WO2022097222A1 - Dispositif et procédé d'agencement et de conception d'une installation de machinerie d'ascenseur dans un immeuble - Google Patents

Dispositif et procédé d'agencement et de conception d'une installation de machinerie d'ascenseur dans un immeuble Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2022097222A1
WO2022097222A1 PCT/JP2020/041301 JP2020041301W WO2022097222A1 WO 2022097222 A1 WO2022097222 A1 WO 2022097222A1 JP 2020041301 W JP2020041301 W JP 2020041301W WO 2022097222 A1 WO2022097222 A1 WO 2022097222A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
building
elevator
layout pattern
layout
unit
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2020/041301
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
圭佑 毛利
Original Assignee
三菱電機株式会社
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by 三菱電機株式会社 filed Critical 三菱電機株式会社
Priority to PCT/JP2020/041301 priority Critical patent/WO2022097222A1/fr
Publication of WO2022097222A1 publication Critical patent/WO2022097222A1/fr

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66B—ELEVATORS; ESCALATORS OR MOVING WALKWAYS
    • B66B1/00—Control systems of elevators in general
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/13—Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads

Definitions

  • This disclosure relates to the layout design of elevator equipment in a building that determines the required number and layout of elevators and escalators at the design stage of buildings such as buildings and large commercial facilities.
  • the elevator equipment layout design such as the required number of elevators has been decided based on the calculation results by the traffic calculation formula such as the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator and the average operation interval.
  • the traffic calculation formula such as the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator and the average operation interval.
  • elevator installation planning support that determines elevator specifications based on the entered traffic demand and service performance targets, and repeatedly improves and evaluates elevator specifications by inference means until the service performance reaches the target.
  • Devices have been proposed (see, for example, Patent Document 1).
  • This disclosure is made to solve the above-mentioned problems, and the optimum number of elevators installed in buildings, buildings, and facilities of various scales and usage patterns and the optimum arrangement of elevators on the layout pattern.
  • the elevator equipment layout design device in a building includes an information input unit for inputting building information and a design target value, a calculation unit for calculating an elevator equipment plan based on the building information and a design target value, and an elevator equipment. It has an output unit that outputs the plan, and the arithmetic unit is a part of the elevator equipment plan, and creates a layout pattern that creates multiple layout patterns that represent the width and length of the passage in the building and the number and operation speed of the elevators. Evaluation unit for the unit, the person flow evaluation unit that calculates the total travel time of the user for the layout pattern, the total travel time of the user, the elevator cost, and the area of the building that does not include the elevator and the passage of the building. It has an optimum solution calculation unit that determines a layout pattern from a plurality of layout patterns based on the above.
  • FIG. It is an overall block diagram of the elevator equipment arrangement design apparatus in a building which concerns on Embodiment 1.
  • FIG. It is a schematic diagram showing the tenant and facility in the building which concerns on Embodiment 1 using topology. It is a figure which shows the flow form of the person which concerns on Embodiment 1.
  • FIG. It is a person flow evaluation table which concerns on Embodiment 1.
  • It is an example diagram showing the connection relationship diagram which concerns on Embodiment 1 as a layout pattern.
  • It is a flowchart which shows the operation of the arithmetic unit which concerns on Embodiment 1.
  • FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram of an elevator equipment layout design device 100 in a building according to the first embodiment.
  • the in-building elevator equipment layout design device 100 calculates an elevator equipment plan according to an information input unit 10 for inputting building information and a design target value, and the input building information and a design target value.
  • a unit 20 and an operation result output unit 70, which is an output unit for outputting the operation result, are provided.
  • the elevator includes an elevator and an escalator.
  • the information input unit 10 inputs building information and design target values.
  • Building information includes the floor area of the building, the shape of the building, the number of floors of the building, information on tenants and facilities entering each floor, and the location of entrances and exits.
  • the building information includes the number of users entering and exiting at the entrance / exit for each time zone, the number of users for each time zone of tenants and facilities, and the ratio of the number of users for each time zone of elevators, escalators, and stairs.
  • the information input unit 10 inputs the location information of the tenant or facility regardless of the transportation efficiency of the entire building. .. If the location of the tenant or facility is not determined, the width of the passage and the length of the passage on each floor will be adjusted in the next calculation unit 20, and the tenant or facility will be adjusted in consideration of the transportation efficiency of the entire building. The position is decided.
  • the information input unit 10 inputs a design target value.
  • Design target values are set for each of the effective area of the building, the cost of the elevator, the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator, the average operating interval of the elevator, and the like.
  • the effective area of the building is the area of the building that does not include the passage and the elevator of the building.
  • Elevator costs include elevator installation costs and repair costs.
  • the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator and the average operating interval of the elevator are indicators for measuring the transport efficiency of the entire building. According to Non-Patent Document 1, the 5-minute transport capacity of elevators is 11 to 25% for office buildings, 3.5 to 5% for apartment buildings, and 8 to 10% for hotels. Has been done.
  • the interval is 30 seconds or less in the case of an office building, 90 seconds or less in the case of one elevator in a condominium, and 90 seconds or less in the case of a condominium with two or more elevators. It is said that 60 seconds or less, and in the case of a hotel, 40 seconds or less is desirable.
  • the information input unit 10 inputs weighting parameters for the time zone and the destination used in the calculation unit 20 described later.
  • the weighting parameters include the total travel time of the user, the elevator cost, and the weighting of which of the effective areas of the building is emphasized to determine the optimum solution.
  • the weighting parameters include weighting for the arrival time to the destination with a large number of users and the arrival time to the destination with a small number of users, and the time zone with a large number of users and the time zone with a small number of users. Weighting for and is also included. If there is weighting for each destination, the information input unit 10 also inputs the weighting value and ratio.
  • the information input unit 10 also inputs the width of the passage when examining the layout pattern, the length of the passage, the stepped width of the dimensions when changing the area of the room, and the like.
  • the smaller the step size of the dimension the more detailed layouts can be examined, but the number of examination patterns increases and the calculation time increases.
  • the calculation unit 20 calculates the elevator equipment plan based on the building information input to the information input unit 10 and the design target value.
  • the elevator equipment plan includes the optimal number of elevators and the optimal placement of elevators.
  • the calculation unit 20 has a connection relationship creation unit 30, a layout pattern creation unit 40, a human flow evaluation unit 50, and an optimum solution in order to calculate the optimum number of elevators and the optimum arrangement of elevators based on the building information and the design target value.
  • a calculation unit 60 is provided.
  • FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the tenants and facilities in the building using the topology.
  • the connection relationship creation unit 30 creates a connection relationship diagram that replaces the facility of the building, the passage of the building, and the elevator as a schematic diagram composed of dots and lines.
  • the connection relationship creation unit 30 may create a schematic diagram using the topology. Based on the tenant information and facility information entered on each floor input by the information input unit 10, the connection relationship creation unit 30 replaces the entrance / exit, tenant, facility, etc. of the building with dots as in the example shown in FIG. , Connect the passages and elevators that connect tenants and facilities as lines to create a connection diagram. For example, in FIG.
  • the line connecting the 1st floor boarding / alighting section and the 2nd floor boarding / alighting section on the left side indicates an escalator
  • the line connecting the 1st floor boarding / alighting section and the 2nd floor boarding / alighting section on the right side indicates an elevator
  • the other lines indicate a passage. ing.
  • the length of the passage and the width of the passage are given as parameters in the layout pattern creating unit 40 described below.
  • the human flow evaluation unit 50 can calculate the walking speed of a person.
  • the layout pattern creation unit 40 gives the number of elevators, the number of passengers per vehicle and the operating speed, and the number of escalators, the step width, and the operating speed as parameters.
  • the human flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the time required to reach the destination floor using the elevator.
  • the layout pattern creation unit 40 is a part of the elevator equipment plan, and creates a plurality of layout patterns representing the width and length of the passage of the building, the number of elevators, and the operating speed.
  • the layout pattern creation unit 40 assigns a serial number to the created layout pattern, and assigns a serial number to the layout pattern to be created last so that it can be identified as the last.
  • the number of elevators means the number of elevators by type, for example, the number of elevators and the number of escalators. However, there may be cases where there are no elevators or zero escalators.
  • the layout pattern creating unit 40 creates a layout pattern such as where to arrange an elevator or a passage based on the floor area of the building, the shape of the building, the number of floors of the building, etc. input by the information input unit 10. Then, the layout pattern creating unit 40 calculates the width and length of the feasible passage, the number of elevators, the operating speed, and the like within the range of the effective area of the building and the design target value of the elevator cost. Further, the layout pattern creating unit 40 is a layout pattern design value that serves as an index for determining whether the effective area of the building, the elevator cost, the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator, and the average operation interval of the elevator are within the design target value. Is calculated. The layout pattern creating unit 40 gives the width and length of the passage of the building, the number of elevators, and the operating speed as parameters for the connection relationship diagram created by the connection relationship creating unit 30.
  • the layout pattern creating unit 40 changes the width of the passage of the building according to the step size of the dimensions input by the information input unit 10 within the range of the effective area of the building and the design target value of the elevator cost.
  • the layout pattern creating unit 40 changes the parameters of the number of elevators and the operating speed within the range of the effective area of the building and the design target values of the elevator cost.
  • the person flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the total travel time of the user for the layout pattern created by the layout pattern creation unit 40.
  • the person flow evaluation unit 50 has a connection relationship diagram in which parameters such as the width and length of the passage in the building, the number of elevators and the operating speed are given, and the time zone of the tenant or facility in the building input by the information input unit 10. Based on the number of users for each, the travel time of the users is calculated, and the total travel time of the users in the layout pattern is calculated.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a flow mode.
  • the walking speed of a person changes depending on the flow mode as shown in FIG.
  • the walking speed of a person is high in a passage that becomes a one-way flow or a countercurrent flow, and the walking speed of a person decreases in a passage that becomes a cross flow or an intercurrent flow.
  • the density of humans affects the walking speed (flow velocity / flow coefficient) as in the example shown in Non-Patent Document 2.
  • the walking speed of a person becomes slow in a passage having a large number of users, a passage in which routes to a plurality of destinations overlap, and a passage in which an outward route from an entrance to a destination and a return route to the entrance / exit overlap.
  • the person flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the travel time of the user in each passage from the walking speed of the person and the length of each passage obtained from the flow form and the density of the users. Similarly for the elevator, the person flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the travel time of the user based on the distance to the destination and the operating speed of the elevator in each case where the user uses the elevator and the escalator. In the elevator, if there are many users, the waiting time becomes long, so the person flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the traveling time including the waiting time. In addition, the person flow evaluation unit 50 also calculates the travel time of the user when the user uses the stairs.
  • Figure 4 is an example of a human flow evaluation table.
  • the use of an elevator represents the use of an elevator
  • the use of es represents the use of an escalator.
  • the person flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the personal travel time based on the time zone, the number of users for each destination, and the route to the destination, and the user is calculated from the number of users for each destination. Calculate the total travel time for each time zone when everyone's travel is completed.
  • the person flow evaluation unit 50 evaluates in a plurality of time zones such as morning, day and night, and determines the transportation efficiency of the entire building by the total of each time zone. For this reason, even if there is no traffic line that causes congestion for users heading to each floor due to the effect of distributed work at the peak of work, there is a traffic line that causes heavy traffic for users heading to the cafeteria at the peak of lunch and to the entrance / exit at the peak of leaving the office. A traffic line that causes heavy traffic jams occurs on the opposite side of the user, and the total travel time of the user becomes longer.
  • the time zone is set to three patterns of coming to work, lunch, and leaving work, but the present invention is not limited to this.
  • the information input unit 10 is used in advance. Enter the number of users for each day of the week or each season, and perform a calculation that changes the users for each day of the week or each season to make a total evaluation throughout the year.
  • the person flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the total travel time for each time zone of the user or the total travel time in the final layout pattern, the travel time for each time zone of the user or the movement for each destination of the user. Instead of summing up the times evenly, the information input unit 10 may input a weighting parameter for a time zone or a destination. As a result, the people flow evaluation unit 50 has a layout that emphasizes the flow line to a certain destination even when the morning rush hour is emphasized or the movement of users to a destination where the number of users is not large is emphasized. It is also possible to shorten the total travel time of the user in the pattern.
  • the information input unit 10 uses the information input unit 10 for the arrival time and use at a destination with a large number of users. By inputting a weighting parameter for the arrival time at a destination with a small number of people, it is possible to prevent the total travel time of users from being too different.
  • the optimal solution calculation unit 60 evaluates the total travel time of the user, the elevator cost, and the effective area of the building (the area of the building not including the passage and the elevator) (hereinafter, simply referred to as "evaluation value"). In some cases), an appropriate layout pattern is determined from a plurality of layout patterns. The total travel time of the user is calculated by the person flow evaluation unit 50.
  • the optimum solution calculation unit 60 evaluates whether or not the layout pattern design value is within the design target value.
  • the designer weights the total travel time of the user, the elevator cost, and the effective area of the building in the information input unit 10.
  • the optimum solution calculation unit 60 calculates an index to be the optimum solution in consideration of the total travel time of the user, the elevator cost, and the weighting on the effective area of the building.
  • the layout pattern design value for the layout pattern created by the layout pattern creation unit 40 is input by the information input unit 10, the effective area of the building, the elevator cost, the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator, and the elevator. Check whether the average operation interval is within the design target value.
  • the layout pattern creation unit 40 creates the layout pattern again and selects the parameters of the passage and the elevator.
  • the person flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the total movement time based on the layout pattern created by the layout pattern creation unit 40. Then, the optimum solution calculation unit 60 holds the serial number and the evaluation value of this layout pattern.
  • the layout pattern creation unit 40 creates a new layout pattern so that the total movement time is short within the range of the design target value and the transportation efficiency of the entire building is improved.
  • the layout pattern creation unit 40 and the person flow evaluation unit 50 repeat such an operation within the range of the design target value, and the optimum solution calculation unit 60 determines the optimum solution that minimizes the total travel time of the user.
  • the optimum solution calculation unit 60 may determine the optimum solution in which the total travel time of the user is equal to or less than a predetermined reference value, instead of determining the optimum solution in which the total travel time of the user is minimized.
  • the width of the passage and the length of the passage will be limited by the effective area of the building.
  • the number and operating speed of elevators will be limited to the cost of elevators, the 5-minute transport capacity of elevators, and the average operating interval of elevators.
  • the optimum solution calculation unit 60 checks whether the layout pattern design value is within the design target value, and narrows down the range of the layout pattern created by the layout pattern creation unit 40 to eliminate unnecessary calculation. The calculation time can be shortened.
  • the optimum solution calculation unit 60 determines whether or not the layout pattern created by the layout pattern creation unit 40 is the last layout pattern based on the serial number.
  • the optimum solution calculation unit 60 selects from a plurality of layout patterns based on the evaluation values regarding the total travel time of the user, the elevator cost, and the effective area of the building. Determine the layout pattern.
  • the optimal solution calculation unit 60 determines a layout pattern having an optimal solution that minimizes the evaluation value.
  • the optimum solution calculation unit 60 may determine a layout pattern having an optimum solution that maximizes the evaluation value. Further, even if the evaluation value is not the minimum or the maximum, the optimum solution calculation unit 60 optimally solves the evaluation value within the range in which the optimum number of elevators installed and the optimum arrangement of the elevators on the layout pattern can be realized. May be.
  • the calculation result output unit 70 is an output unit that outputs an elevator equipment plan.
  • the calculation result output unit 70 outputs the layout pattern in the building that minimizes the total movement time, and the number and arrangement of elevators and escalators in the layout pattern.
  • 5 and 6 are examples of a connection diagram represented as a layout pattern. 5 and 6 show layout patterns for the two-story building represented by the connection relationship diagram shown in FIG. 2, respectively.
  • the number of elevators and escalators is the same, and the transportation efficiency of the entire building is also the same.
  • the arrival time at the destination differs depending on the arrangement and orientation of the escalator.
  • FIGS. 5 and 6 when a user uses an escalator from an entrance to go to room B on the second floor, the escalator is arranged crossing up and down as in the layout pattern of FIG. The user needs to board the escalator and go to the second floor by detouring next to Room A. Therefore, it takes more time for the user to move as compared with the case where the escalators are arranged in parallel for the ascending and descending escalators as in the layout pattern of FIG.
  • FIG. 7 is a flowchart showing the operation of the elevator equipment layout design device 100 in the building.
  • step S101 the information input unit 10 inputs building information.
  • Building information includes the floor area of the building, the shape of the building, the number of floors of the building, information on the tenants and facilities entering each floor, the location of the entrance and exit, the number of users entering and exiting from the entrance and exit, and the use of each tenant and facility by time zone. There are the number of people, the ratio of the number of users for each time zone of elevators and escalators, etc.
  • step S102 the connection relationship creating unit 30 replaces the entrance / exit of the building, the tenant, the facility, etc. with a point, connects the passage connecting the tenant and the facility with the elevator as a line, and creates a connection relationship diagram.
  • the layout pattern creating unit 40 creates a layout pattern such as where to arrange the elevator or passage based on the floor area of the building, the shape of the building, the number of floors of the building, etc. input by the information input unit 10. ..
  • the layout pattern creating unit 40 creates a plurality of layout patterns based on the floor area of the building, the shape of the building, the number of floors of the building, and the like.
  • the layout pattern creation unit 40 assigns a serial number to the created layout pattern, and assigns a serial number to the layout pattern to be created last so that it can be identified as the last.
  • the layout pattern creating unit 40 is a layout pattern as an index for determining whether the effective area of the building, the elevator cost, the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator, and the average operation interval of the elevator are within the design target value. Calculate the design value. Then, the optimum solution calculation unit 60 determines whether or not the effective area of the building, the elevator cost, the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator, and the average operation interval of the elevator are within the design target value based on the layout pattern design value. If the effective area of the building, the cost of the elevator, the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator, and the average operating interval of the elevator are not within the design target values, the process returns to step S103, and the layout pattern creation unit 40 creates a layout pattern. If the effective area of the building, the cost of the elevator, the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator, and the average operating interval of the elevator are within the design target values, the process proceeds to step S105.
  • step S105 the person flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the total travel time of the user based on the layout pattern.
  • step S106 the optimum solution calculation unit 60 holds the serial number and the evaluation value of the layout pattern.
  • step S107 the optimum solution calculation unit 60 determines whether or not the layout pattern created by the layout pattern creation unit 40 is the last layout pattern based on the serial number. If it is not the last layout pattern, the process returns to step S103, the layout pattern creating unit 40 creates the layout pattern, and the person flow evaluation unit 50 calculates the total travel time again. In the case of the final layout pattern, the process proceeds to step S108, and the optimum solution calculation unit 60 determines the optimum solution that minimizes the evaluation values regarding the total travel time of the user, the elevator cost, and the effective area of the building. do. Then, in step S109, the calculation result output unit 70 outputs the elevator equipment plan.
  • the information input unit 10 has input information on tenants and facilities to enter each floor.
  • the strength of the connection between the tenants and the facilities may be input to the information input unit 10 without deciding the tenants and facilities to enter each floor.
  • the layout pattern creation unit 40 also arranges layout patterns for each floor, such as arranging tenants and facilities with frequent traffic on the same floor or close floors based on the strength of ties between tenants and facilities, and connecting them with an escalator. Can be created.
  • various methods are used to evaluate the transportation efficiency of the entire building by calculating the travel time of users in consideration of the direction of the elevator landing, the length of the passage, and the density of users using the connection diagram. It is possible to evaluate, determine, and propose in advance the optimum number of elevators installed in buildings, buildings, and facilities that are close to reality and the optimum arrangement of elevators on the layout pattern. As a result, the user can obtain the effect of shortening the waiting time and eliminating the traffic jam, and the building owner can obtain the effect of reducing the cost by minimizing the number of elevators installed. In addition, the designer of the building or elevator equipment plan can obtain the design support effect such as shortening the design time and saving the design labor.
  • Embodiment 2 is different from the first embodiment in that a guidance device for guiding the moving direction in the building to the user is arranged.
  • a guidance device for guiding the moving direction in the building to the user is arranged.
  • the walking speed of a person is increased in the one-way flow, and the walking speed of the person is decreased in the crossed flow. Therefore, in the present embodiment, a guide device (not shown) is arranged in the building to guide the user to make the cross current into a one-way flow or a countercurrent flow, and increase the walking speed of the user. Shorten the travel time of.
  • the guidance device does not physically carry the user, but it is like a virtual moving walk to shorten the arrival time by creating a flow of users and increasing the walking speed. The effect is obtained. Therefore, in the present embodiment, in addition to the elevator, the optimum number of guide devices and the optimum arrangement are also calculated. Other than that, the same procedure as in the first embodiment can be carried out, and the same effect can be obtained.
  • Guidance devices include guidance boards, digital signage, visual guidance devices such as animation lighting, and auditory guidance devices such as voice announcements, or a combination of both.
  • the effect is to guide the user to make the cross current into a one-way flow or a countercurrent flow, increase the walking speed of the user, and shorten the movement time of the person.
  • the calculation result output unit 70 outputs the number and arrangement of guidance devices that guide the user in the direction of movement in the building.
  • the elevator is located near the doorway so that the user can easily see it, and the position of the escalator is difficult for the user to understand.
  • a guidance device it is possible to guide the user even if the elevator is in an incomprehensible place that is difficult for the user to see, so the transportation efficiency of the entire building is improved. The effect is obtained.
  • the guide device does not physically carry the user like a moving walkway, it is inexpensive, does not require large-scale construction, and has the effect of improving the transportation efficiency of the entire building.
  • FIG. 8 is a layout diagram showing the arrangement of escalators.
  • FIG. 8A is a layout diagram in the case where two sets of two escalators 81 and 82 whose driving directions are up and down are arranged.
  • FIG. 8B is a layout diagram in the case where one set of two escalators 81 and 82 whose driving directions are up and down is arranged and one escalator 83 for switching the driving direction is arranged.
  • the person flow evaluation unit 50 evaluates in a plurality of time zones such as morning, day and night, and judges the transportation efficiency of the entire building by the total of each time zone. For example, in the case of a building that requires the transportation capacity of two escalators 81 going up at the peak of arrival at work and two escalators 82 going down at the peak of leaving work, a total of four escalators are arranged as shown in FIG. 8A. Will be done.
  • FIG. 8B a total of three escalators, one driving direction switching escalator 83 and two escalators 81 and 82 for going up and down, may be arranged.
  • the driving direction switching escalator 83 moves in the upward direction at the peak of arrival at work, so that the number of up escalator becomes two, and the driving direction switching escalator 83 moves in the downward direction at the peak of leaving the office, so that the down escalator Will be two.
  • the calculation result output unit 70 outputs the number and arrangement of the operation direction switching escalators.
  • the escalator for switching the driving direction By arranging the escalator for switching the driving direction in this way, the purchase and maintenance cost of the escalator can be reduced, and the effect that the effective area of the building increases as the installation space of the escalator is reduced can be obtained.
  • a guidance device such as digital signage and animation lighting shown in the second embodiment, even if the driving direction of the escalator changes between when the employee arrives at the office and when the employee leaves the office, the user is guided without causing confusion. be able to.
  • Embodiment 4 is different from the first embodiment in that the optimum solution is a layout pattern that lengthens the movement time of the user's passage.
  • the optimal solution calculation unit 60 may determine a layout pattern in which the evaluation values regarding the total travel time of the user, the elevator cost, and the effective area of the building are the maximum or the minimum within the design target value. In the first embodiment, assuming an office-based building, the optimum solution calculation unit 60 determines that the layout pattern that minimizes the total movement time is the optimum solution. However, if the building is a commercial facility, it is necessary for the user to see many stores, so it is possible to use a layout pattern that lengthens the travel time of the aisle as the optimum solution.
  • the optimum solution calculation unit 60 is effective for the building within the range of design target values such as the effective area of the building, the elevator cost, the 5-minute transport capacity of the elevator, and the average operating interval of the elevator, which are input by the information input unit 10.
  • the layout pattern that maximizes the area can be the optimum solution, or the layout pattern that minimizes the elevator cost can be the optimum solution.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Structural Engineering (AREA)
  • Civil Engineering (AREA)
  • Architecture (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Indicating And Signalling Devices For Elevators (AREA)

Abstract

Un dispositif (100) pour l'agencement et la conception d'une machinerie d'ascenseur dans un immeuble comprend : une unité d'entrée d'informations (10) pour saisir des informations d'immeuble et une valeur cible de conception ; une unité de traitement (20) pour produire un plan d'installation de machinerie d'ascenseur sur la base des informations d'immeuble et de la valeur cible de conception ; et une unité de sortie (70) pour délivrer en sortie le plan d'installation de machinerie d'ascenseur, l'unité de traitement (20) comprenant : une unité de génération de schémas de disposition (40) pour générer une pluralité de schémas de disposition, les schémas de disposition faisant partie du plan d'installation de machinerie d'ascenseur et représentant une largeur et une longueur d'un passage dans l'immeuble et le nombre et la vitesse des machineries d'ascenseur ; une unité d'évaluation de flux de personnes (50) pour calculer un temps de déplacement total d'un utilisateur pour les schémas de disposition ; et une unité de calcul de solution optimale (60) pour déterminer un schéma de disposition parmi les schémas de disposition sur la base d'une valeur d'évaluation concernant le temps de déplacement total d'un utilisateur, d'un coût de machinerie d'ascenseur, et de l'aire de l'immeuble à l'exclusion du passage et de la machinerie d'ascenseur de l'immeuble.
PCT/JP2020/041301 2020-11-05 2020-11-05 Dispositif et procédé d'agencement et de conception d'une installation de machinerie d'ascenseur dans un immeuble WO2022097222A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2020/041301 WO2022097222A1 (fr) 2020-11-05 2020-11-05 Dispositif et procédé d'agencement et de conception d'une installation de machinerie d'ascenseur dans un immeuble

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2020/041301 WO2022097222A1 (fr) 2020-11-05 2020-11-05 Dispositif et procédé d'agencement et de conception d'une installation de machinerie d'ascenseur dans un immeuble

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2022097222A1 true WO2022097222A1 (fr) 2022-05-12

Family

ID=81457005

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2020/041301 WO2022097222A1 (fr) 2020-11-05 2020-11-05 Dispositif et procédé d'agencement et de conception d'une installation de machinerie d'ascenseur dans un immeuble

Country Status (1)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2022097222A1 (fr)

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000044134A (ja) * 1998-07-30 2000-02-15 Taisei Corp 建物内総合交通シミュレーションシステム
JP2000259603A (ja) * 1999-03-12 2000-09-22 Makoto Morishita 媒体効果確認シミュレータ、媒体による効果のシミュレーション方法、および、記憶媒体
JP2007072682A (ja) * 2005-09-06 2007-03-22 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd Ｃａｄシステム
JP2014123229A (ja) * 2012-12-20 2014-07-03 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd Ｂｉｍシステム
WO2014132802A1 (fr) * 2013-02-27 2014-09-04 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Procédé permettant de fournir un guide d'itinéraire au moyen de données de modélisation d'informations de bâtiment (bim), ordinateur permettant de fournir un guide d'itinéraire, et programme informatique associé

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000044134A (ja) * 1998-07-30 2000-02-15 Taisei Corp 建物内総合交通シミュレーションシステム
JP2000259603A (ja) * 1999-03-12 2000-09-22 Makoto Morishita 媒体効果確認シミュレータ、媒体による効果のシミュレーション方法、および、記憶媒体
JP2007072682A (ja) * 2005-09-06 2007-03-22 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd Ｃａｄシステム
JP2014123229A (ja) * 2012-12-20 2014-07-03 Toshiba Elevator Co Ltd Ｂｉｍシステム
WO2014132802A1 (fr) * 2013-02-27 2014-09-04 インターナショナル・ビジネス・マシーンズ・コーポレーション Procédé permettant de fournir un guide d'itinéraire au moyen de données de modélisation d'informations de bâtiment (bim), ordinateur permettant de fournir un guide d'itinéraire, et programme informatique associé

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Barney et al. Elevator traffic handbook: theory and practice
CN101472822B (zh) 电梯系统和在电梯系统中分配目的地呼叫的方法
JP3414843B2 (ja) 交通手段制御装置
CN108861904A (zh) 使用建筑楼层平面图的目的地输入
CN107839695B (zh) 城市轨道交通全线路车站站台与列车运行联合设计方法
JP2009096612A (ja) 人流演算装置
CN103249661B (zh) 电梯系统
JP6485648B2 (ja) エレベーター群管理装置
So et al. Concept design and derivation of the round trip time for a general two-dimensional elevator traffic system
JP2010527873A (ja) 新規の建物および既存の建物内のエレベータ装置用の設計プロセス
WO2022097222A1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé d'agencement et de conception d'une installation de machinerie d'ascenseur dans un immeuble
JP2007031110A (ja) 群管理エレベータ制御システム
JPH07112875A (ja) エレベータシステム
JP4212853B2 (ja) エレベータ設備計画装置
Van Houten Passenger Flow in an Underground Hyperloop Station
CN113065992B (zh) 一种超高层建筑楼梯电梯协同应急疏散方法
WO2024232009A1 (fr) Système de support de conception d'agencement d'installation dans un bâtiment
JP6576014B1 (ja) エレベータシステム
Siikonen et al. KONE Polaris Hybrid.
Basagoiti et al. Passenger flow pattern learning based on trip counting in lift systems combined with real-time information
Odunfa et al. Computer aided design (CAD) of a vertical transportation system in high-rise building: case of ivory tower, University of Ibadan, Ibadan
Lowe et al. BRT Station Capacity Analysis: Optimising Bus Rapid Transit Station Design Through Capacity Analysis
Kırlangıçoğlu Modeling passenger flows in public transport stations
JPH07206282A (ja) 昇降機システム
WO2006092865A1 (fr) Dispositif d’assistance de planification d’équipement pour ascenseur à trois ponts

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 20960775

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 20960775

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP