SU918962A1 - Control system operator simulator - Google Patents

Description

(54) SIMULATOR ortEPATOPC © CONTROL SYSTEMS

I

The invention relates to simulators of control system operators and can be used to train control system operators.

A simulator of control system operators is known that contains a control unit connected to an operator response recording unit, one of the inputs of which is connected to the outputs of the control unit, an information board whose inputs are connected to the information outputs of the control unit and the first time counter f13.

A disadvantage of the known simulator is the low efficiency of training.

The purpose of the invention is to improve the effectiveness of training.

The goal is achieved by the fact that a simulator of operators of systems of control, containing a control unit connected to an operator response recording unit, one of the inputs of which is connected to the outputs of the control unit, an information board, the inputs of which are connected to the information outputs of the control unit, and the first time counter, has a comparison unit, a second time counter and a multi-input logic element OR, with one of the outputs of the control unit connected to the inputs of the second time counter, the output of which coupled to a control input of the bulletin board and the first input of the first time counter, the second

10 whose input is connected to the output of the OR gate, and the outputs are with the first inputs of the comparison unit, the second inputs and outputs of which are connected to the operator's reaction recording unit, at which the inputs of the OR logic element are connected to the inputs of the operator's registration unit.

The drawing shows a block diagram of the simulator.

20

The simulator contains a control block 1, a bulletin board 2, a control block 3, a comparison block 4, an operator recoding block 5, a time encoding block 6, a comparison block 7, a first time counter 8, a second time counter 9, a multi-input logical element OR 10 Position 11 in the drawing is designated operator. Position 12 denotes the control input of information board 2, and position 13 denotes the information TERMINALS of control unit 1. The operator's reaction registration recording unit has a comparison unit 4, an operator reaction registration recording unit 5, and a time encoding unit 6. The control unit 1 is designed to set the algorithm for the operator to perform one of the real control tasks of the control object, taking into account possible operator errors and the necessary actions to eliminate them, as well as to control the display means. On the information board 2, in accordance with the state of the control object being modeled and controls of block 3 Each micro-command of a microprogram consists of three micro-operations; the first to control the display means 2 in accordance with the state of the control object being modeled; the second microoperation corresponds to the number of the control that the operator 11 in this state of the simulated control object needs to influence, and a third microoperation is designed to set the moment of information change on the display 2 in accordance with the mode of operation / control of the control object 11. The microprogram automat of the control unit 1 contains serially connected address register, microprogram memory block and microcommand register. The information board 2 is intended for displaying and the state of the simulated control object to the operator 11. The controls of unit 3 are designed to implement operator control actions 11. The first comparison unit 4 is designed to detect erroneous actions of the idhorator on the control organ of block 3. The reaction recording unit 5 is intended to record the actions of the control operator the control object being modeled, the errors in performing these actions, and the time spent on these actions. The time encoding unit 6 converts the code combination corresponding to the specified control in 9–24 time code required for analyzing the state of the control object being modeled and for performing the action by this authority. The second comparison unit 7 is designed to compare the required and actual times of each action of the operator to control the simulated control object. The first time counter 8 measures the analysis time for operators of the state of the object being simulated by indicating the information board 2 and the effect on certain controls of unit 3. The second time counter 9 is designed to control the display change on the information board 2 at the times corresponding to the response of the simulated object controls the effects of the operator 11. The simulator works as follows. After powering on, the information board 2, the controls of block 3, blocks 4, 5 and 7, the counters 8 and 9 are set to the initial state. Block 1 of the lagger is running a regular microcomand. From the outputs 13 of the microprogram automat of block 1, signals are sent to the information board 2. Each output is associated with a certain means, indications (TpaHcnopasjrroM, indicator, etc.) of the display 2, and the value of signal 1 corresponds to activation, and the value O is non-action this display. At the same time, signals from other outputs of the microprogram automat of block 1 are fed to the inputs of block 4, where they are memorized. The signal value corresponds