EP2508639B1 - Feuille en acier inoxydable austénitique à grains fins présentant d'excellentes caractéristiques de façonnage et de résistance à la fissuration par corrosion sous tension - Google Patents

Feuille en acier inoxydable austénitique à grains fins présentant d'excellentes caractéristiques de façonnage et de résistance à la fissuration par corrosion sous tension Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2508639B1
EP2508639B1 EP10834432.6A EP10834432A EP2508639B1 EP 2508639 B1 EP2508639 B1 EP 2508639B1 EP 10834432 A EP10834432 A EP 10834432A EP 2508639 B1 EP2508639 B1 EP 2508639B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
less
stress corrosion
range
steel sheet
corrosion cracking
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP10834432.6A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2508639A1 (fr
EP2508639A4 (fr
Inventor
Masaharu Hatano
Eiichiro Ishimaru
Akihiko Takahashi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nippon Steel Stainless Steel Corp
Original Assignee
Nippon Steel and Sumikin Stainless Steel Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nippon Steel and Sumikin Stainless Steel Corp filed Critical Nippon Steel and Sumikin Stainless Steel Corp
Publication of EP2508639A1 publication Critical patent/EP2508639A1/fr
Publication of EP2508639A4 publication Critical patent/EP2508639A4/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2508639B1 publication Critical patent/EP2508639B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/58—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with more than 1.5% by weight of manganese
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/02—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing silicon
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D6/00—Heat treatment of ferrous alloys
    • C21D6/004—Heat treatment of ferrous alloys containing Cr and Ni
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D9/00—Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor
    • C21D9/46—Heat treatment, e.g. annealing, hardening, quenching or tempering, adapted for particular articles; Furnaces therefor for sheet metals
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/001—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing N
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/04—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing manganese
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/34—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with more than 1.5% by weight of silicon
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22—METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22C—ALLOYS
    • C22C38/00—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys
    • C22C38/18—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium
    • C22C38/40—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel
    • C22C38/42—Ferrous alloys, e.g. steel alloys containing chromium with nickel with copper
    • C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C21—METALLURGY OF IRON
    • C21D—MODIFYING THE PHYSICAL STRUCTURE OF FERROUS METALS; GENERAL DEVICES FOR HEAT TREATMENT OF FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS METALS OR ALLOYS; MAKING METAL MALLEABLE, e.g. BY DECARBURISATION OR TEMPERING
    • C21D2211/00—Microstructure comprising significant phases
    • C21D2211/001—Austenite

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an austenitic stainless steel sheet that has a fine grained structure (structure including fine crystal grains) with an average grain size of 10 ⁇ m or less and that is excellent in stress corrosion cracking resistance (resistance to stress corrosion cracking) and formability (workability).
  • Non-Patent Document 1 and Non-Patent Document 2 disclose refinement of crystal grains by utilizing a phase transformation from strain-induced martensite to austenite in SUS304 defined in JIS G4305. According to this method, a fine grained structure with grain sizes of 1 to 5 ⁇ m is formed, and as an effect of the refinement, an increase in yield strength (0.2% proof stress) is reported in Non-Patent Document 1, and exhibition of superplasticity in a temperature range of 650 to 750°C is reported in Non-Patent Document 2.
  • Patent Document 1 discloses a metallic gasket, a material thereof, and a method of manufacturing the metallic gasket.
  • Patent Document 1 in SUS301L defined in JIS G4305, a fine grained structure with grain sizes of 5 ⁇ m or less is formed by utilizing the phase transformation from strain-induced martensite to austenite and precipitation of chromium nitrides. High strengthening to Hv 500 or more is attempted by a combination of the formation of the fine grained structure and temper rolling.
  • the grain sizes are adjusted to 1 to 5 ⁇ m; and thereby, an increase in 0.2% proof stress and high strengthening are imparted.
  • Non-Patent Document 3 As a countermeasure, it is disclosed that changing to a ferritic stainless steel without containing Ni is reliable. In addition, it is also disclosed that in the case where it is difficult to use the ferritic stainless steel from an aspect of formability and weldability, austenitic stainless steels of SUSXM15J1 series are effective which have high Ni contents (11.5 to 15%), increased Si contents, and increased Cu content.
  • Patent Document 2 discloses an austenitic stainless steel excellent in stress corrosion cracking resistance and pitting corrosion resistance that includes substantially 9% of Ni, more than 1.5% to less than 2.5% of Cu, and small amounts of Mo and N.
  • Patent Document 3 discloses an austenitic alloy excellent in stress corrosion cracking resistance, characterized in that the austenitic alloy includes 18 to 35% of Cr, 25 to 50% ofNi, 8% or less of Mo, 6% or less of Mn, 0.5% or less of N, and 0.03% or less of C, in which large amounts of Cr and Ni are included.
  • Patent Document 4 discloses an austenitic stainless steel excellent in weather resistance, crevice corrosion resistance, and stress corrosion cracking resistance, characterized in that the austenitic stainless steel includes 0.08% or less of C, 0.1 to 3% of Si, 18 to 23% of Cr, 8.5 to 12% of Ni, 0.2 to 2% of Mo, 0.2 to 3.5% of Cu, 0.03 to 0.25% ofN, in which a Mn content and a S content are adjusted, Cu and N are added in a combined manner, and small amounts of Co, W, V, and Nb are added.
  • Patent Documents 5 to 7 disclose improvements in grain-boundary-type stress corrosion cracking.
  • Patent Document 5 discloses an austenitic stainless steel excellent in grain boundary corrosion resistance and grain boundary stress corrosion cracking resistance, characterized in that the austenitic stainless steel includes either one or both of Mo and Nb.
  • Patent Documents 6 and 7 disclose austenitic stainless steels excellent in grain boundary stress corrosion cracking resistance and methods of producing the same, characterized in that a C content is restricted to 0.03% or less, 0.15% or less ofN is included, and a slab heating temperature and a slab heating time are adjusted; and thereby, a precipitation amount of carbides is reduced, and a Cr depletion amount at or in a vicinity of grain boundaries is reduced.
  • Non-Patent Document 3 All the above-described austenitic stainless steels disclosed in Non-Patent Document 3, and Patent Documents 2 to 7 include more than 8% ofNi, and Cu, Mo, and Si, are added with Nb, Co, W, V, or the like as minor elements; and thereby, the stress corrosion cracking resistance is improved.
  • a grain size is disclosed in Non-Patent Document 5. It is disclosed that commonly, even when the austenitic stainless steel is annealed at a temperature of 1000 to 1100°C and components thereof are adjusted, the limit of the grain refining does not reach a grain size of No. 10, that is, the grain sizes become in a range of larger than 10 ⁇ m.
  • the present invention aims to overcome stress corrosion cracking that is a defect of an austenitic stainless steel by refining crystal grains with an Ni content of 8% or less and without adding expensive Mo; and thereby, an austenitic stainless steel sheet is provided which has a fine grained structure with an average grain size of 10 ⁇ m or less, in which compatibility is ensured between stress corrosion cracking resistance and formability.
  • a fine grained austenitic stainless steel sheet exhibiting excellent stress corrosion cracking resistance and formability
  • the steel components may further include, in terms of percent by mass, one or more selected from a group consisting of Mo: 1% or less, V: 1% or less, B: 0.010% or less, Nb: 0.5% or less, Ti: 0.5% or less, rare earth elements: 0.5% or less, Al: 0.5% or less, Mg: 0.005% or less, and Ca: 0.005% or less.
  • cracking may not occur in a stress cracking test in which the steel sheet is subjected to cylindrical deep drawing at a drawing ratio of 1.5 to 2.0 to obtain a molded product, the molded product is immersed into a boiling aqueous solution of 42% magnesium chloride for four hours, and occurrence of cracking in the molded product is checked.
  • the drawing ratio is a value obtained by dividing a blank diameter by a punch diameter.
  • 0.2% proof stress may be in a range of less than 400 MPa, and uniform elongation may be in a range of more than 30% which are obtained from a tensile test.
  • the austenitic stainless steel sheet having a fine grained structure according to the aspect of the present invention, stress corrosion cracking that is a defect of the austenitic stainless steel is overcome with an Ni content of 8% or less and without adding expensive Mo; and thereby, compatibility can be ensured between stress corrosion cracking resistance and formability.
  • the present inventors targeted at an austenitic stainless steel having a Ni content of 8% or less, and they made a thorough investigation on optimal component balance for forming a fine grained structure, and compatibility between formability and an operation of improving stress corrosion cracking due to the refinement; and as a result, they accomplished the invention. Representative experimental results will be described below.
  • the fine grained structure represents a structure having an average grain size of 10 ⁇ m or less.
  • Austenitic stainless steels having steel components shown in Table 1 were melted, and hot-rolling was conducted to produce hot-rolled steel sheets having the thickness of 3.0mm.
  • the hot-rolled sheets were annealed at 1150°C, and acid-pickling and cold rolling were conducted to produce cold-rolled sheets having the thickness of 0.5 mm. Then, the cold-rolled steel sheets were annealed.
  • a temperature of the steel sheet was held at 10°C while performing water cooling to suppress generation of heat during processing. Thereby, generation of strain-induced martensite was promoted.
  • a temperature was adjusted in a range of 600 to 1050°C, and a holding time was adjusted in a range of one minute to 24 hours in order to form a fine grained structure by utilizing a phase transformation from the strain-induced martensite to austenite.
  • the average grain size was measured by a microscope test method of steel-grain size defined in JIS G0551.
  • the occupancy ratio of the high angle grain boundaries was measured by a grain boundary map with an EBSP method.
  • EBSP method low angle grain boundaries having angles of less than 15° and high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more can be discriminated by the grain boundary mapping, and the occupancy ratio of the high angle grain boundaries in the entirety of grain boundaries can be calculated.
  • Non-Patent Document 6 it is reported that a result of measuring 3000 or more crystal grains statistically reflects a bulk property. Therefore, a measurement magnification was adjusted to include 3000 or more crystal grains.
  • the steel sheet was subjected to a cylindrical deep drawing processing under conditions where a blank diameter was 67.5 mm ⁇ , a punch diameter was 35 mm ⁇ , a die diameter was 37 mm ⁇ , a blank hold force was 1 ton, and a drawing ratio (a value obtained by dividing the blank diameter by the punch diameter) was 1.9.
  • the obtained molded product was left as it was for 48 hours, and it was confirmed that aging cracking did not occur. Then, the molded product was immersed into a boiling aqueous solution of 42% magnesium chloride that is defined in JIS G0576, and the cracking initiation time was measured.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a relationship between the average grain size and a component balance (Md) of a steel sheet that was obtained by annealing the cold-rolled sheet at 800°C for four hours.
  • Md is a value defined in the following Equation (1).
  • each element symbol in Equation (1) represents a content (mass%) of the element.
  • Md 551 - 462 ⁇ C + N - 9.2 ⁇ Si - 8.1 ⁇ Mn - 13.7 ⁇ Cr - 29 ⁇ Ni - Cu - 18.2 ⁇ Mo
  • FIG. 2 illustrates exterior appearances of the molded products after the immersing.
  • FIG. 3 illustrates photographs of microstructures of the steel B(i) and the steel B(ii) provided for an experiment in FIG. 2 .
  • SUS316L (17Cr-12Ni-2Mo)( FIG. 2(iii) ) is expensive austenitic stainless steel that contains Ni and Mo at high contents and is superior in stress corrosion cracking resistance compared to general purpose SUS304 (18Cr-8Ni). However, as shown in FIG. 2(iii) , a plurality of cracking occurred in an opening end portion of the molded product.
  • FIG. 4 illustrates a relationship between a cracking initiation time in the boiling aqueous solution of 42% magnesium chloride, an average grain size, and Md.
  • an arrow (T) in FIG. 4 represents that the cracking initiation time is longer than a value at a plotted point.
  • the stress corrosion cracking is basically transgranular cracking. Due to the refinement of the crystal grains, an area ratio of starting points of cracking in grains decreases greatly. Furthermore, it is known that fracture toughness in a steel material is greatly improved due to the refinement of crystal grains. It is considered that these factors exert an effect with respect to the stress corrosion cracking resistance.
  • the steel sheets (steel sheets having steel components of steel B) in which the stress corrosion cracking resistances are improved due to the refinement of crystal grains are steel sheets that were produced by subjecting cold-rolled sheets after cold rolling to final annealing at 800°C for 4 hours or 24 hours.
  • the steel sheets in which the cracking initiation times are shorter than 4 hours and the average grain sizes are larger than 10 ⁇ m are steel sheets that were produced by subjecting cold-rolled sheets after cold rolling to final annealing in a temperature range of 900 to 1050°C for one minute to four hours.
  • the steel sheet in which the cracking initiation time is shorter than 4 hours and the average grain size is 10 ⁇ m or smaller is a steel sheet that was produced by subjecting a cold-rolled sheet after cold rolling to final annealing at 800°C for 4 hours.
  • Md component balance
  • FIG. 5 shows a graph illustrating a relationship between a cracking initiation time and a ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more in a steel sheet having steel components of steel B.
  • an arrow (T) in FIG. 5 represents that the cracking initiation time is longer than a value at a plotted point.
  • the stress corrosion cracking resistance described in the items (b) and (c) is greatly improved in the case where a ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more is higher than 80%.
  • the reason for this is considered to be as follows. A fine grained material is produced according to a method in which a large amount of strain-induced martensite is generated by cold rolling, and then annealing is conducted at a lower temperature than normal annealing so as to utilize an inverse transformation from the strain-induced martensite to austenite.
  • An accumulated amount of strains during the cold rolling is large, and the annealing is conducted at a low temperature; and thereby, an amount of residual strains after the annealing is apt to be large.
  • recrystallization of austenitic grains is stopped during progressing, and a large amount of low angle grain boundaries having angles of less than 15° are present which are not recognized as the high angle grain boundaries. Therefore, a decrease in the occupancy ratio of the high angle grain boundaries means that an amount of the residual strains in a steel is large, and it is assumed that the residual strains in the steel deteriorate the stress corrosion cracking resistance.
  • the steel sheets having steel components of steel B are steel sheets that were produced by subjecting cold-rolled sheets after cold rolling to final annealing at 800°C for 10 minutes to 24 hours. Heating times of the final annealing were adjusted; and thereby, the steel sheets were produced in which the ratios of the high angle grain boundaries were different.
  • the steel sheets shown in FIG. 5 in which the ratios of the high angle grain boundaries are higher than 80% are steel sheets that were produced by subjecting cold-rolled sheets after cold rolling to final annealing at 800°C for longer than one hour.
  • the refinement of crystal grains is affected by manufacturing conditions with the steel components.
  • it is effective to promote a strain-induced martensite transformation during cold rolling.
  • a rolling reduction rate is set to be large in the cold rolling and generation of heat during processing is suppressed.
  • it is preferable to conduct the final annealing after the cold rolling at a temperature as low as possible for a long time. Specifically, it is effective to conduct the final annealing in a temperature range of 700 to 900°C for longer than one hour.
  • the increase in the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more is effective for a decrease in 0.2% proof stress and an increase in elongation, which contributes to improvement of formability.
  • Patent Document 8 the present inventors have already proposed an austenitic stainless steel sheet for press molding which has a fine grained structure with an average grain size of 10 ⁇ m or less, and a method of producing the same.
  • Patent Document 8 aims to improve "aging cracking", that is, delayed fracture, after the deep drawing processing; and therefore, a technology of Patent Document 8 relates to a technical problem different from "stress corrosion cracking" that is improved in the present embodiment, and the stress corrosion cracking is a phenomenon in which corrosion and dissolution are involved.
  • any examination was not made with respect to the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more which has an effect on the above-described stress corrosion cracking.
  • the final annealing time was substantially one hour or less.
  • the present inventors found a requisite range of the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more which is an influencing factor, so as to improve the stress corrosion cracking resistance. In addition, the present inventors also found that it is effective to control the final annealing time to be in a range of longer than one hour.
  • the present embodiment was accomplished on the basis of the findings of (a) to (g).
  • a fine grained structure with an average grain size of 10 ⁇ m or less is formed, and stress corrosion cracking resistance is improved due to an effect of the refinement. Therefore, in an austenitic stainless steel sheet of the present embodiment, components and a component balance (Md) are defined.
  • C is an element of generating austenite, and C is added for the purpose of securing stability of austenite. In the case where C is added at a large amount, this leads to hardening; and thereby, formability is deteriorated. In addition, precipitation of carbides is promoted; and thereby, the stress corrosion cracking resistance that is an object of the present embodiment is deteriorated. Therefore, the upper limit of a C content is set to 0.05%. This upper limit is preferably 0.03%. The lower limit of the C content is preferably set to 0.005% from a relationship with manufacturability.
  • the lower limit of a Cr content is set to 14%.
  • This lower limit is preferably 15%, and more preferably 16%.
  • the upper limit of the Cr content is set to 19%. This upper limit is preferably 18%.
  • Si is effective as a strong deoxidizing agent.
  • the upper limit of a Si content is set to 2%. This upper limit is preferably 1.5%.
  • Si has an operation of improving the stress corrosion cracking resistance that is an object of the present embodiment. In order to obtain this operation, it is preferable to include 0.5% or more of Si.
  • the lower limit of the Si content is preferably set to 0.1% from a relationship with manufacturability.
  • Mn is an element of generating austenite, and Mn is added for the purpose of securing stability of austenite and improving formability.
  • MnS is generated; and thereby, corrosion resistance is deteriorated. Therefore, the stress corrosion cracking resistance that is an object of the present embodiment is deteriorated.
  • the upper limit of Mn content is set to 4%. This upper limit is preferably 3%.
  • the lower limit of a Mn content is preferably set to 0.5% for the above-described object.
  • Ni is a requisite element in an austenitic stainless steel, and the lower limit of a Ni content is set to 5% for the purpose of securing austenite stability and formability. This lower limit is preferably 6%.
  • Ni is an expensive and rare element, and Ni also has an operation of inhibiting the refinement of crystal grains that is an object of the present embodiment. Therefore, the upper limit of a Ni content is set to 8%. This upper limit is preferably 7.5% or less.
  • the upper limit of a Cu content is set to 4%. This upper limit is preferably 3%.
  • the lower limit of the Cu content is preferably 1 %, and more preferably 1.5%.
  • N is an element of generating austenite, and N is added for the purpose of securing stability of austenite.
  • the upper limit of a N content is set to 0.1 %. This upper limit is preferably in a range of 0.06% or less.
  • the lower limit of the N content is preferably 0.005%, and more preferably 0.01% from a relationship with manufacturability.
  • Mo is not a requisite element in the present embodiment; however, Mo may be added as necessary to improve corrosion resistance and the stress corrosion cracking resistance that is an object of the present embodiment.
  • Mo is a very expensive and a rare element; and therefore, in the case of adding Mo, the upper limit of a Mo content is set to 1%. This upper limit is preferably 0.5%. In order to obtain the above-described effect, the lower limit of the Mo content is preferably 0.1%.
  • V is not a requisite element in the present embodiment; however, V may be added as necessary to improve the corrosion resistance and the stress corrosion cracking resistance that is an object of the present embodiment even though the effect obtained by V is smaller than the effect obtained by Mo.
  • V is an expensive element, and V is a solid-solution strengthening element; and thereby, V deteriorates formability. Therefore, in the case of adding V, the upper limit of a V content is set to 1 %. This upper limit is preferably 0.5%. In order to obtain the above-described effect, the lower limit of the V content is preferably 0.1 %.
  • B and a rare earth element (REM) may be added as necessary to improve hot workability.
  • a B content is in a range of more than 0.010%, manufacturability and the corrosion resistance may be greatly deteriorated. Therefore, in the case of adding B, the upper limit of the B content is set to 0.010%. This upper limit is preferably 0.005%. In the case of adding B, the lower limit of the B content is preferably 0.0005%.
  • the upper limit of the content of the rare earth element is preferably set to 0.5%. This upper limit is more preferably 0.2%.
  • the lower limit of the content of the rare earth element is preferably 0.005%.
  • the rare earth element is one or more selected from a group consisting of Sc, Y, La, Ce, Pr, Nd, Pm, Sm, Eu, Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er, Tm, Yb, and Lu.
  • Nb and Ti generate carbonitrides; and thereby, the generation of Cr carbides is suppressed. Due to this, Nb and Ti contribute to improvement in the stress corrosion cracking resistance. Therefore, Nb and Ti may be added as necessary. However, in the case where Nb or Ti is added at a large amount, formability and manufacturability are deteriorated. Therefore, each upper limit of a Nb content and a Ti content is set to 0.5%. Each upper limit of the Nb content and the Ti content is preferably 0.3%. In the case of adding Nb or Ti, each lower limit of the Nb content and the Ti content is preferably 0.005%, and more preferably 0.01%.
  • Al is an effective element as a deoxidizing element; and therefore, Al may be added as necessary.
  • the upper limit of an Al content is set to 0.5%. This upper limit is preferably 0.3%, and more preferably 0.1%.
  • the lower limit of the Al content is preferably 0.01 %.
  • Mg and Ca form oxides in a molten steel together with Al; and therefore, Mg and Ca operate as deoxidizing agents. Therefore, Mg and Ca may be added as necessary. Ca fixes S to improve hot workability. However, in the case where Mg and Ca are added excessively, this leads to deterioration of corrosion resistance and weldability; and therefore, each upper limit of a Mg content and a Ca content is set to 0.005%. Each upper limit of the Mg content and the Ca content is preferably 0.002%. In the case of adding Mg or Ca, each lower limit of the Mg content and the Ca content is 0.0001%, and more preferably 0.0003%.
  • the austenitic stainless steel according to the present embodiment may contain P and S as a part of unavoidable impurities within a range described below.
  • P and S are elements that are harmful to hot workability and corrosion resistance.
  • a P content is preferably set to be in a range of 0.1% or less.
  • the P content is more preferably in a range of 0.05% or less.
  • a S content is preferably set to be in a range of 0.01% or less.
  • the S content is more preferably in a range of 0.005% or less.
  • Md 551 - 462 ⁇ C + N - 9.2 ⁇ Si - 8.1 ⁇ Mn - 13.7 ⁇ Cr - 29 ⁇ Ni - Cu - 18.2 ⁇ Mo
  • a martensite transformation is caused by a plastic processing even in a temperature range of an Ms point (martensite transformation initiation temperature) or higher.
  • Ms point martensite transformation initiation temperature
  • the upper limit temperature at which transformation is caused by processing is called an Md point. That is, the Md point is an index indicating stability of austenite.
  • an operation of improving the stress corrosion cracking resistance which is an object of the present embodiment, can be obtained due to the formation of the fine grained structure and the refinement.
  • the Md is less than -20, as described in the items (d) and (e)
  • the Md is more than 40, as described in the items (d) and (e)
  • this is effective for the formation of the fine grained structure; however, the improvement of the stress corrosion cracking resistance is inhibited.
  • a preferable range of the Md is -5 to 35.
  • steel components described in (A) are contained.
  • the following production conditions are applied in order to make an average grain size be in a range of 10 ⁇ m or less, and to make an occupancy ratio of high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more be in a range of more than 80% so as to effectively improve the stress corrosion cracking resistance.
  • the method of producing a steel sheet according to the present embodiment includes: a process of subjecting a slab having the steel components in the item (A) to hot rolling so as to produce a hot-rolled steel sheet; a process of annealing the hot-rolled steel sheet (annealing of hot-rolled steel sheet); a process of subjecting the annealed hot-rolled steel sheet to cold rolling so as to produce a cold-rolled steel sheet; and a process of annealing the cold-rolled steel sheet (referred to as annealing of cold-rolled steel sheet or final annealing).
  • Production methods of the processes until the hot rolling are not particularly limited, and well known conditions are applied.
  • the final annealing after the cold rolling In order to form the fine grained structure by the final annealing after the cold rolling, as described in the item (g), it is effective to promote strain-induced martensite transformation in the cold rolling. In order to make the average grain size be in a range of 10 ⁇ m or less, which is an object of the present embodiment, it is effective to set a volume ratio of the strain-induced martensite to be in a range of 50% or more after the cold rolling. The volume ratio of the strain-induced martensite is preferably in a range of more than 60%. Conditions of the final annealing after the cold rolling are adjusted so as to refine crystal grains and increase the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more. It is also preferable to adjust conditions of the cold rolling, and furthermore, it is also preferable to adjust conditions of the annealing of hot-rolled steel sheet.
  • a temperature of the annealing of hot-rolled steel sheet in a range of 1050 to 1200°C in order to coarsen austenite grains, which are to be subjected to the cold rolling, to be in a range of 20 ⁇ m or more; and thereby, the strain-induced martensite transformation is promoted in the cold rolling.
  • grain sizes of austenite may be smaller than 20 ⁇ m.
  • the temperature of the annealing of hot-rolled steel sheet is higher than 1200°C, an acid pickling property after annealing may be deteriorated; and thereby, a surface quality may be deteriorated.
  • the annealing at a temperature of higher than 1200°C causes large load to a facility.
  • the temperature of the annealing of hot-rolled steel sheet is more preferably in a range of 1080 to 1180°C.
  • a rolling reduction ratio is set to be in a range of 70% or more and a rolling temperature is set to be in a range of 50°C or lower in order to promote the strain-induced martensite transformation.
  • the rolling reduction ratio is less than 70%, a volume ratio of the strain-induced martensite becomes less than 50%; and thereby, it is difficult to form the fine grain structure as described above.
  • the rolling reduction ratio is more preferably in a range of 80% or more.
  • the upper limit of the rolling reduction ratio is not particularly limited; however, the upper limit of the rolling reduction ratio is preferably in a range of 90% or less in consideration of a production of a hot-rolled steel sheet and a cold rolling facility capability.
  • the rolling temperature is higher than 50°C, the volume ratio of the strain-induced martensite becomes less than 50%; and thereby, it is difficult to form the fine grain structure as described above.
  • the lower limit of the rolling temperature is not particularly limited; however, it is preferable that the lower limit is in a range of 10°C or more which is a temperature reached by industrial water cooling.
  • the rolling temperature is not limited to the temperature of 10°C or higher, and may be set to a low temperature (for example, -200°C) that is reached through cooling by liquid nitrogen or the like.
  • a temperature of the final annealing is set to be in a range of 700 to 105°C in order to make the average grain size be in a range of 10 ⁇ m or less and to make the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries be in a range of larger than 80%.
  • the temperature of the final annealing is lower than 700°C, a state is maintained in which strains during the cold rolling are accumulated, and recrystallization of austenite grains becomes insufficient; and thereby, formability is deteriorated greatly.
  • the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more is small; and thereby, the stress corrosion cracking resistance that is an object of the present embodiment is deteriorated.
  • the lower limit of the temperature of the final annealing is in a range of 750°C or higher. In the case where the temperature of the final annealing is higher than 1050°C, grain growth of austenite is progressed; and thereby, the average grain size becomes larger than 10 ⁇ m. It is preferable to set the temperature of the final annealing to be in a range of 900°C or lower. In order to obtain a fine grained structure in which the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries is higher than 80%, which is a target of the present embodiment, it is more preferable to set the temperature of the final annealing to be in a range of 750 to 850°C.
  • an annealing time of the final annealing is in a range of longer than one hour in order to promote the recrystallization of austenite; and thereby, the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more is increased.
  • the annealing time of the final annealing is more preferably in a range of two hours or more.
  • the upper limit of the annealing time (holding time) of the final annealing is not limited; however, it is preferable to set the annealing time to be in a range of 24 hours or less on the assumption that industrially well-known box annealing of chromium-based stainless steel is used. In order to obtain a fine grained structure in which the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries is higher than 80% which is a target of the present embodiment, it is more preferable to set the annealing time of the final annealing to be in a range of 4 to 24 hours. In the case of producing the steel sheet with a small-scaled annealing facility, the annealing time of the final annealing is not limited to 24 hours or less, and may be set to be in a range of longer than 24 hours.
  • the temperature of the final annealing is in a range of higher than 900°C to 1050°C, it is preferable to set the annealing time to be in a range of 10 minutes or less (a short holding time) in consideration of grain growth. More preferably, the annealing time (holding time) of the final annealing may be in a range of one minute or less.
  • the average grain size is in a range of 10 ⁇ m or less, and the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more is in a range of higher than 80%.
  • This metal structure may be obtained by subjecting a slab having the steel components in the item (A) to processes under preferred production conditions in the item (B).
  • the average grain size is larger than 10 ⁇ m, it is difficult to obtain excellent stress corrosion cracking resistance due to the refinement which is an object of the present embodiment. Furthermore, even when the average grain size is in a range of 10 ⁇ m or less, in the case where the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more is less than 80%, the improvement of the stress corrosion cracking resistance due to the refinement is lowered as described in the item (f).
  • the average grain size is in a range of 5 ⁇ m or less and the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more is in a range of higher than 85%.
  • the lower limit of the average grain size is not particularly limited; however, from Non-Patent Documents 1 and 2 and Patent Document 1, it can be understood that it is difficult for the average grain size to be less than 1 ⁇ m. Therefore, in consideration of a practical aspect, it is preferable to set the average grain size to be in a range of 1 to 5 ⁇ m.
  • the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more is set to be in a range of higher than 80% as described above, and preferably in a range of higher than 85%.
  • the increasing of the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries is effective for a decrease in 0.2% proof stress and an increase in elongation in a fine grained material (steel sheet in which crystal grains are fine), and the increasing of the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries contributes to improvement of formability.
  • the formability which is a target of the present embodiment, is superior to formability of a ferritic stainless steel and is close to formability of an austenitic stainless steel represented by SUS304 or the like. Therefore, it is preferable that 0.2% proof stress is in a range of lower than 400 MPa, and uniform elongation is in a range of higher than 30%.
  • the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more is preferably in a range of higher than 85%, and more preferably in a range of higher than 90%.
  • Austenitic stainless slabs having steel components shown in Table 2 were melted, and hot rolling was performed to produce a hot-rolled steel sheet having a sheet thickness of 4 mm.
  • Steel Nos. 1 to 23 fulfill the steel component conditions defined in the present embodiment.
  • Steel Nos. 24 to 28 do not fulfill the steel component conditions defined in the present embodiment.
  • Table 2 (mass%) Steel No.
  • the hot-rolled sheets were annealed, and then cold rolling and final annealing were performed.
  • the cold rolling and the final annealing were performed under preferred conditions of the present embodiment and other conditions. Particularly, the cold rolling was performed under either of a condition in which a rolling temperature was lower than 30°C ( ⁇ 30°C) while being cooled with water at room temperature, or a condition in which the rolling temperature was higher than 50°C (>50°C) during cold rolling due to heat generated during processing without performing cooling with water or the like.
  • the steel sheets produced by the cold rolling and the final annealing were acid-pickled, and then measurement of the average grain size, measurement of the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more according to an EBSP method, measurement of the stress corrosion cracking resistance (cracking initiation time), and measurement of mechanical properties (0.2% proof stress and uniform elongation) were conducted.
  • the average grain size was measured by a microscope test method of steel-grain size defined in JIS G0551.
  • a measurement magnification was adjusted to include 3000 or more crystal grains, and a grain boundary map of a microstructure of the steel sheet was measured by the EBSP method.
  • the low angle grain boundaries having angles of less than 15° and the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more were discriminated by the grain boundary map, and then the occupancy ratio of the high angle grain boundaries in the entirety of grain boundaries was calculated.
  • the steel sheet was subjected to a cylindrical deep drawing processing under conditions where a blank diameter was 67.5 mm ⁇ , a punch diameter was 35 mm ⁇ , a die diameter was 37 mm ⁇ , a blank hold force was 1 ton, and a drawing ratio (a value obtained by dividing the blank diameter by the punch diameter) was 1.9.
  • the obtained molded product was left as it was for 48 hours, and it was confirmed that aging cracking did not occur.
  • the molded product was immersed into a boiling aqueous solution of 42% magnesium chloride that is defined in JIS G0576, and the cracking (stress corrosion cracking) initiation time was measured. Whether or not the cracking occurred was determined by visual observation.
  • the mechanical properties were evaluated by a JIS No. 13 B tensile test.
  • HA annealing of hot-rolled steel sheet
  • F final annealing
  • Gram size represents an average grain size
  • high angle ratio represents an occupancy ratio (%) of the high angle grain boundaries (large angle grain boundaries) (ratio of high angle grain boundaries).
  • SCC initiation time represents a time at which the stress corrosion cracking occurs. In “SCC initiation time”, “T” represents that the time is longer than a value described on the left side thereof.
  • a symbol “*” represents a value out of requisite conditions or preferred conditions defined in the present embodiment.
  • Test Nos. 1, 3, 8 to 29 had steel components of the present embodiment, and were produced under preferred production conditions of the present embodiment.
  • evaluation results described below were obtained.
  • the average grain sizes were in a range of 10 ⁇ m or less, the ratios of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more were in a range of higher than 80%, and the stress corrosion cracking initiation times were largely longer than four hours that is a target value.
  • these steel sheets had mechanical properties in which 0.2% proof stresses were in a range of lower than 400 MPa, and the uniform elongations were in a range of more than 30%. Therefore, preferred formability was accomplished together with excellent stress corrosion cracking resistance.
  • the excellent stress corrosion cracking resistance was exhibited due to the refinement of crystal grains; and thereby, the compatibility between the stress corrosion cracking resistance and the formability was accomplished.
  • Test No. 5 had the steel component of the present embodiment; however, the annealing time of the final annealing was one hour which was short. Therefore, the recrystallization of austenite was not sufficiently promoted, and the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more was 75% and did not reach 80%. As a result, the average grain size was 6 ⁇ m which was small; however, the stress corrosion cracking initiation time was three hours. Therefore, the target stress corrosion cracking resistance was not obtained.
  • Test No. 6 had the steel components of the present embodiment; however, Test No. 6 was produced under conditions out of the preferred production conditions of the present embodiment. Since the temperature of the final annealing was lower than 700°C, a state was maintained in which strains were accumulated during the cold rolling, and recrystallization of austenite grains was insufficient. As a result, the ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more did not reach 80%. In addition, the average grain size was 1 ⁇ m which was small; however, the stress corrosion cracking resistance was not improved due to the residual strains during the cold rolling, and the stress corrosion cracking initiation time was 0.5 hours. Furthermore, 0.2% proof stress was 400 MPa or more, and the steel sheet was hardened; and thereby, the formability was deteriorated.
  • Test No. 7 had the steel components of the present embodiment; however, Test No. 7 was produced by annealing at a known annealing temperature, and the temperature of the final annealing was higher than 1050°C. Therefore, the average grain size was 30 ⁇ m. The ratio of the high angle grain boundaries having angles of 15° or more was 98%; however, a cracking initiation time was three hours, and the improvement in the stress corrosion cracking resistance due to the refinement of crystal grains was not found.
  • Test Nos. 30, 32, 34, 35, and 37 had steel components out of the conditions of the present embodiment; however, these test steels were produced under the preferred production conditions of the present embodiment.
  • crystal grains were refined; and thereby, the average grain sizes were in a range of 10 ⁇ m or less.
  • the stress corrosion cracking initiation times were shorter than four hours, and improvement in the stress corrosion cracking resistance, which is a target of the present embodiment, was not found.
  • Md was more than 40, it was considered that the exhibition of the stress corrosion cracking resistance was inhibited.
  • test Nos. 30 since Md was more than 40, it was considered that the exhibition of the stress corrosion cracking resistance was inhibited.
  • Test Nos. 31, 33, and 36 had steel components out of the conditions of the present embodiment, and these test steels were produced under conditions out of the preferred production conditions of the present embodiment.
  • the average grain sizes of these steel sheets were 28 ⁇ m or 30 ⁇ m, and the stress corrosion cracking resistances did not reach the target value of the present embodiment, and these results were expected from the components which were known from the related art.
  • the austenitic steel sheet according to the present embodiment can be suitably applied to members that are used under a corrosion environment including chloride ions, or the like.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Thermal Sciences (AREA)
  • Crystallography & Structural Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Sheet Steel (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Steel (AREA)

Claims (3)

  1. Tôle d'acier inoxydable austénique à grains fins présentant d'excellentes résistance à la fissuration par corrosion sous tension et aptitude au façonnage, la tôle d'acier comprenant :
    en termes de pourcent en masse,
    C : 0,05 % ou inférieur
    Cr: 14 à 19%;
    Si : 2 % ou inférieur;
    Mn : 4 % ou inférieur;
    Ni : 5 à 8 % ;
    Cu : 4 % ou inférieur;
    N : 0,1 % ou inférieur ;
    éventuellement un ou plusieurs choisis dans un groupe constitué de Mo : 1 % ou inférieur, V : 1 % ou inférieur, B : 0,010 % ou inférieur, Nb : 0,5 % ou inférieur, Ti : 0,5 % ou inférieur, des éléments de terres rares : 0,5 % ou inférieur, Al : 0,5 % ou inférieur, Mg : 0,005 % ou inférieur, et Ca : 0,005 % ou inférieur ; et le reste étant Fe et des impuretés inévitables,
    dans laquelle des constituants d'acier sont inclus de sorte que le Md suivant se trouve dans un intervalle de -20 à 40, et
    une taille moyenne de grains se trouve dans un intervalle de 10 µm ou inférieur, un taux d'occupation des limites de grains d'angle élevé présentant des angles de 15° ou supérieur se trouve dans un intervalle supérieur à 80 % Md = 551 - 462 ⁢ C + N - 9 , 2 ⁢ Si - 8 , 1 ⁢ Mn - 13 , 7 ⁢ Cr - 29 ⁢ Ni - Cu - 18 , 2 ⁢ Mo .
    Figure imgb0006
  2. Tôle d'acier inoxydable austénique à grains fins présentant d'excellentes résistance à la fissuration par corrosion sous tension et aptitude au façonnage selon la revendication 1,
    dans laquelle la fissuration n'a pas lieu dans un test de fissuration sous tension, dans lequel la tôle d'acier est soumise à un emboutissage profond cylindrique à un rapport d'emboutissage de 1,5 à 2,0 pour obtenir un produit moulé, le produit moulé est immergé dans une solution aqueuse de chlorure de magnésium à 42 % en ébullition pendant quatre heures, et l'apparence de fissuration dans le produit moulé est vérifiée.
  3. Tôle d'acier inoxydable austénique à grains fins présentant d'excellentes résistance à la fissuration par corrosion sous tension et aptitude au façonnage selon la revendication 1 ou 2, dans laquelle une limite apparente d'élasticité à 0,2 % se trouve dans un intervalle inférieur à 400 MPa, et un allongement uniforme se trouve dans un intervalle supérieur à 30 %, lesquels sont obtenus à partir d'un test de traction.
EP10834432.6A 2009-12-01 2010-09-29 Feuille en acier inoxydable austénitique à grains fins présentant d'excellentes caractéristiques de façonnage et de résistance à la fissuration par corrosion sous tension Active EP2508639B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
JP2009273868A JP5500960B2 (ja) 2009-12-01 2009-12-01 耐応力腐食割れ性と加工性に優れた微細粒オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板
PCT/JP2010/066968 WO2011067979A1 (fr) 2009-12-01 2010-09-29 Feuille en acier inoxydable austénitique à grains fins présentant d'excellentes caractéristiques de façonnage et de résistance à la fissuration par corrosion sous tension

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2508639A1 EP2508639A1 (fr) 2012-10-10
EP2508639A4 EP2508639A4 (fr) 2014-08-13
EP2508639B1 true EP2508639B1 (fr) 2015-08-05

Family

ID=44114838

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10834432.6A Active EP2508639B1 (fr) 2009-12-01 2010-09-29 Feuille en acier inoxydable austénitique à grains fins présentant d'excellentes caractéristiques de façonnage et de résistance à la fissuration par corrosion sous tension

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2508639B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP5500960B2 (fr)
KR (1) KR101411703B1 (fr)
CN (1) CN102753717B (fr)
ES (1) ES2546412T3 (fr)
WO (1) WO2011067979A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (21)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP5500960B2 (ja) * 2009-12-01 2014-05-21 新日鐵住金ステンレス株式会社 耐応力腐食割れ性と加工性に優れた微細粒オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板
KR101620252B1 (ko) * 2012-08-20 2016-05-12 신닛테츠스미킨 카부시키카이샤 스테인리스 강판과 그 제조 방법
KR101707345B1 (ko) 2012-09-04 2017-02-15 신닛테츠스미킨 카부시키카이샤 정밀 가공용 스테인리스 강판 및 그 제조 방법
FI124993B (fi) * 2012-09-27 2015-04-15 Outokumpu Oy Austeniittinen ruostumaton teräs
CN103540860A (zh) * 2013-09-27 2014-01-29 泰州永兴合金材料科技有限公司 一种高强度耐腐蚀的不锈钢板
SG11201701799RA (en) * 2014-09-17 2017-04-27 Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp Austenitic stainless steel sheet
KR101659186B1 (ko) * 2014-12-26 2016-09-23 주식회사 포스코 가요성이 우수한 오스테나이트계 스테인리스강
CN104846291B (zh) * 2015-04-21 2017-11-28 宝山钢铁股份有限公司 一种高强度抗腐蚀不锈钢、不锈钢油套管及其制造方法
CA3002285C (fr) * 2015-10-19 2024-03-12 Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab Nouvel alliage inoxydable austenitique
KR101736636B1 (ko) * 2015-12-23 2017-05-17 주식회사 포스코 방진특성이 우수한 고Mn강판 및 그 제조방법
WO2017171178A1 (fr) 2016-03-28 2017-10-05 엘지전자 주식회사 Acier inoxydable et tuyau constitué de celui-ci
CN106167849B (zh) * 2016-06-17 2018-05-04 浙江大学 一种高强高韧全奥氏体不锈钢的加工方法
CN108070789B (zh) * 2018-01-17 2020-04-03 山东钢铁集团日照有限公司 屈服强度不小于480MPa级超细晶特厚钢及制备方法
JP2020050940A (ja) * 2018-09-28 2020-04-02 国立研究開発法人日本原子力研究開発機構 オーステナイト系微細粒ステンレス鋼の製造方法
JP6746035B1 (ja) * 2018-10-30 2020-08-26 日鉄ステンレス株式会社 オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板
JP6560427B1 (ja) * 2018-11-29 2019-08-14 株式会社特殊金属エクセル ステンレス鋼帯またはステンレス鋼箔及びその製造方法
CN111020381B (zh) * 2019-12-09 2022-01-11 宁波宝新不锈钢有限公司 一种奥氏体不锈钢及其制备方法
KR102448735B1 (ko) * 2020-09-03 2022-09-30 주식회사 포스코 오스테나이트계 스테인리스강 및 그 제조 방법
CN113201695B (zh) * 2021-04-21 2022-11-08 中国科学院金属研究所 一种超塑性成型沉淀硬化纳米晶抗菌不锈钢及其制备方法
CN114507825A (zh) * 2021-12-30 2022-05-17 苏州森锋医疗器械有限公司 一种具有食品保鲜功能的奥氏体不锈钢及其热处理方法
CN117210771B (zh) * 2023-08-24 2024-05-14 鞍钢股份有限公司 核电用厚规格高性能含氮奥氏体不锈钢及其制造方法

Family Cites Families (17)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS619557A (ja) 1984-06-25 1986-01-17 Kawasaki Steel Corp 耐応力腐食割れ性および耐孔食性に優れたオ−ステナイト系ステンレス鋼
JPS62180037A (ja) 1986-02-03 1987-08-07 Daido Steel Co Ltd 耐応力腐食割れ性に優れたオ−ステナイト系合金
JPS62247048A (ja) 1986-04-18 1987-10-28 Nisshin Steel Co Ltd 耐候性、耐隙間腐食性および耐応力腐食割れ性に優れたオ−ステナイト系ステンレス鋼
JPS62287051A (ja) 1986-06-03 1987-12-12 Kobe Steel Ltd 耐粒界腐食性並びに耐粒界応力腐食割れ性の優れたオ−ステナイト系ステンレス鋼
JP3068861B2 (ja) * 1990-12-14 2000-07-24 日新製鋼株式会社 成形加工性に優れたエンジンガスケット用ステンレス鋼およびその製造方法
JPH08269550A (ja) 1995-03-31 1996-10-15 Nippon Steel Corp 耐粒界応力腐食割れ性に優れたオーステナイト系ステンレス鋼の製造方法
JPH10317104A (ja) 1997-05-16 1998-12-02 Nippon Steel Corp 耐粒界応力腐食割れ性に優れたオーステナイト系ステンレス鋼およびその製造方法
JP2000079405A (ja) * 1998-09-07 2000-03-21 Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd 表面性状の良好なオーステナイト系ステンレス薄鋼板の製造方法
JP4321066B2 (ja) 2001-04-27 2009-08-26 住友金属工業株式会社 金属ガスケットとその素材およびそれらの製造方法
JP4368756B2 (ja) * 2003-09-10 2009-11-18 新日鐵住金ステンレス株式会社 ステンレス鋼板及びその製造方法
JP4578296B2 (ja) * 2005-03-18 2010-11-10 日新製鋼株式会社 エアコン四方弁のバルブシート用鋼板
JP4503483B2 (ja) * 2005-04-14 2010-07-14 日立Ｇｅニュークリア・エナジー株式会社 被溶接材とそれを用いた溶接構造物及び高耐食性オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼
JP2008157717A (ja) 2006-12-22 2008-07-10 Toshiba Corp 放射線検出器およびその製造方法
EP2172574B1 (fr) * 2007-08-02 2019-01-23 Nippon Steel & Sumikin Stainless Steel Corporation Acier inoxydable austénoferritique d'excellente résistance à la corrosion et transformabilité, et procédé pour la fabrication dudit
JP5508707B2 (ja) 2008-04-15 2014-06-04 花王株式会社 吸収性物品
JP5308726B2 (ja) * 2008-06-17 2013-10-09 新日鐵住金ステンレス株式会社 微細粒組織を有するプレス成形用オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板およびその製造方法
JP5500960B2 (ja) * 2009-12-01 2014-05-21 新日鐵住金ステンレス株式会社 耐応力腐食割れ性と加工性に優れた微細粒オーステナイト系ステンレス鋼板

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2508639A1 (fr) 2012-10-10
WO2011067979A1 (fr) 2011-06-09
CN102753717A (zh) 2012-10-24
EP2508639A4 (fr) 2014-08-13
JP2011117024A (ja) 2011-06-16
CN102753717B (zh) 2015-02-11
ES2546412T3 (es) 2015-09-23
KR101411703B1 (ko) 2014-06-25
JP5500960B2 (ja) 2014-05-21
KR20120093996A (ko) 2012-08-23

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2508639B1 (fr) Feuille en acier inoxydable austénitique à grains fins présentant d'excellentes caractéristiques de façonnage et de résistance à la fissuration par corrosion sous tension
EP2617852B1 (fr) Feuille d'acier laminée à chaud à haute résistance possédant une excellente aptitude au cintrage et procédé de production
EP3421635B1 (fr) Feuille d'acier laminée à froid à haute résistance présentant une excellente aptitude au pliage
EP3282030B1 (fr) Élément de tôle d'acier traité thermiquement et son procédé de production
EP2942414B1 (fr) Tôle d'acier épaisse, solide et très résistante à la traction, et son procédé de production
EP2410068B1 (fr) Tôle d'acier inoxydable duplex ayant une excellente aptitude au faconnage à la presse
EP2589674A1 (fr) Tôle d'acier laminée à froid à ultrahaute résistance présentant une excellente ductilité et résistance à la rupture différée, et son procédé de production
EP3098330B1 (fr) Matériau pour tôle d'acier inoxydable laminée à froid et son procédé de production
EP3282029B1 (fr) Tôle d'acier pour traitement thermique
EP2924131B1 (fr) Acier inoxydable austénitique à haute teneur en manganèse
JP5286409B2 (ja) 高強度鋼板およびその製造方法
EP3026138A1 (fr) Matériau d'acier à grande résistance mécanique pour utilisation dans les puits de pétrole, et tube pour puits de pétrole
CN109642286B (zh) 铁素体系不锈钢热轧退火钢板及其制造方法
EP3153597A1 (fr) Tube en acier faiblement allié pour puits de pétrole
EP3530769A1 (fr) Tôle en acier inoxydable martensitique
EP2551366B1 (fr) Tube d'acier à haute résistance soudé par résistance électrique et son procédé de fabrication
EP3342891B1 (fr) Tôle d'acier
EP3085801B1 (fr) Élément en tôle d'acier embouti à chaud et son procédé de production
KR101626227B1 (ko) 피로 강도가 우수한 질화용 열연 강판, 질화용 냉연 강판 및 그들의 제조 방법 및 그들을 사용한 피로 강도가 우수한 자동차 부품
CN107835865B (zh) 铁素体系不锈钢热轧钢板和热轧退火板以及它们的制造方法
EP3587610B1 (fr) Tôle d'acier inoxydable ferritique laminée à chaud et recuite et son procédé de production
EP3287536A1 (fr) Acier inoxydable martensitique
US20180216207A1 (en) Formable lightweight steel having improved mechanical properties and method for producing semi-finished products from said steel
EP2455499B1 (fr) Processus de production d'une tôle d acier laminée à froid présentant une excellente aptitude au formage à la presse
KR102517499B1 (ko) 페라이트계 스테인리스 강판 및 그 제조 방법

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120620

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20140714

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: C22C 38/00 20060101AFI20140708BHEP

Ipc: C22C 38/58 20060101ALI20140708BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20150310

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 740767

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010026489

Country of ref document: DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: FG2A

Ref document number: 2546412

Country of ref document: ES

Kind code of ref document: T3

Effective date: 20150923

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 6

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: SE

Ref legal event code: TRGR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 740767

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: MP

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151106

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151207

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20151205

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010026489

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20160509

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20151105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150930

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20151105

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100929

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150929

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150805

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FI

Ref legal event code: PCE

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL STAINLESS STEEL CORPORATION

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 602010026489

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL STAINLESS STEEL CORPORATION, JP

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: NIPPON STEEL & SUMIKIN STAINLESS STEEL CORP., TOKYO, JP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: ES

Ref legal event code: PC2A

Owner name: NIPPON STEEL STAINLESS STEEL CORPORATION

Effective date: 20210917

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Payment date: 20230906

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 20230915

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20230915

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20230929

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Payment date: 20231005

Year of fee payment: 14