WO2009047719A2 - Procédé, appareil et système pour contrôler l'enroulement d'une corde autour d'un tambour - Google Patents

Procédé, appareil et système pour contrôler l'enroulement d'une corde autour d'un tambour Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2009047719A2
WO2009047719A2 PCT/IB2008/054127 IB2008054127W WO2009047719A2 WO 2009047719 A2 WO2009047719 A2 WO 2009047719A2 IB 2008054127 W IB2008054127 W IB 2008054127W WO 2009047719 A2 WO2009047719 A2 WO 2009047719A2
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
rope
winding
characteristic
drum
sensor
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/IB2008/054127
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
WO2009047719A3 (fr
Inventor
Herbert Schmitz
Original Assignee
Herbert Schmitz
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Herbert Schmitz filed Critical Herbert Schmitz
Publication of WO2009047719A2 publication Critical patent/WO2009047719A2/fr
Publication of WO2009047719A3 publication Critical patent/WO2009047719A3/fr
Priority to ZA2010/02034A priority Critical patent/ZA201002034B/en

Links

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B66—HOISTING; LIFTING; HAULING
    • B66D—CAPSTANS; WINCHES; TACKLES, e.g. PULLEY BLOCKS; HOISTS
    • B66D1/00—Rope, cable, or chain winding mechanisms; Capstans
    • B66D1/28—Other constructional details
    • B66D1/40—Control devices
    • B66D1/48—Control devices automatic
    • B66D1/485—Control devices automatic electrical
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H54/00—Winding, coiling, or depositing filamentary material
    • B65H54/02—Winding and traversing material on to reels, bobbins, tubes, or like package cores or formers
    • B65H54/28—Traversing devices; Package-shaping arrangements
    • B65H54/2848—Arrangements for aligned winding
    • B65H54/2854—Detection or control of aligned winding or reversal
    • B65H54/2869—Control of the rotating speed of the reel or the traversing speed for aligned winding
    • B65H54/2878—Control of the rotating speed of the reel or the traversing speed for aligned winding by detection of incorrect conditions on the wound surface, e.g. material climbing on the next layer, a gap between windings

Definitions

  • THIS INVENTION relates generally to winding of rope about a drum and specifically to a method, apparatus and system for monitoring the winding of rope about a drum.
  • winders such as those typically used in mines, which include at least one rope drum (and potentially two rope drums) about which wire rope or a like elongate flexible element, typically attached to the drum, can be wound.
  • a conveyance or cage is attached to a free end of the rope so that rotation of the drum raises or lowers the conveyance in a mineshaft.
  • the winding arrangement can be configured to include two complemental conveyances such that one is raised while the other is lowered.
  • Some mines include very deep mine shafts and, consequently, associated mine winders include long lengths of rope which can exceed 1 km in length and typically has a large gauge or diameter to accommodate the weight of the conveyance containing personnel or excavated material as well as the weight of the rope itself. Operational speeds may exceed 10 m/s and it is possible that the rope may wind or coil about the drum irregularly (further referred to as "bad coiling").
  • the Inventor desires to eliminate or at least alleviate the above-mentioned disadvantages.
  • the invention provides a method of monitoring winding of rope about a drum of a winder, the method including: sensing by means of at least one sensor at least one characteristic of the rope in a region of operative winding of the rope onto the drum during rotation of the drum; capturing the characteristic in real-time via the sensor during winding of the rope onto the drum; comparing the captured characteristic against predefined winding criteria associated with normal winding of the rope; and determining that bad coiling has occurred in response to the captured characteristic violating the winding criteria.
  • rope includes cables, wires and like elongate tensile elements whether of metal, synthetic or natural fibres, or other material.
  • “Drum” includes any spool or reel about which such a rope can be wound.
  • Sensing the at least one characteristic may include directing a plurality of sensors towards the rope.
  • the sensors may be arranged side-by-side and spaced axially along the length of the drum.
  • the sensor may be an optical sensor and, in such case, capturing the characteristic may include capturing at least one image of the rope. Capturing the characteristic may include capturing a video or a series of sequential images.
  • Sensing the at least one characteristic may include directing the optical sensor tangentially towards the rope.
  • the method may further include determining respective radii or heights of various sections of coiled rope.
  • the characteristic of the rope being captured may thus be a difference in radius between exposed layers (e.g. by using so-called edge-detection). In such case, which the winding criteria may dictate that respective radii of innermost and outermost layers of coils may differ by no more than one rope diameter.
  • a first, inner section is defined by an underlying completed coil (coiled from one end of the drum to the other) while a second, outer section is defined by a partially completed overlying coil progressing in an opposite direction between the ends of the drum.
  • the inner section will have a radius which is one rope diameter smaller than a radius of the outer section.
  • the characteristic of the rope being captured may be a coordinate of an outer edge of rope of each of a plurality of axially spaced points.
  • the winding criteria may dictate that no more than one coordinate may differ by no more than a predefined amount from an average.
  • Sensing the at least one characteristic may include directing the optical sensor inwardly toward the rope.
  • the method may further include determining irregular changes in pattern of coiled sections (e.g. a number of places where visible coiled sections of rope overlap or an irregular change in pitch or inclination of the rope).
  • the characteristic being captured may be a variable pattern defined by the rope during winding.
  • the winding criteria may then dictate that a coiling pattern may change no more than once.
  • there will be an inner section and an outer section and these sections will overlap in no more than one place and usually will have a generally consistent inclination.
  • the coil of the inner section will be inclined in one direction (e.g. clockwise), while the coil of the outer section will be inclined in the other direction (e.g.
  • the direction of coiling may change at least twice (e.g. clockwise to counter-clockwise to clockwise), may not change direction where expected and/or the coiling pattern (e.g. pitch) may vary.
  • the characteristic being captured may be a thickness of each visible coil of rope.
  • the winding criteria may dictate that respective thicknesses of the visible coils differ by a tolerance from an average no more than once.
  • the method may further which includes providing at least one acoustic sensor proximate the drum, in which the captured characteristic is a sound of the rope as it is wound about the drum, the sound being captured by the at least one acoustic sensor.
  • the winding criteria may then include predefined acoustic waveforms. "Proximate the drum” includes being sufficiently close to the drum to receive or hear sounds but not necessarily attached to or even adjacent of the drum.
  • the method may include responding automatically in accordance with predefined response criteria upon determining that bad coiling has occurred.
  • the response criteria may direct that an alarm is raised in response to a determination of bad coiling.
  • the alarm may include at least one of a visible alarm (e.g. a flashing light or pop-up window on a computer), and an audible alarm (e.g. from a buzzer or siren).
  • the response criteria may direct that the winder be shut down and thus the method may include automatically shutting down the winder in response to determining that bad coiling has occurred. Instead, or in addition, the method may include automatically correcting or normalising the winding of the rope.
  • the method may include the prior step of storing or amending at least one of the winding criteria and the response criteria.
  • the invention extends to an apparatus for monitoring winding of rope about a drum of a winder, the apparatus including: at least one sensor operable to capture at least one characteristic of the rope as it is wound about the drum; a memory module having stored thereon predefined winding criteria; and an electronic control module in communication with the sensor, the control module being operable to: compare the captured characteristic against the predefined winding criteria; and determine that bad coiling has occurred in response to violation by the captured characteristic of the winding criteria
  • the apparatus in use, may be positioned proximate or fixed to the winder.
  • the apparatus may be mobile, for example being separate from the winder and being movable from one winder to another.
  • the apparatus may be integral with the winder, being permanently affixed thereto.
  • the apparatus may include mounting means for mounting the apparatus in a calibrated position relative to the winder.
  • the senor may include at least one optical sensor and may in fact include a plurality of optical sensors.
  • the optical sensors may, in use, be directed at axially spaced apart locations on or near the drum to capture images of the rope as it winds around any part of the drum.
  • Optical sensors may be in the form of cameras which are operable to capture a plurality of sequential images or video.
  • a video camera it may be configured to capture video having a high resolution and/or a high frame rate, whether digital or analogue, whether colour or monochrome.
  • a lens of the video camera may be a high clarity lens calculated optimally to capture video in its field of view.
  • the control module may be operable to determine respective radii or heights of various layers of coiled rope. Instead, or in addition, the control module may be operable to determine irregular changes in pattern of coiled layers.
  • the senor may instead or in addition be in the form of an acoustic sensor to record a sound of the rope as it is wound around the drum.
  • the acoustic sensor may be in the form of a microphone having a high sensitivity and wide acoustic range and which may, in use, be focused towards the winding area of the drum.
  • the apparatus may include a processor. More particularly, the control module may be a conceptual module corresponding to a functional task performed by the processor. In such case, the apparatus may include a machine-readable medium, e.g. main memory, a hard disk drive and/or the processor itself, which carries thereon a set of instructions to direct the operation of the processor. It is to be understood that the apparatus may include one or more microprocessors, controllers, DSMs (Digital Signal Modules), or any other suitable computing device, resource, hardware, software, and/or embedded logic.
  • DSMs Digital Signal Modules
  • the apparatus may thus be embodied, at least partially, by a computer system.
  • the apparatus may therefore include a graphical user interface, such as a display screen, and an input arrangement, such as a keyboard and/or mouse.
  • the cameras may be directed generally tangentially (relative to the drum) towards the winding rope thereby to capture height differences of various coiled sections of the rope (as defined above).
  • the control module may then be operable to determine that bad coiling has occurred in response to a height difference of two or more rope diameters.
  • the cameras may be directed generally readily inwardly towards the drum thereby to capture the pattern of the coiled rope.
  • the control module in such case may include a pattern recognition engine therefore being operable to detect any irregular or anomalous coil patterns (as defined above).
  • the microphone may record any irregular sound (such as grinding, slipping or the like).
  • the apparatus may include response criteria, for example stored on the machine readable medium, governing a response of the apparatus once the control module has determined that bad coiling has occurred.
  • the response criteria may dictate that the apparatus, under direction of the control module, raises an alarm by means of an alarm arrangement (e.g. sounds a siren, flashes a warning light, or the like), shuts down the winder, and/or attempts to correct the bad coiling.
  • an alarm arrangement e.g. sounds a siren, flashes a warning light, or the like
  • the apparatus may include a bus or other communication interface to interconnect the sensors (cameras and/or microphones), the control module and the machine readable medium.
  • the bus may accommodate digital triggering, and analogue signals and/or industrial bus protocols and may also interconnect the apparatus with a pre-existing winder control system.
  • the controller and/or the criteria may be programmable or configurable via the user interface and input arrangement thereby to configure the operation of the apparatus.
  • the invention extends to a system which includes: a winder having a drum which is rotatable about a winding axis to wind rope about the drum; and an apparatus as defined above operatively associated with the winder.
  • the apparatus may be retrofitted to the winder or may be manufactured together with the winder.
  • the invention extends to a machine readable medium embodying instructions which, when executed by a machine, cause the machine to perform a method as above defined.
  • Figure 1 shows a schematic side elevational view of a mine including a winder
  • Figure 2 shows a schematic view of a system including an apparatus in accordance with the invention
  • Figures 3a - 3h show schematic views of a plurality of winders including normal coiling and bad coiling;
  • Figures 4a - 4h show schematic views of an example of how the apparatus of
  • Figure 2 can determine whether or not bad coiling has occurred
  • Figures 5a - 5h show schematic views of another example of how the apparatus of Figure 2 can determine whether or not bad coiling has occurred;
  • Figures 6a - 6h show schematic views of a further example of how the apparatus of Figure 2 can determine whether or not bad coiling has occurred;
  • Figures 7a - 7h show schematic views of a still further example of how the apparatus of Figure 2 can determine whether or not bad coiling has occurred.
  • Figure 8 shows a flow diagram of a method of monitoring winding of rope about a drum, in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG 1 shows a vertical shaft mine 10 which includes a winder house 12 having two complemental winders 13 (one of which is shown).
  • Each winder 13 includes a drum 38 (see Figures 2 and 3) which is rotatable by means of a motor (not illustrated) about a rotational axis 13.1 to wind rope 14 about (i.e. onto and off of) the drum 38.
  • the rope 14 extends down the mine shaft 16 and a cage 18 or other conveyance is connected to a remote or free end of the rope 14.
  • the mine 10 could be one of those much used in gold mining where shafts 16 can reach great depths.
  • the rope 14 must therefore be sufficiently long and have a sufficient tensile strength to support both itself and an occupied cage 18 and the dynamic loads applied thereto.
  • Some winders are configured to draw in or let out the rope 14 at a speed of over 10 m/s.
  • a system in accordance with the invention is generally indicated by reference numeral 20 and includes two complemental winders 13 interconnected by a common axle 40 and an apparatus 21 , in accordance with the invention, for monitoring the winding of the rope 14 about the drum 38 of each winder
  • the apparatus 21 provides, at block 102, sensors in the form of a bank of cameras 22 and a microphone 24 associated with each winder 13.
  • the sensors 22, 24 are operable to capture or record, at block 104, winding characteristics of the winders 13 in use. More particularly, the cameras 22 capture images.
  • the cameras 22 are video cameras and are spaced axially relative to the drum 38. Instead, there may be a single camera which covers an entire axial width of a drum 38.
  • the sensors 22, 24 are arranged proximate their respective associated winders 13.
  • the winders 13 are standard winders and do not necessarily need to be modified for use with the apparatus 21 in accordance with the invention.
  • the cameras 22 are directed either tangentially towards the rope 14 (i.e. towards an edge of the coils) or inwardly toward the rope (e.g. generally towards the winding axis 13.1 of the drum 38).
  • the sensors 22, 24 are in communication with an electronic control module 28 via high-speed bus arrangements 26.
  • the electronic control module 28 is operable to compare, at block 106, the captured characteristic (video and audio) against predefined winding criteria.
  • the apparatus 21 includes a machine readable medium in the form of a memory module 30 having stored thereon the winding criteria.
  • the electronic control module 28 may be in the form of a processor (as above defined) and the memory module 30 will then accordingly include a set of instructions or a computer program to direct the operation of the processor.
  • control module 28 determines, at block 1 10, that bad coiling has occurred.
  • the apparatus 21 further includes response criteria (also stored on the memory module
  • the apparatus 21 thus includes an alarm arrangement 32 in the form of a siren and a warning light.
  • the control module 28 is also connected to the existing winder control mechanism 34 responsible for controlling the operation of the winders 13 so that the control module 28 can direct that the winders 13 be shut down automatically if bad coiling is detected.
  • the apparatus 21 could include a user interface and input arrangement (such as a computer screen and keyboard) via which the response criteria and/or the winding criteria may be edited as desired.
  • a user interface and input arrangement such as a computer screen and keyboard
  • Figures 3a - 3h illustrate, in general terms, an example of how bad coiling can occur.
  • the rope 14 is wound about the drum 38 from one end to the other and back again in successive layers of coils.
  • "Coil” is understood to include a single winding of the rope 14.
  • Each coil of a particular layer has a constant radius and when a particular layer has been completed, the next layer will have a larger radius and will be wound around the previous layer in an opposite direction.
  • a layer of coils 50 which was formed from left to right, is completed and layer 52 is a partial layer which is being wound, from right to left, around the underlying layer 50.
  • the layer 52 is a partial layer which is being wound, from right to left, around the underlying layer 50.
  • the layer 52 is a partial layer which is being wound, from right to left, around the underlying layer 50.
  • FIG. 3d illustrates, halfway through the layer 54, the direction of coiling gets reversed and a new layer 56 begins. This is undesirable and is an example of bad coiling.
  • the layer 56 usually continues over the partial, underlying layer 54 until it reaches the end of the drum 38 at which point a new layer 58 is started around layer 56. Roughly half of the completed layer 52 is still exposed and there is a marked difference in the radius of the layers 52, 58.
  • the rope 14 forms a new layer 60 (having the same radius as the layer 54).
  • One drawback of bad coiling is that the radius of a particular layer or layer section increases sooner than expected and the winder control mechanism may not be able to compensate for this.
  • the drum 13 is rotating at a calculated speed about the winding axis 13.1 but a radius of the active coiling layer is larger than intended, the rope 14 will be fed out or drawn in at a quicker rate.
  • the cage 18 may jolt or shudder.
  • the control module 28 is configured to detect the lines or outlines of the respective layers of rope 14. Thus, the cameras 22 are directed tangentially towards a portion of the winder 13 where the rope 14 is being wound.
  • the control module 28 analyses in real-time individual frames of the video captured by the cameras 22 using edge detection by trying to create one or more lines or levels, respectively inline with the visible layers.
  • the control module 28 determines by means of edge detection that the radius of layer 52 differs by two rope diameters D (winding criteria) from the radius of layer 56.
  • the winding criteria in the example dictate that the difference in radius of the innermost and outermost layers may differ by no more than one rope diameter D.
  • the control module 28 therefore determines that bad coiling has occurred and accordingly activates the alarm arrangement 32 to make an operator aware of the bad coiling and also stops the winder 13 to limit potential damage.
  • the control module 28 can be configured to detect that the radius changes in two places, i.e. between the layers 52 and 54 and the layers 52 and 56. This also indicates that bad coiling has occurred, and the winding criteria could be defined accordingly.
  • control module 28 is configured to detect discrete coordinates.
  • the control module 28 scans for distinct edges, using edge detection, along a plurality of predefined lines 62.
  • the scanning lines 62 are axially spaced (i.e. spaced along the x-axis) while the scanning direction is radial (i.e. along the y-axis).
  • the coordinates 50.1 , 52.1 , 54.1 , 56.1 of a plurality of sampling lines 62 are determined.
  • the resolution for example the exact number of coordinates (or, conversely, the spacing between the coordinates), can be adjusted as desired, and preferably balanced between reliability and sensitivity.
  • the control module 28 determines that bad coiling has occurred and takes appropriate action.
  • FIG. 6a - 6h another method of determining bad coiling is illustrated.
  • the cameras 22 are directed radially inwardly towards the drum 13 so that the rope 14 is viewed generally transversely to its length.
  • the field of view of the cameras 22 is generally indicated by reference numeral 72.
  • the control module 28 includes a pattern recognition/matching engine, including a plurality of predefined patterns or images, to detect irregular changes in pattern which are indicative of bad coiling.
  • One example of a pattern to which the control module 28 is responsive is an unexpected change in the direction and/or a change in the pitch of the coils.
  • the control module 28 is operable to detect portions of a coil which are partially covered by an overlying coil and are thus only partially visible.
  • the partially completed layer 52 overlaps the underlying complete layer 50.
  • an individual coil of the underlying layer 50 will be partially covered (by the overlying partial layer 52) and partially visible. Under normal coiling conditions, there will be at most one partially covered coil (often having a generally V-shaped appearance).
  • FIGs 6d - 6h there are two or more partially covered coils or the coil is covered in an irregular manner.
  • the pattern recognition engine of the control module 28 is sensitive to the partially covered coils and determines that bad coiling has occurred in response to detection of at least two partially covered coils (winding criteria). The control module 28 then raises the alarm and stops the winder 13 as described above.
  • FIGS. 7a - 7h illustrate another example, conceptually similar to that of
  • the control module 28 again employs edge detection to detect the edges of adjacent coils along and axially extending line 80. It will be noted that the edges of the coils of a particular layer should always be a single rope diameter D apart. An exception to this is where in one layer (e.g. layer 52) overlaps another layer (e.g. layer 50) in which case, the distance between adjacent edges at the point of overlap will be less than a single rope diameter D.
  • an x-value of the coordinate of each edge is determined along the line 80, and is subtracted from the x-value of an adjacent coordinate, thereby to determine an axial distance between the coordinates (i.e. the width of the visible coil).
  • the respective distances between the adjacent coordinates are summed and divided by the total number of coordinates, thereby to determine an average distance.
  • the control module 28 is configured to determine how many times the spacing between adjacent coordinates differs from the average, optionally by more than a predefined tolerance (e.g. 10%). It is to be expected that the spacing between one particular pair of adjacent coordinates will differ from the average, due to a partially completed layer 52 overlapping a completed layer 50. However, the winding criteria dictate that should the spacing between two or more pairs of adjacent coordinates deviate from the average by more than the allowable tolerance, that bad coiling has occurred (as in Figures 7d - 7h). The control module 28 will then raise the alarm as described above.
  • a predefined tolerance e.g. 10%
  • the memory module 30 also includes stored thereon predefined parameters indicative of normal winding and/or of bad coiling (winding criteria) against which the control module 28 compares the audio recorded by the microphone 24. If the audio violates the predefined parameters, the control module 28 determines that bad coiling has occurred and acts as above described.
  • predefined parameters indicative of normal winding and/or of bad coiling winding criteria
  • the control module 28 determines that bad coiling has occurred and acts as above described.
  • the Inventor believes that the invention as exemplified is advantageous because it provides a method 100 and apparatus 21 for timeous detection of bad coiling in a winder. A human operator, who may be error-prone, is no longer required to monitor the winder constantly.
  • the winder 13 can automatically be stopped thereby to minimise damage to the winder 13 and related machine components as well as minimising the risk of human fatalities.
  • the apparatus can be installed on existing winders and thus is retrofittable in existing mines 10.
  • the apparatus 21 and the method 100 find particular application in mines, the application is not necessarily limited thereto.
  • conventional elevator installations in buildings typically also make use of wire rope which coils around a drum or spool, and the apparatus 21 and the method 100 may be applied to such elevator installations.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Filamentary Materials, Packages, And Safety Devices Therefor (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé (100), un appareil (20) et un système (21) pour contrôler l'enroulement d'une corde (14) autour d'un tambour (38) d'un enrouleur (13). Le procédé (100) comprend la détection (102) au moyen d'au moins un capteur (22, 24) d'au moins une caractéristique de la corde (14) dans une région d'enroulement fonctionnel de la corde (14) sur le tambour (38) pendant la rotation du tambour (38), et la capture (104) de la caractéristique en temps réel par l'intermédiaire du capteur (22, 24) pendant l'enroulement de la corde (14) sur le tambour (38). Le procédé (100) comprend en outre la comparaison (106) de la caractéristique capturée par rapport à des critères d'enroulement prédéfinis associés à un enroulement normal de la corde (14) et la détermination (110) du fait qu'un mauvais enroulement s'est produit en réponse au fait que la caractéristique capturée ne satisfait pas aux critères d'enroulement.
PCT/IB2008/054127 2007-10-11 2008-10-08 Procédé, appareil et système pour contrôler l'enroulement d'une corde autour d'un tambour WO2009047719A2 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ZA2010/02034A ZA201002034B (en) 2007-10-11 2010-03-23 A method apparatus and system for monitoring the winding of rope about a drum

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
ZA200708698 2007-10-11
ZA2007/08698 2007-10-11

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2009047719A2 true WO2009047719A2 (fr) 2009-04-16
WO2009047719A3 WO2009047719A3 (fr) 2009-08-06

Family

ID=40549685

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/IB2008/054127 WO2009047719A2 (fr) 2007-10-11 2008-10-08 Procédé, appareil et système pour contrôler l'enroulement d'une corde autour d'un tambour

Country Status (2)

Country Link
WO (1) WO2009047719A2 (fr)
ZA (1) ZA201002034B (fr)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103496644A (zh) * 2013-09-04 2014-01-08 中国海洋石油总公司 钢丝绳缠绕控制方法及系统
ITUB20154968A1 (it) * 2015-10-16 2017-04-16 Danieli Automation Spa Dispositivo di gestione per apparato bobinatore e relativo metodo
EP3323765A1 (fr) * 2016-11-22 2018-05-23 Manitowoc Crane Companies, LLC Detection et analyse optique de palan et de câble de grue
US10544012B2 (en) 2016-01-29 2020-01-28 Manitowoc Crane Companies, Llc Visual outrigger monitoring system
WO2022191005A1 (fr) * 2021-03-10 2022-09-15 コベルコ建機株式会社 Procédé de surveillance de treuil, dispositif de surveillance de treuil et grue
EP4041988A4 (fr) * 2019-10-08 2023-10-18 Services Pétroliers Schlumberger Procédés et systèmes de contrôle du fonctionnement d'un équipement de bobinage de câble métallique
US11919754B2 (en) 2020-11-10 2024-03-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Automated spooling control system using stochastic inference

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2221227A (en) * 1988-06-16 1990-01-31 Ceat Cavi Spa Automatic winder: transverse control
EP0602504A1 (fr) * 1992-12-14 1994-06-22 BICC CEAT CAVI S.r.l. Système et procédé de commande d'une machine pour l'enroulement de câbles électriques et analogues
DE20008405U1 (de) * 2000-05-10 2001-02-22 Manfred Vogel Elmasch Bau Gmbh System zur Verlegung von Materialien wie Fäden, Seile oder Drähte auf einen Spulenkörper
US6443385B1 (en) * 1997-06-20 2002-09-03 Ccs Technology, Inc. Method and device for winding strand-shaped winding material onto a coil
US20050072965A1 (en) * 2003-10-01 2005-04-07 Sanders Mark E. Electronic winch monitoring system

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
GB2221227A (en) * 1988-06-16 1990-01-31 Ceat Cavi Spa Automatic winder: transverse control
EP0602504A1 (fr) * 1992-12-14 1994-06-22 BICC CEAT CAVI S.r.l. Système et procédé de commande d'une machine pour l'enroulement de câbles électriques et analogues
US6443385B1 (en) * 1997-06-20 2002-09-03 Ccs Technology, Inc. Method and device for winding strand-shaped winding material onto a coil
DE20008405U1 (de) * 2000-05-10 2001-02-22 Manfred Vogel Elmasch Bau Gmbh System zur Verlegung von Materialien wie Fäden, Seile oder Drähte auf einen Spulenkörper
US20050072965A1 (en) * 2003-10-01 2005-04-07 Sanders Mark E. Electronic winch monitoring system

Cited By (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103496644A (zh) * 2013-09-04 2014-01-08 中国海洋石油总公司 钢丝绳缠绕控制方法及系统
ITUB20154968A1 (it) * 2015-10-16 2017-04-16 Danieli Automation Spa Dispositivo di gestione per apparato bobinatore e relativo metodo
US10544012B2 (en) 2016-01-29 2020-01-28 Manitowoc Crane Companies, Llc Visual outrigger monitoring system
US10829347B2 (en) 2016-11-22 2020-11-10 Manitowoc Crane Companies, Llc Optical detection system for lift crane
JP2018138489A (ja) * 2016-11-22 2018-09-06 マニタウォック クレイン カンパニーズ， エルエルシーＭａｎｉｔｏｗｏｃ Ｃｒａｎｅ Ｃｏｍｐａｎｉｅｓ， Ｌｌｃ クレーンのホイスト及びロープの光学的な検出及び分析
US10717631B2 (en) 2016-11-22 2020-07-21 Manitowoc Crane Companies, Llc Optical detection and analysis of crane hoist and rope
EP3323765A1 (fr) * 2016-11-22 2018-05-23 Manitowoc Crane Companies, LLC Detection et analyse optique de palan et de câble de grue
US11124392B2 (en) 2016-11-22 2021-09-21 Manitowoc Crane Companies, Llc Optical detection and analysis for boom angles on a crane
US11130658B2 (en) 2016-11-22 2021-09-28 Manitowoc Crane Companies, Llc Optical detection and analysis of a counterweight assembly on a crane
JP7152145B2 (ja) 2016-11-22 2022-10-12 マニタウォック クレイン カンパニーズ， エルエルシー クレーンのホイスト及びロープの光学的な検出及び分析
EP4041988A4 (fr) * 2019-10-08 2023-10-18 Services Pétroliers Schlumberger Procédés et systèmes de contrôle du fonctionnement d'un équipement de bobinage de câble métallique
US11893778B2 (en) 2019-10-08 2024-02-06 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Methods and systems for controlling operation of elongated member spooling equipment
US11919754B2 (en) 2020-11-10 2024-03-05 Schlumberger Technology Corporation Automated spooling control system using stochastic inference
WO2022191005A1 (fr) * 2021-03-10 2022-09-15 コベルコ建機株式会社 Procédé de surveillance de treuil, dispositif de surveillance de treuil et grue

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2009047719A3 (fr) 2009-08-06
ZA201002034B (en) 2010-11-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2009047719A2 (fr) Procédé, appareil et système pour contrôler l'enroulement d'une corde autour d'un tambour
JP7152145B2 (ja) クレーンのホイスト及びロープの光学的な検出及び分析
CN105438983B (zh) 一种工程机械及其卷扬乱绳监测装置和方法
US10633225B2 (en) Crane information presentation system
WO2011158871A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de surveillance de l'endommagement d'un câble en fils métalliques pour ascenseur
JP6271680B1 (ja) エレベータのロープ検査システム
US20030118230A1 (en) Coiled tubing inspection system using image pattern recognition
EP3130555B1 (fr) Surveillance de rainure de corde et corde
CN108238527B (zh) 用于电梯绳索状态监控的装置和方法
JP6542416B1 (ja) ロープ検査システム、ロープ検査方法、およびプログラム
JP6205234B2 (ja) エレベーターの長尺物引掛り検出装置
JP6567174B2 (ja) エレベータ用ロープおよびロープ捩れ状態検出装置
CN107207222A (zh) 用于监控起重机安全性的方法以及用于监控起重机安全性的系统
CN206606891U (zh) 用于电梯绳索状态监控的装置
JP4767039B2 (ja) 振動検知センサシステム及び振動検知方法
WO2022191005A1 (fr) Procédé de surveillance de treuil, dispositif de surveillance de treuil et grue
JP6601376B2 (ja) 回転体の検査装置、および、回転体の検査方法
JP5087338B2 (ja) エレベーターのドア制御装置および方法
JP2020125162A (ja) ロープ巻き取り判定装置、クレーン、ロープ巻き取り判定方法
JP2642730B2 (ja) ケーブル巻き状態検出方法
JP7363294B2 (ja) ロープ絡まり検出装置
JP7299501B2 (ja) 管内土計測方法および管内土計測システム
US8439290B2 (en) Method and device to control certain functioning of a multiplier/bait casting reel
US20230312312A1 (en) Winch drum monitoring device
WO2020016089A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de surveillance d'un état de fonctionnement d'un ascenseur

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
NENP Non-entry into the national phase in:

Ref country code: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase

Ref document number: 08807927

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A2