EP3008705B1 - Einbruchsensor zur überwachung eines zugangs zu einem zu überwachenden gebäude und verfahren sowie alarmanlage damit - Google Patents

Einbruchsensor zur überwachung eines zugangs zu einem zu überwachenden gebäude und verfahren sowie alarmanlage damit Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3008705B1
EP3008705B1 EP14733542.6A EP14733542A EP3008705B1 EP 3008705 B1 EP3008705 B1 EP 3008705B1 EP 14733542 A EP14733542 A EP 14733542A EP 3008705 B1 EP3008705 B1 EP 3008705B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sensor
physical variable
designed
intrusion
average
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP14733542.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3008705A1 (de
Inventor
Christian Reichert
Julian Bartholomeyczik
Frank Schindler
Qiulu DAI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Publication of EP3008705A1 publication Critical patent/EP3008705A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3008705B1 publication Critical patent/EP3008705B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
    • G08B29/18—Prevention or correction of operating errors
    • G08B29/185—Signal analysis techniques for reducing or preventing false alarms or for enhancing the reliability of the system
    • G08B29/188—Data fusion; cooperative systems, e.g. voting among different detectors
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G08—SIGNALLING
    • G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
    • G08B13/00—Burglar, theft or intruder alarms
    • G08B13/02—Mechanical actuation
    • G08B13/08—Mechanical actuation by opening, e.g. of door, of window, of drawer, of shutter, of curtain, of blind

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an intrusion sensor for monitoring access to a building to be monitored, the intrusion sensor being arranged on the access on the inside of the building.
  • the present invention further relates to a method for monitoring access to a building to be monitored.
  • alarm systems for buildings can have intrusion detectors which are arranged on the individual doors and windows of a building and which serve to detect the opening of the door or the window.
  • the alarm system can trigger an alarm if an unauthorized opening of a door or window in the building and an alarm signal e.g. transferred to a central registration office or the police.
  • the detection of an unauthorized opening of a door or a window of a building, i.e. a break-in through the door or the window, is carried out, for example, by a sensor which is designed to detect vibrations or shocks caused by the break-in at the door or occur in the window.
  • the DE602004011587T2 shows a conventional intrusion sensor for monitoring a building.
  • vibrations can be caused, for example, by the burglary tool used on the door lock or the window, for example a lock pick or other lock picking instruments. These vibrations can also be caused, for example, by the use of brute force on the door to separate the door lock from the corresponding receptacle located in the door frame. This is the case, for example, when the door is entered.
  • the sensor is usually attached to the inside of the door or window, i.e. to the inside of the building.
  • the sensor usually recognizes accelerations in all three spatial axes at the same time and reports them to the alarm system or to a microcontroller integrated in the sensor, which transmits an intrusion signal to the alarm system.
  • DE 10 2010 039 837 A1 discloses a method for controlling a portable device with a sensor unit.
  • US 2009/0015400 A1 describes a monitoring device for a container, which has a plurality of sensors.
  • WO 2006/123217 A1 shows a method using artificial intelligence to reduce false alarms in vehicles.
  • the present invention discloses an intrusion sensor with the features of claim 1 and a method with the features of claim 6.
  • An intrusion sensor for monitoring access to a building to be monitored, the intrusion sensor being arranged on the entrance on the inside of the building, with an acceleration sensor which is designed to detect movements of the intrusion sensor in at least one spatial axis and in the event of a movement to output a movement signal, in particular an acceleration signal, in the at least one axis, with an environment sensor which is designed to record at least one value of at least one physical variable in the environment of the Detect intrusion sensor, and with a plausibility check, which is designed to plausibility check the movement signal, in particular the acceleration signal, with the detected value of the physical quantity and to output a break-in signal in the event of a negative plausibility check.
  • a method for monitoring an access to a building to be monitored comprising the steps of detecting a movement of the access in at least one spatial axis and outputting a movement signal, in particular an acceleration signal, in the case of a movement in the at least one axis, recording at least one value of at least one physical quantity in the vicinity of the access on the inside of the building, plausibility check of the movement signal, in particular the acceleration signal, with the detected value of the physical quantity, and output of a break-in signal in the event of a negative plausibility check.
  • An alarm system with an alarm device which is designed to emit an alarm and with at least one intrusion sensor according to the invention which is designed to transmit an intrusion signal to the alarm device.
  • the present invention provides in particular to use physical variables for the plausibility check, which allow the sensor to draw conclusions about whether a person is on the outside of the entrance to the building or on the inside of the entrance to the building.
  • the acceleration sensor detects a movement of the access, e.g. If a shake on a door is recognized and an acceleration signal is output, a value of at least one of the physical variables is recorded and used to check the plausibility of the acceleration signal.
  • acceleration signal is positively plausibility checked, ie if there is a person on the inside of the building in the vicinity of the entrance, no alarm is triggered despite the acceleration signal output by the acceleration sensor.
  • the acceleration signal is given a negative plausibility check, ie if there is no person on the inside of the building in the vicinity of the entrance, an alarm is triggered on the basis of the acceleration signal output by the acceleration sensor.
  • the present invention thus makes it possible to significantly reduce the number of false alarms of an intrusion sensor and thereby to increase the area of use and the acceptance of such a sensor.
  • the ambient sensor is designed as a temperature sensor, which is designed to detect the temperature in the vicinity of the intrusion sensor. Since a person has a body temperature of approx. 37 ° C, the temperature on the inside of the building in the vicinity of the entrance can be recorded with the help of a temperature sensor and used to determine the presence of a person. This enables a precise plausibility check of the acceleration signal.
  • the ambient sensor is designed as a moisture sensor, which is designed to detect the air humidity in the vicinity of the intrusion sensor.
  • a person changes the temperature in their surroundings with their presence, as already described above.
  • the humidity changes the air around a person.
  • the use of a moisture sensor therefore enables a further plausibility check of the acceleration signal.
  • the environment sensor is designed as a sensor which is designed to detect a plurality of physical variables simultaneously in the environment of the intrusion sensor.
  • the plausibility checking device has a memory and is designed to store a detected value of the physical variable at predetermined intervals and to calculate an average value of the detected values of the physical variable. If an average value is formed for the recorded values of the physical quantity, the course of the physical quantity over time can be used in the plausibility check.
  • the plausibility checking device is designed to calculate a long-term mean value for all detected values of the physical quantity. This enables a very stable mean e.g. to be calculated in air-conditioned rooms.
  • the plausibility check is designed to calculate a moving average for a predetermined number of detected values of the physical quantity. This enables the mean value to be adjusted in the event of changing environmental conditions, e.g. if the temperature fluctuates over the course of a day.
  • the intrusion sensor has a data interface which is designed to communicate with an air conditioning system of the building and to query the current building temperature from the latter.
  • the queried building temperature can also be used for a comparison with the recorded value of the physical quantity.
  • the plausibility check device when the acceleration sensor outputs an acceleration signal, is designed to query a current value of the physical quantity from the ambient sensor and compare it with the mean value, and to positively plausibility check the acceleration signal if the current value of the physical quantity is less than a given one Threshold deviates from the mean, and to make the acceleration signal negative if the current value of the physical quantity deviates from the mean by more than the predetermined threshold. This makes it possible to adapt the plausibility check to different applications.
  • the threshold value can be adjusted in such a way that not only temperature changes by adults but also by children can be checked for plausibility.
  • the threshold value can also be set in such a way that temperature changes or other changes in a physical quantity caused by animals, e.g. Cats or dogs, can be used for an accurate plausibility check.
  • access to a building is understood to mean any access to a building that can be closed by a movable lock.
  • Accesses according to the invention can be designed as doors, windows and the like.
  • any sensor that is designed to record acceleration, movement, vibration or the like in at least one of the three spatial axes is regarded as an acceleration sensor.
  • An acceleration sensor according to the invention can also record acceleration, movement, vibration or the like in all three spatial axes.
  • a positive plausibility check means that the plausibility check shows that a person is on the inside of the building near the entrance, so that the presence of the person can be determined by recording the physical quantities.
  • a negative plausibility check means that the plausibility check shows that there is no one on the inside of the building near the entrance.
  • Fig. 1 shows a block diagram of an embodiment of an intrusion sensor 1 according to the invention.
  • the intrusion sensor 1 in Fig. 1 is arranged on a door 2 and has an acceleration sensor 4 which is coupled to a plausibility check 9. Furthermore, the intrusion sensor 1 in Fig. 1 an environmental sensor 6, which is also coupled to the plausibility check 9.
  • the intrusion sensor of the Fig. 1 is used to monitor door 2, which represents access to a building to be monitored.
  • the intrusion sensor 1 is arranged on the door 2 on the inside of the building.
  • the acceleration sensor 4 serves to detect movements of the intrusion sensor 1 in at least one spatial axis. This is always the case when the door 2 is moved or e.g. a burglar at door 2 is troubled. If the door 2 moves, the acceleration sensor 4 outputs an acceleration signal 5 to the plausibility check 9.
  • the ambient sensor 6 detects a value 7 of the temperature 8 in the vicinity of the intrusion sensor 1.
  • the ambient sensor 6 can also be designed to additionally or alternatively, other physical variables 8, e.g. to detect the air humidity 8.
  • the detected value of the temperature 8 is provided by the environmental sensor 6 of the plausibility check 9.
  • the environmental sensor 6 can be designed as any sensor that is suitable for detecting the presence or absence of a person or another living being. This can e.g. be an infrared sensor.
  • the plausibility check 9 validates the acceleration signal 5 with the aid of the detected values 7 of the temperature 8. In the event of a negative plausibility check, the plausibility check 9 outputs a break-in signal 10. If the environmental sensor 6 is designed to additionally or alternatively, other physical variables 8, e.g. to detect the air humidity 8, these recorded values can also be used in the plausibility check.
  • Fig. 2 shows a flow chart of an embodiment of a method according to the invention.
  • the method according to the invention provides in a first step S1 to detect a movement of the access 2, 3 in at least one spatial axis and to output an acceleration signal 5 in the case of a movement in the at least one axis in a second step S2.
  • a third step S3 at least one value 7 of at least one physical variable 8 is recorded in the vicinity of the access 2, 3 on the inside of the building 14.
  • the method further provides for the plausibility check S4 of the acceleration signal 5 with the detected value 7 of the physical quantity 8 and the output S5 of an intrusion signal 10 in the event of a negative plausibility check.
  • Fig. 3 shows a block diagram of a further embodiment of an intrusion sensor 1 according to the invention.
  • the intrusion sensor 1 of the Fig. 3 is based on the intrusion sensor 1 Fig. 1 and differs from this in that the plausibility checking device 9 has a memory 11 and is designed to store a detected value 7 of the physical variable 8 at predetermined intervals and to calculate an average value 12 of the detected values 7 of the physical variable 8.
  • the plausibility check 9 forms a long-term mean 12 for all the recorded values 7 of the physical quantity 8.
  • the plausibility check 9 can also calculate a moving average 12 for a predetermined number of recorded values 7 of the physical quantity 8.
  • the plausibility check 9 of the Fig. 3 is also designed to query an actual value 7 of the physical quantity 8 from the ambient sensor 6 when the acceleration signal 5 is output by the acceleration sensor 4 and to compare it with the mean value 12.
  • the plausibility check 9 makes the acceleration signal 5 positive and no break-in signal 10 is output.
  • the plausibility check device 9 makes the acceleration signal 5 plausible and an alarm is triggered or an intrusion signal 10 is output.
  • the environmental sensor 6 is designed as a sensor 6, which is designed to detect a plurality of physical variables 8 simultaneously in the environment of the intrusion sensor 1.
  • the sensor 6 can detect temperature and air humidity.
  • the intrusion sensor 1 has a data interface which is designed to communicate with an air conditioning system of the building 14 and to query the current building temperature from the latter.
  • the queried building temperature can also be used for a comparison with the recorded value of the physical variable 8.
  • Fig. 4 shows a flow chart of a further embodiment of a method according to the invention.
  • the procedure of Fig. 4 is based on the process of Fig. 2 and differs from this in that the step of plausibility checking S4 provides for storing a detected value 7 of the physical variable 8 at predetermined intervals S6 and calculating S7 a mean value 12 of the recorded values 7 of the physical variable 8.
  • a long-term mean value 12 can be calculated for all recorded values 7 of the physical quantity 8. Additionally or alternatively, when calculating S7 of the mean value 12, a moving mean value 12 can be calculated for a predetermined number of detected values 7 of the physical quantity 8.
  • the method provides for plausibility checking S4 that when an acceleration signal 5 is output by the acceleration sensor 4, a current value 7 of the physical quantity 8 is detected S8 and compared with the mean value S9.
  • the acceleration signal 5 is positively checked for plausibility if the current value 7 of the physical variable 8 deviates from the mean value 12 by more than a predetermined threshold value 13. Furthermore, the acceleration signal 5 is negatively checked for plausibility if the current value 7 of the physical variable 8 deviates from the mean value 12 by less than the predetermined threshold value 13.
  • Fig. 5 shows a block diagram of an alarm system 16 with an embodiment of an intrusion sensor 1 according to the invention.
  • the alarm system 16 is arranged in a building 14. Building 14 of the Fig. 5 is only shown schematically by two wall sections 14 which have an opening in which a window 3 is arranged, on which an intrusion sensor 1 according to the invention is arranged.
  • the opening direction in Fig. 5 is only shown as an example and does not necessarily have to refer to the in Fig. 5 shown vertical spatial axis may be limited. If the door / window is damaged with great force, a tilt and turn movement can also occur, for example, which is not only described by the vertical axis of the room.
  • the alarm system 16 has an alarm transmitter 15 which is coupled to the intrusion sensor 1.
  • the intrusion sensor 1 is designed to transmit an intrusion signal 10 to the alarm transmitter 15, which then emits an alarm.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Burglar Alarm Systems (AREA)
EP14733542.6A 2013-06-10 2014-06-05 Einbruchsensor zur überwachung eines zugangs zu einem zu überwachenden gebäude und verfahren sowie alarmanlage damit Active EP3008705B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102013210747.1A DE102013210747A1 (de) 2013-06-10 2013-06-10 Einbruchsensor zur überwachung eines zugangs zu einem zu überwachenden gebäude und verfahren
PCT/EP2014/061672 WO2014198621A1 (de) 2013-06-10 2014-06-05 Einbruchsensor zur überwachung eines zugangs zu einem zu überwachenden gebäude und verfahren

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3008705A1 EP3008705A1 (de) 2016-04-20
EP3008705B1 true EP3008705B1 (de) 2020-04-01

Family

ID=51022813

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14733542.6A Active EP3008705B1 (de) 2013-06-10 2014-06-05 Einbruchsensor zur überwachung eines zugangs zu einem zu überwachenden gebäude und verfahren sowie alarmanlage damit

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US9799209B2 (zh)
EP (1) EP3008705B1 (zh)
CN (1) CN105283909B (zh)
DE (1) DE102013210747A1 (zh)
WO (1) WO2014198621A1 (zh)

Families Citing this family (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9576469B2 (en) 2014-12-30 2017-02-21 Google Inc. Systems and methods of adaptively adjusting a sensor of a security system
DE102016118166A1 (de) 2016-09-26 2018-03-29 Abus Security-Center Gmbh & Co. Kg Gebäudeüberwachungssystem
WO2019002063A1 (en) 2017-06-30 2019-01-03 Assa Abloy Entrance Systems Ab DOOR ACTUATOR
EP3743898B1 (en) * 2018-01-22 2022-10-12 Assa Abloy AB Determining when a break-in attempt is in process
EP3582196A1 (en) * 2018-06-11 2019-12-18 Verisure Sàrl Shock sensor in an alarm system
AU2019370968B2 (en) * 2018-10-31 2022-12-22 Assa Abloy Ab Classifying vibrations
CN109214491A (zh) * 2018-11-07 2019-01-15 李志民 电子标签、防水卷材、屋面检漏系统及其方法
DE102020126852A1 (de) * 2020-10-13 2022-04-14 Warema Renkhoff Se Verschattungsvorrichtung mit Alarmvorrichtung
FR3126804A1 (fr) 2021-09-09 2023-03-10 Artifeel Dispositif de détermination adaptative d’actions sur un objet par analyse progressive des contraintes qu’elles génèrent

Family Cites Families (19)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5793286A (en) * 1996-01-29 1998-08-11 Seaboard Systems, Inc. Combined infrasonic and infrared intrusion detection system
US5870022A (en) * 1997-09-30 1999-02-09 Interactive Technologies, Inc. Passive infrared detection system and method with adaptive threshold and adaptive sampling
NO312796B1 (no) * 2000-10-26 2002-07-01 Nordan As Alarmbrikke
JP3722087B2 (ja) * 2002-05-13 2005-11-30 オムロン株式会社 監視方法、監視システム、監視プログラム、および監視プログラムを記録した記録媒体
US8354927B2 (en) * 2002-06-11 2013-01-15 Intelligent Technologies International, Inc. Shipping container monitoring based on door status
FI115931B (fi) 2003-10-10 2005-08-15 Tamtron Oy Valvontalaite ja -järjestelmä
SE0400232L (sv) * 2004-02-05 2005-08-06 Vendolocus Ab Alarmsystem
US7218217B2 (en) * 2004-08-05 2007-05-15 Honeywell International, Inc. False alarm reduction in security systems using weather sensor and control panel logic
KR20070045223A (ko) * 2004-08-05 2007-05-02 마쯔시다덴기산교 가부시키가이샤 감시 장치 및 그를 컴퓨터에서 실행시키기 위한 프로그램을 저장한 저장매체.
NO20052403A (no) * 2005-05-18 2006-09-18 Idtec Pte Ltd System og fremgangsmåte for deteksjon av innbrudd
JP2006323755A (ja) * 2005-05-20 2006-11-30 Medical Electronic Science Inst Co Ltd 不審者侵入監視システム
US20080165001A1 (en) * 2007-01-08 2008-07-10 Drake David A Methods and apparatuses for false alarm elimination
DE112011100263A5 (de) * 2010-01-18 2013-07-25 Stefan Wieser Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Überwachen einer Gebäudeöffnung
CN201763180U (zh) * 2010-02-08 2011-03-16 吉林大元电子科技有限公司 智能数字防盗门
CN101866521B (zh) * 2010-07-02 2012-07-04 叶斌 一种基于行为分析的全天候设防的家庭安防报警系统
DE102010039837A1 (de) * 2010-08-26 2012-03-01 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Steuerung eines Geräts
US9311793B2 (en) * 2011-10-24 2016-04-12 Andrew Lohbihler Motion and area monitoring system and method
CN102637331B (zh) * 2012-04-13 2014-07-02 中国科学院深圳先进技术研究院 小区防盗报警系统和方法
NZ703361A (en) * 2012-05-23 2016-07-29 Schlage Lock Co Llc Door lock sensor and alarm

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102013210747A1 (de) 2014-12-11
CN105283909B (zh) 2018-11-20
US20160117918A1 (en) 2016-04-28
US9799209B2 (en) 2017-10-24
WO2014198621A1 (de) 2014-12-18
CN105283909A (zh) 2016-01-27
EP3008705A1 (de) 2016-04-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3008705B1 (de) Einbruchsensor zur überwachung eines zugangs zu einem zu überwachenden gebäude und verfahren sowie alarmanlage damit
EP3097547B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum bestimmen eines unberechtigten eindringens an einer tür
EP3055841A1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zum bestimmen eines zustands eines zu überwachenden objekts
WO2017009083A1 (de) Verfahren zum betrieb eines flächenbearbeitungsgerätes
DE102016114628A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betrieb eines sich selbsttätig fortbewegenden Flächenbearbeitungsgerätes
DE102013103535A1 (de) Überwachungsvorrichtung zur Überwachung von Verschlusseinrichtungen von Objektöffnung eines Objekts, insbesondere Haus, und ein entsprechendes Verfahren
WO2015000731A1 (de) Vorrichtung und verfahren zum ermitteln eines schliesszustands einer haustür oder eines hausfensters
EP2672472A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der momentanen Mobilität von Personen in privaten oder öffentlichen Räumen
DE102015208771B3 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Diebstahlerkennung
EP2350981B1 (de) Zugangskontroll- und -steuersystem
EP4105902A1 (de) Durchgangskontrollvorrichtung
EP3535739B2 (de) Sicherungsvorrichtung zür überwachung der stellung eines flügels
EP3985629B1 (de) Verschattungsvorrichtung mit alarmvorrichtung
DE19959883B4 (de) Antriebssteuerung
WO2018007066A1 (de) Verfahren zum betreiben eines passiven zugangssystems für ein kraftfahrzeug mit einem id-geber
DE102013100325A1 (de) Kapazitive Annäherungssensoranordnung an einer Tür eines Kraftfahrzeugs zum Erfassen einer näherungsweise horizontalen Annäherungsbewegung einer Bedienerhand
DE102018222117A1 (de) Überwachungsvorrichtung für mobiles Trägergerät
DE102016212947B4 (de) Vorrichtung, System und Verfahren zur Aktivitätsdetektion
DE202021103449U1 (de) ESD-Kontrollanordnung
AT513029B1 (de) Verfahren zum Überwachen einer eine Öffnung verschließenden Abschlusskonstruktion
WO2018091692A1 (de) Stangen- oder schienenvorrichtung und rollladenkasten
DE102022116110A1 (de) ESD-Kontrollanordnung
DE102011106037A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben von Anlagen mit PIR-Detektoren
DE102018004993A1 (de) Alarmanlagen-System in unsichtbarer Gestalt
DE202006020307U1 (de) Rollladensystem

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160111

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20191028

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1252371

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200415

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502014013900

Country of ref document: DE

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200701

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20200401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200817

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200701

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200801

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200702

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502014013900

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20210112

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200605

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200630

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200605

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200701

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200630

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1252371

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200401

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230620

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230817

Year of fee payment: 10