JP2007263586A - Ultrasonic flaw detector - Google Patents

Abstract

<P>PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To provide an ultrasonic flaw detector capable of accurately flaw detection, even the tip part and the rear-end part of an axial-directionally curved tubular or rod-like flaw-detected material. <P>SOLUTION: This ultrasonic flaw detector 100 predicts decentering amounts BY'(x), BZ'(x) in an ultrasonic probe 1 installed position, as to a material S to be flaw-detected this time, using decentering amounts AY(x), AZ(x) in an axial center measuring means 6 installation position as to the material S to be flaw-detected the last time, decentering amounts BY(x), BZ(x) in the ultrasonic probe 1 installed position in the last time as thereto, and decentering amounts A'Y(x), A'Z(x) in the axial center measuring means 6 installed position as to the material S to be flaw-detected this time. Y-direction and Z-direction position of a cylindrical rotor 3 are corrected by the predicted decentering amounts BY'(x), BZ'(x), when the tip part and the rear-end part of the material to be flaw-detected this time reach the ultrasonic probe 1 installed position. <P>COPYRIGHT: (C)2008,JPO&INPIT

Description

  The present invention relates to an ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus for a tubular or bar-shaped flaw detection material such as a steel pipe or a steel bar, and in particular, an ultrasonic flaw detection capable of accurately flaw-detecting a front end portion and a rear end portion of a flaw detection material having an axial bend. Relates to the device.

  Conventionally, an ultrasonic flaw detector has been widely used as a device for nondestructively detecting a defect present in a tubular or rod-like flaw detection material. Such an ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus is an apparatus for detecting the presence of flaws by detecting ultrasonic echoes from defects in the flaw detection material or on the surface thereof by making ultrasonic waves enter the flaw detection material from a vertical direction or an oblique direction. It is.

  If it demonstrates more concretely, as a conventional ultrasonic flaw detector, the structure as shown in FIG. 8 of patent document 1 is known, for example. That is, as a conventional ultrasonic flaw detector, an ultrasonic wave is applied to a tubular or rod-shaped flaw detection material (corresponding to “test object 1” shown in FIG. 8 of Patent Document 1) conveyed along the axial direction. An ultrasonic probe for transmission / reception (corresponding to “ultrasonic probe 2” shown in FIG. 8 of Patent Document 1) and an output signal from the ultrasonic probe are received and present in the material to be inspected. An ultrasonic flaw detector for detecting a defect (corresponding to “flaw detector 8” shown in FIG. 8 of Patent Document 1) and the ultrasonic probe are attached, inserted through the flaw detection material, and in the circumferential direction of the flaw detection material A cylindrical rotating body (corresponding to “cylindrical rotating body 3” shown in FIG. 8 of Patent Document 1), and upstream and downstream of the cylindrical rotating body along the conveyance direction of the flaw detection material. An upstream roll and a downstream roll that are arranged and guide and support the material to be inspected (shown in FIG. 8 of Patent Document 1) And the control means for controlling the vertical and horizontal positions of the cylindrical rotating body (“mechanism device 4”, “mechanism device 4” shown in FIG. A configuration including a control device 9 ”,“ mechanism device lifting motor 13 ”,“ mechanism device moving motor 14 ”and“ mechanism device moving mechanism 15 ”) is known.

  When performing ultrasonic flaw detection using the ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus having the above-described configuration, first, the control unit first determines whether the flaw detection material and the cylindrical rotating body are based on the preset outer diameter of the flaw detection material. Perform centering. In other words, the control means controls the position of the cylindrical rotating body in the vertical and horizontal directions so that the axial center position of the flaw detection material coincides with the axial core position of the cylindrical rotating body. After such a centering operation, the cylindrical rotating body is rotated by the control means (which also rotates the ultrasonic probe), and the flaw detection material is conveyed in the axial direction and inserted through the cylindrical rotating body. Thus, the ultrasonic probe is scanned spirally along the outer surface of the flaw detection material. By the control method described above, ultrasonic flaw detection is performed over the entire length of the flaw detection material. According to the above control method, the axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body centered according to the outer diameter of the flaw detection material remains constant over the entire length of the flaw detection material while ultrasonic flaw detection is performed. Will be retained. In other words, it can be said that the control method is a control method on the premise that the flaw detection material is substantially straight over the entire length.

  However, in reality, due to cooling unevenness when quenching the material to be inspected such as a steel pipe, the material to be inspected may be bent in the axial direction (curvature in the axial direction of the material to be inspected). . When the flaw detection material is bent, the above control method cannot accurately match the axial center position of the flaw detection material and the axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body over the entire length of the flaw detection material. Therefore, there is a problem that the separation distance between the ultrasonic probe and the material to be inspected fluctuates along the axial direction of the material to be inspected and the accuracy of flaw detection decreases (error detection of a defect or the like occurs).

  In order to solve such a problem, in Patent Document 1, as shown in FIG. 1 of Patent Document 1, in addition to the above-described configuration, a flaw detection material ("test object 1 shown in FIG. And the cylindrical rotating body (refer to FIG. 1 of Patent Document 1) and the upstream roll (corresponding to “pinch roller 10” and “test object transport roller 12” shown in FIG. 1 of Patent Document 1). The aerial ultrasonic sensor (aerial ultrasonic sensors 16a, 16b, 16c shown in FIG. 1 of Patent Document 1) is disposed between the sensor and the object measured by the aerial ultrasonic sensor. Based on the distance to the flaw detection material, the outer diameter measurement device (the outer diameter measurement device 17 shown in FIG. 1 of Patent Document 1) uses the amount of misalignment of the flaw detection material (the axial center position of the flaw detection material and the cylindrical rotating body). There has been proposed an ultrasonic flaw detector having a configuration for measuring a difference from the axial center position.

According to the ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus, the amount of misalignment due to the bending of the flaw detection material is detected before the flaw detection material is inserted into the cylindrical rotating body by the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the outer diameter measurement device. It is measured for each predetermined part in the axial direction. The control means (corresponding to “mechanism device 4”, “control device 9”, “mechanism device lifting / lowering motor 13”, “mechanism device moving motor 14” and “mechanism device moving mechanism 15” shown in FIG. ), When each of the predetermined parts reaches directly below the ultrasonic probe (corresponding to “ultrasonic probe 2” shown in FIG. 1 of Patent Document 1), the position of the axis of the flaw detection material and the cylinder The position of the cylindrical rotating body in the vertical and horizontal directions is controlled in real time according to the misalignment amount measured for each predetermined portion so that the axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body matches. According to such a control method, compared with a case where the axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body is kept constant over the entire length of the flaw detection material, the ultrasonic probe and the flaw detection object due to the bending of the flaw detection material are compared. Variations in the separation distance from the flaw detection material can be suppressed to a certain extent, and as a result, a decrease in flaw detection accuracy can be suppressed to some extent.
JP-A-6-288991

  However, in the ultrasonic flaw detector proposed in Patent Document 1, the amount of misalignment at the position where the aerial ultrasonic sensor is installed and the amount of misalignment at the position where the ultrasonic probe is installed are determined as follows. It is assumed that the same part has the same value. In other words, assuming that the amount of misalignment of each predetermined part at the position where the aerial ultrasonic sensor is installed is maintained until each predetermined part reaches just below the ultrasonic probe, the misalignment of each predetermined part The position of the cylindrical rotating body in the vertical and horizontal directions is controlled by the same amount as the amount. For this reason, there is a problem that the flaw detection accuracy may be deteriorated particularly at the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material.

  More specifically, the flaw detection material is guided and supported by both the upstream roll and the downstream roll (corresponding to the “pinch roller 10” and the “test object transport roller 12” shown in FIG. 1 of Patent Document 1). In the state in which the flaw detection material is bitten by both the upstream roll and the downstream roll, the axial center position does not fluctuate greatly even if the flaw detection material is conveyed in the axial direction, and the aerial ultrasonic sensor at each predetermined portion It is considered that the misalignment amount at the installation position and the misalignment amount at the ultrasonic probe installation position are substantially equal to each other. In other words, the material to be inspected is guided by both the upstream and downstream rolls at both the timing of measuring the amount of misalignment at the installation position of the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the timing of reaching the position directly below the ultrasonic probe. For a predetermined portion that is in a supported state, the misalignment amount at the aerial ultrasonic sensor installation position and the misalignment amount at the ultrasonic probe installation position are considered to be substantially the same value. Therefore, it is considered that the flaw detection accuracy is unlikely to deteriorate even if the vertical and horizontal positions of the cylindrical rotating body are controlled by the same amount as the misalignment measured at the position where the aerial ultrasonic sensor is installed at the predetermined site.

  On the other hand, the material to be inspected is one roll (upstream roll until the leading edge of the material to be inspected is directly under the ultrasonic probe until it is bitten by the downstream roll and supported. ) Only when the flaw detection material is bent, the flaw detection material is transported in the axial direction, so that the axis position of the flaw detection material is adjusted to the degree of bending. It will fluctuate accordingly. In other words, the part from the forefront of the flaw detection material to the length corresponding to the separation distance between the ultrasonic probe installation position and the downstream roll installation position (tip of the flaw detection material) Only the upstream side roll at both the timing of measuring the misalignment amount at the position where the acoustic sensor is installed (see FIG. 1A) and the timing of reaching just below the ultrasonic probe (see FIG. 1B) Therefore, it is considered that the amount of misalignment at the position where the ultrasonic sensor is installed differs from the amount of misalignment at the position where the ultrasonic probe is installed. That is, in the example shown in FIG. 1, assuming that the tip of the flaw detection material is bent upward and the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the ultrasonic probe are arranged on the same horizontal plane, Even so, the separation distance between the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the flaw detection material (distance D1 in FIG. 1 (a)) and the separation distance between the ultrasonic probe and the flaw detection material (distance D2 in FIG. 1 (b)). ) Is a different value.

  Similarly, the flaw detection material is guided and supported by only one roll (downstream roll) until the last end of the flaw detection material comes out of the upstream roll and reaches just below the ultrasonic probe. Therefore, when the flaw detection material is bent, the flaw detection material is conveyed in the axial direction, so that the axial center position of the flaw detection material varies depending on the degree of the bending. . In other words, the part (the rear end portion of the flaw detection material) from the rearmost end of the flaw detection material to a length corresponding to the separation distance between the installation position of the ultrasonic probe and the installation position of the upstream roll is in the air. In both the timing to measure the misalignment amount at the position where the ultrasonic sensor is installed and the timing to reach directly below the ultrasonic probe, the flaw detection material is guided and supported only by the downstream roll. It is considered that the amount of misalignment at the position where the ultrasonic sensor is installed differs from the amount of misalignment at the position where the ultrasonic probe is installed.

  As described above, with respect to the front end portion and rear end portion of the flaw detection material, the misalignment amount at the installation position of the aerial ultrasonic sensor is different from the misalignment amount at the installation position of the ultrasonic probe. Therefore, Patent Document 1 on the premise that the misalignment amount at the installation position of the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the misalignment amount at the installation position of the ultrasonic probe coincide with each other over the entire length of the flaw detection material. In this ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus, the flaw detection accuracy may be deteriorated particularly at the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material.

  The present invention has been made to solve the problems of the prior art, and an ultrasonic wave capable of accurately detecting the front end and the rear end of a tubular or rod-like flawed material having an axial bend. It is an object to provide a flaw detection apparatus.

  In order to solve the above-mentioned problems, the inventors of the present invention have conducted intensive studies. As a result, the above-described distance between the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the material to be inspected (distance D1 in FIG. 1A), and the ultrasonic probe. The distance between the inspection object and the flaw detection material (distance D2 in FIG. 1B) is that the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the ultrasonic probe are arranged on the same horizontal plane. And the upstream roll and the upstream distance along the axial direction of the flaw detection material, and the distance between the ultrasonic probe and the upstream roll along the axial direction of the flaw detection material is found to be approximately equal to the ratio. It was. In other words, the distance along the axial direction of the material to be inspected between the axial core measuring means such as the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the upstream roll, and the axial direction of the material to be inspected between the ultrasonic probe and the upstream roll. As long as the separation distance along the line is constant, the amount of misalignment at the installation position of the axial core measuring means such as the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the ultrasonic probe installation position at the tip of the flaw detection material It has been found that the ratio of the misalignment to the center misalignment is substantially constant. Similarly, a separation distance along the axial direction of the flaw detection material between the axial core measuring means such as the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the downstream roll, and an axial direction of the flaw detection material between the ultrasonic probe and the downstream roll. As long as the separation distance along the line is constant, the amount of misalignment at the installation position of the axial core measuring means such as the aerial ultrasonic sensor and the installation position of the ultrasonic probe at the rear end of the flaw detection material It has been found that the ratio of the misalignment to the center misalignment is substantially constant. Therefore, for the flaw detection material (previous flaw detection material) for which the flaw detection was performed last time, the misalignment amount at the axial center measuring means installation position and the misalignment amount at the ultrasonic probe installation position were measured. If the amount of misalignment at the position where the axial center measuring means is installed is measured for the flaw detection material (current flaw detection material) to be subjected to the flaw detection this time, the ultrasonic inspection of the flaw detection material this time is calculated. If the position of the cylindrical rotating body is controlled based on the estimated amount of misalignment at the ultrasonic probe installation position, the amount of misalignment at the child installation position can be predicted. It can be expected that the front end portion and the rear end portion can be accurately detected. The present invention has been completed based on the knowledge of the inventors.

  That is, an ultrasonic flaw detector according to the present invention includes an ultrasonic probe that transmits and receives ultrasonic waves to a tubular or rod-shaped flaw detection material conveyed along the axial direction, and the ultrasonic probe. An ultrasonic flaw detector that receives an output signal and detects a defect existing in the flaw detection material and measures a distance from the ultrasonic probe to the flaw detection material, and the ultrasonic probe are attached. A cylindrical rotating body that passes through the flaw detection material and rotates along the circumferential direction of the flaw detection material, and is arranged on the upstream side and the downstream side of the cylindrical rotation body along the conveyance direction of the flaw detection material, An upstream roll and a downstream roll for guiding and supporting the material to be inspected, an axis measuring means for measuring the axis position of the material to be inspected, disposed between the upstream roll and the cylindrical rotating body, and Perpendicular to the axial direction of the cylindrical rotating body and perpendicular to each other Axial (e.g., left-right direction as viewed from the axial direction of the cylindrical rotary member) and the Z-axis direction (e.g., vertical direction as viewed in the axial direction of the cylindrical rotating member) and a control means for controlling the position of.

  And the said control means is the difference of the axial center position of the Y-axis direction of the to-be-tested material measured by the said axial center measuring means, and the axial center position of the initial stage Y-axis direction of the said cylindrical rotary body, Calculated as the amount of misalignment in the Y-axis direction of the flaw detection material at the axial center measurement means installation position, and the Z axis position of the flaw detection material measured by the axial measurement means and the cylindrical rotation The difference from the initial Z axis direction axial position of the body is calculated as the amount of misalignment in the Z axis direction of the flaw detection material at the axial center measuring means installation position.

  Further, the control means determines the axis position of the flaw detection material in the Y-axis direction based on the distance from the ultrasonic probe to the flaw detection material along the Y-axis direction measured by the ultrasonic flaw detector. The difference between the calculated axial center position of the flaw detection material in the Y-axis direction and the preset initial axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body in the Y-axis direction is set as the ultrasonic probe installation position. Is calculated as the amount of misalignment in the Y-axis direction of the flaw detection material at the same time, and based on the distance from the ultrasonic probe to the flaw detection material along the Z-axis direction measured by the ultrasonic flaw detector. The axis position of the flaw detection material in the Z-axis direction is calculated, and the difference between the calculated axis position in the Z-axis direction of the flaw detection material and the preset initial Z-axis direction axis position of the cylindrical rotating body Is calculated as the amount of misalignment in the Z-axis direction of the flaw detection material at the ultrasonic probe installation position.

Further, the control means determines the position of the cylindrical rotating body in the Y-axis direction when the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material to be subjected to flaw detection reach the ultrasonic probe installation position as follows. And correcting the position of the cylindrical rotating body in the Z-axis direction by BZ ′ (x) shown in the following expression (2). .
BY ′ (x) = AY ′ (x) × (BY (x) −CY (x)) / AY (x) (1)
BZ ′ (x) = AZ ′ (x) × (BZ (x) −CZ (x)) / AZ (x) (2)
Here, in the above formulas (1) and (2), x is the position of the flaw detection material in the axial direction, and AY ′ (x) and AZ ′ (x) are flaw detection materials to be flawed this time (the flaw detection material to be flawed this time). AY (x) and AZ (x) each carried out the previous flaw detection for the amount of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the axial center measuring means installation position for the front end portion and rear end portion of the flaw detection material). BY (x) and BZ (x) are the amounts of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the position where the axial center measuring means is installed at the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material (previous flaw detection material). CY (x) and CZ (x) are the amounts of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the ultrasonic probe installation position at the front end portion and the rear end portion of the previous flaw detection material, respectively. Position correction amount in the Y-axis direction and Z-axis direction of the cylindrical rotating body corrected for the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material , BY ′ (x) and BZ ′ (x) are the amounts of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and Z-axis direction at the ultrasonic probe installation positions predicted for the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material, respectively. Means.

  According to such an invention, the misalignment amounts AY (x) and AZ (x) at the axial center measurement means installation position for the previous flaw detection material, and the misalignment amount BY at the ultrasonic probe installation position. Using (x) and BZ (x) and the misalignment amounts AY ′ (x) and AZ ′ (x) at the axial center measurement means installation position for the material to be detected this time, 2) Prediction of the amount of misalignment BY ′ (x) and BZ ′ (x) at the ultrasonic probe installation position for the material to be detected this time. And when the front-end | tip part and rear-end part of a to-be-examined material reach | attain an ultrasonic probe installation position this time, the position of the center axis | shaft of the cylindrical rotating body estimated in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction BY ' (X) and BZ ′ (x) are corrected (that is, the Y axis direction of the cylindrical rotating body set when the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material reached the ultrasonic probe installation position and The position of the cylindrical rotating body in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction is changed by BY ′ (x) and BZ ′ (x) based on the position in the Z-axis direction, respectively. With respect to the end portion, the axial center position and the axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body can be made to coincide with each other with accuracy, and as a result, the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material can be detected with high accuracy.

  Note that the “tip portion” in the present invention corresponds to the distance along the axial direction of the flaw detection material between the ultrasonic probe installation position and the downstream roll installation position from the forefront of the flaw detection material. It means a part up to the length to be. Further, the “rear end” in the present invention is a distance along the axial direction of the flaw detection material from the rearmost end of the flaw detection material between the installation position of the ultrasonic probe and the installation position of the upstream roll. It means a part up to the corresponding length.

  In addition, about the center part except the front-end | tip part and rear-end part of a to-be-examined material, it is based on the axial center position of each site | part measured sequentially by the axial center measurement means similarly to the control method proposed by patent document 1. It is also conceivable to calculate the misalignment amount and sequentially correct the position of the cylindrical rotating body by the same amount as the calculated misalignment amount of each part. However, since the central portion of the flaw detection material is guided and supported by both the upstream roll and the downstream roll when ultrasonic flaw detection is performed, it is considered that the influence of bending is relatively small. Based on the axial average value of the amount of misalignment measured at the ultrasonic probe installation position for the center part of the material, the position of the cylindrical rotating body at the time of detecting the center part of the material to be detected this time is set to a constant value. Even if controlled (that is, without performing complicated control for sequentially changing the position of the cylindrical rotating body as each part of the center of the flaw detection material is sequentially conveyed in the axial direction), flaw detection is performed with relatively high accuracy. It can be expected to be possible.

Therefore, it is preferable that the control means is configured so that when the central portion excluding the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material to be subjected to the current flaw detection reaches the ultrasonic probe installation position, The position in the Y-axis direction is corrected by CY ′ shown in the following formula (3), and the position in the Z-axis direction of the cylindrical rotating body is corrected by CZ ′ shown in the following formula (4). The
CY ′ = Ave (BYc (x) −CY) (3)
CZ ′ = Ave (BZc (x) −CZ) (4)
Here, in the above formulas (3) and (4), x is the axial position of the flaw detection material, and BYc (x) and BZc (x) are flaw detection materials (previous flaw detection materials that were previously subjected to flaw detection). ) And CY and CZ are the Y values of the cylindrical rotating body obtained by correcting the center misalignment amounts in the Y-axis direction and Z-axis direction at the ultrasonic probe installation position at the center portion of The position correction amounts in the axial direction and the Z-axis direction, and Ave () means an average value in parentheses.

  According to the ultrasonic flaw detector according to the present invention, the axial center position and the axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body can be made to coincide with each other accurately with respect to the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material. The front end and the rear end can also be detected with high accuracy.

  DESCRIPTION OF EXEMPLARY EMBODIMENTS Hereinafter, an ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus according to an embodiment of the invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings, taking as an example a case where a material to be detected is a steel pipe.

  FIG. 2 is a block diagram schematically showing a schematic configuration of the ultrasonic flaw detector according to one embodiment of the present invention. As shown in FIG. 2, the ultrasonic flaw detector 100 according to the present embodiment includes an ultrasonic probe 1 that transmits and receives ultrasonic waves to and from a steel pipe S that is conveyed along the axial direction, and an ultrasonic probe. 1 receives an output signal (reflected echo signal) from 1, detects a defect existing in the steel pipe S, and measures an ultrasonic flaw detector 2 that measures the distance from the ultrasonic probe 1 to the steel pipe; The contact 1 is attached, and the cylindrical rotating body 3 that passes through the steel pipe S and rotates along the circumferential direction of the steel pipe S, and the upstream side of the cylindrical rotating body 3 along the conveying direction of the steel pipe S (in FIG. 2). Left side) and downstream side (right side in FIG. 2), respectively, and arranged between the upstream roll 4 and the downstream roll 5 for guiding and supporting the steel pipe S, and between the upstream roll 4 and the cylindrical rotating body 3, The axial center measuring means 6 for measuring the axial center position of the steel pipe S and the axial direction (X Direction) and the Y-axis direction (perpendicular to the paper surface of FIG. 2 and the left-right direction when viewed from the axial direction of the cylindrical rotating body 3) and the Z-axis direction (up and down of the paper surface of FIG. 2). And a control means 7 for controlling the position in the vertical direction as viewed from the axial direction of the cylindrical rotating body 3.

  As long as the ultrasonic probe 1 is capable of receiving ultrasonic waves from inside the steel pipe S and receiving reflected echoes from defects present in the inside or the surface of the steel pipe S, various known products such as commercial products are available. An ultrasound probe can be used.

  The ultrasonic flaw detector 2 sets a predetermined flaw detection gate for the reflected echo signal received from the ultrasonic probe 1 and exists in the steel pipe S based on the magnitude of the amplitude of the reflected echo signal in the flaw detection gate. Detect defects. Further, the ultrasonic flaw detector 2 is based on the reflected echo signal received from the ultrasonic probe 1 until the ultrasonic probe 1 detects the reflected echo on the surface of the steel pipe S after transmitting the ultrasonic wave. , And the distance from the ultrasonic probe 1 to the steel pipe S is measured based on the detected time and the sound velocity of the ultrasonic waves. As the ultrasonic flaw detector 2 having such a function, various known ultrasonic flaw detectors such as commercially available products can be used.

  An ultrasonic probe 1 is attached to the cylindrical rotating body 3 so that an ultrasonic wave is transmitted toward an internal hollow portion. The hollow portion, that is, the ultrasonic probe 1 and the steel pipe S are connected to each other. The gap is configured to be filled with water W supplied from the outside. With such a configuration, the ultrasonic wave transmitted from the ultrasonic probe 1 is propagated to the steel pipe S using the filled water W as a contact medium. Then, when the cylindrical rotating body 3 rotates along the circumferential direction of the steel pipe S, the ultrasonic probe 1 also uses the rotation center of the cylindrical rotating body 3 as the rotation center along the circumferential direction of the steel pipe S. Will rotate. Therefore, when the steel pipe S is conveyed in the axial direction, ultrasonic flaw detection is performed while the ultrasonic probe 1 is scanned spirally along the outer surface of the steel pipe S.

  The upstream roll 4 and the downstream roll 5 are pinch rolls, and the position of the upstream roll 4 and the downstream roll 5 fluctuate depending on the outer diameter of the steel pipe S, and the outer surface of the steel pipe S that has been conveyed is pressed with a predetermined pressure. It is configured to guide and support.

  The axial core measuring means 6 is configured to measure the axial center position of the steel pipe S for each predetermined portion in the axial direction of the steel pipe S. More specifically, it is configured to measure the axial center position of each predetermined portion at every preset timing (each time each predetermined portion of the steel pipe S reaches the installation position of the axial core measuring means 6). ing. As the axial center measuring means 6, for example, as shown in FIG. 3, a pair of aerial ultrasonic sensors 61a and 61b opposed along the Y-axis direction and a pair of aerial ultrasonic sensors opposed along the Z-axis direction. A configuration including 61c and 61d is possible. When the axial center measuring means 6 having such a configuration is employed, the distance Ya from the air ultrasonic sensor 61a measured by the air ultrasonic sensor 61a to the outer surface of the steel pipe S and the air ultrasonic wave measured by the air ultrasonic sensor 61b. Based on the distance Yb from the sensor 61b to the outer surface of the steel pipe S, the position of the axis S0 of the steel pipe S in the Y-axis direction can be measured. More specifically, assuming that the origin is an intersection O between the ultrasonic transmission direction of the aerial ultrasonic sensors 61a and 61b and the ultrasonic transmission direction of the aerial ultrasonic sensors 61c and 61d, the axis of the steel pipe S The position (Y coordinate) of S0 in the Y-axis direction is calculated by (Ya−Yb) / 2. Similarly, the position (Z coordinate) of the axis S0 of the steel pipe S in the Z-axis direction is the distance Za from the air ultrasonic sensor 61c measured by the air ultrasonic sensor 61c to the outer surface of the steel pipe S, and the air ultrasonic wave. Based on the distance Zb from the aerial ultrasonic sensor 61d measured by the sensor 61d to the outer surface of the steel pipe S, it is calculated as (Zb−Za) / 2 with the intersection O as the origin.

  Alternatively, in the same manner as in the configuration described in Patent Document 1, the aerial ultrasonic sensor using the axial center measuring means 6 in which three aerial ultrasonic sensors are arranged so that the transmission directions of the ultrasonic waves intersect each other at 90 ° is adopted. It is also possible to calculate the position of the axis S0 of the steel pipe S on the basis of the distance from the outer surface of the steel pipe S to the outer surface of the steel pipe S and the geometrical relationship when the cross section of the steel pipe S is assumed to be a perfect circle. is there. In any case, as long as the position of the axial center of the steel pipe S can be measured, the configuration of the axial center measuring means 6 is not limited at all, and various configurations can be adopted.

  The control means 7 includes a mechanism unit (not shown) that moves the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction, and a control unit (not shown) that controls the mechanism unit. As the mechanism unit, for example, various known configurations such as a mechanism device, a mechanism device lifting motor, a mechanism device moving motor, and a mechanism device moving mechanism as described in Patent Document 1 can be adopted. The control unit receives the position of the axis S0 of the steel pipe S measured by the axis measuring means 6, and the distance from the ultrasonic probe 1 measured by the ultrasonic flaw detector 2 to the outer surface of the steel pipe S. Based on these received measurement values, the appropriate position (ultrasonic probe 1) of the cylindrical rotating body 3 when the front end and the rear end of the steel pipe S reach the installation position of the ultrasonic probe 1. (The position where the axial center position of the steel pipe S and the axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 coincide with each other) are calculated. And the said mechanism part is controlled so that the cylindrical rotary body 3 may become this calculated position. Hereinafter, the calculation and control operation by the control means 7 (control unit) will be described more specifically.

  First, the control means 7 carries out the position in the Y-axis direction of the axis S0 of the steel pipe S measured by the axis measurement means 6 as described above, and the preset initial (ultrasonic flaw detection) of the cylindrical rotating body 3. The difference from the axial center position in the Y-axis direction is calculated as a misalignment amount in the Y-axis direction of the steel pipe S at the installation position of the axial center measuring means 6. More specifically, for example, when the configuration shown in FIG. 3 is adopted as the axis measuring means 6, the position of the intersection O in the Y-axis direction and the preset initial Y-axis direction of the cylindrical rotating body 3 are described. Is stored in advance, the position in the Y-axis direction of the axis S0 of the steel pipe S calculated using the intersection point O as the origin, and the preset initial Y of the cylindrical rotating body 3 It is possible to calculate the difference from the axial center position in the axial direction. Similarly, the control means 7 determines the position of the axis S0 of the steel pipe S measured by the axis measurement means 6 in the Z-axis direction and the preset initial Z-axis position of the cylindrical rotating body 3. The difference is calculated as the amount of misalignment in the Z-axis direction of the steel pipe S at the position where the shaft core measuring means 6 is installed.

  On the other hand, based on the distance from the ultrasonic probe 1 along the Y-axis direction measured by the ultrasonic flaw detector 2 to the outer surface of the steel pipe S, the control means 7 is the axial position of the steel pipe S in the Y-axis direction. Is calculated. That is, as shown in FIG. 4, the ultrasonic probe 1 also rotates with the rotation of the cylindrical rotating body 3, but the ultrasonic probe 1 is positioned along the Y-axis direction ((b in FIG. 4). ) And (d), the ultrasonic flaw detector 2 measures the distances Ya ′ and Yb ′ from the ultrasonic probe 1 to the outer surface of the steel pipe S, and the control means 7 measures the measurement. Based on the distances Ya ′ and Yb ′, the position of the axis S0 ′ of the steel pipe S in the Y-axis direction is calculated. More specifically, the ultrasonic transmission direction of the ultrasonic probe 1 that has reached the position along the Y-axis direction and the position along the Z-axis direction (of (a) and (c) in FIG. 4). Assuming that the origin is the intersection O ′ with the ultrasonic transmission direction of the ultrasonic probe 1 that has reached (position), the position (Y coordinate) of the axis S0 ′ of the steel pipe S in the Y-axis direction is (Ya ′) -Yb ') / 2. As described above, the control means 7 calculates the axial center position of the steel pipe S in the Y-axis direction at every timing when the ultrasonic probe 1 reaches the position along the Y-axis direction.

  Then, the control means 7 calculates the difference between the calculated position of the axial center S0 ′ of the steel pipe S in the Y-axis direction and the initial axial position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction by ultrasonic waves. The amount of misalignment in the Y-axis direction of the steel pipe S at the probe 1 installation position is calculated. More specifically, the relationship between the position in the Y-axis direction of the intersection O ′ shown in FIG. 4 and the preset initial Y-axis axis position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 is stored in advance. Thus, the difference between the position in the Y-axis direction of the axis S0 ′ of the steel pipe S calculated using the intersection O ′ as the origin and the initial Y-axis direction axis position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 is calculated. It is possible.

  Similarly, the control means 7 detects the ultrasonic probe 1 along the Z-axis direction measured by the ultrasonic flaw detector 2 at every timing when the ultrasonic probe 1 reaches a position along the Z-axis direction. From the distances Za ′ and Zb ′ from the outer surface of the steel pipe S to the Z axis direction position of the axis S0 ′ of the steel pipe S is calculated. The position (Z coordinate) of the axis S0 'of the steel pipe S in the Z-axis direction is calculated as (Zb'-Za') / 2 with the intersection point O 'as the origin. Then, the control means 7 calculates the difference between the calculated position of the axis S0 ′ of the steel pipe S in the Z-axis direction and the preset initial Z-axis position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 by ultrasonic waves. The amount of misalignment in the Z-axis direction of the steel pipe S at the probe installation position 1 is calculated. That is, by storing in advance the relationship between the position of the intersection point O ′ shown in FIG. 4 in the Z-axis direction and the preset initial axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body 3, the intersection point O ′ is determined. The difference between the position in the Z-axis direction of the axis S0 ′ of the steel pipe S calculated as the origin and the initial Z-axis direction position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 set in advance is calculated.

And the control means 7 is the separation | spacing distance (as shown in FIG. 2 of the front-end | tip part of the steel pipe S which implements a flaw detection this time (the installation position of the ultrasonic probe 1 and the installation position of the downstream roll 5 from the forefront of the steel pipe S). Lt) and the rear end (the distance Lb shown in FIG. 2) from the rear end of the steel pipe S to the installation position of the ultrasonic probe 1 and the installation position of the upstream roll 4 When the portion up to the corresponding length) reaches the installation position of the ultrasonic probe 1, the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction is corrected by BY ′ (x) shown in the following equation (1). At the same time, the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Z-axis direction is corrected by BZ ′ (x) shown in the following equation (2). In other words, the control means 7 uses the Y-axis direction and the Z axis of the cylindrical rotating body 3 set when the front end portion and the rear end portion of the steel pipe S on which the flaw detection has been performed have reached the ultrasonic probe 1 installation position. Using the position in the axial direction as a reference, the positions of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction and Z-axis direction are changed by BY ′ (x) and BZ ′ (x), respectively. That is, the control unit of the control means 7 calculates BY ′ (x) and BZ ′ (x), and the positions of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction are BY ′ (x) and BZ ′, respectively. The mechanism part of the control means 7 is controlled so as to move only by (x).
BY ′ (x) = AY ′ (x) × (BY (x) −CY (x)) / AY (x) (1)
BZ ′ (x) = AZ ′ (x) × (BZ (x) −CZ (x)) / AZ (x) (2)

  Here, in the above formulas (1) and (2), x is the position in the axial direction of the steel pipe S, and AY ′ (x) and AZ ′ (x) are the steel pipe S (the material to be inspected this time) that performs the current flaw detection, respectively. ) AY (x) and AZ (x) are the steel pipes for which the previous flaw detection was performed, respectively, with respect to the misalignment amounts in the Y-axis direction and Z-axis direction at the position where the axial center measuring means 6 is installed at the front end portion and the rear end portion. BY (x) and BZ (x) are the amounts of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the position where the axial center measuring means 6 is installed at the front end portion and the rear end portion of S (previously detected material), respectively. CY (x) and CZ (x) represent the amounts of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the position where the ultrasonic probe 1 is installed at the front end portion and the rear end portion of the previous flaw detection material, respectively. Compensation of the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction corrected for the front and rear ends of the flaw detection material BY ′ (x) and BZ ′ (x) are respectively the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the ultrasonic probe 1 installation position predicted for the front end portion and the rear end portion of the material to be detected this time. Means the amount of misalignment.

  By the calculation and control operation of the control means 7 described above, the axial center position and the axial core position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 can be made to coincide with each other with high accuracy at the front end portion and the rear end portion of the steel pipe S. It is possible to detect flaws with high accuracy also at the front end and the rear end.

  The calculation and control operation of the control means 7 is an operation to be performed on the second and subsequent steel pipes S when the material to be flawed previously exists, that is, after the ultrasonic flaw detection is started. For the first steel pipe S, AY (x) and AZ (x), which are misalignment amounts at the position where the axial center measuring means 6 is installed for the previous flaw detection material, and the ultrasonic probe for the previous flaw detection material. Since there are no BY (x) and BZ (x), which are misalignment amounts at one installation position, and position correction amounts CY (x) and CZ (x) of the cylindrical rotating body 3 for the previous flaw detection material, Based on the equations (1) and (2), it is possible to predict BY ′ (x) and BZ ′ (x), which are misalignment amounts at the position where the ultrasonic probe 1 is installed for the material to be detected this time. It is not possible.

  Therefore, for the first steel pipe S, for example, as in the control method proposed in Patent Document 1, the amount of misalignment (formula) is determined based on the axial center position of each part of the steel pipe S measured by the axial core measuring means 6. (Corresponding to AY ′ (x) and AZ ′ (x) shown in (1) and (2)), and the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 is set by the same amount as the calculated misalignment amount of each part. It is conceivable to correct sequentially. However, the control operation is such that the misalignment amount at the axial center measuring means 6 installation position and the misalignment amount at the ultrasonic probe 1 installation position are the same value for the same part of the steel pipe S. Therefore, for the first steel pipe S, there is a possibility that the flaw detection accuracy at the front end and the rear end will deteriorate.

In order to reduce the deterioration of the flaw detection accuracy for the first steel pipe S, for example, for each attribute such as the outer diameter or material of the steel pipe S, the misalignment amount and the axial center at the position where the ultrasonic probe 1 is installed. Ratio of misalignment at the installation position of measuring means 6 (ratio BY (x) and AY (x) shown in equation (1) BY (x) / AY (x), BZ shown in equation (2) It is conceivable that data (a ratio BZ (x) / AZ (x) between (x) and AZ (x)) is previously collected as an actual value and stored in the control means 7. Then, the control means 7 reads out the stored ratios BY (x) / AY (x), BZ (x) / AZ (x) in accordance with the attributes of the first steel pipe S that carries out the flaw detection. When the front end portion and the rear end portion reach the ultrasonic probe 1 installation position, the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction is represented by BY ″ (x) represented by the following equation (1-a). It is only necessary to correct the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Z-axis direction by BZ ″ (x) shown in the following equation (2-a).
BY ″ (x) = AY ′ (x) × BY (x) / AY (x) (1-a)
BZ ″ (x) = AZ ′ (x) × BZ (x) / AZ (x) (2-a)

  The above control method is configured to predict the misalignment amount at the ultrasonic probe installation position 1 using the past actual value data of the steel pipe S having the same kind of attribute. As described, the control is based on the premise that the misalignment amount at the axial center measuring means 6 installation position and the misalignment amount at the ultrasonic probe 1 installation position are the same value for the same part of the steel pipe S. Compared to the method, it can be expected that flaws can be detected with high accuracy.

Note that the control means 7 according to this embodiment is configured such that when the central portion excluding the front end portion and the rear end portion of the steel pipe S to be subjected to flaw detection reaches the ultrasonic probe 1 installation position, the cylindrical rotating body 3 is corrected by CY ′ shown in the following formula (3), and the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Z-axis direction is corrected by CZ ′ shown in the following formula (4). In other words, the control means 7 determines the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction set when the central portion of the steel pipe S that has been subjected to the previous flaw reaches the installation position of the ultrasonic probe 1. , The positions of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction are changed by CY ′ and CZ ′, respectively. That is, the control unit 7 of the control unit 7 calculates CY ′ and CZ ′ and controls the control unit 7 so that the positions of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction are moved by CY ′ and CZ ′, respectively. Control the mechanism.
CY ′ = Ave (BYc (x) −CY) (3)
CZ ′ = Ave (BZc (x) −CZ) (4)

  Here, in the above formulas (3) and (4), x is the position in the axial direction of the steel pipe S, and BYc (x) and BZc (x) are the steel pipe S (previously flawed material) on which the previous flaw detection was performed, respectively. CY and CZ are Y values of the cylindrical rotating body 3 in which the center misalignment amounts in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the position where the ultrasonic probe 1 is installed at the center portion are corrected for the center portion of the last material to be detected. The position correction amounts in the axial direction and the Z-axis direction, and Ave () means an average value in parentheses.

  According to the calculation and control operation of the control means 7 for the central portion of the steel pipe S described above, even if the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 at the time of flaw detection at the central portion of the material to be detected is controlled to a constant value. (In other words, flaw detection can be performed with relatively high accuracy without performing complicated control for sequentially changing the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 as each portion of the central portion of the steel pipe S is sequentially conveyed in the axial direction).

  The calculation and control operation of the control means 7 for the central portion of the steel pipe S is performed when the material to be inspected last time, that is, the second and subsequent steel pipes S after the start of ultrasonic flaw detection. It is. For the first steel pipe S, BYc (x) and BZc (x), which are misalignment amounts at the position where the ultrasonic probe 1 is installed for the previous flaw detection material, and the cylindrical rotating body for the previous flaw detection material This is because the position correction amounts CY ′ and CZ ′ for the current flaw detection material cannot be calculated based on the equations (3) and (4) because the position correction amounts CY and CZ of 3 do not exist.

  Therefore, for the first steel pipe S, for example, as in the control method proposed in Patent Document 1, the misalignment is based on the axis position of each part of the central portion of the steel pipe S measured by the axis measuring means 6. It is conceivable to calculate the amount and sequentially correct the position of the cylindrical rotating body 3 by the same amount as the calculated center misalignment amount of each part. And when calculating the position correction amount of the cylindrical rotating body 3 with respect to the center part of the second steel pipe S, the above calculation was performed as the position correction amounts CY and CZ shown in the equations (3) and (4). What is necessary is just to use the axial direction average value of the misalignment amount of each site | part of the center part of the 1st steel pipe S. FIG.

  FIG. 5 shows a case where the ultrasonic flaw detector 100 according to the present embodiment described above is applied and a case where the ultrasonic flaw detector 100 is not applied (the steel pipe S based on the outer diameter of the steel pipe S without considering the bending of the steel pipe S). 5 is a graph showing an example of the result of evaluating the erroneous detection of defects in the case where a flaw and a cylindrical rotating body 3 are centered for flaw detection). The horizontal axis in FIG. 5 represents the evaluated year and month, and the vertical axis represents the false detection rate (the number of steel pipes erroneously detected as having defects / the number of steel pipes subjected to flaw detection).

  As shown in FIG. 5, by applying the ultrasonic flaw detection apparatus 100 according to the present embodiment, even if the steel pipe has a bend, erroneous detection of defects is greatly reduced, and flaw detection can be performed with high accuracy. I understood.

FIG. 1 is an explanatory diagram for explaining a problem in a conventional ultrasonic flaw detector. FIG. 2 is a block diagram schematically showing a schematic configuration of the ultrasonic flaw detector according to one embodiment of the present invention. FIG. 3 is a diagram showing an example of the configuration of the axial center measuring means shown in FIG. FIG. 4 is an explanatory diagram for explaining a method of calculating the axial center position of the flaw detection material by the ultrasonic flaw detector shown in FIG. FIG. 5 is a graph showing an example of the evaluation result of the flaw detection accuracy by the ultrasonic flaw detector shown in FIG.

Explanation of symbols

DESCRIPTION OF SYMBOLS 1 ... Ultrasonic probe 2 ... Ultrasonic flaw detector 3 ... Cylindrical rotary body 4 ... Upstream side roll 5 ... Downstream side roll 6 ... Axle measuring means 7 ...・ Control means 100 ... Ultrasonic flaw detector S ... Steel pipe (Flaw detection material)
A: Incident angle in the tube circumferential direction

Claims (2)

An ultrasonic probe that transmits and receives ultrasonic waves to a tubular or rod-shaped flaw detection material conveyed along the axial direction;
An ultrasonic flaw detector that receives an output signal from the ultrasonic probe, detects a defect existing in the flaw detection material, and measures a distance from the ultrasonic probe to the flaw detection material;
A cylindrical rotating body to which the ultrasonic probe is attached and which passes through the flaw detection material and rotates along the circumferential direction of the flaw detection material;
An upstream roll and a downstream roll that are arranged on the upstream side and the downstream side of the cylindrical rotating body along the conveying direction of the flaw detection material, respectively, and that guide and support the flaw detection material;
An axial center measuring means that is disposed between the upstream roll and the cylindrical rotating body and measures the axial center position of the flaw detection material;
Control means for controlling the positions in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction orthogonal to the axial direction of the cylindrical rotating body and orthogonal to each other;
The control means includes
The difference between the axial center position in the Y-axis direction of the flaw detection material measured by the axial-core measuring means and the initial axial position in the Y-axis direction of the cylindrical rotating body is set as the axial-core measuring means installation position. Calculated as the amount of misalignment in the Y-axis direction of the flaw detection material at the same time, and the axial position of the flaw detection material in the Z-axis direction measured by the axial core measuring means and the preset initial position of the cylindrical rotating body The difference from the axial center position in the Z-axis direction is calculated as the amount of misalignment in the Z-axis direction of the flaw detection material at the axial center measuring means installation position,
Based on the distance from the ultrasonic probe to the flaw detection material along the Y-axis direction measured by the ultrasonic flaw detector, the axial position of the flaw detection material in the Y-axis direction is calculated, and the calculated flaw detection target The difference between the axial center position of the flaw detection material in the Y-axis direction and the initial axial center position of the cylindrical rotating body in the Y-axis direction is determined as the Y of the flaw detection material at the ultrasonic probe installation position. Calculated as the axial misalignment amount, and based on the distance from the ultrasonic probe to the flaw detection material along the Z axis direction measured by the ultrasonic flaw detector, the flaw detection material in the Z axis direction The axial position is calculated, and the difference between the calculated axial position in the Z-axis direction of the flaw detection material and the initial axial position in the Z-axis direction of the cylindrical rotating body is calculated by the ultrasonic probe. It is configured to calculate the amount of misalignment in the Z-axis direction of the flaw detection material at the child installation position,
The control means determines the position of the cylindrical rotating body in the Y-axis direction when the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material to be subjected to the current flaw detection reach the ultrasonic probe installation position by the following formula: The ultrasonic wave is corrected by BY ′ (x) shown in (1) and the position of the cylindrical rotating body in the Z-axis direction is corrected by BZ ′ (x) shown in the following formula (2). Flaw detection equipment.
BY ′ (x) = AY ′ (x) × (BY (x) −CY (x)) / AY (x) (1)
BZ ′ (x) = AZ ′ (x) × (BZ (x) −CZ (x)) / AZ (x) (2)
Here, in the above formulas (1) and (2), x is the position in the axial direction of the flaw detection material, and AY ′ (x) and AZ ′ (x) are flaw detection materials to be flawed this time (current flaw detection materials). AY (x) and AZ (x) each carried out the previous flaw detection for the amount of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the axial center measuring means installation position for the front end portion and rear end portion of the flaw detection material). BY (x) and BZ (x) are the amounts of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the position where the axial center measuring means is installed at the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material (previous flaw detection material). CY (x) and CZ (x) are the amounts of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and the Z-axis direction at the ultrasonic probe installation position at the front end portion and the rear end portion of the previous flaw detection material, respectively. Position correction amount in the Y-axis direction and Z-axis direction of the cylindrical rotating body corrected for the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material , BY ′ (x) and BZ ′ (x) are the amounts of misalignment in the Y-axis direction and Z-axis direction at the ultrasonic probe installation positions predicted for the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material, respectively. Means. The control means is configured so that the position of the cylindrical rotating body in the Y-axis direction is reached when the central portion excluding the front end portion and the rear end portion of the flaw detection material that performs flaw detection reaches the ultrasonic probe installation position. Is corrected by CY ′ shown in the following formula (3), and the position of the cylindrical rotating body in the Z-axis direction is corrected by CZ ′ shown in the following formula (4). The described ultrasonic flaw detector.
CY ′ = Ave (BYc (x) −CY) (3)
CZ ′ = Ave (BZc (x) −CZ) (4)
Here, in the above formulas (3) and (4), x is the axial position of the flaw detection material, and BYc (x) and BZc (x) are flaw detection materials (previous flaw detection materials that were previously subjected to flaw detection). ) And CY and CZ are the Y values of the cylindrical rotating body obtained by correcting the center misalignment amounts in the Y-axis direction and Z-axis direction at the ultrasonic probe installation position at the center portion of The position correction amounts in the axial direction and the Z-axis direction, and Ave () means an average value in parentheses.

Images