Classifications

• • D—TEXTILES; PAPER
  • D01—NATURAL OR MAN-MADE THREADS OR FIBRES; SPINNING
  • D01F—CHEMICAL FEATURES IN THE MANUFACTURE OF ARTIFICIAL FILAMENTS, THREADS, FIBRES, BRISTLES OR RIBBONS; APPARATUS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR THE MANUFACTURE OF CARBON FILAMENTS
  • D01F6/00—Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof
  • D01F6/88—Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from mixtures of polycondensation products as major constituent with other polymers or low-molecular-weight compounds
  • D01F6/92—Monocomponent artificial filaments or the like of synthetic polymers; Manufacture thereof from mixtures of polycondensation products as major constituent with other polymers or low-molecular-weight compounds of polyesters
• • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
  • A63—SPORTS; GAMES; AMUSEMENTS
  • A63B—APPARATUS FOR PHYSICAL TRAINING, GYMNASTICS, SWIMMING, CLIMBING, OR FENCING; BALL GAMES; TRAINING EQUIPMENT
  • A63B51/00—Stringing tennis, badminton or like rackets; Strings therefor; Maintenance of racket strings
  • A63B51/02—Strings; String substitutes; Products applied on strings, e.g. for protection against humidity or wear

Definitions

• the present invention relates to a process for the preparation of polyethylene terephthalate monofilaments.
• Monofilaments derived from polyethylene terephthalate have a high rigidity as compared with nylon monofilaments and have suitable qualities for use as fishing lines, especially leaders, gut for tennis rackets and other uses requiring rigidity.
• conventional polyethylene terephthalate monofilaments have shown the disadvantage that, although the monofilaments have a knot strength against tension almost identical with that of nylon monofilaments of the same fineness, their knot strength against impact is so small as to be in the range of between one-sixth and one-tenth of that of the nylon monofilaments.
• a process for the preparation of polyethylene terephthalate monofilaments has been disclosed in Japanese Laid Open Patent Application No. 103308/1980.
• a polyethylene terephthalate monofilament not,subjected to drawing is drawn to 3 to 3.5 times its original size in water having a temperature of in the range of from 85 to 95°C and the monofilament is further drawn to 1.7 to 2.3 times the first drawn size in a gas having a temperature of in the range of from 150 to 260°C.
• the monofilament is then subjected to heat treatment in a gas having a temperature in the range of from 200 to 260°C through take-up ratios (or relax ratios) of between 1.0 and 0.95.
• take-up ratios or relax ratios
• the present invention provides a process for the preparation of a polyethylene terephthalate monofilament in which a non-drawn monofilament made of a mixture comprising 100 parts by weight of polyethylene terephthalate and in the range of from 5 to 150 parts by weight of modified polyethylene terephthalate having a molar ratio of terephthalic acid to isophthalic acid in the range of from 97/3 to 80/20 is drawn to 2.8 to 4.0 times its original size at a temperature in the range of from 85 C to 100°C under humid heating conditions and is further drawn to 1.5 to 2.5 times its first drawn size in a gas having a temperature in the range of from 180 to 250 0 C and then, the second drawn monofilament is heat treated in a gas having a temperature of in the range of from 180 to 250 0 C through a take-up ratio of in the range of from 0.9 to 1.0.
• a polyethylene terephthalate monofilament prepared according to a process of the present invention has a knot strength against tension substantially identical to or higher than conventional polyethylene terephthalate monofilaments and also has-a far greater knot strength against impact than such filaments. More importantly, a monofilament prepared by a process of the invention has been found to be stronger than a conventional nylon filament in terms of both tensile strength and knot strength. A monofilament of the invention also does not show any whitening of the filament. Whitening in a filament indicates that although the filament is strong the filament can split easily in the vertical direction in use; this is an important disadvantage with regard to fishing lines.
• the monofilaments produced do not exhibit the advantagous properties described.
• whitening occurs.
• Polyethylene terephthalate suitable for use in the present invention should have an ultimate viscosity of.- between 0.4 and 1.5, preferably of between 0.6 and 1.2 (the ultimate viscosity is the viscosity, at a temperature of 30°C, of a solution containing 1g resin per 100 ml of solvent, the solvent being a mixture of tetrachloroethane and phenol in a weight ratio of 1/1).
• Modified polyethylene terephthalate having a molar ratio of terephthalic acid to isophthalic acid ranging from 97/3 to 80/20 is prepared by mixing terephthalic acid or an ester-forming derivative thereof, such as dimethyl isophthalate, and isophthalic acid or an ester-forming derivative thereof, such as dimethyl isophthalate, in a molar ratio of between 97/3 and 80/20 and then, subjecting the mixture to condensation polymerization with ethylene glycol or ethylene oxide by any suitable production method for a polyester.
• the modified polyethylene terephthalate suitably has an ultimate viscosity of in the range of from 0.4 to 1.5, preferably from 0.6 to 1.2
• the mixture of polyethylene terephthalate and the modified polyethylene terephthalate used contains from-, 1 0 to 100 parts by weight of the modified polyethylene terephthalate.
• the molar ratio of terephthalic acid to isophthalic acid is usually in the range of from 99:1 to 90:10, preferably of from 99:1 to 95:5. The ratio will vary according to the amount of isophthalic acid in the modified polyethylene terephthalate and the mixing ratio of polyethylene terephthalate and the modified polyethylene terephthalate.
• Polyethylene terephthalate and the modified polyethylene terephthalate can be mixed by suitable methods in which, for example, pellets of both the components are blended, the blended substance subjected to fusion kneading using an extruder and extruded so as to be formed into a pellet.
• a non-drawn monofilament may be produced by subjecting the specified mixture of polyethylene terephthalate and the modified polyethylene terephthalate to fusion spinning in usual manner.
• the non-drawn monofilament should suitably have a fineness of more than 100 denier, usually more than 200 denier, but less than some ten thousands denier.
• the non-drawn monofilament is drawn twice under specific conditions and then heat treated under specific conditions.
• the temperature of the surrounding fluid is an average of 3 or more temperatures of the fluid measured adjacent to the monofilament within 1 cm from the monofilament.
• the drawing magnification is the value given from consideration of the speed ratio of a feed roller and a take-up roller.
• the temperature under wet or humid heating conditions is preferably in the range of from 93 to 97°C.
• the drawing magnification in that stage is preferably in the range of from 3.0 to 3.5.
• a residence time of the monofilament in the drawing is usually in the range of from 2 to 10 sec., preferably from 3 to 6 sec.
• drawing under wet or humid heating refers to drawing in, for example, hot water or steam.
• the monofilament thus drawn as described above is further drawn in heated gas to 1.5 to 2.5 times the first drawn size in the second drawing stage.
• gas air or inert gases such as nitrogen may be employed but usually air is used.
• the temperature of the medium in the second drawing stage is preferably in the range of from 180 to 240°C.
• the drawing magnification is preferably in the range of from 1.8 to 2.2.
• the residence time of the monofilament in the drawing is normally in the range of from 1 to 10 sec., preferably from 2 to 4 sec.
• the monofilament is then heat treated. Again if the temperature is too low, a monofilament having a high knot strength against impact cannot be obtained and, if the temperature is too high, an undersirable whitening phenomenon of the monofilament occurs. It is important that drawing should not be performed in the heat treatment. If drawing is performed in the heat treatment, a monofilament having a high knot strength against impact cannot be obtained.
• the temperature in the heat treatment is advantageously higher than that for the above-described drawing and is preferably in the range of between 185 and 245°C.
• the residence time of the monofilament in the heat treatment is generally in the range of from 1 to 3 sec., preferably from 1 to 2 sec.
• a "take-up” or “relax” ratio is the ratio of the speed of rotation of the take-up roller, or filament winding drum, to that of the feed roller, or filament releasing drum. For example, a take-up roller rotating at 90 m per minute and a feed roller rotating at 100 m per minute would give a take-' up ratio of 0.9.
• the take-up ratio is preferably in the range of from 0.95 to 0.98.
• a total drawing magnification given as a result of all three stages i.e. the product of values of the drawing magnification for each of the two drawing steps and a value of the take-up ratio in the heat treatment is suitably in the range of from 5.5 to 6.5, preferably from 6 to 6.25.
• Knot strength against tension in the dried state is a value measured in accordance with JIS-L1070 while knot strength against impact in the dried state is a value of a force required for cutting a knotted portion of a monofilament by applying an impact to the monofilament in its longitudinal direction with one end of the monofilament being fixed to a jig and the other end being held by the jig, such as by the use of an impact tester.
• a polyethylene terephthalate monofilament having a substantially identical or higher knot strength against tension and transparency and a far higher knot strength against impact in comparison with polyethylene terephthalate monofilaments produced by previously proposed methods can be produced. It has been found, in comparison with conventional nylon filaments, that a filament of the present invention is in the range of from 10 to 15% stronger in terms of tensile strength and in the range of from 15 to 20% stronger in terms of knot strength. Such monofilaments are of high industrial value.
• knot strength against impact was measured using a Universal Impact Tester manufactured by Toyo Seiki Seisakusho Co., Ltd. and the transparency was based on a visual inspection in which a monofilament 2000 m. in length was wound around a bobbin of 10 cm diameter and 20 cm height.
• Polyethylene terephthalate (Novapet 1110B produced by Mitsubishi Kasei Kogyo Co., Ltd.), in pellet form having an ultimate viscosity of 1.10 and modified polyethylene terephthalate, in pellet form, having an ultimate viscosity of 0.73, obtained by condensation polymerization of a mixture, having a molar ratio of 90:10,of dimethyl terephthalate to dimethyl isophthalate, and ethylene glycol were mixed in usual manner at the ratios shown in Table 1 to produce a non-drawn monofilament having a fineness of 2400 denier.
• the non-drawn monofilament was fed at a rate of 20m/min. and was subjected to first drawing in hot water, second drawing in air, and heat treatment in air under conditions described in Table 1.
• the non-drawn monofilament was fed at a rate or 20m/min., it was drawn to 3.0 times its original size in hot water at a temperature of 96°C and then drawn to 2.14 times the first drawn size in air at a temperature of 200°C and heat treated in air at a temperature of 230°C and a take-up ratio of 0.98.
• the monofilament thus obtained had a knot strength against tension, of 5.3 g/d in the dry state, a knot strength against impact, of 85 kg.cm/mm 2 in the dry state and was transparent.
• a knot strength against tension of 5.3g/d in the dry state
• a knot strength against impact of 85 kg.cm/mm 2 in the dry state and was transparent.
• the monofilament thus obtained had a knot strength against tension, of 5.3g/d in the dry state, a knot strength against impact, of 6 0 kg.cm/mm2 in the dry state and was subject to slight whitening.
• polyethylene terephthalate, in pellet form the same as that employed in Example 1, and 67 parts by weight of modified polyethylene terephthalate, in pellet form, having an ultimate viscosity of 0.745 obtained by condensation polymerization of a mixture,having a molar ratio of 95:5,of dimethyl terephthalate to dimethyl isophthalate and ethylene glycol were mixed so as to produce a monofilament in the same manner as in Example 6.
• the monofilament thus obtained had knot strength against tension, of 5.48 g/d in the dry state, a knot strength against impact, of 77 kg.cm/mm2 in the dry state and was transparent.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=13578188

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (2)

Families Citing this family (1)

Citations (3)

• 1981
  • 1981-05-19 JP JP7550681A patent/JPS6014845B2/ja not_active Expired
• 1982
  • 1982-05-18 EP EP82302534A patent/EP0067541A3/en not_active Withdrawn

Patent Citations (3)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events