EP2774729A1 - Système robotique et unité de commande de robot - Google Patents

Système robotique et unité de commande de robot Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2774729A1
EP2774729A1 EP20110872273 EP11872273A EP2774729A1 EP 2774729 A1 EP2774729 A1 EP 2774729A1 EP 20110872273 EP20110872273 EP 20110872273 EP 11872273 A EP11872273 A EP 11872273A EP 2774729 A1 EP2774729 A1 EP 2774729A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
robot
angular speed
joint
speed command
joint angular
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP20110872273
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2774729A4 (fr
Inventor
Yosuke Kamiya
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yaskawa Electric Corp
Original Assignee
Yaskawa Electric Corp
Yaskawa Electric Manufacturing Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yaskawa Electric Corp, Yaskawa Electric Manufacturing Co Ltd filed Critical Yaskawa Electric Corp
Publication of EP2774729A1 publication Critical patent/EP2774729A1/fr
Publication of EP2774729A4 publication Critical patent/EP2774729A4/fr
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J9/00—Programme-controlled manipulators
    • B25J9/16—Programme controls
    • B25J9/1628—Programme controls characterised by the control loop
    • B25J9/1643—Programme controls characterised by the control loop redundant control
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25J—MANIPULATORS; CHAMBERS PROVIDED WITH MANIPULATION DEVICES
    • B25J13/00—Controls for manipulators
    • B25J13/06—Control stands, e.g. consoles, switchboards
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/39—Robotics, robotics to robotics hand
    • G05B2219/39435—Free movable unit has push buttons for other than position, orientation control
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/40—Robotics, robotics mapping to robotics vision
    • G05B2219/40336—Optimize multiple constraints or subtasks
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/40—Robotics, robotics mapping to robotics vision
    • G05B2219/40349—Optimize manipulability measure function
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/40—Robotics, robotics mapping to robotics vision
    • G05B2219/40367—Redundant manipulator
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/40—Robotics, robotics mapping to robotics vision
    • G05B2219/40371—Control trajectory to avoid joint limit as well as obstacle collision
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/40—Robotics, robotics mapping to robotics vision
    • G05B2219/40381—Control trajectory in case of joint limit, clamping of joint

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a robot system and a robot control device.
  • Patent Literature 1 discloses an operation locus teaching method for a robot, which is capable of creating operation locus teaching data using a robot having a redundant degree of freedom not affecting robot work, in addiction to a degree of freedom required for work by the robot.
  • This operation locus teaching method is characterized in that the redundant degree of freedom is decided based on an evaluation function having the redundant degree of freedom as an element and representing a margin of a joint angle space of the robot.
  • Patent Literature 1 Japanese Patent Application Laid-open No. H6-187020
  • the present invention aims to provide a robot system and a robot control device with greater ease of manipulation of a redundant robot when compared with a case not having a configuration of the present invention.
  • a robot system includes a robot, and a robot control device that controls the robot.
  • the robot has a plurality of joint axes including a redundant axis, the joint axes being driven by a servomotor.
  • the robot control device has a first command generator, a limit avoidance command generator, a posture optimization command generator, a null space matrix calculator, a second command generator and a controller.
  • the first command generator generates a first joint angular speed command for the robot on the basis of an input speed command for a control point of the robot.
  • the limit avoidance command generator generates a joint angular speed command A for the robot for avoiding a state in which the robot reaches an operating limit, or the basis of an evaluation function A, while a signal A is being input.
  • the posture optimization command generator generates a joint angular speed command B for the robot for optimizing a posture of the robot, on the basis of an evaluation function B, while a signal B is being input.
  • the null space matrix calculator calculates a null space matrix of a Jacobian matrix related to the control point.
  • the second command generator generates a second joint angular speed command for the robot on the basis of the joint angular speed command A, the joint angular speed command B, and the null space matrix.
  • the controller controls the servomotor on the basis of a third joint angular speed command that is a sum of the first and second joint angular speed commands.
  • a robot control device includes a first command generator, a limit avoidance command generator, a posture optimization command generator, a null space matrix calculator, a second command generator, and a controller.
  • the first command generator generates a first joint angular speed command for a robot having a plurality of joint axes including a redundant axis, on the basis of a speed command for a control point of the robot.
  • the limit avoidance command generator configured to generate a joint angular speed command A for the robot for avoiding a state in which the robot reaches an operating limit, on the basis of an evaluation function A, while a signal A is being input.
  • the posture optimization command generator generates a joint angular speed command B for the robot for optimizing a posture of the robot, on the basis of an evaluation function 3, while a signal B is being input.
  • the null space matrix calculator calculates a null space matrix of a Jacobian matrix related to the control point.
  • the second command generator generates a second joint angular speed command for the robot on the basis of the joint angular speed command A, the joint angular speed command B, and the null space matrix.
  • the controller controls a servomotor on the basis of a third joint angular speed command that is a sum of the first and second joint angular speed commands.
  • the present invention can improve ease of manipulation of a redundant robot when compared with a case not having a configuration of the present invention.
  • a robot system 10 includes, as illustrated in FIG. 1 , a robot 12 having first to seventh joint axes J1 to J7, a robot control device 14 controlling operation of the robot 12, and a teaching pendant 16 for teaching a position and posture of the robot 12.
  • a robot coordinate system Cr illustrated in FIG. 1 is, for example, an orthogonal coordinate system.
  • the origin is at a point on the first joint axis J1 of the robot 12, the X axis extends in the front-back direction of the robot 12, the Y axis extends in the left-right direction, and the Z axis extends in the up-down direction.
  • the robot 12 is a redundant robot, for example, a seven-axis vertical multi-articulated robot including the joint axis J3 as a redundant axis.
  • Each of the joint axes J1 to J7 is driven by a servomotor (not illustrated) containing an encoder.
  • the robot 12 is not limited to a seven-axis vertical multi-articulated robot.
  • Other examples of the robot include a robot having a joint axis redundantly with the degrees of freedom of the work space of the robot. For example, a three-axis robot having only three joints each rotating around the Y axis of the robot coordinate system Cr has redundancy on the XZ plane.
  • This three-axis robot is therefore a robot that has a joint axis redundantly in relation to operation on the XZ plane. That is, the robot may be any redundant robot that has a redundant degree of freedom, irrespective of the number of axes of joints and the axial configuration.
  • the robot control device 14 is connected to the robot 12.
  • the robot control device 14 includes a first command generator 14a, a limit avoidance command generator 14b, a posture optimization command generator, 14c, a null space matrix calculator 14d, a second command generator 14e, a position and speed controller (an example of the controller) 14f, and a monitor 14g.
  • the robot control device 14 is installed with a CPU (not illustrated), and the function of each block illustrated in FIG. 1 is implemented by a software program executed by the CPU or hardware.
  • the first command generator 14a can generate a joint angular speed command (first joint angular speed command) ⁇ ref1, based on the speed command V.
  • the limit avoidance command generator 14b can output a joint angular speed command (joint angular speed command A) ⁇ LMT for the robot 12 to avoid a limit.
  • the signal A will be described later.
  • the limit refers to a state in which the robot 12 reaches an operating limit, and includes, for example, the following first to third limits.
  • the first limit is a limit in a case where a joint axis reaches a movable limit angle.
  • the movable limit angle includes a movable limit angle that is mechanically determined in terms of the design of the robot 12, and a movable limit angle that is set as desired by software. Either limit can be applied.
  • the second limit is a limit in a case where the robot 12 approaches an obstruction (for example, peripheral equipment or any other robots) to a distance set by software.
  • an obstruction for example, peripheral equipment or any other robots
  • the third limit is a limit in a case where the robot 12 approaches a singular posture to a range set by software.
  • the robot reaching the third limit is given an excessive joint angular speed command.
  • the singular posture of the robot is a posture in which a particular degree of freedom is lost due to a kinetic state such as the position of a joint of the robot and the direction of a rotor axis. For example, if an operation command is given in a particular direction in a posture in which the second joint axis J2, the fourth joint axis J4, and the sixth joint axis J6 of the robot 12 lie on a straight line, the joint angular speed commands for these joints become excessive.
  • the limit avoidance command generator 14b can generate 1) a joint angular speed command ⁇ JLC for avoiding the first limit, 2) a joint angular speed command ⁇ OAC for avoiding the second limit, and 3) a joint angular speed command ⁇ SAC for avoiding the third limit, in accordance with the kinds of limits as described above.
  • the detailed method of generating these joint angular speed commands ⁇ JLC , ⁇ OAC , ⁇ SAC will be described later.
  • the limit avoidance command generator 14b can output the sum of the generated joint angular speed commands. ⁇ JLC , ⁇ CAC , ⁇ SAC as a joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT .
  • the posture optimization command generator 14c can output a joint angular speed command (joint angular speed ccmmand B) ⁇ OPT for optimizing the posture of the robot 12.
  • the signal B will be described latter.
  • the optimization of a posture of the robot 12 includes, for example, the following first and second optimizations.
  • the first optimization is an optimization for reducing the operating time of the robot 12.
  • the second optimization is an optimization for improving manipulability of the robot 12.
  • the posture optimization command generator 14c can generate 1) a joint angular speed command ⁇ TMC for reducing the operating time and 2) a joint angular speed command ⁇ SAC for improving manipulability, in accordance with the kinds of optimizations.
  • the detailed method of generating these joint angular speed commands ⁇ TMC , ⁇ SAC will be described later.
  • the kinds of optimizations are determined based on the value of a signal B SEL output from the teaching pendant 16.
  • the posture optimization command generator 14c can output the generated joint angular speed commands ⁇ TMC , ⁇ SAC as a joint angular speed command ⁇ OPT .
  • the null space matrix calculator 14d can calculate a null space matrix N of a Jacobian matrix J related to the hand (an example of the control point) of the robot 12, based on the joint angle of the robot 12. Specifically, the null space matrix calculator 14d can obtain the position and posture of the hand of the robot 12 and the direction of each of the joint axes J1 to J7 from the joint angle (the current value of the joint angle) and calculate the null space matrix of the Jacobian matrix related to the hand of the robot 12.
  • the null space matrix is an operation matrix for generating an operation command for the redundant degree of freedom with the position and posture of the hand being kept, in a redundant robot.
  • this operation command is not a command only to a particular axis, i.e., a redundant axis, but is a command to a redundant degree of freedom (the joint degree of freedom that does not affect the position and posture of the hand), wherein control target axes are all or some of the axes including the redundant axis and vary depending on the posture and the operating direction of the robot in each control cycle.
  • control target axes will be described by taking a three-axis robot having only three joint axes (first to third joint axes) each rotating around the Y axis of the robot coordinate system Cr, as an example.
  • the control target axis as a redundant degree of freedom in this case is not limited to one of the first to third joint axes of the three-axis robot but is at least one of the first to third joint axes that can rotate around the Y axis of the robot coordinate system Cr (that can change the posture) with the hand position being kept.
  • Which of the joint axes is to be set as a control target axis is calculated using the null space matrix.
  • the control target axes as a redundant degree of freedom are the first joint axis and the second joint axis.
  • the null space matrix N is calculated by the hollowing equation, based on the Jacobian matrix J related to the hand, the pseudo inverse matrix J + of the Jacobian matrix, and the unit matrix I.
  • N I - J + ⁇ J
  • the Jacobian matrix of the control target part is used.
  • the joint angle and the joint angular speed of the robot 12 are obtained based on the result of multiplying an encoder value fed-back from the encoder, by a reduction ratio.
  • the second command generator 14e can generate a joint angular speed command (second joint angular speed command) ⁇ ref2 based on the joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT , the joint angular speed command ⁇ OPT , and the null space matrix N.
  • the generated joint angular speed command ⁇ ref2 is added to the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref1 generated by the first command generator 14a to yield a joint angular speed command (third joint angular speed command) ⁇ ref3 (see FIG. 1 ).
  • the position and speed controller 14f can control the servomotor based on a difference e between the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref3 and a joint angular speed feedback ⁇ fb, and control the position and speed of each joint.
  • the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref3 is used as a command to the position and speed controller 14f.
  • a joint angle command obtained by adding the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref3 to the current joint angle of the robot 12 may be used as a command to the position and speed controller 14f.
  • the number of the position and speed controllers 14f provided corresponds to the number of the joint axes J1 to J7 that constitute the robot 12.
  • the monitor 14g can determine whether the robot 12 reaches a limit.
  • the monitor 14g can stop operation of the robot 12 and output an alarm when a limit is reached.
  • the monitor 14g can determine whether the first limit is reached, by monitoring the angle of each of the joint axes J1 to J7.
  • the monitor 14g can also determine that the second limit is reached, by calculating the distance between the robot 12 and an obstruction based on the position and size of the obstruction that are registered in advance. When the position and size of the obstruction are not registered in the robot control device 14 in advance, the operator can determine by visual inspection that the second limit is reached, and then stop operation of the robot 12.
  • the monitor 14g can also determine whether the third limit is reached, by monitoring the posture of the robot 12 (the current value ⁇ fb of the joint angle of the robot 12) and the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref3, because an excessive joint angular speed command ⁇ ref3 is generated when the robot 12 approaches the singular posture.
  • the singular posture of the robot 12 is a posture in which the second joint axis J2, the fourth joint axis J4, and the sixth joint axis J6 lie on a straight line.
  • the singular posture of the robot varies depending on the configuration of the link.
  • the teaching pendant 16 is connected to the robot control device 14.
  • the teaching pendant 16 is provided with a jog manipulation button 20, a first limit avoidance button (an example of the first signal output unit) 21, a first posture optimization button (an example of the second signal output unit) 22, and a display screen 32.
  • the operator of the robot 12 can use the jog manipulation button 20 provided on the teaching pendant 16 to jog-manipulate the robot 12 and teach a work program for the robot 12.
  • the operator can also use a replay button 19 provided on the teaching pendant 16 to perform a work program replay operation.
  • the operator can use the teaching pendant 16 to allow a control target part (control point) of the robot 12 to operate based on a designated coordinate system.
  • control target part is, for example, the hand of the robot 12.
  • Other examples of the control target part include a particular part of a joint of the robot 12 and the tip of an end effector attached to the hand.
  • the designated coordinate system is, for example, the robot coordinate system Cr.
  • the hand of the robot 12 can be moved in the X-axis direction, the Y-axis direction, and the Z-axis direction as well as the rotation direction around the X axis, the rotation direction around the Y axis, and the rotation direction around the Z axis.
  • Other examples of the designated coordinate system include a joint coordinate system and a coordinate system set as desired by the operator of the robot 12.
  • the jog manipulation button 20 is a button for the operator to jog-manipulate the robot 12.
  • the teaching pendant 16 outputs a preset hand speed command V.
  • the first limit avoidance button 21 is a button for the operator to give an instruction to avoid a limit.
  • the teaching pendant 16 When the first limit avoidance button 21 is pressed, the teaching pendant 16 outputs the signal A.
  • the first limit avoidance button 21 takes momentary action. That is, the teaching pendant 16 outputs the signal A while the first limit avoidance button 21 is being pressed.
  • the first posture optimization button 22 is a button for the operator to give an instruction to optimize a posture of the robot 12.
  • the teaching pendant 16 When the first posture optimization button 22 is pressed, the teaching pendant 16 outputs the signal B.
  • the first posture optimization button 22 takes momentary action. That is, the teaching pendant 16 outputs the signal B while the first posture optimization button 22 is being pressed.
  • a display area corresponding to the function of the robot control device 14 is configured on the display screen 32 of the teaching pendant 16, and information such as characters and images is displayed in this display area.
  • a posture optimization assist function is performed for assisting in optimization of a posture of the robot 12 as described later
  • a display area D1 on the left side, a display area D2 on the upper right side, and a display area D3 on the lower right side are configured on the display screen 32, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 5 .
  • a teaching program in which teaching data for the robot 12 is written is displayed in the display area D1.
  • a graphics image representing the posture of the robot 12 at present is displayed in the display area D2.
  • a graphics image representing the robot 12 with the optimized posture is displayed in the display area D3.
  • the teaching pendant 16 further includes a posture optimization command generator 16c, a null space matrix calculator 16d, a second command generator 16e, and a robot model rendering unit (an example of the rendering unit) 16r, as illustrated in FIG. 6 .
  • the posture optimization command generator 16c operates substantially in the same manner as the posture optimization command generator 14c provided in the robot control device 14. With input of a signal S, the posture optimization command generator 16c can output a joint angular speed command ⁇ OPTa for optimizing a posture of the robot 12.
  • the null space matrix calculator 16d operates substantially in the same manner as the null space matrix calculator, 14d provided in the robot control device 14.
  • the null space matrix calculator 16d can calculate a null space matrix Na of the Jacobian matrix related to the hand of the robot model, based on a joint angle ⁇ m fb output by the robot model rendering unit 16r.
  • the second command generator 16e operates substantially in the same manner as the second command generator 14e provided in the robot control device 14.
  • the second command generator 16e can generate a joint angular speed command ⁇ ref2a based on the joint angular speed command ⁇ OPTa and the null space matrix Na.
  • the generated joint angular speed command ⁇ ref2a is integrated by an integrator 16i and added to the current value ⁇ fb of the joint angle of the robot 12 that is transmitted from the robot control device 14, to yield a joint angle ⁇ m .
  • the robot model rendering unit 16r can create a graphics image of the robot 12 based on the joint angle of the robot 12 and render the image on the display screen 32.
  • the robot model rendering unit 16r can render a graphics image of the robot model having the joint angle ⁇ fb in the display area D2, based on the current value ⁇ fb of the joint angle of the robot 12 that is transmitted from the robot control device 14. If the joint angle ⁇ fb of the robot 12 changes, the robot model rendering unit updates the rendering of the graphics image as needed.
  • the robot model rendering unit 16r can also render a graphics image of the robot model whose joint angle is the angle ⁇ m , in the display area D3, based on the joint angle ⁇ m .
  • the teaching pendant 16 is provided with a switch button 25 (see FIG. 1 ) to switch a target manipulated by the operator to one of the actual robot 12 and the robot model displayed in the display area D3.
  • the posture optimization command generator 16c, the null space matrix calculator 16d, the second command generator 16e, and the robot model rendering unit 16r may not necessarily be provided in the teaching pendant 16. That is, the same configuration can be implemented such that some of the posture optimization command generator 16c, the null space matrix calculator 16d, the second command generator 16e, and the robot model rendering unit 16r are provided, for example, in the robot control device 14, and the robot control device 14 and the teaching pendant 16 communicate with each other to transmit/receive data.
  • the operator can manipulate the position and posture of the hand of the robot 12 by pressing the jog manipulation button 20. If the robot 12 reaches a limit while the position and posture of the hand is being manipulated, the operator can press the first limit avoidance button 21 to allow all the joint axes J1 to J7 of the robot 12 including the redundant axis J3 to operate, and avoid the limit with the position and posture of the hand being kept. The operator can also press the first posture optimization button 22 to allow all the joint axes J1 to J7 of the robot 12 including the redundant axis J3 to operate, and optimize a posture of the robot 12 with the position and posture of the hand being kept.
  • the hand speed command V is input from the teaching pendant 16 to the first command generator 14a illustrated in FIG. 1 .
  • the first command generator 14a generates the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref1 using Equation (2), based on the hand speed command V and the pseudo inverse matrix J + of the Jacobian matrix related to the hand of the robot 12.
  • ⁇ ref ⁇ 1 J + ⁇ V
  • the first command generator 14a may generate the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref1 without using Equation (2).
  • the first command generator 14a may generate the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref1 by integrating the hand speed command V for conversion into a hand position command and thereafter performing an inverse kinematics calculation.
  • the monitor 14g determines whether the robot 12 reaches a limit.
  • the monitor 14g determines that the robot 12 reaches a limit
  • the robot 12 is stopped, and an alarm is output.
  • the limit avoidance operation for avoiding a limit at the next step Sa3 is thereafter performed.
  • step Sa4 When the monitor 14g determines that the robot 12 does not reach a limit, the processing proceeds to step Sa4.
  • step Sa31 and step Sa32 are processed in order.
  • the robot 12 performs the limit avoidance operation for avoiding a limit.
  • the limit avoidance command generator 14b calculates the joint angular speed commands ⁇ JLC , ⁇ OAC , ⁇ SAC for avoiding the first to third limits, respectively, in accordance with the alarm output by the monitor 14g.
  • a method of calculating each of the joint angular speed commands ⁇ JLC , ⁇ OAC , ⁇ SAC will be described below.
  • Equation (3) The joint angular speed command ⁇ JLC for avoiding the first limit is calculated by Equation (3), Equation (4a), and Equation (4b), based on an evaluation function V JLC (an example of the evaluation function A).
  • ⁇ JLC - grad V JLC
  • Equation (3) The processing of Equation (3), Equation (4a), and Equation (4b) is performed for each of the joint axes J1 to J7.
  • the coefficient K JLC is the gain (weight) of the joint angular speed command.
  • the angle ⁇ LIM is a set angle set as an angle (movable limit angle) for limiting the movable range of each joint.
  • the angle ⁇ is the current value of the angle of each joint.
  • the angle ⁇ and the angle ⁇ + are the upper limit and the lower limit, respectively, of the set angle ⁇ LIM and represent the limit area in which the evaluation function V JLC is calculated (see FIG. 7 ).
  • Equation (4a) and Equation (4b) the evaluation function V JLC is calculated only for the joint that enters the limit area, and the evaluation function V JLC is set to zero for the other joints.
  • the joint angle command becomes zero.
  • the evaluation function V JLC is obtained based on the magnitude of the difference between the set angle ⁇ LIM and the angle feedback (the current value of the joint angle) ⁇ of each joint, as indicated by Equation (4b).
  • the joint angular speed command ⁇ JLC is then calculated such that the joint goes away from the joint movable range, from the gradient of the evaluation function V JLC .
  • Equation (5) The joint angular speed command ⁇ OAC for avoiding the second limit is calculated by Equation (5), Equation (6a), and Equation (6b), based on an evaluation function V OAC (an example of the evaluation function A).
  • ⁇ OAC - J P T ⁇ grad V OAC
  • Equation (5) the matrix J P is the Jacobian matrix of the closest point calculated from a part (closest point) of the robot 12 that is closest to an obstruction. While the robot 12 is avoiding the limit, the closest point is newly calculated when the current value of the joint angle of the robot 12 is changed.
  • Equation (5) is performed for each of the joint axes J1 to J7.
  • the processing of Equation (6a) and Equation (6b) is performed for each axis (the X axis, the Y axis, and the Z axis) of the robot coordinate system Cr.
  • the coefficient K OAC is the gain (weight) of the avoidance command.
  • the distance D LIM is a set distance set as a distance by which the robot 12 can approach an obstruction.
  • the obstruction is set as model data in the robot control device 14, for example, by reading CAD data or model data of an offline simulator.
  • the obstruction is set by actually measuring data of the obstruction using a camera or a laser sensor.
  • the obstruction is set by the operator manipulating the teaching pendant 16.
  • the distance D is the shortest distance from the obstruction to the robot 12.
  • the distance D - and the distance D + are the upper limit and the lower limit, respectively, of the distance D LIM and represent the limit area in which the evaluation function V OAC is calculated (see FIG. 8 ).
  • the evaluation function V OAC is calculated in the case where the robot 12 enters the limit area, and the evaluation function V OAC is set to zero in the other cases.
  • the joint angular speed command ⁇ OAC becomes zero.
  • the evaluation function V OAC is obtained based cn the magnitude of the difference between the distance D LIM and the distance D, as indicated by Equation (6b).
  • the joint angular speed command ⁇ OAC is then calculated from the gradient of the evaluation function V OAC and the Jacobian matrix J P such that the robot 12 goes away from the obstruction.
  • Equation (7) The joint angular speed command ⁇ SAC for avoiding the third limit is calculated by Equation (7), Equation (8a), and Equation (8b), based on an evaluation function V SAC (an example of the evaluation function A).
  • V SAC an example of the evaluation function A.
  • V SAC 0
  • V SAC K SAC ⁇ det J T ⁇ J
  • Equation (7) The processing of Equation (7), Equation (8a), and Equation (8b) is performed for each of the joint axes J1 to J7.
  • the coefficient K SAC is the gain (weight) of the joint angular speed command.
  • the angular speed command ⁇ is the angular speed command for each joint.
  • the angular speed ⁇ - and the angular speed ⁇ + are the upper limit and the lower limit, respectively, of the angular speed command ⁇ for a joint and represent the limit angular speed in which the evaluation function V SAC is calculated.
  • the evaluation function V SAC is calculated only for the joint given the joint angular speed command ⁇ exceeding the limit angular speed ⁇ - , ⁇ + , and the evaluation function V SAC is set to zero for the other joints.
  • the joint angular speed command ⁇ SAC becomes zero.
  • Equation (8a) or Equation (8b) is determined based on the angular speed command ⁇ . Determination of the singular posture is made before the case determination. That is, the determination as to the posture of the robot 12 is carried out in advance, and Equation (8a) or Equation (8b) is calculated after the singular posture is determined.
  • the evaluation function V SAC is obtained based on the manipulability of the hand of the robot 12, as indicated by Equation (8b).
  • the joint angular speed command ⁇ SAC is then calculated from the gradient of the evaluation function V SAC such that the joint goes away from the singular point.
  • the limit avoidance command generator 14b outputs the generated joint angular speed commands ⁇ JLC , ⁇ OAC , ⁇ SAC as the joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT .
  • the limit avoidance command generator 14b outputs the sum of the generated joint angular speed commands ⁇ JLC , ⁇ OAC , ⁇ SAC as the joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT . That is, when two or more limits occur, the sum of the joint angular speed commands for avoiding the corresponding limits is the joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT .
  • the second command generator 14e calculates the joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT for avoiding a limit by the following equation with the position and posture of the hand being kept using the null space matrix N, and generates the calculated joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT as the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref2.
  • the null space matrix N is used to decide a control target axis as the redundant degree of freedom in each control cycle and calculate the joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT .
  • ⁇ LMT N ⁇ ⁇ LMT
  • the joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT is the sum of the joint angular speed commands ⁇ JLC , ⁇ OAC , ⁇ SAC for limit avoidance that are output by the limit avoidance command generator 14b.
  • Equation (10) to Equation (12) may be used to calculate the joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT for avoiding a limit with the position and posture of the hand being kept.
  • V LMT J ⁇ ⁇ LMT
  • V LMT is a virtual hand speed command calculated from ⁇ LMT .
  • ⁇ ⁇ LMT J + ⁇ V LTM
  • ⁇ LMT is a virtual joint angular speed command calculated from V LMT .
  • the first term ( ⁇ LMT ) of Equation (12) is a joint angular speed for avoiding a limit.
  • the second term of Equation (12) is a joint angular speed command in which the angular speed norm is the smallest among joint angular speeds that produce V LMT . Since the first term and the second term are different, limit avoidance can be performed with the position and posture of the hand being kept.
  • step Sa31 and step Sa32 are processed in order, whereby the limit avoidance operation at step Sa3 is performed.
  • the first limit avoidance button 21 can be used to reduce the time and effort for the operator of the robot 12 on concentrating on the avoidance operation, for example, in which direction and how many times the redundant axis should be moved to avoid a limit. That is, the operator can perform limit avoidance online by pressing the first limit avoidance button 21. The operator can also decide the operating angle of a joint of the actual robot 12 by adjusting the time for pressing the first limit avoidance button 21.
  • the operator determines whether the position and posture of the hand of the robot 12 reaches the desired position and posture.
  • step Sa1 is performed. That is, the operator moves the robot 12 again using the teaching pendant 16.
  • the robot 12 reaches the limit (reach limit) of the operating range, the robot 12 cannot move any further in a predetermined direction.
  • the reach limit is decided by design parameters such as the link length and the joint movable range of the robot 12.
  • the reach limit is preset in the robot control device 14.
  • step Sa51 and step Sa52 are thereafter processed in order.
  • the posture optimization operation is performed to optimize a posture of the robot 12 having a redundant degree of freedom with the position and posture of the hand being kept, using the redundant degree of freedom of the robot 12.
  • the posture optimization command generator 14c illustrated in FIG. 1 calculates the joint angular speed command ⁇ TMC for reducing the operating time or the joint angular speed command ⁇ SAC for improving manipulability, in accordance with the kind of optimization (the value of the signal B SEL ) selected by the operator. It is noted that the same variable ⁇ SAC is used because ⁇ SAC for avoiding the third limit that is generated by the limit avoidance command generator 14b and ⁇ SAC for improving manipulability that is generated by the posture optimization command generator 14c both are command to move away from the singular point.
  • Equation (13) The joint angular speed command ⁇ TMC for reducing the operating time is calculated by Equation (13) and Equation (14), based on the evaluation function V TMC (an example of the evaluation function B).
  • ⁇ TMC - grad V TMC
  • V TMC 0.5 ⁇ K TMC ⁇ ⁇ TMC - ⁇ 2
  • the coefficient K TMC is the gain (weight) of the joint angular speed command.
  • the angle ⁇ TMC is the joint angle at the previous teaching point (the teaching point immediately preceding the current teaching point).
  • the operating time of the robot 12 from the previous teaching point to the current teaching point can be reduced by controlling the joint angle of the joint axis of the robot 12 at the current teaching point such that it approaches the joint angle of the joint axis of the robot 12 at the previous teaching point.
  • Which axis is to be set as a control target (to be given the joint angular speed command for reducing the operating time) varies depending on the posture and the operating direction of the robot in each control cycle and is calculated using the null space matrix N.
  • the angle ⁇ is the current value of the angle of each joint.
  • the evaluation function V TMC is obtained based on the magnitude of the difference between the angle ⁇ TMC and the angle feedback of each joint (the current value of the angle of each joint) ⁇ .
  • the joint angular speed command close to the previous teaching position that is, the joint angular speed command ⁇ TMC for reducing the operating time, is then calculated from the gradient of the evaluation function V TMC .
  • the operating time can be reduced more by setting a large gain for the joint with a great maximum operating speed. That is, a more efficient operation command is generated by allowing the joint with a great operating speed to operate by a large amount and allowing the joint with a small operating speed to operate by a small amount.
  • Equation (15) - grad V SAC
  • V SAC K SACi ⁇ det J T ⁇ J
  • the evaluation function V SAC is calculated based on the manipulability of the robot 12, and the joint angular speed command ⁇ SAC is generated by the same method as in the singular point avoidance at step Sa31.
  • the second command generator 14e illustrated in FIG. 1 calculates the joint angular speed command ⁇ OPT by the following equation for optimizing a posture of the robot 12 with the position and posture of the hand being kept using the null space matrix N and generates the calculated joint angular speed command ⁇ OPT as the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref2.
  • ⁇ OPT N ⁇ ⁇ OPT
  • the joint angular speed command ⁇ OPT is either of the joint angular speed commands ⁇ TMC , ⁇ SAC for optimizing the posture of the robot 12 that are output by the posture optimization command generator 14c.
  • step Sa51 and step Sa52 are processed in order, whereby the posture optimization operation at step Sa5 is performed.
  • a posture of the robot 12 can be optimized with the position and posture of the hand being kept using the null space matrix N related to the hand.
  • step Sa5 the operator of the robot 12 can predict the behavior in the posture optimization operation of the robot 12, using the robot posture optimization assist function.
  • the robot posture optimization assist function will be described below.
  • the graphics image of the robot model at present is rendered by the robot model rendering unit 16r illustrated in FIG. 6 , in the display area D2.
  • the graphics image of the robot model with the optimized posture is rendered in the display area D3 by the robot model rendering unit 16r.
  • the operator presses the switch button 25 illustrated in FIG. 1 to switch the manipulation target from the actual robot 12 to the robot model displayed in the display area D3.
  • the kind of optimization (the first optimization or the second optimization) is also selected.
  • the operator then presses the first posture optimization button 22.
  • the signal S (see FIG. 6 ) is input to the posture optimization command generator 16c of the teaching pendant 16.
  • the posture optimization command generator 16c calculates the joint angular speed command ⁇ OPTa in accordance with the kind of optimization selected by the operator of the robot 12.
  • the second command generator 16e generates the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref2a based on the joint angular speed command ⁇ OPTa calculated by the posture optimization command generator 16c and the null space matrix Na calculated by the null space matrix calculator 16d.
  • the robot model rendering unit 16r renders the graphics image of the robot model at the joint angle ⁇ m in the display area D3, based on the joint angle ⁇ m obtained by adding the current value ⁇ fb of the joint angle of the robct 12 that is transmitted from the robot control device 14, to the joint angular speed command integrated by the integrator 16i. That is, the graphics image of the robot 12 with the optimized posture is displayed in the display area D3.
  • the operator can decide the operating angle (the degree of optimization) of the joint of the robot model by adjusting the time for pressing the first posture optimization button 22.
  • the robot 12 optimized by the second optimization is rendered in the display area D3 illustrated in FIG. 5 .
  • the robot 12 rendered in the display area D3 is improved in manipulability of the hand.
  • the operator can view the graphics image of the robot 12 with the optimized posture on the display area D3 by performing the posture optimization assist function.
  • An individual evaluation index may be selected for each teaching position, and the redundant degree of freedom can be optimized with the selected evaluation index, rather than deciding the redundant degree of freedom related to all the teaching data using a uniform evaluation index (for example, evaluation function) decided in advance.
  • the operator can select optimization means for each teaching point, rather than optimizing all the positions related to teaching data in the operating program with the same evaluation index.
  • the operator presses the switch button 25 (see FIG. 1 ) again to switch the manipulation target from the robot model displayed in the display area D3 to the actual robot.
  • the operator can decide the final teaching position by optimizing the posture of the redundant degree of freedom of the actual robot 12.
  • the operator can decide the operating angle (the degree of optimization) of a joint of the actual robot 12 by adjusting the time for pressing the first posture optimization button 22.
  • the robot system can avoid a limit with the position and posture of the hand being kept, before the robot 12 reaches a limit.
  • the posture of the redundant degree of freedom can be optimized with the position and posture of the hand being kept. That is, the operator can decide online the joint angle of the robot 12 including the redundant degree of freedom, thereby improving the manipulability of the redundant robot.
  • a teaching pendant 116 is further provided with a second limit avoidance button 121 and a second posture optimization button 122, as illustrated in FIG. 9 .
  • the second limit avoidance button 121 is a button for the operator to give an instruction to avoid a limit.
  • the teaching pendant 116 When the second limit avoidance button 121 is pressed, the teaching pendant 116 outputs the signal A.
  • the second limit avoidance button 121 takes alternate action. That is, once the second limit avoidance button 121 is pressed, the teaching pendant 116 outputs the signal A until the second limit avoidance button 121 is pressed again.
  • the second posture optimization button 122 is a button for the operator to give an instruction to optimize the posture of the robot 12.
  • the teaching pendant 116 When the second posture optimization button 122 is pressed, the teaching pendant 116 outputs the signal B.
  • the second posture optimization button 122 takes alternate action. That is, once the second posture optimization button 122 is pressed, the teaching pendant 116 outputs the signal B until the second posture optimization button 122 is pressed again.
  • the robot control device 14 reads model data of an obstruction and the robot 12 from CAD data of the robot 12 or an offline simulator. As a result, a model of the obstruction is set in the robot control device 14.
  • the signal A and the signal B output from the teaching pendant 116 are input to the limit avoidance command generator 14b and the posture optimization command generator 14c, respectively, of the robot control device 14.
  • the limit avoidance command generator 14b and the posture optimization command generator 14c of the robot control device 14 output the joint angular speed commands ⁇ LMT and ⁇ OPT , respectively.
  • the operator also selects the kind of optimization (the first optimization or the second optimization).
  • the signal B SEL corresponding to the kind of optimization is input to the posture optimization command generator 14c.
  • the operator presses the jog manipulation button 20 to jog-manipulate the robot 12.
  • the limit avoidance operation and the posture optimization operation are then performed automatically.
  • the joint angular speed commands for the limit avoidance operation and the posture optimization operation are obtained by the same methods as in the processing at step Sa3 and step Sa5, respectively, as explained in the first embodiment. That is, in the present step Sb4, the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref1 for implementing the hand speed command V output by the first command generator 14a based on Equation (2) is added to the joint angular speed command ⁇ ref2 output by the second command generator 14e to generate each joint angular speed command ⁇ ref3 for robot 12.
  • This joint angular speed command ⁇ ref2 is the sum of the joint angular speed command ⁇ LMT (see Equation (9)) for avoiding a limit with the position and posture of the hand being kept and the joint angular speed command ⁇ OPT (see Equation (17)) for optimizing a posture of the robot 12 with the position and posture of the hand being kept.
  • the teaching pendant 116 stops output of the signal A and the signal B, so that execution of the limit avoidance operation or the posture optimization operation is cancelled.
  • the operator can execute only one of the limit avoidance operation and the posture optimization operation by pressing only one of the second limit avoidance button 121 and the second posture optimization button 122.
  • the method illustrated in the present embodiment allows the limit avoidance operation and the posture optimization operation to be performed automatically and thereby improves the manipulability of the redundant robot.
  • the present invention is not limited to the foregoing embodiments and can be modified within the range that does not change the spirit of the present invention.
  • the invention configured by combining part or the whole of the foregoing embodiments and modifications is also embraced in the technical scope of the present invention.
  • buttons and the first and the second posture optimization buttons only a button corresponding to the required function may be provided on the teaching pendant.
  • buttons are not limited to hardware buttons.
  • the buttons may be buttons implemented by software.
  • the present invention is applicable not only in a case where the actual robot is used as illustrated in the foregoing embodiments but also in a case where a simulation model of the robot is used. That is, it is also usable for checking the validity of the teaching program using an offline simulator.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Robotics (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Manipulator (AREA)
  • Numerical Control (AREA)
EP11872273.5A 2011-09-15 2011-09-15 Système robotique et unité de commande de robot Withdrawn EP2774729A4 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
PCT/JP2011/071137 WO2013038544A1 (fr) 2011-09-15 2011-09-15 Système robotique et unité de commande de robot

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2774729A1 true EP2774729A1 (fr) 2014-09-10
EP2774729A4 EP2774729A4 (fr) 2016-05-18

Family

ID=47882803

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP11872273.5A Withdrawn EP2774729A4 (fr) 2011-09-15 2011-09-15 Système robotique et unité de commande de robot

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US9149931B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2774729A4 (fr)
CN (1) CN103781602A (fr)
WO (1) WO2013038544A1 (fr)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2868445B1 (fr) * 2013-11-05 2022-10-05 KUKA Deutschland GmbH Procédé de programmation de déroulements de mouvement d'un robot industriel redondant et robot industriel associé

Families Citing this family (35)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US9510911B2 (en) * 1999-09-17 2016-12-06 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. System and methods for managing multiple null-space objectives and SLI behaviors
US10029367B2 (en) 1999-09-17 2018-07-24 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. System and method for managing multiple null-space objectives and constraints
KR102167359B1 (ko) * 2012-06-01 2020-10-19 인튜어티브 서지컬 오퍼레이션즈 인코포레이티드 영공간을 이용한 수술 머니퓰레이터의 명령된 재구성을 위한 시스템 및 방법
WO2014146095A1 (fr) * 2013-03-15 2014-09-18 Intuitive Surgical Operations, Inc. Système et procédés de gestion de multiples objectifs de zone morte et de comportements sli
JP6033193B2 (ja) * 2013-09-24 2016-11-30 本田技研工業株式会社 ロボット
JP2015174185A (ja) * 2014-03-14 2015-10-05 三菱重工業株式会社 ロボットのシミュレーション装置及び方法、制御装置、及びロボットシステム
US9958862B2 (en) * 2014-05-08 2018-05-01 Yaskawa America, Inc. Intuitive motion coordinate system for controlling an industrial robot
CN104834230B (zh) * 2015-05-19 2017-06-23 芜湖固高自动化技术有限公司 一种工业机器人教学培训系统及其控制方法
US9682476B1 (en) 2015-05-28 2017-06-20 X Development Llc Selecting robot poses to account for cost
US9724826B1 (en) 2015-05-28 2017-08-08 X Development Llc Selecting physical arrangements for objects to be acted upon by a robot
DE102015211865B3 (de) * 2015-06-25 2016-05-12 Kuka Roboter Gmbh Verfahren zum redundanzoptimierten Planen eines Betriebs eines mobilen Roboters
CN105234930B (zh) * 2015-10-15 2017-05-24 哈尔滨工程大学 基于构形平面的冗余机械臂运动控制方法
CN105269565B (zh) * 2015-10-30 2017-04-05 福建长江工业有限公司 一种六轴磨抛工业机器人离线编程及修正方法
CN105700385A (zh) * 2016-04-21 2016-06-22 奇弩（北京）科技有限公司 机器人调试模拟平台
JP6348141B2 (ja) * 2016-04-28 2018-06-27 ファナック株式会社 付加軸の状態が含まれる動作プログラムを表示するロボットの制御装置
CN106217374B (zh) * 2016-08-11 2019-01-11 广州成潮智能科技有限公司 一种智能机械臂的控制方法、装置及系统
CN108326844B (zh) * 2017-01-20 2020-10-16 香港理工大学深圳研究院 冗余度机械臂的可操作度优化的运动规划方法和装置
AT16425U1 (de) * 2017-12-14 2019-08-15 Wittmann Kunststoffgeraete Verfahren zur Validierung von programmierten Ablaufsequenzen oder
KR102116119B1 (ko) * 2018-10-22 2020-05-27 (주)미래컴퍼니 마스터 로봇 및 그 제어 방법
CN109746936B (zh) * 2018-12-19 2021-05-04 深圳镁伽科技有限公司 机器人的关节限位方法、装置、系统及存储介质
SE542915C2 (en) * 2019-01-08 2020-09-15 Husqvarna Ab A robotic lawnmover, and methods of navigating and defining a work area for the same
US11034026B2 (en) * 2019-01-10 2021-06-15 General Electric Company Utilizing optical data to dynamically control operation of a snake-arm robot
CN110134062B (zh) * 2019-04-17 2020-12-08 华中科技大学 一种基于强化学习的多轴数控机床加工路径优化方法
US11154985B1 (en) * 2019-07-02 2021-10-26 X Development Llc Null space jog control for robotic arm
JP7437910B2 (ja) * 2019-10-29 2024-02-26 株式会社東芝 制御システム、制御方法、ロボットシステム、プログラム、及び記憶媒体
DE102019131400B4 (de) * 2019-11-21 2022-03-10 Franka Emika Gmbh Kraftmessung und Krafterzeugung in redundanten Robotermanipulatoren
US11904473B2 (en) 2019-12-30 2024-02-20 Intrinsic Innovation Llc Transformation mode switching for a real-time robotic control system
US11559893B2 (en) 2020-04-02 2023-01-24 Intrinsic Innovation Llc Robot control for avoiding singular configurations
CN111522351B (zh) * 2020-05-15 2021-05-18 中国海洋大学 水下机器人三维编队及避障方法
US11691283B2 (en) 2020-05-27 2023-07-04 Intrinsic Innovation Llc Robot control parameter interpolation
US11679498B2 (en) 2020-05-27 2023-06-20 Intrinsic Innovation Llc Robot execution system
CN112847339A (zh) * 2020-12-25 2021-05-28 珠海新天地科技有限公司 一种机器人模拟装置
CN114193436B (zh) * 2021-12-07 2023-12-26 珠海格力智能装备有限公司 一种机器人工作空间优化方法、装置、存储介质和设备
US20230294275A1 (en) * 2022-03-21 2023-09-21 Intrinsic Innovation Llc Robot programming
CN114700952A (zh) * 2022-04-24 2022-07-05 伍福人工智能(河南)有限公司 关节限位的控制方法、装置、终端设备以及存储介质

Family Cites Families (20)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS584377A (ja) * 1981-03-18 1983-01-11 株式会社安川電機 関節形産業用ロボツトの制御装置
JPS6024603A (ja) * 1983-07-20 1985-02-07 Hitachi Ltd ロボツトの制御方法
JPS60201408A (ja) * 1984-03-26 1985-10-11 Shin Meiwa Ind Co Ltd 産業用ロボツト
JPH0596477A (ja) * 1991-10-03 1993-04-20 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd マスタスレーブマニピユレータの制御方法
JP3146463B2 (ja) * 1992-02-19 2001-03-19 株式会社安川電機 冗長軸マニピュレータの肘移動制御装置
US5737500A (en) * 1992-03-11 1998-04-07 California Institute Of Technology Mobile dexterous siren degree of freedom robot arm with real-time control system
JPH06187020A (ja) 1992-12-18 1994-07-08 Kobe Steel Ltd ロボットの動作軌跡教示方法
JPH0852674A (ja) * 1994-08-12 1996-02-27 Kobe Steel Ltd マニピュレータの位置姿勢決定方法
JP3207728B2 (ja) * 1995-10-11 2001-09-10 三菱重工業株式会社 冗長マニピュレータの制御方法
JP2003103482A (ja) 2001-09-28 2003-04-08 Nachi Fujikoshi Corp 調整用パラメータの設定方法
JP2004094399A (ja) * 2002-08-29 2004-03-25 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd 多関節マニピュレータの制御方法及びその制御プログラム、並びにその制御システム
CN100592967C (zh) * 2003-07-29 2010-03-03 松下电器产业株式会社 控制机器人的方法和设备
JP3946753B2 (ja) * 2005-07-25 2007-07-18 ファナック株式会社 ロボットプログラム評価・修正方法及びロボットプログラム評価・修正装置
JP4605227B2 (ja) * 2005-12-01 2011-01-05 株式会社村田製作所 転倒防止制御装置
US7859540B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2010-12-28 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Reconstruction, retargetting, tracking, and estimation of motion for articulated systems
US8467904B2 (en) 2005-12-22 2013-06-18 Honda Motor Co., Ltd. Reconstruction, retargetting, tracking, and estimation of pose of articulated systems
EP1974869A1 (fr) 2007-03-26 2008-10-01 Honda Research Institute Europe GmbH Appareil et procédé pour générer et contrôler les mouvements d'un robot
JP5220536B2 (ja) * 2008-10-01 2013-06-26 川崎重工業株式会社 ロボット制御方法、ロボット制御装置、及びロボット制御システム
JP5175691B2 (ja) * 2008-11-20 2013-04-03 トヨタ自動車株式会社 ロボットアームの教示システム及び方法
JP2010176503A (ja) * 2009-01-30 2010-08-12 Fanuc Ltd 工作機械と工作機械に対して作業を行なうロボットを備えた加工システム

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP2868445B1 (fr) * 2013-11-05 2022-10-05 KUKA Deutschland GmbH Procédé de programmation de déroulements de mouvement d'un robot industriel redondant et robot industriel associé

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN103781602A (zh) 2014-05-07
US9149931B2 (en) 2015-10-06
US20140195054A1 (en) 2014-07-10
WO2013038544A1 (fr) 2013-03-21
EP2774729A4 (fr) 2016-05-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2774729A1 (fr) Système robotique et unité de commande de robot
US9566707B2 (en) Robot controller and robot system for moving robot in response to force
JP5428965B2 (ja) 表示装置、表示制御方法、プログラム、およびコンピュータ読み取り可能な記録媒体
JP5148715B2 (ja) 産業用ロボット及び産業用ロボットのプログラミング方法
JP5946859B2 (ja) 力に応じて動かすロボットのロボット制御装置およびロボットシステム
KR20180059888A (ko) 로봇교시방법 및 로봇 암 제어장치
JP5872894B2 (ja) ロボット動作教示支援装置及び方法
JP2012011498A (ja) ロボットアーム操作システムおよびその操作方法
KR20180069031A (ko) 로봇의 다이렉트 교시방법
US20180117764A1 (en) Force control coordinate axis setting device, robot, and force control coordinate axis setting method
JP2009274148A (ja) シミュレーション装置
US10507585B2 (en) Robot system that displays speed
JP2021030364A (ja) ロボット制御装置
KR101787865B1 (ko) 다관절 링크 기구의 역운동학 해법, 및 이 역운동학 해법을 이용한 교시 데이터 작성 장치
JP6928031B2 (ja) 制御装置及び制御システム
Herbin et al. Bilateral teleoperation system for a mini crane
JPWO2013038544A1 (ja) ロボットシステム及びロボット制御装置
WO2023073958A1 (fr) Dispositif de création de programme, dispositif de commande et système de machine
WO2021181804A1 (fr) Dispositif et programme de simulation
Mihelj et al. yControl-open architecture controller for Yaskawa Motoman MH5 robot
KR20190001842A (ko) 다관절 햅틱 장치의 성능 평가 시스템 및 이를 이용한 성능 평가 방법
KR100736136B1 (ko) 작업성을 고려한 용접로봇의 제어방법
JP2005230952A (ja) 制御方法および制御装置
Hu Research on Kinematic Trajectory Simulation System of KUKA Arc Welding Robot System
JPH01111208A (ja) ロボット教示装置

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

PUAB Information related to the publication of an a document modified or deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009199EPPU

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20140307

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RA4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched (corrected)

Effective date: 20160420

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B25J 9/06 20060101ALI20160414BHEP

Ipc: B25J 9/16 20060101AFI20160414BHEP

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20161122

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN