EP1044073A4 - Transparentes substrat mit hydrophober antischmutzbeschichtung und verfahren zu dessen herstellung - Google Patents

Transparentes substrat mit hydrophober antischmutzbeschichtung und verfahren zu dessen herstellung

Info

Publication number
EP1044073A4
EP1044073A4 EP98953562A EP98953562A EP1044073A4 EP 1044073 A4 EP1044073 A4 EP 1044073A4 EP 98953562 A EP98953562 A EP 98953562A EP 98953562 A EP98953562 A EP 98953562A EP 1044073 A4 EP1044073 A4 EP 1044073A4
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
solution
coated substrate
drying
treatment solution
range
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Withdrawn
Application number
EP98953562A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP1044073A1 (de
Inventor
Yongan Yan
Din-Guo Chen
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Yazaki Corp
Original Assignee
Yazaki Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Yazaki Corp filed Critical Yazaki Corp
Publication of EP1044073A1 publication Critical patent/EP1044073A1/de
Publication of EP1044073A4 publication Critical patent/EP1044073A4/de
Withdrawn legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B1/00Optical elements characterised by the material of which they are made; Optical coatings for optical elements
    • G02B1/10Optical coatings produced by application to, or surface treatment of, optical elements
    • G02B1/18Coatings for keeping optical surfaces clean, e.g. hydrophobic or photo-catalytic films
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C03GLASS; MINERAL OR SLAG WOOL
    • C03CCHEMICAL COMPOSITION OF GLASSES, GLAZES OR VITREOUS ENAMELS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF GLASS; SURFACE TREATMENT OF FIBRES OR FILAMENTS MADE FROM GLASS, MINERALS OR SLAGS; JOINING GLASS TO GLASS OR OTHER MATERIALS
    • C03C17/00Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by coating
    • C03C17/28Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by coating with organic material
    • C03C17/30Surface treatment of glass, not in the form of fibres or filaments, by coating with organic material with silicon-containing compounds
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C09DYES; PAINTS; POLISHES; NATURAL RESINS; ADHESIVES; COMPOSITIONS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; APPLICATIONS OF MATERIALS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • C09DCOATING COMPOSITIONS, e.g. PAINTS, VARNISHES OR LACQUERS; FILLING PASTES; CHEMICAL PAINT OR INK REMOVERS; INKS; CORRECTING FLUIDS; WOODSTAINS; PASTES OR SOLIDS FOR COLOURING OR PRINTING; USE OF MATERIALS THEREFOR
    • C09D4/00Coating compositions, e.g. paints, varnishes or lacquers, based on organic non-macromolecular compounds having at least one polymerisable carbon-to-carbon unsaturated bond ; Coating compositions, based on monomers of macromolecular compounds of groups C09D183/00 - C09D183/16
    • GPHYSICS
    • G02OPTICS
    • G02BOPTICAL ELEMENTS, SYSTEMS OR APPARATUS
    • G02B1/00Optical elements characterised by the material of which they are made; Optical coatings for optical elements
    • G02B1/10Optical coatings produced by application to, or surface treatment of, optical elements

Definitions

  • This invention relates generally to thin-film optical coatings and to processes for applying such coatings, and, more particularly, to processes for applying thin-film optical coatings that are hydrophobic and stain-resistant.
  • optical transparencies incorporate coatings made by stacking multiple thin-film layers having precise thicknesses and refractive indices.
  • coatings are derived from inorganic materials, their exposed surfaces are inherently hydrophilic and have a high surface energy. Consequently, foreign contaminants in the form of dirt, oils and fingerprints can adhere strongly to such exposed surfaces.
  • Such foreign contaminants can severely degrade the optical performance of such coatings by altering the path of impinging light.
  • the adhesion of such foreign contaminants can be very strong, such that they are removable only by applying various chemical cleaners or by physical wiping.
  • cleaning processes can permanently damage the coatings and/or the underlying substrates.
  • One prior technique for reducing the surface energy of such inorganic coatings is to thermally treat the coated substrates at temperatures in the range of 400 to 800°C, so as to dehydroxylate the surfaces' -OH groups.
  • This technique generally is inadequate to treat surfaces already exposed to the ambient environment, and it cannot be used to treat coatings applied to substrates formed of plastic, because plastic substrates typically have deformation temperatures lower than the treatment temperature.
  • Another prior technique for reducing the surface energy of such inorganic coatings includes modifying the surface using a chemical vapor deposition process. Unfortunately, this technique requires the use of relatively expensive vacuum equipment and it requires relatively long time durations for the reaction and for evacuation of chemicals from the chamber.
  • Yet another prior technique for reducing the surface energy of such inorganic coatings is to deposit onto the optical coating a hydrophobic overcoat containing saturated hydrocarbon, fluorocarbon or organosilane.
  • Organosilane- based solutions ordinarily incorporate non-polar or less polar solvents, such as octane, heptane, toluene, tetrahydrofuran and trichloroethane, which are either highly flammable or toxic. The use of such solvents, therefore, is undesirable.
  • Known techniques for grafting org.anosil.ane coatings to underlying coated substrates also require relatively long soaking times under dry atmosphere (dry nitrogen or dry air), followed by rinsing or wiping with solvents and baking at elevated temperatures. Applying the coatings in a higher humidity environment can deteriorate the coating solution and/or cause the coating to be non-uniform or translucent.
  • organosilane coatings typically have optical indices very similar to that of glass, such that when such coatings are applied to glass substrates, the coatings might not be readily visible.
  • any slight variation in the coating's thickness can adversely affect the optical performance of many optical substrates with multi-layer thin film coatings and can render surface contamination and defects highly visible. It should, therefore, be appreciated that there is a need for a process for applying a low-cost, efficient, thin-film optical coating to a transparent substrate, wherein the coating is hydrophobic, oil-repellant, and stain-resistant, and wherein the coating does not adversely affect desirable optical properties of any underlying coating and/or the substrate.
  • the hydrophobic coating also should be chemically stable, i.e., non-reactive with various solvents and detergents, and it should be mechanically and environmentally stable, i.e., resistant to variations in temperature, humidity and ultraviolet light.
  • the hydrophobic coating should be uniform, with no pin-hole or spot defects, and its use should not be limited to any particular substrate size.
  • the coating should be applied by a simple dip-coating procedure without the need for toxic or highly flammable solvents, and it should be environmentally friendly and should not require the need for wiping or rinsing during the application process. The present invention satisfies these needs and provides further related benefits.
  • the present invention is embodied in a transparent substrate carrying a thin-film optical coating, and in a process for applying it, wherein the coating is hydrophobic, oil-repellant, and stain-resistant, and wherein the coating does not adversely affect desirable optical properties of any underlying coating and/or the substrate.
  • the hydrophobic coating is chemically stable, i.e., non-reactive with various solvents and detergents, and it is mechanically and environmentally stable, i.e., resistant to variations in temperature, humidity and ultraviolet light.
  • the hydrophobic coating is uniform, with no pin-hole or spot defects, and its use is not limited to any particular substrate size.
  • the coating is applied without the need for toxic or highly flammable solvents, and it is environmentally friendly and does not require the need for wiping or rinsing during the application process.
  • the hydrophobic, oil-repellant, and stain-resistant thin-film coating is prepared by dip-coating a substrate in a treatment solution incorporating an organosilane in a solvent that includes water, an alcohol such as ethanol, propanol or butanol, ethylene glycol or glycerol, and an acid catalyst.
  • the organosilane preferably has a concentration in the range of 0.05 to 50 mmole per 1000 ml of solution, and the solvent includes 0.1 to 90% by weight water, and 0.5 to 20% by weight ethylene glycol and/or glycerol, with the remainder being an alcohol, preferably ethanol or propanol, alone or mixed with butanol.
  • the treatment solution preferably is prepared in a two-step procedure, in which the organosilane is first reacted in concentrated form and then diluted.
  • the organosilanes incorporated into the treatment solution have a saturated or fluorinated hydrocarbon chain, which will directly attach to silicon atoms in the underlying substrate by C-Si bonds.
  • the organosilanes also contain 1 to 3 hydrolyzable groups, which directly bond to silicon atoms by C-O-Si bonds.
  • the organosilanes can be described by the following general formula:
  • n is 0-3, p+q>2 and preferably >8, and
  • R is an alkyl group, preferably CH 3 - or CH 3 CH 2 -.
  • the acid catalyst incorporated into the treatment solution is a mineral or organic acid, preferably CH 3 CO 2 H, HC1 or HNO 3 .
  • the dip-coating procedure requires the substrates to be immersed in the treatment solution for just one to 60 seconds and to be withdrawn at a rate higher than about 0.001 cm/sec. Any size substrates can be accommodated, and multiple substrates can be dip-coated at a time, with the restriction that the substrates be spaced at least 1 cm apart.
  • the relative humidity during the dip- coating procedure should be in the range of 15 to 95%, and preferably in the range of 40 to 80%.
  • the temperature should be in the range of 10 to 40°C.
  • the dip- coated substrates are flash-dried at room temperature for at least one minute, and preferably 20 minutes, and then baked at a temperature in the range of 50 to 250 °C for at least one minute.
  • the surfaces of the substrates to be coated in accordance with the invention should contain metallic or inorganic components, including by way of example, SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , ZnO 2 , TiO 2 , ITO, In 2 O 3 , Sb 2 ,O 3 , MgF 2 , and SnO 2 . These surfaces can be formed by bulk material, by coatings of such components on an underlying substrate, or by organic/inorganic composites containing such inorganic components.
  • FIG. 1 depicts the effect of the application of a permanent marker to a transparent substrate carrying an inorganic, multi-layer, antireflective coating, with its left side untreated and its right side treated with a hydrophobic overcoat in accordance with the invention.
  • FIG. 2 is a graph depicting the reflectance of a transparent substrate carrying an inorganic, multi-layer, antireflective coating, both with and without a hydrophobic overcoat in accordance with the invention.
  • the preferred embodiments of the invention take the form of a transparent plastic substrate that carries an inorganic, multi-layer anti-reflective coating on which is deposited a special hydrophobic overcoat that substantially reduces the coated substrate's susceptibility to staining.
  • the overcoat is applied in an efficient manner, without the need for highly flammable or toxic solutions and without the need for long processing time periods.
  • the hydrophobic overcoat is applied by dip-coating the substrate into an aqueous- alcohol solution containing a fluorinated organosilane, and by then drying and baking the coated substrate at a prescribed temperature and for a prescribed time period.
  • the solvent used in the fluorinated organosilane solution includes water and an alcohol such as ethanol, propanol or butanol.
  • the solvent can further include organic solvents having higher boiling points than those of the alcohol, such as ethylene glycol and glycerol. These solvent components all are less flammable and have lower toxicity than solvents used in known prior art methods of applying similar hydrophobic coatings.
  • the organosilanes used in the preferred embodiments of the invention incorporate saturated hydrocarbon chains that attach directly to metal atoms by C- O-metal bonds.
  • the carbon chains which may be branched, include at least two, and preferably eight or more, carbon atoms. Hydrogen atoms attached to the carbon atoms may be substituted by fluorine atoms, such as perfluorinated or fluorinated carbon chains.
  • the organosilanes also preferably include one to three hydrolyzable groups that bond directly to metal atom by C-O-metal bonds.
  • the organosilanes can be described by the general formula:
  • n is 0-3, p+q>2 and preferably >8, and
  • R is an alkyl group, preferably CH 3 - or CH 3 CH 2 -.
  • the treatment solution also may contain suitable acidic catalysts such as CH 3 CO 2 H, HC1 or HNO 3 .
  • the concentration of the organosilane in the treatment solution is in the range of 0.05 to 50 mmole per 1000 ml of solution, .and preferably in the range of 0.1 to 10 mmole per 1000 ml.
  • the solvent includes 0.1 to 90% by weight water, and 0.5 to 20% by weight ethylene glycol and/or glycerol.
  • the remainder of the solvent is alcohol, preferably ethanol or propanol, alone or mixed with butanol.
  • composition of the treatment solution, and the process for preparing it have a significant effect on the properties of the resulting coating.
  • treatment solutions containing the same organosilane, or even the same treatment solution can be used to produce dip- coated substrates having anti-contaminant, hydrophobic properties that are improved, that are unchanged, or that are severely, or permanently contaminated (e.g., translucent or incorporating non-removable stains).
  • the anti-contaminant, hydrophobic coating of the invention is suitable for application to substrates containing metallic or inorganic components, including by way of example SiO 2 , Al 2 O 3 , ZnO 2 , TiO 2 , ITO, In 2 O 3 , Sb 2 ,O 3 , MgF 2 , and SnO 2 .
  • the substrates can be made of bulk material, such as glass sheet or aluminum foil, or they can themselves be coatings of inorganic components formed on any suitable substrate.
  • the substrates preferably, but not necessarily, are cleaned and free of surface contamination before the anti-contaminant, hydrophobic coatings are applied.
  • a treatment solution was prepared in a two-step procedure.
  • a solution A was prepared by mixing iso-propanol, water, HC1, and 1H,1H,2H,2H- perfluorodecyltriethoxysilane, in a molar ratio of 1300: 11 :290: 1, for two hours under magnetic stirring.
  • This solution A was then mixed with a solution B containing 56000 parts water (molar ratio), 1500 parts ethylene glycol, and 15000 parts iso-propanol, for one hour under magnetic stirring, to produce the treatment solution.
  • PMMA substrates 40 cm x 15 cm carrying inorganic, multi-layer anti-reflective (AR) coatings then were contacted with the treatment solution for 10 seconds and withdrawn from the solution at a rate of 0.15 cm/sec, in a relative humidity of 50%.
  • the substrates then were flashed in open air for 20 minutes and baked at 84 °C for 20 additional minutes.
  • the water contact angle for the coated substrate was determined to be 55 ° before the treatment, and 118° after the treatment. The larger contact angle demonstrates a higher degree of hydrophobicity. Visible defects in the treated substrates were not observed, nor were shifts in the treated substrates' optical performance, in the spectral region of 400 to 700 nm.
  • Example 1 is depicted in FIG. 1, and the non-degradation of treated substrate's optical performance, as shown by reflectivity over the spectral region of 400 to 700 nm, is depicted in FIG. 2.
  • a treatment solution was prepared in exactly the same way as was done in Example 1, except that the reaction time for preparing solution A was reduced to 30 minutes.
  • AR-coated PMMA substrates were contacted with the treatment solution for 10 seconds and then withdrawn at a rate of 0.15 cm/sec, in a relative humidity of 50%.
  • the substrates then were baked at 84 °C for 20 minutes.
  • the water contact angle was determined to have increased from 55 ° before the treatment to just 70° after the treatment. No visible defects were observed on the treated substrate.
  • This Example shows that the reaction time for preparing solution A was insufficient.
  • a treatment solution was prepared by first preparing a solution A by mixing iso-propanol, water, HC1, and lH,lH,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltriethoxysilane, in a molar ratio of 1000:3 : 1 : 1, for 30 minutes under magnetic stirring. Solution A was then mixed with an additional 5500 parts (molar ratio) of iso-propanol, for 15 hours under magnetic stirring.
  • AR-coated PMMA substrates were contacted with the treatment solution for 20 minutes and then withdrawn at a rate of 0.3 cm/sec, in a relative humidity of 50%. The substrates then were baked at 84 °C for 20 minutes. The water contact angle was determined to have increased from 55 ° before the treatment to 116° after the treatment.
  • a treatment solution was prepared by first preparing a solution A by mixing iso-propanol, water, HC1, and lH, lH,2H,2H-perfluorodecyltriethoxysilane, in a molar ratio of 1800:74:2.3: 1, for six hours under magnetic stirring. Solution A was then mixed with an additional 23000 parts (molar ratio) of water, for 30 minutes under magnetic stirring.
  • AR-coated PMMA substrates were contacted with the treatment solution for 10 seconds and then withdrawn at a rate of 0.2 cm/sec, in a relative humidity of 50%.
  • the substrates then were baked at 84 °C for 20 minutes, without a preliminary flash-drying in open air.
  • the water contact angle was determined to have increased from 55° before the treatment to 112° after the treatment. No visible defects were observed on the treated substrates.
  • the treatment solution's useful lifetime was determined to be only about 30 hours. Substrates treated with the treatment solution three days after the treatment solution had been prepared failed to show any significant increase in water contact angle. This indicates that the particular solvents used are important in determining the treatment solution's useful life time.
  • a treatment solution was prepared in exactly the same way as was done in Example 1, and AR-coated PMMA substrates were dip-coated in the treatment solution in exactly the same way as was done in Example 1.
  • a first set of the dip-coated substrates were flashed in open air for 20 minutes and then baked at 40 °C for 10 minutes. The water contact angle for this first set of substrates was determined to have increased from 55 ° before the treatment to 86° after the treatment.
  • a second set of the dip-coated substrates were directly baked at 84 °C for 20 minutes, without being preliminarily flashed in open air. The water contact angles for this second set of substrates was determined to have increased from 55 ° before the treatment to 95° to 120° after the treatment. Many visible spot defects and organosilane contaminants were strongly attached to both sets of treated substrates.
  • This Example shows that the curing conditions were inadequate, i.e., either the baking temperature was insufficiently high or the flashing in open air was omitted.
  • a treatment solution and AR-coated PMMA substrates were prepared in exactly the same manner as was done in Example 1, except that the relative humidity during the withdrawal of the substrates from the treatment solution was reduced to 10%.
  • the water contact angle for these treated substrates was determined to have increased from 55 ° before the treatment to 95 ° -120° after the treatment. Many visible spot defects and organosilane contaminants were strongly attached to the substrates.
  • This Example shows that relative humidity during the withdrawal of the substrates from the treatment solution affects the quality of the resulting coating.
  • Example 9 A treatment solution and AR-coated PMMA substrates were prepared in exactly the same manner as were done in Example 1, except that the treatment solution was aged at room temperature for 60 days. Substrates treated with the aged solution were determined to have substantially the same properties as substrates treated with fresh solution. This Example shows that aging of the preferred treatment solution does not adversely affect the solution's utility.
  • AR-coated PMMA substrates treated in the manner set forth in Example 1 underwent: 1) a thermal shock test (-30 to 80°C, 1000 cycles), 2) a dry cotton abrasion test (500 g weight, 1000 times), 3) an ultraviolet radiation test (carbon arc, 450 hr), 4) a humidity test (60 °C, 95% relative humidity, 192 hours), 5) and a chemical resistance test (gasoline, detergent, 60 °C, 24 hours). No significant changes in the tested substrates' anti-contaminant and hydrophobic properties were determined to have occurred.
  • a pair of AR-coated eyeglasses were dip-coated in a treatment solution like that prepared in Example 1 and then were allowed to dry overnight (15 hours) at room temperature.
  • the treated eyeglasses were determined to be more resistant to fingerprint and dirt contamination.
  • the frequency of the need to clean the treated eyeglasses was reduced by 400 to 1000%.
  • the treated eyeglasses were determined to be more easily cleaned than were the untreated eyeglasses.
  • An AR-coated PMMA substrate (40cm x 35 cm) was dip-coated in a treatment solution prepared in the same manner as set forth in Example 1. About 95% of the substrate's surface was determined to have an initial water contact angle of 65 °, and the substrate surface's remaining 5% was determined to have an initial water contact angle of 77°. Contamination of this latter surface portion was believed to be the cause of this variation in water contact angle. After dip-coating and baking the coated substrate in the same manner as set forth in Example 1, the water contact angle was determined to have increased to 1 15-120° for the area whose original angle was 65 °, but was determined to have remain substantially unchanged for the area whose original angle was 77°.
  • a new treatment solution was prepared in the same manner as was done in Example 1, except that the amount of solution A was increased relative to the amount of solution B by 25%.
  • the same amount of solution A as in Example 1 was added to a new solution B containing 44800 parts water (molar ratio), 1200 parts ethylene glycol, and 12000 parts iso-propanol.
  • a uniform anti-stain, hydrophobic coating was achieved on the substrate's entire surface, and the water contact angle was determined to be 115-120° for the entire surface.
  • This Example shows that increasing the concentration of the organosilane in the treatment solution can overcome the adverse effects of contamination in the underlying AR coating.
  • Example 1 After a treatment solution prepared as set forth in Example 1 has been used extensively and/or aged for an extended period, it might yield coatings having a discernable decrease in water contact angle. Such an old treatment solution can be restored to original effectiveness by adding to it 30% more of the solution A, after it has been preliminarily reacted for two hours, and by mixing the replenished solution for longer than 10 minutes. Such a replenished solution produced uniform anti-stain, hydrophobic coatings over the entire surface of an AR-coated PMMA substrate. This Example shows that the treatment solution can be replenished without discarding the old solvents and without producing any waste solutions.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Optics & Photonics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Geochemistry & Mineralogy (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Application Of Or Painting With Fluid Materials (AREA)
  • Paints Or Removers (AREA)
  • Surface Treatment Of Glass (AREA)
  • Surface Treatment Of Optical Elements (AREA)
  • Laminated Bodies (AREA)
EP98953562A 1997-10-15 1998-10-14 Transparentes substrat mit hydrophober antischmutzbeschichtung und verfahren zu dessen herstellung Withdrawn EP1044073A4 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US6234997P 1997-10-15 1997-10-15
US63349P 1997-10-15
PCT/US1998/021797 WO1999019084A1 (en) 1997-10-15 1998-10-14 Transparent substrate bearing an anti-stain, hydrophobic coating, and process for making it

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1044073A1 EP1044073A1 (de) 2000-10-18
EP1044073A4 true EP1044073A4 (de) 2005-04-13

Family

ID=22041892

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP98953562A Withdrawn EP1044073A4 (de) 1997-10-15 1998-10-14 Transparentes substrat mit hydrophober antischmutzbeschichtung und verfahren zu dessen herstellung

Country Status (5)

Country Link
EP (1) EP1044073A4 (de)
JP (1) JP3579655B2 (de)
AU (1) AU737281B2 (de)
CA (1) CA2305513C (de)
WO (1) WO1999019084A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19941753A1 (de) * 1999-09-02 2001-05-10 Nanogate Gmbh Verfahren und Stoffe
DE10135684A1 (de) * 2001-07-21 2003-02-06 Nano X Gmbh Material zur Herstellung abriebfester, hydrophober und/oder oloephober Beschichtungen
FR2858627B1 (fr) * 2003-08-06 2006-01-21 Laurent Victor Charles Jacob Composition pour creer une couche de polymere,sur un support comportant une face de verre mineral, formant avec le support un materiau complexe. procede de fabrication de tels materiaux.
DE102005060401A1 (de) 2005-12-15 2007-06-21 Degussa Gmbh Lagerstabile Beschichtungszusammensetzung für eine abriebfeste und witterungsbeständige Ausstattung glatter anorganischer Oberflächen mit "Easy-to-clean"-Eigenschaften
EP2886205A1 (de) 2013-12-19 2015-06-24 Institute of Solid State Physics, University of Latvia Verfahren für Antireflexbeschichtungsschutz mit Organosilanen

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4636440A (en) * 1985-10-28 1987-01-13 Manville Corporation Novel process for coating substrates with glass-like films and coated substrates
US4687707A (en) * 1984-06-26 1987-08-18 Asahi Glass Company Ltd. Low reflectance transparent material having antisoiling properties
US5266358A (en) * 1991-06-05 1993-11-30 Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. Method of forming water-repellent metal oxide film coated on glass substrate
US5443914A (en) * 1993-12-17 1995-08-22 Nordam Chemically induced crazing resistant acrylic
EP0825157A2 (de) * 1996-08-19 1998-02-25 Central Glass Company, Limited Wasserabweisende Glasscheibe und Verfahren zu deren Herstellung

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3688093T2 (de) * 1985-03-22 1993-10-21 Toray Industries Durchsichtiger Gegenstand und Verfahren zu seiner Herstellung.
US4778721A (en) * 1986-07-09 1988-10-18 Battelle Memorial Institute Method of forming abrasion-resistant plasma coatings and resulting articles
KR100214288B1 (ko) * 1993-04-16 1999-08-02 성재갑 안개서림 방지용 내마모성 피복조성물 및 이를 도포한 합성수지 성형품
US5846649A (en) * 1994-03-03 1998-12-08 Monsanto Company Highly durable and abrasion-resistant dielectric coatings for lenses

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4687707A (en) * 1984-06-26 1987-08-18 Asahi Glass Company Ltd. Low reflectance transparent material having antisoiling properties
US4636440A (en) * 1985-10-28 1987-01-13 Manville Corporation Novel process for coating substrates with glass-like films and coated substrates
US5266358A (en) * 1991-06-05 1993-11-30 Nissan Motor Company, Ltd. Method of forming water-repellent metal oxide film coated on glass substrate
US5443914A (en) * 1993-12-17 1995-08-22 Nordam Chemically induced crazing resistant acrylic
EP0825157A2 (de) * 1996-08-19 1998-02-25 Central Glass Company, Limited Wasserabweisende Glasscheibe und Verfahren zu deren Herstellung

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See also references of WO9919084A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU1090199A (en) 1999-05-03
AU737281B2 (en) 2001-08-16
JP3579655B2 (ja) 2004-10-20
JP2003521360A (ja) 2003-07-15
CA2305513A1 (en) 1999-04-22
WO1999019084A1 (en) 1999-04-22
CA2305513C (en) 2005-01-04
EP1044073A1 (de) 2000-10-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US6395331B1 (en) Transparent substrate bearing an anti-stain, hydrophobic coating, and process for making it
JP4267813B2 (ja) 反射防止面用防汚コーティング層および調製方法
EP0166363B1 (de) Durchsichtiger schwer schmutzender Gegenstand mit niedriger Reflexion
EP0545201B2 (de) Dauerhaft wasserabweisende Glasoberfläche
US5476717A (en) Material having antireflection, hydrophobic and abrasion resistance properties and process for depositing an antireflection, hydrophobic and abrasion resistant coating on a substrate
US5415927A (en) Water-repellant glass products and process for the production thereof
US6001485A (en) Water repellant glass plate and method for manufacturing the same
WO2005056488A1 (ja) プライマー層が形成されたガラス基材及び防曇性物品
JP3567483B2 (ja) 防汚性低反射率ガラスの製造方法
AU737281B2 (en) Transparent substrate bearing an anti-stain, hydrophobic coating, and process for making it
JPH04359031A (ja) 撥水撥油性フィルム及びその製造方法
JPH05330856A (ja) 低反射ガラス
JP3649585B2 (ja) 撥水性被膜形成用溶液
JPS63296002A (ja) 無機コート膜を有する光学物品及びその製造方法
US20020192365A1 (en) Method for imparting hydrophilicity to substrate
JPS62247302A (ja) 光学物品の製造方法
JP3570134B2 (ja) 防汚膜の形成方法及び表示素子用フィルター
JPH06138305A (ja) 撥水処理された光学部材
JP3712103B2 (ja) プラスチックレンズの製造方法及びプラスチックレンズ
JP4687009B2 (ja) 防曇性物品及びその製造方法
JP3672688B2 (ja) 撥水性ガラスの製法
JP4396232B2 (ja) 防汚性光学物品の製造方法
JPH05132574A (ja) 防曇性プラスチツクの製造方法
JP2005115278A (ja) 防汚性光学物品の製造方法
JPH0756021B2 (ja) 常温で撥水性、防汚性を発現する組成物

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000512

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CH DE FR GB IT LI NL

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: 7C 08J 7/04 B

Ipc: 7C 03C 17/30 B

Ipc: 7B 32B 17/06 B

Ipc: 7B 32B 13/12 B

Ipc: 7B 32B 9/04 B

Ipc: 7B 32B 9/00 B

Ipc: 7B 05D 5/06 B

Ipc: 7B 05D 3/02 A

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20050301

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: 7C 03C 17/00 B

Ipc: 7C 03C 17/42 B

Ipc: 7C 08J 7/04 B

Ipc: 7C 03C 17/30 B

Ipc: 7B 32B 17/06 B

Ipc: 7B 32B 13/12 B

Ipc: 7B 32B 9/04 B

Ipc: 7B 32B 9/00 B

Ipc: 7B 05D 5/06 B

Ipc: 7B 05D 3/02 A

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: YAZAKI CORPORATION

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN

18D Application deemed to be withdrawn

Effective date: 20110708