WO1989010067A1 - Preparation of silage - Google Patents

Preparation of silage Download PDF

Info

Publication number
WO1989010067A1
WO1989010067A1 PCT/NO1989/000036 NO8900036W WO8910067A1 WO 1989010067 A1 WO1989010067 A1 WO 1989010067A1 NO 8900036 W NO8900036 W NO 8900036W WO 8910067 A1 WO8910067 A1 WO 8910067A1
Authority
WO
WIPO (PCT)
Prior art keywords
lactic acid
bacteria
acid bacteria
growth
strains
Prior art date
Application number
PCT/NO1989/000036
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Inventor
Steinar Pedersen
Margrethe Broch-Due
Original Assignee
Apothekernes Laboratorium A.S
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Apothekernes Laboratorium A.S filed Critical Apothekernes Laboratorium A.S
Publication of WO1989010067A1 publication Critical patent/WO1989010067A1/en

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K30/00Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K30/10Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder
    • A23K30/15Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder using chemicals or microorganisms for ensilaging
    • A23K30/18Processes specially adapted for preservation of materials in order to produce animal feeding-stuffs of green fodder using chemicals or microorganisms for ensilaging using microorganisms or enzymes

Definitions

  • the present invention concerns a process for ensilage of feed plants.
  • different preservation methods for feed have been known which by their pH-decreasing effect prevent the growth of butyric acid bacteria, other spoilage bacteria and fungi.
  • mineral acids, formic acid or other additives which stimulate a natural lactic acid fermentation have been used.
  • Lactic acid fermentation is regarded as an ideal way of preservation because of the low material losses and the high nutritional value of the acids produced.
  • Lactic acid bacteria also have a relatively long generation time compared to the aerobic and facultatively anaerobic bacteria against which they compete during the first phase of ensilage, i.e. while the supply of oxygen is good. To stimustimulate the lactic acid fermentation the following have therefore been attempted
  • faecalis grows rapidly under aerobic conditions, and while not being particularily tolerant to lactate, it rapidly reduces pH to a level where L.piantarum is of greater advantage, b) the addition of high numbers of lyophilized/dried lactic acid bacteria to the crop before or during the filling of the silo,
  • the commercially available inoculants are usually lyophilized products to which a cryoprotective agent, a carrier and/or a nutrient solution have often been added.
  • the inoculants are added to the crop either as powder or as an aqueous suspension which is sprayed onto the grass during harvesting or filling of the silo.
  • At least one strain shows ability to utilize starch.
  • a combination of strains belonging to the genera Pediococcus and Lactobacillus was used. Surprisingly it was found that by using 6-8 selected strains the effluent was considerably reduced. This may be due to production of water binding polymers by at least one of the strains used, e.g. Lactobacillus plantarum. It has been found that this strain is especially suited since it effectively uses the plants' polysaccharides.
  • the ensilage produces variable amounts of effluent depending on the dry matter content of the ensiled material, the rate of packing, the rate of cutting or grinding and the use of additives which enhance lysis (e.g. acids).
  • the production of effluent has been a considerable problem because of the significant loss of valuable nutritious components and because it represents a significant pollution and environmental problem.
  • the present invention provides by reduction of the effluent a great advantage compared to the state of the art.
  • the selective growth environment is created for the applied lactic acid bacteria so they will multiply and reach an active growth phase in the absence of competing microorganisms before application to the crop.
  • This is achieved by innoculating the lyophilized bacteria in a specially composed sterile broth, e.g. modified MRS, which is contained in a tightly closed container, e.g. a plastic bottle.
  • the container is thereafter incubated at room temperature, and after 24 hours it contains a turbid bacterial culture in active growth.
  • the bacterial culture which is stable for 1-2 weeks at 4°C, is mixed with water and thereafter sprayed onto the crop during harvesting, e.g. by using a flail harvester.
  • the bacterial culture is propagated to a high cell density before application, i.e. a large number of active bacteria is added to the crop.
  • the bacteria are converted from a resting (lyophilized) state to active metabolizing and lactate-producing cells in the absence of interfering micro-organisms and are added to the crop in active state.
  • the bacteria are cultivated under conditions which are selective for lactic acid bacteria (e.g. absence of air, ca. 20°C, specially composed growth medium), and which promote rapid growth and a ready-to-use bacterial suspension after only 12 - 24 1-rurs.
  • the bacterial culture is also stable for 1-2 weeks 4oC), thus giving great flexibility for the user.
  • the number of lyophilized bacteria of each strain contained in the preparation may theoretically be reduced as long as the cells are viable and have the ability to multiply. This may give a significant expense-saving effect during the production of the product compared to conventional inoculants for ensilage requiring large quantities of bacteria, thus entailing higher production costs and hence higher prices.
  • An ensilage kit consists of a vial with lyophilized lactic acid bacteria (ca. 10 ml) and a sealed container with a sterile nutrient broth (a plastic bottle with screw-cap, 2 litres).
  • the ensilage kit is easy to transport, requires little storage space and is stable, which is of great importance in connection with e.g. preparedness.
  • the inoculant may be applied to the crop by using conventional harvesting equipment (e.g. flail harvester).
  • conventional harvesting equipment e.g. flail harvester
  • this product has the same advantages as other inoculants used for ensilage, being environmentally safe, biologically compatible, not hazardous to the health (e.g. when splashed in the eyes), not caustic (e.g. on clothes, skin etc.) and does not corrode equipment (e.g. feed harvester etc.).
  • Tween 80 ® is a registered trade mark for polyoxyethylene- (20)-sorbitanemonooleate.
  • a procedure for application of the product for ensilage of crop may be as follows:
  • the vial containing the lyophilized bacteria is half-filled with cold tap water (or sterile nutrient broth), closed with the rubber stopper and shaken well.
  • the contents of the vial are poured into the container with sterile nutrient broth (2 litres), the broth having room temperature.
  • the cap is replaced and the container is left for activation at room temperature (20-25°C) for 24 hours.
  • the contents should be used immediately after the activation period, but may be stored for 1 week at cellar temperature (5-10°C).
  • the contents of the container are mixed thoroughly and diluted with cold tap water to approximately 25 litres in a plastic can.
  • the mixture is applied to the grass via flail harvester, and is recommended for approximately 7 tons of grass.
  • the grass is supplied with a minimum of 1.000.000 viable lactic acid bacteria per gram.
  • the grass material consisted of timothy (Phleum pratense) (73%), meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) (17%), red clover (Trifolum pratense) (6%) and other grass species (4%).
  • the dry matter content of the grass was 14-15%.
  • the buffer capacity was 350 mekv./kg dry matter (DM) and the sugar content, expressed as water soluble carbohydrate (WSC), was 115-120 g/kg DM.
  • Lactic Control 2,0 28,2 59,6 21,9 acid Accord.to inv. 2,4 36,2 65,5 70,5 (g/kq DM) Formic acid 0.4 5.5 45.0 12.6
  • the metabolizing strains according to the invention show a significantly more rapid pH-decrease than both the control and the formic acid silage which to some extent is reflected in the increased lactic acid production.
  • neither the control nor the formic acid silo is sufficiently stabilized, which leads to a secondary pH-increase parallell to the consumption of produced lactic acid.
  • the production of effluent by using the product according to the invention is significantly reduced compared to the control and the formic acid, this also resulting in a reduced loss of dry matter.
  • Example 2 Experiments comparing metabolizing strains according to the invention and formic acid. Carbondioxide loss.
  • the experiment was performed by using 10 1 pilot silos. Loss of carbon dioxide was measured as weight loss.
  • the grass material consisted mainly of timothy (Phleum pratense) and meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis) (50/50).
  • the dry matter content was 23%.
  • the grass material consisted mainly of timothy (Phleum pratense) with a dry matter content of 20,9% and WSC of 129 g/kg DM.
  • Table 4 pH-development and lactic acid production.
  • Lactic Formic acid 0 0,7 0,8 3,2 7,3 acid Accord. to inv. 0 4,0 7,8 12,8 11,8
  • the strain L.piantarum is able to utilize starch as an energy- and carbon source.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Medicines Containing Plant Substances (AREA)
  • Jellies, Jams, And Syrups (AREA)
  • Saccharide Compounds (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Micro-Organisms Or Cultivation Processes Thereof (AREA)
PCT/NO1989/000036 1988-04-28 1989-04-26 Preparation of silage WO1989010067A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
NO881867A NO164576C (no) 1988-04-28 1988-04-28 Fremgangsmaate ved ensilering av forplanter.
NO881867 1988-04-28

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
WO1989010067A1 true WO1989010067A1 (en) 1989-11-02

Family

ID=19890849

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
PCT/NO1989/000036 WO1989010067A1 (en) 1988-04-28 1989-04-26 Preparation of silage

Country Status (2)

Country Link
NO (1) NO164576C (no)
WO (1) WO1989010067A1 (no)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0678120A1 (en) * 1993-01-15 1995-10-25 Oy Panimolaboratorio - Bryggerilaboratorium Ab Procedure for treatment of seed material to be germinated
US8519008B2 (en) 2003-01-22 2013-08-27 Purina Animal Nutrition Llc Method and composition for improving the health of young monogastric mammals

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1442055A1 (de) * 1964-07-13 1969-03-06 Beck Dr Theodor Verfahren zur Herstellung und Anwendung eines Bakterienpraeparates als Silierhilfsmittel bei der Gaerfutterbereitung
GB1547063A (en) * 1977-07-07 1979-06-06 Salen Interdevelop Ab Process for the biological ensiling of vegetable and/or animals materials
DD237255A1 (de) * 1985-05-13 1986-07-09 Ostra Veb Verfahren zur mikrobiell-enzymatischen herstellung von silagen aus eiweissreichen gruenpflanzen
WO1989001970A2 (en) * 1987-09-02 1989-03-09 Plant Genetic Systems N.V. Transformed lactic acid bacteria

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1442055A1 (de) * 1964-07-13 1969-03-06 Beck Dr Theodor Verfahren zur Herstellung und Anwendung eines Bakterienpraeparates als Silierhilfsmittel bei der Gaerfutterbereitung
GB1547063A (en) * 1977-07-07 1979-06-06 Salen Interdevelop Ab Process for the biological ensiling of vegetable and/or animals materials
DD237255A1 (de) * 1985-05-13 1986-07-09 Ostra Veb Verfahren zur mikrobiell-enzymatischen herstellung von silagen aus eiweissreichen gruenpflanzen
WO1989001970A2 (en) * 1987-09-02 1989-03-09 Plant Genetic Systems N.V. Transformed lactic acid bacteria

Non-Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
CHEMICAL ABSTRACTS, Vol. 110, (1989), abstract No. 6662d; & CS,A, 249,286 (88-02-15). *
SWEDISH J AGRIC. RES., Vol. 13, 1983, SVEN LINDGREN et al., "Effect of Inoculants, Grain and Formic Acid on Silage Fermentation", p. 91-100. See especially abstract and page 99. *
SWEDISH J AGRIC. RES., Vol. 15, 1985, SVEN LINDGREN et al., "Silage Inoculation", p. 9-18. See especially abstract. *

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0678120A1 (en) * 1993-01-15 1995-10-25 Oy Panimolaboratorio - Bryggerilaboratorium Ab Procedure for treatment of seed material to be germinated
US8519008B2 (en) 2003-01-22 2013-08-27 Purina Animal Nutrition Llc Method and composition for improving the health of young monogastric mammals
US9078457B2 (en) 2003-01-22 2015-07-14 Purina Animal Nutrition Llc Method and composition for improving the health of young monogastric mammals
US9433232B2 (en) 2003-01-22 2016-09-06 Purina Animal Nutrition Llc Methods for feeding sows and for improving the health of young piglets
US10172376B2 (en) 2003-01-22 2019-01-08 Purina Animal Nutrition Llc Methods for feeding sows and for improving the health of young piglets
US10980250B2 (en) 2003-01-22 2021-04-20 Purina Animal Nutrition Llc Methods for feeding sows and for improving the health of young piglets
US11452303B2 (en) 2003-01-22 2022-09-27 Purina Animal Nutrition Llc Methods for feeding sows and for improving the health of young piglets

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
NO164576C (no) 1990-10-24
NO164576B (no) 1990-07-16
NO881867D0 (no) 1988-04-28
NO881867L (no) 1989-10-30

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Ohmomo et al. Silage and microbial performance, old story but new problems
AU2002239449B2 (en) Mixed cultures for improved fermentation and aerobic stability of silage
Weinberg et al. The effect of applying lactic bacteria at ensilage on the chemical and microbiological composition of vetch, wheat and alfalfa silages
GB1591810A (en) Process and composition for the preservation of vegetables
MOON et al. Aerobic deterioration of wheat, lucerne and maize silages prepared with Lactobacillus acidophilus and a Candida spp.
AU2002239449A1 (en) Mixed cultures for improved fermentation and aerobic stability of silage
FI82354B (fi) Konservering av faerskfoder.
EP1089633B1 (en) Methods and compositions for improving aerobic stability of silage
JPH02265443A (ja) かいばおよび穀物を貯蔵する方法
US4528199A (en) Silage production from fermentable forages
US20140186929A1 (en) Compositions and methods comprising a combination silage inoculant
US6905716B2 (en) Propionic acid based preservative agent for animal and vegetable products
Alli et al. Effects of additives on lactic acid production and water soluble carbohydrates in chopped corn and alfalfa
WO1989010067A1 (en) Preparation of silage
CN108419898A (zh) 一种秸秆饲料青贮用添加剂及应用
CN112175834B (zh) 植物乳酸菌在枯草芽孢杆菌固体菌剂保存中的应用及延长枯草芽孢杆菌的保存期的方法
Rauramaa et al. The effect of inoculants and cellulase on the fermentation and microbiological composition of grass silage: II Microbiological changes in the silages
CN111349578B (zh) 乳酸菌固体菌剂的制备方法
JPS5913175B2 (ja) サイレ−ジの製造法
CN102450525A (zh) 一种豆科牧草的青贮复合菌添加剂
GB1565921A (en) Process for fermentation of green fodder
CN1257683C (zh) 玉米青贮饲料
US3147121A (en) Preparation of silage with pediococcus cerevisiae
WO2014081320A1 (en) A new strain of lactobacillus buchneri a, composition, a multi-component preparation for starch-rich plant preservation, their use and a method for plant preservation.
KR0149895B1 (ko) 미생물 발효를 이용한 부패 및 동결이 방지된 습사료의 제조방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AK Designated states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): FI

AL Designated countries for regional patents

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LU NL SE