JP2933501B2 - Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability of DI can bottom - Google Patents

Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability of DI can bottom

Info

Publication number
JP2933501B2
JP2933501B2 JP7041637A JP4163795A JP2933501B2 JP 2933501 B2 JP2933501 B2 JP 2933501B2 JP 7041637 A JP7041637 A JP 7041637A JP 4163795 A JP4163795 A JP 4163795A JP 2933501 B2 JP2933501 B2 JP 2933501B2
Authority
JP
Japan
Prior art keywords
rolling
temperature
formability
strength
aluminum alloy
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
JP7041637A
Other languages
Japanese (ja)
Other versions
JPH08239729A (en
Inventor
浩司 山村
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kobe Steel Ltd
Original Assignee
Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kobe Steel Ltd filed Critical Kobe Steel Ltd
Priority to JP7041637A priority Critical patent/JP2933501B2/en
Publication of JPH08239729A publication Critical patent/JPH08239729A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of JP2933501B2 publication Critical patent/JP2933501B2/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Description

【発明の詳細な説明】DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

【0001】[0001]

【産業上の利用分野】本発明は、飲料用缶に関し、さら
に詳しくは缶底成形性に優れるDI缶に適したアルミニ
ウム合金硬質板の製造方法に関する。
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION 1. Field of the Invention The present invention relates to a beverage can, and more particularly, to a method for producing an aluminum alloy hard plate suitable for a DI can having excellent bottom moldability.

【0002】[0002]

【従来の技術】DI(しごき絞り:drawing with ironi
ng)缶は、資源節減およびコストダウンの観点から、よ
り薄肉軽量化が要求され続けられている。このような現
状下で種々の材料、製造方法についての改善が提案され
ているが、従来、一般的には3004合金の硬質板が専
ら使用されている。この材料には大きくは2種類の製造
工程があり、これは荒鈍直通工程と中鈍工程である。
2. Description of the Related Art DI (drawing with ironi)
ng) Cans are required to be thinner and lighter from the viewpoint of resource saving and cost reduction. Under such circumstances, improvements in various materials and manufacturing methods have been proposed. Conventionally, generally, hard plates made of 3004 alloy are exclusively used. There are roughly two types of manufacturing processes for this material, a rough direct passing process and a medium dulling process.

【0003】熱延材に焼鈍を施してその後冷間圧延によ
って製品板厚にする荒鈍工程には要求される強度(製品
缶の耐圧強度)によって、焼鈍方法がバッチ式とCAL
式(特願平1-226746号公報参照)とがある。いずれの工
程でも得られる製品はDI加工後の耳率が低くなり、歩
留りの点で優れるといった特徴がある。しかし従来のこ
れら例における工程は熱間圧延時の歪みの導入が十分で
ない為、結晶粒が粒径60μm以上と比較的大きく、か
つ、微細結晶粒として成形性向上の効果を持つサブグレ
インの形成も5%未満に止まる上、元板での強度が高い
ことによりDI加工時に缶底部の伸びが十分得られない
ことからくるスプリングバック或いはクビレを生じ缶底
成形性が劣るといった成形面での問題があった。
[0003] Depending on the strength (pressure resistance of the product can) required for the annealing step of annealing the hot-rolled material and then cold rolling to make the product sheet thickness, the batch method and the CAL method are used.
(See Japanese Patent Application No. 1-226746). The products obtained by any of the processes have characteristics such that the ear ratio after DI processing is low and the yield is excellent. However, in the conventional processes in these examples, since the introduction of distortion during hot rolling is not sufficient, the formation of subgrains having relatively large crystal grains with a grain size of 60 μm or more and having the effect of improving formability as fine crystal grains is performed. Is less than 5%, and the strength of the base plate is so high that the bottom of the can is not sufficiently stretched during DI processing, resulting in springback or cracking resulting in poor moldability of the can bottom. was there.

【0004】缶底成形性を向上させるために、従来は冷
間圧延後仕上げ焼鈍を施したり、中鈍CAL工程を採用
したりしている。冷間圧延後仕上げ焼鈍を施しサブグレ
インを形成する工程では、実際上コイルで焼鈍する為、
全体を均一なサブグレインの面積占有率とすることは非
常に難しく、コイル内部と外部とでバラツキを生じて内
部を10%としたとき外部では30%を超えるといった
ことが生じる。更に、この方法では工程数が増加すると
いった問題もある。また、中鈍CAL工程は荒鈍工程材
に比較し粒径20μm以下の微細結晶粒が得られ缶底成
形性の向上は図れるが、この工程では加工硬化が大きく
なるためにネック部の強度が高くなり、DI缶特性とし
て必要なネックフランジ成形性に劣るといった問題もあ
る。
[0004] In order to improve the moldability of the bottom of the can, conventionally, finish annealing has been performed after cold rolling, or a middle dull CAL process has been employed. In the process of forming sub-grains by performing finish annealing after cold rolling, in order to actually anneal with coils,
It is very difficult to make the entire area occupied by the sub-grains uniformly, and there is variation between the inside and outside of the coil, and when the inside is 10%, the outside exceeds 30%. Further, this method has a problem that the number of steps is increased. Also, in the middle dulling CAL process, fine crystal grains having a particle size of 20 μm or less can be obtained as compared with the rough dulling process material, and the moldability at the bottom of the can can be improved. However, there is also a problem that the neck flange formability required as a characteristic of the DI can is inferior.

【0005】[0005]

【発明が解決しようとする課題】薄肉軽量化の要求に応
えるために、本出願人は先に特開平 4−272151号公報に
開示される先行技術等幾つかの改善発明を提案してき
た。前記先行技術では、前述した熱延材にCAL焼鈍を
施し、その後冷間圧延によって製品とする工程である。
しかしながらこの方法では缶底成形性を向上させる為の
手段に関しては特に触れていなく、その結果、サブグレ
インの面積占有率で5%未満となり、DIにおける「し
ごき」加工性は優れるものの、スプリングバックが十分
抑制できないことにより、所定の缶底深さが出なくある
いは缶底成形時の伸びが不十分となり缶底の立ち上がり
部にクビレを生じて、缶に要求される耐圧強度を満足で
きない等の問題は依然として残されている。
In order to meet the demand for thinner and lighter weight, the present applicant has previously proposed several improved inventions such as the prior art disclosed in Japanese Patent Application Laid-Open No. 4-272151. The prior art is a process in which CAL annealing is performed on the above-described hot-rolled material and then cold-rolled to obtain a product.
However, this method does not particularly mention means for improving the moldability of the bottom of the can, and as a result, the area occupancy of the sub-grain is less than 5%, and the "back ironing" processability in DI is excellent, but the springback is low. Inability to sufficiently suppress the problem, such as a problem that the predetermined can bottom depth does not come out or the elongation at the time of forming the can bottom becomes insufficient and cracks occur at the rising portion of the can bottom, and the pressure resistance required for the can cannot be satisfied. Is still there.

【0006】この問題を解決するためには、成分の調整
により元板の強度レベルを向上させる等の対策を採る必
要があるが、これでは逆にDI成形性を低下させること
になり実際的な問題の解決にはつながらない。
In order to solve this problem, it is necessary to take measures such as improving the strength level of the base plate by adjusting the components. It does not solve the problem.

【0007】本発明は、このような問題点の解消を図る
ために成されたものであり、本発明の目的は、高強度お
よび良成形性を維持しながら薄肉化並びに生産性の向上
を図り得るアルミニウム合金板の製造方法を提供するこ
とにある。
The present invention has been made to solve such problems, and an object of the present invention is to reduce the thickness and improve the productivity while maintaining high strength and good moldability. An object of the present invention is to provide a method for manufacturing an aluminum alloy sheet to be obtained.

【0008】[0008]

【課題を解決するための手段】本発明は、上記の目的を
達成するため以下に述べる構成としたものである。即
ち、本発明は、重量%でMn:0.85〜1.15,M
g:0.90〜1.50,Fe:0.35〜0.55,
Si:0.15〜0.30,Cu:0.15〜0.30
およびZn:0.1〜1.0を含有し、その他不可避的
不純物を含むアルミニウム合金鋳塊に、580〜630
℃にて2時間以上の均熱処理を施し、その後冷却して開
始温度を450〜520℃とした荒熱延および仕上げ熱
延からなる熱延を行って、この場合の仕上げ熱延前の温
度を400〜450℃に、仕上げ熱延直後の温度を30
0〜350℃にそれぞれ調節して、得られる熱延板に対
してさらに加熱冷却速度100℃/min 以上、加熱冷却
温度400〜600℃の範囲で保持10min 以内の連続
焼鈍を施し、引き続いてタンデム圧延機を用いてトータ
ルの冷間圧延率が83〜87%の製品を1パスで製造す
るに当たり、圧延速度1000〜1700m/min の範
囲で、出側温度Y(℃)と圧延速度X(m/min)との間
に下記の関係式 2.1×(3200−X)0.5+63<Y<2.1×(3
200−X)0.5+84 を満足させてサブグレインの面積占有率を5%以上25
%未満とすることを特徴とするDI缶底成形性に優れた
アルミニウム合金板の製造方法である。
The present invention has the following configuration to achieve the above object. That is, in the present invention, Mn: 0.85 to 1.15 by weight%
g: 0.90 to 1.50, Fe: 0.35 to 0.55
Si: 0.15 to 0.30, Cu: 0.15 to 0.30
And Zn: 0.1 to 1.0, and 580 to 630 in an aluminum alloy ingot containing other unavoidable impurities.
C. for 2 hours or more, followed by cooling to perform hot rolling consisting of rough hot rolling and finishing hot rolling with a starting temperature of 450 to 520 ° C. The temperature immediately after finishing hot rolling to 30 to 400 to 450 ° C.
0 to 350 ° C., and the obtained hot rolled sheet is further subjected to continuous annealing at a heating / cooling rate of 100 ° C./min or more and a heating / cooling temperature of 400 to 600 ° C. for 10 minutes or less, followed by tandem When a product having a total cold rolling reduction of 83 to 87% is manufactured in one pass using a rolling mill, the exit temperature Y (° C.) and the rolling speed X (m) are set within a range of a rolling speed of 1000 to 1700 m / min. / Min) and the following relational expression: 2.1 × (3200−X) 0.5 +63 <Y <2.1 × (3
200−X) 0.5 + 84 and the area occupancy of the subgrain is 5% or more 25
%, Which is a method for producing an aluminum alloy sheet having excellent moldability at the bottom of a DI can, characterized in that the content is less than 0.1%.

【0009】[0009]

【作用】本発明の作用を述べるに当たり、先ず化学成分
の限定理由について説明する。 Mn:Mnは、強度の向上およびAl−Fe−Mn系晶
出物を生成することによるしごき加工時の焼き付き防止
に効果のある元素である。しかしこの場合、0.85%
未満ではいずれの効果もなく、また、1.15%を超え
ると巨大晶出物を形成するおそれがあって成形性を低下
させる。以上の理由によりMn量は0.85%〜1.1
5%とする。 Mg:Mgは、缶強度向上に効果のある元素であり、特
にCuとの組み合わせにより、ベーキング時にAl−C
u−Mg系析出物による析出硬化を生じて缶底部の高度
強化に有効である。しかし、0.90%未満ではその効
果は小さく、また、1.50%を超えると強度が高くな
り過ぎ成形性の低下を招く。以上の理由により、Mg量
は0.90%〜1.50%の範囲とする。
In describing the operation of the present invention, the reasons for limiting the chemical components will be described first. Mn: Mn is an element that is effective for improving strength and preventing seizure during ironing by generating Al-Fe-Mn-based crystals. But in this case, 0.85%
If it is less than 1%, there is no effect, and if it exceeds 1.15%, there is a possibility that a giant crystal may be formed and the formability is reduced. For the above reasons, the Mn content is 0.85% to 1.1.
5%. Mg: Mg is an element effective in improving the strength of the can.
Precipitation hardening is caused by u-Mg based precipitates, which is effective for highly strengthening the bottom of the can. However, if the content is less than 0.90%, the effect is small, and if it exceeds 1.50%, the strength becomes too high and the moldability is reduced. For the above reasons, the Mg content is in the range of 0.90% to 1.50%.

【0010】Fe:Feは、結晶粒の微細化並びにMn
との関係でAl−Fe−Mn系晶出物を形成することに
よるしごき加工性の向上に効果がある。しかし、0.3
5%未満ではこの効果が小さく、また、0.55%を超
えると巨大晶出物を形成して成形性を低下させる。以上
の理由によりFe量は0.35%〜0.55%とする。 Si:Siは、Al−Fe−Mn系晶出物に相変態を生
じさせ、所謂、α相を形成させ晶出物の硬度を上昇さ
せ、しごき加工性の向上(焼き付きの防止)に効果があ
る。しかし、0.15%未満ではその効果は小さく、ま
た、0.30%を超えると強度が高くなり過ぎる上晶出
物の巨大化を生じて成形性を低下させる。以上の理由に
よりSi量は0.15%〜0.30%とする。
Fe: Fe is used for reducing the size of crystal grains and Mn.
Thus, the formation of Al-Fe-Mn-based crystallization is effective in improving ironing workability. But 0.3
If it is less than 5%, this effect is small, and if it exceeds 0.55%, a giant crystal is formed to lower the formability. For the above reasons, the Fe content is set to 0.35% to 0.55%. Si: Si causes a phase transformation in an Al—Fe—Mn-based crystallized substance, forms a so-called α phase, increases the hardness of the crystallized substance, and is effective in improving ironing workability (prevention of seizure). is there. However, if the content is less than 0.15%, the effect is small, and if it exceeds 0.30%, the strength becomes excessively high, and the size of the upper crystal becomes large, thereby reducing the formability. For the above reasons, the amount of Si is set to 0.15% to 0.30%.

【0011】Cu:Cuは、強度上昇並びにMgとの組
み合わせに基づく製缶時のベーキングによる軟化防止に
効果がある。しかし、0.15%未満ではいずれの効果
もなく、また、0.30%を超えると強度上昇が大き
く、成形性の低下に繋がる。したがって、Cu量は0.
15%〜0.30%とする。 Zn:Znは、晶出物の分散を適正にし、絞り加工性、
しごき加工性及びフランジ成形性の向上に効果がある。
しかし、Zn量が0.1%未満ではその効果が小さい。
また、Zn量は1.0%を超えてもその効果は飽和状態
である上に飲料缶に必要な耐蝕性を低下させるおそれが
ある。以上の理由によりZn量は0.1%〜1.0%の
範囲とする。なお、その他不可避的不純物として、Ti
は0.1%以下、Bは0.05%以下等、不純物レベル
であれば本発明の効果を妨げるものではない。
Cu: Cu is effective in increasing strength and preventing softening due to baking during can-making based on a combination with Mg. However, if it is less than 0.15%, there is no effect, and if it exceeds 0.30%, the strength increases greatly, leading to a decrease in formability. Therefore, the amount of Cu is 0.1.
15% to 0.30%. Zn: Zn makes the dispersion of the crystallized matter appropriate, drawability,
It is effective in improving ironing workability and flange formability.
However, if the Zn content is less than 0.1%, the effect is small.
Further, even if the Zn content exceeds 1.0%, the effect is saturated and the corrosion resistance required for the beverage can may be reduced. For the above reasons, the Zn content is in the range of 0.1% to 1.0%. In addition, as other unavoidable impurities, Ti
Is 0.1% or less, and B is 0.05% or less, as long as the impurity level is not impaired.

【0012】次に製造工程について述べる。通常にDC
鋳造された本合金系鋳塊を面削した後、均熱を行う。こ
の均熱は析出物の形成に影響し、熱延板での結晶粒微細
化に影響を与える。結晶粒微細化はDI成形におけるし
ごき加工性を向上させる上で重要である。従来、均熱条
件は一般的に600℃未満である。これは従来ピット炉
(バッチ炉)では鋳塊の加熱温度に差異が生じ、高温部
ではバーニングを起こすおそれがあること、また、従来
からも高温であるため(Al−Mg合金の場合は540
℃以下)、更に高温に均熱にすることの効果が明らかで
なかった。
Next, the manufacturing process will be described. Normally DC
After beveling the cast alloy base ingot, soaking is performed. This soaking affects the formation of precipitates and affects the refinement of crystal grains in the hot rolled sheet. Grain refinement is important for improving ironing workability in DI molding. Conventionally, soaking conditions are generally below 600 ° C. This is because there is a difference in the heating temperature of the ingot in the conventional pit furnace (batch furnace), and there is a risk of burning in a high temperature part. In addition, since the temperature is high conventionally (540 in case of Al-Mg alloy).
° C or less), and the effect of soaking at a higher temperature was not clear.

【0013】本発明では均熱温度を580〜630℃と
している。580℃未満では化合物による再結晶粒の核
形成が少なく、効果が余りない。また、630℃を超え
る場合にはバーニングのおそれがある。より望ましくは
600〜620℃の範囲である。更に好ましくは横型の
連続均質化熱処理炉を用いることにより、鋳塊の加熱温
度差も少なく安定した均質化熱処理条件での操業が行え
る。尚、横型の連続均質化熱処理炉としては炉内を数区
分に分けて、加熱帯,保持帯および冷却帯を備えている
ものが好ましい。
In the present invention, the soaking temperature is 580 to 630 ° C. When the temperature is lower than 580 ° C., nucleation of recrystallized grains by the compound is small, and the effect is not sufficient. If the temperature exceeds 630 ° C., burning may occur. More preferably, it is in the range of 600 to 620 ° C. More preferably, by using a horizontal continuous homogenizing heat treatment furnace, operation under stable homogenizing heat treatment conditions can be performed with a small difference in the heating temperature of the ingot. The horizontal continuous homogenizing heat treatment furnace is preferably one having a heating zone, a holding zone, and a cooling zone by dividing the inside of the furnace into several sections.

【0014】続いて均熱後に熱延を行うが、熱延時の歪
み導入は更に熱延板での結晶粒を微細にするものであ
る。従って、熱延開始前に鋳塊を冷却(放冷)して熱延
を開始する。520℃を超える温度での熱延開始では歪
み導入の効果が少なく、また、450℃未満では効果は
あるものの、特に冷却までの時間で表される生産性に劣
る。従って、加熱開始温度は450〜520℃の範囲で
ある。なお、開始温度の調整には、炉内冷却による方法
と均熱後室温まで冷却し熱延温度まで加熱する方法とが
あり、冷却帯を持つ連続均熱炉で行う前者の方がより生
産性で各段に優れる。
Subsequently, hot rolling is performed after soaking, and the introduction of strain during hot rolling further reduces the crystal grains in the hot rolled sheet. Therefore, before starting hot rolling, the ingot is cooled (cooled) to start hot rolling. At the start of hot rolling at a temperature exceeding 520 ° C., the effect of introducing strain is small, and at a temperature lower than 450 ° C., although there is an effect, productivity is particularly poor in terms of time until cooling. Therefore, the heating start temperature is in the range of 450 to 520 ° C. There are two methods for adjusting the starting temperature: a method by cooling in the furnace, and a method of cooling to room temperature and then heating to the hot rolling temperature after soaking. Excellent in each stage.

【0015】熱延はリバース型の粗圧延とタンデムの仕
上げ圧延から成され、熱延板の結晶粒を微細にするため
には、仕上げ圧延での出入りの温度コントロールが必要
である。入側温度は低目が望ましいが出側温度を適正な
温度範囲に制御するためには入側温度を400〜450
℃にする必要がある。また、出側温度は同じく300〜
350℃にする必要がある。300℃未満では熱延コイ
ル全体を再結晶させることができず、350℃を超える
場合には再結晶をするものの、結晶粒の成長による粗大
化を招く。なお、熱延後にコイル全体を再結晶させる理
由は、残存する一部未再結晶粒をその後の焼鈍にて再結
晶させると結晶粒の粗大化を招くためである。なお、本
条件で得られる結晶粒は20〜40μmとなる。上記条
件にて得られた熱延板の板厚は本発明では規制していな
いが、一般製品の板厚および要求される強度を考慮する
と1.5〜3.0mmである。
Hot rolling is performed by reverse type rough rolling and tandem finish rolling. In order to make the crystal grains of the hot rolled sheet fine, it is necessary to control the temperature at the entrance and exit during the finish rolling. The entrance temperature is preferably low, but in order to control the exit temperature to an appropriate temperature range, the entrance temperature is set to 400 to 450.
℃. The outlet temperature is also 300 ~
It needs to be 350 ° C. If the temperature is lower than 300 ° C., the entire hot rolled coil cannot be recrystallized. If the temperature exceeds 350 ° C., recrystallization is performed, but coarsening due to growth of crystal grains is caused. The reason why the entire coil is recrystallized after hot rolling is that if the remaining partially unrecrystallized grains are recrystallized by subsequent annealing, the crystal grains become coarse. The crystal grains obtained under these conditions are 20 to 40 μm. Although the thickness of the hot-rolled sheet obtained under the above conditions is not regulated in the present invention, it is 1.5 to 3.0 mm in consideration of the thickness of a general product and the required strength.

【0016】熱延板(コイル)はその後に所謂CAL焼
鈍が施され、その場合特にCuとMg量のコントロール
が重要である。400℃未満ではCuとMgの固溶量が
少なく、製缶時のベーキング強度が得られない。一方、
600℃を超える場合にはその固溶が多くなり、強度は
確保できるものの、加工硬化の増大による成形性の低下
に繋がる。また、加熱冷却も速度が遅い場合は固溶量の
低下を招き、やはり強度不足となる。なお、加熱の保持
時間は加熱温度により異なるが、10分以内で十分であ
る。
The hot-rolled sheet (coil) is thereafter subjected to so-called CAL annealing, in which case it is particularly important to control the amounts of Cu and Mg. If it is lower than 400 ° C., the amount of solid solution of Cu and Mg is small, and baking strength at the time of can making cannot be obtained. on the other hand,
When the temperature exceeds 600 ° C., the solid solution increases, and although the strength can be ensured, it leads to a decrease in formability due to an increase in work hardening. In addition, when the heating and cooling speed is low, the amount of solid solution is reduced, and the strength is also insufficient. The holding time of heating varies depending on the heating temperature, but it is sufficient that the holding time is within 10 minutes.

【0017】次に冷間圧延を行うが、これが本発明の要
点とするところである。本発明ではタンデム冷間圧延機
の特徴を十分調査研究し、その特徴を利用することによ
り、缶底成形性に優れたDI成形用アルミニウム硬質板
の開発を行ったものである。缶底成形性を向上させる為
には、サブグレインを形成させ十分な伸びを与えること
が重要であることが判明した。そして成形性の向上を図
るためには冷間圧のみ(仕上げ焼鈍なし)にて材料を回
復させた時に優れた特性を示すことも明らかである。そ
のためにはタンデム冷間圧延機での発熱を利用すること
が有効であるが、単に圧下率を大きくした場合でも圧延
速度との関係で十分な速度に達しない場合はサブグレイ
ンの占有率が低くなり、缶底成形性の向上に対する寄与
は小さいことが判った。
Next, cold rolling is performed, which is the point of the present invention. In the present invention, the characteristics of a tandem cold rolling mill have been sufficiently investigated and studied, and by utilizing the characteristics, an aluminum hard plate for DI forming with excellent can bottom formability has been developed. In order to improve the moldability of the can bottom, it was found that it is important to form sub-grains and give sufficient elongation. It is also clear that excellent properties are exhibited when the material is recovered only by cold pressure (without finish annealing) in order to improve the formability. For that purpose, it is effective to use the heat generated by the tandem cold rolling mill.However, if the reduction rate does not reach a sufficient speed even if the reduction rate is simply increased, the occupancy rate of the sub-grain is low. Thus, it was found that the contribution to the improvement of the can bottom formability was small.

【0018】その関係について調査した結果、以下の要
件を満足することにより缶底成形性に優れた材料を得ら
れることが判明した。即ち、トータルの冷間圧延率83
〜87%の製品をタンデム圧延機を用いて1パスで製造
するに当たり、圧延速度1000m/min 〜1700m
/min の範囲で、出側温度Y(℃)と圧延速度X(m/
min)の間に下記の関係式 2.1×(3200−X)0.5+63<Y<2.1×(3
200−X)0.5+84 を満足させて、サブグレインの面積占有率を5%以上2
5%未満とすることである。
As a result of investigating the relationship, it was found that a material excellent in the moldability of the can bottom can be obtained by satisfying the following requirements. That is, the total cold rolling reduction 83
A rolling speed of 1000 m / min to 1700 m is required to produce ~ 87% of the product in one pass using a tandem rolling mill.
/ Min in the outlet side temperature Y (° C) and the rolling speed X (m /
min), the following relational expression: 2.1 × (3200−X) 0.5 +63 <Y <2.1 × (3
200−X) 0.5 +84, and the area occupancy of subgrain is 5% or more 2
To be less than 5%.

【0019】従って、本発明では冷間圧延率83〜87
%の製品をタンデム圧延機を用いて1パスで製造するも
のである。冷間圧延が83%未満では、製品の耳が0−
180°耳となりDI成形性を低下させるためである。
一方、87%以上では45°耳が高くなり過ぎる上、強
度上昇によるDI成形性の低下を招く。また、現状の一
般的に使われている圧延機ではタンデム圧延機以外は1
パスで前述の冷間圧延率を得ることはできない。
Therefore, according to the present invention, the cold rolling reduction is 83 to 87.
% Product is manufactured in one pass using a tandem rolling mill. If the cold rolling is less than 83%, the ear of the product is 0-
The reason for this is that the ear becomes 180 ° and the DI moldability is reduced.
On the other hand, if it is 87% or more, the 45 ° ear becomes too high, and the DI formability decreases due to the increase in strength. In addition, among the currently used rolling mills other than the tandem rolling mill, one is used.
The above-mentioned cold rolling reduction cannot be obtained with a pass.

【0020】更に、圧延速度に関して、1000m/mi
n 未満では生産性が著しく低下し現実的ではなく、しか
もロールとの摩擦による発熱が十分でなくサブグレイン
化のための温度が維持できない。1700m/min を超
える場合、圧延時の歪みが非常に悪くなり、製品板に悪
影響を及ぼす。以上の理由により、圧延速度は1000
m/min 〜1700m/min の範囲とする。
Further, regarding the rolling speed, 1000 m / mi
If it is less than n, the productivity is remarkably reduced and it is not practical. In addition, the heat generated by friction with the roll is not sufficient, and the temperature for sub-grain formation cannot be maintained. If it exceeds 1700 m / min, the distortion during rolling becomes extremely poor, which has an adverse effect on the product plate. For the above reasons, the rolling speed is 1000
m / min to 1700 m / min.

【0021】圧延速度と出側温度との関係において上述
の式を満足しない範囲、つまり、圧延速度が1000m
/min 〜1700m/min の範囲で、Yが2.1×(3
200−X)0.5+63以下の場合は、冷間圧延における
サブグレイン化に必要な歪み量は得られるものの、クー
ラントの冷却効果により十分な温度が得られないため、
サブグレインの占有率が5%未満となり、缶底成形性の
向上に対する効果がみられない。なお、圧延クーラント
を絞ってしまうと表面性状を劣化するといった問題も生
じる。また、Yが2.1×(3200−X)0.5+84以
上では、クーラントの冷却効果より発熱の効果の方が大
きくなり、サブグレインが25%以上形成され、缶底成
形性は向上するがしごき加工性を低下させる結果とな
る。なお、クーラント量を増加させる場合、圧延時に過
潤滑を起こすため、これも表面性状を劣化させる。
The relationship between the rolling speed and the outlet temperature does not satisfy the above equation, that is, the rolling speed is 1000 m
/ Min to 1700 m / min, and Y is 2.1 × (3
In the case of (200-X) 0.5 +63 or less, although the amount of strain required for sub-grain formation in cold rolling can be obtained, a sufficient temperature cannot be obtained due to the cooling effect of the coolant.
The subgrain occupancy is less than 5%, and there is no effect on the improvement of can bottom formability. In addition, if the rolling coolant is squeezed, there arises a problem that the surface properties are deteriorated. On the other hand, when Y is 2.1 × (3200−X) 0.5 +84 or more, the effect of heat generation is larger than the cooling effect of the coolant. This results in reduced workability. When the amount of coolant is increased, excessive lubrication occurs during rolling, which also deteriorates the surface properties.

【0022】次にサブグレインの面積占有率について説
明する。これまでに述べてきたように、缶底成形性を向
上させるためにはサブグレインを積極的に形成させるこ
とが重要であり、占有率5%未満ではその効果は小さ
い。しかしながらサブグレインが25%以上形成された
場合、DI加工中の加工硬化が大きくなる。通常DI加
工では数回のしごき加工が行われるため、最初のダイス
での加工硬化の増大は次ダイスでのしごき加工性を低下
させ、一般にティアーオフと呼ばれる缶胴割れを生じ、
缶胴材として要求される特性を満足しなくなる。
Next, the sub-grain area occupancy will be described. As described above, it is important to actively form sub-grains in order to improve the moldability of the can bottom, and the effect is small when the occupancy is less than 5%. However, when 25% or more of the sub-grains are formed, the work hardening during DI processing becomes large. Normally, since ironing is performed several times in DI processing, an increase in work hardening in the first die lowers ironing workability in the next die, causing a can body crack generally called tear-off,
The properties required for a can body cannot be satisfied.

【0023】[0023]

【実施例】以下、本発明の実施例について説明する。 (A) 実施例1:下記表1、表2に示される工程および成
分で材料を作製し、各材料について比較を行った。比較
の結果の特性は下記表3、表4に示される通りである。
本発明に係るNo.1,No.2は、比較例よりも成形性
(ティアーオフ率)に優れる。さらに、缶強度について
も本発明例は問題がないレベルであり、本発明例と同等
あるいは同等以上の強度を有する比較例については成形
性(ティアーオフ率,ネック成功率,フランジ成功率)
が劣っている。このまように成形性および缶強度を総合
的に比較すると本発明例No.1,No.2は、比較例No.
3〜No.7よりも優れた結果が得られている。
Embodiments of the present invention will be described below. (A) Example 1: Materials were prepared by the steps and components shown in Tables 1 and 2 below, and each material was compared. The characteristics as a result of the comparison are as shown in Tables 3 and 4 below.
No. 1 and No. 2 according to the present invention are more excellent in moldability (tear-off rate) than the comparative example. In addition, the present invention example is at a level where there is no problem in the can strength, and the comparative examples having the same or higher strength than the present invention formability (tea-off rate, neck success rate, flange success rate).
Is inferior. As described above, when the moldability and the can strength are comprehensively compared, the inventive examples No. 1 and No. 2 show the comparative example No.
Results superior to No. 3 to No. 7 were obtained.

【0024】[0024]

【表1】 [Table 1]

【0025】[0025]

【表2】 [Table 2]

【0026】[0026]

【表3】 [Table 3]

【0027】[0027]

【表4】 [Table 4]

【0028】尚、DI缶として必要な成形性評価および
缶強度の調査は以下の通りである。張り出し性(エリク
セン値)はJISエリクセンB法を用いた。しごき加工
性はブランク径140mmφ,ポンチ径90mmφにて作製
した絞りカップを用い、DI加工機で最後のしごき加工
率を41%として約5万缶の製缶試験を行い、そのとき
のティアーオフ率にて評価した。なお、缶サイズは35
0ccであり、潤滑油は水溶性潤滑油を用いた。
The evaluation of the moldability necessary for the DI can and the examination of the strength of the can are as follows. For the overhang property (Erichsen value), the JIS Erichsen B method was used. The ironing workability was evaluated by using a drawn cup made with a blank diameter of 140 mmφ and a punch diameter of 90 mmφ, and using a DI processing machine with a final ironing rate of 41%, performing a can-making test of about 50,000 cans. Was evaluated. The can size is 35
0 cc, and a water-soluble lubricating oil was used as the lubricating oil.

【0029】次に得られたDI缶に205℃のベーキン
グを施し、4段ネック加工を実施した。加工配分は2mm
/段である。4段ネックができた成功率(ネック成功
率)にて評価した。更に4段ネック缶に交角90°のポ
ンチにてフランジ部の穴拡げ(拡缶)を実施しフランジ
率12%(フランジ径65mmφ,ネック径58mmφ)に
おける成功率(フランジ成功率)にて評価した。
Next, the obtained DI can was baked at 205 ° C., and a four-stage neck processing was performed. Processing distribution is 2mm
/ Stage. The success rate at which a 4-stage neck was formed (neck success rate) was evaluated. Further, the hole of the flange portion was expanded (canned) with a punch having a 90 ° intersection angle on the four-stage neck can, and the success rate (flange success rate) at a flange rate of 12% (flange diameter 65 mmφ, neck diameter 58 mmφ) was evaluated. .

【0030】缶強度である耐圧、座屈強度は水圧負荷お
よび軸圧縮にて求めた。缶強度試験に供した缶はいずれ
も同一条件で成形しており、耐圧強度の差異は元板の強
度の差異および缶底の成形性(形状の出やすさとクビレ
の有無)に影響される。サブグレインはTEMにより観
察しその面積占有率を求めた。
The pressure strength and buckling strength, which are can strengths, were determined by hydraulic load and axial compression. All of the cans subjected to the can strength test were molded under the same conditions, and the difference in pressure strength was affected by the difference in the strength of the base plate and the moldability of the can bottom (easiness of appearance and presence or absence of cracks). The sub-grains were observed by TEM to determine the area occupancy.

【0031】(B) 実施例2:下記表5の合金を表6に示
す工程で材料を製作した。なお、工程Aは本発明の範囲
のものであり、工程Bは比較の例である。表7,表8に
はそれらの材料の特性が示される。成形性については工
程A,B共に略同等であるが、缶強度(耐圧強度、座屈
強度共)の点で工程Aの方が優れている。これは工程A
はサブグレインの面積占有率が適正範囲にあり、缶底成
形でのスプリングバックが小さく形状が目的形状に近い
こと及び缶底ドーム立ち上がり部のクビレが無いことに
よる。
(B) Example 2 An alloy shown in Table 5 below was used to produce a material in the steps shown in Table 6. Step A is within the scope of the present invention, and step B is a comparative example. Tables 7 and 8 show the properties of these materials. The moldability is substantially the same in both steps A and B, but step A is superior in terms of can strength (both pressure resistance and buckling strength). This is step A
Is due to the fact that the area occupancy of the sub-grain is in an appropriate range, the springback in forming the can bottom is small, the shape is close to the target shape, and there is no crack at the rising portion of the can bottom dome.

【0032】[0032]

【表5】 [Table 5]

【0033】[0033]

【表6】 [Table 6]

【0034】[0034]

【表7】 [Table 7]

【0035】[0035]

【表8】 [Table 8]

【0036】(C) 実施例3:下記表9の合金を下記表1
0,表11に示す工程で材料を製作した。なお、工程C
は本発明の範囲のものであり、工程D,E,Fは比較の
各例である。表12,表13にはそれらの材料の特性が
示される。成形性については工程C,Fは略同等である
が、缶強度(耐圧強度、座屈強度共)の点で工程Cの方
が優れている。これは工程Cはサブグレインの面積占有
率が影響しており、缶底成形でのスプリングバックが小
さく形状が目的形状に近いことおよび缶底ドーム立ち上
がり部のクビレが無いことならびに適度な加工硬化によ
り缶壁強度が適正レベルにあるためである。また、D,
Eについては缶強度は特に問題ないが、成形性が本発明
例よりも劣る。
(C) Example 3: The alloys shown in Table 9 below were used instead of the alloys shown in Table 1 below.
0, and materials were manufactured in the steps shown in Table 11. Step C
Are within the scope of the present invention, and steps D, E and F are comparative examples. Tables 12 and 13 show the properties of these materials. Regarding the formability, steps C and F are almost the same, but step C is superior in terms of can strength (both pressure resistance and buckling strength). This is because in step C, the area occupancy of the sub-grain influences, the springback in the can bottom forming is small, the shape is close to the target shape, there is no crack at the rising part of the can bottom dome, and moderate work hardening This is because the can wall strength is at an appropriate level. D,
As for E, the can strength is not particularly problematic, but the moldability is inferior to that of the present invention.

【0037】[0037]

【表9】 [Table 9]

【0038】[0038]

【表10】 [Table 10]

【0039】[0039]

【表11】 [Table 11]

【0040】[0040]

【表12】 [Table 12]

【0041】[0041]

【表13】 [Table 13]

【0042】[0042]

【発明の効果】以上述べたように本発明によれば、本発
明方法により得られるアルミニウム缶は、DI缶として
要求される高井強度を有し、かつ成形性に優れるため
に、材料の薄肉化および生産性の向上が図れる。
As described above, according to the present invention, the aluminum can obtained by the method of the present invention has a high well strength required as a DI can and is excellent in formability, so that the thickness of the material can be reduced. And productivity can be improved.

Claims (1)

(57)【特許請求の範囲】(57) [Claims] 【請求項1】 重量%でMn:0.85〜1.15,M
g:0.90〜1.50,Fe:0.35〜0.55,
Si:0.15〜0.30,Cu:0.15〜0.30
およびZn:0.1〜1.0を含有し、その他不可避的
不純物を含むアルミニウム合金鋳塊に、580〜630
℃にて2時間以上の均熱処理を施し、その後冷却して開
始温度を450〜520℃とした荒熱延および仕上げ熱
延からなる熱延を行って、この場合の仕上げ熱延前の温
度を400〜450℃に、仕上げ熱延直後の温度を30
0〜350℃にそれぞれ調節して、得られる熱延板に対
してさらに加熱冷却速度100℃/min 以上、加熱冷却
温度400〜600℃の範囲で保持10min 以内の連続
焼鈍を施し、引き続いてタンデム圧延機を用いてトータ
ルの冷間圧延率が83〜87%の製品を1パスで製造す
るに当たり、圧延速度1000〜1700m/min の範
囲で、出側温度Y(℃)と圧延速度X(m/min)との間
に下記の関係式 2.1×(3200−X)0.5+63<Y<2.1×(3
200−X)0.5+84 を満足させてサブグレインの面積占有率を5%以上25
%未満とすることを特徴とするDI缶底成形性に優れた
アルミニウム合金板の製造方法。
1. Mn: 0.85 to 1.15 by weight%
g: 0.90 to 1.50, Fe: 0.35 to 0.55
Si: 0.15 to 0.30, Cu: 0.15 to 0.30
And Zn: 0.1 to 1.0, and 580 to 630 in an aluminum alloy ingot containing other unavoidable impurities.
C. for 2 hours or more, followed by cooling to perform hot rolling consisting of rough hot rolling and finishing hot rolling with a starting temperature of 450 to 520 ° C. The temperature immediately after finishing hot rolling to 30 to 400 to 450 ° C.
0 to 350 ° C., and the obtained hot rolled sheet is further subjected to continuous annealing at a heating / cooling rate of 100 ° C./min or more and a heating / cooling temperature of 400 to 600 ° C. for 10 minutes or less, followed by tandem When a product having a total cold rolling reduction of 83 to 87% is manufactured in one pass using a rolling mill, the exit temperature Y (° C.) and the rolling speed X (m) are set within a range of a rolling speed of 1000 to 1700 m / min. / Min) and the following relational expression: 2.1 × (3200−X) 0.5 +63 <Y <2.1 × (3
200−X) 0.5 + 84 and the area occupancy of the subgrain is 5% or more 25
% Of the aluminum alloy sheet having excellent DI can bottom formability.
JP7041637A 1995-03-01 1995-03-01 Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability of DI can bottom Expired - Lifetime JP2933501B2 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7041637A JP2933501B2 (en) 1995-03-01 1995-03-01 Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability of DI can bottom

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP7041637A JP2933501B2 (en) 1995-03-01 1995-03-01 Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability of DI can bottom

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
JPH08239729A JPH08239729A (en) 1996-09-17
JP2933501B2 true JP2933501B2 (en) 1999-08-16

Family

ID=12613851

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
JP7041637A Expired - Lifetime JP2933501B2 (en) 1995-03-01 1995-03-01 Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability of DI can bottom

Country Status (1)

Country Link
JP (1) JP2933501B2 (en)

Families Citing this family (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001262261A (en) * 2000-03-22 2001-09-26 Furukawa Electric Co Ltd:The Aluminum alloy sheet for can barrel excellent in can bottom formability and its producing method
JP5000917B2 (en) * 2006-04-03 2012-08-15 古河スカイ株式会社 Method for producing rolled aluminum alloy sheet for battery case with excellent multi-stage workability
JP5160044B2 (en) * 2006-04-03 2013-03-13 古河スカイ株式会社 Method for producing rolled aluminum alloy sheet for battery case with excellent multi-stage workability
CN102688901B (en) * 2012-06-13 2014-06-04 鞍钢股份有限公司 Method for controlling shape of 08Mn steel plate
JP6898254B2 (en) * 2015-12-25 2021-07-07 株式会社Uacj Aluminum alloy plate for can body and its manufacturing method
CN114054501A (en) * 2020-07-30 2022-02-18 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 Method for manufacturing high-plate-shape color-coated substrate
JP2023160496A (en) * 2022-04-22 2023-11-02 株式会社Uacj Cold-rolled aluminum alloy sheet and method for producing the same

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH08239729A (en) 1996-09-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4645544A (en) Process for producing cold rolled aluminum alloy sheet
JP2007277694A (en) Painted aluminum-alloy sheet for lid of positive pressure can, and manufacturing method therefor
JP2933501B2 (en) Method for producing aluminum alloy sheet excellent in formability of DI can bottom
JPH10152762A (en) Production of hard aluminum alloy sheet excellent in di workability
JP2006283113A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for drink can barrel, and method for producing the same
JP3550259B2 (en) Aluminum alloy plate for DI can body excellent in high-speed ironing formability and method for producing the same
JPH08325664A (en) High-strength heat treatment type aluminum alloy sheet for drawing and its production
JP3871462B2 (en) Method for producing aluminum alloy plate for can body
JP3644818B2 (en) Method for producing aluminum alloy plate for can body
JP3409195B2 (en) Aluminum alloy hard plate for forming and manufacturing method thereof
JP3644819B2 (en) Method for producing aluminum alloy plate for can body
JP3871473B2 (en) Method for producing aluminum alloy plate for can body
JP2001262261A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for can barrel excellent in can bottom formability and its producing method
JP3278130B2 (en) Method for producing high-strength heat-treated aluminum alloy sheet for drawing
JP2005076041A (en) Method for manufacturing hard aluminum alloy sheet for can body
JP2022519238A (en) How to make a plate or band made of aluminum alloy and the board, band or molded product manufactured by it
JP2956038B2 (en) Al alloy plate for drawing cups excellent in suppressing distortion pattern and method for producing the same
JPH09268355A (en) Production of aluminum alloy sheet for can body, reduced in earing rate
JP3713614B2 (en) Method for producing aluminum alloy plate for can body
JP2006283112A (en) Aluminum alloy sheet for drink can barrel, and method for producing the same
JPH05345963A (en) Manufacture of high formability aluminum alloy sheet
JP3587993B2 (en) Manufacturing method of aluminum alloy sheet for deep drawing
JPH01208438A (en) Manufacture of aluminum alloy hard plate for wrapping
JPH08127850A (en) Production of aluminum alloy sheet for forming low in edge ratio
JPH08134610A (en) Production of aluminum alloy sheet for forming

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
A01 Written decision to grant a patent or to grant a registration (utility model)

Free format text: JAPANESE INTERMEDIATE CODE: A01

Effective date: 19990511

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20080528

Year of fee payment: 9

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20090528

Year of fee payment: 10

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100528

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20100528

Year of fee payment: 11

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110528

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20110528

Year of fee payment: 12

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120528

Year of fee payment: 13

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20120528

Year of fee payment: 13

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20130528

Year of fee payment: 14

FPAY Renewal fee payment (event date is renewal date of database)

Free format text: PAYMENT UNTIL: 20140528

Year of fee payment: 15

EXPY Cancellation because of completion of term