EP3289314B1 - Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung vom interpolationsfehler - Google Patents

Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung vom interpolationsfehler Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP3289314B1
EP3289314B1 EP16722346.0A EP16722346A EP3289314B1 EP 3289314 B1 EP3289314 B1 EP 3289314B1 EP 16722346 A EP16722346 A EP 16722346A EP 3289314 B1 EP3289314 B1 EP 3289314B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
measurements
encoder apparatus
error
encoder
sub
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP16722346.0A
Other languages
English (en)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP3289314A1 (de
Inventor
Martin Simon Rees
Stephen Paul Hunter
David Sven Wallace
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Renishaw PLC
Original Assignee
Renishaw PLC
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Renishaw PLC filed Critical Renishaw PLC
Publication of EP3289314A1 publication Critical patent/EP3289314A1/de
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP3289314B1 publication Critical patent/EP3289314B1/de
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01D—MEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D18/00—Testing or calibrating apparatus or arrangements provided for in groups G01D1/00 - G01D15/00
    • G01D18/001—Calibrating encoders
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01B—MEASURING LENGTH, THICKNESS OR SIMILAR LINEAR DIMENSIONS; MEASURING ANGLES; MEASURING AREAS; MEASURING IRREGULARITIES OF SURFACES OR CONTOURS
    • G01B11/00—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques
    • G01B11/002—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring two or more coordinates
    • G01B11/005—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring two or more coordinates coordinate measuring machines
    • G01B11/007—Measuring arrangements characterised by the use of optical techniques for measuring two or more coordinates coordinate measuring machines feeler heads therefor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01D—MEASURING NOT SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR A SPECIFIC VARIABLE; ARRANGEMENTS FOR MEASURING TWO OR MORE VARIABLES NOT COVERED IN A SINGLE OTHER SUBCLASS; TARIFF METERING APPARATUS; MEASURING OR TESTING NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01D5/00—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable
    • G01D5/12—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable using electric or magnetic means
    • G01D5/244—Mechanical means for transferring the output of a sensing member; Means for converting the output of a sensing member to another variable where the form or nature of the sensing member does not constrain the means for converting; Transducers not specially adapted for a specific variable using electric or magnetic means influencing characteristics of pulses or pulse trains; generating pulses or pulse trains
    • G01D5/24471—Error correction
    • G01D5/2449—Error correction using hard-stored calibration data

Definitions

  • This invention relates to a method of determining an encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error and an error map for correcting for an encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error.
  • Apparatus e.g. measuring apparatus
  • a coordinate measuring machine can have numerous relatively moveable parts and it can be necessary to keep track of their relative position so that the position of an inspection device mounted on the CMM can be determined.
  • a measurement apparatus can have an articulated head on which an inspection device (e.g. a measurement probe) is mounted.
  • the articulated head can comprise one or more rotary axes, so as to enable the orientation of inspection device about said one or more axes to be changed. In order to know the position and orientation of the inspection device, it can be important to measure the relative position of the relatively moveable parts of the articulated head.
  • US2008/0177491 discloses a technique for correcting interpolation errors derived from position readings obtained by reading measurement scale on a CMM.
  • the quill of a CMM is moved to a plurality of positions and a plurality of position data is determined.
  • the plurality of position data represents a position curve.
  • a periodic component in the curve is determined, which periodic component corresponds approximately to the periodic division of the scale.
  • Correction values for correcting the interpolation values are determined such that the periodic component is at least reduced.
  • US6188341 discloses an encoder interpolation circuit for obtaining interpolation data from two sine-wave encoder signals of different phases (e.g. sine and cosine wave signals). However, the two sine-wave signals do not always have an accurate phase different of ⁇ /2, and are not always equal in magnitude. If the interpolative computation is carried out with use of these deviated signals, the obtained angle may possibly subject to an interpolation error. US6188341 teaches analysing the phase and amplitude differences of the two sine-wave signals and applying a correction based thereon.
  • EP0048851 discloses an incremental encoder apparatus in which interpolated values are corrected.
  • EP0048851 discloses using a reference measurement system (e.g. a laser interferometer) to determine correction values.
  • a reference measurement system e.g. a laser interferometer
  • This invention provides a new method for determining an encoder apparatus' error, in particular a method of determining an encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error (SDE).
  • SDE sub-divisional error
  • this application describes a method of determining an encoder apparatus' SDE by analysing the measurements obtained by an apparatus (e.g. a measurement apparatus) in which the encoder apparatus is incorporated, for example by analysing measurements obtained by an apparatus during inspection of an artefact.
  • the present invention also provides an error map for correcting for an encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error.
  • the invention provides an error function for correcting for an encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error.
  • a method of determining the sub-divisional error of an encoder apparatus that is configured to measure the position of relatively moveable parts of an apparatus on which an inspection device is mounted, the method comprising: causing the inspection device to inspect a feature so as to obtain measurements of the surface of the feature, which comprises relatively moving said relatively moveable parts of the apparatus; and using the measurements of the surface of the feature obtained by the inspection device during said inspection of the feature to determine the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error.
  • Using the measurements of the surface of the feature obtained by the inspection (e.g. measurement) of a feature e.g. a surface (e.g. of an artefact) can be beneficial as the feature provides a reference.
  • the method can comprise determining the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error from the apparatus' measurements alone.
  • the method can comprise determining the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error from measurements obtained by the apparatus only. Accordingly, the method can comprise determining the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error without the need to compare to the measurements obtained by the apparatus to measurements obtained by a secondary measurement device during said movement. Accordingly, the method does not necessarily require the use of external calibration equipment, such as an interferometer, to determine the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error. Rather, the sub-divisional error can be determined from the apparatus' measurements alone. Accordingly, the method could be described as being a self-calibration technique for determining the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error.
  • an encoder apparatus can comprise a scale and one or more readheads which output signals which represent the position and/or motion of the scale relative to the readhead(s).
  • a scale can comprise a series of features, for example a series of generally periodic features.
  • a scale can have a characteristic pitch distance (or angle for some rotary systems, e.g. disc scale on which scale features are radially arranged), but readhead signals can also be used to interpolate between scale pitch intervals to produce position measurements which have a much higher resolution than the scale pitch.
  • the readhead produces a spatially periodic signal, and in some embodiments the readhead's signal period has a higher frequency (shorter wavelength) than the scale period.
  • interpolation can still be used to produce position measurements which have a much higher resolution than signal period.
  • the interpolation may not be perfect, for example due to misalignment between the readhead and the scale, resulting in systematic position measurement errors which repeat every scale pitch interval. These are known as sub-divisional errors (SDE).
  • SDE is also commonly known as "interpolation error”.
  • interpolation error can be used interchangeably.
  • SDE can still be present to such an extent that it causes undesirable errors in the apparatus' measurement. Determining an encoder apparatus' SDE can therefore be advantageous. For example, if SDE is found to be too great then steps can be taken to reduce the SDE. Optionally, the SDE can error mapped such that the error map can be used to reduce the effects of the encoder apparatus' SDE. This can result in significant improvements in the accuracy of measurements obtained by the apparatus.
  • the method can comprise determining at least one error map for correcting for the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error based on measurements obtained during inspection/measurement of the feature/surface (e.g. based on measurement of the feature/surface).
  • the error map could be configured for correcting the encoder apparatus' output.
  • the error map could be configured such that it can be used to correct a determined relative position of the encoder apparatus' scale and readhead.
  • the encoder apparatus is a rotary encoder apparatus (also known as an angular encoder apparatus)
  • the error map could be configured such that it can be used to correct the determined angular orientation/position of the scale and readhead.
  • the encoder apparatus is configured to measure the relative position (e.g. relative rotational) position of relatively moveable parts of an apparatus, (e.g. the angular orientation of an articulated head, for instance the angular orientation of an inspection device mounted on an articulated head), then the error map can be configured such that it can be used to correct the determined relative position of the relatively moveable parts of the apparatus.
  • the relative position e.g. relative rotational
  • relatively moveable parts of an apparatus e.g. the angular orientation of an articulated head, for instance the angular orientation of an inspection device mounted on an articulated head
  • the at least one error map could comprise a look-up table or function.
  • the error map can be used to determine (e.g. it can describe) the form of the SDE (e.g. the form of the error caused by interpolation). Accordingly, in other words, the error map can describe the shape, waveform, signature or profile of the encoder apparatus' SDE. Accordingly, the error map could comprise a function which describes the form of the SDE.
  • the function can comprise a trigonometric function, for example a Fourier Series.
  • the function comprises a polynomial function.
  • the SDE could be assumed or determined to be the same for every scale (or signal) period along the encoder apparatus' measurement range, or the SDE could vary along the encoder apparatus' measurement range. Accordingly, as explained in more detail below the apparatus could be configured to correct for SDE differently dependent on relative position of the scale and readhead.
  • the error map could be configured such that its description of the form of the SDE varies along the encoder apparatus' measurement range. Accordingly, optionally, the error map can take into account changes (e.g. variations) in the SDE along the measurement range of the encoder apparatus. Accordingly, for example, rather than assuming that the SDE has the same form along the measurement range of the encoder apparatus (e.g.: in the case of a linear encoder, along at least part of its length; or in the case of a rotary encoder, through at least part of a revolution), the error map can be configured such that the sub-divisional error is corrected differently dependent on the relative position of the parts that the encoder apparatus is measuring.
  • the error map can be configured to vary the way that sub-divisional error is corrected throughout the range of encoder apparatus dependent on the relative position of the scale and readhead.
  • the sub-divisional error map can be position dependent. Accordingly, as will be understood, if desired, rather than having a single error map (e.g. a single look-up table) different error maps (e.g. different look-up tables) can be provided for different sections of the range of the encoder apparatus.
  • the error map could be configured to correct sub-divisional error differently for different sections of the scale.
  • Each section could comprise at least a single scale period, optionally a plurality of scale periods.
  • the sub-divisional error map (or error maps) could be tailored for different sections of the scale.
  • the error map comprises a function
  • the function for correcting the SDE comprises at least one coefficient which itself is dependent on (e.g. is a function of) the relative position of the scale and readhead. Accordingly, the error map can describe the change (e.g. variation) in the SDE along the encoder apparatus' measurement range.
  • the method can comprise determining the sub-divisional error for different regions of the encoder apparatus' measurement range. Accordingly, the method can comprise for each of said different regions determining the form (e.g. at least one property, e.g. the properties) of a periodic variation in the measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the form e.g. at least one property, e.g. the properties
  • the error map could be configured such that it can be used to determine the encoder apparatus' SDE to a resolution finer than the period of the periodic signal.
  • the error map has a resolution finer than the scale period.
  • the error map can be used to determine (e.g. can describe) the form of the SDE to a degree finer than the scale period.
  • the readhead can produce a periodic (in other words cyclical) signal (e.g. a spatially periodic signal) in response to relative movement of the readhead and scale.
  • the error map could be configured such that it can be used to determine the encoder apparatus' SDE to resolution finer than the period of the periodic signal.
  • the error map can be used to determine (e.g.
  • the (spatial) period of the signal can be the same as the (spatial) period of the scale's features.
  • the period of the signal could be half the period of the scale features.
  • the method can comprise determining the encoder apparatus' SDE based on the form of a periodic variation in the measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the method can comprise determining the encoder apparatus' SDE based on the form of (e.g. at least one property of, e.g. the properties of) a periodic variation in the measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the method can comprise determining the properties of a periodic variation in the measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the at least one property could describe the periodic variation in the measurements at said at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the at least one property could comprise the amplitude of said variations at said at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the at least one property could comprise the phase offset of said variations at said at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the amplitude and/or phase offset can be represented by the amplitudes of a combination of sine and cosine functions (e.g. without a direct reference to a phase offset).
  • An error map can be based on said determined form/properties.
  • the method comprises assuming that any variation from expected measurements is due to the encoder apparatus' SDE. Accordingly, the measurements could be used to determine an error map based on such variation.
  • the at least one predetermined spatial frequency can correspond to (for example comprise) the encoder apparatus' scale's period.
  • the at least one predetermined spatial frequency can correspond to (for example comprise) the signal period, e.g. the encoder apparatus' signal period.
  • the signal period can be shorter than the scale period, e.g. the signal period could be half the scale period.
  • the at least one predetermined spatial frequency corresponds to (e.g. comprises) at least one harmonic of the scale or signal period.
  • the at least one predetermined spatial frequency can also correspond to (e.g. comprise) at least the second harmonic of the scale or signal period.
  • the encoder apparatus could be a linear encoder apparatus.
  • the encoder apparatus can be a rotary encoder apparatus.
  • the encoder apparatus could comprise a disc encoder apparatus (in which the scale markings can be provided radially on the face of a disc) or a ring encoder apparatus (in which the scale markings can be provided on the circumferential face/edge of a ring).
  • the apparatus can comprise at least one rotational axis.
  • the apparatus can comprise an articulated head.
  • the articulated head can comprise at least one rotational axis, for example about which an inspection device can be oriented.
  • the encoder apparatus can comprise a rotary encoder apparatus for measuring the rotational position of the rotational axes (e.g. for measuring the orientation of the inspection device about said rotational axis).
  • the articulated head can be an articulated probe head.
  • the articulated head can be what is commonly referred to as a continuous head (e.g. as opposed to an indexed head), also commonly known as a scanning head.
  • the articulated head can one or more motors for effecting rotation about said one or more axes.
  • the articulated head can comprise the rotary encoder apparatus.
  • the articulated head can comprise a first member, and a second member that is mounted for rotation with respect to the first member about a first axis.
  • the articulated head can further comprise a third member that is mounted for rotation with respect to the second member about a second axis.
  • the first and second axes can be non-parallel to each other, for example perpendicular to each other.
  • the articulated head could be configured such that a device, e.g. an inspection device can be mounted on the third member.
  • the second and third members can provide for rotational movement of a device (e.g. an inspection device) about the first and second axes.
  • the rotary encoder apparatus can act between the first and second members to measure their angular position about the first axis (e.g. such that the angular position of a device (e.g. an inspection device) about the first axis can be measured).
  • the rotary encoder apparatus can act between the second and third members to measure their angular position about the second axis (e.g. such that the angular position of a device (e.g. an inspection device) about the second axis can be measured).
  • the first member can be configured to be mounted to a part of an apparatus that is moveable in at least one linear dimension, for example at least two perpendicular linear dimensions, for example three mutually perpendicular linear dimensions.
  • the first member can be configured to be mounted to what is commonly known as the quill (for example the quill of a CMM).
  • a first rotary encoder apparatus which acts between the first and second members to measure their angular position about the first axis
  • a second rotary encoder apparatus is provided which acts between the second and third members to measure their angular position about the second axis.
  • the first rotary encoder apparatus can be provided which acts between the first and second members to measure angular position of the inspection device about the first axis
  • a second rotary encoder apparatus can be provided which acts between the second and third members to measure angular position of the inspection device about the second axis.
  • At least the SDE for the first rotary encoder apparatus can be determined.
  • At least the SDE for the second rotary encoder apparatus can be determined.
  • At least a first error map can be determined for correcting for the first rotary encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error.
  • At least a second error map can be determined for correcting for the second rotary encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error.
  • an inspection device can be for inspecting an artefact, e.g. a feature, e.g. a surface of the artefact.
  • the inspection device could be a surface sensing device, e.g. for detecting and measuring the position of a surface.
  • the inspection device could be a contact measurement probe or a non-contact measurement probe.
  • a contact probe can comprise a stylus.
  • the contact probe could comprise a stylus shaft and a stylus tip.
  • the stylus shaft can space the stylus tip away from a body of the contact probe.
  • the body of the contact probe can be configured to be connected to the apparatus (e.g. an articulated probe head).
  • the inspection device could be a touch-trigger probe.
  • the inspection device could be an analogue measurement probe, for example an analogue contact measurement probe.
  • an analogue contact probe can provide a measure of the extent of deflection of a probe's stylus relative to the probe body.
  • Said measurements can relate to measurements of the position of a feature, e.g. of the surface of an artefact.
  • the measurements can relate to stylus tip position measurements.
  • the apparatus can comprise a manufacturing apparatus, such as a pick-and-place machine.
  • the apparatus can comprise an articulated arm, such as a robot arm.
  • the apparatus can comprise a measurement apparatus.
  • the apparatus can be a coordinate positioning machine.
  • the apparatus can comprise a machine tool, or a coordinate measuring machine (CMM).
  • CCM coordinate measuring machine
  • Suitable encoder apparatus comprise magnetic, optical (including transmissive and reflective versions, as well as diffractive and non-diffractive versions), inductive and capacitive encoder apparatus.
  • Suitable encoder apparatus comprise incremental and absolute encoder apparatus.
  • Suitable encoder apparatus comprise enclosed (also known as sealed) encoder apparatus and open (also known as exposed) encoder apparatus.
  • the encoder apparatus can comprise an incremental encoder apparatus.
  • the encoder apparatus can comprise an absolute encoder apparatus.
  • the encoder apparatus can comprise a combined incremental and absolute encoder apparatus.
  • an encoder apparatus' scale can comprise a series of features, e.g. an array of features, which can be read by the readhead.
  • the series/array of features can extend in one dimension or two dimensions (accordingly, the encoder apparatus can be a one-dimensional or two-dimensional encoder apparatus).
  • the features can take the form of lines, dots or other shapes.
  • the scale can comprise a series of substantially periodically arranged features.
  • the period (also referred to as the pitch) of the scale's features could be not more 2mm, for instance not more than 1mm, for example not more than 500 ⁇ m (microns), optionally not more than 100 ⁇ m (microns), for instance not more than 50 ⁇ m (microns), and optionally not more than 40 ⁇ m (microns).
  • the encoder apparatus comprises a diffractive-based optical encoder.
  • the scale can be configured to diffract light (e.g. from a light source in the readhead) so as to form a resultant signal (e.g. an interference fringe or modulated spots) at the detector which changes with relative movement of the scale and readhead.
  • light can comprise electromagnetic radiation (EMR) having a wavelength anywhere in the infra-red to the ultraviolet regions.
  • EMR electromagnetic radiation
  • the encoder apparatus e.g. the readhead, for example a detector in the readhead
  • quadrature signals e.g. analogue quadrature signals, e.g. SINE and COSINE signals
  • the encoder apparatus can be configured to interpolate said quadrature signals.
  • the encoder apparatus' SDE can relate to said interpolation of said quadrature signals.
  • the invention can also be used with encoder apparatus which do not produce such quadrature signals.
  • the invention can also be used with encoder apparatus which do not produce periodic signals in response to relative movement of the scale and readhead.
  • the invention can be used with an optical image based encoder system.
  • the invention can be used with a snap-shot (e.g. an optical image) based encoder systems which obtain a snapshot of the scale on demand and from which a relative position of the scale and readhead can be determined.
  • the invention can be applied to correct the determination of the fine pitch position information in the absolute encoder described in WO2010/139964 which is configured to obtain optical images of an absolute scale.
  • the measurements could comprise the output of the encoder apparatus.
  • the measurements could relate to the relative position and/or orientation of relatively moveable parts of the apparatus (e.g. during the inspection of an artefact).
  • the measurements could comprise measurements of any surface within the apparatus' movement (e.g. measurement) volume.
  • the measurements could relate to measurements of an artefact (e.g. a calibration artefact) located within the apparatus movement (e.g. measurement) volume.
  • the feature/surface/artefact can be a part of the apparatus itself (e.g. a surface of a table of the apparatus, e.g. a workpiece table), or a removable object located so as to be within the apparatus' movement (e.g. measurement) volume.
  • a surface is not necessarily an outer surface of an artefact.
  • the surface could comprise an inner surface of an artefact.
  • a feature need not necessarily be a distinctive feature.
  • the feature could comprise a point or line on a flat, planar surface.
  • measurements of a surface can comprise measurements normal to the surface.
  • the measurements can be measurements of the tip position normal to a surface.
  • the method can comprise relating position measurements (e.g. surface measurements, tip measurements) to scale measurements (e.g. angular measurements).
  • the measurements comprise a determined position of a part of the apparatus.
  • the measurements comprise a determined orientation of a part of the apparatus.
  • the measurements comprise a determined angular position and/or orientation of an inspection device mounted on the apparatus.
  • the method can comprise determining an error associated with the measurements and determining the SDE from said error (e.g. based on a variation in said error).
  • the probe could be a passive probe.
  • the probe could be a rigid contact probe.
  • the apparatus e.g. the articulated head
  • the apparatus can be configured to bias the probe (e.g. a rigid probe) against the surface and drag it along the surface whilst adapting/moving to follow deviations in the surface.
  • the apparatus could be servoed in order to keep the probe biased against the surface with a constant force.
  • the apparatus e.g. the articulated head
  • the method comprises obtaining measurements of a feature, e.g. a surface having a known shape.
  • the method comprises obtaining measurements of a spherical shape, e.g. a sphere.
  • the method can comprise obtaining measurements around the sphere, e.g. around its equator line.
  • the method can comprise relatively rotating the inspection device and feature/surface being measured about a rotational axis (e.g. of an articulated head) so as to maintain a nominally constant relative orientation between the probe and the surface of the artefact (e.g. the surface of the sphere).
  • a rotational axis e.g. of an articulated head
  • the probe is measuring in the substantially same direction relative to itself as it moves along the feature/surface (e.g. around the sphere).
  • this could be such that the relative orientation between the surface normal and the stylus length is substantially constant (e.g. substantially perpendicular) during obtaining the measurements.
  • the method could further comprise measuring an artefact and using the determined sub-divisional error (e.g. using the error map) to correct for the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error.
  • the method can comprise correcting the encoder apparatus' output.
  • the method can comprise using the corrected output to determine a measurement of the artefact (e.g. the position of the surface of the artefact). As will be understood this could comprise using the corrected output to determine the position of a surface sensing region of the probe.
  • the error map can be stored wherever is appropriate.
  • the error map can be stored in a permanent or transitory memory device.
  • the error map could be stored locally or remotely from the apparatus.
  • the error map could be stored in memory located within a part of the measurement apparatus (e.g. within the articulated head).
  • the error map is stored in a computer, e.g. a controller, associated with the apparatus.
  • this document describes determining the sub-divisional error of an encoder apparatus comprising a scale and readhead by moving the scale and readhead relative to each other and obtaining measurements, and determining the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error based on a (e.g. an identifiable) periodic variation in said measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • an error map can be generated for correcting for sub-divisional error in the output of an encoder apparatus comprising a scale and readhead, by moving the scale and readhead relative to each other and obtaining measurements, and generating the error map for correcting the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error based on a (e.g. an identifiable) periodic variation in said measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • an error map for correcting for sub-divisional error in the output of an encoder apparatus which is configured to monitor the position of relatively moveable parts of an apparatus can be generated by moving the relatively moveable parts of the apparatus relative to each other and obtaining measurements, and generating the error map for correcting the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error based on a (e.g. an identifiable) periodic variation in said measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the invention relies on the assumption that variations in the measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency are caused by the encoder apparatus' SDE and basing the determined SDE and optionally any error map on that assumption.
  • the error map could be generated based on the form (e.g. the properties) of a periodic variation in said measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the method can comprise identifying the characteristics of a periodic variation in the measurements at said at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the method can comprise identifying the form of a periodic variation in the measurements at said at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the method can comprise identifying at least one property (e.g. the properties) of a periodic variation in the measurements at said at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the at least one property (e.g. the properties) could describe the periodic variation at said at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the measurements can comprise measurements of a feature, e.g. a surface (e.g. of an artefact) obtained during such relative motion.
  • the measurements can comprise measurements of the position of a surface of an artefact.
  • the measurements could relate to the (e.g. could comprise the determined) position of a stylus tip (e.g. of a contact probe) during said relative movement.
  • the measurements comprise the encoder apparatus' output during said relative motion.
  • the method could comprise determining at least one property (e.g. the properties) of a periodic variation in the output of the encoder apparatus (e.g. in the output of the readhead) during said relative movement.
  • the encoder apparatus' output could comprise the output from a scale detector in the readhead, either processed or unprocessed.
  • the encoder apparatus' output could comprise the readhead's output.
  • the encoder apparatus' comprises the output from an interpolator associated with the readhead.
  • the encoder apparatus' output comprises a position measurement of the scale and readhead based on scale readings. The measurements can be obtained (e.g. recorded) against time.
  • the measurements could relate to a determined relative position and/or orientation of the relatively moveable parts of an apparatus (e.g. a measurement apparatus) in which the encoder apparatus is incorporated during said motion.
  • an apparatus e.g. a measurement apparatus
  • the encoder apparatus is incorporated during said motion.
  • the method can comprise generating the at least one error map such that it is different for different regions of the encoder apparatus' range so as to accommodate for differences in the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error throughout its range. Accordingly, the at least one error map can be different for different regions of the encoder apparatus' range.
  • the predetermined frequency can comprise the readhead signal period or the scale period, and optionally harmonics thereof.
  • a computer implemented method comprising receiving measurements of the surface of a feature obtained by an inspection device mounted on an apparatus (e.g. measurement apparatus) in which the encoder apparatus is incorporated, the measurements of the surface of a feature being derived from the encoder apparatus' output, and determining the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error from said measurements of the surface of a feature.
  • the inspection device could be a contact measurement probe or a non-contact measurement probe.
  • the method could be implemented via bespoke dedicated electronics (e.g. an FPGA) or for example could via software running on a generic processor.
  • bespoke dedicated electronics e.g. an FPGA
  • software running on a generic processor e.g. an FPGA
  • an error map for correcting for an encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error based on properties of a periodic variation in measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency can be generated by a computer receiving said measurements, analysing said measurements to determine any periodic variation therein at at least one predetermined frequency, and generating an error map based on (e.g. the form of, or at least one property, e.g. the properties, of) any such periodic variation.
  • At least one error function can be provided which describes the form of the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error (e.g. the form of the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error). Said description of the sub-divisional error can vary along the encoder apparatus' measurement range.
  • the function comprises at least one coefficient which itself is dependent on (e.g. is a function of) the relative position of the scale and readhead.
  • an apparatus comprising an encoder that is configured to measure the position of relatively moveable parts of the apparatus, and an inspection device, the apparatus configured to cause the inspection device to inspect a feature so as to obtain measurements of the surface of the feature, which comprises relatively moving said relatively moveable parts of the apparatus and to use the measurements of the surface of the feature obtained by the inspection device during said inspection of the feature to determine the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error.
  • Fig 1 illustrates a motorised articulated scanning (continuous) head 16 mounted on a coordinate measuring machine (CMM) 14.
  • CMM coordinate measuring machine
  • a workpiece 10 to be measured is placed on a table 12 of the CMM 14 and the motorised scanning head 16 is mounted on a quill 18 of the CMM 14.
  • the quill 18 is driveable in the directions X, Y, Z relative to the table by motors in a known manner.
  • the motorised scanning head 16 comprises a fixed part formed by a base or housing 20 supporting a movable part in the form of a shaft 22 rotatable by a motor M1 relative to the housing 20 about a first axis A1.
  • the shaft 22 is secured to a further housing 24 which in turn supports a shaft 26 rotatable by a motor M2 relative to the housing 24 about a second axis A2 perpendicular to the first axis A1.
  • a probe 28 with a stylus 29 having a workpiece contacting tip 30 is mounted onto the motorised scanning head 16.
  • the arrangement is such that the motors M1, M2 of the head can position the workpiece contacting tip 30 angularly about the axes A1 or A2 and the motors of the CMM 14 can position the motorised scanning head linearly anywhere within the three-dimensional coordinate framework of the CMM. Any combination of such motions can be controlled so as to bring the stylus tip 30 into a predetermined relationship with the surface being scanned.
  • Linear encoders also known as linear position transducers (not shown) are provided on the CMM for measuring linear displacement of the scanning head and angular/rotary encoders (also known as angular position transducers) E1 and E2 are provided in the scanning head for measuring angular displacement of the stylus about the respective axes A1 and A2.
  • the probe has a deflectable stylus 29 and transducers in the probe measure the amount of stylus deflection.
  • a touch-trigger probe which indicates that contact has occurred (rather than provide a measure of the extent of deflection) can be used.
  • a rigid probe could be used.
  • the articulated head could be operated to bias the rigid probe against the surface (e.g. in a constant torque mode) as it moves along the surface.
  • a non-contact probe may be used instead of or in addition to a contact probe.
  • the probe may be one dimensional (e.g. a non-contact probe which senses distance from surface), two dimensional (e.g. a contact probe sensing deflection in X and Y) or three dimensional (e.g. a contact probe sensing deflection in X, Y and Z).
  • the A1 axis of the scanning head 16 is nominally parallel to the CMM Z axis (which is along the quill 18).
  • the scanning head may rotate the probe continuously about this axis.
  • the A2 axis of the scanning head is orthogonal to its A1 axis.
  • any error in the determined angular position is amplified due to the offset distance.
  • the magnitude of any error in the determined position increases away from the source. Accordingly, it can be important to ensure that the output of the angular encoders E1 and E2 contain as little error as possible.
  • the encoder apparatus can comprise a disc 40 that has, around its periphery on the plane face of the disc, an incremental scale 42 that is made up of a series of alternately light reflecting and non-reflecting lines 44.
  • the lines 44 extend radially and are circumferentially spaced apart from each other.
  • the scale 42 is an amplitude scale, but as will be understood a phase scale structure could alternatively be provided.
  • a pair of readheads 50 are located adjacent the scale.
  • the readheads 50 are arranged to be rotatable relative to the incremental scale 42 about a central bearing 38.
  • the encoder apparatus is configured such that the scale 40 rotates with rotational movement of the axis of the articulated head, but as will be understood it could be configured to be the other way around such that the readhead(s) rotate with rotational movement of the axis of the articulated head.
  • only a single readhead 50 is needed, but having two or more readheads can be useful, e.g. for removing errors caused by any eccentricity in the rotational motion of the scale and/or readheads.
  • the readhead 50 includes a light source 52, an index grating 54, an incremental detector 56 and a reference mark detector 58.
  • light emitted from the light source 52 is reflected and diffracted by the incremental scale 42.
  • the reflected, diffracted light interacts with the index grating 54 which further diffracts the light, which interferes to form an interference fringe at the detector 56, which moves with relative movement of the disc 40 and readhead 50.
  • the detector 56 detects the interference fringe and provides output signals in response.
  • the readhead can produce what is commonly known as analogue quadrature signals (e.g. SIN and COS signals) which can be used to detect and report relative position and motion of the disc 40 and readhead 50.
  • the disc 40 can have one or more reference marks 48 which define one or more reference positions.
  • the reference mark 48 is placed adjacent to the incremental scale 42, and as schematically illustrated by Figure 4 is located within the readhead's 50 light source's 52 footprint.
  • the reference mark 48 is configured to reduce the amount of light reflected back toward the reference mark detector 58 in the readhead 50 (but could be configured differently, e.g. to increase the amount of light reflected back toward the reference mark detector and/or provide a change in the pattern of light reflected back toward the reference mark detector).
  • the encoder apparatus is configured to detect and report a change at the reference mark detector 58 to signal that the readhead 50 and scale 40 are at a reference position.
  • Such a type of encoder is well known and for example described in more detail in WO2015/049174 , the details of which are incorporated herein by this reference.
  • the invention is also applicable to other types of encoder, including other types of incremental optical encoder (including for example those that do not rely on the diffraction and interference of light), as well as non-optical encoders (e.g. magnetic, capacitance, inductive encoders), linear encoders, and absolute encoders too.
  • the signals reported by a readhead and/or its detector can be interpolated to produce position measurements which have a much higher resolution than the pitch (also known as "period") of the scale features.
  • the readhead's signal period has a higher frequency (shorter wavelength) than the scale period, in which case interpolation can still be used to produce position measurements which have a much higher resolution than signal period.
  • the interpolation might not be perfect, for example due to misalignment of the readhead and scale, resulting in systematic errors which repeat every scale pitch and/or signal period interval, e.g. as schematically illustrated in Figure 5 .
  • SDE sub-divisional errors
  • E ( A ) is the encoder error (e.g. in radians) as a function of axis position A (e.g. in radians)
  • a si and a ci are the amplitudes of the harmonic components
  • n is the maximum harmonic order.
  • the function describes the SDE.
  • An error map can then be created.
  • the error map can comprise the error function.
  • the function could for example be applied to calculate the error each time a position from the encoder apparatus is required.
  • the error map could take a different form, and for example could be derived from the function. For instance, a look-up table could be generated from the function. As will be understood, depending on the specific encoder being used, more or fewer orders could be used in order to adequately describe the SDE.
  • a first method of measuring the SDE of a rotary axis of the articulated head 16 described above comprises measuring a planar surface which is positioned with its surface normal perpendicular to the axis of rotation of which the SDE is to be measured (although as will be understood this need not necessarily be the case).
  • the surface normal of the plane can first be measured, then a linear scan can be performed on the plane from tip position T1 to position T2, with the head axis position changing from angle a1 at the start of the scan to angle a2 at the end of the scan.
  • Figure 6a shows an example movement for a rotary axis parallel to the CMM z-axis (i.e. axis A1).
  • Figure 6b illustrates a slight variation on this method, which avoids any linear movement of the CMM along the axis in which measurements are being obtained (e.g. in this case along the CMM's y-axis). This can help to ensure that any identified SDE is only due to the rotary encoder and not due to any SDE arising from the y-axis' linear encoder.
  • E A a s 1 sin NA + a c 1 cos NA + a s 2 sin 2 NA + a c 2 cos 2 NA
  • d A L sin P E A
  • P the angle between the probe and the plane surface normal (e.g. in radians)
  • L the probe length (from the rotary axis to the probe tip) (e.g. in mm).
  • d A L sin P a s 1 sin NA + a c 1 cos NA + a s 2 sin 2 NA + a c 2 cos 2 NA
  • a high-resolution linear scan along the plane produces a set of axis angles A and distance measurements d .
  • a best fit e.g. a linear best fit
  • the measurement data can be analysed in different ways to determine the coefficients, e.g. by performing a Fourier analysis (e.g. a Fast-Fourier Transform) on the data set to determine the values of the coefficients at the predetermined frequencies.
  • a Fourier analysis e.g. a Fast-Fourier Transform
  • the SDE can be reliably extracted because it has a very specific spatial frequency (as determined by the encoder scale pitch), and it is unlikely that any other effects would contribute systematically at this frequency.
  • distance measurements d can be converted to encoder angles before performing the best fit.
  • a disadvantage with using a plane artefact is that only a restricted range of the rotary encoder can be measured in a single scan.
  • a spherical artefact can be used.
  • a scan can be performed around the sphere, (e.g. along the equator line of the sphere) while always keeping the probe perpendicular to the surface normal at the point of contact between the probe and the sphere, as shown in Figure 8 .
  • any SDE can be affected by the alignment of readheads relative to the scale, the SDE might not be the same throughout the full range of the axis since the alignment of the readheads may vary with axis position.
  • the harmonic coefficients a s 1 , a c 1 , a s 2 and a c 2 can become functions of axis position.
  • the data can be split into small sections based on axis position, and these can be analysed separately to produce a set of harmonic coefficients valid only for the position range. For example, the data captured between axis positions 0 and 5 degrees is analysed to give a set of coefficients, then the data between 5 and 10 degrees is analysed to give another set of coefficients, and so on. The variation of the coefficients can then be plotted as functions of axis position, an example of which is shown in Figure 11 .
  • the variation of the coefficients can also be parameterised using harmonic functions.
  • error map can be stored wherever is appropriate, e.g. in memory associated with the apparatus.
  • the above error map comprises a harmonic series function, this need not necessarily be the case.
  • the SDE could be represented by a polynomial function.
  • the error map could comprise a polynomial function.
  • the error map could comprise a look-up table instead of a function which describes the SDE.
  • the look-up table can have a density matching the required resolution (e.g. a single data entry could exist for every possible interpolated position), or could have a sparser density in which case interpolation between entries in the table could be required.
  • a look up table could be implemented and used.
  • one look-up table could be provided which maps the correction entire measurement range of the encoder apparatus.
  • one look-up table is provided which has a basic form and modifiers are provided which are dependent on relative position of the scale and readhead.
  • a plurality of look-up tables are provided which are specific to different axis ranges.
  • a plurality of look-up tables are provided for given axis positions, and the SDE error for positions between those given axis positions can be interpolated therefrom.
  • the invention can also be used to determine the SDE of a linear encoder apparatus.
  • the probe tip could be driven into an artefact by virtue of movement of one of the linear axes of the CMM (e.g. along the Y-axis) so as to cause the probe's stylus to deflect.
  • a series of measurements relating to the position of the probe tip during such deflection can be collected.
  • the determined position of the stylus' tip should be constant, and so any variation in the measurements at the predetermined spatial frequency at which SDE is expected to occur (i.e. at the scale/signal period and harmonics thereof) can be attributed to the linear encoder's SDE.
  • n 2 (for example).
  • the above describes a method of determining an encoder apparatus' SDE by analysing the measurements obtained during the inspection of an artefact, and using measurements that are not necessarily the direct output of the encoder apparatus. Accordingly, rather than analysing the direct output of an encoder apparatus to establish the SDE, the above describes a method by which the SDE is derived from measurements which themselves were derived in part using the output of the encoder apparatus. In other words, the above could be described as a technique for indirectly obtaining an encoder apparatus' SDE.
  • the SDE can be obtained by analysing the variation in the measurements obtained by an apparatus at predetermined frequencies in order to establish the SDE.
  • it describes a technique for determining properties (namely the phase offset and amplitude) of the variation in the measurements at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the above description provides numerous methods for determining the encoder apparatus' sub-divisional error by analysing only the measurements obtained by the apparatus within which the encoder apparatus is provided (i.e. and without the use of measurements obtained by external/secondary measurement/calibration equipment such as an interferometer). Accordingly, the methods rely on analysing only measurements obtained by and/or determined from the apparatus' encoders.
  • the above also provides a description of a novel way of extracting an encoder apparatus' SDE by looking at variations in measurements obtained at at least one predetermined spatial frequency.
  • the above also provides a description of a novel way of representing an encoder apparatus' SDE, e.g. by way of a function, and for example by way of a function which accommodates for changes in the encoder's SDE along the measurement range.
  • data required for determining the SDE can be obtained through the use of traditional techniques, such as via the use of external calibration equipment, as well as via the novel methods taught above.
  • the SDE can be determined in a known way by comparing the outputs of the encoder apparatus with the outputs of a calibrated interferometer, and then an error function for describing the SDE can be determined in line with the above described techniques.
  • the coordinate positioning machine is a serial CMM (i.e. in which the three linear degrees of freedom is provided by three independent, orthogonal axes of motion).
  • the invention can also be used to control the movement of other types of coordinate positioning machines, such as parallel CMMs, robot arms or the like.
  • the invention can also be used with not just dedicated CMMs, but also with other types of coordinate positioning machines such as machine tools.
  • the invention is also suitable for use with Cartesian and non-Cartesian positioning machines, such as polar and spherical coordinate positioning machines.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Transmission And Conversion Of Sensor Element Output (AREA)

Claims (15)

  1. Verfahren zum Bestimmen des Unterteilungsfehlers einer Kodiervorrichtung (E1), die konfiguriert ist, um die Position von relativ beweglichen Teilen (20, 22) einer Vorrichtung (16) zu messen, an der eine Prüfeinrichtung (28) montiert ist, wobei das Verfahren umfasst:
    Bewirken, dass die Prüfeinrichtung ein Merkmal, das eine Referenz bereitstellt, prüft, um Messwerte der Oberfläche des Merkmals zu beschaffen, was das relative Bewegen der relativ beweglichen Teile der Vorrichtung umfasst; und
    Verwenden der Messwerte der Oberfläche des Merkmals, die von der Prüfeinrichtung während der Prüfung des Merkmals beschafft wurden, um den Unterteilungsfehler der Kodiervorrichtung zu bestimmen.
  2. Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, ferner umfassend das Bestimmen mindestens einer Fehlerkarte zum Korrigieren des Unterteilungsfehlers der Kodiervorrichtung.
  3. Verfahren nach irgendeinem Anspruch 2, wobei die mindestens eine Fehlerkarte eine Nachschlagetabelle oder -funktion umfasst.
  4. Verfahren nach Anspruch 2 oder 3, wobei die Fehlerkarte die Form des Unterteilungsfehlers beschreibt, und wobei die Beschreibung entlang des Messbereichs der Kodiervorrichtung variiert.
  5. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, umfassend das Bestimmen des Unterteilungsfehlers der Kodiervorrichtung basierend auf den Eigenschaften einer periodischen Veränderung in den Messwerten bei mindestens einer vorbestimmten Ortsfrequenz.
  6. Verfahren nach Anspruch 5, wobei die Eigenschaften den Amplituden- und Phasenversatz der Veränderungen bei der mindestens einen vorbestimmten Ortsfrequenz umfassen.
  7. Verfahren nach den Ansprüchen 5 und 6, wobei die mindestens eine vorbestimmte Ortsfrequenz der Skale (42) oder Signalperiode der Kodiervorrichtung und gegebenenfalls Oberwellen davon entspricht.
  8. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, umfassend das Bestimmen des Unterteilungsfehlers für verschiedene Bereiche des Messbereichs der Kodiervorrichtung.
  9. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Vorrichtung mindestens eine Drehachse (A1) umfasst, um die die Prüfrichtung ausgerichtet sein kann, und die Kodiervorrichtung (E1) eine Drehkodiervorrichtung zum Messen der Ausrichtung der Prüfeinrichtung (28) um die Drehachse ist.
  10. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Prüfeinrichtung (28) einen Tastkopf umfasst.
  11. Verfahren nach Anspruch 10, wobei der Tastkopf einen Taststift (29) mit einer Tastspitze (30) umfasst, und wobei die Messwerte Messwerte der Position der Tastspitze betreffen.
  12. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Vorrichtung, an der die Prüfeinrichtung montiert ist, eine Koordinatenpositioniermaschine (14) umfasst.
  13. Verfahren nach einem der vorhergehenden Ansprüche, wobei die Kodiervorrichtung (E1) eine Skale (42) und einen Lesekopf (50) zum Lesen der Skale umfasst.
  14. Computerimplementiertes Verfahren, umfassend das Empfangen von Messwerten der Oberfläche eines Merkmals, das eine Referenz bereitstellt, die durch eine Prüfeinrichtung (28), die an einer Vorrichtung (16) montiert ist, in die eine Kodiervorrichtung (E1) eingearbeitet ist, beschafft werden, wobei die Messwerte der Oberfläche des Merkmals aus der Ausgabe der Kodiervorrichtung abgeleitet werden, und der Unterteilungsfehler der Kodiervorrichtung aus den Messwerten der Oberfläche des Merkmals bestimmt wird.
  15. Vorrichtung (16), umfassend einen Kodierer (E1), der konfiguriert ist, um die Position von relativ beweglichen Teilen (20, 22) der Vorrichtung zu messen, und eine Prüfeinrichtung (28), wobei die Vorrichtung konfiguriert ist, um zu bewirken, dass die Prüfeinrichtung ein Merkmal, das eine Referenz bereitstellt, prüft, um Messwerte der Oberfläche des Merkmals zu beschaffen, was das relative Bewegen der relativ beweglichen Teile der Vorrichtung umfasst, und um die Messwerte der Oberfläche des Merkmals, die von der Prüfeinrichtung während der Prüfung des Merkmals beschafft wurden, zu verwenden, um den Unterteilungsfehler der Kodiervorrichtung zu bestimmen.
EP16722346.0A 2015-04-29 2016-04-28 Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung vom interpolationsfehler Active EP3289314B1 (de)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
EP15275124 2015-04-29
PCT/GB2016/051197 WO2016174433A1 (en) 2015-04-29 2016-04-28 Method of determining sub-divisional error

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3289314A1 EP3289314A1 (de) 2018-03-07
EP3289314B1 true EP3289314B1 (de) 2019-06-05

Family

ID=53180667

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP16722346.0A Active EP3289314B1 (de) 2015-04-29 2016-04-28 Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung vom interpolationsfehler

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US10627259B2 (de)
EP (1) EP3289314B1 (de)
JP (1) JP7042620B2 (de)
CN (1) CN107532930B (de)
WO (1) WO2016174433A1 (de)

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3129750B1 (de) * 2014-04-08 2023-05-31 Nikon Metrology NV Messsondeneinheit für metrologieanwendungen
JP6993800B2 (ja) * 2017-07-07 2022-01-14 株式会社ミツトヨ 門型移動装置および三次元測定機
DE102017222508B4 (de) 2017-12-12 2022-02-17 Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Korrektur von Messsystemabweichungen
CN108303130B (zh) * 2018-02-05 2020-09-04 中国计量大学 基于激光干涉原理的光栅莫尔信号细分误差标定方法
DE102018217934A1 (de) * 2018-10-19 2020-04-23 Dr. Johannes Heidenhain Gesellschaft Mit Beschränkter Haftung Positionsmesseinrichtung und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Positionsmesseinrichtung
US10732268B1 (en) * 2019-05-21 2020-08-04 Pony Ai Inc. Systems and methods for enclosure alignment
CN113686365B (zh) * 2021-09-02 2022-06-17 北京精雕科技集团有限公司 绝对式位置测量装置
CN113770810A (zh) * 2021-09-24 2021-12-10 成都飞机工业（集团）有限责任公司 一种用于在机测量的测针调姿辅助装置及其使用方法

Family Cites Families (24)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2729697A1 (de) * 1977-07-01 1979-01-04 Heidenhain Gmbh Dr Johannes Verfahren zur interpolation
DE3036830A1 (de) * 1980-09-30 1982-04-15 Dr. Johannes Heidenhain Gmbh, 8225 Traunreut Laengen- oder winkelmesseinrichtung
US6188341B1 (en) * 1996-11-11 2001-02-13 Fanuc Ltd. Encoder interpolation circuit which corrects an interpolation angle between a received sine-wave encoder signal and a cosine-wave encoder signal
KR20060015557A (ko) 2003-04-28 2006-02-17 스티븐 제임스 크램톤 외골격을 구비한 ｃｍｍ 암
JP2005003672A (ja) * 2003-05-19 2005-01-06 Yaskawa Electric Corp エンコーダ位置誤差解析装置
GB0508395D0 (en) 2005-04-26 2005-06-01 Renishaw Plc Method for scanning the surface of a workpiece
DE102005036719A1 (de) * 2005-07-28 2007-02-01 Carl Zeiss Industrielle Messtechnik Gmbh Verfahren zum Korrigieren von Interpolationsfehlern einer Maschine, insbesondere eines Koordinatenmessgerätes
ATE523761T1 (de) 2006-04-21 2011-09-15 Renishaw Plc Verfahren zur fehlerkorrektur
GB0712008D0 (en) 2007-06-21 2007-08-01 Renishaw Plc Apparatus and method of calibration
JP5111031B2 (ja) * 2007-09-14 2012-12-26 キヤノン株式会社 変位検出方法及びモータ制御装置
CN101551260A (zh) * 2009-05-20 2009-10-07 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 光电轴角编码器细分误差的检测装置
GB0909724D0 (en) 2009-06-05 2009-07-22 Renishaw Plc Position measurement encoder and method of operation
GB201013938D0 (en) 2010-08-20 2010-10-06 Renishaw Plc Method for recalibrating coordinate positioning apparatus
EP2505959A1 (de) 2011-03-28 2012-10-03 Renishaw plc Koordinatenpositionierungsmaschinensteuerung
CN102270961B (zh) 2011-07-20 2013-06-05 深圳市海浦蒙特科技有限公司 正余弦编码器的信号细分方法及细分装置、电机控制装置
CN103842766B (zh) * 2011-10-06 2017-05-24 瑞尼斯豪公司 测量方法
JP6071196B2 (ja) * 2011-12-27 2017-02-01 キヤノン株式会社 エンコーダ
JP5995589B2 (ja) * 2012-07-30 2016-09-21 キヤノン株式会社 補正値導出装置、変位量導出装置、制御装置、および補正値導出方法
CN102944258A (zh) * 2012-11-26 2013-02-27 中国科学院长春光学精密机械与物理研究所 高精度编码器光电信号细分误差的检测方法
CN104165586B (zh) * 2013-05-17 2016-12-28 上海三菱电梯有限公司 单台机器人工件坐标系的非接触式高精度标定方法及应用
GB201316329D0 (en) * 2013-09-13 2013-10-30 Renishaw Plc A Method of Using a scanning probe
CN104457608A (zh) * 2013-09-16 2015-03-25 上海航天精密机械研究所 圆柱体尺寸误差检测系统
JP7032045B2 (ja) 2013-10-01 2022-03-08 レニショウ パブリック リミテッド カンパニー 測定エンコーダ
CN104493808B (zh) * 2014-11-26 2017-01-04 上海大学 运动部件空间位姿精度和轨迹拉线式测量系统和方法

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
None *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN107532930A (zh) 2018-01-02
JP7042620B2 (ja) 2022-03-28
WO2016174433A1 (en) 2016-11-03
JP2018514773A (ja) 2018-06-07
US20180058884A1 (en) 2018-03-01
EP3289314A1 (de) 2018-03-07
CN107532930B (zh) 2021-07-30
US10627259B2 (en) 2020-04-21

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3289314B1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zur bestimmung vom interpolationsfehler
TWI495846B (zh) 用於量測一零件之方法及裝置
JP2960013B2 (ja) 移動物体の検出用目盛及びこれを用いた移動物体の検出装置
US9341500B2 (en) Calibration method and angle measuring method for an angle measuring device, and angle measuring device
EP2816322B1 (de) Drehwinkelmessvorrichtung und drehwinkelmessverfahren
US7797981B2 (en) Position measuring device
EP2542853B1 (de) Oberflächenmessinstrument und seine kalibrierung
JP6143885B2 (ja) ロータリエンコーダを自己較正するための方法
US10578414B2 (en) Inner-wall measuring instrument and offset-amount calculation method
JP4690276B2 (ja) 真円度測定装置の較正方法
CN113340403B (zh) 基于圆周条纹和线阵相机的转轴径向振动测量方法
JP5902891B2 (ja) エンコーダ及び校正方法
JP5858673B2 (ja) 位置計測装置、光学部品の製造方法、及び型の製造方法
JP2010169635A (ja) 形状測定装置
Baršić et al. 18RPT01 Probe Trace Traceability for contact probe and stylus instrument measurements
Sładek et al. Analysis of the Accuracy of Coordinate Measuring Systems
JP6953772B2 (ja) 誤差検出方法、誤差検出プログラム、誤差検出装置、エンコーダ装置の製造方法、エンコーダ装置、駆動装置、ステージ装置、及びロボット装置
TW201723434A (zh) 一種高精度編碼器精度校正之方法
JP2022186534A (ja) プローブユニットの補正方法

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE INTERNATIONAL PUBLICATION HAS BEEN MADE

PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20171116

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAV Request for validation of the european patent (deleted)
DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190109

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1140478

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190615

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602016014830

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20190605

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190905

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190905

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190906

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 1140478

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191007

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191005

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602016014830

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200306

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200430

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200428

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20200430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200428

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190605

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230602

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230421

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230427

Year of fee payment: 8

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20230502

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230418

Year of fee payment: 8