to the operator's required action on the control unit of block 3 corresponding to this input of block 4. Signals from the third outputs of microprogrammed & tomato of block 1 arrive at counter 9, where the time code of the indication change on the information board 2 starts from the moment the micro-command is started. Counter 9 counts the time and at the moment of correspondence of time to the code recorded in counter 9, the signal from its output goes to the control input 12 of information board 2 and allows changing the display in accordance with the signals received from the outputs of the microgram of the automaton of unit 1. At the same time, the output signal the counter 9 starts the counter 8. The operator 11 in accordance with the indication given to him on the board 2 acts on the organs of the block 3. Signals from the controls of the block 3 are fed to the block 5 of the registration, in block 4 of the comparison, in block b on I The OR 10 logic element and the logic inputs of the microprogramming automaton of block 1. In block 4, a one-by-one comparison of the signals occurs — those received from the controls of block 3, with the signals recorded previously at the first inputs. Comparison results are fed to the reaction registration unit 5. The presence of the value of the signals I at the output of the comparison block 4 corresponds to the erroneous action of the operator, and the value O on all the outputs of the block 4 corresponds to an error-free performance by the operator of the necessary action. These signals come in block 5 registration reactions. In addition, block 5 registers the actually committed by the operator 11: action. The signal at the output of the logic element OR 10 stops the counter 8. The time code recorded in the counter 8 is compared in block 7 with the time code corresponding to the active control unit of block 3. The signals from block 7 corresponding to the difference between the required and actual time of the operator’s work, They are registered in block 5. In accordance with the signals received at the logical inputs of the microprograms of the outer machine of block 1, the next microinstruction is selected. At the first outputs of the Sh10GO firmware of the unit 1, signals appear that correspond to the indication of the state of the control object being modeled, at the second outputs signals corresponding to the next required operator’s action, and to the third, the code of the indication change time on the board 2. When the operator performs The next action cycle of the simulator is repeated. The proposed simulator allows it to simulate the functioning of a real control object depending on the correct and erroneous actions of the operator. This brings the process of training and training closer to the actual process of controlling & laziness, which increases the reliability of counterparts in the study of operator activity. By simulating the operation of the control object in case of erroneous actions of the operator, the simulator allows the operator to train to eliminate the errors that have been experienced in operation, which increases the effectiveness of the training. Formula of the operator of the control systems containing a control unit connected to the URLS reaction recording, one of the inputs to which The s with the outputs of the control unit, the information board, the input of which is connected to the informative outputs of the control unit, and the YerU1 counter time, so that, in order to improve the efficiency of training, it has a comparison unit, a second time counter and a multiple input logical element OR, while one of the outputs of the control unit is connected to the inputs of the second time counter, Zyhod which is connected to the control input of the information board and the first input of the first time counter, the second one of which is connected to the output of the OR logic element, and the outputs are connected to the first inputs of the comparison unit, the second inputs and outputs of which are connected to the registration node Operator's actions, and the inputs of the logical element OR are connected to the inputs of the registration function of the operator's uip. Sources of information taken into account during the examination 1. USSR Copyright Certificate No. 407382, south. G 09 B 9/00, 1972.

Claims (1)

Claim A simulator of control system operators, comprising a control unit connected to an operator response registration unit, one of the inputs of which is connected to the outputs of the control unit, an information board whose inputs are connected to informative outputs of the control unit, and a first time counter, characterized in that, with In order to improve the learning efficiency, he has a comparison unit, a second time counter and a lot of input logic element OR, while one of the outputs of the control unit is connected to the inputs of the second counter in a belt whose output is connected to the control input of the information board and the first input of the first time counter, the second input of which is connected to the output of the OR logic element, and the outputs are connected to the first inputs of the comparison unit, the second inputs and outputs of which are connected to. an operator reaction registration unit, the input of an OR logic element being connected to the inputs of the operator reaction registration unit.