EP2452012B1 - Apparatus for screening fibre suspensions - Google Patents

Apparatus for screening fibre suspensions Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2452012B1
EP2452012B1 EP10796769.7A EP10796769A EP2452012B1 EP 2452012 B1 EP2452012 B1 EP 2452012B1 EP 10796769 A EP10796769 A EP 10796769A EP 2452012 B1 EP2452012 B1 EP 2452012B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
slots
drum
respect
screening
ridges
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP10796769.7A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP2452012A4 (en
EP2452012A1 (en
Inventor
Risto Ljokkoi
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Andritz Oy
Original Assignee
Andritz Oy
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Andritz Oy filed Critical Andritz Oy
Publication of EP2452012A1 publication Critical patent/EP2452012A1/en
Publication of EP2452012A4 publication Critical patent/EP2452012A4/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2452012B1 publication Critical patent/EP2452012B1/en
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21DTREATMENT OF THE MATERIALS BEFORE PASSING TO THE PAPER-MAKING MACHINE
    • D21D5/00Purification of the pulp suspension by mechanical means; Apparatus therefor
    • D21D5/02Straining or screening the pulp
    • D21D5/06Rotary screen-drums
    • DTEXTILES; PAPER
    • D21PAPER-MAKING; PRODUCTION OF CELLULOSE
    • D21DTREATMENT OF THE MATERIALS BEFORE PASSING TO THE PAPER-MAKING MACHINE
    • D21D5/00Purification of the pulp suspension by mechanical means; Apparatus therefor
    • D21D5/02Straining or screening the pulp
    • D21D5/16Cylinders and plates for screens

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to an apparatus for screening fibers and corresponding in the chemical pulp and paper industry, especially coarse screening for separating coarse particles, such as knots, stones and other solid particles from fiber suspension.
  • the invention relates to an apparatus having a rotating screen drum.
  • a typical screen structure has a feed conduit for fiber suspension that may have been produced in digestion of wood chips or in a defibrator for secondary pulp fibers.
  • a suspension can include knots, slivers, bark particles, dirt, metal particles and other non-desired substances.
  • the fiber suspension flows in the vicinity of a cylindrical screen, often referred to as a plate or a basket, whereby acceptable fiber fraction, the accept; passes through the screen plate, while the reject remains on the first side of the screen plate and exits via a reject opening in the casing.
  • a cylindrical screen plate i.e. screen drum
  • the cylindrical screen plate passes by impulse or turbulence elements for intensifying the flow of the fiber suspension through the surface of the screen plate, and thus also the screening is intensified.
  • the screen plate has apertures, either holes or slots, having a size suitable for the screening process. The size of the screen plate apertures has to be appropriate so that the accepted fibers get through the screening surface while the non-desired substance is prevented from passing through.
  • EP-patent publication 275967 presents a method and an apparatus for knot separation, wherein approximately a lower MC-consistency level (6-8 %) is achieved.
  • the increase of usable consistency range is achieved by proper dimensioning and design of the profile of the screening surface and by optimizing the rotational speed of the screen drum and the feed velocity of the pulp in respect to each other.
  • the direction of rotation of the drum is the same as the feed direction of the pulp and the reject discharge direction is the same as the direction of rotation of the drum.
  • the screen drum is profiled so that ridges are provided on the outer surface of the drum between the screen apertures, which ridges are comprised of front surfaces ascending in a declined position from the outer surface of the drum and of rear surfaces that are essentially perpendicular against the outer surface.
  • the declination angle of the ridges in relation to the drum axis is between -45 and +45 degrees.
  • the apertures on the drum can be holes or slots, but typically the screening surface of this kind of screens is provided with round holes, the diameter of which can vary in the range of 5-15 mm depending on the object of application.
  • EP 1357222 ( US2004004032 ) describes a fine screen for fiber suspension having a stationary screen drum, inside which a blade member rotates cleaning the screening surface.
  • the screening surface is provided with elongated apertures having a width of 1-8 mm, and a ratio of length and width between 2 and 20.
  • An object of this publication is to increase the proportion of long fibers in the accept.
  • US-patent 490417 presents a screen having a stationary screen drum. Slots in the screening surface are parallel to each other, but can de declined with respect to the axis of the drum.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a rotating screen drum for a coarse screen, by means of which high consistencies (even over 6 %) can be reached, but in a way that is more energy-efficient than before.
  • the present invention relates to an apparatus for screening fiber suspension, especially coarse screening for removing coarse particles, such as knots, comprising a casing, a feed conduit for fiber suspension and outlet conduits for reject and accept, a drum arranged inside the casing and rotating with respect to the vertical axis, the screening surface of which drum is provided with apertures, wherethrough the accept fraction flows, the feed and outlet conduits of said apparatus being arranged so that the fiber suspension is fed in a space between the casing and the screen drum and the accept is discharged from the interior of the screen drum, wherein the apertures in the screening surface are slots, said slots form rows of slots and the outer side of the screening surface is profiled such that ridges are provided between the rows of slots.
  • the longitudinal direction of the slots in relation to the direction of rotation of the drum is between -40 degrees and +40 degrees and the ratio of the length and the width of the slots is 1.05-10.
  • the longitudinal direction/longitudinal axis of the apertures is between -30 and +30 degrees with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum, preferably between -15 and +15 degrees.
  • the direction of the longitudinal extension of the apertures is essentially the same as the direction of rotation of the drum, i.e. perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the screen drum.
  • the slots are of rectangular or oval shape. The edges of their ends are rectangular or rounded. A typical slot is elongated. The width is typically 4-12 mm. The ratio of the length and the width of the slots is 1.05-10, preferably 2-8.
  • the slots are arranged one above another in the axial direction of the drum, whereby rows/zones of slots are formed, which are located at a distance from each other in the circumferential direction of the drum.
  • rows/zones of slots are formed, which are located at a distance from each other in the circumferential direction of the drum.
  • vertical rows of slots are in a declined position.
  • the outer side of the screening surface of the drum is profiled such that ridges are arranged between the rows/zones of slots.
  • the outer surface refers to the side of the drum whereto the fiber suspension is fed and wherefrom the accept fraction flows through the apertures to the other surface, and whereon the reject fraction remains.
  • the profile ridges are preferably arranged so that they are at an angle of -5...+20 degrees, typically 15 degrees with respect to the vertical axis of the drum.
  • the line of the vertical rows of slots with respect to the vertical axis of the drum may vary so that the ends of the slots form a line that is essentially parallel to the ridges, i.e. typically in a declined position in respect to the longitudinal axis of the drum.
  • the profile is formed of ridges having a front surface and a rear surface at a certain angle with respect to the plane of the screen surface and possibly therebetween a surface essentially parallel to the plane of the plate.
  • the front surface of the profile ridge can according to an embodiment be also perpendicular against the plane of the screen surface, whereby the rear surface is descending. In this case the front surface opposes to and mixes the flow, whereby the flow through the screening surface increases, and thus the capacity of the apparatus increases, but simultaneously the separating capacity decreases.
  • the front surface and the rear surface of the ridge of the profile can also be symmetrically declined.
  • profile ridges are arranged also in the slot zone so that ridges are provided between the slots located one above another.
  • the profile is formed by a row of ridges broken by slots.
  • the slot zone may be provided with one or more thus formed profiles, which are at the same declination angle with respect to the vertical axis of the drum as the rows/zones of slots and the profiles between them. That is, the ridges are parallel to the rows of slots.
  • the slots of the vertical rows of slots are in the horizontal direction arranged so that the slots of every second row of slots are located on the same horizontal lines, i.e. in a first group of horizontal lines, and respectively the slots of every second row of slots are located in a second group of horizontal lines.
  • the longitudinal position/angle of the slots located in one row of slots with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum changes from above downwards seen along the axis of the drum.
  • the longitudinal direction of the uppermost slot is parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum.
  • the longitudinal direction of a lower slot is declined downwards, starting from the front end of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum, whereby the front end of the slot is located higher than its trailing end (in the direction of rotation of the drum).
  • a lower slot is declined downwards more than an upper one.
  • the angle of declination of the lower slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger.
  • the longitudinal direction of the uppermost slot is also parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum, while the following lower slot is declined upwards with respect to the direction of rotation, whereby the front end of said slot, in the direction of rotation of the drum, is located lower than its trailing end.
  • the next lower slot is declined at the trailing end upwards to a greater extent than the upper slot.
  • the declination angle of the lower slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger.
  • two slots located one above another can be essentially parallel, but it is pertinent that most of the slots in a row of slots are located at different declination angles with respect to each other.
  • the position/angle of the longitudinal direction of the slots in one row of slots with respect to the direction of rotation changes from down upwards seen along the drum axis so that the longitudinal direction of the lowermost slot is parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum, while a slot located above is declined with respect to the direction of rotation.
  • the next upper slot can be declined upwards, whereby the front end of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum is located lower than the trailing end of the slot.
  • the upper slot is more declined than the lower slot.
  • the declination angle of the upper slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger.
  • an upper slot can be declined correspondingly so that the front end of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum is located higher than the trailing end of the slot. In that case, the slots are declined downwards with respect to the direction of rotation.
  • two slots located one above another can be essentially parallel, such as two lowermost, but it is pertinent that most of the slots in a row of slots are located at different declination angles with respect to each other.
  • the capacity of the apparatus increases and the consistency is higher.
  • the separating capacity of the apparatus is increased, i.e. cleaner accept is obtained.
  • the apparatus according to the embodiments of the present invention allows separation of coarse particles, such as knots and corresponding, from the fiber suspension more efficiently than before and at a higher consistency (even over 6%). Thanks to the elongated slots, the speed of the screen drum can be increased, because the "projections" of the slots remain adequately large. A greater speed allows a higher consistency. If the screening surface is provided with circular holes, the upper speed limit is met earlier, because with increasing speed the holes get clogged faster, as their projection is decreased. In the apparatus according to the embodiments of the invention, the screening is more energy efficient, typically due to either a decreased rotational speed or increased capacity.
  • FIG. 1 illustrates a screen according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, which screen comprises an essentially cylindrical outer casing 1, to which casing a fiber suspension inlet conduit 2, an accept outlet conduit 3 and a reject outlet conduit 4 are connected, a screen drum 5 and one or more stationary blades 6 inside the screen drum 5, which extend in the vicinity of the screen drum's surface.
  • the rotating screen drum 5 is attached in a way known per se to a shaft 7 functioning e.g. by belt drive (not shown).
  • the space 8 between the screen drum 5 and the outer casing 1 is annular.
  • the above mentioned conduits 2 and 4 are connected to the outer casing 1 of the annular space.
  • the fiber suspension is fed into the space 8 and the accept flown through the screening surface is discharged from the interior of the screen drum.
  • the blades 6 are attached by means of arms 9 to a stationary frame 10, which also forms a support for the shaft 7 via bearings.
  • the blades 6 are located inside the drum 5.
  • said blades generate a suitable impulse, positive and negative, onto the drum 5, thus cleaning the screening surface of the drum.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a straightened screening surface profile according to a preferred embodiment.
  • the profile plate 20 is formed of apertures 21 and profiles 22 between them.
  • the apertures 21 are slots in accordance with the invention.
  • the form of the slots is rectangular, whereby the edges of their ends can be either rectangular or rounded.
  • the ratio of the length L and width W of the slots is 1.05-10, preferably 2-8, depending on the object of application.
  • the width W is typically 4-12 mm.
  • the longitudinal direction 23 of the slots 21 is parallel to the direction 24 of rotation of the drum 5.
  • slots are arranged one above another, whereby rows/zones 11 of slots are formed at a distance from each other in the circumferential direction of the drum.
  • the profile ridges 22 and the vertical rows of slots are not aligned with respect to the vertical axis of the drum, but they are declined rows.
  • the ridges and rows of slots are at an angle of -5...+20 degrees, typically 15 degrees, angle ⁇ , with respect to the vertical shaft 7 of the drum.
  • the slots of the vertical rows 11 of slots can be arranged in the horizontal direction so that they form parallel horizontal rows.
  • Figure 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment, where the slots 21 of the vertical rows 11 of slots are in the horizontal direction arranged so that the slots of every second row of slots are located on the same horizontal lines.
  • the slots of the vertical rows of slots are in the horizontal direction arranged so that the slots of every second vertical row 11 of slots are located on the same horizontal lines, i.e. in a first group of horizontal lines, and respectively the slots of every second row of slots are located in a second group of horizontal lines.
  • the longitudinal direction/longitudinal axis 23 of the slots 21 is at an angle ⁇ with respect to the direction 24 of rotation of the drum, which angle is between -40 and +40 degrees.
  • the angle ⁇ is approximately +25 degrees and in Figure 3b approximately -24 degrees.
  • Figure 4 illustrates profiles of the outer surface of the plate 20.
  • the screening surface can be regarded to be formed of a plate with ridges 22 and planar portions 26 therebetween, which are provided with machined apertures 21.
  • profile ridges are additionally provided in the zone of slots so that ridges 25 are arranged between slots located one above another.
  • the profile is formed by a row of ridges broken by slots.
  • the slot zone may be provided with one or more thus formed profiles, which are preferably at the same declination angle with respect to the vertical axis of the drum as the rows/zones 11 of slots and the profiles 22 between them.
  • Figure 5a and b illustrate a screening surface profile as a straightened and cut side view.
  • the inner surface 27 plate 20 is flat, except for the apertures.
  • the outer surface profile ridge 22 of the plate 20 is formed of front surfaces 29 ascending at a certain angle from the plane 28 of the plate 20, surfaces 30 essentially parallel to the plane 28 of the plate 20, rear surfaces 31 essentially perpendicular to the plane 28 of the plate 20 and portions of the plane 28 between the apertures 21.
  • the screen plate can be regarded as being formed of a plate provided with ridges 22 formed of said parts 29, 30 and 31, and between them planar parts 28 provided with machined apertures 21.
  • the front surface 29 is perpendicular against the plane 28 of the plate and the rear surface is declined.
  • the declined front surface receives the pulp entering the drum, aiming e.g. to accelerate its speed, but an even flow through the screening surface apertures in the screening surface is obtained anyway. This eliminates disturbing flow of the suspension in the opposite direction, which happens under some circumstances.
  • the front surface of the profile ridge is perpendicular against the plane of the screening surface and the rear surface of the ridge is descending ( Figure 5a ) the front surface resists and mixes the flow, whereby the flow through the screening surface increases, and thus the capacity of the apparatus increases.
  • the ridges 22 are somewhat declined with respect to the axis of the drum, as well as with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum.
  • the direction of the ridges 22 has the influence that if the ridges 22 on the screen drum 5 are declined backwards, they tend to lift the fiber suspension upwards on the screen drum, whereby the circulation time of the fiber suspension in the screen is increased, separation becomes more exact and the reject amount is decreased while the accept amount is increased.
  • the circulation time is decreased and the capacity is increased.
  • the height of the screen drum has an influence on the operational speeds, declination angles etc.
  • the position of the longitudinal direction 23 of the slots 21 in one row of slots with respect to the direction 24 of rotation of the drum changes from up downwards seen along the shaft 7 of the drum ( Figure 6a ).
  • the longitudinal direction of the uppermost slot 21' is parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum (i.e. perpendicular with respect to the axis of the drum).
  • the longitudinal direction of a next lower slot 21" is declined (with respect to the axis of the drum), starting from the front end 32 of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum, whereby the front end 32 of the slot is located higher than its trailing end 33 (in the direction of rotation of the drum).
  • the next lower slot is declined downwards more than the upper one.
  • the declination angle of the lower slot is typically 1-5 degrees, typically 2-4 degrees larger.
  • the change in the direction of the slots can be regarded as descending from above downwards.
  • the longitudinal direction of the uppermost slot is also parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum, while a following lower slot is declined upwards with respect to the direction of rotation, whereby the front end 32' of said slot, in the direction of rotation of the drum, is located lower than its trailing end 33'.
  • the next lower slot is declined at the trailing end upwards to a greater extent than the upper slot.
  • the declination angle of the lower slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger.
  • the change in the direction of the slots can be regarded as ascending from above downwards.
  • two slots located one above another can be essentially parallel, but it is pertinent that most of the slots in a row of slots are located at different declination angles with respect to each other.
  • the position/angle of the longitudinal direction of the slots in one row of slots with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum changes from down upwards seen along the drum's axis so that the longitudinal direction of the lowermost slot is parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum, while a slot located next above is declined with respect to the direction of rotation.
  • the next upper slot can be declined upwards ( Figure 6c ), whereby the front end 32" of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum is located lower than the trailing end 33" of the slot.
  • the upper slot is more declined than the lower slot.
  • the declination angle of the upper slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger.
  • the change in the direction of the slots can be regarded as from down upwards ascending.
  • an upper slot can be declined correspondingly so that the front end 32"' of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum is located higher than the trailing end 33"' of the slot. In that case, the slots are declined downwards with respect to the direction of rotation.
  • the change in the direction of the slots can be regarded as from down upwards descending.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Combined Means For Separation Of Solids (AREA)

Description

  • The present invention relates to an apparatus for screening fibers and corresponding in the chemical pulp and paper industry, especially coarse screening for separating coarse particles, such as knots, stones and other solid particles from fiber suspension. The invention relates to an apparatus having a rotating screen drum.
  • In the treatment of wood pulp sorters, screens are used to separate acceptable fibers from non-desired substances in a suspension. A typical screen structure has a feed conduit for fiber suspension that may have been produced in digestion of wood chips or in a defibrator for secondary pulp fibers. A suspension can include knots, slivers, bark particles, dirt, metal particles and other non-desired substances.
  • Inside the casing of a screen the fiber suspension flows in the vicinity of a cylindrical screen, often referred to as a plate or a basket, whereby acceptable fiber fraction, the accept; passes through the screen plate, while the reject remains on the first side of the screen plate and exits via a reject opening in the casing. When the cylindrical screen plate, i.e. screen drum, rotates, it passes by impulse or turbulence elements for intensifying the flow of the fiber suspension through the surface of the screen plate, and thus also the screening is intensified. The screen plate has apertures, either holes or slots, having a size suitable for the screening process. The size of the screen plate apertures has to be appropriate so that the accepted fibers get through the screening surface while the non-desired substance is prevented from passing through.
  • EP-patent publication 275967 ( FI76139 ) presents a method and an apparatus for knot separation, wherein approximately a lower MC-consistency level (6-8 %) is achieved. The increase of usable consistency range is achieved by proper dimensioning and design of the profile of the screening surface and by optimizing the rotational speed of the screen drum and the feed velocity of the pulp in respect to each other. In the apparatus according to said publication the direction of rotation of the drum is the same as the feed direction of the pulp and the reject discharge direction is the same as the direction of rotation of the drum. Further the screen drum is profiled so that ridges are provided on the outer surface of the drum between the screen apertures, which ridges are comprised of front surfaces ascending in a declined position from the outer surface of the drum and of rear surfaces that are essentially perpendicular against the outer surface. The declination angle of the ridges in relation to the drum axis is between -45 and +45 degrees. The apertures on the drum can be holes or slots, but typically the screening surface of this kind of screens is provided with round holes, the diameter of which can vary in the range of 5-15 mm depending on the object of application.
  • EP 1357222 ( US2004004032 ) describes a fine screen for fiber suspension having a stationary screen drum, inside which a blade member rotates cleaning the screening surface. The screening surface is provided with elongated apertures having a width of 1-8 mm, and a ratio of length and width between 2 and 20. An object of this publication is to increase the proportion of long fibers in the accept. Also US-patent 490417 presents a screen having a stationary screen drum. Slots in the screening surface are parallel to each other, but can de declined with respect to the axis of the drum.
  • An object of the present invention is to provide a rotating screen drum for a coarse screen, by means of which high consistencies (even over 6 %) can be reached, but in a way that is more energy-efficient than before.
  • The present invention relates to an apparatus for screening fiber suspension, especially coarse screening for removing coarse particles, such as knots, comprising a casing, a feed conduit for fiber suspension and outlet conduits for reject and accept, a drum arranged inside the casing and rotating with respect to the vertical axis, the screening surface of which drum is provided with apertures, wherethrough the accept fraction flows, the feed and outlet conduits of said apparatus being arranged so that the fiber suspension is fed in a space between the casing and the screen drum and the accept is discharged from the interior of the screen drum, wherein the apertures in the screening surface are slots, said slots form rows of slots and the outer side of the screening surface is profiled such that ridges are provided between the rows of slots. According to the invention, the longitudinal direction of the slots in relation to the direction of rotation of the drum is between -40 degrees and +40 degrees and the ratio of the length and the width of the slots is 1.05-10.
  • According to a preferred embodiment the longitudinal direction/longitudinal axis of the apertures is between -30 and +30 degrees with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum, preferably between -15 and +15 degrees. According to a preferred embodiment the direction of the longitudinal extension of the apertures is essentially the same as the direction of rotation of the drum, i.e. perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the screen drum.
  • The slots are of rectangular or oval shape. The edges of their ends are rectangular or rounded. A typical slot is elongated. The width is typically 4-12 mm. The ratio of the length and the width of the slots is 1.05-10, preferably 2-8.
  • The slots are arranged one above another in the axial direction of the drum, whereby rows/zones of slots are formed, which are located at a distance from each other in the circumferential direction of the drum. Typically vertical rows of slots are in a declined position.
  • According to a preferred embodiment, the outer side of the screening surface of the drum is profiled such that ridges are arranged between the rows/zones of slots. The outer surface refers to the side of the drum whereto the fiber suspension is fed and wherefrom the accept fraction flows through the apertures to the other surface, and whereon the reject fraction remains. The profile ridges are preferably arranged so that they are at an angle of -5...+20 degrees, typically 15 degrees with respect to the vertical axis of the drum. The line of the vertical rows of slots with respect to the vertical axis of the drum may vary so that the ends of the slots form a line that is essentially parallel to the ridges, i.e. typically in a declined position in respect to the longitudinal axis of the drum.
  • The profile is formed of ridges having a front surface and a rear surface at a certain angle with respect to the plane of the screen surface and possibly therebetween a surface essentially parallel to the plane of the plate. By means of the declination angle of the ridges, the direction of the declination with respect to the direction of rotation, the rotational speed of the drum and the angle of elevation of the front surface of the ridges it is possible to optimize the circulation time of the pulp and the turbulence in proportion to the final result of the separation (accept/reject). When the front surface of the profile ridge receiving the flow is declined backwards, i.e. it ascends from the screening surface plane and the rear surface is perpendicular, an even flow through the screening surface apertures is obtained. This eliminates disturbing flow of the suspension in the opposite direction, which happens under some circumstances. The front surface of the profile ridge can according to an embodiment be also perpendicular against the plane of the screen surface, whereby the rear surface is descending. In this case the front surface opposes to and mixes the flow, whereby the flow through the screening surface increases, and thus the capacity of the apparatus increases, but simultaneously the separating capacity decreases. The front surface and the rear surface of the ridge of the profile can also be symmetrically declined.
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, profile ridges are arranged also in the slot zone so that ridges are provided between the slots located one above another. Thus, in that case the profile is formed by a row of ridges broken by slots. The slot zone may be provided with one or more thus formed profiles, which are at the same declination angle with respect to the vertical axis of the drum as the rows/zones of slots and the profiles between them. That is, the ridges are parallel to the rows of slots.
  • According to an embodiment, the slots of the vertical rows of slots are in the horizontal direction arranged so that the slots of every second row of slots are located on the same horizontal lines, i.e. in a first group of horizontal lines, and respectively the slots of every second row of slots are located in a second group of horizontal lines.
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the longitudinal position/angle of the slots located in one row of slots with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum changes from above downwards seen along the axis of the drum. The longitudinal direction of the uppermost slot is parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum. Meanwhile, the longitudinal direction of a lower slot is declined downwards, starting from the front end of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum, whereby the front end of the slot is located higher than its trailing end (in the direction of rotation of the drum). Typically a lower slot is declined downwards more than an upper one. The angle of declination of the lower slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger. According to another embodiment, the longitudinal direction of the uppermost slot is also parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum, while the following lower slot is declined upwards with respect to the direction of rotation, whereby the front end of said slot, in the direction of rotation of the drum, is located lower than its trailing end. Thus, the next lower slot is declined at the trailing end upwards to a greater extent than the upper slot. The declination angle of the lower slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger. In these embodiments, two slots located one above another can be essentially parallel, but it is pertinent that most of the slots in a row of slots are located at different declination angles with respect to each other.
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, the position/angle of the longitudinal direction of the slots in one row of slots with respect to the direction of rotation changes from down upwards seen along the drum axis so that the longitudinal direction of the lowermost slot is parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum, while a slot located above is declined with respect to the direction of rotation. Thus, the next upper slot can be declined upwards, whereby the front end of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum is located lower than the trailing end of the slot. Typically the upper slot is more declined than the lower slot. The declination angle of the upper slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, an upper slot can be declined correspondingly so that the front end of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum is located higher than the trailing end of the slot. In that case, the slots are declined downwards with respect to the direction of rotation. In these embodiments, two slots located one above another can be essentially parallel, such as two lowermost, but it is pertinent that most of the slots in a row of slots are located at different declination angles with respect to each other.
  • In the above embodiments, where the declination is directed downwards, the capacity of the apparatus increases and the consistency is higher. When the declination is directed upwards, the separating capacity of the apparatus is increased, i.e. cleaner accept is obtained.
  • The apparatus according to the embodiments of the present invention allows separation of coarse particles, such as knots and corresponding, from the fiber suspension more efficiently than before and at a higher consistency (even over 6%). Thanks to the elongated slots, the speed of the screen drum can be increased, because the "projections" of the slots remain adequately large. A greater speed allows a higher consistency. If the screening surface is provided with circular holes, the upper speed limit is met earlier, because with increasing speed the holes get clogged faster, as their projection is decreased. In the apparatus according to the embodiments of the invention, the screening is more energy efficient, typically due to either a decreased rotational speed or increased capacity.
  • The invention will be described in more detail, providing examples only, with reference to the appended figures, of which
    • Figure 1 illustrates the apparatus according to the invention as a schematic side view,
    • Figure 2 illustrates a screening surface according to an embodiment as a view from above,
    • Figures 3a and b illustrate a screening surface according to another embodiment as a view from above,
    • Figure 4 illustrates a screening surface according to an embodiment as a view from above,
    • Figure 5 illustrates a screening surface profile according to an embodiment as a straightened and cut side view, and
    • Figures 6 a, b, c and d illustrate screening surfaces according to some embodiments as a view from above.
  • Figure 1 illustrates a screen according to a preferred embodiment of the invention, which screen comprises an essentially cylindrical outer casing 1, to which casing a fiber suspension inlet conduit 2, an accept outlet conduit 3 and a reject outlet conduit 4 are connected, a screen drum 5 and one or more stationary blades 6 inside the screen drum 5, which extend in the vicinity of the screen drum's surface. The rotating screen drum 5 is attached in a way known per se to a shaft 7 functioning e.g. by belt drive (not shown). The space 8 between the screen drum 5 and the outer casing 1 is annular. The above mentioned conduits 2 and 4 are connected to the outer casing 1 of the annular space. The fiber suspension is fed into the space 8 and the accept flown through the screening surface is discharged from the interior of the screen drum. The blades 6 are attached by means of arms 9 to a stationary frame 10, which also forms a support for the shaft 7 via bearings. The blades 6 are located inside the drum 5. Here said blades generate a suitable impulse, positive and negative, onto the drum 5, thus cleaning the screening surface of the drum.
  • Figure 2 illustrates a straightened screening surface profile according to a preferred embodiment. The profile plate 20 is formed of apertures 21 and profiles 22 between them. As seen from the figure, the apertures 21 are slots in accordance with the invention. The form of the slots is rectangular, whereby the edges of their ends can be either rectangular or rounded. The ratio of the length L and width W of the slots is 1.05-10, preferably 2-8, depending on the object of application. The width W is typically 4-12 mm. In this embodiment the longitudinal direction 23 of the slots 21 is parallel to the direction 24 of rotation of the drum 5.
  • In the axial direction of the drum, slots are arranged one above another, whereby rows/zones 11 of slots are formed at a distance from each other in the circumferential direction of the drum. The profile ridges 22 and the vertical rows of slots are not aligned with respect to the vertical axis of the drum, but they are declined rows. The ridges and rows of slots are at an angle of -5...+20 degrees, typically 15 degrees, angle β, with respect to the vertical shaft 7 of the drum.
  • The slots of the vertical rows 11 of slots can be arranged in the horizontal direction so that they form parallel horizontal rows. Figure 2 illustrates an alternative embodiment, where the slots 21 of the vertical rows 11 of slots are in the horizontal direction arranged so that the slots of every second row of slots are located on the same horizontal lines. Thereby, the slots of the vertical rows of slots are in the horizontal direction arranged so that the slots of every second vertical row 11 of slots are located on the same horizontal lines, i.e. in a first group of horizontal lines, and respectively the slots of every second row of slots are located in a second group of horizontal lines.
  • In Figure 3 the longitudinal direction/longitudinal axis 23 of the slots 21 is at an angle α with respect to the direction 24 of rotation of the drum, which angle is between -40 and +40 degrees. In Figure 3a the angle α is approximately +25 degrees and in Figure 3b approximately -24 degrees.
  • Figure 4 illustrates profiles of the outer surface of the plate 20. The screening surface can be regarded to be formed of a plate with ridges 22 and planar portions 26 therebetween, which are provided with machined apertures 21. In the embodiment of Figure 4, profile ridges are additionally provided in the zone of slots so that ridges 25 are arranged between slots located one above another. Thus, in that case the profile is formed by a row of ridges broken by slots. The slot zone may be provided with one or more thus formed profiles, which are preferably at the same declination angle with respect to the vertical axis of the drum as the rows/zones 11 of slots and the profiles 22 between them.
  • Figure 5a and b illustrate a screening surface profile as a straightened and cut side view. The inner surface 27 plate 20 is flat, except for the apertures. In Figure 5b the outer surface profile ridge 22 of the plate 20 is formed of front surfaces 29 ascending at a certain angle from the plane 28 of the plate 20, surfaces 30 essentially parallel to the plane 28 of the plate 20, rear surfaces 31 essentially perpendicular to the plane 28 of the plate 20 and portions of the plane 28 between the apertures 21. On the other hand, the screen plate can be regarded as being formed of a plate provided with ridges 22 formed of said parts 29, 30 and 31, and between them planar parts 28 provided with machined apertures 21. In the embodiment of Figure 5a the front surface 29 is perpendicular against the plane 28 of the plate and the rear surface is declined.
  • When the front surface of the profile ridge, which receives the flow, is declined backwards, i.e. it ascends from the screening surface plane, and the rear surface is perpendicular (Fig. 5b), the declined front surface receives the pulp entering the drum, aiming e.g. to accelerate its speed, but an even flow through the screening surface apertures in the screening surface is obtained anyway. This eliminates disturbing flow of the suspension in the opposite direction, which happens under some circumstances. When the front surface of the profile ridge is perpendicular against the plane of the screening surface and the rear surface of the ridge is descending (Figure 5a) the front surface resists and mixes the flow, whereby the flow through the screening surface increases, and thus the capacity of the apparatus increases.
  • It is seen in Figures 2-4 that the ridges 22 are somewhat declined with respect to the axis of the drum, as well as with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum. By means of the declination angle of the ridges, the direction of declination with respect to the direction of rotation, the rotational speed of the drum and the angle of elevation of part 29 of the ridges it is possible to optimize the circulation time of the pulp in the screen with respect to the final result of the separation. The direction of the ridges 22 has the influence that if the ridges 22 on the screen drum 5 are declined backwards, they tend to lift the fiber suspension upwards on the screen drum, whereby the circulation time of the fiber suspension in the screen is increased, separation becomes more exact and the reject amount is decreased while the accept amount is increased. Whereas with forward declined ridges the circulation time is decreased and the capacity is increased. In addition to said factors, also the height of the screen drum has an influence on the operational speeds, declination angles etc.
  • According to the embodiments of Figure 6, the position of the longitudinal direction 23 of the slots 21 in one row of slots with respect to the direction 24 of rotation of the drum changes from up downwards seen along the shaft 7 of the drum (Figure 6a). The longitudinal direction of the uppermost slot 21' is parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum (i.e. perpendicular with respect to the axis of the drum). Meanwhile, the longitudinal direction of a next lower slot 21" is declined (with respect to the axis of the drum), starting from the front end 32 of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum, whereby the front end 32 of the slot is located higher than its trailing end 33 (in the direction of rotation of the drum). Thus, the next lower slot is declined downwards more than the upper one. The declination angle of the lower slot is typically 1-5 degrees, typically 2-4 degrees larger. In this kind of embodiment, the change in the direction of the slots can be regarded as descending from above downwards. According to another embodiment (Fig. 6 b), the longitudinal direction of the uppermost slot is also parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum, while a following lower slot is declined upwards with respect to the direction of rotation, whereby the front end 32' of said slot, in the direction of rotation of the drum, is located lower than its trailing end 33'. Thus, the next lower slot is declined at the trailing end upwards to a greater extent than the upper slot. The declination angle of the lower slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger. In this kind of embodiment, the change in the direction of the slots can be regarded as ascending from above downwards. In these embodiments, two slots located one above another can be essentially parallel, but it is pertinent that most of the slots in a row of slots are located at different declination angles with respect to each other.
  • According to a preferred embodiment of the invention (Figure 6c, d), the position/angle of the longitudinal direction of the slots in one row of slots with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum changes from down upwards seen along the drum's axis so that the longitudinal direction of the lowermost slot is parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum, while a slot located next above is declined with respect to the direction of rotation. Thus, the next upper slot can be declined upwards (Figure 6c), whereby the front end 32" of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum is located lower than the trailing end 33" of the slot. Typically the upper slot is more declined than the lower slot. The declination angle of the upper slot is 1-5, typically 2-4 degrees larger. In this kind of embodiment, the change in the direction of the slots can be regarded as from down upwards ascending. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention (Figure 6d), an upper slot can be declined correspondingly so that the front end 32"' of the slot in the direction of rotation of the drum is located higher than the trailing end 33"' of the slot. In that case, the slots are declined downwards with respect to the direction of rotation. In this kind of embodiment, the change in the direction of the slots can be regarded as from down upwards descending.
  • In embodiments, where the slots are declined downwards (Fig. 6a and d), a greater capacity is obtained. In embodiments, where the slots are declined upwards (Fig. 6b and c), higher cleanliness is achieved, as contaminated particles flow from above downwards.
  • As becomes obvious from the above, the method and apparatus according to the invention have allowed deleting the drawbacks of the prior art apparatuses and methods and thus increasing the capacity of the screening apparatus. It is, however, to be noted that in the above only some most important embodiments of the invention have been described in more detail, which are by no means meant to limit the invention from what is presented in the claims, which alone define the scope of protection of the invention.

Claims (15)

  1. An apparatus for screening fiber suspension, especially for removing coarse particles, such as knots, comprising a casing (1), a feed conduit (2) for fiber suspension and outlet conduits (4, 3) for reject and accept, a screen drum (5) arranged rotatably with respect to the vertical shaft (7) inside the casing and having a screening surface (20) provided with apertures (21), through which the accept fraction flows, in which apparatus the feed and outlet conduits are arranged so that the fiber suspension is fed into a space (8) between the casing and the screen drum and the accept is discharged from the interior of the screen drum,
    wherein the apertures in the screening surface are slots (21), which slots form rows (11) of slots, and the outer side of the screening surface is profiled so that ridges (22) are arranged between the rows of slots,
    characterized in that
    the slots (21) have a longitudinal direction with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum between -40 and +40 degrees, and a ratio of the length and width between 1.05 and 10.
  2. An apparatus according to claim 1, in which the longitudinal direction of the slots (23) is between -30 and +30 degrees with respect to the direction of rotation of the drum, preferably between -15 and +15 degrees.
  3. An apparatus according to claim 1 or 2, in which the longitudinal direction of the slots (21) is parallel to the direction of rotation of the drum.
  4. An apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the slots (21) are one above another in the vertical direction.
  5. An apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the ratio of the length and width of the slots (21) is 2-8.
  6. An apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the profile ridges (22) are arranged so that they are at an angle of -5...+20 degrees, preferably + 15 degrees with respect to the vertical axis (7) of the screen drum.
  7. An apparatus according to claim 6, in which the slots (21) located one above another form vertical rows of slots, wherein the ends of the slots form a line that is parallel to the profile ridges (22).
  8. An apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the slots (21) of the vertical rows (11) of slots are in the horizontal direction arranged so that the slots of every second vertical row of slots are located on the same horizontal lines, i.e. in a first group of horizontal lines, and respectively the slots of every second row of slots are located in a second group of horizontal lines.
  9. An apparatus according to claim 6 or 7, in which the outer side of the screening surface (20) is profiled so that one or more ridges (25) are provided in the zone of slots also between the slots located one above another.
  10. An apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the profile is formed of ridges (22, 25) having a front surface (29) and a rear surface (31) at a certain angle with respect to the screening surface plane and possibly therebetween a surface (30) essentially parallel to the plane of the plate.
  11. An apparatus according to claim 10, in which the front surface (29) of the profile ridge receiving the flow is declined backwards, i.e. it ascends from the screening surface plane and the rear surface (31) is perpendicular.
  12. An apparatus according to claim 10, in which the front surface (29) of the profile ridge is perpendicular against the screening surface plane and the rear surface (31) is descending.
  13. An apparatus according to claim 10, in which the front surface and rear surface of the profile ridge are declined.
  14. An apparatus according to any one of the preceding claims, in which the longitudinal (23) position of the slots (21', 21 ") located in one row (11) of slots with respect to the direction of rotation (24) of the drum changes from above downward seen along the axis of the drum.
  15. An apparatus according to claim 14, in which the longitudinal position of a slot (21 ") in a row of slots is declined more than the longitudinal position of an upper or a lower slot (21') .
EP10796769.7A 2009-07-07 2010-06-10 Apparatus for screening fibre suspensions Not-in-force EP2452012B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
FI20095769A FI20095769A (en) 2009-07-07 2009-07-07 Apparatus for handling a fiber suspension
PCT/FI2010/050482 WO2011004060A1 (en) 2009-07-07 2010-06-10 Apparatus for screening fibre suspensions

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2452012A1 EP2452012A1 (en) 2012-05-16
EP2452012A4 EP2452012A4 (en) 2012-12-05
EP2452012B1 true EP2452012B1 (en) 2014-01-15

Family

ID=40935850

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP10796769.7A Not-in-force EP2452012B1 (en) 2009-07-07 2010-06-10 Apparatus for screening fibre suspensions

Country Status (7)

Country Link
EP (1) EP2452012B1 (en)
JP (1) JP2012532999A (en)
CN (1) CN102472008A (en)
BR (1) BRPI1014007A2 (en)
FI (1) FI20095769A (en)
RU (1) RU2012104023A (en)
WO (1) WO2011004060A1 (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR101438798B1 (en) * 2012-02-08 2014-09-05 서울대학교산학협력단 Method for cooperative operation between macrocell base station and femtocell base station
JP6248616B2 (en) * 2013-12-25 2017-12-20 セイコーエプソン株式会社 Sheet manufacturing equipment

Family Cites Families (9)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US1631585A (en) * 1927-06-07 Screen plate
US3713541A (en) * 1971-05-10 1973-01-30 Bird Machine Co Screening machine with slotted screen
SE450711B (en) * 1985-11-14 1987-07-20 Besam Ag screening member
FI76139C (en) * 1987-01-19 1988-09-09 Ahlstroem Oy Twigs separation method and apparatus
US4795560A (en) * 1987-04-16 1989-01-03 The Black Clawson Company Screen plates
CN2069430U (en) * 1990-07-20 1991-01-16 上海造纸机械总厂沪光分厂 Special-shaped screen board
FI89521C (en) * 1991-10-04 1993-10-11 Cae Investments Bv Process for producing a screen product and by the process for produced screen product
DE10217926A1 (en) * 2002-04-23 2003-11-13 Voith Paper Patent Gmbh Process for wet screening of fiber suspensions
EP1777339B1 (en) * 2005-10-19 2010-10-06 Voith Patent GmbH Screening device for paper pulp

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP2452012A4 (en) 2012-12-05
FI20095769A0 (en) 2009-07-07
JP2012532999A (en) 2012-12-20
WO2011004060A1 (en) 2011-01-13
CN102472008A (en) 2012-05-23
FI20095769A (en) 2011-01-08
BRPI1014007A2 (en) 2016-04-12
RU2012104023A (en) 2013-08-20
EP2452012A1 (en) 2012-05-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4356085A (en) Rotary screening machine for pulp suspensions
US3849302A (en) Method and apparatus for screening paper fiber stock
JPS5841889B2 (en) Method for sifting fiber suspended liquid and pressurized sifting device for carrying out the method
JP4048258B2 (en) Waste paper pulp sorting equipment
WO1994023848A1 (en) Screening apparatus for papermaking pulp
GB1566468A (en) Apparatus for screening paper fibre stock
CA1064428A (en) Stationary cylindrical screen for liquid suspensions including a heavy impurities trap and dilution means
EP1598477B1 (en) Pressure screen for screening a fibrous suspension
US20140158586A1 (en) Pulp screen rotor with slurry passages around and through the rotor
EP2452012B1 (en) Apparatus for screening fibre suspensions
US8950584B2 (en) Apparatus for screening fibrous suspensions
CA2060074C (en) Apparatus for treating fiber suspension
US3970548A (en) Apparatus for screening paper fiber stock
CA1092549A (en) Vortex separator with coaxial inlet and lightweight reject pipelines
EP0485153A1 (en) Apparatus for screening to remove knots from a fluid borne slurry of fibres and knots
US20230060771A1 (en) Pulp Screening Machine
MXPA01001292A (en) Screen.
FI109038B (en) Process for treating fiber pulp mixture and strainer
JPH07308598A (en) Rotor for screen sorting device and screen sorting device
AT408771B (en) SORTER FOR CLEANING A FIBER SUSPENSION
CA1329333C (en) Method and apparatus for separating knots
WO2004046457A1 (en) Method and apparatus for treating fiber suspension
EP2994568B1 (en) An apparatus for separating particles in a pulp suspension
MXPA01001294A (en) Screen.
US4927529A (en) Method and apparatus for separating knots

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20120125

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

DAX Request for extension of the european patent (deleted)
A4 Supplementary search report drawn up and despatched

Effective date: 20121102

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: D21D 5/06 20060101ALI20121026BHEP

Ipc: D21D 5/16 20060101AFI20121026BHEP

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20130806

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AL AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 649906

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 602010013194

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140220

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20140115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MK05

Ref document number: 649906

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140515

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140415

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140515

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010013194

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20141016

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602010013194

Country of ref document: DE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140610

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 602010013194

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20141016

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20140610

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 602010013194

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20150101

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20150227

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140630

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140610

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140630

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150101

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140630

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20140610

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140416

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20100610

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140115