EP3540082A1 - Additif à base de soufre pour acier liquide, et procédé de fabrication d'acier additionné de soufre - Google Patents

Additif à base de soufre pour acier liquide, et procédé de fabrication d'acier additionné de soufre Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3540082A1
EP3540082A1 EP17870071.2A EP17870071A EP3540082A1 EP 3540082 A1 EP3540082 A1 EP 3540082A1 EP 17870071 A EP17870071 A EP 17870071A EP 3540082 A1 EP3540082 A1 EP 3540082A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
less
iron sulfide
steel
molten steel
sulfur
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP17870071.2A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP3540082A4 (fr
Inventor
Hajime Hasegawa
Susumu Kudo
Mitsuhiro Matsushima
Tetsuro SEKIUCHI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from JP2016219986A external-priority patent/JP6848369B2/ja
Application filed by Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel and Sumitomo Metal Corp
Publication of EP3540082A1 publication Critical patent/EP3540082A1/fr
Publication of EP3540082A4 publication Critical patent/EP3540082A4/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/60—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing lead, selenium, tellurium, or antimony, or more than 0.04% by weight of sulfur
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21C—PROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00—Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/0037—Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00 by injecting powdered material
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21C—PROCESSING OF PIG-IRON, e.g. REFINING, MANUFACTURE OF WROUGHT-IRON OR STEEL; TREATMENT IN MOLTEN STATE OF FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C21C7/00—Treating molten ferrous alloys, e.g. steel, not covered by groups C21C1/00 - C21C5/00
    • C21C7/10—Handling in a vacuum
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/14—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing titanium or zirconium
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/22—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with molybdenum or tungsten
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/24—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with vanadium
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/26—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with niobium or tantalum
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/32—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with boron
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/42—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with copper
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/44—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with molybdenum or tungsten
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/50—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with titanium or zirconium
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/54—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with boron

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a sulfur additive to be added to molten steel for adjusting the constituents of the molten steel and to a method for producing the resulfurized steel using that sulfur additive.
  • S is an element improving the machineability of steel materials, so is often added in required amounts in the steelmaking process to molten steel of particularly steel for machine structure use which is machined into complicated shapes.
  • a sulfur additive pure sulfur refined to a high purity, industrially produced iron sulfide, or pyrite, marcasite, pyrrhotite, etc. obtained by various beneficiation methods are used.
  • the molten steel refined in converters or vacuum vessels contains a large amount of oxygen. Removal of this large amount of oxygen by adding 0.015 to 0.100 % or so by mass of Al, which is a deoxidizing element having a strong affinity with oxygen, is a general practice.
  • alumina clusters deposit on the inside wall of the continuous casting nozzles which is used for injecting molten steel from the tundish to the mold (including sliding nozzles and other injection adjusting nozzles and submerged nozzles), and therefore, cause the phenomenon of these nozzles being blocked at the time of continuous casting (below, also referred to as "nozzle blockage").
  • the impurities in the iron sulfide ore become oxygen sources resulting in the formation of a larger number of alumina clusters, and therefore, cause more easily nozzle blockage.
  • PTL 1 proposes a secondary refining method of molten steel which comprises the step of using a vacuum degasification apparatus to decarburize and deoxidize the molten steel and adding alloy elements to the molten steel, wherein the alloy elements are added during the decarburization process of the molten steel, and then the deoxidation process is carried out.
  • the technical problem which the present invention is intended to solve is to stabilize the yield of sulfur in molten steel when adding a sulfur additive to molten steel and to prevent the occurrence of nozzle blockage by virtue of impurities at the time of continuous casting.
  • the present invention has the object thereof to provide a sulfur additive which is inexpensive and has few impurities and to provide a method for producing resulfurized steel using that sulfur additive.
  • the inventors studied in-depth techniques for solving the above technical problem. As a result, they discovered that if using iron sulfide ore having a specific particle size obtained by crushing and sieving as a sulfur additive, it is possible to stabilize the yield of sulfur in the molten steel and prevent occurrence of nozzle blockage at the time of continuous casting.
  • the present invention was made based on the above discovery and has as its gist the following:
  • the present invention it is possible to provide a sulfur additive which is inexpensive and has few impurities, and it is possible to provide a method for producing resulfurized steel which stabilize the yield of the sulfur in the molten steel during the sulfur additive being added to the molten steel and prevents occurrence of nozzle blockage at the time of continuous casting.
  • FIG. 1 is a view showing the relationships between the particle sizes (mm) of iron sulfide ore particles of brands A, B, and C of iron sulfide ore used as a sulfur additive and the oxygen concentrations in the iron sulfide ore particles (%).
  • the sulfur additive according to the present invention used for molten steel (below, sometimes referred to as “the additive according to the present invention") is characterized by containing iron sulfide ore having a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm of 85 % or more by mass% based on the total mass% thereof.
  • the method for producing the resulfurized steel according to the present invention (below, sometimes referred to as “the method for producing according to the present invention") is characterized by using the additive according to the present invention to produce Al-deoxidized resulfurized steel containing Al: 0.015 to 0.100 mass% and S: 0.012 to 0.100 mass%.
  • the additive according to the present invention in the RH vacuum degassing process after adjusting the constituents other than the sulfur.
  • the inventors investigated in detail the composition and characteristics of iron sulfide ore rock so as to enable inexpensive iron sulfide ore to be used as a sulfur additive.
  • the inventors investigated the composition of iron sulfide ore by chemical analysis and X-ray diffraction. As a result, they have found that although the main constituent in iron sulfide ore is pyrite the iron sulfide ore contains dolomite, quartz, and other carbonates and oxides in addition to pyrite. The inventors have found that these impurities (dolomite, quartz, and other carbonates and oxides, below sometimes simply referred to as "impurities”) are included in the iron sulfide ore in a range of from 3 to 20 mass% or so in terms of oxygen concentration.
  • the inventors investigated the form of these impurities. They sliced the iron sulfide ore and examined the cross-section using an optical microscope or scan electron microscope (SEM) etc. As a result, the inventors have found that (a) the impurities are present in iron sulfide ore as aggregates of fine particles of particle sizes of several millimeters or less and that (b) the impurities are not present uniformly in the iron sulfide ore but are segregated therein. Further, they similarly examined a plurality of types of iron sulfide ore with different particle sizes, and as a result, they have found that (c) there are differences in the states of distribution of the impurities among the types of iron sulfide ore particles.
  • the inventors based on the results, thought that "the amounts of impurities contained in the iron sulfide ore might differ depending on the particle sizes of the iron sulfide ore". On the basis of that technical concept, they separated the iron sulfide ore particles by size by sieving and measured the amounts of impurities (mass converted to oxygen concentration) for each particle size of iron sulfide ore by virtue of usual chemical analysis, X-ray diffraction, etc.
  • FIG. 1 shows, as examples, the relationships between the particle sizes (mm) of iron sulfide ore obtained by crushing three types of actual brands A, B, and C of iron sulfide ore rock differing in production areas and separating them into multiple sizes by sieving and the oxygen concentration in the iron sulfide ore for each particle size (mass%).
  • the oxygen concentration in the iron sulfide ore was measured by way of inert gas fusion-infrared absorption spectrum that is one type of chemical analysis.
  • FIG. 1 although the production areas differ, the relationships between the particle size and oxygen concentration are substantially the same.
  • the oxygen concentration became low in the range of particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm, more preferably in the range of particle size of 9.5 to 31.5 mm.
  • the particle size is 5.0 to 37.5 mm in range, more preferably if the particle size is 9.5 to 31.5 mm in range, the oxygen concentration will become low in level.
  • the iron sulfide ore produced from mines unavoidably contains carbonates, oxides, and other impurities.
  • the sizes of these particles are small ones of several millimeters or less.
  • the main constituent of iron sulfide ore, pyrite, and these impurities greatly differ in hardness.
  • iron sulfide ores are crushed using a crusher etc. so as to be made to be easily handled, but the fracture of the iron sulfide ores is believed to occur starting from the interfaces of the pyrite and impurities which are different in hardness.
  • fine impurity particles are finely dispersed. It is believed that it is hard for impurities to remain in relatively coarse (5.0 to 37.5 mm) iron sulfide ore particles, while a relatively large amount of impurities remain in fine iron sulfide ore particles of less than 5.0 mm size. Note that, in coarse (over 37.5 mm) iron sulfide ore, impurity particles are believed to remain as they are without being crushed.
  • iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm preferably iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 9.5 to 31.5 mm, as a sulfur additive to be added to molten steel.
  • raw ore of iron sulfide ore is crushed and sieved to obtain iron sulfide ore with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm.
  • the iron sulfide ore with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm in range is directly used as it is even without crushing.
  • Particles with a particle size as a result of sieving of over 37.5 mm may be again crushed to a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm in range.
  • the same method as this one is applied to iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 9.5 to 31.5 mm.
  • iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm preferably iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 9.5 to 31.5 mm, in a mass% of 85% mass or more is used.
  • the amount of the iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm is made to be 85 % or more by mass based on the total amount of the sulfur additive, preferably 90 mass% or more.
  • the particle size of the iron sulfide ore particles is measured after sieving the iron sulfide ore by the method prescribed in JIS Z 8815 (ISO2591-1).
  • the iron sulfide ore passing through a test sieve of metal wire cloth with nominal openings of 37.5 mm prescribed in JIS Z 8801-1 (ISO3310-1) and remaining on a test sieve of metal wire cloth with nominal openings of 5.0 mm is defined as iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm
  • the inventors added iron sulfide ore particles to molten steel and investigated the changes in oxygen concentration in the molten steel so as to confirm the effects of the additive according to the present invention.
  • a rise in the oxygen concentration in the molten steel was seen after adding iron sulfide ore into the molten metal.
  • the amount of change was small with addition of iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm in range and, further, was smaller with addition of iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 9.5 to 31.5 mm in range.
  • the chemical composition of molten steel obtained by primary refining in a converter or electrical furnace etc. is adjusted. If necessary, secondary refining is carried out by an RH vacuum degassing apparatus, ladle-heating type refining apparatus, simplified molten steel processing apparatus, etc.
  • deoxidation is carried out by addition of Al.
  • the yield of Al stabilizes by virtue of removing the ladle slag at the position where the Al source is to be added.
  • the Al source is preferably added to the molten steel at as early a stage as possible after primary refining, then the molten steel stirred and the Al 2 O 3 inclusions floating up separated.
  • the additive according to the present invention iron sulfide ore with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5mm in 85 mass% or more
  • the additive according to the present invention will react with the ladle slag resulting in advancing desulfurization and it is liable to become impossible to control the sulfur concentration in the obtained resulfurized steel to a required range.
  • the thus prepared molten steel is continuously cast into slabs in accordance with an ordinary method.
  • oxygen sources should be prevented from being mixed into the molten steel. If oxygen sources are mixed into the molten steel, Al 2 O 3 inclusions are formed, therefore, this is for preventing formation of Al 2 O 3 inclusions.
  • the submerged nozzle used at the time of continuous casting may be one of an inexpensive alumina graphite material, but a nonstick nozzle containing CaO may also be used.
  • the method for producing according to the present invention is suitable for manufacturing resulfurized steel containing S: 0.012 to 0.100 mass%.
  • the resulfurized steel obtained by the method for producing according to the present invention contains Al: 0.015 to 0.100 mass% after Al deoxidation.
  • S is an element required for securing the machineability of the steel and, further, is an element having an effect on the occurrence of nozzle blockage at the time of continuous casting.
  • the amount of S is less than 0.012%, the amount of addition of the sulfur additive need only be small and no nozzle blockage will occur. However, the required machineability cannot be secured, so the amount of S is made 0.012% or more. Preferably it is 0.015% or more.
  • the amount of S is made 0.100% or less. Preferably it is 0.075% or less.
  • Al is an element which reacts with the O in the molten steel to form Al 2 O 3 and is used for deoxidizing molten steel.
  • the amount of Al is less than 0.015%, the deoxidizing effect will not be sufficiently expressed, so the amount of Al is made 0.015% or more. Preferably, it is 0.025% or more.
  • the amount of Al is over 0.100%, a large amount of Al 2 O 3 inclusions will be formed and nozzle blockage will frequently occur at the time of continuous casting, so the amount of Al is made 0.100% or less. Preferably it is 0.070% or less.
  • the added steel according to the present invention basically needs to contain S: 0.012 to 0.100% and further to contain Al: 0.015 to 0.100%.
  • the composition of the other elements is not particularly limited, but to more effectively express the effect of improvement of the machineability by the addition of sulfur, the composition is controlled to C: 0.07 to 1.20%, Si: over 0 to 1.00%, Mn: over 0 to 2.50%, P: over 0 to 0.10%, N: over 0 to 0.02%. This will be explained below:
  • C is an element required for securing the strength of steel and the hardenability of a weld zone. If the amount of C is less than 0.07%, the strength required for steel for machine structure use becomes difficult to secure, so the amount of C is 0.07% or more. More preferably, it is 0.10% or more. On the other hand, if the amount of C is over 1.20%, the toughness falls, so the amount of C is 1.20% or less. More preferably it is 1.00% or less.
  • Si is an element which contributes to the improvement of the strength of steel by solution strengthening. If the amount of Si is over 1.00%, the toughness falls, so the amount of Si is 1.00% or less. More preferably it is 0.70% or less. The lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of Si, 0.01% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.10% or more.
  • Mn is an element which raises the hardenability of steel and contributes to the improvement of the strength. If the amount of Mn is over 2.50%, the weldability of the steel falls, so Mn is 2.50% or less. More preferably it is 2.00% or less. The lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of Mn, 0.30% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.50% or more.
  • P is an element which segregates and obstructs toughness. If the amount of P is over 0.10%, the toughness remarkably falls, so the amount of P is 0.10% or less. More preferably it is 0.05% or less.
  • the lower limit is not particularly defined, but if reducing the amount of P to less than 0.001%, the manufacturing cost will greatly rise, so in practical steel, 0.001 % is the substantive lower limit. From the viewpoint of the manufacturing cost, 0.010% or more is more preferable.
  • N is an element which contributes to improvement of the strength of steel by solution strengthening. If the amount of N is over 0.02%, the amount of solid solution N increases, the strength rises, and the toughness falls, so the amount of N is 0.02% or less. More preferably it is 0.015% or less.
  • the lower limit is not particularly defined, but if reducing N to less than 0.001%, the manufacturing cost will greatly rise, so in practical steel, 0.001% is the substantive lower limit. From the viewpoint of the manufacturing cost, 0.002% or more is more preferable.
  • the added steel according to the present invention may further contain, for improving the properties, one or more elements of the groups of elements of (a) Cu: 2.00% or less and/or Ni: 2.00% or less, (b) Cr: 2.00% or less and/or Mo: 2.00% or less, (c) Nb: 0.25% or less and/or V: 0.25% or less, and (d) Ti: 0.30% or less and/or B: 0.005% or less.
  • Cu and Ni are both elements contributing to improvement of the strength of steel. If the amount of Cu is over 2.00%, the strength rises too much and the toughness falls, so the amount of Cu is preferably 2.00% or less. More preferably it is 1.60% or less. The lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of Cu, 0.10% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.20% or more.
  • Ni is over 2.00%, in the same way as Cu, the strength rises too much and the toughness falls, so the amount of Ni is preferably 2.00% or less. More preferably it is 1.60% or less.
  • the lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of Ni, 0.10% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.30% or more.
  • Cr and Mo are both elements contributing to the improvement of the strength of steel. If the amount of Cr is over 2.00%, the strength rises too much and the toughness falls, so the amount of Cr is preferably 2.00% or less. More preferable is 1.60% or less. The lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of Cr, 0.15% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.25% or more.
  • the amount of Mo is preferably 2.00% or less. More preferable is 1.60% or less.
  • the lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of Mo, 0.02% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.10% or more.
  • Nb and V both are elements which form carbonitrides and contribute to the improvement of the strength and toughness by the pinning effect of the carbonitrides. If the amount of Nb is over 0.25%, the carbonitrides become coarser and the toughness falls, so the amount of Nb is preferably 0.25% or less. More preferable is 0.20% or less. The lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of Nb, 0.01% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.02% or more.
  • V is over 0.25%, in the same way as Nb, the carbonitrides become coarser and the HAZ (heat affected zone) toughness falls, so the amount of V is preferably 0.25% or less. More preferable is 0.20% or less. The lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of V, 0.01% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.10% or more.
  • Ti is an element which bonds with N to form nitrides and refine the crystal grains and contributes to improvement of the toughness. If the amount of Ti is over 0.30%, the machineability falls, so the amount of Ti is preferably 0.30% or less. More preferable is 0.25% or less. The lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of Ti, 0.01% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.02% or more.
  • B is an element which inhibits the formation of intergranular ferrite and contributes to the improvement of toughness. If the amount of B is over 0.005%, BN precipitates at the austenite grain boundaries and the toughness falls, so the amount of B is preferably 0.005% or less. More preferable is 0.003% or less. The lower limit is not particularly defined, but to sufficiently obtain the effect of addition of B, 0.0005% or more is preferable. More preferable is 0.0010% or more.
  • Example 1 When tapping molten steel primary refined in a volume 300 ton converter into a ladle, metal Al was added to deoxidize the steel by Al.
  • Example 1 as a sulfur additive, the brand A iron sulfide ore particles shown in FIG. 1 were used.
  • Table 1 shows the chemical compositions of molten steel after adding sulfur additives at the time of continuous casting of resulfurized steel of the invention examples and comparative examples.
  • the thus produced resulfurized steel was continuously cast.
  • the continuous casting was carried out by a cross-sectional size 220 mm ⁇ 220 mm bloom six stand casting machine.
  • the degree of overheating of the molten steel in the tundish at the time of continuous casting was 10 to 60°C.
  • the throughput of molten steel (amount of cast molten steel per unit time) was 0.3 to 0.6 t/min. The throughput was adjusted by the opening degree of a sliding nozzle.
  • Table 2 shows the mass% of iron sulfide ore having a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm, the mass% of iron sulfide ore having a particle size of less than 5.0 mm, the mass% of iron sulfide ore having a particle size over 37.5 mm, the nozzle blockage index, and nozzle blockage results.
  • the "No.” in Table 2 corresponds to the "No.” in Table 1.
  • the "theoretical opening degree” is the opening degree of the sliding nozzle required for giving a predetermined throughput in the state where the submerged nozzle and/or sliding nozzle are neither damaged or blocked.
  • the "actual opening degree” is the opening degree which a gauge of the injection system actually shows at the time of casting. If alumina clusters etc. stick to the submerged nozzle and/or sliding nozzle and blockage advances, the opening degree of the sliding nozzle is made larger in order to obtain the same flow rate. Therefore, this means that the larger the nozzle blockage index, the more frequent the nozzle blockage.
  • the target is 1 or less.
  • the "+" mark in the "Change of nozzle opening degree” in Table 2 indicates an increase in the nozzle opening degree, that is, a tendency toward nozzle blockage, while the "-" mark indicates a decrease in the nozzle opening degree, that is, a tendency toward reduction of nozzle blockage or stability of the nozzle opening degree.
  • nozzle blockage was evaluated by three stages of the nozzle blockage index. A nozzle blockage index of 1 or less was evaluated as “Good”, an index of over 1 to 3 was evaluated as “Fair”, and an index of over 3 was evaluated as "Poor”.
  • the ratio of iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm in the sulfur additive was 85 mass% or more.
  • the nozzle blockage index was 1 or less and continuous casting was possible without occurrence of nozzle blockage.
  • the ratio of iron sulfide ore particles with a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm in the sulfur additive was less than 85 mass%. Nozzle blockage frequently occurred at the time of continuous casting.
  • Example 2 except for using a sulfur additive comprised of the brand B and brand C iron sulfide ore particles shown in FIG. 1 , the same procedure was carried out as in Example 1 to continuously cast resulfurized steel.
  • Table 3 shows the chemical composition of molten steel after adding a sulfur additive at the time of continuous casting of resulfurized steel of the invention examples and comparative examples.
  • Table 4 shows the mass% of iron sulfide ore having a particle size of 5.0 to 37.5 mm, the mass% of iron sulfide ore having a particle size of less than 5.0 mm, the mass% of iron sulfide ore having a particle size over 37.5 mm, the nozzle blockage index, and nozzle blockage results.
  • the "No.” in Table 4 corresponds to the "No.” in Table 3.
  • the method for producing according to the present invention it is possible to provide a sulfur additive which is inexpensive and low in impurities able to stabilize the yield of sulfur in the molten steel and prevent the occurrence of nozzle blockage at the time of continuous casting. Accordingly, the present invention is high in applicability in the ferrous metal industry.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Steel In Its Molten State (AREA)
EP17870071.2A 2016-11-10 2017-06-13 Additif à base de soufre pour acier liquide, et procédé de fabrication d'acier additionné de soufre Withdrawn EP3540082A4 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2016219986A JP6848369B2 (ja) 2015-11-27 2016-11-10 溶鋼への硫黄添加原料及び硫黄添加鋼の製造方法
PCT/JP2017/021869 WO2018087953A1 (fr) 2015-11-27 2017-06-13 Additif à base de soufre pour acier liquide, et procédé de fabrication d'acier additionné de soufre

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3540082A1 true EP3540082A1 (fr) 2019-09-18
EP3540082A4 EP3540082A4 (fr) 2020-06-03

Family

ID=67623377

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP17870071.2A Withdrawn EP3540082A4 (fr) 2016-11-10 2017-06-13 Additif à base de soufre pour acier liquide, et procédé de fabrication d'acier additionné de soufre

Country Status (1)

Country Link
EP (1) EP3540082A4 (fr)

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3849125A (en) * 1973-03-26 1974-11-19 Finkl & Sons Co Method of sulphur addition fume control
JP2671086B2 (ja) * 1992-09-22 1997-10-29 新日本製鐵株式会社 連続鋳造法による低炭硫黄系快削鋼
JPH10102119A (ja) * 1996-09-26 1998-04-21 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd 硫黄快削鋼の製造方法
RU2127323C1 (ru) * 1997-12-29 1999-03-10 Акционерное общество открытого типа "Череповецкий сталепрокатный завод" Способ легирования стали серой
FR2928153B1 (fr) * 2008-03-03 2011-10-07 Affival Nouvel additif pour le traitement des aciers resulfures
JP6114118B2 (ja) * 2013-06-04 2017-04-12 日本冶金工業株式会社 Ｓ含有鋼の製造方法
KR101545976B1 (ko) * 2013-08-28 2015-08-28 현대제철 주식회사 극저탄소강의 정련방법
CN104232842A (zh) * 2014-09-01 2014-12-24 浙江青山钢铁有限公司 提高氩氧脱碳法制备含硫易切削不锈钢硫命中率的方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP3540082A4 (fr) 2020-06-03

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2208799B1 (fr) Procede de fusion et d'affinage de l'acier pour un tube en acier ayant une excellente résistance aux gaz acides
JP6786964B2 (ja) 硫黄添加鋼の連続鋳造ノズルの閉塞防止方法
JP4957872B2 (ja) 耐硫化物応力割れ性に優れた鋼管用鋼
WO2014061782A1 (fr) Acier pour trempe à haute fréquence doté d'excellentes caractéristiques de fatigue
KR102565782B1 (ko) 용강으로의 Ca 첨가 방법
CN111518987A (zh) Cr12冷作模具钢精炼稀土添加方法
JP5541310B2 (ja) 清浄性の高い鋼材の製造方法
CN111440920A (zh) Cr12冷作模具钢VD工序稀土添加方法
JP6565719B2 (ja) 溶接熱影響部靱性に優れた厚板鋼材
US11098384B2 (en) Sulfur additive for molten steel and method for producing resulfurized steel
WO2014191783A1 (fr) Procédé de production d'acier micro-allié de pureté ultra-élevée contenant du soufre et ayant une incidence sur les procédés de resulfuration métallurgiques
EP3540082A1 (fr) Additif à base de soufre pour acier liquide, et procédé de fabrication d'acier additionné de soufre
JP6825399B2 (ja) 清浄鋼の溶製方法
JP6888275B2 (ja) 硫黄添加鋼の製造方法
CN107012390B (zh) 一种无取向硅钢用低碳磷铁及其冶炼方法
KR20130097935A (ko) 페로니켈 용선용 탈황제 및 이를 이용한 페로니켈 용선의 탈황처리 방법
RU2375463C2 (ru) Проволока для внепечной обработки металлургических расплавов
JP2004346402A (ja) ばね用鋼材の製鋼精錬方法
KR101441301B1 (ko) 마르텐사이트 스테인레스 강 및 그 제조 방법
JPH0873923A (ja) 耐水素誘起割れ性に優れた清浄鋼の製造法
KR102103392B1 (ko) 정련방법 및 강재
KR100900650B1 (ko) 용강중 칼슘 성분 조정용 와이어 및 이를 이용한 용강중칼슘 성분 조정방법
KR101786972B1 (ko) 고청정 스테인리스 용강의 정련방법
KR101091931B1 (ko) 칼슘 처리강의 제조 방법
JP4418119B2 (ja) 溶鋼中の微細酸化物分散方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20190523

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20200504

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C22C 38/26 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/32 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/00 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/44 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C21C 7/10 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/42 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/14 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/22 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/60 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C21C 7/00 20060101AFI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/04 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/02 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/54 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/24 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/50 20060101ALI20200424BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20201205