US20210054482A1 - Aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use, automobile structural member, and method for producing aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use - Google Patents

Aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use, automobile structural member, and method for producing aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20210054482A1
US20210054482A1 US17/043,487 US201917043487A US2021054482A1 US 20210054482 A1 US20210054482 A1 US 20210054482A1 US 201917043487 A US201917043487 A US 201917043487A US 2021054482 A1 US2021054482 A1 US 2021054482A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
aluminum alloy
alloy sheet
structural member
automobile structural
sheet
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US17/043,487
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Tomoki HOSOKAWA
Shimpei Kimura
Tetsuya Masuda
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=68060565&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=US20210054482(A1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Assigned to KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO (KOBE STEEL, LTD.) reassignment KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO (KOBE STEEL, LTD.) ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: HOSOKAWA, TOMOKI, KIMURA, SHIMPEI, MASUDA, TETSUYA
Publication of US20210054482A1 publication Critical patent/US20210054482A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • C22C21/02Alloys based on aluminium with silicon as the next major constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C21/00Alloys based on aluminium
    • C22C21/06Alloys based on aluminium with magnesium as the next major constituent
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working
    • C22F1/04Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon
    • C22F1/05Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working of aluminium or alloys based thereon of alloys of the Al-Si-Mg type, i.e. containing silicon and magnesium in approximately equal proportions
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22FCHANGING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF NON-FERROUS METALS AND NON-FERROUS ALLOYS
    • C22F1/00Changing the physical structure of non-ferrous metals or alloys by heat treatment or by hot or cold working

Definitions

  • the present invention generally relates to Al—Mg—Si (6XXX-series) aluminum alloy sheets produced through regular rolling.
  • the present invention relates to such an aluminum alloy sheet being used for automobile structural members and having excellent crushing properties.
  • the term “aluminum alloy sheer” refers to a material aluminum alloy sheet which is a rolled sheet having undergone hot rolling and/or cold rolling, where the rolled sheet is after receiving tempering such as solution treatment and/or quenching, but before receiving forming into an automobile structural member and artificial aging such as paint bake hardening.
  • tempering such as solution treatment and/or quenching
  • paint bake hardening aluminum is also simply referred to as “Al”.
  • the automobile structural members have to be produced from aluminum alloy materials that have strength and formability equivalent to those for the automotive body panels and, in addition, have excellent impact absorption and crushing properties (crushing resistance or crushing characteristics) upon body collision, for the sake of passenger safety.
  • VDA 238-100 Plate bending test for metallic materials (hereinafter also referred to as a “VDA bending test”) standardized by German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA).
  • VDA bending test has been employed in evaluation typically in Europe to meet the increased (stricter) level of automobile crash safety standards, and this requires frames, pillars, and other automobile structural members that have more excellent crushing characteristics.
  • Patent Literature (PTL) 1 discloses a 6XXX-series aluminum alloy sheet in which, of grains, the grain size in the through-thickness direction is specified, and the ratio of the grain size in the sheet rolling direction to the grain size in the through-thickness direction is controlled.
  • PTL 2 proposes a 6XXX-series aluminum alloy sheet in which the amounts of Mg, Si, and Cu are controlled, and the average area fraction of Cube orientations in a sheet cross section is controlled to be 22% or more.
  • PTL 2 which has an objective to improve crushing properties, mentions that the VDA bending test as an evaluation test for sheet crushing properties has a correlation with crushing properties upon automobile collision. The VDA bending test gives a bending angle, which enables quantitative evaluation for the level of crushing properties of the sample.
  • the crushing properties are trade-off against the formability, and are also trade-off against the strength.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet when produced by a production method regulated to provide better formability, has lower crushing properties.
  • An aluminum alloy sheet when produced from a material aluminum alloy having controlled metal contents to have higher strength, has lower crushing properties.
  • safety standards typically for automobiles have become more and more strict, and this demands for aluminum alloy sheets that have such properties as to give higher safety. Accordingly, demands are made to develop aluminum alloy sheets having still better crushing properties without deterioration in strength and formability.
  • Such automobile structural members require not only strength, formability, and crushing properties, but also corrosion resistance to corrosive environments such as salt water, from the viewpoint of reliability as structural members.
  • structural members derived from aluminum alloys require such excellent corrosion resistance as to resist grain-boundary corrosion and other corrosion over the long term.
  • the present invention has an object to provide: an aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use, an automobile structural member, and a method for producing such an aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use, where the aluminum alloy sheet is a 6XXX-series aluminum alloy sheet produced through regular rolling and excels in strength, formability, crushing properties, and corrosion resistance with balance as a material sheet.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet having strength, formability, crushing properties, and corrosion resistance at excellent levels with balance can be obtained by appropriately adjusting the chemical composition of the material aluminum alloy, defining the anisotropy of the aluminum alloy texture by earing rate, and controlling the earing rate within a predetermined range.
  • the present invention provides an aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet is an Al—Mg—Si aluminum alloy sheet containing, in mass percent, 0.4% to 1.0% of Mg, 0.6% to 1.2% of Si, and less than 0.7% of Cu, with the remainder consisting of Al and impurities.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet has an earing rate of ⁇ 10.0% to ⁇ 3.0%.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use contains Mg in a content, in mass percent, of 0.4% to 0.6%. Ina preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use contains Si in a content, in mass percent, of 0.6% to 0.8%. Ina preferred embodiment of the present invention, the aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use has such bake hardenability as to have a 0.2% yield strength of 215 MPa or more after receiving artificial aging at a temperature of 180° C. for 20 minutes.
  • the present invention also provides an automobile structural member derived from any of the aluminum alloy sheets for automobile structural member use.
  • the present invention also provides a method for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use.
  • the method is a method for producing an Al—Mg—Si aluminum alloy sheet and includes the step of casting an aluminum alloy containing, in mass percent, 0.4% to 1.0% of Mg, 0.6% to 1.2% of Si, and less than 0.7% of Cu, with the remainder consisting of Al and impurities, to give an ingot.
  • the ingot then receives homogenizing, hot rolling, cold rolling, annealing, solutionizing (solution treatment), and quenching.
  • a rolling reduction in the cold rolling step is controlled to be 40% or more; and a heat treatment temperature in the annealing step is set to be 275° C. or higher.
  • the present invention can provide an aluminum alloy sheet which is used for an automobile structural member and which has strength, formability, crushing properties, and corrosion resistance at excellent levels with balance, by appropriately regulating the chemical composition of the material aluminum alloy and allowing the aluminum alloy to have anisotropy in texture.
  • the present invention enables production of an aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use, which aluminum alloy sheet excels in strength, formability, crushing properties, and corrosion resistance, and enables production of an automobile structural member from the aluminum alloy sheet, by adjusting the chemical composition of the material aluminum alloy and regulating the cold rolling reduction and the annealing heat treatment temperature in the production process.
  • FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a system for a VDA bending test to evaluate crushing properties
  • FIG. 2A is a front view of the punch in FIG. 1 ;
  • FIG. 2B is a side view of the punch in FIG. 1 .
  • Al—Mg—Si hereinafter also referred to as “6XXX-series” aluminum alloy sheet according to the embodiment of the present invention is used not for automotive body panels as in conventional use, but for the automobile structural member or members.
  • the automobile structural member (hereinafter also simply referred to as “structural member”) therefore requires to have not only formability as required of the conventional automotive body panels, but also excellent crushing properties and high yield strength even after artificial aging, where these properties are properties necessary particularly for the automobile structural members.
  • XX to YY means that the factor in question is equal to or greater than the lower limit value (XX) and equal to or less than the upper limit value (YY).
  • the Al—Mg—Si aluminum alloy sheet according to the present embodiment contains, in its chemical composition in mass percent, 0.4% to 1.0% of Mg, 0.6% to 1.2% of Si, and less than 0.7% of Cu, with the remainder consisting of Al and impurities.
  • Magnesium (Mg) forms, together with Si, Mg 2 Si and other compound phases and precipitates upon artificial aging such as baking finish treatment.
  • appropriate control of the Mg content allows the aluminum alloy sheet to have higher strength.
  • An aluminum alloy sheet having a Mg content of less than 0.4% may fail to have sufficient strength as a structural member.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet having a Mg content of greater than 1.0% may undergo formation or precipitation of coarse particles of Mg 2 Si and other compound phases upon casting and upon solutionization-quenching treatment, and the coarse particles will work as fine fracture origins. This causes the aluminum alloy sheet to have lower crushing properties.
  • the Mg content is preferably 0.8% or less, and more preferably 0.6% or less.
  • the “strength of an aluminum alloy sheet” herein can be evaluated by a measured 0.2% yield strength (MPa) of the aluminum alloy sheet (before artificial aging) after solution treatment and quenching.
  • the strength can also be evaluated by a measured 0.2% yield strength of an aluminum alloy sheet (after artificial aging), where the aluminum alloy sheet (after artificial aging) is derived from the aluminum alloy sheet (before artificial aging) through the application of a prestrain of 2% or more and artificial aging at a temperature of 180° C. for 20 minutes.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet when having a higher 0.2% yield strength (before artificial aging) and/or a higher 0.2% yield strength (after artificial aging), has higher strength and better bake hardenability (BH).
  • Si forms, together with Mg, Mg 2 Si and other compound phases and precipitates upon artificial aging such as baking finish treatment.
  • appropriate control of the Si content allows the aluminum alloy sheet to have higher strength.
  • An aluminum alloy sheet having a Si content of less than 0.6% may hardly provide sufficient strength as a structural member.
  • the Si content is preferably 0.7% or more, and more preferably 0.8% or more.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet having a Si content of greater than 1.2% may undergo formation or precipitation of coarse particles of Mg 2 Si and other compound phases upon casting and upon solutionization-quenching treatment, and the coarse particles will work as fine fracture origins to cause the aluminum alloy sheet to have lower crushing properties.
  • the Si content is preferably 1.1% or less, more preferably 1.0% or less, and still more preferably 0.8% or less.
  • Copper (Cu) if present in a content of 0.7% or more, forms a precipitation free zone (also called PFZ) in the vicinity of a grain boundary as associated with aging precipitation, and the zone, which is less potentially noble than the inside of the grain, selectively dissolves in a corrosive environment and causes the aluminum alloy sheet to have lower resistance to grain-boundary corrosion (corrosion resistance).
  • PFZ precipitation free zone
  • the Cu content is controlled to be less than 0.7%.
  • the Cu content is preferably 0.5% or less, and more preferably 0.3% or less.
  • the Cu content herein has no lower limit and may be 0%.
  • the other elements (such as elements described below) than the above-mentioned elements are basically regarded as impurities in the present embodiment.
  • the contents of these elements are described below regarding their upper limits, which are permissible levels when being derived from melting materials, such as scrap, to form ingots.
  • the contents have no lower limits and may be 0%.
  • Mn 1.0% or less
  • Fe 0.5% or less
  • Cr 0.3% or less
  • Zr 0.2% or less
  • V 0.2% or less
  • Ti 0.1% or less
  • Zn 0.5% or less
  • Ag 0.1% or less
  • Sn 0.15% or less.
  • Aluminum Alloy Sheet Thickness 1.5 mm or More
  • the thickness of the Al—Mg—Si aluminum alloy sheet according to the present embodiment is not limited in its lower limit, but is typically 1.5 mm or more, to provide strength and rigidity necessary as an automobile structural member.
  • the thickness is also not limited in its upper limit, but is typically 4.0 mm or less, in consideration of limitations in forming such as press forming and the range of such allowable weight increase as not to adversely affect the weight reduction effect as compared with a steel sheet as a comparative material. Whether the material sheet having a thickness within the range is formed as a hot-rolled sheet or cold-rolled sheet is appropriately selected.
  • the earing rate of an aluminum alloy sheet indicates texture anisotropy and shows a strong correlation particularly with the integration degree of Cube orientations.
  • An aluminum alloy sheet having an earing rate of greater than ⁇ 3.0% may include Cube orientations with a low integration degree, fail to restrain a shear zone in bending deformation during crushing, and have lower crushing properties.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet having an earing rate of less than ⁇ 10.0% may include Cube orientations excessively highly integrated and have a lower breaking elongation, namely, have lower formability, as a result of concentration of strain to the Cube orientations.
  • a disk-shaped test specimen having an outer diameter of 66 mm is blanked, and the test specimen receives cupping using a 40-mm diameter punch to give a drawn cup having a cup diameter of 40 mm.
