US20180208886A1 - Protein-rich biomass of thraustochytrids, culturing method and uses - Google Patents

Protein-rich biomass of thraustochytrids, culturing method and uses Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20180208886A1
US20180208886A1 US15/744,593 US201615744593A US2018208886A1 US 20180208886 A1 US20180208886 A1 US 20180208886A1 US 201615744593 A US201615744593 A US 201615744593A US 2018208886 A1 US2018208886 A1 US 2018208886A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
biomass
ccap
feed
microalga
schizochytrium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US15/744,593
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Olivier CAGNAC
Cyril Rols
Julien Pagliardini
Pierre Calleja
Cécile GADY
Sabrina VANDEPLAS
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Adisseo France SAS
Fermentalg SA
Original Assignee
Adisseo France SAS
Fermentalg SA
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Adisseo France SAS, Fermentalg SA filed Critical Adisseo France SAS
Assigned to ADISSEO FRANCE SAS, FERMENTALG reassignment ADISSEO FRANCE SAS ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: CAGNAC, Olivier, CALLEJA, PIERRE, PAGLIARDINI, Julien, ROLS, Cyril, Gady, Cécile, VANDEPLAS, Sabrina
Publication of US20180208886A1 publication Critical patent/US20180208886A1/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N1/00—Microorganisms, e.g. protozoa; Compositions thereof; Processes of propagating, maintaining or preserving microorganisms or compositions thereof; Processes of preparing or isolating a composition containing a microorganism; Culture media therefor
    • C12N1/12—Unicellular algae; Culture media therefor
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K10/00—Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/10—Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes
    • A23K10/16—Addition of microorganisms or extracts thereof, e.g. single-cell proteins, to feeding-stuff compositions
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K20/00—Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K20/00—Accessory food factors for animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K20/10—Organic substances
    • A23K20/142—Amino acids; Derivatives thereof
    • A23K20/147—Polymeric derivatives, e.g. peptides or proteins
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23K—FODDER
    • A23K50/00—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/70—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for birds
    • A23K50/75—Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for birds for poultry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L17/00—Food-from-the-sea products; Fish products; Fish meal; Fish-egg substitutes; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L17/60—Edible seaweed
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L33/00—Modifying nutritive qualities of foods; Dietetic products; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L33/10—Modifying nutritive qualities of foods; Dietetic products; Preparation or treatment thereof using additives
    • A23L33/135—Bacteria or derivatives thereof, e.g. probiotics
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23L—FOODS, FOODSTUFFS, OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES A21D OR A23B-A23J; THEIR PREPARATION OR TREATMENT, e.g. COOKING, MODIFICATION OF NUTRITIVE QUALITIES, PHYSICAL TREATMENT; PRESERVATION OF FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS, IN GENERAL
    • A23L33/00—Modifying nutritive qualities of foods; Dietetic products; Preparation or treatment thereof
    • A23L33/10—Modifying nutritive qualities of foods; Dietetic products; Preparation or treatment thereof using additives
    • A23L33/17—Amino acids, peptides or proteins
    • A23L33/195—Proteins from microorganisms
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K36/00—Medicinal preparations of undetermined constitution containing material from algae, lichens, fungi or plants, or derivatives thereof, e.g. traditional herbal medicines
    • A61K36/02—Algae
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K36/00—Medicinal preparations of undetermined constitution containing material from algae, lichens, fungi or plants, or derivatives thereof, e.g. traditional herbal medicines
    • A61K36/06—Fungi, e.g. yeasts
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K8/00—Cosmetics or similar toiletry preparations
    • A61K8/18—Cosmetics or similar toiletry preparations characterised by the composition
    • A61K8/96—Cosmetics or similar toiletry preparations characterised by the composition containing materials, or derivatives thereof of undetermined constitution
    • A61K8/97—Cosmetics or similar toiletry preparations characterised by the composition containing materials, or derivatives thereof of undetermined constitution from algae, fungi, lichens or plants; from derivatives thereof
    • A61K8/9728—Fungi, e.g. yeasts
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P17/00—Drugs for dermatological disorders
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P17/00—Drugs for dermatological disorders
    • A61P17/16—Emollients or protectives, e.g. against radiation
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61P—SPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P3/00—Drugs for disorders of the metabolism
    • A61P3/02—Nutrients, e.g. vitamins, minerals
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61Q—SPECIFIC USE OF COSMETICS OR SIMILAR TOILETRY PREPARATIONS
    • A61Q19/00—Preparations for care of the skin
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23V—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2002/00—Food compositions, function of food ingredients or processes for food or foodstuffs
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23—FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23V—INDEXING SCHEME RELATING TO FOODS, FOODSTUFFS OR NON-ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES AND LACTIC OR PROPIONIC ACID BACTERIA USED IN FOODSTUFFS OR FOOD PREPARATION
    • A23V2250/00—Food ingredients
    • A23V2250/20—Natural extracts
    • A23V2250/202—Algae extracts
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K2800/00—Properties of cosmetic compositions or active ingredients thereof or formulation aids used therein and process related aspects
    • A61K2800/10—General cosmetic use

Definitions

  • the invention is in the field of cultures of microalgae, in particular thraustochytrids. It has as an object a thraustochytrid biomass which is rich in proteins, the process for obtaining said biomass and uses thereof in food.
  • soybean The best-known source of plant proteins used in animal feed is soybean, generally in the form of meal, which is the solid residue remaining after oil extraction.
  • soybean meal has several disadvantages associated with its origin.
  • the meal is generally imported from countries which practice intensive soybean cultivation to the detriment of other plants that provide biodiversity.
  • GM genetically modified soybean varieties, which are found mixed with non-GM soybean in the meal, which does not help meet an increasing demand for genetically modified organism (GMO)-free food products of plant origin.
  • GMO genetically modified organism
  • Spirulina like chlorella, however, has the disadvantage of a low productivity, which precludes high-yield fermenter cultivation. If their cultivation makes it possible to meet a local and limited demand in conventional dietary supplements, it does not help meet the objective of wider, economically-viable industrial production of a source of dietary proteins the qualities of which will enable it to replace the common sources, such as soybean, in food for animal and human consumption.
  • protists known for their industrial production capacity in fermenters, have long been used to produce fats high in polyunsaturated fatty acids such as DHA or EPA, for example WO 97/37032, WO 2015/004402 or WO 2012/175027.
  • the biomasses obtained, including after fat extraction do not contain sufficient protein contents to permit their use as protein source in food, at the very least without costly additional protein-enrichment steps.
  • the methods used for oil extraction may sometimes contaminate the remaining biomass, notably with organic solvents that make it unsuitable for consumption.
  • One of the goals of the invention is to provide a novel source of proteins for animal or human consumption which meets the objective of wide, economically-viable industrial production, the qualities of which will enable it to replace the common sources such as soybean.
  • the invention shows that, under certain culture conditions, thraustochytrids, known for their use in the production of oils with high polyunsaturated fatty acid contents (notably DHA, EPA) are microorganisms capable of producing a large amount of proteins, which can make them a source of dietary proteins similar to soybean, in particular for animal feed.
  • oils with high polyunsaturated fatty acid contents notably DHA, EPA
  • the invention has as a first object a thraustochytrid biomass which may comprise, by weight relative to the weight of dry matter, at least 35% proteins, preferentially at least 45% proteins, which may range up to more than 60% proteins, indeed more than 75% proteins, in particular from 45% to 75% proteins.
  • the weight percentages of proteins may be expressed in terms of the proteins themselves or in terms of the amino acids contained in said proteins.
  • said biomass may further comprise, by weight relative to the weight of dry matter, less than 20% fat, preferentially less than 10% fat, more preferentially less than 7% fat.
  • said biomass is a thraustochytrid biomass which may comprise, by weight relative to the weight of dry matter, at least 35% proteins, preferentially at least 45% proteins, very preferentially from 45% to 60% proteins and, still by weight relative to the weight of dry matter, less than 20% fat, preferentially less than 10% fat, more preferentially less than 7% fat.
  • the invention also relates to a process for producing a biomass as defined above and below, characterized in that it comprises:
  • a. a first step of culturing thraustochytrids in a suitable culture medium and under conditions which can promote the production of proteins at a level of at least 35% proteins by weight relative to the weight of dry matter and which, optionally, limits the production of fat to a level of less than 20% fat by weight relative to the weight of dry matter, until a culture density of at least 40 g/L dry matter, preferentially at least 60 g/L, more preferentially at least 80 g/L, is obtained;
  • the invention also relates to the use of a biomass as defined above or below, in the fields of human or animal cosmetics and food, and notably a food comprising such a biomass.
  • the invention also relates to the biomass according to the invention for use in therapy.
  • compositions for humans or animals relates to cosmetic or pharmaceutical compositions for humans or animals and to food or food compositions for humans or animals, which comprise a biomass according to the invention.
  • biomass advantageously refers to a set of thraustochytrid cells produced by culturing the aforesaid protists, and having the levels of proteins and, optionally, fatty acids described in the present text, cells which may or may not retain their physical integrity.
  • said biomass may comprise a quantity of degraded thraustochytrid cells ranging from 0% to 100%.
  • degraded means that said thraustochytrid cells may have had their structure and/or composition modified. For example, they may have undergone a drying step or an oil harvesting step, the important thing being that the biomass comprising these cells has the levels of proteins and, optionally, of fatty acids described in the present text.
  • the biomass has not undergone treatments that modify its amino acid composition during or after harvesting. That is, the treatments to which said biomass is subjected after harvesting do not alter the amino acid composition thereof.
  • the biomass was not subjected to a step of enrichment in proteins and/or amino acids. That is, the proteins, peptides and amino acids contained in the biomass according to the invention derive only from the culture of thraustochytrids. It should be noted that proteins or amino acids not produced by thraustochytrids are likely to be present in the culture medium, notably in the case of preculture on medium comprising a yeast extract. The residual amounts of these proteins that may be present in the biomass, if any, will be in undetectable trace amounts, included in the definition of a biomass that does not undergo enrichment in proteins and/or amino acids.
  • the biomass has not undergone treatments that modify the amino acid and fat composition thereof. That is, the treatments to which said biomass is subjected after harvesting do not alter the amino acid and fat composition thereof.
  • the relative composition of amino acids in relation to fat remains substantially constant.
  • non-degraded thraustochytrids in the biomass according to the invention have better properties of preservation and digestibility than degraded thraustochytrids.
  • One of the preferred forms of the invention is a biomass comprising a substantially predominant amount of non-degraded thraustochytrids.
  • the term “degraded” refers to thraustochytrids the structural and/or chemical integrity of which may have been altered, such as for example lysed thraustochytrids, resulting for example from a homogenization process.
  • said biomass may be used raw, optionally dried, or subjected to any treatment necessary for the use thereof, notably homogenization.
  • said biomass may have, by weight relative to the weight of dry matter, a moisture content of 1% to 95%.
  • said biomass may have, by weight relative to the weight of dry matter, a moisture content of 70% to 90%, preferentially 80% to 85%.
  • said biomass may have, by weight relative to the weight of dry matter, a moisture content of 1% to 10%, preferentially 2% to 7%.
  • said thraustochytrids may be of the order Thraustochytriales, preferentially of the subclass Thraustochytriaceae, more preferentially of a genus which may be selected from the group comprising the genera Aurantiochytrium, Aplanochytrium, Botryochytrium, Japonochytrium, Oblongichytrium, Parietichytrium, Schizochytrium, Sicyoidochytrium, Thraustochytrium and Ulkenia.
  • the thraustochytrids are very preferentially non-genetically modified microorganisms. If GM thraustochytrids are used, they do not contain genes encoding one or more enzymes that make it possible to degrade or digest the biomass for use as food.
  • said thraustochytrids may be selected from the species Aplanochytrium kerguelense; Aplanochytrium minuta; Aplanochytrium stocchinoi; Aplanochytrium sp. PR24-1; Aurantiochytrium limacinum; Aurantiochytrium limacinum AB022107; Aurantiochytrium limacinum HM042909; Aurantiochytrium limacinum JN986842; Aurantiochytrium limacinum SL1101 JN986842; Aurantiochytrium mangrovei; Aurantiochytrium mangrovei DQ323157; Aurantiochytrium mangrovei DQ356659; Aurantiochytrium mangrovei DQ367049; Aurantiochytrium mangrovei CCAP 4062/2; Aurantiochytrium mangrovei CCAP 4062/3; Aurantiochytrium mangrovei CCAP 4062/4;
  • Botryochytrium radiatum Botryochytrium radiatum Raghukumar 16; Botryochytrium radiatum SEK353; Botryochytrium sp.; Botryochytrium sp. BUTRBC 143; Botryochytrium sp. Raghukumar 29; Oblongichytrium minutum; Oblongichytrium multirudimentalis; Oblongichytrium sp.; Oblongichytrium sp.
  • Parieticytrium sarkarianum Parieticytrium sarkarianum SEK351; Parieticytrium sarkarianum SEK364; Parieticytrium sp.; Parieticytrium sp. F3-1; Parieticytrium sp. H 1 -14; Parieticytrium sp.
  • NBRC102984 Phytophthora infestans; Schizochytrium aggregatum DQ323159; Schizochytrium aggregatum DQ356661; Schizochytrium aggregatum; Schizochytrium limacinum; Schizochytrium limacinum OUC166 HM042907; Schizochytrium mangrovei; Schizochytrium mangrovei FB1; Schizochytrium mangrovei FB3; Schizochytrium mangrovei FBS; Schizochytrium minutum; Schizochytrium sp. ATCC20888 DQ367050; Schizochytrium sp. KGS2 KC297137; Schizochytrium sp.
  • Thraustochytrium aggregatum Thraustochytrium aggregatum DQ356662; Thraustochytrium aureum; Thraustochytrium aureum DQ356666; Thraustochytrium gaertnerium; Thraustochytrium kinnei; Thraustochytrium kinnei DQ323165; Thraustochytrium motivum; Thraustochytrium multirudimentale; Thraustochytrium pachydermum; Thraustochytrium roseum; Thraustochytrium sp. 13A4.1; Thraustochytrium sp. ATCC 26185; Thraustochytrium sp.
  • Thraustochytrium sp. BL14 Thraustochytrium sp. BL2; Thraustochytrium sp. BL3; Thraustochytrium sp. BL4; Thraustochytrium sp. BLS; Thraustochytrium sp. BL6; Thraustochytrium sp. BL7; Thraustochytrium sp. BL8; Thraustochytrium sp. BL9; Thraustochytrium sp. BP3.2.2; Thraustochytrium sp. BP3.3.3; Thraustochytrium sp.
  • the thraustochytrids may be selected from the genera Aurantiochytrium and Schyzochitrium , preferentially from the species
  • said biomass may be a biomass:
  • the invention also has as an object a process for producing a biomass as previously described which comprises:
  • step a) of culturing the thraustochytrids is carried out in a culture medium and under conditions suitable for promoting the production of proteins and for limiting the production of fat.
  • said suitable culture medium is preferably a chemically defined culture medium which comprises a carbon source, a nitrogen source, a phosphorus source and salts.
  • the term “chemically defined culture medium” refers to culture medium wherein the content of each element is known. Precisely, the invention is directed to a medium that may not comprise rich or complex organic matter.
  • rich or complex organic matter refers to unpurified organic matter, appearing as mixtures for which the exact composition and the concentrations of the various components of the mixture are not known with precision, not controlled, and may have a significant variability from one batch to another.
  • rich or complex organic matter mention may be made of yeast extracts or peptones which are products of a protein hydrolysis reaction or also rich mineral matter such as for example marine mineral salts or other complex growth agents, not having a fixed concentration of each of their components.
  • said defined medium may comprise salts selected from calcium, cobalt, manganese, magnesium, zinc, nickel, copper, potassium, iron and sodium salts, and mixtures thereof.
  • said salts may be selected from calcium chloride, cobalt chloride, manganese chloride, magnesium sulfate, zinc sulfate, nickel sulfate, copper sulfate, potassium sulfate, iron sulfate, sodium molybdate, sodium selenite, sodium chloride and mixtures thereof.
  • the medium may also comprise sodium chloride (NaCl), notably for certain strains of marine origin.
  • NaCl sodium chloride
  • marine strains which may allow a culture medium which may comprise sodium chloride, strains of Schizochytrium sp., in particular Schizochytrium sp. CCAP 4062/3.
  • the medium may not comprise sodium chloride (NaCl), at the very least may comprise a very small amount of sodium chloride, having less than 3.5 g/L, preferably less than 1 g/L, more preferentially less than 10 mg/L of sodium ions and less than 1 g/L, preferably less than 500 mg/L, more preferentially 200 mg/L of chloride ions.
  • NaCl sodium chloride
  • NaCl sodium chloride
  • the carbon source of said defined medium may be one or more carbohydrates, one or more acetates, one or more alcohols, one or more complex molecules, or any mixture, in any proportion, of at least two of these sources.
  • said nitrogen source of said defined medium may be selected from one or more nitrate salts, one or more glutamate salts, one or more ammonium salts, urea, ammonia, or any mixture, in any proportion, of at least two of these sources.
  • the phosphorus source of said defined medium may be selected from phosphoric acid, phosphate salts, advantageously sodium hydrogen phosphate (Na 2 HPO 4 ), or sodium dihydrogen phosphate (NaH 2 PO 4 ), or potassium dihydrogen phosphate (KH 2 PO 4 ), or potassium hydrogen phosphate (K 2 HPO 4 ), or any mixture, in any proportion, of at least two of these sources.
  • said culture medium may comprise magnesium chloride, advantageously in tetrahydrate form (MgCl 2 .4H 2 O); calcium chloride, advantageously in dihydrate form (CaCl 2 .2H 2 O); cobalt chloride hexahydrate (CoCl 2 .6H 2 O); manganese(II) chloride tetrahydrate (MnCl 2 .4H 2 O); magnesium sulfate heptahydrate (MgSO 4 .7H 2 O); zinc sulfate heptahydrate (ZnSO 4 .7H 2 O); nickel sulfate hexahydrate (NiSO 4 .6H 2 O); copper sulfate pentahydrate (CuSO 4 .5H 2 O); potassium sulfate (K 2 SO 4 ); iron sulfate heptahydrate (FeSO 4 .7H 2 O); boric acid (H 3 BO 3 ); ethylenediaminete
  • magnesium chloride in said culture medium, may be at a concentration of 0.008 to 0.012 g/L, advantageously 0.009 to 0.011 g/L; calcium chloride may be at a concentration of 0.40 to 0.70 g/L, advantageously 0.50 to 0.60 g/L; cobalt chloride hexahydrate may be at a concentration of 0.00008 to 0.00013 g/L, advantageously 0.00009 to 0.00012 g/L; manganese(II) chloride tetrahydrate may be at a concentration of 0.008 to 0.013 g/L, advantageously 0.009 to 0.012 g/L; magnesium sulfate heptahydrate may be at a concentration of 6 to 10 g/L, advantageously 7 to 9 g/L; zinc sulfate heptahydrate may be at a concentration of 0.008 to 0.013 g/L, advantageously 0.009 to 0.012 g/L; nickel
  • magnesium chloride is at a concentration of 0.0108 g/L; calcium chloride is at a concentration of 0.55 g/L; cobalt chloride hexahydrate (CoCl 2 .6H 2 O) is at a concentration of 0.000108 g/L; manganese(II) chloride tetrahydrate is at a concentration of 0.0108 g/L; magnesium sulfate heptahydrate is at a concentration of 8.01 g/L; zinc sulfate heptahydrate is at a concentration of 0.0108 g/L; nickel sulfate hexahydrate is at a concentration of 0.0056 g/L; copper sulfate pentahydrate is at a concentration of 0.0072 g/L; potassium sulfate is at a concentration of 2.09 g/L; iron sulfate heptahydrate is at a concentration of 0.04 g/L; boric acid
  • the first culture step a) of the process may be carried out in co-called “batch” discontinuous mode, in so-called “fed batch” semi-continuous mode or in continuous mode.
  • the first step is divided into two sub-steps, a first growth sub-step a1) in the suitable culture medium followed by a second production sub-step a2) wherein one or more carbon source, nitrogen source and/or phosphorus source enrichment solutions may be added to the culture medium, simultaneously or successively, so as to maintain in the culture medium nitrogen and phosphorus levels that do not limit growth.
  • the growth sub-step a1) is carried out until a concentration of carbon source, more particularly of glucose, of less than 20 g/L is obtained.
  • the growth sub-step al) is carried out until a culture density of at least 20 g/L, preferentially at least 40 g/L, more preferentially at least 60 g/L, even more preferentially at least 80 g/L, is obtained.
  • the non-limiting level of nitrogen source in step a2) is advantageously 0.5 to 5 g/L, preferentially 0.5 to 2 g/L, and the non-limiting level of phosphorus source is advantageously 0.5 to 5 g/L, preferentially 0.5 to 2 g/L.
  • the carbon source content sought for this step a2) may be 0 to 200 g/L, notably 5 or 10 to 50 g/L.
  • the carbon source content in sub-step a2) is 0 to 50 g/L, more preferentially 0 to 10 g/L.
  • the culture of which the first step a) is divided into two sub-steps a1) and a2) as defined above is carried out in so-called “fed batch” semi-continuous mode.
  • the culture may be carried out by any known culture technique, for example in flasks or in a reactor, but also in fermenters or in any container suitable for growing protists, particularly thraustochytrids, such as for example “raceway”-type basins, provided that said technique makes it possible to carry out the required culture conditions.
  • any known culture technique for example in flasks or in a reactor, but also in fermenters or in any container suitable for growing protists, particularly thraustochytrids, such as for example “raceway”-type basins, provided that said technique makes it possible to carry out the required culture conditions.
  • the culture is carried out in fermenters according to the known methods for culturing protists in fermenters.
  • the second step b) of the process for recovering said biomass may be carried out under suitable conditions for obtaining a biomass which may have the moisture content sought.
  • Said recovery of the protists may be carried out by any technique allowing recovery of the biomass, notably methods of filtration, gravimetric or under reduced pressure, centrifugation, decantation, or even methods of precipitation followed by gravimetric filtration.
  • the invention also has as an object a biomass which can be obtained by the process according to the invention as described above in all its variants.
  • the invention also has as an object the use of a biomass as described above in the fields of human or animal cosmetics, pharmaceuticals or food.
  • thraustochytrid biomass according to the invention, as described above and below, for improving animal performance.
  • This improvement in performance may be evaluated, in particular, by measuring consumption, weight gain or feed conversion ratio.
  • livestock refers notably to grazing animals (particularly cattle raised for meat, milk, cheese and leather; sheep raised for meat, wool and cheese; caprines), pigs, rabbits, poultry (chickens, hens, turkeys, ducks, geese, etc.), members of the horse family (ponies, horses, foals), animals intended to support human activities (transport, leisure) or the feeding thereof, aquatic animals (for example fish, shrimp, oysters and mussels).
  • the feeding of fish up to the alevin stage may be distinguished from that of raised fish, including the feed and feed compositions intended therefor.
  • Domestic animals, pets and leisure animals which also include mammals, ruminants or not, will be distinguished from birds and fish. They include in particular dogs and cats.
  • the invention also has as an object a food, or food composition, for humans or animals, which may comprise a biomass according to the invention as described above.
  • food refers to any composition which may be used as food for humans or animals, in particular livestock.
  • the food may comprise only the biomass, optionally dried, optionally transformed, or the biomass, optionally dried, optionally transformed, mixed with any other additive, carrier or support, used in the field of food for human or animal consumption, such as for example food preservatives, dyes, flavor enhancers, pH regulators, or also pharmaceutical additives such as for example growth hormones, antibiotics.
  • any other additive, carrier or support used in the field of food for human or animal consumption, such as for example food preservatives, dyes, flavor enhancers, pH regulators, or also pharmaceutical additives such as for example growth hormones, antibiotics.
  • the present invention concerns in particular feeds for animals and more particularly for livestock. These feeds typically appear in the form of flours, pellets or slop into which the biomass according to the invention is incorporated.
  • feed refers to anything that may be used to feed animals.
  • the feeds may comprise, in addition to the algal biomass, a nutritional base and nutritional additives.
  • the essential part of the animal's feed ration thus consists of the “nutritional base” and the algal biomass.
  • This base consists, by way of example, of a mixture of cereals, proteins and fats of animal and/or plant origin.
  • Nutritional bases for animals are adapted to the feeding of these animals and are well- known to persons skilled in the art.
  • these nutritional bases comprise for example corn, wheat, pea and soybean. These nutritional bases are adapted to the needs of the various animal species for which they are intended. These nutritional bases may already contain nutritional additives such as vitamins, mineral salts and amino acids.
  • the additives used in animal feed may be added to improve certain characteristics of the feeds, for example to enhance the flavor thereof, to make the raw materials of the feeds more digestible for the animals or to protect the animals. They are frequently used in large-scale intensive breeding operations.
  • the additives used in animal feeds can be divided into the following subcategories in particular (source: EFSA):
  • the invention relates to livestock feeds comprising 1% to 60%, preferably 1% to 20%, quite preferentially 3% to 8% of a dried biomass obtained by the process according to the invention.
  • the invention relates to livestock feeds comprising 1% to 40%, preferably 5% to 10% of a non-dried biomass obtained by the process of the invention.
  • the feed is intended for livestock, in particular cattle, sheep, pigs, rabbits, poultry and horses.
  • the feed is intended for aquatic animals, in particular fish, at least up to the alevin stage, indeed including farmed fish.
  • the feed is intended for domestic animals, pets and/or leisure animals.
  • the food composition is intended for humans.
  • the invention also has as an object a cosmetic or pharmaceutical composition for humans or animals comprising a biomass according to the invention as described above.
  • the cosmetic or pharmaceutical composition may comprise only the biomass, optionally dried, optionally transformed, or the biomass, optionally dried, optionally transformed, mixed with any other additive, carrier or support used in the field of cosmetics or pharmaceuticals, such as, for example, preservatives, dyes, pH regulators.
  • the invention also has as an object the use of the biomass as described above in therapy, as well as in the prevention and treatment of malnutrition.
  • FIG. 1 Experimental design of the measurement of apparent metabolizable energy (AME) in 23-day-old chickens; (test 14ALG069)
  • FIG. 2 Experimental design of the choice and consumption test in chicks (7 and 9 days old); (test 14ALG081)
  • FIG. 3 Measurement of feed consumption at 7 days of age under choice conditions (corn-soybean feed vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested) (test 14ALG081)
  • FIG. 4 Measurement of feed consumption at 9 days of age under choice conditions (corn-soybean feed vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested) (test 14ALG081)
  • FIG. 5 Measurement of mean relative feed consumption over the 2 tests (at 7 d and 9 d) under choice conditions (corn-soybean feed vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested) (test 14ALG081)
  • FIG. 6 Measurement of growth performance (consumption, weight gain, feed conversion ratio) of 0- to 7-day-old chicks fed a control corn-soybean diet vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested (not under choice conditions) (test 14ALG081)
  • FIG. 7 Measurement of growth performance (consumption, weight gain, feed conversion ratio) of 0- to 9-day-old chicks fed a control corn-soybean diet vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested (not under choice conditions) (test 14ALG081)
  • FIG. 1 shows the experimental design of the measurement of apparent metabolizable energy (AME) in 23-day-old chickens; (test 14ALG069).
  • AME apparent metabolizable energy
  • test 14ALG069 Approximately 300 1-day-old male chicks (Ross PM3) were placed in the same low-density enclosure and fed a standard starter containing wheat, corn and soybean meal. At 13 days of age the chickens are starved for 2 hours before being weighed and distributed by weight group. One hundred twenty chickens are thus selected, placed in individual metabolic cages and assigned to one of the experimental treatments according to their weight (20 repetitions per diet).
  • Feed and water are distributed ad libitum throughout the test.
  • the experimental feeds are provided as 3.2-mm-diameter pellets.
  • a total excreta collection period flanked by 17-hour fasts, was carried out for 3 days, from day 20 to day 23.
  • the excreta are collected individually each day, combined and stored at ⁇ 20° C.
  • the collected excreta are freeze-dried then left at room temperature for a water-uptake phase (48 h) in order to stabilize the moisture content before weighing, grinding (0.5 mm) and analyses.
  • FIG. 2 shows the experimental design of the choice and consumption tests in chicks (7 and 9 days old); (test 14ALG081). Two experimental tests were carried out in parallel.
  • Test 1 choice test: For the test with choice of feed, approximately 200 1-day-old male chicks (Ross PM3) were placed in groups of about 20 in divided metabolic cages and were fed a standard starter containing wheat, corn and soybean meal. At 6 days of age the chickens are starved for 2 hours before being weighed and distributed by weight group. One hundred twenty chickens are thus selected, placed by groups of 4 into 30 divided metabolic cages and assigned at day 7 to one of the experimental treatments according to their weight (10 repetitions per treatment). Each cage contains two feeding dishes containing different feeds, corresponding to the following three experimental treatments:
  • Feed and water are dislricited ad libitum throughout the test.
  • the experimental feeds are provided as 3.2-mm-diameter pellets. Consumption is measured at T 0+1h , T 0+2h , T 0+3h , T 0+4h and T 0+6h at 7 and 9 days of age, with the feeding dishes in the cages being switched every hour. Between the two consumption measurements (day 8), the animals receive the wheat-corn-soybean starter.
  • Test 2 in a second test, the chicks have access to only one type of feed, optionally supplemented with microalga ( FIG. 6 ). Approximately 400 1-day-old male chicks (Ross PM3) were weighed and distributed by weight group. Two hundred forty selected animals are placed by groups of 4 at day 1 in 60 undivided cages in blocks of homogeneous weight (15 blocks of 4 cages) with one feeding dish per cage, each with an experimental feed (15 repetitions per feed). In each cage, the 4 chicks are identified individually. Feed and water are distributed ad libitum throughout the test. The experimental feeds are corn-soybean starter supplemented with 0%, 5%, 10% or 15% microalga, also used in test 1 with choice of feed. Individual live weights are measured at 1, 7 and 9 days of age.
  • Uneaten feeds are weighed and consumption per cage is measured at 7 and 9 days of age. From 0 to 7 days of age, the animals fed the feed containing 10% microalga have a significantly improved weight gain compared to the control and to the other two supplemented diets.
  • FIG. 3 shows the measurement of feed consumption at 7 days of age under choice conditions (corn-soybean feed vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested) (test 14ALG081);
  • FIG. 4 shows the measurement of feed consumption at 9 days of age under choice conditions (corn-soybean feed vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested) (test 14ALG081);
  • FIG. 5 shows the measurement of mean relative food consumption over the 2 tests (at 7 d and 9 d) under choice conditions (corn-soybean feed vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested) (test 14ALG081);
  • FIG. 6 shows the measurement of growth performance (consumption, weight gain, feed conversion ratio) of 0- to 7-day-old chicks fed a control corn-soybean diet vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested (not under choice conditions) (test 14ALG081);
  • FIG. 7 shows the measurement of growth performance (consumption, weight gain, feed conversion ratio) of 0- to 9-day-old chicks fed a control corn-soybean diet vs feed substituted with 5%, 10% and 15% of the microalga tested (not under choice conditions) (test 14ALG081).
  • An Aurantiochytrium mangrovei preculture is prepared on a shaker table (140 rpm) in a temperature-controlled enclosure (26° C.), in preculture medium, containing 4 g of yeast extract as nitrogen source, and 30 g of glucose as carbon source. After 48 hours of incubation the cells are centrifuged for 5 minutes at 3000 g and the cell pellet is rinsed with preculture medium containing neither yeast extract nor any other source of mineral or organic nitrogen. The purpose of this operation is to avoid any supply of Na + in the main culture via the addition of yeast extract. The preculture corresponds to 1/100 (v/v) of the culture volume of the main solution. In the case of strain Schizochytrium sp. CCAP 4062/3,27 g/L of NaCl is added to this medium.
  • Total biomass concentration is monitored by measuring the dry mass (filtration on GF/F filter, Whatman, then oven drying, at 105° C., for at least 24 h before weighing).
  • Aurantiochytrium mangrovei CCAP 4062/5 cultures are prepared in 1- to 2-L fermenters (bioreactors) for use with computer-controlled automated systems.
  • the composition of the culture medium and those of the addition solutions are as follows:
  • the system is adjusted to pH 6 by adding base (NaOH, or KOH) and/or acid (sulfuric acid solution).
  • the culture temperature was set to 26° C.
  • Dissolved oxygen pressure was regulated in the medium throughout the culture, by shaking speed (250-1200 rpm), air flow rate (0.25-1 vvm), or oxygen flow rate (0.1-0.5 vvm).
  • the regulatory parameters, integrated into the controller, made it possible to maintain a constant pO 2 of 5% to 30%.
  • Culture time was 20 to 100 hours, preferably 25 to 96 hours, for example 50 hours.
  • addition solution 1 was carried out, as well as additions of solution 2 in order to maintain glucose concentrations between 200 mM and 500 mM.
  • Aurantiochytrium mangrovei CCAP 4062/5 cultures are prepared in fermenters as essentially described in Example 1.1.
  • the procedure is modified in terms of the mode of pH regulation by addition of ammonia (NH 4 OH) to avoid the large supply of Na+or K+related to pH regulation by sodium hydroxide or potassium hydroxide, and which may pose problems in terms of the development of animal feed.
  • NH 4 OH ammonia
  • the medium used for this example is described in Table 1 below. Unlike the medium described in Example 1.1, this chemically defined medium makes it possible to sustain growth throughout the culture without nutritional limitations.
  • the physicochemical parameters are controlled during the culture by means of integrated regulators, with pH maintained around a setting of 5, temperature set to 30° C., and pO 2 maintained around a setting of 30% until maximum shaking and air flow rate values are reached.
  • additions of addition medium are carried out so as to maintain the glucose concentration in the culture medium between 20 g/L and 50 g/L.
  • Aurantiochytrium mangrovei CCAP 4062/5 cultures are prepared in fermenters under culture conditions as essentially described in Example 1.1.
  • the cultures are started in batch mode on the medium presented in Table 3 below.
  • the dilution rate used directly effects the protein content of the biomass (results not shown).
  • the dilution rate used is 0.13 h ⁇ 1 , which corresponds to half the maximum growth rate of the strain under the culture conditions used.
  • Schizochytrium sp. CCAP 4062/3 cultures are prepared in fermenters as essentially described in Example 1.1, with culture medium supplemented with 27 g/L and 35.6 g/L NaCl for the initial fermenter medium and the addition medium, respectively.
  • Schizochytrium sp. CCAP 4062/3 cultures are prepared in fermenters as essentially described in Example 1.2, with culture medium supplemented with 27 g/L and 35.6 g/L NaCl for the initial fermenter medium and the addition medium, respectively.
  • microalgal biomass was first analyzed for its proximate composition ((moisture (EAU-H internal method adapted to Regulation EC 152/2009 of 27 Jan. 2009 (103° C./4h)—SN), fats by hydrolysis (Regulation EC 152/2009 of 27 Jan. 2009—Procedure B—SN), crude proteins estimated on the basis of the sum of the total amino acid concentrations (Directive 98/64/EC, 9/3/99—Standard NF EN ISO 13903), mineral substances (Regulation EC 152/2009 of 27 Jan.
  • this microalga is evaluated in vivo for the measurement of amino acid digestibility in caecectomized cockerels (Green et al., 1987).
  • the animals adult Isa Brown cockerels
  • a mash composed of one of the ingredients tested (microalga tested or a control soybean meal) and supplemented with wheat starch to obtain a protein level of 18% corresponding to the animals' need.
  • Twelve cockerels housed in individual cages were used per treatment. Each animal received on average 171.2 ⁇ 14.5 g of mash after being starved for 24 h.
  • the excreta collected up to 48 h after force-feeding were collected by group of 4 cockerels such that 3 excreta per treatment are freeze-dried.
  • DIS (X) F standardized ileal digestibility coefficient (%) of amino acid X of raw material F; X F : concentration (g/100 g) of the amino acid in the raw material; X E : concentration (g/100 g) of the amino acid in the excreta; I D : amount of feed consumed (g); Q E : amount excreted (g); L F : incorporation ratio of the raw material in the feed; X END : endogenous losses of amino acid X (g/100 g).
  • Strain CC4062/5 was cultivated as mentioned above. The culture was stopped at 49 h, producing several kilograms of microalgal biomass for the purpose of carrying out a preliminary digestibility test in the animals. This biomass was dried on a drying cylinder and has the form of flakes. It is identified as “strain 4, 49-h culture”.
  • biochemical composition results for the “microalga, strain 4, 49-h culture” are presented in Table 5 below and are expressed as both gross and corrected dry matter (DM) content.
  • test 14ALG058 Composition of the microalga tested (strain 4, 49-h culture) vs a control soybean meal Concentrations Concentrations (gross %) (% of dry matter) Soybean Soybean ⁇ A meal ⁇ A meal Dry matter, % 94.8 89.5 — — Moisture, % 5.2 10.5 — — Sum of amino acids 50.8 46.9 53.4 52.4 Fats 10.6 5.0 11.2 5.6 Crude fiber n/d 4.2 n/d 4.7 Mineral substances 7.3 5.8 7.7 6.5 Starch ⁇ 1.0 n/a ⁇ 1.1 n/a Total sugars 1.3 n/d 1.4 n/d ADF n/d 3.7 n/d 4.1 NDF n/d 7.2 n/d 8.0 Total dietary fiber (TDF) 16.5 n/d 17.4 n/d Water-insoluble cell 4.9 n/d 5.2 n/d wall (WICW) Calcium 0.118 0.371 0.124 0.4
  • microalga has a total nitrogenous matter (sum of amino acids) and mineral substances composition slightly higher than that of the control soybean meal.
  • the mineral content of the biomass tested is comparable to the lowest concentrations published, ranging from 7% to 43% DM depending on the family, genus and species of the microalga.
  • the phosphorus and calcium contents are inversely proportional with 2.3 times more phosphorus and 3.3 times less calcium in the microalga relative to the control soybean meal.
  • the “strain 4, 49-h culture” tested does not contain starch reserves and its total sugar concentration remains low (1.4% DM) compared to the raw materials conventionally used in animal nutrition. In contrast, its fat content is two times higher than that of soybean meal (11.2% vs 5.6% DM) and its gross energy 125 kcal/kg DM higher.
  • Microalgae walls have different compositions and structures than those of raw materials of plant origin, and render unsuitable the fiber analyses conventionally used. Also, analysis of total dietary fiber (TDF) (Prosky et al., 1988) has the advantage of being less restrictive and the “microalga, strain 4, 49-h culture” has a total fiber percentage of 17.4% DM (which, by way of comparison, is about what is analyzed in rye or barley grain) with a water-insoluble cell wall (WICW) residue measured at 5.2% DM.
  • TDF total dietary fiber
  • WICW water-insoluble cell wall
  • the total protein concentrations reported in Tables 4 to 8 derive from the sum of amino acids themselves assayed according to the method described above.
  • Table 6 shows the amino acid concentrations analyzed in the microalga and the soybean meal and expressed as gross values or relative to the sum of amino acids.
  • microalga has a relatively balanced amino acid profile, which agrees with the work comparing the amino acid profiles of different microalgae with those of so-called conventional protein sources (Becker, 2007).
  • the essential amino acid concentrations of the microalga are slightly higher than those measured in the soybean meal (21.5% DM and 24.0% DM, respectively).
  • test 14ALG058 Total nitrogen and amino acid concentrations (gross %), amino acid concentrations relative to the sum of amino acids (% sum AA), standardized ileal digestibility coefficients of amino acids (%) measured in caecectomized cockerels, and digestible amino acid concentrations (gross %) of the microalga tested vs a control soybean meal.
  • the results concerning standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of amino acids measured in caecectomized cockerels, as well as the digestible amino acid concentrations, are presented in Table 6.
  • the digestibilities of nitrogen and the sum of amino acids of the microalga are 80.1 ⁇ 0.3% and 78.4 ⁇ 1.0%, respectively, which are 9.5 and 10.1 points lower than the control soybean meal.
  • the arginine and cystine SIDs of the microalga have the lowest results, respectively 61.0 ⁇ 0.8% and 60.9 35 3.7%.
  • the digestibility coefficients of the essential amino acids of the microalga range from 80.7 ⁇ 1.8% (threonine SID) to 88.7 ⁇ 0.6% (histidine SID).
  • Lysine digestibility is measured at 85.6 ⁇ 1.3%. These coefficients are about 1.2 (histidine SID) to 7.4 (tryptophan SID) points lower than those measured for the control soybean meal. However, they reflect high digestibility coefficients, making it possible to consider the evaluated microalga as a protein source of good quality (i.e., they are significantly higher than the microalgae protein digestibility values reported in the literature by about 55% to 77% (Henman et al., 2012).
  • Strain CC4062/5 was cultivated under the same conditions but for a period of 22 h. It is identified as “strain 4, 22-h culture”.
  • this biomass was dried on a drying cylinder and has the physical form of flakes.
  • microalga, strain 4, 22-h culture has a total nitrogenous matter composition (sum of amino acids) 2.3 and 1.3 points higher than those of the control soybean meal and the “microalga, strain 4, 49-h culture”.
  • the phosphorus/calcium ratio is unbalanced.
  • the phosphorus and calcium contents are inversely proportional with 3.6 times more phosphorus and 3.6 times less calcium in the microalga relative to the control soybean meal.
  • the optimized strain 4 (22-h culture) contains 1.5 times more total phosphorus than during a 49-h culture.
  • the fat content is higher than that of the soybean meal (8% vs 5.6% DM), and the results confirm that neither starch nor total sugars represent a form of energy storage in this strain 4.
  • Gross energy is measured at 4641 kcal/kg DM, or 371 kcal/kg DM less vs the control soybean meal.
  • the total dietary fiber (TDF) of the “microalga, strain 4, 22-h culture” represents 12.7% of DM with a water-insoluble cell wall (WICW) residue measured at 2.1% DM.
  • the residue deduced as follows: R (%) 100—mineral substances (%)—total nitrogenous matter (%)—fat (%)—starch (%)—sugars (%) indicates that the TDF content is 15.1 points lower than that of R thus estimated at 27.8% DM.
  • the “microalga, strain 4, 22-h culture” has 2 points higher fat than the soybean meal taken in comparison (Table 7).
  • test 14ALG065 Composition of the microalga tested (strain 4, 22-h culture) vs a control soybean meal AA concentrations AA concentrations (gross %) (% dry matter) Soybean Soybean ⁇ A meal ⁇ A meal Dry matter 94.6 89.5 — — Moisture 5.4 10.5 — — Sum of amino acids 51.7 46.9 54.7 52.4 Fat 7.6 5.0 8.0 5.6 Crude fiber n/d 4.2 n/d 4.7 Mineral substances 9.0 5.8 9.5 6.5 Starch ⁇ 0.5 n/a ⁇ 0.5 ⁇ 0.6 Total sugars ⁇ 0.5 n/d ⁇ 0.5 ⁇ 0.6 ADF n/d 3.7 n/d 4.1 NDF n/d 7.2 n/d 8.0 Total dietary fiber (TDF) 12.0 n/d 12.7 n/d Water-insoluble cell 2.0 n/d 2.1 n/d wall (WICW) Calcium 0.109 0.371 0.115 0.415 Phosphorus
  • the sum of amino acids amounts to 54.7% of DM, with more precisely 23.9% DM of essential amino acids and 30.8% DM of nonessential amino acids.
  • Table 8 presents the amino acid concentrations analyzed in the microalga and the soybean meal and expressed as gross values or relative to the sum of amino acids. The results reflect that the microalga has a relatively balanced amino acid profile compared to the control soybean meal.
  • the glutamic acid, arginine and aspartic acid of the “microalga, strain 4, 22-h culture” are present in higher proportions with values (% sum AA) of 26.75%, 9.48% and 8.26%, respectively.
  • the lysine content (% sum AA) is 5.94% in reference to that of the control soybean meal (6.12%).
  • Arginine, methionine and, to a lesser extent, threonine contribute more strongly to the microalga protein tested than to that of the soybean meal (9.48% vs 7.29%, 2.13% vs 1.36%, and 4.27% vs 4.01%, respectively).
  • the microalga cultivated for 22 h has 2.4 points more essential acids than a 49-h culture, or the same content as that of the control soybean meal. Except for arginine, essential amino acids are present in a larger proportion of the sum of amino acids.
  • microalga, strain 4, 22-h culture has methionine, arginine and threonine contents higher than those of the soybean, whereas the lysine and valine contents are equivalent or slightly higher in the microalgal biomass.
  • the concentrations of digestible lysine, methionine, arginine, threonine and valine are higher than those of the control soybean meal. They reflect a good quality of the protein of the microalga tested, superior or equivalent to that of soybean meal.
  • drying process used does not appear to be a factor that denatures the quality of the protein, given the high digestibility coefficients measured for lysine.
  • test 14ALG065 Total nitrogen and amino acid concentrations (gross %), amino acid concentrations relative to the sum of amino acids (% sum AA), standardized ileal digestibility coefficients of amino acids (%) measured in caecectomized cockerels, and digestible amino acid concentrations (gross %) of the microalga tested vs a control soybean meal.
  • microalga, strain 4, 22-h culture The measurement of apparent metabolizable energy (AME) of the microalga “microalga, strain 4, 22-h culture” was performed in 3-week-old chickens (Bourdillon et al., 1990).
  • substitution method was applied starting with a control diet composed of corn-soybean base and premix.
  • the microalga, ground on a 3-mm grid was incorporated in increasing proportions of 4%, 8%, 12%, 16% and 20% in substitution for the corn-soybean mixture, while keeping the premix constant in the diets.
  • the feeds substituted with the microalga are optimally balanced (notably in their protein to energy ratio) on the basis of assumptions regarding AME, digestible amino acids, and bioavailable phosphorus made for the microalga.
  • the outliers ( ⁇ 2.5 standard deviations from the mean) were removed before treatment by analysis of variance (ANOVA, SAS 9.1.3 ⁇ 2002-2003 by SAS Institute Inc., Cary, N.C., USA) according to a factorial design. Dry matter digestibility (dDM) and the apparent digestibility coefficients of nitrogen (DCa nitrogen), phosphorus (DCa phosphorus), calcium (DCa calcium) and fat (DCa fat) are calculated in the same way for each diet.
  • ANOVA analysis of variance
  • the value of the parameter for 100% incorporation of the microalga was extrapolated from the prediction model, thus making it possible to estimate AME and AMEn and the apparent digestibility coefficient of phosphorus of the microalga.
  • Table 10 presents the dry matter digestibility and nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy (AMEn) results of the control corn-soybean feed as well as the substituted diets D2 to D6.
  • the apparent digestibility coefficients of nitrogen (DCa nitrogen), phosphorus (DCa phosphorus), calcium (DCa calcium) and fat (DCa fat) were estimated by the same method.
  • the dry matter digestibility of the various diets is strongly correlated with their AMEn values.
  • the AMEn of corn-soybean diet D1 is measured at 3398 ⁇ 53 kcal/kg DM.
  • the results show that the AMEn value of diet D2 is equivalent to that of the corn-soybean control and reflect that the 4% substitution with the microalga does not impact the energy digestibility of the diet.
  • AMEn and DCa nitrogen decrease linearly with increasing percentages of substitution (p ⁇ 0.0001).
  • microalga shows a reduction in the feed conversion ratio (FCR) over the period 13-23 days. It should also be noted that the chickens tend to consume less (except for D2) for a similar weight gain, however, regardless of the percentage of incorporation of the microalga and higher than that measured for the control corn-soybean diet (Table 11).
  • test 14ALG069 Weight gain, consumption, and feed conversion ratio of the animals over the period 13 to 23 days fed diets substituted with 0%, 4%, 8%, 12%, 16% and 20% of the microalga tested (strain 4, 22-h culture), respectively.
  • the AME and AMEn values of the “microalga, strain 4, 22-h culture” are measured at 2785 kcal/kg DM and 2296 kcal/kg DM, respectively. It should be noted that these values are in the range of the mean in vivo reference values of the AMEn measurement of soybean meal of protein class 46, 48 and 50 of 2303 ⁇ 137, 2348 ⁇ 248, and 2365 ⁇ 178 kcal/kg DM, respectively. Thus, the energy supply provided by this microalga is comparable to that of standard-quality soybean meal.
  • test 14ALG069 A: Apparent metabolizable energy and nitrogen-corrected apparent metabolizable energy of the microalga tested measured in 23-day-old chickens.
  • B In vivo reference values measured according to the same model for various soybean meal protein classes (references from Adisseo, 2012).
  • test 1 the consumption data at each measurement point at 7 and 9 days of age were analyzed according to a paired test procedure (XLSTAT 2010.4.02 ⁇ Addinsoft 1995-2010) considering that the consumption from one feeding dish is dependent on the consumption from the other in each cage.
  • Feed and water are distributed ad libitum throughout the test.
  • the experimental feeds are provided as 3.2-mm-diameter pellets. Consumption is measured at T 0+1h , T 0+2h , T 0+3h , T 0+4h and T 0+0h at 7 and 9 days of age, with the feeding dishes in the cages being switched every hour. Between the two consumption measurements (day 8), the animals receive the wheat-corn-soybean starter.
  • the chicks have access to only one type of feed, optionally supplemented with microalga ( FIG. 6 ).
  • Approximately 400 1-day-old male chicks (Ross PM3) were weighed and distributed by weight group. Two hundred forty selected animals are placed by groups of 4 at day 1 in 60 undivided cages in blocks of homogeneous weight (15 blocks of 4 cages) with one feeding dish per cage, each with an experimental feed (15 repetitions per feed). In each cage, the 4 chicks are identified individually. Feed and water are distributed ad libitum throughout the test.
  • the experimental feeds are corn-soybean starter supplemented with 0%, 5%, 10% or 15% microalga, also used in test 1 with choice of feed.
  • the consumption results show that the “microalga, strain 4, 22-h culture” tested may be included up to 15% in balanced corn-soybean feeds without affecting the performance of 0- to 9-day-old chicks.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Mycology (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Birds (AREA)
  • Natural Medicines & Medicinal Plants (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Dermatology (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Alternative & Traditional Medicine (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Virology (AREA)
US15/744,593 2015-07-17 2016-07-13 Protein-rich biomass of thraustochytrids, culturing method and uses Abandoned US20180208886A1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (3)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FR1556791 2015-07-17
FR1556791A FR3038913B1 (fr) 2015-07-17 2015-07-17 Biomasse de thraustochytrides, procede de culture et utilisations
PCT/EP2016/066590 WO2017012931A1 (fr) 2015-07-17 2016-07-13 Biomasse de thraustochytrides riche en proteines, procede de culture et utilisations

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20180208886A1 true US20180208886A1 (en) 2018-07-26

Family

ID=54608686

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US15/744,593 Abandoned US20180208886A1 (en) 2015-07-17 2016-07-13 Protein-rich biomass of thraustochytrids, culturing method and uses

Country Status (17)

Country Link
US (1) US20180208886A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP3325605B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP2018528785A (fr)
KR (1) KR102691468B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN108026503A (fr)
AU (1) AU2016294730A1 (fr)
BR (1) BR112018000847B1 (fr)
CA (1) CA2992148C (fr)
CO (1) CO2018001420A2 (fr)
FR (1) FR3038913B1 (fr)
IL (1) IL256928B (fr)
MX (1) MX2018000692A (fr)
PH (1) PH12018500130A1 (fr)
RU (1) RU2018103326A (fr)
SG (1) SG11201800120RA (fr)
WO (1) WO2017012931A1 (fr)
ZA (1) ZA201800215B (fr)

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2020074488A1 (fr) * 2018-10-12 2020-04-16 Evonik Operations Gmbh Aliment pour animaux pour améliorer les performances de croissance
WO2020157302A1 (fr) * 2019-02-01 2020-08-06 Adisseo France S.A.S. Utilisation d'une biomasse de thraustochytrides pour maintenir une fonction de barrière intestinale
US11122817B2 (en) 2014-07-25 2021-09-21 Smallfood Inc. Protein rich food ingredient from biomass and methods of production
US11213048B2 (en) 2014-07-25 2022-01-04 Smallfood, Inc. Protein rich food ingredient from biomass and methods of preparation
EP3852544A4 (fr) * 2018-09-21 2022-07-06 Heliae Development LLC Compositions et procédés pour l'introduction d'acides gras à chaînes impaires dans des ufs de volaille
EP4180513A1 (fr) * 2021-11-15 2023-05-17 Indian Oil Corporation Limited Procédé amélioré de production de biomasse algale enrichie

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP6779450B2 (ja) * 2015-10-19 2020-11-04 国立大学法人 筑波大学 スクアレンを蓄積した培養微細藻類を含有する魚介類養殖用飼料
FR3085962B1 (fr) 2018-09-14 2021-06-18 Fermentalg Procede d'extracton d'une huile riche en pufa
KR102614551B1 (ko) * 2020-12-07 2023-12-15 씨제이제일제당 주식회사 단일 미세조류로부터 단백질 및 오메가-3 지방산을 포함하는 바이오매스를 제조하는 방법 및 이에 의해 제조된 바이오매스
KR20230100375A (ko) * 2021-12-28 2023-07-05 씨제이제일제당 (주) 유동성이 개선된 바이오매스 과립 제조방법
KR20230148659A (ko) * 2022-04-18 2023-10-25 씨제이제일제당 (주) 펩신 소화율이 우수한 고단백 미세조류 바이오매스, 배양 방법 및 이의 용도
KR20240092855A (ko) * 2022-12-15 2024-06-24 씨제이제일제당 (주) 미세조류 추출물을 포함하는 세포 배양용 조성물 및 이의 용도
KR20240133410A (ko) * 2023-02-28 2024-09-04 씨제이제일제당 (주) 영양분이 풍부한 미세조류인 스키조키트리움 속 균주를 활용한 연어양식용 배합사료 제조 방법

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5908622A (en) * 1988-09-07 1999-06-01 Omegatech, Inc. Food product containing thraustochytrium and/or schizochytrium microflora and an additional agricultural based ingredient

Family Cites Families (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US7989195B2 (en) 2008-02-20 2011-08-02 Washington State University Research Foundation Heterotrophic algal high cell density production method and system
EP3196309B1 (fr) * 2009-03-19 2019-09-04 DSM IP Assets B.V. Thraustochytrides, compositions d'acides gras et leurs méthodes de fabrication et utilisations
ES2701403T3 (es) * 2009-12-28 2019-02-22 Dsm Ip Assets Bv Traustoquítridos recombinantes que crecen en sacarosa, y composiciones, métodos de preparación y usos de los mismos
CA3153553A1 (fr) * 2009-12-28 2011-07-28 Sanofi Vaccine Technologies, S.A.S. Methodes de production de proteines heterologues comprenant des domaines de membrane dans des corps extracellulaires microalgaux
CN102839129A (zh) * 2011-06-23 2012-12-26 法国罗凯特兄弟公司 一种裂殖壶菌诱变方法及其产生的变异株
FR3008423B1 (fr) * 2013-07-12 2017-12-22 Fermentalg Nouvelle souche de aurantiochytrium
FR3031984B1 (fr) * 2015-01-27 2019-05-24 Roquette Freres Procede d'enrichissement de la biomasse de microalgues du genre traustochytrium en dha et en acides amines arg et glu

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US5908622A (en) * 1988-09-07 1999-06-01 Omegatech, Inc. Food product containing thraustochytrium and/or schizochytrium microflora and an additional agricultural based ingredient

Cited By (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US11122817B2 (en) 2014-07-25 2021-09-21 Smallfood Inc. Protein rich food ingredient from biomass and methods of production
US11213048B2 (en) 2014-07-25 2022-01-04 Smallfood, Inc. Protein rich food ingredient from biomass and methods of preparation
EP3852544A4 (fr) * 2018-09-21 2022-07-06 Heliae Development LLC Compositions et procédés pour l'introduction d'acides gras à chaînes impaires dans des ufs de volaille
WO2020074488A1 (fr) * 2018-10-12 2020-04-16 Evonik Operations Gmbh Aliment pour animaux pour améliorer les performances de croissance
CN112888316A (zh) * 2018-10-12 2021-06-01 赢创运营有限公司 用于改善生长性能的动物饲料
WO2020157302A1 (fr) * 2019-02-01 2020-08-06 Adisseo France S.A.S. Utilisation d'une biomasse de thraustochytrides pour maintenir une fonction de barrière intestinale
WO2020156679A1 (fr) * 2019-02-01 2020-08-06 Adisseo France S.A.S. Utilisation d'une biomasse de thraustochytrides pour le maintien de la fonction de barrière intestinale
EP4180513A1 (fr) * 2021-11-15 2023-05-17 Indian Oil Corporation Limited Procédé amélioré de production de biomasse algale enrichie

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
FR3038913A1 (fr) 2017-01-20
MX2018000692A (es) 2018-09-06
JP2018528785A (ja) 2018-10-04
WO2017012931A1 (fr) 2017-01-26
EP3325605A1 (fr) 2018-05-30
KR20180029249A (ko) 2018-03-20
PH12018500130A1 (en) 2018-07-23
EP3325605B1 (fr) 2023-09-06
IL256928A (en) 2018-03-29
KR102691468B1 (ko) 2024-08-05
SG11201800120RA (en) 2018-02-27
BR112018000847A2 (pt) 2018-09-04
CO2018001420A2 (es) 2018-11-22
ZA201800215B (en) 2023-10-25
IL256928B (en) 2021-03-25
CA2992148C (fr) 2024-01-02
AU2016294730A1 (en) 2018-01-25
BR112018000847B1 (pt) 2024-02-15
CN108026503A (zh) 2018-05-11
CA2992148A1 (fr) 2017-01-26
RU2018103326A (ru) 2019-08-19
FR3038913B1 (fr) 2020-05-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20180208886A1 (en) Protein-rich biomass of thraustochytrids, culturing method and uses
EP2371226B1 (fr) Adjuvant de sels biliaires pour animaux, destiné à améliorer l'efficacité d'utilisation des graisses dans le corps des animaux
CN103750055B (zh) 哺乳期母猪专用饲料
CN109072169B (zh) 富含油和蛋白质的破囊壶菌生物质、培养方法及用途
CN101530159A (zh) 一种养殖动物用饲料添加剂及其应用
CN105767571A (zh) 一种小球藻蛋鸡饲料及其饲喂方法
Nikolaev et al. Poultry Product Manufacturing Using By-Products of Fat-and-Oil Industry
Thanapal et al. Influence of low and high-density diets with yeast supplementation on feed intake, nutrient digestibility, egg production and egg quality in hy-line brown laying hens
Omar Economic evaluation of using dried Brewer's yeast as feed additives for two broiler breeds
RU2717991C1 (ru) Белковая кормовая добавка для сельскохозяйственных животных и рыб
Ansaripoor et al. Optimization of growth performance responses of Japanese quail with different concentrations of metabolizable energy, lysine, and sulfur amino acids using Taguchi method
Abun et al. The effect of Lacto-B probiotics on broiler chicken performance
Billah et al. Supplementation of Spirulina platensis in feed and water for the performance of broiler.
Ardiansyah et al. Effect of adding cassava peel and lactic acid bacteria as a feed additive to the weight of immune organs of super native chicken
Ovchinnikov et al. Incubation qualities of the eggs of the laying hens of the parent herd when using probiotics in the diet
Nath et al. Growth performance and serum biochemical responses of commercial broilers fed diets containing rubber seed and yeast
RU2808121C1 (ru) Способ кормления цыплят-бройлеров при использовании кормовой добавки с пробиотической активностью
Churyumova et al. Effect of feeding probiotic and vitamin U on poultry egg production
Ambarwati et al. Effect of dietary supplementation with flying fish (exocoetidae) silage on the egg quality and duck performance
RU2762877C1 (ru) Способ повышения биологической ценности мяса перепелов
RU2722509C1 (ru) Энергетическая кормовая добавка
Wan et al. Growth Performance of Broiler Quails Fed with Enriched Probiotic Feed
Maoba et al. Serum biochemical values of indigenous Boschveld chickens in response to baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) supplementation.
Lalev et al. Investigation of dietary probiotic effects on productive traits in broiler breeders
Kutlieva et al. INFLUENCE OF THE FUNCTIONAL PROBIOTIC FEED ADDITIVE “PROBIOCELL” ON THE GROWTH AND DEVELOPMENT, PHYSIOLOGICAL INDICATORS AND MEAT PRODUCTIVITY OF RABBITS

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: ADISSEO FRANCE SAS, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CAGNAC, OLIVIER;ROLS, CYRIL;PAGLIARDINI, JULIEN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20180115 TO 20180212;REEL/FRAME:045006/0090

Owner name: FERMENTALG, FRANCE

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:CAGNAC, OLIVIER;ROLS, CYRIL;PAGLIARDINI, JULIEN;AND OTHERS;SIGNING DATES FROM 20180115 TO 20180212;REEL/FRAME:045006/0090

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: ADVISORY ACTION MAILED

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: APPEAL BRIEF (OR SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF) ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: EXAMINER'S ANSWER TO APPEAL BRIEF MAILED

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: APPEAL READY FOR REVIEW

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: ON APPEAL -- AWAITING DECISION BY THE BOARD OF APPEALS

STCV Information on status: appeal procedure

Free format text: BOARD OF APPEALS DECISION RENDERED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: DOCKETED NEW CASE - READY FOR EXAMINATION

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: NON FINAL ACTION MAILED

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: RESPONSE TO NON-FINAL OFFICE ACTION ENTERED AND FORWARDED TO EXAMINER

STPP Information on status: patent application and granting procedure in general

Free format text: FINAL REJECTION MAILED

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION