Classifications

• • G—PHYSICS
  • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
  • G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
  • G01N21/00—Investigating or analysing materials by the use of optical means, i.e. using sub-millimetre waves, infrared, visible or ultraviolet light
  • G01N21/62—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light
  • G01N21/66—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light electrically excited, e.g. electroluminescence
  • G01N21/69—Systems in which the material investigated is excited whereby it emits light or causes a change in wavelength of the incident light electrically excited, e.g. electroluminescence specially adapted for fluids, e.g. molten metal

Definitions

• the present invention pertains to a method of assaying the concentration of a light-emitting compound through luminescence and, more particularly, to a method of assaying the concentration of a light-emitting compound through electrogenerated chemiluminescence.
• the analytical methods based on luminescence in its various modifications are generally known for their sensitivity, but each have their own shortcomings at very low concentrations of the emitting species.
• the sensitivity of fluorescence is limited by Raleigh and Raman scattering phenomena as well as fluorescent impurities which increase the non-specific background emission.
• Phosphorescence is mainly restricted to solid state and the emission from those very few compounds which have room temperature phosphorescence in solution is generally extremely sensitive to oxygen, which hampers their practical applications.
• the methods based on conventional fluorescence and phosphorescence use an excitation by light and need an appropriate light source and optics.
• the methods based on chemiluminescence do not need excitation optics and the instrumentation is generally very simple. However, chemiluminescence methods are often subjects to serious chemical interference.
• the method based on an instru- mentally simple electrochemical excitation i.e., electrogenerated chemiluminescence or ECL
• ECL electrogenerated chemiluminescence
• ECL of inorganic and organic compounds in electrolyte solutions is well known in the art.
• the anodic ECL of luminol at the platinum electrode in an aqueous electrolyte has been studied since 1929 (for instance, N, Harvey, J. Phys. Chem. 33 (1929) 1456; K. Haapakka and J. Kankare, Anal. Chim.
• Numerous sample cell configurations and methods of measurement for the ECL detection have been proposed where the ECL is generated either at the surface of the electrode (for instance in EP 65 8760 Al and WO 96/28538) or at the surface of magnetic beads collected onto the surface of the electrode (for instance in WO 92/14139; WO 92/14138, JP 08190801 A2 and WO 96/15440).
• the ECL detectors have been applied in High Pressure Liquid Chromatography (for instance, D. Skotty, W. Lee and T. Nie- man, Anal. Chem. 68 (1996) 1530) and in Capillary Electrophoresis (for instance, G. Forbes, T. Nieman and J. Sweedler, Anal. Chim. Acta 347 (1997) 289). Jones (EP 962 773) has studied known ECL reactions on bipolar electrodes. In said publication the electrochemical reaction takes place on very small conducting carbon particles, wherefore high voltage gradients, which are unrealistic in practice, are required to obtain a sufficient voltage drop across the conducting carbon particles.
• the luminescent compound typically must be in the close proximity of the electrode surface.
• the ECL label which contains luminescent compound attached to antibody or antigen, is bound to the electrode surface, e.g. , by the direct immunoreaction where one of the immunoreagents is immobilized on the electrode surface (J. Kankare and K. Haapakka, GB 2217007 B, US 5,308,754), or indirectly by utilizing non-conducting magnetic beads coated with immunoreagents, which after the immunoreaction has occurred, are collected at the electrode surface by a magnetic field.
• the present invention provides a method for measuring the concent- ration of a luminescent compound with improved sensitivity.
• the method includes providing an electrolyte having immersed therein a pair of current-delivering electrodes with an electrically conductive material positioned between the electrodes, but not in electronic contact with the electrodes, and a luminescent compound. An electric current is then applied to the electrodes to induce the lumines- cent compound in electronic contact with the electrically conductive material to luminesce. The luminescence (i.e., emitted-light) is measured to ascertain the concentration of the luminescent compound.
• the electrically conductive material examples include, but are not limited to, electrochemically inert materials and insulated metals, alloys or semi- metals or combinations thereof.
• Representative electrochemically inert materials are glassy carbon, gold, platinum, or mixtures thereof.
• Representative insulated metals or semi-metals are aluminum, hafnium, magnesium, silicon, tantalum, titanium, zirconium, or mixtures thereof.
• the insulating material is an oxide or polymeric coating.
• the electrically conductive mate- rial is a porous membrane covered with a thin layer of the electrochemically inert material or the insulated metal or semi-metal.
• the electrolyte is a non-aqueous or aqueous electrolyte.
• the luminescent compound is attached to the surface of the electrically conductive material or alternatively is bound to an analyte of interest (e.g. , a nucleic acid or ami- no acid sequence).
• luminescence is measured after a delay from the end of a electrical pulse being applied to the current-delivering electrodes.
• luminescence is induced using at least two different electrochemiluminescent compounds, at least two different types of electrically conductive materials or at least two different analytes of interest.
• the method of the present invention provides an ECL assay with increased sensitivity.
• Other advantages include the ability to assay the concentration of multiple analytes of interest and to provide internal standardization.
• Figure 1 is a block diagram of the contactless electrogenerated luminescence apparatus with a single electrically conductive material.
• Figure 2 is a plot graph of luminescence as a function of luminol concentration measured by contactless electrogenerated luminescence.
• Figure 3 is a plot graph of luminescence as a function of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ concentration measured by contactless electrogenerated luminescence.
• Figure 4 is a plot graph of luminescence as a function of ter- bium(III) concentration measured by delayed contactless electrogenerated luminescence.
• Figure 5 is a plot graph of luminescence as a function of human
• hTSH Thyroid-Stimulating-Hormone
• Figure 6 is a plot graph of Tb(III) (•) and Ru(bpy) 3 2+ (O) concentrations in a sample mixture measured by contactless and delayed contactless elect- rogenerated luminescence, respectively.
• Figure 7 is a composite electroluminogram of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ illustrating the effect on luminescence by varying the diameter of spherical Au-conduc- tors: 2.0 mm (-.-); 2.5 mm ( ); 3.5 mm ( — ); and 6.0 mm ( — ).
• the present invention provides a unique method for measuring the concentration of a luminescent compound with increased sensitivity.
• This method as further described below is hereinafter referred to as Contactless Electrogenerated Luminescence or COEL.
• an electrolyte containing a luminescent compound is provided having immersed therein a pair of current- delivering electrodes.
• An electrically conductive material is positioned between the current-delivering electrodes, but not in electronic contact with the electrodes.
• Electronic contact in this context means both physical contact and being within the requisite excitation distance to induce luminescence of a luminescent compound, which is preferably 25 A or less.
• An electric current is generated between the electrodes inducing the luminescent compound within electronic contact of the electrically conductive material to luminesce.
• the luminescence i.e., light-emission
• the luminescence is measured following conventional techniques to ascertain the concentration of luminescent compound.
• the electrically conductive material is any electrically conductive material that does not detrimentally react with the electrolyte.
• the conductor should have a conductivity equal to, preferably greater than, the conductivity of the electrolyte. While wishing not to be bound by theory, it is believed that a faradaic current is generated through the conductor by causing a voltage drop in the electrolyte when a current is generated between the current-delivering electrodes. This method of generating a faradaic current is also known as bipolar electrolysis as set forth in Eardley, D. Handley and S. Andrew, Electrochim. Acta 18 (1973) 839; F. Goodridge, C. King and A. Wright, Elect- rochim. Acta 22 (1977) 347; M. Fleischmann, J. Ghoroghchian and S. Pons, J. Phys. Chem. 89 (1985) 5530.
• the conductor is made from an electrically conductive material used for electrodes in ECL assays.
• the conductor can be an electrochemically inert material such as glassy carbon, gold, platinum, stainless steel or a combination thereof.
• the conductor can also be an insulated metal, alloy, semi-metal or any combination thereof. Specific examples of metals or semi-metals include, but are not limited to, aluminum, hafnium, magnesium, silicon, tantalum, titanium, zirconium, or any combination thereof.
• insulated means that the metal, alloy or semi-metal is insulated (i.e. , covered) with an protective coating such as an oxide or polymer coating. The coating can range from 1 to 100 nanometers, as with oxide-covered electrodes used in known ECL assays.
• the choice of mate- rial for the conductor is dependent on the type of ECL reaction used to generate luminescence. For example, if an anodic ECL reaction will be used to initiate luminescence an electrochemically inert material is selected. On the other hand, if a cathodic ECL reaction will be used to initiate luminescence an insulated metal, alloy or semi-metal is selected.
• the conductors of the present invention can also contain additional non-conductive components to alter the physical properties of the conductor.
• the conductor can have a polymeric core to decrease the density of the conductor to allow it to be suspended in the electrolyte.
• the conductor can have a core formed from a magnetic metal or alloy to aid in collection of the conductor.
• a magnetic metal or alloy can be used, such as those listed in the Handbook of Chemistry and Physics, 70th ed. , CRC press, which is incorporated herein by reference.
• the conductor can have any shape or size.
• the conductor can have a spherical or elliptical shape. Electrically conductive materials shaped as spheres are readily available from commercial sources such as AbbotBall Company, located in Connecticut, USA.
• the spherical conductors can range in size from 10 ⁇ m to 10 mm.
• the conductor can be a porous matrix having thereon the electrochemically inert material, or the insulated metal or semi-metal.
• the electrolyte can contain conductors of differing shapes, sizes and electrically conductive materials to provide alternating threshold potentials for inducing luminescence.
• conductors formed from differing materials such as gold and aluminum, will have different threshold potentials for initiating luminescence of a luminescent compound (i.e. , an ECL moiety) in electronic contact with the conductor.
• a luminescent compound i.e. , an ECL moiety
• conductors having diffe- ring sizes will also exhibit different threshold potentials for initiating luminescence of ECL moiety.
• the electrolyte is any electrolyte used for ECL reactions.
• the electrolyte can be an aqueous or non-aqueous electrolyte.
• the choice of the electrolyte is partially determined by factors such as the analyte to be detected and the ECL moiety to be used. For example, if the concentration of a biomolecules (e.g., nucleic acid or protein) is to be ascertained, a buffered aqueous electrolyte is selected. Such parameters can easily be deter- mined by one skilled in the art.
• the ECL moiety is any luminescent moiety used for ECL assays.
• the ECL moieties are preferably metal chelates.
• metal chelates to be used include, but are not limited to, chelates of transition or rare earth metals such as ruthenium, terbium, osmium, rhenium, iridium, rhodium, platinum, indium, palladium, molybdenum, techne- tium, copper, chromium, tungsten, or combinations thereof.
• Two especially preferred chelates are ruthenium and terbium chelates.
• the current delivering electrodes are made from any electrically conductive materials used for electrodes in ECL reactions. Accordingly, the electrodes can be formed from the same electrically conductive materials used to form the conductors as described above. In one embodiment of the invention, the electrodes and the conductor are of the same material. In another embodiment, the current delivering electrodes are made from electrically conductive materials on which no ECL emission is possible to minimize background emission. Preferably, the electrodes are spaced distally from each other.
• An electric current is generated by applying an appropriate voltage to the current-delivering electrodes for a predefined time frame, which results in a partial current flow through the conductor causing the ECL moiety in electronic contact with the conductor to luminesce.
• the requisite voltage (i.e. , threshold potential) to induce luminescence is dependent on the interfacial potential at the conductor-electrolyte interface and the portion of the faradaic current flowing through the interface.
• the resulting light intensity is measured on the wavelength and/or time-resolved basis for a period necessary to achieve the required signal-to-noise ratio, and used for the quantification of the luminescent compound.
• the light detector is any light-detecting device, such as a photomultiplier or a photodiode with an optical filter or monochromator.
• the light-detecting device can be connected with an amplifier where the electrical signal from the light detector is amplified.
• the concentration of the ECL moiety is determined by standard analysis techniques known in the art.
• the method of the present invention is used to measure an analyte of interest.
• the ECL moiety is used as a labeling agent to quantify the concentration of an analyte of interest.
• the ECL moiety may be bound as a labeling agent to the analyte of interest or to a reagent used to ascertain the presence of the analyte (e.g., an antigen or antibody in immunoassays).
• the method of the present invention is particulary suitable for use with analytical methods having low detec- tion limit requirements.
• Examples of such analytical methods include, but are not limited to, binding assays such as immunoassays, nucleic acid hybridization assays, releasing assays, back titration assays and detection systems used in chro- matography, capillary electrophoresis and flow injection analysis.
• binding assays such as immunoassays, nucleic acid hybridization assays, releasing assays, back titration assays and detection systems used in chro- matography, capillary electrophoresis and flow injection analysis.
• the method of the present invention is used as an immunoassay to determine the concentration of an antigen or multiple antigens.
• the antigen is quantified by incubating a conductor or multiple conductors having immobilized thereon a primary antibody with the antigen-containing sample and subsequently with a secondary antibody bound to an ECL moiety. After incubation for a sufficient amount of time, the conductor or conductors are washed in which unbound labeled antibodies are washed away. The conductor or conductors are subsequently placed in a cell between current-delivering electrodes, in which luminescence is induced and measured in accordance with the present invention.
• Various modifications of the above-described immunoassay can be used.
• two or more labeled compounds can be simultaneously detected.
• the above-described double labeling can be extended to noncompetitive assays where the secondary antibody is labeled with different ECL moieties to achieve the internal standardization of the assay.
• two or more different labeling compounds can be used thus requiring different electrolytes for the generation of luminescence.
• different labeling compounds and analytes on the same or different conductors can be quantified one after another.
• variations in the size or material of the conductors allows for the simultaneous measurement of different luminescent compounds and determining the concentration of different analytes in a sample.
• two conductors of different sizes may be coated with different primary antibodies.
• the conductors are then incubated with a mixture containing two different antigens to be quantified and two secondary antibodies labeled with the same ECL moiety. After a sufficient amount of time, the conductors are washed to remove the unbound secondary antibodies.
• the conductors are then placed in a cell where luminescence is induced by gradually increasing the voltage applied to the current- delivering electrodes. As the voltage is gradually increased, light is emitted at the larger conductor first since it has a lower threshold potential than its smaller counterpart. Once the voltage drop in the electrolyte solution is high enough, light then begins to emit at the smaller conductor.
• Other modifications of the method of the present invention can be easily ascertained by those skilled in the art.
• FIG. 1 shows a generalized diagram of the apparatus to be used in accordance with the invention.
• a cell (10) is provided having cell walls (12) enclosing an electrolyte (14).
• the electrolyte (14) has immersed therein a pair of current-delivering electrodes (16, 18) and a conductor (20) position between the electrodes, but not in electronic contact with the electrodes.
• a current source (22) that is also connected to a recording device (24), which in turn is connected to a light detector (26) to detect the light (hv) emitted at the conductor.
• the current-delivering electrodes were made of stainless steel wire having a diameter of 2 mm. The electrodes were spaced 11 mm apart from each other.
• the current source was a home-made coulostatic pulse generator capable of generating square pulses of 60 volts (V) and 0.4 milliseconds (ms).
• the light detector was a Hama- matsu photomultiplier, Model No. R3550.
• the detected signal was amplified with a Stanford Research preamplifier, Model No. SR455.
• the amplified signal was counted with a Stanford Research photon counter, Model No. SR400.
• the photon counter was connected to a PC-computer for controlling the measuring system and data storage.
• Sample solutions were prepared from the following components: 5.0 x 10 "2 borate buffer adjusted to pH 7.8, 7.1 x 10 2 M sodium azide and varying amounts of luminol (i.e., 5-amino-2,3-dihydro-l,4-phthalazinedione).
• the contactless electrogenerated luminescence (COEL) was initiated at the surface of a spherical 6.3-mm diameter aluminum conductor (Al-conductor) (AbbotBall Company) as follows: excitation pulses of 0.4 ms duration and 60 V amplitude with the intermittent 10 ms zero level were applied to the current-delivering electrodes resulting in an approximately 50 mA peak current in the sample solution.
• the resulting light emission i.e.
• COEL response from the Al-conductor was detec- ted by the photomultiplier.
• the integrated COEL response from the 500 excitation pulses as a function of luminol concentration in the sample solutions are presented in Table 1 and Figure 2.
• the background COEL response i.e., the response without the Al-conductor in the sample cell
• Sample solutions were prepared from the following components: 1.12 x 10 " ' M potassium dihydrogen phosphate and 8.80 x 10 "2 M dipotassium hydrogen phosphate buffer at pH 7.2, 1.0 x 10 1 M tripropylamine, 7.1 x 10 ⁇ 2 M sodium azide and varying amounts of tris(2,2'-bipyridyl)ruthenium(II) (Ru(b- py) 3 2+ )-
• the contactless electrogenerated luminescence (COEL) was initiated at the surface of a spherical 5.0-mm diameter gold conductor (Au-conductor) (i.e.
• COEL was initiated at the surface of a spherical 6.3-mm diameter Al-conductor (AbbotBall Company) as follows: excitation pulses of 0.4 ms; duration and 60 V amplitude with the intermittent 100 ms zero level were applied to the current-delivering electrodes resulting in an approximately 50 mA current in said sample solutions.
• the resulting light emission from the Al- conductor was detected by the photomultiplier during the 0.08 - 8.0 ms interval from the end of the 0.4-ms excitation pulse (i.e. , a delayed COEL or, abbreviated, a DCOEL response).
• the integrated DCOEL response from the 500 excitation pulses as a function of terbium(III) concentration in the sample solutions are presented in Table 3 and Figure 4.
• the background DCOEL response i.e., the response without the Al-conductor in the sample cell
• N-bis(carboxymethyl)aminomethyl]phenol was used as the labeling compound and was synthesized as set forth in J. Kankare et al. , Anal. Chim. Acta, 266:205 (1992), which is incorporated herein by reference.
• the coated and washed Al-conductor was placed in the aforementioned test tube. After one-hour incubation by continuously shaking, the Al-conductor was washed twice for 2 minutes with 400 ⁇ l 5.0 x 10 "2 M TRIS-HC1 buffer at pH 7.4 containing additionally 0.05 % sodium azide, 0.2 % BSA, 0.1 % Tween. The Al-conductor was then transferred to the COEL cell containing 5.0 x 10 "2 M H 3 BO 3 -H 2 SO 4 buffer at pH 7.8 and 1.0 x 10 "2 M sodium azide. The DCOEL res- ponse was measured following the procedure of Example 3 and the results are presented in Table 4 and Figure 5.
• Sample solutions were prepared from the following components: 5.0 x 10 "2 M borate buffer adjusted to pH 7.8, 3.0 x 10 "3 M peroxydisulfate and 1.0 x 10 "3 M Tween (polyoxyethylene(20) sorbitan monolaurate) and varying amounts of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ and Tb(III)-l chelate.
• COEL was initiated at the surface of a spherical 6.3-mm diameter Al-conductor (AbbotBall Company) as follows: excitation pulses of 0.4 ms duration and 60 V amplitude with the intermittent 100 ms zero level were applied to the current-delivering electrodes resulting in an approximately 50 mA current in the said sample solution.
• the resulting light emission from the Al-conductor was detected by the photomultiplier during the excitation pulse (i.e. , a COEL response) and during the 0.08 - 8.0 ms interval from the end of the 0.4-ms excitation pulse (i.e., a delayed COEL or DCOEL response).
• the integrated COEL and DCOEL responses from the 500 excitation pulses are presented in Table 5 and Figure 6: the DCOEL response can be used for the quantification of Tb(III)-l in these sample mixtures because the COEL of Ru(bpy) 3 + was too short-lived to reach the 0.08 - 8.0 ms detection window, while the listed COEL response (i.e. , the observed COEL response subtracted by the COEL res- ponse of Tb(III)-l which, in turn, is estimated from its measured DCOEL response) can be used for the quantification of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ .
• Example 6 Size-selective Contactless Electrogenerated Luminescence A sample solution was prepared from the following components:
• COEL was separately initiated at the surface of spherical gold conductors (Au- conductors) with the diameters listed in Table 6 (i.e., a glass ball covered with a vacuum evaporated gold layer) by applying a DC excitation voltage from 0 V to 20 V to the current-delivering electrodes at a sweep rate of 0.25 V s "1 in the sample solution.
• the resulting COEL responses of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ from the different Au-conductors was detected by the photomultiplier and are displayed in Figure 7 (2.0 mm (-.-), 2.5 mm ( ), 3.5 mm (— ) and 6.0 mm ( — )).
• the peak voltages and intensities of the COEL of Ru(bpy) 3 2+ using the different Au-conductors are listed in Table 6.

Landscapes

• Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
• Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
• Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
• Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
• Biochemistry (AREA)
• General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
• General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
• Immunology (AREA)
• Pathology (AREA)
• Investigating Or Analysing Materials By The Use Of Chemical Reactions (AREA)
• Investigating, Analyzing Materials By Fluorescence Or Luminescence (AREA)
• Investigating Or Analysing Biological Materials (AREA)
• Investigating Or Analysing Materials By Optical Means (AREA)
• Steroid Compounds (AREA)

Priority Applications (7)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Publications (2)

Family

ID=23483870

Family Applications (1)

Country Status (11)

Cited By (1)

Families Citing this family (54)

Citations (3)

Family Cites Families (22)

• 1999
  • 1999-08-17 US US09/376,139 patent/US6136268A/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
• 2000
  • 2000-08-16 DE DE60038803T patent/DE60038803D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2000-08-16 CA CA002380655A patent/CA2380655A1/en not_active Abandoned
  • 2000-08-16 AU AU65737/00A patent/AU777936B2/en not_active Ceased
  • 2000-08-16 JP JP2001517146A patent/JP4573486B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
  • 2000-08-16 WO PCT/FI2000/000693 patent/WO2001013095A1/en not_active Ceased
  • 2000-08-16 ES ES00953206T patent/ES2304971T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
  • 2000-08-16 DK DK00953206T patent/DK1204858T3/da active
  • 2000-08-16 PT PT00953206T patent/PT1204858E/pt unknown
  • 2000-08-16 AT AT00953206T patent/ATE394663T1/de active
  • 2000-08-16 EP EP00953206A patent/EP1204858B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime

Patent Citations (3)

Also Published As

Similar Documents

Legal Events