EP1958775B1 - Procédé de correction de la séparation du film d'encre - Google Patents

Procédé de correction de la séparation du film d'encre Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP1958775B1
EP1958775B1 EP08100676.9A EP08100676A EP1958775B1 EP 1958775 B1 EP1958775 B1 EP 1958775B1 EP 08100676 A EP08100676 A EP 08100676A EP 1958775 B1 EP1958775 B1 EP 1958775B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
color
measuring
scanned
correction
scanned dots
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
EP08100676.9A
Other languages
German (de)
English (en)
Other versions
EP1958775A2 (fr
EP1958775A3 (fr
Inventor
Adrian Dr.Kohlbrenner
Peter Dr. Ehbets
Wolfgang Geissler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
X Rite Switzerland GmbH
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Original Assignee
X Rite Switzerland GmbH
Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by X Rite Switzerland GmbH, Heidelberger Druckmaschinen AG filed Critical X Rite Switzerland GmbH
Publication of EP1958775A2 publication Critical patent/EP1958775A2/fr
Publication of EP1958775A3 publication Critical patent/EP1958775A3/fr
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP1958775B1 publication Critical patent/EP1958775B1/fr
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B41—PRINTING; LINING MACHINES; TYPEWRITERS; STAMPS
    • B41F—PRINTING MACHINES OR PRESSES
    • B41F33/00—Indicating, counting, warning, control or safety devices
    • B41F33/0036—Devices for scanning or checking the printed matter for quality control

Definitions

  • the invention relates to a method for correcting the measurement error caused by color-splitting-surface effects in the color measurement of a printed sheet on a running printing device according to the preamble of independent claim 1.
  • WO2005108083A1 a method and a measuring device for determining color and / or density values for the monitoring and / or control of the printing process in a printing device, especially a sheetfed offset printing machine described, wherein measuring fields of a sheet during the printing process directly in or on the current printing device photoelectrically measured and from the measured values obtained, the color and / or density values for the relevant measuring fields are formed.
  • the measured values are detected directly during the printing process with a measuring arrangement which is located inside the printing device - e.g. a sheetfed offset press or generally a printer - is installed.
  • a measuring arrangement which is located inside the printing device - e.g. a sheetfed offset press or generally a printer - is installed.
  • This type of measured value acquisition or measurement is referred to below as “inline”.
  • “externally” refers to a measured value acquisition outside the printing device in a stable state of the printed product.
  • Inline measuring technology is significantly more complex than conventional external color measurement technology.
  • the inline measurement must be carried out shortly after the paint application.
  • the color layer is not yet stable. It is influenced by various printing process parameters and color properties, which decay with different time constants. Depending on the situation, this can result in large differences between the inline measured values and corresponding external measured values on stable dry samples.
  • the process dependence complicates the interpretation of the measurement data. It is not clear if one measured variation was caused by a change in the color order or by a change in the process parameters. Inline and external measured values are therefore not directly comparable.
  • WO2005108083A1 describes a solution for this problem. It consists of a special design of measuring technology and measuring geometry in conjunction with computational correction methods for the inline measured values, which enable a conversion into standard-compliant color and density measured values for corresponding stable external samples (printed products).
  • the known approach thus includes a metrological component and a computational component.
  • the aim of the metrological component is to maximally reduce the influence of the process-dependent disruptive effects and to provide as unambiguous as possible measured values.
  • the remaining measured value deviations from externally determined, standard-compliant measured values are then compensated by means of numerical correction measures or models.
  • a preferred realization of the mentioned metrological correction component is according to WO2005108083A1 the use of polarizing filters in the illumination and receiver channels of the measuring head.
  • the polarization filters consist of linear polarizers and are installed with mutually perpendicular polarization axes in the illumination and receiver channel.
  • Such an arrangement of polarization filters eliminates or at least greatly attenuates the noise component that results from the surface effect.
  • the mathematical correction components are used for this.
  • polarizing filters as part of a metrological correction component
  • use of polarizing filters is also associated with various disadvantages.
  • a particular disadvantage is the strong attenuation of the light level. Also space problems, reduced optical imaging quality and costs are other negative factors.
  • a computational correction of the surface effect is most not practical because the disturbance of the ink layer immediately after the pressure at the location of measurement is typically still so strong that the surface effect that the measuring system sees is very pronounced. Especially with dark surfaces, the disturbing signal component, which comes from the surface effect, is large in comparison to the actual useful signal. Since the surface effect is an additive disturbance, a computational correction must ultimately be subtractive on the overall signal. Since, in particular, the printing process shows fluctuations and thus also the measurements fluctuate, such a subtractive correction is problematic or not practicable.
  • the present invention is intended to provide an alternative method for measuring value correction in inline measurements which does not have the above-described disadvantages of known methods of this type.
  • the purpose of the measured value correction is to minimize the differences between inline measurements and corresponding external measurements.
  • the basic idea of the invention is not to correct the surface effect as in WO2005108083A1 using a polarizer, but purely computationally based on image data of a line or area camera, which is mounted in the printing press and watching the just printed paper.
  • the method according to the invention is based on the finding that the surface effect caused by the color breakage or the color splitting, which adds a noise component to the measurement, occurs very locally and with an overall very low area coverage. If the print image is scanned with a camera, the disturbing effects in the camera image are recognizable as individual fine but at the same time extremely bright spots.
  • the basic idea of the invention consists in identifying these extremely bright spots in the image and eliminating their influence on the measurement result. This can be done by not taking into account these bright points for the formation of the measured values of interest or that the area ratio of these points on the total image and their average brightness is calculated, whereby the surface effect can be determined quantitatively and used to correct the measurement result.
  • the method according to the invention thus represents an image-based correction of the surface effect.
  • the method of the present invention requires an imaging sensor (e.g., a line or area camera) which is mounted so that it can record the print image in a suitable location at a high quality.
  • an imaging sensor e.g., a line or area camera
  • the method can also be implemented with a point-by-point scanning sensor if it has a sufficiently high spatial resolution.
  • Such a measuring system includes, for example, a line scan camera, which just printed sheet only a few centimeters after the nip still observed on the printing cylinder.
  • a line scan camera which just printed sheet only a few centimeters after the nip still observed on the printing cylinder.
  • a camera is equipped with suitable light sources and / or filters which define a meaningful for the pressure control spectral sensitivity of the camera.
  • a suitable for the needs of the pressure control camera is also equipped with at least three separate spectral sub-areas, such as cyan, magenta, yellow density.
  • the equipment with polarizing filters is not easy and therefore a computational correction makes particular sense.
  • this printer will continuously create images of the so-called colorimeter in the printing operation and transmit them to a measuring computer.
  • the measuring computer extracts therefrom, if not already done in an earlier processing stage, from the overall picture the image of the colorimeter and then finally the images of the individual measuring fields of the strip.
  • the measurement variables of interest for pressure control can then be determined from these partial images. This is advantageously done by suitable averaging of the measured values of the individual pixels within a measuring field.
  • the method according to the invention now provides that image or sampling points with a particularly large surface effect proportion and / or the strength of the surface effect as a whole are determined on the basis of the image data of the sub-images which are to be used for printing control. This is done by identifying in the image data those image or sampling points whose brightness exceeds a certain threshold.
  • the correction can now be carried out in a particularly simple embodiment of the invention so that the identified bright pixels (and possibly also adjacent Pixels) can be excluded from further processing. This means that the above-described averaging of the measured values of pixels for the formation of measured values for pressure control then takes place without the image or sampling points falsified by the strong surface effect.
  • the surface effect is determined quantitatively.
  • the quantitative knowledge of the surface effect is of particular interest because it enables the error-prone measurements of a second non-imaging system to be corrected. It is conceivable in particular a combination of an imaging subsystem for image inspection (ie, for example, for image defect detection, but not for color control of the printing press) with a non-imaging subsystem (eg punctiform spectrophotometer) for color control of the printing press (see. Fig. 4 ).
  • the described corrections correct only the measurement error component caused by the surface effect caused by the color cleavage (color break).
  • the corrections described thus represent a kind of "virtual" polarization filter.
  • In order to optimally correct the total error caused by the color splitting in practice even more computational corrections, as described in the document WO2005108083A1 are described performed. However, these are not the subject of the present invention and therefore require no further explanation.
  • the inventive method is not limited to the use of imaging measuring systems (line or area camera).
  • imaging measuring systems line or area camera
  • a non-imaging measuring system can be used, as for example in the document WO2005108083A1 is described.
  • imaging Sensors eg a camera system for image inspection.
  • the image information of the imaging sensors can then be used to correct the measurement error (caused by the surface effect) of the non-imaging sensors in the manner described above.
  • the image information can also be used to detect faulty measurement fields.
  • so lubrication (especially when starting the printing press) and defects (slugs) can be detected in the print image and so the corresponding measurement fields are excluded from the pressure control. This is particularly useful when using a combination of non-imaging and imaging sensors.
  • a printed sheet B located on the last printing cylinder Z of a printing press is scanned pointwise photoelectrically by means of an imaging scanning device in the form of a line camera K.
  • an imaging scanning device in the form of a line camera K.
  • the image data obtained in the form of the scanning signals of all sampled image or sampling points are represented by the box 1.
  • Suitable imaging scanners are known and not the subject of the present invention.
  • color and / or density measured values are formed in a conventional manner, which can be used for example for the control of the printing press.
  • the scanning signals of pixels from the measuring fields are thereby a color control strip usually present on the sheet evaluated.
  • the totality of the color and / or density measurements is represented by box 3.
  • Fig. 2 is a simplest embodiment of the inventive correction process shown in more detail.
  • the Fig. 3 shows a section of a typical measured brightness distribution over the sampling points of a sheet.
  • the abscissa indicates the individual sampling points i, the ordinates their brightnesses I.
  • the brightness of most sampling points is below the limit value I G.
  • the limit value I G Where the surface of the ink layer on the printing sheet is disturbed by the color break, extremely bright sampling points are measured. However, the number or area ratio of these extremely bright sampling points is relatively low.
  • Sample points lying above the limit I G brightness are, as already said, filtered out or not for the formation of the color and / or Density measured values taken into account.
  • the determination of the limit value I G is performed empirically on the basis of test measurements in such a way that inline measurement results and external measurement results are as comparable as possible.
  • a variant of the method according to the invention is shown, in which a combination of a line camera K and a point measuring device S, in particular a spectrophotometer, is used to scan the printed sheet B.
  • a point measuring device S in particular a spectrophotometer
  • the measuring signals of the point measuring device S are first preprocessed in the usual way (box 11) and then converted into color and / or density measured values (box 13).
  • a correction of the surface effect is performed (box 12), wherein the evaluation of the image data of the line scan camera is used.
  • further numerical corrections for the remaining measurement errors for the remaining measurement errors (box 14) and finally the output of the corrected color and / or density measured values (box 15) take place, for example. for the purpose of printing machine control.

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Inking, Control Or Cleaning Of Printing Machines (AREA)
  • Spectrometry And Color Measurement (AREA)

Claims (5)

  1. Procédé pour corriger l'erreur de mesure provoquée par des effets de surface provoqués par une dissociation d'encre lors de la mesure d'encre d'une feuille imprimée sur un dispositif d'impression en service, ladite feuille d'impression étant balayée point par point de manière photo-électrique, et des valeurs de mesure d'encre et/ou de densité (3) étant formées à partir de signaux de balayage, caractérisé en ce que les points de balayage, qui présentent une luminosité dépassant une valeur seuil (IG) sont identifiés et que les valeurs mesurées sont corrigées sur la base des points balayés identifiés.
  2. Procédé selon la revendication 1, caractérisé en ce que lors de la formation d'une valeur de mesure d'encre et/ou de densité (3), pour un champ de mesure se trouvant sur la feuille imprimée, les signaux de balayage d'au moins une partie des points de balayage sont déterminés.
  3. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que la correction des valeurs de mesure d'encre et/ou de densité s'effectue par le fait que les signaux de balayage des points de balayage identifiés ne sont pas pris en compte à la formation des valeurs de mesure d'encre et/ou de densité.
  4. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que le rapport de surface des points d'échantillon est défini avec la luminosité dépassant la valeur seuil (Ia) pour déterminer l'ampleur de l'effet de surface.
  5. Procédé selon l'une des revendications précédentes, caractérisé en ce que pour l'identification des points de balayage, dont la densité dépasse la valeur seuil (Ia), il est utilisé un système de balayage de préférence une caméra linéaire ou de surface (K).
EP08100676.9A 2007-02-15 2008-01-21 Procédé de correction de la séparation du film d'encre Active EP1958775B1 (fr)

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DE102007008017A DE102007008017A1 (de) 2007-02-15 2007-02-15 Farbspaltungskorrekturverfahren

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP1958775A2 EP1958775A2 (fr) 2008-08-20
EP1958775A3 EP1958775A3 (fr) 2010-04-14
EP1958775B1 true EP1958775B1 (fr) 2014-08-06

Family

ID=39402664

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP08100676.9A Active EP1958775B1 (fr) 2007-02-15 2008-01-21 Procédé de correction de la séparation du film d'encre

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US7894065B2 (fr)
EP (1) EP1958775B1 (fr)
JP (1) JP5497988B2 (fr)
CN (1) CN101244648B (fr)
DE (1) DE102007008017A1 (fr)

Families Citing this family (10)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN101844438B (zh) * 2009-03-25 2014-06-11 海德堡印刷机械股份公司 印刷机中的在线油墨调节
DE102010015034B4 (de) * 2009-04-30 2016-01-14 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Hybrid-Inline-Farbregelung für Druckmaschinen
DE102010017866A1 (de) * 2009-05-07 2010-11-25 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Verfahren zur Steuerung eines Farbwerkes einer Druckmaschine
DE102010051952B4 (de) * 2009-12-11 2022-01-20 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Analyse Farbauszüge
CN102416760B (zh) * 2010-09-24 2016-08-03 海德堡印刷机械股份公司 对版测量元件
DE102012004482A1 (de) * 2011-03-24 2012-09-27 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft Nutzenfarboptimierung
DE102012012517A1 (de) 2011-07-15 2013-01-17 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft Feuchtmittelregelung in einer Druckmaschine
CN102909950B (zh) 2011-08-03 2015-12-09 海德堡印刷机械股份公司 在印刷速度变化时输墨装置的控制
DE102012016832A1 (de) 2011-09-22 2013-03-28 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Farbregelung auf letzter Farbauftragswalze
DE102012020911A1 (de) 2011-11-11 2013-05-16 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Ag Färbungswächter für Druckmaschinen

Family Cites Families (14)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DE3265740D1 (en) * 1981-04-03 1985-10-03 Gretag Ag Method and device for the colorimetric analysis of a printed colour test scale
JPS6122949A (ja) * 1984-07-12 1986-01-31 Shinohara Tekkosho:Kk オフセツト印刷機のインキロ−ラ−装置
US5182721A (en) * 1985-12-10 1993-01-26 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft Process and apparatus for controlling the inking process in a printing machine
EP0241773B1 (fr) * 1986-04-18 1991-05-29 Heidelberger Druckmaschinen Aktiengesellschaft Détermination des défauts de repérage dans l'impression polychrome
DE3830732C2 (de) * 1988-09-09 2000-05-25 Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag Verfahren zur Feuchtmittelführung bei einer Offset-Druckmaschine
JPH04203955A (ja) * 1990-11-29 1992-07-24 Narumi China Corp 印刷パターンの検査方法
US6081608A (en) * 1995-02-09 2000-06-27 Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Printing quality examining method
US5724259A (en) * 1995-05-04 1998-03-03 Quad/Tech, Inc. System and method for monitoring color in a printing press
DE19749064A1 (de) * 1997-11-06 1999-05-12 Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Farbwertgradienten
US6796240B2 (en) * 2001-06-04 2004-09-28 Quad/Tech, Inc. Printing press register control using colorpatch targets
DE10257981A1 (de) * 2002-01-15 2003-07-24 Heidelberger Druckmasch Ag Farbsteuerung einer Druckmaschine mit spektralbasierter Farbmessung
DE102004021599A1 (de) 2004-05-03 2005-12-01 Gretag-Macbeth Ag Verfahren zur Ermittlung von Farb- und/oder Dichtewerten und für das Verfahren ausgebildete Druckeinrichtungen
AT502095B1 (de) * 2005-06-21 2007-11-15 Arc Seibersdorf Res Gmbh Verfahren zur prüfung von gegenständen
US7636163B2 (en) * 2007-07-23 2009-12-22 X-Rite, Inc. Color measurement device with error detection

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP1958775A2 (fr) 2008-08-20
EP1958775A3 (fr) 2010-04-14
CN101244648B (zh) 2011-03-16
JP5497988B2 (ja) 2014-05-21
JP2008195073A (ja) 2008-08-28
US20080201110A1 (en) 2008-08-21
US7894065B2 (en) 2011-02-22
DE102007008017A1 (de) 2008-08-21
CN101244648A (zh) 2008-08-20

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP1958775B1 (fr) Procédé de correction de la séparation du film d'encre
EP1744884B1 (fr) Procede pour determiner des valeurs de densite et/ou d'encrage et dispositif d'impression pour la mise en oeuvre dudit procede
EP0884178B1 (fr) Procédé pour reguler l'encrage dans une machine d'impression
EP0713447B1 (fr) Dispositif de verification d'image d'un produit imprime
EP2033789A2 (fr) Calibrage d'appareils de mesure de couleur dans une machine d'impression
DE10319770A1 (de) Verfahren zur Regelung der Farbdichte einer von einer Druckmaschine auf einem Druckträger aufgebrachten Farbe und Vorrichtung zur Regelung verschiedener für den Druckprozess einer Druckmaschine relevanter Parameter
EP1759845B1 (fr) Procédé de contrôle pour une méthode à imprimer
CH697367B1 (de) Vorrichtung und Verfahren zur Erfassung und Auswertung eines Bildes von einem vorbestimmten Auschnitt eines Druckerzeugnisses.
WO2018015193A1 (fr) Système d'inspection comportant plusieurs zones de détection
DE102005060893B4 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung eines drucktechnischen Messwertes
DE4109744C2 (de) Verfahren zur Ermittlung der Flächendeckung einer druckenden Vorlage, insbes. einer Druckplatte, sowie Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens
DE20213431U1 (de) Einrichtung zur Qualitätskontrolle an Drucksachen
DE69026488T2 (de) Verfahren zur Qualitätsbeurteilung von Druckerzeugnissen
DE102004063988B4 (de) Verfahren zur Erfassung von bei einem Druckvorgang wirkenden Variablen
EP4391517A1 (fr) Procédure de détermination de la position des mesures spectrales
EP2325010B1 (fr) Procédé destiné à la détermination de caractéristiques d'une matière imprimée
DE102007007628A1 (de) Vorrichtung zur Überwachung der Druckparameter einer Druckmaschine

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: X-RITE EUROPE GMBH

Owner name: HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

AX Request for extension of the european patent

Extension state: AL BA MK RS

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 20101014

AKX Designation fees paid

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

GRAP Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1

INTG Intention to grant announced

Effective date: 20140416

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: X-RITE SWITZERLAND GMBH

Owner name: HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

GRAS Grant fee paid

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC MT NL NO PL PT RO SE SI SK TR

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: NOT ENGLISH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: EP

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: REF

Ref document number: 680832

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20140815

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: FG4D

Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R096

Ref document number: 502008012073

Country of ref document: DE

Effective date: 20140918

RAP2 Party data changed (patent owner data changed or rights of a patent transferred)

Owner name: HEIDELBERGER DRUCKMASCHINEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT

Owner name: X-RITE SWITZERLAND GMBH

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: NL

Ref legal event code: VDEP

Effective date: 20140806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: LT

Ref legal event code: MG4D

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: ES

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: GR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141107

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: NO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141106

Ref country code: LT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: PT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141209

Ref country code: BG

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141106

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: LV

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: PL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: CY

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: HR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: IS

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20141206

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: RO

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: CZ

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: EE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

Ref country code: DK

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: R097

Ref document number: 502008012073

Country of ref document: DE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150131

26N No opposition filed

Effective date: 20150507

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20150121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MC

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: IE

Ref legal event code: MM4A

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150121

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: AT

Ref legal event code: MM01

Ref document number: 680832

Country of ref document: AT

Kind code of ref document: T

Effective date: 20150121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20150121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: MT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: HU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT; INVALID AB INITIO

Effective date: 20080121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: TR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 20140806

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: PLFP

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20210125

Year of fee payment: 14

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20220121

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20220121

P01 Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered

Effective date: 20230511

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20240119

Year of fee payment: 17

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 20240202

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20240124

Year of fee payment: 17