WO2000004402A1 - Gps signal fault isolation monitor - Google Patents

Gps signal fault isolation monitor Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO2000004402A1
WO2000004402A1 PCT/US1999/014282 US9914282W WO0004402A1 WO 2000004402 A1 WO2000004402 A1 WO 2000004402A1 US 9914282 W US9914282 W US 9914282W WO 0004402 A1 WO0004402 A1 WO 0004402A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
satellite
signal
signals
acceleration
drift
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
PCT/US1999/014282
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Mats A. Brenner
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Honeywell Inc
Original Assignee
Honeywell Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Honeywell Inc filed Critical Honeywell Inc
Priority to CA002337876A priority Critical patent/CA2337876C/en
Priority to JP2000560468A priority patent/JP4446604B2/ja
Priority to DE69904187T priority patent/DE69904187T2/de
Priority to EP99930650A priority patent/EP1097391B1/en
Publication of WO2000004402A1 publication Critical patent/WO2000004402A1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01SRADIO DIRECTION-FINDING; RADIO NAVIGATION; DETERMINING DISTANCE OR VELOCITY BY USE OF RADIO WAVES; LOCATING OR PRESENCE-DETECTING BY USE OF THE REFLECTION OR RERADIATION OF RADIO WAVES; ANALOGOUS ARRANGEMENTS USING OTHER WAVES
    • G01S19/00Satellite radio beacon positioning systems; Determining position, velocity or attitude using signals transmitted by such systems
    • G01S19/01Satellite radio beacon positioning systems transmitting time-stamped messages, e.g. GPS [Global Positioning System], GLONASS [Global Orbiting Navigation Satellite System] or GALILEO
    • G01S19/13Receivers
    • G01S19/20Integrity monitoring, fault detection or fault isolation of space segment
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01CMEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
    • G01C21/00Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00
    • G01C21/10Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration
    • G01C21/12Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration executed aboard the object being navigated; Dead reckoning
    • G01C21/16Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration executed aboard the object being navigated; Dead reckoning by integrating acceleration or speed, i.e. inertial navigation
    • G01C21/165Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in groups G01C1/00 - G01C19/00 by using measurements of speed or acceleration executed aboard the object being navigated; Dead reckoning by integrating acceleration or speed, i.e. inertial navigation combined with non-inertial navigation instruments

Definitions

  • the present invention relates generally to aircraft navigation and more particularly to a system employing a Global Positioning System(GPS) and an Inertial
  • GPS systems have been used to determine aircraft position by receiving signals from a plurality of satellites.
  • the signals each have information as to the position of the satellites and the time of transmission so that the GPS receiver, on the aircraft, can calculate its own position. Since there are four variables (position in 3 axes and time), signals from at least 4 satellites are necessary for a determination of receiver position. If there are at least five satellites having good geometry each subset of four signals can be used for positioning and they can be compared with each other to determine if one of the signals is in error (Fail safe).
  • the present invention addresses these and other needs by:
  • the IRU acceleration signal is compared to the GPS acceleration signal along the predetermined axis. When there is an error greater than a predetermined amount, the faulty satellite signal is identified and can be eliminated from the calculations. Thus only four satellites are necessary for continued operation.
  • a signal drift which may be considered as a ramp output
  • the initial change at the beginning of the ramp causes an acceleration transient which is detected by the acceleration monitor so that early identification of this condition is made.
  • FIG. 1 shows a schematic block diagram of the system utilizing the present invention
  • FIG. 2 is a block diagram showing the operation of the acceleration monitor of the present invention.
  • FIGS. 3 A and 3B are graphs showing how the new satellite drift monitor of the above mentioned copending application operates.
  • GPS receiver 12 is of a type well known in the art which operates to receive signals from a plurality of satellites, e.g. SI - S6 in Figure 1, indicative of their positions and of the time of transmission. While 6 satellites have been shown, it will be understood, that more or less than 6 satellites may be in view of the GPS receiver 12 and that the number may change over a period of time. GPS receiver 12 operates on the signals from satellites SI - S6 to determine the position of the receiver and to produce the GPS code based pseudo range measurements , pr, to each satellite. Also, by tracking and counting the cycles (including fractions of cycles) in the carrier from each satellite, the GPS receiver 12 provides the accumulated carrier count, pc, which can be used to obtain the change of pseudo range over a time ⁇ t according to the equation:
  • the change of the pseudo range obtained by differencing the carrier count is accurate to within centimeters ( 0.01 meter ) while the pseudo range change formed by differencing the pseudo range measurements is accurate to within 2 to 5 meters.
  • the code based change in pseudo range ⁇ pr , the carrier based change in pseudo range, ⁇ pc, or a combination thereof are used in the present invention as will be described below.
  • the pr and pc signals are provided as outputs represented by a path 16 from GPS receiver 12 and, via paths 17 and 18 to a standard RAIM shown in box 20 which also receives a pressure altitude signal from an altitude sensing means 22 via a path 24.
  • a deselect signal is presented from RAIM 20 as an output represented by a path 26. This occurs if there are at least 6 satellites in view with good geometry, in which case, groups of five satellite signals can be compared so as to determine which one, if any, of them is faulty. If one is so identified, then this information is passed (via path 26 and a path 28) to a satellite selection function represented by a box 30 which also receives the GPS pr and pc from path 16. The satellite selection function 30 eliminates the faulty satellite signal and passes the remaining valid signals as an output represented by a path 32 to a Position function represented by box 34.
  • Position function 34 also receives a pressure altitude signal from an Altitude Sensing means 22 via path 24 and produces an output indicative of the aircraft position (as represented by a path 36) to downstream equipment such as indicators or flight management systems (not shown). If there are only 5 satellites in view with good geometry, then groups of four satellite signals can still be compared against at least one other satellite signal so as to determine if any of them are faulty but since the faulty satellite cannot be identified no de-selection can be performed. In such a case the downstream equipment and the pilot will be notified that the GPS signals should not be used (this signal is not shown in figure 1).
  • the signal output represented by path 16 is provided via paths 17 and 18 to an acceleration monitor as represented by a box 44.
  • the acceleration monitor 44 also receives an input from the inertial reference unit 14 (which is also well known in the art and comprises a plurality of gyros and accelerometers) that produces outputs as represented by a line 46 indicative of h (altitude), C, (attitude matrix), D (latitude, longitude, wander angle matrix), v (velocity) and ⁇ v (change of velocity).
  • the inertial reference unit 14 which is also well known in the art and comprises a plurality of gyros and accelerometers
  • a line 46 indicative of h (altitude), C, (attitude matrix), D (latitude, longitude, wander angle matrix), v (velocity) and ⁇ v (change of velocity).
  • a minimum of 3 gyros and 3 accelerometers are employed, but to ensure fail safe or fail operational operation and high reliability, two or three redundant systems are preferably employed.
  • the ⁇ v signal from path 46 and the pr, pc signals from paths 16, 17 and 18 are used by the Acceleration Monitor, 44, of the present invention by an operation which will be better understood with reference to Figure 2.
  • the Acceleration Monitor 44 is shown receiving the inertial signals h, C , D v, and ⁇ v over a path shown by arrow 46 which corresponds to figure 1 and receiving the GPS input, pr and pc, over a path shown by arrow 18 which corresponds to Figure 1.
  • the inertial signal ⁇ v consists of filtered velocity increments at a 10 - 60 Hz rate which are provided to a function box 54 labeled "Transform to L frame".
  • Function box 54 also receives the attitude input C, shown by arrow 46 and transforms the filtered velocity increments to the local vertical frame, L, and outputs the transformed increments to a function represented by a box 58 labeled "Form 2nd 1 Hz Time Difference".
  • box 58 "double position difference signals” (i.e. signals representing the difference in the change of position in the current ⁇ t interval and the change of position in the previous ⁇ t interval) along each axis are formed by integrating the inertial acceleration (i.e. the transformed high rate velocity increments).
  • the output of the function 58 reflects an inertially measured acceleration which contains earth rotation induced acceleration components that will not be present in the acceleration derived from the GPS signal (to be explained below).
  • the output of function 58 is provided as input to a function represented by a box 60 labeled "Remove Earth Rotation Induced Acceleration” where the undesired earth rotation components are removed.
  • the inertially based reference signal from function 60 is presented to a function represented by a box 62 labeled "Project Along Line Of Sight” which also receives a signal, LOS ( unit vector along the line of sight to the satellite ) shown by arrow 64 and the output of function 62 is an inertial double position difference projected along the line of sight to the satellite.
  • This signal is presented to a function represented by box 66 labeled "Discriminator & time removal transformation" where the acceleration monitor discriminator is formed.
  • the pseudo range measurements pr and accumulated carrier cycle counts pc for all tracked satellites are presented from path 18 to a function represented by a box 70 labeled "Form Range Difference" which also receives an initial GPS position, r init , shown on an input represented by arrow 72 which is the GPS position at the time of initialization and received from the position function 34 in figure 1.
  • the signal, pc consists of accumulated carrier cycles (each cycle corresponds to about 0.19 m position change in the usual satellite signal) and the signal pr are code based pseudo range measurements.
  • the signals pr , pc or any combination thereof include the motion of the satellite and function 70 operates to remove the satellite motion component and provide the result to a function represented by a box 74 labeled "Form 2nd 1 Hz Time Difference".
  • the double difference signal i.e. the difference in the change of cycle count ( or smoothed pseudo range ) in the current ⁇ t interval and the change of cycle count ( or smoothed pseudo range ) in the previous ⁇ t interval
  • function 76 an output which represents the acceleration of the GPS receiver (but which also contains components that relate to the change in the line of sight vector at the current position and the line of sight vector at the initial reference position) is provided to a function represented by a box 76 labeled "Line of Sight Compensation".
  • function 76 is one where the components related to the line of sight are removed.
  • the output from function 76 is presented to a function represented by a box 78 labeled
  • the cycle count includes the motion of the satellite and function 78 operates to remove the satellite motion acceleration component.
  • the final result is a GPS signal based double position difference along the line of sight and this is provided to the function represented by box 66.
  • the "Discriminator & Time Removal Transformation” function 66 operates on the GPS and Inertial Reference acceleration signals from functions 78 and 62 respectively to form a discriminator by differencing the two signals. This function also subtracts an average (over all of the satellites) of all discriminators from each satellite specific discriminator thereby eliminating the receiver clock offset.
  • This signal is presented to a function represented by a box 80 where the discriminator output is averaged over time and compared to a fixed threshold value to produce a deselected signal on a line 82 which is used to deselect any satellite whose acceleration exceeds the threshold. It should be noted that all of the functions performed by function boxes described above can be performed by a computer program with each function being readily programmable by one having ordinary skill in the programming art.
  • the deselect signal on line 82 of figure 2 is shown being provided via lines 26 and 28 to the Select Satellite function 30 and the deselected satellite signal will not proceed to the Positioning function 34.
  • An Acceptance Monitor 86 is shown in figure 1 receiving the GPS signal over paths 16, 17 and 18 and further receiving a pressure altitude signal from the Altitude box 22 over path 24.
  • the Acceptance Monitor 86 is used in the art to detect GPS signals which are obviously incorrect because, for example the satellite pseudo range is far out of reasonable bounds. When such an erroneous satellite is received, the
  • Acceptance Monitor 86 produces a deselect signal to path 26 and via path 28 to the Select Satellite function 30 which then operates to prevent the erroneous signals from being used by the Positioning function 34.
  • a new satellite drift monitor or "Z RAIM” is shown as a box 92 which receives the GPS signals over paths 16, 17 and 18 and the pressure altitude signal over path 34.
  • Z RAIM 92 provides an output indicative of the Horizontal Protection Limit, HPL, to the pilot or to downstream aircraft equipment such as the Flight Management System (not shown) over a path 95
  • the new satellite drift monitor or Z RAIM 92 of the present invention (which is claimed in the above referred to copending application) operates to determine if a drift has already begun when a signal from a new satellite is first acquired. This is explained with reference to Figures 3 A and 3B.
  • the RAIM discriminator Assuming that there are N satellites with good geometry, the RAIM discriminator, as known in the art for the nth satellite, is formed by the equation:
  • b is a well known satellite geometry dependent coefficient as seen in the above k referred to publication
  • N is the number of satellites
  • k indicates the kth satellite
  • ⁇ pr k is the difference between the measured pseudo range (or smoothed pseudo range) and the predicted pseudo range for the kth satellite. Due to selective availability (SA, a deliberate noise signal superimposed on the output of the GPS by the DOD), the discriminator will vary as seen in Figure 3 A
  • the new satellite error bound, ⁇ , defined to have a predetermined confidence level of l-p m(j which is typically 99.9%, , is defined by the equation:
  • the discriminator will cross zero or reach a minimum value from time to time i.e. at least every 5 minutes. As the discriminator crosses zero or reaches the minimum absolute value
  • t is the time since the satellite was first received.
  • the satellite error limit, SEL is the minimum of the current satellite error bound ⁇ and the previous satellite error limit with the estimated l-p md drift error bound added.
  • SEL(t) min ( ⁇ , SEL (t - ⁇ t) + r ⁇ t) (7)
  • ⁇ t is the time step.
  • HPL a required output in avionics equipment
  • K md is the statistical sigma number corresponding to the missed detection
  • the Acceleration Monitor 44 of the present invention should detect an acceleration. To achieve fail operation capability, a de-selection of a new satellite via paths 22, 23 and function 24 in figure 1 should be performed if the rate, r, exceeds a predetermined time dependent threshold. Only newly acquired satellites need to be monitored this way since satellites that are already used for positioning, are being monitored by the Acceleration Monitor 44.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Radar, Positioning & Navigation (AREA)
  • Remote Sensing (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Position Fixing By Use Of Radio Waves (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)
  • Gyroscopes (AREA)
PCT/US1999/014282 1998-07-17 1999-06-25 Gps signal fault isolation monitor Ceased WO2000004402A1 (en)

Priority Applications (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CA002337876A CA2337876C (en) 1998-07-17 1999-06-25 Gps signal fault isolation monitor
JP2000560468A JP4446604B2 (ja) 1998-07-17 1999-06-25 Gps信号障害隔離モニタ
DE69904187T DE69904187T2 (de) 1998-07-17 1999-06-25 Überwachungsgerät zur isolierung von gps-fehlern
EP99930650A EP1097391B1 (en) 1998-07-17 1999-06-25 Gps signal fault isolation monitor

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US09/118,046 1998-07-17
US09/118,046 US5969672A (en) 1998-07-17 1998-07-17 GPS signal fault isolation monitor

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO2000004402A1 true WO2000004402A1 (en) 2000-01-27

Family

ID=22376208

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/US1999/014282 Ceased WO2000004402A1 (en) 1998-07-17 1999-06-25 Gps signal fault isolation monitor

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US5969672A (https=)
EP (1) EP1097391B1 (https=)
JP (1) JP4446604B2 (https=)
CA (1) CA2337876C (https=)
DE (1) DE69904187T2 (https=)
WO (1) WO2000004402A1 (https=)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001280997A (ja) * 2000-03-30 2001-10-10 Japan Radio Co Ltd Gnss・慣性航法装置

Families Citing this family (32)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6353408B1 (en) * 1998-03-31 2002-03-05 U.S. Philips Corporation Electronic navigation apparatus
US6924781B1 (en) * 1998-09-11 2005-08-02 Visible Tech-Knowledgy, Inc. Smart electronic label employing electronic ink
DE19945121C2 (de) * 1999-09-21 2001-12-13 Mannesmann Vdo Ag Verfahren zum Navigieren eines Fahrzeugs
US6469660B1 (en) 2000-04-13 2002-10-22 United Parcel Service Inc Method and system for displaying target icons correlated to target data integrity
US6466846B2 (en) 2000-07-10 2002-10-15 United Parcel Service Of America, Inc. Method, apparatus, system, and computer software program product for determining position integrity in a system having a global navigation satellite system (GNSS) component
US6549829B1 (en) * 2001-10-31 2003-04-15 The Boeing Company Skipping filter for inertially augmented landing system
WO2004040329A2 (en) * 2002-10-29 2004-05-13 Sirf Technology, Inc. System and method for estimating clock acceleration and location determination
FR2852683B1 (fr) * 2003-03-19 2005-05-20 Airbus France Procede et dispositif d'aide au pilotage d'un aeronef lors d'une approche de non precision pendant une phase d'atterrissage.
US6856905B2 (en) * 2003-04-29 2005-02-15 Garmin At, Inc. Systems and methods for fault detection and exclusion in navigational systems
ATE505032T1 (de) 2003-09-03 2011-04-15 Visible Tech Knowledgy Inc Elektronisch aktualisierbares label und display
US7102567B2 (en) * 2003-10-29 2006-09-05 Sirf Technology, Inc. System and method for estimating clock acceleration and location determination
JP4736866B2 (ja) * 2005-04-28 2011-07-27 株式会社デンソー ナビゲーション装置
US7501981B2 (en) * 2005-11-18 2009-03-10 Texas Instruments Incorporated Methods and apparatus to detect and correct integrity failures in satellite positioning system receivers
DE102007006612B4 (de) * 2007-02-06 2013-10-24 Astrium Gmbh Verfahren, Endgerät und Computerprogrammprodukt zum Erhöhen der Verfügbarkeit eines globalen Navigationssystems
EP1980867A3 (en) * 2007-04-10 2009-11-25 Qualcomm Incorporated Multipath mitigation using sensors
US8359182B2 (en) * 2007-04-25 2013-01-22 Uti Limited Partnership Methods and systems for evaluating the performance of MEMS-based inertial navigation systems
FR2916060B1 (fr) * 2007-05-11 2009-07-10 Airbus France Sa Procede et dispositif de surveillance d'une position horizontale d'un avion roulant au sol.
US8234507B2 (en) 2009-01-13 2012-07-31 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Electronic-ink display device employing a power switching mechanism automatically responsive to predefined states of device configuration
US8457013B2 (en) 2009-01-13 2013-06-04 Metrologic Instruments, Inc. Wireless dual-function network device dynamically switching and reconfiguring from a wireless network router state of operation into a wireless network coordinator state of operation in a wireless communication network
US9030356B2 (en) * 2009-09-29 2015-05-12 Texas Instruments Incorporated Positioning system receiver sensor system coupled with measurement data output
FR2972810B1 (fr) * 2011-03-16 2014-01-03 Sagem Defense Securite Detection et correction d'incoherence de phase porteuse en poursuite d'un signal de radionavigation
US9903956B2 (en) 2011-09-12 2018-02-27 Continental Teves Ag & Co. Ohg Method for selecting a satellite
KR101877562B1 (ko) * 2011-10-07 2018-08-10 한국전자통신연구원 Gps 위성의 이상 상태 감시 장치 및 방법
US9341718B2 (en) * 2012-09-07 2016-05-17 Honeywell International Inc. Method and system for providing integrity for hybrid attitude and true heading
US9547086B2 (en) 2013-03-26 2017-01-17 Honeywell International Inc. Selected aspects of advanced receiver autonomous integrity monitoring application to kalman filter based navigation filter
US9784844B2 (en) 2013-11-27 2017-10-10 Honeywell International Inc. Architectures for high integrity multi-constellation solution separation
US10215862B2 (en) * 2014-04-07 2019-02-26 Honeywell International Inc. Systems and methods for a code carrier divergence high-pass filter monitor
US9395384B1 (en) * 2015-10-07 2016-07-19 State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Systems and methods for estimating vehicle speed and hence driving behavior using accelerometer data during periods of intermittent GPS
JP6750818B2 (ja) * 2017-10-23 2020-09-02 国立研究開発法人宇宙航空研究開発機構 飛行体用航法装置および飛行体制御方法
GB2600907A (en) * 2020-08-10 2022-05-18 Veeride Geo Ltd Proximity-based navigation method
US12442936B2 (en) 2021-06-14 2025-10-14 Honeywell International Inc. Inertial coasting position and velocity solution separation
CN115856952A (zh) * 2022-12-05 2023-03-28 北京航空航天大学 一种复杂地形环境下araim可用性预测方法

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10104015A (ja) * 1996-10-01 1998-04-24 Yokogawa Denshi Kiki Kk 航法装置
EP0838660A1 (en) * 1996-10-25 1998-04-29 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Velocity calculating apparatus
WO1998018016A1 (en) * 1996-10-23 1998-04-30 Honeywell Inc. Gps/irs global position determination method and apparatus with integrity loss provisions

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5646843A (en) * 1990-02-05 1997-07-08 Caterpillar Inc. Apparatus and method for surface based vehicle control system
US5606506A (en) * 1993-04-05 1997-02-25 Caterpillar Inc. Method and apparatus for improving the accuracy of position estimates in a satellite based navigation system using velocity data from an inertial reference unit
US5787384A (en) * 1995-11-22 1998-07-28 E-Systems, Inc. Apparatus and method for determining velocity of a platform
US5757317A (en) * 1997-03-17 1998-05-26 Litton Systems, Inc. Relative navigation utilizing inertial measurement units and a plurality of satellite transmitters

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPH10104015A (ja) * 1996-10-01 1998-04-24 Yokogawa Denshi Kiki Kk 航法装置
WO1998018016A1 (en) * 1996-10-23 1998-04-30 Honeywell Inc. Gps/irs global position determination method and apparatus with integrity loss provisions
EP0838660A1 (en) * 1996-10-25 1998-04-29 Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. Velocity calculating apparatus

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
BRENNER M: "IMPLEMENTATION OF A RAIM MONITOR IN A GPS RECEIVER AND AN INTEGRATED GPS/IRS", INTERNATIONAL TECHNICAL MEETING OF THE SATELLITE DIVISION OF THE INSTITUTE OF NAVIGATION, PAGE(S) 397 - 406, XP000602527 *
PATENT ABSTRACTS OF JAPAN vol. 098, no. 009 31 July 1998 (1998-07-31) *

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001280997A (ja) * 2000-03-30 2001-10-10 Japan Radio Co Ltd Gnss・慣性航法装置

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
US5969672A (en) 1999-10-19
JP4446604B2 (ja) 2010-04-07
DE69904187T2 (de) 2003-07-17
CA2337876A1 (en) 2000-01-27
CA2337876C (en) 2005-09-20
EP1097391A1 (en) 2001-05-09
JP2002520625A (ja) 2002-07-09
EP1097391B1 (en) 2002-11-27
DE69904187D1 (de) 2003-01-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5969672A (en) GPS signal fault isolation monitor
EP1097390B1 (en) Gps satellite drift monitor
US5760737A (en) Navigation system with solution separation apparatus for detecting accuracy failures
US6856905B2 (en) Systems and methods for fault detection and exclusion in navigational systems
EP1456684B1 (en) Fault detection and exclusion for gps systems
US5583774A (en) Assured-integrity monitored-extrapolation navigation apparatus
US5631656A (en) Fail safe system with common mode avoidance
US6166683A (en) System and method for high-integrity detection and correction of cycle slip in a carrier phase-related system
US20200341153A1 (en) Reducing bias impact on gnss integrity
US10996345B2 (en) Signal fault detection for global navigation satellite system using multiple antennas
JP2002520623A5 (https=)
US20020109628A1 (en) Integrated inertial/gps navigation system
US9983314B2 (en) System for excluding a failure of a satellite in a GNSS system
CN111812680B (zh) 主参数和导出的参数的完整性监测
EP3913403A1 (en) Three-dimensional attitude determination system with multi-faceted integrity solution
US11073620B2 (en) Alternate uncertainty limits in the presence of a detected satellite fault
Blomenhofer et al. On‐the‐fly carrier phase ambiguity resolution for precise aircraft landing
US12111403B2 (en) Error and integrity evaluation via motion prediction
Abousalem et al. A new technique for quality control in GPS kinematic positioning
Kohli GPS Integrity Monitoring Using an AHRS as Reference
Ahlbrecht et al. High Integrity Positioning: Lessons from the Aviation Industry

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): CA JP

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LU MC NL PT SE

121 Ep: the epo has been informed by wipo that ep was designated in this application
DFPE Request for preliminary examination filed prior to expiration of 19th month from priority date (pct application filed before 20040101)
ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref document number: 2337876

Country of ref document: CA

Ref country code: CA

Ref document number: 2337876

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWE Wipo information: entry into national phase

Ref document number: 1999930650

Country of ref document: EP

ENP Entry into the national phase

Ref country code: JP

Ref document number: 2000 560468

Kind code of ref document: A

Format of ref document f/p: F

WWP Wipo information: published in national office

Ref document number: 1999930650

Country of ref document: EP

WWG Wipo information: grant in national office

Ref document number: 1999930650

Country of ref document: EP