EP2988573A1 - Dispositif de plaque de cuisson et procede de fonctionnement - Google Patents

Dispositif de plaque de cuisson et procede de fonctionnement Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2988573A1
EP2988573A1 EP15180339.2A EP15180339A EP2988573A1 EP 2988573 A1 EP2988573 A1 EP 2988573A1 EP 15180339 A EP15180339 A EP 15180339A EP 2988573 A1 EP2988573 A1 EP 2988573A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pot
signal
pot positions
hob
positions
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP15180339.2A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2988573B1 (fr
Inventor
Jennifer Keisker
Michaela Baumgart
Britta Hölscher
Heike Justinsky
Frank Holtmann
Hermann Stahl
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Miele und Cie KG
Original Assignee
Miele und Cie KG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Miele und Cie KG filed Critical Miele und Cie KG
Publication of EP2988573A1 publication Critical patent/EP2988573A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2988573B1 publication Critical patent/EP2988573B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05B—ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B6/00—Heating by electric, magnetic or electromagnetic fields
    • H05B6/02—Induction heating
    • H05B6/06—Control, e.g. of temperature, of power
    • H05B6/062—Control, e.g. of temperature, of power for cooking plates or the like
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05B—ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B2213/00—Aspects relating both to resistive heating and to induction heating, covered by H05B3/00 and H05B6/00
    • H05B2213/03—Heating plates made out of a matrix of heating elements that can define heating areas adapted to cookware randomly placed on the heating plate
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H05—ELECTRIC TECHNIQUES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • H05B—ELECTRIC HEATING; ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR; CIRCUIT ARRANGEMENTS FOR ELECTRIC LIGHT SOURCES, IN GENERAL
    • H05B2213/00—Aspects relating both to resistive heating and to induction heating, covered by H05B3/00 and H05B6/00
    • H05B2213/05—Heating plates with pan detection means

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a cooking field device with at least one hob, which comprises a plurality of induction coils, which are arranged distributed substantially uniformly over the hob.
  • the present invention relates to a method for operating such a cooking field device.
  • cooktops with induction coils which have predetermined cooking zones, on which one or more cooking vessels can be placed.
  • the individual cooking zones may be highlighted in a suitable manner. It can be z. B. be provided on the footprint of the hob an imprint that indicates the individual cooking zones, for example by means of an imprint, edged or otherwise marked.
  • a hob has a plurality of smaller induction coils, which are interconnected as accurately as possible depending on cooking vessel size and / or Gargefäßêtgeometrie. Then no predefined, but flexible cooking zones are provided. Thus, a cooking vessel can be placed at almost any location on a hob, with only the induction coil located under the cooking vessel are activated.
  • hob is in the WO 2009/083279 A1 disclosed. Similar hobs are in the pamphlets EP 2 242 328 A2 and US 2007/0164017 A1 described.
  • the cooking field device has at least one hob, which comprises a plurality of induction coils.
  • the induction coils are arranged distributed substantially uniformly over the hob.
  • At least one identification device is provided which comprises at least one evaluation device and at least one signal device.
  • the evaluation device is suitable and designed to recognize pot positions on the hob and output via the signal device, a signal when at least a predetermined minimum distance between at least two pot positions is reached.
  • the detection device is preferably designed as a so-called cooktop manager, which provides an extended pan detection, with which the pot positions can be determined on the hob.
  • pot position is particularly to understand the position on the hob on which a pot or other cooking vessel is placed.
  • recognition of pot positions in particular means that it can be detected by the detection device, whether a pot is set up and where this pot is placed.
  • the evaluation device is suitable and designed to recognize different pot positions on the hob and to check whether a predetermined minimum distance is exceeded.
  • This predetermined minimum distance is preferably a concrete distance between two pot positions or a non-predetermined distance genknüpft to certain conditions.
  • the cooking field device offers many advantages.
  • a significant advantage is that the cooking appliance according to the invention is provided by the detection device of the invention, with which a user is informed in a simple manner may be that the positioning of different pots can be optimized. For example, if two pots are too close together, this is communicated to the user by a simple signal.
  • a simple signal is to be understood in particular as a simple light signal or else as a simple sound signal.
  • a user is preferably proposed or prescribed no specific action, so that a user can freely decide whether he wants to change the pot positions or at least one pot position in order to optimize the effectiveness of the hob.
  • the z. B. can also be integrated into existing display devices of cooking hob, also a particularly cost-effective detection device is provided.
  • the evaluation device is suitable and designed to recognize the pot positions associated induction coils on the hob. Then, a signal is preferably output via the signal device if at least one induction coil is assigned to two pot positions. In such an embodiment, the predetermined minimum distance is then fallen below when a certain condition is met.
  • the special condition here is the common use of an induction coil for two pot positions.
  • the evaluation device can recognize that two pot positions are subject to a predetermined minimum distance, since the pots assigned to the pot positions must be so close to each other that they at least partially stand up on the same induction coil.
  • the induction coils associated with a pot position are all induction coils that are activated or used by the currently set-up pot of the pot position.
  • the evaluation device is suitable and designed to evaluate the power setting of the pot position. This makes it possible, in particular, for the evaluation device to only evaluate a subset distance as critical and output a signal if at least one predetermined minimum size of the power settings of the different pot positions differs. So it is z. B. possible that two pot positions use at least one common induction coil, wherein the two pot positions have the same power settings. Then both pot positions can be operated with the same control level, so that the evaluation device comes to the conclusion that the use of a common induction coil does not adversely affect the cooking result. However, should a given minimum size of the power settings be different, the evaluation device is the undershoot minimum distance as critically evaluate and issue a signal.
  • the evaluation device outputs a signal via the signal device, which indicates to the user that two pot positions are selected too close to each other and that he can change the pot distance for optimum use of the hob.
  • the evaluation device comprises at least one sensor device.
  • a sensor device With such a sensor device, one or more pot positions can be detected on the hob. It is also possible that the distance between the two pot positions or a minimum distance between two pot positions is checked.
  • the sensor device can preferably be provided integrated on the hob or in the hob. In other advantageous embodiments, however, the sensor device can also be provided independently of the hob. Then, the sensor device z. B. be provided above the hob on a cooker hood.
  • the sensor device is provided at least one induction coil or between at least two induction coils. So it can be easily found out whether an induction coil is assigned to a pot position or to several pot positions.
  • the sensor device preferably comprises at least one active and / or passive sensor. At least one sensor is particularly preferably an inductive, acoustic, optical and / or capacitive sensor. Such a sensor may also preferably or exclusively be a sound and / or vibration emitting / receiving sensor. In particular, the use of an ultrasonic sensor is preferred. By means of the aforementioned sensors, it is possible to reliably detect the pot positions on the hob.
  • the signal device preferably comprises at least one optical and / or at least one acoustic output device.
  • an optical output device in the simplest case z. B. be a light emitting diode or other light emitting device that is activated when falling below a minimum distance or flashes.
  • the optical output device is integrated into an already existing output device of the cooking field device or is also designed as a separate display. On such a separate display may preferably be a schematic image of the cooking field are displayed with the current pot positions, whereby the pot positions can be visually highlighted, which are below a minimum distance to another pot position.
  • An acoustic output device can, for. B. be a small speaker. Simple audio signals can then be output via such a loudspeaker in order to inform a user that two pots are placed too close together and the user can improve the effectiveness of the cooktop by changing the pot positions.
  • the inventive method is suitable for operating a cooking field device with at least one hob, which comprises a plurality of induction coils.
  • the induction coils are arranged essentially uniformly over the hob, and a detection device is additionally provided which comprises at least one evaluation device and at least one signal device.
  • the evaluation recognizes pot positions on the hob and outputs a signal on the signaling device when at least a predetermined minimum distance between at least two pot positions is reached.
  • a pot position is the position of a pot on the hob to understand. When detecting the pot positions, it is detected whether a pot is set up and where this pot is placed on the hob.
  • the method according to the invention also offers many advantages.
  • a significant advantage is that a user can be easily informed that at least two pot positions are too close to each other on the hob. As a result, the hob may not be used optimally.
  • a user is then informed by a simple signal that he can optimize the efficiency of the hob or the cooking processes in the different pot positions. Whether a user responds to this hint, he can decide freely. In this particularly simple, yet reliable way of pan detection with reference to the user, the user namely no action instructions or rules of action are given. Thus, a user may be advised in a non-intrusive manner that the use of the hob can be optimized. Thus, the user does not perceive the hint as an indication that he has done something wrong, but that the cooking field device can be used even better.
  • the evaluation recognizes the pot positions associated induction coils on the hob and outputs via the signal device from a signal when at least one induction coil is assigned to two pot positions. Then, preferably, the minimum distance is linked to at least one condition. Namely, the minimum distance is below that when two pots share at least one induction coil.
  • the evaluation device particularly preferably evaluates the power setting of the pot positions and outputs only one signal via the signal device if the power setting of the pot positions differs in at least one predetermined minimum size. In this case, the falling below of a minimum distance by the evaluation device is evaluated as critical only when two pot positions share an induction coil and the pot position has different power settings.
  • the evaluation device will output a signal if, in a shared induction coil, a pot position is used for searing and the other pot position is used for simmering. Then the control levels of the two pot positions differ significantly, so that the shared induction coil can not be operated with optimal setting at least one pot position. Then the user is signaled that he can improve the positioning of the pot positions on the hob.
  • the evaluation device compares the pot positions of at least one first time with the pot positions of at least one second time.
  • Such an approach can be used in particular and preferably for the detection of cooking vessels. If a large pot position detected by the evaluation, it may not be reliable to determine whether it is a large or two smaller pots. If the user changes the pot position of at least one pot caused by a signal, the evaluation device can draw conclusions as to whether one or two cooking vessels are set up when comparing the first and second time points.
  • the signaling device comprises at least one optical and / or one acoustic output device, wherein a signal tone and / or an optical signal is output when the minimum distance between at least two pot positions is exceeded.
  • a signal tone and / or an optical signal is output when the minimum distance between at least two pot positions is exceeded.
  • only a few or even just one beep can be output.
  • a simple flashing light is preferably provided, for example as an LED. Overall, preferably a very simple signal output is preferred.
  • the pot positions are determined by means of at least one inductive, acoustic, optical and / or capacitive sensor. Furthermore, it is preferred that additionally or exclusively a sound and / or vibration emitting and / or receiving sensor is used. In this way, the pot positions can be determined reliably on the hob.
  • the minimum distance between at least two pot positions is determined by means of at least one inductive, acoustic, optical and / or capacitive sensor.
  • a sound and / or vibration emitting and / or receiving sensor can be used to check two pot positions with respect to a minimum distance.
  • FIG. 1 is purely schematically a cooking field device 1 according to the invention in a kitchenette 100 integrated shown in a perspective view.
  • the cooking field device comprises a hob 2, on which a pot 101 is placed in FIG.
  • the cooking field device in the embodiment shown here comprises an operating device 27, which has a plurality of operating elements 28.
  • the cooking field device may also be provided without its own operating device 27.
  • the operation of the hob 2 can then be done for example via the control panel 103 of another cooking appliance 102, which is provided together with the cooking field device 1 in the kitchen unit 100.
  • controls 104 may be provided on the control panel 103 of the cooking appliance 102, which serve to control the hob 2.
  • a cooking field device 1 according to the invention is shown purely schematically from above.
  • the cooking field device 1 comprises a hob 2, which has a plurality of induction coils 3.
  • the induction coils 3 are substantially uniform over the Hob 2 is distributed and arranged in rows and columns.
  • the cooking field device 1 is also associated with a detection device 4, which in the exemplary embodiment shown here comprises an evaluation device 5 and a signal device 6.
  • the evaluation device 5 is suitable and designed to determine pots 101 set up on the hob and their pot positions 7, 8. In this case, the evaluation device 5 detects the pot positions 7, 8 on the hob 2 and also determines whether the pot positions 7, 8 are arranged to each other such that a minimum distance 13 between the pot positions 7, 8 is exceeded.
  • a sensor 15 may be formed as an inductive sensor 16, as an acoustic sensor 17, as an optical sensor 18 or as a capacitive sensor 19.
  • the sensor is designed as a sound and / or vibration emitting and / or received sensor.
  • a minimum distance 13 is understood in particular to mean a specific distance between the pot positions. In the embodiment shown here, however, is checked by the evaluation device 5, whether the distance between the pot positions 7, 8 is chosen so far apart that the pot positions 7, 8 do not use common induction coils 3. A sufficient distance between the pot positions would be in the in FIG. 2 embodiment shown, inter alia, the case when the pot position 7 would be provided on one of the pot positions symbolized by the dashed circles. Then a minimum distance would not fall below.
  • the pot positions 7, 8 are provided so close to each other that the induction coil 3.1 is used both from the pot position 7 and from the pot position 8.
  • the evaluation device 5 When evaluating the pot positions 7, 8, the evaluation device 5 comes to the result that the minimum distance 13 between the pot positions 7, 8 has fallen below and outputs a signal 12 on the signal device 6. By this signal 12, the user is advised that the choice of pot positions 7, 8 can be improved. Whether the user is the Pot position 7, 8 changed, he can decide freely. He is not given or suggested that or where he must change the pot positions 7, 8.
  • the signal device 6 comprises an acoustic output device 22, which is made available by a small loudspeaker 29.
  • the evaluation device 5 has recognized that the two pot positions 7, 8 use a common induction coil 3.1, so that the signal device 6 outputs a signal 12, which is designed here as a warning sound 30.
  • FIG. 3 is the same embodiment as in FIG. 2 displayed.
  • various sensors 15 of sensor devices 14 on and between some induction coils 3 are shown purely schematically.
  • the sensors 15 can be provided both in or on the induction coils 3 or between a plurality of induction coils.
  • the user has responded to the signal 12 and changed the pot position 7.
  • the user 7 has reacted to the signal tone 12 in such a way that he has brought about a maximum distance between the two pot positions 7, 8.
  • Such a procedure is preferred and it can be deposited for example in a manual that a user should establish a maximum distance between pot positions when the detection device 4 determines a conflict between two pot positions 7, 8.
  • By establishing the maximum possible distance between the pot positions 7, 8 is achieved in a simple manner that two pot positions 7, 8, which were provided too close to each other, can be pulled apart in any case in a single attempt optimally.
  • the evaluation device 5 of the recognition device 4 is in the in the FIGS. 2 and 3 shown embodiment also suitable and oriented to dissolve, whether a large pot position 7, 8 consists of a single cooking vessel or several cooking vessels.
  • the pot positions 7, 8 are compared in a first time 25 with the pot positions 7, 8 of a second time 26. If a user has caused a signal 12 to change at least one pot position 7, 8, it will be possible at a second time 26 to determine uniquely by the evaluation device 5 whether one or more pot positions 7, 8 are present on the hob 2.
  • FIG. 4 a further embodiment of a cooking field device 1 according to the invention is shown purely schematically in a plan view.
  • the cooking field device 1 comprises a hob 2 with a plurality of induction coils 3.
  • the induction coils 3 are substantially uniformly distributed in rows and columns on the hob 2.
  • the pot positions 7, 8 and the pot positions 9, 10 are arranged so close to each other that a predetermined minimum distance between these pot positions 7, 8 and 9, 10 is exceeded.
  • This also results in this embodiment from the fact that the evaluation detects the pot positions 7, 8, 9, 10 associated induction coils 3.
  • sensors 15 are used, wherein in FIG. 4 purely schematically and by way of example on a few induction coils sensor devices 14 are indicated with sensors 15.
  • the pot position 7 and 8 use a common induction coil 3.1.
  • the pot positions 9, 10 use a common induction coil 3.2. Since by using a common induction coil 3.1, 3.2 of several pot positions 7, 8; 9, 10 the cooking field device 1 may not be optimally operated under certain circumstances, a corresponding message is issued to the user via a signaling device 6.
  • the signal device 6 is formed in the embodiment shown here as an optical output device 21.
  • the optical output device 21 can be provided in a simple embodiment, for example, by a lighting element such as an LED available.
  • the optical output device 21 is provided by a light strip 31.
  • the light strip 31 is designed such that a user across the width 32 of the hob 2 is at least approximately indicated, which pot positions 7, 8, 9, 10 are provided too close to each other.
  • a signal 12 is output on the optical output device 21.
  • the signal device 6, where on the hob 2, the pot position 7, 8, 9, 10 can be provided optimally.
  • Such a configuration may be advantageous.
  • a user can be informed relatively accurately about the positions of the problematic pot positions 7, 8, 9, 10, even if a plurality of pots on the hob 2 is provided.
  • FIG. 5 a further embodiment of a cooking field device 1 according to the invention is shown in a plan view.
  • the cooking field device 1 comprises a hob 2 with a plurality of induction coils 3, which are distributed substantially uniformly in rows and columns over the hob 2.
  • sensor devices 14 with sensors 15 are indicated.
  • the signaling device 6 is embodied in the embodiment shown here as an optical output device 21 and is provided by a display 33.
  • the pot positions 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 recognized by the evaluation device 5 are indicated purely schematically by symbols 34.
  • the symbols 34 of the pot positions 7, 8, 10, 11, which are too close to each other, are visually highlighted. This is shown here purely schematically by a small circle in the middle of the symbols 34. Such highlighting can be achieved by flashing or z. B. also be done by a color highlighting.
  • a user can also be made a proposal in which direction the pot positions 8, 10 should be moved, so that a minimum distance between the pot positions 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 is no longer undershot. This is indicated purely schematically by the dashed arrows in the display 33.
  • the evaluation device 5 analyzes whether the power settings 23 of the affected pot positions 7, 8; 10, 11 differ in at least a minimum size 24.
  • the evaluation device 5 takes into account the control stage 35 of the critical pot positions 7, 8 in the exemplary embodiment shown here; 10, 11.
  • the control stage 35 indicates the power with which the induction coils 3 of the corresponding pot positions 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 are operated.
  • the pot positions 7 and 8 and the pot positions 10 and 11 use a common induction coil 3.1, 3.2.
  • the common use of the induction coils 3.1, 3.2 is usually only a problem if the pot positions 7 and 8 or 10 and 11 to be operated with different powers. This may be the case if z. B. on the pot position 8 a roasting dish stands up, in which a piece of meat is to be seared sharp.
  • the power settings 24 of the pot positions 7 and 8 are very different.
  • the shared induction coil 3.1 can not be set optimally for both pot positions 7, 8.
  • the evaluation device 5 via the signaling device 6, a signal 12, which should entice the user to the pot positions 7, 8, 9, 10, 11 as far as possible to pull apart, so that a minimum distance between the pot positions 7, 8, 9 , 10, 11 is not undershot.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Electromagnetism (AREA)
  • Cookers (AREA)
  • Induction Heating Cooking Devices (AREA)
EP15180339.2A 2014-08-20 2015-08-10 Dispositif de plaque de cuisson et procede de fonctionnement Active EP2988573B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102014111899.5A DE102014111899A1 (de) 2014-08-20 2014-08-20 Kochfeldeinrichtung und Verfahren zum Betreiben

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2988573A1 true EP2988573A1 (fr) 2016-02-24
EP2988573B1 EP2988573B1 (fr) 2017-07-26

Family

ID=53800871

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP15180339.2A Active EP2988573B1 (fr) 2014-08-20 2015-08-10 Dispositif de plaque de cuisson et procede de fonctionnement

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2988573B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102014111899A1 (fr)
ES (1) ES2641714T3 (fr)

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109838821A (zh) * 2017-11-28 2019-06-04 E.G.O.电气设备制造股份有限公司 用于电磁炉的锅检测传感器及电磁炉
EP3614796A3 (fr) * 2018-08-16 2020-05-27 Miele & Cie. KG Procédé d'attribution automatique d'au moins un appareil de montage d'au moins un point de cuisson d'une plaque de cuisson inductive, plaque de cuisson inductive, dispositif de montage et système de mise en uvre dudit procédé
EP3697176A1 (fr) * 2019-02-18 2020-08-19 Miele & Cie. KG Procédé d'attribution automatique d'un appareil de mise en place à un point de cuisson d'une plaque de cuisson inductive, appareil de mise en place et système de mise en uvre du procédé
EP3957134A4 (fr) * 2019-04-18 2022-12-28 LG Electronics Inc. Dispositif de chauffage par induction à expérience d'utilisateur et interface utilisateur améliorées
WO2023099712A1 (fr) * 2021-12-03 2023-06-08 BSH Hausgeräte GmbH Dispositif de plaque de cuisson, plaque de cuisson, système de plaque de cuisson et procédé de positionnement d'une unité de support

Families Citing this family (8)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102015118453B4 (de) * 2015-10-29 2017-11-16 Miele & Cie. Kg Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Kochfeldeinrichtung
ES2754873A1 (es) * 2018-10-18 2020-04-20 Bsh Electrodomesticos Espana Sa Dispositivo de inducción
ES2754877A1 (es) * 2018-10-18 2020-04-20 Bsh Electrodomesticos Espana Sa Dispositivo de Inducción
ES2754821A1 (es) * 2018-10-18 2020-04-20 Bsh Electrodomesticos Espana Sa Dispositivo de inducción
KR102206096B1 (ko) * 2019-04-18 2021-01-21 엘지전자 주식회사 사용자 경험 및 사용자 인터페이스가 개선된 유도 가열 장치
CN110840224A (zh) * 2019-11-11 2020-02-28 上海纯米电子科技有限公司 料理锅及其控制方法
DE102020103295A1 (de) 2020-02-10 2021-08-12 Miele & Cie. Kg Kochfeldeinheit
CN111654933A (zh) * 2020-06-15 2020-09-11 哈尔滨理工大学 一种智能电磁加热组件

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070164017A1 (en) 2003-11-27 2007-07-19 Brandt Industries Method for heating a container placed on a cooktop by heating means associated to inductors
WO2009053279A1 (fr) * 2007-10-25 2009-04-30 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Table de cuisson et procédé de fonctionnement d'un champ de cuisson
WO2009083279A1 (fr) 2008-01-03 2009-07-09 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Terminaux sans fil, serveurs de traduction de langue, et procédés pour traduire la parole entre des langues
EP2242328A2 (fr) 2009-04-17 2010-10-20 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Procédé de détection d'éléments de vaisselle de cuisson sur un champ de cuisson à matrice
WO2010118943A1 (fr) * 2009-04-17 2010-10-21 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Plaque de cuisson équipée d'un ensemble de détection et procédé de fonctionnement d'une plaque de cuisson
EP2312908A1 (fr) * 2009-10-13 2011-04-20 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Champ de cuisson doté de capteurs

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ES2358818B1 (es) * 2009-01-22 2012-04-02 Bsh Electrodomesticos España, S.A Procedimiento para accionar un campo de cocción con una pluralidad de elementos de calentamiento.
ES2579334T3 (es) * 2012-07-20 2016-08-10 BSH Hausgeräte GmbH Dispositivo de campos de cocción
DE102013218715A1 (de) * 2012-10-19 2014-04-24 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Kochfeldvorrichtung

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20070164017A1 (en) 2003-11-27 2007-07-19 Brandt Industries Method for heating a container placed on a cooktop by heating means associated to inductors
WO2009053279A1 (fr) * 2007-10-25 2009-04-30 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Table de cuisson et procédé de fonctionnement d'un champ de cuisson
WO2009083279A1 (fr) 2008-01-03 2009-07-09 Sony Ericsson Mobile Communications Ab Terminaux sans fil, serveurs de traduction de langue, et procédés pour traduire la parole entre des langues
EP2242328A2 (fr) 2009-04-17 2010-10-20 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Procédé de détection d'éléments de vaisselle de cuisson sur un champ de cuisson à matrice
WO2010118943A1 (fr) * 2009-04-17 2010-10-21 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Plaque de cuisson équipée d'un ensemble de détection et procédé de fonctionnement d'une plaque de cuisson
EP2312908A1 (fr) * 2009-10-13 2011-04-20 BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte GmbH Champ de cuisson doté de capteurs

Cited By (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109838821A (zh) * 2017-11-28 2019-06-04 E.G.O.电气设备制造股份有限公司 用于电磁炉的锅检测传感器及电磁炉
EP3614796A3 (fr) * 2018-08-16 2020-05-27 Miele & Cie. KG Procédé d'attribution automatique d'au moins un appareil de montage d'au moins un point de cuisson d'une plaque de cuisson inductive, plaque de cuisson inductive, dispositif de montage et système de mise en uvre dudit procédé
EP3697176A1 (fr) * 2019-02-18 2020-08-19 Miele & Cie. KG Procédé d'attribution automatique d'un appareil de mise en place à un point de cuisson d'une plaque de cuisson inductive, appareil de mise en place et système de mise en uvre du procédé
EP3957134A4 (fr) * 2019-04-18 2022-12-28 LG Electronics Inc. Dispositif de chauffage par induction à expérience d'utilisateur et interface utilisateur améliorées
WO2023099712A1 (fr) * 2021-12-03 2023-06-08 BSH Hausgeräte GmbH Dispositif de plaque de cuisson, plaque de cuisson, système de plaque de cuisson et procédé de positionnement d'une unité de support

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102014111899A1 (de) 2016-02-25
ES2641714T3 (es) 2017-11-13
EP2988573B1 (fr) 2017-07-26

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2988573B1 (fr) Dispositif de plaque de cuisson et procede de fonctionnement
DE102014105161B4 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Kochfeldeinrichtung und Kochfeldeinrichtung
DE102008064731B4 (de) Kochfeld mit einem bewegbaren Heizelement
EP2067377B1 (fr) Dispositif de cuisson
EP2688364B1 (fr) Dispositif de champ de cuisson
CH700524A1 (de) Haushaltgerät mit berührungsloser Gestenbedienung.
EP2833697B1 (fr) Dispositif de plaque de cuisson
WO2014170161A1 (fr) Table de cuisson comprenant une zone de cuisson et un symbole réduit dans la zone de cuisson dans une unité d'affichage, ainsi que procédé servant à faire fonctionner une table de cuisson
EP3028536B1 (fr) Système de table de cuisson
WO2019238421A1 (fr) Combinaison d'appareils composée d'appareils ménagers, procédé permettant de faire fonctionner un système de hotte aspirante et produit-programme informatique
DE102014110026B4 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Kochfeldeinrichtung und Kochfeldeinrichtung
DE102015118453B4 (de) Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Kochfeldeinrichtung
DE60304516T2 (de) Fritiergerät
EP2911472B1 (fr) Dispositif d'appareil de cuisson, en particulier dispositif de plaque de cuisson, doté d'une pluralité d'onduleurs
EP2988280B1 (fr) Dispositif et procede de reglage du volume d'un bip sonore destine a signaler un etat d'un appareil menager et appareil menager
DE102018203607A1 (de) Verfahren zur Darstellung einer Anzeige an einem Kochfeld und Kochfeld
EP3612002B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'un dispositif de chauffage d'un champ de cuisson et champ de cuisson
DE102012222144A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern eines Garablaufs
DE102018114140A1 (de) Kochgeschirr und Verfahren zum Positionieren
DE102017124826A1 (de) Verfahren zur Erkennung der Induktionseignung eines Kochgeschirrs
DE102013217273A1 (de) Bedienvorrichtung für ein Haushaltsgerät mit einer Vibrationseinheit und/oder einer Timereinheit im Bedienelement sowie Haushaltsgerät mit einer derartigen Bedienvorrichtung
EP3028539B1 (fr) Système de table de cuisson
WO2020079611A1 (fr) Dispositif à induction
EP3868174A1 (fr) Dispositif à induction
EP3868176A1 (fr) Dispositif à induction

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20160824

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAJ Information related to disapproval of communication of intention to grant by the applicant or resumption of examination proceedings by the epo deleted

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSDIGR1

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170317

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20170405

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R084

Ref document number: 502015001505

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 913387

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20170815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 746

Effective date: 20170725

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502015001505

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: GC2A

Effective date: 20170918

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2641714

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20171113

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20170726

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171026

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171026

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171027

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20171126

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502015001505

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20170831

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170810

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20180430

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170810

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 4

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20170831

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20180831

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20150810

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20170726

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 913387

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20200810

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200810

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230528

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20230822

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20230822

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20230914

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230824

Year of fee payment: 9

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230831

Year of fee payment: 9