WO2007034101A1 - Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme - Google Patents
Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- WO2007034101A1 WO2007034101A1 PCT/FR2006/050885 FR2006050885W WO2007034101A1 WO 2007034101 A1 WO2007034101 A1 WO 2007034101A1 FR 2006050885 W FR2006050885 W FR 2006050885W WO 2007034101 A1 WO2007034101 A1 WO 2007034101A1
- Authority
- WO
- WIPO (PCT)
- Prior art keywords
- wheel
- modal
- wheels
- vehicle
- speed
- Prior art date
Links
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G3/00—Resilient suspensions for a single wheel
- B60G3/02—Resilient suspensions for a single wheel with a single pivoted arm
- B60G3/04—Resilient suspensions for a single wheel with a single pivoted arm the arm being essentially transverse to the longitudinal axis of the vehicle
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G17/00—Resilient suspensions having means for adjusting the spring or vibration-damper characteristics, for regulating the distance between a supporting surface and a sprung part of vehicle or for locking suspension during use to meet varying vehicular or surface conditions, e.g. due to speed or load
- B60G17/015—Resilient suspensions having means for adjusting the spring or vibration-damper characteristics, for regulating the distance between a supporting surface and a sprung part of vehicle or for locking suspension during use to meet varying vehicular or surface conditions, e.g. due to speed or load the regulating means comprising electric or electronic elements
- B60G17/016—Resilient suspensions having means for adjusting the spring or vibration-damper characteristics, for regulating the distance between a supporting surface and a sprung part of vehicle or for locking suspension during use to meet varying vehicular or surface conditions, e.g. due to speed or load the regulating means comprising electric or electronic elements characterised by their responsiveness, when the vehicle is travelling, to specific motion, a specific condition, or driver input
- B60G17/0165—Resilient suspensions having means for adjusting the spring or vibration-damper characteristics, for regulating the distance between a supporting surface and a sprung part of vehicle or for locking suspension during use to meet varying vehicular or surface conditions, e.g. due to speed or load the regulating means comprising electric or electronic elements characterised by their responsiveness, when the vehicle is travelling, to specific motion, a specific condition, or driver input to an external condition, e.g. rough road surface, side wind
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G3/00—Resilient suspensions for a single wheel
- B60G3/18—Resilient suspensions for a single wheel with two or more pivoted arms, e.g. parallelogram
- B60G3/20—Resilient suspensions for a single wheel with two or more pivoted arms, e.g. parallelogram all arms being rigid
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2400/00—Indexing codes relating to detected, measured or calculated conditions or factors
- B60G2400/20—Speed
- B60G2400/202—Piston speed; Relative velocity between vehicle body and wheel
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2400/00—Indexing codes relating to detected, measured or calculated conditions or factors
- B60G2400/25—Stroke; Height; Displacement
- B60G2400/252—Stroke; Height; Displacement vertical
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2500/00—Indexing codes relating to the regulated action or device
- B60G2500/10—Damping action or damper
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B60—VEHICLES IN GENERAL
- B60G—VEHICLE SUSPENSION ARRANGEMENTS
- B60G2800/00—Indexing codes relating to the type of movement or to the condition of the vehicle and to the end result to be achieved by the control action
- B60G2800/90—System Controller type
- B60G2800/91—Suspension Control
Definitions
- Suspension control device vehicle provided with same, method of obtaining and program
- the invention relates to a device for controlling a suspension of a motor vehicle.
- One field of application of the invention relates to motor vehicles having a spring suspension, a hydropneumatic suspension or a suspension of another type.
- suspensions comprise on each wheel a damper with variable damping law, which can be adjusted by an actuator controlled by a computer on board the vehicle.
- the computer receives input measurements provided by sensors and calculates from them or the control variables of the dampers actuators.
- the calculator notably takes into account accelerations sustained by the vehicle body during the journey, such as, for example, the modal acceleration of pumping in the vertical direction, the modal acceleration of rolling around a longitudinal axis and the modal acceleration. pitching around a transverse axis.
- the computer calculates the corresponding modal speeds of the body.
- Devices are thus known in which the computer implements a regulation to make the vertical modal speed in pumping to zero, the angular modal speed in roll and the angular modal speed in pitch, this logic being commonly called “Skyhook" and in front of improve the comfort of people in the car.
- Skyhook a regulation to make the vertical modal speed in pumping to zero
- the wheels can very much sink to the box at the passage of speed bumps or high obstacles or any other sudden unevenness provided in the road surface. These obstacles represent particular demands for which the Skyhook logic is not optimized.
- a first object of the invention is a device for controlling a suspension of a motor vehicle body on its wheels, comprising a computer capable of calculating a control quantity of an actuator of at least one actuator.
- variable shock absorber of the suspension characterized in that the device comprises a means for measuring the travel and the speed of movement, relative to the body, of the right wheel and the left wheel located on the same front axle and / or rearward, the computer comprises - a means of detecting a large amplitude of wheel movement, when the displacement of the left wheel and the displacement of the right wheel each exceed a first prescribed threshold of detection and when the speed of movement of the wheel left wheel and the travel speed of the right wheel each exceed a second prescribed detection threshold,
- a second object of the invention is a motor vehicle comprising a box, wheels, a suspension of the box on the wheels and a suspension control device as described above.
- a third object of the invention is a method for obtaining a motor vehicle, the motor vehicle being provided with wheels, a body, a suspension having at least one damping variable damping of the body on the wheels , and a suspension control device, the control device having at least one computer capable of calculating a control quantity of an actuator of said at least one suspension damper, the obtaining method comprising a step of mounting of the computer on the vehicle, characterized in that the method of obtaining comprises at least one programming step of the computer according to at least one program comprising program instructions implementing the calculation means of the suspension control device such as as described above.
- a fourth object of the invention is a computer program for controlling a computer, comprising program instructions for calculating a desired magnitude of a wheel damper actuator, when a large amplitude of movement of wheel is detected, for the calculation of a control variable according to at least said setpoint, when implemented in a suspension control device as described above.
- FIG. 1 is a schematic perspective view of a connection device on the ground of a front axle of a vehicle
- FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the suspension control device
- FIG. 3 is a schematic perspective view of the body of a vehicle, provided with the suspension on its wheels
- FIG. 4 is a modular block diagram of a modal speed calculation unit of the control device according to FIG. invention
- FIG. 5 is a modular block diagram of an estimator provided in the control device according to FIG. 4,
- FIG. 6 is a modular block diagram of a Skyhook type modal effort calculation unit
- FIG. 7 is a modular block diagram of a unit for calculating a mass suspended at the front and at the rear,
- FIG. 8 is a flow chart of the method for calculating the suspended masses of the unit according to FIG. 7;
- FIG. 9 is a modular block diagram of a unit for calculating the levels of movement and twisting of the body;
- FIG. 10 is a modular block diagram of a modulus of effort calculation unit of the Roadhook type
- FIG. 11 is a modular block diagram of a unit for calculating anticipatory modal effort terms
- FIG. 12 is a modular block diagram of a unit for calculating wheel setpoint loads, comprising the Skyhook type modal force calculation unit and the Roadhook type modal force calculation unit;
- FIG. 13 represents timing diagrams of stress detection signals and an intermediate weighting coefficient calculated as a function thereof, occurring in the calculation unit according to FIG. 12,
- FIG. 14 shows timing diagrams of the steering wheel angle during a single cornering, and a weighting coefficient between the Skyhook efforts and the Roadhook efforts, involved in the calculation unit according to FIG. 12,
- FIG. 15 shows the damping laws of the variable dampers of the suspension
- FIG. 16 is a modular block diagram of a unit for calculating a set damping law in the event of detection of a percussion
- FIG. 17 of a unit for calculating a reference damping law in the event of detection of a large amplitude of cash movement
- FIG. 18 is a cross-sectional diagram showing the connection of a displacement sensor to the body and a front wheel or rear.
- the vehicle 1 comprises a body 2 mounted on four wheels, namely a left front wheel A, a right front wheel B, a right rear wheel C and a left rear wheel D.
- Each wheel A, B, C, D is connected to the body 2 by its own system S spring suspension R between stops, but could also be a hydropneumatic suspension.
- Each suspension system S comprises an AM damper provided with an actuator M controlled by an on-board CSS calculator.
- This actuator M is for example a motor which makes it possible to modify the passage section of the oil in the damper AM. It therefore corresponds to each passage section of the oil in the damper, a damping law different from this one.
- damping laws also known as damping states, are stored in the form of curves, tables of values, mathematical formulas or others.
- FIG. 15 represents these damping laws ER, where each damping law is a predetermined curve of the force exerted by the damper towards the body as a function of the VDEB travel speed of this damper AM, the laws of increasing firmer having, at speed of travel constant, bigger forces.
- the damping states ER are, for example, numbered in ascending order for the increasingly firm damping states, that is to say corresponding to a larger and larger buffer force at the VDEB speed of travel. constant.
- a minimum damping state corresponds to a damping state having a minimum firmness, that is to say corresponding to a damping force greater than or equal to a minimum for each VDEB speed of travel.
- the CSS computer is connected to the CAN network of the vehicle to recover a large part of the useful signals (vehicle speed, ABS regulation, lateral and longitudinal accelerations provided by the braking system, sportiness required by the driver provided by an interface with the user ( intelligent service housing), etc.). It also uses its own sensors (direct wired links with the sensors) to know the movements of the car at any time. It is finally connected to the actuators which it manages.
- the motor can be stepper, in which case the damper AM has a determined number N of discrete damping laws or a DC motor in position, in which case the damper AM has an infinity of damping laws.
- the stepper motor actuator can take nine distinct stable positions, resulting in nine damping laws, from flexible to farm. Indeed, the smaller the passage section of the oil, the greater the damping force will be important, and the more the damper will be firm.
- Each actuator M has a control COM input connected to the CSS computer to receive therefrom a control ER variable selecting a position of the actuator M among several to impose a predetermined damping law corresponding to this position.
- a displacement sensor CAP-DEB is provided on at least one of the wheels A, B, C, D of the vehicle, and preferably on each wheel A, B, C, D.
- Each CAP-DEB sensor therefore measures the travel DEB of its associated wheel relative to the body 2.
- each sensor CAP-DEB wheel deflection sensors are for example angular and give the instantaneous value of the angle between the axis of rotation of the wheel and the body 2.
- each sensor CAP- Debit DEB comprises a fixed part CAPF, such as a housing, fixed to the body 2, and a movable part CAPM, connected to an element fixed to the wheel.
- a connecting link BIEL connects the moving part CAPM to the fixed part CAPF and rotates an element MES of angular measurement contained in the fixed part CAPF, when the wheel goes up or down with respect to the box 2.
- the mobile part CAPM is by example fixed on an SUP element for supporting the axis AX of rotation of the wheel. This support SUP element is movable about a substantially longitudinal axis SUPL with respect to the body 2.
- the movable portion CAPM is fixed on the support SUP element at a distance from its axis SUPL of rotation.
- the travel DEB measurements of the wheels A, B, C, D are sent from the CAP-DEB sensors to the CSS calculator, which has corresponding E-DEB inputs.
- the CSS calculator calculates from the wheel movement DEB measurements the modal acceleration zG in pumping of the body, the modal angular acceleration ⁇ in roll and the angular modal acceleration ⁇ in pitch, according to the formulas below.
- G is the center of gravity of box 2
- zG is the altitude of G in ascending vertical direction Z
- ⁇ is the roll angle of box 2 around a longitudinal axis X passing through G and directed from the rear to the front
- ⁇ is the pitch angle of the body 2 about a transverse axis passing through G and directed from the right to the left
- the X, Y, Z axes forming an orthonormal reference.
- FA, FB, FC, FD are the forces exerted by the respective wheels A, B, C, D on the body 2 by means of their suspension S.
- v is the track of the body 2, that is to say say the distance between the right wheels and the left wheels in the transverse direction, e is the wheelbase of the vehicle,
- Ig is the longitudinal distance between the center of gravity G and the transverse axis of the front wheels A and B
- M is the predetermined mass of the body 2 without occupant of the vehicle.
- l ⁇ is the moment of inertia in roll
- l ⁇ is the moment of inertia in pitch.
- CBAD is a couple exerted by the anti-roll bar ADB on the box 2.
- C ⁇ is a roll torque
- C ⁇ is a pitching torque.
- the mode of calculating the modal accelerations in the CSS calculator is for example implemented by the module 10 represented in FIGS. 4 and 5.
- the module 10 comprises a first means CAL for calculating the modal accelerations zG, ⁇ and ⁇ , receiving as input the DEB measurements of the displacement of the wheels.
- the average CAL comprises:
- the filter 13 eliminates the low frequencies of the travel DEB measurement provided by the CAP-DEB sensors.
- This filter 13 comprises, for example, a high-pass filter having a low cut-off frequency greater than or equal to 0.2 Hz.
- the filter 13 is for example produced by a band-pass filter which therefore additionally has a high cut-off frequency, for example. example greater than or equal to 8 Hz, which allows to keep a sufficiently constant phase in the bandwidth.
- the DEBF filtered wheel deflection provided at the output of the filter 13 from the wheel displacement DEB measurement is sent to the input of the estimator 11, as well as to another input of the estimator 12.
- the filter 13 provides four filtered flow measurements DEBF (A), DEBF (B), DEBF (C), DEBF (D).
- the estimator 1 1 calculates the anti-roll bar torque CBAD as a function of the filtered clearance values DEBF provided by the filter 13 in the following manner:
- CBAD (A) (DEBF (A) - DEBF (B)). (Kbadav) / v 2 ,
- Kbadav is a predetermined parameter corresponding to the stiffness of the anti-roll bar before BAD
- Kbadar is a predetermined parameter corresponding to the stiffness of the rear anti-roll bar, not shown.
- the suspension effort estimator 12 has an input for the filtered deflections DEBF, an input for the unfiltered displacements
- DEB an input for the real state ER of the actuator, that is to say the damping law ER that it currently implements, this actual state and its changes being for example stored, a DEAV input Static force on the front wheels and a static force DEAR entry on the rear wheels.
- this estimator 12 is described in FIG. 5 by way of example for the calculation of the suspension force FA on the left front wheel A. Of course, the calculation is similar for the other forces FB,
- FC FC, FD, by replacing what relates specifically to wheel A by the values corresponding to wheel B, C or D.
- the travel DEB (A) measured by the sensor CAP-DEB on the wheel A is sent to a low-pass PB filter limiting the bandwidth of the travel DEB (A), followed by a derivation module DER to obtain the VDEB travel speed for the wheel A.
- the VDEB wheel travel speeds are provided on an output of the estimator 12 and the module 10.
- An MFAM module for calculating the damping FAM force exerted by the damper AM on the body 2 receives as input the real state ER and the travel speed VDEB of the wheel concerned.
- the damping laws of AM dampers are stored in advance, or can be recalculated once the ER state has been specified.
- Each of the damping laws ER makes it possible to calculate or determine the travel speed VDEB as a function of the damping force FAM by the damper AM and vice versa.
- the module MFAM determines from the state ER the current damping law for the damper AM of the wheel A and determines from the speed of movement VDEB (A) of the wheel A for this selected law, for example by reading the curve of this law, the amperage force FAM of the wheel A.
- Another module MFSEC for calculating a FSEC force of dry friction of the shock absorber AM of the wheel A also receives the input VDEB speed of movement thereof and calculates the force FSEC dry friction by the following formula:
- Fsec (FsAv). tanh (VDEB / 10 "2 ) where VDEB is in cm / s, and FsAv is a coefficient of dry friction of the front wheels, having been previously calculated on a test bench and is for example equal to about 200 Newton.
- This coefficient of friction is replaced by a coefficient FsAr of friction for the rear wheels.
- a static attitude calculation module AS receives the debits DEB of the four wheels A, B, C, D and calculates therefrom the static attitude AS, which represents the static equilibrium position of the S suspension when the vehicle is stationary on a level ground.
- This MAS module calculates a static front plate ASav and an ASar static rear plate.
- the static attitude before ASav is for example calculated as the average clearance DEBAVMOY (half-sum) of the deflections DEB of the front wheels A, B, filtered by a low-pass filter, for example of the Butterworth type of the second order, average clearance filter, which is then added a front attitude offset constant.
- the static rear attitude ASar is for example calculated as the average clearance DEBARMOY (half-sum) of the deflections DEB of the rear wheels C, D, filtered by a low-pass filter, for example of Butterworth type second order, average clearance filter which is then added a rear attitude offset constant. It is assumed that the displacement sensor CAP-DEB is calibrated to measure the displacement relative to this static attitude AS.
- An adder AD1 adds the filtered clearance DEBF-A of the wheel A to the static attitude AS calculated for the wheel A, that is to say the static attitude before, to obtain the real length LR of the spring R associated with wheel A.
- the static attitude calculation module AS is for example part of a static characteristic estimator 20 shown in FIG. 6, receiving as input the deflections DEB of the four wheels A, B, C, D, a front static pressure and a rear static pressure in the case of a hydropneumatic suspension, the speed WH of the vehicle, an opening information 10.
- the speed VVH of the vehicle is for example provided by a speed sensor or any other means of calculation.
- the static feature estimator 20 comprises:
- the MDAAR backward apparent dynamic mass is calculated in
- MDAAR (EDFAR.2 / g) + back constant.
- the dynamic spring bending force is zero in the equilibrium position of the spring corresponding to its static position, the relative forward displacement being the deflection relative to the static equilibrium position, the extraction being done for example by interpolation of the table but can also be made from a registered curve of EDFAV, EDFAR.
- the MDAAR mass and the MDAAV mass are calculated using the front static pressure and the rear static pressure.
- BAAR (CAR WH 2 ) / g, where CAR is a predetermined aerodynamic backward coefficient.
- step S2 if the vehicle speed VVH is between a predetermined low threshold WH 1 and a predetermined high threshold WH2,
- step S3 if the opening information IO is "closed” or the vehicle speed VVH is greater than a prescribed threshold VVH3,
- step S4 if the difference between the filtered front axle suspension MSUSEAVF (n) and its value MSUSEAVF (n-i) previously stored in memory is sufficient (greater in absolute value than a prescribed difference ⁇ ).
- the suspended mass of front axle MSUSEAV is taken equal to the suspended mass of filtered front axle MSUSEAVF and is recorded in the memory MEM, at the stage
- the front axle suspension mass MSUSEAV (n) is unchanged and remains equal to the value MSUSEAV (ni) previously stored in the MEM memory, in step S6 and in the other position of the COMLOG logic switch.
- a mass suspended before MSUSAV is calculated by filtering the suspended mass of front axle MSUSEAV by a low-pass filter PB2, and possibly by saturating the values obtained by this filtering above a threshold high and below a low threshold.
- the low-pass filters PB1 and PB2 are for example of order 1 with each a cut-off frequency at 0.02 Hz.
- the procedure is similar for the calculation of the MSUSEAR rear axle suspension mass and the MSUSAR rear suspension mass, replacing MDAAV + BAAV with MDAAR + BAAR and replacing MSUSEAVF with MSUSEARF.
- the suspended mass of the MSUS vehicle is then calculated by summing the suspended mass before MSUSAV and the rear suspended mass MSUSAR
- a suspension stiffness before kAV and a rear suspension stiffness kAR are calculated.
- the suspension stiffness before kAV is obtained by extracting from the pre-recorded table or curve giving the stiffness of the front suspension as a function of the static attitude before, the value of front stiffness corresponding to the static attitude before ASav, for example by interpolation linear.
- the rear suspension stiffness kAR is obtained by extracting from the pre-recorded table or curve giving the stiffness of the rear suspension as a function of the rear static attitude, the rear stiffness value corresponding to the static rear attitude ASar, for example by interpolation. linear.
- the CGI module of FIG. 4 implements this calculation of the length Ig and is for example part of the estimator 20.
- a module MLR calculates, from a table or recorded curve giving a bending force as a function of the length of the spring R, the absolute flexural force FLEX-ABS corresponding to the actual value LR entered by this length.
- This recorded bending curve also takes into account the suspension stops, which are for example made of rubber and exert a greater force on the body when the spring presses these stops at the end of the stroke of the damper AM.
- an MDEA module receives as input static attitude AS and calculates according to it the corresponding static stress DEAV bending on the front wheels and the corresponding static stress DEAR bending on the rear wheels.
- the RMAvAr mass distribution value is continuously estimated using the DEB travel values provided by the CAP-DEB deflection sensors and the comparison of each of these values with a calculated average of the DEB deflections.
- a CAP-ACCT accelerometer is provided on the vehicle to provide a transverse acceleration ACCT to an estimator 14 of the roll torque C ⁇ , also receiving as input the total mass MTOT and a rectraction value RECT of the transverse acceleration ACCT.
- the transverse accelerometer CAP-ACCT is positioned on the center of gravity G and not on the center CR of roll.
- the RECT value for resetting the transverse acceleration is calculated by the CAL-ACC module as follows:
- ⁇ is the unfiltered roll modal acceleration
- n is the value of the variable at the current cycle and (n-1) is the value of the variable at the previous cycle.
- d (G, CR) HCdG - hRoulis is the distance between the center of gravity G and the rolling center CR, and is prerecorded.
- An estimator 15 of the pitching torque C ⁇ receives as input the length Ig, the total mass MTOT, an ACCL longitudinal acceleration provided by a longitudinal accelerometer CAPL disposed in the vehicle body, braking IF information and a recalibration value RECL. longitudinal acceleration calculated by the CAL-ACC module.
- ⁇ is the unfiltered pitch modal acceleration.
- the component c ⁇ B of the torque c ⁇ is the component of the pitching torque due to the Brouilhet effect and is calculated as a function of the braking IF information.
- a determination module 16 supplies this braking IF information as a function of a master cylinder pressure value P M c, itself provided by a brake master cylinder pressure sensor CAP-P.
- the calculated values of the pairs C ⁇ and C ⁇ are entered in the CAL-ACC module which calculates from them and the value of the other inputs and outputs the modal acceleration zG modal, the modal acceleration ⁇ in roll, the modal acceleration ⁇ in pitch, and the values of registration RECT and RECL.
- the modal acceleration ⁇ in roll and modal acceleration ⁇ in pitch are respectively sent to two converters C1 and C2 of degrees in radians per second, then to be supplied with zG on a SACC output for the three unfiltered modal accelerations and from there to a SACC2 output of the module 10 to the outside.
- these three modal accelerations present on the SACC output of the module 10 are each sent to a filter 17 eliminating the low frequencies below a low cut-off frequency of, for example, 0.1 Hz, 0.2 Hz or 0.3 Hz. 17 presents for example in more of this high-pass component a low-pass component to form a bandpass filter.
- the low cutoff frequency of the filter 17 may be different depending on the modal acceleration zG, ⁇ or ⁇ .
- the modal accelerations filtered at the output of the filter 17 are then sent to an integrator module 18 having a high-pass filter at the output, providing at output the estimated modal body speeds, namely the modal speed zG in pumping, the modal speed ⁇ in body roll, and the modal speed ⁇ in body pitch, on an output of the module 10.
- These modal body speeds, zG in pumping, ⁇ in roll, ⁇ in pitch are absolute speeds compared to a Galilean benchmark and are called the first modal cash rates for comfort Skyhook logic.
- the calculator CSS then calculates the control variable ER of the actuator M of the shock absorber AM of the wheel A and the other wheels B, C, D as a function of these calculated modal speeds zG, ⁇ and ⁇ , and gives the quantities ER control thus calculated to the corresponding actuators M on their control COM input.
- An estimator 24 is provided for calculating, as a function of wheel deflections DEB, a level NMC of movement of the body and a level NTC of jigging of the body.
- the level NMC of movement of the body and the level NTC of jigging of the body are obtained in the estimator 24 by:
- the bandpass filter PB3 is set to let the frequencies of the movements of the body, which are relatively low.
- the bandpass filter PB3 of the movements of the body is for example adjusted from 0.5 to 2.5 Hz and is close to the resonant frequency of the suspension. For example, it can be chosen between two slopes to obtain an NMC level of attenuated movement and an NMC level of unmitigated movement.
- the bandpass filter PB3 is set to let the frequencies of the jumps of the body, which are relatively large.
- the PB3 band pass filter of the jacks of the box is set with a low cutoff frequency of 3 Hz and a cutoff frequency high of 8 Hz or more. It can for example be chosen between two slopes to obtain an attenuated tractive NTC level and a non-attenuated tran- sition NTC level.
- the MMAX holding module can have a settable slope of descent and a parametric delay of maxima maintenance.
- the maximization hold delay is chosen shorter to obtain the NTC level of the body jerk than to obtain the NMC level of movement of the body.
- the modal gains b z , b ⁇ , b ⁇ are variable as a function of the deflections DEB of the wheels A, B, C, D and are calculated by the estimator 21 as a function of quantities which have been calculated previously as a function of these DEB deflections. wheels A, B, C, D.
- the modal gains b z , b ⁇ , b ⁇ can comprise one or more multiplicative coefficients, with for example the following multiplicative coefficients: a reference multiplying coefficient b zRE F, b ⁇ REF, b ⁇ RE F, respectively in pumping, in roll and in pitch,
- the estimator 21 receives as input the following quantities:
- the modal stiffnesses provided by the estimator 24 the modal stiffness in pumping k z , the modal stiffness in pitch k ⁇ and the modal stiffness in roll k ⁇ , - the modal speeds V m0d provided by the modulus 10: the modal speed zG in case pumping, the modal speed ⁇ in body roll, the modal speed ⁇ in body pitch,
- the modal moments of inertia provided by the estimator 20 the moment of inertia in roll l ⁇ and the moment of inertia in pitch l ⁇ , - the suspended mass MSUS provided by the estimator 20,
- an information IS of sportiness which can be in a Boolean state 0 of absence of sportiness, or in another Boolean state 1 of sportiness, according to the actuation of a corresponding button of the dashboard of the vehicle by its driver in a position respectively of sports driving or lack of sports driving.
- the reference multiplying coefficient b zRE F, b ⁇ REF, b ⁇ RE F, respectively in pumping, in roll and in pitch is obtained by extracting from a table or pre-recorded reference curve giving the reference multiplying coefficient as a function of the speed of the vehicle, the value b zRE F, b ⁇ REF, b ⁇ RE F of the reference multiplying coefficient, which corresponds to the entered value WH of the speed of the vehicle, for example by linear interpolation.
- R ⁇ NTC - ⁇ ⁇ .NMC
- ⁇ z , ⁇ ⁇ , ⁇ ⁇ are prerecorded parameters making it possible to adjust the ratio between the two levels NMC and NTC, these parameters ⁇ z , ⁇ , ⁇ being for example set between 0.5 and 1;
- the value obtained from bzA ⁇ , b ⁇ A ⁇ , b ⁇ A ⁇ is for example only retained if the associated resistance R z , R ⁇ , R ⁇ is greater than a prescribed threshold. If the associated resistance R z , R ⁇ , R ⁇ is less than or equal to this prescribed threshold, we take 1 as the attenuation multiplying coefficient bzATT, b ⁇ A ⁇ , b ⁇ ATT-
- K REF is a reference stiffness in roll
- K REF is a reference stiffness in pitch
- I ⁇ REF is a reference moment of inertia in roll
- 1 ⁇ REF is a moment of reference inertia in pitch
- ⁇ zSEF K REF > W ' MREF .
- the multiplicative coefficient of driving type b zT ⁇ p, b ⁇ ⁇ p, b ⁇ T ⁇ p, respectively in pumping, in roll and in pitch is equal to a pre-recorded gain of sportiness GS Z , GS ⁇ , GS ⁇ , if the information IS of sportiness is in the Boolean state 1 of sportiness and is equal to 1, if the information IS of sportiness is in the Boolean state 0 of absence of sportiness.
- the first modal pumping effort F z1 , the first modal rolling effort F ⁇ i, the first pitch modal force F ⁇ 1 are calculated and are also called modal comfort forces or "skyhooks".
- the first modal pumping effort F z1 , the first modal roll force F ⁇ i, the first pitch modal force F ⁇ 1 are provided on an output of the estimator 21.
- the device comprises an estimator 31 of the modal velocities V m ⁇ d 2 of the body relative to the average plane of the wheels as a function of the measured DEB displacements of the wheels A, B, C, D.
- These modal speeds V m ⁇ d 2 by relative to the average plane of the wheels are referred to as relative velocities and include the relative modal velocity z G2 of the pumping box, the relative modal velocity ⁇ 2 of the pitch box and the relative modal velocity ⁇ 2 of the rolling body.
- This estimator 31 of the relative modal speeds V m ⁇ d 2 receives as input: the DEB movements measured on the wheels A, B, C, D,
- the RMAvAr mass distribution value between the front and the rear the length Ig separating the center of gravity G from the front wheel axis A, B, and the wheelbase e.
- the DEB deflections are first filtered in a low-pass filter, for example order 2 and Butterworth type, to obtain only the low-frequency movements and eliminate to a large extent the high frequency jitter. Then, a differentiator derives the DEB clearances thus filtered to obtain the Roadhook travel speeds of the wheels A, B, C, D.
- a low-pass filter for example order 2 and Butterworth type
- An estimator 32 is provided for calculating an anticipated transversal jerk 7 (third derivative of the Y coordinate with respect to time) from the measured speed WH of the vehicle and the speed of rotation ⁇ of the steering wheel of the vehicle, where ⁇ is the measured rotation angle of this flywheel, measured by any sensor or appropriate means.
- This estimator 32 receives as input:
- the anticipated transversal jerk 7 is estimated according to the formula: ⁇ _ DhWH 1 ⁇ e ( ⁇ + K.WH 2 ) where D is the reduction of the steering wheel and K is a constant of overbraking gain, calculated according to the value RMAvAr mass distribution between the front and rear and mass suspended MSUS.
- the overbraking gain K is a vehicle size, determined by measurements on the vehicle.
- An estimator 40 is provided to calculate this anticipated engine torque to the wheels, designated C R.
- C M is the engine torque determined by any appropriate means, for example by a motor control computer.
- c ⁇ RouE is the speed of rotation of the wheels.
- An estimator 33 is provided for calculating an anticipated longitudinal jerk X (third derivative of the X coordinate with respect to time) from the derivative of the anticipated engine torque and the derivative P MC of the pressure P M c of the master cylinder. This estimator 33 receives as input:
- the calculation is performed as follows. Firstly, a pre-recorded table or curve giving a braking force of the master cylinder as a function of the pressure of the master cylinder is extracted, the value EFR of this braking force corresponding to the pressure P M c of the master cylinder, for example by linear interpolation. A low-pass filter, for example of order 1 of the Butterworth type, is then applied to this braking force EFR, and the braking force EFR thus filtered is drifted in a drift to obtain the FRF derivative of the force
- An anticipated force of the engine is calculated for the EMR wheels, equal to the anticipated engine torque at the wheels C R , divided by a predetermined average radius Rmoy of the wheels and prerecorded.
- a low-pass filter for example of order 1 of the Butterworth type, is then applied to this anticipated EMR force from the engine to the wheels, and the anticipated EMR force of the engine thus filtered is drifted in a differentiator to obtain the derivative. the filtered EMR effort.
- the anticipated longitudinal jerk X is then equal to the sum of the derivatives ⁇ FRF , , divided by the total mass MTOT:
- the total mass MTOT includes the suspended mass MSUS, can include the mass of the wheels and can be bounded between two thresholds.
- a module 34 is provided for calculating anticipatory modal effort terms, namely:
- the estimator 34 receives as input the following quantities:
- the modal stiffnesses provided by the estimator 24 the modal stiffness in pumping k z , the modal stiffness in pitch k ⁇ and the modal stiffness in roll k ⁇ ,
- the relative modal velocity z G2 in case pumping the relative modal velocity ⁇ 2 in the body roll
- the relative modal velocity ⁇ 2 in body pitch the relative modal velocity ⁇ 2 in body pitch
- the modal moments of inertia provided by the estimator 20 the moment of inertia in roll l ⁇ and the moment of inertia in pitch l ⁇ , the MSUS suspended mass provided by the estimator 20,
- each of these terms modal anticipatory pitch efforts c nt ⁇ 2a and roll 2ant c ⁇ is calculated by treatment anticipated longitudinal jerk X respectively and the anticipated transverse jerk Y to obtain a anticipated longitudinal jerk treated X 7 , and an anticipated transversal jerk Y 7 , then multiplication respectively by a gain in longitudinal bias G S ⁇ to obtain the anticipatory modal torque in pitch c ⁇ 2a n t and by a gain in longitudinal stress G S ⁇ to obtain the anticipatory modal torque in roll c ⁇ 2 a n t according to the formulas:
- the longitudinal biasing gain G S ⁇ and the transverse biasing gain G S ⁇ are predetermined focusing parameters, determined by vehicle tests to obtain the good performance of the cash register under the stress of the driver.
- This formatting is described below for calculating the anticipated pitch modal torque, designated c ⁇ 2ant from the anticipated longitudinal jerk X: - passage of the anticipated longitudinal jerk X in a low amplitude cancellation filter 341, having a high positive SHJL threshold for longitudinal jerk activation and a low negative threshold SBJL for longitudinal jerk activation, to replace with null values the values of the anticipated longitudinal jerk X located between the high threshold of activation of longitudinal jerk SHJL and the low activation threshold of SBJL longitudinal jerk over time;
- a module 342 for maintaining the maxima which may have a parametric time delay for maxima maintenance, to obtain a filtered and maintained jerk at its maxima, designated X / max ,
- the delay must be long enough for the corrective term Roadhook (see above) to have the time to become significant on simple action (simple cornering, braking or acceleration) and be short enough not to disrupt Roadhook operation and not to ask for unnecessary depreciation.
- each of the thresholds SHJT, SHJL, SBJT and SBJL is between 1 and 10 ms -3 .
- b m o d2 is a second corrective modal gain
- bz 2 is a second corrective pump modal gain to calculate the second corrective modal force in pumping Fz 2CO r
- b ⁇ 2 is a second corrective modal roll gain to compute the second corrective modal pair in roll c ⁇ 2cor
- b ⁇ 2 is a second pitch correction modal gain for calculating the second correction modal pair in pitch c ⁇ 2c o r .
- the second corrective modal gains bz2, b ⁇ 2, b ⁇ 2 can comprise one or more multiplicative coefficients, with for example the following multiplicative coefficients:
- the second reference multiplier coefficient b RAA F2, ⁇ b REF2, b ⁇ RE F2, respectively for heave, roll and pitch is obtained in extracting a second table or reference curve, pre-recorded for the Roadhook logic, giving the second reference multiplying coefficient as a function of the vehicle speed, the value b zRE F2, b ⁇ REF2, b ⁇ RE F2 of the second reference multiplying coefficient, which corresponds to to the entered value WH of the vehicle speed, for example by linear interpolation.
- the estimator 34 then makes the synthesis between the anticipatory pitch modal torque c ⁇ 2a nt and the second pitch correction modal pair c ⁇ 2co r, to obtain at the output the second pitch torque or modulus c ⁇ 2 of pitch,
- the second pumping corrective modal force is output as the second modulating force or force F 72 F 72
- the synthesis is performed by choosing the anticipatory term or the corrective term according to their values, as described in the table below.
- the second pitch modal force c ⁇ 2 is equal to max (I c ⁇ 2 ⁇ r I, I c ⁇ 2an t I) -sgn (c ⁇ 2a nt),
- Obtaining the second modal modulus c ⁇ 2 for rolling is analogous to the foregoing, from c ⁇ 2c or and c ⁇ 2an t instead of c ⁇ 2 ⁇ r and c ⁇ 2an t, with a first prescribed value of roll V1 ⁇ at instead of V1 ⁇ , and a second prescribed value of roll V2 ⁇ instead of V2 ⁇ .
- the first modal pumping effort F z1 , the first modal roll force F ⁇ i and the first modal pitch force F ⁇ 1 provided by the estimator 21 (modal comfort forces by the Skyhook logic, generally designated by first modal force F1 setpoint), as well as the second modal effort F 72 pumping, the second modal stress c ⁇ 2 roll and the second modal effort c ⁇ 2 pitch provided by the estimator 34 (modal efforts behavior by logic Roadhook, generally designated by second modal F2 setpoint forces), are sent to an estimator 22 of a set force for each damper, ie for the wheels A, B, C, D, the target forces FA1 , FB1, FC1, FD1.
- the estimator 22 For each mode, the estimator 22 weights the first effort F1 comfort and the second effort F2 behavior to calculate the modal force F setpoint. The estimator 22 calculates:
- F ⁇ 1 - a modal stress F F ⁇ of roll setpoint, as a function of the first modal roll force F ⁇ i of comfort, of the second modal stress c ⁇ 2 of the behavior roll and of the weighting coefficient ⁇ , according to the formula:
- this weighting coefficient ⁇ is normally 0 to make the modal reference forces follow the first comfort forces F z1 , F ⁇ i and F ⁇ 1 of the Skyhook logic.
- the corrected longitudinal acceleration X COR is calculated by an estimator 25 from the ACCL measured longitudinal acceleration, provided by the CAPL longitudinal accelerometer.
- the estimator 25 receives as input:
- the pre-recorded table or curve giving the braking force of the master cylinder as a function of the pressure of the master cylinder is extracted, the value EFR of this braking force corresponding to the pressure P M c of the master cylinder, for example by linear interpolation.
- the anticipated force of the engine at the wheels EMR is calculated, equal to the anticipated engine torque at the wheels C R , divided by a mean radius Rmoy of the wheels, predetermined and prerecorded.
- a longitudinal drag force ETR is calculated as a function of the speed of the vehicle VVH according to the formula:
- COEF is a predetermined and pre-recorded coefficient
- DEC is a predetermined and pre-recorded offset
- MSUS can include the mass of the wheels and can be bounded between two thresholds.
- the anticipated longitudinal acceleration X ANT is possibly then bounded between two thresholds.
- X COR ACCL + PH (X ⁇ - ACCL)
- the cutoff frequency of the high-pass filter PH makes it possible to adjust the speed of resetting of the estimate to the measurement.
- the corrected transverse acceleration ⁇ COR is calculated by an estimator 26 from the measured transverse acceleration ACCT, provided by the transverse accelerometer CAP-ACCT.
- the estimator 26 receives as input: the suspended mass MSUS,
- Anticipated transversal acceleration ⁇ ANT is estimated according to the formula:
- K the override gain constant, calculated as a function of the RMAvAr mass distribution value between front and rear and of the MSUS hanging mass.
- K of overbraking gain is a vehicle size, determined by measurements on the vehicle.
- the anticipated longitudinal acceleration ⁇ ANT is then possibly bounded between two thresholds.
- EVAT T ⁇ - ACCT by applying to this EVAT evolution of the transverse acceleration a high-pass filter PH2, for example of the Butterworth type of order 1, to obtain the filtered EVAT transverse evolution, equal to PH (T 1 ⁇ - ACCT),
- the cutoff frequency of the high-pass filter PH2 makes it possible to adjust the resetting speed of the estimate on the measurement.
- an estimator 23 calculates the coefficient ⁇ of weighting of the first efforts of comfort and the second efforts of behavior.
- the estimator 23 receives as input:
- Skyhook are selected for the modal setpoint forces, that is, the weighting coefficient ⁇ is 0.
- the solicitations are detected on the values taken by these inputs.
- the weighting coefficient ⁇ goes to "all behavior "or Roadhook, that is to say to 1, to select the second efforts F 72 , c ⁇ 2 and c ⁇ 2 behavior as modal reference forces.
- a stabilization within a load, typically a large motorway curve as in Figure 14, there is the possibility of again passing the weighting coefficient ⁇ gradually to 0 in Skyhook logic to promote comfort .
- a variation of the accelerometric quantities is detected, the distribution immediately returns to 'all' behavior, ie to 1.
- a boolean signal 'lateral driver demand' (SSOLT) is created.
- a boolean signal 'longitudinal conductive solicitation' (SSOLL) on crossing adjustable thresholds of corrected acceleration or anticipated jerk.
- the weighting factor goes to 1 and the timer is reset when the following events are detected:
- the estimator 23 determines, as a function of the sportiness information IS, a longitudinal MODL threshold modulation and a transverse MODT threshold modulation.
- the longitudinal MODL threshold modulation is equal to a prescribed longitudinal value plus smaller than 1 and the transverse MODT threshold modulation is equal to a transverse prescribed value smaller than 1.
- the longitudinal MODL threshold modulation is equal to 1 and the transversal MODT threshold modulation is equal to 1.
- transverse logic ST5 a longitudinal logic signal SSOLL for biasing, a second longitudinal logic signal SL2, a third longitudinal logic signal SL3, a transverse logic signal SSOLT for biasing, a fourth transverse logic signal ST4 and a fifth signal.
- transverse logic ST5 as follows:
- the transverse acceleration ⁇ ⁇ is initialized to 0.
- THALi is a first threshold of longitudinal acceleration
- THAL 2 is a second threshold of variation of longitudinal acceleration
- THJLi and THJL 2 are first and second longitudinal jerk thresholds, THATi is a first transverse acceleration threshold,
- THJTi and THJT 2 are first and second transverse jerk thresholds, these thresholds being prerecorded.
- the states 1 of the detection signals correspond to states of presence of a solicitation and the states 0 correspond to states of absence of solicitations.
- a logic driver SSOL logic signal is determined to be equal to 1 if the first longitudinal logic signal SSOLL of solicitation is at 1 and / or if the transversal SSOLT solicitation logic signal is at 1 (logical OR non-exclusive operator).
- a first logic signal SL1 is made equal to the logic signal SSOL driver bias. According to information IS of sportiness, a time is determined
- TMOD TPER
- an intermediate weighting coefficient OCINTER is then calculated as follows:
- a limited logic driver SSOLUMIT logic signal is calculated by filtering the driver bias signal SSOL in a negative slope limiter to a minimum of 1 to 0 in modulation time TMOD.
- Figure 14 shows the timing diagrams of the angle ⁇ of the steering wheel during a single cornering, which causes the passage of the coefficient ⁇ of weighting to 1 (Roadhook) at the beginning and at the end of the turn, while the coefficient The weighting ⁇ is at 0 (Skyhook) before the turn, after the turn and in the middle of the turn.
- This forward force distribution coefficient CAV is greater than or equal to 0 and less than or equal to 1.
- An anti-roll ratio RAD is calculated according to the speed VVH of the vehicle. For example, one extracts from the table or pre-recorded curve giving the anti-roll ratio according to the speed of the vehicle, the value of the ratio anti-devers RAD corresponding to the speed WH of the vehicle, for example by linear interpolation.
- the estimator 22 calculates the reference forces of the dampers AM to the wheels A, B, C, D as a function of the modal forces F z , F ⁇ and F ⁇ setpoint, according to the following formulas:
- the estimator determines from forces FA1, FB1, FC1,
- FD1 set AM shock absorbers to the wheels A, B, C, D, and the VDEB travel speed valid respectively for these wheels A, B, C, D, the law ER 0 ER C A, ER C B, ER C C, ER C D of the reference damping to be taken by the shock absorber AM of wheel A, B, C, D, for example by positioning the point (VDEB (A); FA1) on the graph of FIG. 15 and looking for the nearest damping ER law.
- An estimator 27 calculates minimum damping states. This function makes it possible to prevent the suspension from occupying too flexible damping states by imposing minimal ER M states, that is, that is to say the minimum damping laws ER M , and this, according to 4 different input flows:
- this criterion is used for the situations of life of the vehicle at a standstill, or at a very low speed (for sidewalk for example), or at speed very high for security and maintenance of cash.
- this criterion is used for safety on very large longitudinal stresses, in the event that the RoadHook logic is not satisfactory, and for the acceleration situations or stabilized braking, as opposed to transient longitudinal phases.
- this criterion is used for safety on very large lateral stresses, in the event that the RoadHook logic does not give satisfaction, and for the situations of stabilized turns, during which synthesis logic favors SkyHook logic.
- the first minimal state ER M i is obtained by extracting from the pre-recorded table or curve giving the second minimum state as a function of the speed of the vehicle, the value of the first minimum state ER M i corresponding to the measured speed VVH of the vehicle, for example by linear interpolation.
- the first minimum condition can be calculated separately for the front wheels and for the rear wheels.
- the second minimal state ER M 2 is obtained by extracting from the pre-recorded table or curve giving the second minimum state as a function of the vehicle speed and the corrected longitudinal acceleration, the value of the second minimum state ER M 2 corresponding to the speed Measured VVH of the vehicle and corrected longitudinal acceleration X COR , for example by linear interpolation.
- the third minimal state ER M3 is obtained by extracting from the pre-recorded table or curve giving the third minimum state as a function of the vehicle speed and the corrected transverse acceleration, the value of the third minimal state ER M3 corresponding to the measured speed VVH. of the vehicle and corrected transverse acceleration ⁇ COR , for example by linear interpolation.
- the fourth minimal state ER M4 is obtained by extracting from the prerecorded table or curve giving the fourth minimum state as a function of the anticipated transversal jerk, the value of the fourth minimal state ER M4 corresponding to the anticipated transversal jerk Y, for example by linear interpolation.
- the minimum overall condition ER M damping provided by the estimator 27 is then equal to the maximum of the minimum states ER M i, SO 2 M, SO 3 M, SO M4. This gives a global minimum state ER M A, ER M B, ERM C , ERMD damping respectively for the wheels A, B, C, D.
- Each of the two functions RoadHook and SkyHook has as input main flow the information of the four deflection sensors.
- the SkyHook function will require the most flexible damping possible because the absolute modal speeds will be very low.
- the vehicle is likely to make climbs or descents of sidewalks, which are binding stresses, for which it would be preferable that the vehicle is in a state of damping a little firmer.
- the SkyHook will request a flexible state. This can be problematic for high speeds, because the damping may have to go into very firm in a very short time, which is not possible with the actuators used.
- the RoadHook logic may be slightly behind the driving demands: the anticipatory efforts estimated by the RoadHook logic are not behind, but for a passage in firm law is applied, it is necessary that the wheel has already taken the speed of travel. However, when the wheel takes the speed of travel, it is already too late. It is therefore necessary to ensure a sufficiently firm damping, regardless of the speed of travel of the wheels, incorporating minimal damping states on longitudinal and lateral accelerations, as well as lateral jerk (ahead of accelerations).
- a control module 28 receives as input the law ER C A, ER C B, ERcc, ER 0 D of reference damping, provided by the estimator 22 and the global minimum state ER M A, ER M B, ER MC , ER M D damping, provided by the estimator 27, respectively for the wheels A, B, C, D and calculates from these states the states ER A , ER 6 , ER 0 , ER 0 control wheel dampers A, B, C, D, taking for each wheel the maximum of the set-point damping law and the overall minimum damping state:
- ER A max (ER CA , ER MA )
- ER 6 max (ER CB , ER MB )
- ER 0 max (ER CC , ER M c)
- the control states ER A , ER 6 , ER 0 , ER 0 are furthermore sent to the input of the estimator 12 for the real state ER of the actuator.
- a percussion detection is performed on the front wheels. It is not possible to anticipate the obstacle. An obstacle will be detected when the front wheels cross it. The detection of a percussion is done by monitoring the speed of movement of the front wheels of the vehicle.
- the peculiarity of a percussion is the important speed of movement that it generates at the level of the wheels.
- the obstacle can be low amplitude (shallow hen nest for example) but it is generating a shock because the wheels are struggling at high speed.
- an estimator 50 is provided for calculating a reference state or setpoint damping law ERP in the event of detection of a percussion.
- This estimator 50 receives as input:
- the estimator 50 comprises:
- a threshold SDP percussion detection is predefined in the module 51.
- the speed of travel VDEB (A) of the front wheel is greater in absolute value at the percussion detection threshold SDP
- a boolean logic signal P of probable percussion detection is set to 1
- the forward wheel VDEB travel speed (A) is less than or equal in absolute value to the detection threshold SDP of percussion
- the signal P of probable detection of percussion is at 0.
- this percussion detection threshold SDP is set according to the speed WH of the vehicle. From the pre-recorded table, curve or cartography giving the percussion detection threshold as a function of the speed of the vehicle, the value of the percussion detection threshold SDP corresponding to the vehicle speed VVH, for example by linear interpolation, is extracted. At very high VVH speeds, for example, any obstacle risks generating a high speed of travel. At high vehicle speeds, it is therefore necessary to increase the threshold SDP percussion detection, so as not to make unwanted treatment on road solicitations that do not correspond to actual percussion. The travel speeds, after an impact, can oscillate for a few moments and may exceed several times the SDP threshold due to a single initial shock.
- a TEMP delay triggered at the first exceedance of the SDP threshold then makes it possible to avoid detecting several percussions for the same obstacle crossing. For example, a detected percussion is validated only if it is detected for more than a prescribed duration of the percussion detection DDP, for example 15 milliseconds.
- a percussion detection inhibition signal S SIDP is generated as being equal to 1 for inhibiting the percussion detection, when at least one of the deflections before DEB (A), DEB (B) becomes lower than a first threshold SDEB1 stop, or greater than a second threshold SDEB2 stop, and is equal to 0 otherwise.
- the module 51 generates a percussive validation signal W from the probable percussion detection signal P, as follows.
- a validable percussion signal Q and the percussion enable signal W are generated at the computation cycle n according to their values at the preceding cycle n-1 and an expired TEMP timing signal T calculated according to the signal P of Probable percussion detection.
- the validable percussion Q signal is initialized to 1.
- An elapsed TEMP timer signal T is set to 1, if the signal
- Probable P percussion detection has remained at 0 since its last falling edge for a time longer than the TEMP time delay.
- the elapsed time delay signal T S is otherwise 0.
- the percussion validation signal W is then set to 1, meaning that a percussion is well detected, when at the same time
- the signal P of probable detection of percussion is at 1 during a prescribed number of consecutive cycles, for example 3 cycles forming the duration DDP,
- the corrected transverse acceleration ⁇ COR is lower in absolute value than a prescribed threshold SY of inhibition of the transverse acceleration corrected: * COR ⁇ SY, either
- the module 52 calculates the DEL delay of crossing the rear wheels with respect to the front wheels of a wheel.
- DEL (e / WH) - TR
- TR is a prescribed reaction time corresponds to the time required for the actuators to go into a flexible state.
- an inhibition signal SINV for low speeds is set to 1, and the crossing DEL delay is equal to a prescribed maximum value DELMAX.
- a delay is started during the DEL delay of crossing in the module 53 for treating the left wheels.
- a flexible and prescribed reference damping state ERP is imposed for the left rear wheel of the vehicle during a prescribed processing time, so that the percussion is suitably damped by the damper of the left rear wheel.
- the damping state to be applied and the duration of the processing are parameterizable debugging data.
- the treatment on the left front wheel can only be a post-treatment.
- the purpose of this is to limit train shocks and to slow down wheel movements and rebounds just after the obstacle.
- the post-treatment of the front wheels consists in imposing a firm and prescribed reference damping condition ERP for a duration of prescribed treatment.
- the damping state to be applied and the duration of the processing are parameterizable debugging data.
- the percussion processing modules 53, 54 produce ERP imposed damping states of the percussions, which can be preponderant compared to the damping ER states required by the SkyHook and RoadHook functions. In certain life situations, these ERP imposed states of damping percussion can either degrade the comfort of the vehicle or be dangerous for its safety. This is why the treatment of percussion is subject to possible inhibitions.
- this function If this function is activated, it will impose ERP states for damping the percussion, which will be closed for a fixed time on all four wheels. On a paved road, these firm damping ERP states will generate discomfort throughout the post- treatment. The ideal strategy on pavements that do not generate cash movements is indeed to remain in the most flexible law possible.
- the processing of the percussion will be inhibited as soon as a determined number, for example three, percussions will be detected in a short predetermined period of time, for example on the signal W of percussion validation.
- the resulting inhibition will have a configurable duration.
- Another case of treatment inhibition can be provided for the safety of the vehicle.
- a soft damping condition can be dangerous for handling.
- the RoadHook logic optimizing the behavior of the vehicle must not be deactivated by other functions. This is about the safety of people.
- the lateral acceleration of the vehicle is monitored: when this exceeds a certain parameterizable threshold, the percussion treatment is inhibited, as is provided above, when the corrected transverse acceleration ⁇ COR is greater than or equal in absolute value to the prescribed threshold SY of inhibition of corrected transverse acceleration 1 COR ⁇ SY.
- the module 52 generates a signal INHIB of inhibition of treatment of the percussions, equal to 1 to inhibit the treatment of the percussions by the modules 53 and 54, when at least one and / or the other of the following conditions is realized: a predetermined number of percussions, represented by a rising edge of the percussion enable signal W, is detected in a predetermined time;
- the inhibition signal SINV for the low speeds is set to 1, to indicate that the speed WH of the vehicle is too low or that the coefficient ⁇ of weighting of the first efforts F z1 , F ⁇ i and F ⁇ 1 of comfort and second efforts F 72 , c ⁇ 2 and c ⁇ 2 behavior is too large, to indicate that the Roadhook logic is in force,
- Each of the modules 53, 54 also comprises a clock CLK input, combined by an AND logic operator with respectively the input W (A) of the signal W of the percussion enable of the front left wheel A and the input W (B ) of the percussion enable signal W of the right front wheel B, to indicate the calculation frequency of the modules 53 and 54.
- a clock input is also provided for each of the blocks, estimators and modules shown in the figures.
- this provides the ERP setpoints in case of detection of a percussion, that is to say for the wheels A, B, C, D, the states of ERP setpoint A , ERP 6 , ERP C , ERP 0 , to another input of the control module 28.
- the control module 28 calculates from these states the states
- ER A max ( CA ER, ERP A , ER MA )
- ER 6 max (ER CB , ERP 6 , ER MB )
- ERc max (ER CC , ERP C , ER M c)
- ER 0 max (ER CD , ERP 0 , ER M D)
- Detection of the large deflections and high speeds of travel of the front wheels or rear wheels is provided.
- the objective is to detect as soon as possible the obstacles that can generate large amplitudes of cash flow, in forward and / or reverse.
- the detection of these life situations is intended to treat the obstacles simultaneously soliciting the right and left wheels of the front or rear axle.
- These obstacles can be detected in compression for the speed bumps or in relaxation for the bleeds or large hollows. In the forward direction, this kind of obstacle will generate on the front wheels large amplitudes of deflections and travel speeds.
- an estimator 60 is provided for calculating a reference state or setpoint damping law ERGD when a large amplitude of wheel movement is detected. This estimator 60 receives as input:
- the deflections before DEB (A), DEB (B) of the front wheels A, B, and the deflections DEB (C), DEB (D) of the rear wheels C, D which are for example those filtered DEBF (A), DEBF (B), DEBF (C), DEBF (D), provided by the filter 13 from the DEB (A), DEB (B), DEB (C), DEB (D) deflections provided by the CAP-DEB sensors of movements,
- the estimator 60 implements a logic for detecting and processing large amplitudes of movement and comprises: a module 61 for detecting large amplitudes of wheel motion;
- a first SDGD high-speed detection threshold and a second SVGD high-speed detection threshold are predefined in the module 61.
- the DEBF travel (A) of the left front wheel exceeds the first SDGD threshold of detection of large deflections
- the travel DEBF (B) of the right front wheel exceeds the first threshold SDGD of detection of large deflections
- the travel speed VDEB (A) of the left front wheel exceeds the second threshold SVGD of detection of high speeds of travel
- the travel speed VDEB (B) of the right front wheel exceeds the second threshold SVGD detection of high travel speeds
- a first signal SDGDAV of large forward motion detection is set to 1 to indicate the detection of a large range of wheel movement on the front wheels.
- SDGDAR which is set to 1 to indicate the detection of a large amplitude of wheel movement on the rear wheels, when the four overrun conditions are both filled with DEBF (D) and DEBF (C) travel and VDEB (D) and VDEB (C) travel speeds for the rear wheels.
- the first and second thresholds SDGD and SVGD may be different for the front and the back. Exceeding the first and / or second thresholds SDGD, SVGD may be the passage of the deflection and / or the speed of deflection under the threshold SDGD, SVGD lower, for example in relaxation of the dampers, and / or the passage of the deflection and / or the rate of travel above another SDGD threshold above the SDGD threshold, lower SVGD, for example in damper attack.
- a large motion detection signal SGD is set to indicate the detection of a large amplitude of wheel motion on the wheels, when the first forward motion detection signal SDGDAV and / or the second detection signal SDGDAR Large backward movements detects at 1.
- the large motion detection signal SGD is provided by the detection module 61 to the validation and inhibition module 62.
- the first SDGD threshold of large deflection detection and the second threshold SVGD of detection of high travel speeds are parameterized according to the speed WH of the vehicle.
- SVGD one extracts from the pre-recorded table, curve or cartography giving the detection threshold according to the speed of the vehicle, the value of the SDGD threshold, detection SVGD corresponding to the speed WH of the vehicle, for example by linear interpolation. Inhibition of detection of large wheel movements
- An INSGD signal for enabling or inhibiting the detection of a large amplitude of wheel motion is generated by the module 62, as being equal to 0 to inhibit the detection, when one or more of the following conditions are realized:
- the coefficient ⁇ of weighting of the first efforts F z1 , F ⁇ i and F ⁇ 1 of comfort and second efforts F 72 , c ⁇ 2 and c ⁇ 2 of behavior is too great, (greater than a threshold SCOEFF2 of weighting coefficient, by zero example) to indicate that the Roadhook logic is at least partially in effect,
- the NTC level of jitter is greater than a threshold SNTC prescribed level of jitter.
- the signal INSGD takes the state 1 of validation of the detection large amplitude of wheel movement.
- a filtering around the cash mode (around the Hertz) and a filtering in the band of the jumps (between 3 and 8 Hz ) are used to characterize the condition of the road (good road, road with good pavement but generating body movements, road with degraded but flat surface, road with degraded coating but generating cash movements).
- the jitter level calculated from the filtering between 3 and 8 Hz is used.
- the threshold SNTC prescribed level of jitter is configurable. Thus, the compromise between cash register and vibratory comfort is optimized.
- the estimator 63 calculates, from the signal INSGD of validation or inhibition of detection of large amplitude of movement of wheels, the coefficient ⁇ of treatment of large amplitudes of wheel motion.
- the treatment coefficient est is a variable greater than or equal to
- the treatment coefficient est is
- the coefficient ⁇ of treatment increases from 0 to 1 with a prescribed slope of climb, for example parameterizable by a first delay TEMP1 at the input of the module 63.
- the processing coefficient ⁇ is then maintained at its maximum value 1 for a prescribed duration, for example parameterizable by a second TEMP2 time delay at the input of the module 63, and goes back down to 0 with a prescribed descent slope, for example parameterizable by a third temporization TEMP3 at the input of the module 63.
- the module 64 receives the coefficient ⁇ of treatment of the large wheel motion amplitudes and the speed WH of the vehicle and calculates, as a function of these, the reference damping law ERGD in case of detection of a large amplitude of movement of the vehicle. wheel.
- ERGD minimum states can be parameterized according to the speed VVH of the vehicle to optimize the compromise between cash handling and vibration comfort whatever the speed of the vehicle: the minimum states to be used are for example lower at 30 km / h for the passing speed bumps at higher speed where a solicitation of the road creating a large deflection will require high minimum conditions.
- the minimum states ERGD can also be calculated separately for the front wheels and for the rear wheels.
- an intermediate state ERGD-INTER with a large amplitude of wheel movement is extracted from a pre-recorded table or curve giving this intermediate state intermediate state as a function of the speed of the vehicle, the value ERGD- INTER of the intermediate state of large amplitude of movement of wheels, corresponding to the speed VVH of the vehicle, for example by linear interpolation.
- the state of ERGD of reference damping of large amplitude of movement of wheels is then equal to the intermediate state ERGD-INTER of damping, multiplied by the coefficient ⁇ of treatment of large amplitudes of wheel motion, rounded for example to the nearest amortization law number.
- this provides the reference damping states ERGD in the event of detection of a large amplitude of wheel movement, that is to say for the wheels A, B , C, D, the set states ERP A , ERP 6 , ERP C , ERP 0 , to another input of the control module 28.
- the control module 28 calculates from these states the states
- ERGDA, ERGDB, ERGD C , ERGD 0 for controlling the dampers of the wheels A, B, C, D, taking for each wheel the maximum of the states ER 0 , ERGD (and possibly ERP for the taking into account of the percussions) of Depreciation of the deposit and the global minimum state ERM of depreciation:
- ER A max ( CA ER, ERGD A , ER MA )
- ER 6 max (ER CB , ERGD B , ER M B)
- ER 0 max (ER CC , ERGD C , ER M c)
- ER 0 max (ER CD , ERGD 0 , ER M D)
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Vehicle Body Suspensions (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Priority Applications (6)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT06808323T ATE532654T1 (de) | 2005-09-22 | 2006-09-13 | Vorrichtung zur aufhängungsregelung, fahrzeug mit dieser vorrichtung, herstellungsverfahren dafür und entsprechendes programm |
EP06808323A EP1926614B1 (fr) | 2005-09-22 | 2006-09-13 | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme |
CN2006800437411A CN101312841B (zh) | 2005-09-22 | 2006-09-13 | 悬挂系统控制装置,配备该装置的车辆,制造方法 |
US12/067,759 US8112199B2 (en) | 2005-09-22 | 2006-09-13 | Suspension control device, vehicle comprising said device, production method thereof and associated program |
JP2008531747A JP2009508749A (ja) | 2005-09-22 | 2006-09-13 | サスペンション制御装置、同装置を具備する車両、実現方法およびプログラム |
BRPI0617564A BRPI0617564B1 (pt) | 2005-09-22 | 2006-09-13 | dispositivo de comando da suspensão de um veículo |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
FR0509701 | 2005-09-22 | ||
FR0509701A FR2890900B1 (fr) | 2005-09-22 | 2005-09-22 | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme. |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
WO2007034101A1 true WO2007034101A1 (fr) | 2007-03-29 |
Family
ID=36593209
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/FR2006/050885 WO2007034101A1 (fr) | 2005-09-22 | 2006-09-13 | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme |
Country Status (8)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US8112199B2 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP1926614B1 (fr) |
JP (1) | JP2009508749A (fr) |
CN (1) | CN101312841B (fr) |
AT (1) | ATE532654T1 (fr) |
BR (1) | BRPI0617564B1 (fr) |
FR (1) | FR2890900B1 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2007034101A1 (fr) |
Families Citing this family (8)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JP5700190B2 (ja) * | 2009-08-04 | 2015-04-15 | 日立オートモティブシステムズ株式会社 | サスペンション制御装置 |
US20120103119A1 (en) * | 2010-11-02 | 2012-05-03 | Lin cheng-da | Electrically controlable transmission for controlling the stiffness of a vehicle shock absorber |
CN103182915B (zh) * | 2011-12-28 | 2015-06-24 | 比亚迪股份有限公司 | 加速度积分曲线的校正方法、悬架控制系统及控制方法 |
WO2013121022A1 (fr) * | 2012-02-15 | 2013-08-22 | Floor Master | Système de réduction de roulement et de pas dans un véhicule mobile |
DE102017111107A1 (de) | 2017-05-22 | 2018-11-22 | Dr. Ing. H.C. F. Porsche Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Anpassen eines Fahrwerkes bei einem Kraftfahrzeug |
JP6662355B2 (ja) * | 2017-08-03 | 2020-03-11 | マツダ株式会社 | 車両のサスペンション装置 |
FR3079779B1 (fr) * | 2018-04-06 | 2020-05-29 | Renault S.A.S | Procede de pilotage d'amortisseurs de vehicule au passage d'un dos d'ane |
JP7172414B2 (ja) * | 2018-10-12 | 2022-11-16 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 車両用ロール振動制振制御装置 |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3939292A1 (de) * | 1989-11-28 | 1991-05-29 | Teves Gmbh Alfred | Verbundregelsystem fuer kraftfahrzeuge |
EP0538965A2 (fr) * | 1989-02-10 | 1993-04-28 | Lord Corporation | Procédé pour atténuer des vibrations au moyen d'un amortisseur semi-actif à réglage continu |
EP0539063A1 (fr) | 1991-10-25 | 1993-04-28 | Lord Corporation | Système pour réduire les tamponnements de butée de choc |
US20040254701A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2004-12-16 | Laplante John A. | Semi-active shock absorber control system |
Family Cites Families (26)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPH0780411B2 (ja) * | 1986-07-31 | 1995-08-30 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 車輌用アクテイブサスペンシヨン |
JP2830049B2 (ja) * | 1989-05-12 | 1998-12-02 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | ショックアブソーバ制御装置 |
US5071157A (en) * | 1989-11-02 | 1991-12-10 | General Motors Corporation | Full vehicle suspension control |
JPH03273916A (ja) * | 1990-03-23 | 1991-12-05 | Mazda Motor Corp | 車両のサスペンション装置 |
JP2560564B2 (ja) | 1991-05-17 | 1996-12-04 | 三菱電機株式会社 | サスペンション制御装置 |
DE4116118C2 (de) | 1991-05-17 | 2000-11-23 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | System zur Erzeugung von Signalen zur Steuerung oder Regelung eines steuerbaren oder regelbaren Fahrwerkes |
DE4117897C2 (de) | 1991-05-31 | 2001-10-04 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | System zur Erzeugung von Signalen zur Steuerung oder Regelung eines in seinen Bewegungsabläufen steuerbaren oder regelbaren Fahrwerkes |
JPH0648133A (ja) * | 1991-10-03 | 1994-02-22 | Unisia Jecs Corp | 車両懸架装置 |
US5510985A (en) * | 1992-01-05 | 1996-04-23 | Unisia Jecs Corporation | System for controlling damping force characteristic of shock absorber of vehicle |
DE69312371T2 (de) | 1992-04-17 | 1998-01-15 | Toyota Motor Co Ltd | Radaufhängungs-Regelsystem mit variablem Dämpfungskoeffizient, abhängig von der Frequenz der Erregerkraft |
DE4217325A1 (de) | 1992-05-26 | 1993-12-02 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung von Signalen zur Steuerung oder Regelung eines steuerbaren oder regelbaren Fahrwerkes |
JPH0699718A (ja) * | 1992-09-18 | 1994-04-12 | Nippondenso Co Ltd | 減衰力可変ショックアブソーバ制御装置 |
JP3118116B2 (ja) * | 1993-04-20 | 2000-12-18 | アイシン精機株式会社 | サスペンション制御装置 |
US5510986A (en) | 1994-03-14 | 1996-04-23 | Trw Inc. | Method and apparatus for controlling an active suspension system |
JP3206315B2 (ja) * | 1994-08-04 | 2001-09-10 | トヨタ自動車株式会社 | 車両の減衰力制御装置 |
JPH08113021A (ja) * | 1994-10-19 | 1996-05-07 | Nissan Motor Co Ltd | 電気粘性流体を用いたショックアブソーバの減衰力制御装置 |
US5510988A (en) | 1994-12-19 | 1996-04-23 | General Motors Corporation | Vehicle chassis control system |
DE19539566C1 (de) | 1995-10-25 | 1997-02-13 | Fichtel & Sachs Ag | Anordnung zur Steuerung einer Fahrwerk-Einrichtung |
DE19722148A1 (de) | 1996-05-28 | 1997-12-04 | Mando Machine Co Ltd | Traktionssteuervorrichtung |
JPH11123919A (ja) * | 1997-10-22 | 1999-05-11 | Hino Motors Ltd | 独立懸架式エアサスペンション車の車高調整装置 |
US6397134B1 (en) | 2000-09-13 | 2002-05-28 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Vehicle suspension control with enhanced body control in steering crossover |
US6633803B1 (en) | 2000-09-13 | 2003-10-14 | Delphi Technologies, Inc. | Method and apparatus for determining slew rate limits and controlling dampers in a suspension system |
DE10126933B4 (de) | 2001-06-01 | 2004-08-26 | Continental Aktiengesellschaft | Verfahren zur Regelung oder Steuerung der Dämpferkraft verstellbarer Dämpfer an Fahrzeugen |
JP4348934B2 (ja) * | 2002-09-25 | 2009-10-21 | アイシン・エィ・ダブリュ株式会社 | 車両のサスペンション制御装置 |
JP2005075238A (ja) * | 2003-09-02 | 2005-03-24 | Toyota Motor Corp | 車両用サスペンション装置 |
FR2890905B1 (fr) | 2005-09-22 | 2009-01-16 | Peugeot Citroen Automobiles Sa | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme. |
-
2005
- 2005-09-22 FR FR0509701A patent/FR2890900B1/fr not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2006
- 2006-09-13 BR BRPI0617564A patent/BRPI0617564B1/pt active IP Right Grant
- 2006-09-13 JP JP2008531747A patent/JP2009508749A/ja active Pending
- 2006-09-13 EP EP06808323A patent/EP1926614B1/fr active Active
- 2006-09-13 CN CN2006800437411A patent/CN101312841B/zh active Active
- 2006-09-13 US US12/067,759 patent/US8112199B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2006-09-13 WO PCT/FR2006/050885 patent/WO2007034101A1/fr active Application Filing
- 2006-09-13 AT AT06808323T patent/ATE532654T1/de active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0538965A2 (fr) * | 1989-02-10 | 1993-04-28 | Lord Corporation | Procédé pour atténuer des vibrations au moyen d'un amortisseur semi-actif à réglage continu |
DE3939292A1 (de) * | 1989-11-28 | 1991-05-29 | Teves Gmbh Alfred | Verbundregelsystem fuer kraftfahrzeuge |
EP0539063A1 (fr) | 1991-10-25 | 1993-04-28 | Lord Corporation | Système pour réduire les tamponnements de butée de choc |
US20040254701A1 (en) * | 2002-01-11 | 2004-12-16 | Laplante John A. | Semi-active shock absorber control system |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
BRPI0617564B1 (pt) | 2020-04-14 |
EP1926614B1 (fr) | 2011-11-09 |
FR2890900A1 (fr) | 2007-03-23 |
ATE532654T1 (de) | 2011-11-15 |
EP1926614A1 (fr) | 2008-06-04 |
JP2009508749A (ja) | 2009-03-05 |
FR2890900B1 (fr) | 2007-12-14 |
CN101312841A (zh) | 2008-11-26 |
US20080300751A1 (en) | 2008-12-04 |
BRPI0617564A2 (pt) | 2013-01-01 |
CN101312841B (zh) | 2011-03-09 |
US8112199B2 (en) | 2012-02-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1926616B1 (fr) | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme | |
EP1926615B1 (fr) | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme | |
EP1926617B1 (fr) | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme | |
EP1926618B1 (fr) | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede et programme | |
EP1926613B1 (fr) | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme | |
EP1926614B1 (fr) | Dispositif de commande de suspension, vehicule muni de celui-ci, procede d'obtention et programme | |
FR2672352A1 (fr) | Procede et montage de controle d'un amortisseur de vibrations. | |
FR2701902A1 (fr) | Système de régulation et/ou de commande d'une suspension de véhicule automobile. | |
WO2007003861A2 (fr) | Procédé et système anti-roulis d'un véhicule et véhicule correspondant | |
FR2691676A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour générer des signaux de commande ou de régulation d'un châssis commandé ou réglable. | |
FR3006941A1 (fr) | Systeme de suspension d'un vehicule | |
WO2014102099A1 (fr) | Suspension de véhicule avec correction d'antiroulis |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 200680043741.1 Country of ref document: CN |
|
121 | Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application | ||
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2006808323 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 2008531747 Country of ref document: JP |
|
NENP | Non-entry into the national phase |
Ref country code: DE |
|
WWP | Wipo information: published in national office |
Ref document number: 2006808323 Country of ref document: EP |
|
WWE | Wipo information: entry into national phase |
Ref document number: 12067759 Country of ref document: US |
|
ENP | Entry into the national phase |
Ref document number: PI0617564 Country of ref document: BR Kind code of ref document: A2 Effective date: 20080320 |