  • the heights of ears of the drawn cup are measured, on the basis of which the earing rate (%) can be calculated according to Formula (1) below.
  • hX represents the height of an ear of the drawn cup; and the index X of h represents the measurement position of the cup height (ear height), where the position is a position making an angle of X° with the sheet rolling direction of the aluminum alloy sheet.
  • Earing rate (%) [ ⁇ ( h 45+ h 135+ h 225+ h 315) ⁇ ( h 0+ h 90+ h 180+ h 270)) ⁇ / ⁇ 1 ⁇ 2( h 0 +h 90+ h 180+ h 270+ h 45+ h 135+ h 225+ h 315) ⁇ ] ⁇ 100 (1)
  • Formula (1) can also be expressed as Formula (2):
  • Earing rate (%) ⁇ ((Average of heights at four points in the 45° direction relative to the bottom(the sheet rolling direction) of the cup) ⁇ (Average of heights at four points in the 0° and 90° directions relative to the bottom of the cup))/(Average of heights at eight points in the 0°,45°, and 90° directions relative to the bottom of the cup) ⁇ 100 (2)
  • crushing properties refers to such properties that the resulting automobile structural member resists cracking and crushing and, even when undergoing cracking and/or crushing, deforms to the last in the early stages of and during deformation upon application of an impulsive load such as in automobile collision.
  • a member having good crushing properties resists cracking and crushing and, even when undergoing cracking and/or crushing, undergoes bending deformation like an accordion.
  • the crushing properties may deteriorate when the material aluminum alloy has a Mg content and a Si content each greater than the upper limit of the range specified in the present embodiment.
  • the crushing properties can be evaluated by the VDA bending test mentioned later.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet has a bending angle of preferably 93° or more, more preferably 100° or more, further more preferably 105° or more, and still more preferably 110° or more.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet having such crushing properties as to give a bending angle of 93° or more is evaluated as being accepted for automobile structural member use.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet having such crushing properties as to give a bending angle of less than 93° is evaluated to be insufficient for automobile structural member use.
  • a bending test to evaluate the crushing properties operates in accordance with the VDA bending test prescribed in German Association of the Automotive Industry (VDA).
  • FIG. 1 illustrates, as a perspective view, how to preform the bending test.
  • FIG. 2A and FIG. 2B are a front view and a side view, respectively, of a punch 3 , which is a sheet-like bending jig.
  • two rollers 2 are disposed in parallel to each other with a roller gap L, and a sheet-like test specimen 1 is placed horizontally on the two rollers 2 equally in length on both sides, as indicated by the doted lines in FIG. 1 .
  • the punch 3 which is a sheet-like bending jig, is placed vertically above the sheet-like test specimen 1 .
  • the rollers 2 , the test specimen 1 , and the punch 3 stand so that the top edge side of the punch 3 lies at the center of the roller gap L, and the sheet rolling direction of the sheet-like test specimen 1 intersects with the extending direction of the sheet-like punch 3 at right angles.
  • the punch 3 then presses from above against the central part of the sheet-like test specimen 1 to put a load F on the test specimen, thereby bends the sheet-like test specimen 1 by pushing (by pressing) toward the narrow roller gap L, and presses the central part of the bent, deformed sheet-like test specimen 1 into the narrow roller gap.
  • a bending angle (in degree) at the time when the load F, which is put by the punch 3 from above, becomes maximum is measured, and the crushing properties are evaluated by the magnitude of the bending angle, where the bending angle is defined as the outer bending angle of the central part of the sheet-like test specimen 1 . It can be determined that, with an increasing bending angle, the sheet-like test specimen more remains in a bending deformation state without crushing during bending, and offers higher crushing properties.
  • the VDA bending test operates under conditions as follows.
  • the sheet-like test specimen 1 has a thickness of 2.0 mm and has a square shape of a width b of 60 mm by a length l of 60 nm.
  • the two rollers 2 each have a diameter D of 30 mm and lie with a roller gap L of 4.0 mm, which is 2.0 times as much as the thickness of the sheet-like test specimen 1 .
  • the central part of the sheet-like test specimen presses into the roller gap at a depth S.
  • the punch 3 has a length of a side in contact with the test specimen 1 of 90 mm, and has a tapered narrow shape so that its lower side (apex) has a radius r of 0.2 mm, where the lower side presses against the central part of the sheet-like test specimen 1 , as illustrated in the front view of the punch 3 .
  • the punch 3 has two recesses each having a width of 9 mm and a depth of 12 mm, in the opposite side to the apex.
  • the punch 3 is configured to apply a load on the test specimen 1 when the recesses of the punch 3 are engaged to a loading device (not shown).
  • the aluminum alloy sheet according to the present embodiment when receiving a prestrain of 2% or more and undergoes artificial aging at a temperature of 180° C. for 20 minutes after receiving solution treatment (solutionization) and quenching, preferably has a 0.2% yield strength (bake hardenability or BH) of 215 MPa or more.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet when having a 0.2% yield strength of 215 MPa or more, can surely have strength necessary as an alloy sheet for automobile structural member use.
  • the 0.2% yield strength can be controlled not only by the contents of elements in the aluminum alloy, but also particularly by the thermal hysteresis and the rolling reduction in in the steps in the after-mentioned production method.
  • An aluminum alloy sheet according to the present embodiment if produced by a method with a rolling reduction in cold rolling lower than the lower limit of the range specified in the present embodiment, may have lower formability, as described later.
  • the formability can be evaluated by breaking elongation as indicated in working examples below, and the aluminum alloy sheet preferably has such formability as to give a breaking elongation of 25% or more.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet having such formability as to give a breaking elongation of 25% or more is evaluated as being accepted for automobile structural member use.
  • an aluminum alloy sheet having such formability as to give a breaking elongation of less than 25% is evaluated as being insufficient for automobile structural member use.
  • the method for producing an aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use according to the present embodiment is a method for producing an Al—Mg—Si aluminum alloy sheet.
  • the method includes the steps of casting, homogenizing, hot rolling, cold rolling, annealing, solution-treating, and quenching, where the step of casting preforms on an aluminum alloy having the chemical composition.
  • a rolling reduction in the cold rolling step is controlled to be 40% or more, and a heat treatment temperature in the annealing step is set to be 275° C. or higher.
  • the earing rate as specified in the present embodiment can be obtained by appropriately regulating, among these production steps, the rolling reduction in the cold rolling and the temperature in the annealing process within the numerical ranges. Each step or process will be illustrated in detail below.
  • a molten aluminum alloy is prepared by melting to have a chemical composition within the range of the 6XXX-series chemical composition and is cast.
  • the casting operates by a casting technique appropriately selected from regular melting-casting techniques such as continuous casting and semicontinuous casting (direct chill casting; DC casting).
  • the homogenization (soaking) is significant not only for homogenization of the microstructure (elimination or minimization of segregation in grains in the ingot microstructure), which is a common objective, but also for sufficient solid-solution (solutionization) of Si and Mg.
  • the homogenization may work under any conditions without limitation, as long as the homogenization can achieve the objects.
  • the homogenization (soaking) may operate as common single or single-stage treatment.
  • the homogenization preferably operates at a temperature for a (holding) time appropriately selected within the ranges respectively from 500° C. to 560° C. and one hour or longer.
  • the homogenization if operating at an excessively low temperature, may fail to sufficiently eliminate segregation in grains, and the residual segregation will work as a fracture origin, and this may cause the aluminum alloy sheet to have lower crushing properties.
  • the hot rolling of the ingot after homogenization includes a rough rolling substep of the ingot (slab) and a finish rolling substep, in accordance with the target thickness after rolling.
  • the hot rough rolling substep and hot finish rolling substep may employ any of rolling mills such as reverse mills and tandem mills as appropriate.
  • Hot rolling in the hot rough rolling substep if started at a start temperature higher than the solidus temperature, may cause burning, and this may impede the hot rolling itself.
  • Hot rolling if started at a start temperature lower than 350° C., may require an excessively high load to operate on any material after the homogenization step, and this may impede the hot rolling itself.
  • hot rolling operates at a hot rolling start temperature selected within the range from 350° C. to the solidus temperature, to give a hot-rolled sheet having a thickness of about 2 to about 8 mm. Annealing (heat treatment) of this hot-rolled sheet before cold rolling is not always necessary, but may be performed.
  • hot finish rolling After the hot rough rolling, hot finish rolling preferably operates to an end temperature from 250° C. to 350° C.
  • the hot finish rolling if operating to an excessively low end temperature lower than 250° C., may cause lower productivity due to a higher rolling load.
  • the hot finish rolling if operating to an excessively high end temperature higher than 350° C. so as to give a recrystallized microstructure without a large amount of residual deformed microstructure, may highly possibly cause the aluminum alloy sheet to have lower crushing properties, due to precipitation of coarse Mg 2 Si particles.
  • Annealing (heat treatment) of this hot-rolled sheet before cold rolling is not always necessary, but may be performed.
  • the step of cold rolling the hot rolled sheet to a desired thickness when operating at a high cold rolling reduction, can introduce strain homogeneous in the through-thickness direction, and this will give homogeneous, fine, equiaxial grains upon the solution heat treatment.
  • cold rolling operating at a cold rolling reduction of 40% or more allows the texture to have such anisotropy as to give crushing properties and formability with balance. This can give an aluminum alloy sheet having an earing rate of ⁇ 10.0% or more.
  • cold rolling if operating at a cold rolling reduction of less than 40%, may introduce little strain, and this may cause the deformed microstructure after hot rolling to remain. This may cause the aluminum alloy sheet to have an earing rate of less than ⁇ 10.0%. The resulting aluminum alloy sheet may have better crushing properties, but significantly lower formability. To eliminate or minimize this, the cold rolling operates at a cold rolling reduction of 40% or more.
  • the cold rolling reduction is preferably 60% or more.
  • An annealing process at a temperature of 275° C. or higher allows the nuclei of Cube orientations remained after cold rolling to preferentially grow without coarsening and gives an aluminum alloy sheet having an earing rate of ⁇ 3.0% or less.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet can have not only excellent formability as with conventional equivalents, but also satisfactory crushing properties.
  • Annealing if operating at a temperature of lower than 275° C., which is equal to or lower than the recrystallization temperature, may fail to invite recrystallization, to cause the aluminum alloy sheet to have an earing rate of greater than ⁇ 3.0%, and to thereby have significantly lower crushing properties although having good formability.
  • the annealing temperature is preferably 300° C. or higher.
  • the annealing process preferably operates at a rate of temperature rise of 1 to 500° C./hr.
  • the annealing process if operating at a rate of temperature rise of less than PC/hr, may cause grains to coarsen and have larger sizes, and this may cause the aluminum alloy sheet to tend to have lower crushing properties.
  • the annealing process if operating at a rate of temperature rise of greater than 500° C./hr, may cause Cube orientation nuclei to be present in a small number, and this may cause the Cube orientations after solution treatment to be present in a smaller area fraction and cause the aluminum alloy sheet to tend to have lower crushing properties.
  • the workpiece After the cold rolling, the workpiece receives a solution treatment, and subsequent quenching down to room temperature.
  • the solution treatment and quenching may preform using a common continuous heat treatment line.
  • the workpiece receives the solution treatment at a temperature from 500° C. to the melting temperature, and then receives quenching down to room temperature at an average cooling rate of 20° C./sec or more.
  • the workpiece if receiving a solution treatment at a temperature lower than 500° C., may include smaller amounts of solute Mg and solute Si, because Mg—Si compounds and other compounds formed before the solution treatment undergo re-solutionization insufficiently.
  • the workpiece if receiving quenching at an average cooling rate of less than 20° C./sec, may highly possibly fail to include sufficient amounts of solute Si and solute Mg, because Mg—Si precipitates predominantly form during cooling, and this lowers the amounts of solute Mg and solute Si.
  • the quenching operates with a selective means under selective conditions, where non-limiting examples of the means include air cooling means such as fans; and water cooling means such as mist, spraying, and immersion. After the solution treatment as above, the workpiece may receive pre-aging as appropriate.
  • the present embodiment also relates to an automobile structural member made from the aluminum alloy sheet.
  • the aluminum alloy sheet according to the present embodiment has strength, formability, and crushing properties at excellent levels with balance as a material sheet, and can give an automobile structural member having still better safety.
  • Ingots of 6XXX-series aluminum alloys having the chemical compositions given in Table 1 were prepared, from which aluminum alloy sheets for automobile structural member use were produced under various production conditions given in Table 2, and received earing rate measurement.
  • the produced aluminum alloy sheets were evaluated for strength, formability, and crushing properties by measurements of the 0.2% yield strength (MPa) before and after artificial aging, the breaking elongation (%), and the VDA bending angle (degree) after artificial aging. The results are also presented in Table 2.
  • Aluminum alloys having the chemical compositions given in Table 1 were molten and cast to give ingots.
  • the ingots received a homogenization treatment by holding the same at a temperature of 540° C. for 4 hours.
  • the ingots then received hot rolling to an end temperature of 250° C. to 350° C.
  • the workpieces further received cold rolling at the rolling reductions given in Table 2 to a final thickness of 2.0 mm, and yielded cold-rolled sheets.
  • the cold-rolled sheets received an annealing process in an air furnace, in which each workpiece was raised in temperature at a rate of 30° C./hr, held at the annealing temperature given in Table 2 for 4 hours, and cooled down at a rate of 40° C./hr.
  • the workpiece according to Comparative Example 1 did not receive the annealing process.
  • the workpieces then received a tempering treatment (T4 treatment) under common conditions in a heat treatment facility. Specifically, each sheet after the annealing was heated at an average heating rate up to the solution treatment temperature of 5° C./sec, held at a temperature of 525° C. for 28 seconds for the solution treatment, and then cooled down to room temperature by fan air cooling at an average cooling rate of 20° C./sec. Immediately after the cooling, the workpieces received pre-aging by holding the same at 80° C. for 5 hours, and then received slow cooling (natural cooling) and yielded a series of aluminum alloy sheets (T4 sheets).
  • T4 treatment tempering treatment
  • test samples were sampled, and received earing rate measurement by the following method.
  • a disk-shaped test specimen having an outer diameter of 66 mm was blanked from each test sample, and the test specimen received cupping using a punch having a diameter of 40 mm and yielded a drawn cup having a cup diameter of 40 mm.
  • the ear heights of the drawn cup were measured, from which the earing rate (%) was calculated according to Formula (1).
  • a JIS 13A tensile test specimen (20 mm by 80 mm gauge length by 2.0 mm) was sampled, and received a tensile test at room temperature under the following conditions, to measure the 0.2% yield strength.
  • two sets of test samples after pre-aging were prepared, and one of the two was subjected to a 0.2% yield strength measurement without additional heat treatment.
  • the other set received a prestrain of 2% or more, and underwent artificial aging at a temperature of 180° C. for 20 minutes and subsequent measurement of 0.2% yield strength.
  • the tensile test operated so that the tensile direction be perpendicular to the sheet rolling direction.
  • the tensile speed was set at 5 mm/min before the load reached the 0.2% yield strength, and set at 20 mm/min on or above the 0.2% yield strength.
  • the measurement operated five times, the five measurements were averaged, and the average was defined as the 0.2% yield strength.
  • a sample having a 0.2% yield strength of 215 MPa or more after artificial aging was determined as having sufficient strength for automobile structural member use and evaluated as accepted.
  • a JIS 13A tensile test specimen (20 mm by 80 mm gauge length by 2.0 nm) was sampled, and received a tensile test at room temperature under the following conditions.
  • the test specimen was pulled at a speed of 5 mm/min, and the elongation at the time when the test specimen broken (ruptured) was measured.
  • the test specimen was pulled in three directions, i.e., 0° direction, 45° direction, and 90° direction relative to the sheet rolling direction, and received the measurement five times, from which five breaking elongations were calculated according to Formula (3) below and averaged, and the average was defined as the breaking elongation of the sample.
  • Formula (3) Lo represents the gauge length before the tensile test and L represents the gauge length at break.
  • a sample having a breaking elongation of 25% or more was determined as having sufficient formability for automobile structural member use and evaluated as accepted.
  • the test sample after the preliminary treatment received a prestrain of 2% or more and underwent artificial aging at a temperature of 180° C. for 20 minutes. From the resulting sample, a square test specimen having a thickness of 2.0 mm, a width b of 60 mm, and a length l of 60 mm was sampled, and received a VDA bending test to evaluate crushing properties.
  • the VDA bending test operated in conformity to VDA 238-100 as a three-point bending test so that the bend line be in parallel with the sheet rolling direction.
  • the bending speed was set at 10 mm/min until the load reached 30 N, and set at 20 mm/min thereafter.
  • the system was set so that bending was stopped at the time when cracking occurred or the load decreased from the maximum load by 60 N due to reduction in sheet thickness.
  • the bending test operated on three test specimens per sample, the three measurements were averaged, and the average was defined as the bending angle (degree) of the sample.
  • a sample having a bending angle of 93° or more was determined as having sufficient crushing properties for automobile structural member use and evaluated as accepted.
  • Table 2 The evaluation results for the strength, formability, and crushing properties are presented in Table 2.
  • Table 2 a component content, a production condition for the aluminum alloy sheet, and a material microstructure each of which does not meet or fall within the range specified in the present invention are underlined.
  • Examples 1 to 9 were produced from aluminum alloys having chemical compositions within the range specified in the present invention, where the production operated under conditions specified in the present invention.
  • Examples 1 to 9 are samples produced from aluminum alloys having chemical compositions containing, in mass percent, 0.4% to 1.0% of Mg and 0.6% to 1.2% of Si, and had an earing rate of ⁇ 10.0% to ⁇ 3.0%. Thus, these samples were aluminum alloy sheets having strength, formability, and crushing properties at excellent levels with balance.
  • Example 2 Mg content: 0.4%), Example 8 (Mg content: 0.6%), and Example 9 (Mg content: 1.0%), whose conditions are common except for the Mg content.
  • the comparisons demonstrate that the samples having a Mg content from 0.4% to 0.6% have particularly excellent crushing properties.
  • Example 5 Si content: 0.6%)
  • Example 6 Si content: 0.8%)
  • Example 2 Si content: 1.0%)
  • Example 7 Si content: 1.2%)
  • the comparisons demonstrate that the samples having a Si content from 0.6% to 0.8% have particularly excellent crushing properties.
  • Comparative Examples 1 to 10 are samples produced using aluminum alloys having chemical compositions out of the range specified in the present invention, or samples produced through cold rolling at a rolling reduction out of the range specified in the present invention or through annealing at a temperature out of the range specified in the present invention, although the samples are produced from aluminum alloys having chemical compositions within the range specified in the present invention. As a result, these samples are inferior in 0.2% yield strength after artificial aging or in crushing properties.
  • Comparative Example 1 did not receive the annealing process, thereby had an earing rate out of the range specified in the present invention, and had poor crushing properties.
  • Comparative Examples 2 and 3 received annealing at a temperature lower than the range specified in the present invention, thereby had an earing rate out of the range specified in the present invention, and had poor crushing properties.
  • Comparative Examples 4 to 6 received cold rolling at a rolling reduction less than the range specified in the present invention, thereby had an earing rate out of the range specified in the present invention, and had poor formability.
  • Comparative Example 7 was produced from an aluminum alloy having a Si content less than the range specified in the present invention, and thereby had low strength.
  • Comparative Example 8 was produced from an aluminum alloy having a Si content greater than the range specified in the present invention and had poor crushing properties.
  • Comparative Example 9 was produced from an aluminum alloy having a Mg content less than the range specified in the present invention and had low strength.
  • Comparative Example 10 was produced from an aluminum alloy having a Mg content greater than the range specified in the present invention and had poor crushing properties.
  • ingots of the aluminum alloys of alloy numbers 1 and 11 in Table 1 were prepared, from which aluminum alloy sheets for automobile structural member use were produced under production conditions as described in the Aluminum Alloy Sheet Production, except for the rolling reduction in cold rolling and the annealing temperature as given in Table 3.
  • the aluminum alloy sheets were then evaluated for resistance to grain-boundary corrosion (corrosion resistance).
  • the resistance to grain-boundary corrosion was evaluated by a test in conformity to ISO 11846, Method B.
  • the test samples used herein were sheet test samples after the solution treatment. To remove a surface film, the test samples were immersed in a 5% NaOH (60° C.) for one minute, rinsed, immersed in 70% HNO 3 for one minute, rinsed again, and dried at room temperature.
  • aqueous solution containing HCl and NaCl (containing 30 g/L of NaCl and 10 ⁇ 1 mL/L of 36% concentrated hydrochloric acid) was prepared as an etchant, and the test samples were immersed in the etchant at 25° C. for 24 hours, where the etchant was present in an amount of 5 ml per 1 cm 2 of the surface area of the material.
  • the test samples were immersed in 70% HNO 3 and brushed with a plastic brush to remove corrosion products, rinsed, and dried at room temperature.
  • portions (each 30 mm by 50 mm) which were determined to have deep corrosion were selected at three arbitrary points in each test sample, and the three portions were embedded and ground to give cross sections.
  • the depth of deepest grain-boundary corrosion in each cross section was measured using an optical microscope. In this testing example, samples having a maximum grain-boundary corrosion depth of 300 ⁇ m or less were evaluated as accepted.
  • Example 1 was produced from an aluminum alloy having a Cu content within the range specified in the present invention and had excellent resistance to grain-boundary corrosion.
  • Comparative Example 11 was produced from an aluminum alloy having a Cu content greater than the range specified in the present invention and had poor resistance to grain-boundary corrosion.
  • the present invention allows a 6XXX-series aluminum alloy sheet produced through regular rolling to combine excellent crushing properties and strength, which are properties specific to automobile structural member use, with formability and corrosion resistance. This enlarges the applicability of such 6XXX-series aluminum alloy sheets as automobile structural members.
US17/043,487 2018-03-30 2019-03-27 Aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use, automobile structural member, and method for producing aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use Abandoned US20210054482A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2018070252A JP6688828B2 (ja) 2018-03-30 2018-03-30 自動車構造部材用アルミニウム合金板、自動車構造部材および自動車構造部材用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP2018-070252 2018-03-30
PCT/JP2019/013472 WO2019189517A1 (ja) 2018-03-30 2019-03-27 自動車構造部材用アルミニウム合金板、自動車構造部材および自動車構造部材用アルミニウム合金板の製造方法

