US20050086718A1 - Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress - Google Patents

Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress Download PDF

Info

Publication number
US20050086718A1
US20050086718A1 US10/675,852 US67585203A US2005086718A1 US 20050086718 A1 US20050086718 A1 US 20050086718A1 US 67585203 A US67585203 A US 67585203A US 2005086718 A1 US2005086718 A1 US 2005086718A1
Authority
US
United States
Prior art keywords
plant
sequence
polypeptide
sequences
domain
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Abandoned
Application number
US10/675,852
Other languages
English (en)
Inventor
Jacqueline Heard
James Keddie
Robert Creelman
Omaira Pineda
Cai-Zhong Jiang
Oliver Ratcliffe
Roderick Kumimoto
Neal Gutterson
Bradley Sherman
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Mendel Biotechnology Inc
Original Assignee
Mendel Biotechnology Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Priority claimed from US10/112,887 external-priority patent/US20030188330A1/en
Priority claimed from US10/225,066 external-priority patent/US7238860B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/225,068 external-priority patent/US7193129B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/286,264 external-priority patent/US20030093837A1/en
Priority claimed from US10/374,780 external-priority patent/US7511190B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/412,699 external-priority patent/US7345217B2/en
Priority claimed from US10/666,642 external-priority patent/US7196245B2/en
Priority to US10/675,852 priority Critical patent/US20050086718A1/en
Application filed by Mendel Biotechnology Inc filed Critical Mendel Biotechnology Inc
Assigned to MENDEL BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. reassignment MENDEL BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC. ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST (SEE DOCUMENT FOR DETAILS). Assignors: PINEDA, OMALRA, JIANG, CAI-ZHONG, HEARD, JACQUELINE E., CREELMAN, ROBERT A., KEDDIE, JAMES S., KUMIMOTO, RODERICK W., RATCLIFFE, OLIVER, SHERMAN, BRADLEY K., GULTERSON, NEAL I.
Priority to BRPI0407822-5A priority patent/BRPI0407822B1/pt
Priority to US10/546,266 priority patent/US7659446B2/en
Priority to PCT/US2004/005654 priority patent/WO2004076638A2/fr
Priority to AU2004214935A priority patent/AU2004214935B2/en
Priority to CA2937101A priority patent/CA2937101A1/fr
Priority to CA2516645A priority patent/CA2516645C/fr
Priority to EP04714657A priority patent/EP1601758B1/fr
Priority to US11/069,255 priority patent/US8558059B2/en
Publication of US20050086718A1 publication Critical patent/US20050086718A1/en
Priority to US11/705,903 priority patent/US7868229B2/en
Priority to US11/981,813 priority patent/US8633353B2/en
Priority to US12/077,535 priority patent/US8030546B2/en
Priority to US12/157,329 priority patent/US7956242B2/en
Priority to US12/169,527 priority patent/US7960612B2/en
Priority to US13/244,288 priority patent/US20120137382A1/en
Priority to US13/448,329 priority patent/US20130031669A1/en
Priority to US14/480,473 priority patent/US20150135360A1/en
Priority to US15/347,676 priority patent/US10597667B2/en
Abandoned legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
    • C12N15/8214—Plastid transformation
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
    • C07K—PEPTIDES
    • C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
    • C07K14/415—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from plants
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8216—Methods for controlling, regulating or enhancing expression of transgenes in plant cells
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8242—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
    • C12N15/8243—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine
    • C12N15/8247—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine involving modified lipid metabolism, e.g. seed oil composition
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8242—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits
    • C12N15/8243—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with non-agronomic quality (output) traits, e.g. for industrial processing; Value added, non-agronomic traits involving biosynthetic or metabolic pathways, i.e. metabolic engineering, e.g. nicotine, caffeine
    • C12N15/8251—Amino acid content, e.g. synthetic storage proteins, altering amino acid biosynthesis
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8262—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield involving plant development
    • C12N15/8267—Seed dormancy, germination or sprouting
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8273—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for drought, cold, salt resistance
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8274—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for herbicide resistance
    • C12N15/8275—Glyphosate
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
    • C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
    • C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
    • C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
    • C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
    • C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
    • C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
    • C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
    • C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
    • C12N15/8279—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance
    • C12N15/8282—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for biotic stress resistance, pathogen resistance, disease resistance for fungal resistance
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A—TECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A40/00—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production
    • Y02A40/10—Adaptation technologies in agriculture, forestry, livestock or agroalimentary production in agriculture
    • Y02A40/146—Genetically Modified [GMO] plants, e.g. transgenic plants

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to compositions and methods for modifying a plant phenotypically, said plant having altered sugar sensing and an altered response to abiotic stresses, including osmotic stresses, including germination in cold and heat, increased tolerance to drought and high salt stress.
  • a plant's traits such as its biochemical, developmental, or phenotypic characteristics, may be controlled through a number of cellular processes.
  • One important way to manipulate that control is through transcription factors, proteins that influence the expression of a particular gene or sets of genes.
  • Transformed and transgenic plants that comprise cells having altered levels of at least one selected transcription factor, for example, possess advantageous or desirable traits.
  • Strategies for manipulating traits by altering a plant cell's transcription factor content can therefore result in plants and crops with new and/or improved commercially valuable properties.
  • Transcription factors can modulate gene expression, either increasing or decreasing (inducing or repressing) the rate of transcription. This modulation results in differential levels of gene expression at various developmental stages, in different tissues and cell types, and in response to different exogenous (e.g., environmental) and endogenous stimuli throughout the life cycle of the organism.
  • transcription factors are key controlling elements of biological pathways, altering the expression levels of one or more transcription factors can change entire biological pathways in an organism. For example, manipulation of the levels of selected transcription factors may result in increased expression of economically useful proteins or biomolecules in plants or improvement in other agriculturally relevant characteristics. Conversely, blocked or reduced expression of a transcription factor may reduce biosynthesis of unwanted compounds or remove an undesirable trait. Therefore, manipulating transcription factor levels in a plant offers tremendous potential in agricultural biotechnology for modifying a plant's traits, including traits that improve a plant's survival and yield during periods of abiotic stress, including germination in cold and hot conditions, and osmotic stress, including drought, salt stress, and other abiotic stresses, as noted below.
  • a drought is a period of abnormally dry weather that persists long enough to produce a serious hydrologic imbalance (for example crop damage, water supply shortage, etc.). While much of the weather that we experience is brief and short-lived, drought is a more gradual phenomenon, slowly taking hold of an area and tightening its grip with time. In severe cases, drought can last for many years and can have devastating effects on agriculture and water supplies. With burgeoning population and chronic shortage of available fresh water, drought is not only the number one weather related problem in agriculture, it also ranks as one of the major natural disasters of all time, causing not only economic damage, but also loss of human lives.
  • Heat shock may produce a decrease in overall protein synthesis, accompanied by expression of heat shock proteins.
  • Heat shock proteins function as chaperones and are involved in refolding proteins denatured by heat.
  • chilling sensitivity has been used to describe many types of physiological damage produced at low, but above freezing, temperatures. Most crops of tropical origins, such as soybean, rice, maize and cotton are easily damaged by chilling. Typical chilling damage includes wilting, necrosis, chlorosis or leakage of ions from cell membranes. The underlying mechanisms of chilling sensitivity are not completely understood yet, but probably involve the level of membrane saturation and other physiological deficiencies. For example, photoinhibition of photosynthesis (disruption of photosynthesis due to high light intensities) often occurs under clear atmospheric conditions subsequent to cold late summer/autumn nights. For example, chilling may lead to yield losses and lower product quality through the delayed ripening of maize.
  • Sugars are key regulatory molecules that affect diverse processes in higher plants including germination, growth, flowering, senescence, sugar metabolism and photosynthesis.
  • Sucrose for example, is the major transport form of photosynthate and its flux through cells has been shown to affect gene expression and alter storage compound accumulation in seeds (source-sink relationships).
  • Glucose-specific hexose-sensing has also been described in plants and is implicated in cell division and repression of “famine” genes (photosynthetic or glyoxylate cycles).
  • Water deficit is a common component of many plant stresses. Water deficit occurs in plant cells when the whole plant transpiration rate exceeds the water uptake. In addition to drought, other stresses, such as salinity and low temperature, produce cellular dehydration (McCue and Hanson (1990) Trends Biotechnol. 8: 358-362
  • Salt and drought stress signal transduction consist of ionic and osmotic homeostasis signaling pathways.
  • the ionic aspect of salt stress is signaled via the SOS pathway where a calcium-responsive SOS3-SOS2 protein kinase complex controls the expression and activity of ion transporters such as SOS1.
  • SOS1 calcium-responsive SOS3-SOS2 protein kinase complex controls the expression and activity of ion transporters such as SOS1.
  • SOS1 calcium-responsive SOS3-SOS2 protein kinase complex controls the expression and activity of ion transporters such as SOS1.
  • SOS1 calcium-responsive SOS3-SOS2 protein kinase complex controls the expression and activity of ion transporters
  • the osmotic component of salt stress involves complex plant reactions that overlap with drought and/or cold stress responses.
  • Abscisic acid biosynthesis is regulated by osmotic stress at multiple steps. Both ABA-dependent and -independent osmotic stress signaling first modify constitutively expressed transcription factors, leading to the expression of early response transcriptional activators, which then activate downstream stress tolerance effector genes.
  • the present invention relates to methods and compositions for producing transgenic plants with modified traits, particularly traits that address agricultural and food needs.
  • modified traits including altered sugar sensing and tolerance to abiotic and osmotic stress (e.g., tolerance to cold, high salt concentrations and drought), may provide significant value in that they allow the plant to thrive in hostile environments, where, for example, high or low temperature, low water availability or high salinity may limit or prevent growth of non-transgenic plants.
  • the present invention pertains to transgenic plants that comprise a recombinant polynucleotide that includes a nucleotide sequence encoding a CCAAT transcription factor with the ability to regulate abiotic stress tolerance in a plant.
  • the nucleotide sequence is capable of hybridizing to the complement of the G482 polynucleotide sequence (SEQ ID NO:3) under stringent conditions consisting of hybridization (e.g., to filter-bound DNA, such as a hybridization procedure that includes the use of 6 ⁇ SSC, 65° C., in two wash steps of 10-30 minutes in duration.
  • hybridization e.g., to filter-bound DNA, such as a hybridization procedure that includes the use of 6 ⁇ SSC, 65° C., in two wash steps of 10-30 minutes in duration.
  • the resultant transgenic plant has increased tolerance to abiotic stress as compared to a non-transformed plant.
  • the invention also encompasses transgenic plant that comprise a recombinant polynucleotide that includes a nucleotide sequence encoding a CCAAT transcription factor with the ability to regulate abiotic stress tolerance in a plant; the transcription factor comprising a CCAAT-box binding conserved domain that is at least 83% identical with the conserved CCAAT-box binding or “B” domain of the G482 polypeptide (SEQ ID NO: 4).
  • This transgenic plant has increased tolerance to abiotic stress as compared to a non-transformed plant that does not overexpress the recombinant polynucleotide.
  • the present invention also relates to a method of using transgenic plants transformed with the presently disclosed transcription factor sequences, their complements or their variants to grow a progeny plant by crossing the transgenic plant with either itself or another plant, selecting seed that develops as a result of the crossing; and then growing the progeny plant from the seed.
  • the progeny plant will generally express mRNA that encodes a transcription factor: that is, a DNA-binding protein that binds to a DNA regulatory sequence and regulates gene expression, such as that of a plant trait gene.
  • the mRNA will generally be expressed at a level greater than a non-transformed plant; and the progeny plant is characterized by a change in a plant trait compared to the non-transformed plant.
  • the present invention also pertains to an expression cassette.
  • the expression cassette comprises at least two elements, including: (1) a constitutive, inducible, or tissue-specific promoter; and (2) a recombinant polynucleotide having a polynucleotide sequence, or a complementary polynucleotide sequence thereof, selected from the group consisting of
  • the invention is also characterized by a host cell that contains the aforementioned expression cassette.
  • the present invention also pertains to methods for increasing a plant's tolerance to abiotic stress. This is accomplished through the use of a vector that comprises a polynucleotide sequence that hybridizes over its full length to the complement of the G482 polynucleotide (SEQ ID NO:3) under the stringent conditions of hybridization to filter-bound DNA in 6 ⁇ SSC at 65° C.
  • the polynucleotide sequence encodes a CCAAT transcription factor that has the property of SEQ ID NO:4 of regulating abiotic stress tolerance in a plant.
  • the vector also includes regulatory elements that control expression of the polynucleotide sequence in a target plant. These regulatory elements flank the polynucleotide sequence.
  • the target plant is then transformed with the vector, which transformation process generates a plant with increased tolerance to osmotic stress.
  • the invention is also directed to a method for producing a plant that has increased tolerance to one or more osmotic stresses.
  • This method is performed by selecting a polynucleotide that encodes the G482 polypeptide (SEQ ID NO: 4), inserting either this polynucleotide or its complement into an expression cassette (for example, the expression cassette described above), introducing the expression cassette into a plant or plant cell in order to overexpress the G482 polypeptide, which thereby produces a plant having increased tolerance to osmotic stress.
  • a plant that has this increased tolerance relative to a control plant not so transformed may then be identified and selected.
  • the invention further pertains to an isolated nucleic acid comprising a nucleotide sequence at least 99.6% identical to G482, SEQ ID NO: 3, wherein the expression of this nucleotide sequence results in increased abiotic stress tolerance in a plant.
  • polypeptides encoded by isolated nucleic acids that are at least 99.6% identical to G482 vectors comprising isolated nucleic acid that are at least 99.6% identical to G482, and host cells and transgenic plants transformed with these isolated nucleic acids.
  • Sequence Listing provides exemplary polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences of the invention. The traits associated with the use of the sequences are included in the Examples.
  • CD-ROM1 is a read-only memory computer-readable compact disc and contains a copy of the Sequence Listing in ASCII text format.
  • the Sequence Listing is named “MBI0022CIP.ST25.txt” and is 163 kilobytes in size.
  • the copies of the Sequence Listing on the CD-ROM disc are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety.
  • FIG. 1 shows a conservative estimate of phylogenetic relationships among the orders of flowering plants (modified from Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (1998) Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 84: 1-49). Those plants with a single cotyledon (monocots) are a monophyletic clade nested within at least two major lineages of dicots; the eudicots are further divided into rosids and asterids. Arabidopsis is a rosid eudicot classified within the order Brassicales; rice is a member of the monocot order Poales.
  • FIG. 1 was adapted from Daly et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 1328-1333.
  • FIG. 2 shows a phylogenic dendogram depicting phylogenetic relationships of higher plant taxa, including clades containing tomato and Arabidopsis; adapted from Ku et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 97: 9121-9126; and Chase et al. (1993) Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 80: 528-580.
  • FIG. 3 is adapted from Kwong et al (2003) Plant Cell 15: 5-18, and shows crop orthologs identified through BLAST analysis of various L1L-related sequences.
  • a phylogeny tree was then generated using ClustaIX based on whole protein sequences showing the non-LEC1-like HAP3 clade of transcription factors (large box).
  • This clade also contains members from other species (for example, SEQ ID NOs: 18, 20, 24, 26, 48, 50, 52, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, and other sequences appearing in Table 5) are phylogenetically distinct from the LEC 1-like proteins, some of which are also shown in FIG. 3 .
  • the smaller box delineates the G482-like subclade, containing transcription factors that are structurally most closely related to G482, and in which several members have been shown to confer improved abiotic stress tolerance and/or altered flowering time characteristics.
  • FIG. 4 shows the phylogenic relationship of sequences within the G482-subclade (within the smaller box) and the non-LEC1-like clade (larger box).
  • FIG. 5 shows the domain structure of HAP3 proteins.
  • HAP3 proteins contain an amino-terminal A domain, a central B domain, and a carboxy-terminal C domain. There may be relatively little sequence similarity between HAP3 proteins in the A and C domains. The A and C domains could thus provide a degree of specificity to each member of the HAP3 family.
  • the B domain is the conserved region that specifies DNA binding and subunit association.
  • FIGS. 6A-6F the alignments of HAP3 polypeptides are presented, including G481, G482, G485, G1364, G2345, G1781 and related sequences from Arabidopsis aligned with soybean, rice and corn sequences, showing the B domains (indicated by the line that spans FIGS. 6B through 6D ).
  • Consensus residues within the listed sequences are indicated by boldface.
  • the boldfaced residues in the consensus sequence that appears at the bottom of FIGS. 6A through 6C in their respective positions are uniquely found in the non-LEC1-like clade.
  • the underlined serine residue appearing in the consensus sequence in its respective positions is uniquely found within the G482-like subclade.
  • the residue positions indicated by the arrows in FIG. 6B are associated with an alteration of flowering time when these polypeptides are overexpressed.
  • FIGS. 7A-7D show the effects of water deprivation and recovery from this treatment on Arabidopsis control and 35S::G481-overexpressing lines.
  • Overexpressing plants had a darker green and less withered appearance ( FIG. 7C ) than those in the control group ( FIG. 7A ).
  • the differences in appearance between the control and G481-overexpressing plants after they were rewatered was even more striking.
  • Most (11 of 12 plants; FIG. 7 B) of this set of control plants died after rewatering, indicating the inability to recover following severe water deprivation, whereas all nine of the overexpressor plants of the line shown recovered from this drought treatment ( FIG. 7D ).
  • the results shown in FIGS. 7A-7D were typical of a number of control and 35 S::G481-overexpressing lines.
  • FIGS. 8A and 8B show the effects of salt stress on Arabidopsis seed germination.
  • the three lines of G481-and G482 overexpressors on these two plate had longer roots and showed greater cotyledon expansion (arrows) after three days on 150 mM NaCl than the control seedlings on the right-hand sides of the plates.
  • FIG. 9A G481 null mutant seedlings (labeled K481) show reduced tolerance of osmotic stress, relative to the control seedlings in FIG. 8B , as evidenced by the reduced cotyledon expansion and root growth in the former group. Without salt stress tolerance on control media, ( FIGS. 9C , G481 null mutants; and 9 D, control seedlings), the knocked out and control plants appear the same.
  • FIGS. 10A-10D show the effects of stress-related treatments on G485 overexpressing seedlings (35S::G485 lines) in plate assays.
  • the overexpressors fared much better than the wild-type controls exposed to the same treatments in FIGS. 10E-10H , respectively, as evidenced by the enhanced cotyledon expansion and root growth seen with the overexpressing seedlings.
  • FIGS. 11A-11C depict the effects of G485 knockout and overexpression on flowering time and maturation.
  • a T-DNA insertion knockout mutation containing a SALK — 062245 insertion was shown to flower several days later than wild-type control plants.
  • the plants in FIG. 11A are shown 44 days after germination.
  • FIG. 11C shows that G485 primary transformants flowered distinctly earlier than wild-type controls. These plants are shown 24 days after germination. These effects were observed in each of two independent T1 plantings derived from separate transformation dates. Additionally, accelerated flowering was also seen in plants that overexpressed G485 from a two component system (35S::LexA;op-LexA::G485).
  • G485 is both sufficient to act as a floral activator, and is also necessary in that role within the plant. G485 overexpressor plants also matured and set siliques much more rapidly than wild type controls, as shown in FIG. 11B with plants 39 days post-germination.
  • the present invention relates to polynucleotides and polypeptides, for example, for modifying phenotypes of plants, particularly those associated with osmotic stress tolerance.
  • various information sources are referred to and/or are specifically incorporated.
  • the information sources include scientific journal articles, patent documents, textbooks, and World Wide Web browser-inactive page addresses, for example. While the reference to these information sources clearly indicates that they can be used by one of skill in the art, each and every one of the information sources cited herein are specifically incorporated in their entirety, whether or not a specific mention of “incorporation by reference” is noted. The contents and teachings of each and every one of the information sources can be relied on and used to make and use embodiments of the invention.
  • Nucleic acid molecule refers to a oligonucleotide, polynucleotide or any fragment thereof. It may be DNA or RNA of genomic or synthetic origin, double-stranded or single-stranded, and combined with carbohydrate, lipids, protein, or other materials to perform a particular activity such as transformation or form a useful composition such as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA).
  • PNA peptide nucleic acid
  • Polynucleotide is a nucleic acid molecule comprising a plurality of polymerized nucleotides, e.g., at least about 15 consecutive polymerized nucleotides, optionally at least about 30 consecutive nucleotides, at least about 50 consecutive nucleotides.
  • a polynucleotide may be a nucleic acid, oligonucleotide, nucleotide, or any fragment thereof.
  • a polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide (or protein) or a domain or fragment thereof.
  • the polynucleotide may comprise a promoter, an intron, an enhancer region, a polyadenylation site, a translation initiation site, 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions, a reporter gene, a selectable marker, or the like.
  • the polynucleotide can be single stranded or double stranded DNA or RNA.
  • the polynucleotide optionally comprises modified bases or a modified backbone.
  • the polynucleotide can be, e.g., genomic DNA or RNA, a transcript (such as an mRNA), a cDNA, a PCR product, a cloned DNA, a synthetic DNA or RNA, or the like.
  • the polynucleotide can be combined with carbohydrate, lipids, protein, or other materials to perform a particular activity such as transformation or form a useful composition such as a peptide nucleic acid (PNA).
  • PNA peptide nucleic acid
  • the polynucleotide can comprise a sequence in either sense or antisense orientations. “Oligonucleotide” is substantially equivalent to the terms amplimer, primer, oligomer, element, target, and probe and is preferably single stranded.
  • Gene refers to the partial or complete coding sequence of a gene, its complement, and its 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions.
  • a gene is also a functional unit of inheritance, and in physical terms is a particular segment or sequence of nucleotides along a molecule of DNA (or RNA, in the case of RNA viruses) involved in producing a polypeptide chain. The latter may be subjected to subsequent processing such as splicing and folding to obtain a functional protein or polypeptide.
  • a gene may be isolated, partially isolated, or be found with an organism's genome.
  • a transcription factor gene encodes a transcription factor polypeptide, which may be functional or require processing to function as an initiator of transcription.
  • genes may be defined by the cis-trans test, a genetic test that determines whether two mutations occur in the same gene and which may be used to determine the limits of the genetically active unit (Rieger et al. (1976) Glossary of Genetics and Cytogenetics: Classical and Molecular, 4th ed., Springer Verlag. Berlin).
  • a gene generally includes regions preceding (“leaders”; upstream) and following (“trailers”; downstream) of the coding region.
  • a gene may also include intervening, non-coding sequences, referred to as “introns”, located between individual coding segments, referred to as “exons”. Most genes have an associated promoter region, a regulatory sequence 5′ of the transcription initiation codon (there are some genes that do not have an identifiable promoter). The function of a gene may also be regulated by enhancers, operators, and other regulatory elements.
  • a “recombinant polynucleotide” is a polynucleotide that is not in its native state, e.g., the polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequence not found in nature, or the polynucleotide is in a context other than that in which it is naturally found, e.g., separated from nucleotide sequences with which it typically is in proximity in nature, or adjacent (or contiguous with) nucleotide sequences with which it typically is not in proximity.
  • the sequence at issue can be cloned into a vector, or otherwise recombined with one or more additional nucleic acid.
  • isolated polynucleotide is a polynucleotide whether naturally occurring or recombinant, that is present outside the cell in which it is typically found in nature, whether purified or not.
  • an isolated polynucleotide is subject to one or more enrichment or purification procedures, e.g., cell lysis, extraction, centrifugation, precipitation, or the like.
  • a “polypeptide” is an amino acid sequence comprising a plurality of consecutive polymerized amino acid residues e.g., at least about 15 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues, optionally at least about 30 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues, at least about 50 consecutive polymerized amino acid residues.
  • a polypeptide comprises a polymerized amino acid residue sequence that is a transcription factor or a domain or portion or fragment thereof. Additionally, the polypeptide may comprise 1) a localization domain, 2) an activation domain, 3) a repression domain, 4) an oligomerization domain, or 5) a DNA-binding domain, or the like.
  • the polypeptide optionally comprises modified amino acid residues, naturally occurring amino acid residues not encoded by a codon, non-naturally occurring amino acid residues.
  • Protein refers to an amino acid sequence, oligopeptide, peptide, polypeptide or portions thereof whether naturally occurring or synthetic.
  • “Portion”, as used herein, refers to any part of a protein used for any purpose, but especially for the screening of a library of molecules which specifically bind to that portion or for the production of antibodies.
  • a “recombinant polypeptide” is a polypeptide produced by translation of a recombinant polynucleotide.
  • a “synthetic polypeptide” is a polypeptide created by consecutive polymerization of isolated amino acid residues using methods well known in the art.
  • the isolated polypeptide is separated from other cellular components with which it is typically associated, e.g., by any of the various protein purification methods herein.
  • “Homology” refers to sequence similarity between a reference sequence and at least a fragment of a newly sequenced clone insert or its encoded amino acid sequence.
  • Hybridization complex refers to a complex between two nucleic acid molecules by virtue of the formation of hydrogen bonds between purines and pyrimidines.
  • Identity or similarity refers to sequence similarity between two polynucleotide sequences or between two polypeptide sequences, with identity being a more strict comparison.
  • the phrases “percent identity” and “% identity” refer to the percentage of sequence similarity found in a comparison of two or more polynucleotide sequences or two or more polypeptide sequences.
  • Sequence similarity refers to the percent similarity in base pair sequence (as determined by any suitable method) between two or more polynucleotide sequences. Two or more sequences can be anywhere from 0-100% similar, or any integer value therebetween. Identity or similarity can be determined by comparing a position in each sequence that may be aligned for purposes of comparison.
  • a degree of similarity or identity between polynucleotide sequences is a function of the number of identical or matching nucleotides at positions shared by the polynucleotide sequences.
  • a degree of identity of polypeptide sequences is a function of the number of identical amino acids at positions shared by the polypeptide sequences.
  • a degree of homology or similarity of polypeptide sequences is a function of the number of amino acids at positions shared by the polypeptide sequences.
  • amino acid consensus motif refers to the portion or subsequence of a polypeptide sequence that is substantially conserved among the polypeptide transcription factors listed in the Sequence Listing.
  • “Alignment” refers to a number of nucleotide bases or amino acid residue sequences aligned by lengthwise comparison so that components in common (ire., nucleotide bases or amino acid residues) may be visually and readily identified. The fraction or percentage of components in common is related to the homology or identity between the sequences. Alignments such as those of FIGS. 6A-6F may be used to identify conserved domains and relatedness within these domains. An alignment may suitably be determined by means of computer programs known in the art, such as MACVECTOR software (1999) (Accelrys, Inc., San Diego, Calif.).
  • a “conserved domain” or “conserved region” as used herein refers to a region in heterologous polynucleotide or polypeptide sequences where there is a relatively high degree of sequence identity between the distinct sequences.
  • a CCAAT-box binding conserved domain such as one of the domains shown in Table 1, is an example of a conserved domain.
  • a conserved domain is preferably at least 10 base pairs (bp) in length.
  • a “conserved domain”, with respect to presently disclosed polypeptides refers to a domain within a transcription factor family that exhibits a higher degree of sequence homology, such as at least 26% sequence similarity, at least 16% sequence identity, preferably at least 40% sequence identity, preferably at least 65% sequence identity including conservative substitutions, and more preferably at least 80% sequence identity, and even more preferably at least 85%, or at least about 86%, or at least about 87%, or at least about 88%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95%, or at least about 98% amino acid residue sequence identity of a polypeptide of consecutive amino acid residues.
  • a fragment or domain can be referred to as outside a conserved domain, outside a consensus sequence, or outside a consensus DNA-binding site that is known to exist or that exists for a particular transcription factor class, family, or sub-family.
  • the fragment or domain will not include the exact amino acids of a consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site of a transcription factor class, family or sub-family, or the exact amino acids of a particular transcription factor consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site.
  • conserved domains may be identified as regions or domains of identity to a specific consensus sequence (see, for example, Riechmann et al. (2000) supra). Thus, by using alignment methods well known in the art, the conserved domains of the plant transcription factors for the CAAT-element binding proteins (Forsburg and Guarente (1989) Genes Dev. 3: 1166-1178) may be determined.
  • the CCAAT-box binding conserved domains or conserved domains for SEQ ID NO: 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 and similar sequences are listed in Table 1. Also, the polypeptides of Table 1 have CCAAT-box binding conserved domains specifically indicated by start and stop sites. A comparison of the regions of the polypeptides in Table 1 allows one of skill in the art to identify “B” or CCAAT-box binding conserved domains, or conserved domains for any of the polypeptides listed or referred to in this disclosure.
  • “Complementary” refers to the natural hydrogen bonding by base pairing between purines and pyrimidines.
  • sequence A-C-G-T (5′->3′) forms hydrogen bonds with its complements A-C-G-T (5′->3′) or A-C-G-U (5′->3′).
  • Two single-stranded molecules may be considered partially complementary, if only some of the nucleotides bond, or “completely complementary” if all of the nucleotides bond. The degree of complementarity between nucleic acid strands affects the efficiency and strength of the hybridization and amplification reactions.
  • “Fully complementary” refers to the case where bonding occurs between every base pair and its complement in a pair of sequences, and the two sequences have the same number of nucleotides.
  • highly stringent or “highly stringent condition” refer to conditions that permit hybridization of DNA strands whose sequences are highly complementary, wherein these same conditions exclude hybridization of significantly mismatched DNAs.
  • Polynucleotide sequences capable of hybridizing under stringent conditions with the polynucleotides of the present invention may be, for example, variants of the disclosed polynucleotide sequences, including allelic or splice variants, or sequences that encode orthologs or paralogs of presently disclosed polypeptides. Nucleic acid hybridization methods are disclosed in detail by Kashima et al. (1985) Nature 313:402404, and Sambrook et al.
  • stringency is determined by the temperature, ionic strength, and concentration of denaturing agents (e.g., formamide) used in a hybridization and washing procedure (for a more detailed description of establishing and determining stringency, see below).
  • denaturing agents e.g., formamide
  • the degree to which two nucleic acids hybridize under various conditions of stringency is correlated with the extent of their similarity.
  • similar nucleic acid sequences from a variety of sources such as within a plant's genome (as in the case of paralogs) or from another plant (as in the case of orthologs) that may perform similar functions can be isolated on the basis of their ability to hybridize with known transcription factor sequences.
  • nucleic acid hybridization can be performed to isolate transcription factor sequences having similarity to transcription factor sequences known in the art and are not limited to those explicitly disclosed herein.
  • Such an approach may be used to isolate polynucleotide sequences having various degrees of similarity with disclosed transcription factor sequences, such as, for example, encoded transcription factors having 60% or greater identity with disclosed transcription factors, or 83% or greater identity with the B domain of disclosed transcription factors.
  • Sequences that are sufficiently similar to one another will be appreciated by those of skill in the art and may be based upon percentage identity of the complete sequences, percentage identity of a conserved domain or sequence within the complete sequence, percentage similarity to the complete sequence, percentage similarity to a conserved domain or sequence within the complete sequence, and/or an arrangement of contiguous nucleotides or peptides particular to a conserved domain or complete sequence. Sequences that are sufficiently similar to one another will also bind in a similar manner to the same DNA binding sites of transcriptional regulatory elements using methods well known to those of skill in the art.
  • equivalog describes members of a set of homologous proteins that are conserved with respect to function since their last common ancestor. Related proteins are grouped into equivalog families, and otherwise into protein families with other hierarchically defined homology types. This definition is provided at the Institute for Genomic Research (TIGR) world wide web (www) website, “tigr.org ” under the heading “Terms associated with TIGRFAMs”.
  • TIGR Institute for Genomic Research
  • variant may refer to polynucleotides or polypeptides, that differ from the presently disclosed polynucleotides or polypeptides, respectively, in sequence from each other, and as set forth below.
  • polynucleotide variants differences between presently disclosed polynucleotides and polynucleotide variants are limited so that the nucleotide sequences of the former and the latter are closely similar overall and, in many regions, identical. Due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, differences between the former and latter nucleotide sequences o may be silent (i.e., the amino acids encoded by the polynucleotide are the same, and the variant polynucleotide sequence encodes the same amino acid sequence as the presently disclosed polynucleotide.
  • Variant nucleotide sequences may encode different amino acid sequences, in which case such nucleotide differences will result in amino acid substitutions, additions, deletions, insertions, truncations or fusions with respect to the similar disclosed polynucleotide sequences. These variations result in polynucleotide variants encoding polypeptides that share at least one functional characteristic. The degeneracy of the genetic code also dictates that many different variant polynucleotides can encode identical and/or substantially similar polypeptides in addition to those sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing.
  • a variant of a transcription factor nucleic acid listed in the Sequence Listing that is, one having a sequence that differs from the one of the polynucleotide sequences in the Sequence Listing, or a complementary sequence, that encodes a functionally equivalent polypeptide (i.e., a polypeptide having some degree of equivalent or similar biological activity) but differs in sequence from the sequence in the Sequence Listing, due to degeneracy in the genetic code.
  • polymorphisms that may or may not be readily detectable using a particular oligonucleotide probe of the polynucleotide encoding polypeptide, and improper or unexpected hybridization to allelic variants, with a locus other than the normal chromosomal locus for the polynucleotide sequence encoding polypeptide.
  • Allelic variant or “polynucleotide allelic variant” refers to any of two or more alternative forms of a gene occupying the same chromosomal locus. Allelic variation arises naturally through mutation, and may result in phenotypic polymorphism within populations. Gene mutations may be “silent” or may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence. “Allelic variant” and “polypeptide allelic variant” may also be used with respect to polypeptides, and in this case the term refer to a polypeptide encoded by an allelic variant of a gene.
  • “Splice variant” or “polynucleotide splice variant” as used herein refers to alternative forms of RNA transcribed from a gene. Splice variation naturally occurs as a result of alternative sites being spliced within a single transcribed RNA molecule or between separately transcribed RNA molecules, and may result in several different forms of mRNA transcribed from the same gene. This, splice variants may encode polypeptides having different amino acid sequences, which may or may not have similar functions in the organism. “Splice variant” or “polypeptide splice variant” may also refer to a polypeptide encoded by a splice variant of a transcribed mRNA.
  • polynucleotide variants may also refer to polynucleotide sequences that encode paralogs and orthologs of the presently disclosed polypeptide sequences.
  • Polypeptide variants may refer to polypeptide sequences that are paralogs and orthologs of the presently disclosed polypeptide sequences.
  • a polypeptide sequence variant may have “conservative” changes, wherein a substituted amino acid has similar structural or chemical properties. Deliberate amino acid substitutions may thus be made on the basis of similarity in polarity, charge, solubility, hydrophobicity, hydrophilicity, and/or the amphipathic nature of the residues, as long as the functional or biological activity of the transcription factor is retained.
  • negatively charged amino acids may include aspartic acid and glutamic acid
  • positively charged amino acids may include lysine and arginine
  • amino acids with uncharged polar head groups having similar hydrophilicity values may include leucine, isoleucine, and valine; glycine and alanine; asparagine and glutamine; serine and threonine; and phenylalanine and tyrosine (for more detail on conservative substitutions, see Table 3).
  • a variant may have “non-conservative” changes, e.g., replacement of a glycine with a tryptophan.
  • Similar minor variations may also include amino acid deletions or insertions, or both.
  • Related polypeptides may comprise, for example, additions and/or deletions of one or more N-linked or 0-linked glycosylation sites, or an addition and/or a deletion of one or more cysteine residues.
  • Guidance in determining which and how many amino acid residues may be substituted, inserted or deleted without abolishing functional or biological activity may be found using computer programs well known in the art, for example, DNASTAR software (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,840,544).
  • Ligand refers to any molecule, agent, or compound that will bind specifically to a complementary site on a nucleic acid molecule or protein. Such ligands stabilize or modulate the activity of nucleic acid molecules or proteins of the invention and may be composed of at least one of the following: inorganic and organic substances including nucleic acids, proteins, carbohydrates, fats, and lipids.
  • the class of plants that can be used in the method of the invention is generally as broad as the class of higher and lower plants amenable to transformation techniques, including angiosperms (monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants), gymnosperms, ferns, horsetails, psilophytes, lycophytes, bryophytes, and multicellular algae.
  • angiosperms monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants
  • gymnosperms ferns
  • horsetails psilophytes, lycophytes, bryophytes, and multicellular algae.
  • a “transgenic plant” refers to a plant that contains genetic material not found in a wild-type plant of the same species, variety or cultivar.
  • the genetic material may include a transgene, an insertional mutagenesis event (such as by transposon or T-DNA insertional mutagenesis), an activation tagging sequence, a mutated sequence, a homologous recombination event or a sequence modified by chimeraplasty.
  • the foreign genetic material has been introduced into the plant by human manipulation, but any method can be used as one of skill in the art recognizes.
  • a transgenic plant may contain an expression vector or cassette.
  • the expression cassette typically comprises a polypeptide-encoding sequence operably linked (i.e., under regulatory control of) to appropriate inducible or constitutive regulatory sequences that allow for the expression of polypeptide.
  • the expression cassette can be introduced into a plant by transformation or by breeding after transformation of a parent plant.
  • a plant refers to a whole plant as well as to a plant part, such as seed, fruit, leaf, or root, plant tissue, plant cells or any other plant material, e.g., a plant explant, as well as to progeny thereof, and to in vitro systems that mimic biochemical or cellular components or processes in a cell.
  • Control plant refers to a plant that serves as a standard of comparison for testing the results of a treatment or genetic alteration, or the degree of altered expression of a gene or gene product. Examples of control plants include plants that are untreated, or genetically unaltered (i.e., wild-type).
  • “Fragment”, with respect to a polynucleotide, refers to a clone or any part of a polynucleotide molecule that retains a usable, functional characteristic.
  • Useful fragments include oligonucleotides and polynucleotides that may be used in hybridization or amplification technologies or in the regulation of replication, transcription or translation.
  • a polynucleotide fragment refers to any subsequence of a polynucleotide, typically, of at least about 9 consecutive nucleotides, preferably at least about 30 nucleotides, more preferably at least about 50 nucleotides, of any of the sequences provided herein.
  • Fragments may also include subsequences of polypeptides and protein molecules, or a subsequence of the polypeptide. Fragments may have uses in that they may have antigenic potential.
  • the fragment or domain is a subsequence of the polypeptide which performs at least one biological function of the intact polypeptide in substantially the same manner, or to a similar extent, as does the intact polypeptide.
  • a polypeptide fragment can comprise a recognizable structural motif or functional domain such as a DNA-binding site or domain that binds to a DNA promoter region, an activation domain, or a domain for protein-protein interactions, and may initiate transcription.
  • Fragments can vary in size from as few as 3 amino acid residues to the full length of the intact polypeptide, but are preferably at least about 30 amino acid residues in length and more preferably at least about 60 amino acid residues in length.
  • Exemplary polypeptide fragments are the first twenty consecutive amino acids of a mammalian protein encoded by are the first twenty consecutive amino acids of the transcription factor polypeptides listed in the Sequence Listing.
  • Exemplary fragments also include fragments that comprise a B domain of a transcription factor, for example, amino acid residues 26-116 of G482 (SEQ ID NO: 4), as noted in Table 1.
  • the invention also encompasses production of DNA sequences that encode transcription factors and transcription factor derivatives, or fragments thereof, entirely by synthetic chemistry.
  • the synthetic sequence may be inserted into any of the many available expression vectors and cell systems using reagents well known in the art.
  • synthetic chemistry may be used to introduce mutations into a sequence encoding transcription factors or any fragment thereof.
  • “Derivative” refers to the chemical modification of a nucleic acid molecule or amino acid sequence. Chemical modifications can include replacement of hydrogen by an alkyl, acyl, or amino group or glycosylation, pegylation, or any similar process that retains or enhances biological activity or lifespan of the molecule or sequence.
  • a “trait” refers to a physiological, morphological, biochemical, or physical characteristic of a plant or particular plant material or cell. In some instances, this characteristic is visible to the human eye, such as seed or plant size, or can be measured by biochemical techniques, such as detecting the protein, starch, or oil content of seed or leaves, or by observation of a metabolic or physiological process, e.g. by measuring tolerance to water deprivation or particular salt or sugar concentrations, or by the observation of the expression level of a gene or genes, e.g., by employing Northern analysis, RT-PCR, microarray gene expression assays, or reporter gene expression systems, or by agricultural observations such as osmotic stress tolerance or yield. Any technique can be used to measure the amount of, comparative level of, or difference in any selected chemical compound or macromolecule in the transgenic plants, however.
  • Trait modification refers to a detectable difference in a characteristic in a plant ectopically expressing a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the present invention relative to a plant not doing so, such as a wild-type plant.
  • the trait modification can be evaluated quantitatively.
  • the trait modification can entail at least about a 2% increase or decrease in an observed trait (difference), at least a 5% difference, at least about a 10% difference, at least about a 20% difference, at least about a 30%, at least about a 50%, at least about a 70%, or at least about a 100%, or an even greater difference compared with a wild-type plant. It is known that there can be a natural variation in the modified trait. Therefore, the trait modification observed entails a change of the normal distribution of the trait in the plants compared with the distribution observed in wild-type plants.
  • transcript profile refers to the expression levels of a set of genes in a cell in a particular state, particularly by comparison with the expression levels of that same set of genes in a cell of the same type in a reference state.
  • the transcript profile of a particular transcription factor in a suspension cell is the expression levels of a set of genes in a cell knocking out or overexpressing that transcription factor compared with the expression levels of that same set of genes in a suspension cell that has normal levels of that transcription factor.
  • the transcript profile can be presented as a list of those genes whose expression level is significantly different between the two treatments, and the difference ratios. Differences and similarities between expression levels may also be evaluated and calculated using statistical and clustering methods.
  • the polynucleotide or polypeptide is expressed in a cell or tissue type other than a cell or tissue type in which the sequence is expressed in the wild-type plant, or by expression at a time other than at the time the sequence is expressed in the wild-type plant, or by a response to different inducible agents, such as hormones or environmental signals, or at different expression levels (either higher or lower) compared with those found in a wild-type plant.
  • the term also refers to altered expression patterns that are produced by lowering the levels of expression to below the detection level or completely abolishing expression.
  • the resulting expression pattern can be transient or stable, constitutive or inducible.
  • the term “ectopic expression or altered expression” further may relate to altered activity levels resulting from the interactions of the polypeptides with exogenous or endogenous modulators or from interactions with factors or as a result of the chemical modification of the polypeptides.
  • overexpression refers to a greater expression level of a gene in a plant, plant cell or plant tissue, compared to expression in a wild-type plant, cell or tissue, at any developmental or temporal stage for the gene. Overexpression can occur when, for example, the genes encoding one or more transcription factors are under the control of a strong expression signal, such as one of the promoters described herein (e.g., the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S transcription initiation region). Overexpression may occur throughout a plant or in specific tissues of the plant, depending on the promoter used, as described below.
  • transcription regulating region refers to a DNA regulatory sequence that regulates expression of one or more genes in a plant when a transcription factor having one or more specific binding domains binds to the DNA regulatory sequence.
  • Transcription factors of the present invention possess an AP2 domain, a B3 domain, or both of these binding domains.
  • the AP2 domain of the transcription factor binds to a transcription regulating region comprising the motif CAACA
  • the B3 domain of the same transcription factor binds to a transcription regulating region comprising the motif CACCTG.
  • the transcription factors of the invention also comprise an amino acid subsequence that forms a transcription activation domain that regulates expression of one or more abiotic stress tolerance genes in a plant when the transcription factor binds to the regulating region.
  • phase change refers to a plant's progression from embryo to adult, and, by some definitions, the transition wherein flowering plants gain reproductive competency. It is believed that phase change occurs either after a certain number of cell divisions in the shoot apex of a developing plant, or when the shoot apex achieves a particular distance from the roots. Thus, altering the timing of phase changes may affect a plant's size, which, in turn, may affect yield and biomass.
  • substrate refers to any rigid or semi-rigid support to which nucleic acid molecules or proteins are bound and includes membranes, filters, chips, slides, wafers, fibers, magnetic or nonmagnetic beads, gels, capillaries or other tubing, plates, polymers, and microparticles with a variety of surface forms including wells, trenches, pins, channels and pores.
  • a substrate may also refer to a reactant in a chemical or biological reaction, or a substance acted upon (e.g., by an enzyme).
  • substantially purified refers to nucleic acid molecules or proteins that are removed from their natural environment and are isolated or separated, and are at least about 60% free, preferably about 75% free, and most preferably about 90% free, from other components with which they are naturally associated.
  • a transcription factor may include, but is not limited to, any polypeptide that can activate or repress transcription of a single gene or a number of genes.
  • transcription factors can be identified by the presence of a region or domain of structural similarity or identity to a specific consensus sequence or the presence of a specific consensus DNA-binding site or DNA-binding site motif (see, for example, Riechmann et al. (2000) Science 290: 2105-2110).
  • the plant transcription factors may belong to the CAAT-element binding protein transcription factor family (Forsburg and Guarente (1989) supra).
  • the transcription factors encoded by the present sequences are involved in cell differentiation and proliferation and the regulation of growth. Accordingly, one skilled in the art would recognize that by expressing the present sequences in a plant, one may change the expression of autologous genes or induce the expression of introduced genes. By affecting the expression of similar autologous sequences in a plant that have the biological activity of the present sequences, or by introducing the present sequences into a plant, one may alter a plant's phenotype to one with improved traits related to osmotic stresses.
  • the sequences of the invention may also be used to transform a plant and introduce desirable traits not found in the wild-type cultivar or strain. Plants may then be selected for those that produce the most desirable degree of over- or under-expression of target genes of interest and coincident trait improvement.
  • sequences of the present invention may be from any species, particularly plant species, in a naturally occurring form or from any source whether natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic or recombinant.
  • sequences of the invention may also include fragments of the present amino acid sequences.
  • amino acid sequence is recited to refer to an amino acid sequence of a naturally occurring protein molecule, “amino acid sequence” and like terms are not meant to limit the amino acid sequence to the complete native amino acid sequence associated with the recited protein molecule.
  • the polynucleotides and polypeptides of the invention have a variety of additional uses. These uses include their use in the recombinant production (i.e., expression) of proteins; as regulators of plant gene expression, as diagnostic probes for the presence of complementary or partially complementary nucleic acids (including for detection of natural coding nucleic acids); as substrates for further reactions, e.g., mutation reactions, PCR reactions, or the like; as substrates for cloning e.g., including digestion or ligation reactions; and for identifying exogenous or endogenous modulators of the transcription factors.
  • a polynucleotide comprises a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide (or protein) or a domain or fragment thereof. Additionally, the polynucleotide may comprise a promoter, an intron, an enhancer region, a polyadenylation site, a translation initiation site, 5′ or 3′ untranslated regions, a reporter gene, a selectable marker, or the like.
  • the polynucleotide can be single stranded or double stranded DNA or RNA.
  • the polynucleotide optionally comprises modified bases or a modified backbone.
  • the polynucleotide can be, e.g., genomic DNA or RNA, a transcript (such as an mRNA), a cDNA, a PCR product, a cloned DNA, a synthetic DNA or RNA, or the like.
  • the polynucleotide can comprise a sequence in either sense or antisense orientations.
  • transgenic plants comprising isolated polynucleotides encoding transcription factors may also modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides, and proteins.
  • Examples include Peng et al. (1997, Genes Development 11: 3194-3205) and Peng et al. (1999, Nature, 400: 256-261).
  • Peng et al. (1997, Genes Development 11: 3194-3205)
  • Peng et al. (1999, Nature, 400: 256-261) Many others have demonstrated that an Arabidopsis transcription factor expressed in an exogenous plant species elicits the same or very similar phenotypic response. See, for example, Fu et al. (2001, Plant Cell 13: 1791-1802); Nandi et al. (2000, Curr. Biol. 10: 215-218); Coupland (1995, Nature 377: 482483); and Weigel and Nilsson (1995, Nature 377: 482-500).
  • Mandel et al. (1992, Cell 71-133-143) and Suzuki et al.(2001, Plant J. 28: 409-418) teach that a transcription factor expressed in another plant species elicits the same or very similar phenotypic response of the endogenous sequence, as often predicted in earlier studies of Arabidopsis transcription factors in Arabidopsis (see Mandel et al. 1992, supra; Suzuki et al. 2001, supra).
  • Gilmour et al. (1998, Plant J. 16: 433442) teach an Arabidopsis AP2 transcription factor, CBF1 (SEQ ID NO: 96), which, when overexpressed in transgenic plants, increases plant freezing tolerance.
  • CBF1 Arabidopsis AP2 transcription factor
  • Jaglo et al. ((2001) Plant Physiol. 127: 910-917) further identified sequences in Brassica napus which encode CBF-like genes and that transcripts for these genes accumulated rapidly in response to low temperature. Transcripts encoding CBF-like proteins were also found to accumulate rapidly in response to low temperature in wheat, as well as in tomato. An alignment of the CBF proteins from Arabidopsis, B.
  • the effect of a transcription factor on cellular responses or a cellular trait is determined by the particular genes whose expression is either directly or indirectly (e.g., by a cascade of transcription factor binding events and transcriptional changes) altered by transcription factor binding.
  • the resulting transcript profile associated with transcription factor overexpression is related to the trait or cellular process controlled by that transcription factor.
  • the PAP2 gene and other genes in the MYB family have been shown to control anthocyanin biosynthesis through regulation of the expression of genes known to be involved in the anthocyanin biosynthetic pathway (Bruce et al.
  • the CAAT family of transcription factors also be referred to as the “CCAAT” or “CCAAT-box” family, are characterized by their ability to bind to the CCAAT-box element located 80 to 300 bp 5′ from a transcription start site (Gelinas et al. (1985) Nature 313: 323-325).
  • the CCAAT-box is a conserved cis-acting regulatory element with the consensus sequence CCAAT that is found in the promoters of genes from all eukaryotic species. The element can act in either orientation, alone or as multimeric regions with possible cooperation with other cis regulatory elements (Tasanen et al. (1992) ( J. Biol. Chem. 267: 11513-11519).
  • the first proteins identified that bind to the CCAAT-box element were identified in yeast.
  • the CCAAT-box transcription factors bind as hetero-tetrameric complex called the HAP complex (heme activator protein complex) or the CCAAT binding factor (Forsburg and Guarente (1988) Mol. Cell Biol. 8: 647-654).
  • the HAP complex in yeast is composed of at least four subunits, HAP2, HAP3, HAP4 and HAP5.
  • the proteins that make up the HAP2,3,4,5 complex are represented by single genes. Their function is specific for the activation of genes involved in mitochondrial biogenesis and energy metabolism (Dang et al. (1996) Mol. Microbiol. 22:681-692).
  • the CCAAT binding factor is a trimeric complex consisting of NF-YA (HAP2-like), NF-YB (HAP3-like) and NF-YC (HAP5-like) subunits (Maity and de Crombrugghe (1998) Trends Biochem. Sci. 23: 174-178).
  • analogous members of the CCAAT binding factor complex are represented by small gene families, and it is likely that these genes play a more complex role in regulating gene transcription.
  • Arabidopsis there are ten members of the HAP2 subfamily, ten members of the HAP3 subfamily, thirteen members of the HAP5 subfamily. Plants and mammals, however, do not appear to have a protein equivalent of HAP4 of yeast.
  • HAP4 is not required for DNA binding in yeast although it provides the primary activation domain for the complex (McNabb et al. (1995) Genes Dev. 9: 47-58; Olesen and Guarente (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 1714-1729).
  • CCAAT binding factors serve as general transcriptional regulators that influence the frequency of transcriptional initiation (Maity and de Crombrugghe (1998) supra).
  • CCAAT binding factors can serve to regulate target promoters in response to environmental cues and it has been demonstrated that assembly of CCAAT binding factors on target promoters occurs in response to a variety signals (Myers et al. (1986) Myers et al. (1986) Science 232: 613-618; Maity and de Crombrugghe (1998) supra; Bezhani et al. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276: 23785-23789).
  • Mammalian CP 1 and NF-Y are both heterotrimeric CCAAT binding factor complexes (Johnson and McKnight (1989) Ann. Rev. Biochem. 58: 799-839. Plant CCAAT binding factors are assumed to be trimeric, as is the case in mammals, however, they could associate with other transcription factors on target promoters as part of a larger complex.
  • the CCAAT box is generally found in close proximity of other promoter elements and it is generally accepted that the CCAAT binding factor functions synergistically with other transcription factors in the regulation of transcription.
  • a HAP3-like protein from rice, OsNF-YB1 interacts with a MADS-box protein OsMADS18 in vitro (Masiero et al.
  • HAP3/HAP5 subunit dimers have been shown to be able to interact with TFIID in the absence of HAP2 subunits (Romier et al. (2003) J. Biol. Chem. 278: 1336-1345).
  • the CCAAT-box motif is found in the promoters of a variety of plant genes.
  • the expression pattern of many of the HAP-like genes in Arabidopsis shows developmental regulation.
  • Our findings suggest that while most of the CCAAT-box gene transcripts are found ubiquitously throughout the plant, in more than half of the cases, the genes are predominantly expressed in flower, embryo and/or silique tissues. Cell-type specific localization of the CCAAT genes in Arabidopsis would be very informative and could help determine the activity of various CCAAT genes in the plant.
  • LEC1 is a HAP3 subunit homolog that accumulates only during seed development. Arabidopsis plants carrying a mutation in the LEC1 gene display embryos that are intolerant to desiccation and that show defects in seed maturation (Lotan et al. (1998) Cell 93: 1195-1205). This phenotype can be rescued if the embryos are allowed to grow before the desiccation process occurs during normal seed maturation. This result suggests LEC1 has a role in allowing the embryo to survive desiccation during seed maturation.
  • the mutant plants also possess trichomes, or epidermal hairs on their cotyledons, a characteristic that is normally restricted to adult tissues like leaves and stems.
  • LEC1 also plays a role in specifying embryonic organ identity in addition to the mutant analysis, the ectopic expression (unregulated overexpression) of the wild type LEC1 gene induces embryonic programs and embryo development in vegetative cells consistent with its role in coordinating higher plant embryo development.
  • the ortholog of LEC1 has been identified recently in maize.
  • the expression pattern of ZmLEC1 in maize during somatic embryo development is similar to that of LEC1 in Arabidopsis during zygotic embryo development (Zhang et al. (2002) Planta 215:191-194).
  • Plant CCAAT binding factors potentially bind DNA as heterotrimers composed of HAP2-like, HAP3-like and HAP5-like subunits. All subunits contain regions that are required for DNA binding and subunit association. The subunit proteins appear to lack activation domains; therefore, that function must come from proteins with which they interact on target promoters. No proteins that provide the activation domain function for CCAAT binding factors have been identified in plants. In yeast, however, the HAP4 protein provides the primary activation domain (McNabb et al. (1995) Genes Dev. 9: 47-58; Olesen and Guarente (1990) Genes Dev. 4, 1714-1729).
  • HAP2-, HAP3- and HAP5-like proteins have two highly conserved sub-domains, one that functions in subunit interaction and the other that acts in a direct association with DNA. Outside these two regions, non-paralogous Arabidopsis HAP-like proteins are quite divergent in sequence and in overall length.
  • HAP3 proteins contain an amino-terminal A domain, a central B domain and a carboxy-terminal C domain. There is very little sequence similarity between HAP3 proteins in the A and C domains; it is therefore reasonable to assume that the A and C domains could provide a degree of functional specificity to each member of the HAP3 subfamily.
  • the B domain is the conserved region that specifies DNA binding and subunit association.
  • FIGS. 6A-6F HAP3 proteins from Arabidopsis, soybean, rice and corn are aligned with G48 1, with the A, B and C domains and the DNA binding and subunit interaction domains indicated.
  • FIG. 6B-6C the B domain of the non-LEC1-like clade (identified in FIGS.
  • Xaa can be any amino acid.
  • the proline residue that appears in brackets is an additional residue that was found in only one sequence (not shown in FIG. 6B ).
  • the boldfaced residues that appear here and in the consensus sequences of FIGS. 6B-6C in their present positions are uniquely found in the non-LEC1-like clade, and may be used to identify members of this clade.
  • the G482-like subclade may be delineated by the underlined serine residue in its present position here and in the consensus sequence of FIGS. 6B-6C . More generally, the non-LEC1-like clade is distinguished by a B domain comprising: Asn-(Xaa) 4 -Lys-(Xaa) 33-34 -Asn-Gly;
  • G482 subclade is distinguished by a B-domain comprising: Ser-(Xaa) 9 -Asn-(Xaa) 4 -Lys-(Xaa) 33-34 -Asn-Gly.
  • Overexpression of these polypeptides confers increased abiotic stress tolerance in a transgenic plant, as compared to a non-transformed plant that does not overexpress the polypeptide.
  • Table 1 shows the polypeptides identified by SEQ ID NO; Mendel Gene ID (GID) No.; the transcription factor family to which the polypeptide belongs, and conserved B domains of the polypeptide.
  • the first column shows the polypeptide SEQ ID NO; the second column the species and identifier (GID, GenBank accession no., or other identifier); the third column shows the conserved domain in amino acid coordinates; the fourth column shows the B domain; and the fifth column shows the percentage identity to G482.
  • the sequences are arranged in descending order of percentage identity to G482.
  • the transcription factors of the present invention each possess a B or conserved domain, including the orthologs of G482 found by BLAST analysis, as described below.
  • the B domain of the transcription factors will bind to a transcription-regulating region comprising the motif CCAAT.
  • the B domains of G481, G485 and rice G3395 are at least 83% identical to the corresponding domains of G482, and all four of these transcription factors, which rely on the binding specificity of their B domains, have similar or identical functions in plants, conferring increased abiotic, including osmotic, stress tolerance when overexpressed.
  • the present invention provides, among other things, transcription factors (TFs), and transcription factor homolog polypeptides, and isolated or recombinant polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides, or novel sequence variant polypeptides or polynucleotides encoding novel variants of transcription factors derived from the specific sequences provided here. These polypeptides and polynucleotides may be employed to modify a plant's characteristics.
  • Exemplary polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides of the invention were identified in the Arabidopsis thaliana GenBank database using publicly available sequence analysis programs and parameters. Sequences initially identified were then further characterized to identify sequences comprising specified sequence strings corresponding to sequence motifs present in families of known transcription factors. In addition, further exemplary polynucleotides encoding the polypeptides of the invention were identified in the plant GenBank database using publicly available sequence analysis programs and parameters. Sequences initially identified were then further characterized to identify sequences comprising specified sequence strings corresponding to sequence motifs present in families of known transcription factors. Polynucleotide sequences meeting such criteria were confirmed as transcription factors.
  • Additional polynucleotides of the invention were identified by screening Arabidopsis thaliana and/or other plant cDNA libraries with probes corresponding to known transcription factors under low stringency hybridization conditions. Additional sequences, including full length coding sequences were subsequently recovered by the rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) procedure, using a commercially available kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Where necessary, multiple rounds of RACE are performed to isolate 5′ and 3′ ends. The full-length cDNA was then recovered by a routine end-to-end polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers specific to the isolated 5′ and 3′ ends. Exemplary sequences are provided in the Sequence Listing.
  • polynucleotides of the invention can be or were ectopically expressed in overexpressor or knockout plants and the changes in the characteristic(s) or trait(s) of the plants observed. Therefore, the polynucleotides and polypeptides can be employed to improve the characteristics of plants.
  • the polynucleotides of the invention can be or were ectopically expressed in overexpressor plant cells and the changes in the expression levels of a number of genes, polynucleotides, and/or proteins of the plant cells observed. Therefore, the polynucleotides and polypeptides can be employed to change expression levels of a genes, polynucleotides, and/or proteins of plants.
  • G481, G482 and G485 (polynucleotide SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3 and 5) were chosen for study based on observations that Arabidopsis plants overexpressing these genes had resistance to abiotic stresses, such as osmotic stress, and including drought-related stress (see Example VIII, below).
  • G481, G482 and G485 are members of the CCAAT family, proteins that act in a multi-subunit complex and are believed to bind CCAAT boxes in promoters of target genes as trimers or tetramers.
  • HAP2 In Arabidopsis, three types of CCAAT binding proteins exist: HAP2, HAP3 and HAP5.
  • LEAFY COTYLEDON1 LEC1
  • LEC1-LIKE LEC1-LIKE
  • LEC1 is a critical regulator required for normal development during the early and late phases of embryo genesis that is sufficient to induce embryonic development in vegetative cells. Kwong et al. showed that ten Arabidopsis HAP3 subunits can be divided into two classes based on sequence identity in their central, conserved B domain. LEC1 and L1L constitute LEC1-type HAP3 subunits, whereas the remaining HAP3 subunits were designated non-LEC1-type.
  • FIG. 3 and 4 Phylogenetic trees based on sequential relatedness of the HAP3 genes are shown in FIG. 3 and 4 . As can be seen in these figures, G1364 and G2345 are closely related to G481, and G482 and G485 are more related to G481 than either LEC1 or L1L, which are found on somewhat more distant nodes.
  • the polynucleotides of the invention include sequences that encode transcription factors and transcription factor homolog polypeptides and sequences complementary thereto, as well as unique fragments of coding sequence, or sequence complementary thereto.
  • Such polynucleotides can be, e.g., DNA or RNA, e.g., mRNA, cRNA, synthetic RNA, genomic DNA, cDNA synthetic DNA, oligonucleotides, etc.
  • the polynucleotides are either double-stranded or single-stranded, and include either, or both sense (i.e., coding) sequences and antisense (i.e., non-coding, complementary) sequences.
  • the polynucleotides include the coding sequence of a transcription factor, or transcription factor homolog polypeptide, in isolation, in combination with additional coding sequences (e.g., a purification tag, a localization signal, as a fusion-protein, as a pre-protein, or the like), in combination with non-coding sequences (e.g., introns or inteins, regulatory elements such as promoters, enhancers, terminators, and the like), and/or in a vector or host environment in which the polynucleotide encoding a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog polypeptide is an endogenous or exogenous gene.
  • additional coding sequences e.g., a purification tag, a localization signal, as a fusion-protein, as a pre-protein, or the like
  • non-coding sequences e.g., introns or inteins, regulatory elements such as promoters, enhancers, terminators, and the like
  • polynucleotides of the invention can be produced by a variety of in vitro amplification methods adapted to the present invention by appropriate selection of specific or degenerate primers.
  • protocols sufficient to direct persons of skill through in vitro amplification methods including the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) the ligase chain reaction (LCR), Qbeta-replicase amplification and other RNA polymerase mediated techniques (e.g., NASBA), e.g., for the production of the homologous nucleic acids of the invention are found in Berger (supra), Sambrook (supra), and Ausubel (supra), as well as Mullis et al.
  • RNA can be converted into a double stranded DNA suitable for restriction digestion, PCR expansion and sequencing using reverse transcriptase and a polymerase. See, e.g., Ausubel, Sambrook and Berger, all supra.
  • polynucleotides and oligonucleotides of the invention can be assembled from fragments produced by solid-phase synthesis methods. Typically, fragments of up to approximately 100 bases are individually synthesized and then enzymatically or chemically ligated to produce a desired sequence, e.g., a polynucleotide encoding all or part of a transcription factor.
  • a desired sequence e.g., a polynucleotide encoding all or part of a transcription factor.
  • chemical synthesis using the phosphoramidite method is described, e.g., by Beaucage et al. (1981) Tetrahedron Letters 22: 1859-1869; and Matthes et al. (1984) EMBO J. 3: 801-805.
  • oligonucleotides are synthesized, purified, annealed to their complementary strand, ligated and then optionally cloned into suitable vectors. And if so desired, the polynucleotides and polypeptides of the invention can be custom ordered from any of a number of commercial suppliers.
  • homologous sequences can be derived from any plant including monocots and dicots and in particular agriculturally important plant species, including but not limited to, crops such as soybean, wheat, corn (maize), potato, cotton, rice, rape, oilseed rape (including canola), sunflower, alfalfa, clover, sugarcane, and turf; or fruits and vegetables, such as banana, blackberry, blueberry, strawberry, and raspberry, cantaloupe, carrot, cauliflower, coffee, cucumber, eggplant, grapes, honeydew, lettuce, mango, melon, onion, papaya, peas, peppers, pineapple, pumpkin, spinach, squash, sweet corn, tobacco, tomato, tomatillo, watermelon, rosaceous fruits (such as apple, peach, pear, cherry and plum) and
  • Other crops including fruits and vegetables, whose phenotype can be changed and which comprise homologous sequences include barley; rye; millet; sorghum; currant; avocado; citrus fruits such as oranges, lemons, grapefruit and tangerines, artichoke, cherries; nuts such as the walnut and peanut; endive; leek; roots such as arrowroot, beet, cassava, turnip, radish, yam, and sweet potato; and beans.
  • the homologous sequences may also be derived from woody species, such pine, poplar and eucalyptus, or mint or other labiates.
  • homologous sequences may be derived from plants that are evolutionarily related to crop plants, but which may not have yet been used as crop plants. Examples include deadly nightshade (Atropa belladona), related to tomato; jimson weed (Datura strommium), related to peyote; and teosinte (Zea species), related to corn (maize).
  • Homologous sequences as described above can comprise orthologous or paralogous sequences.
  • Several different methods are known by those of skill in the art for identifying and defining these functionally homologous sequences. Three general methods for defining orthologs and paralogs are described; an ortholog, paralog or homolog may be identified by one or more of the methods described below.
  • Orthologs and paralogs are evolutionarily related genes that have similar sequence and similar functions. Orthologs are structurally related genes in different species that are derived by a speciation event. Paralogs are structurally related genes within a single species that are derived by a duplication event.
  • gene duplication may cause two copies of a particular gene, giving rise to two or more genes with similar sequence and often similar function known as paralogs.
  • a paralog is therefore a similar gene formed by duplication within the same species.
  • Paralogs typically cluster together or in the same lade (a group of similar genes) when a gene family phylogeny is analyzed using programs such as CLUSTAL (Thompson et al. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680; Higgins et al. (1996) Methods Enzymol. 266: 383402). Groups of similar genes can also be identified with pair-wise BLAST analysis (Feng and Doolittle (1987) J. Mol. Evol. 25: 351-360).
  • a clade of very similar MADS domain transcription factors from Arabidopsis all share a common function in flowering time (Ratcliffe et al. (2001) Plant Physiol. 126: 122-132), and a group of very similar AP2 domain transcription factors from Arabidopsis are involved in tolerance of plants to freezing (Gilmour et al. (1998) Plant J. 16: 433-442). Analysis of groups of similar genes with similar function that fall within one clade can yield sub-sequences that are particular to the lade.
  • consensus sequences can not only be used to define the sequences within each clade, but define the functions of these genes; genes within a clade may contain paralogous sequences, or orthologous sequences that share the same function (see also, for example, Mount (2001), in Bioinformatics: Sequence and Genome Analysis Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y., page 543.)
  • orthologs genes with similar sequence and similar function. These genes, termed orthologs, often have an identical function within their host plants and are often interchangeable between species without losing function. Because plants have common ancestors, many genes in any plant species will have a corresponding orthologous gene in another plant species.
  • CLUSTAL Thimpson et al. (1994) Nucleic Acids Res. 22: 4673-4680; Higgins et al. (1996) supra
  • potential orthologous sequences can be placed into the phylogenetic tree and their relationship to genes from the species of interest can be determined. Orthologous sequences can also be identified by a reciprocal BLAST strategy. Once an orthologous sequence has been identified, the function of the ortholog can be deduced from the identified function of the reference sequence.
  • Transcription factor gene sequences are conserved across diverse eukaryotic species lines (Goodrich et al. (1993) Cell 75: 519-530; Lin et al. (1991) Nature 353: 569-571; Sadowski et al. (1988) Nature 335: 563-564). Plants are no exception to this observation; diverse plant species possess transcription factors that have similar sequences and functions.
  • Orthologous genes from different organisms have highly conserved functions, and very often essentially identical functions (Lee et al. (2002) Genome Res. 12: 493-502; Remm et al. (2001) J. Mol. Biol. 314: 1041-1052). Paralogous genes, which have diverged through gene duplication, may retain similar functions of the encoded proteins. In such cases, paralogs can be used interchangeably with respect to certain embodiments of the instant invention (for example, transgenic expression of a coding sequence).
  • CBF family An example of such highly related paralogs is the CBF family, with three well-defined members in Arabidopsis and at least one ortholog in Brassica napus (SEQ ID NOs: 96, 98, 100, and 102, respectively), all of which control pathways involved in both freezing and drought stress (Gilmour et al. (1998) Plant J. 16: 433-442; Jaglo et al. (1998) Plant Physiol. 127: 910-917).
  • SAR systemic acquired resistance
  • the transgenic plants displayed enhanced resistance Choern et al. (2001) Plant J. 27: 101-113).
  • NPR1 acts through activation of expression of transcription factor genes, such as TGA2 (Fan and Dong (2002) Plant Cell 14: 1377-1389).
  • E2F genes are involved in transcription of plant genes for proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Plant E2Fs share a high degree of similarity in amino acid sequence between monocots and dicots, and are even similar to the conserved domains of the animal E2Fs. Such conservation indicates a functional similarity between plant and animal E2Fs. E2F transcription factors that regulate meristem development act through common cis-elements, and regulate related (PCNA) genes (Kosugi and Ohashi, (2002) Plant J. 29: 45-59).
  • PCNA cell nuclear antigen
  • the ABI5 gene (ABA insensitive 5) encodes a basic leucine zipper factor required for ABA response in the seed and vegetative tissues.
  • Co-transformation experiments with ABI5 cDNA constructs in rice protoplasts resulted in specific transactivation of the ABA-inducible wheat, Arabidopsis, bean, and barley promoters. These results demonstrate that sequentially similar ABI5 transcription factors are key targets of a conserved ABA signaling pathway in diverse plants. (Gampala et al. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 277: 1689-1694).
  • Bioactive gibberellins are essential endogenous regulators of plant growth. GA signaling tends to be conserved across the plant kingdom. GA signaling is mediated via GAI, a nuclear member of the GRAS family of plant transcription factors. Arabidopsis GAI has been shown to function in rice to inhibit gibberellin response pathways (Fu et al. (2001) Plant Cell 13: 1791-1802).
  • the Arabidopsis gene SUPERMAN encodes a putative transcription factor that maintains the boundary between stamens and carpels.
  • Maize, petunia and Arabidopsis myb transcription factors that regulate flavonoid biosynthesis are very genetically similar and affect the same trait in their native species, therefore sequence and function of these myb transcription factors correlate with each other in these diverse species (Borevitz et al. (2000) Plant Cell 12: 2383-2394).
  • Wheat reduced height-1 (Rht-B1/Rht-D1) and maize dwarf-8 (d8) genes are orthologs of the Arabidopsis gibberellin insensitive (GAI) gene. Both of these genes have been used to produce dwarf grain varieties that have improved grain yield. These genes encode proteins that resemble nuclear transcription factors and contain an SH2-like domain, indicating that phosphotyrosine may participate in gibberellin signaling. Transgenic rice plants containing a mutant GAI allele from Arabidopsis have been shown to produce reduced responses to gibberellin and are dwarfed, indicating that mutant GAI orthologs could be used to increase yield in a wide range of crop species (Peng et al. (1999) Nature 400: 256-261).
  • Transcription factors that are homologous to the listed sequences will typically share at least about 70% amino acid sequence identity in B domain. More closely related transcription factors can share at least about 75% or about 80% or about 90% or about 95% or about 98% or more sequence identity with the listed sequences, or with the listed sequences but excluding or outside a known consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site, or with the listed sequences excluding one or all conserved domains. Factors that are most closely related to the listed sequences share, e.g., at least about 85%, about 90% or about 95% or more % sequence identity to the listed sequences, or to the listed sequences but excluding or outside a known consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site or outside one or all conserved domain.
  • the sequences will typically share at least about 40% nucleotide sequence identity, preferably at least about 50%, about 60%, about 70% or about 80% sequence identity, and more preferably about 85%, about 90%, about 95% or about 97% or more sequence identity to one or more of the listed sequences, or to a listed sequence but excluding or outside a known consensus sequence or consensus DNA-binding site, or outside one or all conserved domain.
  • the degeneracy of the genetic code enables major variations in the nucleotide sequence of a polynucleotide while maintaining the amino acid sequence of the encoded protein.
  • B domains within the CCAAT-binding transcription factor family may exhibit a higher degree of sequence homology, such as at least 70% amino acid sequence identity including conservative substitutions, and preferably at least 80% sequence identity, and more preferably at least 85%, or at least about 86%, or at least about 87%, or at least about 88%, or at least about 90%, or at least about 95%, or at least about 98% sequence identity.
  • Transcription factors that are homologous to the listed sequences should share at least 30%, or at least about 60%, or at least about 75%, or at least about 80%, or at least about 90% at least about 95% amino acid sequence identity over the entire length of the polypeptide or the homolog.
  • Percent identity can be determined electronically, e.g., by using the MEGALIGN program (DNASTAR, Inc. Madison, Wis.).
  • the MEGALIGN program can create alignments between two or more sequences according to different methods, for example, the clustal method. (See, for example, Higgins and Sharp (1988) Gene 73: 237-244.)
  • the clustal algorithm groups sequences into clusters by examining the distances between all pairs. The clusters are aligned pairwise and then in groups. Other alignment algorithms or programs may be used, including FASTA, BLAST, or ENTREZ, FASTA and BLAST, and which may be used to calculate percent similarity.
  • the percent identity of two sequences can be determined by the GCG program with a gap weight of 1, e.g., each amino acid gap is weighted as if it were a single amino acid or nucleotide mismatch between the two sequences (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,262,333).
  • the percentage similarity between two polypeptide sequences is calculated by dividing the length of sequence A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence A, minus the number of gap residues in sequence B, into the sum of the residue matches between sequence A and sequence B, times one hundred. Gaps of low or of no similarity between the two amino acid sequences are not included in determining percentage similarity. Percent identity between polynucleotide sequences can also be counted or calculated by other methods known in the art, e.g., the Jotun Hein method. (See, e.g., Hein (1990) Methods Enzymol. 183: 626-645.) Identity between sequences can also be determined by other methods known in the art, e.g., by varying hybridization conditions (see U.S. patent application No. 20010010913).
  • the invention provides methods for identifying a sequence similar or paralogous or orthologous or homologous to one or more polynucleotides as noted herein, or one or more target polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotides, or otherwise noted herein and may include linking or associating a given plant phenotype or gene function with a sequence.
  • a sequence database is provided (locally or across an internet or intranet) and a query is made against the sequence database using the relevant sequences herein and associated plant phenotypes or gene functions.
  • polynucleotide sequences or one or more polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotide sequences may be used to search against a BLOCKS (Bairoch et al. (1997) Nucleic Acids Res. 25: 217-221), PFAM, and other databases which contain previously identified and annotated motifs, sequences and gene functions.
  • Methods that search for primary sequence patterns with secondary structure gap penalties Smith et al. (1992) Protein Engineering 5: 35-51) as well as algorithms such as Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST; Altschul (1993) J. Mol. Evol. 36: 290-300; Altschul et al.
  • a further method for identifying or confirming that specific homologous sequences control the same function is by comparison of the transcript profile(s) obtained upon overexpression or knockout of two or more related transcription factors. Since transcript profiles are diagnostic for specific cellular states, one skilled in the art will appreciate that genes that have a highly similar transcript profile (e.g., with greater than 50% regulated transcripts in common, more preferably with greater than 70% regulated transcripts in common, most preferably with greater than 90% regulated transcripts in common) will have highly similar functions. Fowler et al.
  • methods using manual alignment of sequences similar or homologous to one or more polynucleotide sequences or one or more polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotide sequences may be used to identify regions of similarity and B domains.
  • Such manual methods are well-known of those of skill in the art and can include, for example, comparisons of tertiary structure between a polypeptide sequence encoded by a polynucleotide which comprises a known function with a polypeptide sequence encoded by a polynucleotide sequence which has a function not yet determined.
  • Such examples of tertiary structure may comprise predicted alpha helices, beta-sheets, amphipathic helices, leucine zipper motifs, zinc finger motifs, proline-rich regions, cysteine repeat motifs, and the like.
  • Orthologs and paralogs of presently disclosed transcription factors may be cloned using compositions provided by the present invention according to methods well known in the art.
  • cDNAs can be cloned using mRNA from a plant cell or tissue that expresses one of the present transcription factors.
  • Appropriate mRNA sources may be identified by interrogating Northern blots with probes designed from the present transcription factor sequences, after which a library is prepared from the mRNA obtained from a positive cell or tissue.
  • Transcription factor-encoding cDNA is then isolated using, for example, PCR, using primers designed from a presently disclosed transcription factor gene sequence, or by probing with a partial or complete cDNA or with one or more sets of degenerate probes based on the disclosed sequences.
  • the cDNA library may be used to transform plant cells. Expression of the cDNAs of interest is detected using, for example, methods disclosed herein such as microarrays, Northern blots, quantitative PCR, or any other technique for monitoring changes in expression. Genomic clones may be isolated using similar techniques to those.
  • the invention encompasses isolated nucleotide sequences that are sequentially and structurally similar to G481, G482, and G485, SEQ ID NO: 1, 3, and 5, and function in a plant in a manner similar to G481, G482 and G485 by regulating abiotic stress tolerance.
  • the nucleotide sequences of G481 and G485 are 88% and 82% identical to the polynucleotide sequence of G482, respectively. Since all three polynucleotide sequences are phylogenetically related, sequentially similar, and have been shown to regulate abiotic stress tolerance, one skilled in the art would predict that other similar, phylogenetically related sequences would also regulate abiotic stress tolerance.
  • a sequence that was 99.5% identical (861 of 865 bases) to G482 has been taught by Edwards et al., ((1998) Plant Physiol. 117: 1015-1022), but with no analysis of the function of this gene.
  • the present invention is also directed to polypeptide encoded by isolated nucleic acid that are similar tc G481, G482 and G485, vectors comprising isolated nucleic acid that are similar to G481, G482 and G485, and transgenic plants transformed with these isolated nucleic acids.
  • Polynucleotides homologous to the sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing and tables can be identified, e.g., by hybridization to each other under stringent or under highly stringent conditions.
  • Single stranded polynucleotides hybridize when they associate based on a variety of well characterized physical-chemical forces, such as hydrogen bonding, solvent exclusion, base stacking and the like.
  • the stringency of a hybridization reflects the degree of sequence identity of the nucleic acids involved, such that the higher the stringency, the more similar are the two polynucleotide strands. Stringency is influenced by a variety of factors, including temperature, salt concentration and composition, organic and non-organic additives, solvents, etc. present in both the hybridization and wash solutions and incubations (and number thereof), as described in more detail in the references cited above.
  • polynucleotide sequences that are capable of hybridizing to the claimed polynucleotide sequences, including any of the transcription factor polynucleotides within the Sequence Listing, and fragments thereof under various conditions of stringency (See, for example, Wahl and Berger (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 399407; and Kimmel (1987) Methods Enzymol. 152: 507-511).
  • full-length cDNA, orthologs, and paralogs of the present nucleotide sequences may be identified and isolated using well-known methods.
  • the cDNA libraries, orthologs, and paralogs of the present nucleotide sequences may be screened using hybridization methods to determine their utility as hybridization target or amplification probes.
  • T m The melting temperature
  • L is the length of the duplex formed
  • [Na+] is the molar concentration of the sodium ion in the hybridization or washing solution
  • % G+C is the percentage of (guanine+cytosine) bases in the hybrid. For imperfectly matched hybrids, approximately 1° C. is required to reduce the melting temperature for
  • Hybridization experiments are generally conducted in a buffer of pH between 6.8 to 7.4, although the rate of hybridization is nearly independent of pH at ionic strengths likely to be used in the hybridization buffer (Anderson et al. (1985) supra).
  • one or more of the following may be used to reduce non-specific hybridization: sonicated salmon sperm DNA or another non-complementary DNA, bovine serum albumin, sodium pyrophosphate, sodium dodecylsulfate (SDS), polyvinyl-pyrrolidone, ficoll and Denhardt's solution.
  • Dextran sulfate and polyethylene glycol 6000 act to exclude DNA from solution, thus raising the effective probe DNA concentration and the hybridization signal within a given unit of time.
  • conditions of even greater stringency may be desirable or required to reduce non-specific and/or background hybridization. These conditions may be created with the use of higher temperature, lower ionic strength and higher concentration of a denaturing agent such as formamide.
  • Stringency conditions can be adjusted to screen for moderately similar fragments such as homologous sequences from distantly related organisms, or to highly similar fragments such as genes that duplicate functional enzymes from closely related organisms.
  • the stringency can be adjusted either during the hybridization step or in the post-hybridization washes.
  • Salt concentration, formamide concentration, hybridization temperature and probe lengths are variables that can be used to alter stringency (as described by the formula above). As a general guidelines high stringency is typically performed at T m ⁇ 5° C. to T m ⁇ 20° C., moderate stringency at T m ⁇ 20° C. to T m ⁇ 35° C. and low stringency at T m ⁇ 35° C. to T m ⁇ 50° C.
  • Hybridization may be performed at low to moderate stringency (25-50° C. below T m ), followed by post-hybridization washes at increasing stringencies. Maximum rates of hybridization in solution are determined empirically to occur at T m ⁇ 25° C. for DNA-DNA duplex and T m ⁇ 15° C. for RNA-DNA duplex.
  • the degree of dissociation may be assessed after each wash step to determine the need for subsequent, higher stringency wash steps.
  • High stringency conditions may be used to select for nucleic acid sequences with high degrees of identity to the disclosed sequences.
  • An example of stringent hybridization conditions obtained in a filter-based method such as a Southern or northern blot for hybridization of complementary nucleic acids that have more than 100 complementary residues is about 5° C. to 20° C. lower than the thermal melting point (T m ) for the specific sequence at a defined ionic strength and pH.
  • Conditions used for hybridization may include about 0.02 M to about 0.15 M sodium chloride, about 0.5% to about 5% casein, about 0.02% SDS or about 0.1% N-laurylsarcosine, about 0.001 M to about 0.03 M sodium citrate, at hybridization temperatures between about 50° C. and about 70° C.
  • high stringency conditions are about 0.02 M sodium chloride, about 0.5% casein, about 0.02% SDS, about 0.001 M sodium citrate, at a temperature of about 50° C.
  • Nucleic acid molecules that hybridize under stringent conditions will typically hybridize to a probe based on either the entire DNA molecule or selected portions, e.g., to a unique subsequence, of the DNA.
  • Stringent salt concentration will ordinarily be less than about 750 mM NaCl and 75 mM trisodium citrate. Increasingly stringent conditions may be obtained with less than about 500 mM NaCI and 50 mM trisodium citrate, to even greater stringency with less than about 250 mM NaCl and 25 mM trisodium citrate.
  • Low stringency hybridization can be obtained in the absence of organic solvent, e.g., formamide, whereas high stringency hybridization may be obtained in the presence of at least about 35% formamide, and more preferably at least about 50% formamide.
  • Stringent temperature conditions will ordinarily include temperatures of at least about 30° C., more preferably of at least about 37° C., and most preferably of at least about 42° C.
  • washing steps that follow hybridization may also vary in stringency; the post-hybridization wash steps primarily determine hybridization specificity, with the most critical factors being temperature and the ionic strength of the final wash solution. Wash stringency can be increased by decreasing salt concentration or by increasing temperature. Stringent salt concentration for the wash steps will preferably be less than about 30 mM NaCl and 3 mM trisodium citrate, and most preferably less than about 15 mM NaCl and 1.5 mM trisodium citrate.
  • hybridization and wash conditions that may be used to bind and remove polynucleotides with less than the desired homology to the nucleic acid sequences or their complements that encode the present transcription factors include, for example:
  • wash steps of even greater stringency, including about 0.2 ⁇ SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C. and washing twice, each wash step being about 30 min, or about 0.1 ⁇ SSC, 0.1% SDS at 65° C. and washing twice for 30 min.
  • the temperature for the wash solutions will ordinarily be at least about 25° C., and for greater stringency at least about 42° C.
  • Hybridization stringency may be increased further by using the same conditions as in the hybridization steps, with the wash temperature raised about 3° C. to about 5° C., and stringency may be increased even further by using the same conditions except the wash temperature is raised about 6° C. to about 9° C.
  • wash steps may be performed at a lower temperature, e.g., 50° C.
  • An example of a low stringency wash step employs a solution and conditions of at least 25° C. in 30 mM NaCl, 3 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS over 30 min. Greater stringency may be obtained at 42° C. in 15 mM NaCl, with 1.5 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS over 30 min. Even higher stringency wash conditions are obtained at 65° C.-68° C. in a solution of 15 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM trisodium citrate, and 0.1% SDS. Wash procedures will generally employ at least two final wash steps. Additional variations on these conditions will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art (see, for example, U.S. patent application No. 20010010913).
  • Stringency conditions can be selected such that an oligonucleotide that is perfectly complementary to the coding oligonucleotide hybridizes to the coding oligonucleotide with at least about a 5-10 ⁇ higher signal to noise ratio than the ratio for hybridization of the perfectly complementary oligonucleotide to a nucleic acid encoding a transcription factor known as of the filing date of the application. It may be desirable to select conditions for a particular assay such that a higher signal to noise ratio, that is, about 15 ⁇ or more, is obtained.
  • a subject nucleic acid will hybridize to a unique coding oligonucleotide with at least a 2 ⁇ or greater signal to noise ratio as compared to hybridization of the coding oligonucleotide to a nucleic acid encoding known polypeptide.
  • the particular signal will depend on the label used in the relevant assay, e.g., a fluorescent label, a calorimetric label, a radioactive label, or the like.
  • Labeled hybridization or PCR probes for detecting related polynucleotide sequences may be produced by oligolabeling, nick translation, end-labeling, or PCR amplification using a labeled nucleotide.
  • polynucleotide sequences that are capable of hybridizing to the present polynucleotide sequences, and, in particular, to SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, polynucleotides that encode polypeptide SEQ ID NOs: 29-32, and fragments thereof under various conditions of stringency.
  • transcription factor homolog polypeptides can be obtained by screening an expression library using antibodies specific for one or more transcription factors.
  • the encoded polypeptide(s) can be expressed and purified in a heterologous expression system (e.g., E. coli ) and used to raise antibodies (monoclonal or polyclonal) specific for the polypeptide(s) in question.
  • Antibodies can also be raised against synthetic peptides derived from transcription factor, or transcription factor homolog, amino acid sequences. Methods of raising antibodies are well known in the art and are described in Harlow and Lane (1988), Antibodies: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, New York. Such antibodies can then be used to screen an expression library produced from the plant from which it is desired to clone additional transcription factor homologs, using the methods described above.
  • the selected cDNAs can be confirmed by sequencing and enzymatic activity.
  • any of a variety of polynucleotide sequences are capable of encoding the transcription factors and transcription factor homolog polypeptides of the invention. Due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, many different polynucleotides can encode identical and/or substantially similar polypeptides in addition to those sequences illustrated in the Sequence Listing. Nucleic acids having a sequence that differs from the sequences shown in the Sequence Listing, or complementary sequences, that encode functionally equivalent peptides (i.e., peptides having some degree of equivalent or similar biological activity) but differ in sequence from the sequence shown in the Sequence Listing due to degeneracy in the genetic code, are also within the scope of the invention.
  • Altered polynucleotide sequences encoding polypeptides include those sequences with deletions, insertions, or substitutions of different nucleotides, resulting in a polynucleotide encoding a polypeptide with at least one functional characteristic of the instant polypeptides. Included within this definition are polymorphisms which may or may not be readily detectable using a particular oligonucleotide probe of the polynucleotide encoding the instant polypeptides, and improper or unexpected hybridization to allelic variants, with a locus other than the normal chromosomal locus for the polynucleotide sequence encoding the instant polypeptides.
  • Allelic variant refers to any of two or more alternative forms of a gene occupying the same chromosomal locus. Allelic variation arises naturally through mutation, and may result in phenotypic polymorphism within populations. Gene mutations can be silent (i.e., no change in the encoded polypeptide) or may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence.
  • allelic variant is also used herein to denote a protein encoded by an allelic variant of a gene.
  • Splice variant refers to alternative forms of RNA transcribed from a gene.
  • Splice variation arises naturally through use of alternative splicing sites within a transcribed RNA molecule, or less commonly between separately transcribed RNA molecules, and may result in several mRNAs transcribed from the same gene.
  • Splice variants may encode polypeptides having altered amino acid sequence.
  • the term splice variant is also used herein to denote a protein encoded by a splice variant of an mRNA transcribed from a gene.
  • SEQ ID NO: 4 represents a single transcription factor; allelic variation and alternative splicing may be expected to occur.
  • Allelic variants of SEQ ID NO: 3 can be cloned by probing cDNA or genomic libraries from different individual organisms according to standard procedures. Allelic variants of the DNA sequence shown in SEQ ID NO: 3, including those containing silent mutations and those in which mutations result in amino acid sequence changes, are within the scope of the present invention, as are proteins which are allelic variants of SEQ ID NO: 4.
  • cDNAs generated from alternatively spliced mRNAs, which retain the properties of the transcription factor are included within the scope of the present invention, as are polypeptides encoded by such cDNAs and mRNAs.
  • Allelic variants and splice variants of these sequences can be cloned by probing cDNA or genomic libraries from different individual organisms or tissues according to standard procedures known in the art (see U.S. Pat. No. 6,388,064).
  • the invention also encompasses related nucleic acid molecules that include allelic or splice variants SEQ ID NO: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11-21, 27-52, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 75, 77, and 79, and include sequences which are complementary to these nucleotide sequences.
  • nucleic acid molecules also include nucleotide sequences encoding a polypeptide comprising or consisting essentially of a substitution, modification, addition and/or deletion of one or more amino acid residues compared to the polypeptide as set forth in any of SEQ ID NOs: 2,4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26,28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92 and 94.
  • Such related polypeptides may comprise, for example, additions and/or deletions of one or more N-linked or O-linked glycosylation sites, or an addition and/or a deletion of one or more cysteine residues.
  • Table 2 illustrates, e.g., that the codons AGC, AGT, TCA, TCC, TCG, and TCT all encode the same amino acid: serine. Accordingly, at each position in the sequence where there is a codon encoding serine, any of the above trinucleotide sequences can be used without altering the encoded polypeptide.
  • sequence alterations that do not change the amino acid sequence encoded by the polynucleotide are termed “silent” variations.
  • silent variations With the exception of the codons ATG and TGG, encoding methionine and tryptophan, respectively, any of the possible codons for the same amino acid can be substituted by a variety of techniques, e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, available in the art. Accordingly, any and all such variations of a sequence selected from the above table are a feature of the invention.
  • substitutions, deletions and insertions introduced into the sequences provided in the Sequence Listing are also envisioned by the invention.
  • sequence modifications can be engineered into a sequence by site-directed mutagenesis (Wu (ed.) Methods Enzymol. ( 1993) vol. 217, Academic Press) or the other methods noted below.
  • Amino acid substitutions are typically of single residues; insertions usually will be on the order of about from I to 10 amino acid residues; and deletions will range about from 1 to 30 residues.
  • deletions or insertions are made in adjacent pairs, e.g., a deletion of two residues or insertion of two residues. Substitutions, deletions, insertions or any combination thereof can be combined to arrive at a sequence.
  • the mutations that are made in the polynucleotide encoding the transcription factor should not place the sequence out of reading frame and should not create complementary regions that could produce secondary mRNA structure.
  • the polypeptide encoded by the DNA performs the desired function.
  • Conservative substitutions are those in which at least one residue in the amino acid sequence has been removed and a different residue inserted in its place. Such substitutions generally are made in accordance with the Table 3 when it is desired to maintain the activity of the protein. Table 3 shows amino acids which can be substituted for an amino acid in a protein and which are typically regarded as conservative substitutions.
  • substitutions are those in which at least one residue in the amino acid sequence has been removed and a different residue inserted in its place. Such substitutions generally are made in accordance with the Table 4 when it is desired to maintain the activity of the protein.
  • Table 4 shows amino acids which can be substituted for an amino acid in a protein and which are typically regarded as structural and functional substitutions. For example, a residue in column 1 of Table 4 may be substituted with a residue in column 2; in addition, a residue in column 2 of Table 4 may be substituted with the residue of column 1.
  • Substitutions that are less conservative than those in Table 3 can be selected by picking residues that differ more significantly in their effect on maintaining (a) the structure of the polypeptide backbone in the area of the substitution, for example, as a sheet or helical conformation, (b) the charge or hydrophobicity of the molecule at the target site, or (c) the bulk of the side chain.
  • substitutions which in general are expected to produce the greatest changes in protein properties will be those in which (a) a hydrophilic residue, e.g., seryl or threonyl, is substituted for (or by) a hydrophobic residue, e.g., leucyl, isoleucyl, phenylalanyl, valyl or alanyl; (b) a cysteine or proline is substituted for (or by) any other residue; (c) a residue having an electropositive side chain, e.g., lysyl, arginyl, or histidyl, is substituted for (or by) an electronegative residue, e.g., glutamyl or aspartyl; or (d) a residue having a bulky side chain, e.g., phenylalanine, is substituted for (or by) one not having a side chain, e.g., glycine.
  • a hydrophilic residue e.g
  • the present invention optionally includes methods of modifying the sequences of the Sequence Listing.
  • nucleic acid or protein modification methods are used to alter the given sequences to produce new sequences and/or to chemically or enzymatically modify given sequences to change the properties of the nucleic acids or proteins.
  • given nucleic acid sequences are modified, e.g., according to standard mutagenesis or artificial evolution methods to produce modified sequences.
  • the modified sequences may be created using purified natural polynucleotides isolated from any organism or may be synthesized from purified compositions and chemicals using chemical means well know to those of skill in the art.
  • Ausubel, supra provides additional details on mutagenesis methods.
  • Artificial forced evolution methods are described, for example, by Stemmer (1994) Nature 370: 389-391, Stemmer (1994) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 91: 10747-10751, and U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,811,238, 5,837,500, and 6,242,568.
  • sequence can be modified by addition of lipids, sugars, peptides, organic or inorganic compounds, by the inclusion of modified nucleotides or amino acids, or the like.
  • protein modification techniques are illustrated in Ausubel, supra. Further details on chemical and enzymatic modifications can be found herein. These modification methods can be used to modify any given sequence, or to modify any sequence produced by the various mutation and artificial evolution modification methods noted herein.
  • the invention provides for modification of any given nucleic acid by mutation, evolution, chemical or enzymatic modification, or other available methods, as well as for the products produced by practicing such methods, e.g., using the sequences herein as a starting substrate for the various modification approaches.
  • optimized coding sequence containing codons preferred by a particular prokaryotic or eukaryotic host can be used e.g., to increase the rate of translation or to produce recombinant RNA transcripts having desirable properties, such as a longer half-life, as compared with transcripts produced using a non-optimized sequence.
  • Translation stop codons can also be modified to reflect host preference. For example, preferred stop codons for Saccharomyces cerevisiae and mammals are TAA and TGA, respectively. The preferred stop codon for monocotyledonous plants is TGA, whereas insects and E. coli prefer to use TAA as the stop codon.
  • polynucleotide sequences of the present invention can also be engineered in order to alter a coding sequence for a variety of reasons, including but not limited to, alterations which modify the sequence to facilitate cloning, processing and/or expression of the gene product.
  • alterations are optionally introduced using techniques which are well known in the art, e.g., site-directed mutagenesis, to insert new restriction sites, to alter glycosylation patterns, to change codon preference, to introduce splice sites, etc.
  • a fragment or domain derived from any of the polypeptides of the invention can be combined with domains derived from other transcription factors or synthetic domains to modify the biological activity of a transcription factor.
  • a DNA-binding domain derived from a transcription factor of the invention can be combined with the activation domain of another transcription factor or with a synthetic activation domain.
  • a transcription activation domain assists in initiating transcription from a DNA-binding site. Examples include the transcription activation region of VP16 or GAL4 (Moore et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 376-381; Aoyama et al.
  • polynucleotide sequences of the invention are incorporated into recombinant DNA (or RNA) molecules that direct expression of polypeptides of the invention in appropriate host cells, transgenic plants, in vitro translation systems, or the like. Due to the inherent degeneracy of the genetic code, nucleic acid sequences which encode substantially the same or a functionally equivalent amino acid sequence can be substituted for any listed sequence to provide for cloning and expressing the relevant homolog.
  • transgenic plants of the present invention comprising recombinant polynucleotide sequences are generally derived from parental plants, which may themselves be non-transformed (or non-transgenic) plants. These transgenic plants may either have a transcription factor gene “knocked out” (for example, with a genomic insertion by homologous recombination, an antisense or ribozyme construct) or expressed to a normal or wild-type extent. However, overexpressing transgenic “progeny” plants will exhibit greater mRNA levels, wherein the mRNA encodes a transcription factor, that is, a DNA-binding protein that is capable of binding to a DNA regulatory sequence and inducing transcription, and preferably, expression of a plant trait gene.
  • a transcription factor that is, a DNA-binding protein that is capable of binding to a DNA regulatory sequence and inducing transcription, and preferably, expression of a plant trait gene.
  • the mRNA expression level will be at least three-fold greater than that of the parental plant, or more preferably at least ten-fold greater mRNA levels compared to said parental plant, and most preferably at least fifty-fold greater compared to said parental plant.
  • the present invention includes recombinant constructs comprising one or more of the nucleic acid sequences herein.
  • the constructs typically comprise a vector, such as a plasmid, a cosmid, a phage, a virus (e.g., a plant virus), a bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC), a yeast artificial chromosome (YAC), or the like, into which a nucleic acid sequence of the invention has been inserted, in a forward or reverse orientation.
  • the construct further comprises regulatory sequences, including, for example, a promoter, operably linked to the sequence. Large numbers of suitable vectors and promoters are known to those of skill in the art, and are commercially available.
  • non-Ti vectors can be used to transfer the DNA into monocotyledonous plants and cells by using free DNA delivery techniques.
  • free DNA delivery techniques can involve, for example, the use of liposomes, electroporation, microprojectile bombardment, silicon carbide whiskers, and viruses.
  • transgenic plants such as wheat, rice (Christou (1991) Bio/Technology 9: 957-962) and corn (Gordon-Kamm (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618) can be produced.
  • An immature embryo can also be a good target tissue for monocots for direct DNA delivery techniques by using the particle gun (Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol.
  • plant transformation vectors include one or more cloned plant coding sequence (genomic or cDNA) under the transcriptional control of 5′ and 3′ regulatory sequences and a dominant selectable marker.
  • plant transformation vectors typically also contain a promoter (e.g., a regulatory region controlling inducible or constitutive, environmentally-or developmentally-regulated, or cell- or tissue-specific expression), a transcription initiation start site, an RNA processing signal (such as intron splice sites), a transcription termination site, and/or a polyadenylation signal.
  • a potential utility for the transcription factor polynucleotides disclosed herein is the isolation of promoter elements from these genes that can be used to program expression in plants of any genes.
  • Each transcription factor gene disclosed herein is expressed in a unique fashion, as determined by promoter elements located upstream of the start of translation, and additionally within an intron of the transcription factor gene or downstream of the termination codon of the gene.
  • the promoter sequences are located entirely in the region directly upstream of the start of translation. In such cases, typically the promoter sequences are located within 2.0 kb of the start of translation, or within 1.5 kb of the start of translation, frequently within 1.0 kb of the start of translation, and sometimes within 0.5 kb of the start of translation.
  • the promoter sequences can be isolated according to methods known to one skilled in the art.
  • constitutive plant promoters which can be useful for expressing the TF sequence include: the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter, which confers constitutive, high-level expression in most plant tissues (see, e.g., Odell et al. (1985) Nature 313: 810-812); the nopaline synthase promoter (An et al. (1988) Plant Physiol. 88: 547-552); and the octopine synthase promoter (Fromm et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 977-984).
  • CaMV cauliflower mosaic virus
  • the transcription factors of the invention may be operably linked with a specific promoter that causes the transcription factor to be expressed in response to environmental, tissue-specific or temporal signals.
  • a specific promoter that causes the transcription factor to be expressed in response to environmental, tissue-specific or temporal signals.
  • a variety of plant gene promoters that regulate gene expression in response to environmental, hormonal, chemical, developmental signals, and in a tissue-active manner can be used for expression of a TF sequence in plants. Choice of a promoter is based largely on the phenotype of interest and is determined by such factors as tissue (e.g., seed, fruit, root, pollen, vascular tissue, flower, carpel, etc.), inducibility (e.g., in response to wounding, heat, cold, drought, light, pathogens, etc.), timing, developmental stage, and the like.
  • tissue e.g., seed, fruit, root, pollen, vascular tissue, flower, carpel, etc.
  • inducibility e.g., in response to wounding, heat
  • tissue specific promoters include: seed-specific promoters (such as the napin, phaseolin or DC3 promoter described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,773,697), fruit-specific promoters that are active during fruit ripening (such as the dru 1 promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 5,783,393), or the 2A11 promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 4,943,674) and the tomato polygalacturonase promoter (Bird et al. (1988) Plant Mol. Biol.
  • root-specific promoters such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,618,988, 5,837,848 and 5,905,186
  • pollen-active promoters such as PTA29, PTA26 and PTA13 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,792,929)
  • promoters active in vascular tissue Rost and Keller (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 37: 977-988
  • flower-specific Karl et al. (1995) Plant Mol. Biol. 28: 231-243
  • pollen Baerson et al. (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 26: 1947-1959
  • carpels Ohl et al.
  • Additional promoters are those that elicit expression in response to heat (Ainley et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 13-23), light (e.g., the pea rbcS-3A promoter, Kuhlemeier et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 471-478, and the maize rbcS promoter, Schafffner and Sheen (1991) Plant Cell 3: 997-1012); wounding (e.g., wunl, Siebertz et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 961-968); pathogens (such as the PR-1 promoter described in Buchel et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol.
  • Plant expression vectors can also include RNA processing signals that can be positioned within, upstream or downstream of the coding sequence.
  • the expression vectors can include additional regulatory sequences from the 3′-untranslated region of plant genes, e.g., a 3′ terminator region to increase mRNA stability of the mRNA, such as the PI-II terminator region of potato or the octopine or nopaline synthase 3′ terminator regions.
  • Specific initiation signals can aid in efficient translation of coding sequences. These signals can include, e.g., the ATG initiation codon and adjacent sequences. In cases where a coding sequence, its initiation codon and upstream sequences are inserted into the appropriate expression vector, no additional translational control signals may be needed. However, in cases where only coding sequence (e.g., a mature protein coding sequence), or a portion thereof, is inserted, exogenous transcriptional control signals including the ATG initiation codon can be separately provided. The initiation codon is provided in the correct reading frame to facilitate transcription. Exogenous transcriptional elements and initiation codons can be of various origins, both natural and synthetic. The efficiency of expression can be enhanced by the inclusion of enhancers appropriate to the cell system in use.
  • the present invention also relates to host cells which are transduced with vectors of the invention, and the production of polypeptides of the invention (including fragments thereof) by recombinant techniques.
  • Host cells are genetically engineered (i.e., nucleic acids are introduced, e.g., transduced, transformed or transfected) with the vectors of this invention, which may be, for example, a cloning vector or an expression vector comprising the relevant nucleic acids herein.
  • the vector is optionally a plasmid, a viral particle, a phage, a naked nucleic acid, etc.
  • the engineered host cells can be cultured in conventional nutrient media modified as appropriate for activating promoters, selecting transformants, or amplifying the relevant gene.
  • the culture conditions such as temperature, pH and the like, are those previously used with the host cell selected for expression, and will be apparent to those skilled in the art and in the references cited herein, including, Sambrook, supra and Ausubel, supra
  • the host cell can be a eukaryotic cell, such as a yeast cell, or a plant cell, or the host cell can be a prokaryotic cell, such as a bacterial cell.
  • Plant protoplasts are also suitable for some applications.
  • the DNA fragments are introduced into plant tissues, cultured plant cells or plant protoplasts by standard methods including electroporation (Fromm et al. (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 5824-5828, infection by viral vectors such as cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) (Hohn et al. (1982) Molecular Biology of Plant Tumors Academic Press, New York, N.Y., pp. 549-560; U.S. Pat. No.
  • the cell can include a nucleic acid of the invention that encodes a polypeptide, wherein the cell expresses a polypeptide of the invention.
  • the cell can also include vector sequences, or the like.
  • cells and transgenic plants that include any polypeptide or nucleic acid above or throughout this specification, e.g., produced by transduction of a vector of the invention, are an additional feature of the invention.
  • Host cells transformed with a nucleotide sequence encoding a polypeptide of the invention are optionally cultured under conditions suitable for the expression and recovery of the encoded protein from cell culture.
  • the protein or fragment thereof produced by a recombinant cell may be secreted, membrane-bound, or contained intracellularly, depending on the sequence and/or the vector used.
  • expression vectors containing polynucleotides encoding mature proteins of the invention can be designed with signal sequences which direct secretion of the mature polypeptides through a prokaryotic or eukaryotic cell membrane.
  • Polypeptides of the invention may contain one or more modified amino acid residues.
  • the presence of modified amino acids may be advantageous in, for example, increasing polypeptide half-life, reducing polypeptide antigenicity or toxicity, increasing polypeptide storage stability, or the like.
  • Amino acid residue(s) are modified, for example, co-translationally or post-translationally during recombinant production or modified by synthetic or chemical means.
  • Non-limiting examples of a modified amino acid residue include incorporation or other use of acetylated amino acids, glycosylated amino acids, sulfated amino acids, prenylated (e.g., farnesylated, geranylgeranylated) amino acids, PEG modified (e.g., “PEGylated”) amino acids, biotinylated amino acids, carboxylated amino acids, phosphorylated amino acids, etc.
  • PEG modified e.g., “PEGylated”
  • the modified amino acid residues may prevent or increase affinity of the polypeptide for another molecule, including, but not limited to, polynucleotide, proteins, carbohydrates, lipids and lipid derivatives, and other organic or synthetic compounds.
  • a transcription factor provided by the present invention can also be used to identify additional endogenous or exogenous molecules that can affect a phentoype or trait of interest.
  • such molecules include organic (small or large molecules) and/or inorganic compounds that affect expression of (i.e., regulate) a particular transcription factor.
  • such molecules include endogenous molecules that are acted upon either at a transcriptional level by a transcription factor of the invention to modify a phenotype as desired.
  • the transcription factors can be employed to identify one or more downstream genes that are subject to a regulatory effect of the transcription factor.
  • a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog of the invention is expressed in a host cell, e.g., a transgenic plant cell, tissue or explant, and expression products, either RNA or protein, of likely or random targets are monitored, e.g., by hybridization to a microarray of nucleic acid probes corresponding to genes expressed in a tissue or cell type of interest, by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of protein products, or by any other method known in the art for assessing expression of gene products at the level of RNA or protein.
  • a transcription factor of the invention can be used to identify promoter sequences (such as binding sites on DNA sequences) involved in the regulation of a downstream target.
  • interactions between the transcription factor and the promoter sequence can be modified by changing specific nucleotides in the promoter sequence or specific amino acids in the transcription factor that interact with the promoter sequence to alter a plant trait.
  • transcription factor DNA-binding sites are identified by gel shift assays.
  • the promoter region sequences can be employed in double-stranded DNA arrays to identify molecules that affect the interactions of the transcription factors with their promoters (Bulyk et al. (1999) Nature Biotechnol. 17: 573-577).
  • the identified transcription factors are also useful to identify proteins that modify the activity of the transcription factor. Such modification can occur by covalent modification, such as by phosphorylation, or by protein-protein (homo or-heteropolymer) interactions. Any method suitable for detecting protein-protein interactions can be employed. Among the methods that can be employed are co-immunoprecipitation, cross-linking and co-purification through gradients or chromatographic columns, and the two-hybrid yeast system.
  • the two-hybrid system detects protein interactions in vivo and is described in Chien et al. ((1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 88: 9578-9582) and is commercially available from Clontech (Palo Alto, Calif.).
  • plasmids are constructed that encode two hybrid proteins: one consists of the DNA-binding domain of a transcription activator protein fused to the TF polypeptide and the other consists of the transcription activator protein's activation domain fused to an unknown protein that is encoded by a cDNA that has been recombined into the plasmid as part of a cDNA library.
  • the DNA-binding domain fusion plasmid and the cDNA library are transformed into a strain of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae that contains a reporter gene (e.g., lacZ) whose regulatory region contains the transcription activator's binding site. Either hybrid protein alone cannot activate transcription of the reporter gene. Interaction of the two hybrid proteins reconstitutes the functional activator protein and results in expression of the reporter gene, which is detected by an assay for the reporter gene product.
  • a reporter gene e.g., lacZ
  • the library plasmids responsible for reporter gene expression are isolated and sequenced to identify the proteins encoded by the library plasmids. After identifying proteins that interact with the transcription factors, assays for compounds that interfere with the TF protein-protein interactions can be preformed.
  • extracellular molecules that alter activity or expression of a transcription factor can be identified.
  • the methods can entail first placing a candidate molecule in contact with a plant or plant cell.
  • the molecule can be introduced by topical administration, such as spraying or soaking of a plant, or incubating a plant in a solution containing the molecule, and then the molecule's effect on the expression or activity of the TF polypeptide or the expression of the polynucleotide monitored. Changes in the expression of the TF polypeptide can be monitored by use of polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies, gel electrophoresis or the like.
  • Changes in the expression of the corresponding polynucleotide sequence can be detected by use of microarrays, Northerns, quantitative PCR, or any other technique for monitoring changes in mRNA expression. These techniques are exemplified in Ausubel et al. (eds.) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons (1998, and supplements through 2001). Changes in the activity of the transcription factor can be monitored, directly or indirectly, by assaying the function of the transcription factor, for example, by measuring the expression of promoters known to be controlled by the transcription factor (using promoter-reporter constructs), measuring the levels of transcripts using microarrays, Northern blots, quantitative PCR, etc. Such changes in the expression levels can be correlated with modified plant traits and thus identified molecules can be useful for soaking or spraying on fruit, vegetable and grain crops to modify traits in plants.
  • any available composition can be tested for modulatory activity of expression or activity of any nucleic acid or polypeptide herein.
  • available libraries of compounds such as chemicals, polypeptides, nucleic acids and the like can be tested for modulatory activity.
  • potential modulator compounds can be dissolved in aqueous or organic (e.g., DMSO-based) solutions for easy delivery to the cell or plant of interest in which the activity of the modulator is to be tested.
  • the assays are designed to screen large modulator composition libraries by automating the assay steps and providing compounds from any convenient source to assays, which are typically run in parallel (e.g., in microtiter formats on micrometer plates in robotic assays).
  • high throughput screening methods involve providing a combinatorial library containing a large number of potential compounds (potential modulator compounds). Such “combinatorial chemical libraries” are then screened in one or more assays, as described herein, to identify those library members (particular chemical species or subclasses) that display a desired characteristic activity. The compounds thus identified can serve as target compounds.
  • a combinatorial chemical library can be, e.g., a collection of diverse chemical compounds generated by chemical synthesis or biological synthesis.
  • a combinatorial chemical library such as a polypeptide library is formed by combining a set of chemical building blocks (e.g., in one example, amino acids) in every possible way for a given compound length (i.e., the number of amino acids in a polypeptide compound of a set length).
  • Exemplary libraries include peptide libraries, nucleic acid libraries, antibody libraries (see, e.g., Vaughn et al. (1996) Nature Biotechnol. 14: 309-314 and PCT/US96/10287), carbohydrate libraries (see, e.g., Liang et al.
  • combinatorial or other libraries are well known to those of skill in the art.
  • combinatorial chemical libraries include, but are not limited to, peptide libraries (see, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,010,175; Furka, (1991) Int. J. Pept. Prot. Res. 37: 487493; and Houghton et al. (1991) Nature 354: 84-88).
  • Other chemistries for generating chemical diversity libraries can also be used.
  • compound screening equipment for high-throughput screening is generally available, e.g., using any of a number of well known robotic systems that have also been developed for solution phase chemistries useful in assay systems. These systems include automated workstations including an automated synthesis apparatus and robotic systems utilizing robotic arms. Any of the above devices are suitable for use with the present invention, e.g., for high-throughput screening of potential modulators. The nature and implementation of modifications to these devices (if any) so that they can operate as discussed herein will be apparent to persons skilled in the relevant art.
  • Zymark Corp. provides technical bulletins describing screening systems for detecting the modulation of gene transcription, ligand binding, and the like.
  • the integrated systems herein in addition to providing for sequence alignment and, optionally, synthesis of relevant nucleic acids, can include such screening apparatus to identify modulators that have an effect on one or more polynucleotides or polypeptides according to the present invention.
  • RNA levels and/or protein expression for example, according to the methods herein.
  • modulators can also be combined with transcriptional activators or inhibitors to find modulators that inhibit transcriptional activation or transcriptional repression. Either expression of the nucleic acids and proteins herein or any additional nucleic acids or proteins activated by the nucleic acids or proteins herein, or both, can be monitored.
  • the invention provides a method for identifying compositions that modulate the activity or expression of a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the invention.
  • a test compound whether a small or large molecule, is placed in contact with a cell, plant (or plant tissue or explant), or composition comprising the polynucleotide or polypeptide of interest and a resulting effect on the cell, plant, (or tissue or explant) or composition is evaluated by monitoring, either directly or indirectly, one or more of: expression level of the polynucleotide or polypeptide, activity (or modulation of the activity) of the polynucleotide or polypeptide.
  • an alteration in a plant phenotype can be detected following contact of a plant (or plant cell, or tissue or explant) with the putative modulator, e.g., by modulation of expression or activity of a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the invention.
  • Modulation of expression or activity of a polynucleotide or polypeptide of the invention may also be caused by molecular elements in a signal transduction second messenger pathway and such modulation can affect similar elements in the same or another signal transduction second messenger pathway.
  • polynucleotides also referred to herein as oligonucleotides, typically having at least 12 bases, preferably at least 15, more preferably at least 20, 30, or 50 bases, which hybridize under at least highly stringent (or ultra-high stringent or ultra-ultra-high stringent conditions) conditions to a polynucleotide sequence described above.
  • the polynucleotides may be used as probes, primers, sense and antisense agents, and the like, according to methods as noted supra.
  • Subsequences of the polynucleotides of the invention are useful as nucleic acid probes and primers.
  • An oligonucleotide suitable for use as a probe or primer is at least about 15 nucleotides in length, more often at least about 18 nucleotides, often at least about 21 nucleotides, frequently at least about 30 nucleotides, or about 40 nucleotides, or more in length.
  • a nucleic acid probe is useful in hybridization protocols, e.g., to identify additional polypeptide homologs of the invention, including protocols for microarray experiments.
  • Primers can be annealed to a complementary target DNA strand by nucleic acid hybridization to form a hybrid between the primer and the target DNA strand, and then extended along the target DNA strand by a DNA polymerase enzyme.
  • Primer pairs can be used for amplification of a nucleic acid sequence, e.g., by the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or other nucleic-acid amplification methods. See Sambrook, supra, and Ausubel, supra.
  • the invention includes an isolated or recombinant polypeptide including a subsequence of at least about 15 contiguous amino acids encoded by the recombinant or isolated polynucleotides of the invention.
  • polypeptides, or domains or fragments thereof can be used as immunogens, e.g., to produce antibodies specific for the polypeptide sequence, or as probes for detecting a sequence of interest.
  • a subsequence can range in size from about 15 amino acids in length up to and including the full length of the polypeptide.
  • an expressed polypeptide which comprises such a polypeptide subsequence performs at least one biological function of the intact polypeptide in substantially the same manner, or to a similar extent, as does the intact polypeptide.
  • a polypeptide fragment can comprise a recognizable structural motif or functional domain such as a DNA binding domain that activates transcription, e.g., by binding to a specific DNA promoter region an activation domain, or a domain for protein-protein interactions.
  • Arabidopsis thaliana is the object of rapidly growing attention as a model for genetics and metabolism in plants. Arabidopsis has a small genome, and well-documented studies are available. It is easy to grow in large numbers and mutants defining important genetically controlled mechanisms are either available, or can readily be obtained. Various methods to introduce and express isolated homologous genes are available (see Koncz et al., eds., Methods in Arabidopsis Research (1992) World Scientific, New Jersey, N.J., in “Preface”).
  • transgenic plants comprising isolated polynucleotides encoding transcription factors may also modify expression of endogenous genes, polynucleotides, and proteins.
  • Examples include Peng et al. (1997 Genes and Development 11: 3194-3205) and Peng et al. (1999 Nature 400: 256-261).
  • Peng et al. (1997 Genes and Development 11: 3194-3205)
  • Peng et al. (1999 Nature 400: 256-261).
  • many others have demonstrated that an Arabidopsis transcription factor expressed in an exogenous plant species elicits the same or very similar phenotypic response. See, for example, Fu et al. (2001 Plant Cell 13: 1791-1802); Nandi et al. (2000 Curr. Biol. 10: 215-218); Coupland (1995 Nature 377: 482-483); and Weigel and Nilsson (1995, Nature 377: 482-500).
  • Homologous genes that may be derived from any plant, or from any source whether natural, synthetic, semi-synthetic or recombinant, and that share significant sequence identity or similarity to those provided by the present invention, may be introduced into plants, for example, crop plants, to confer desirable or improved traits. Consequently, transgenic plants may be produced that comprise a recombinant expression vector or cassette with a promoter operably linked to one or more sequences homologous to presently disclosed sequences.
  • the promoter may be, for example, a plant or viral promoter.
  • the invention thus provides for methods for preparing transgenic plants, and for modifying plant traits. These methods include introducing into a plant a recombinant expression vector or cassette comprising a functional promoter operably linked to one or more sequences homologous to presently disclosed sequences. Plants and kits for producing these plants that result from the application of these methods are also encompassed by the present invention.
  • one or more transcription factor genes of the present invention may be used to increase or decrease, or improve or prove deleterious to a given trait. For example, knocking out a transcription factor gene that naturally occurs in a plant, or suppressing the gene (with, for example, antisense suppression), may cause decreased tolerance to an osmotic stress relative to non-transformed or wild-type plants. By overexpressing this gene, the plant may experience increased tolerance to the same stress. More than one transcription factor gene may be introduced into a plant, either by transforming the plant with one or more vectors comprising two or more transcription factors, or by selective breeding of plants to yield hybrid crosses that comprise more than one introduced transcription factor.
  • Plant transcription factors can modulate gene expression, and, in turn, be modulated by the environmental experience of a plant. Significant alterations in a plant's environment invariably result in a change in the plant's transcription factor gene expression pattern. Altered transcription factor expression patterns generally result in phenotypic changes in the plant. Transcription factor gene product(s) in transgenic plants then differ(s) in amounts or proportions from that found in wild-type or non-transformed plants, and those transcription factors likely represent polypeptides that are used to alter the response to the environmental change. By way of example, it is well accepted in the art that analytical methods based on altered expression patterns may be used to screen for phenotypic changes in a plant far more effectively than can be achieved using traditional methods.
  • sugars are central regulatory molecules that control several aspects of plant physiology, metabolism and development (Hsieh et al. (1998) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 95: 13965-13970). It is thought that this control is achieved by regulating gene expression and, in higher plants, sugars have been shown to repress or activate plant genes involved in many essential processes such as photosynthesis, glyoxylate metabolism, respiration, starch and sucrose synthesis and degradation, pathogen response, wounding response, cell cycle regulation, pigmentation, flowering and senescence. The mechanisms by which sugars control gene expression are not understood.
  • ABA abscisic acid
  • ethylene mutants Several sugar sensing mutants have turned out to be allelic to abscisic acid (ABA) and ethylene mutants.
  • ABA is found in all photosynthetic organisms and acts as a key regulator of transpiration, stress responses, embryogenesis, and seed germination. Most ABA effects are related to the compound acting as a signal of decreased water availability, whereby it triggers a reduction in water loss, slows growth, and mediates adaptive responses.
  • ABA also influences plant growth and development via interactions with other phytohormones.
  • Physiological and molecular studies indicate that maize and Arabidopsis have almost identical pathways with regard to ABA biosynthesis and signal transduction. For further review, see Finkelstein and Rock ((2002) Abscisic acid biosynthesis and response (In The Arabidopsis Book, Editors: Somerville and Meyerowitz (American Society of Plant Biologists, Rockville, Md.).
  • sucrose a disaccharide sugar used for systemically transporting carbon and energy in most plants
  • sucrose-signaling pathway in seeds may therefore cause seeds to have more protein, oil or carbohydrate, depending on the type of manipulation.
  • sucrose is converted to starch which is used as an energy store. It is thought that sugar-signaling pathways may partially determine the levels of starch synthesized in the tubers. The manipulation of sugar signaling in tubers could lead to tubers with a higher starch content.
  • the presently disclosed transcription factor genes that manipulate the sugar signal transduction pathway may lead to altered gene expression to produce plants with desirable traits.
  • manipulation of sugar signal transduction pathways could be used to alter source-sink relationships in seeds, tubers, roots and other storage organs leading to increase in yield.
  • Osmotic stress Modification of the expression of a number of presently disclosed transcription factor genes may be used to increase germination rate or growth under adverse osmotic conditions, which could impact survival and yield of seeds and plants.
  • Osmotic stresses may be regulated by specific molecular control mechanisms that include genes controlling water and ion movements, functional and structural stress-induced proteins, signal perception and transduction, and free radical scavenging, and many others (Wang et al. (2001) Acta Hort. (ISHS) 560: 285-292).
  • Instigators of osmotic stress include freezing, drought and high salinity, each of which is discussed in more detail below.
  • freezing, high salt and drought have similar effects on plants, not the least of which is the induction of common polypeptides that respond to these different stresses.
  • freezing is similar to water deficit in that freezing reduces the amount of water available to a plant. Exposure to freezing temperatures may lead to cellular dehydration as water leaves cells and forms ice crystals in intercellular spaces (Buchanan, supra).
  • high salt concentration and freezing the problems for plants caused by low water availability include mechanical stresses caused by the withdrawal of cellular water.
  • transcription factors that modify a plant's response to osmotic stress into, for example, a crop or ornamental plant may be useful in reducing damage or loss. Specific effects caused by freezing, high salt and drought are addressed below.
  • Plants are subject to a range of environmental challenges. Several of these, including salt stress, general osmotic stress, drought stress and freezing stress, have the ability to impact whole plant and cellular water availability. Not surprisingly, then, plant responses to this collection of stresses are related. In a recent review, Zhu notes that “most studies on water stress signaling have focused on salt stress primarily because plant responses to salt and drought are closely related and the mechanisms overlap” (Zhu (2002) Ann. Rev. Plant Biol. 53: 247-273). Many examples of similar responses and pathways to this set of stresses have been documented. For example, the CBF transcription factors have been shown to condition resistance to salt, freezing and drought (Kasuga et al. (1999) Nature Biotech. 17: 287-291).
  • the Arabidopsis rd29B gene is induced in response to both salt and dehydration stress, a process that is mediated largely through an ABA signal transduction process (Uno et al. (2000) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 11632-11637), resulting in altered activity of transcription factors that bind to an upstream element within the rd29B promoter.
  • McCDPK1 calcium-dependent protein kinase
  • the stress-induced kinase was also shown to phosphorylate a transcription factor, presumably altering its activity, although transcript levels of the target transcription factor are not altered in response to salt or drought stress.
  • Saijo et al. demonstrated that a rice salt/drought-induced calmodulin-dependent protein kinase (OsCDPK7) conferred increased salt and drought tolerance to rice when overexpressed (Saijo et al. (2000) Plant J. 23: 319-327).
  • modifying the expression of a number of presently disclosed transcription factor genes may be used to increase a plant's tolerance to low water conditions and provide the benefits of improved survival, increased yield and an extended geographic and temporal planting range.
  • the genes of the sequence listing including, for example, G482, that provide tolerance to salt may be used to engineer salt tolerant crops and trees that can flourish in soils with high saline content or under drought conditions.
  • increased salt tolerance during the germination stage of a plant enhances survival and yield.
  • transcription factor genes that provide increased salt tolerance during germination, the seedling stage, and throughout a plant's life cycle, would find particular value for imparting survival and yield in areas where a particular crop would not normally prosper.
  • transcription factor genes i.e., G481 and its equivalogs
  • G481 and its equivalogs can be used to alter anthocyanin levels in one or more tissues, depending on the organ in which these genes are expressed.
  • the potential utilities of these genes include alterations in pigment production for horticultural purposes, and possibly increasing stress resistance, including osmotic stress resistance.
  • plants with increased anthocyanin may provide health-promoting effects such as inhibition of tumor growth, prevention of bone loss and prevention of the oxidation of lipids.
  • a clade of structurally and functionally related sequences that derive from a wide range of plants including polynucleotide SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93, polynucleotides that encode polypeptide SEQ ID NOs: 29-32, fragments thereof, paralogs, orthologs, equivalogs, and fragments thereof, is provided.
  • the invention also provides polypeptides comprising SEQ ID NOs: 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60, 62, 64, 66, 68, 70, 72, 74, 76, 78, 80, 82, 84, 86, 88, 90, 92, 94, and fragments thereof, conserved domains thereof, paralogs, orthologs, equivalogs, and fragments thereof.
  • Plants that overexpress these sequences have been observed to be more tolerant to a wide variety of abiotic stresses, including, germination in heat and cold, and osmotic stresses such as drought and high salt levels. Many of the orthologs of these sequences are listed in the Sequence Listing, and due to the high degree of structural similarity to the sequences of the invention, it is expected that these sequences may also function to increase plant biomass and/or abiotic stress tolerance.
  • the invention also encompasses the complements of the polynucleotides.
  • the polynucleotides are useful for screening libraries of molecules or compounds for specific binding and for creating transgenic plants having increased biomass and/or abiotic stress tolerance.
  • nucleic acids of the invention are also useful for sense and anti-sense suppression of expression, e.g. to down-regulate expression of a nucleic acid of the invention, e.g. as a further mechanism for modulating plant phenotype. That is, the nucleic acids of the invention, or subsequences or anti-sense sequences thereof, can be used to block expression of naturally occurring homologous nucleic acids.
  • sense and anti-sense technologies are known in the art, e.g. as set forth in Lichtenstein and Nellen (1997) Antisense Technology: A Practical Approach IRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.
  • Antisense regulation is also described in Crowley et al. (1985) Cell 43: 633-641; Rosenberg et al. (1985) Nature 313: 703-706; Preiss et al. (1985) Nature 313: 27-32; Melton (1985) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 82: 144-148; Izant and Weintraub (1985) Science 229: 345-352; and Kim and Wold (1985) Cell 42: 129-138. Additional methods for antisense regulation are known in the art. Antisense regulation has been used to reduce or inhibit expression of plant genes in, for example in European Patent Publication No. 271988.
  • Antisense RNA may be used to reduce gene expression to produce a visible or biochemical phenotypic change in a plant (Smith et al. (1988) Nature, 334: 724-726; Smith et al. (1990) Plant Mol. Biol. 14: 369-379).
  • sense or anti-sense sequences are introduced into a cell, where they are optionally amplified, e.g. by transcription.
  • Such sequences include both simple oligonucleotide sequences and catalytic sequences such as ribozymes.
  • a reduction or elimination of expression i.e., a “knock-out” of a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog polypeptide in a transgenic plant, e.g., to modify a plant trait
  • an antisense construct corresponding to the polypeptide of interest as a cDNA.
  • the transcription factor or homolog cDNA is arranged in reverse orientation (with respect to the coding sequence) relative to the promoter sequence in the expression vector.
  • the introduced sequence need not be the full-length cDNA or gene, and need not be identical to the cDNA or gene found in the plant type to be transformed.
  • the antisense sequence need only be capable of hybridizing to the target gene or RNA of interest.
  • the introduced sequence is of shorter length, a higher degree of homology to the endogenous transcription factor sequence will be needed for effective antisense suppression.
  • antisense sequences of various lengths can be utilized, preferably, the introduced antisense sequence in the vector will be at least 30 nucleotides in length, and improved antisense suppression will typically be observed as the length of the antisense sequence increases.
  • the length of the antisense sequence in the vector will be greater than 100 nucleotides. Transcription of an antisense construct as described results in the production of RNA molecules that are the reverse complement of mRNA molecules transcribed from the endogenous transcription factor gene in the plant cell.
  • RNAi RNA interference
  • microRNA-based methods Llave et al. (2002) Science 297: 2053-2056; Tang et al. (2003) Genes Dev. 17: 49-63.
  • RNAi is a post-transcriptional, targeted gene-silencing technique that uses double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) to incite degradation of messenger RNA (mRNA) containing the same sequence as the dsRNA (Constans, (2002) The Engineer 16: 36).
  • dsRNA double-stranded RNA
  • mRNA messenger RNA
  • siRNAs Small interfering RNAs, or siRNAs are produced in at least two steps: an endogenous ribonuclease cleaves longer dsRNA into shorter, 21-23 nucleotide-long RNAs (Plasterk (2002) Science 296: 1263-1265). The siRNA segments then mediate the degradation of the target mRNA (Zamore, (2001) Nature Struct. Biol., 8:746-50). RNAi has been used for gene function determination in a manner similar to antisense oligonucleotides (Constans, (2002) The Scientist 16:36).
  • siRNAs small hairpin RNAs
  • Shaw et al. (2002) Science 296:550-553, and Paddison, et al. (2002) Genes & Dev. 16:948-958.
  • Post-transcriptional gene silencing by double-stranded RNA is discussed in further detail by Hammond et al. (2001) Nature Rev Gen 2: 110-119, Fire et al. (1998) Nature 391: 806-811 and Timmons and Fire (1998) Nature 395: 854.
  • RNA encoded by a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog cDNA can also be used to obtain co-suppression of a corresponding endogenous gene, e.g., in the manner described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,231,020 to Jorgensen.
  • Such co-suppression also termed sense suppression
  • sense suppression does not require that the entire transcription factor cDNA be introduced into the plant cells, nor does it require that the introduced sequence be exactly identical to the endogenous transcription factor gene of interest.
  • antisense suppression the suppressive efficiency will be enhanced as specificity of hybridization is increased, e.g., as the introduced sequence is lengthened, and/or as the sequence similarity between the introduced sequence and the endogenous transcription factor gene is increased.
  • Vectors expressing an untranslatable form of the transcription factor mRNA can also be used to suppress expression of an endogenous transcription factor, thereby reducing or eliminating its activity and modifying one or more traits.
  • Methods for producing such constructs are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,583,021.
  • such constructs are made by introducing a premature stop codon into the transcription factor gene.
  • a plant trait can be modified by gene silencing using double-strand RNA (Sharp (1999) Genes and Development 13: 139-141).
  • Another method for abolishing the expression of a gene is by insertion mutagenesis using the T-DNA of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. After generating the insertion mutants, the mutants can be screened to identify those containing the insertion in a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog gene. Plants containing a single transgene insertion event at the desired gene can be crossed to generate homozygous plants for the mutation.
  • Such methods are well known to those of skill in the art (See for example Koncz et al. (1992) Methods in Arabidopsis Research, World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., River Edge, N.J.).
  • a plant phenotype can be altered by eliminating an endogenous gene, such as a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog, e.g., by homologous recombination (Kempin et al. (1997) Nature 389: 802-803).
  • a plant trait can also be modified by using the Cre-lox system (for example, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,658,772).
  • a plant genome can be modified to include first and second lox sites that are then contacted with a Cre recombinase. If the lox sites are in the same orientation, the intervening DNA sequence between the two sites is excised. If the lox sites are in the opposite orientation, the intervening sequence is inverted.
  • polynucleotides and polypeptides of this invention can also be expressed in a plant in the absence of an expression cassette by manipulating the activity or expression level of the endogenous gene by other means, such as, for example, by ectopically expressing a gene by T-DNA activation tagging (Ichikawa et al. (1997) Nature 390 698-701; Kakimoto et al. (1996) Science 274: 982-985).
  • This method entails transforming a plant with a gene tag containing multiple transcriptional enhancers and once the tag has inserted into the genome, expression of a flanking gene coding sequence becomes deregulated.
  • the transcriptional machinery in a plant can be modified so as to increase transcription levels of a polynucleotide of the invention (See, e.g., PCT Publications WO 96/06166 and WO 98/53057 which describe the modification of the DNA-binding specificity of zinc finger proteins by changing particular amino acids in the DNA-binding motif).
  • the transgenic plant can also include the machinery necessary for expressing or altering the activity of a polypeptide encoded by an endogenous gene, for example, by altering the phosphorylation state of the polypeptide to maintain it in an activated state.
  • Transgenic plants (or plant cells, or plant explants, or plant tissues) incorporating the polynucleotides of the invention and/or expressing the polypeptides of the invention can be produced by a variety of well established techniques as described above.
  • an expression cassette including a polynucleotide, e.g., encoding a transcription factor or transcription factor homolog, of the invention
  • standard techniques can be used to introduce the polynucleotide into a plant, a plant cell, a plant explant or a plant tissue of interest.
  • the plant cell, explant or tissue can be regenerated to produce a transgenic plant.
  • the plant can be any higher plant, including gymnosperms, monocotyledonous and dicotyledenous plants. Suitable protocols are available for Leguminosae (alfalfa, soybean, clover, etc.), Umbelliferae (carrot, celery, parsnip), Cruciferae (cabbage, radish, rapeseed, broccoli, etc.), Curcurbitaceae (melons and cucumber), Gramineae (wheat, corn, rice, barley, millet, etc.), Solanaceae (potato, tomato, tobacco, peppers, etc.), and various other crops.
  • Transformation and regeneration of both monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cells are now routine, and the selection of the most appropriate transformation technique will be determined by the practitioner.
  • the choice of method will vary with the type of plant to be transformed; those skilled in the art will recognize the suitability of particular methods for given plant types.
  • Suitable methods can include, but are not limited to: electroporation of plant protoplasts; liposome-mediated transformation; polyethylene glycol (PEG) mediated transformation; transformation using viruses; micro-injection of plant cells; micro-projectile bombardment of plant cells; vacuum infiltration; and Agrobacterium tumefaciens mediated transformation. Transformation means introducing a nucleotide sequence into a plant in a manner to cause stable or transient expression of the sequence.
  • plants are preferably selected using a dominant selectable marker incorporated into the transformation vector.
  • a dominant selectable marker incorporated into the transformation vector.
  • such a marker will confer antibiotic or herbicide resistance on the transformed plants, and selection of transformants can be accomplished by exposing the plants to appropriate concentrations of the antibiotic or herbicide.
  • modified traits can be any of those traits described above. Additionally, to confirm that the modified trait is due to changes in expression levels or activity of the polypeptide or polynucleotide of the invention can be determined by analyzing mRNA expression using Northern blots, RT-PCR or microarrays, or protein expression using immunoblots or Western blots or gel shift assays.
  • the present invention may be an integrated system, computer or computer readable medium that comprises an instruction set for determining the identity of one or more sequences in a database.
  • the instruction set can be used to generate or identify sequences that meet any specified criteria.
  • the instruction set may be used to associate or link certain functional benefits, such improved characteristics, with one or more identified sequence.
  • the instruction set can include, e.g., a sequence comparison or other alignment program, e.g., an available program such as, for example, the Wisconsin Package Version 10.0, such as BLAST, FASTA, PILEUP, FINDPATTERNS or the like (GCG, Madison, Wis.).
  • a sequence comparison or other alignment program e.g., an available program such as, for example, the Wisconsin Package Version 10.0, such as BLAST, FASTA, PILEUP, FINDPATTERNS or the like (GCG, Madison, Wis.).
  • Public sequence databases such as GenBank, EMBL, Swiss-Prot and PIR or private sequence databases such as PHYTOSEQ sequence database (Incyte Genomics, Palo Alto, Calif.) can be searched.
  • sequence comparisons between two (or more) polynucleotides or polypeptides are typically performed by comparing sequences of the two sequences over a comparison window to identify and compare local regions of sequence similarity.
  • the comparison window can be a segment of at least about 20 contiguous positions, usually about 50 to about 200, more usually about 100 to about 150 contiguous positions.
  • a variety of methods for determining sequence relationships can be used, including manual alignment and computer assisted sequence alignment and analysis. This later approach is a preferred approach in the present invention, due to the increased throughput afforded by computer assisted methods. As noted above, a variety of computer programs for performing sequence alignment are available, or can be produced by one of skill.
  • HSPs high scoring sequence pairs
  • T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold (Altschul et al. supra). These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are then extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N (penalty score for mismatching residues; always ⁇ 0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score.
  • Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value; the cumulative score goes to zero or below, due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments; or the end of either sequence is reached.
  • the BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment.
  • sequence identity refers to the % sequence identity generated from a tblastx using the NCBI version of the algorithm at the default settings using gapped alignments with the filter “off” (see, for example, NIH NLM NCBI website at ncbi.nlm.nih, supra).
  • a nucleic acid is considered similar to a reference sequence (and, therefore, in this context, homologous) if the smallest sum probability in a comparison of the test nucleic acid to the reference nucleic acid is less than about 0.1, or less than about 0.01, and or even less than about 0.001.
  • An additional example of a useful sequence alignment algorithm is PILEUP.
  • PILEUP creates a multiple sequence alignment from a group of related sequences using progressive, pairwise alignments. The program can align, e.g., up to 300 sequences of a maximum length of 5,000 letters.
  • the integrated system, or computer typically includes a user input interface allowing a user to selectively view one or more sequence records corresponding to the one or more character strings, as well as an instruction set which aligns the one or more character strings with each other or with an additional character string to identify one or more region of sequence similarity.
  • the system may include a link of one or more character strings with a particular phenotype or gene function.
  • the system includes a user readable output element that displays an alignment produced by the alignment instruction set.
  • the invention provides methods for identifying a sequence similar or homologous to one or more polynucleotides as noted herein, or one or more target polypeptides encoded by the polynucleotides, or otherwise noted herein and may include linking or associating a given plant phenotype or gene function with a sequence.
  • a sequence database is provided (locally or across an inter or intra net) and a query is made against the sequence database using the relevant sequences herein and associated plant phenotypes or gene functions.
  • Any sequence herein can be entered into the database, before or after querying the database. This provides for both expansion of the database and, if done before the querying step, for insertion of control sequences into the database.
  • the control sequences can be detected by the query to ensure the general integrity of both the database and the query.
  • the query can be performed using a web browser based interface.
  • the database can be a centralized public database such as those noted herein, and the querying can be done from a remote terminal or computer across an internet or intranet.
  • Any sequence herein can be used to identify a similar, homologous, paralogous, or orthologous sequence in another plant. This provides means for identifying endogenous sequences in other plants that may be useful to alter a trait of progeny plants, which results from crossing two plants of different strain. For example, sequences that encode an ortholog of any of the sequences herein that naturally occur in a plant with a desired trait can be identified using the sequences disclosed herein. The plant is then crossed with a second plant of the same species but which does not have the desired trait to produce progeny which can then be used in further crossing experiments to produce the desired trait in the second plant.
  • the resulting progeny plant contains no transgenes; expression of the endogenous sequence may also be regulated by treatment with a particular chemical or other means, such as EMR.
  • EMR electrospray chromosomes
  • Some examples of such compounds well known in the art include: ethylene; cytokinins; phenolic compounds, which stimulate the transcription of the genes needed for infection; specific monosaccharides and acidic environments which potentiate vir gene induction; acidic polysaccharides which induce one or more chromosomal genes; and opines; other mechanisms include light or dark treatment (for a review of examples of such treatments, see, Winans (1992) Microbiol. Rev. 56: 12-31; Eyal et al. (1992) Plant Mol. Biol. 19: 589-599; Chrispeels et al. (2000) Plant Mol. Biol. 42: 279-290; Piazza et al. (2002) Plant Physiol. 128: 1077-1086).
  • Table 5 lists sequences discovered to be orthologous to a number of representative transcription factors of the present invention.
  • the column headings include the transcription factors listed by (a) the SEQ ID NO: of the ortholog or nucleotide encoding the ortholog; (b) the GID sequence identifier; (c) the Sequence Identifier or GenBank Accession Number;(d) the species from which the orthologs to the transcription factors are derived; (e) the smallest sum probability relationship to G482 determined by BLAST analysis; and (f) the percent identity of the B domain of the sequence to the same domain in G482.
  • Arabidopsis thaliana cDNA libraries derived from different tissues or treatments, or genomic libraries were screened to identify novel members of a transcription family using a low stringency hybridization approach.
  • Probes were synthesized using gene specific primers in a standard PCR reaction (annealing temperature 60° C.) and labeled with 32 P dCTP using the High Prime DNA Labeling Kit (Boehringer Mannheim Corp. (now Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, Ind.). Purified radiolabelled probes were added to filters immersed in Church hybridization medium (0.5 M NaPO 4 pH 7.0, 7% SDS, 1% w/v bovine serum albumin) and hybridized overnight at 60° C. with shaking. Filters were washed two times for 45 to 60 minutes with 1 ⁇ SCC, 1% SDS at 60° C.
  • Gene-specific primers were designed to be used along with adaptor specific primers for both 5′ and 3′ RACE reactions. Nested primers, rather than single primers, were used to increase PCR specificity. Using 5′ and 3′ RACE reactions, 5′ and 3′ RACE fragments were obtained, sequenced and cloned. The process can be repeated until 5′ and 3′ ends of the full-length gene were identified. Then the full-length cDNA was generated by PCR using primers specific to 5′ and 3′ ends of the gene by end-to-end PCR.
  • RT-PCR experiments may be performed to identify those genes induced after exposure to osmotic stress. Generally, the gene expression patterns from ground plant leaf tissue is examined. Reverse transcriptase PCR was conducted using gene specific primers within the coding region for each sequence identified. The primers were designed near the 3′ region of each DNA binding sequence initially identified.
  • RNA from these ground leaf tissues was isolated using the CTAB extraction protocol. Once extracted total RNA was normalized in concentration across all the tissue types to ensure that the PCR reaction for each tissue received the same amount of cDNA template using the 28S band as reference. Poly(A+) RNA was purified using a modified protocol from the Qiagen OLIGOTEX purification kit batch protocol. cDNA was synthesized using standard protocols. After the first strand cDNA synthesis, primers for Actin 2 were used to normalize the concentration of cDNA across the tissue types. Actin 2 is found to be constitutively expressed in fairly equal levels across the tissue types we are investigating.
  • Germination assays all followed modifications of the same basic protocol. Sterile seeds were sown on the following conditional media. Plates were incubated at 22° C. under 24-hour light (120-130 ⁇ Ein/m 2 /s) in a growth chamber. Evaluation of germination and seedling vigor was conducted 3 to 15 days after planting. The basal media was 80% Murashige-Skoog medium (MS)+vitamins.
  • MS Murashige-Skoog medium
  • the medium was supplemented with 150 mM NaCl or 300 mM mannitol.
  • This example provides experimental evidence for increased biomass and abiotic stress tolerance controlled by the transcription factor polypeptides and polypeptides of the invention.
  • Salt stress assays are intended to find genes that confer better germination, seedling vigor or growth in high salt. Evaporation from the soil surface causes upward water movement and salt accumulation in the upper soil layer where the seeds are placed. Thus, germination normally takes place at a salt concentration much higher than the mean salt concentration of in the whole soil profile.
  • Sugar sensing assays are intended to find genes involved in sugar sensing by germinating seeds on high concentrations of sucrose and glucose and looking for degrees of hypocotyl elongation.
  • the germination assay on mannitol controls for responses related to osmotic stress.
  • Sugars are key regulatory molecules that affect diverse processes in higher plants including germination, growth, flowering, senescence, sugar metabolism and photosynthesis.
  • Sucrose is the major transport form of photosynthate and its flux through cells has been shown to affect gene expression and alter storage compound accumulation in seeds (source-sink relationships).
  • Glucose-specific hexose-sensing has also been described in plants and is implicated in cell division and repression of “famine” genes (photosynthetic or glyoxylate cycles).
  • the medium was supplemented with 150 mM NaCl or 300 mM mannitol.
  • Growth regulator sensitivity assays were performed in MS media, vitamins, and either 0.3 ⁇ M ABA, 9.4% sucrose, or 5% glucose.
  • Temperature stress cold germination experiments were carried out at 8° C. Heat stress germination experiments were conducted at 32° C. to 37° C. for 6 hours of exposure.
  • G481 Polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 1
  • G481 is equivalent to AtHAP3a which was identified by Edwards et al., ((1998) Plant Physiol. 117: 1015-1022) as an EST with extensive sequence homology to the yeast HAP3.
  • Northern blot data from five different tissue samples indicates that G481 is primarily expressed in flower and/or silique, and root tissue. No other functional data is available for G481 in Arabidopsis.
  • G481 There are several genes in the database from higher plants that show significant homology to G481 including, X59714 from corn, and two ESTs from tomato, AJ486503 and A1782351.
  • G481 The function of G481 was analyzed through its ectopic overexpression in plants. Except for darker color in one line (noted below), plants overexpressing G481 had a wild-type morphology. G481 overexpressors were found to be more tolerant to high sucrose and high salt (the latter is seen in FIG. 8A ), having better germination, longer radicles, and more cotyledon expansion. There was a consistent difference in the hypocotyl and root elongation in the overexpressor compared to wild-type controls. These results indicated that G481 is involved in sucrose-specific sugar sensing. Sucrose-sensing has been implicated in the regulation of source-sink relationships in plants.
  • 35S::G481 plants were also significantly larger and greener in a soil-based drought assay than wild-type controls plants After eight days of drought treatment overexpressing lines had a darker green and less withered appearance ( FIG. 7C ) than those in the control group ( FIG. 7A ). The differences in appearance between the control and G481-overexpressing plants after they were rewatered was even more striking. Eleven of twelve plants of this set of control plants died after rewatering ( FIG. 7B ), indicating the inability to recover following severe water deprivation, whereas all nine of the overexpressor plants of the line shown recovered from this drought treatment ( FIG. 7D ). The results shown in FIGS. 7A-7D were typical of a number of control and 35S::G481-overexpressing lines.
  • this gene or its equivalogs may be used to improve seedling vigor, plant survival, as well as yield, quality, and range.
  • G482 Polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 3
  • the closest homology in the non-Arabidopsis plant database is within the B domain of G482, and therefore no potentially orthologous genes are available in the public domain.
  • a T-DNA insertion mutant for G482 was analyzed and was found to flower slightly later than control plants.
  • G482 The function of G482 was also analyzed through its ectopic overexpression in plants. Plants overexpressing G482 had a wild-type morphology. Germination assays to measure salt tolerance demonstrated increased seedling growth when germinated on the high salt medium ( FIG. 8B ).
  • G485 Polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 5
  • G485 is a member of the HAP3-like subfamily of CCAAT-box binding transcription factors. G485 corresponds to gene At4g14540, annotated by the Arabidopsis Genome Initiative. The gene corresponds to sequence 1042 from patent application W00216655 (Harper et al. (2002)) on stress-regulated genes, transgenic plants and methods of use. In this application, G485 was reported to be cold responsive in their microarray analysis. No information is available about the function(s) of G485.
  • a T-DNA insertion mutant for G485 was analyzed and was found to flower several days later than control plants ( FIG. 11A ).
  • G1820 SEQ ID NO: 68
  • G485 G485
  • G485 overexpressor plants also matured and set siliques much more rapidly than wild type controls ( FIG. 11B ).
  • G485 overexpressing plants were shown to have enhanced response to stress-related treatments in plate-based germination assays. As seen in FIGS. 10A-10D and Table 6, 35S::G485 lines showed enhanced cotyledon expansion and root growth seen in the overexpressing seedlings in cold, high sucrose, high salt and ABA treatments, as compared to wild-type controls with the same treatments seen in FIGS. 10E-10H .
  • G485 could be used to modify flowering time.
  • the delayed flowering displayed by G485 knockouts suggests that the gene might be used to manipulate the flowering time of commercial species.
  • an extension of vegetative growth can significantly increase biomass and result in substantial yield increases.
  • some species for example sugar beet
  • Table 6 provides a summary of the data collected from one series of experiments conducted with plants overexpressing G482 or a paralog of G482.
  • the promoter used for regulating the introduced transcription factor was the cauliflower mosaic virus 35 S transcription initiation region.
  • the column headings include the transcription factors used to transform the Arabidopsis plants listed by Gene ID (GID) numbers, the corresponding polypeptide SEQ ID NO; the project type indicating the nature of the promoter-gene interaction, and the ratio of lines determine to have one of the enhanced abiotic stress phenotypes listed over the number of lines tested
  • G3395 an ortholog of G482, is a member of the HAP3-like subfamily of CCAAT-box binding transcription factors. G3395 corresponds to polypeptide BAC76331 (“NF-YB subunit of rice”).
  • G482 (SEQ ID NO: 3), G485 (SEQ ID NO: 5), G1248 (SEQ ID NO: 69), G1781 (SEQ ID NO: 71) and related crop orthologs G3398 (SEQ ID NO: 75), G3435 (SEQ ID NO: 47), and G3436 (SEQ ID NO: 49), accelerate onset of flowering when overexpressed in Arabidopsis.
  • an activation domain appears to convert a floral repressor to a floral activator.
  • Overexpression of a fusion protein comprising G481 fused at its carboxyl end with a GAL4 activation domain causes early flowering that is comparable to the effects caused by G482 or G482 overexpression.
  • This example describes identification of genes that are orthologous to Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors from a computer homology search.
  • Homologous sequences including those of paralogs and orthologs from Arabidopsis and other plant species, were identified using database sequence search tools, such as the Basic Local Alignment Search Tool (BLAST) (Altschul et al. (1990) J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410; and Altschul et al. (1997) Nucleic Acid Res. 25: 3389-3402).
  • BLAST Basic Local Alignment Search Tool
  • the tblastx sequence analysis programs were employed using the BLOSUM-62 scoring matrix (Henikoff and Henikoff(1992) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 89: 10915-10919).
  • sequences are compared to sequences SEQ ID NOs: 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 21, 23, 25, 27, 33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 69, 71, 73, 75, 77, 79, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 91, 93 or polynucleotides that encode polypeptide SEQ ID NOs: 29-32, using the Washington University TBLASTX algorithm (version 2.0a19MP) at the default settings using gapped alignments with the filter “off”.
  • Candidate paralogous sequences were identified among Arabidopsis transcription factors through alignment, identity, and phylogenic relationships. Paralogs of G481 so determined include G482, G485, G1364, and G2345.
  • Candidate orthologous sequences were identified from proprietary unigene sets of plant gene sequences in Zea mays, Glycine max and Oryza sativa based on significant homology to Arabidopsis transcription factors. These candidates were reciprocally compared to the set of Arabidopsis transcription factors. If the candidate showed maximal similarity in the protein domain to the eliciting transcription factor or to a paralog of the eliciting transcription factor, then it was considered to be an ortholog. Identified non- Arabidopsis sequences that were shown in this manner to be orthologous to the Arabidopsis sequences are provided in Table 5.
  • yeast strains are constructed that contain a lacZ reporter gene with either wild-type or mutant transcription factor binding promoter element sequences in place of the normal UAS (upstream activator sequence) of the GALL promoter.
  • Yeast reporter strains are constructed that carry transcription factor binding promoter element sequences as UAS elements are operably linked upstream (5′) of a lacZ reporter gene with a minimal GAL1 promoter.
  • the strains are transformed with a plant expression library that contains random cDNA inserts fused to the GAL4 activation domain (GAL4-ACT) and screened for blue colony formation on X-gal-treated filters (X-gal: 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- ⁇ -D-galactoside; Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad Calif.).
  • GAL4-ACT GAL4 activation domain
  • X-gal 5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl- ⁇ -D-galactoside
  • the strains are transformed with a cDNA polynucleotide encoding a known transcription factor DNA binding domain polypeptide sequence.
  • Yeast strains carrying these reporter constructs produce low levels of beta-galactosidase and form white colonies on filters containing X-gal.
  • the reporter strains carrying wild-type transcription factor binding promoter element sequences are transformed with a polynucleotide that encodes a polypeptide comprising a plant transcription factor DNA binding domain operably linked to the acidic activator domain of the yeast GAL4 transcription factor, “GAL4-ACT”.
  • GAL4-ACT yeast GAL4 transcription factor
  • the clones that contain a polynucleotide encoding a transcription factor DNA binding domain operably linked to GLA4-ACT can bind upstream of the lacZ reporter genes carrying the wild-type transcription factor binding promoter element sequence, activate transcription of the lacZ gene and result in yeast forming blue colonies on X-gal-treated filters.
  • cDNA clones are isolated; i.e., clones that cause yeast strains carrying lacZ reporters operably linked to wild-type transcription factor binding promoter elements to form blue colonies on X-gal-treated filters.
  • the cDNA clones do not cause a yeast strain carrying a mutant type transcription factor binding promoter elements fused to LacZ to turn blue.
  • a polynucleotide encoding transcription factor DNA binding domain a conserved domain, is shown to activate transcription of a gene.
  • the presence of a transcription factor comprising a DNA binding domain which binds to a DNA transcription factor binding element is evaluated using the following gel shift assay.
  • the transcription factor is recombinantly expressed and isolated from E. coli or isolated from plant material.
  • Total soluble protein, including transcription factor, (40 ng) is incubated at room temperature in 10 ⁇ l of 1 ⁇ binding buffer (15 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1 mM EDTA, 30 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 5% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM DTT) plus 50 ng poly(dl-dC):poly(dl-dC) (Pharmacia, Piscataway N.J.) with or without 100 ng competitor DNA.
  • 1 ⁇ binding buffer 15 mM HEPES (pH 7.9), 1 mM EDTA, 30 mM KCl, 5% glycerol, 5% bovine serum albumin, 1 mM DTT
  • probe DNA comprising a DNA transcription factor binding element (1 ng) that has been 32 P-labeled by end-filling (Sambrook et al. (1989) supra) is added and the mixture incubated for an additional 10 minutes. Samples are loaded onto polyacrylamide gels (4% w/v) and fractionated by electrophoresis at 150V for 2 h (Sambrook et al. supra). The degree of transcription factor-probe DNA binding is visualized using autoradiography. Probes and competitor DNAs are prepared from oligonucleotide inserts ligated into the BamHI site of pUC 118 (Vieira et al. (1987) Methods Enzymol. 153: 3-1 1).
  • Inserts are determined by dideoxy DNA sequence analysis (Sambrook et al. supra). Inserts are recovered after restriction digestion with EcoRI and HindIII and fractionation on polyacrylamide gels (12% w/v) (Sambrook et al. supra).
  • the cloning vector may be introduced into a variety of cereal plants by means well known in the art such as, for example, direct DNA transfer or Agrobacterium tumefaciens -mediated transformation. It is now routine to produce transgenic plants using most dicot plants (see Weissbach and Weissbach, (1989) supra; Gelvin et al. (1990) supra; Herrera-Estrella et al. (1983) supra; Bevan (1984) supra; and Klee (1985) supra). Methods for analysis of traits are routine in the art and examples are disclosed above.
  • Cereal plants such as, but not limited to, corn, wheat, rice, sorghum, or barley, may also be transformed with the present polynucleotide sequences in pMEN20 or pMEN65 expression vectors for the purpose of modifying plant traits.
  • pMEN020 may be modified to replace the NptII coding region with the BAR gene of Streptomyces hygroscopicus that confers resistance to phosphinothricin.
  • the KpnI and BgIII sites of the Bar gene are removed by site-directed mutagenesis with silent codon changes.
  • the cloning vector may be introduced into a variety of cereal plants by means well known in the art such as, for example, direct DNA transfer or Agrobacterium tumefaciens -mediated transformation. It is now routine to produce transgenic plants of most cereal crops (Vasil (1994) Plant Mol. Biol. 25: 925-937) such as corn, wheat, rice, sorghum (Cassas et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 90: 11212-11216, and barley (Wan and Lemeaux (1994) Plant Physiol. 104:37-48. DNA transfer methods such as the microprojectile can be used for corn (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol.
  • Vectors according to the present invention may be transformed into corn embryogenic cells derived from immature scutellar tissue by using microprojectile bombardment, with the A288XB73 genotype as the preferred genotype (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618). After microprojectile bombardment the tissues are selected on phosphinothricin to identify the transgenic embryogenic cells (Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618). Transgenic plants are regenerated by standard corn regeneration techniques (Fromm et al. (1990) Bio/Technol. 8: 833-839; Gordon-Kamm et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2: 603-618).
  • the plasmids prepared as described above can also be used to produce transgenic wheat and rice plants (Christou (1991) Bio/Technol. 9:957-962; Hiei et al. (1994) Plant J. 6:271-282; Aldemita and Hodges (1996) Planta 199:612-617; and Hiei et al. (1997) Plant Mol. Biol. 35:205-218) that coordinately express genes of interest by following standard transformation protocols known to those skilled in the art for rice and wheat (Vasil et al. (1992) Bio/Technol. 10:667-674; Vasil et al. (1993) Bio/Technol. 11:1553-1558; and Weeks et al. (1993) Plant Physiol. 102:1077-1084), where the bar gene is used as the selectable marker.
  • orthologs of G481 and G482 may be analyzed through their ectopic overexpression in plants using the CaMV 35S or other appropriate promoter, as identified above. These genes encode members of the HAP3 subfamily of CCAAT-box binding transcription factors and include those found in Table 5, FIGS.
  • trichocarpa (BU880488), Zea mays (SEQ ID NO: 33, 35, 37, 39,41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 55, 57, 77, 93, CC429501; and AX584265), Oryza sativa (SEQ ID NO: 27, 53, 73, 75, 87, 89, AAAA01003638, AP005193, AC108500, AP004366, AP003266, AP004179, AC104284, and AP120529), and Triticum aestivum (SEQ ID NO: 59, 61, and BJ248969).
  • HAP3 subfamily of CCAAT-box binding transcription factor genes that may be analyzed through ectopic overexpression in plants also includes rice nucleic acid sequences that encode polypeptides SEQ ID NO: 29-32, corn sequence gi115840, and wheat sequence gi16902058. These polynucleotide and polypeptide sequences derived from monocots may be used to transform both monocot and dicot plants, and those derived from dicots may also be used to transform either group, although some of these sequences will function best if the gene is transformed into the a plant from the same group as that from which the sequence is derived.
  • Seeds of these transgenic plants are subjected to germination assays to measure sucrose sensing.
  • Sterile monocot seeds including, but not limited to, corn, rice, wheat, rye and sorghum, as well as dicots including, but not limited to soybean and alfalfa, are sown on 80% MS medium plus vitamins with 9.4% sucrose; control media lack sucrose. All assay plates are then incubated at 22° C. under 24-hour light, 120-130 ⁇ Ein/m 2 /s, in a growth chamber. Evaluation of germination and seedling vigor is then conducted three days after planting.
  • Overexpressors of these genes may be found to be more tolerant to high sucrose by having better germination, longer radicles, and more cotyledon expansion. These results would indicate that overexpressors of G482 orthologs are involved in sucrose-specific sugar sensing.
  • Plants overexpressing G482 orthologs may also be subjected to soil-based drought assays to identify those lines that are more tolerant to water deprivation than wild-type control plants.
  • 35S: G482 ortholog overexpressing plants will appear significantly larger and greener, with less wilting or desiccation, than wild-type controls plants, particularly after a period of water deprivation is followed by rewatering and a subsequent incubation period.
  • Orthologs to Arabidopsis genes may identified by several methods, including hybridization, amplification, or bioinformatically. This example describes how one may identify homologs to the Arabidopsis AP2 family transcription factor CBF1 (polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 95, encoded polypeptide SEQ ID NO: 96), which confers tolerance to abiotic stresses (Thomashow et al. (2002) U.S. Pat. No. 6,417,428), and an example to confirm the function of homologous sequences. In this example, orthologs to CBF1 were found in canola ( Brassica napus ) using polymerase chain reaction (PCR).
  • PCR polymerase chain reaction
  • Primer Mol 368 is in the AP2 binding domain of CBF1 (amino acid sequence: His-Pro-Ile-Tyr-Arg-Gly-Val) while primer Mol 378 is outside the AP2 domain (carboxyl terminal domain) (amino acid sequence: Met-Ala-Glu-Gly-Met-Leu-Leu-Pro).
  • the genomic DNA isolated from B. napus was PCR-amplified by using these primers following these conditions: an initial denaturation step of 2 min at 93° C.; 35 cycles of 93° C. for 1 min, 55° C. for 1 min, and 72° C. for 1 min; and a final incubation of 7 min at 72° C. at the end of cycling
  • PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 1.2% agarose gel and transferred to nylon membrane and hybridized with the AT CBF1 probe prepared from Arabidopsis genomic DNA by PCR amplification.
  • the hybridized products were visualized by colorimetric detection system (Boehringer Mannheim) and the corresponding bands from a similar agarose gel were isolated using the Qiagen Extraction Kit (Qiagen).
  • the DNA fragments were ligated into the TA clone vector from TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen) and transformed into E. coli strain TOP 10 (Invitrogen).
  • nucleic acid sequence and amino acid sequence of one canola ortholog found in this manner (bnCBF1; polynucleotide SEQ ID NO: 101 and polypeptide SEQ ID NO: 102) identified by this process is shown in the Sequence Listing.
  • the aligned amino acid sequences show that the bnCBF1 gene has 88% identity with the Arabidopsis sequence in the AP2 domain region and 85% identity with the Arabidopsis sequence outside the AP2 domain when aligned for two insertion sequences that are outside the AP2 domain.
  • CBF1 paralogous sequences to Arabidopsis genes
  • CBF2 and CBF3 Two paralogs of CBF1 from Arabidopsis thaliana: CBF2 and CBF3.
  • CBF2 and CBF3 have been cloned and sequenced as described below.
  • the sequences of the DNA SEQ ID NO: 97 and 99 and encoded proteins SEQ ID NO: 98 and 100 are set forth in the Sequence Listing.
  • amino acid sequences of the three CBF polypeptides range from 84 to 86% identity.
  • An alignment of the three amino acidic sequences reveals that most of the differences in amino acid sequence occur in the acidic C-terminal half of the polypeptide.
  • This region of CBF 1 serves as an activation domain in both yeast and Arabidopsis (not shown).
  • Residues 47 to 106 of CBF1 correspond to the AP2 domain of the protein, a DNA binding motif that to date, has only been found in plant proteins.
  • a comparison of the AP2 domains of CBF1, CBF2 and CBF3 indicates that there are a few differences in amino acid sequence. These differences in amino acid sequence might have an effect on DNA binding specificity.
  • canola was transformed with a plasmid containing the Arabidopsis CBF1, CBF2, or CBF3 genes cloned into the vector pGA643 (An (1987) Methods Enzymol. 253: 292).
  • the CBF genes were expressed constitutively under the CaMV 35S promoter.
  • the CBF1 gene was cloned under the control of the Arabidopsis COR15 promoter in the same vector pGA643.
  • Each construct was transformed into Agrobacterium strain GV3101. Transformed Agrobacteria were grown for 2 days in minimal AB medium containing appropriate antibiotics.
  • Explants were transferred to the same media, but containing 300 mg/l timentin (SmithKline Beecham, Pa.) and thinned to 10 cotyledons/plate. After 7 days explants were transferred to Selection/Regeneration medium. Transfers were continued every 2-3 weeks (2 or 3 times) until shoots had developed. Shoots were transferred to Shoot-Elongation medium every 2-3 weeks. Healthy looking shoots were transferred to rooting medium. Once good roots had developed, the plants were placed into moist potting soil.
  • timentin SmithKline Beecham, Pa.
  • the transformed plants were analyzed for the presence of the NPTII gene/ kanamycin resistance by ELISA, using the ELISA NPTII kit from 5Prime-3Prime Inc. (Boulder, Colo.). Approximately 70% of the screened plants were NPTII positive; these plants were further analyzed.
  • Spring canola transformed with CBF3 shows a 50% leakage at about ⁇ 10 to ⁇ 15° C.
  • Winter canola transformed with CBF3 may show a 50% leakage at about ⁇ 16 to ⁇ 20° C.
  • the spring or winter canola are cold acclimated the transformed plants may exhibit a further increase in freezing tolerance of at least ⁇ 2° C.
  • plants were watered with 150 mM NaCl. Plants overexpressing CBF1, CBF2 or CBF3 grew better compared with plants that had not been transformed with CBF1, CBF2 or CBF3.
  • Promoters are isolated from transcription factor genes that have gene expression patterns useful for a range of applications, as determined by methods well known in the art (including transcript profile analysis with cDNA or oligonucleotide microarrays, Northern blot analysis, semi-quantitative or quantitative RT-PCR).
  • Interesting gene expression profiles are revealed by determining transcript abundance for a selected transcription factor gene after exposure of plants to a range of different experimental conditions, and in a range of different tissue or organ types, or developmental stages. Experimental conditions to which plants are exposed for this purpose includes cold, heat, drought, osmotic challenge, varied hormone concentrations (ABA, GA, auxin, cytokinin, salicylic acid, brassinosteroid), pathogen and pest challenge.
  • the tissue types and developmental stages include stem, root, flower, rosette leaves, cauline leaves, siliques, germinating seed, and meristematic tissue.
  • the set of expression levels provides a pattern that is determined by the regulatory elements of the gene promoter.
  • Transcription factor promoters for the genes disclosed herein are obtained by cloning 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb of genomic sequence immediately upstream of the translation start codon for the coding sequence of the encoded transcription factor protein. This region includes the 5′-UTR of the transcription factor gene, which can comprise regulatory elements.
  • the 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb region is cloned through PCR methods, using primers that include one in the 3′ direction located at the translation start codon (including appropriate adaptor sequence), and one in the 5′ direction located from 1.5 kb to 2.0 kb upstream of the translation start codon (including appropriate adaptor sequence).
  • the desired fragments are PCR-amplified from Arabidopsis Col-0 genomic DNA using high-fidelity Taq DNA polymerase to minimize the incorporation of point mutation(s).
  • the cloning primers incorporate two rare restriction sites, such as Not1 and Sfi1, found at low frequency throughout the Arabidopsis genome. Additional restriction sites are used in the instances where a Not1 or Sfi1 restriction site is present within the promoter.
  • the 1.5-2.0 kb fragment upstream from the translation start codon, including the 5′-untranslated region of the transcription factor, is cloned in a binary transformation vector immediately upstream of a suitable reporter gene, or a transactivator gene that is capable of programming expression of a reporter gene in a second gene construct.
  • Reporter genes used include green fluorescent protein (and related fluorescent protein color variants), beta-glucuronidase, and luciferase.
  • Suitable transactiivator genes include LexA-GAL4, along with a transactivatable reporter in a second binary plasmid (as disclosed in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/958,131, incorporated herein by reference).
  • the binary plasmid(s) is transferred into Agrobacterium and the structure of the plasmid confirmed by PCR. These strains are introduced into Arabidopsis plants as described in other examples, and gene expression patterns determined according to standard methods know to one skilled in the art for monitoring GFP fluorescence, beta-glucuronidase activity, or luminescence.

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Biophysics (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Cell Biology (AREA)
  • Plant Pathology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Nutrition Science (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Botany (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
  • Peptides Or Proteins (AREA)
US10/675,852 1998-09-22 2003-09-30 Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress Abandoned US20050086718A1 (en)

Priority Applications (18)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US10/675,852 US20050086718A1 (en) 1999-03-23 2003-09-30 Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US10/546,266 US7659446B2 (en) 2003-02-25 2004-02-25 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
PCT/US2004/005654 WO2004076638A2 (fr) 2003-02-25 2004-02-25 Polynucleotides et polypeptides dans des plantes
AU2004214935A AU2004214935B2 (en) 2003-02-25 2004-02-25 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
CA2937101A CA2937101A1 (fr) 2003-02-25 2004-02-25 Polynucleotides et polypeptides a facteur de transcription de vegetal repondant au stress abiotique et utilisation associee en vue de produire des vegetaux trangeniques
CA2516645A CA2516645C (fr) 2003-02-25 2004-02-25 Polynucleotides et polypeptides de facteur de transcription de plantes et utilisation de ceux-ci pour produire des plantes transgeniques
BRPI0407822-5A BRPI0407822B1 (pt) 2003-02-25 2004-02-25 Polinucleotídeos e polipeptídeos nas plantas
EP04714657A EP1601758B1 (fr) 2003-02-25 2004-02-25 Polynucleotides et polypeptides dans des plantes
US11/069,255 US8558059B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2005-02-28 Genes for conferring to plants increased tolerance to environmental stresses
US11/705,903 US7868229B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2007-02-12 Early flowering in genetically modified plants
US11/981,813 US8633353B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2007-10-30 Plants with improved water deficit and cold tolerance
US12/077,535 US8030546B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2008-03-17 Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US12/157,329 US7956242B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2008-06-09 Plant quality traits
US12/169,527 US7960612B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2008-07-08 Plant quality with various promoters
US13/244,288 US20120137382A1 (en) 1998-09-22 2011-09-24 Stress tolerance in plants
US13/448,329 US20130031669A1 (en) 1999-03-23 2012-04-16 Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress ii
US14/480,473 US20150135360A1 (en) 1998-09-22 2014-09-08 Stress tolerance in plants
US15/347,676 US10597667B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2016-11-09 Stress tolerance in plants

Applications Claiming Priority (18)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US12581499P 1999-03-23 1999-03-23
US16622899P 1999-11-17 1999-11-17
US53303000A 2000-03-22 2000-03-22
US71399400A 2000-11-16 2000-11-16
US83794401A 2001-04-18 2001-04-18
US31084701P 2001-08-09 2001-08-09
US33604901P 2001-11-19 2001-11-19
US10/112,887 US20030188330A1 (en) 2002-03-18 2002-03-18 Genes for modifying plant traits xi
US17146802A 2002-06-14 2002-06-14
US10/225,068 US7193129B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2002-08-09 Stress-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US10/225,066 US7238860B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2002-08-09 Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US41183702P 2002-09-18 2002-09-18
US10/286,264 US20030093837A1 (en) 1999-03-23 2002-11-01 Polynucleotides for seed trait alteration
US43416602P 2002-12-17 2002-12-17
US10/374,780 US7511190B2 (en) 1999-11-17 2003-02-25 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US10/412,699 US7345217B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2003-04-10 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US10/666,642 US7196245B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2003-09-18 Polynucleotides and polypeptides that confer increased biomass and tolerance to cold, water deprivation and low nitrogen to plants
US10/675,852 US20050086718A1 (en) 1999-03-23 2003-09-30 Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress

Related Parent Applications (13)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US71399400A Continuation-In-Part 1996-09-04 2000-11-16
US83794401A Continuation-In-Part 1998-09-22 2001-04-18
US10/112,887 Continuation-In-Part US20030188330A1 (en) 1998-09-22 2002-03-18 Genes for modifying plant traits xi
US10/225,068 Continuation-In-Part US7193129B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2002-08-09 Stress-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US10/225,066 Continuation-In-Part US7238860B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2002-08-09 Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US10/286,264 Continuation-In-Part US20030093837A1 (en) 1998-09-22 2002-11-01 Polynucleotides for seed trait alteration
US10/374,780 Continuation-In-Part US7511190B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2003-02-25 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US10/412,699 Continuation-In-Part US7345217B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2003-04-10 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US10/666,642 Continuation-In-Part US7196245B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2003-09-18 Polynucleotides and polypeptides that confer increased biomass and tolerance to cold, water deprivation and low nitrogen to plants
US11/069,255 Continuation-In-Part US8558059B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2005-02-28 Genes for conferring to plants increased tolerance to environmental stresses
US11/479,226 Continuation-In-Part US7858848B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2006-06-30 Transcription factors for increasing yield
US11/986,992 Continuation-In-Part US8809630B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2007-11-26 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US12/077,535 Continuation-In-Part US8030546B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2008-03-17 Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants

Related Child Applications (10)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US53303000A Continuation-In-Part 1998-09-22 2000-03-22
US10/374,780 Continuation-In-Part US7511190B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2003-02-25 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US10/714,887 Continuation-In-Part US20070240243A9 (en) 1998-09-22 2003-11-13 Plant transcriptional regulators of drought stress
US11/069,255 Continuation-In-Part US8558059B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2005-02-28 Genes for conferring to plants increased tolerance to environmental stresses
US11/479,226 Continuation-In-Part US7858848B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2006-06-30 Transcription factors for increasing yield
US11/705,903 Continuation-In-Part US7868229B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2007-02-12 Early flowering in genetically modified plants
US11/981,813 Continuation-In-Part US8633353B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2007-10-30 Plants with improved water deficit and cold tolerance
US12/077,535 Continuation-In-Part US8030546B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2008-03-17 Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US12/157,329 Continuation-In-Part US7956242B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2008-06-09 Plant quality traits
US13/448,329 Continuation-In-Part US20130031669A1 (en) 1999-03-23 2012-04-16 Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress ii

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
US20050086718A1 true US20050086718A1 (en) 2005-04-21

Family

ID=35006387

Family Applications (2)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/675,852 Abandoned US20050086718A1 (en) 1998-09-22 2003-09-30 Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US10/546,266 Expired - Lifetime US7659446B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2004-02-25 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
US10/546,266 Expired - Lifetime US7659446B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2004-02-25 Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (2) US20050086718A1 (fr)
EP (1) EP1601758B1 (fr)
AU (1) AU2004214935B2 (fr)
BR (1) BRPI0407822B1 (fr)
CA (2) CA2516645C (fr)
WO (1) WO2004076638A2 (fr)

Cited By (55)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050172364A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2005-08-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Genes for modifying plant traits XI
US20060015972A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2006-01-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of drought stress
US20060021083A1 (en) * 2004-04-01 2006-01-26 Zhihong Cook Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20060272060A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2006-11-30 Mendel Biotechnology Plant transcriptional regulators
US20070006335A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2007-01-04 Zhihong Cook Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20070022495A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2007-01-25 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factors for increasing yield
US20070124834A1 (en) * 2003-10-14 2007-05-31 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20070199107A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2007-08-23 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Early flowering in genetically modified plants
US20070209086A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2007-09-06 Mendel Biotechnology Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20080040973A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2008-02-21 Donald Nelson Transgenic crop plants with improved stress tolerance
US20080104730A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2008-05-01 Jingrui Wu Yield-improved transgenic plants
US20080155706A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2008-06-26 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant tolerance to low water, low nitrogen and cold
US20080163397A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2008-07-03 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved water deficit and cold tolerance
US20080229448A1 (en) * 2004-12-20 2008-09-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant Stress Tolerance from Modified Ap2 Transcription Factors
US20080301836A1 (en) * 2007-05-17 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Selection of transcription factor variants
US20080301841A1 (en) * 2000-11-16 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved yield and stress tolerance
US20080301840A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Conferring biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20090044297A1 (en) * 1999-05-06 2009-02-12 Andersen Scott E Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US20090049573A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2009-02-19 Dotson Stanton B Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
EP2046111A2 (fr) * 2006-08-07 2009-04-15 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plantes présentant une taille et une vitesse de croissance accrues
US20090138981A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2009-05-28 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20090205063A1 (en) * 2004-07-14 2009-08-13 Mendel Biotechnology Plant polynucleotides for improved yield and quality
US7598429B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2009-10-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factor sequences for conferring advantageous properties to plants
US7601893B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2009-10-13 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Stress-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20090265807A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2009-10-22 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20090265813A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2009-10-22 Mendel Biotechnology , Inc. Stress tolerance in plants
WO2009102965A3 (fr) * 2008-02-15 2009-11-12 Ceres, Inc. Tolérance à la sécheresse et à la chaleur chez les plantes
US20100071086A1 (en) * 2008-09-12 2010-03-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polysome-mediated cell type-, tissue type- or condition-enhanced transcript profiling
US7692067B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2010-04-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants
US20100107279A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2010-04-29 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20100138952A1 (en) * 2008-08-05 2010-06-03 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Gene promoter regulatory element analysis computational methods and their use in transgenic applications
US20100199382A1 (en) * 2007-09-21 2010-08-05 Basf Plant Science Gmbh Plants Having Increased Yield-Related Traits And A Method For Making The Same
US20100212041A1 (en) * 2005-01-27 2010-08-19 Valerie Frankard Plants Having Increased Yield And A Method For Making The Same
US20100218271A1 (en) * 2005-10-05 2010-08-26 Crop Design N.V. Plants having improved characteristics and method for making the same
US7825296B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2010-11-02 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20110078806A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2011-03-31 Mendel Biotechnology Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7956242B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2011-06-07 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant quality traits
US7960612B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2011-06-14 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant quality with various promoters
US20120156249A1 (en) * 2009-08-26 2012-06-21 Organobalance Gmbh Genetically modified organism for the production of lipids
US8877916B2 (en) 2000-04-26 2014-11-04 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US9029523B2 (en) 2000-04-26 2015-05-12 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US9290773B2 (en) 2002-10-02 2016-03-22 Monsanto Technology Llc Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US9322031B2 (en) 1999-05-06 2016-04-26 Monsanto Technology Llc Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US9447425B2 (en) 2000-11-16 2016-09-20 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factor sequences for conferring advantageous properties to plants
CN109470850A (zh) * 2018-11-06 2019-03-15 爱必信（上海）生物科技有限公司 一种免疫共沉淀试剂盒及方法
US10329575B2 (en) 1999-05-14 2019-06-25 Ceres, Inc. Regulatory sequence for plants
US10450580B2 (en) * 2012-12-18 2019-10-22 Yield10 Bioscience, Inc. Transcriptional regulation for improved plant productivity
US10640781B2 (en) 2015-02-18 2020-05-05 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Modification of transcriptional repressor binding site in NF-YC4 promoter for increased protein content and resistance to stress
US10851383B2 (en) 2003-10-14 2020-12-01 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
CN113528518A (zh) * 2021-06-28 2021-10-22 西南大学 抑制核盘菌的miRNA及其应用
CN114133438A (zh) * 2021-12-17 2022-03-04 广东省科学院南繁种业研究所 一种紫心甘薯花色素苷合成调控因子IbEIN3-2及其应用
CN114292857A (zh) * 2021-12-24 2022-04-08 山东省花生研究所 一种花生耐盐基因AhMADS50及其应用
US11634723B2 (en) 2003-09-11 2023-04-25 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US11739340B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2023-08-29 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
CN117866983A (zh) * 2024-03-11 2024-04-12 浙江大学海南研究院 OsbZIP10基因在调控水稻籽粒直链淀粉含量中的应用

Families Citing this family (81)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8686226B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2014-04-01 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. MYB-related transcriptional regulators that confer altered root hare, trichome morphology, and increased tolerance to abiotic stress in plants
US8283519B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2012-10-09 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US7511190B2 (en) 1999-11-17 2009-03-31 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20140196162A1 (en) 2006-05-15 2014-07-10 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators
US20050086718A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2005-04-21 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US8426678B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2013-04-23 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7888557B2 (en) 2003-02-22 2011-02-15 Monsanto Technology Llc Transgenic plants
BRPI0415345A (pt) * 2003-10-14 2006-12-05 Mendel Biotechnology Inc reguladores transcricionais de planta de estresse abiótico
AU2004290050A1 (en) * 2003-11-13 2005-05-26 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators
ATE531807T1 (de) 2005-03-21 2011-11-15 Univ California Verfahren zur herstellung von trockenheitsresistenten pflanzen
ZA200900024B (en) 2006-06-29 2010-04-28 Mendel Biotechnology Inc Improved yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants
US7977535B2 (en) * 2006-07-12 2011-07-12 Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University DNA encoding ring zinc-finger protein and the use of the DNA in vectors and bacteria and in plants
ES2558133T3 (es) * 2006-08-02 2016-02-02 Cropdesign N.V. Plantas transformadas con el polipéptido SYT que tienen el rendimiento aumentado en estrés abiótico y procedimiento de producción de las mismas
JPWO2008044800A1 (ja) * 2006-10-12 2010-02-18 独立行政法人理化学研究所 変異植物体及びその製造方法
BRPI0720219A2 (pt) * 2006-12-08 2013-12-24 Univ Iowa State Res Found Inc Genes de planta envolvidos em absorção e metabolismo de nitrato
BR122020022203B1 (pt) 2007-07-24 2021-04-20 Evogene Ltd método de aumento da taxa de crescimento de uma planta
CL2008003010A1 (es) * 2007-10-11 2011-09-16 Monsanto Tech Llc Sociedad Organizada Bajo Las Leyes Del Estado De Delaware Metodo para reducir la colonizacion de hongos swobre semillas de maiz,adn no natural en especies de maiz que comprende los genes codificantes para las proteinas cspb de b. subtilis transcripcional nf-yb de maiz, y celula de maiz que comprenden dicho adn.
US7947877B2 (en) 2008-05-14 2011-05-24 Monosanto Technology LLC Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV328921
US7935870B2 (en) 2008-05-14 2011-05-03 Monsanto Technology Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV354718
US7964774B2 (en) 2008-05-14 2011-06-21 Monsanto Technology Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV384196
US8829282B2 (en) 2008-05-14 2014-09-09 Monsanto Technology, Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV425044
US8466342B2 (en) 2009-06-09 2013-06-18 Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc Early endosperm promoter and methods of use
US8071848B2 (en) 2009-06-17 2011-12-06 Monsanto Technology Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV218328
US8440891B2 (en) 2009-09-22 2013-05-14 Board of Trustees of the University of Akransas, N.A. Rice cultivar CL 142-AR
US8440892B2 (en) 2009-10-15 2013-05-14 Board Of Trustees Of The University Of Arkansas, N.A. Rice cultivar CL 181-AR
CA2775146A1 (fr) 2009-10-26 2011-05-12 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Promoteur somatique specifique a un ovule et procedes d'utilisation
US8143488B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2012-03-27 Monsanto Technoloy LLC Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV470336
US8148611B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2012-04-03 Monsanto Technology Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV453784
US8138394B2 (en) 2010-02-26 2012-03-20 Monsanto Technology Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV431158
US8581048B2 (en) 2010-03-09 2013-11-12 Monsanto Technology, Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV119103
US8153865B2 (en) 2010-03-11 2012-04-10 Monsanto Technology Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV152154
CA2812506A1 (fr) * 2010-09-24 2012-03-29 Basf Plant Science Company Gmbh Plantes a caracteristiquesde rendement ameliorees et leur procede de production
US8513487B2 (en) 2011-04-07 2013-08-20 Zenon LISIECZKO Plants and seeds of spring canola variety ND-662c
US8513494B2 (en) 2011-04-08 2013-08-20 Chunren Wu Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV695971
US8507761B2 (en) 2011-05-05 2013-08-13 Teresa Huskowska Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV372145
US8513495B2 (en) 2011-05-10 2013-08-20 Dale Burns Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV291489
US9204603B2 (en) 2011-12-21 2015-12-08 The Curators Of The University Of Missouri Soybean variety S05-11482
WO2013096818A1 (fr) 2011-12-21 2013-06-27 The Curators Of The University Of Missouri Variété de soja s05-11268
EP2800816A1 (fr) 2012-01-06 2014-11-12 Pioneer Hi-Bred International Inc. Promoteur spécifique d'ovule et méthodes d'utilisation
WO2013103365A1 (fr) 2012-01-06 2013-07-11 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Promoteurs de pollen préférés et procédés d'utilisation
US9612235B2 (en) 2012-04-05 2017-04-04 Koch Biological Solutions, Llc Herbicidal compound screening
US8802935B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2014-08-12 Monsanto Technology Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV942568
US8878009B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2014-11-04 Monsanto Technology, LLP Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV318181
US8859857B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2014-10-14 Monsanto Technology Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV259778
US8835720B2 (en) 2012-04-26 2014-09-16 Monsanto Technology Llc Plants and seeds of spring canola variety SCV967592
WO2014059155A1 (fr) 2012-10-11 2014-04-17 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Promoteurs de cellules de garde et leur utilisation
CA2905743C (fr) 2013-03-13 2021-09-28 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Application de glyphosate pour desherbage d'une brassicee
CN105339380A (zh) 2013-03-14 2016-02-17 先锋国际良种公司 用以防治昆虫害虫的组合物和方法
EP2971000A4 (fr) 2013-03-15 2016-11-23 Pioneer Hi Bred Int Polypeptides phi-4 et leurs procédés d'utilisation
WO2015023639A2 (fr) * 2013-08-13 2015-02-19 New York University Plantes transgéniques et système de transformation transitoire pour la découverte par la technique target de facteurs de transcription sur l'ensemble du génome
EA030896B1 (ru) 2013-08-16 2018-10-31 Пайонир Хай-Бред Интернэшнл, Инк. Инсектицидные белки и способы их применения
MX359027B (es) 2013-09-13 2018-09-12 Pioneer Hi Bred Int Proteinas insecticidas y metodos para su uso.
EP3102592B1 (fr) 2014-02-07 2020-05-20 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Protéines insecticides et leurs procédés d'utilisation
US10106813B2 (en) 2014-02-10 2018-10-23 Board Of Trustees Of Michigan State University Drought-tolerance in plants
US20170218384A1 (en) 2014-08-08 2017-08-03 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Ubiquitin promoters and introns and methods of use
WO2016044092A1 (fr) 2014-09-17 2016-03-24 Pioneer Hi Bred International Inc Compositions et procédés de lutte contre des insectes ravageurs
EP3207143B1 (fr) 2014-10-16 2023-11-22 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Protéines insecticides et leurs procédés d'utilisation
US20170359965A1 (en) 2014-12-19 2017-12-21 E I Du Pont De Nemours And Company Polylactic acid compositions with accelerated degradation rate and increased heat stability
CN108064233B (zh) 2015-05-19 2022-07-15 先锋国际良种公司 杀昆虫蛋白及其使用方法
EP3310803A1 (fr) 2015-06-16 2018-04-25 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Compositions et procédés de lutte contre des insectes nuisibles
CN109475096B (zh) 2015-08-06 2022-08-23 先锋国际良种公司 植物来源的杀昆虫蛋白及其使用方法
US11236347B2 (en) 2015-08-28 2022-02-01 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Ochrobactrum-mediated transformation of plants
EP3390431A1 (fr) 2015-12-18 2018-10-24 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Protéines insecticides et leurs procédés d'utilisation
BR112018012887B1 (pt) 2015-12-22 2024-02-06 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc Cassete de expressão, vetor, métodos de obtenção de célula vegetal e planta transgênica, métodos para expressar um polinucleotídeo
EP3960863A1 (fr) 2016-05-04 2022-03-02 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Protéines insecticides et leurs procédés d'utilisation
CA3022858A1 (fr) 2016-06-16 2017-12-21 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Compositions et procedes de lutte contre des insectes nuisibles
EP4083215A1 (fr) 2016-06-24 2022-11-02 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Éléments régulateurs de plantes et leurs procédés d'utilisation
US11155829B2 (en) 2016-07-01 2021-10-26 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Insecticidal proteins from plants and methods for their use
WO2018013333A1 (fr) 2016-07-12 2018-01-18 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Compositions et procédés de lutte contre des insectes nuisibles
EP3535285B1 (fr) 2016-11-01 2022-04-06 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Protéines insecticides et leurs procédés d'utilisation
CN111373046A (zh) 2017-09-25 2020-07-03 先锋国际良种公司 组织偏好性启动子和使用方法
EP3764796A4 (fr) 2018-03-14 2021-12-22 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Protéines insecticides issues de plantes et leurs procédés d'utilisation
WO2019178042A1 (fr) 2018-03-14 2019-09-19 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Protéines insecticides issues de plantes et procédés pour leur utilisation
BR112020023800A2 (pt) 2018-05-22 2021-02-23 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. elementos reguladores de planta e métodos de uso dos mesmos
WO2020005933A1 (fr) 2018-06-28 2020-01-02 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Procédés de sélection de plantes transformées
BR112021008329A2 (pt) 2018-10-31 2021-08-03 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. composições e métodos para transformação de plantas mediada por ochrobactrum
CN110698549B (zh) * 2019-09-25 2021-09-07 东北农业大学 ZmNAC89转录因子基因的克隆及其在提高玉米耐盐碱性和产量中的应用
CN111217898B (zh) * 2020-03-10 2021-09-07 河北师范大学 蛋白质OsZZW1在调控水稻抗旱性中的应用
EP4182466A2 (fr) 2020-07-14 2023-05-24 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Protéines insecticides et leurs procédés d'utilisation
CN114516907B (zh) * 2020-11-20 2024-03-29 中国科学技术大学 一种植物抗逆性相关基因atagl70及其编码蛋白与应用
CN112626084B (zh) * 2020-12-31 2022-03-29 安徽农业大学 草莓MYB转录因子FvMYB24基因、表达蛋白及应用

Citations (70)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6121513A (en) * 1998-07-20 2000-09-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Sulfonamide resistance in plants
US6235975B1 (en) * 1997-02-21 2001-05-22 The Regents Of The University Of California Leafy cotyledon1 genes and methods of modulating embryo development in transgenic plants
US20020023281A1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2002-02-21 Jorn Gorlach Expressed sequences of arabidopsis thaliana
US20020102695A1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2002-08-01 Silva Oswaldo Da Costa E Transcription factor stress-related proteins and methods of use in plants
US6495742B1 (en) * 1998-08-12 2002-12-17 Independent Administrative Institute Japan International Research Center For Agricultural Sciences Genes encoding plant transcription factors
US20030041356A1 (en) * 2001-03-27 2003-02-27 Lynne Reuber Methods for modifying flowering phenotypes
US20030061637A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2003-03-27 Cai-Zhong Jiang Polynucleotides for root trait alteration
US20030101481A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2003-05-29 James Zhang Plant gene sequences I
US20030121070A1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2003-06-26 Luc Adam Genes for modifying plant traits IV
US20030126638A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-07-03 Allen William B. Alteration of oil traits in plants
US20030188330A1 (en) * 2002-03-18 2003-10-02 Jacqueline Heard Genes for modifying plant traits xi
US6664446B2 (en) * 1999-03-23 2003-12-16 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transgenic plants comprising polynucleotides encoding transcription factors that confer disease tolerance
US20040009476A9 (en) * 2000-08-24 2004-01-15 Harper Jeffrey F. Stress-regulated genes of plants, transgenic plants containing same, and methods of use
US20040019927A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2004-01-29 Sherman Bradley K. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20040045049A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2004-03-04 James Zhang Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US6706866B1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2004-03-16 Michigan State University Plant having altered environmental stress tolerance
US6717034B2 (en) * 2001-03-30 2004-04-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Method for modifying plant biomass
US20040098764A1 (en) * 2001-03-16 2004-05-20 Heard Jacqueline E. Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US20040111768A1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2004-06-10 E Silva Oswaldo Da Costa Transcription factor stress-related proteins and methods of use in plants
US20040128712A1 (en) * 2000-02-17 2004-07-01 Cai-Zhong Jiang Methods for modifying plant biomass and abiotic stress
US6825397B1 (en) * 1998-11-09 2004-11-30 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. LEC1 trancriptional activator nucleic acids and methods of use thereof
US20050022266A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2005-01-27 Jingrui Wu Yield-improved transgenic plants
US20050097638A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2005-05-05 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcriptional regulation of plant biomass and abiotic stress tolerance
US20050155117A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2005-07-14 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcriptional regulation of plant disease tolerance
US20050163397A1 (en) * 2004-01-23 2005-07-28 Electric Scientific Industries Image subtraction of illumination artifacts
US6946586B1 (en) * 1999-04-07 2005-09-20 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Genetic trait breeding method
US20060008874A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2006-01-12 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US20060015972A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2006-01-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of drought stress
US20060162018A1 (en) * 2003-06-06 2006-07-20 Gutterson Neil I Plant transcriptional regulators of disease resistance
US7109393B2 (en) * 2000-08-15 2006-09-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Methods of gene silencing using inverted repeat sequences
US7135616B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2006-11-14 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Biochemistry-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20070022495A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2007-01-25 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factors for increasing yield
US7193129B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2007-03-20 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Stress-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7196245B2 (en) * 2002-09-18 2007-03-27 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides that confer increased biomass and tolerance to cold, water deprivation and low nitrogen to plants
US20070093837A1 (en) * 2005-09-20 2007-04-26 Peter Bohrmann System for the fixation of bone segments or bone fragments
US7223904B2 (en) * 1999-02-18 2007-05-29 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant gene sequences II
US7238860B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2007-07-03 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20070184092A1 (en) * 2006-01-23 2007-08-09 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Methods and compositions for modulating tocol content
US20070199107A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2007-08-23 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Early flowering in genetically modified plants
US20070226839A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2007-09-27 Mendel Biotechnology Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20080040973A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2008-02-21 Donald Nelson Transgenic crop plants with improved stress tolerance
US20080104730A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2008-05-01 Jingrui Wu Yield-improved transgenic plants
US20080155706A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2008-06-26 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant tolerance to low water, low nitrogen and cold
US20080163397A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2008-07-03 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved water deficit and cold tolerance
US20080229448A1 (en) * 2004-12-20 2008-09-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant Stress Tolerance from Modified Ap2 Transcription Factors
US20080301841A1 (en) * 2000-11-16 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved yield and stress tolerance
US20080301840A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Conferring biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20080301836A1 (en) * 2007-05-17 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Selection of transcription factor variants
US20080313756A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2008-12-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant quality traits
US20090044297A1 (en) * 1999-05-06 2009-02-12 Andersen Scott E Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US20090049573A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2009-02-19 Dotson Stanton B Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US20090049566A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2009-02-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant quality with various promoters
US20090138981A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2009-05-28 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20090151015A1 (en) * 2006-04-24 2009-06-11 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc Disease-inducible promoters
US20090183270A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2009-07-16 Adams Thomas R Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US20090192305A1 (en) * 1998-12-22 2009-07-30 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Ap2 transcription factors for modifying plant traits
US20090205063A1 (en) * 2004-07-14 2009-08-13 Mendel Biotechnology Plant polynucleotides for improved yield and quality
US7598429B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2009-10-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factor sequences for conferring advantageous properties to plants
US20090265813A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2009-10-22 Mendel Biotechnology , Inc. Stress tolerance in plants
US7635800B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2009-12-22 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7659446B2 (en) * 2003-02-25 2010-02-09 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7663025B2 (en) * 1999-03-23 2010-02-16 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant Transcriptional Regulators
US20100071086A1 (en) * 2008-09-12 2010-03-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polysome-mediated cell type-, tissue type- or condition-enhanced transcript profiling
US20100083402A1 (en) * 2000-11-16 2010-04-01 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription Factor Sequences for Conferring Advantageous Properties to Plants
US7692067B2 (en) * 2002-09-18 2010-04-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants
US20100107279A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2010-04-29 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20100162427A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2010-06-24 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20100175145A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2010-07-08 Mendel Biotechnology Plant transcriptional regulators
US20100223689A1 (en) * 2006-08-07 2010-09-02 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with enhanced size and growth rate
US20100281565A1 (en) * 2007-11-21 2010-11-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transformation of Crambe Abyssinica

Family Cites Families (40)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4407956A (en) 1981-03-13 1983-10-04 The Regents Of The University Of California Cloned cauliflower mosaic virus DNA as a plant vehicle
WO1985001856A1 (fr) 1983-11-03 1985-05-09 Johannes Martenis Jacob De Wet Procede de transfert de genes exogenes dans des plantes en utilisant le pollen comme vecteur
US4943674A (en) 1987-05-26 1990-07-24 Calgene, Inc. Fruit specific transcriptional factors
US5750871A (en) 1986-05-29 1998-05-12 Calgene, Inc. Transformation and foreign gene expression in Brassica species
US5597945A (en) 1986-07-25 1997-01-28 Board Of Supervisors Of Louisiana State University And Agricultural And Mechanical College Plants genetically enhanced for disease resistance
GB8626879D0 (en) 1986-11-11 1986-12-10 Ici Plc Dna
US4987071A (en) 1986-12-03 1991-01-22 University Patents, Inc. RNA ribozyme polymerases, dephosphorylases, restriction endoribonucleases and methods
US5543508A (en) 1987-12-15 1996-08-06 Gene Shears Pty. Limited Ribozymes
US5268526A (en) 1988-07-29 1993-12-07 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Overexpression of phytochrome in transgenic plants
US5223409A (en) 1988-09-02 1993-06-29 Protein Engineering Corp. Directed evolution of novel binding proteins
US5589615A (en) 1988-10-14 1996-12-31 Plant Genetic Systems N.V. Process for the production of transgenic plants with increased nutritional value via the expression of modified 2S storage albumins
US5231020A (en) 1989-03-30 1993-07-27 Dna Plant Technology Corporation Genetic engineering of novel plant phenotypes
US5689041A (en) 1989-08-10 1997-11-18 Plant Gentic Systems N.V. Plants modified with barstar for fertility restoration
US5658772A (en) 1989-12-22 1997-08-19 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Site-specific recombination of DNA in plant cells
WO1991010725A1 (fr) 1990-01-22 1991-07-25 Dekalb Plant Genetics Plantes de mais transgeniques fertiles
US5484956A (en) 1990-01-22 1996-01-16 Dekalb Genetics Corporation Fertile transgenic Zea mays plant comprising heterologous DNA encoding Bacillus thuringiensis endotoxin
US5618988A (en) 1990-03-02 1997-04-08 Amoco Corporation Enhanced carotenoid accumulation in storage organs of genetically engineered plants
US5837848A (en) 1990-03-16 1998-11-17 Zeneca Limited Root-specific promoter
FR2673643B1 (fr) 1991-03-05 1993-05-21 Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie Peptide de transit pour l'insertion d'un gene etranger dans un gene vegetal et plantes transformees en utilisant ce peptide.
IL101508A0 (en) 1991-04-08 1992-12-30 Rhone Poulenc Agrochimie Chimeric plant genes based on upstream regulatory elements of helianthinin
EP0612208B1 (fr) 1991-10-04 2004-09-15 North Carolina State University Plantes transgeniques resistant a des agents pathogenes
US5610042A (en) 1991-10-07 1997-03-11 Ciba-Geigy Corporation Methods for stable transformation of wheat
ATE207957T1 (de) 1992-02-19 2001-11-15 Oregon State Produktion virus-resistenter pflanzen durch einführung von nicht-translatierbarer viraler plus-strang-rna
US5426039A (en) 1993-09-08 1995-06-20 Bio-Rad Laboratories, Inc. Direct molecular cloning of primer extended DNA containing an alkane diol
US6242568B1 (en) 1994-01-18 2001-06-05 The Scripps Research Institute Zinc finger protein derivatives and methods therefor
US5605793A (en) 1994-02-17 1997-02-25 Affymax Technologies N.V. Methods for in vitro recombination
US5571706A (en) 1994-06-17 1996-11-05 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of Agriculture Plant virus resistance gene and methods
US5736369A (en) 1994-07-29 1998-04-07 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Method for producing transgenic cereal plants
USRE39229E1 (en) 1994-08-20 2006-08-08 Gendaq Limited Binding proteins for recognition of DNA
WO1997013401A1 (fr) 1995-10-13 1997-04-17 Purdue Research Foundation Procede de production de plantes hybrides
US5783393A (en) 1996-01-29 1998-07-21 Agritope, Inc. Plant tissue/stage specific promoters for regulated expression of transgenes in plants
US5773697A (en) 1996-04-23 1998-06-30 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Genetic constructs and methods for producing fruits with very little or diminished seed
US5773269A (en) 1996-07-26 1998-06-30 Regents Of The University Of Minnesota Fertile transgenic oat plants
US6417428B1 (en) 1996-09-04 2002-07-09 Michael F. Thomashow Plant having altered environmental stress tolerance
GB9710809D0 (en) 1997-05-23 1997-07-23 Medical Res Council Nucleic acid binding proteins
US6262333B1 (en) 1998-06-10 2001-07-17 Bayer Corporation Human genes and gene expression products
US6168920B1 (en) 1998-08-10 2001-01-02 Incyte Genomics, Inc. Extracellular adhesive proteins
MXPA02004884A (es) 1999-11-17 2004-04-05 Mendel Biotechnology Inc Genes de tolerancia a patogenos.
EP1346035A2 (fr) * 2000-10-24 2003-09-24 E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company Facteurs de transcription pour vegetaux
CA2442587A1 (fr) * 2001-03-28 2002-10-10 Montserrat Pages Procede permettant d'augmenter la tolerance des plantes aux stress environnementaux

Patent Citations (86)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US6706866B1 (en) * 1996-09-04 2004-03-16 Michigan State University Plant having altered environmental stress tolerance
US6235975B1 (en) * 1997-02-21 2001-05-22 The Regents Of The University Of California Leafy cotyledon1 genes and methods of modulating embryo development in transgenic plants
US6121513A (en) * 1998-07-20 2000-09-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Sulfonamide resistance in plants
US6495742B1 (en) * 1998-08-12 2002-12-17 Independent Administrative Institute Japan International Research Center For Agricultural Sciences Genes encoding plant transcription factors
US20030101481A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2003-05-29 James Zhang Plant gene sequences I
US20080313756A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2008-12-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant quality traits
US7345217B2 (en) * 1998-09-22 2008-03-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20040045049A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2004-03-04 James Zhang Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20090049566A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2009-02-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant quality with various promoters
US20090138981A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2009-05-28 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20090265807A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2009-10-22 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20060008874A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2006-01-12 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US20080155706A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2008-06-26 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant tolerance to low water, low nitrogen and cold
US6825397B1 (en) * 1998-11-09 2004-11-30 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. LEC1 trancriptional activator nucleic acids and methods of use thereof
US20090192305A1 (en) * 1998-12-22 2009-07-30 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Ap2 transcription factors for modifying plant traits
US7223904B2 (en) * 1999-02-18 2007-05-29 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant gene sequences II
US6664446B2 (en) * 1999-03-23 2003-12-16 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transgenic plants comprising polynucleotides encoding transcription factors that confer disease tolerance
US20050172364A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2005-08-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Genes for modifying plant traits XI
US20080163397A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2008-07-03 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved water deficit and cold tolerance
US20070199107A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2007-08-23 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Early flowering in genetically modified plants
US20030061637A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2003-03-27 Cai-Zhong Jiang Polynucleotides for root trait alteration
US20030093837A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2003-05-15 James Keddie Polynucleotides for seed trait alteration
US20100175145A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2010-07-08 Mendel Biotechnology Plant transcriptional regulators
US20030131386A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2003-07-10 Raymond Samaha Stress-induced polynucleotides
US20060015972A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2006-01-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of drought stress
US20050097638A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2005-05-05 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcriptional regulation of plant biomass and abiotic stress tolerance
US7663025B2 (en) * 1999-03-23 2010-02-16 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant Transcriptional Regulators
US6946586B1 (en) * 1999-04-07 2005-09-20 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Genetic trait breeding method
US20090044297A1 (en) * 1999-05-06 2009-02-12 Andersen Scott E Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US20100083395A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2010-04-01 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Stress-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7511190B2 (en) * 1999-11-17 2009-03-31 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20040019927A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2004-01-29 Sherman Bradley K. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20080301840A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Conferring biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20070226839A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2007-09-27 Mendel Biotechnology Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20070022495A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2007-01-25 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factors for increasing yield
US20090276912A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2009-11-05 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and Polypeptides in Plants
US20040111768A1 (en) * 1999-12-22 2004-06-10 E Silva Oswaldo Da Costa Transcription factor stress-related proteins and methods of use in plants
US20020023281A1 (en) * 2000-01-27 2002-02-21 Jorn Gorlach Expressed sequences of arabidopsis thaliana
US20040128712A1 (en) * 2000-02-17 2004-07-01 Cai-Zhong Jiang Methods for modifying plant biomass and abiotic stress
US6677504B2 (en) * 2000-04-07 2004-01-13 Basf Plant Science Gmbh Transcription factor stress-related proteins and methods of use in plants
US20020102695A1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2002-08-01 Silva Oswaldo Da Costa E Transcription factor stress-related proteins and methods of use in plants
US20080172759A1 (en) * 2000-04-07 2008-07-17 Basf Plant Science Gmbh Transcription factor stress-related proteins and methods of use in plants
US7109393B2 (en) * 2000-08-15 2006-09-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Methods of gene silencing using inverted repeat sequences
US20030121070A1 (en) * 2000-08-22 2003-06-26 Luc Adam Genes for modifying plant traits IV
US20040009476A9 (en) * 2000-08-24 2004-01-15 Harper Jeffrey F. Stress-regulated genes of plants, transgenic plants containing same, and methods of use
US20100083402A1 (en) * 2000-11-16 2010-04-01 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription Factor Sequences for Conferring Advantageous Properties to Plants
US20080301841A1 (en) * 2000-11-16 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved yield and stress tolerance
US6835540B2 (en) * 2001-03-16 2004-12-28 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Biosynthetic pathway transcription factors
US20040098764A1 (en) * 2001-03-16 2004-05-20 Heard Jacqueline E. Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US20030041356A1 (en) * 2001-03-27 2003-02-27 Lynne Reuber Methods for modifying flowering phenotypes
US6717034B2 (en) * 2001-03-30 2004-04-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Method for modifying plant biomass
US7238860B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2007-07-03 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7135616B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2006-11-14 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Biochemistry-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20100107279A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2010-04-29 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20050155117A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2005-07-14 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcriptional regulation of plant disease tolerance
US7635800B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2009-12-22 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7601893B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2009-10-13 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Stress-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7598429B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2009-10-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factor sequences for conferring advantageous properties to plants
US7193129B2 (en) * 2001-04-18 2007-03-20 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Stress-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20080104730A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2008-05-01 Jingrui Wu Yield-improved transgenic plants
US20030126638A1 (en) * 2001-06-29 2003-07-03 Allen William B. Alteration of oil traits in plants
US20030188330A1 (en) * 2002-03-18 2003-10-02 Jacqueline Heard Genes for modifying plant traits xi
US7196245B2 (en) * 2002-09-18 2007-03-27 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides that confer increased biomass and tolerance to cold, water deprivation and low nitrogen to plants
US20070101454A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2007-05-03 Mendel Biotechnology Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20100192249A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2010-07-29 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants ii
US20100186105A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2010-07-22 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants iii
US20100186106A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2010-07-22 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants iv
US20100162427A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2010-06-24 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7692067B2 (en) * 2002-09-18 2010-04-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants
US20090183270A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2009-07-16 Adams Thomas R Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US20050022266A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2005-01-27 Jingrui Wu Yield-improved transgenic plants
US20090049573A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2009-02-19 Dotson Stanton B Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US7659446B2 (en) * 2003-02-25 2010-02-09 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20060162018A1 (en) * 2003-06-06 2006-07-20 Gutterson Neil I Plant transcriptional regulators of disease resistance
US20050163397A1 (en) * 2004-01-23 2005-07-28 Electric Scientific Industries Image subtraction of illumination artifacts
US20090205063A1 (en) * 2004-07-14 2009-08-13 Mendel Biotechnology Plant polynucleotides for improved yield and quality
US20080229448A1 (en) * 2004-12-20 2008-09-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant Stress Tolerance from Modified Ap2 Transcription Factors
US20090265813A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2009-10-22 Mendel Biotechnology , Inc. Stress tolerance in plants
US20070093837A1 (en) * 2005-09-20 2007-04-26 Peter Bohrmann System for the fixation of bone segments or bone fragments
US20070184092A1 (en) * 2006-01-23 2007-08-09 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Methods and compositions for modulating tocol content
US20090151015A1 (en) * 2006-04-24 2009-06-11 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc Disease-inducible promoters
US20080040973A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2008-02-21 Donald Nelson Transgenic crop plants with improved stress tolerance
US20100223689A1 (en) * 2006-08-07 2010-09-02 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with enhanced size and growth rate
US20080301836A1 (en) * 2007-05-17 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Selection of transcription factor variants
US20100281565A1 (en) * 2007-11-21 2010-11-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transformation of Crambe Abyssinica
US20100071086A1 (en) * 2008-09-12 2010-03-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polysome-mediated cell type-, tissue type- or condition-enhanced transcript profiling

Cited By (102)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20090138981A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2009-05-28 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20090265807A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2009-10-22 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US8030546B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2011-10-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US20080155706A1 (en) * 1998-09-22 2008-06-26 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant tolerance to low water, low nitrogen and cold
US8022274B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2011-09-20 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant tolerance to low water, low nitrogen and cold
US7960612B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2011-06-14 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant quality with various promoters
US7956242B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2011-06-07 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant quality traits
US8809630B2 (en) 1998-09-22 2014-08-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US8558059B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2013-10-15 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Genes for conferring to plants increased tolerance to environmental stresses
US20070240243A9 (en) * 1999-03-23 2007-10-11 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of drought stress
US7868229B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2011-01-11 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Early flowering in genetically modified plants
US8633353B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2014-01-21 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved water deficit and cold tolerance
US20070199107A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2007-08-23 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Early flowering in genetically modified plants
US20060272060A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2006-11-30 Mendel Biotechnology Plant transcriptional regulators
US20080163397A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2008-07-03 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved water deficit and cold tolerance
US7663025B2 (en) 1999-03-23 2010-02-16 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant Transcriptional Regulators
US20060015972A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2006-01-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant transcriptional regulators of drought stress
US20050172364A1 (en) * 1999-03-23 2005-08-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Genes for modifying plant traits XI
US9322031B2 (en) 1999-05-06 2016-04-26 Monsanto Technology Llc Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US20090044297A1 (en) * 1999-05-06 2009-02-12 Andersen Scott E Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US10329575B2 (en) 1999-05-14 2019-06-25 Ceres, Inc. Regulatory sequence for plants
US9175051B2 (en) 1999-11-17 2015-11-03 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factors for increasing yield
US20070022495A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2007-01-25 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factors for increasing yield
US20110119789A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2011-05-19 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factors for increasing yield
US20080301840A1 (en) * 1999-11-17 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Conferring biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US7888558B2 (en) 1999-11-17 2011-02-15 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Conferring biotic and abiotic stress tolerance in plants
US7858848B2 (en) 1999-11-17 2010-12-28 Mendel Biotechnology Inc. Transcription factors for increasing yield
US8877916B2 (en) 2000-04-26 2014-11-04 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US9029523B2 (en) 2000-04-26 2015-05-12 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US7939715B2 (en) 2000-11-16 2011-05-10 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved yield and stress tolerance
US10093942B2 (en) 2000-11-16 2018-10-09 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factor sequences for conferring advantageous properties to plants
US20080301841A1 (en) * 2000-11-16 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with improved yield and stress tolerance
US9447425B2 (en) 2000-11-16 2016-09-20 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factor sequences for conferring advantageous properties to plants
US8426685B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2013-04-23 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7635800B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2009-12-22 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7598429B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2009-10-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Transcription factor sequences for conferring advantageous properties to plants
US20100107279A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2010-04-29 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20070209086A1 (en) * 2001-04-18 2007-09-06 Mendel Biotechnology Yield-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7601893B2 (en) 2001-04-18 2009-10-13 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Stress-related polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20080104730A1 (en) * 2001-05-22 2008-05-01 Jingrui Wu Yield-improved transgenic plants
US20090241217A9 (en) * 2001-05-22 2009-09-24 Jingrui Wu Yield-improved transgenic plants
US20100186106A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2010-07-22 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants iv
US20110078806A1 (en) * 2002-09-18 2011-03-31 Mendel Biotechnology Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US9982273B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2018-05-29 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants IV
US8071846B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2011-12-06 Monsanto Company Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants II
US7825296B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2010-11-02 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US7692067B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2010-04-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants
US10787677B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2020-09-29 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants IV
US8541665B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2013-09-24 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US8957282B2 (en) 2002-09-18 2015-02-17 Monsanto Technology Llc Yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants IV
US9290773B2 (en) 2002-10-02 2016-03-22 Monsanto Technology Llc Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US20090049573A1 (en) * 2002-10-02 2009-02-19 Dotson Stanton B Transgenic plants with enhanced agronomic traits
US11634723B2 (en) 2003-09-11 2023-04-25 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US11739340B2 (en) 2003-09-23 2023-08-29 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US7851608B2 (en) 2003-10-14 2010-12-14 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20110041219A1 (en) * 2003-10-14 2011-02-17 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US10851383B2 (en) 2003-10-14 2020-12-01 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20070124834A1 (en) * 2003-10-14 2007-05-31 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US7868155B2 (en) 2003-11-06 2011-01-11 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20080044898A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2008-02-21 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20090106866A1 (en) * 2003-11-06 2009-04-23 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, Promoter Control Elements, And Combinations, And Uses Thereof
US20090181851A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2009-07-16 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, Promoter Control Elements, And Combinations, And Uses Thereof
US20110016587A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2011-01-20 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20070006335A1 (en) * 2004-02-13 2007-01-04 Zhihong Cook Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20100037346A1 (en) * 2004-04-01 2010-02-11 Ceres, Inc. Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20060021083A1 (en) * 2004-04-01 2006-01-26 Zhihong Cook Promoter, promoter control elements, and combinations, and uses thereof
US20090205063A1 (en) * 2004-07-14 2009-08-13 Mendel Biotechnology Plant polynucleotides for improved yield and quality
US20080229448A1 (en) * 2004-12-20 2008-09-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plant Stress Tolerance from Modified Ap2 Transcription Factors
US8426683B2 (en) 2005-01-27 2013-04-23 Cropdesign N.V. Plants having increased yield and a method for making the same
US20100212041A1 (en) * 2005-01-27 2010-08-19 Valerie Frankard Plants Having Increased Yield And A Method For Making The Same
US20090265813A1 (en) * 2005-08-31 2009-10-22 Mendel Biotechnology , Inc. Stress tolerance in plants
US20100218271A1 (en) * 2005-10-05 2010-08-26 Crop Design N.V. Plants having improved characteristics and method for making the same
US20080040973A1 (en) * 2006-06-23 2008-02-21 Donald Nelson Transgenic crop plants with improved stress tolerance
US8927811B2 (en) 2006-08-07 2015-01-06 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with enhanced size and growth rate
EP2471355A1 (fr) * 2006-08-07 2012-07-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plantes à taux de croissance et taille accrus
EP2046111A4 (fr) * 2006-08-07 2010-03-17 Mendel Biotechnology Inc Plantes présentant une taille et une vitesse de croissance accrues
EP2046111A2 (fr) * 2006-08-07 2009-04-15 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plantes présentant une taille et une vitesse de croissance accrues
US20100223689A1 (en) * 2006-08-07 2010-09-02 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Plants with enhanced size and growth rate
US20080301836A1 (en) * 2007-05-17 2008-12-04 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Selection of transcription factor variants
US20100199382A1 (en) * 2007-09-21 2010-08-05 Basf Plant Science Gmbh Plants Having Increased Yield-Related Traits And A Method For Making The Same
US20110023193A1 (en) * 2008-02-15 2011-01-27 Cory Christensen Drought and heat tolerance in plants
WO2009102965A3 (fr) * 2008-02-15 2009-11-12 Ceres, Inc. Tolérance à la sécheresse et à la chaleur chez les plantes
US11578337B2 (en) 2008-02-15 2023-02-14 Ceres, Inc. Drought and heat tolerance in plants
US11530417B2 (en) 2008-02-15 2022-12-20 Ceres, Inc. Drought and heat tolerance in plants
US10604766B2 (en) 2008-02-15 2020-03-31 Ceres, Inc. Drought and heat tolerance in plants
US11946060B2 (en) 2008-02-15 2024-04-02 Ceres, Inc. Drought and heat tolerance in plants
US20100138952A1 (en) * 2008-08-05 2010-06-03 Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc. Gene promoter regulatory element analysis computational methods and their use in transgenic applications
US20100071086A1 (en) * 2008-09-12 2010-03-18 Mendel Biotechnology, Inc. Polysome-mediated cell type-, tissue type- or condition-enhanced transcript profiling
US8841114B2 (en) * 2009-08-26 2014-09-23 Organobalance Gmbh Genetically modified organism for the production of lipids
US20120156249A1 (en) * 2009-08-26 2012-06-21 Organobalance Gmbh Genetically modified organism for the production of lipids
US9598710B2 (en) 2009-08-26 2017-03-21 Organobalance Gmbh Genetically modified organism for the production of lipids
US11072798B2 (en) 2012-12-18 2021-07-27 Yield 10 Bioscience, Inc. Transcriptional regulation for improved plant productivity
US11746356B2 (en) 2012-12-18 2023-09-05 Yield10 Bioscience, Inc. Transcriptional regulation for improved plant productivity
US10450580B2 (en) * 2012-12-18 2019-10-22 Yield10 Bioscience, Inc. Transcriptional regulation for improved plant productivity
US12037594B2 (en) 2015-02-18 2024-07-16 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Modification of transcriptional repressor binding site in NF-YC4 promoter for increased protein content and resistance to stress
US10640781B2 (en) 2015-02-18 2020-05-05 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Modification of transcriptional repressor binding site in NF-YC4 promoter for increased protein content and resistance to stress
US11542520B2 (en) 2015-02-18 2023-01-03 Iowa State University Research Foundation, Inc. Modification of transcriptional repressor binding site in NF-YC4 promoter for increased protein content and resistance to stress
CN109470850A (zh) * 2018-11-06 2019-03-15 爱必信（上海）生物科技有限公司 一种免疫共沉淀试剂盒及方法
CN113528518A (zh) * 2021-06-28 2021-10-22 西南大学 抑制核盘菌的miRNA及其应用
CN114133438A (zh) * 2021-12-17 2022-03-04 广东省科学院南繁种业研究所 一种紫心甘薯花色素苷合成调控因子IbEIN3-2及其应用
CN114292857A (zh) * 2021-12-24 2022-04-08 山东省花生研究所 一种花生耐盐基因AhMADS50及其应用
CN117866983A (zh) * 2024-03-11 2024-04-12 浙江大学海南研究院 OsbZIP10基因在调控水稻籽粒直链淀粉含量中的应用

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
WO2004076638A8 (fr) 2012-04-12
EP1601758A2 (fr) 2005-12-07
EP1601758B1 (fr) 2012-11-14
US7659446B2 (en) 2010-02-09
BRPI0407822A (pt) 2006-02-14
AU2004214935B2 (en) 2011-04-21
US20060242738A1 (en) 2006-10-26
EP1601758A4 (fr) 2007-08-15
WO2004076638A2 (fr) 2004-09-10
WO2004076638A3 (fr) 2006-10-19
CA2937101A1 (fr) 2004-09-10
CA2516645C (fr) 2016-07-26
CA2516645A1 (fr) 2004-09-10
AU2004214935A1 (en) 2004-09-10
BRPI0407822B1 (pt) 2019-09-24

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2272962B1 (fr) Polynucléotides et polypeptides dans les plantes
US20050086718A1 (en) Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
EP1682668B1 (fr) Regulateurs transcriptionnels de plantes
US7897843B2 (en) Transcriptional regulation of plant biomass and abiotic stress tolerance
EP1485490B1 (fr) Polynucleotides et polypeptides utilises dans des plantes en vue d'ameliorer leurs caracteristiques
US7663025B2 (en) Plant Transcriptional Regulators
EP1230345B1 (fr) Genes resistant au stress environnemental
US8912394B2 (en) Transcriptional regulation of plant disease tolerance
US8283519B2 (en) Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US20060015972A1 (en) Plant transcriptional regulators of drought stress
US20040098764A1 (en) Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress
US20040128712A1 (en) Methods for modifying plant biomass and abiotic stress
US20030121070A1 (en) Genes for modifying plant traits IV
US8686226B2 (en) MYB-related transcriptional regulators that confer altered root hare, trichome morphology, and increased tolerance to abiotic stress in plants
US20050172364A1 (en) Genes for modifying plant traits XI
EP2410060A1 (fr) Gènes servant à modifier des caractéristiques de plantes IV
US20060162018A1 (en) Plant transcriptional regulators of disease resistance
US8541665B2 (en) Polynucleotides and polypeptides in plants
US20130031669A1 (en) Plant transcriptional regulators of abiotic stress ii
WO2005038034A2 (fr) Regulateurs transcriptionnels vegetaux du stress abiotique
US20140201861A1 (en) Polynucleotides and polypeptides that confer increased yield, size or biomass

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
AS Assignment

Owner name: MENDEL BIOTECHNOLOGY, INC., CALIFORNIA

Free format text: ASSIGNMENT OF ASSIGNORS INTEREST;ASSIGNORS:HEARD, JACQUELINE E.;KEDDIE, JAMES S.;CREELMAN, ROBERT A.;AND OTHERS;REEL/FRAME:014298/0207;SIGNING DATES FROM 20031212 TO 20031226

STCB Information on status: application discontinuation

Free format text: ABANDONED -- FAILURE TO RESPOND TO AN OFFICE ACTION