EP3042369A1 - Procédé et dispositif de détection et de commande servant à la détermination de la plausibilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens d'un véhicule automobile - Google Patents

Procédé et dispositif de détection et de commande servant à la détermination de la plausibilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens d'un véhicule automobile

Info

Publication number
EP3042369A1
EP3042369A1 EP14758378.5A EP14758378A EP3042369A1 EP 3042369 A1 EP3042369 A1 EP 3042369A1 EP 14758378 A EP14758378 A EP 14758378A EP 3042369 A1 EP3042369 A1 EP 3042369A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
motor vehicle
wrong
directional
plausibility
roadway
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Ceased
Application number
EP14758378.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Inventor
Simon GEISLER
Christian Braeuchle
Christian Jeschke
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Robert Bosch GmbH
Original Assignee
Robert Bosch GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Robert Bosch GmbH filed Critical Robert Bosch GmbH
Publication of EP3042369A1 publication Critical patent/EP3042369A1/fr
Ceased legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/01Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled
    • G08G1/056Detecting movement of traffic to be counted or controlled with provision for distinguishing direction of travel
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/50Context or environment of the image
    • G06V20/56Context or environment of the image exterior to a vehicle by using sensors mounted on the vehicle
    • G06V20/58Recognition of moving objects or obstacles, e.g. vehicles or pedestrians; Recognition of traffic objects, e.g. traffic signs, traffic lights or roads
    • G06V20/582Recognition of moving objects or obstacles, e.g. vehicles or pedestrians; Recognition of traffic objects, e.g. traffic signs, traffic lights or roads of traffic signs
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/50Context or environment of the image
    • G06V20/56Context or environment of the image exterior to a vehicle by using sensors mounted on the vehicle
    • G06V20/588Recognition of the road, e.g. of lane markings; Recognition of the vehicle driving pattern in relation to the road
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/09Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions
    • G08G1/0962Arrangements for giving variable traffic instructions having an indicator mounted inside the vehicle, e.g. giving voice messages
    • G08G1/09623Systems involving the acquisition of information from passive traffic signs by means mounted on the vehicle
    • GPHYSICS
    • G08SIGNALLING
    • G08GTRAFFIC CONTROL SYSTEMS
    • G08G1/00Traffic control systems for road vehicles
    • G08G1/16Anti-collision systems
    • G08G1/166Anti-collision systems for active traffic, e.g. moving vehicles, pedestrians, bikes

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method and a control and
  • False drivers also known as ghost drivers, cause death, injuries and substantial property damage in the event of an accident. Under a wrong-way driving is here understood contrary to the prescribed direction of travel on a directional roadway.
  • a directional roadway is one of
  • Directional lanes can be found on motorways or expressways, such as federal highways. Wrong trips can be subdivided into forward and reverse, whereby the forward drives are initiated by an incorrect ascent or by turning.
  • German motorways Especially when driving wrong on motorways it comes in accidents due to the high speeds and thus the high collision speeds often cause fatal accidents.
  • the detection of wrong trips on navigation devices is not always reliable, as the information of the navigation device, such as
  • Modern motor vehicles use inertial sensors, such as acceleration and yaw rate sensors, as well as the steering angle for determining the
  • the method according to the invention for plausibilizing a wrong-way drive of a motor vehicle when driving onto a directional roadway basically comprises the following steps:
  • the method according to the invention very advantageously enables the detection of an action chain, which is a plausibility check, ie check or preliminary check, as a preparation or component of a detection or recognition of a
  • the method according to the invention can also already be regarded and used as the detection of a wrong-way drive. Safety is improved by capturing environmental data, which increases the reliability and robustness of the process. This allows the invention
  • the present method specifically looks at the wrong-way behavior of a motor vehicle or a motorist at a driveway or in a connection point, since there are most wrong-way driving. So can Advantageously, the wrong-way drive is already checked for plausibility and / or detected according to the invention prior to driving into the actual road.
  • Wrong-way plausibility or probability This may include a comparison of the collected information with plausibility values and a subsequent assessment. From the individual ratings, the probability can then be determined or calculated. Each individual acquisition can be considered as a plausibility criterion, which is then used to determine the probability.
  • the individual steps of the method can run completely in the motor vehicle, in an external unit, such as a central server, or in parallel and distributed on both systems.
  • the execution of the steps is not bound to the named order.
  • the direction information comprises direction-dependent lane markings and / or direction-dependent traffic signs.
  • Each piece of information alone or in combination, can serve as the basis for this capture.
  • several of these information or plausibility criteria are detected. This increases the robustness and security of the process, as it can draw on a broader basis.
  • the plausibility criteria can be independent of each other, in a sense, in parallel, or in their possible or probable course, as in a
  • This criterion can be detected by means of sensors, such as a video sensor, or a navigation device or module. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, it is provided that the detection is based on information from video, navigation data and / or data of an inertial sensor system of the motor vehicle, or that at least one sensor of the motor vehicle is used for the detection. Since most motor vehicles have now installed different sensors, these or their signals can be easily used for the process. The signals may be used directly or indirectly, such as processed or as a basis for derived quantities or values.
  • sensors for example, image sensors, including cameras or video cameras, radar sensors, acceleration sensors, wheel sensors, steering angle sensors, GPS devices, but also navigation devices or these and other data processing computer or control units can be used.
  • image sensors including cameras or video cameras, radar sensors, acceleration sensors, wheel sensors, steering angle sensors, GPS devices, but also navigation devices or these and other data processing computer or control units can be used.
  • two sensor types such as a navigation module and a video sensor, as the two types complement each other. This increases the safety and robustness of the process.
  • the determination, determination and / or the plausibility check can be carried out in a device external to the motor vehicle.
  • an external device such as a server, for example, the vehicle manufacturer can be used. It can also be provided to run the method only in the external device, for example, if the motor vehicle does not have the required sensors, the map material or a part thereof.
  • the communication between the external device and the server can be established via a mobile radio channel.
  • an initiation and / or an execution of a turning maneuver can be detected.
  • the journey on the directional lane may be a first plausibility criterion
  • the initiation may be a second plausibility criterion
  • the actual implementation may be another plausibility criterion.
  • Plausibil a wrong ride of a motor vehicle in a driveway provided on a directional lane, comprising means for detecting a passage of a stop line or a stop line of a junction of the
  • the means for detecting may comprise at least one optical sensor, preferably a video sensor, a navigation system and / or an inertial sensor. These components are easy to integrate and allow fast and secure capture.
  • the means for determining may include a controller or a controller or a suitable computing unit.
  • the steps of detection or the plausibility criteria include the group: detecting a crossing of a stop line or a stop line of a junction of the directional lane; Detecting at least one direction information of a roadway of the connection point located in front of the motor vehicle; Capture at least one directional
  • Figure 1 is a schematic representation of a connection point of a
  • FIG. 2 shows a schematic representation of a drive of a motor vehicle into the connection point
  • FIG. 3 a schematic representation of a further travel of the motor vehicle in the connection point
  • Figure 4 is a schematic representation of a still further drive of
  • Figure 5 is a schematic representation of a turning of the motor vehicle from the junction to the directional lane
  • Figure 6 is a schematic representation of a turning maneuver a
  • Figure 7 is a schematic representation of a motor vehicle with a control and detection device
  • FIG. 8 shows, in the form of a flow chart, a method for checking the plausibility of a wrong-way drive of a motor vehicle.
  • Figure 1 shows a road or highway 1 with two structurally separate directional lanes 2 and a junction 3. Die
  • Starting point 3 has a ramp 6 and a departure ramp 5. Starting from a common lane 6 serves the ramp 4 or driveway for driving on the directional lane 2 of the highway 1, while the departure ramp
  • a wrong-moving vehicle or wrong-way driver 7 is shown in a first position 8 during the driveway on or the entrance to the junction 3, this situation will be explained later with reference to FIG 2.
  • vehicle or "motor vehicle” is used herein to mean all powered vehicles, such as passenger cars, for example.
  • FIG. 2 shows the entrance of a motor vehicle 7 from an access road 13 into the connection point 3.
  • the motor vehicle 7 does not bend correctly into the lane of the ramp 4, but mistakenly in the lane of the departure ramp 5.
  • the wrong-moving vehicle 7 crosses either a stop line 14 or a stop line 15.
  • the stop line 14 forms the transition for correctly moving vehicles on the ramp 5 to the
  • the barrier line 15 separates in the area of the common carriageway
  • FIG. 3 shows the wrong-moving vehicle 7 on the way ahead
  • Down ramp 5 In the direction of travel in front of the vehicle 7 are road markings or lane markings 18, shown here in the form of directional arrows.
  • the directional arrow 18 located directly in front of the motor vehicle 7 points counter to a direction of travel of the motor vehicle 7, while the directional arrow 18 arranged on the access ramp 4 points in the direction of the direction of travel of the motor vehicle 7.
  • a detection area 19 of a sensor system, for example a video camera, of the motor vehicle 7 is shown.
  • the detection depth, that is, the length of the detection area 19, and / or the detection width, that is, the angle or the detection cone of the detection area 19, need not be drawn to scale.
  • Figure 4 shows the motor vehicle 7 in the further course of the journey on the departure ramp 5.
  • the motor vehicle 7 is just about to leave the common lane 6 of the connection point 3.
  • the directional panels 20 can be right-pointing directional panels in the sense of the Highway Code, Shield 625-20.
  • the directional panels 20 serve to guide the correctly moving traffic on the departure ramp 5.
  • the directional panels 20 contain directional information oriented counter to the direction of travel or direction of movement of the wrong-traveling vehicle 7.
  • This change can also be referred to as a turn.
  • the motor vehicle 7 is now opposite to the direction of travel on the directional lane 2, which corresponds to a wrong drive.
  • the ride on the ramp 5 can already be regarded as a wrong course.
  • FIG. 6 shows, by way of example, an unauthorized turning maneuver of a motor vehicle
  • the motor vehicle 7 shown on the directional lane 2.
  • the motor vehicle 7 first drives correctly on a right lane 2a of the directional lane 2 and then changes over to the middle lane 2b, which is still a correct one
  • Driving style corresponds.
  • the further turning in the left lane 2c then represents a prohibited wrong drive. From a vehicle orientation of 90 degrees in
  • a motor vehicle 7 is shown schematically, which corresponds for example to the wrong-way driver 7 from the previous figures.
  • the motor vehicle 7 comprises a control and detection device with at least one sensor 21, which is shown here by way of example for a plurality of sensors.
  • the sensor 21 may be, for example, an image sensor such as a video camera, a radar sensor, an acceleration sensor, a wheel sensor, a steering angle sensor, a GPS device, or the like.
  • the motor vehicle 7 or the control and detection device further comprises a navigation device 22 and means for determining a probability of wrong travel such as a controller or a control device 23.
  • the controller 23 communicates with the sensor 21 and
  • Navigation device 22 in communication, this can be wired or wireless.
  • the controller is connected to a memory 24, for example, for storing data, such as comparison or
  • the controller is connected to a communication interface 25 which is adapted to communicate with an external device 26, such as a central server.
  • the sensor 21, the navigation device 22, the controller 23, the memory 24 and the communication interface 25 can - as shown here - as
  • each component is designed as hardware, as can individual
  • the motor vehicle 7 and the control and detection device information By means of the communication interface 25, the motor vehicle 7 and the control and detection device information, such as map data, and / or
  • a first step 100 of the method this is activated. This can be done, for example, in response to one or more sensors of the motor vehicle 7 and / or external sensors.
  • a step 1 10 the crossing of a stop line 14 or a blocking line 15 of the connection point 3 of the directional lane 2 is detected by the motor vehicle 7. This capture may be on video and / or
  • the crossing of the stop line 14 or the stop line 15 can be detected either directly via a camera recording of these lines or indirectly via a passage past one or more prohibition signs 16 and / or the directional sign 17.
  • Road markings 18 is another plausibility check step. As described, this step can be based on video data and can additionally be supported or further made plausible by navigation data.
  • the situation of the detection step 120 is shown in FIG.
  • at least one direction-dependent traffic sign 20 is detected by the video sensor system 21 of the motor vehicle 7, which is shown in FIG. This detection or detection serves the other
  • a further plausibility check step 140 the turn from the roadway 5 of the connection point 3 to the directional lane 2 is detected. This turning or driveway of the motor vehicle 7 is shown in FIG. Using the video sensor 21, an inertial sensor and / or the
  • step 150 it is detected whether an initiation and / or an execution of a turning maneuver are detected while driving on the directional lane 2. This situation is shown in FIG.
  • step 150 itself may be three individual ones
  • Plausibilmaschinee include, of which the first is the determination of a ride on a directional lane 2, such as a highway. This is possible via the video sensors 21 and / or a navigation system 22.
  • the initiation of a turning maneuver can be determined via the inertial sensor system of the motor vehicle 7.
  • the initiation of a turning maneuver can be determined via the inertial sensor system of the motor vehicle 7.
  • Implementation of the turning maneuver can be determined. Based on the last two steps, initiation and / or execution of a turning maneuver can also be detected on other roads or lanes such as the junction 3.
  • a probability of a wrong travel is determined based on at least one of the detection steps 1 10, 120, 130, 140 or 150.
  • the possibly to be performed processing or billing of sensor data can either in the motor vehicle 7, for example in the controller 23 , or take place in an external device 26.
  • the method for checking the plausibility of a wrong-way trip can be considered such that for each detection or plausibility step 1 10, 120, 130, 140 and 150 a different plausibility criterion is looked at.
  • a measurement or sensor value is first detected.
  • this may be a camera image containing the stop line 14 or already processed or preprocessed sensor data, such as the dimensions and / or orientation of a line on a roadway.
  • this measured value is compared with a predetermined plausibility value, which may be stored, for example, in the memory 24 of the motor vehicle 7 or in the external device 26.
  • a predetermined plausibility value which may be stored, for example, in the memory 24 of the motor vehicle 7 or in the external device 26. In the case of a stop line 14 this can
  • Plausibility value for example, the dimensions and / or the spatial arrangement of a stop line include.
  • each plausibility criterion can now be evaluated. This can be done purely digitally, which means that when a fulfillment or violation of a plausibility or plausibility criterion takes on the value 1, while otherwise having the value 0. Alternatively, it can be provided to make this evaluation percentage, for example, depending on the reliability and / or the validity of the
  • each plausibility criterion or each detection step 1 10 to 150 may be assigned a percentage or a probability.
  • each step 1 may be 10 to 150
  • Such an action chain may include detecting a passage of a stop line, then detecting
  • the first step could be weighted at 10%, the second step at 20% and the third step at 30%.
  • n is determined as the probability of a wrong trip. This can be, for example This can be done by adding the percentages for all fulfilled plausibility criteria, which then directly determines the probability of a
  • a wrong travel can now be determined or detected based on the probability.
  • the determined probability can be compared with a predetermined, also adaptable, limit value.
  • this limit can be 60%, so that from or with a probability of 60%, a wrong drive is detected.
  • reactions to the detection can take place. This can be passive actions, like
  • Warnings or warnings to the driver of the motor vehicle 7, and also active actions, such as an intervention in the movement and / or steering of the motor vehicle 7 include.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Traffic Control Systems (AREA)
  • Navigation (AREA)

Abstract

L'invention concerne un procédé pour déterminer la plausibilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens d'un véhicule automobile (7) en cas d'entrée sur une file directionnelle (2). Un dépassement d'une ligne de stop ou d'une ligne d'interdiction d'un accès d'autoroute (3) de la file directionnelle (2) est détecté et/ou au moins une information de direction d'une voie de circulation (5) de l'accès d'autoroute (3) se trouvant devant le véhicule automobile (7) est détectée et une probabilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens est déterminée sur la base de la détection. L'invention concerne en outre un dispositif de détection et de commande servant à la détermination de la plausibilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens d'un véhicule automobile (7) en cas d'entrée sur une file directionnelle (2). Ledit dispositif comporte : des moyens pour la détection d'un dépassement d'une ligne de stop (14) ou d'une ligne d'interdiction (15) d'un accès d'autoroute (3) de la file directionnelle (2) ; et/ou des moyens pour la détection d'au moins une information de direction (18, 20) d'une voie de circulation (5) de l'accès d'autoroute (3) se trouvant devant le véhicule automobile ; et des moyens pour la détermination d'une probabilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens sur la base de la détection.
EP14758378.5A 2013-09-06 2014-09-01 Procédé et dispositif de détection et de commande servant à la détermination de la plausibilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens d'un véhicule automobile Ceased EP3042369A1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (4)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102013217833 2013-09-06
DE102013223397 2013-11-15
DE102014208617.5A DE102014208617A1 (de) 2013-09-06 2014-05-08 Verfahren und Steuer- und Erfassungseinrichtung zum Plausibilisieren einer Falschfahrt eines Kraftfahrzeugs
PCT/EP2014/068460 WO2015032704A1 (fr) 2013-09-06 2014-09-01 Procédé et dispositif de détection et de commande servant à la détermination de la plausibilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens d'un véhicule automobile

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP3042369A1 true EP3042369A1 (fr) 2016-07-13

Family

ID=52478732

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP14758378.5A Ceased EP3042369A1 (fr) 2013-09-06 2014-09-01 Procédé et dispositif de détection et de commande servant à la détermination de la plausibilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens d'un véhicule automobile

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US9786166B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP3042369A1 (fr)
JP (1) JP6664325B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN105518759A (fr)
DE (1) DE102014208617A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2015032704A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (25)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102014210411A1 (de) * 2013-09-06 2015-03-12 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Steuer- und Erfassungseinrichtung zum Plausibilisieren einer Falschfahrt eines Kraftfahrzeugs
JP6462493B2 (ja) * 2015-05-29 2019-01-30 株式会社デンソー 進入判定装置、進入判定方法
DE102015213521A1 (de) * 2015-07-17 2017-01-19 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Warnen vor einem falsch fahrenden Fahrzeug
JP2018529302A (ja) 2015-08-11 2018-10-04 ジェネシス ロボティクス エルエルピー 電気機械
US11139707B2 (en) 2015-08-11 2021-10-05 Genesis Robotics And Motion Technologies Canada, Ulc Axial gap electric machine with permanent magnets arranged between posts
DE102015218004A1 (de) * 2015-09-18 2017-03-23 Conti Temic Microelectronic Gmbh Fahrerassistenzvorrichtung und Verfahren zur frühzeitigen Vermeidung von Falschfahrten
JP6451584B2 (ja) * 2015-10-09 2019-01-16 株式会社デンソー 情報処理装置
DE102016210017A1 (de) * 2016-06-07 2017-12-07 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren Vorrichtung und System zur Falschfahrererkennung
DE102016211095A1 (de) 2016-06-22 2017-12-28 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Überwachen einer Fahrbahn
US9911334B2 (en) * 2016-07-12 2018-03-06 Siemens Industry, Inc. Connected vehicle traffic safety system and a method of warning drivers of a wrong-way travel
US11043885B2 (en) 2016-07-15 2021-06-22 Genesis Robotics And Motion Technologies Canada, Ulc Rotary actuator
DE102016214471A1 (de) * 2016-08-04 2018-02-08 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren, Vorrichtung und System zum Warnen vor einer Falschfahrtsituation für ein Fahrzeug
DE102016220947A1 (de) * 2016-10-25 2018-06-28 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Fahrerassistenzsystem
US10481609B2 (en) * 2016-12-09 2019-11-19 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Parking-lot-navigation system and method
DE102016015514A1 (de) * 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 Lucas Automotive Gmbh Fahrassistenz für ein Kraftfahrzeug
KR20180084556A (ko) * 2017-01-17 2018-07-25 팅크웨어(주) 카메라의 촬영 영상을 이용한 운전 안내 제공 방법, 운전 안내 제공 장치, 전자 장치, 컴퓨터 프로그램 및 컴퓨터 판독 가능한 기록 매체
DE102017201924A1 (de) * 2017-02-08 2018-08-09 Audi Ag Verfahren zum Informieren zumindest eines Empfängerfahrzeugs über ein Falschfahrerfahrzeug sowie Servervorrichtung und Kraftfahrzeuge
US10160459B2 (en) * 2017-03-22 2018-12-25 Ford Global Technologies, Llc Vehicle lane direction detection
CN108520634A (zh) * 2018-03-28 2018-09-11 吉利汽车研究院(宁波)有限公司 高速匝道限速识别方法、装置及电子设备
JP7081316B2 (ja) * 2018-06-08 2022-06-07 スズキ株式会社 運転支援装置
CN110428660A (zh) * 2019-08-12 2019-11-08 中车株洲电力机车研究所有限公司 一种自导向车辆线路运行方向的识别及控制方法、装置、系统以及计算机可读存储介质
CN111429732B (zh) * 2020-03-23 2021-11-09 南京慧尔视智能科技有限公司 交织路段及利用交替通行规则提高其通行效率的方法
US20210020040A1 (en) * 2020-10-05 2021-01-21 James P. Bradley Roadway Safety System
CN112201055A (zh) * 2020-11-10 2021-01-08 上海悦充网络科技有限公司 一种车辆行驶危险感应识别处理方法及系统
DE102021214684A1 (de) 2021-12-20 2023-06-22 Robert Bosch Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung Verfahren zur automatisierten Erzeugung von plausiblen Routendaten

Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102010060926A1 (de) * 2009-12-09 2011-06-16 Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Haltelinienerkennungsvorrichtung

Family Cites Families (13)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE19934774B4 (de) 1999-07-23 2006-06-08 Audi Ag Steuerung für ein Fahrzeug zum Vermeiden von Falschfahrten
US6727807B2 (en) * 2001-12-14 2004-04-27 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Driver's aid using image processing
DE10200785B4 (de) 2002-01-11 2005-09-29 Audi Ag Kraftfahrzeug
JP2008181328A (ja) * 2007-01-24 2008-08-07 Toyota Motor Corp 車両用運転支援装置
DE102007048842A1 (de) 2007-10-11 2008-09-04 Vdo Automotive Ag Fahrerassistenzsystem zur Warnung bei Falschfahrt
CN100578562C (zh) * 2007-12-28 2010-01-06 云南澜博科技有限公司 用视频监测车辆违法行为的方法
JP5015849B2 (ja) * 2008-04-11 2012-08-29 トヨタ自動車株式会社 逆走警告装置、逆走警告方法
JP5107125B2 (ja) 2008-04-11 2012-12-26 トヨタ自動車株式会社 逆走警告装置、逆走警告方法
DE102008046875B3 (de) * 2008-09-11 2010-03-11 Heinz-Werner Twachtmann Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Verhinderung des Fahrens entgegen der vorgeschriebenen Fahrtrichtung
US8428861B1 (en) * 2009-06-09 2013-04-23 Transcore, Lp Wrong way detection system
JP5545109B2 (ja) 2010-08-05 2014-07-09 アイシン・エィ・ダブリュ株式会社 運転支援装置、情報配信装置、運転支援方法、情報配信方法及びコンピュータプログラム
DE102011082600B4 (de) 2011-09-13 2023-02-09 Robert Bosch Gmbh Erkennung eines Befahrens eines Fahrzeuges in eine nicht zulässige Fahrtrichtung
CN102509490A (zh) * 2011-10-13 2012-06-20 北京工业大学 模块化设计的交通信息视频采集实验教学方法

Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102010060926A1 (de) * 2009-12-09 2011-06-16 Fuji Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Haltelinienerkennungsvorrichtung

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102014208617A1 (de) 2015-03-12
JP2016532975A (ja) 2016-10-20
JP6664325B2 (ja) 2020-03-13
CN105518759A (zh) 2016-04-20
US9786166B2 (en) 2017-10-10
WO2015032704A1 (fr) 2015-03-12
US20160217688A1 (en) 2016-07-28

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3042369A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de détection et de commande servant à la détermination de la plausibilité d'une circulation dans le mauvais sens d'un véhicule automobile
EP3042370B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande et de détection permettant de déterminer la plausibilité d'une circulation à contre-sens d'un véhicule automobile
WO2015032707A1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de commande et de détection pour plausibiliser la circulation d'un véhicule à moteur à contre-sens
DE102011082600B4 (de) Erkennung eines Befahrens eines Fahrzeuges in eine nicht zulässige Fahrtrichtung
DE102014208673A1 (de) Verfahren und Verkehrsüberwachungseinrichtung zum Feststellen einer Falschfahrt eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102011081456A1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Verkehrszeichenerkennung
DE102016209239A1 (de) Fahrassistenzvorrichtung und fahrassistenzverfahren
DE102009006335A1 (de) Verfahren zur Unterstützung des Fahrers eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102010045162A1 (de) Schlaglochassistent mit Umfeldwahrnehmung
DE102013215100A1 (de) Bereitstellen eines Umfeldmodells beim Ausfall eines Sensors eines Fahrzeugs
DE102017214969A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Falschfahrwarnung eines Fahrzeugs nach einem Unfall und/oder einer sicherheitskritischen Fahrsituation, insbesondere nach einem zwischenzeitlichen Stillstand des Fahrzeugs
DE102016209240A1 (de) Fahrassistenzvorrichtung und fahrassistenzverfahren
DE102013219023A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Unterstützung eines Fahrers eines Fahrzeugs beim Spurwechsel
DE102013224171A1 (de) Verfahren und Steuer- und Erfassungseinrichtung zur Erkennung einer Einfahrt eines Kraftfahrzeugs in einen Fahrstreifen einer Straße entgegen einer Fahrrichtung
DE102010020135A1 (de) Fahrerassistenzvorrichtung und Fahrerassistenzverfahren
DE102016203746A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Erkennen eines Falschfahrerfahrzeugs
DE102014221675A1 (de) Verfahren und Steuer- und Erfassungseinrichtung zum Plausibilisieren einer Falschfahrt eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102014210411A1 (de) Verfahren und Steuer- und Erfassungseinrichtung zum Plausibilisieren einer Falschfahrt eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102014207541A1 (de) Fahrbahnmarkierungsbezogene Fahrassistenz
DE102012222931A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Ermittlung einer Position und/oder Art einer Straßeninfrastruktureinrichtung
DE102007021580B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Ermitteln der fahrzeugrelevanten Verkehrszeichen
DE102018219110A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Einleiten gefahrenreduzierender Maßnahmen in Reaktion auf das Erkennen einer Falschfahrt eines Kraftfahrzeugs
DE102019125215A1 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Fahrerassistenzsystems, Steuervorrichtung zum Steuern eines Betriebs eines Fahrerassistenzsystems und Fahrzeug
DE102014220571A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Erkennung von relevanten Verkehrszeichen für ein Fahrzeug
DE102017223621A1 (de) Verfahren und Steuereinheit zur Steuerung einer Funktion eines zumindest teilweise automatisiert fahrenden Fahrzeugs

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: REQUEST FOR EXAMINATION WAS MADE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160406

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: ROBERT BOSCH GMBH

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20210225

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R003

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION HAS BEEN REFUSED

18R Application refused

Effective date: 20220922