EP1038981B1 - Alliage de decolletage a base de cuivre - Google Patents

Alliage de decolletage a base de cuivre Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1038981B1
EP1038981B1 EP98953070A EP98953070A EP1038981B1 EP 1038981 B1 EP1038981 B1 EP 1038981B1 EP 98953070 A EP98953070 A EP 98953070A EP 98953070 A EP98953070 A EP 98953070A EP 1038981 B1 EP1038981 B1 EP 1038981B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
weight
percent
remainder
alloy
alloys
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP98953070A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1038981A1 (fr
EP1038981A4 (fr
Inventor
Keiichiro Sambo Copper Alloy Co. Ltd. OISHI
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Sambo Copper Alloy Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Sambo Copper Alloy Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Sambo Copper Alloy Co Ltd filed Critical Sambo Copper Alloy Co Ltd
Priority to EP04077561A priority Critical patent/EP1508626B1/fr
Priority to EP04077560A priority patent/EP1502964B1/fr
Publication of EP1038981A1 publication Critical patent/EP1038981A1/fr
Publication of EP1038981A4 publication Critical patent/EP1038981A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1038981B1 publication Critical patent/EP1038981B1/fr
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22F—CHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • C22F1/08—Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of copper or alloys based thereon
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C9/00—Alloys based on copper
    • C22C9/04—Alloys based on copper with zinc as the next major constituent

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to free-cutting copper alloys.
  • bronze alloys such as the one under JIS designation H5111 BC6 and brass alloys such as the ones under JIS designations H3250-C3604 and C3771.
  • Those alloys are so enhanced in machinability with the addition of 1.0 to 6.0 percent, by weight, of lead as to give industrially satisfactory results as easy-to-work copper alloy.
  • lead-contained copper alloys have been an important basic material for a variety of articles such as city water faucets, water supply/drainage metal fittings and valves.
  • lead does not form a solid solution in the matrix but disperses in granular form, thereby improving the machinability of those alloys.
  • lead has to be added in as much as 2.0 or more percent by weight. If the addition of lead is less than 1.0 percent by weight, chippings will be spiral in form as (D) in Fig. 1. Spiral chippings cause various troubles such as, for example, tangling with the tool. If, on the other hand, the content of lead is 1.0 or more percent by weight and not larger than 2.0 percent by weight, the cut surface will be rough, though that will produce some results such as reduction of the cutting resistance. It is usual, therefore, that lead is added in not smaller than 2.0 percent by weight.
  • Some expanded copper alloys in which a high degree of cutting property is required are mixed with some 3.0 or more percent, by weight, of lead. Further, some bronze castings have a lead content of as much as some 5.0 percent, by weight.
  • lead-mixed alloys have been greatly limited in recent years, because lead contained therein is harmful to humans as an environment pollutant. That is, the lead-contained alloys pose a threat to human health and environmental hygiene because lead finds its way in metallic vapor that generates in the steps of processing those alloys at high temperatures such as melting and casting and there is also danger that lead contained in the water system metal fittings, valves and others made of those alloys will dissolve out into drinking water.
  • the cutting works, forgings, castings and others include city water faucets, water supply/drainage metal fittings, valves, stems, hot water supply pipe fittings, shaft and heat exchanger parts.
  • Silicon raises the easy-to-cut property by producing a gamma phase (in some cases, a kappa phase) in the structure of metal. That way, both are the same in that they are effective in improving the machinability, though they are quite different in contribution to the properties of the alloy.
  • silicon is added to the first invention alloy so as to bring about a high level of machinability meeting the industrial requirements, while making it possible to reduce greatly the lead content. That is, the first invention alloy is improved in machinability through formation of a gamma phase with the addition of silicon.
  • silicon is usually added in the form of a Cu-Si alloy, which boosts the production cost.
  • An experiment showed that when silicon is added in the amount of 2.0 to 4.0 percent, by weight, it is desirable to hold the content of copper at 69 to 79 percent, by weight, in consideration of its relation to the content of zinc in order to maintain the intrinsic properties of the Cu-Zn alloy.
  • the first invention alloy is composed of 69 to 79 percent, by weight, of copper and 2.0 to 4.0 percent, by weight, of silicon respectively.
  • silicon improves not only the machinability but also the flow of the molten metal in casting, strength, wear resistance, resistance to stress corrosion cracking, high-temperature oxidation resistance. Also, the ductility and dezincing corrosion resistance will be improved to some extent.
  • the addition of lead is set at 0.02 to 0.4 percent by weight on this ground.
  • a sufficient level of machinability is obtained by adding silicon that has the aforesaid effect even if the addition of lead is reduced.
  • lead has to be added in the amount not smaller than 0.02 percent by weight if the alloy is to be superior to the conventional free-cutting copper alloy in machinability, while the addition of lead exceeding 0.4 percent would have adverse effects, resulting in a rough surface condition, poor hot workability such as poor forging behavior and low cold ductility. Meanwhile, it is expected that such a small content of not higher than 0.4 percent by weight will be able to clear the lead-related regulations however strictly they are to be stipulated in the advanced nations including Japan in the future.
  • the addition range of lead is set at 0.02 to 0.4 percent by weight in the first and also second to eighth alloys which will be described later.
  • the first alloy may further comprise one selected from 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of bismuth, 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of tellurium, and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of selenium; and the remaining percent, by weight, of zinc.
  • This second copper alloy will be hereinafter called the "second alloy”.
  • the second alloy is composed of the first invention alloy and, in addition, one selected element from 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of bismuth, 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of tellurium, and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of selenium.
  • Bismuth, tellurium and selenium as well as lead do not form a solid solution with the matrix but disperse in granular form to enhance the machinability. That makes up for the reduction of the lead content.
  • the addition of any one of those elements along with silicon and lead could further improve the machinability beyond the level hoped from the addition of silicon and lead. From this finding, the second alloy is worked out in which one element selected from among bismuth, tellurium and selenium is mixed.
  • the addition of bismuth, tellurium or selenium as well as silicon and lead could make the copper alloy so machinable that complicated forms could be freely cut out at a high speed.
  • the second' alloy is prepared with the addition of bismuth, tellurium or selenium kept to 0.02 to 0.4 percent by weight.
  • the addition of bismuth, tellurium or selenium which improves the machinability of the copper alloy though a mechanism different from that of silicon as mentioned above, would not affect the proper contents of copper and silicon.
  • the contents of copper and silicon in the second alloy are set at the same level as those in the first alloy. weight, of zinc.
  • This fourth copper alloy will be hereinafter called the "fourth invention alloy”.
  • the fourth invention alloy has any one selected from among 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of bismuth, 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of tellurium, and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of selenium in addition to the components in the third invention alloy.
  • the grounds for mixing those additional elements and setting those amounts to be added are the same as given for the second invention alloy.
  • the first alloy may further comprise at least one element selected from 0.3 to 3.5 percent, by weight, of tin, 0.02 to 0.25 percent, by weight, of phosphorus, 0.02 to 0.15 percent, by weight, of antimony, and 0.02 to 0.15 percent, by weight, of arsenic, and the remaining percent, by weight, of zinc.
  • This third copper alloy will be hereinafter called the "third alloy”.
  • the third alloy has, in addition to the first alloy, at least one element selected from among 0.3 to 3.5 percent, by weight, of tin, 0.02 to 0.25 percent, by weight, of phosphorus, 0.02 to 0.15 percent, by weight, of antimony, and 0.02 to 0.15 percent, by weight, of arsenic.
  • Tin is effective in improving not only the machinability but also corrosion resistance properties (dezincification corrosion resistance) and forgeability.
  • tin improves the corrosion resistance in the alpha phase matrix and, by dispersing the gamma phase, the corrosion resistance, forgeability and stress corrosion cracking resistance.
  • the third alloy is thus improved in corrosion resistance by the property of tin and in machinability mainly by adding silicon. Therefore, the contents of silicon and copper in this' alloy are set at the same as those in the first invention alloy.
  • tin would have to be added in the amount of at least 0.3 percent by weight. But even if the addition of tin exceeds 3.5 percent by weight, the corrosion resistance and forgeability will not improve in proportion to the amount added of tin. It is no good economy.
  • Phosphorus disperses the gamma phase uniformly and at the same time refines the crystal grains in the alpha phase in the matrix, thereby improving the machinability and also the corrosion resistance properties (dezincification corrosion), forgeability, stress corrosion cracking resistance and mechanical strength.
  • the third alloy is thus improved in corrosion resistance and others through the action of phosphorus and in machinability mainly by adding silicon.
  • the addition of phosphorus in a very small quantity, that is, 0.02 or more percent by weight could produce results. But the addition in more than 0.25 percent by weight would not be so effective as hoped from the quantity added. Rather, that would reduce the hot forgeability and extrudability.
  • the third alloy is improved in machinability and also corrosion resistance and other properties by adding at least one element selected from among tin, phosphorus, antimony and arsenic (which improve corrosion resistance) in quantities within the aforesaid limits in addition to the same quantities of copper and silicon as in the first invention copper alloy.
  • the additions of copper and silicon are set at 69 to 79 percent by weight and 2.0 to 4.0 percent by weight respectively - the same level as in the first alloy in which any other machinability improver than silicon and a small amount of lead is not added - because tin and phosphorus work mainly as corrosion resistance improver like antimony and arsenic.
  • the first alloy may further comprise at least one element selected from, 0.3 to 3.5 percent, by weight, of tin, 0.02 to 0.25 percent, by weight, of phosphorus, 0.02 to 0.15 percent, by weight, of antimony, and 0.02 to 0.15 percent, by weight, of arsenic; one element selected from 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of bismuth, 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of tellurium, and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of selenium; and the remaining percent, by weight, of zinc.
  • This sixth copper alloy will be hereinafter called the "fourth alloy”.
  • the fourth alloy has any one element selected from 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of bismuth, 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of tellurium, and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of selenium in addition to the components in the fifth invention alloy.
  • the machinability is improved by adding, in addition to silicon and lead, any one element selected from among bismuth, tellurium and selenium as in the second invention alloy and the corrosion resistance and other properties are raised by adding at least one selected from among tin, phosphorus, antimony and arsenic as in the fifth invention alloy.
  • the additions of copper, silicon, bismuth, tellurium and selenium are set at the same levels as those in the second invention alloy, while the additions of tin, phosphorus, antimony and arsenic are adjusted to those in the fifth invention alloy.
  • the first alloy may further comprise 0.1 to 1.5 percent, by weight, of aluminum, and 0.02 to 0.25 percent, by weight, of phosphorus, and the remaining percent, by weight, of zinc.
  • the fifth copper alloy will be hereinafter called the "fifth alloy”.
  • Aluminum is an element which improves the strength, machinability, wear resistance and also high-temperature oxidation resistance. Silicon, too, has a property of enhancing the machinability, strength, wear resistance, resistance to stress corrosion cracking and also high-temperature oxidation resistance. Aluminum works to raise the high-temperature oxidation resistance when it is used together with silicon and that in not smaller than 0.1 percent by weight. But even if the addition of aluminum increases beyond 1.5 percent by weight, no proportional results can be expected. For this reason, the addition of aluminum is set at 0.1 to 1.5 percent by weight.
  • Phosphorus is added to enhance the flow of molten metal in casting. Phosphorus also works for improvement of the aforesaid machinability, dezincification corrosion resistance and also high-temperature oxidation resistance in addition to the flow of molten metal. Those effects are exhibited when phosphorus is added in the amount not smaller than 0.02 percent by weight. But even if phosphorus is used in more than 0.25 percent by weight, it will not result in a proportional increase in effect rather weakening the alloy. For this consideration, the addition of phosphorus settles down on 0.02 to 0.25 percent by weight.
  • silicon is added to improve the machinability as mentioned above, it is also capable of improving the flow of molten metal like phosphorus.
  • the effect of silicon in improving the flow of molten metal is exhibited when it is added in the amount of not smaller than 2.0 percent by weight.
  • the range of the addition for the flow improvement overlaps that for improvement of the machinability. These taken into consideration, the addition of silicon is set to 2.0 to 4.0 percent by weight.
  • the first alloy may further comprise 0.1 to 1.5 percent, by weight, of aluminum; 0.02 to 0.25 percent, by weight, of phosphorus; one element selected from 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of bismuth, 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of tellurium, and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of selenium; and the remaining percent, by weight, of zinc.
  • the sixth alloy will be hereinafter called'the "sixth alloy".
  • the sixth alloy contains one element selected from 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of bismuth, 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of tellurium and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of selenium in addition to the components of the fifth alloy. While a high-temperature oxidation resistance as good as in the fifth alloy is secured, the machinability is further improved by adding one element selected from among bismuth and other elements which are as effective as lead in raising the machinability.
  • the first alloy may further comprise 0.1 to 1.5 percent, by weight, of aluminum; 0.02 to 0.25 percent, by weight, of phosphorus; at least one selected from 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of chromium and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of titanium; and the remaining percent, by weight, of zinc.
  • the tenth copper alloy will be hereinafter called the "seventh alloy”.
  • Chromium and titanium are intended for improving the high-temperature oxidation resistance. Good results can be expected especially when they are added together with aluminum to produce a synergistic effect. Those effects are exhibited when the addition is no less than 0.02 percent by weight, whether they are added alone or in combination. The saturation point is 0.4 percent by weight.
  • the seventh alloy has at least one element selected from among 0.02 to 0.4 percent by weight of chromium and 0.02 to 0.4 percent by weight of titanium in addition to the components of the fifth alloy and thus further improved over the fifth alloy with regard to the high-temperature oxidation resistance.
  • the first alloy may further comprise 0.1 to 1.5 percent, by weight, of aluminum; 0.02 to 0.25 percent, by weight, of phosphorus; at least one element selected from among 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of chromium and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of titanium; one element selected from among 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of bismuth, 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of tellurium and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of selenium; and the remaining percent, by weight, of zinc.
  • the eighth alloy will be hereinafter called the "eighth alloy".
  • the eighth alloy contains any one selected from among 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of bismuth, 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of tellurium and 0.02 to 0.4 percent, by weight, of selenium in addition to the components of the seventh alloy. While as high a high-temperature oxidation resistance as in the tenth invention alloy is secured, the eleventh invention alloy is further improved in machinability by adding one element selected from among bismuth and other elements which are as effective as lead in raising the machinability.
  • a free-cutting copper alloy also with further improved easy-to-cut feature obtained by subjecting any one of the preceding respective invention alloys to a heat treatment for 30 minutes to 5 hours at 400 to 6000C.
  • the ninth alloy will be hereinafter called the "ninth alloy”.
  • the first to eighth alloys contain machinability improving elements such as silicon and have an excellent machinability because of the addition of such elements.
  • the effect of those machinability improving elements could be further enhanced by heat treatment.
  • the first to eighth invention alloys which are high in copper content with gamma phase in small quantities and kappa phase in large quantities undergo a change in phase from the kappa phase to the gamma phase in a heat treatment.
  • the gamma phase is finely dispersed and precipitated, and the machinability is improved.
  • the materials are often force-air-cooled or water cooled depending on the forging conditions, productivity after hot working (hot extrusion, hot forging etc.), working environment and other factors.
  • the alloys with a low content of copper in particular are rather low in the content of the gamma phase and contain beta phase.
  • the beta phase changes into gamma phase, and the gamma phase is finely dispersed and precipitated, whereby the machinability is improved.
  • first alloys Nos. 1001 to 1007 were hot extruded into a round bar 15 mm in outside diameter at 750 C to produce the following test pieces: first alloys Nos. 1001 to 1007, second alloys Nos. 2001 to 2006, third alloys Nos. 5001 to 5020, fourth alloys Nos. 6001 to 6045, fifth alloys Nos. 8001 to 8008, sixth alloys Nos. 9001 to 9006, seventh alloys Nos. 10001 to 10008, and eighth alloys Nos. 11001 to 11011.
  • No. 12004 is an alloy test piece obtained by heat-treating an extruded test piece with the same composition as No. 1007 under the same conditions as for No. 12002 - for two hours at 4500C.
  • This aluminum bronze is the most excellent of the expanded copper alloys under the JIS designations with regard to strength and wear resistance.
  • No. 13006 corresponds to the naval brass alloy "JIS C 4622" and is the most excellent of the expanded copper alloys under the JIS designations with regard to corrosion resistance.
  • the chips from the cutting work were examined and classified into four forms (A) to (D) as shown in Fig. 1.
  • the results are enumerated in Table 18 to Table 33.
  • the chippings in the form of a spiral with three or more windings as (D) in Fig. 1 are difficult to process, that is, recover or recycle, and could cause trouble in cutting work as, for example, getting tangled with the tool and damaging the cut metal surface.
  • chippings in the form of a fine needle as (A) in Fig. 1 or in the form of arc shaped pieces as (B) will not present such problems as mentioned above and are not bulky as the chippings in (C) and (D) and easy to process.
  • fine chippings as (A) still could creep in on the slide table of a machine tool such as a lathe and cause mechanical trouble, or could be dangerous because they could stick into the worker's finger, eye or other body parts.
  • the surface condition of the cut metal surface was checked after cutting work.
  • the results are shown in Table 18 to Table 33.
  • the commonly used basis for indication of the surface roughness is the maximum roughness (Rmax). While requirements are different depending on the application field of brass articles, the alloys with Rmax ⁇ 10 microns are generally considered excellent in machinability. The alloys with 10 microns ⁇ Rmax ⁇ 15 microns are judged as industrially acceptable while those with Rmax ⁇ 15 microns are taken as poor in machinability.
  • the following invention alloys are all equal to the conventional lead-contained alloys Nos. 13001 to 13003 in machinability: first alloys Nos. 1001 to 1007, second alloys Nos. 2001 to 2006, third alloys Nos. 5001 to 5020, fourth alloys Nos. 6001 to 6045, fifth alloys Nos. 8001 to 8008, sixth alloys Nos. 9001 to 9006, seventh alloys Nos. 10001 to 10008, eighth alloys Nos. 11001 to 11011, ninth alloys Nos. 12001 to 12004.
  • those invention alloys are favorably compared not only with the conventional alloys Nos.
  • the ninth alloys Nos. 12001 to 12004 which are obtained by heat-treating the first invention alloys Nos. 1006 and 1007, are improved over the first alloys in machinability. It is understood that a proper heat treatment could further enhance the machinability of the first to eighth alloys, depending upon the alloy compositions and other conditions.
  • the first to ninth alloys were examined in comparison with the conventional alloys in hot workability and mechanical properties.
  • hot compression and tensile tests were conducted the following way.
  • test pieces two test pieces, first and second test pieces, in the same shape 15 mm in outside diameter and 25 mm in length were cut out of each extruded test piece obtained as described above.
  • the first test piece was held for 30 minutes at 7000C, and then compressed at the compression rate of 70 percent in the direction of axis to reduce the length from 25 mm to 7.5 mm.
  • the surface condition after the compression (7000C deformability) was visually evaluated.
  • the results were given in Table 18 to Table 33.
  • the evaluation of deformability was made by visually checking for cracks on the side of the test piece. In Table 18 to Table 33, the test pieces with no cracks found are marked " ⁇ "; those with small cracks are indicated by " ⁇ " and those with large cracks are represented by a symbol "x".
  • the second test pieces were put to a tensile test by the commonly practiced test method to determine the tensile strength, N/mm 2 and elongation, %.
  • the first to ninth alloys were put to dezincification corrosion and stress corrosion cracking tests in accordance with the test methods specified under "ISO 6509” and “JIS H 3250" respectively to examine the corrosion resistance and resistance to stress corrosion cracking in comparison with the conventional alloys.
  • the test piece taken from each extruded test piece was imbedded laid in a phenolic resin material in such a way that the exposed test piece surface is perpendicular to the extrusion direction of the extruded test piece.
  • the surface of the test piece was polished with emery paper No. 1200, and then ultrasonic-washed in pure water and dried.
  • the test piece thus prepared was dipped in a 12.7 g/l aqueous solution of cupric chloride dihydrate (CuCl 2 •2H 2 O) 1.0% and left standing for 24 hours at 750C.
  • the test piece was taken out of the aqueous solution and the maximum depth of dezincing corrosion was determined.
  • the measurements of the maximum dezincification corrosion depth are given in Table 18 to Table 25 and Table 28 to Table 33.
  • the first to fourth invention alloys and the fifth. to ninth alloys are excellent in corrosion resistance in comparison with the conventional alloys Nos. 13001 to 13003 which contain great amounts of lead. And it was confirmed that especially the third and fourth alloys whose improvement in both machinability and corrosion resistance has been intended are very high in corrosion resistance in comparison with the conventional alloy No. 13006, a naval brass which is the most resistant to corrosion of all the expanded alloys under the JIS designations.
  • test piece In the stress corrosion cracking tests in accordance with the test method described in "JIS H 3250", a 150-mm-long test piece was cut out from each extruded material. The test piece was bent with the center placed on an arc-shaped tester with a radius of 40 mm in such a way that one end forms an angle of 45 degrees with respect the other end. The test piece thus subjected to a tensile residual stress was degreased and dried, and then placed in an ammonia environment in the desiccator with a 12.5% aqueous ammonia (ammonia diluted in the equivalent of pure water). To be exact, the test piece was held some 80 mm above the surface of aqueous ammonia in the desiccator.
  • test piece After the test piece was left standing in the ammonia environment for 2 hours, 8 hours and 24 hours, the test piece was taken out from the desiccator, washed in sulfuric acid solution 10% and examined for cracks under a magnifier of 10 magnifications.
  • the results are given in Table 18 to Table 25 and Table 28 to Table 33.
  • the alloys which developed clear cracks when held in the ammonia environment for two hours are marked "xx.”
  • the test pieces which had no cracks at two hours but were found clearly cracked in 8 hours are indicated in "x.”
  • the test pieces which had no cracks in 8 hours, but were found clearly to have cracks in 28 hours are identified by the symbol " ⁇ ".
  • the test pieces which were found to have no cracks at all in 24 hours are given a symbol "o".
  • Test pieces in the shape of a round bar with the surface cut to a outside diameter of 14 mm and the length cut to 30 mm were prepared from each of the following extruded materials: No. 8001 to No. 8008, No. 9001 to No. 9006, No. 10001 to No. 10008, No. 11001 to No. 11011 and No. 13001 to No. 13006.
  • Each test piece was then weighed to measure the weight before oxidation. After that, the test piece was placed in a porcelain crucible and held in an electric furnace maintained at 500°C. At the passage of 100 hours, the test piece was taken out of the electric furnace and was weighed to measure the weight after oxidation. From the measurements before and after oxidation was calculated the increase in weight by oxidation.
  • the weight of each test piece increased after oxidation.
  • the increase was brought about by high-temperature oxidation. Subjected to a high temperature, oxygen combines with copper, zinc and silicon to form Cu 2 O, ZnO, SiO 2 . That is, oxygen adds to the weight. It can be said, therefore, that the alloys which are smaller in weight increase by oxidation are more excellent in high-temperature oxidation resistance.
  • Table 28 to Table 31 and Table 33 The results obtained are shown in Table 28 to Table 31 and Table 33.
  • the fifth to eighth invention alloys are equal, in regard to weight increase by oxidation, to the conventional alloy No. 13005, an aluminum bronze ranking high in resistance to high-temperature oxidation among the expanded copper alloys under the JIS designations and are far smaller than any other conventional copper alloy.
  • the fifth to eighth invention alloys are very excellent in machinability and resistance to high-temperature oxidation as well. No.
  • alloy composition (wt%) Cu Si Pb Zn 1001 74.8 2.9 0.03 remainder 1002 74.1 2.7 0.21 remainder 1003 78.1 3.6 0.10 remainder 1004 70.6 2.1 0.36 remainder 1005 74.9 3.1 0.11 remainder 1006 69.3 2.3 0.05 remainder 1007 78.5 2.9 0.05 remainder No. alloy composition (wt%) Cu Si Pb Bi Te Se Zn 2001 73.8 2. 7 0.05 0.03 remainder 2002 69.9 2.0 0.33 0.27 remainder 2003 74.5 2.8 0.03 0. 31 remainder 2004 78.0 3.6 0.12 0.05 remainder 2005 76.2 3.2 0.05 0.33 remainder 2006 72.9 2.6 0. 24 0.06 remainder No. alloy composition (wt%) Cu Si Pb Sn Al P Zn 3001 70.8 1.9 0.23 3.2 remainder 3002 74.5 3.0 0.
  • alloy composition (wt%) Cu Si Pb Al P Cr Ti Zn 10001 76.0 2.8 0.12 0.7 0.13 0.21 remainder 10002 75.0 3.0 0.03 0.2 0.05 0.03 remainder 10003 78.3 3.4 0.06 1.3 0.20 0.34 remainder 10004 69.6 2.1 0.25 0.8 0.03 0.17 remainder 10005 77.5 3.6 0.12 0.7 0.15 0.23 remainder 10006 71.8 2.2 0.32 1.2 0. 08 0.32 remainder 10007 74.7 2.7 0.1 0.6 0.10 0.03 remainder 10008 75.4 2.9 0.03 0.3 0.06 0.12 0.08 remainder No. alloy composition (wt%) Cu Si Pb AI Bi Te Se P Cr Ti Zn 11001 76.5 2.9 0.08 0.9 0.03 0.12 0.03 remainder 11002 70.4 2.2 0.32 0.5 0.
  • alloy composition (wt%) beat treatment Cu Si Pb Zn temperature time 12001 69.3 2.3 0.05 remainder 580°C 30min. 12002 69.3 2.3 0.05 remainder 450°C 2hr. 12003 78.5 2.9 0.05 remainder 580°C 30min. 12004 78.5 2.9 0.05 remainder 450°C 2hr. No.
  • machinability machinability hot workability mechanical properties form of chippings condition of cut surface cutting force (N) 7 0 0°C deformability tensile strength (N/mm 2 ) elongation (%) 7001 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 2 ⁇ 7 5 5 1 7 7002 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 7 ⁇ 7 7 6 1 9 7003 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 5 ⁇ 6 2 0 1 5 7004 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 0 ⁇ 7 1 4 1 8 7005 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 8 ⁇ 7 0 8 1 9 7006 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 0 ⁇ 6 8 5 1 6 7007 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 2 ⁇ 7 1 7 1 8 7008 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 0 ⁇ 8 1 1 1 8 7009 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 0 ⁇ 7 9 0 1 5 7010 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 1 ⁇ 7 0 8 1 8 7011 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 8 ⁇
  • machinability hot workability mechanical properties form of chippings condition of cut surface cutting force (N) 7 0 0°C deformability tensile strength (N/mm 2 ) elongation (%) 7021 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 6 ⁇ 7 9 2 1 9 7022 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 8 ⁇ 7 6 2 2 0 7023 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 9 ⁇ 7 2 5 1 7 7024 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 8 ⁇ 7 4 4 2 1 7025 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 0 ⁇ 7 5 0 2 0 7026 ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 2 ⁇ 6 7 1 2 3 7027 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 8 ⁇ 7 4 0 2 3 7028 o ⁇ ⁇ 1 3 3 ⁇ 7 6 3 2 2 7029 ⁇ ⁇ 1 2 9 ⁇ 6 4 7 2 4 No.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Conductive Materials (AREA)
  • Forging (AREA)
  • Adornments (AREA)
  • Domestic Plumbing Installations (AREA)

Claims (2)

  1. Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre qui comprend 69 à 79 pour cent, en poids, de cuivre ; 2,0 à 4,0 pour cent, en poids, de silicium ; 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de plomb ; le pourcentage restant, en poids, de zinc, et facultativement l'un de :
    a) un élément choisi parmi 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de bismuth, 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de tellure, et 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de sélénium ; ou
    b) au moins un élément choisi parmi 0,3 à 3,5 pour cent, en poids, d'étain, 0,02 à 0,25 pour cent, en poids, de phosphore, 0,02 à 0,15 pour cent, en poids, d'antimoine, et 0,02 à 0,15 pour cent, en poids, d'arsenic ; ou
    c) au moins un élément choisi parmi 0,3 à 3,5 pour cent, en poids, d'étain, 0,02 à 0,25 pour cent, en poids, de phosphore, 0,02 à 0,15 pour cent, en poids, d'antimoine, et 0,02 à 0,15 pour cent, en poids, d'arsenic; et un élément choisi parmi 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de bismuth, 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de tellure, et 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de sélénium ; ou
    d) 0,1 à 1,5 pour cent, en poids, d'aluminium ; et 0,02 à 0,25 pour cent, en poids, de phosphore ; ou
    e) 0,1 à 1,5 pour cent, en poids, d'aluminium ; et 0,02 à 0,25 pour cent, en poids, de phosphore ; un élément choisi parmi 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de bismuth, 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de tellure, et 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de sélénium ; ou
    f) 0,1 à 1,5 pour cent, en poids, d'aluminium ; et 0,02 à 0,25 pour cent, en poids, de phosphore; et au moins un élément choisi parmi 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de chrome et 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de titane ; ou
    g) 0,1 à 1,5 pour cent, en poids, d'aluminium ; et 0,02 à 0,25 pour cent, en poids, de phosphore; et au moins un élément choisi parmi 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de chrome et 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de titane ; un élément choisi parmi 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de bismuth, 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de tellure, et 0,02 à 0,4 pour cent, en poids, de sélénium ;
    et dans lequel la structure métallique de l'alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre a au moins une phase choisie parmi la phase γ (gamma) et la phase κ (kappa).
  2. Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre selon la revendication 1, qui est soumis à un traitement thermique pendant 30 minutes à 5 heures à 400 à 600°C.
EP98953070A 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de decolletage a base de cuivre Expired - Lifetime EP1038981B1 (fr)

Priority Applications (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP04077561A EP1508626B1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre.
EP04077560A EP1502964B1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre.

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP28792198 1998-10-09
JP28792198A JP3917304B2 (ja) 1998-10-09 1998-10-09 快削性銅合金
PCT/JP1998/005156 WO2000022181A1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de decolletage a base de cuivre

Related Child Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04077561A Division EP1508626B1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre.
EP04077560A Division EP1502964B1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre.

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1038981A1 EP1038981A1 (fr) 2000-09-27
EP1038981A4 EP1038981A4 (fr) 2003-02-19
EP1038981B1 true EP1038981B1 (fr) 2005-01-26

Family

ID=17723462

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04077561A Expired - Lifetime EP1508626B1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre.
EP98953070A Expired - Lifetime EP1038981B1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de decolletage a base de cuivre
EP04077560A Expired - Lifetime EP1502964B1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre.

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04077561A Expired - Lifetime EP1508626B1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre.

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP04077560A Expired - Lifetime EP1502964B1 (fr) 1998-10-09 1998-11-16 Alliage de décolletage à base de cuivre.

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (3) EP1508626B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP3917304B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR100375426B1 (fr)
AU (1) AU738301B2 (fr)
CA (1) CA2303512C (fr)
DE (3) DE69833582T2 (fr)
TW (1) TW577931B (fr)
WO (1) WO2000022181A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (31)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8506730B2 (en) 1998-10-09 2013-08-13 Mitsubishi Shindoh Co., Ltd. Copper/zinc alloys having low levels of lead and good machinability
JP2002069551A (ja) * 2000-09-04 2002-03-08 Sumitomo Light Metal Ind Ltd 快削性銅合金
DE10132055C2 (de) * 2001-07-05 2003-12-11 Diehl Metall Stiftung & Co Kg Entzinkungsbeständige Kupfer-Zink-Legierung sowie Verfahren zu ihrer Herstellung
JP2004244672A (ja) 2003-02-13 2004-09-02 Dowa Mining Co Ltd 耐脱亜鉛性に優れた銅基合金
CZ20032094A3 (cs) * 2003-08-01 2005-04-13 Kovohutě Čelákovice A. S. Automatová mosaz
DE502005009545D1 (de) * 2004-10-11 2010-06-17 Diehl Metall Stiftung & Co Kg Kupfer-zink-silizium-legierung, deren verwendung und deren herstellung
CN101098976B (zh) 2005-09-22 2014-08-13 三菱伸铜株式会社 含有极少量铅的易切削铜合金
KR100864909B1 (ko) * 2007-01-30 2008-10-22 주식회사 풍산 쾌삭성 구리합금
KR100864910B1 (ko) * 2007-01-30 2008-10-22 주식회사 풍산 쾌삭성 구리합금
JP5326114B2 (ja) 2009-04-24 2013-10-30 サンエツ金属株式会社 高強度銅合金
JP5645570B2 (ja) * 2010-09-27 2014-12-24 株式会社Ｌｉｘｉｌ 鍛造用及び切削加工用銅基合金並びに水道用器具
US20140294665A1 (en) 2011-02-04 2014-10-02 Baoshida Swissmetal Ag Cu-Ni-Zn-Mn Alloy
CN103917674B (zh) * 2011-11-04 2015-06-03 三菱伸铜株式会社 铜合金热锻件
JP5763504B2 (ja) * 2011-11-11 2015-08-12 三菱伸銅株式会社 銅合金製の転造加工用素材及び転造加工品
JP2013194277A (ja) * 2012-03-19 2013-09-30 Lixil Corp 切削加工用銅基合金及びその合金を用いた水道用器具
AU2013340034B2 (en) 2012-10-31 2018-03-22 Kitz Corporation Brass alloy and processed part and wetted part
JP2015175008A (ja) * 2014-03-13 2015-10-05 株式会社Ｌｉｘｉｌ 鉛レス黄銅材料および水道用器具
CN106103755A (zh) * 2014-03-31 2016-11-09 株式会社栗本铁工所 水管部件用低铅黄铜合金
TWI598452B (zh) 2016-01-21 2017-09-11 慶堂工業股份有限公司 具優異熔鑄性之無鉛快削黃銅合金及其製造方法和用途
WO2019035224A1 (fr) * 2017-08-15 2019-02-21 三菱伸銅株式会社 Alliage de cuivre de décolletage, et procédé de fabrication de celui-ci
WO2018034284A1 (fr) 2016-08-15 2018-02-22 三菱伸銅株式会社 Alliage de cuivre facilement usinable et procédé de fabrication de celui-ci
JP6448166B1 (ja) * 2017-08-15 2019-01-09 三菱伸銅株式会社 快削性銅合金、及び、快削性銅合金の製造方法
JP6448168B1 (ja) * 2017-08-15 2019-01-09 三菱伸銅株式会社 快削性銅合金、及び、快削性銅合金の製造方法
US11155909B2 (en) 2017-08-15 2021-10-26 Mitsubishi Materials Corporation High-strength free-cutting copper alloy and method for producing high-strength free-cutting copper alloy
KR101969010B1 (ko) 2018-12-19 2019-04-15 주식회사 풍산 납과 비스무트가 첨가되지 않은 쾌삭성 무연 구리합금
JP7180488B2 (ja) * 2019-03-25 2022-11-30 三菱マテリアル株式会社 銅合金丸棒材
TWI731506B (zh) 2019-06-25 2021-06-21 日商三菱伸銅股份有限公司 快削性銅合金及快削性銅合金的製造方法
WO2020261666A1 (fr) 2019-06-25 2020-12-30 三菱マテリアル株式会社 Alliage de cuivre à décolletage et procédé de production d'alliage de cuivre à décolletage
KR102623143B1 (ko) 2019-06-25 2024-01-09 미쓰비시 마테리알 가부시키가이샤 쾌삭성 구리 합금 주물, 및 쾌삭성 구리 합금 주물의 제조 방법
KR20220059528A (ko) 2019-12-11 2022-05-10 미쓰비시 마테리알 가부시키가이샤 쾌삭성 구리 합금, 및 쾌삭성 구리 합금의 제조 방법
DE102020127317A1 (de) 2020-10-16 2022-04-21 Diehl Metall Stiftung & Co. Kg Bleifreie Kupferlegierung sowie Verwendung der bleifreien Kupferlegierung

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS5696040A (en) * 1979-12-28 1981-08-03 Seiko Epson Corp Exterior decorative part material for casting
DE3427740A1 (de) * 1984-07-27 1986-02-06 Diehl GmbH & Co, 8500 Nürnberg Messinglegierung, herstellungsverfahren und verwendung
JPS61133357A (ja) * 1984-12-03 1986-06-20 Showa Alum Ind Kk 加工性および耐焼付性にすぐれた軸受用Ｃｕ合金
JPS62297429A (ja) * 1986-06-17 1987-12-24 Nippon Mining Co Ltd 耐食性に優れた銅合金
US5288458A (en) * 1991-03-01 1994-02-22 Olin Corporation Machinable copper alloys having reduced lead content
DE4339426C2 (de) * 1993-11-18 1999-07-01 Diehl Stiftung & Co Kupfer-Zink-Legierung
JP3459520B2 (ja) * 1996-09-05 2003-10-20 古河電気工業株式会社 リードフレーム用銅合金
WO1998010105A1 (fr) * 1996-09-05 1998-03-12 The Furukawa Electric Co., Ltd. Alliage de cuivre pour dispositifs electroniques

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU738301B2 (en) 2001-09-13
EP1508626A1 (fr) 2005-02-23
DE69828818D1 (de) 2005-03-03
JP3917304B2 (ja) 2007-05-23
KR20010033101A (ko) 2001-04-25
EP1508626B1 (fr) 2006-09-13
EP1038981A1 (fr) 2000-09-27
DE69833582T2 (de) 2007-01-18
JP2000119774A (ja) 2000-04-25
WO2000022181A1 (fr) 2000-04-20
EP1502964B1 (fr) 2006-03-01
KR100375426B1 (ko) 2003-03-10
TW577931B (en) 2004-03-01
EP1038981A4 (fr) 2003-02-19
CA2303512C (fr) 2006-07-11
DE69835912D1 (de) 2006-10-26
EP1502964A1 (fr) 2005-02-02
DE69833582D1 (de) 2006-04-27
DE69835912T2 (de) 2007-03-08
AU1054099A (en) 2000-05-01
DE69828818T2 (de) 2006-01-05
CA2303512A1 (fr) 2000-04-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1038981B1 (fr) Alliage de decolletage a base de cuivre
EP1045041B1 (fr) Alliage de cuivre de decolletage sans plomb
US6413330B1 (en) Lead-free free-cutting copper alloys
US8506730B2 (en) Copper/zinc alloys having low levels of lead and good machinability
CA2619357C (fr) Alliage de cuivre de decolletage presentant une tres faible teneur en plomb
US7056396B2 (en) Copper/zinc alloys having low levels of lead and good machinability
KR101340487B1 (ko) 쾌삭성 무연 구리합금 및 이의 제조방법
US5637160A (en) Corrosion-resistant bismuth brass
JP4620963B2 (ja) 黄銅およびその製造方法ならびにこれを用いた部品
JP4184357B2 (ja) 無鉛快削性黄銅合金及びその製造方法
JP3732305B2 (ja) 耐食性及び熱間加工性並びに耐応力腐食割れ性に優れた銅基合金とその銅基合金の製造方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20000707

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BE DE FI FR GB IT SE

A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20030108

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20031006

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE FI FR GB IT SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050126

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050126

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 69828818

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20050303

Kind code of ref document: P

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20050426

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

ET Fr: translation filed
26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20051027

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: TP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 69828818

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: SCHAUMBURG UND PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE MBB, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 69828818

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: SCHAUMBURG & PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE MBB, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R082

Ref document number: 69828818

Country of ref document: DE

Representative=s name: SCHAUMBURG & PARTNER PATENTANWAELTE GBR, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 18

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 19

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20171129

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20171130

Year of fee payment: 20

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20171127

Year of fee payment: 20

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20171222

Year of fee payment: 20

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R071

Ref document number: 69828818

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: PE20

Expiry date: 20181115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION

Effective date: 20181115