EP2601320B1 - Kugelstrahlverfahren - Google Patents
Kugelstrahlverfahren Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP2601320B1 EP2601320B1 EP11760870.3A EP11760870A EP2601320B1 EP 2601320 B1 EP2601320 B1 EP 2601320B1 EP 11760870 A EP11760870 A EP 11760870A EP 2601320 B1 EP2601320 B1 EP 2601320B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- shot peening
- steel
- compressive residual
- shot
- retained austenite
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D7/00—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
- C21D7/02—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working
- C21D7/04—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface
- C21D7/06—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface by shot-peening or the like
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
- C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
- C21D2211/00—Microstructure comprising significant phases
- C21D2211/001—Austenite
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a method for shot peening. Specifically, it relates to a method for shot-peening a steel.
- the stress shot peening can be used for a part, like a spring that can be stressed while shot-peening it, there have been problems in that stress shot peening cannot be used for a part like a gear that cannot be stressed while shot-peening it.
- US 4,415,378 discloses a method for work hardening the surface of a carburised steel part, whereby an amount of 10-30% residual austenite in the case layer is transformed to at least 5-20% of untempered martensite, to induce compressive residual stresses.
- the object of the present invention is to provide a method for shot peening for producing maximum compressive residual stresses that exceed 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset by controlling the properties of the material or the conditions for the heat treatment of the processed steel and the conditions for shot peening, without using the stress shot peening.
- the method for shot peening of the first aspect of the present invention is to produce a compressive residual stress in a processed steel that has an amount of retained austenite in a range of 5 to 30%, by peening shot media onto the processed steel.
- the amount of retained austenite is controlled to keep the change in the amount within a range of 2 to 30% before and after the shot peening.
- the shot peening is controlled to keep the change in the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated at a range of 2 to 30% before and after the shot peening.
- the processed steel is a gas carburized steel.
- a maximum compressive residual stress can be obtained that exceeds 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset.
- no jig for stressing the processed steel for the shot peening is required.
- efficient shot peening can be used for a part such as a gear that has a complicated shape.
- the method for shot peening of the first aspect can always be performed.
- a processed steel that has a desired amount of retained austenite can be easily obtained by changing carburizing.
- Fig. 1 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.
- Steel-A to Steel-G are prepared as the processed steels.
- the carbon contents (wt %), the conditions for heat treatment, and the yield strengths at 0.2% offset (MPa), as properties of the materials, and the tensile strengths (MPa), the hardness at the surfaces (HV0.3), and the amount of retained austenite ⁇ (Gamma) R (%), are all shown in the table.
- the processed steels are prepared from the steels that are based on a chromium steel or a chromium-molybdenum steel and that have different carbon contents, i.e., between 0.2 and 0.8 wt%, and the steels that are based on a chromium-molybdenum steel that have a carbon content of 0.8 wt%, and that are tempered in different conditions.
- These processed steels are gas carburized steels.
- Fig. 2 is a table showing the conditions of the shot peening that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.
- Two types of conditions for shot peening (the conditions for peening shot media onto the processed steels) were used.
- a compressive-air shot peening system was used in both types.
- the hardness (HV), the diameters (mm), and the air pressure for peening shot media are all shown in the table.
- the coverage which represents the amount of shot media being peened, was 300% in all cases.
- Fig. 3 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels after the shot peening. The table also shows the properties before the shot peening. It shows the properties of Steel-A to Steel-G in the upper and lower sides for two respective types of conditions for shot peening.
- That table shows the maximum compressive residual stress ⁇ (Sigma) R (MPa), Gamma R at the peak depth (%), Sigma R (max)/ Sigma 0.2 , and the rate of change in Gamma R at the peak depth (%), as the properties of the processed steels after shot peening.
- the maximum compressive residual stress Sigma R means the maximum value of the compressive residual stresses that are measured at various depths from the surface (since a compressive residual stress is generally expressed as a negative value, it is the maximum value in absolute values).
- the compressive residual stresses were measured by using a micro-stress analyzer that is available from Rigaku Corporation (X-ray tube: Cr-K ⁇ ( Alpha ); diffractive surface: (220); stress constant: -318 MPa/deg; Bragg angle of the strain-free 2 ⁇ : 156.4 °).
- the Gamma R at the peak depth (%) denotes the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
- the amounts of retained austenite were also measured by using a micro-stress analyzer that is available from Rigaku Corporation (X-ray tube: Cr-K Alpha ; diffractive surface: (220); Gamma-diffraction plane: (311); time for measuring on Alpha-plane: 60 sec; range of diffraction on Alpha-plane: 156.4 °).
- the Sigma R (max)/ Sigma 0.2 denotes the maximum compressive residual stress compared to the yield strength at 0.2% offset.
- the rate of change in Gamma R at the peak depth (%) denotes a rate of change in the amount of retained austenite before and after the shot peening at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
- Fig. 4 shows supplemental data for Fig. 3 .
- the processed steels that have the maximum compressive residual stress that exceeds 60% of yield strength at 0.2% offset can be obtained by the following process, i.e., peening shot media onto a processed steel that has the amount of retained austenite in a range between 5 to 30%.
- the rate of change (reduction) in the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is controlled to be in a range between 2 to 30%.
- the threshold value of the amount of retained austenite i.e., 5 to 30%, is determined based on the maximum value in the range that is representative for industrial materials.
- the upper limit for the rate of change in the amount of retained austenite i.e., 30%, is specified based on the maximum value of the amount of retained austenite.
- the lower limit for the rate of change in the amount of retained austenite i.e., 2%, is determined by plotting the Sigma R (max)/ Sigma 0.2 in relation to the rate of change in Gamma R at the peak depth (%) and drawing an approximate curve by the least square method.
- the rate of change (reduction) in the amount of retained austenite of the processed steel at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is controlled to be in a range between 2 to 30%, the maximum compressive residual stress becomes over 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset. This is because the retained austenite expands by the deformation-induced martensitic transformation and thus the mechanical properties improve by the expansion of the retained austenite.
- processed steels that have the amount of retained austenite in a range between 5 to 30% are subject to shot peening.
- the change in the amount of retained austenite before and after shot peening is controlled to be in a range of 2 to 30%, so as to produce the compressive residual stress in the processed steel.
- a maximum compressive residual stress that exceeds 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset can be produced. Therefore, no jig for stressing the processed steel for the stress shot peening is required. Further, a part such as a gear, which has a complicated shape, can be efficiently shot-peened.
- the processed material is a gas carburized steel
- a processed steel that has a desired amount of retained austenite can be easily obtained by adjusting the conditions for carburizing.
- Any steels can be used for the processed steels, but a gas carburized steel that has a large amount of retained austenite is preferable.
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
- Solid-Phase Diffusion Into Metallic Material Surfaces (AREA)
- Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
Claims (2)
- Verfahren zum Kugelstrahlen,
wobei Strahlmaterialien auf einen verarbeiteten Stahl gestrahlt werden, der eine Menge von eingeschlossenem Austenit in einem Bereich von 5 bis 30% aufweist, und
wobei eine Änderung in der Menge des eingeschlossenen Austenits in einer Tiefe, an der die maximale Druckeigenspannung erzeugt wird, auf einen Bereich von 2 bis 30 % vor und nach dem Kugelstrahlen gesteuert wird, um eine Druckeigenspannung in dem verarbeiteten Stahl zu erzeugen, die 60% der Streckfestigkeit bei 0,2% Dehnung überschreitet. - Verfahren zum Kugelstrahlen Anspruch 1,
wobei der verarbeitete Stahl ein aufgekohlter Stahl ist.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| JP2010176682 | 2010-08-05 | ||
| PCT/JP2011/004414 WO2012017656A1 (en) | 2010-08-05 | 2011-08-04 | A method for shot peening |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| EP2601320A1 EP2601320A1 (de) | 2013-06-12 |
| EP2601320B1 true EP2601320B1 (de) | 2018-01-17 |
Family
ID=44675767
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| EP11760870.3A Active EP2601320B1 (de) | 2010-08-05 | 2011-08-04 | Kugelstrahlverfahren |
Country Status (5)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| US (1) | US20130160510A1 (de) |
| EP (1) | EP2601320B1 (de) |
| JP (1) | JP5790656B2 (de) |
| CN (1) | CN102906282A (de) |
| WO (1) | WO2012017656A1 (de) |
Families Citing this family (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103604874A (zh) * | 2013-10-30 | 2014-02-26 | 北京理工大学 | 残余压应力定值试块的制作工艺及其使用和保存方法 |
Family Cites Families (20)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US4191599A (en) * | 1978-09-13 | 1980-03-04 | Ford Motor Company | Method of heat treating high carbon alloy steel parts to develop surface compressive residual stresses |
| US4495002A (en) * | 1981-05-27 | 1985-01-22 | Westinghouse Electric Corp. | Three-step treatment of stainless steels having metastable austenitic and martensitic phases to increase resistance to chloride corrosion |
| US4415378A (en) * | 1982-04-22 | 1983-11-15 | Dana Corporation | Case hardening method for steel parts |
| JPH0643604B2 (ja) * | 1986-02-20 | 1994-06-08 | 住友金属工業株式会社 | 機械構造用部品の製造方法 |
| JPH0756043B2 (ja) * | 1988-09-27 | 1995-06-14 | マツダ株式会社 | 鋼部材の製造方法 |
| JPH0466863A (ja) * | 1990-07-09 | 1992-03-03 | Toyota Motor Corp | 鋼材の加工による残留応力の測定方法 |
| JPH06271930A (ja) * | 1993-03-18 | 1994-09-27 | Nisshin Steel Co Ltd | 疲労特性に優れた高強度高靭性鋼の製法 |
| JPH09123145A (ja) * | 1995-10-26 | 1997-05-13 | Mishima Kosan Co Ltd | 舗装用コンクリートブロック製造用金型の製造方法 |
| JP3975314B2 (ja) * | 1999-08-27 | 2007-09-12 | 株式会社ジェイテクト | 軸受部品素材及び転がり軸受の軌道輪の製作方法 |
| JP2004011737A (ja) * | 2002-06-06 | 2004-01-15 | Nsk Ltd | 自動調心ころ軸受 |
| JP2004339575A (ja) * | 2003-05-16 | 2004-12-02 | Nsk Ltd | 転動装置部品の製造方法 |
| JP4137122B2 (ja) * | 2003-10-31 | 2008-08-20 | 日本ピストンリング株式会社 | カムシャフトの製造方法、カムシャフト及びこれに用いるカムロブ材 |
| JP2006250316A (ja) * | 2005-03-14 | 2006-09-21 | Nsk Ltd | 転動装置 |
| JP4749073B2 (ja) * | 2005-07-26 | 2011-08-17 | 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 | 金型及びその製造方法 |
| CN101135344A (zh) * | 2006-08-30 | 2008-03-05 | 上海百信轴承有限公司 | 摇臂轴承高碳铬钢外圈复合处理技术 |
| CN100516593C (zh) * | 2006-10-17 | 2009-07-22 | 武汉理工大学 | 锰铜合金奥贝球铁汽车后桥螺旋锥齿轮及其制备方法 |
| JP2008207279A (ja) * | 2007-02-27 | 2008-09-11 | Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd | 金型の表面改質方法および金型 |
| JP5164539B2 (ja) * | 2007-11-28 | 2013-03-21 | 大同特殊鋼株式会社 | ショットピーニング方法 |
| JP5214265B2 (ja) * | 2008-02-05 | 2013-06-19 | 愛知製鋼株式会社 | ベルト式cvt用プーリー |
| JP5090257B2 (ja) * | 2008-06-05 | 2012-12-05 | 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 | アルミ加工用金型に適した工具鋼およびアルミ加工用金型 |
-
2011
- 2011-08-04 WO PCT/JP2011/004414 patent/WO2012017656A1/en not_active Ceased
- 2011-08-04 US US13/695,541 patent/US20130160510A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2011-08-04 CN CN2011800216053A patent/CN102906282A/zh active Pending
- 2011-08-04 JP JP2012531147A patent/JP5790656B2/ja active Active
- 2011-08-04 EP EP11760870.3A patent/EP2601320B1/de active Active
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| JP2013532583A (ja) | 2013-08-19 |
| US20130160510A1 (en) | 2013-06-27 |
| JP5790656B2 (ja) | 2015-10-07 |
| EP2601320A1 (de) | 2013-06-12 |
| CN102906282A (zh) | 2013-01-30 |
| WO2012017656A1 (en) | 2012-02-09 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| KR101371929B1 (ko) | 침탄 부품 및 그 제조 방법 | |
| Miková et al. | Fatigue behavior of X70 microalloyed steel after severe shot peening | |
| US8151613B2 (en) | Method for shot peening | |
| US20200240487A1 (en) | Helical compression spring and method for producing same | |
| JP7165522B2 (ja) | 圧縮コイルばねおよびその製造方法 | |
| JP7062395B2 (ja) | 圧縮コイルばねの製造方法 | |
| CN105002507A (zh) | 一种17CrNiMo6材料齿轮加工工艺方法 | |
| Toboła et al. | Phase composition and stress state in the surface layers of burnished and gas nitrided Sverker 21 and Vanadis 6 tool steels | |
| Kuznetsov et al. | Increase of wear and heat resistance of the AISI 304 steel surface layer by multi-pass nanostructuring burnishing | |
| EP2601320B1 (de) | Kugelstrahlverfahren | |
| Epp et al. | Comparison of alternative peening methods for the improvement of fatigue properties of case-hardened steel parts | |
| CN110157861B (zh) | 一种截齿及其制备方法 | |
| EP2601321B1 (de) | Kugelstrahlverfahren für einen unter gas aufgekohlten stahl | |
| Menig et al. | Influence of optimized warm peening on residual stress stability and fatigue strength of AISI 4140 in different material states | |
| Janutienė | Investigation of hardening and tempering deformations of carburized low alloy steel | |
| Teichmann et al. | Shot peening of TWIP steel-influence on mechanical properties | |
| Epp et al. | Comparison of water jet peening and laser shock peening with shot peening for the improvement of fatigue properties of casehardened steel gears | |
| JP7532846B2 (ja) | 鋼部品の製造方法 | |
| Birnfeld et al. | Effect of carburized steel hardness on surface roughness and residual stresses after manufacturing operations | |
| Klumpp et al. | Influence of conventional and cryogenic piezo peening on bending fatigue strength of hardened bearing steel AISI 52100 | |
| Siregar et al. | Effect of hardness, impact strength and microstructure of steel VCN 150 by hardening and tempering | |
| Tsuji et al. | Influences of mechanical properties and retained austenite content on shot-peening characteristics | |
| JP2002294396A (ja) | 熱処理歪の少ない肌焼用鋼 | |
| Medvedeva et al. | Surface characteristics of different tool steels and cast iron after machine hammer peening | |
| JPH11310824A (ja) | 浸炭焼き入れ鋼部材及びその製造方法 |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
| 17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20121019 |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
| 17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20160331 |
|
| GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED |
|
| INTG | Intention to grant announced |
Effective date: 20170810 |
|
| GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
| GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED |
|
| AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: REF Ref document number: 964472 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180215 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R096 Ref document number: 602011045135 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: MP Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SK Ref legal event code: T3 Ref document number: E 26593 Country of ref document: SK |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: LT Ref legal event code: MG4D |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MK05 Ref document number: 964472 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: HR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: NO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180417 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180417 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: RS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180418 Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180517 Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R097 Ref document number: 602011045135 Country of ref document: DE |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: AL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
| STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 Ref country code: SM Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| 26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20181018 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
| GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180804 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180831 Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180804 Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180831 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: BE Ref legal event code: MM Effective date: 20180831 |
|
| REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180804 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180831 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180804 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180804 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO Effective date: 20110804 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180117 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20250820 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20250729 Year of fee payment: 15 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20250825 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20250829 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20250725 Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
| PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Payment date: 20250731 Year of fee payment: 15 |