WO2001096627A1 - Improved phosphating operation - Google Patents

Improved phosphating operation Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2001096627A1
WO2001096627A1 PCT/US2001/019499 US0119499W WO0196627A1 WO 2001096627 A1 WO2001096627 A1 WO 2001096627A1 US 0119499 W US0119499 W US 0119499W WO 0196627 A1 WO0196627 A1 WO 0196627A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
phosphating
composition
cations
working
dissolved
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/US2001/019499
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Brian B. Cuyler
Kevin K. Meagher
Timm L. Kelly
Original Assignee
Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien filed Critical Henkel Kommanditgesellschaft Auf Aktien
Priority to CA2413646A priority Critical patent/CA2413646C/en
Priority to BR0111737-8A priority patent/BR0111737A/pt
Priority to US10/311,440 priority patent/US8062435B2/en
Priority to JP2002510737A priority patent/JP2004503678A/ja
Priority to AU2001267000A priority patent/AU2001267000A1/en
Publication of WO2001096627A1 publication Critical patent/WO2001096627A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/05Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions
    • C23C22/06Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6
    • C23C22/34Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 containing fluorides or complex fluorides
    • C23C22/36Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 containing fluorides or complex fluorides containing also phosphates
    • C23C22/362Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 containing fluorides or complex fluorides containing also phosphates containing also zinc cations
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/05Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions
    • C23C22/06Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6
    • C23C22/07Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals using aqueous solutions using aqueous acidic solutions with pH less than 6 containing phosphates
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C23COATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; CHEMICAL SURFACE TREATMENT; DIFFUSION TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL; INHIBITING CORROSION OF METALLIC MATERIAL OR INCRUSTATION IN GENERAL
    • C23CCOATING METALLIC MATERIAL; COATING MATERIAL WITH METALLIC MATERIAL; SURFACE TREATMENT OF METALLIC MATERIAL BY DIFFUSION INTO THE SURFACE, BY CHEMICAL CONVERSION OR SUBSTITUTION; COATING BY VACUUM EVAPORATION, BY SPUTTERING, BY ION IMPLANTATION OR BY CHEMICAL VAPOUR DEPOSITION, IN GENERAL
    • C23C22/00Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals
    • C23C22/73Chemical surface treatment of metallic material by reaction of the surface with a reactive liquid, leaving reaction products of surface material in the coating, e.g. conversion coatings, passivation of metals characterised by the process

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the well known general field of phosphate conversion coating of metals and more particularly to phosphate coatings formed from a liquid phosphating composition that contains both zinc and at least one of nickel, cobalt, and manganese as layer forming cations.
  • the coatings formed from such a phosphating composition normally contain both zinc and at least the one(s) of nickel, cobalt, and zinc also present in the phosphating compositions.
  • These coatings may also contain iron, particularly if a ferriferous substrate such as ordinary (non-stainless) steel is being phosphated. Almost all phosphating compositions and processes are subject to the formation of "sludge", a solid phase that separates spontaneously from the liquid phosphating composition as the latter is used.
  • sludge The major components of sludge are water-insoluble phosphates, usually of more or less the same type(s) that constitute the desired conversion coating. Although some attempts have been made to re-use sludge, in most commercial operations it still represents an economically significant cost of phosphating, because the anions and cations incorporated into the sludge generally must be replenished along with the ions from the phosphating composition that actually form the desired phosphate conversion coating. Sludge generally either sinks to the bottom of any container in which it forms or floats on the liquid phosphating composition from which it forms and therefore can be easily removed from the liquid phosphating composition by filtering or skimming if desired or needed.
  • Sludge also is usually only weakly adherent to metal surfaces, and if it does accumulate on them can be readily removed by brushing, water flush, or the like.
  • a phenomenon less common than sludging that is sometimes observed in commercial phosphating is the formation of an adherent scale on process equipment, such as squeegee rolls, immersion heaters and heat exchangers, that must be kept in contact with the phosphating compositions during their use in order to maintain optimum conditions for phosphating.
  • No phosphate conversion coating of these items of process equipment is desired, and the objects are generally made of non-metals such as rubber for squeegee rolls or of metals such as stainless steel on which normal phosphate conversion coatings do not spontaneously form.
  • NCM divalent nickel, divalent cobalt, and/or divalent manganese
  • a major object of this invention is to provide high NCM phosphating compositions and/or processes that produce less sludge and/or scaling than previously used high NCM phosphating, particularly when the processes are operated at high temperatures.
  • Embodiments of the invention include working aqueous liquid compositions suitable for contacting directly with metal surfaces to provide conversion coatings thereon; liquid or solid concentrates that will form such working aqueous liquid com- positions upon dilution with water, optionally with addition of other ingredients; processes of using working aqueous liquid compositions according to the invention as defined above to form protective coatings on metal surfaces and, optionally, to further process the metal objects with surfaces so protected; protective solid coatings on metal surfaces formed in such a process, and metal articles bearing such a protective coating.
  • a working composition according to the invention preferably comprises water and the following components: (A) dissolved phosphate anions;
  • One or more of undissolved iron cations and the following components may also be present in the working composition:
  • component (F) dissolved fluoride ions that are not part of any of components (A) through (E) as recited immediately above;
  • component (A) preferably, at least for economy, is sourced to a composition according to the invention by at least one of orthophosphoric acid and its salts of any degree of neutralization.
  • Component (A) can also be sourced to a composition according to the invention by pyrophosphate and other more highly condensed phosphates, including metaphosphates, which tend at the preferred concentrations for at least working compositions according to the invention to hydrolyze to orthophosphates.
  • pyrophosphate and other more highly condensed phosphates including metaphosphates, which tend at the preferred concentrations for at least working compositions according to the invention to hydrolyze to orthophosphates.
  • condensed phosphates are usually at least as expensive as orthophosphates, there is little practical incentive to use condensed phosphates, except possibly to prepare extremely highly concentrated liquid compositions according to the invention, in which condensed phosphates may be more soluble.
  • the concentration of component (A) in a working composition according to the invention measured as its stoichiometric equivalent as PO "3 anions with the stoichiometry based on equal numbers of phosphorus atoms, preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.70, 0.75, 0.80, 0.84, 0.86, 0.88, 0.90, or 0.92 % and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 20, 10, 6.5, 5.0, 4.0, 3.5, 3.0, 2.0,
  • Component (B) of dissolved NCM cations is preferably sourced to the composition as at least one nitrate or phosphate salt (which may of course be prepared by dissolving the elemental metal and/or an oxide or carbonate thereof in acid), although any other sufficiently soluble salt of the NCM cations may be used.
  • the entire NCM cations content of any water-soluble NCM salt dissolved in a composition according to the invention is presumed to be NCM cations in solution, irrespective of any coordinate complex formation or other physical or chemical bonding of the NCM cations with other constituents of the composition according to the invention.
  • the concentration of NCM cations in a working composition according to the invention preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 0.10, 0.12, 0.14, 0.16, 0.18, or 0.20 % and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 1.5, 1.0, 0.8, 0.70, 0.60, 0.55, 0.50, or 0.47 %. If the concentration of NCM is too low, the improved corrosion resistance associated with a "high NCM" phosphating composition will not usually be achieved, while if this concentration is too high, the cost of the composition will increase inordinately without any corresponding increase in performance.
  • Zinc cations for component (C) are preferably sourced to a composition according to the invention from at least one zinc phosphate salt, at least one zinc nitrate salt, and/or by dissolving at least one of metallic zinc, zinc oxide, and zinc carbonate in a precursor composition that contains at least enough phosphoric and/or nitric acid to convert the zinc content of the oxide to a dissolved zinc salt.
  • these preferences are primarily for economy and availability of commercial materials free from amounts of impurities that adversely affect phosphating reactions, so that any other suitable source of dissolved zinc cations could also be used.
  • the entire zinc content of any salt or other compound dissolved or reacted with acid in a composition according to the invention is to be presumed to be present as cations when determining whether the concentration of zinc cations satisfies a concentration preference as noted below.
  • the concentration of zinc cations preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.010,
  • the concentration of zinc cations additionally preferably is not greater than, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.20, 0.15, 0.10, 0.08, or 0.06 %; and, independently, the ratio of zinc cations to NCM cations preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.03:1.00,
  • the concentration of zinc cations additionally preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.075, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.23, 0.25, 0.27, 0.29, or 0.31 percent; and, independently, the ratio of zinc cations to NCM cations preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 1.10:1.00, 1.20:1.00, 1.30:1.00, 1.35:1.00, 1.40:1.00, 1.45:1.00, 1.50:1.00, 1.55:1.00, or 1.58:1.00 and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 7:1.00, 5:1.00, 3.0:1.00, 2.7:1.00, 2.5:1.00, 2.3:1.00, 2.1 :1.00, 1.9:1.00, or 1.7:1.00.
  • Component (D) of iron cations is preferably sourced to a phosphating composition according to the invention by a source of iron(lll) ions, most preferably ferric nitrate although other water-soluble sources of ferric ions may be used.
  • the solubilities of ferric phosphate and of ferric hydroxide are rather low in the presence of preferred amounts of other constituents of a preferred phosphating composition according to this invention, and it is in certain embodiments of the invention preferred to maintain the dissolved iron(lll) cations at their saturation value by supplying an excess of ferric salt, most of which remains undissolved unless and until some of the dissolved ferric ions are removed from the composition by drag-out, precipitation as sludge, or the like.
  • ferric salts are affected by pH. At relatively low pH levels (high acidity) such as are typically present in the concentrate compositions of the present invention (replenisher or make-up), the ferric salt will generally be more soluble than at higher pH levels. Precipitation of a portion of the ferric salt dissolved in a replenisher or make-up concentrate will thus commonly be observed when the concentrate is diluted in the working phosphating composition.
  • the concentration of dissolved iron cations in a working phosphating composition according to the invention preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 40, 60, 80, or 100 % of its saturation level, which is believed to correspond to about 10 parts of dissolved iron per million parts by weight of total phosphating composition (this unit of concentration being freely used hereinafter for any constituent of a phosphating composition and being hereinafter usually abbreviated as "ppm").
  • ppm total concentration of dissolved iron cations
  • the amount of total ferric salt provided to the phosphating composition may be desirable to limit the amount of total ferric salt provided to the phosphating composition. At very high levels of total ferric salt, excessive sludging and/or scaling may take place. For this reason, it may be advantageous to provide to the phosphating composition an amount of total ferric salt that contains not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 700, 600, 500, 400, 200 or 100 ppm of iron cations.
  • Optional component (E) of conversion coating accelerator preferably is present in a composition according to the invention, because without this component the coating formation rate usually is slower than is desired.
  • the accelerator when present in a working composition according to the invention preferably is selected from the group consisting of: 0.3 to 4 parts of chlorate ions per thousand parts of total phosphating composition, this unit of concentration being freely used hereinafter for any constituent of the composition and being hereinafter usually abbreviated as "ppt";
  • Nitrate ions are preferred within this group and are most preferably used without any of the other accelerators in this group.
  • Nitrate ions are preferably sourced to the composition by at least one of nitric acid and its salts.
  • nitrate ions When nitrate ions are present in a working composition according to the invention, their concentration more preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.3, 3.6, 3.9, 4.1 , or 4.3 ppt and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 25, 20, 17, 15, 13, 11 , or 9.0 ppt. (If the concentration of nitrate is too high, the danger of emissions of noxious oxides of nitrogen from the phosphating composition is increased.)
  • optional component (F) of dissolved fluoride in a composition according to the invention is also preferred, because without it the danger of forming the small surface blemishes known in art as "white specking", “seediness”, or the like is increased when phosphating zinciferous surfaces, and there is also less likelihood of obtaining the most desired crystal morphology.
  • this fluoride is sourced to the composition in two differing forms: "uncomplexed fluoride” supplied by hydrofluoric acid and/or one of its salts (which may be partially or totally neutralized); and “complexed fluoride” supplied to the composition by at least one of the acids HBF 4 , H 2 SiF 6 , H 2 TiF6, H2ZrF 6 , and H 2 HfF 6 , and their salts (which also may be partially or totally neutralized).
  • H 2 SiF 6 and its salts are most preferred, the acid itself being usually preferred for economy and ready commercial availability.
  • the concentration of uncomplexed fluoride in the phosphating composition preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10, 0.12, 0.14, or 0.16 ppt and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 2.0, 1.5, 1.0, 0.8, 0.6, 0.40, 0.35, 0.30, 0.25, 0.23, 0.21 , 0.19, or 0.17 ppt; independently, the concentration of complexed fluoride in the phosphating composition preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.04, 0.08, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20, 0.24, 0.28, 0.31 , 0.33, 0.35, or 0.37 ppt and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the
  • the concentration of complexed fluoride in the phosphating composition preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.25, 0.50, 1.0, 1.5, 1.8, 2.0, 2.2, or 2.4 ppt and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 20, 15, 10.0, 7.0, 5.0,
  • the concentration of uncomplexed fluoride in the phosphating composition preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, 0.54, 0.57, or 0.59 ppt and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 7.0, 6.0, 5.0, 4.5, 3.5, 2.5, 2.0, 1.5, 1.00, 0.90, 0.80, 0J0, 0.65, or 0.60 ppt; and, independently, the ratio of uncomplexed fluoride to complexed fluoride preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.02:1.00, 0.04:1.00, 0.06:1.00, 0.08:1.00, 0.10:1.00, 0.12:1.00, 0.14:1.00, 0.16:1.00, 0.18:1.00, 0.20:1.00, 0.
  • a phosphating composition according to the invention contains either fluoride only in uncomplexed form or fluoride only in complexed form, then: if the NCM concentration is greater than the zinc concentration in the phosphating composition, the total fluoride content of the composition preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.10, 0.20, 0.30, 0.40, or 0.50 ppt and independently preferably is not more than, 5, 3, 2.0, 1.0, 0.8, or 0.6 ppt; but if the NCM concentration is less than or equal to the zinc concentration in the composition, the total fluoride content of the composition preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, or 2.9 ppt and independently preferably is, with increasing preference in the order given, not more than 20, 15, 10, 7, 5, or 3.1 ppt.
  • a phosphating composition according to the invention contains dissolved fluoride of any type
  • the ratio of the total dissolved fluoride concentration to the dissolved zinc cations concentration, both measured in the same mass-based units preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.2:1.00, 0.4:1.00, 0.6:1.00, 0.80:1.00, 0.87:1.00, or 0.92:1.00 and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 5:1.00, 3:1.00, 2.0:1.00, 1.8:1.00, 1.6:1.00, 1.4:1.00, 1.20:1.00, or 1.10:1.00.
  • a phosphating composition according to this invention is necessarily acidic. Its acidity is preferably measured for control and optimization by two characteristics familiar in the art as "points" of Free Acid (hereinafter usually abbreviated as “FA”) and of Total Acid (hereinafter usually abbreviated as “TA”). Either of these values is measured by titrating a 10.0 milliliter sample of the composition with 0.100 N strong alkali. If FA is to be determined, the titration is to an end point of pH 3.8 as measured by a pH meter or an indicator such as bromcresol green or bromthymol blue, while if
  • FA Free Acid
  • TA Total Acid
  • the titration is to an end point of pH 8.0 as measured by a pH meter or an indicator such as phenolphthalein.
  • the value in points is defined as equal to the number of milliliters of the titrant required to reach the end point.
  • a working phosphating composition according to this invention preferably has an FA value that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.1 , 0.3, 0.5,
  • a working phosphating composition according to the invention preferably has a TA value that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22, 25, or 27 points and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 50, 45, 40, 38, 36, or 34 points.
  • the phosphating coating formation will be lower than is usually desired, while if either value is too high there may be excessive dissolution of the substrate and/or suboptimal crystal morphology in the coating formed.
  • the FA and TA values can be brought within a preferred range by use of appropriate amounts of acidic sources of phosphate, nitrate, and/or complexed fluoride and basic sources of zinc and/or NCM, but if needed, optional component (G) preferably is used to bring the composition within a preferred range of both TA and FA.
  • Alkali metal hydroxides, carbonates, and/or oxides are preferably used for this purpose if alkalinity is needed, and phosphoric acid and/or nitric acid is preferably used if acidity is needed.
  • Optional component (H) of sludge conditioner is not always needed in a composition according to the invention and therefore is preferably omitted in such instances.
  • at least one such conditioner may be advantageously used, in order to make separation and collection of any sludge that forms easier.
  • suitable material for these purposes can be readily selected by those skilled in the art.
  • Preferred sludge conditioners are shown in the examples below.
  • a composition according to this invention should be largely free from various materials often used in prior art compositions.
  • compositions according to this invention in most instances preferably do not contain, with increasing preference in the order given, and with independent preference for each component named, more than 5, 4, 3, 2, 1 , 0.5,
  • Preferred concentrations have been specified above for working compositions according to the invention, but another embodiment of the invention is make-up con- centrate compositions that can be diluted with water only to produce a working composition, and the concentration of ingredients other than water in such a concentrate composition preferably is as high as possible without resulting in instability of the concentrate during storage, in order to minimize the cost of shipping water from a concentrate manufacturer to an end user, who can almost always provide water more cheaply at the point of use.
  • the concentration of each ingredient other than water preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 or times as great as the preferred minimum amounts specified above for working compositions according to the invention.
  • a make-up concentrate preferably has the same ratios between various ingredients as are specified for working compositions above.
  • a phosphating composition according to the invention is preferably maintained while coating a metal substrate in a process according to the invention at a temperature that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 30, 40, 50,
  • the specific areal density (also often called “add-on weight [or mass]”) of a phosphate coating formed according to this invention preferably is at least, with in- creasing preference in the order given, 0.3, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.2, 1.4, or 1.6 grams of dried coating per square meter of substrate coated, this unit of coating weight being hereinafter usually abbreviated as "g/m 2 ", and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 10, 8, 6, 5.0, 4.5, 4.0, or 3.5 g/m 2 .
  • the phosphate conversion coating weight may be measured by stripping the conversion coating in a solution of chromic acid in water as generally known in the art.
  • metal substrate surfaces preferably are conventionally cleaned, rinsed, and "conditioned” with a Jernstedt salt or an at least similarly effective treatment, all in a manner well known in the art for any particular type of substrate; and after a treatment according to the invention the composition according to the invention generally should be rinsed off the surface coated before drying.
  • This invention is particularly advantageously, and therefore preferably, used on zinciferous metal substrates, such as galvanized steel of all kinds and zinc- magnesium and zinc-aluminum alloys, or more generally any metal alloy surface that is at least 55 % zinc, and on such substrates there are two particularly preferred established areas of commercial operation in which this invention is especially advantageous and to which it is therefore highly preferably applied.
  • the phosphating composition used contains at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 2.5, 3.0, 3.3, 3.6, 3.9, 4.1 , 4.3, or 4.5 ppt of NCM cations; and contains NMC and zinc cations in a ratio of zinc to NMC that preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given,
  • the phosphating composition is: in contact during its use in phosphating with at least one surface on which no phosphate coating or other solid coating forma- tion is desired; and maintained during its use at a temperature that preferably is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 50, 55, 60, 62, 64,
  • the characteristic feature is a very rapid movement of the substrate through the phosphating composition during the phosphating process, a common condition in high speed treatment of coils.
  • a suitable replenisher to compensate for any changes in the concentrations of ingredients in the initially prepared phosphating composition that occur as a result of using the phosphating composition.
  • the optimum characteristics of a replenisher composition often depend on the nature of the substrate being coated and the relative speed of motion between the phosphating composition and the substrate being phosphated.
  • a preferred replenisher composition preferably comprises water and the following concentrations of the following other components:
  • R2A a concentration of dissolved phosphate anions that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 15, 17, 19, 21 , 23, 25, or 27 % and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 50, 45, 40, 37, 34, 32, 30, or 28 %
  • R2B a concentration of dissolved NCM cations that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 1.2, 1.4, 1.6, or 1.8 % and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 5.0, 4.0, 3.0, 2.5, 2.3, 2.1 , or 1.9 %;
  • R2C a concentration of dissolved zinc cations that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 4.0, 4.2, 4.4, 4.6, 4.8, 5.0, or 5.2 % and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 15, 12, 10, 8.0, 7.0, 6.0, or 5.5 %;
  • R2D a concentration of dissolved iron cations that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.02, 0.04, 0.06, 0.08, or 0.10 %.
  • one or more of undissolved iron cations and the following concentrations of the following components may also be present:
  • R2E a concentration of nitrate ions that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 5.0, 5.2, 5.4, 5.6, 5.8, 6.0, or 6.2 % and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 12, 10, 9.0, 8.0, 7.5, 7.0, 6.8, 6.6, or 6.4 percent
  • R2F a concentration of dissolved uncomplexed fluoride ions that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50, 0.55, or 0.58 percent and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 1.5, 1.2, 1.0, 0.90, 0.80, 0.70, 0.65, or 0.62 percent
  • R2G surfactant that is not part of any of components (R2A) through
  • a particularly preferred replenisher compo- sition preferably comprises water and the following concentrations of the following other components:
  • R1 A a concentration of dissolved phosphate anions that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21 , 23, or 25 percent and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 50, 45, 40, 37, 34, 32, 30, 28, or 26 percent;
  • R2B a concentration of dissolved NCM cations that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 4.2, 4.4, 4.6, or 4.8 % and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 8.0, 7.0, 6.0, 5.5, 5.3, 5.1 , or 4.9 %;
  • R2C a concentration of dissolved zinc cations that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.50, 0.60, 0.70, 0.80, 0.90, 1.00, or
  • R2E a concentration of nitrate ions that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 3.0, 3.5, 3.7, 3.9, 4.1 , 4.3, 4.5, or 4.7 % and independently preferably is not more than, with increasing preference in the order given, 10, 8.0, 7.0, 6.5, 6.0, 5.7, 5.4, 5.2, 5.0, or 4.8 percent
  • R2F a concentration of dissolved uncomplexed fluoride ions that is at least, with increasing preference in the order given, 0.05, 0.10, 0.15, 0.20,
  • Preferred surfactant(s) and sludge conditioners are described in the working examples.
  • both working phosphating compositions were made from a concentrate with the ingredients shown in Table 1 below.
  • the working compositions each contained 425 milliliters of this concentrate and 42 grams of sodium carbonate in a total volume of 6.0 liters.
  • Example 1 also contained 4 grams of ferric nitrate nonahydrate crystals, but this ingredient was omitted from Comparison Example 1 , which was otherwise identical to Example 1 in concentrations of ingredients other than water.
  • Both working phosphating compositions had FA values of 2.5. The TA value was 31.1 for Example 1 and 30.9 for Comparison Example 1.
  • Example 1 Each working composition was heated with one of two substantially identical heating elements with a surface of Type 316 stainless steel exposed to the working composition, which was maintained at 71 " 5 EC while conventionally cleaned and conditioned galvanized steel test panels were phosphated by immersion for 5 seconds each.
  • the appearance of the phosphated galvanized steel surfaces from Example 1 and Comparison Example 1 was substantially identical in scanning electron micrographs at 1000 diameters magnification. However, after five hours of use, the surfaces of the two immersion heaters were very different.
  • a preferred replenisher for use with a high nickel-low zinc phosphating composition as used in Example 1 contains the ingredients shown in Table 2 below.
  • the substrate was also conventionally cleaned and conditioned galvanized steel, but in these examples the steel was passed rapidly through the phosphating composition rather than being immersed in it.
  • the phosphating composition contained the ingredients shown in Table 3 below.
  • the phosphating composition was replenished with a conventional replenisher that did not contain zinc or iron, and the speed of the substrate through the phosphating composition was varied. A minimum coating weight of 1.5 g/m 2 is required for this operation and was readily achieved at substrate speeds up to 182 m/min. However, when the speed was raised to 199 m/min, satisfactory coating weights could not be maintained.
  • the coating characteristics did not improve, presumably because substantially all of the zinc cations added in the replenisher were precipitated as zinc phosphate.
  • Example 2 a phosphating composition was used that contained the same ingredients for Comparison Example 1 except that 0.062 percent of iron cations was added to the composition as ferric nitrate nonahydrate, not all of which dissolved.
  • the replenisher used had a composition including iron and zinc, as shown in full in Table 4 below. With these operating conditions, required coating weights and other coating characteristics were easily achieved for a period of twelve hours at a substrate speed of 199 m/min, and little or no turbidity and/or sludge formation was observed.
  • the xanthan gum, urea, and sulfonate salt present in this composition are all sludge modifiers.
  • Hot dipped G70 galvanized steel test panels (supplied by ACT) were cleaned with PARCO 1200 cleaner (available from the Surface Technologies division of Henkel Corporation) (14 point, 60°C, 10 seconds), then rinsed with hot water (10 seconds), and treated with PARCOLENE AT conditioner (available from the Surface Technologies division of Henkel Corporation) at 28°C prior to immersion in the phosphating baths (77-80°C, 5 sec). Coating weights were measured by stripping using ammonium dichromate, in accordance with conventional practice. Scaling and sludging were evaluated by visual inspection of the reaction vessel and the amount of scale deposited on the immersion heating device over the course of the phosphating operation (approximately 6 hours).
  • Example 3.2 (7.5 ppm Fe (III)) gave optimum results (no sludging, minimal scaling), in commercial operation it would be preferable to operate at a somewhat higher Fe (III) level due to the problems associated with trying to precisely maintain a very low concentration of Fe (III), as a relatively minor decrease in the Fe (III) level (e.g., where the level approaches 0 ppm) could lead to severe sludging and scaling problems.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Chemical Treatment Of Metals (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Sludge (AREA)
PCT/US2001/019499 2000-06-16 2001-06-18 Improved phosphating operation WO2001096627A1 (en)

Priority Applications (5)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA2413646A CA2413646C (en) 2000-06-16 2001-06-18 Improved phosphating operation
BR0111737-8A BR0111737A (pt) 2000-06-16 2001-06-18 Operação de fosfatação, e, composição
US10/311,440 US8062435B2 (en) 2001-06-18 2001-06-18 Phosphating operation
JP2002510737A JP2004503678A (ja) 2000-06-16 2001-06-18 改良されたリン酸塩処理方法
AU2001267000A AU2001267000A1 (en) 2000-06-16 2001-06-18 Improved phosphating operation

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US21220500P 2000-06-16 2000-06-16
US60/212,205 2000-06-16

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2001096627A1 true WO2001096627A1 (en) 2001-12-20

Family

ID=22790000

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US2001/019499 WO2001096627A1 (en) 2000-06-16 2001-06-18 Improved phosphating operation

Country Status (6)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2004503678A (pt)
KR (1) KR20030037230A (pt)
AU (1) AU2001267000A1 (pt)
BR (1) BR0111737A (pt)
CA (1) CA2413646C (pt)
WO (1) WO2001096627A1 (pt)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6530999B2 (en) * 2000-10-10 2003-03-11 Henkel Corporation Phosphate conversion coating
EP2607521A4 (en) * 2010-08-19 2016-03-30 Kobe Steel Ltd SURFACE-TREATED METAL MATERIAL WITH EXCELLENT DEPOSITION SUPPRESSION PROPERTIES, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF, HEAT EXCHANGE AND SEAWATER EVAPORATOR

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2017514997A (ja) 2014-04-30 2017-06-08 リオ フェアヴァルトゥングス アクティエンゲゼルシャフト 金属部品を酸洗及びリン酸塩処理するための処理装置及び処理方法

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3870573A (en) * 1973-02-09 1975-03-11 Oxy Metal Finishing Corp Scale modifier for phosphate solutions
US4147567A (en) * 1976-11-24 1979-04-03 Imperial Chemical Industries Limited Phosphating process
US4486241A (en) * 1981-09-17 1984-12-04 Amchem Products, Inc. Composition and process for treating steel
US5203930A (en) * 1989-08-22 1993-04-20 Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Process of forming phosphate coatings on metal surfaces
US5868874A (en) * 1995-12-14 1999-02-09 Ppg Industries, Inc. Zinc phosphate conversion coating compositions and process

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3870573A (en) * 1973-02-09 1975-03-11 Oxy Metal Finishing Corp Scale modifier for phosphate solutions
US4147567A (en) * 1976-11-24 1979-04-03 Imperial Chemical Industries Limited Phosphating process
US4486241A (en) * 1981-09-17 1984-12-04 Amchem Products, Inc. Composition and process for treating steel
US5203930A (en) * 1989-08-22 1993-04-20 Metallgesellschaft Aktiengesellschaft Process of forming phosphate coatings on metal surfaces
US5868874A (en) * 1995-12-14 1999-02-09 Ppg Industries, Inc. Zinc phosphate conversion coating compositions and process

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6530999B2 (en) * 2000-10-10 2003-03-11 Henkel Corporation Phosphate conversion coating
EP2607521A4 (en) * 2010-08-19 2016-03-30 Kobe Steel Ltd SURFACE-TREATED METAL MATERIAL WITH EXCELLENT DEPOSITION SUPPRESSION PROPERTIES, METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF, HEAT EXCHANGE AND SEAWATER EVAPORATOR

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CA2413646C (en) 2013-02-12
JP2004503678A (ja) 2004-02-05
CA2413646A1 (en) 2001-12-20
BR0111737A (pt) 2003-07-01
KR20030037230A (ko) 2003-05-12
AU2001267000A1 (en) 2001-12-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
JP2806531B2 (ja) 鉄又は鉄合金材料の表面処理用リン酸亜鉛系水溶液及び処理方法
KR100250366B1 (ko) 금속기판상에 인산 아연피막을 형성하기 위한 산성 수성조성물 및 이의 농축제
US5976272A (en) No-rinse phosphating process
US5797987A (en) Zinc phosphate conversion coating compositions and process
US6530999B2 (en) Phosphate conversion coating
JPH046281A (ja) 金属表面のリン酸亜鉛皮膜処理方法
US4824490A (en) Process of producing phosphate coatings on metals
WO1997017480A1 (en) Finely crystalline and/or fast phosphate conversion coating composition and process
PT1633905E (pt) Revestimento de superfícies metálicas por soluções de fosfatação contendo peróxido de hidrogénio e de nitroguanidina
US20080314479A1 (en) High manganese cobalt-modified zinc phosphate conversion coating
US5595611A (en) Moderate temperature manganese phosphate conversion coating composition and process
JPH05287549A (ja) カチオン型電着塗装のための金属表面のリン酸亜鉛処理方法
EP0172806A4 (en) ALKALINE RESISTANCE PHOSPHATE CONVERSION COATING.
JPH0465151B2 (pt)
CA2413646C (en) Improved phosphating operation
EP0904425B1 (en) Moderate temperature manganese phosphate conversion coating composition and process
JPH08134661A (ja) 金属表面のリン酸亜鉛皮膜形成方法
JPH04341574A (ja) 金属表面のリン酸亜鉛処理方法
US8062435B2 (en) Phosphating operation
US2975082A (en) Method of providing ferrous articles with phosphate coatings and compositions therefor
CA2236512C (en) Process of phosphatizing metal surfaces
JPH0380877B2 (pt)
CN1047706A (zh) 常温防锈磷化液
EP1290244A1 (en) Method for forming phosphate coatings on nonferrous metals and plated steel sheets
CN106702359A (zh) 一种高耐蚀磷化液及其制备方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AE AG AL AM AT AU AZ BA BB BG BR BY BZ CA CH CN CO CR CU CZ DE DK DM DZ EE ES FI GB GD GE GH GM HR HU ID IL IN IS JP KE KG KP KR KZ LC LK LR LS LT LU LV MA MD MG MK MN MW MX MZ NO NZ PL PT RO RU SD SE SG SI SK SL TJ TM TR TT TZ UA UG US UZ VN YU ZA ZW

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): GH GM KE LS MW MZ SD SL SZ TZ UG ZW AM AZ BY KG KZ MD RU TJ TM AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE TR BF BJ CF CG CI CM GA GN GW ML MR NE SN TD TG

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
REG Reference to national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8642

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 2002 510737

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1020027016927

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 2413646

Country of ref document: CA

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1020027016927

Country of ref document: KR

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 10311440

Country of ref document: US

122 Ep: pct application non-entry in european phase