WO2004106895A1 - Testeur d'usure - Google Patents

Testeur d'usure Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2004106895A1
WO2004106895A1 PCT/JP2004/007191 JP2004007191W WO2004106895A1 WO 2004106895 A1 WO2004106895 A1 WO 2004106895A1 JP 2004007191 W JP2004007191 W JP 2004007191W WO 2004106895 A1 WO2004106895 A1 WO 2004106895A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
test
test piece
correction
load
amplification factor
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2004/007191
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Takashi Nakamura
Hitoshi Izumiya
Takahiro Shiina
Hiroyuki Koguma
Takahiro Urai
Original Assignee
Moog Japan Ltd.
Hokkaido Technology Licensing Office Co., Ltd.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Moog Japan Ltd., Hokkaido Technology Licensing Office Co., Ltd. filed Critical Moog Japan Ltd.
Publication of WO2004106895A1 publication Critical patent/WO2004106895A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/32—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying repeated or pulsating forces
    • G01N3/36—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying repeated or pulsating forces generated by pneumatic or hydraulic means
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/003—Generation of the force
    • G01N2203/0042—Pneumatic or hydraulic means
    • G01N2203/0048—Hydraulic means

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a fatigue tester, and can be used, for example, for a hydraulic servo fatigue tester for acquiring data in a very high cycle range.
  • Fatigue accounts for more than 70-80% of the damage to mechanical structures, and countermeasures against fatigue are one of the most pressing issues for mechanical engineers.
  • a horizontal portion that is, a fatigue limit appears at a repetition rate of about 10 6 to 10 7 .
  • general machines are designed based on the fatigue limit.
  • Test equipment for such ultra-high cycle fatigue is required to have higher performance than conventional fatigue test equipment in repetition rate, load accuracy, load stability, removal of uneven load, and the like.
  • a DSP Digital Signal Processor
  • the applicant of the present application has used a DSP (Digital Signal Processor) controller to perform digital control and operate the hydraulic servo mechanism to improve load accuracy, load stability, and operability.
  • This axial load fatigue tester secures high responsiveness by increasing the natural frequency of the system by integrating the components of the main body of the tester to increase rigidity, and secures data of ultra-high cycle range. Many acquisitions have been achieved.
  • a spherical bearing (spherical bearing) is incorporated in the test piece mounting part, and self-alignment is performed when a tensile load is applied to the test piece.
  • a computer is connected to the DSP controller, and it is possible to display measured values during testing and input control parameters on the screen of this computer.
  • Patent Document 2 JP-A-2000-131203 (FIGS. 1, 7, paragraphs [0007] [0011], [002 6], [0040])
  • the load signal may not follow the target value signal when the amplification factor is set to a constant value.
  • the maximum value and the minimum value of the load signal are monitored in real time, and the optimum amplification factor correction amount and zero point correction amount are calculated based on the difference between the monitoring result and the target value signal.
  • a correction operation for disturbance that corrects the amplification factor and the zero point is performed.
  • Such proportional control is sometimes referred to as adaptive proportional control because it changes the amplification factor and the zero point every moment in response to disturbances and the like, and is described in Patent Document 1 described above. This adaptive proportional control is also performed by a fatigue tester.
  • Patent Document 2 discloses an AGC (Auto Gain) for automatically controlling an amplification factor.
  • the (Control) method is a method in which the magnitude of the amplitude of the target value signal used in the next cycle is corrected based on the amplitude of the control target output amount actually generated in a certain cycle during control execution. It is described that high-precision control cannot be performed from one cycle, and it is difficult to apply it to a low-cycle fatigue test in which the area of the hysteresis curve of the stress-strain curve of the test piece is relatively large. Therefore, as described in Patent Document 2 mentioned above, The low cycle fatigue tester described above does not control the AGC method in the first place, so it does not solve the above problems.
  • a measured value during a test (for example, a load applied to a test piece, a load applied to a test piece, or the like) is displayed on a computer screen connected to a DSP controller.
  • the maximum value, the minimum value, the value of the signal of the function generator, etc.) are displayed, but these displays are displayed as load values and voltage values, and the stress display required by the experimenter is Absent. Therefore, the experimenter had to calculate and understand the stress based on the specimen diameter.
  • control parameters could not be input as stress values, but it was necessary to calculate the load and voltage values to be controlled based on the specimen diameter and input them as control parameters.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a fatigue tester capable of improving test accuracy.
  • the present invention provides a main body having a test piece mounting part for mounting a test piece and an actuator part for applying a load to the test piece, and a detection signal corresponding to the load applied to the test piece to feed back the actuator.
  • a control unit for performing feedback control for sending a control signal for controlling the operation of the unit to the main body.
  • the control unit includes a digital controller for performing feedback control by digital processing.
  • This digital camera controller is provided with a control signal generating means for generating a control signal corresponding to a deviation amount between a detection signal and a target value signal, and compares a waveform of the detection signal with a waveform of the target value signal.
  • an amplification factor correction Z for performing a calculation process relating to an amplification factor and a zero correction used for a control signal generation process, and a zero-point correction calculating means
  • An amplification factor correcting means for performing an amplification factor correction process based on the calculation result by the positive / zero correction calculation device; and a zero point correction device for performing a zero point correction process based on the calculation result by the amplification factor correction / zero correction device.
  • the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means is configured to switch the algorithm of the calculation process for the amplification factor correction stepwise according to the degree of convergence of the detection signal to the target value signal. It is characterized by that.
  • the “calculation processing for the amplification factor and the correction of the zero point” includes the processing of calculating the amount of increase or decrease with respect to the original value (the value before correction) of the amplification factor and the zero point, and the processing after the correction. It also includes the process of calculating the zero point of and the value of the amplification factor itself (corrected value itself).
  • the "configuration for switching algorithms stepwise” includes both a configuration for switching two algorithms and a configuration for switching three or more algorithms. In this case, one-way switching, which does not return to the original algorithm after switching once, And one-way traffic switching that can return to the original algorithm again after one switching.
  • switching includes, for example, the following. That is, (1) switching of the form of the mathematical expression used for the calculation process itself is included. For example, a change from a linear function to a quadratic function, a change in the exponent, a change from an addition term to a subtraction term or vice versa, a change in the number of terms, and the like. (2) Switching the values of coefficients and constants included in the formulas used in the calculation process is included. For example, a process of multiplying by 0.1% is changed to a process of multiplying by 0.05%. (3) Switching data and data groups used for calculation processing is included.
  • Switching the structure of selection processing for example, processing of IF statements, etc.
  • branch processing for example, processing of CASE statements, etc.
  • the order and position of the selection processing in the program are changed, the number of branches is increased / decreased, and the degree of layering of the selection processing and the branch processing is changed.
  • switching from an algorithm that performs a calculation process using a mathematical expression to an algorithm that performs a data selection process, or from an algorithm that performs a calculation process using a mathematical expression, to a routine having a different processing content for example, a routine using a different mathematical formula
  • Switching to an algorithm that performs selection processing of different data, a routine that uses different data, etc.
  • the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means compares the waveform of the detection signal with the waveform of the target value signal, and based on the comparison result, determines the amplification factor and
  • the algorithm of the calculation process related to the correction of the amplification factor is switched stepwise according to the degree of convergence of the detection signal to the target value signal.
  • the amplification factor correction Z zero point correction calculation means switches the algorithm of the calculation process for the zero correction stepwise according to the degree of convergence of the detected signal to the target value signal. It is desirable that it is.
  • the amplification factor correction Z-zero correction calculating means converts the waveform of the periodically changing detection signal and the waveform of the periodically changing target value signal into one waveform. Comparing every cycle, based on the amount of deviation of both waveforms obtained as a result of this comparison, perform calculation processing for the amplification factor and zero point correction for each waveform cycle, and switch the algorithm when performing this calculation processing It is desirable that the configuration be such that it is determined at each cycle of the waveform.
  • the algorithm can be switched at an appropriate timing, the convergence speed is increased, and the test is performed. The accuracy is further improved.
  • the control that involves the stepwise switching of the algorithm of the calculation processing relating to the correction of the amplification factor and the zero point as described above is called multi-mode adaptive proportional control (MAP). Shall be.
  • MAP multi-mode adaptive proportional control
  • Such multi-stage adaptive proportional control can be applied to other controlled devices other than the fatigue tester of the present invention. That is, the output signal (corresponding to the detection signal corresponding to the load applied to the test piece) from the controlled device (corresponding to the body of the fatigue tester) is fed back and the controlled device is controlled.
  • a digital controller that performs digital feedback control is provided.
  • a control signal generating means for generating a control signal corresponding to the deviation amount; a comparison between a waveform of the output signal and a waveform of the target value signal; and, based on the comparison result, an amplification factor and a zero point used for the control signal generation processing.
  • a gain correction / zero correction calculation method that performs calculation processing related to correction, and an amplification correction based on the calculation result by the amplification correction Z zero correction calculator
  • the amplification factor according to the degree of convergence to the target value signal
  • the algorithm of the calculation process may be switched stepwise. Further, in addition to the amplification factor, a configuration may be adopted in which the algorithm of the calculation process relating to the correction of the zero point is switched stepwise.
  • the fatigue tester includes a control unit that sends a control signal for controlling the operation of the actuator unit to the main body and a control unit that performs feedback control.
  • the control unit includes a digital controller that performs feedback control by digital processing. And an external processing device connected to the digital controller for transmitting and receiving information to and from the digital controller to perform processing other than processing related to feedback control.
  • a test condition setting screen display that accepts the test condition setting input by the experimenter by using the input input processing means, a process that displays a test-in-progress screen that monitors the test status during the test, and this test. It is characterized by comprising: a screen display during a test for performing a process of receiving an input by an experimenter performed by using a middle screen; and an input reception processing means.
  • processing related to feedback control includes, in addition to the processing of the main feedback loop, for example, the above-described calculation processing relating to the correction of the amplification factor and the zero point, and the correction processing of the amplification factor and the zero point. Is included.
  • the display processing of three screens, a standby screen, a test condition setting screen, and a test screen is performed by an external processing device provided separately from the digital controller. And an input receiving process using these screens. Therefore, these screens are switched for each situation of the test machine operation, that is, for each scene up to the test preparation stage and the actual stage.
  • the input reception processing means In addition to the standby screen display, the input reception processing means, the test condition setting screen display, the input reception processing means, and the screen display during the test. It is also possible to provide reciprocal operation forced invalidation means for forcibly invalidating operations that should or should not be performed, or input parameter auditing means for auditing whether parameters (test conditions etc.) input by the experimenter are abnormal. Providing these blocks prevents erroneous operation, which leads to further improvement in test accuracy.
  • standby screen display ⁇ input reception processing means, test condition setting screen display ⁇ input reception processing means, and screen display during test ⁇ input reception processing means are all provided in the external processing device, the digital controller is However, the processing for displaying three screens and the processing for accepting input on three screens performed by these means are not burdened. In other words, all functions of the man-machine interface between the experimenter and the test machine are realized by the external processing device, and the digital controller bears only the arithmetic processing directly related to the control performance. As a result, the processing load on the digital controller is reduced, and the speed of arithmetic processing directly related to control performance such as responsiveness, load accuracy, and convergence to disturbances is improved. The above objectives are achieved by these.
  • a test condition setting screen display / input reception processing means sets a combination of a maximum stress and a minimum stress, a combination of a maximum stress and a stress ratio, as a test condition on the test condition setting screen. It is configured to accept the input of any combination of the minimum stress and the stress ratio and the diameter of the test piece. It is desirable to have a configuration to display.
  • the tester is configured to display a graph of the stress on the screen during the test
  • the experimenter only needs to use the commonly used parameters of stress, stress ratio, and specimen diameter. The performance is improved.
  • the stress display on the screen during the test is graphed, the experimenter can intuitively grasp the test status, and the operability of the test machine is further improved. For this reason, even an experimenter who does not have knowledge of a fatigue testing machine or control can easily perform a fatigue test.
  • a program for causing a computer to function as the external processing device is also a distribution target and a transaction target even in the program itself, as described below. That is, as the external processing device described above, a program or a part thereof for causing a computer to function is, for example, a read-only memory (M ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) or a compact disk (CD) using a read-only memory (CD).
  • a program or a part thereof for causing a computer to function is, for example, a read-only memory (M ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ ) or a compact disk (CD) using a read-only memory (CD).
  • CD-ROM CD-ROM
  • CD_R CD recordable
  • CD-RW CD rewritable
  • DVD-ROM read-only memory
  • DVD—RAM digital 'versatile' disc
  • FD flexible disk
  • magnetic tape hard disk
  • ROM read-only memory
  • EEPROM electrically erasable and rewritable read-only memory
  • RAM random' access' memory
  • MAN park
  • WAN wide area network
  • wired network such as the Internet
  • intranet an intranet
  • extranet or a wireless communication network
  • a carrier wave it is also possible to carry on a carrier wave.
  • the program described above may be a part of another program, or may be recorded on a recording medium together with a separate program.
  • the present invention includes an actuator section for applying a load to the test piece, and a test piece mounting section for mounting the test piece in a state of being arranged in a direction along the load direction of the actuator section.
  • the grips are provided with grips for gripping both ends of the test piece, and each of these grips is formed with a test piece contact surface with which both end faces of the test piece abut.
  • the end faces on both sides of the test piece satisfy the parallelism of 0.01 and the test piece abuts on each of the grips facing each other among the faces of the component parts of the tester main body.
  • All the surfaces that play a role in defining the parallelism between the surfaces are all finished so as to satisfy the parallelism of 0.01, and each end of the test piece with the test piece attached to the test piece mounting part.
  • a gap is formed between the outer peripheral surface of each of the grips and each of the gripping portions.
  • parallellism is the parallelism in drafting science (parallelism described in the production drawing), that is, the parallelism of the plane portion with respect to the reference plane.
  • Parallellism 0.01 means that the space between two planes that are parallel to the reference plane and that have a distance of 0.01 mm is allowed.
  • the reference plane may be, for example, a surface on the opposite side of each component.
  • each surface that plays a role in defining the parallelism between the test piece abutting surfaces of the opposing gripping portions refers to a case where a plurality of test machine main body components are assembled to form a test machine main body. Next, the surfaces that will affect the relative posture of the test piece contact surfaces of each gripping portion as a result are described.
  • the gap between the fitting of the outer peripheral surface of each end of the test piece used in the actual test and each grip portion is a dummy for alignment used in the alignment work performed before the test. It is desirable that the gap be larger than the clearance between the outer peripheral surface of each end of the test piece and each gripping portion.
  • the alignment before the test is performed. After performing alignment work using the core dummy test piece, remove the core alignment dummy test piece and attach a test piece to be used in the actual test. This makes it possible to perform alignment work with high accuracy. In addition, the loose fitting described above can be easily realized. In addition, if the alignment work is performed once using the alignment dummy test piece, it is possible to perform a plurality of tests as it is, thereby reducing the labor of the experimenter.
  • FIG. 1 shows the overall configuration of a fatigue tester 10 of the present embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a test piece mounting portion 20 constituting the main body 11 of the fatigue tester 10
  • FIG. 3 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a main part of the test piece mounting portion 20.
  • 4 to 6 show examples of screens associated with the processing by the external processing device 90 constituting the control means 60 of the fatigue tester 10.
  • the fatigue tester 10 is a fatigue tester for acquiring ultra-high cycle range data.
  • a fatigue tester 10 includes a main body 11 for attaching a test piece 1 and applying a load to the test piece 1, and a control means 60 for controlling an operation for applying a load on the main body 11. It is configured with.
  • the main body 11 includes a test piece mounting section 20 for mounting the test piece 1, an actuator section 40 for applying a load to the test piece 1, and a servo valve 50 for switching a hydraulic pressure supplied to the actuator section 40. It is provided with.
  • a test piece mounting portion 20 is connected to the upper end 1 A of the test piece 1 via a plurality of components, and detects a load applied to the test piece 1, and a load sensor 21.
  • the load sensor 21 is fixed to the upper surface 23 A of the load cell holder 23 by a plurality of bolts 26.
  • the load cell 21 undergoes minute deformation by receiving a force from the test piece 1, and the strain at that time is detected by the strain gauge 22, whereby the load applied to the test piece 1 is detected.
  • the load cell holder 23 is mounted on the actuator 40 by a plurality of bolts (not shown). It is fixed to the upper surface 42A of the cylinder 42.
  • the load cell holder 23 has a configuration in which the upper and lower flange portions are connected by a plurality of (for example, two) pillar portions, and is formed of, for example, a lump of metal material.
  • the upper grip portion 24 is provided with a round bar-shaped shaft portion 27 extending upward, and a male screw 28 is cut on the upper portion of the shaft portion 27.
  • a bush 29 is sandwiched between the shaft portion 27 and the load sensor 21, and thereby the relative positioning between the upper grip portion 24 and the load cell 21 in a direction orthogonal to the load direction (vertical direction in FIG. 2).
  • the external thread 28 of the shaft 27 is engaged with a lock nut 30 by force S. By tightening the lock nut 30, the relative position of the upper grip portion 24 with respect to the load cell 21 in the load direction is adjusted. It is fixed.
  • the lower grip 25 is screwed to a piston screw 41D provided at the tip of the first piston rod 41B of the actuator 40, and is fixed to the first piston rod 41B.
  • the test piece 1 is loaded with a load due to the reciprocating motion of the piston 41 of the actuator section 40.
  • each of the grasping portions 24 and 25 for grasping the upper and lower ends 1A and 1B of the test piece 1 is, for example, a circular insertion for inserting the upper and lower ends 1A and 1B of the test piece 1.
  • the test piece fixing lids 24B and 25B are configured to hold down and fix the test piece.
  • Each test piece fixing lid 24B, 25B has a disk shape having a through hole through which the test piece 1 is inserted in the center, that is, a donut shape. It consists of a lid piece.
  • Each of the test piece fixing lids 24B and 25B may be divided into three parts instead of two parts.
  • each part is divided into 120-degree sections to form a substantially fan-shaped lid piece, and each of these lid pieces is attached to each test piece holder 24A, 25A using two bolts 33, 34, respectively.
  • Fix it That is, the test piece fixing cover 24B is fixed with a total of six bolts 33, and the test piece fixing lid 25B is fixed with a total of six bolts 34.
  • the test piece 1 in the three divisions is better than that in the two divisions.
  • test piece fixing covers 24B and 25B For materials that do not cause breakage such as the above, such as high-strength steel, for example, using two-piece test piece fixing covers 24B and 25B, Depending on the material of 1, the test piece fixing lids 24B and 25B having different numbers of divisions may be used.
  • the bottom surfaces of the insertion holes 31 and 32 formed in the test piece holders 24A and 25A are the test piece contact surfaces 31A on which the upper and lower end faces 1C and 1D of the test piece 1 are respectively contacted. , 32A.
  • the outer peripheral surfaces IE and 1F of the upper and lower ends 1A and 1B of the test piece 1 and the test piece holders 24A and 25A of the upper and lower grip portions 24 and 25 are provided.
  • the gaps 35 and 36 are formed between the inner peripheral surfaces (side surfaces) 31B and 32B of the insertion holes 31 and 32 formed in FIG.
  • the upper and lower ends 2A, 2B of the alignment test specimen used for the alignment operation performed before the test are indicated by the two-dot chain line in the figure. Except for the upper and lower ends 2A and 2B, this dummy test piece for centering is the same as the test piece 1 used in the actual test.
  • the outer diameters (diameters) Wl and W2 of the upper and lower ends 2A and 2B of the centering dummy test piece are the outer diameters of the upper and lower ends 1A and 1B of the test piece 1 used in the actual test.
  • the dimensions (diameter) are larger than Dl and D2, respectively.
  • the inner diameters (diameters) of the insertion holes 31 and 32 formed in the test piece holders 24A and 25A of the upper and lower grip portions 24 and 25 are Hl and H2
  • the upper and lower ends of the test piece 1 used in the actual test are used.
  • the gaps (H1-D1) and (H2-D2) between the outer surfaces 1E and IF of the parts 1A and 1B and the inner surfaces (side surfaces) 31B and 32B of the insertion holes 31 and 32 are for alignment.
  • each component that plays a role in defining the parallelism between the test piece contact surfaces 31A and 32A (see FIG. 3) of the upper and lower grip portions 24 and 25 is high.
  • Each component Each surface (upper surface or lower surface) is finished to satisfy the parallelism of 0.01. Further, the surface roughness of each of these surfaces is equivalent to the roughness of the polished finish. Note that the parallelism of these surfaces is the parallelism after securing a perpendicularity to the load direction (the direction in which the piston 41 advances and retreats).
  • the following surface is processed to have a parallelism of 0.01 and a roughness equivalent to a polished finish. That is, in FIG. 3, (1) the upper and lower end surfaces 1C and 1D of the test piece 1, (2) the test piece contact surfaces 31A and 32A of the upper and lower grip portions 24 and 25, and (3) the upper and lower ends of the test piece 1. Opposite surfaces 1G, 1H of parts 1A, 1B, (4) Upper and lower test specimen fixing lids 24B, 25B contacting these opposing surfaces 1G, 1H.
  • the actuator section 40 is the same as the above-described actuator section of the fatigue tester described in Patent Document 1 by the present applicant, and therefore, detailed illustration is omitted.
  • the actuator section 40 includes a piston 41 that moves forward and backward to apply a load to the test piece 1, and a cylinder 42 that is arranged around the piston 41 and guides the sliding of the piston 41.
  • the piston 41 has a head portion 41A that moves forward and backward due to a difference in front and rear oil pressure, a first piston rod 41B provided on the forward side of the head portion 41A, and a first piston rod 41B provided on the retreat side of the head portion 41A. It is configured to include a two-piston rod 41C.
  • a first pressure chamber 43 is formed on the forward side of the head 41A of the piston 41, and a second pressure chamber 44 is formed on the retreat side of the head 41A. ing .
  • the first pressure chamber 43 and the second pressure chamber 44 have a first pressure chamber Oil for applying oil pressure to the head portion 41A is supplied through the flow path 45 and the second flow path 46.
  • the servo valve 50 is similar to the servo valve of the fatigue tester described in Patent Document 1 by the present applicant, and has four ports (not shown), ie, a P port, an R port, a C1 port, and a C2 port. It has a port.
  • the P port is connected to a supply pressure pipe of a hydraulic unit (not shown), and the R port is connected to a return pipe connected to an oil tank (not shown).
  • the C1 port and the C2 port are connected to a first flow path 45 and a second flow path 46 formed in the cylinder 42 of the actuator section 40, respectively.
  • the servo valve 50 switches the oil that has entered from the P port to the C1 or C2 port according to the current signal or the voltage signal that is sent from the DSP controller 70. For example, when switching to the C1 port, the oil that has flowed out of the C1 port enters the first pressure chamber 43 through the first flow path 45 and pushes the head 41A of the piston 41 to move the piston 41 backward. Due to the backward movement of the piston 41, the oil in the second pressure chamber 44 is pushed by the head portion 41A and enters the C2 port through the second flow path 46. Then, the oil that has entered the servo valve 50 from the C2 port is guided to the R port in the servo valve 50 and finally flows to the return pipe of the hydraulic unit. The oil circulates through such a route. The same is true when switching to the C2 port, in which case the piston 41 moves forward.
  • the switching control of the servo valve 50 causes the piston 41 to move forward and backward.
  • the first piston rod 41B of the actuator section 40 is connected to the lower end 1B of the test piece 1 via the lower grip 25.
  • the lower end 1B of the test piece 1 is displaced in the longitudinal direction of the test piece 1, and as a result, a load is applied to the test piece 1. It is as follows.
  • a so-called nozzle flapper type servo valve can be suitably used, and from the viewpoint of further improving responsiveness, a so-called direct drive type servo valve may be used.
  • the former nozzle flapper type servo valve is formed by a pressure difference between a nozzle flapper and a flapper in a portion called a first stage. The latter moves the pool, and the latter direct drive type servo valve drives the spool directly by a driving element such as a voice coil or a giant magnetostrictive element / electrostrictive element.
  • control means 60 feeds back a detection signal of the strain gauge 22 corresponding to the load applied to the test piece 1 to control the operation of the actuator section 40 and sends a control signal to the servo valve 50.
  • the DSP controller 70 performs digital processing of the processing directly related to control performance, and transmits and receives information between the DSP controller 70 and the DSP controller 70.
  • An external processing device 90 that performs processing that is not directly related to control performance is provided.
  • the DSP controller 70 includes a function generator 71, a servo amplifier 72 constituting control signal generation means, a D_A converter 73, an A_D converter 74, a counter 75, and a limiter 76.
  • the DSP controller 70 also includes a peak-bottom Hornoled 77, an amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation unit 78, an amplification factor correction unit 79, and a zero correction unit 80.
  • Each component of the DSP controller 70 includes one or a plurality of central processing units (CPUs) provided inside the DSP controller 70 and one that defines the operation procedure of the CPU. Alternatively, it is realized by a plurality of control programs and various memories such as a ROM and a RAM. Further, the hardware constituting the DSP controller 70 may include, for example, a product-sum operation unit in addition to the CPU.
  • the control program is such that an execution program created and compiled by the external processing device 90 is mounted on the DSP controller 70. This control program is created by combining a program created by the external processing unit 90 with various instructions (for example, an instruction for outputting a sine waveform) provided by a DSP board built in the DSP controller 70. Generally, all parts of the control program may be created by the external processing device 90.
  • the DSP controller 70 performs the following fully digitalized feedback control.
  • a signal corresponding to the target load is generated in the function generator 71.
  • This signal is amplified at a predetermined amplification rate by the servo amplifier 72 and is converted into an analog current signal or a voltage signal through the DA converter 73.
  • the analog current signal or the voltage signal is replaced in the servo valve 50 with oil having a flow rate proportional to the magnitude of the signal, and guided to the first pressure chamber 43 or the second pressure chamber 44 of the actuator section 40. As a result, the piston 41 moves, and a load is applied to the test piece 1.
  • the load applied to the test piece 1 is converted into an analog voltage signal or a current signal in proportion to the load by the load cell 21 and the strain gauge 22, and further converted into a digital signal through the AD converter 74. Is done. Then, a deviation value between the target value signal from the function generator 71 and this load signal is calculated, and this value is sent to the servo amplifier 72 again. The deviation finally converges by such a feedback loop, and a load corresponding to the target value signal is applied to the test piece 1.
  • the load signal may not follow the target value signal when the gain is set to a constant value.
  • a correction operation for disturbance is performed by the peak bottom hold 77, the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation unit 78, the amplification factor correction unit 79, and the zero correction unit 80. That is, the peak value and the minimum value of the load signal are monitored in real time by the peak bottom hold 77, and the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means 78 determines the optimum amplification factor based on the deviation between the monitoring result and the target value signal. A correction amount and a zero-point correction amount are calculated. Then, based on this calculation result, the signal of the function generator 71 is corrected by the zero point correction means 80, and the amplification factor of the servo amplifier 72 is corrected by the amplification factor correction means 79.
  • the fatigue tester 10 is stopped by the limiter 76.
  • the number of repetitions required for the fatigue test is counted by the counter 75.
  • the function generator 71 performs a process of generating a target value r (k).
  • the target value r (k) is a sign waveform and is represented by the following equation (1).
  • r (k) ⁇ ⁇ 8 ⁇ (2 ⁇ X (F X k / F)) + OFF ⁇ ⁇ ⁇ (1)
  • A is the sine wave amplitude (amplitude) of the attained target load
  • F is the value of the fatigue test.
  • the repetition frequency (frequency) F is the operating frequency (sampling frequency) of the A / D converter 74 of the DSP controller 70
  • OFF is the zero point, that is, the sine wave average value (offset) of the target load.
  • This determination process is performed by the processing means 90A of the external processing device 90, and the result of the determination is delivered to the function generator 71, and is used for the processing in the function generator 71. For example, suppose that the mouthpiece 21 is calibrated to output 10 V at 100 kgf (9.81 kN).
  • this waveform is a sine waveform having an amplitude of 450 kgf (4.41 kN) above and below 550 kgf (5.39 kN).
  • the setting input based on the stress value is received on the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG. 5 by the test condition setting screen display 'input reception processing means 92' of the external processing device 90 as described later.
  • the experimenter does not need to perform the conversion work from the stress value to the load value.
  • the external processing device 90 converts the stress value to the load value, calculates the target load amplitude and zero point, determines the load, and converts the voltage value to the voltage value. Performs all conversion processing automatically.
  • the repetition frequency F of the fatigue test is input by the experimenter using a test condition setting screen 200 in FIG. 5 described later.
  • the servo amplifier 72 performs a process of generating a control signal to be sent to the servo valve 50.
  • G is an amplification rate, that is, a proportional gain (gain).
  • the peak bottom hold 77 measures the maximum value and the minimum value of each cycle of the waveform of the actually measured load value detected by the strain meter 22, and performs a process of storing and storing the maximum value and the minimum value.
  • the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means 78 compares the waveform of the target value signal with the waveform (feedback waveform) of the detection signal of the strain meter 22, and based on the comparison result, calculates the amplification factor (gain). And a calculation process for correcting the zero point (offset). This is a process for performing adaptive proportional control.
  • the comparison between the target value signal waveform and the feedback waveform includes comparing the amplitude of the target value signal waveform with the amplitude of the feedback waveform, and comparing the zero point (offset) of the target value signal waveform with the zero point (offset) of the feedback waveform. This is a comparison.
  • the amplitude and offset of the waveform of the target value signal are values calculated and determined by the external processing device 90 when the test conditions are first set on the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG. 5 as described above.
  • the amplitude and offset of the feedback waveform are calculated by the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means 78 based on the maximum value and the minimum value measured by the peak bottom hold 77. It should be noted that the comparison processing of these waveforms and the calculation processing relating to the correction based on the comparison result are basically performed for each cycle of the waveform, but may be performed for a plurality of cycles.
  • the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means 78 outputs a response signal (a detection signal of the strain meter 22).
  • the processing for switching the algorithm of the calculation processing relating to the correction of the amplification factor (gain) and the zero point (offset) is performed stepwise.
  • This is a process for performing multi-stage adaptive proportional control. In principle, the process of determining whether or not to switch is performed for each cycle of the waveform, but may be performed for a plurality of cycles.
  • a specific example of the process of switching the algorithm stepwise includes the following two-stage switching process.
  • the number of switching stages, the content of the algorithm, the switching determination method, and the like are as follows. It is not limited.
  • the following algorithm A and algorithm B are used.
  • the amplitude of the measured load is A
  • the proportional gain at that time is G.
  • G (A / A) XG. This value of G and the current ratio
  • i indicates the i-th sampling data, and corresponds to each cycle. Therefore, the value of i changes at a longer time interval than k in Equation (1) and Equation (3).
  • Gtp is a parameter (gain tuning parameter) used to smooth the change in proportional gain. As the value of gtp, for example, an experience value of 0.02 or the like can be used, but the value is not limited to this.
  • the above method is Algorithm A.
  • AGC In normal adaptive proportional control, AGC is performed using only algorithm A described above. However, when the measured load value converges to the target value to some extent, the value of gtp XAG becomes extremely small, and the convergence peaks out, making it difficult to converge the error to a value smaller than, for example, 1%.
  • the AGC algorithm is changed from the above algorithm A to the following algorithm B when the actually measured load value converges to a target value to some extent after the start of the test.
  • the amount of increase or decrease is not limited to the above-mentioned 0.0002, but may be another value, or the increase and decrease amounts may be different values.
  • the timing of switching from algorithm A to algorithm B is the first time gtp X A G ⁇ 0.0006 is satisfied during control by algorithm A. Therefore, in each cycle, gtp X A G ⁇ 0.0006 is satisfied, and the repulsive force is cut off by half IJ.
  • the numerical value of 0.0006 is a value obtained empirically through experiments, but the criterion value is not limited to this.
  • the error can be converged to ⁇ 0.1% or less by the multi-stage adaptive proportional control that switches from algorithm A to algorithm B as described above.
  • the value of gtp in the algorithm A is dynamically changed while monitoring the degree of convergence, or a switching criterion value (boundary value of gtp XAG) which is only 0 ⁇ 0006 in the above example.
  • a multi-stage adaptive proportional control that switches over three or more stages by changing the amount of increase / decrease in algorithm B, etc.
  • the rated output refers to the larger of the absolute value of the maximum value of the target load and the absolute value of the minimum value of the target load.
  • the flow of processing for determining the offset correction amount is the same for both algorithms C and D, and the only difference is the numerical value of the adjustment amount.
  • the algorithm is regarded as different, and the “algorithm” is defined.
  • the values of each adjustment amount of 0.15% and 0.006% of the rated output are forces S, which are empirically obtained by experiments, and are not limited to these values.
  • the error value of 1.5% of the rated output which serves as a criterion value for switching between the algorithms C and D, is not limited to this, and other values may be used.
  • the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means 78 always keeps the automatic offset control (A ⁇ C: Auto offset control) valid even when the AGC is invalidated. That is, during the test, the load average value always or substantially coincides with the target value.
  • the experimenter uses the “AGC enable” button 360 on the screen 300 during the test shown in FIG. Effect can be selected.
  • the average value is adjusted once before the test, so that the error of the average value can be kept small immediately after the start of the test. Therefore, the offset adjustment amount actually used may be almost the value of algorithm D.
  • the amplification factor correction means 79 and the zero point correction means 80 store the calculation results obtained by the amplification factor correction / zero point correction calculation means 78 in a memory, and perform amplification factor and zero point correction processing based on the calculation results. Each one is to do. Since the processing by the amplification factor correction Z zero point correction calculation means 78 is performed for each cycle of the waveform, the contents of the correction processing by the amplification factor correction means 79 and the zero point correction means 80 are updated for each waveform cycle.
  • the counter 75 performs a process of counting the number of repetitions necessary for a fatigue test and a process of a counter limit.
  • Counter limit is a function that stops the test when the number of test repetitions reaches a specified value.
  • the specified value is a value that the experimenter has input in the input section 233 of the number of repetition of the discontinuation on the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG.
  • the limiter 76 performs each processing of a maximum limiter, a minimum limiter, a gain oscillation prevention limiter, and a test piece breakage detection mechanism.
  • the maximum limiter is the maximum force detected by the peak bottom hold 77
  • the minimum limiter is the minimum value detected by the peak bottom hold 77 This function stops the test operation when the value falls below the previously set value, and prevents the abnormal load from being repeated.
  • the value set in advance before the test is a value calculated based on the value entered by the experimenter in the input section 231 of the allowable excessive error on the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG.
  • the gain oscillation prevention limiter has a function of preventing the output from increasing without limit by auto tuning and making the test unstable.
  • the experimenter applies a limiter based on the value entered in the input section 232 for the maximum allowable gain on the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG.
  • the test piece fracture detection mechanism detects the fracture of the test piece 1 by sensing a sudden change in the response load waveform, and stops the fatigue test at the moment when the test piece 1 breaks, thereby detecting the fracture of the test piece. And a function to protect the fatigue tester 10 itself.
  • the external processing device 90 is configured by a computer, and has various functions not directly related to control performance. It is provided with processing means 90A for performing seed processing, input means 96 such as a keyboard and a mouse, and display means 97 such as a liquid crystal display and a CRT display. Further, for example, an output unit such as a printer or a plotter may be appropriately provided.
  • the processing means 90A includes a standby screen display, an input reception processing means 91, a test condition setting screen display, an input reception processing means 92, a screen display during the test, an input reception processing means 93, and a reciprocal operation forced invalidation. Means 94 and input parameter auditing means 95.
  • the standby screen display 'input reception processing means 91 is a processing for displaying the standby screen 100 of Fig. 4 used when operating the actuator unit 40 in a state other than the test, and the standby screen 100 This is a process for receiving an operation input to the actuator section 40 by the experimenter performed by using.
  • Display of test condition setting screen ⁇ Input reception processing means 92 is a process of displaying test condition setting screen 200 of FIG. 5 for setting test conditions, and an experimenter performing using this test condition setting screen 200. The processing for accepting the input of the setting of the test condition according to. If the experimenter inputs necessary values on the test condition setting screen 200 of FIG. 5 and instructs the decision, the input test conditions are displayed on the test condition setting screen display ' The parameters are automatically converted into parameters that can be interpreted by the control program of 70 and transferred to the DSP controller 70.
  • the screen display during test 'input reception processing means 93 is a process for displaying the screen 300 during the test shown in Fig. 6 for monitoring the test status during the test, and the input performed by the experimenter using the screen 300 during the test. This is a process for accepting the request.
  • the input reception processing means 93 communicates with the control program of the DSP controller 70 and investigates the cause. Perform the process of reporting.
  • the reciprocal operation forcibly invalidating means 94 performs a process of forcibly invalidating an operation that should not be performed or an operation that should not be performed while a certain operation is being performed. For example, during the test, the parameters of the test conditions cannot be changed.
  • the input parameter auditing means 95 performs a process of monitoring whether a parameter (test condition or the like) input by an experimenter is abnormal. For example, monitor for inconsistent parameter inputs on the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG. [0116]
  • the means 91-95 included in the processing means 90A are provided inside a computer main body (including not only personal computers but also higher-order models) constituting the external processing device 90. This is realized by a central processing unit (CPU) and one or more programs that define the operation procedure of the CPU.
  • CPU central processing unit
  • a fatigue test for acquiring ultra-high cycle range data is performed using the fatigue tester 10 as follows.
  • the experimenter performs the centering operation of the main body 11 of the fatigue testing machine 10 using the dummy test piece for centering.
  • a dummy test piece for alignment is mounted on the grip portion 25 on the lower side (the piston 41 side).
  • the horizontal position of the load cell 21 is adjusted so that the upper end 2A of the dummy test piece for centering fits into the insertion hole 31 formed in the test piece holder 24A of the grip portion 24 on the upper side (the load cell 21 side). Adjust the position.
  • the load cell 21 is fixed by the bonoleto 26, and the lock nut 30 is tightened. Finally, the dummy specimen for alignment is removed.
  • the above alignment work can be performed in about a few minutes, and the work time is remarkably reduced as compared with the case where the strain gauge is pasted on the test piece and the alignment work is conventionally performed. it can. After this alignment work, no matter how many times the test piece 1 for the fatigue test is attached at random, the test piece 1 will not receive any restraining force from the side. Therefore, unlike the conventional case, this alignment work does not need to be performed for each fatigue test.
  • the experimenter After performing the alignment operation using the alignment dummy test piece as described above, the experimenter attached a test piece to the test piece mounting portion 20 of the main body 11 of the fatigue tester 10 in order to perform a fatigue test. Attach strip 1. At this time, the experimenter uses the standby screen 100 of FIG. 4 displayed on the screen of the display means 97 by the input screen processing means 91 to display the standby screen of the external processing device 90 and displays the test piece 1 Operate the piston 41 necessary for installation work.
  • the standby screen 100 includes a feedback value display section 110 and a test condition table.
  • Display unit 120, piston control unit 130, "communication end” button 140, "test condition setting” button 150, "to test console” button 160, and "numeric offset input” button 170 are provided. .
  • the feedback value display section 110 is provided with a display section 111 of a load obtained from a detection signal of the strain gauge 22, and a display section 112 of a load stress obtained by converting the load into a test piece diameter. I have.
  • the conversion process to the stress value is performed by the standby screen display 'input reception processing means 91.
  • the test condition display section 120 is provided with display sections 121 124 for the maximum absolute stress, the test stress ratio, the test piece diameter, and the test frequency. These display values are the values entered by the experimenter on the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG. 5 by clicking the “test condition setting” button 150.
  • the piston control unit 130 includes an up button 131 for moving the piston 41 forward (up), a down button 132 for moving the piston 41 backward (down), and a neutral button 133 for moving the piston 41 to the center position.
  • the advance amount display section 134 that displays the advance amount (up amount) of the piston 41 with a bar
  • the reverse amount display section 135 that displays the retreat amount (down amount) of the piston 41 with a bar
  • the adjustment amount of the zero point of the servo valve 50 There are provided a valve zero adjustment input section 136 for inputting, and a “Set” button 137 for actually setting the value input on the valve zero adjustment input section 136. Since the zero point of the servo valve 50 is normally shifted to the safe side, the zero point adjustment is performed to correct this in advance and perform precise control.
  • the "communication end” button 140 is a button for terminating communication with the DSP controller 70
  • the "test condition setting” button 150 is a button for moving to the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG.
  • the “To test console” button 160 is a button for moving to the in-test screen 300 in FIG. 6, and the “Numerical value input” button 170 is used to forcibly set the zero point (offset) at the time of adjustment, such as before starting the test. ) Is a button used to set a certain value.
  • the experimenter also sets test conditions before the test.
  • the experimenter clicks the “test condition setting” button 150 on the standby screen 100 of FIG.
  • the test condition setting screen display / input reception processing means 92 displays the test condition setting screen 200 of FIG.
  • a test condition setting screen 200 is used to set main conditions among the test conditions.
  • a "cancel” button 240 for taking human power and a "set condition” button 250 for actually setting the conditions manually input in each of the settings 220 and 230 are provided.
  • the main condition setting section 210 is provided with input sections 211 214 for a maximum absolute stress, a test stress ratio, a test piece diameter, and a test frequency, and is used to input a check when performing a compression-compression test.
  • a compression / compression test selection check input unit 215 is provided.
  • the values of the maximum absolute stress, test stress ratio, and specimen diameter entered here are determined by the sine wave amplitude A and the average sine wave (zero) OFF of the target load in Equation (1) above.
  • This calculation determination processing is performed by the test condition setting screen display 'input reception processing means 92.
  • the value of the test frequency input here is set as the value of F in the above-mentioned equation (1).
  • the altitude condition setting section 220 is provided with input sections 221-223 for load cell conversion constant, vacuum bias, and default gain.
  • the load cell conversion constant indicates the relationship between the load applied to the load cell 21 and the output voltage of the strain gauge 22, and is input according to the calibration result of the load cell 21. It is used for load-voltage conversion in various processes such as sine wave amplitude A of target load and sine wave average value (zero) OFF calculation determination process.
  • the default gain sets the initial value of the amplification factor (gain).
  • the limiter setting section 230 is provided with input sections 231-233 for the permissible excessive error, the permissible maximum gain, and the number of repetition of discontinuation. These input values are used for various limit processes performed by the limiter 76 and the counter 75.
  • a test condition display section 310 for displaying test conditions is displayed on a screen 300 during the test.
  • a test status numerical display unit 320 for numerically displaying the test status and a test status graph display unit 330 for displaying the stress based on the actually measured load as a test status in a graph display are provided.
  • the test condition display section 310 is provided with display sections 311 314 for the maximum absolute stress, the test stress ratio, the test piece diameter, and the test frequency. These display values are the values entered by the experimenter on the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG.
  • the test status numerical display section 320 includes a count display section 321 for displaying the count value of the counter 75, a gain display section 322 for displaying the current gain, and a percentage of the rated input of the servo valve 50.
  • the test error displayed here is (actual load amplitude-target load amplitude) / target load amplitude X 100 (%).
  • the test status graph display section 330 displays a stress waveform (a waveform in which the horizontal axis represents time and the vertical axis represents stress) calculated from the actual load.
  • the conversion process from the load value to the stress value at this time is performed by the screen display / input reception processing means 93 during the test.
  • test status numerical display section 320 and the test status graph display section 330 are periodically updated by the screen display under test / input reception processing means 93.
  • an "automatic offset adjustment” button 340 for automatically adjusting the offset for automatically adjusting the offset
  • a "test stop” button 350 for stopping the test for stopping the test
  • an "AGC enable” button 360 for enabling the AGC are provided.
  • “Automatic offset adjustment” button 340 is a button for automatically bringing the load statically to the offset value before the test starts.
  • the multi-stage adaptive proportional control is not enabled, and only the proportional control is performed.
  • the values of the amplification factor (gain) and the zero point (offset) are constant, and even if the actual load deviates from the target load due to external factors, it will be appropriate. Accordingly, the operation of correcting the amplification factor and the value of the zero point is not performed.
  • the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means 78 performs amplification processing in accordance with the degree of convergence of the actual load signal (the detection signal of the strain gauge 22) to the target value signal when performing the calculation processing relating to the amplification factor and zero correction. Since the algorithm of the calculation process related to the correction of the gain is switched stepwise, when the detection signal converges to the target value signal to some extent, the algorithm related to the correction of the amplification factor is switched so that the target value of the detection signal is The degree of convergence to a signal can be increased. Therefore, the test accuracy can be improved.
  • the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means 78 has a configuration in which not only the amplification factor but also the algorithm of the calculation process relating to the correction of the zero is switched stepwise according to the degree of convergence of the detection signal to the target value signal. Therefore, the degree of convergence of the detection signal to the target value signal can be further increased, and the test accuracy can be further improved.
  • the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means 78 is configured to determine whether to switch the algorithm for each cycle of the waveform, the algorithm can be switched at an appropriate timing. . For this reason, the speed of convergence can be improved, and the test accuracy can be further improved.
  • the multi-stage adaptive proportional control uses ⁇ 0%. . Can be converged within 1%.
  • the fatigue tester 10 includes the DSP controller 70 and the external processing device 90 as the control means 60
  • the DSP controller 70 includes arithmetic processing (target value signal) directly related to control performance. And the load signal, amplification factor correction, zero point correction, peak bottom hold, and calculation of amplification factor and zero point correction for multi-stage adaptive proportional control).
  • arithmetic processing that is not directly related to control performance (calculation processing that converts the voltage fed back to load, numerical display of stress' Draft display of stress ⁇ Bar display of piston travel distance ⁇ Arrow display of piston operation button , Etc., which can be used by humans to make the display easy to handle.
  • a program for arithmetic processing directly related to control performance The functions that are not directly related to the functions can be completely separated from the programs for arithmetic processing, and the hardware that executes each of these programs can be separated.
  • the processing load on the DSP controller 70 can be reduced, so that the processing speed of arithmetic processing directly related to control performance such as responsiveness, load accuracy, and convergence to disturbance can be improved.
  • the test accuracy can be improved.
  • the external processing device 90 includes a standby screen display and input reception processing means 91, a test condition setting screen display and input reception processing means 92, and a test screen display and input reception processing means 93. Therefore, in each stage of the test and preparation, the experimenter refers to one of the three screens: the standby screen 100 in FIG. 4, the test condition setting screen 200 in FIG. 5, and the test screen 300 in FIG. At the same time, it is possible to confirm only the display of the information required in each scene, and to perform only the input work required in each scene. Therefore, the experimenter only needs to perform the minimum necessary operations in each stage of the test and its preparation, so that there is no need to perform extra operations or refer to extra information to think about extra things. Operability can be improved. Since the operability can be improved, the occurrence of erroneous recognition or erroneous operation can be avoided or suppressed, and the test accuracy can be improved.
  • the waiting button display 131 and the descending button 132 are displayed as arrows in the piston control section 130 of the waiting screen 100 in FIG. Since the bar 134 and the retreat amount display section 135 are displayed as bars, the experimenter can intuitively operate the piston 41. In addition, erroneous operations can be avoided or suppressed. Further, since the feedback value display section 110 is provided and the stress is displayed, the experimenter can easily confirm the load state of the current load.
  • test condition setting screen display 'input reception processing means 92 can receive the input of the maximum absolute stress, the stress ratio, and the test piece diameter on the test condition setting screen 200 in Fig. 5. For this reason, the experimenter can use only the commonly used parameter of the stress 'stress ratio' specimen diameter, which can improve the operability of the fatigue testing machine 10 and improve the fatigue testing machine and control. Even an experimenter without knowledge can easily perform a fatigue test.
  • the external processing device 90 includes the reciprocal operation forced invalidation means 94, erroneous operation can be prevented.
  • the external processing device 90 includes the input parameter monitoring means 95, the safety of the test can be improved.
  • Alignment work is performed using a dummy alignment test specimen having ends 2A, 2B that are larger than ends 1A, 1B of test piece 1 used in the actual test. In addition to being able to perform with high accuracy, the loose fitting described above can be easily realized. In addition, if the alignment work is performed once using the alignment dummy test piece, a plurality of tests can be performed as it is, so that the labor of the experimenter can be reduced.
  • the bias stress ⁇ ⁇ at a load stress of ⁇ 400 MPa was 3.2.3.9 MPa.
  • the ratio of ⁇ is 0.8-2.3% with respect to the applied stress. This value does not affect the fatigue test result at all.
  • the ratio of ⁇ to the applied stress of 400 MPa is 3.5-7.4%. . Therefore, in the fatigue tester 10 of the present embodiment, it was found that the eccentric load was significantly reduced, and the effect of the present invention was remarkably shown.
  • the present invention is not limited to the above-described embodiment, and includes modifications and the like within a range that can achieve the object of the present invention.
  • the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means 78 has a configuration in which, for both the amplification factor and the zero, the algorithm of the calculation process relating to the correction is stepwise switched.
  • a configuration may be adopted in which the algorithm is switched stepwise only for the amplification factor.
  • the test accuracy can be further improved.
  • the waveform of the detected signal and the waveform of the target value signal are compared by the amplification factor correction / zero correction calculation means, and the amplification factor and the zero value are calculated based on the comparison result.
  • the algorithm of the calculation process related to the correction of the amplification factor is switched stepwise according to the degree of convergence of the detection signal to the target value signal.
  • the display processing of the three screens of the standby screen, the test condition setting screen, and the test screen, and the use of these screens are performed by an external processing device provided separately from the digital controller. Since the input processing is performed, the operability can be improved, the operation burden on the experimenter can be reduced, and the occurrence of erroneous recognition or erroneous operation can be avoided or suppressed, and the test accuracy can be improved. There is an effect that can be.
  • the parallelism of each surface of the test piece and the component parts of the test machine main body is improved.
  • the fitting between the end portion of the test piece and the grip portion is loosened, it is possible to suppress the occurrence of an eccentric load and to improve the test accuracy.
  • FIG. 1 is an overall configuration diagram of a fatigue tester according to one embodiment of the present invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of a test piece mounting portion constituting a main body of the fatigue tester of the embodiment.
  • FIG. 3 is an enlarged cross-sectional view of a main part of a test piece mounting portion of the embodiment.
  • FIG. 4 is a view showing an example of a standby screen associated with processing by an external processing device constituting control means of the fatigue tester of the embodiment.
  • FIG. 5 is an exemplary diagram of a test condition setting screen associated with processing by an external processing device constituting control means of the fatigue tester of the embodiment.
  • FIG. 6 is a view showing an example of a screen during a test associated with processing by an external processing device constituting a control means of the fatigue tester of the embodiment.

Abstract

L'invention concerne un testeur d'usure dont l'exactitude est améliorée, qui comporte : un corps principal (11) ayant une section de montage (20) de pièce à tester et un actionneur (40) ; un moyen de commande (60) qui exécute une commande de rétroaction permettant de renvoyer un signal de détection conformément à une charge appliquée à la pièce à tester (1). Dans le testeur d'usure (10), un moyen de calcul (78) de correction/correction point zéro du rapport d'amplification compare une forme d'onde d'un signal détecté à une forme d'onde d'un signal cible et calcule le rapport d'amplification et la correction point zéro en fonction du résultat de la comparaison. Dans ce calcul, selon le degré de convergence du signal détecté par rapport au signal de la valeur cible, l'algorithme du calcul concernant la correction du rapport d'amplification est progressivement commuté. De plus, outre le rapport d'amplification, l'algorithme du calcul concernant la correction point zéro peut également commuté de manière progressive.
PCT/JP2004/007191 2003-05-27 2004-05-26 Testeur d'usure WO2004106895A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2003-149131 2003-05-27
JP2003149131A JP4172544B2 (ja) 2003-05-27 2003-05-27 疲労試験機

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2004106895A1 true WO2004106895A1 (fr) 2004-12-09

Family

ID=33487142

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2004/007191 WO2004106895A1 (fr) 2003-05-27 2004-05-26 Testeur d'usure

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4172544B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2004106895A1 (fr)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103676851A (zh) * 2013-11-26 2014-03-26 西安交通大学 一种电液伺服疲劳试验机双电控装置
CN112595454A (zh) * 2020-12-28 2021-04-02 贵州航天计量测试技术研究所 一种用于疲劳试验机的标准测力仪及动态力校准系统
CN113607580A (zh) * 2021-08-10 2021-11-05 江苏徐工工程机械研究院有限公司 一种金属构件疲劳试验方法及剩余寿命预测方法

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP4710569B2 (ja) * 2005-11-30 2011-06-29 株式会社島津製作所 試験機
JP5146401B2 (ja) * 2009-05-18 2013-02-20 株式会社島津製作所 材料試験機
JP5353805B2 (ja) * 2010-04-20 2013-11-27 株式会社島津製作所 試験機
JP6039918B2 (ja) * 2012-05-22 2016-12-07 株式会社鷺宮製作所 試験装置および試験装置の制御方法
JP6011076B2 (ja) * 2012-07-04 2016-10-19 株式会社島津製作所 疲労試験機および駆動波形の補正方法
JP6948448B2 (ja) * 2017-07-06 2021-10-13 エスペック株式会社 環境試験装置
JP6784649B2 (ja) * 2017-07-06 2020-11-11 エスペック株式会社 環境試験装置
JP2022076153A (ja) * 2020-11-09 2022-05-19 株式会社島津製作所 材料試験機、及び材料試験機の制御装置

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000131203A (ja) * 1998-10-21 2000-05-12 Saginomiya Seisakusho Inc データサンプリング方法及びデータサンプリング機能を備えた制御装置
JP2002243606A (ja) * 2001-02-19 2002-08-28 Hokkaido Technology Licence Office Co Ltd 疲労試験機

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2000131203A (ja) * 1998-10-21 2000-05-12 Saginomiya Seisakusho Inc データサンプリング方法及びデータサンプリング機能を備えた制御装置
JP2002243606A (ja) * 2001-02-19 2002-08-28 Hokkaido Technology Licence Office Co Ltd 疲労試験機

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
IZUMIYA H. ET AL.: "Choko cycle-yo kogata digital servo hiro shikenki no kaihatsu", THE JAPAN SOCIETY OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS HOKKAIDO SHIBU, no. 012-1, 25 September 2001 (2001-09-25), pages 16 - 17, XP002986894 *
IZUMIYA H. ET AL.: "Kooto kogata digital servo hiro shikenki no kaihatsu", PROCEEDINGS OF SYMPOSIUM ON FATIGUE, THE SOCIETY OF MATERIALS SCIENCE, 6 December 2002 (2002-12-06), pages 153 - 156, XP002986893 *
NAKAMURA T. ET AL.: "Kooto kogata digital servo hiro shikenki no kaihatsu", THE SOCIETY OF MATERIAL SCIENCE, vol. 52, no. 11, 15 November 2003 (2003-11-15), pages 1280 - 1284, XP002986895 *

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103676851A (zh) * 2013-11-26 2014-03-26 西安交通大学 一种电液伺服疲劳试验机双电控装置
CN112595454A (zh) * 2020-12-28 2021-04-02 贵州航天计量测试技术研究所 一种用于疲劳试验机的标准测力仪及动态力校准系统
CN112595454B (zh) * 2020-12-28 2022-08-23 贵州航天计量测试技术研究所 一种卧式疲劳试验机动静态力校准系统
CN113607580A (zh) * 2021-08-10 2021-11-05 江苏徐工工程机械研究院有限公司 一种金属构件疲劳试验方法及剩余寿命预测方法
CN113607580B (zh) * 2021-08-10 2023-09-05 江苏徐工工程机械研究院有限公司 一种金属构件疲劳试验方法及剩余寿命预测方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP4172544B2 (ja) 2008-10-29
JP2004354081A (ja) 2004-12-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2004106895A1 (fr) Testeur d'usure
MORROW¹ et al. Cycle-dependent stress relaxation
US7536237B2 (en) Sensor-based measurement of tool forces and machining process model parameters
US6313427B1 (en) Welding gun and methods conducted using the same
US7206657B2 (en) Real-time measurement of tool forces and machining process model parameters
JP2008501943A5 (fr)
US7975557B2 (en) Multiple testing system and testing method
Xu et al. Effect of vibratory weld conditioning on the residual stresses and distortion in multipass girth-butt welded pipes
WO2012011173A1 (fr) Machine à tester des matériaux
JP3230840B2 (ja) 腐食環境センサー及び腐食環境制御装置
KR102641050B1 (ko) 시일 시공 관리 방법, 시일 시공 관리 장치, 시일 시공 관리 프로그램, 시일 시공 관리 시스템
WO2008049796A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif pour mesurer et contrôler les déflections structurelles d'une machine à presser - cintrer
CN108362591A (zh) 硬度测试计和硬度测试方法
FR2567644A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour la mesure de faibles forces et de petits mouvements dans une machine d'essai de materiaux ou autre dispositif d'application de charge
JP2007218809A (ja) 材料試験機
CN109682690B (zh) 挂篮仿真智能加载系统
WO2004005180A1 (fr) Systeme de pesage de charges dans un appareil de levage et de transfert
KR100286930B1 (ko) 재료시험기
JP2005172589A (ja) 材料の試験方法、材料試験機
JP2002243606A (ja) 疲労試験機
Müller et al. An adaptive and automated bolt tensioning system for the pitch bearing assembly of wind turbines
EP1468257B1 (fr) Cellule de mesure de force
Armentia et al. Fatigue performance of prosthetic screws used in dental implant restorations: Rolled versus cut threads
Marciniak et al. Fatigue tests of materials with the controlled energy parameter amplitude
Plancak et al. Some observations on contact stress measurement by pin load cell in bulk metal forming

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase