EP2213420B1 - Procédé de commande et machine-outil manuelle - Google Patents

Procédé de commande et machine-outil manuelle Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2213420B1
EP2213420B1 EP09178639A EP09178639A EP2213420B1 EP 2213420 B1 EP2213420 B1 EP 2213420B1 EP 09178639 A EP09178639 A EP 09178639A EP 09178639 A EP09178639 A EP 09178639A EP 2213420 B1 EP2213420 B1 EP 2213420B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
acceleration
driving power
rotational speed
threshold value
tool
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP09178639A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2213420A1 (fr
Inventor
Holger Cecchin
Erwin Manschitz
Germar Meiendres
Franz Mössnang
Stefan Hammerstingl
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Hilti AG
Original Assignee
Hilti AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Hilti AG filed Critical Hilti AG
Publication of EP2213420A1 publication Critical patent/EP2213420A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2213420B1 publication Critical patent/EP2213420B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25D—PERCUSSIVE TOOLS
    • B25D11/00—Portable percussive tools with electromotor or other motor drive
    • B25D11/005—Arrangements for adjusting the stroke of the impulse member or for stopping the impact action when the tool is lifted from the working surface
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25D—PERCUSSIVE TOOLS
    • B25D2211/00—Details of portable percussive tools with electromotor or other motor drive
    • B25D2211/06—Means for driving the impulse member
    • B25D2211/068—Crank-actuated impulse-driving mechanisms
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25D—PERCUSSIVE TOOLS
    • B25D2250/00—General details of portable percussive tools; Components used in portable percussive tools
    • B25D2250/131—Idling mode of tools
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B25—HAND TOOLS; PORTABLE POWER-DRIVEN TOOLS; MANIPULATORS
    • B25D—PERCUSSIVE TOOLS
    • B25D2250/00—General details of portable percussive tools; Components used in portable percussive tools
    • B25D2250/221—Sensors

Definitions

  • the present invention relates to a method for controlling a pneumatic, in particular electro-pneumatic, striking hand tool according to the preamble of claim 1 and an electropneumatically striking hand tool according to the preamble of claim 12.
  • the method is a control method for reducing idle strokes of a power tool.
  • EP 0 303 651 B1 is a method for interrupting a drive operation for an electro-pneumatic chisel hammer and hammer drill known. This method is used in case of blocking to interrupt the drive train to protect a user. A blockage of a chisel hammer is detected by a position of a tool or an impactor in a striking mechanism. Blocking a rotational movement is detected by exceeding acceleration values.
  • the Indian EP 0 303 651 B1 quoted electro-pneumatic chisel hammer from the DE 28 20 128 switches off due to construction, if a user raises the chisel hammer.
  • a tool falls into a strike axis mounted stop.
  • a flying mass can now fly forward to the extent that the flying mass does not further close a ventilation opening in the guide tube between the flying mass and an exciter piston.
  • the excitation piston can no longer suck in the flying mass because a pressure equalization takes place via the ventilation opening.
  • the impact mechanism is thus deactivated in a passive manner.
  • the flying piston is pushed over the ventilation opening by the tool.
  • the exciter piston can suck in the flying piston again and the hammer mechanism is active.
  • EP 1 170 095 A2 describes a striking electric hand tool according to the preamble of claim 12 and a method according to the preamble of claim 1, with a motor-driven pneumatic percussion.
  • a control unit monitors a position of one of the beating elements, eg tool, striker, flying piston. If the beating element shifts in a position that is prominent for a blank, a speed of the driving motor is lowered to 10% to 50% of a working speed.
  • the present invention provides a method according to claim 1, which reduces a power consumption of an electropneumatically striking hand tool when lifting from a workpiece, i. if no counterforce acts on an electropneumatic impact mechanism.
  • the inventive method according to claim 1 for controlling an electropneumatically striking hand tool machine performs the following steps.
  • An acceleration is detected, which acts along a direction of impact of the power tool.
  • a drive power is reduced when the detected acceleration is greater than a threshold value, wherein the threshold value is selected to be greater than accelerations that occur during a striking operation of the power tool on a workpiece.
  • a flying piston periodically strikes a tool, possibly via an intermediate striker, when the tool is in contact with a workpiece, i. in the intended application mode.
  • the impulse and the kinetic energy of the flying piston are transmitted to the tool and the workpiece.
  • the occurring acceleration values of the coupled system of flying piston and tool are due to their common mass low.
  • the flying piston or the anvil is typically stopped by the tool before they reach a corresponding catching device in the direction of impact.
  • the acceleration values transferred to the hand tool machine during hitting are low in the intended application mode.
  • the occurring accelerations e.g. The corresponding peak values, both in the intended operation and when emptying are given for by the structure and performance of a power tool, possibly even by the tool.
  • the acceleration values can be measured for a type of hand tool.
  • the threshold value can be selected taking into account the measured values.
  • One aspect of the invention relates to a portable power tool according to claim 12 having a drive shaft, a pneumatic impact mechanism, an acceleration sensor and an evaluation device for carrying out the above-mentioned control method.
  • detection of a look-up is carried out by checking at least one of the following criteria.
  • First criterion the acceleration occurs in the direction of impact and exceeds the threshold value;
  • Second criterion the acceleration exceeds in terms of magnitude the threshold twice in the interval of a first period of time and
  • third criterion the acceleration exceeds in terms of amount the threshold twice within a second period of time.
  • the drive power is reduced when a lookup is detected.
  • Blanking can be distinguished from hard placement based on the direction of acceleration. In a hard touch the forces from the tool in the direction of the power tool act. When blanking occur both forces in as well as against the direction of impact. Therefore, it may prove advantageous to determine a blanking on the basis of the forces occurring in the direction of impact and / or based on a double crossing of the negative and the positive peak values of the acceleration. It can also be used that a blanking occurs with a predetermined period.
  • An embodiment provides that, for the third criterion, either the acceleration in each case once in the direction of impact and against the direction of impact exceeds the threshold value in absolute terms, or the acceleration between the two times exceeding the threshold value goes back to zero.
  • the second period of time may be selected to be shorter than a period between two strokes of a beating operation on a workpiece.
  • Blanking occurs periodically, with the period dictated by the drive.
  • An embodiment provides that the first period is selected depending on a current speed of a drive shaft.
  • the first time span may be the inverse of the current speed.
  • a further embodiment provides that after detection of a lookup, the drive power is lowered from a high drive power to an average drive power.
  • a single exceeding of the threshold value can be done by an unforeseen event. As soon as a subsequent exceeding, which is to be expected when looking up, does not occur, the drive power can be quickly increased again. Otherwise, the drive power is already reduced and decreasing to a low drive power sleep mode can be as fast.
  • a development provides that the drive power is lowered to a low drive power, if after the detection of a lookup within a third period another lookup is detected.
  • the drive power is increased to the high drive power.
  • the control method provides the full power of the drive and starts again from the beginning when no more lookup is detected. For example, the lookup is triggered when the user places the hand tool on a workpiece or when a flying piston of a percussion mechanism comes to rest.
  • the third and / or fourth time period can be selected as a function of a current rotational speed of a drive shaft.
  • a lookup takes place in a rhythm which is predetermined by the drive shaft. Therefore, based on the rotational speed, it can be determined at which time interval after a first look-up a second look-up would have to take place.
  • a speed of a drive shaft is adjusted for adjusting the drive power.
  • a low speed for the low drive power can be selected with less than 35% of a high speed for the high drive power.
  • An average speed for the average drive power can be selected between 75% and 85% of a high speed for the high drive power.
  • a resonant speed resonantly excites a pneumatic hammer mechanism of the hand tool machine and a high speed, which deviates by less than 10% from the resonant speed, can be selected for the high drive power.
  • the resonant excitation is characterized by the fact that the excitation power is transmitted to the striking mechanism with the highest efficiency.
  • An embodiment provides that the acceleration sensor and the evaluation device are integrated in an electronic module.
  • Fig. 1 shows schematically as an example of a striking hand tool an electro-pneumatic chisel hammer 1, other examples not shown are, inter alia, rotary hammers, combi hammers.
  • a drive train with a primary drive 3, a drive shaft 4 and a striking mechanism 5 is arranged. Between the primary drive 3 and the drive shaft 4, a transmission 7 may be connected.
  • the primary drive 3 is preferably an electric motor, for example a universal motor or a brushless motor.
  • the drive shaft 4 is rotated at speeds in the range between 1 Hz and 100 Hz, for example at 10 Hz to 60 Hz by the primary drive 3.
  • the rotational movement of the drive shaft 4 is transmitted by the striking mechanism 5 in a periodic impact movement along a striking axis 8.
  • a tool held in a tool holder 9 is driven out of the chipping hammer 1 by the periodic impacts along the striking axis 8 in the direction of impact 100.
  • a return of the tool in the chisel hammer 1 against the direction of impact 100 is effected by pressing the chisel hammer 1 to a workpiece.
  • Fig. 2 shows an exemplary impact mechanism
  • a guide tube 10 carries an excitation piston 12 and a flying piston 13 along the striking axis 8.
  • the excitation piston 12 and the flying piston 13 are formed in a form-fitting manner to an inner wall 11 of the guide tube 10.
  • An airtight seal can be achieved by sealing rings 15, 16.
  • a first ventilation opening 17 connects an interior of the guide tube 10 with an outer space of the guide tube 10 in the region of the excitation piston 12.
  • a second ventilation opening in the area of the flying piston 13 connects an interior of the guide tube 10 to an outer space of the guide tube 10.
  • a striker 20 is mounted in an anvil guide 21.
  • the anvil guide 21 limits movement of the striker 20 in the direction of impact 100 and against the direction of impact 100.
  • a tool-facing end 22 is in contact with a tool which is held in the tool holder 9.
  • a tool-facing end 23 of the striker 20 protrudes from the striker guide 21 in the interior of the guide tube 10th
  • the exciter piston 12 is forced by the drive shaft 4 to a periodic movement along the striking axis 14.
  • the drive shaft 4 is rotated about its axis of rotation 30 and thereby moves an eccentric to the axis of rotation 30 arranged eccentric pin 31.
  • the eccentric pin 31 is connected to a rod 32 with the excitation piston 12.
  • the half stroke of the exciter piston 12 corresponds approximately to the distance 33 of the eccentric pin 31 from the axis of rotation 30.
  • Fig. 3 schematically shows the occurring acceleration values a in the machine housing 2, plotted over the time t, wherein a positive acceleration value a indicates an acceleration in the direction of impact 100.
  • a user sets the Hand tool 1 on the tool (82).
  • the intended application operation 83 in which the workpiece is processed by the blows of the chisel hammer 1.
  • a whitening occurs 84, because the user lifts the chisel hammer 1, for example, to position it at a different location on the workpiece.
  • the impacts of the flying piston 13 on the striker 20 occur periodically at intervals T, which are predetermined by the rotational speed of the drive shaft.
  • the pattern of the acceleration a in one of the beats can be divided into two phases 80, 81.
  • a positive acceleration value a1 is detected, that is, an acceleration in the direction of impact 100. This is attributable to the event when the striker 20 and the tool are accelerated out of the machine tool 1.
  • Their acceleration a is presumably partly transmitted to the machine housing 2 due to friction in the striker guide 21 and in the tool receptacle 9 and when the plunger 20 is stopped at the tool-facing end 24 of the striker guide 21.
  • a negative acceleration value a2 is detected, to which presumably a relaxation in the impact of elastically deformed components and / or a return of the striker 20 at the end 25 of the striker guide 21 contribute.
  • the peak values and the time integrals of the positive acceleration value a1 and the negative acceleration value a2 may differ, but are typically not different by more than a factor of two.
  • the striker 20 and the tool can not deliver the impulse transmitted by the missile 13 to a workpiece, but strike the respective ends 24 of their guides 21 unrestrained. This is referred to as a blank.
  • the amplitude of the acceleration values a3, a4 is at least a factor of two greater than the acceleration values a1, a2 during the intended time, depending on the design of the chisel hammer 1 and the mass of the tool Application mode 83, ie when hitting a workpiece.
  • a blank 84 may also be divided into two phases 85, 86.
  • a positive acceleration value a3 i. an acceleration a in the direction of impact 100.
  • the positive acceleration value a3 correlates among other things with the striking of the missile 13 and / or the striker 20 in tool-facing ends 24 of their guides 10, 21.
  • a negative acceleration value a4 results in a negative acceleration value a4, presumably a relaxation of components elastically deformed during the first phase 85 and / or a rebound of the striker 20 at the end 25 of the striker guide 21.
  • the time interval between two empty beats corresponds to the period T or the specification by the current rotational speed of the drive shaft 4.
  • the placement 82 of the chisel hammer 1 on a workpiece has a different signature with respect to the occurring acceleration a5.
  • the acceleration value a5 may be approximately equal to the absolute acceleration values a3, a4.
  • the amplitude and time integral of the acceleration values at touch-up are greatly affected by a user, a workpiece, and a situation, such as a posture. in a breakthrough, depending.
  • the impact typically exhibits only a single phase with negative acceleration values, that is to say an acceleration a opposite to the direction of impact 100, during placement.
  • the chisel hammer is usually reset a few seconds apart, so that within a period T a corresponding acceleration a5 occurs only once.
  • a user When placing the chisel hammer 1, a user typically wants the maximum impact power available. When picking up the chisel hammer 1, whitening should be suppressed as much as possible in order to reduce the load on the chisel hammer 1 and the user.
  • a system controller 41 In response to actuation of a system switch 40, a system controller 41 is activated or triggered.
  • the system controller 41 instructs a motor controller 42 to accelerate the primary drive 3 (S1).
  • the speed N of the drive shaft 4 reaches a high speed N1.
  • the high speed N1 can be in the range of 80% to 100% of the nominal maximum speed.
  • the high speed N1 is preferably matched to the impact mechanism 5, that the excitation piston 12, the movement of the flying piston 13 resonantly excites.
  • the impact mechanism 5 strikes at a distance of the period T (S2).
  • the period T between two strokes corresponds to the inverse of the high speed N1 or an integral multiple of the inverse of the high speed N 1.
  • An acceleration sensor 43 detects the occurring acceleration a.
  • the acceleration sensor 43 may be located in the percussion mechanism 5, on the guide tube 10 impact mechanism 5, in an electronic group for controlling the primary drive 4 away from the percussion mechanism 5, e.g. the system controller 41, or be arranged at other locations within the machine housing 2.
  • the signals of the acceleration sensor 43 are forwarded to an evaluation device 44.
  • the evaluation device 44 compares the occurring acceleration values a with a threshold value A (S3).
  • the magnitude of the threshold A is greater than the acceleration values a1 that typically occur in the intended application mode 83, and less than the typical acceleration values a5 selected during a blank bump 84.
  • the threshold A is to be adapted to the respective chisel hammer 1 and possibly also to a tool used.
  • the evaluation device 44 only responds to positive acceleration values a, i. to an acceleration in the direction of the striking axis 100.
  • a branch S4 of the control method takes place with the event when the threshold value A is exceeded by a positive acceleration value a (left branch of the flowchart). Otherwise, the evaluation device 44 continues to monitor the occurring acceleration values a (right branch of the flowchart).
  • a time t1 of the exceeding can be detected.
  • the evaluation device 44 can, for example, start or reset a timer 45.
  • the evaluation device 44 instructs the system controller 41 to lower the rotational speed of the drive shaft 4 to an average rotational speed N2 (S5).
  • the average speed N2 may be 15% to 30% lower than the previously set high speed N1.
  • the evaluation device 44 checks whether within a time period T1 the threshold value A is exceeded once more (S6).
  • the evaluation device 44 can be triggered, for example, by the timer 45, which was previously started or reset by the evaluation device 44.
  • the time period T1 is longer than the period T, for example, up to 50% greater.
  • the time period T1 can be determined as a function of the current average speed N2. When idling 84, a further empty space and corresponding acceleration values a4, a5 are expected within the time period T1 since the last empty space.
  • a branch S7 of the control method takes place when either the time period T1 is exceeded or the threshold value A is exceeded once more. If, on the one hand, the threshold value A is not exceeded within the time period T1, the speed N of the drive shaft is raised to the high speed N1 (S8). The chisel hammer 1 works again with full power. The control process returns to step S3.
  • the rotational speed N of the drive shaft 4 is lowered to a low rotational speed N3 (S9).
  • the low speed N3 may be, for example, 10% to 30% of the nominal maximum speed.
  • the low speed N3 is preferably selected so that the excitation of its movement through the excitation piston 12 is out of resonance. The coupling of the movement of the excitation piston 12 to the flying mass 13 is reduced and it can be transmitted less energy. In another embodiment, it is provided to completely switch off the primary drive 3.
  • a ventilation opening 18 may be provided, which is at least temporarily opened during idle.
  • the vent opening 18 may be arranged as in the above-described passive Leerschlagdämpfung.
  • the missile 13 closes the ventilation opening 18 when the missile 13 rests against the striker 20 which is fully engaged in the guide tube 10.
  • the vent opening 18 is exposed when the missile 13 may abut a tool-side stop, because the striker 20 is disengaged from the guide tube 10 to a tool-side stop 24. Due to the ventilation opening 18, the coupling of the flying piston 13 is additional weakened and the movement of the flying piston 13 may inter alia come to a standstill due to friction losses.
  • the evaluation device 44 continuously checks whether further blank beats occur (S10).
  • the timer 45 is reset, for example, each time by the evaluation device 44 when the threshold A is exceeded. If no further exceeding is detected within a second time period T2, the control method branches (S11).
  • the rotational speed N of the drive shaft 4 is increased to the high rotational speed N1 (S12).
  • the control process returns to step S3.
  • the time period T2 can be selected equal to the time period T1. Alternatively, the time T2 may be up to five times, e.g. the triple, the period T be selected. The time period T2 can be determined as a function of the current low rotational speed N2. If percussion 5 still looks up, time T2 should be chosen so that another beat is expected within T2.
  • the impact mechanism 5 can transmit less energy to the missile 13 and thus to the striker 20 at the changed low speed N3.
  • the empty space becomes weaker and the acceleration values a4, a5 of the empty space decrease.
  • the threshold A is reduced when a first number of idle beats, i. Exceeding the threshold value A, were detected.
  • the first number can be between three and ten.
  • the threshold value A can also be lowered continuously to a lower threshold A2 with each detected blank.
  • the lower threshold value A2 can be, for example, half of the threshold value A, but is greater than the acceleration values a1, a2 in the intended application mode.
  • the missile 13 can come to a complete halt. It turns out that the missile 13 comes to a stop between the ventilation opening 18 and the striker 20. Even if now the speed of the drive shaft 4 is increased to the high speed N1, the missile 13 stops. It now requires a placement of the chisel hammer 1 on a workpiece, so that the tool pushes the missile 13 via the vent opening 18 to couple the missile 13 back to the exciter piston 12.
  • the above-described embodiment distinguishes setting of blanking by two criteria. First, only acceleration values a in the direction of impact 100 are taken into account, and secondly, it is checked whether a second beat (S6) occurs after a first beat (S3). The control procedure can simply apply one of the two criteria.
  • step S3 After exceeding the threshold value A, it is checked whether the threshold value A is exceeded again within a time period T3.
  • the period of time T3 within which the second phase takes place when looking up is characteristic of a chisel hammer 1.
  • the period of time T3 can thus be measured and stored in the evaluation device 44 stored.
  • a refinement provides that it is checked that the acceleration values in the first and second phases have different signs. Alternatively, it can be checked whether a zero crossing of the acceleration occurs between the two phases. The acceleration a can then be determined without sign.
  • the steps S6 and S10 can be adapted analogously.
  • the speed of the drive shaft 4 is lowered directly from the high speed N1 to the low speed N3, when an acceleration a is detected for the first time, which is assigned to a lookup.
  • the steps S5, S6, S7 and S8 can be omitted.
  • the acceleration values are detected by stretch strips.
  • the stretch marks are preferably arranged on the machine housing 2. The occurring accelerations lead to a corresponding compression and expansion of the machine housing 2 or arranged in the machine housing 2 elements.
  • the acceleration is typically detected by the stretch marks as a change in resistance or capacitance.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Percussive Tools And Related Accessories (AREA)
  • Automatic Control Of Machine Tools (AREA)

Claims (13)

  1. Procédé pour commander une machine-outil manuelle à percussion pneumatique, caractérisé en ce qu'il comporte les étapes consistant à :
    détecter une accélération (a) le long d'un axe de percussion (8) de la machine-outil manuelle (1),
    détecter l'apparition d'une percussion résiduelle en contrôlant au moins l'un des critères suivants :
    premier critère : l'accélération (a) se produit dans la direction de percussion (100) et sa grandeur dépasse une valeur de seuil (A), la valeur de seuil (A) étant choisie pour être supérieure à des valeurs d'accélération maximales (a1, a2) qui apparaissent dans un mode de percussion de la machine-outil manuelle (1) sur une pièce,
    deuxième critère : la grandeur de l'accélération (a) dépasse deux fois la valeur de seuil (A) sur un premier intervalle de temps (T) qui est choisi en fonction de la vitesse de rotation actuelle (N) d'un arbre d'entraînement (4), et
    troisième critère : la grandeur de l'accélération (a) dépasse deux fois la valeur de seuil (A) sur un deuxième intervalle de temps (T3) qui est choisi plus court qu'un intervalle de temps entre deux percussions en mode de percussion, et
    réduire la puissance d'entraînement lorsqu'une percussion résiduelle est détectée.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que, pour le troisième critère, soit la grandeur de l'accélération dépasse la valeur de seuil (A) une fois dans la direction de percussion (100) et une fois dans la direction de percussion (100) opposée, soit la grandeur de l'accélération retourne à zéro entre les instants où la valeur de seuil (A) est franchie deux fois.
  3. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 ou 2, caractérisé en ce que le deuxième intervalle de temps (T3) est plus court qu'un intervalle de temps (T) entre deux percussions en mode de percussion sur une pièce.
  4. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisé en ce qu'après une détection d'une percussion résiduelle, la puissance d'entraînement est réduite d'une puissance d'entraînement élevée à une puissance d'entraînement moyenne.
  5. Procédé selon la revendication 4, caractérisé en ce que si après la détection d'une percussion résiduelle sur un troisième intervalle de temps (T2), une percussion résiduelle est encore détectée, la puissance d'entraînement est réduite à une puissance d'entraînement faible.
  6. Procédé selon la revendication 4 ou 5, caractérisé en ce que si après une détection d'une percussion résiduelle sur un quatrième intervalle de temps (T3), aucun autre percussion résiduelle n'est détectée, la puissance d'entraînement est augmentée jusqu'à la puissance d'entraînement élevée.
  7. Procédé selon la revendication 5 ou 6, caractérisé en ce que le troisième et/ou quatrième intervalle de temps est choisi en fonction de la vitesse de rotation actuelle d'un arbre d'entraînement (4).
  8. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce qu'une vitesse de rotation (N) d'un arbre d'entraînement (4) est établie afin de régler la puissance d'entraînement.
  9. Procédé selon la revendication 8, caractérisé en ce qu'une petite vitesse de rotation (N3) pour la puissance d'entraînement faible est choisie inférieure à 35 % d'une grande vitesse de rotation (N1) pour la puissance d'entraînement élevée.
  10. Procédé selon la revendication 8 ou 9, caractérisé en ce qu'une vitesse de rotation moyenne (N2) pour la puissance d'entraînement moyenne est choisie entre 75 % et 85 % d'une grande vitesse de rotation (N1) pour la puissance d'entraînement élevée.
  11. Procédé selon l'une quelconque des revendications 8 à 10, caractérisé en ce qu'une vitesse de rotation de résonance excite un mécanisme de percussion pneumatique de la machine-outil manuelle (1) en résonance et une grande vitesse de rotation (N) est choisie pour la puissance d'entraînement élevée, laquelle vitesse s'écarte de moins de 10 % de la vitesse de rotation de résonance.
  12. Machine-outil manuelle comportant :
    un arbre d'entraînement (4),
    un mécanisme de percussion pneumatique (5), et
    un capteur d'accélération, caractérisée par un dispositif d'évaluation pour mettre en oeuvre l'un des procédés des revendications 1 à 11.
  13. Machine-outil manuelle selon la revendication 12, caractérisée en ce que le capteur d'accélération et le dispositif d'évaluation sont intégrés dans un module électronique.
EP09178639A 2009-01-30 2009-12-10 Procédé de commande et machine-outil manuelle Active EP2213420B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102009000515A DE102009000515A1 (de) 2009-01-30 2009-01-30 Steuerungsverfahren und Handwerkzeugmaschine

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2213420A1 EP2213420A1 (fr) 2010-08-04
EP2213420B1 true EP2213420B1 (fr) 2012-01-25

Family

ID=42102331

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP09178639A Active EP2213420B1 (fr) 2009-01-30 2009-12-10 Procédé de commande et machine-outil manuelle

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US8333251B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP2213420B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP5551460B2 (fr)
AT (1) ATE542641T1 (fr)
DE (1) DE102009000515A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (15)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102012208870A1 (de) * 2012-05-25 2013-11-28 Robert Bosch Gmbh Schlagwerkeinheit
EP2826609A1 (fr) * 2013-07-18 2015-01-21 HILTI Aktiengesellschaft Amorce de forage automatique
EP2835198A1 (fr) 2013-08-09 2015-02-11 HILTI Aktiengesellschaft Fonction de perçage adaptative et intuitive
EP2857150A1 (fr) * 2013-10-03 2015-04-08 HILTI Aktiengesellschaft Machine-outil manuelle
DE102013224759A1 (de) * 2013-12-03 2015-06-03 Robert Bosch Gmbh Werkzeugmaschinenvorrichtung
JP6304533B2 (ja) * 2014-03-04 2018-04-04 パナソニックＩｐマネジメント株式会社 インパクト回転工具
JP6331082B2 (ja) * 2014-05-30 2018-05-30 日立工機株式会社 電動工具
CN104308811B (zh) * 2014-10-23 2016-05-11 吴江市江南不锈钢器材有限责任公司 一种省力安全锤
US10814468B2 (en) 2017-10-20 2020-10-27 Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Percussion tool
CN214723936U (zh) 2018-01-26 2021-11-16 米沃奇电动工具公司 冲击工具
EP3808506A1 (fr) * 2019-10-17 2021-04-21 Hilti Aktiengesellschaft Machine-outil manuelle
EP3822033A1 (fr) * 2019-11-14 2021-05-19 Hilti Aktiengesellschaft Procédé de commande et de réglage d'une machine-outil
US20230027574A1 (en) * 2021-07-26 2023-01-26 Makita Corporation Striking tool
US20230026934A1 (en) * 2021-07-26 2023-01-26 Makita Corporation Striking tool
CN113576563B (zh) * 2021-09-02 2022-10-04 深圳市理康医疗器械有限责任公司 一种电磁弹道式冲击波发生器

Family Cites Families (16)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE2820128A1 (de) * 1978-05-09 1979-11-22 Bosch Gmbh Robert Handwerkzeugmaschine
DE3884522D1 (de) 1987-03-05 1993-11-04 Bosch Gmbh Robert Verfahren zum unterbrechen der antriebstaetigkeit, insbesondere der schlag- und/oder drehantriebstaetigkeit, einer handwerkzeugmaschine.
JP2506214B2 (ja) * 1990-01-17 1996-06-12 オークマ株式会社 数値制御工作機械の衝突検出装置
DE4334933C2 (de) * 1993-10-13 1997-02-20 Fraunhofer Ges Forschung Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum zwangsweisen Abschalten von handgeführten Arbeitsmitteln
JP2887727B2 (ja) * 1994-03-31 1999-04-26 三菱自動車工業株式会社 エアハンマ用スナップおよびエアハンマ装置
US5704435A (en) * 1995-08-17 1998-01-06 Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation Hand held power tool including inertia switch
DE19628945A1 (de) * 1995-11-02 1997-05-07 Bosch Gmbh Robert Verfahren zum Unterbrechen der Antriebstätigkeit einer Handwerkzeugmaschine, sowie nach diesem Verfahren arbeitende Handwerkzeugmaschine
DE19960824C2 (de) * 1999-12-16 2003-08-21 Hilti Ag Verfahren und Einrichtung zur Untersuchung und Identifizierung der Art eines Untergrunds
DE10033362A1 (de) * 2000-07-08 2002-01-17 Hilti Ag Elektrohandwerkzeug mit Leerschlagabschaltung
DE10117123A1 (de) * 2001-04-06 2002-10-17 Bosch Gmbh Robert Handwerkzeugmaschine
DE10237898B3 (de) * 2002-08-19 2004-03-18 Hilti Ag Sicherheitsmodul für multifunktionale, drehend und schlagend arbeitende Handwerkzeugmaschine
DE10303006B4 (de) * 2003-01-27 2019-01-03 Hilti Aktiengesellschaft Handgeführtes Arbeitsgerät
US7156188B2 (en) * 2003-05-12 2007-01-02 Bermingham Construction Limited Pile driver with energy monitoring and control circuit
JP4276130B2 (ja) * 2004-05-28 2009-06-10 株式会社マキタ 作業工具
DE102004045141A1 (de) * 2004-09-17 2006-03-30 Wacker Construction Equipment Ag Expositionsmessvorrichtung für ein Arbeitsgerät
DE102005028918A1 (de) * 2005-06-22 2006-12-28 Wacker Construction Equipment Ag Bohr- und/oder Schlaghammer mit Leerlaufsteuerung

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JP5551460B2 (ja) 2014-07-16
EP2213420A1 (fr) 2010-08-04
JP2010173064A (ja) 2010-08-12
US20100193205A1 (en) 2010-08-05
US8333251B2 (en) 2012-12-18
DE102009000515A1 (de) 2010-08-05
ATE542641T1 (de) 2012-02-15

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP2213420B1 (fr) Procédé de commande et machine-outil manuelle
EP2213423B1 (fr) Mécanisme de percussion pneumatique
EP2243599B1 (fr) Visseuse à percussion et procédé de commande pour une visseuse à percussion
EP1893388B1 (fr) Marteau perforateur et/ou marteau pneumatique a commande de la marche a vide
EP3180166B1 (fr) Procéde optimisé pour une ancre extensible
EP3221088B1 (fr) Procédé de commande d'une perceuse
EP2373446B1 (fr) Procédé d'utilisation d'un marteau
EP3180165B1 (fr) Procéde optimisé pour une ancre extensible
EP2213422B1 (fr) Méchanisme d'impact pneumatique
EP3181301A1 (fr) Machine-outil portative a percussion
EP3335837A1 (fr) Procédé de commande pour une machine-outil manuelle à percussion
EP3083155A1 (fr) Machine-outil à main
EP2213421B1 (fr) Mécanisme de percussion pneumatique et procédé de commande
EP1607187B1 (fr) Appareil pour l'amélioration de la réponse en coupure d'un outil électropneumatique à percussion
EP3389932A1 (fr) Machine-outil portative à percussion
EP3389934B1 (fr) Machine-outil portative a percussion
EP2331298B1 (fr) Outil à accouplement de rattrapage
EP3946831B1 (fr) Spécification de vitesses de sécurité pour un manipulateur de robot
DE202016104106U1 (de) Elektrowerkzeug
WO2016059017A1 (fr) Machine-outil portative de burinage
EP3052274A1 (fr) Machine-outil manuelle
WO1999001260A1 (fr) Marteau de demolition et/ou marteau foreur dote d'un embrayage a point mort

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20110204

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 20110228

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

RIC1 Information provided on ipc code assigned before grant

Ipc: B25D 11/00 20060101ALI20110826BHEP

Ipc: B25D 9/14 20060101AFI20110826BHEP

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MK MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK SM TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 542641

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20120215

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502009002557

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20120322

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20120125

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120525

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120425

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120426

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120525

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20121026

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502009002557

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20121026

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120506

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: HILTI AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Effective date: 20121231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SM

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20121210

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091210

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20131210

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131231

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131231

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20131210

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20120125

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 7

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 542641

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20141210

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20141210

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 8

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20231228

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20231221

Year of fee payment: 15

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20231214

Year of fee payment: 15