EP1807249B1 - Dispositif et procede pour profiler des troncs d'arbre - Google Patents
Dispositif et procede pour profiler des troncs d'arbre Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1807249B1 EP1807249B1 EP05793988A EP05793988A EP1807249B1 EP 1807249 B1 EP1807249 B1 EP 1807249B1 EP 05793988 A EP05793988 A EP 05793988A EP 05793988 A EP05793988 A EP 05793988A EP 1807249 B1 EP1807249 B1 EP 1807249B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- machining
- axis
- another
- saw
- tree trunk
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims description 15
- 238000003754 machining Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 90
- 238000005520 cutting process Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000003801 milling Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 claims 1
- 241000763859 Dyckia brevifolia Species 0.000 description 7
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 description 4
- 240000005702 Galium aparine Species 0.000 description 3
- 235000014820 Galium aparine Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 description 3
- 244000290594 Ficus sycomorus Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000001520 comb Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004744 fabric Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000012447 hatching Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003780 insertion Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000037431 insertion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009434 installation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002244 precipitate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013138 pruning Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009966 trimming Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B27—WORKING OR PRESERVING WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; NAILING OR STAPLING MACHINES IN GENERAL
- B27B—SAWS FOR WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; COMPONENTS OR ACCESSORIES THEREFOR
- B27B7/00—Sawing machines working with circular saw blades, specially designed for length sawing of trunks
- B27B7/02—Sawing machines working with circular saw blades, specially designed for length sawing of trunks by making use of circular saws mounted substantially at right angles, e.g. vertically and horizontally
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B27—WORKING OR PRESERVING WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; NAILING OR STAPLING MACHINES IN GENERAL
- B27B—SAWS FOR WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; COMPONENTS OR ACCESSORIES THEREFOR
- B27B1/00—Methods for subdividing trunks or logs essentially involving sawing
- B27B1/007—Methods for subdividing trunks or logs essentially involving sawing taking into account geometric properties of the trunks or logs to be sawn, e.g. curvature
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B27—WORKING OR PRESERVING WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; NAILING OR STAPLING MACHINES IN GENERAL
- B27B—SAWS FOR WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; COMPONENTS OR ACCESSORIES THEREFOR
- B27B33/00—Sawing tools for saw mills, sawing machines, or sawing devices
- B27B33/20—Edge trimming saw blades or tools combined with means to disintegrate waste
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B27—WORKING OR PRESERVING WOOD OR SIMILAR MATERIAL; NAILING OR STAPLING MACHINES IN GENERAL
- B27L—REMOVING BARK OR VESTIGES OF BRANCHES; SPLITTING WOOD; MANUFACTURE OF VENEER, WOODEN STICKS, WOOD SHAVINGS, WOOD FIBRES OR WOOD POWDER
- B27L11/00—Manufacture of wood shavings, chips, powder, or the like; Tools therefor
- B27L11/007—Combined with manufacturing a workpiece
Definitions
- the invention relates to an apparatus and a method for processing, namely for profiling tree trunks with a first rotating machining tool, which rotates about a first axis and has a first workpiece machining area, and with a second rotating machining tool, which rotates about a second axis and a second Processing region, wherein the first axis and the second axis are substantially offset by 90 ° to each other and oriented substantially perpendicular to the tree trunk axis.
- the aim of this processing of tree trunks is to work out a right-angled forest-edged corner area out of the tree trunk in order to produce rectangular side edges for side boards to be cut off in a later processing step.
- Sawblades are used on this one hand to produce an optimum side edge of the side board with the aid of the saw cut, and on the other hand to produce wood chips with a defined shape when working out the corner region of the tree trunk, which can be resold as a by-product of the tree trunk.
- a nearly identical profiling is from the DE-A 199 60 319
- the first rotating machining tool has no additional chopping knives, but only a circular saw blade comprises.
- the machining volume machined by the chopping knives of the second machining tool is slightly larger than in the case of the aforementioned device with two rotating chopping knives.
- the disadvantage of a first machining tool consisting only of a circular saw blade lies in the fact that the gap formed by the circular saw blade instability in the machining area for the second machining tool because the corner area to be cut out by the second machining tool is only connected on one side to the tree trunk, while the second side of the corner area is completely separated from the tree trunk by the saw cut.
- splitting wedges which are stationarily positioned on the machining device between the two rotating machining tools.
- the disadvantage of such splitting wedges is that they can easily jam due to their thickness corresponding to the saw cut width and thereby disturb the entire production process. If the splitting wedges also become damaged as a result of jamming or because they wear out quickly, the splitting wedges also have to be replaced, which entails additional costs.
- the present invention is based on the object of further improving the known profiling methods with regard to processing effort and processing result.
- first machining tool and the second machining tool are arranged to each other that the first axis and the second axis lie in a common plane or intersect at a small distance of a few centimeters and that the two workpiece processing areas each at least partially overlap one another in the transverse direction of the tree trunk or adjoin one another.
- the two processing tools act on the essentially identical processing longitudinal section with a very small time offset, wherein they at least partially mesh with one another or pass each other. That is, they work intermittently, so first, for example, sets the first processing tool a saw cut - possibly combined with a simultaneous ausspanen a section adjacent to the saw cut - while immediately thereafter the second chopper performs the ausspanen to produce the wood chips.
- the first processing tool has a combined cutter / saw segment head or a saw segment head in which a plurality of saw segments distributed over its circumference and possibly parallel to it are arranged chopping knives which are spaced from each other by a sufficient distance Have circumferential direction to allow combing with the second processing tool or to prevent its interference.
- the second processing tool from a cutter head is formed with a plurality of circumferentially spaced chopping knives, which are intended to intervene in each case a gap between adjacent SAgesegmente and possibly chopping blade of the first processing tool. If the two processing tools are then operated in a synchronized manner so that the intermittent application of the workpiece according to the invention takes place, then despite the mutual proximity of the tools, their collision or disruption is avoided.
- a segmented saw blade is also provided on the cutter head to produce the second edge of Facilitzuspanenden corner area clean with a saw cut.
- the chopping blades of the second processing tool do not necessarily have to be immersed in a region that has previously been cut free from the sawing segments;
- the processing areas of the two processing tools can also adjoin one another without overlapping or penetrating each other. It is essential, however, that a mutual interference or contact or interference of the two processing tools is excluded.
- processing longitudinal section when the intermittent processing according to the invention by the two tools in the same longitudinal section of the processing device to be clarified.
- a “processing longitudinal section of a processing device” means that with respect to the longitudinal axis or longitudinal direction of a processing device (which usually corresponds to the longitudinal axis or longitudinal direction of the adjacent processing devices or the entire associated profiling), the processing is performed by a tool in a certain length range ,
- the associated tools process the tree trunk intermittently so that the two workpiece machining areas penetrate one another overlap in tree trunk transverse direction or that they are at least adjacent to each other.
- the first machining tool and the second machining tool are arranged relative to each other such that the first axis and the second axis lie in a common plane or intersect at a small distance of a few centimeters. It is particularly advantageous if the common plane of the two axes is oriented substantially perpendicular to the tree trunk axis.
- both processing tools actually have no or almost no offset to each other in the tree trunk longitudinal direction, i. They work on the tree trunk parallel to each other, so to speak at the same time (the individual segments of the processing tools alternate in editing in direct succession) in the same processing longitudinal section.
- the gap formed by the first processing tool fails in the longitudinal direction only very briefly, since the exposed corner area is immediately followed by the second processing tool. Consequently, this corner area in the region of the gap no longer needs to be supported, so that it is easy to manage without the use of riving knives.
- the gap area exposed by the first saw cut is on the order of about half a meter (corresponding approximately to the distance between the two processing tools)
- the gap length in the apparatus according to the invention is only a few centimeters This length depends on the circle radii of the machining tools, on the width of the first machining tool and on the machining dimensions.
- a particular advantage of the distance between the machining area of the first machining tool and the machining area of the second machining tool, which distance is reduced to 0 in the longitudinal direction of the stem, is that the form errors in a curved section are minimized; because while hitherto in an attempt to saw bowing in adaptation to the curvature of a tree trunk, the spaced apart processing areas of the two processing tools to an independent width adjustment of the two processing tools would have to compensate to compensate for the curvature differences in the two processing areas, such compensation is no longer necessary in the inventive merging of the two processing areas, since both processing tools can be adjusted simultaneously or together.
- the two processing tools are mounted together in an angle milling unit, so that they are then expediently drivable on the same drive and in particular via a common gear and are mutually adjustable with respect to their orientation relative to the tree trunk and / or other processing tools.
- the entire angle milling or milling-saw unit can be pivoted about a horizontal axis (in conjunction with a servo-controlled elevation axis) to the wood to be machined up or down a sloping to the table support the tree trunk extending side board tidied up.
- Another common adjustment of the milling-saw unit can be exploited when pivoting about a vertical axis, that a bow-cutting incision without pruning is possible without having to perform an additional width adjustment of the two processing tools relative to each other.
- the present invention proposes not only a device for processing, namely for profiling tree trunks, but also a method for processing, namely for profiling tree trunks.
- An example from the DE-A 199 60 319 Known profiling consists of the introduction of a substantially parallel to the tree trunk axis extending saw cut in the tree trunk and from the subsequent Ausspanen one of at least substantially limited by the saw cut, in particular forest edge portion.
- the disadvantages described at the outset in connection with the cited document are also to be avoided by the profiling method according to the invention and also the processing effort and processing result are correspondingly improved. This is inventively achieved in that the Insertion of the saw cut and the ausspanen parallel to each other at least partially in the same processing section and / or intermittently.
- the two processing tools alternately apply the same processing area or at least directly adjoining processing areas, but in the same processing (longitudinal) section.
- this common processing area or the directly adjacent processing areas the saw cut and the Ausspanen can adapt to the shape of the tree trunk, that the two processing tools pivoted together about a common horizontal and / or vertical pivot axis and / or together along a common horizontal and / or vertical axis are adjusted.
- the special advantage in contrast to the mentioned DE-A-199 60 319 lies in the fact that by introducing the saw cut (possibly combined with adjacent Ausspanen) and the respective subsequent intermittent cutting a gap is formed, which has a maximum length in the order of a few centimeters in tree trunk longitudinal direction. As a result, the gap no longer has to be supported by a splitting wedge.
- FIG. 1 shows a portion of a tree trunk, a so-called model 1, which is acted upon by a first machining tool 2 and a second machining tool 3 to a corner region 1 a (s. FIG. 3a ) of the tree trunk.
- the first machining tool 2 consists of a sawing segment head with four sawing segments 4 distributed over its circumference and a cutter head 24 arranged adjacently thereto with four chopping knives 25 distributed over the circumference.
- Each sawing segment 4 or chopping knife 25 has opposite the respectively adjacent sawing segment 4 or Cleaver 25 in the circumferential direction at a greater distance, as will be explained in more detail below in connection with the second processing tool 3.
- the first machining tool 2 has a first axis of rotation A, which is oriented substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis C of the tree trunk 1 and in the exemplary embodiment FIG. 1 in the vertical direction.
- the second processing tool 3 has a cutter head 5 with a total of four distributed over the circumference arranged chopping knives 6, which - similar to the sawing segments 4 of the machining tool 2 - are arranged over the circumference with mutual distance to each other in the space between the adjacent Saw segments can dive without touching the two editing tools. Adjacent to the cutter head 5 additional sawing segments 7 are provided (with recesses in the region of the chopping blade 6), the also introduce a saw cut on the side edge of the model or corner area machined by the second machining tool 3.
- the second machining tool 3 rotates about an axis of rotation B, which - as well as the first axis A - is oriented substantially perpendicular to the longitudinal axis of the tree trunk and in the embodiment of FIG. 1 runs in a horizontal direction.
- the two axes of rotation A and B are not only offset by 90 ° to each other, but they are still substantially in the same plane E, so that the machining tool 2 with its processing area I and the machining tool 3 with its processing area II, the model in the same processing longitudinal section III, so in the same longitudinal region of the tree trunk alternately or intermittently apply (see 3e to 3h and 5b).
- FIG. 2 now shows a similar device and arrangement of the back, that is in the direction opposite to the feed direction c.
- the only difference is that the machining tool 2 in this variant only from a shegesegmentkopf (omitting the cutter head 24 from FIG. 1 ) consists. All other components are identical to the variant FIG. 1 why they are also identified with the same reference numerals.
- FIG. 2 are also the directions of rotation A and B of the two processing tools 2 and 3 indicated.
- FIGS. 3a to 3d show a partially processed model of the device FIG. 2 in perspective side view ( FIG. 3a ), in plan view ( FIG. 3b ), in side view ( Figure 3c ) and in back view ( 3d figure ).
- a very short failing gap 7 can be seen, which consists of an inserted through the saw segments 4, extending in the longitudinal direction of the log saw cut, the is delimited in the length direction by a cutout 8 caused by the cutter head 5.
- the size of the gap 7 overlapping spring tongue 9 is minimal, so that they undergo sufficient support through the remaining model areas and their support no separate riving knife is required.
- FIGS. 3e to 3h show a partially processed model of the device FIG. 1 in perspective side view ( FIG. 3e ), in plan view ( FIG. 3f ), in side view ( FIG. 3g ) and in back view ( FIG. 3h ).
- a processing area I of the first processing tool 2 (not shown)
- a processing area II of the second processing tool 3 (also not shown) are shown.
- the machining areas are those areas that act on the associated machining tools at a specific time in the tree trunk.
- FIG. 4 is now the possible by merging the two processing tools according to the invention principle of path control explained schematically.
- the model 1 is shown in side view and two processing devices 11, 12, each with a first processing tool 2 and a second processing tool 3, wherein each processing device, although mirror-image, but otherwise the same design and each have a sawing segment 4 and a cutter head 5 with attached saw blade. 7 having.
- Table support 13 shown horizontally the processing levels of Sagesegmentkexcellent 4 are arranged inclined so that along the wooden model to be processed along a diagonal to the table support 13 extending side board 14 can be trimmed.
- the axes A of the saw segment heads 4 are slightly inclined relative to the vertical by the processing devices 11, 12 have been pivoted about a horizontal pivot axis D in the direction d.
- each processing device 11, 12 adjusted in the height direction e and so the mutual distance can be changed.
- FIG. 5a is shown in plan view on the one hand, the processing device 11 and on the other hand, a likewise constructed processing device 15.
- a sheet-like cut is made in the model for producing a side product.
- FIG. 5b shows two more, equally constructed processing devices 16, 17, the left and right processing devices can be pivoted in pairs around its vertical axis in the direction of the arrows f, thereby to perform when introducing two
- FIG. 5a shown shows two more, equally constructed processing devices 16, 17, the left and right processing devices can be pivoted in pairs around its vertical axis in the direction of the arrows f, thereby to perform when introducing two seewaren 14, 18 an active sheet cutting, the is not only the processing devices in the width direction g (as in FIG. 5a shown), but also in addition to pivot about the vertical axis.
- FIG. 5b is also a common longitudinal direction h of the four processing devices 11, 15, 16 and 17 shown, which are part of a profiling.
- the associated processing longitudinal sections III are shown for the processing tools 2 and 3 of the processing devices 11 and 17, the processing tools 2 and 3 - and thus the associated workpiece processing areas (I, II) - a processing device respectively on the same processing longitudinal section III -befinden.
- the present invention with almost any orientation of the two tool axis (that is, the axis of the first machining tool can be arranged both vertically and horizontally oriented or inclined to the horizontal or vertical, are arranged, wherein each axis of the second The processing tool is offset by 90 ° in the same plane) has the advantage of providing a compact and short design machining device by combining the two processing tools in one, the same processing longitudinal section acting unit, which is simple and easy due to their small length insert existing processing lines.
- the device according to the invention or the method according to the invention makes a riving knife superfluous, so that all associated risks of jamming or the expense of a tool change are eliminated.
- the comparatively thick gap otherwise required for a splitting wedge may also be smaller, which leads to a further increase in yield and, due to the comparatively lower comminution work in the non-deported area, to a reduction in the required drive or cutting power by increasing the chip fraction to be machined by the milling cutter.
Landscapes
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- Forests & Forestry (AREA)
- Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
- Dovetailed Work, And Nailing Machines And Stapling Machines For Wood (AREA)
- Milling Processes (AREA)
- Turning (AREA)
- Milling, Drilling, And Turning Of Wood (AREA)
- Catching Or Destruction (AREA)
- Machine Tool Units (AREA)
- Cultivation Of Plants (AREA)
- Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
- Organic Insulating Materials (AREA)
Claims (22)
- Dispositif pour profiler des troncs d'arbres, comprenant un premier outil rotatif de façonnage (2) qui tourne autour d'un premier axe (A) et comporte une première zone (I) de façonnage de pièces, et un second outil rotatif de façonnage (3) qui tourne autour d'un second axe (B) et présente une seconde zone de façonnage (II), le premier axe (A) et le second axe (B) étant sensiblement décalés l'un de l'autre de 90° et étant respectivement orientés, pour l'essentiel, perpendiculairement à l'axe longitudinal (C) du tronc d'arbre (1),
caractérisé par le fait
que le premier outil de façonnage (2) et le second outil de façonnage (3) sont mutuellement agencés de façon telle que le premier axe (A) et le second axe (B) se trouvent dans un plan commun (E), ou se croisent selon un faible espacement d'un nombre restreint de centimètres ;
et par le fait que les deux zones (I, II) de façonnage de pièces se chevauchent réciproquement ou sont réciproquement limitrophes, au moins en partie, dans la direction transversale du tronc d'arbre. - Dispositif selon la revendication 1,
caractérisé par le fait
que les deux zones (I, II) de façonnage de pièces se trouvent à chaque fois, au moins en partie, pour l'essentiel sur le même tronçon longitudinal de façonnage (III) du dispositif de façonnage (11, 12, 15, 16, 17). - Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes 1 à 2,
caractérisé par le fait
que le plan commun (E) des deux axes (A, B) des outils de façonnage (2, 3) est orienté, pour l'essentiel, perpendiculairement à l'axe (C) du tronc d'arbre. - Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes 2 à 3,
caractérisé par le fait
que les deux outils de façonnage (2, 3) agissent, en alternance, sur le même tronçon longitudinal de façonnage (III). - Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes 1 à 4,
caractérisé par le fait
que les deux outils de façonnage (2, 3) engrènent au moins partiellement l'un dans l'autre. - Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes 1 à 5,
caractérisé par le fait
que le premier outil de façonnage (2) est une tête de sciage segmentée. - Dispositif selon la revendication 6,
caractérisé par le fait
que le premier outil de façonnage (2) possède une tête additionnelle de fraisage (24), munie de plusieurs tranchoirs (25) répartis sur le pourtour. - Dispositif selon la revendication 6,
caractérisé par le fait
que la tête de sciage (2) segmentée comprend plusieurs segments de sciage (4) répartis sur son pourtour ; et par le fait que des segments de sciage voisins sont mutuellement espacés, dans la direction périphérique, d'une distance suffisante pour permettre un engrènement et/ou un défilement frontal conjoint avec le second outil de façonnage (3). - Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes 1 à 8,
caractérisé par le fait
que le second outil de façonnage (3) consiste en une tête de fraisage (5) dotée de plusieurs tranchoirs (6) répartis sur le pourtour. - Dispositif selon la revendication 8 et la revendication 9,
caractérisé par le fait
que les tranchoirs (6) sont prévus pour s'engager dans un espace interstitiel respectif situé entre des segments de sciage voisins (4) de la tête de sciage (2) segmentée. - Dispositif selon la revendication 9,
caractérisé par le fait
que la tête de fraisage (5) offre également une lame de scie (7), notamment segmentée. - Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes 1 à 11,
caractérisé par le fait
que les deux outils de façonnage (2, 3) sont montés conjointement dans une unité de fraisage d'angle. - Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes 1 à 12,
caractérisé par le fait
que les deux outils de façonnage (2, 3) peuvent être menés par l'intermédiaire du même entraînement et, en particulier, par l'intermédiaire d'une transmission commune. - Dispositif selon l'une des revendications précédentes 1 à 13,
caractérisé par le fait
que l'orientation des deux outils de façonnage (2, 3) peut être réglée, en commun, vis-à-vis du tronc d'arbre (1) et/ou d'autres outils de façonnage (12, 15, 16, 17). - Procédé de profilage de troncs d'arbres, consistant au moins à pratiquer, dans le tronc d'arbre (1), un trait de scie s'étendant pour l'essentiel parallèlement à l'axe (C) dudit tronc d'arbre, dans une première zone (I) de façonnage de pièces ; et à effectuer ensuite un enlèvement de copeaux, dans une seconde zone de façonnage (II), sur une zone d'angle (1a) notamment flacheuse, au moins pour l'essentiel délimitée par ledit trait de scie,
caractérisé par le fait
que l'exécution du trait de scie et l'enlèvement de copeaux s'opèrent parallèlement l'un à l'autre, au moins en partie dans le même tronçon longitudinal de façonnage (III) et/ou en mode intermittent ; et par le fait que les deux zones (I, II) de façonnage de pièces se chevauchent réciproquement ou sont réciproquement limitrophes, au moins en partie, dans la direction transversale du tronc d'arbre. - Procédé selon la revendication 15,
caractérisé par le fait
que l'exécution du trait de scie, et l'enlèvement de copeaux consécutif, sont effectués par des outils segmentés de façonnage (2, 3) s'interpénétrant. - Procédé selon la revendication 15,
caractérisé par le fait
que l'exécution du trait de scie, et l'enlèvement de copeaux consécutif, sont effectués par des outils de façonnage (2, 3) défilant en regard l'un de l'autre. - Procédé selon la revendication 16,
caractérisé par le fait
que les deux outils de façonnage (2, 3) sont menés conjointement par l'intermédiaire du même entraînement. - Procédé selon la revendication 16,
caractérisé par le fait
que les deux outils de façonnage (2, 3) agissent en alternance, sur le même tronçon longitudinal de façonnage (III), par des zones de façonnage (I, II) qui se chevauchent ou par des zones de façonnage (I, II) qui sont au moins directement limitrophes. - Procédé selon la revendication 16,
caractérisé par le fait
que les deux outils de façonnage sont mutuellement coordonnés de façon telle que l'exécution du trait de scie, et l'enlèvement de copeaux respectivement consécutif, ne provoquent aucune saignée ou, tout au plus, une saignée (7) présentant, dans la direction longitudinale (c) du tronc d'arbre, une longueur maximale de l'ordre de quelques centimètres seulement. - Procédé selon la revendication 16,
caractérisé par le fait
que le premier outil de façonnage est une tête combinée de fraisage/sciage segmenté et assure, dans le même temps, l'exécution du trait de scie et l'enlèvement de copeaux dans une région du tronc d'arbre qui occupe une position voisine. - Procédé selon la revendication 16,
caractérisé par le fait
que le trait de scie et l'enlèvement de copeaux sont adaptés à la forme du tronc d'arbre (1) par pivotement conjoint imprimé aux deux outils de façonnage (2, 3) autour d'un axe commun de pivotement (D, F) horizontal et/ou vertical ; et/ou par réglage conjoint desdits outils le long d'un axe commun (e, g) horizontal et/ou vertical.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
PL05793988T PL1807249T3 (pl) | 2004-10-25 | 2005-10-01 | Urządzenie i sposób do profilowania kłód drzew |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE102004051933A DE102004051933A1 (de) | 2004-10-25 | 2004-10-25 | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum Profilieren von Baumstämmen |
PCT/EP2005/010623 WO2006045403A1 (fr) | 2004-10-25 | 2005-10-01 | Dispositif et procede pour profiler des troncs d'arbre |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1807249A1 EP1807249A1 (fr) | 2007-07-18 |
EP1807249B1 true EP1807249B1 (fr) | 2008-11-19 |
Family
ID=35455256
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP05793988A Active EP1807249B1 (fr) | 2004-10-25 | 2005-10-01 | Dispositif et procede pour profiler des troncs d'arbre |
Country Status (10)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7770616B2 (fr) |
EP (1) | EP1807249B1 (fr) |
CN (1) | CN101048266B (fr) |
AT (1) | ATE414597T1 (fr) |
CA (1) | CA2585217C (fr) |
DE (2) | DE102004051933A1 (fr) |
NO (1) | NO332455B1 (fr) |
PL (1) | PL1807249T3 (fr) |
RU (1) | RU2365496C2 (fr) |
WO (1) | WO2006045403A1 (fr) |
Cited By (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP4166292A1 (fr) | 2021-10-14 | 2023-04-19 | Gebrüder Linck, Maschinenfabrik "Gatterlinck" GmbH & Co. KG | Procédé et dispositif de fabrication de bois scié |
Families Citing this family (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FI123382B (fi) * | 2010-10-11 | 2013-03-28 | Heinolan Sahakoneet Oy | Laitteisto pelkan työstämiseksi ja jakamiseksi puukappaleisiin |
DE102010042596A1 (de) * | 2010-10-18 | 2012-04-19 | Homag Holzbearbeitungssysteme Ag | Bearabeitungsvorrichtung zur Bearbeitung von Werkstücken |
FI127662B (fi) * | 2015-11-24 | 2018-11-30 | Veisto Oy | Laitteisto ja menetelmä tukkien käsittelemiseksi |
RU171199U1 (ru) * | 2016-04-19 | 2017-05-23 | Александр Алексеевич Дайлов | Диск тарельчатый обдирно-фрезерный для обработки древесины |
US11247362B2 (en) * | 2019-02-22 | 2022-02-15 | Sterling Site Access Solutions | Circular saw blade |
Family Cites Families (20)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US259661A (en) * | 1882-06-20 | Band-saw guide | ||
US4964448A (en) * | 1958-09-14 | 1990-10-23 | Schultz David A | Raised panel cutter assembly |
US3552457A (en) * | 1968-05-29 | 1971-01-05 | Mac Millan Bloedel Ltd | Log break-down method and apparatus |
DE2918622C2 (de) * | 1979-05-09 | 1981-11-19 | Gebrüder Linck Maschinenfabrik und Eisengießerei Gatterlinck, 7602 Oberkirch | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur spanenden Zerlegung von Baumstämmen in allseitig bearbeitete Holzerzeugnisse |
US4239069A (en) * | 1979-08-10 | 1980-12-16 | Zimmerman Edwin H | Automatic cant production machine |
AT382549B (de) * | 1985-09-30 | 1987-03-10 | Wolf Johann Gmbh Kg | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum besaeumen von baumstaemmen |
DE3702890A1 (de) * | 1986-02-27 | 1987-09-03 | Linck Masch Gatterlinck | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur spanenden zerlegung von baumstaemmen in allseitig bearbeitete holzerzeugnisse mittels profilzerspanung |
ATE77578T1 (de) * | 1987-04-13 | 1992-07-15 | Wolf Johann Gmbh Kg | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum besaeumen von rundhoelzern. |
US4936359A (en) * | 1988-07-07 | 1990-06-26 | Ccx Fantastic, Inc. | Method and apparatus for breaking corners of wood members |
DE4419325C1 (de) | 1994-06-02 | 1995-05-11 | Dietz Hans Prof Dr | Spanerwerkzeug |
DE29521324U1 (de) * | 1994-06-08 | 1997-06-05 | Strojcad S.R.O., Michalovce | Vorrichtung zum Schneiden |
DE19513699C1 (de) * | 1995-04-11 | 1996-04-25 | Linck Masch Gatterlinck | Werkzeugkopf für Profilzerspaner |
DE29508355U1 (de) | 1995-05-24 | 1996-09-26 | Gebrüder Linck Maschinenfabrik "Gatterlinck" GmbH & Co KG, 77704 Oberkirch | Vorrichtung zum Zerlegen von Baumstämmen in Holzerzeugnisse und Fräskopf für eine solche Vorrichtung |
FI99096C (fi) * | 1995-11-24 | 1997-10-10 | Kauko Rautio | Menetelmä puunrungon käsittelemiseksi lastuamalla |
SE514304C2 (sv) * | 1997-10-10 | 2001-02-05 | Ari Ab | Anordning och förfarande för bearbetning av en timmerstock |
AT406131B (de) * | 1998-07-17 | 2000-02-25 | Wolf Systembau Gmbh & Co Kg | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum herstellen von acht- oder mehrseitigen kanthölzern |
ES2291213T3 (es) * | 1999-06-08 | 2008-03-01 | Key Knife, Inc. | Procedimiento y aparato para el perfilado de un rollizo. |
DE19960319C1 (de) * | 1999-12-15 | 2001-07-26 | Dietz Hans | Vorrichtung zum Erzeugen eines Hackschnitzels sowie Vorrichtung zum Profilieren eines Baumstammes |
US6637483B2 (en) * | 2000-06-08 | 2003-10-28 | Key Knife, Inc. | Method and apparatus for profiling a log |
US7219706B2 (en) * | 2002-09-06 | 2007-05-22 | Key Knife, Inc. | Apparatus having adjustable saws for wood cutting |
-
2004
- 2004-10-25 DE DE102004051933A patent/DE102004051933A1/de not_active Withdrawn
-
2005
- 2005-10-01 AT AT05793988T patent/ATE414597T1/de active
- 2005-10-01 US US11/577,813 patent/US7770616B2/en active Active
- 2005-10-01 PL PL05793988T patent/PL1807249T3/pl unknown
- 2005-10-01 CA CA2585217A patent/CA2585217C/fr active Active
- 2005-10-01 WO PCT/EP2005/010623 patent/WO2006045403A1/fr active Application Filing
- 2005-10-01 RU RU2007113063/12A patent/RU2365496C2/ru active
- 2005-10-01 EP EP05793988A patent/EP1807249B1/fr active Active
- 2005-10-01 DE DE502005006023T patent/DE502005006023D1/de active Active
- 2005-10-01 CN CN2005800366642A patent/CN101048266B/zh active Active
-
2007
- 2007-04-23 NO NO20072074A patent/NO332455B1/no unknown
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP4166292A1 (fr) | 2021-10-14 | 2023-04-19 | Gebrüder Linck, Maschinenfabrik "Gatterlinck" GmbH & Co. KG | Procédé et dispositif de fabrication de bois scié |
DE102021126725A1 (de) | 2021-10-14 | 2023-04-20 | Gebrüder Linck, Maschinenfabrik "Gatterlinck" GmbH & Co. KG | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum herstellen von schnittholz |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2006045403A1 (fr) | 2006-05-04 |
PL1807249T3 (pl) | 2009-04-30 |
NO332455B1 (no) | 2012-09-24 |
CA2585217A1 (fr) | 2006-05-04 |
RU2365496C2 (ru) | 2009-08-27 |
DE502005006023D1 (de) | 2009-01-02 |
CN101048266B (zh) | 2010-04-14 |
CN101048266A (zh) | 2007-10-03 |
DE102004051933A1 (de) | 2006-05-04 |
CA2585217C (fr) | 2011-11-15 |
US7770616B2 (en) | 2010-08-10 |
EP1807249A1 (fr) | 2007-07-18 |
RU2007113063A (ru) | 2008-11-27 |
NO20072074L (no) | 2007-07-18 |
US20090120532A1 (en) | 2009-05-14 |
ATE414597T1 (de) | 2008-12-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE3343953A1 (de) | Verfahren zur bearbeitung gekruemmter staemme | |
EP1807249B1 (fr) | Dispositif et procede pour profiler des troncs d'arbre | |
EP0634254B1 (fr) | Dispositif à chariot d'alimentation et procédé pour la fabrication d'articles en bois à partir de troncs d'arbres | |
DE3125191A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur zufuehrung von holzbloecken in eine holzbearbeitungsmaschine | |
EP0242352B1 (fr) | Dispositif pour l'enlevement de copeaux des parties laterales de troncs d'arbres | |
DE68906892T2 (de) | Sägevorrichtung. | |
AT399307B (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zur spanenden zerlegung von baumstämmen in allseitig bearbeitete holzerzeugnisse | |
DE4419324C2 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Bearbeiten von Holz | |
DE2920755A1 (de) | Einrichtung und verfahren zum stirnseitigen zusammensetzen von hoelzern mittels keilzinkenverbindungen | |
EP0744255B1 (fr) | Dispositif pour découper des troncs d'arbres et tête de fraisage pour ce dispositif | |
EP1652640A1 (fr) | Dispositif de sciage pour des troncs d'arbres avec une surface de support et une surface de butée ajustable | |
DE3347584C2 (fr) | ||
DE3208377A1 (de) | Verfahren und vorrichtung zum ausfraesen der baumkanten von baumstaemmen | |
DE3514892C1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zum Zerspanen von Holz, insbesondere zur spanenden Zerlegung von mit Baukanten versehenen Baumstämmen | |
DE102017011825B4 (de) | Verfahren zum Auftrennen länglicher Werkstücke aus Holz, Kunststoff und dergleichen in Lamellen sowie Bearbeitungsmaschine zur Durchführung eines solchen Verfahrens | |
DE3244450C2 (fr) | ||
DE3120961A1 (de) | Kreissaegemaschine | |
EP0785051A1 (fr) | Procédé et dispositif pour découper des troncs d'arbres | |
EP1652639A1 (fr) | Procédé pour le changement de format dans une installation pour la fabrication de carton ondulé | |
DE102022101204A1 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Herstellung von Schnittholz aus einem Baumstamm, und zur Durchführung des Verfahrens geeignete Ritzsäge | |
EP3838528B1 (fr) | Douve, fût de bois pourvu de douves et procédé de fabrication de douves | |
WO2002060659A2 (fr) | Procede et dispositif pour decouper des bois ronds courbes dans un plan afin d'obtenir des produits ligneux | |
DE102022132324A1 (de) | Verfahren und Sägewerksvorrichtung zum Herstellen von Schnittholz aus einem Baumstamm | |
DE3337199A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur herstellung von umschlagzuschnitten | |
DE202023106628U1 (de) | Vorrichtung zum Profilieren eines Baumstammes |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20070329 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070928 |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IS IT LI LT LU LV MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 502005006023 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20090102 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: R. A. EGLI & CO. PATENTANWAELTE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: RO Ref legal event code: EPE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
LTIE | Lt: invalidation of european patent or patent extension |
Effective date: 20081119 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090301 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PL Ref legal event code: T3 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IS Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090319 Ref country code: LV Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FD4D |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090219 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090420 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20090820 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: GEBRUDER LINCK G.M.B.H. & CO. KG "GATTERLINCK" MA Effective date: 20091031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091031 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091031 Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090220 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20091001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090520 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081119 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: RO Payment date: 20130920 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20131023 Year of fee payment: 9 Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20131022 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20141001 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141031 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141001 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141001 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20141031 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 11 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 14 |
|
P01 | Opt-out of the competence of the unified patent court (upc) registered |
Effective date: 20230420 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20230921 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PL Payment date: 20230915 Year of fee payment: 19 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20231025 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20231031 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20231023 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: FI Payment date: 20231023 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20230919 Year of fee payment: 19 Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20231019 Year of fee payment: 19 |