WO2005124315A1 - Procédé pour évaluer sous tous ses aspects l’espérance de vie ou la longévité du fluage - Google Patents

Procédé pour évaluer sous tous ses aspects l’espérance de vie ou la longévité du fluage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2005124315A1
WO2005124315A1 PCT/JP2005/011268 JP2005011268W WO2005124315A1 WO 2005124315 A1 WO2005124315 A1 WO 2005124315A1 JP 2005011268 W JP2005011268 W JP 2005011268W WO 2005124315 A1 WO2005124315 A1 WO 2005124315A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
creep
void
life
grain boundary
voids
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/JP2005/011268
Other languages
English (en)
Japanese (ja)
Inventor
Hidetaka Nishida
Original Assignee
The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc.
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc. filed Critical The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc.
Priority to JP2006514819A priority Critical patent/JP4054834B2/ja
Publication of WO2005124315A1 publication Critical patent/WO2005124315A1/fr

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N3/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N3/32—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress by applying repeated or pulsating forces
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2203/00—Investigating strength properties of solid materials by application of mechanical stress
    • G01N2203/0058—Kind of property studied
    • G01N2203/0069—Fatigue, creep, strain-stress relations or elastic constants
    • G01N2203/0071—Creep

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a technology for evaluating a remaining life of a device member subjected to creep damage.
  • Non-Patent Document 1 At present, more than 80% of commercial thermal power generation units in Japan have accumulated operation hours exceeding 100,000 hours, and the remaining 20% The situation is over 200,000 hours. For this reason, at the time of periodic inspection, for the boiler of the thermal power generation unit, the location under the harshest conditions is selected from the past life-span diagnosis history, structure, stress, temperature, weighting, etc., and the creep deterioration progresses. It is important to understand the situation accurately and repair appropriately.
  • Non-Patent Document 2 As a conventional method for evaluating the remaining creep life, which focuses on voids generated in actual machine members, the surfaces of the members are polished and corroded, and a film made of acetyl cellulose is attached. An evaluation method using a copy of the surface of the member (hereinafter referred to as “replica”) is described. Methods for evaluating the remaining life or creep damage using this replica include A-meter, microstructure comparison, void area ratio (Non-Patent Document 3), void area density, grain boundary damage (non- An evaluation method using various parameters such as Patent Document 4) is known.
  • a parameter indicating the state of creep deterioration of a real machine member is obtained, and the "creep life consumption rate" is expressed as a ratio of the actual use time to the total time (life) from the time of new material to creep rupture.
  • the remaining life of the members of the actual machine is estimated.
  • a creep test is performed to create a master curve representing the relationship between the parameters of each method and the creep life consumption rate.
  • a replica of the surface force of the target actual machine member is sampled, and the parameter obtained on the replica is compared with the master curve, whereby the creep life consumption rate of the actual machine member can be estimated.
  • Non-Patent Document 5 describes a method for estimating the remaining creep life by a non-destructive inspection such as an ultrasonic noise energy method or an ultrasonic statroscopy method.
  • Non-Patent Documents 6 and 7 below describe the physical meaning of the “void occupancy on the grain boundary line” (Non-Patent Document 8) used as an index focusing on voids at grain boundaries as a creep damage parameter. It is stated that it is clear.
  • the "A-parameter method” draws a straight line parallel to the stress axis within a predetermined region, and determines the number of intersections between the straight line and the grain boundary line.
  • the ratio is a parameter, and is generally called the "A parameter for measurement”.
  • the A parameter is based on the idea that if at least one void exists at the grain boundary, the grain interface is considered to be severely damaged and the entire grain boundary is regarded as a small crack.
  • the physical meaning of the commonly used measurement A parameter is considered to be sparse.
  • the "void area ratio method” uses the ratio of the void area per unit area in a predetermined region as a parameter, and the "void area density method” uses the unit area (usually lmm 2 ).
  • This evaluation method uses the number of voids per hit as a parameter. Since this void area density method only needs to find the number of voids, measurement is easy.
  • This parameter (void area density) is proportional to the radius and number of voids, and inversely proportional to the crystal grain size. There is a problem that it does not directly represent the number of voids actually existing inside.
  • “Void occupancy on grain boundary line method” is a method for each grain boundary line within a predetermined range appearing on a cut surface or a surface of a member, for each void on the grain boundary line with respect to the length of the grain boundary line. This is an evaluation method that calculates the ratio of the total length and uses the average value as a parameter. This parameter has a one-to-one correspondence with the effective area used in conventional damage mechanics, which is equivalent to the area ratio of voids at the grain interface, which is the path of creep rupture. There is a problem that the force is difficult to measure compared to other methods.
  • Patent Document 1 describes a creep (remaining) life evaluation method capable of easily and accurately estimating the "creep life consumption rate" of a creep-degraded device member.
  • the ratio of the total length of voids on a grain boundary to the length of one grain boundary of a member is determined for each grain boundary, and the maximum value is determined as a parameter (“M parameter” t).
  • M parameter a parameter that is determined for each grain boundary.
  • This method is referred to as the “M-parameter method”.
  • M-parameter method it is possible to obtain an evaluation that the creep life consumption rate is high and the remaining life is short, that is, the risk of creep fracture is high, as the M-parameter force is closer to 1 ".
  • Patent Document 1 International Publication WO02Z014835
  • Non-patent Document 1 Keiichi Iwamoto, Thermal and Nuclear Power, 48-8 (1997), 14
  • Non-Patent Document 2 Japan Iron and Steel Association, Creep and Creep-Fatigue Damage Manual by Replica Method "Structural Material Reliability Evaluation Technology Subcommittee High-Temperature Strength WG Research Results Report (separate volume manual), (1991), 1
  • Non-Patent Document 3 Isamu Nonaka, Keiji Sonoya, Masashi Nakashiro, Hiroshi Yoneyama, Masaaki Kitagawa, Harima Ishikawajima Harima Technical Report, 32-5 (1992), 313
  • Non-patent Document 4 Kenji Kikuchi, Yoshiyuki Kaji, Materials, 44-505 (1995), 1244
  • Non-Patent Document 5 Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Power Plant 'Remaining Life Evaluation Technology for Structures, (1992)
  • Non-Patent Document 6 Naoya Tada, Tetsushi Fukuda, Takayuki Kitamura, Ryuichi Otani, Materials 46-1, (1997), 39
  • Non-patent document 7 Naoya Tada, Takayuki Kitamura, Ryuichi Otani, Materials 45-1, 1, (1996), 110
  • Non-patent document 8 Tsuneyuki Ejima, Zhou, Ryuichi Otani, Takayuki Kitamura, Naoya Tada, The 32nd high temperature strength system Preprints of Non-Podium, (1994), 94
  • the metal structures of the weld metal portion and the heat affected zone of the weld in particular, have a particle size of about 100 micrometers (m) in order from the weld metal side (200 ⁇ m). m) and a fine-grained part consisting of crystals with a grain size of about 1 ⁇ m to 10 ⁇ m. Considering that recent experiments have shown that the grain grows to almost the same size as one crystal grain boundary in the above, when the ⁇ fine grain part '' is evaluated by the above M-parameter method, the creep life There is a possibility that the M-parameter force reaches 1 "in the early stage, that is, the risk of creep rupture is high.
  • creep rupture is mainly attributable to the fact that voids generated on grain boundaries grow, connect, and coalesce to form microcracks.
  • intensive cracks occur in the second half of the creep life, even if one void has the same size as one grain boundary in the fine grain part, there is a high risk of creep rupture immediately. Therefore, it is difficult for the M-parameter method to accurately evaluate the creep life of “fine-grained parts”.
  • the portions that lead to creep rupture in the coarse-grained portion and the fine-grained portion are determined by various conditions such as differences in welding methods such as longitudinal welding or girth welding and the degree of application of stress. It is important to accurately evaluate the creep life of fine-grained parts in view of the fact that they differ from each other and that the actual parts are subjected to various types of welding and are placed in a multiaxial stress field.
  • the present invention has been made in view of the above circumstances, and provides a method capable of accurately evaluating the remaining life of a device member subjected to creep damage irrespective of a fine grain portion and a coarse grain portion.
  • the purpose is.
  • the present invention relates to a time or a time until a creep-damaged device member undergoes creep rupture.
  • the number of specific voids existing over a plurality of crystal grain boundaries within a predetermined range on the surface of the above-mentioned component is determined.
  • the ratio of the number of the specific voids to the area of the predetermined range is defined as a specific void density
  • the length of one crystal grain boundary within the predetermined range on the surface of the device member is defined by the total voids on the grain boundaries.
  • the ratio of the total length is determined as void grain boundary occupancy for each crystal grain boundary, and the maximum value is defined as the maximum void grain boundary occupancy, based on the specific void density and the maximum void grain boundary occupancy! / Evaluate the remaining life of each of the device members, and use the result of the shorter evaluation of V ⁇ as the remaining life of the device members.
  • the specific void is an extended void existing over at least 1/2 of each length of at least two grain boundaries, or generated on a plurality of grain boundaries. It is a connecting void formed by merging the voids.
  • the maximum void grain boundary occupancy is calculated by the following equation.
  • n is the number of voids present on each grain boundary
  • ⁇ ⁇ is the length of the i-th void on the ⁇ -th grain boundary in the direction of the grain boundary, and L is the length of the ⁇ -th grain boundary where the void exists.
  • the evaluation of the remaining life is based on the evaluation criteria obtained from the creep test on the relationship between the specific void density and the remaining life and on the relationship between the maximum void grain boundary occupancy and the remaining life. Estimating said time by reference.
  • the evaluation of the remaining life is the ratio of the number of all voids within the predetermined range to the area of the predetermined range in addition to the above evaluation criteria for the specific void density and the maximum void grain boundary occupancy. With reference to the evaluation criteria for the void number density and other parameters, the shortest time estimated by the evaluation criteria for each parameter is defined as the remaining life.
  • a more specific embodiment is directed to a void present on the surface of a fine grain portion formed of a crystal having a grain size of 10 ⁇ m or less of an equipment member. Further, the surface of the device member is imaged, and the number of voids is obtained on the image. In this case, the surface of the device member is polished and corroded, and then a film made of acetyl cellulose or the like is attached to the device member. In addition, it is possible to image the surface of the device member.
  • the number of specific voids existing over a plurality of crystal grain boundaries within a predetermined range on the surface of an equipment member is determined, and is represented by the ratio of the number of specific voids to the area of the range.
  • the specific void density By determining the specific void density, the remaining life of equipment components that have undergone creep damage can be evaluated. In this evaluation method, it is necessary to detect only a specific void among all voids within a predetermined range, and therefore, the evaluation can be performed more quickly and easily than the conventional void number density method.
  • the specific void existing over a plurality of crystal grain boundaries is a void that has grown from one grain boundary to two or more grain boundaries. It is an index that indicates the degree of progress of creep deterioration.
  • the state of creep deterioration specifically, the remaining life can be accurately grasped, and even in the “fine grain part” where the crystal grain boundary is small, two or more
  • voids extending across the grain boundaries it is possible to accurately evaluate the remaining life of fine-grained parts, which is difficult with conventional evaluation methods such as the A-parameter method.
  • the specific void an extended void existing over at least 1/2 of each length of at least two crystal grain boundaries, or a void generated on a plurality of crystal grain boundaries.
  • an evaluation criterion for example, a master curve described later
  • a creep test based on the relationship between the specific void density and the remaining life as described above
  • the evaluation criterion for the "specific void density” is also referred to, and the time estimated by the evaluation criterion of each parameter is referred to.
  • the shortest of these is the remaining life of the equipment members, it is possible to make evaluations from a safer side.
  • These evaluation criteria include parameters and creep life as described below. A master curve indicating the relationship with the consumption rate, a function or data indicating the relationship between the two, and the like can be used.
  • the surface of the fine-grain portion formed of a crystal having a grain size of 10 ⁇ m or less is selected as a portion for determining the number of voids within a predetermined range. Can be.
  • the image of the surface of the device member may be obtained by polishing and corroding the surface of the device member and then attaching a film made of acetyl cellulose or the like, or photographing the surface of the device member using imaging means. Obtained by imaging the surface of.
  • FIG. 1 is a main flowchart of a creep remaining life evaluation method of an embodiment.
  • FIG. 2 is a diagram showing a specimen and a void observation position used in a creep test.
  • FIG. 3 is a diagram showing a specimen and a void observation position used in a creep test.
  • FIG. 4 is a diagram showing a specimen and a void observation position used in a creep test.
  • FIG. 5 is a diagram showing a position where a test piece is collected from actual waste wood of a thermal power plant.
  • FIG. 6 is an electron micrograph showing the occurrence of voids at each interruption in the creep rupture test for pipe internal pressure.
  • FIG. 7 is a diagram showing a state of void generation at an observation position at each interruption during an internal pressure creep rupture test (actual machine acceleration test).
  • FIG. 8 is a view showing a basic concept of an L parameter.
  • FIG. 9 is a diagram showing a basic concept of M parameters.
  • FIG. 11 is a master curve showing a relationship between an M parameter and a talyp life consumption rate.
  • FIG. 12 is a diagram showing a basic concept of a void number density which is a parameter of the void number density method.
  • FIG. 1 is a main flowchart of the remaining creep life evaluation method of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 2 to 4 show specimens used for the creep test and the void observation position in each specimen.
  • the test piece shown in Fig. 2 is a test piece 1 taken from a welded part that has been subjected to creep damage by a high-temperature reheated steam pipe in operation, and the test piece 1 is used while appropriately stopping the test piece. Conduct a creep rupture test. The test conditions are shown below.
  • test stress (tensile) is 68.6MPa.
  • the metallographic structure near the welded portion 2 of the test piece 1 includes, from the weld metal side, a coarse-grained portion 3 formed of crystals having a grain size of about 100 ⁇ m or less, It is composed of fine-grained parts 4 formed of crystals of about ⁇ m to 10 ⁇ m.
  • the M parameter is obtained based on the void observation result in the coarse-grained part 3
  • the L parameter is obtained based on the void observation result in the fine-grained part 4.
  • the test specimen shown in Fig. 3 is a test in which girth welding is performed on a solid round bar ( ⁇ 40Xt8XL430) made of 2.25Cr-lMo steel, and the pipe force of the weld joint penetrating the center is also obtained.
  • Piece 5 The girth weld 6 of the test piece 5 is preferably prepared by 1 to 4 layers of covered arc welding so as to be as close as possible to the weld of the actual machine member, and is preferably heat-treated at 993KX for 1.3 hours. 5 specimens In addition, an internal pressure creep rupture test is performed.
  • test piece 5 while heating the test piece 5 in an electric furnace, pressurized water is injected into the test piece 5, and high pressure steam is applied to apply internal pressure.
  • interruption is performed appropriately, voids in the coarse-grained part and fine-grained part are observed at each interruption, and each parameter is obtained by the method described later.
  • the test conditions are shown below.
  • Circumferential stress is 61.3MPa (according to the formula of average diameter).
  • the specimen 7 in Fig. 4 is, for example, a waste material of a high-temperature reheated steam pipe elbow made of 2.25Cr-lMo steel, and a welded portion 8 of the specimen 7 has a pair of bent pieces having the same curvature.
  • an internal pressure creep rupture test (acceleration test on actual equipment) is performed with appropriate interruption. Specifically, after heating the specimen 7 by surrounding it with a plate-shaped heater, water under pressure is injected into the specimen 7, and high-pressure steam is applied to apply internal pressure.
  • FIG. 5 shows a position where a test piece was taken from a waste material of an actual thermal power plant to perform another creep test.
  • T piece pipe near the SH pipe in (a) and the RHY piece pipe in (b) voids were observed on the surfaces near the circumferential welds 10 and 11, and the diameter was 10 mm from the cross section near the part where the presence of voids was recognized.
  • the RH stub-side stub of (c) a 2mm diameter miniature creep round bar specimen is taken from the cross section near the stub welded part 12 where the presence of voids has been recognized.
  • Parameter Ask for data The usage conditions for each waste material are shown in the table below.
  • Fig. 6 shows the state of void generation at each interruption in the pipe internal pressure creep rupture test using test piece 5 (Fig. 3).
  • the surface of the test piece 5 may be directly imaged using a scanning electron microscope (hereinafter, “SEM” t) as shown in the figure, and the surface of the test piece 5 may be It can also be polished and corroded, and a replica obtained by attaching a predetermined film (for example, an acetyl cellulose film) and copying the surface of the member can be observed with a SEM.
  • SEM scanning electron microscope
  • the surface of the test piece 5 is polished by, for example, rough polishing with a grinder, successively polishing with a grindstone of No. 120-No. It is better to sequentially perform puff polishing with diamond particles and perform mirror finishing.
  • the corrosive liquid is impregnated into absorbent cotton and applied to the polished surface to form a bond in the metal structure. Grain boundaries can be made identifiable.
  • the following two types of corrosive liquids can be used for corrosion.
  • Picric acid Saturated picric acid (dissolved in methanol) + surfactant
  • sodium dodecylbenzenesulfonate is preferably used and mixed at a ratio of 1 g to 100 ml of saturated picric acid.
  • a replica softening material for example, methyl acetate
  • an acetyl cellulose film is stuck thereon, so that the replica softening material is sufficient. If the acetyl cellulose film is peeled off after drying, the surface of the test piece 5 can be copied. As a result, voids generated on the surface of the test piece 5 appear as protrusions on the replica.
  • void observation In void observation, a predetermined range (for example, 30 mm 2 Observing the void generation status in (), confirming the location where damage is most aggressive (voids are generated and connection is concentrated), and then observing that location by SEM (e.g., observation at 1000x) ), It is possible to perform a void observation without missing a spot where damage has progressed.
  • a predetermined range for example, 30 mm 2 Observing the void generation status in (), confirming the location where damage is most aggressive (voids are generated and connection is concentrated), and then observing that location by SEM (e.g., observation at 1000x) ), It is possible to perform a void observation without missing a spot where damage has progressed.
  • the number of voids increases on the surface of the test piece 5 with the elapse of time in the pipe internal pressure creep rupture test. For example, as shown in the figure, the state of void generation at each stop
  • the above interruptions are represented by the creep life consumption rate (tZtr), which is obtained as a result of a pipe internal pressure creep rupture test until the test piece 5 reaches creep rupture. Value.
  • FIG. 7 shows the state of void formation at observation positions 9a and 9b at the time of each interruption in the internal pressure creep rupture test (actual machine acceleration test) using specimen 7 (FIG. 4).
  • voids began to form randomly on multiple grain boundaries, then increased intensively at specific locations, and eventually joined to form microcracks. You.
  • FIG. 8 shows the basic concept of the L parameter for evaluating the remaining life of the equipment member by the creep remaining life evaluation method of the embodiment.
  • the L parameter is represented by a ratio of the number of voids present over a plurality of crystal grain boundaries within a predetermined range on the surface of the void observation position to a predetermined range.
  • a void hereinafter, referred to as “half the length of at least two crystal grain boundaries” within a predetermined range (for example, 1 mm 2 ) on the surface of the observation position is used.
  • center void 16b exists on the three grain boundaries 15 and the two voids 1b
  • the voids 16c are present on the three grain boundaries 15 and do not completely cover the grain boundaries 15. However, the voids 16c are more than 1/2 of each length of the two grain boundaries 15. Because it exists throughout
  • the number of connected voids within a predetermined range (for example, 1 mm 2 ) on the surface of the observation position is determined, and this number is used as an evaluation target.
  • the L parameter expressed as the value divided by the area of the range (for example, 1 mm 2 ). Therefore, the L parameter is defined by the following equation.
  • A is the area of the evaluation range (for example, 1 mm 2 )
  • m is the number of connected voids within the evaluation target range
  • FIG. 9 shows the basic concept of another parameter, the M parameter.
  • the M parameter is a ratio of the total length of all voids on the grain boundary to the length of one crystal grain boundary within a predetermined range (for example, lmm 2 ) on the surface of the void observation position. It is obtained for each grain boundary as the field occupancy, and is expressed by the maximum value. That is, the M parameter can be obtained by the following equation.
  • n is the number of grain boundaries where voids exist
  • n is the number of voids present on each grain boundary
  • L is the length of the ⁇ -th grain boundary where the void exists
  • the percentage can be obtained by the following equation.
  • the maximum value can be obtained as the ⁇ parameter.
  • each master curve was created as an evaluation standard of the remaining creep life. (ST2, ST3).
  • FIG. 10 is a master curve showing the relationship between the L parameter and the creep life consumption rate.
  • the creep life consumption rate is represented by the ratio of the total time “t” to the total time “tr” to the time to the creep rupture of the new material and the total time “t” of the time subjected to the creep test and the actual use time. . Therefore
  • the L parameter is substantially “0” in the first half of the life of the device member, and increases in the second half of the life.
  • the master curve based on this L parameter is
  • Creep rupture is mainly due to the fact that voids generated on grain boundaries grow, coalesce and join to form micro cracks.
  • Connected voids exist over at least 1/2 of each length of at least two grain boundaries, that is, are formed by connecting a plurality of voids.
  • FIG. 11 is a master curve representing the relationship between the M parameter and the creep life consumption rate.
  • the M parameter increases in a smooth downwardly convex curve over the entire creep life, and the L-parameter master curve (Fig. 10) and other conventional master curves Sudden increase in late life (e.g., Figure 13) It is not allowed.
  • the M parameter evaluates the creep life by focusing only on the localized damaged part, that is, only the maximum damaged part, it can be seen that the M parameter shows a certain value even at the beginning of the life.
  • the master curve based on this M parameter shows that the growth and connection of voids proceed intensively on a specific grain boundary on the crystal grain boundary in the weld heat affected zone coarse grain region, and the crack It can be seen that this directly reflects the mechanism of cleaved fracture, which leads to growth and destruction.
  • various parameters are also obtained for the actual machine member to be evaluated (ST4).
  • the evaluation results based on the above-described L parameter and M parameter and the estimation based on the conventional remaining life evaluation method are used. Compare the result. For example, a void number density method can be adopted as a conventional remaining life evaluation method.
  • the actual method of obtaining the various member parameters is as follows. Among the welded parts of the member, a comprehensive consideration is given to the conditions of the past remaining life diagnosis history, structure, stress, temperature, load, etc. Select a location under severe conditions and collect a surface force replica of the location. By enlarging and displaying the surface of the member copied on this replica by SEM, various parameters in a predetermined range can be obtained.
  • the method for obtaining the L parameter and the M parameter is as described in ST1 of the main flowchart.
  • a method of obtaining the void number density which is a parameter of the void number density method, will be described.
  • FIG. 12 shows the basic concept of the void number density, which is a parameter of the void number density method.
  • the void number density is a ratio of the number of all the voids 20 existing in a predetermined range to the area (for example, 1 mm 2 ) of the range, and is specifically defined by the following equation.
  • A is the area of the evaluation enclosure (for example, 1 mm 2 )
  • n is the number of alll within the evaluation range
  • FIG. 13 is a master curve of the void number density method. This master curve can be created by the various creep tests described in ST1 of the main flowchart (Fig. 1), and the master curve based on the void number density method and other conventional methods for evaluating the remaining life is publicly available. It is also possible to use this.
  • the time corresponding to "6% of the total life” can be obtained by the following equation, assuming that the actual use time of the actual machine member to be evaluated at the time of the evaluation is "t ⁇ 7000hr".
  • the creep life consumption rate can be estimated to be "tZtr ⁇ 0.97". it can. That is, according to the master curve, the remaining life of the member is a time corresponding to 3% of the total life, and can be obtained by the following equation.
  • the creep life consumption rate can be estimated as "tZtr ⁇ 0.92". Therefore, according to the master curve of the void number density method, the remaining life of the member is a time corresponding to 8% of the total life, and can be obtained by the following equation.
  • the shortest time obtained as a result of the remaining life estimation by each method is estimated as the time until the actual machine member to be evaluated reaches creep rupture (ST7). That is,
  • the remaining life of the member can be estimated to be “216 hours” obtained based on the M parameter.
  • the L parameter method suitable for evaluating the remaining life of fine grains and the M parameter method (M Combined with the parameter method, the residual creep life can be evaluated at any point on the actual machine member, regardless of whether the evaluation target site on the actual machine member is a misalignment of the fine grained part or the coarse grained part. can do. Furthermore, by comparing the result of estimation with a conventional remaining life evaluation method such as the above-mentioned void number density method, more reliable remaining life evaluation can be performed.
  • the method of evaluating the remaining life of the actual machine member using the method for evaluating the remaining creep life of the embodiment has been described above.
  • the reliability of the creep life evaluation means how close the evaluation result (remaining life or creep life consumption rate) based on the parameters adopted is to the result of the creep test. Therefore, not all conceivable parameters can be used as they are for the evaluation of the remaining life of actual components, but it is necessary to confirm in advance the reliability of the parameters to be adopted for the evaluation of the remaining life. .
  • the following shows an example of the accuracy confirmation test results for confirming the reliability of the L parameter.
  • the rupture time was 147 hours in a simulated fracture test (15 mm square X L50 mm specimen) of a real machine scale high-temperature reheated steam pipe, and the rupture time was 147 hours.
  • expanded voids existing over at least 1/2 of each length of at least two grain boundaries are formed by uniting voids generated on a plurality of grain boundaries. If the expanded voids can be clearly distinguished from those that have grown larger due to the growth of one void and those that have combined multiple voids, the expanded voids are considered to be connected. Well, you can count them separately.
  • the various types of ST1 test force of ST1 were calculated based on the data representing the relationship between each parameter obtained and the creep life consumption rate.
  • the creep life consumption rate and the remaining life can be immediately obtained based on the above formulas simply by inputting various parameters for the actual machine member force. .
  • the method of evaluating the remaining life of the actual machine member using the creep remaining life evaluation method of the embodiment has been described.
  • the present invention is not limited to this.
  • the estimation based on the conventional void number density method is performed.
  • the results were also compared, the results of estimation based on other parameter-based evaluation methods can also be compared.
  • an A-parameter method, a tissue contrast method, a void area ratio method, or a void area density method can be employed.
  • the L parameter or the M parameter Each master curve was used to represent the relationship between the data and the life consumption rate of talyp.However, a database was created to show the relationship between the two, and the remaining life was evaluated by comparing this with the parameters obtained for the actual machine components. You can also. In either method, it is possible to automatically calculate the remaining life by inputting the obtained L parameters using the computer.
  • the actual machine member when obtaining the L parameter, also obtains a replica of the member surface, enlarges the replica by SEM or the like, and visually observes the voids. After connecting the images, the connected voids can be automatically recognized by a machine such as a computer, and the number thereof can be quickly and easily obtained on the image.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Testing Resistance To Weather, Investigating Materials By Mechanical Methods (AREA)
  • Investigating Strength Of Materials By Application Of Mechanical Stress (AREA)
  • Investigating And Analyzing Materials By Characteristic Methods (AREA)

Abstract

Procédé pour évaluer précisément l’espérance de vie ou la longévité d’un élément d’un dispositif endommagé par le fluage quel qu’en soit le grain. L’espérance de vie ou la longévité est représentée par le temps qui s’écoule jusqu’à ce que l’élément du dispositif endommagé par le fluage subisse une rupture liée au fluage. Est déterminé le nombre de vides liés présents sur la moitié ou plus de chaque longueur de deux limites de grain ou plus dans des régions allant jusqu’à 1 mm2 de la surface de l’élément du dispositif. Le rapport du nombre des vides liés spécifiques sur la région de 1 mm2 est utilisé en tant que paramètre L. Tout comme le rapport d’occupation des limites de grain de vide, le rapport du total des longueurs de tous les vides présents aux limites de grain à la surface de l’élément du dispositif sur la longueur d’une limite de grain dans la région de 1 mm2 est déterminé pour chaque limite de grain, et la valeur maximale est utilisée en tant que paramètre M. Les espérances de vie ou longévités de l'élément du dispositif sont évaluées sur la base des paramètres L et M, et la plus courte est déterminée comme étant l’espérance de vie ou la longévité de l’élément du dispositif.
PCT/JP2005/011268 2004-06-21 2005-06-20 Procédé pour évaluer sous tous ses aspects l’espérance de vie ou la longévité du fluage WO2005124315A1 (fr)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2006514819A JP4054834B2 (ja) 2004-06-21 2005-06-20 クリープ余寿命の総合評価方法

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2004182551 2004-06-21
JP2004-182551 2004-06-21

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2005124315A1 true WO2005124315A1 (fr) 2005-12-29

Family

ID=35509805

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/JP2005/011268 WO2005124315A1 (fr) 2004-06-21 2005-06-20 Procédé pour évaluer sous tous ses aspects l’espérance de vie ou la longévité du fluage

Country Status (2)

Country Link
JP (1) JP4054834B2 (fr)
WO (1) WO2005124315A1 (fr)

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009145185A (ja) * 2007-12-13 2009-07-02 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The クリープ寿命評価方法
JP2010223823A (ja) * 2009-03-24 2010-10-07 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The クリープ損傷評価方法
JP2010236941A (ja) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-21 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd 配管溶接部の寿命評価方法
JP2012108051A (ja) * 2010-11-18 2012-06-07 Babcock Hitachi Kk 耐熱鋼溶接部の損傷予測方法
JP2013117485A (ja) * 2011-12-05 2013-06-13 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The 高クロム鋼管の余寿命を推定する余寿命推定方法、推定システム、及び、推定プログラム
JP2013140095A (ja) * 2012-01-05 2013-07-18 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The クリープ損傷を受ける金属の余寿命診断装置および余寿命診断プログラム
WO2015111184A1 (fr) * 2014-01-24 2015-07-30 中国電力株式会社 Méthode d'évaluation de durée de vie restante pour un tube métallique souffrant de dégâts de fluage
WO2020065711A1 (fr) * 2018-09-25 2020-04-02 中国電力株式会社 Procédé de création de courbe de diagnostic de durée de vie restante

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5859710B2 (ja) * 2013-10-25 2016-02-10 中国電力株式会社 加熱及び加圧により劣化した製品のクリープ余寿命の予測方法、及び、この予測方法に用いる検量線作成方法

Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11230928A (ja) * 1998-02-12 1999-08-27 Hitachi Ltd 応力腐食割れ感受性診断方法及びその装置
WO2002014835A1 (fr) * 2000-08-16 2002-02-21 The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc. Procédé d'évaluation de la limite de fluage

Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH11230928A (ja) * 1998-02-12 1999-08-27 Hitachi Ltd 応力腐食割れ感受性診断方法及びその装置
WO2002014835A1 (fr) * 2000-08-16 2002-02-21 The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc. Procédé d'évaluation de la limite de fluage

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
KIKUCHI K. ET AL: "A Proposal of Grain Boundary Damage Parameter", JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF MATERIALS SCIENCE JAPAN, vol. 44, no. 505, 15 October 1995 (1995-10-15), pages 1244 - 1248, XP002995866 *
KIKUCHI K. ET AL: "Grain Boundary Damage for Pre-strained material", NIPPON KIKAI GAKKAI TSUJO SOKAI KOENKAI KOEN RONBUNSHU, vol. 73, no. 2, 1 April 1996 (1996-04-01), pages 274 - 275, XP002995865 *
NISHIDA H.: "The Development of New Residual Life Assessment Method at the High Temperature Steam Piping Welding Joints", NIPPON KIKAI GAKKAI ZAIRYO RIKIGAKU BUMON KOENKAI KOEN RONBUNSHU, 4 September 2004 (2004-09-04), pages 121 - 122, XP002995867 *

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2009145185A (ja) * 2007-12-13 2009-07-02 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The クリープ寿命評価方法
JP2010223823A (ja) * 2009-03-24 2010-10-07 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The クリープ損傷評価方法
JP2010236941A (ja) * 2009-03-30 2010-10-21 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd 配管溶接部の寿命評価方法
JP2012108051A (ja) * 2010-11-18 2012-06-07 Babcock Hitachi Kk 耐熱鋼溶接部の損傷予測方法
JP2013117485A (ja) * 2011-12-05 2013-06-13 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The 高クロム鋼管の余寿命を推定する余寿命推定方法、推定システム、及び、推定プログラム
JP2013140095A (ja) * 2012-01-05 2013-07-18 Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The クリープ損傷を受ける金属の余寿命診断装置および余寿命診断プログラム
WO2015111184A1 (fr) * 2014-01-24 2015-07-30 中国電力株式会社 Méthode d'évaluation de durée de vie restante pour un tube métallique souffrant de dégâts de fluage
JP5763868B1 (ja) * 2014-01-24 2015-08-12 中国電力株式会社 クリープ損傷を受ける金属管の余寿命診断方法
CN105593664A (zh) * 2014-01-24 2016-05-18 中国电力株式会社 发生蠕变损伤的金属管的剩余寿命诊断方法
US9880087B2 (en) 2014-01-24 2018-01-30 The Chugoku Electric Power Co., Inc. Remaining service life evaluation method for metal pipe suffering from creep damage
WO2020065711A1 (fr) * 2018-09-25 2020-04-02 中国電力株式会社 Procédé de création de courbe de diagnostic de durée de vie restante

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPWO2005124315A1 (ja) 2008-04-10
JP4054834B2 (ja) 2008-03-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
WO2005124315A1 (fr) Procédé pour évaluer sous tous ses aspects l’espérance de vie ou la longévité du fluage
JP4464043B2 (ja) クリープ寿命評価方法
JP3652943B2 (ja) 金属材料の損傷評価方法及び装置
Wan et al. Investigation of bond between fiber reinforced polymer and concrete undergoing global mixed mode I/II loading
JP4054833B2 (ja) クリープ余寿命の評価方法
JP5086615B2 (ja) 高強度鋼溶接部のクリープ伸びによる寿命評価方法及び高強度鋼溶接部の寿命評価方法
Vakhguelt et al. Combination non-destructive test (NDT) method for early damage detection and condition assessment of boiler tubes
JP2012173217A (ja) 配管検査方法及び配管寿命決定方法
JP2009174859A (ja) 機械部品の余寿命評価方法
Kibey et al. Full-scale test observations for measurement of tensile strain capacity of welded pipelines
JP3976938B2 (ja) クリープ寿命評価方法
WO2019159940A1 (fr) Procédé d'inspection d'usine
Hioe et al. Fracture toughness variation with flaw depth in various specimen geometries and role of constraint in material fracture resistance
Baumgartner et al. Fatigue of brazed joints made of X5CrNi18-10 and Cu110 and derivation of reliable assessment approaches
Ohtani et al. Nonlinear acoustic evaluation of creep damage in boiler heat exchange tubes
JP4672616B2 (ja) 応力腐食割れ亀裂進展速度の評価方法
JP5492057B2 (ja) 耐熱鋼溶接部の損傷予測方法
JP3825378B2 (ja) 耐熱鋼の寿命評価方法
JPH075086A (ja) 高温構造材料のクリープと疲労の重畳損傷推定方法
JP2008032480A (ja) 耐熱鋼の損傷評価方法及びその装置
JP2003275890A (ja) 疲労寿命向上処理方法およびそれによる長寿命溶接継手
JP2540630B2 (ja) フェライト系耐熱鋼の余寿命評価方法
JP2007303980A (ja) 金属部材のクリープ余寿命の予測方法
JP2002168853A (ja) 金属材料の寿命評価方法
Mokhtar et al. Failure analysis of high pressure high temperature super-heater outlet header tube in heat recovery steam generator

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BW BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EC EE EG ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KM KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NA NG NI NO NZ OM PG PH PL PT RO RU SC SD SE SG SK SL SM SY TJ TM TN TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VC VN YU ZA ZM ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): BW GH GM KE LS MW MZ NA SD SL SZ TZ UG ZM ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LT LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GQ GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

DPEN Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed from 20040101)
121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2006514819

Country of ref document: JP

NENP Non-entry into the national phase

Ref country code: DE

WWW Wipo information: withdrawn in national office

Country of ref document: DE

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase