of the penetrator.
  • the front cores detach from the penetrator without exerting a lateral moment on the penetrator. After a hole has already been punched using the front cores, lateral forces do not occur when the penetrator penetrates further.
  • the pre-core should penetrate the armor and therefore the pre-core must also have great strength.
  • the pre-core expediently consists of the same material as the tip area of the penetrator, and preferably this pre-core has at least the same hardness as the tip area of the penetrator. This ensures the penetration effect of the pre-cores.
  • the pre-core is expediently supported at the front end of the penetrator against the acceleration force.
  • the front core is supported at the front end of the penetrator.
  • the pre-core should only be connected to the penetrator to such an extent that the connection is sufficient for transport and flight.
  • the connection of the pre-core from the penetrator should not be hindered, so that side moments are avoided. It is even sufficient to connect the pre-core to the penetrator using a rubber cord.
  • the pre-core is expediently covered by a slippery hood attached to the front end of the penetrator.
  • This cover is inexpensive for ballistic reasons.
  • the cover can be formed, for example, by a slippery hood made of aluminum.
  • the slippery hood is screwed onto the front end of the penetrator and the preliminary core is supported on the hood with the interposition of a rubber ring.
  • the arrangement can be made so that at least two pre-cores are connected to the front end of the penetrator, the front pre-core having a smaller diameter than the rear pre-core and the rear pre-core having a smaller diameter than the end face of the penetrator so that the rear pre-core passes through an edge bead is centered on the end face of the penetrator and the front pre-core is centered by an edge bead on the end face of the rear pre-core and that the front pre-core is supported against the wind-slipping hood with the interposition of a rubber ring.
  • a penetrator according to the invention can be produced in a manner known per se by sintering, the composition of the sintered powder being able to be selected differently in the different strength ranges of the penetrator.
  • a penetrator which consists essentially of tungsten heavy metal, can be sintered, for example, from a powdery mixture of tungsten heavy metal and addition metals such as iron, nickel, manganese, copper, cobalt and molybdenum, manganese-iron alloy, individually or in groups, the proportion of the additional metals in those areas of the sintered mold which correspond to the areas of lower strength of the penetrator is increased.
  • the invention also relates to special processes for the production of a penetrator for a sabot projectile consisting essentially of heavy metal, such as tungsten heavy metal or uranium, in particular depleted uranium, the body of which penetrates from its tip region to its rear region lig is formed and in its tip area a high strength and low toughness, in a central area of its length a lower strength and greater toughness than in its tip area and in the rear area greater strength and less toughness than in its central area, but less strength and has a greater toughness than in its tip area.
  • heavy metal such as tungsten heavy metal or uranium, in particular depleted uranium
  • the body of the penetrator can be cold forged from a blank which has a larger cross section in the areas which correspond to the areas of greater strength of the penetrator than in the areas which correspond to the areas of lower strength of the penetrator . Since the penetrator should have the same cross section in its finished final state, the cold deformation takes place in the areas of greater strength and lower toughness with a greater degree of deformation than in the areas of greater toughness and lower strength.
  • the penetrator consists essentially of tungsten heavy metal
  • cold forging in the tip region of the penetrator can be carried out with a degree of deformation of up to 30% and cold forging in the rear region of the penetrator with a degree of deformation of up to 20%.
  • the penetrator is cold forged in the tip region of the penetrator with a degree of deformation of 6-20%, in the middle region with a degree of deformation of 2-12% and in the rear region with a degree of deformation of 4-16%.
  • a blank which is homogeneous over its length and is made of a homogeneous alloy of 90-99% tungsten heavy metal, the rest iron, nickel, copper, manganese, cobalt, molybdenum, individually or in groups, is preferably used. In these cases, the differences in strength are only achieved through the degree of deformation. However, a blank sintered from tungsten heavy metal and additional metals can be used, which contains a greater content of additional metals in the areas of lower strength and greater toughness. If the cold forging is carried out with a greater degree of deformation in the areas of the blank in which the proportion of heavy tungsten metal is greater and the proportion of addition metal is smaller, an even greater strength is achieved by the degree of deformation. According to the invention, the penetrator is expediently subjected to annealing at 800-1 550 ° C. after cold forging.
  • the different strength values in the different areas can be generated by different partial heat treatment in these areas.
  • the penetrator is produced from a uranium alloy containing approximately 0.7% titanium and in the tip region at a temperature of 400-600 ° C. preferably 400-500 ° C, in the middle range at a temperature of 180-300 ° C, preferably 180-220 ° C. and partially heat-treated in the rear area at a temperature of 350-450 ° C, preferably 350-400 ° C.
  • the penetrator is made from a depleted uranium alloy containing approximately 2% molybdenum and in the tip region at a temperature of 350-400 ° C., in the middle region at a temperature of 520-670 ° C., preferably 520-570 ° C, and partially heat-treated in the rear area at a temperature of 400-550 ° C, preferably 400-450 ° C. There may also be gradual transitions between the areas of different strengths.
  • the molding from the uranium alloy in question can be cast or sintered.
  • a penetrator made of depleted uranium can also be further solidified by cold working.
  • a uranium penetrator can therefore be cold-forged from a uranium blank which has been assembled and heat-treated in accordance with the invention and which has a larger cross-section in the areas which correspond to the areas of greater strength of the penetrator than in the areas which have smaller areas Correspond to the strength of the penetrator.
  • cold forging in the tip region of the penetrator can be carried out with a degree of deformation of up to 30% and cold forging in the central and rear region of the penetrator with a degree of deformation of 2-12%.
  • Cold forging is expediently carried out in the tip area with a degree of deformation of 6-20%, in the middle area with a degree of deformation of 2-12% and in the rear area with a degree of deformation of 4-16%.
  • the penetrator consisting of uranium, in particular depleted uranium, is heat-treated after the cold forging at a temperature of 300-800 ° C.
  • a heat treatment which is also referred to as recrystallization annealing, continuous transitions between the areas of different strength can be achieved and in this way metallurgical notches between these areas are avoided.
  • the invention is schematically illustrated in the drawing.
  • Fig. 1 shows an example of a sabot projectile with penetrator and sabot, the penetrator being shown in axial section.
  • Fig. 2 shows a diagram of the strength and toughness of a penetrator over the length of the same.
  • 3 shows an example of cold forging a penetrator with a diagram of the degree of forging over the length of the penetrator.
  • Fig. 4 shows a penetrator made of uranium alloys. 5 shows a penetrator with a pre-core.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Electrical Discharge Machining, Electrochemical Machining, And Combined Machining (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Replacement Of Web Rolls (AREA)
  • Manufacture Of Motors, Generators (AREA)
  • Fish Paste Products (AREA)
  • Jib Cranes (AREA)
  • Confectionery (AREA)
  • Drilling Tools (AREA)
  • Earth Drilling (AREA)

Claims (22)

1. Projectile constitué essentiellement d'un métal lourd, comme par exemple un métal lourd à base de tungstène ou de l'uranium, en particulier de l'uranium appauvri, dont le corps est conçu d'une seule pièce depuis sa zone de pointe (c) jusqu'à sa zone arrière (e) et présente dans sa zone de pointe (c) une résistance élevée et une faible ténacité et, dans la zone médiane (d) de sa longueur, une résistance plus faible et une ténacité plus élevée que dans sa zone de pointe (c), caractérisé en ce qu'il est conçu sous forme de projectile perforant (1, 11) pour emploi avec une cage motrice, et présente, dans sa zone arrière (e) une résistance plus grande et une ténacité plus faible que dans sa zone médiane (d), mais une résistance plus faible et une ténacité plus grande que dans sa zone de pointe (c).
2. Projectile perforant selon la revendication 1, qui présente, dans la zone de sa pointe (2), une résistance de 1 100-2000 N/mm2 et une ténacité plus faible que dans sa zone médiane (d), dans sa zone médiane (d) une résistance de 600-900 N/mm2 et une ténacité plus grande que dans sa zone de pointe (c), caractérisé en ce que dans sa zone arrière (e), sa résistance augmente jusqu'à 1 300 N/mm2 et sa ténacité diminue.
3. Projectile perforant selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'à la zone de pointe (c) du projectile perforant (11) est raccordé au moins un prénoyau (14, 15).
4. Projectile perforant selon la revendication 3, caractérisé en ce que le prénoyau (14, 15) est constitué du même matériau que la zone de pointe (c) du projectile perforant (11).
5. Projectile perforant selon la revendication 3 ou 4, caractérisé en ce que le prénoyau (14, 15) présente au moins la même dureté que la zone de pointe (c) du projectile perforant (11).
6. Projectile perforant selon la revendication 3, 4 ou 5, caractérisé en ce que le prénoyau (14, 15) est appuyé contre l'extrémité avant (13) du projectile perforant (11) par l'application de force d'accélération et n'est fixé à cette extrémité que de façon imperdable.
7. Projectile perforant selon l'une des revendications 3 à 6, caractérisé en ce que le prénoyau est recouvert d'un capot (18) caréné fixé à l'extrémité avant (13) du projectile perforant (11).
8. Projectile perforant selon la revendication 7, caractérisé en ce que le capot caréné (18) est constitué d'aluminium.
9. Projectile perforant selon l'une des revendications 3 à 8, caractérisé en ce que le capot caréné (18) est vissé sur l'extrémité avant (13) du projectile perforant (11) ; et en ce que le prénoyau (15) s'appuie contre le capot (18) avec interposition d'un anneau de caoutchouc (21).
10. Projectile perforant selon d'une des revendications 3 à 9, caractérisé en ce qu'à l'extrémité avant (13) du projectile perforant (11) sont raccordés au moins deux prénoyaux (14, 15), étant précisé que le prénoyau avant (15) présente un diamètre plus petit que le prénoyau arrière (14) et que le prénoyau arrière (14) présente un diamètre plus petit que la surface frontale (16) du projectile perforant (11) ; en ce que le prénoyau arrière (14) est centré contre la surface frontale (16) du projectile perforant (11) par un bourrelet de bordure (22) et que le prénoyau avant (15) est centré contre la surface frontale (17) du prénoyau arrière (14) par un bourrelet de bordure (23) ; et en ce que le prénoyau avant (15) s'appuie contre le capot caréné (18) avec interposition d'un anneau de caoutchouc (21).
11. Procédé de fabrication d'un projectile perforant selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que l'on forge à froid le corps du projectile perforant à partir d'une ébauche qui, dans les zones qui correspondent aux zones de plus grande résistance du projectile perforant, présente une section plus grande que dans les zones qui correspondent aux zones de plus petite résistance du projectile perforant.
12. Procédé selon la revendication 11, caractérisé en ce que l'ébauche est essentiellement constituée de métal lourd à base de tungstène ; et en ce que le forgeage à froid dans la zone de pointe du projectile perforant se fait avec un taux de déformation allant jusqu'à 30 % et le forgeage à froid dans la zone arrière du projectile perforant, avec un taux de déformation allant jusqu'à 20 %.
13. Procédé selon la revendication 11 ou 12, caractérisé en ce que le forgeage à froid se fait, dans la zone de pointe du projectile perforant, avec un taux de déformation de 6 à 20 %, dans la zone médiane, avec un taux de déformation de 2-12 % et, dans la zone arrière, avec un taux de déformation de 4-16 %.
14. Procédé selon les revendications 11, 12 ou 13, caractérisé en ce que l'on emploie une ébauche homogène sur toute sa longueur et constituée d'un alliage homogène de 90-99 % de métal lourd à base de tungstène, le reste étant du fer, du nickel, du cuivre, du manganèse, du cobalt, du molybdène, isolément ou à plusieurs.
15. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 11 à 14, caractérisé en ce qu'après le forgeage à froid, on soumet le projectile perforant à un revenu à 800-1 550 °C.
16. Procédé de fabrication d'un projectile perforant selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le projectile perforant est fabriqué en un alliage d'uranium contenant environ 0,7 % de titane ; et en ce qu'il subit un traitement thermique par parties, dans la zone de pointe à une température de 400-600 °C, dans la zone médiane à une température de 180-300 °C, et dans la zone arrière à une température 350-450 °C.
17. Procédé selon la revendication 16, caractérisé en ce que le projectile perforant est fabriqué en un alliage d'uranium contenant environ 0,7 % de titane ; et en ce qu'il subit un traitement thermique par parties, dans la zone de pointe à une température de 400-500 °C. dans la zone médiane à une température de 180-220 °C. et dans la zone arrière à une température de 350-400 °C.
18. Procédé de fabrication d'un projectile perforant selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le projectile perforant est fabriqué en un alliage d'uranium appauvri contenant environ 2 % de molybdène ; et en ce qu'il subit un traitement thermique par parties, dans la zone de pointe à une température de 350-400 °C, dans la zone médiane à une température de 520-670 °C, et dans la zone arrière à une température de 400-550 °C.
19. Procédé selon la revendication 18, caractérisé en ce que le projectile perforant est fabriqué en un alliage d'uranium appauvri contenant environ 2 % de molybdène ; et en ce qu'il subit un traitement thermique par parties, dans la zone de pointe à une température de 350-400 °C, dans la zone médiane à une température de 520-570 °C, et dans la zone arrière à une température de 400-450 °C.
20. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 11 et 16 à 19, caractérisé en ce que le forgeage à froid se fait, dans la zone de pointe du projectile perforant, avec un taux de déformation allant jusqu'à 30 % et, dans la zone médiane et dans la zone arrière du projectile perforant, avec un taux de déformation de 2-12 %.
21. Procédé selon l'une des revendications 11 et 16 à 19, caractérisé en ce que le forgeage à froid se fait, dans la zone de pointe du projectile perforant, avec un taux de déformation de 6 à 20 %, dans la zone médiane, avec un taux de déformation de 2-12 %, et, dans la zone arrière avec un taux de déformation de 4-16 %.
22. Procédé selon la revendication 20 ou 21, caractérisé en ce qu'après le forgeage à froid, le projectile perforant subit un traitement thermique sous une température de 300-800 °C.
EP84890215A 1983-11-23 1984-11-14 Projectile perforant sous-calibré et son procédé de fabrication Expired EP0143775B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (8)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT4114/83 1983-11-23
AT411483 1983-11-23
AT132484 1984-04-19
AT132384 1984-04-19
AT1324/84 1984-04-19
AT1323/84 1984-04-19
AT1774/84 1984-05-29
AT177484 1984-05-29

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0143775A2 EP0143775A2 (fr) 1985-06-05
EP0143775A3 EP0143775A3 (en) 1986-06-25
EP0143775B1 true EP0143775B1 (fr) 1989-01-11

Family

ID=27421498

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP84890215A Expired EP0143775B1 (fr) 1983-11-23 1984-11-14 Projectile perforant sous-calibré et son procédé de fabrication

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US4665828A (fr)
EP (1) EP0143775B1 (fr)
AT (1) ATE40006T1 (fr)
BR (1) BR8405954A (fr)
DE (1) DE3476117D1 (fr)
ES (1) ES8606037A1 (fr)
IL (1) IL73583A (fr)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3929015A1 (de) * 1989-09-01 1991-03-14 Diehl Gmbh & Co Unterkalibriges uebungsgeschoss
DE202015004089U1 (de) 2015-06-02 2015-08-04 Bundesrepublik Deutschland, vertreten durch das Bundesministerium der Verteidigung, dieses vertreten durch das Bundesamt für Ausrüstung, Informationstechnik und Nutzung der Bundeswehr Penetrator

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3634433A1 (de) * 1986-10-09 1988-04-14 Diehl Gmbh & Co Einlage fuer hohlladungen bzw. penetratoren oder wuchtkoerper fuer geschosse
DE3705382A1 (de) * 1987-02-20 1988-09-01 Diehl Gmbh & Co Penetrator und verfahren zu seiner herstellung
US4722825A (en) * 1987-07-01 1988-02-02 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Method of fabricating a metal/ceramic composite structure
DE3723909C2 (de) * 1987-07-18 1994-12-08 Rheinmetall Gmbh Penetrator
FR2633205B1 (fr) * 1988-06-22 1992-04-30 Cime Bocuze Procede de mise en forme directe et d'optimisation des caracteristiques mecaniques de projectiles perforants en alliage de tungstene a haute densite
DE3821474C1 (de) * 1988-06-25 1998-08-27 Nwm De Kruithoorn Bv Unterkalibriges, drallstabilisiertes Mehrzweckgeschoß
US5078054A (en) * 1989-03-14 1992-01-07 Olin Corporation Frangible projectile
US4940404A (en) * 1989-04-13 1990-07-10 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Method of making a high velocity armor penetrator
DE3926711C2 (de) * 1989-08-12 1995-12-07 Rheinmetall Ind Gmbh Geschoß mit Innenraum
DE3932383C2 (de) * 1989-09-28 1995-01-05 Rheinmetall Gmbh Geschoßkörper
FR2664039B1 (fr) * 1990-07-02 1994-09-23 Sauvestre Jean Claude Alliages mixtes organiques-metalliques pour realisation de projectiles.
DE4023482A1 (de) * 1990-07-24 1992-01-30 Rheinmetall Gmbh Unterkalibriges wuchtgeschoss
DE19619341C2 (de) * 1996-05-14 1999-11-11 Rheinmetall W & M Gmbh Unterkalibriges Wuchtgeschoß und Verfahren zu seiner Herstellung
WO2002073115A1 (fr) * 2001-03-13 2002-09-19 Robert Frederick Bunney Appareil
US7243588B2 (en) * 2001-05-15 2007-07-17 Doris Nebel Beal Inter Vivos Patent Trust Power-based core for ammunition projective
US6840149B2 (en) * 2001-05-15 2005-01-11 Doris Nebel Beal Inter Vivos Patent Trust In-situ formation of cap for ammunition projectile
DE10231777A1 (de) * 2002-07-13 2004-02-05 Diehl Munitionssysteme Gmbh & Co. Kg Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Wolfram-Basismaterials und Verwendung desselben
US20040055501A1 (en) * 2002-09-20 2004-03-25 Hunn David L. Penetrator and method for using same
FR2987891B1 (fr) * 2012-03-06 2014-09-26 Nexter Munitions Projectile sous calibre a structure de tete amenagee
DE102013212528A1 (de) * 2013-06-27 2014-12-31 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren zur Herstellung eines Stahlformkörpers
DE102015117018A1 (de) * 2015-10-06 2017-04-06 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Penetrator sowie unterkalibriges Geschoss
DE102020120747A1 (de) * 2020-08-06 2022-02-10 Rheinmetall Waffe Munition Gmbh Penetrator, Verwendung eines Penetrators und Geschoss

Family Cites Families (18)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR363305A (fr) * 1906-02-15 1906-07-26 Elias Mattison Johnson Projectile d'artillerie pour perforer les cuirasses, et son mode de fabrication
FR829623A (fr) * 1937-10-05 1938-07-01 Acieries De Champagnole Procédé d'établissement de projectiles à grande puissance de perforation et produits nouveaux en résultant
US2401483A (en) * 1940-07-31 1946-06-04 Mallory & Co Inc P R Projectile and method of making the same
US2393648A (en) * 1942-02-20 1946-01-29 Carl A Martin Projectile
US2435095A (en) * 1942-06-24 1948-01-27 Harry J Nichols Projectile
FR1231010A (fr) * 1950-12-29 1960-09-26 Cie Ind Des Metaux Electroniqu Projectiles à corps ou noyau composite et leur procédé de fabrication
US2922366A (en) * 1956-05-22 1960-01-26 Lyon George Albert Projectile nose structure
FR1212390A (fr) * 1959-05-26 1960-03-23 Emploi de nouveaux matériaux pour éléments de munitions et procédés d'obtention de ces éléments
US3302570A (en) * 1965-07-23 1967-02-07 Walter G Finch Armor piercing, fragmenting and incendiary projectile
US3880083A (en) * 1967-05-19 1975-04-29 Us Army Bimetallic mass stabilized flechette
LU56486A1 (fr) * 1968-07-15 1969-05-21
BE794801A (fr) * 1972-01-31 1973-07-31 Int Nickel Ltd Procede de recuit en zones d'alliages
GB1514908A (en) * 1974-01-22 1978-06-21 Mallory Metallurg Prod Ltd Armour piercing projectiles
CH627549A5 (de) * 1977-11-28 1982-01-15 Oerlikon Buehrle Ag Verfahren zur herstellung eines panzerbrechenden geschosses.
FR2490805B1 (fr) * 1980-09-23 1985-10-31 France Etat Projectile empenne du type fleche
US4458599A (en) * 1981-04-02 1984-07-10 Gte Products Corporation Frangible tungsten penetrator
DE3209593A1 (de) * 1982-03-17 1983-09-29 Rheinmetall GmbH, 4000 Düsseldorf Unterkalibriges panzerbrechendes wuchtgeschoss (penetrator)
US4428295A (en) * 1982-05-03 1984-01-31 Olin Corporation High density shot

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3929015A1 (de) * 1989-09-01 1991-03-14 Diehl Gmbh & Co Unterkalibriges uebungsgeschoss
DE202015004089U1 (de) 2015-06-02 2015-08-04 Bundesrepublik Deutschland, vertreten durch das Bundesministerium der Verteidigung, dieses vertreten durch das Bundesamt für Ausrüstung, Informationstechnik und Nutzung der Bundeswehr Penetrator

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0143775A2 (fr) 1985-06-05
ES537862A0 (es) 1986-04-01
IL73583A (en) 1990-12-23
ES8606037A1 (es) 1986-04-01
EP0143775A3 (en) 1986-06-25
BR8405954A (pt) 1985-09-17
DE3476117D1 (en) 1989-02-16
US4665828A (en) 1987-05-19
ATE40006T1 (de) 1989-01-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0143775B1 (fr) Projectile perforant sous-calibré et son procédé de fabrication
DE60010884T2 (de) Expansionsgeschoss
EP1502074B1 (fr) Projectile a decomposition partielle et a deformation a point d'impact identique et procede de manufacture d'un tel projectile
EP0291845B1 (fr) Projectile à noyau et à enveloppe
DE2703638C2 (fr)
EP0088999B1 (fr) Projectile à noyau perforant pour combattre des armures multicouches
EP0088898B1 (fr) Projectile de calibre réduit à noyau perforant
EP1214560B2 (fr) Projectile a destruction partielle avec penetrateur en tant que culot
DE19604061A1 (de) Kern-Geschoß
EP1222436B1 (fr) Projectile a deformation avec penetrateur dans la tete
WO2018177713A1 (fr) Projectile, en particulier dans le domaine des moyens calibres
WO2001018483A1 (fr) Projectile de carabine pour la chasse a teneur en plomb reduite ou sans plomb, presentant une force de retention du noyau dans la chemise amelioree
DE102007037738A1 (de) Geschoss mit einem Führungskäfig und Pusherplatte mit beschleunigungsoptimierter Öffnung
EP1196734B1 (fr) Projectile a decomposition partielle pourvu d'un penetrateur dans sa partie avant
DE3617415C2 (de) Unterkalibriges Treibspiegelgeschoß
DE1453811B1 (de) Panzergranate
EP3742106B1 (fr) Pénétrateur, utilisation d'un pénétrateur et projectile
EP2719993A2 (fr) Projectile de chasse à expansion
EP0149703B1 (fr) Projectile anti-char
DE10045009A1 (de) Jagdbüchsengeschoß mit zusätzlich gekapseltem Kern
EP0989381B1 (fr) Projectile sous-calibré
DE102004035385A1 (de) Teilzerlegungsgeschoss mit massivem Kern und Kern aus gepresstem Pulver
DE3724401A1 (de) Fluegelstabilisiertes, unterkalibriges treibkaefiggeschoss
EP1656533B1 (fr) Projectile a desagregation partielle comprenant un noyau massif et un noyau en poudre comprimee
AT334787B (de) Teilmanteljagdgeschoss

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR GB SE

RTI1 Title (correction)
PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR GB SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19860701

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19870624

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR GB SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 40006

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19890115

Kind code of ref document: T

GBT Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977)
REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3476117

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19890216

ET Fr: translation filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19891016

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19891018

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19891019

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 19891020

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19891023

Year of fee payment: 6

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19891031

Year of fee payment: 6

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19901114

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19901114

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19901115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19901130

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: VOEST-ALPINE A.G.

Effective date: 19901130

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19910731

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19910801

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 84890215.1

Effective date: 19910705