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20210054482A1 true US20210054482A1 (en) 2021-02-25

Family

ID=68060565

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US17/043,487 Abandoned US20210054482A1 (en) 2018-03-30 2019-03-27 Aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use, automobile structural member, and method for producing aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use

Country Status (4)

Country Link
US (1) US20210054482A1 (ja)
JP (1) JP6688828B2 (ja)
CN (1) CN111684090A (ja)
WO (1) WO2019189517A1 (ja)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114058885A (zh) * 2021-11-16 2022-02-18 中铝材料应用研究院有限公司 6xxx系铝合金板材及其制备方法和焊接方法

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN115418539A (zh) * 2022-09-04 2022-12-02 桂林理工大学 一种含钼元素的抗火铝合金

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160047021A1 (en) * 2013-04-09 2016-02-18 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) Aluminum alloy sheet for press forming, process for manufacturing same, and press-formed product thereof

Family Cites Families (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS58224142A (ja) * 1982-06-22 1983-12-26 Sumitomo Light Metal Ind Ltd 成形性のすぐれたアルミニウム合金板およびその製造方法
JPS6056786B2 (ja) * 1982-10-01 1985-12-11 株式会社神戸製鋼所 箔圧延性に優れた箔地の製造方法
JP3498942B2 (ja) * 1998-09-24 2004-02-23 株式会社神戸製鋼所 耐リジングマーク性に優れたアルミニウム合金板及びリジングマーク発生の有無の評価方法
JP4383039B2 (ja) * 2001-11-30 2009-12-16 トヨタ自動車株式会社 曲げ加工性に優れたアルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP2003268475A (ja) * 2002-03-12 2003-09-25 Sky Alum Co Ltd 成形加工用アルミニウム合金板およびその製造方法
JP5415016B2 (ja) * 2008-04-16 2014-02-12 株式会社Uacj 成形加工用アルミニウム合金板およびその製造方法
CN101638745B (zh) * 2009-08-28 2012-07-04 沈阳工业大学 一种AlMgSi合金板材的制备方法
CN108699663A (zh) * 2016-03-30 2018-10-23 昭和电工株式会社 Al-Mg-Si系合金板的制造方法

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20160047021A1 (en) * 2013-04-09 2016-02-18 Kabushiki Kaisha Kobe Seiko Sho (Kobe Steel, Ltd.) Aluminum alloy sheet for press forming, process for manufacturing same, and press-formed product thereof

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN114058885A (zh) * 2021-11-16 2022-02-18 中铝材料应用研究院有限公司 6xxx系铝合金板材及其制备方法和焊接方法

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP2019178420A (ja) 2019-10-17
JP6688828B2 (ja) 2020-04-28
WO2019189517A1 (ja) 2019-10-03
CN111684090A (zh) 2020-09-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3245309B1 (en) Highly formable automotive aluminum sheet with reduced or no surface roping and a method of preparation
US20180023174A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet
US20170283913A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet having high formability
US20160047021A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for press forming, process for manufacturing same, and press-formed product thereof
JP4939088B2 (ja) 成形時のリジングマーク性に優れたアルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP2020158885A (ja) アルミニウム合金製品及び調製方法
US20150376742A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for structural material
CN105838928B (zh) 高强度铝合金板
US20210180160A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for automotive structural member, automotive structural member, and method for manufacturing aluminum alloy sheet for automotive structural member
WO2015034024A1 (ja) 焼付け塗装硬化性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
US20180363113A1 (en) High-strength aluminum alloy plate
US20170121801A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for vehicle structural component and method of manufacturing the aluminum alloy sheet
JP2009173973A (ja) 成形時のリジングマーク性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
US20210054482A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use, automobile structural member, and method for producing aluminum alloy sheet for automobile structural member use
JP4944474B2 (ja) 伸びフランジ性に優れたアルミニウム合金板およびその製造方法
KR101159410B1 (ko) 도장 베이킹 경화성이 우수하고, 실온 시효를 억제한 알루미늄 합금판 및 그 제조 방법
JP2018204116A (ja) アルミニウム合金板
JP4515363B2 (ja) 成形性に優れたアルミニウム合金板およびその製造方法
JP2008062255A (ja) キャビティ発生の少ないAl−Mg−Si系アルミニウム合金板の超塑性成形方法およびAl−Mg−Si系アルミニウム合金成形板
JP2003321754A (ja) 曲げ加工性に優れたアルミニウム合金板の製造方法
US20170349978A1 (en) Aluminum alloy sheet
WO2017170835A1 (ja) アルミニウム合金板及びアルミニウム合金板の製造方法
JP3766334B2 (ja) 曲げ加工性に優れたアルミニウム合金板
JP2003247040A (ja) フラットヘム加工性に優れたアルミニウム合金板およびその製造方法
JP4588338B2 (ja) 曲げ加工性とプレス成形性に優れたアルミニウム合金板

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: KABUSHIKI KAISHA KOBE SEIKO SHO (KOBE STEEL, LTD.), JAPAN

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HOSOKAWA, TOMOKI;KIMURA, SHIMPEI;MASUDA, TETSUYA;REEL/FRAME:053922/0926

Effective date: 20190701

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: APPLICATION DISPATCHED FROM PREEXAM, NOT YET DOCKETED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION