WO2012017656A1 - A method for shot peening - Google Patents

A method for shot peening Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2012017656A1
WO2012017656A1 PCT/JP2011/004414 JP2011004414W WO2012017656A1 WO 2012017656 A1 WO2012017656 A1 WO 2012017656A1 JP 2011004414 W JP2011004414 W JP 2011004414W WO 2012017656 A1 WO2012017656 A1 WO 2012017656A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
shot peening
compressive residual
retained austenite
amount
shot
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2011/004414
Other languages
French (fr)
Inventor
Yuji Kobayashi
Toshiya Tsuji
Original Assignee
Sintokogio, Ltd.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sintokogio, Ltd. filed Critical Sintokogio, Ltd.
Priority to US13/695,541 priority Critical patent/US20130160510A1/en
Priority to EP11760870.3A priority patent/EP2601320B1/en
Priority to CN2011800216053A priority patent/CN102906282A/en
Priority to JP2012531147A priority patent/JP5790656B2/en
Publication of WO2012017656A1 publication Critical patent/WO2012017656A1/en

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D7/00—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation
    • C21D7/02—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working
    • C21D7/04—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface
    • C21D7/06—Modifying the physical properties of iron or steel by deformation by cold working of the surface by shot-peening or the like
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D2211/00—Microstructure comprising significant phases
    • C21D2211/001—Austenite

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for shot peening. Specifically, it relates to a method for shot-peening a steel.
  • the stress shot peening can be used for a part, like a spring that can be stressed while shot-peening it, there have been problems in that stress shot peening cannot be used for a part like a gear that cannot be stressed while shot-peening it.
  • the object of the present invention is to provide a method for shot peening for producing maximum compressive residual stresses that exceed 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset by controlling the properties of the material or the conditions for the heat treatment of the processed steel and the conditions for shot peening, without using the stress shot peening.
  • the method for shot peening of the first aspect of the present invention is to produce a compressive residual stress in a processed steel that has an amount of retained austenite in a range of 5 to 30%, by peening shot media onto the processed steel.
  • the amount of retained austenite is controlled to keep the change in the amount within a range of 2 to 30% before and after the shot peening.
  • the shot peening is controlled to keep the change in the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated at a range of 2 to 30% before and after the shot peening.
  • the processed steel is a gas carburized steel.
  • a maximum compressive residual stress can be obtained that exceeds 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset.
  • no jig for stressing the processed steel for the shot peening is required.
  • efficient shot peening can be used for a part such as a gear that has a complicated shape.
  • the method for shot peening of the first aspect can always be performed.
  • a processed steel that has a desired amount of retained austenite can be easily obtained by changing carburizing.
  • Fig. 1 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.
  • Fig. 2 is a table showing the conditions of the shot peening that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.
  • Fig. 3 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels after the shot peening.
  • Fig. 4 is a supplemental table giving data that are similar to those in Table 3.
  • Fig. 1 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.
  • Steel-A to Steel-G are prepared as the processed steels.
  • the carbon contents (wt %), the conditions for heat treatment, and the yield strengths at 0.2% offset (MPa), as properties of the materials, and the tensile strengths (MPa), the hardness at the surfaces (HV0.3), and the amount of retained austenite are all shown in the table.
  • the processed steels are prepared from the steels that are based on a chromium steel or a chromium-molybdenum steel and that have different carbon contents, i.e., between 0.2 and 0.8 wt%, and the steels that are based on a chromium-molybdenum steel that have a carbon content of 0.8 wt%, and that are tempered in different conditions.
  • These processed steels are gas carburized steels.
  • Fig. 2 is a table showing the conditions of the shot peening that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.
  • Two types of conditions for shot peening (the conditions for peening shot media onto the processed steels) were used.
  • a compressive-air shot peening system was used in both types.
  • the hardness (HV), the diameters (mm), and the air pressure for peening shot media are all shown in the table.
  • the coverage which represents the amount of shot media being peened, was 300% in all cases.
  • Fig. 3 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels after the shot peening. The table also shows the properties before the shot peening. It shows the properties of Steel-A to Steel-G in the upper and lower sides for two respective types of conditions for shot peening.
  • That table shows the maximum compressive residual stress Gamma R at the peak depth (%), Gamma R (max)/ Gamma 0.2 , and the rate of change in Gamma R at the peak depth (%), as the properties of the processed steels after shot peening.
  • the maximum compressive residual stress Gamma R means the maximum value of the compressive residual stresses that are measured at various depths from the surface (since a compressive residual stress is generally expressed as a negative value, it is the maximum value in absolute values).
  • the compressive residual stresses were measured by using a micro-stress analyzer that is available from Rigaku Corporation
  • the Gamma R at the peak depth (%) denotes the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
  • the amounts of retained austenite were also measured by using a micro-stress analyzer that is available from Rigaku Corporation (X-ray tube: Cr-K Alpha ; diffractive surface: (220); Gamma-diffraction plane: (311); time for measuring on Alpha-plane: 60 sec; range of diffraction on Alpha-plane: 156.4 degree C).
  • the Gamma R (max)/ Gamma 0.2 denotes the maximum compressive residual stress compared to the yield strength at 0.2% offset.
  • the rate of change in Gamma R at the peak depth (%) denotes a rate of change in the amount of retained austenite before and after the shot peening at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
  • Fig. 3 shows supplemental data for Fig. 3.
  • the processed steels that have the maximum compressive residual stress that exceeds 60% of yield strength at 0.2% offset can be obtained by the following process, i.e., peening shot media onto a processed steel that has the amount of retained austenite in a range between 5 to 30%.
  • the rate of change (reduction) in the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is controlled to be in a range between 2 to 30%.
  • the threshold value of the amount of retained austenite i.e., 5 to 30%, is determined based on the maximum value in the range that is representative for industrial materials.
  • the upper limit for the rate of change in the amount of retained austenite i.e., 30%, is specified based on the maximum value of the amount of retained austenite.
  • the lower limit for the rate of change in the amount of retained austenite i.e., 2%, is determined by plotting the Gamma R (max)/ Gamma 0.2 in relation to the rate of change in Gamma R at the peak depth (%) and drawing an approximate curve by the least square method.
  • the rate of change (reduction) in the amount of retained austenite of the processed steel at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is controlled to be in a range between 2 to 30%, the maximum compressive residual stress becomes over 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset. This is because the retained austenite expands by the deformation-induced martensitic transformation and thus the mechanical properties improve by the expansion of the retained austenite.
  • processed steels that have the amount of retained austenite in a range between 5 to 30% are subject to shot peening.
  • the change in the amount of retained austenite before and after shot peening is controlled to be in a range of 2 to 30%, so as to produce the compressive residual stress in the processed steel.
  • a maximum compressive residual stress that exceeds 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset can be produced. Therefore, no jig for stressing the processed steel for the stress shot peening is required. Further, a part such as a gear, which has a complicated shape, can be efficiently shot-peened.
  • the processed material is a gas carburized steel
  • a processed steel that has a desired amount of retained austenite can be easily obtained by adjusting the conditions for carburizing.
  • Any steels can be used for the processed steels, but a gas carburized steel that has a large amount of retained austenite is preferable.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)
  • Solid-Phase Diffusion Into Metallic Material Surfaces (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention is to provide a method for shot peening for producing a compressive residual stress that exceeds 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset without using stress shot peening. Shot media are peened onto a processed steel that has an amount of retained austenite in a range between 5 to 30%, and any change in the amount of retained austenite is controlled to be in a range of 2 to 30% before and after shot peening to produce the compressive residual stress in the processed steel.

Description

A METHOD FOR SHOT PEENING
The present invention relates to a method for shot peening. Specifically, it relates to a method for shot-peening a steel.
Conventionally, shot peening has been known to produce compressive residual stresses to improve the fatigue strength of parts made of a steel (see authored by the Society of Shot Peening Technology of Japan; Fatigue of Metals and Shot Peening; published by Gendai Kogaku-sha; 2004). Further, it has been known that increasing the maximum value of compressive residual stresses is very effective in improving the fatigue strength of the parts (see Masahiko Mitsubayashi, Takashi Miyata, and Hideo Aihara; Prediction of Improvement in Fatigue Strength by Shot Peening and Selection of Most Effective Peening Conditions; Transactions of JSME, Vol. 61, No. 586 (June, 1995) pp. 28-34).
However, it is also known that the maximum value of compressive residual stresses produced by shot peening is approximately 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset (Hideki Okada, Akira Tange, and Kotoji Ando; Relationship among Specimen's Hardness, Residual Stress Distribution and Yield Stress on the Difference of Shot Peening Methods; Journal of High Pressure Institute of Japan, Vol. 41, No. 5 (2003) pp. 233-242). Thus by applying stress shot peening, i.e., shot-peening a part that is under a pre-stressed condition, a maximum compressive residual stress that exceeds 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset can be obtained (see the above reference).
Though the stress shot peening can be used for a part, like a spring that can be stressed while shot-peening it, there have been problems in that stress shot peening cannot be used for a part like a gear that cannot be stressed while shot-peening it.
 Disclosure of the Invention
The object of the present invention is to provide a method for shot peening for producing maximum compressive residual stresses that exceed 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset by controlling the properties of the material or the conditions for the heat treatment of the processed steel and the conditions for shot peening, without using the stress shot peening.
The method for shot peening of the first aspect of the present invention is to produce a compressive residual stress in a processed steel that has an amount of retained austenite in a range of 5 to 30%, by peening shot media onto the processed steel. The amount of retained austenite is controlled to keep the change in the amount within a range of 2 to 30% before and after the shot peening.
In the method for shot peening of the second aspect of the present invention, the shot peening is controlled to keep the change in the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated at a range of 2 to 30% before and after the shot peening.
In the method for shot peening of the third aspect of the present invention the processed steel is a gas carburized steel.
By the method for shot peening of the first aspect, a maximum compressive residual stress can be obtained that exceeds 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset. Thus no jig for stressing the processed steel for the shot peening is required. Further, efficient shot peening can be used for a part such as a gear that has a complicated shape.
By the method for shot peening of the second aspect, the method for shot peening of the first aspect can always be performed.
By the method for shot peening of the third aspect, a processed steel that has a desired amount of retained austenite can be easily obtained by changing carburizing.
The basic Japanese patent application, No. 2010-176682, filed August 5, 2010, is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety in the present application.
The present invention will become more fully understood from the detailed description given below. However, the detailed description and the specific embodiment are illustrations of desired embodiments of the present invention, and are described only for an explanation. Various possible changes and modifications will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art on the basis of the detailed description.
The applicant has no intention to dedicate to the public any disclosed embodiment. Among the disclosed changes and modifications, those which may not literally fall within the scope of the present claims constitute, therefore, a part of the present invention in the sense of the doctrine of equivalents.
The use of the articles "a," "an," and "the" and similar referents in the specification and claims are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by the context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., "such as") provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention, and so does not limit the scope of the invention, unless otherwise claimed.
Fig. 1 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.

Fig. 2 is a table showing the conditions of the shot peening that were used in the embodiments of the present invention.

Fig. 3 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels after the shot peening.

Fig. 4 is a supplemental table giving data that are similar to those in Table 3.
Below, the embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the drawings.
Fig. 1 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels that were used in the embodiments of the present invention. Steel-A to Steel-G are prepared as the processed steels. The carbon contents (wt %), the conditions for heat treatment, and the yield strengths at 0.2% offset (MPa), as properties of the materials, and the tensile strengths (MPa), the hardness at the surfaces (HV0.3), and the amount of retained austenite
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-I000001
are all shown in the table. The processed steels are prepared from the steels that are based on a chromium steel or a chromium-molybdenum steel and that have different carbon contents, i.e., between 0.2 and 0.8 wt%, and the steels that are based on a chromium-molybdenum steel that have a carbon content of 0.8 wt%, and that are tempered in different conditions. These processed steels are gas carburized steels.
Fig. 2 is a table showing the conditions of the shot peening that were used in the embodiments of the present invention. Two types of conditions for shot peening (the conditions for peening shot media onto the processed steels) were used. A compressive-air shot peening system was used in both types. The hardness (HV), the diameters (mm), and the air pressure for peening shot media are all shown in the table. The coverage, which represents the amount of shot media being peened, was 300% in all cases.
Fig. 3 is a table showing the properties of the processed steels after the shot peening. The table also shows the properties before the shot peening. It shows the properties of Steel-A to Steel-G in the upper and lower sides for two respective types of conditions for shot peening.
That table shows the maximum compressive residual stress
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-I000002
GammaR at the peak depth (%), GammaR (max)/ Gamma0.2, and the rate of change in GammaR at the peak depth (%), as the properties of the processed steels after shot peening.
The maximum compressive residual stress GammaR (MPa) means the maximum value of the compressive residual stresses that are measured at various depths from the surface (since a compressive residual stress is generally expressed as a negative value, it is the maximum value in absolute values). The compressive residual stresses were measured by using a micro-stress analyzer that is available from Rigaku Corporation
Figure JPOXMLDOC01-appb-I000003
The GammaR at the peak depth (%) denotes the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated. The amounts of retained austenite were also measured by using a micro-stress analyzer that is available from Rigaku Corporation (X-ray tube: Cr-KAlpha; diffractive surface: (220); Gamma-diffraction plane: (311); time for measuring on Alpha-plane: 60 sec; range of diffraction on Alpha-plane: 156.4 degree C).
The GammaR (max)/ Gamma0.2 denotes the maximum compressive residual stress compared to the yield strength at 0.2% offset. The rate of change in GammaR at the peak depth (%) denotes a rate of change in the amount of retained austenite before and after the shot peening at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated.
As seen in Fig. 3, the GammaR (max)/ Gamma0.2 exceeds 60%, which is the target value, for Steel-B, -C, -D, -E, and -G. Fig. 4 shows supplemental data for Fig. 3.
From these data, it was found that the processed steels that have the maximum compressive residual stress that exceeds 60% of yield strength at 0.2% offset can be obtained by the following process, i.e., peening shot media onto a processed steel that has the amount of retained austenite in a range between 5 to 30%. The rate of change (reduction) in the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is controlled to be in a range between 2 to 30%.
The threshold value of the amount of retained austenite, i.e., 5 to 30%, is determined based on the maximum value in the range that is representative for industrial materials. The upper limit for the rate of change in the amount of retained austenite, i.e., 30%, is specified based on the maximum value of the amount of retained austenite. The lower limit for the rate of change in the amount of retained austenite, i.e., 2%, is determined by plotting the GammaR (max)/ Gamma0.2 in relation to the rate of change in GammaR at the peak depth (%) and drawing an approximate curve by the least square method.
If the rate of change (reduction) in the amount of retained austenite of the processed steel at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is controlled to be in a range between 2 to 30%, the maximum compressive residual stress becomes over 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset. This is because the retained austenite expands by the deformation-induced martensitic transformation and thus the mechanical properties improve by the expansion of the retained austenite.
As discussed above, in the embodiments of the present invention processed steels that have the amount of retained austenite in a range between 5 to 30% are subject to shot peening. The change in the amount of retained austenite before and after shot peening is controlled to be in a range of 2 to 30%, so as to produce the compressive residual stress in the processed steel. Thus, a maximum compressive residual stress that exceeds 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset can be produced. Therefore, no jig for stressing the processed steel for the stress shot peening is required. Further, a part such as a gear, which has a complicated shape, can be efficiently shot-peened.
Further, by changing the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is in the range between 2 to 30% before and after shot peening, a maximum compressive residual stress that exceeds 60% of the yield strength at 0.2% offset can always be produced.
Further, since the processed material is a gas carburized steel, a processed steel that has a desired amount of retained austenite can be easily obtained by adjusting the conditions for carburizing.
Any steels can be used for the processed steels, but a gas carburized steel that has a large amount of retained austenite is preferable.

Claims (3)

  1. A method for shot peening,
    wherein shot media are peened onto a processed steel that has an amount of retained austenite in a range between 5 to 30%, and
    wherein a change in the amount of retained austenite is controlled to be in a range of 2 to 30% before and after shot peening to produce a compressive residual stress in the processed steel.
  2. The method for shot peening of claim 1, wherein a change in the amount of retained austenite at the depth where the maximum compressive residual stress is generated is controlled to be in a range of 2 to 30% before and after shot peening to produce a compressive residual stress in the processed steel.
  3. The method for shot peening of claim 1 or 2, wherein the processed steel is a gas carburized steel.
PCT/JP2011/004414 2010-08-05 2011-08-04 A method for shot peening WO2012017656A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US13/695,541 US20130160510A1 (en) 2010-08-05 2011-08-04 Method for shot peening
EP11760870.3A EP2601320B1 (en) 2010-08-05 2011-08-04 A method for shot peening
CN2011800216053A CN102906282A (en) 2010-08-05 2011-08-04 A method for shot peening
JP2012531147A JP5790656B2 (en) 2010-08-05 2011-08-04 Shot peening method

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2010176682 2010-08-05
JP2010-176682 2010-08-05

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2012017656A1 true WO2012017656A1 (en) 2012-02-09

Family

ID=44675767

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2011/004414 WO2012017656A1 (en) 2010-08-05 2011-08-04 A method for shot peening

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US20130160510A1 (en)
EP (1) EP2601320B1 (en)
JP (1) JP5790656B2 (en)
CN (1) CN102906282A (en)
WO (1) WO2012017656A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN103604874A (en) * 2013-10-30 2014-02-26 北京理工大学 Manufacturing process, application method and preservation method of residual compressive stress constant value test block

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4415378A (en) * 1982-04-22 1983-11-15 Dana Corporation Case hardening method for steel parts
US5019182A (en) * 1988-09-27 1991-05-28 Mazda Motor Corporation Method of forming hard steels by case hardening, shot-peening and aging without tempering
EP1138795A1 (en) * 1999-08-27 2001-10-04 Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. Law material for bearing parts

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4191599A (en) * 1978-09-13 1980-03-04 Ford Motor Company Method of heat treating high carbon alloy steel parts to develop surface compressive residual stresses
US4495002A (en) * 1981-05-27 1985-01-22 Westinghouse Electric Corp. Three-step treatment of stainless steels having metastable austenitic and martensitic phases to increase resistance to chloride corrosion
JPH0643604B2 (en) * 1986-02-20 1994-06-08 住友金属工業株式会社 Manufacturing method for machine structural parts
JPH0466863A (en) * 1990-07-09 1992-03-03 Toyota Motor Corp Residual stress measuring method by steel working
JPH06271930A (en) * 1993-03-18 1994-09-27 Nisshin Steel Co Ltd Production of high strength and high toughness steel excellent in fatigue property
JPH09123145A (en) * 1995-10-26 1997-05-13 Mishima Kosan Co Ltd Manufacture for metal mold for production of paving concrete block
JP2004011737A (en) * 2002-06-06 2004-01-15 Nsk Ltd Self-aligning roller bearing
JP2004339575A (en) * 2003-05-16 2004-12-02 Nsk Ltd Method for producing parts of rolling device
US20080276753A1 (en) * 2003-10-31 2008-11-13 Hiroyuki Takamura Method of Manufacturing Cam Shaft, Cam Shaft, and Cam Lobe Material Used in the Same
JP2006250316A (en) * 2005-03-14 2006-09-21 Nsk Ltd Rolling device
JP4749073B2 (en) * 2005-07-26 2011-08-17 独立行政法人産業技術総合研究所 Mold and manufacturing method thereof
CN101135344A (en) * 2006-08-30 2008-03-05 上海百信轴承有限公司 Rocker bearing high carbon-chrome steel outer ring composite treatment technology
CN100516593C (en) * 2006-10-17 2009-07-22 武汉理工大学 Automobile rear-bridge spiral conic gear of manganese-copper alloy autenite-bainite nodular iron and its preparing method
JP2008207279A (en) * 2007-02-27 2008-09-11 Sanyo Special Steel Co Ltd Surface refining method of metal mold and metal mold
JP5164539B2 (en) * 2007-11-28 2013-03-21 大同特殊鋼株式会社 Shot peening method
JP5214265B2 (en) * 2008-02-05 2013-06-19 愛知製鋼株式会社 Pulley for belt type CVT
JP5090257B2 (en) * 2008-06-05 2012-12-05 山陽特殊製鋼株式会社 Tool steel suitable for aluminum machining dies and aluminum machining dies

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4415378A (en) * 1982-04-22 1983-11-15 Dana Corporation Case hardening method for steel parts
US5019182A (en) * 1988-09-27 1991-05-28 Mazda Motor Corporation Method of forming hard steels by case hardening, shot-peening and aging without tempering
EP1138795A1 (en) * 1999-08-27 2001-10-04 Koyo Seiko Co., Ltd. Law material for bearing parts

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
"Fatigue of Metals and Shot Peening", 2004, GENDAI KOGAKU-SHA
HIDEKI OKADA, AKIRA TANGE, KOTOJI ANDO: "Relationship among Specimen's Hardness, Residual Stress Distribution and Yield Stress on the Difference of Shot Peening Methods", JOURNAL OF HIGH PRESSURE INSTITUTE OF JAPAN, vol. 41, no. 5, 2003, pages 233 - 242
MASAHIKO MITSUBAYASHI, TAKASHI MIYATA, HIDEO AIHARA: "Prediction of Improvement in Fatigue Strength by Shot Peening and Selection of Most Effective Peening Conditions", TRANSACTIONS OF JSME, vol. 61, no. 586, June 1995 (1995-06-01), pages 28 - 34

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2013532583A (en) 2013-08-19
US20130160510A1 (en) 2013-06-27
EP2601320A1 (en) 2013-06-12
JP5790656B2 (en) 2015-10-07
CN102906282A (en) 2013-01-30
EP2601320B1 (en) 2018-01-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Miková et al. Fatigue behavior of X70 microalloyed steel after severe shot peening
US8151613B2 (en) Method for shot peening
Muñoz-Cubillos et al. Deep rolling effect on fatigue behavior of austenitic stainless steels
CN1985019B (en) Method for producing wear-resistant and fatigue-resistant edge layers from titanium alloys, and correspondingly produced components
Farrahi et al. An investigation into the effect of various surface treatments on fatigue life of a tool steel
EP2436795A1 (en) Carburized component and manufacturing method therefor
Asi et al. The effect of high temperature gas carburizing on bending fatigue strength of SAE 8620 steel
US20160130679A1 (en) Post Machining Multi-Step Material Working Treatment of Fluid End Housing
Schulze Characteristics of surface layers produced by shot peening
Kikuchi et al. Combined effect of surface morphology and residual stress induced by fine particle and shot peening on the fatigue limit for carburized steels
Toboła et al. Phase composition and stress state in the surface layers of burnished and gas nitrided Sverker 21 and Vanadis 6 tool steels
WO2012017656A1 (en) A method for shot peening
Bayraktar et al. Heat treatment, surface roughness and corrosion effects on the damage mechanism of mechanical components in the very high cycle fatigue regime
Epp et al. Comparison of alternative peening methods for the improvement of fatigue properties of case-hardened steel parts
WO2012017658A1 (en) A method for shot peening a gas carburised steel
Canale et al. Overview of factors contributing to steel spring performance and failure
JP6274743B2 (en) Shot peening method to obtain high compressive residual stress
JP7165522B2 (en) Compression coil spring and its manufacturing method
JP2017088959A (en) Method of producing nitrided component and nitrided component
JP6996700B2 (en) Metal processing method
JP2019039049A (en) Spring excellent in fatigue resistance, and production method thereof
Epp et al. Comparison of water jet peening and laser shock peening with shot peening for the improvement of fatigue properties of casehardened steel gears
CN112639442B (en) Degradation evaluation method
Teichmann et al. Shot peening of TWIP steel-influence on mechanical properties
Klumpp et al. Influence of conventional and cryogenic piezo peening on bending fatigue strength of hardened bearing steel AISI 52100

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 201180021605.3

Country of ref document: CN

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application

Ref document number: 11760870

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: A1

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2012531147

Country of ref document: JP

Kind code of ref document: A

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2011760870

Country of ref document: EP

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 13695541

Country of ref document: US

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE