EP2006109B1 - Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant une erreur - Google Patents

Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant une erreur Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP2006109B1
EP2006109B1 EP08159475A EP08159475A EP2006109B1 EP 2006109 B1 EP2006109 B1 EP 2006109B1 EP 08159475 A EP08159475 A EP 08159475A EP 08159475 A EP08159475 A EP 08159475A EP 2006109 B1 EP2006109 B1 EP 2006109B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
sheet
stack
time segment
identification
identifying
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Not-in-force
Application number
EP08159475A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP2006109A1 (fr
Inventor
Jörn SACHER
Harald Willeke
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Koenig and Bauer AG
Original Assignee
Koenig and Bauer AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Family has litigation
First worldwide family litigation filed litigation Critical https://patents.darts-ip.com/?family=37836993&utm_source=google_patent&utm_medium=platform_link&utm_campaign=public_patent_search&patent=EP2006109(B1) "Global patent litigation dataset” by Darts-ip is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Application filed by Koenig and Bauer AG filed Critical Koenig and Bauer AG
Publication of EP2006109A1 publication Critical patent/EP2006109A1/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP2006109B1 publication Critical patent/EP2006109B1/fr
Not-in-force legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
    • B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
    • B41F33/0036—Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H35/00—Delivering articles from cutting or line-perforating machines; Article or web delivery apparatus incorporating cutting or line-perforating devices, e.g. adhesive tape dispensers
    • B65H35/02—Delivering articles from cutting or line-perforating machines; Article or web delivery apparatus incorporating cutting or line-perforating devices, e.g. adhesive tape dispensers from or with longitudinal slitters or perforators
    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B65—CONVEYING; PACKING; STORING; HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL
    • B65H—HANDLING THIN OR FILAMENTARY MATERIAL, e.g. SHEETS, WEBS, CABLES
    • B65H2301/00—Handling processes for sheets or webs
    • B65H2301/50—Auxiliary process performed during handling process
    • B65H2301/54—Auxiliary process performed during handling process for managing processing of handled material
    • B65H2301/542—Quality control

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for identifying at least one faulty sheet according to the preamble of claim 1.
  • a sheet stack marking device for a rotary printing machine wherein by using different markers, preferably colored strips, which are introduced by different, each of a sensor signal activatable marking devices in a stack printed sheet, on the stacked sheet error identification is possible, wherein as identifiable errors a misprint or an overshoot of an applied sheet as well as a passer difference or a chromatic aberration concerning the printed image are mentioned.
  • the invention has for its object to provide a method for marking at least one faulty sheet, the marking or treatment facilitates sorting faulty sheet.
  • the advantages achieved by the invention are, in particular, that in a stack of sheets printed in a printing machine individual faulty sheets or areas with multiple faulty sheets can be identified quickly and reliably, so that faulty sheets are sorted out before further processing of the filed in the stack sheet can.
  • z. B. in a sheet-fed press, in particular in a sheetfed offset press, at least one printing unit of this printing press sequentially fed sheets at least one ink, but preferably multicolored by several in the transport direction of the sheet in the printing press successively arranged printing units at least on one side, preferably in fair and Reverse printing on both sides z. B. printed in an offset printing process.
  • the printed in the printing machine sheets are placed after completion of the printing process at the end of the printing press in a stack preferably arranged on the printing press in a stack.
  • a z. B. opto-electronically designed inspection system in particular arranged in the printing press inline inspection system with a preferably arranged in the transport direction of the sheet behind the last printing unit of the printing press camera, z. B. with at least one CCD chip having a semiconductor camera, said camera at least from a portion of a printed sheet, preferably of the entire sheet and / or of all printed in this printing machine in each case an image, z. B. receives a color image and preferably in the form of digital data to an electronic evaluation unit, for. B.
  • an image processing computer wherein in the evaluation unit, a currently recorded image based on a reference image with respect to at least one print quality affecting error, z. B. with respect to a color error and / or register error is checked and wherein the evaluation unit in an insufficient match between the currently recorded image and the reference image, d. H. at a detection of a predetermined tolerance exceeding a predetermined and thus no longer tolerable error, an error message in the form of an electronic control signal outputs, with this control signal z. B.
  • the inspection system is preferably equipped with the function, the position of a to detect errors detected on a sheet and / or detected errors according to previously defined different types of errors, as z. B. color errors and register errors represent, to distinguish.
  • the control signal output by the evaluation unit of the inspection system to the at least one strip insertion system is preferably in the form of a digital, in particular electrical, signal, e.g. B. formed as a switching pulse, wherein each switching pulse correlates with at least one faulty arc.
  • the control signal output by the evaluation unit of the inspection system to the at least one strip insertion system can also be of a complex nature and contain a plurality of information relevant to the control of the at least one strip insertion system.
  • a Striteinschusssystem has at least a Einsch manrete, and a strip holder, wherein the admirst manende in the stack of the deposited sheet strip z. B. held as a roll material in a trained as a roll holder strip holder and after rolling from the role according to the required strip length with a cutter through a strip separating the strip from the roll is cut to length. Triggered by a control signal indicative of an error detected by the inspection system in at least one of the printed sheets, the marker shoots a strip between an upper edge of the sheet already deposited in the stack and a sheet currently to be deposited on that stack, and thus the sheet already in the stack filed bow at least not yet fully touching bow. Once the newly deposited on the stack sheet rests on the stack so that thereby the shot strip is held in the stack, this z. B. unrolled from a roll strip cut off the roll.
  • the Einschman réelle can z. B. on a Sogradconvergeer belonging to the printing press display. It is also possible to mount the Einschman réelle on a tripod and to put next to the belonging to the printing press display.
  • the first variant is z. B. in a so-called large format printing machine, where then z. B. an automatic format adjustment is provided.
  • the second variant mentioned above is z. B. realized on a medium format printing press, in which case an automatic, z. B. remote controlled format adjustment is not given. It is preferably provided that the position of the at least one at least one faulty sheet characterizing Einsch machines and thus the aforementioned format adjustment is set by the evaluation of the inspection system.
  • the printing press prints sheets with a production speed of z. B. 15,000 or more sheets per hour, z. 18,000 or 21,000 sheets per hour, d. H. every second, more than four printed sheets each arrive at the stack on the stack belonging to the printing press.
  • Strip insertion systems achieve this working speed i. d. R. not, but z. B. einsch manen at the earliest half a second again a strip in the pile.
  • the period of time required for the strip insertion system to again insert a strip into the stack will be referred to as the dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system, the dead time .DELTA.t being a period duration as a result of the cyclic operation of the strip insertion system and a fastest possible working cycle of the strip injection system Strip Einschusssystems can be viewed.
  • the dead time .DELTA.t is z. B. on the order of at least about half a second and is thus much slower than the usual production speed of the printing press.
  • a sheet-fed printing press can therefore deposit a plurality of sheets on the stack because of its high production speed during a dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system.
  • a einz tellender in the stack strip can, for. B. may be formed as a flat, band-shaped material made of paper or plastic, with different colored or provided with different color material can be used. It can be provided that the strip insertion system is capable of a strip to be shot in response to a further control signal or from mark a particular information contained in the control signal in a certain way. Additionally or alternatively, it may be provided that several Einsch manellates are arranged on the same belonging to a printing machine stack of sheets, wherein the plurality Einschmantechnik preferably einsch manen each other differing strips in the same stack. These stripes can z. B. in their color, in their material and / or in their marking differ from each other. The mark can z. B. be printed with an inkjet printer.
  • Differently formed strips which are injected by the Striteinschusssystem in the same stack, can be used to distinguish different types of errors, eg. B. for distinguishing a color error from a register error, and / or in particular for distinguishing between a single error and an error sequence can be used, wherein a training and / or marking the strip z. B. a single error or the beginning of an error sequence and another training and / or marking the strip z. B. identify the end of an error sequence.
  • a single error is an error event which triggers the shooting of a strip into the stack, wherein no further error event is detected at any other within the dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system on the stack beginning with the insertion of the strip. The end of an error sequence is then reached as soon as a dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system commencing with the passage of a strip and after the laying off of one or more faulty sheets a faultless sheet is deposited on the stack.
  • Fig. 1 to 4 For example, four fault scenarios are described in each case with reference to a diagram, wherein in the respective fault scenarios faulty sheets are marked with the possibility of distinguishing between different errors. It is provided that preferably designed as a strip markings with two different configurations and / or Markings are available, with one of the differently formed and / or marked markings, z. B. one of the strips, z. B. with "A" and the other label, z. B. the other strip, z. B. with "B" is called.
  • the diagrams show in each case at least one error event detected by the print production in the printing press, ie in particular its inspection system, wherein the error events marked F1, F2 or F3 are respectively plotted against the time curve t, these error events F1, F2 or F3 each correlate with at least one detected as faulty bow.
  • the error events marked F1, F2 or F3 are respectively plotted against the time curve t, these error events F1, F2 or F3 each correlate with at least one detected as faulty bow.
  • 1 to 4 is the time relationship between the dead time .DELTA.t of Stsammlungseinschusssystems and each pulse-shaped error event represented F1; F2 is selected, for example, such that within each of the dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system shown there, six sheets in the printing press are printed and checked by the inspection system, so that within each dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system successively up to six error events F1; F2; F3 can occur.
  • the markings marked "A" or "B", respectively stripes, can be z. B. differ in their respective material and / or at least in their respective color and / or in their respective caption from each other.
  • Fig. 1 shows by way of example that at least one fault has been detected by the inspection system on a sheet to be deposited on the stack, whereby a first error event F1 is marked so that a control signal is output from the inspection system to the strip insertion system. Since that in the Fig. 1 If the diagram shown represents only a small part of the production process, the illustrated time segment may have been preceded by an error-free production of printed sheets or the production of the printed sheets was just started at this time. Due to the detected error, the strip insertion system attaches an identifier marked "A" to the stack in conjunction with the arc detected as faulty.
  • the inspection system does not detect an error within the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system at any other sheet to be filed so that it remains within that dead time ⁇ t at the single detected error.
  • the detected error is thus a single error with the singular error event F1, because in a sequence of z. B. six consecutively printed and to be deposited in the order of their production successive sheet only a single sheet has been found to be faulty.
  • Fig. 2 shows by way of example that - how to Fig. 1 an error event F1 is detected by the inspection system in conjunction with a sheet to be deposited on the stack so that a strip corresponding to this error event F1 is injected into the stack by the strip insertion system.
  • the duration of the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system begins when the strip labeled "A" is fired.
  • at least one error occurs within the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system on at least one further sheet to be deposited on the stack, so that a further error event F2 has occurred within the dead time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system.
  • Example shown occur in a sequence of z. B.
  • F2 occurs by detecting at least one error on at least one further sheet to be deposited on the stack, at the end of this further second dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system, a further strip labeled "B" is injected into the stack, as described in US Pat Fig. 3 is shown, provided that the at least one detected within this further second dead time .DELTA.t of Stsammlungeinschusssystems error event F1; F2 at the end of this second dead time .DELTA.t of StAINseinschusssystems as explained for Fig.
  • Fig. 4 shows the case that in the dead time .DELTA.t of the strip insertion system starting with the insertion of a strip marked with "A" into the stack, error events F1; F2 be detected, in contrast to those in the FIGS. 2 and 3
  • a faulty sheet is deposited on the stack, which is why there is no streak at the end of this dead-time ⁇ t of the strip insertion system begun with the insertion of the strip marked "A” , In particular, no marked with "B” strip is injected into the stack.
  • the error event F3 ends with the fact that after the sequence of faulty sheets again at least one error-free sheet is stored on the stack. At the end of the arbitrarily long sequence of erroneous sheets to be deposited on the stack, a strip marked "B" is injected into the stack in correlation with the first error-free sheet, thereby marking the end of the sequence of defective sheets.
  • a strip marked "A” may be extended by several, e.g. B. premature by up to three sheets and marked with "B” strip to several, z. B. be delayed by up to three sheets late in the stack.
  • a longitudinal cutting device When a longitudinal cutting device is arranged in the transport path of the printed sheet in the printing press on its way to the printing machine belonging to the delivery, wherein the longitudinal cutting device divided along its arc guided by a longitudinal section, z. B. divides into two equal halves, then arise z. B. on the support surface of the stack to be formed in the stack in correlation to the number of longitudinal sections performed the otherwise divide a stack partial stack, namely always a total of a partial stack more than longitudinal cuts are performed, each of these partial stacks individually and separately from the or other sub-stack (s) can be further processed.
  • the intersection between two sub-sheets correlates within the stack formed by depositing a plurality of divided sheets between two adjacent sub-stacks with an interface passing vertically through the stack.
  • a plurality of strip-insertion systems corresponding to the number of individual partial stacks or at least insertion devices are provided on the delivery of the printing press. If the slitter halves printed sheets, z. For example, two controlled by the same striping system Einsch manieri be provided. On the other hand, it can also be provided that at the display of the printing press are arranged several neither mechanically nor electrically interconnected, but at least independently controllable and thus self-sufficient, each having at least one Einschmanêt strip systems, each of these Stsammlungeinschusssysteme one of the sub-stack is assigned.
  • Information about the printed sheet on the relative position of the cutting line executed by the longitudinal cutting device is preferably stored in the inspection system, so that the inspection system z. B. the multiple Einschmantechnik controlling strip Einschusssystem can control differentiated. Depending on which part of the arc the inspection system detects an error, then the respective sub-stack, in which this sub-sheet is stored, associated Einschmanêt is activated and activated. It may also be provided to print information on the position of the error detected by the inspection system on the strip to be buried, wherein the position z. B. may be indicated by referenced on the unbroken arc coordinates.
  • Fig. 5 shows in a plan view of a section of a printing machine, wherein in the transport direction T of the printing material, in particular the succession of sheets to be printed, several, preferably each other printing ink verdruckende printing units 01 are arranged. Behind the last in the transport direction T printing unit 01 is a belonging to the printing press display 02, wherein the printed in the printing machine sheets are stored in a stack 03 to each other. On one side of the stack 03, z. B. at a transversely to the transport direction T of the sheet-facing side, a St considerably-to the transport direction T of the sheet-facing side, a StMOeinschusssystem is arranged with at least one Einschmanêt 04, which einschitt a strip 06 in the stack 03.
  • Fig. 6 shows in a side view along a line XX extending section by the one in the Fig. 5 illustrated stack 03, the line XX transverse to the transport direction T of the arc.
  • the Einschman choir 04 rolls due to its activation by a control signal, this control signal is preferably generated by an arranged in the printing machine inspection system, eg. B. strip-shaped material from a roll holder 07 and performs an unrolled from the roll holder 07 end of the material to the upper edge 08 of the stack 03, whereby a strip 06 of sufficient length of this material is placed on the top 03 lying in the stack bow.
  • Fig. 7 shows in a plan view of a section of a printing press, the arrangement shown substantially that in the Fig. 5 like.
  • the arrangement of Fig. 5 be printed in the printing machine by a bow behind the transport direction T last printing unit 01 arranged longitudinal cutting device 09 in two z. B.
  • equally wide parts, with both parts of each sheet are each stacked as a partial sheet in belonging to the printing press display 02 each side by side in two sub-stacks 03.
  • Each sub-stack 03 is in each case a Einschmanêt 04 arranged, which each einschitt a strip 06 in the respective sub-stack 03.
  • Fig. 8 shows - similar to the Fig. 6 - In a side view along a line YY extending section through in the Fig. 7 shown sub-stacks 03, wherein the line YY transverse to the transport direction T of the arc runs.
  • Both Einschmanieri 04 roll in their activation in each case by a control signal, each of these control signals is preferably generated by an inspection system arranged in the printing press, z. B.
  • a writing or arc-marking device may be used in a stack of sheets placed on top of each other according to the purpose of the invention preferably used Einsch manellas makes a single faulty sheet or a region with several faulty bow by a unique, outside the stack preferably easily perceptible marking or marking identifiable.
  • the selected arc which is considered to be defective, together with the sequence of sheets following it during the dead time, is preferably discharged from the device for disposal or reworking from the stream of sheets guided to the delivery.
  • the selection of a bow from the stream of led to the display Bow is in particular with a z.
  • B. at least one CCD camera having carried inspection system, wherein the inspection system at least a subset of the outfeed sheet a picture is taken, wherein a currently recorded image based on a reference image with respect to at least one of the print quality of the printed sheet impairing error or a type of error is checked, with an insufficient match between the currently recorded image and the reference image an error message z.
  • B. is generated in the form of a control signal.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Controlling Sheets Or Webs (AREA)
  • Forming Counted Batches (AREA)
  • Inking, Control Or Cleaning Of Printing Machines (AREA)
  • Control Or Security For Electrophotography (AREA)
  • Treatments Of Macromolecular Shaped Articles (AREA)
  • Paper (AREA)
  • Magnetic Record Carriers (AREA)
  • Manufacturing Of Magnetic Record Carriers (AREA)
  • Processing And Handling Of Plastics And Other Materials For Molding In General (AREA)
  • Treatment Of Fiber Materials (AREA)
  • Inspection Of Paper Currency And Valuable Securities (AREA)
  • Investigating Materials By The Use Of Optical Means Adapted For Particular Applications (AREA)

Claims (22)

  1. Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant au moins une erreur, plusieurs feuilles, après leur impression dans une machine à imprimer, étant vérifiées avec un système d'inspection quant à l'occurrence d'au moins une erreur, et déposées sous la forme d'au moins une pile, au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur étant identifiée avec au moins un dispositif, caractérisé en ce qu'un dispositif de découpage longitudinal divise en plusieurs feuilles partielles, le long de sa direction de transport à travers la machine à imprimer, la au moins une feuille imprimée dans la machine à imprimer, avant sa dépose, étant déterminé quelle est, après la division de la feuille, la feuille partielle concernée par le défaut détecté avec le système d'inspection, sachant que seule la feuille partielle concernée par le défaut est identifiée par le dispositif, avec un marquage perceptible hors de la pile.
  2. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que, dans les limites d'un cycle opératoire du au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, plusieurs feuilles sont imprimées les unes après les autres dans la machine à imprimer, le cycle opératoire définissant une période de temps commençant par un marquage appliqué sur la pile, le dispositif identifiant une feuille entachée d'erreur, à la fin de ce cycle opératoire, étant en mesure d'appliquer de nouveau un marquage sur la pile.
  3. Dispositif selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que, dans les limites du cycle opératoire du au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, plusieurs feuilles sont chacune vérifiées quant à l'occurrence d'erreurs.
  4. Dispositif selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que, par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, après expiration de la période de temps définie par son cycle opératoire, un marquage, se distinguant du marquage appliqué au début de cette période de temps, est appliqué sur la pile, lorsque, dans les limites de cette période de temps, après l'erreur détectée à son début sur une feuille, une erreur est détectée sur au moins une autre feuille, et lorsqu'aucune erreur n'est détectée, au moins sur la feuille à déposer sur la pile à la fin de cette période de temps.
  5. Dispositif selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que, par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, après expiration d'au moins une autre période de temps définie par son cycle opératoire, faisant suite à une période de temps avec un marquage appliqué à son début, un marquage, se distinguant du marquage appliqué au début de la période de temps antérieure, est appliqué sur la pile, lorsque, dans les limites de cette au moins une autre période de temps, au moins une autre feuille entachée d'erreur est déposée sur la pile, et lorsqu'aucune erreur n'est détectée, au moins sur la feuille à déposer sur la pile, à la fin de cette au moins une autre période de temps.
  6. Dispositif selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que, par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, dans la période de temps avec un marquage appliqué à son début, aucun marquage n'est appliqué sur la pile à sa fin, lorsqu'aucune erreur n'est détectée sur aucune autre feuille vérifiée dans cette période de temps.
  7. Dispositif selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que, par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, dans la période de temps avec un marquage appliqué à son début, aucun marquage n'est appliqué sur la pile à sa fin, lorsqu'une erreur est détectée au moins sur la feuille à déposer à la fin de cette période de temps.
  8. Dispositif selon la revendication 2, caractérisé en ce que, par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, dans la période de temps avec un marquage appliqué à son début, aucun marquage n'est appliqué sur la pile à sa fin, lorsqu'une erreur est détectée chaque fois sur toutes les feuilles vérifiées dans cette période de temps.
  9. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que, par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, un marquage à appliquer sur la pile au début d'une période de temps est appliqué sur la pile, ou est introduit dans la pile, plusieurs feuilles avant la feuille identifiée comme entachée d'erreur.
  10. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que, par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, un marquage, à appliquer sur la pile à la fin d'une période de temps, se distinguant du marquage appliqué au début de cette période de temps, ou d'une période de temps antérieure, est appliqué sur la pile, ou est introduit dans la pile, plusieurs feuilles après la feuille identifiée comme entachée d'erreur.
  11. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'un dispositif réalisé sous forme d'intercaleur de bande est utilisé pour identifier au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur.
  12. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que des marquages de réalisation différente sont utilisés par le dispositif, sachant qu'une première réalisation des marquages identifie une erreur individuelle et qu'une autre réalisation des marquages identifie une séquence d'erreurs.
  13. Dispositif selon l'une des revendications 1, 10 ou 11, caractérisé en ce qu'une information concernant la position, se référant aux feuilles imprimées, de la ligne de coupe à réaliser par le dispositif de découpage longitudinal est mémorisée dans le système d'inspection, le système d'inspection, à l'aide de la position de la ligne de coupe, associant une erreur détectée sur la feuille, à une feuille partielle formée par la découpe longitudinale.
  14. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que les feuilles partielles produites par le dispositif de découpage longitudinal sont déposées en piles partielles subdivisant la pile, une surface limite, parcourant verticalement la pile, étant réalisée entre deux piles partielles voisines, disposées l'une à côté de l'autre, la feuille partielle concernée par l'erreur étant identifiée dans sa pile partielle respective par le dispositif avec un marquage.
  15. Dispositif selon la revendication 14, caractérisé en ce qu'un dispositif, identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, est utilisé pour chacune des piles partielles.
  16. Dispositif selon la revendication 14, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif, identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, est positionné en fonction de la pile partielle sur laquelle la feuille partielle concernée par l'erreur est déposée.
  17. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif, identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, est disposé de manière réglable sur la pile.
  18. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que la position du au moins un dispositif, identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, est réglée par une unité d'évaluation du système d'inspection.
  19. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que le dispositif, identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, est disposé sur une butée à degré de pages d'une sortie appartenant à une machine à imprimer.
  20. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce qu'au moins une bande marquée est utilisée par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, pour l'identification d'une feuille entachée d'erreur.
  21. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que des marquages, composés de matériaux se distinguant les uns des autres, sont utilisés par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, pour l'identification des types d'erreur différents.
  22. Dispositif selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que des marquages de couleur différente sont utilisés par le au moins un dispositif identifiant au moins une feuille entachée d'erreur, pour identifier des types d'erreur différents.
EP08159475A 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant une erreur Not-in-force EP2006109B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102005045498A DE102005045498B4 (de) 2005-09-23 2005-09-23 Verfahren zur Kennzeichnung oder Behandlung zumindest eines fehlerbehafteten Bogens
EP06120504A EP1777073B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé pour identifier ou traiter au moins une feuille defectueuse

Related Parent Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06120504A Division EP1777073B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé pour identifier ou traiter au moins une feuille defectueuse

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP2006109A1 EP2006109A1 (fr) 2008-12-24
EP2006109B1 true EP2006109B1 (fr) 2009-12-23

Family

ID=37836993

Family Applications (3)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08159478A Not-in-force EP2006110B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'exclusion d'au moins une feuille défectueuse d'un traitement prévu pour une feuille non défectueuse
EP08159475A Not-in-force EP2006109B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant une erreur
EP06120504A Not-in-force EP1777073B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé pour identifier ou traiter au moins une feuille defectueuse

Family Applications Before (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08159478A Not-in-force EP2006110B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé d'exclusion d'au moins une feuille défectueuse d'un traitement prévu pour une feuille non défectueuse

Family Applications After (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP06120504A Not-in-force EP1777073B1 (fr) 2005-09-23 2006-09-12 Procédé pour identifier ou traiter au moins une feuille defectueuse

Country Status (3)

Country Link
EP (3) EP2006110B1 (fr)
AT (3) ATE452760T1 (fr)
DE (4) DE102005045498B4 (fr)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE102009023963A1 (de) * 2009-06-05 2010-12-09 Robert Bosch Gmbh Verfahren zum Bestimmen eines Qualitätsmaßes für ein von einer Bearbeitungsmaschine bearbeitetes Produkt
DE102011106805A1 (de) 2010-07-29 2012-02-02 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Vorrichtung zum Ausgeben von Bogen aus einer Druckmaschine
DE102016226171A1 (de) 2016-12-23 2018-06-28 Koenig & Bauer Ag Auslage und Verfahren zur Kennzeichnung von Bogen in der Auslage einer bogenverarbeitenden Maschine
DE102017216260A1 (de) 2017-09-14 2019-03-14 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Bildinspektion von Druckerzeugnissen mit Fehlerklassen
CN113299003B (zh) * 2020-04-29 2023-03-28 深圳怡化电脑股份有限公司 一种调整介质承载组件的方法和装置

Family Cites Families (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE1252708B (de) * 1967-10-26 VEB Druckmaschmenwerk Leip ziq, Leipzig Vorrichtung zum Einlegen von Markierungsstreifen in sich bil dende Stapel einer Druckmaschine
US3138048A (en) * 1963-09-24 1964-06-23 Nat Steel Corp Classification of sheet material
US3375744A (en) * 1966-03-08 1968-04-02 Eastman Kodak Co Cutting, counting and classifying apparatus
DE3034212C2 (de) * 1980-09-11 1982-11-25 M.A.N.- Roland Druckmaschinen AG, 6050 Offenbach Rotationsdruckmaschine mit einer Bogenstapelmarkierungsvorrichtung
GB2109775B (en) * 1981-11-12 1985-06-19 Jack Evans Thompson Inserting tabs into sheet stack of different positions
JPS61209899A (ja) * 1985-03-09 1986-09-18 明産株式会社 長尺状シ−トのマ−キング装置
DE4127102C2 (de) * 1991-08-16 1994-05-19 Friedrich Elmpt Verfahren zum Einbringen eines Zählstreifens in einen Bogenstapel sowie Vorrichtung zur Durchführung dieses Verfahrens
GB9418232D0 (en) * 1994-09-09 1994-10-26 Portals Eng Ltd Tab inserter
DE19653403C2 (de) * 1996-10-21 2001-05-10 Koenig & Bauer Ag Verfahren zum Transport von Bogen
GB0019543D0 (en) * 2000-08-10 2000-09-27 Pelcombe Ltd Counting apparatus

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE502006004766D1 (de) 2009-10-15
DE102005045498A1 (de) 2007-04-12
DE502006007720D1 (de) 2010-10-07
DE502006005756D1 (de) 2010-02-04
EP2006110A3 (fr) 2008-12-31
EP2006110A2 (fr) 2008-12-24
EP2006110B1 (fr) 2009-09-02
DE102005045498B4 (de) 2007-06-21
ATE478766T1 (de) 2010-09-15
ATE452760T1 (de) 2010-01-15
EP2006109A1 (fr) 2008-12-24
EP1777073B1 (fr) 2010-08-25
EP1777073A3 (fr) 2008-07-23
ATE441525T1 (de) 2009-09-15
EP1777073A2 (fr) 2007-04-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0167196A1 (fr) Procédé pour transformer des bandes ou des feuilles de valeur en liasses
EP2006109B1 (fr) Procédé d'identification d'au moins une feuille comportant une erreur
EP0685420A1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle pour la fabrication de produits imprimés et ensemble pour la mise en oeuvre du procédé
WO2018206588A1 (fr) Machine de traitement de feuilles et procédé pour la surveillance d'un passage de feuilles
DE19939164B4 (de) Verfahren zur Verarbeitung von Bedruckstoffen
DE102015116030A1 (de) Einrichtung zum Codieren von Druckbogen in einer Bogendruckmaschine
EP3251852B1 (fr) Dispositif et procédé destinés à la transformation de produits imprimés
EP2862715B1 (fr) Presse
EP1206402B1 (fr) Procede et dispositif pour distribuer un nombre predetermine de feuilles faisant partie d'un groupe de feuilles
DE102009027861A1 (de) Verfahren zur Seitenkantenausrichtung von Druckbogen
EP1447364B1 (fr) Dispositif permettant la séparation individuelle de flans d'une feuille imprimée
DE2445999A1 (de) Verfahren und vorrichtung zum schneiden und sortieren von fotografischen aufzeichnungstraegern
DE10349896B4 (de) Bogendruckmaschine und Verfahren zum Betreiben einer Bogendruckmaschine
DE102009009543A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Einführen von Makierstreifen in einen Druckerzeugnisstapel
DE2259761A1 (de) Vorrichtung zum erfassen und aussortieren von makulatur
DE102004015101B4 (de) Verfahren und Sensoreinrichtung zum Steuern eines endlosen, eine Naht aufweisenden Transportmediums für eine Druckmaschine
EP3003721B1 (fr) Procédé de réimpression d'au moins un exemplaire imprimé individualisé
DE102009051637A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Herstellen einer endlosen Papierbahn mit Wasserzeichenmarken
DE102004060019B4 (de) Verfahren zur Kennzeichnung von Druckexemplaren sowie Druckmaschine
DE102022111571A1 (de) Falzapparat einer Offset-Rollendruckmaschine und Offset-Rollendruckmaschine
DE102006028482A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Markierung von Druckbogen mit fehlerhaften Einzelnutzen beim Nutzendruck
DE102006012330C5 (de) Bogendruckmaschine mit Nachverarbeitungseinheit
CH631109A5 (en) Apparatus for controlling and preadjusting the register and for eliminating waste paper on a multicolour rotary printing machine, and method for driving the apparatus
DE10303374A1 (de) Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Steuern einer papierverarbeitenden Maschine
CH660354A5 (de) Kollationiereinrichtung fuer bogensammeleinrichtungen.

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 1777073

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA HR MK RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20081124

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AC Divisional application: reference to earlier application

Ref document number: 1777073

Country of ref document: EP

Kind code of ref document: P

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 502006005756

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 20100204

Kind code of ref document: P

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20091223

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

LTIE Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension

Effective date: 20091223

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FD4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100323

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100423

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100403

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100423

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

PLBI Opposition filed

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009260

PLAX Notice of opposition and request to file observation + time limit sent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS2

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100324

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

26 Opposition filed

Opponent name: MANROLAND AG

Effective date: 20100923

PLBB Reply of patent proprietor to notice(s) of opposition received

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNOBS3

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER A.G.

Effective date: 20100930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20100912

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20100624

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20091223

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Payment date: 20120922

Year of fee payment: 7

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20121001

Year of fee payment: 7

PLCK Communication despatched that opposition was rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNREJ1

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 20120924

Year of fee payment: 7

PLBN Opposition rejected

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009273

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: OPPOSITION REJECTED

27O Opposition rejected

Effective date: 20130222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R100

Ref document number: 502006005756

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20130222

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 452760

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20130912

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130912

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20130912

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502006005756

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: KOENIG BAUER AG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: KOENIG BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, 97080 WUERZBURG, DE

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R081

Ref document number: 502006005756

Country of ref document: DE

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER AG, DE

Free format text: FORMER OWNER: KOENIG & BAUER AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT, 97080 WUERZBURG, DE

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 12

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CA

Effective date: 20170922

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: CD

Owner name: KOENIG & BAUER AG, DE

Effective date: 20170922

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 13

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20190925

Year of fee payment: 14

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20190827

Year of fee payment: 14

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20190926

Year of fee payment: 14

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R119

Ref document number: 502006005756

Country of ref document: DE

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20200912

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20210401

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20200912