EP2917897A1 - Contrôle de la qualité d'un kinégramme d'une structure à lentilles - Google Patents

Contrôle de la qualité d'un kinégramme d'une structure à lentilles

Info

Publication number
EP2917897A1
EP2917897A1 EP13782973.5A EP13782973A EP2917897A1 EP 2917897 A1 EP2917897 A1 EP 2917897A1 EP 13782973 A EP13782973 A EP 13782973A EP 2917897 A1 EP2917897 A1 EP 2917897A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
lens structure
image
holder
test pattern
carrier
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP13782973.5A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2917897B1 (fr
Inventor
Georg Kruse
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Giesecke and Devrient Mobile Security GmbH
Original Assignee
Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Giesecke and Devrient GmbH filed Critical Giesecke and Devrient GmbH
Publication of EP2917897A1 publication Critical patent/EP2917897A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2917897B1 publication Critical patent/EP2917897B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/06—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
    • G07D7/12—Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/003—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using security elements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G07—CHECKING-DEVICES
    • G07D—HANDLING OF COINS OR VALUABLE PAPERS, e.g. TESTING, SORTING BY DENOMINATIONS, COUNTING, DISPENSING, CHANGING OR DEPOSITING
    • G07D7/00—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency
    • G07D7/06—Testing specially adapted to determine the identity or genuineness of valuable papers or for segregating those which are unacceptable, e.g. banknotes that are alien to a currency using wave or particle radiation
    • G07D7/12—Visible light, infrared or ultraviolet radiation
    • G07D7/1205—Testing spectral properties

Definitions

  • the invention discloses an apparatus and method for checking the quality of a tilted image of a lens structure which is placed on a support, e.g. a portable data carrier is located.
  • a laser inscription for the representation of images, it is customary to work in raster mode, ie the image is written in a well-defined and uniform distance from one another line by line or line by line using a pulsed laser in serial processing.
  • the eye of the beholder no longer sees the individual halftone dots on the finished label, but depending on the size of the dots and the distance to each other and depending on the ratio of black dots to a light background, a more or less strong gray. If either the laser or the mirror or the carrier, for example a card, is moved irregularly during a laser inscription, for example by coupling in mechanical vibrations or vibrations, then the spacing of the screen dots changes accordingly.
  • stripe structures can result if an electrical coupling, for example a 50 Hz hum, disturbs the drive or positioning logic of the deflection mirrors.
  • Other effects that can lead to stripe structures in the laser image are, for example, laser power fluctuations, ie dot size changes, during laser marking.
  • the challenge now is to determine if a personalized card or passport is a good or a bad ("reject") document.
  • a personalized card or passport is a good or a bad ("reject") document.
  • the corresponding document is rejected as a reject.
  • the examination of the quality of information to be displayed in a data carrier which are executed in the form of a tilted image of a lens structure in a portable data carrier, is carried out by a subjective visual examination and evaluation of, for example, the contrast, the tilting behavior or the overall intensity.
  • a carrier For a carrier, all suitable carriers come into question.
  • portable data carriers are used as carriers.
  • Lens structures are placed on portable data carriers, such as e.g. Credit cards, health cards, passports, identity cards, visa, banknotes, entrance tickets, SIM cards, etc. applied.
  • a disadvantage of the subjective examination is that neither an objective evaluation of the quality of the information to be displayed is possible nor an objective comparison between two lens structures, which each represent a tilted image, is possible.
  • WO 2010/043443 A discloses a method and a device for the inspection of lens structures.
  • the brightness values or color values represented by a lens structure are checked at two different angles without an inscription being applied.
  • defects in or near the lens surface can be detected.
  • the costs for producing the cards have already been incurred.
  • a conclusion on the problem causing the quality reduction is in most cases no longer possible at this stage.
  • An examination of the quality of representation of incorporated into the lens structure Infomation taking into account the tilting behavior is not possible here.
  • the lens parameters are determined by geometric measurement of the lens parameters, e.g. measured by means of a height sensor.
  • this test method only checks the geometric or optical properties of the lens structures and provides no information about the tilting behavior and the quality of the representation of written infomations.
  • tilting behavior, display quality, sharpness and contrast are determined by a complex interplay between lens parameters, design of the label, e.g. Resolution, color, and map design determined.
  • a final assessment of the quality of the tilting behavior of the lens structures or the quality of the information represented by the tilting behavior of the lens structure is therefore only at the end product, i. on already produced carrier with applied lens structure possible.
  • the object of the invention is to find a solution for overcoming the disadvantages of the prior art.
  • the invention discloses a device for checking the quality of a tilted image of a lens structure, which is arranged on a carrier, characterized in that the device comprises
  • an optical pickup device for picking up at least one image of the lens structure during rotation of the holder
  • a data processing device for evaluating the at least one image taken by the optical pickup device for color values and for controlling the motor.
  • An advantageous embodiment is characterized in that the motor is a stepping motor to rotate the holder gradually by a defined angle.
  • the optical recording device is a camera.
  • a further advantageous embodiment is characterized in that the device has a shield against extraneous light.
  • a further advantageous embodiment is characterized in that at least the holder and / or the light source and / or the optical detection device are set up such that a distance and / or an angle to the lens structure can be variably adjusted.
  • the optical detection device is a microscope.
  • Another advantageous embodiment is characterized in that the light source generates a white or a colored light.
  • Another advantageous embodiment is characterized in that the carrier is a portable data carrier.
  • the invention further discloses a method for checking the quality of a tilted image of a lens structure which is arranged on a support, characterized in that the method comprises at least the following steps
  • An advantageous embodiment is characterized in that at least one field to be measured is defined in the lens structure to be tested. Another advantageous embodiment is characterized by the fact that in at least two fields to be measured, the fields are the same or different sizes. Another advantageous embodiment is characterized in that at least one test pattern is introduced into the lens structure.
  • test pattern comprises at least two surfaces which have the same or different color values.
  • test pattern comprises at least two surfaces which are the same or different in size.
  • test pattern is introduced into the lens structure by means of a laser.
  • a further advantageous embodiment is characterized in that the color values are evaluated for all the images which are taken by the lens structure during rotation of the holder for at least one surface and / or test pattern to be measured.
  • a further advantageous embodiment is characterized in that at least one image is taken of the lens structure per an angular position to be determined during the rotation.
  • the present invention provides an objective measuring method which makes it possible to objectively judge the quality of the presentation of information by means of the tilting effect of a lens structure.
  • the measuring method can be carried out, for example, by means of suitably prepared carriers having a lens structure, with which the assessment of an expected quality of a production batch can be carried out.
  • the invention makes it possible, on the one hand, to check the quality of lens-producing production means, such as laminating sheets. Conversely, the invention makes it possible to sort out unsuitable means of production. On the other card designs, such as film thicknesses, film coatings, etc., are tested for their basic suitability for the representation of tilting effects.
  • carriers having tilting lens structures have been tested by positioning a lens-structured carrier by hand relative to a fixed light source.
  • the carrier was tilted about the transverse axis and tested with the naked eye, the tilting image of the lens structure on a tilting out.
  • a lens structure to be tested is applied to a carrier, such as a credit card or a passport page.
  • a test pattern can be introduced into the lens structure, for example by means of a laser.
  • the lens structure to be tested is measured with the above-described device and methods described above, and checked. The determined color value is then displayed as a function of the angle at which the optical detection device has taken pictures from the lens structure.
  • a measurement curve showing the course of the color values as a function of the angle which lies between the rotated holder and the optical detection device is assessed on the basis of defined criteria.
  • the trace has a so-called Gaussian shape.
  • a broad and flat curve means poor quality.
  • a narrow and high curve means a good quality.
  • the test pattern according to the invention consists of different light to dark gray areas.
  • the surfaces may also be black or white or any other suitable color.
  • so-called gray wedges may be included in the test pattern.
  • a gray wedge has a stepless progression from light to dark, e.g. from black to white.
  • the test pattern according to the invention is introduced into the lens structure by means of a laser.
  • a so-called calibrated laser system which a defined laser power or a defined color value, e.g. a gray value.
  • dpi value dot-per-inch value
  • the test pattern is centered within the lens structure.
  • the test pattern has a scaling of, for example, 1: 1. This means that a grid of, for example, square areas has an area of 0.64 x 0.64 square millimeters. This can be used, for example, to measure or control the lens width.
  • the carrier is mounted on a holder.
  • the holder is rotated by a motor.
  • a stepping motor is used.
  • a stepper motor has the advantage that the holder is rotated stepwise, whereby each the step corresponds to a certain angle. The angle can be adjusted. The smaller the angle, the better the accuracy of the data to be evaluated.
  • An optical pickup device captures at least one image of the lens structure during rotation.
  • at least one image is taken for each angular step by which the holder is rotated.
  • ROI regions of interest
  • a plurality of ROI's are defined, where at least one ROI is recommended for a light, eg white one , and define a dark, eg black, area in the image.
  • the ROIs advantageously have the same area size and before the evaluation of the captured images, it is checked whether the ROIs for each measured angle or each image are correctly positioned.
  • the color value e.g. Gray value, black level, white level, etc.
  • the color value determined for each angle of rotation of the holder with the lens structure From these values, it is then advantageous to determine an average over all images for the respective ROI, e.g. a mean gray value or a mean white value for the respective ROI.
  • the color values determined are entered into a diagram via the angle and evaluated, as described above.
  • a great advantage of the invention is that any quality-reducing effects are detected early, for example, before a mass production, since the quality inspection prepared by means of accordingly so-called test specimens are performed, which are corresponding carriers with lens structure with tilting effect.
  • the method can be used to determine the cause of quality-reducing effects associated with tilting images. For example, critical laminating sheets can be checked and replaced if necessary.
  • the reject rate is reduced and the corresponding costs are avoided.
  • the device and method are expandable.
  • the positions of lenses, their radii or the angular accuracy of inscribed in the lens structure, for example, rectangular structures are checked and measured.
  • Further extensions are, for example, the examination of the quality of representation of metallic structures in the data carrier, such as a hologram or a kinegram or a security thread.
  • FIG. 2 shows exemplary measured curves for color values determined according to the invention, in this case gray values, of two patterns which are plotted over the angle when taking the picture
  • FIG. 3 shows a test pattern according to the invention
  • FIG. 4 shows an inventive image of a lens structure with an area to be measured according to the invention, so-called region of interest (ROI).
  • ROI region of interest
  • Figure 1 shows the basic structure of a device according to the invention.
  • the device according to the invention for checking the quality of a tilting image of a lens structure 4, which is arranged on a carrier 2, comprises a holder 6, for fixing the carrier 2.
  • the holder 6 is rotated by a motor 8.
  • a light source 10 illuminates the lens structure 4.
  • An optical pickup device 12 picks up at least one image of the lens structure 4 during rotation of the holder 6.
  • a data processing device 14 evaluates the at least one image taken by the optical recording device 12 regarding its color values and controls the motor 8.
  • the data processing device 14 is provided with suitable contact-bound and / or contactless communication links with the motor 8, the light source 10 and the optical pickup device 12 connected.
  • the motor 8 is advantageously a stepper motor to turn the holder 6 stepwise by a defined angle.
  • the device according to the invention has a shield against extraneous light.
  • the shield is not shown for reasons of clarity.
  • the shield consists of an opaque material.
  • the shield can be opened and closed be used to insert a to be tested carrier 2 with lens structure 4 in the holder 6 and to remove from this.
  • At least the holder 6 and / or the light source 10 and / or the optical detection device 12 are arranged so that a distance and / or an angle to the lens structure 4 are variably adjustable.
  • the optical pickup device 12 is advantageously a microscope or a camera.
  • the optical recording device 12 comprises a combination of a microscope and a camera.
  • the optical pickup device 12 is capable of taking frames and / or taking continuous pictures in the form of a film.
  • Positioning aids are advantageously located in the optical pickup device 12, e.g. to display a target cross, a frame, a grid or similar in the picture to be taken.
  • a calibration of the optical pickup 12 may be performed with the aim of obtaining a mm scale instead of a scale of a number of pixels.
  • a mm scale is applied and this is taken with the optical recording device 12 ; on, so-called "teaching / learning" of the optical recording device 12.
  • the mm scale can then be reached by simple conversion.
  • the scale thus determined can then be superimposed on the picture taken and remains valid as long as the focus and the working distance of the optical recording device 12 to the carrier 2 to be checked does not change. In principle, you can also superimpose a reference image such as a gray wedge on the captured image.
  • image filtering e.g. by Sobel filter, etc., e.g. Highlight edges, e.g. to obtain a machine evaluable criterion.
  • image filtering e.g. by Sobel filter, etc.
  • Highlight edges e.g. to obtain a machine evaluable criterion.
  • the light source 10 produces a white or a colored light or a light of a suitable wavelength, e.g. infrared or ultraviolet. Furthermore, the generated light is uniform and diffuse.
  • a suitable wavelength e.g. infrared or ultraviolet.
  • the carrier 2 is a portable data carrier, such as e.g. a chip card, a passport, an ID card, a driver's license, a credit card, a health card, a visa, a document of value, a banknote etc.
  • a portable data carrier such as e.g. a chip card, a passport, an ID card, a driver's license, a credit card, a health card, a visa, a document of value, a banknote etc.
  • the present invention further discloses a method for checking the quality of a tilted image of a lens structure 4, which is arranged on a support 2.
  • a surface 26 to be measured so-called “region of interest", abbreviated to ROI, is defined in the lens structure 4 to be inspected, with at least two surfaces 26 to be measured, the surfaces 26 being equal or different in size
  • Test pattern 16 is incorporated into the lens structure 4.
  • the test pattern 16 comprises at least two areas which have the same or different color values at least two surfaces which are equal or different in size.
  • the test pattern 16 is advantageously introduced into the lens structure 4 by means of a laser.
  • the color values are evaluated for all and / or at least one surface 26 and / or test pattern 16 to be measured over all images taken by the lens structure 4.
  • the color values can be evaluated with regard to the brightness and / or the color information.
  • at least one image is taken of the lens structure 4 per one angular position to be determined during the rotation. For example, if the motor 8 is a stepper motor and the holder 6 rotates in three degree increments, at least one image from the lens structure 4 is picked up by the optical pickup 12 for every three degree increment.
  • the images After the images have been taken by the optical recording device 12, the images are evaluated.
  • the area to be measured 26 (ROI) is positioned the same for all images of the sequence, so that the area to be measured 26 is completely within the test pattern 16 for each angular position to be measured. Depending on the angle, different color values result for the pictures of a sequence. Alternatively, several subregions of each image of a sequence can be evaluated. If one evaluates for each image a plurality of differently positioned surfaces 26 to be measured and compares the results of each image with one another, it is possible, for example, to obtain statements regarding the uniformity of the lens structure 4 to be tested.
  • a so-called white balance for the optical recording device 12 can be achieved, for example by subtraction of the determined gray or color values. This is useful if the optical recording device used does not have a manual white balance.
  • the invention may be used to qualify personalization devices for portable data carriers, such as credit cards, identity cards, etc.
  • portable data carriers such as credit cards, identity cards, etc.
  • this can happen during the initial acceptance of such systems, but on the other hand, it can also be used in ongoing production in order to determine possible quality defects in personalization.
  • Corresponding tests are also carried out after a plant has been repaired in order to prove that it has been successfully repaired or adjusted before resuming production.
  • a prepared and geometrically defined test pattern 16 eg a test grid
  • a well-defined map, eg of reference material having dimensions and properties according to ISO 7810 are used.
  • the equipment to be qualified writes the test pattern 16 on a support 2, e.g. a credit card. This test pattern 16 is then checked for correct size, tilt, distortion, etc.
  • a further test step in the qualification and acceptance of personalization systems is the control of the gray value calibration, in particular in the case of laser systems, or the color calibration, in particular in personalization systems with printing technology.
  • the verification of a gray value calibration can be carried out, for example, by comparing a carrier 2 with lens structure 4 described with a so-called gray wedge 20 against a reference card, which consists of the same card material, in which case a reference material is necessary.
  • a gray wedge 20 is a stepless progression from a light to a dark color, eg a stepless progression from black to white. Comparison by visual inspection is common but inaccurate. A comparison By contrast, by means of densitometer, although accurate, but very expensive and is carried out only in exceptional cases. With the invention described herein, it is possible to perform such a comparison quickly, easily and objectively.
  • FIG. 2 shows exemplary measurement curves of two patterns for color values determined according to the invention, in this case gray values which are plotted over the angle when taking the picture.
  • the measurement curve of pattern 1 whose measuring points are marked with squares, is narrow and high and indicates a good quality. Accordingly, the measurement curve of pattern 2, whose measurement points are marked with circles, shows a broad and low profile and thus a poorer quality than the measurement curve of pattern 1.
  • For representing and interpreting the measurement points one carries the respectively measured color values, e.g. Brightness, above the respective angle at which the optical pickup device 12 has received the lens structure 4.
  • the evaluation of the substrate 2 to be tested with lens structure 4 takes place relative to threshold values for the contrast which are to be determined in advance, ie the difference between the light and dark areas, corresponding to FIG Height of the top, as well as the contrast, ie the width of the top.
  • Measured values below this threshold give poor quality above this threshold. More specifically, a high tip means good quality and a flat tip means poor quality.
  • a narrow tip With a narrow tip, a large change in contrast occurs with little change in the viewing angle. At a wide peak, the contrast changes only slightly with a larger change in the viewing angle, the lens structure 4 shows only a small reaction. Correspondingly, a narrow tip means a good, a wide tip a bad quality.
  • Test results show that for significantly different lens radii, the shape of the measured curve is different. Accordingly, the quality criterion for a good or a bad lens structure 4 is different for different lens radii.
  • Further quality criteria may be a uniformity or continuity of the measurement curve as well as a respective standard deviation of the gray values.
  • Unsteady or noisy curves indicate disturbances within the surface 26 to be measured, which are visible only at certain angles, eg lens inclusions, air bubbles or incompletely shaped lenses, eg lamination marks.
  • a large standard deviation, ie a low measurement accuracy, indicates strongly noisy gray values, caused for example by an uneven lens surface.
  • subsequence of images If one takes more than one image per angular position, a so-called subsequence of images, then one can vary within a subsequence, for example, the position of the surface 26 to be measured and / or change the aperture, focus, shutter speed, etc. of the camera and consequently with methods, which are known from digital image processing extend the respective surface to be measured 26, for example, to achieve higher depth of field or greater brightness dynamics, so-called focus stacking technique or high dynamic range technology.
  • the device according to the invention is initially to be used as a separate device.
  • the device according to the invention can also be installed in the form of a module in personalization systems and then used for process control or quality assurance.
  • FIG. 3 shows a test pattern 16 according to the invention.
  • the test pattern 16 includes four areas 18, each comprising black and white squares. In each case, a gray wedge 20 runs horizontally, the gray wedge 20 being dark on the outside and becoming lighter towards the center of the test pattern 16. In the middle of the test pattern 16 are a black strip 22 and a white strip 24, with both strips 22 and 24 arranged vertically.
  • the test pattern 16 consists in the simplest case of a black area with a certain size, for example 5 x 5 square millimeters. In principle, the larger the area 26 to be measured of the test pattern 16, the lower is the measurement error.
  • the test pattern 16 is present, for example, in the form of a file, for example as a JPG or TIF-coded picture.
  • a carrier 2 with lens structure 4 to be tested is subjected to a step preceding the actual measurement under defined conditions, such as e.g. fixed ink or laser power defined, dpi value, etc., described with a test pattern 16, printed or lasered.
  • the test pattern 16 is thereby e.g. inscribed in the lens structure 4 by means of a laser beam at an angle in a region of the carrier 2 to be tested.
  • a single-stage tilt image is generated, which is sufficient for the measuring method described here.
  • test pattern 16 may be supplemented with white or gray areas. This is e.g. the setting of the laser power for the labeling process easier.
  • test pattern 16 contains geometrically defined elements, e.g. square or circular surfaces or checkerboard-like patterns, so it can also be tested for distortion, faithfulness of the personalization or absolute size of the lens structure 4.
  • a plurality of possibly different test patterns 16 are defined, which are inscribed at different angles in the carrier 2 to be tested and completely or partially overlap. This results in a multiple tilt effect, which can also be tested with the method described here.
  • a corresponding test pattern 16 can also be preceded by a lamination of a carrier 2 to be tested in the form of a card benefit by printing. tecrinik be applied during application of a design print. In this way, different types of tilting images are generated.
  • FIG. 4 shows a photo of a section of a lens structure 4 with a surface 26 to be measured according to the invention, a so-called region of interest (ROI).
  • ROI region of interest
  • the surface 26 to be measured may take any suitable form. Here a square shape was chosen. A round or polygonal or asymmetrical shape can also be selected for the surface 26 to be measured if this corresponds to the requirements for a measurement to be performed.
  • ROI region of interest

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Toxicology (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Spectroscopy & Molecular Physics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)
  • Testing Of Optical Devices Or Fibers (AREA)

Abstract

La présente invention décrit un dispositif et un procédé pour le contrôle de la qualité d'un kinégramme d'une structure à lentilles (4) qui est disposée sur un support (2), caractérisé en ce que le support (2) est fixé sur un dispositif de fixation (6), le dispositif de fixation (6) étant tourné par un moteur (8). Une source de lumière (10) éclaire la structure à lentille (4) pendant qu'un dispositif d'enregistrement optique (12) enregistre au moins une image de la structure à lentille (4) pendant la rotation du dispositif de fixation (6). Un dispositif de traitement de données (14) évalue ladite au moins une image de la structure à lentilles (4) en ce qui concerne ses valeurs de couleur et commande le moteur (8).
EP13782973.5A 2012-11-06 2013-10-21 Vérification de la qualité d'une image pivotante d'une structure lenticulaire Active EP2917897B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102012021725.0A DE102012021725A1 (de) 2012-11-06 2012-11-06 Qualitätsprüfung eines Kippbildes einer Linsenstruktur
PCT/EP2013/003168 WO2014072021A1 (fr) 2012-11-06 2013-10-21 Contrôle de la qualité d'un kinégramme d'une structure à lentilles

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2917897A1 true EP2917897A1 (fr) 2015-09-16
EP2917897B1 EP2917897B1 (fr) 2019-07-17

Family

ID=49486439

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP13782973.5A Active EP2917897B1 (fr) 2012-11-06 2013-10-21 Vérification de la qualité d'une image pivotante d'une structure lenticulaire

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2917897B1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102012021725A1 (fr)
WO (1) WO2014072021A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102013105457A1 (de) * 2013-05-28 2014-12-04 Bundesdruckerei Gmbh Verfahren zum Bewerten einer Bildqualität eines Bildes

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4526467A (en) * 1982-07-19 1985-07-02 Polaroid Corporation Apparatus and methods for testing lens structure
ES2038119T3 (es) * 1985-10-15 1993-07-16 Gao Gesellschaft Fur Automation Und Organisation Mbh Soporte de datos con caracteristica optica de autenticidad, asi como procedimiento para la fabricacion y comprobacion de dicho soporte de datos.
US5933228A (en) * 1997-05-30 1999-08-03 Eastman Kodak Company Integral imaging lens sheets
JP2002162315A (ja) * 2000-11-28 2002-06-07 Dainippon Printing Co Ltd レンズ製品の検査方法及び装置
DE202004011811U1 (de) * 2004-07-28 2005-12-08 Byk-Gardner Gmbh Vorrichtung zur goniometrischen Untersuchung optischer Oberflächeneigenschaften
US9208394B2 (en) * 2005-09-05 2015-12-08 Alpvision S.A. Authentication of an article of manufacture using an image of the microstructure of it surface
EP2005257A1 (fr) * 2005-10-11 2008-12-24 Smart Holograms Limited Element de securite holographique interactif
KR20070106428A (ko) * 2006-04-28 2007-11-01 가부시끼가이샤 도시바 기록 매체의 검증 장치 및 검증 방법
DE102008052248B4 (de) 2008-10-18 2017-02-02 Mühlbauer Gmbh & Co. Kg Verfahren und Vorrichtung für die Überprüfung von Linsenstrukturen

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
See references of WO2014072021A1 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE102012021725A1 (de) 2014-05-08
EP2917897B1 (fr) 2019-07-17
WO2014072021A1 (fr) 2014-05-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
DE19643017C1 (de) Verfahren für die Ermittlung von optischen Fehlern in großflächigen Scheiben
DE112017001464B4 (de) Abstandsmessvorrichtung und Abstandsmessverfahren
DE3688547T2 (de) "diffraktosight"-verfahren.
DE69707518T2 (de) Mustersuchverfahren und Vorrichtung zur Positionierung einer Maske bezüglich eines Werkstücks
EP2917897B1 (fr) Vérification de la qualité d'une image pivotante d'une structure lenticulaire
EP3040705A1 (fr) Procédé de détermination de particules
DE102008020505A1 (de) Bildaufnahem- und Farbmesssystem
DE102013103527A1 (de) Bildaufnahmesystem zur Bildaufnahme von Merkmalen eines Identifikationsdokumentes
DE10143522A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Untersuchen eines Objekts
WO2005003758A1 (fr) Procede et dispositif de mesure d'une mousse
EP2724323B1 (fr) Procédé et dispositif de création d'un ensemble de données de référence d'un document à partir d'un document
DE102008052248B4 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung für die Überprüfung von Linsenstrukturen
DE1264829B (de) Verfahren zur Guetebestimmung von Druckzeichen und Anordnung zur Durchfuehrung des Verfahrens
DE10303282B4 (de) Verfahren zur Inline-Qualitätsprüfung und zum Authentizitätsnachweis von bedruckten und/oder geprägten bahnförmigen Materialien
DE102020129997A1 (de) Strichcodeleser mit kalibrierung der scanner-bildhelligkeit mit mehreren sichtfeldern von einem einzelnen sensor
EP3999838A1 (fr) Procédé pour analyser des substances, produit de programme informatique à utiliser dans ce procédé, et appareil électronique mobile
DE102013216424A1 (de) Bildgebendes Verfahren zur Segmentierung einer Beschichtung auf einem Substrat
EP2392893A1 (fr) Dispositif de mesure de hauteur et procédé de mesure de hauteur d'une installation électrique centrale d'un véhicule automobile
DE112017001026T5 (de) Verfahren und System zur ldentifizierung und Messung eines Defekts, der die Transparenz in einem Substrat für ein Sicherheitsdokument verringert
DE102008007758A1 (de) Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Authentifizierung von Produkten
EP4127670A1 (fr) Procédé de reconnaissance de surfaces
AT502069A1 (de) Verfahren und einrichtung zum prüfen von gegenständen
DE19823358A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur automatisierten Erfassung und Prüfung von geometrischen und/oder texturellen Merkmalen eines Objekts
EP4409551A1 (fr) Solution de sécurité comprenant un procédé et un dispositif pour vérifier une image numérique comportant une caractéristique de sécurité intégrée
WO2023052493A1 (fr) Solution de sécurité avec une image numérique à caractéristique de sécurité intégrée, et procédé de conversion d'image et dispositif de conversion d'image pour la production de celle-ci

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20150608

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: BA ME

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT MOBILE SECURITY GMBH

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: EXAMINATION IS IN PROGRESS

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20180215

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: GRANT OF PATENT IS INTENDED

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20190212

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: THE PATENT HAS BEEN GRANTED

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO RS SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502013013183

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 1156555

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20190815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20190717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191017

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191118

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191017

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: RS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191117

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20191018

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20200224

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502013013183

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG2D Information on lapse in contracting state deleted

Ref country code: IS

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191031

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191031

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191021

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20200603

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: BE

Ref legal event code: MM

Effective date: 20191031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191031

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20191021

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191021

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191021

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 1156555

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20191021

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20191021

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20131021

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20190717

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230520

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502013013183

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT EPAYMENTS GMBH, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: GIESECKE+DEVRIENT MOBILE SECURITY GMBH, 81677 MUENCHEN, DE

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231023

Year of fee payment: 11

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231031

Year of fee payment: 11