US8324456B2 - Method for improving transformation efficiency using powder - Google Patents

Method for improving transformation efficiency using powder Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US8324456B2
US8324456B2 US12/086,426 US8642606A US8324456B2 US 8324456 B2 US8324456 B2 US 8324456B2 US 8642606 A US8642606 A US 8642606A US 8324456 B2 US8324456 B2 US 8324456B2
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
agrobacterium
powder
plant
immature embryos
plant material
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active, expires
Application number
US12/086,426
Other languages
English (en)
Other versions
US20110131685A1 (en
Inventor
Yuji Ishida
Yukoh Hiei
Jun Ueki
Takeshi Yamamoto
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kaneka Corp
Original Assignee
Japan Tobacco Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Japan Tobacco Inc filed Critical Japan Tobacco Inc
Assigned to JAPAN TOBACCO INC. reassignment JAPAN TOBACCO INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HIEI, YUKOH, ISHIDA, YUJI, UEKI, JUN, YAMAMOTO, TAKESHI
Publication of US20110131685A1 publication Critical patent/US20110131685A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of US8324456B2 publication Critical patent/US8324456B2/en
Assigned to KANEKA CORPORATION reassignment KANEKA CORPORATION ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: JAPAN TOBACCO INC.
Active legal-status Critical Current
Adjusted expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
    • C12N15/8202—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation by biological means, e.g. cell mediated or natural vector
    • C12N15/8205—Agrobacterium mediated transformation

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an efficient method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer into plant materials.
  • Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer is a method for plant transformation based on functions of Agrobacterium .
  • a soil bacterium Agrobacterium ( Agrobacterium tumefaciens ) functions in such a manner that the T-DNA forming a part of its Ti (tumor-inducing) plasmid involved in the pathogenicity of the Agrobacterium is integrated into the genome of a plant when it infects the plant.
  • Agrobacterium -mediated plant transformation is a method for introducing a desired gene into the genome of a plant through the above Agrobacterium function by constructing a transforming plasmid in which the T-DNA region of the Ti plasmid is replaced by the gene desired to be introduced into the plant genome and then using Agrobacterium prepared to carry the transforming plasmid in place of the Ti plasmid.
  • Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer is universally used as a transformation method for dicotyledons. Although it has been understood that hosts of Agrobacterium are limited only to dicotyledons and Agrobacterium has no ability to infect monocotyledons (De Cleene, M. and De Ley, J., (1976) Bot. Rev., 42: 389-466), some attempts have been made to transform monocotyledons through Agrobacterium -mediated method (Grimsley, N., et al., (1987) Nature, 325: 177-179; Gould, J., et al., (1991) Plant Physiol., 95: 426-434; Mooney, P.
  • Ishida et al. used maize inbred line A188 and A188-related inbred lines as materials to perform Agrobacterium -mediated transformation (Ishida, Y., et al., (1996) Nature Biotechnology, 14: 745-750). Thereafter, further reports were issued for Agrobacterium -mediated transformation in maize, each of which reports used A188 and A188-related hybrids (Deji, A., et al., (2000) Biochim. et Biophys.
  • Attempts which have been made to improve the efficiency of Agrobacterium -mediated maize transformation include: selection of transformed cells on N6 basal medium (Zhao, Z.-Y., et al., (2001) Mol. Breed., 8: 323-333); addition of AgNO 3 and carbenicillin to culture medium (Zhao, Z.-Y., et al., (2001) Mol. Breed., 8: 323-333; Ishida, Y., et al., (2003) Plant Biotechnology, 20: 57-66); and addition of cysteine to co-culture medium (Frame, B. R., et al., (2002) Plant Physiol., 129: 13-22). Ishida et al.
  • Singh and Chawla reported that immature wheat embryos expressing the GUS gene increased in number when mixed in a suspension of silicon carbide fibers (SCFs) with a vortex mixer for 2 to 3 minutes before being inoculated with Agrobacterium (Singh, N. and Chawla, S., (1999) Current Science, 76: 1483-1485). This is because the immature embryos were injured by SCFs.
  • Other attempts to injure tissues before Agrobacterium inoculation include injuring with a particle gun (Bidney et al., 1992) and injuring by ultrasonication (Trick, H. N. and Finer, J. J., (1997) Transgenic Res., 6:329-336).
  • An object of the present invention is to develop and provide a method which allows gene transfer into plants at higher efficiency than that achieved by conventional methods for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer into plants, i.e., a method which allows transformation at higher efficiency than that achieved conventionally.
  • Another object of the present invention is to develop and provide a method for producing a transformed plant, which is based on the above method.
  • the inventors of the present invention have found that when Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer into a plant material is performed in the presence of a powder, gene transfer is achieved at higher efficiency than in the absence of a powder.
  • the inventors have further performed transformant selection on the gene-transferred plant materials, and thus have found that the transformation efficiency is improved in plant materials which were gene-transferred in the presence of a powder, as compared to those obtained in the absence of a powder.
  • the present invention therefore provides a method for improving gene transfer efficiency and/or transformation efficiency by inoculating an Agrobacterium into a plant material in the presence of a powder.
  • the present invention relates to a method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer into a plant material, which comprises inoculating an Agrobacterium into the plant material in the presence of a powder.
  • the phrase “in the presence of a powder” means a state where a powder is present during inoculation of an Agrobacterium into a plant material.
  • an Agrobacterium suspension may be pre-mixed with a powder and the resulting mixture may then be inoculated into a plant material; or a plant material may be pre-mixed with a powder and the resulting mixture may then be inoculated with an Agrobacterium ; or an Agrobacterium suspension, a powder and a plant material may be mixed at a time to thereby inoculate the Agrobacterium into the plant material.
  • the elements are mixed to give a moderately uniform mixture, and there is no necessity to vigorously shake the elements.
  • the mixing time is set to be short, for example, 1 minute or less, preferably 45 seconds or less, and more preferably 30 seconds or less.
  • the method of the present invention is a method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer into a plant material, which comprises the step of inoculating an Agrobacterium into the plant material in the presence of a powder, wherein the step comprises:
  • the method of the present invention is a method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer into a plant material, which comprises the step of inoculating an Agrobacterium into the plant material in the presence of a powder, wherein the step comprises:
  • the method of the present invention is a method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer into a plant material, which comprises the step of inoculating an Agrobacterium into the plant material in the presence of a powder, wherein the step comprises mixing together an Agrobacterium suspension, the powder and the plant material to thereby inoculate the Agrobacterium into the plant material.
  • the method of the present invention is based on a technical idea that the surface of a powder, which was added during inoculation of an Agrobacterium into a plant material, provides a reaction field required for infection of the Agrobacterium into the plant material, thereby resulting in improved infection efficiency and hence improved gene transfer and transformation efficiencies.
  • a powder at least does not affect living tissues and has one or more properties selected from the group consisting of: being insoluble in water; having an affinity for living tissues; having adsorption properties; and having a surface polarity.
  • the powder used in the method of the present invention has two or more of the above four properties.
  • the powder used in the method of the present invention does not affect living tissues, is insoluble in water, and optionally further has one or more properties selected from the group consisting of: having an affinity for living tissues; having adsorption properties; and having a surface polarity.
  • the expression “not affect living tissues” means having no inhibitory effect on vital activities of plants and Agrobacterium cells.
  • the powder is available for use as long as it is free from toxic or other properties which substantially produce adverse effects on each stage including transformation, regeneration after transformation, or growth after regeneration.
  • being insoluble in water means being insoluble or sparingly soluble in an aqueous solvent, more specifically means being insoluble or sparingly soluble in a buffer or medium to be used in the method of the present invention, and even more specifically means being insoluble or sparingly soluble under conditions used for preparation of an Agrobacterium suspension and a plant material as well as under conditions used for inoculation. Due to its water insolubility, the powder used in the method of the present invention can maintain its powder form without being dissolved during each step in the method of the present invention.
  • the expression “having an affinity for living tissues” means having an adsorption capacity for living tissues. Since particles having an affinity for living tissues are capable of adsorbing Agrobacterium cells and/or a plant material, the surface of such particles may provide a reaction field for efficient infection.
  • the expression “having adsorption properties” means the ability to adsorb a substance.
  • Agrobacterium cells and/or a plant material may be adsorbed to the added powder, whereby the powder surface may provide a reaction field for infection.
  • Examples of a powder having adsorption properties include porous powders.
  • the expression “having a surface polarity” means that the powder surface is polar, i.e., the powder surface is relatively hydrophilic. Such a powder having a surface polarity can form a water membrane on the powder surface to thereby contain Agrobacterium cells and/or a plant material within this water membrane.
  • Powders that can be used in the method of the present invention are exemplified by those selected from the group consisting of, but not limited to, porous ceramics, glass wool, activated charcoal, and mixtures thereof.
  • porous ceramics include, but are not limited to, hydroxyapatite, silica gel and zeolite.
  • Powders that can be used in the method of the present invention have, but are not limited to, a particle size of 1 to 150 ⁇ m, preferably 5 to 75 ⁇ m. Powders having these particle sizes can be obtained, e.g., by sizing with sieves or various classifiers, or alternatively, are also generally commercially available. It should be noted that particle size determination may be accomplished by using laser diffraction or an optical microscope, etc.
  • the powder amount used in the method of the present invention is set at, but not limited to, an amount such that the concentration of an Agrobacterium inoculated into a plant material is 30 mg/ml or more, preferably 60 mg/ml or more.
  • the upper limit of the powder amount used in the method of the present invention is set at, but not limited to, an amount such that the concentration of an Agrobacterium inoculated into a plant material is 240 mg/ml or less.
  • inoculation of an Agrobacterium into a plant material may be accomplished by simply establishing contact between the plant material and the Agrobacterium . Inoculation may be accomplished by either standard inoculation or drop inoculation. Standard inoculation is a technique in which a plant material is mixed with an Agrobacterium suspension (inoculum) to immerse the plant material in the suspension, and the immersed plant material is collected and plated onto a medium to effect co-culture for inoculation.
  • the period of co-culture may be, but is not limited to, 1 hour or more, preferably 1 day or more, 3 days or more, or 7 days or more.
  • the upper limit of the co-culture period is preferably, but is not limited to, 7 days or less, 10 days or less, or 14 days or less.
  • the time for mixing of a powder, an Agrobacterium suspension and a plant material or mixing of an Agrobacterium suspension and a plant material is not limited in any way, as long as these elements are fully mixed.
  • a preferred mixing time may be 3 minutes, 5 minutes, 10 minutes or 30 minutes.
  • Plants for use in the method of the present invention include both monocotyledons and dicotyledons.
  • Monocotyledons include, but are not limited to, rice, maize, barley, wheat, asparagus, sorghum and sugar cane.
  • Dicotyledons include, but are not limited to, tobacco, soybean, Bird's foot trefoil, potato, cotton and sunflower.
  • a preferred plant for use in the method of the present invention is a monocotyledon, most preferably rice or maize.
  • plant material is intended to encompass all aspects of plants to be used for Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of plants including plant cells, leaves, roots, stems, buds, flowers (including stamens and pistils, etc.), fruits, seeds, germinated seeds or plant tissues of any other parts, meristem, explants, immature embryos, calli or embryoid-like tissues (hereinafter referred to as calli or the like, or simply calli), or whole plants.
  • a desirable plant form used in the method of the present invention is an immature embryo or a callus, most desirably an immature embryo.
  • the present invention also provides a method for producing a transformed plant, which is based on the above gene transfer method.
  • the present invention relates to a method for producing a transformed plant through Agrobacterium -mediated transformation in a plant material, which comprises the following steps:
  • step (1) is accomplished by:
  • step (1) is accomplished by:
  • step (1) is accomplished by mixing together the Agrobacterium suspension, the powder and the plant material to thereby inoculate the Agrobacterium into the plant material.
  • the properties, material, particle size and amount of a powder that can be used in the method of the present invention for producing a transformed plant are the same as described above for the method of the present invention for gene transfer in a plant.
  • inoculation of plant cells with an Agrobacterium suspension may be accomplished by using the same technique, mixing time and co-culture period as described above.
  • a transformed plant to be produced is the same as the plant available for use in the gene transfer method of the present invention.
  • step (c) may be further followed by the steps of:
  • auxin e.g., 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
  • cytokinin e.g., 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
  • cytokinin e.g., 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
  • cytokinin e.g., 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid)
  • cytokinin e.g., 2,4-D (2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid
  • the “plant” used herein for gene transfer is intended to include both monocotyledons and dicotyledons.
  • Monocotyledons for use in the method of the present invention include, but are not limited to, rice, maize, barley, wheat, asparagus, sorghum and the like.
  • Dicotyledons for use in the method of the present invention include, but are not limited to, tobacco, soybean, Bird's foot trefoil, potato, cotton, sunflower and the like.
  • a preferred plant for use in the method of the present invention is a monocotyledon, most preferably rice or maize.
  • plant material is intended to encompass all aspects of plants to be used for Agrobacterium -mediated transformation of plants including, but not limited to, plant cells, leaves, roots, stems, buds, flowers (including stamens and pistils, etc.), fruits, seeds, germinated seeds or plant tissues of any other parts, meristem, explants, immature embryos, calli, or whole plants.
  • a desirable plant form used in the method of the present invention is an immature embryo or a callus, most desirably an immature embryo.
  • the expressions of plant cell, tissue and whole plant have the same meanings as commonly used in the art.
  • the immature embryo means the embryo of an immature seed under maturation after pollination.
  • the stage (maturation phase) of the immature embryo used in the method of the present invention are not specifically limited, and it may be excised at any stage after pollination. However, it is preferably at a post-pollination stage of two days or more.
  • Preferred for use is the scutellum of an immature embryo capable of inducing a callus that can be dedifferentiated to regenerate a normal plant by the method described below after the transformation described below.
  • the immature embryo is preferably an immature embryo of an inbred line, F1 between inbred lines, F1 between an inbred line and an open-pollinated cultivar, or a commercially available F1 cultivar.
  • a callus means an undifferentiated cell clump under uncontrolled growth.
  • a callus can be obtained by culturing a differentiated cell of a plant tissue in a medium containing a plant growth regulator such as auxin (e.g., 2,4-D) or cytokinin (referred to as dedifferentiation medium).
  • a plant growth regulator such as auxin (e.g., 2,4-D) or cytokinin (referred to as dedifferentiation medium).
  • the treatment for obtaining a callus is called dedifferentiation treatment and this process is called dedifferentiation process.
  • a material suitable for transformation is prepared by excising a plant tissue, immature embryo or the like as appropriate from a plant, seed or the like.
  • the plant material may be cultured before being infected with an Agrobacterium.
  • a soil bacterium Agrobacterium ( Agrobacterium tumefaciens ) has long been known to induce crown gall disease in many dicotyledons, and in 1970s, it was discovered that its Ti plasmid is involved in pathogenicity and that the T-DNA forming a part of the Ti plasmid is integrated into plant genomes. Subsequently, it was shown that the T-DNA contains genes involved in the synthesis of hormones necessary for inducing cancers (cytokinin and auxin) and that these genes are expressed in plants though they are bacterial genes.
  • Excision of the T-DNA and its transfer to plants require genes existing in the virulence region (vir region) on the Ti plasmid, and excision of the T-DNA requires border sequences flanking the T-DNA.
  • Another Agrobacterium, Agrobacterium rhizogenes has a similar system based on its Ri plasmid (e.g., FIGS. 3 and 4 of Japanese Patent Public Disclosure No. 2000-342256).
  • a desired gene was expected to be integrated into plant genomes by inserting it onto the T-DNA because the T-DNA is integrated into plant genomes by infection with Agrobacterium .
  • a method for inserting an exogenous gene onto the T-DNA was developed.
  • disarmed strains in which the hormone-synthesizing genes have been removed from the T-DNA of the tumor-inducing Ti plasmid such as LBA4404 (see Hoekema, A., et al., (1983), Nature, Vol. 303, p. 179-180), C58C1 (pGV3850), and GV3Ti11SE were prepared.
  • Two methods were developed for introducing a desired gene into the T-DNA of the Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium or introducing the T-DNA carrying a desired gene into Agrobacterium using these strains.
  • the first method is called the intermediate vector method wherein an intermediate vector that can be easily genetically manipulated to insert a desired gene and that can be replicated in E. coli is inserted into the T-DNA region of a disarmed Ti plasmid of Agrobacterium by homologous recombination via triparental mating.
  • the second method is called the binary vector method based on the finding that the vir region is required for integration of the T-DNA into plants but need not be present on the same plasmid to serve its functions.
  • a binary vector which is a small plasmid replicable in both Agrobacterium and E. coli into which the T-DNA is integrated, is introduced into Agrobacterium having a disarmed Ti plasmid.
  • Binary vectors include pBIN19, pBI121, pGA482, etc., and many novel binary vectors based on them were constructed and used for transformation. In the Ri plasmid system, similar vectors were constructed and used for transformation.
  • Agrobacterium A281 is a super-virulent strain that has a wide host range and higher transformation efficiency than those of other strains. This characteristic is attributed to pTiBo542 of the Ti plasmid carried by A281. Two novel systems were developed using pTiBo542 until now. One uses EHA101 and EHA105 strains carrying a disarmed Ti plasmid of pTiBo542 and finds applications in transformation of various plants as a system having a high transforming ability by applying these strains to the binary vector system described above.
  • the other is a ‘super-binary’ vector (see Hiei, Y., et al., (1994), The Plant Journal, Vol. 6, p. 271-282; Ishida, Y., et al., (1996), Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 4, p. 745-750; Komari, T. and Kubo T., (1999), Methods of Genetic Transformation: Agrobacterium tumefaciens . In Vasil, I. K. (ed.) Molecular improvement of cereal crops., Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 43-82; and International Publication No. WO 95/06722) system (e.g., FIG. 4 of Japanese Patent Public Disclosure No. 2000-342256).
  • This system is a kind of binary vector system because it consists of a disarmed Ti plasmid having the vir region (virA, virB, virC, virD, virE and virG (hereinafter sometimes each referred to as “vir fragment region”)) and a plasmid having the T-DNA.
  • vir fragment region a disarmed Ti plasmid having the vir region
  • virG virD, virE and virG
  • Agrobacterium that can be used as hosts in the method of the present invention are not specifically limited, but preferably include Agrobacterium tumefaciens (e.g., Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 (see Hoekema, A., et al., (1983), Nature, Vol. 303, p. 179-180) and EHA101 as described above).
  • Agrobacterium tumefaciens e.g., Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 (see Hoekema, A., et al., (1983), Nature, Vol. 303, p. 179-180) and EHA101 as described above).
  • the method of the present invention significant effects can be obtained, without specific limitation, by using any gene transfer system based on the expression of the genes in the virulence (vir) region in Agrobacterium .
  • benefits of the present invention can be obtained by using any vector system such as intermediate vectors, binary vectors, super-virulent binary vectors and super-binary vectors as described above.
  • the same effects can also be obtained by using different vector systems obtained by modifying these vectors (e.g., by excising a part or all of the vir region of Agrobacterium and additionally inserting it into a plasmid, or excising a part or all of the vir region and introducing it as a part of a novel plasmid into Agrobacterium ).
  • the infection efficiency can also be virtually improved with wild-type Agrobacterium by increasing the introduction efficiency of the wild-type T-DNA region into plants.
  • a desired gene to be introduced into plants can be inserted at a restriction enzyme site in the T-DNA region of the plasmid described above according to standard procedures, and can be selected on the basis of a suitable selective marker such as a gene having resistance to a drug such as PPT (phosphinothricin), hygromycin, kanamycin or paromomycin simultaneously or separately inserted into the plasmid.
  • a suitable selective marker such as a gene having resistance to a drug such as PPT (phosphinothricin), hygromycin, kanamycin or paromomycin simultaneously or separately inserted into the plasmid.
  • a desired DNA may not be readily inserted into the T-DNA region of a large plasmid having many restriction enzyme sites by conventional subcloning methods. In such cases, the desired DNA can be inserted by homologous recombination in cells of Agrobacterium via triparental mating.
  • the size of the transgene is not limited, but preferably about 100 by to 200
  • Agrobacterium such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens
  • Introduction of the plasmid into an Agrobacterium such as Agrobacterium tumefaciens can be accomplished by conventional methods such as triparental mating as described above, electroporation, electroinjection, and chemical treatments with PEG or the like.
  • the gene to be introduced into plants is basically located between the left and right border sequences flanking the T-DNA in the same manner as in conventional techniques. However, only one border sequence may exist because the plasmid is circular, or three or more border sequences may exist when multiple genes are to be located at different sites.
  • the gene may also be located on the Ti or Ri plasmid or on another plasmid in Agrobacterium . Alternatively, it may also be located on multiple types of plasmids.
  • Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer can be performed simply by contacting a plant material with an Agrobacterium .
  • it can be performed by preparing an Agrobacterium suspension having a cell density of about 10 6 to 10 11 cfu/ml, immersing a plant material in this suspension for about 3 to 10 minutes, and then co-culturing them on a solid medium for several days.
  • the plant material is co-cultured with Agrobacterium at the same time the plant material is infected with Agrobacterium or before Agrobacterium is removed after infection.
  • Known media can be used for co-culture.
  • LS-AS medium and nN6-As medium used in the Example section below or other media such as N6S3-AS medium and 2N6-AS medium (see Hiei, Y., et al., (1994), The Plant Journal, Vol. 6, p. 271-282) are known.
  • step (c) i.e., infection of a plant material with Agrobacterium is performed in the presence of a powder.
  • step (c) described above should be followed by the steps of:
  • the step of selecting a transformed cell means selecting a cell having a desired trait based on phenotype data and/or physical data.
  • Phenotype data such as transformation efficiency can be obtained by evaluating the expression of a marker gene and/or a selective marker gene co-introduced with a gene desired to be introduced into a plant.
  • Marker genes and/or selective marker genes that can be used include, e.g., the GUS ( ⁇ -glucuronidase) gene and/or antibiotic resistance genes (e.g., PPT (phosphinothricin) resistance genes, hygromycin resistance genes, kanamycin resistance genes, paromomycin resistance genes)), etc.
  • GUS ⁇ -glucuronidase
  • antibiotic resistance genes e.g., PPT (phosphinothricin) resistance genes, hygromycin resistance genes, kanamycin resistance genes, paromomycin resistance genes
  • transformation efficiency can be evaluated from the coloration resulting from the cleavage of X-Gulc (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- ⁇ -D-glucuronic acid) by GUS.
  • X-Gulc 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- ⁇ -D-glucuronic acid
  • evaluation can be made from the extent of growth on a selective medium containing the antibiotic after transformation.
  • the selecting step may also be performed based on transmission to progeny via sexual reproduction and genetic and molecular analyses in progeny populations.
  • the selected transformant may be regenerated and the regenerated plant may be grown to a whole plant.
  • Regeneration from the selected transformant to a whole plant can be performed by known methods (e.g., Hiei, Y., et al., (1994), The Plant Journal, Vol. 6, p. 271-282; and Ishida, Y., et al., (1996), Nature Biotechnology, Vol. 4, p. 745-750).
  • the method of the present invention improves gene transfer efficiency and/or transformation efficiency when Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer into a plant material is performed in the presence of a powder, as compared to in the absence of a powder.
  • Gene transfer efficiency can be evaluated by, e.g., assessing the area of transient expression of the transgene. In the Example section below, transient expression of the GUS gene in immature embryos was evaluated.
  • Transformation efficiency can be calculated by, e.g., counting the number of regenerated plants expressing the GUS gene as transformants among those obtained from inoculated immature embryos and dividing the total number by the number of inoculated immature embryos. Alternatively, it can also be calculated by counting the number of regenerated plants showing resistance against a selective pressure as transformants and dividing the total number by the number of inoculated immature embryos.
  • step (c) i.e., infection of a plant material with Agrobacterium is performed in the presence of a powder. It would therefore be understood that the gene transfer and/or transformation method of the present invention may be described as follows.
  • the method of the present invention is a method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer and/or transformation in a plant, which comprises the following steps:
  • the method of the present invention is a method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer and/or transformation in a plant, which comprises the following steps:
  • the method of the present invention is a method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer and/or transformation in a plant, which comprises the following steps:
  • the method of the present invention is a method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer and/or transformation in a plant, which comprises the following steps:
  • the properties, material, particle size and amount of a powder that can be used in the method of the present invention for gene transfer and/or transformation in a plant are the same as described above for the method of the present invention for gene transfer in a plant.
  • inoculation of plant cells with an Agrobacterium suspension may be accomplished by using the same technique, mixing time and co-culture period as described above.
  • a transformed plant to be produced is the same as the plant available for use in the gene transfer method of the present invention.
  • the present invention therefore provides a method for Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer and transformation in a plant, which achieves high efficiency for gene transfer and transformation.
  • FIG. 1 is a graph showing the effect of powder addition on transformation efficiency in rice. Five immature embryos were inoculated for each test. The vertical axis represents the number of hygromycin-resistant plants obtained per inoculated immature embryo, while “SG” and “HA” in the horizontal axis denote silica gel and hydroxyapatite, respectively.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph showing the effect of powder particle size on transformation efficiency in rice.
  • Nine to twelve immature embryos were inoculated for each test.
  • the vertical axis represents the number of regenerated calli obtained per inoculated immature embryo, while the horizontal axis represents the particle size of each powder added.
  • Cons. denotes a control treated in the absence of any powder.
  • FIG. 3 is a graph showing the effect of powder amount on transient expression of a transgene in rice.
  • Ten immature embryos were inoculated for each test.
  • the vertical axis represents expression of the GUS gene in the immature embryos. The value is evaluated as follows: co-cultured immature embryos are stained with X-Gluc and then classified into the following levels: 3 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 75% or more of their scutellum); 2 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 25% to 74% of their scutellum); 1 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 5% to 24% of their scutellum); 0.5 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in less than 5% of their scutellum); and 0 (immature embryos showing no GUS gene expression).
  • the horizontal axis represents the powder amount added.
  • FIG. 4 is a graph showing the effect of powder amount on transformation efficiency in rice.
  • Nine to ten immature embryos were inoculated for each test.
  • the vertical axis represents the number of regenerated calli obtained per inoculated immature embryo, while the horizontal axis represents the powder amount added.
  • FIG. 5 is a graph showing the effect of zeolite on transient expression of a transgene in rice. Fourteen to fifteen immature embryos were inoculated for each test. The vertical axis represents expression of the GUS gene in the immature embryos. The value is evaluated as follows: co-cultured immature embryos are stained with X-Gluc and then classified into the following levels: 3 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 25% or more of their scutellum); 2 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 10% to 24% of their scutellum); 1 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in less than 10% of their scutellum); and 0 (immature embryos showing no GUS gene expression). The horizontal axis represents the particle size of zeolite added. “None” represents a control treated in the absence of any powder.
  • FIG. 6 is a graph showing the effect of powder addition (mixed into an inoculum) on transient expression of a transgene. Twelve to thirteen immature embryos were inoculated for each test. The vertical axis represents expression of the GUS gene in the immature embryos.
  • the value is evaluated as follows: co-cultured immature embryos are stained with X-Gluc and then classified into the following levels: 3 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 75% or more of their scutellum); 2 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 25% to 74% of their scutellum); 1 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 5% to 24% of their scutellum); 0.5 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in less than 5% of their scutellum); and 0 (immature embryos showing no GUS gene expression).
  • SG denotes silica gel
  • HA denotes hydroxyapatite
  • GW denotes ground glass wool.
  • “None” represents a control treated in the absence of any powder.
  • FIG. 7 is a graph showing the effect of powder addition to an inoculum on transient expression of a transgene in rice calli.
  • Six calli were inoculated for each test.
  • the vertical axis represents expression of GUS gene in the inoculated calli.
  • the value is evaluated as follow: co-cultured calli are stained with X-Gluc and then classified into the following levels: 3 (calli showing GUS gene expression in 75% or more of all sites); 2 (calli showing GUS gene expression in 25% to 74% of all sites); 1 (calli showing GUS gene expression in 5% to 24% of all sites); 0.5 (calli showing GUS gene expression in less than 5% of all sites); and 0 (calli showing no GUS gene expression).
  • “HA” denotes hydroxyapatite
  • “None” represents a control treated in the absence of any powder.
  • FIG. 8 is a graph showing the effect of powder addition to an inoculum on transformation efficiency in rice. Six calli were inoculated for each test. The vertical axis represents the number of regenerated calli obtained per inoculated callus. In the horizontal axis, “HA” denotes hydroxyapatite, and “None” represents a control treated in the absence of any powder.
  • FIG. 9 is a graph showing the effect of powder addition (mixed into an inoculum) on transient expression of a transgene in immature rice embryos inoculated with a normal binary vector. Eleven to twelve immature embryos were inoculated for each test. The vertical axis represents expression of the GUS gene in the immature embryos.
  • the value is evaluated as follows: co-cultured immature embryos are stained with X-Gluc and then classified into the following levels: 3 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 75% or more of their scutellum); 2 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 25% to 74% of their scutellum); 1 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in 5% to 24% of their scutellum); 0.5 (immature embryos showing GUS gene expression in less than 5% of their scutellum); and 0 (immature embryos showing no GUS gene expression).
  • GW and “HA” denote ground glass wool and hydroxyapatite, respectively.
  • “None” represents a control treated in the absence of any powder.
  • LBA4404(pSB134) was used as an Agrobacterium strain and its vector.
  • LBA4404(pSB134) was created as follows. A GUS expression unit derived from pIG221 (Ohta, S., et al., (1990) Plant Cell Physiol., 31: 805-813) was inserted at a HindIII restriction site located upstream of the HPT gene under the control of the maize ubiquitin promoter in pKY205 (Kuraya, Y., et al., (2004) Mol. Breed., 14: 309-320). This plasmid was introduced into LBA4404(pSB1) ( Komari, T., et al., (1996) Plant J., 10: 165-174) to obtain LBA4404(pSB134).
  • test cultivar used was a japonica rice cultivar “Yukihikari.” Immature seeds at 8 to 14 days after flowering were treated to remove their glumes and sterilized with 70% ethanol for several seconds and then with a 1% aqueous sodium hypochlorite solution containing Tween 20 (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Japan) for 15 minutes. After washing several times with sterilized water, immature embryos of 1.5-2 mm in length were excised for use as test materials.
  • the powders used for testing were hydroxyapatite (Bio-Rad) and silica gel (ICN Pharmaceuticals). These powders (80 to 100 mg each) were introduced into tubes and sterilized in an autoclave. Agrobacterium colonies cultured on AB medium (Chilton, M-D, et al., (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  • the aseptically excised immature embryos were plated onto 2N6-AS medium. After mixing with a vortex mixer for several seconds to ensure a uniformly dispersed state of the powder in the bacterial suspension, the suspension was added dropwise onto the immature embryos in a volume of 5 ⁇ l per immature embryo. After the inoculum added dropwise was dried, the immature embryos were each transferred to another site on the same medium. After the culture container was sealed, co-culture was performed at 25° C. in the dark for 7 days. Some of the immature embryos were treated with X-Gluc to examine GUS expression (Hiei et al., 1994).
  • each tissue was immersed in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) containing 0.1% Triton X-100 and allowed to stand at 37° C. for 1 hour.
  • Agrobacterium was removed with phosphate buffer, followed by addition of phosphate buffer containing 1.0 mM 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- ⁇ -D-glucuronic acid (X-Gluc) and 20% methanol. After incubation at 37° C. for 24 hours, tissues showing blue staining were observed under a microscope.
  • nN6CC medium N6 inorganic salts, N6 vitamins, 0.5 g/l casamino acid, 0.5 g/l L-proline, 1 mg/ 1 2,4-D, 0.5 mg/l NAA, 0.1 mg/ 1 6BA, 20 g/l sucrose, 55 g/l sorbitol, 250 mg/l cefotaxime, 250 mg/l carbenicillin, 5 g/l Gelrite, pH 5.8) or NBK4CC (NBK4 major inorganic salts, B5 minor inorganic salts, B5 vitamins, AA amino acids, 0.5 g/l casamino acid, 0.5 g/l L-proline, 1 mg/l 2,4-D, 0.5 mg/l NAA, 0.1 mg/ 1 6BA, 20 g/1 maltose, 55 g/l sorbitol, 250 mg/l cefotaxime, 250
  • the resulting calli were each divided into 5 parts, plated onto 50 mg/l hygromycin-containing nN6CC or NBK4CC medium, and then cultured for 10 days under the same conditions.
  • the proliferated cell clumps were plated onto a 50 mg/l hygromycin-containing regeneration medium (N6 inorganic salts, N6 vitamins, AA amino acids, 1 g/l casamino acid, 0.5 mg/l kinetin, 20 g/l sucrose, 30 g/l sorbitol, 4 g/l Gelrite, pH 5.8) or (NBK4 major inorganic salts, B5 minor inorganic salts, B5 vitamins, AA amino acids, 1 g/l casamino acid, 2 mg/l kinetin, 20 g/1 maltose, 30 g/l sorbitol, 5 g/l Gelrite, pH 5.8), and then cultured for about 2 weeks under the same conditions.
  • N6 inorganic salts N6 vitamins, AA amino acids, 1 g/l casamino acid, 0.5 mg/l kinetin, 20 g/l sucrose, 30 g/l sorbitol, 4 g/l Gelrite
  • spots indicative of transient expression of the GUS gene are observed over a wide area of the scutellum. Spots observed at separate sites even on the same scutellum are recognized to be derived from different transformed cells individually gene-transferred.
  • immature embryos proliferated after co-culture and resting culture are each divided into 4 to 6 blocks and the resulting 20 to 30 cell clumps are proliferated in the presence of hygromycin, calli proliferated therefrom and their regenerated plants are regarded as independent transformants even if they are derived from a single immature embryo.
  • hygromycin-resistant calli proliferated from cell clumps obtained by embryo division one callus was selected from one cell clump and plated onto a hygromycin-containing regeneration medium. Among regenerated plants obtained therefrom, those showing hygromycin resistance were counted as transformants, and the total number was divided by the number of inoculated immature embryos to calculate the transformation efficiency.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were treated with X-Gluc. Although blue spots indicative of transient expression of the GUS gene were observed in immature embryos in each case, the immature embryos inoculated with the powder-containing inoculums had a wider area of blue staining than the control immature embryos treated in the absence of any powder. This indicated that powder addition promoted gene transfer.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were cultured on a hygromycin-containing medium, and the resulting calli were plated and cultured on a hygromycin-containing regeneration medium.
  • hygromycin-resistant regenerated plants were obtained from immature embryos in each case, the immature embryos inoculated with the powder-containing inoculums resulted in a larger number of hygromycin-resistant regenerated plants than the control immature embryos treated in the absence of any powder. This indicated that powder addition improved the transformation efficiency ( FIG. 1 ).
  • LBA4404(pSB131) (Ishida, Y., et al., (1996) Nature Biotechnology, 14: 745-750) was used as an Agrobacterium strain and its vector.
  • test cultivar used was a maize inbred line A188. From kernels at 8 to 14 days after crossing, immature embryos of 1.0-1.2 mm in size were aseptically excised for use as test materials.
  • the powders used for testing were hydroxyapatite (Bio-Rad), silica gel (ICN Pharmaceuticals) and mortar-ground glass wool. These powders (80 to 100 mg each) were introduced into tubes and sterilized in an autoclave. Agrobacterium colonies cultured on YP medium (5 g/l yeast extract, 10 g/l peptone, 5 g/l NaCl, pH 6.8) for 3 to 5 days were collected by scraping with a platinum loop and suspended at a concentration of 1 ⁇ 10 8 to 1 ⁇ 10 9 cfu/ml in LS-inf medium (Ishida, Y., et al., (1996) Nature Biotechnology, 14: 745-750). The resulting Agrobacterium suspension (1 ml) was added to each powder-containing tube for use as an inoculum.
  • YP medium 5 g/l yeast extract, 10 g/l peptone, 5 g/l NaCl, pH 6.8
  • the resulting Agrobacterium suspension (1 m
  • Inoculation was accomplished in two ways, i.e., standard inoculation and drop inoculation.
  • Standard inoculation was accomplished as follows.
  • the aseptically excised immature embryos were treated at 46° C. for 3 minutes and then centrifuged at 15,000 rpm at 4° C. for 10 minutes.
  • the heat-treated and centrifuged immature embryos were mixed with the inoculum and mixed with a vortex mixer for 30 seconds.
  • the immature embryos were plated onto LS-AS medium containing 5 ⁇ M AgNO 3 and 5 ⁇ M CuSO 4 . After the culture container was sealed, co-culture was performed at 25° C. in the dark for 7 days.
  • Drop inoculation was accomplished as follows. The heat-treated and centrifuged immature embryos were plated onto LS-AS medium containing 5 ⁇ l AgNO 3 and 5 mM CuSO 4 . After lightly mixing with a vortex mixer to ensure a uniformly dispersed state of the powder in the bacterial suspension, the suspension was added dropwise onto the immature embryos in a volume of 5 ⁇ l per immature embryo. After the inoculum added dropwise was dried, the immature embryos were each transferred to another site on the same medium. After the culture container was sealed, co-culture was performed at 25° C. in the dark for 7 days.
  • the immature embryos were plated onto modified LSD1.5 medium (Ishida, Y., et al., (2003) Plant Biotechnology, 20: 57-66) containing 5 mg/l phosphinothricin (PPT) and cultured in the dark at 25° C. for 10 to 14 days, followed by culture on modified LSD1.5 medium containing 10 mg/l PPT.
  • modified LSD1.5 medium containing 5 mg/l phosphinothricin (PPT)
  • PPT phosphinothricin
  • the proliferated cell clumps were plated onto LSZ regeneration medium (Ishida, Y., et al., (1996) Nature Biotechnology, 14: 745-750) containing 5 mg/l PPT and 10 ⁇ M CuSO 4 , and then cultured in the light at 25° C. for about 2 weeks. Leaves of the regenerated plants were partially excised and treated with X-Gluc to examine GUS expression.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were treated with X-Gluc. Although blue spots indicative of transient expression of the GUS gene were observed in immature embryos in each case, the immature embryos inoculated with the powder-containing inoculums had a wider area of blue staining than the control immature embryos treated in the absence of any powder, in both cases of standard inoculation and drop inoculation. This indicated that powder addition promoted gene transfer.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were cultured on a PPT-containing medium, and the resulting calli were plated and cultured on a PPT-containing regeneration medium.
  • GUS analysis was performed on regenerated PPT-resistant plants. Although GUS-positive plants were obtained from immature embryos in each case, the immature embryos inoculated with the powder-containing inoculums resulted in a larger number of GUS-positive plants than the control immature embryos treated in the absence of any powder, in both cases of standard inoculation and drop inoculation. This indicated that powder addition improved the transformation efficiency (Table 1).
  • Powder addition-induced improvement in the transformation efficiency was observed not only in the case where immature embryos were mixed in the presence of Agrobacterium and the powder and then plated onto the co-culture medium (standard inoculation), but also in the case where a mixture of the powder and Agrobacterium was added dropwise onto immature embryos (drop inoculation). This indicates that improvement of the transformation efficiency does not result from powder-induced injury in plant tissue.
  • LBA4404(pSB134) was used as an Agrobacterium strain and its vector.
  • test cultivar used was a japonica rice cultivar “Yukihikari.” Immature seeds at 8 to 14 days after flowering were treated to remove their glumes and sterilized with 70% ethanol for several seconds and then with a 1% aqueous sodium hypochlorite solution containing Tween 20 for 15 minutes. After washing several times with sterilized water, immature embryos of 1.5-2 mm in length were excised for use as test materials.
  • the powders used for testing were 5 types of silica gel having different particle sizes (particle size: 5-20 ⁇ m, 20-40 ⁇ m, 45-75 ⁇ m, 75-150 ⁇ m and 150-425 ⁇ m; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Japan). These powders (120 mg each) were introduced into tubes and sterilized in an autoclave. Agrobacterium colonies cultured on AB medium (Chilton, M-D., et al., (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were treated with X-Gluc. Although blue spots indicative of transient expression of the GUS gene were observed in all cases (including the control treated in the absence of any powder), the immature embryos inoculated with the inoculums containing silica gel having a particle size of 150 ⁇ m or less had a wider area of blue staining than the control treated in the absence of any powder and the immature embryos inoculated with the inoculum containing 150 ⁇ m or more powder. This indicated that the degree of promoting gene transfer would vary depending on the particle size of a powder.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were cultured on a hygromycin-containing medium, and the resulting calli were plated and cultured on a hygromycin-containing regeneration medium.
  • hygromycin-resistant regenerated plants were obtained from immature embryos in each case, the immature embryos inoculated with the inoculums containing silica gel having a particle size of 150 ⁇ m or less resulted in a larger number of hygromycin-resistant regenerated plants than the control immature embryos treated in the absence of any powder, and hence showed improved transformation efficiency ( FIG. 2 ).
  • LBA4404(pSB134) was used as an Agrobacterium strain and its vector.
  • test cultivar used was a japonica rice cultivar “Yukihikari.” Immature seeds at 8 to 14 days after flowering were treated to remove their glumes and sterilized with 70% ethanol for several seconds and then with a 1% aqueous sodium hypochlorite solution containing Tween 20 for 15 minutes. After washing several times with sterilized water, immature embryos of 1.5-2 mm in length were excised for use as test materials.
  • the powders used for testing were activated charcoal and silica gel (Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Japan). These powders (0 to 240 mg each) were introduced into tubes and sterilized in an autoclave. Agrobacterium colonies cultured on AB medium (Chilton, M-D., et al., (1974) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were treated with X-Gluc. Although blue spots indicative of transient expression of the GUS gene were observed in all cases (including the control treated in the absence of any powder), the immature embryos inoculated with the inoculums containing activated charcoal in an amount of 60 mg or more per ml inoculum had a wider area of blue staining than the control treated in the absence of any powder and the immature embryos inoculated with the inoculums containing 30 mg or less powder. This indicated that the degree of promoting gene transfer would vary depending on the amount of a powder added to an inoculum ( FIG. 3 ).
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were cultured on a hygromycin-containing medium, and the resulting calli were plated and cultured on a hygromycin-containing regeneration medium.
  • hygromycin-resistant regenerated plants were obtained from immature embryos in each case, the immature embryos inoculated with the inoculums containing 30 mg or more silica gel resulted in a larger number of hygromycin-resistant regenerated plants than the control immature embryos treated in the absence of any powder, and hence showed improved transformation efficiency ( FIG. 4 ).
  • LBA4404(pSB131) was used as an Agrobacterium strain and its vector.
  • test cultivar used was a maize inbred line A188. From kernels at 8 to 14 days after crossing, immature embryos of 1.0-1.2 mm in size were aseptically excised for use as test materials.
  • the powders used for testing were 2 types of zeolite having different particle sizes (5 ⁇ m and 75 ⁇ m; Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd., Japan). Powder sterilization and inoculum preparation were performed as described in Example 2.
  • Inoculation was accomplished through drop inoculation as described in Example 2. Examination of GUS expression in the co-cultured immature embryos was accomplished as described in Example 2.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were treated with X-Gluc. Although blue spots indicative of transient expression of the GUS gene were observed in immature embryos in each case, the immature embryos inoculated with the inoculums containing zeolite showed a wider area of GUS gene expression than the control immature embryos. When compared to zeolite having a particle size of 5 ⁇ m, a much wider area of GUS gene expression was observed in zeolite having a particle size of 75 ⁇ m ( FIG. 5 ).
  • LBA4404(pSB134) was used as an Agrobacterium strain and its vector.
  • test cultivar used was a japonica rice cultivar “Yukihikari.” Test materials were prepared as described in Example 4.
  • the powders used for testing were silica gel, hydroxyapatite and ground glass wool. These powders (120 mg in total) were introduced into tubes and sterilized in an autoclave. In the case of mixing two powders, the powders of about 60 mg each were introduced into a tube and sterilized. Likewise, in the case of mixing three powders, the powders of about 40 mg each were introduced into a tube and sterilized.
  • An Agrobacterium suspension was prepared as described in Example 4. The resulting Agrobacterium suspension (1 ml) was added to each powder-containing tube for use as an inoculum.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were treated with X-Gluc. Although blue spots indicative of transient expression of the GUS gene were observed in all cases (including the control treated in the absence of any powder), the immature embryos inoculated with the powder-containing inoculums had a wider area of blue staining than the control treated in the absence of any powder. There was no great difference in the degree of promoting gene transfer between a single powder and a mixture of 2 or 3 powders ( FIG. 6 ).
  • LBA4404(pSB134) was used as an Agrobacterium strain and its vector.
  • test cultivar used was a japonica rice cultivar “Yukihikari.” Immature seeds at 8 to 14 days after flowering were treated to remove their glumes and sterilized with 70% ethanol for several seconds and then with a 1% aqueous sodium hypochlorite solution containing Tween 20 for 15 minutes. After washing several times with sterilized water, immature embryos of 1.5-2 mm in length were excised and plated onto 2N6-AS medium. After culture in the dark at 25° C. for 1 week, immature embryos from which calli were proliferated were used as test materials.
  • the powder used for testing was hydroxyapatite (Bio-Rad).
  • the calli were plated onto 2N6-AS medium. After shaking with a vortex mixer to ensure a uniformly dispersed state of the powder in the bacterial suspension, the suspension was added dropwise onto the calli in a volume of 10 ⁇ l per callus. After the inoculum added dropwise was dried, the calli were each transferred to another site on the same medium. Co-culture and examination of GUS expression were performed as described in Example 4.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were treated with X-Gluc.
  • the calli inoculated with the hydroxyapatite-containing inoculum had a wider area of blue staining than the calli inoculated with a powder-free inoculum. This indicated that powder addition to an inoculum also promoted gene transfer even when callus was used as a material ( FIG. 7 ).
  • the co-cultured calli were cultured on a hygromycin-containing medium, and the proliferated calli were then plated and cultured on a hygromycin-containing regeneration medium.
  • the calli inoculated with the hydroxyapatite-containing inoculum allowed regeneration of a larger number of hygromycin-resistant plants, and hence showed improved transformation efficiency ( FIG. 8 ).
  • LBA4404(pIG121Hm) (Hiei, et al., 1994, The Plant Journal, 6: 271-282) was used as an Agrobacterium strain and its vector.
  • LBA4404(pIG121Hm) is a normal binary vector which is free from a part of the super-virulent vir gene found in the super-binary vector.
  • test cultivar used was a japonica rice cultivar “Yukihikari.” Test materials were prepared as described in Example 4.
  • the powders used for testing were ground glass wool and hydroxyapatite. Inoculums were prepared as described in Example 1.
  • the co-cultured immature embryos were treated with X-Gluc. Although blue spots indicative of transient expression of the GUS gene were observed in all cases (including the control treated in the absence of any powder), the immature embryos inoculated with the inoculum containing ground glass wool or hydroxyapatite had a wider area of blue staining than the immature embryos treated in the absence of any powder. This indicated that powder addition to an inoculum also promoted gene transfer even when a normal binary vector was inoculated ( FIG. 9 ).
  • DNAs were extracted from the transformed plants obtained in Example 1 and additional transformed plants obtained in the same manner as shown in Example 1 by using an inoculum containing ground glass wool or activated charcoal.
  • the extracted DNAs were each treated with a restriction enzyme XbaI and subjected to Southern analysis using the GUS gene as a probe to detect the transgene.
  • Southern analysis was performed as described in Molecular Cloning (Sambrook, et al., 1989; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press). As a result, hybridizing bands were detected at different sites, thus proving that the transgene was randomly inserted in the rice genome.
  • the copy number of the transgene was found to be 1 to 4 (Table 2).
  • Example 1 The transformed plants obtained in Example 1 and additional transformed plants obtained in the same manner as shown in Example 1 by using an inoculum containing ground glass wool were self-fertilized, and the resulting T1 seeds were seeded. Leaves were partially excised from young seedlings at 10 days after seeding to examine expression of the GUS gene, as described in Example 1.
  • the present invention provides a convenient method for gene transfer and transformation with higher efficiency than that achieved by conventional Agrobacterium -mediated methods.
  • the present invention improved the efficiency of Agrobacterium -mediated gene transfer and transformation in plants, thereby allowing many transformed plants to be efficiently obtained, and contributing to efficient growth of cultivars containing a practical gene.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
  • Physical Or Chemical Processes And Apparatus (AREA)
  • Preparation Of Compounds By Using Micro-Organisms (AREA)
  • Inorganic Compounds Of Heavy Metals (AREA)
US12/086,426 2005-12-13 2006-12-13 Method for improving transformation efficiency using powder Active 2029-02-04 US8324456B2 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2005/022863 WO2007069301A1 (ja) 2005-12-13 2005-12-13 粉体を用いて形質転換効率を向上させる方法
JPPCT/JP2005/022863 2005-12-13
WOPCT/JP2005/022863 2005-12-13
PCT/JP2006/324839 WO2007069643A1 (ja) 2005-12-13 2006-12-13 粉体を用いて形質転換効率を向上させる方法

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20110131685A1 US20110131685A1 (en) 2011-06-02
US8324456B2 true US8324456B2 (en) 2012-12-04

Family

ID=38162624

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US12/086,426 Active 2029-02-04 US8324456B2 (en) 2005-12-13 2006-12-13 Method for improving transformation efficiency using powder

Country Status (7)

Country Link
US (1) US8324456B2 (ja)
EP (1) EP1964919B1 (ja)
CN (1) CN101331227B (ja)
AT (1) ATE545700T1 (ja)
AU (1) AU2006324560B2 (ja)
DK (1) DK1964919T3 (ja)
WO (2) WO2007069301A1 (ja)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104823844A (zh) * 2015-01-27 2015-08-12 江苏省中国科学院植物研究所 一种莲属植物的组织培养方法

Families Citing this family (23)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2011120478A (ja) * 2008-03-31 2011-06-23 Japan Tobacco Inc アグロバクテリウム菌による形質転換植物の作成方法
AU2010278126B2 (en) * 2009-07-29 2015-01-22 Kaneka Corporation A method of gene introduction into triticum plant using agrobacterium, and a method of producing transformed triticum plant
JP2013212051A (ja) * 2010-07-29 2013-10-17 Japan Tobacco Inc アグロバクテリウム菌を用いた、オオムギ属植物へ遺伝子導入を行う方法およびオオムギ属植物の形質転換植物の作成方法
US10829828B2 (en) 2011-09-13 2020-11-10 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods and compositions for weed control
UA116089C2 (uk) 2011-09-13 2018-02-12 Монсанто Текнолоджи Ллс Спосіб та композиція для боротьби з бур'янами (варіанти)
US10806146B2 (en) 2011-09-13 2020-10-20 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods and compositions for weed control
WO2013175480A1 (en) 2012-05-24 2013-11-28 A.B. Seeds Ltd. Compositions and methods for silencing gene expression
EP2891716B1 (en) * 2012-08-28 2018-03-28 Biocube System Inc. Porous solid phase for rapidly isolating biological molecules for nucleic acid amplification reaction from biological sample, and use thereof
US10683505B2 (en) 2013-01-01 2020-06-16 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods of introducing dsRNA to plant seeds for modulating gene expression
MX364458B (es) 2013-03-13 2019-04-26 Monsanto Technology Llc Métodos y composiciones para el control de malezas.
US10612019B2 (en) 2013-03-13 2020-04-07 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods and compositions for weed control
US10568328B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2020-02-25 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods and compositions for weed control
UA122662C2 (uk) 2013-07-19 2020-12-28 Монсанто Текнолоджі Ллс Композиція та спосіб боротьби з leptinotarsa
AR098295A1 (es) 2013-11-04 2016-05-26 Monsanto Technology Llc Composiciones y métodos para controlar infestaciones de plagas y parásitos de los artrópodos
UA119253C2 (uk) 2013-12-10 2019-05-27 Біолоджикс, Інк. Спосіб боротьби із вірусом у кліща varroa та у бджіл
DE102013020605A1 (de) 2013-12-15 2015-06-18 Kws Saat Ag Selektionsmarker-freies rhizobiaceae-vermitteltes verfahren zur herstellung einer transgenen pflanze der gattung triticum
AU2015280252A1 (en) 2014-06-23 2017-01-12 Monsanto Technology Llc Compositions and methods for regulating gene expression via RNA interference
WO2015200539A1 (en) 2014-06-25 2015-12-30 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods and compositions for delivering nucleic acids to plant cells and regulating gene expression
CN106604993A (zh) 2014-07-29 2017-04-26 孟山都技术公司 用于控制昆虫害虫的组合物和方法
BR112017015705A2 (pt) 2015-01-22 2018-03-20 Monsanto Technology Llc composições e métodos para controle de leptinotarsa
WO2016196738A1 (en) 2015-06-02 2016-12-08 Monsanto Technology Llc Compositions and methods for delivery of a polynucleotide into a plant
WO2016196782A1 (en) 2015-06-03 2016-12-08 Monsanto Technology Llc Methods and compositions for introducing nucleic acids into plants
CN110607323A (zh) * 2019-09-24 2019-12-24 四川育良生物科技有限公司 一种农杆菌介导水稻遗传转化方法

Citations (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1995006722A1 (fr) 1993-09-03 1995-03-09 Japan Tobacco Inc. Procede permettant de transformer une monocotyledone avec un scutellum d'embryon immature
US5591616A (en) 1992-07-07 1997-01-07 Japan Tobacco, Inc. Method for transforming monocotyledons
WO1999038979A1 (en) 1998-01-29 1999-08-05 Dow Agrosciences Llc Whisker-mediated transformation of plant cell aggregates and plant tissues and regeneration of plants thereof
JPH11290072A (ja) 1998-04-08 1999-10-26 Mitsui Chem Inc 植物細胞への遺伝子導入方法
JP2000342256A (ja) 1999-06-04 2000-12-12 Japan Tobacco Inc 植物細胞への遺伝子導入の効率を向上させる方法
EP1306440A1 (en) 2000-08-03 2003-05-02 Japan Tobacco Inc. Method of improving gene transfer efficiency into plant cells
CN1429904A (zh) * 2002-12-26 2003-07-16 中国农业大学 一种对玉米进行基因转化的方法
JP2003274953A (ja) 2002-03-27 2003-09-30 Niigata Prefecture 植物細胞への遺伝子導入方法及び遺伝子導入用の植物細胞処理装置
US20070283455A1 (en) * 2006-05-31 2007-12-06 Gray Dennis J Genetic Transformation of Grapevines

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2649287B2 (ja) 1992-07-07 1997-09-03 日本たばこ産業株式会社 単子葉植物の形質転換方法

Patent Citations (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5591616A (en) 1992-07-07 1997-01-07 Japan Tobacco, Inc. Method for transforming monocotyledons
WO1995006722A1 (fr) 1993-09-03 1995-03-09 Japan Tobacco Inc. Procede permettant de transformer une monocotyledone avec un scutellum d'embryon immature
EP0672752A1 (en) 1993-09-03 1995-09-20 Japan Tobacco Inc. Method of transforming monocotyledon by using scutellum of immature embryo
JP3329819B2 (ja) 1993-09-03 2002-09-30 日本たばこ産業株式会社 未熟胚の胚盤を用いた単子葉植物の形質転換方法
US6350611B1 (en) 1998-01-29 2002-02-26 Dow Agrosciences Llc Transcriptional regulatory region
JP2002528047A (ja) 1998-01-29 2002-09-03 ダウ・アグロサイエンス・エル・エル・シー 植物細胞凝集体及び植物組織のホイスカー−媒介形質転換ならびにその植物の再生
WO1999038979A1 (en) 1998-01-29 1999-08-05 Dow Agrosciences Llc Whisker-mediated transformation of plant cell aggregates and plant tissues and regeneration of plants thereof
JPH11290072A (ja) 1998-04-08 1999-10-26 Mitsui Chem Inc 植物細胞への遺伝子導入方法
JP2000342256A (ja) 1999-06-04 2000-12-12 Japan Tobacco Inc 植物細胞への遺伝子導入の効率を向上させる方法
EP1306440A1 (en) 2000-08-03 2003-05-02 Japan Tobacco Inc. Method of improving gene transfer efficiency into plant cells
JP2003274953A (ja) 2002-03-27 2003-09-30 Niigata Prefecture 植物細胞への遺伝子導入方法及び遺伝子導入用の植物細胞処理装置
CN1429904A (zh) * 2002-12-26 2003-07-16 中国农业大学 一种对玉米进行基因转化的方法
US20070283455A1 (en) * 2006-05-31 2007-12-06 Gray Dennis J Genetic Transformation of Grapevines

Non-Patent Citations (29)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Bidney, D., et al., "Microprojectile bombardment of plant tissues increases transformation frequency by Agrobacterium tumefaciens," Plant Mol. Biol., 18 301-313 (1992).
Chan, M-T. et al., "Agrobacterium-mediated production of transgenic rice plants expressing a chimeric alpha-amylase promoter/beta-glucuronidase gene," Plant Mol. Biol., 22 491-506 (1993).
Chan, M-T. et al., "Agrobacterium-mediated production of transgenic rice plants expressing a chimeric α-amylase promoter/β-glucuronidase gene," Plant Mol. Biol., 22 491-506 (1993).
Cheng et al. Plant Cell Reports 16(3-4): 127-132 (Dec. 1996). *
Cheng, M., et al., "Genetic Transformation of Wheat Mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens," Plant Physiol., 115 971-980 (1997).
De Cleene, M. and De Ley, J., "The Host Range of Crown Gall," Bot. Rev., 42 389-466 (1976).
Deji, A., et al., "Genomic organization and transcriptional regulation of maize ZmRR1 and ZmRR2 encoding cytokinin-inducible response regulators," Biochim. et Biophys. Acta, 1492 216-220 (2000).
Frame, B. R., et al., "Agrobacterium tumefaciens-Mediated Transformation of Maize Embryos Using a Standard Binary Vector System," Plant Physiol., 129 13-22 (2002).
Gould, J., et al., "Transformation of Zea mays L. Using Agrobacterium tumefaciens and the Shoot Apex," Plant Physiol., 95 426-434 (1991).
Grimsley, N., et al., "Agrobacterium-mediated delivery of infectious maize streak virus into maize plants," Nature, 325 177-179 (1987).
Hiei, Y., et al., "Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of teh boundaries of the T-DNA," The Plant Journal, 6 271-282 (1994).
Hoekema, A., et al., "A binary plant vector strategy based on separation of vir- and T-region of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti-plasmid," Nature, 303 179-180 (1983).
Ishida, Y., et al., "High efficiency transformation of miaze (Zea mays L.) mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens," Nature Biotechnology, 14, 745-750 (1996).
Ishida, Y., et al., "Improved Protocol for Transformation of Maize (Zea mays L.) Mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens," Plant Biotechnology, 20 57-66 (2003).
Jones, Huw D. et al., "Review of methodologies and a protocol for the Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of wheat," Plant Methods, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-9, Sep. 5, 2005. XP021011428.
Komari, T. and Kubo, T., (1999) Methods of Genetic Transformation: Agrobacterium tumefaciens. In Vasil, I. K. (ed.), Molecular improvement of cereal crops, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, p. 43-82.
Kumar, K. K., et al., "An Improved Agrobacterium-Mediated Transformation Protocol for Recalcitrant Elite Indica Rice Cultivars," Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, vol. 23, No. 1, pp. 67-73, Mar. 2005. XP002522679.
Mooney, P.A., et al., "Agrobacterium tumefaciens-gene transfer into wheat tissues," Plant Cell, Tissues and Organ Culture, 25 209-218 (1991).
Negrotto, D., et al., "The use of phosphomannose-isomerase as a selectable marker to recover transgenic maize plants (Zea mays L.) via Agrobacterium transformation," Plant Cell Reports, 19 798-803 (2000).
Nomura, M., et al., "The evolution of C4 plants: acquisition of cis-regulatory sequences in the promoter of C4-type pyruvate, orthophosphate dikinase gene," Plant J., 22 211-221 (2000).
Nomura, M., et al., "The promoter of rbcS in a C3 plant (rice) directs organ-specific light-dependent expression in a C4 plant (maize), but does not confer bundle sheath cell-specific expression," Plant Mol. Biol., 44 99-106 (2000).
Potrycus, I., "Gene Transfer to Cereals: An Assessment," Bio/technology, 8 535-542 (1990).
Raineri, D. M., et al., Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Bio/technology, 8 33-38 (1990).
Singh, N. and Chawla, S., "Use of silicon carbide for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation in wheat," Current Science, 76 1483-1485 (1999).
Taniguchi, M., et al., "The Promoter for the Maize C4 Pyruvate, orthophosphate Dikinase Gene Directs Cell- and Tissue-specific Transcription in Transgenic Maize Plants," Plant Cell Physiol., 41 42-48 (2000).
Tingay, S., et al., "Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated barley transformation," Plant J., 11 1369-1376 (1997).
Trick, H. N. and Finer, J. J., "SAAT: sonication-assisted Agrobacterium-mediated transformation," Transgenic Res., 6:329-336 (1997).
Zhao, Z.-Y., et al., "Agrobacterium-mediated sorghum transformation," Plant Mol. Biol., 44 789-798 (2000).
Zhao, Z.-Y., et al., "High throughput genetic transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens in maize," Mol. Breed., 8 323-333 (2001).

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN104823844A (zh) * 2015-01-27 2015-08-12 江苏省中国科学院植物研究所 一种莲属植物的组织培养方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DK1964919T3 (da) 2012-05-14
US20110131685A1 (en) 2011-06-02
CN101331227A (zh) 2008-12-24
EP1964919A1 (en) 2008-09-03
ATE545700T1 (de) 2012-03-15
WO2007069643A1 (ja) 2007-06-21
CN101331227B (zh) 2012-03-28
AU2006324560B2 (en) 2013-08-29
WO2007069301A1 (ja) 2007-06-21
EP1964919A4 (en) 2009-05-27
EP1964919B1 (en) 2012-02-15
AU2006324560A1 (en) 2007-06-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US8324456B2 (en) Method for improving transformation efficiency using powder
US8357836B2 (en) Agrobacterium-mediated method for producing transformed maize or rice
WO1998017813A1 (fr) Procede de transformation de riz de type indica
US20110030100A1 (en) Method for promoting efficiency of gene introduction into plant cells
AU2008221585B2 (en) Method of elevating transformation efficiency in plant by adding copper ion
Wu et al. Somatic embryogenesis and Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Gladiolus hybridus cv.‘Advance Red’
US7812222B2 (en) Method of transducing gene into plant material
EP2135503B1 (en) METHOD FOR IMPROVEMENT OF EFFICIENCY OF TRANSFORMATION IN PLANT, COMPRISING CO-CULTURE STEP FOR CULTURING PLANT TISSUE IN CO-CULTURE MEDIUM CONTAINING 3,6-DICHLORO-o-ANISIC ACID
JPWO2008105509A1 (ja) 選抜工程を経ないアグロバクテリウム菌による形質転換植物の作成方法
WO2012015039A1 (ja) アグロバクテリウム菌を用いた、オオムギ属植物へ遺伝子導入を行う方法およびオオムギ属植物の形質転換植物の作成方法
JP5260963B2 (ja) 粉体を用いて形質転換効率を向上させる方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: JAPAN TOBACCO INC., JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:ISHIDA, YUJI;HIEI, YUKOH;UEKI, JUN;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:022568/0116

Effective date: 20090226

STCF Information on status: patent grant

Free format text: PATENTED CASE

FPAY Fee payment

Year of fee payment: 4

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 8TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1552); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 8

AS Assignment

Owner name: KANEKA CORPORATION, JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNOR:JAPAN TOBACCO INC.;REEL/FRAME:055903/0464

Effective date: 20210120

MAFP Maintenance fee payment

Free format text: PAYMENT OF MAINTENANCE FEE, 12TH YEAR, LARGE ENTITY (ORIGINAL EVENT CODE: M1553); ENTITY STATUS OF PATENT OWNER: LARGE ENTITY

Year of fee payment: 12