EP1660700A2 - Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction - Google Patents
Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reactionInfo
- Publication number
- EP1660700A2 EP1660700A2 EP04779290A EP04779290A EP1660700A2 EP 1660700 A2 EP1660700 A2 EP 1660700A2 EP 04779290 A EP04779290 A EP 04779290A EP 04779290 A EP04779290 A EP 04779290A EP 1660700 A2 EP1660700 A2 EP 1660700A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- electrolyte
- anode
- iron
- copper
- electrochemical cell
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C25—ELECTROLYTIC OR ELECTROPHORETIC PROCESSES; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25C—PROCESSES FOR THE ELECTROLYTIC PRODUCTION, RECOVERY OR REFINING OF METALS; APPARATUS THEREFOR
- C25C1/00—Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of solutions
- C25C1/12—Electrolytic production, recovery or refining of metals by electrolysis of solutions of copper
Definitions
- the present invention relates, generally, to a method and apparatus for electrowinning metals, and more particularly to a method and apparatus for copper electrowinning using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction.
- Background of the Invention Efficiency and cost-effectiveness of copper electrowinning is and for a long time has been important to the competitiveness of the domestic copper industry.
- Past research and development efforts in this area have thus focused — at least in part — on mechanisms for decreasing the total energy requirement for copper electrowinning, which directly impacts the cost-effectiveness of the electrowinning process.
- the decomposition of water reaction at the anode produces oxygen (O 2 ) gas.
- O 2 oxygen
- the liberated oxygen gas bubbles break the surface of the electrolyte bath, they create an acid mist. Reduction or elimination of acid mist is desirable.
- the decomposition of water anode reaction used in conventional electrowinning contributes significantly to the overall cell voltage via the anode reaction equilibrium potential and the overpotential.
- the decomposition of water anode reaction exhibits a standard potential of 1.23 Volts (N), which contributes significantly to the total voltage required for conventional copper electrowinning.
- the typical overall cell voltage is approximately 2.0 N. A decrease in the anode reaction equilibrium potential and/or overpotential would reduce cell voltage, and thus conserve energy and decrease the total operating costs of the electrowinning operation.
- the ferric iron generated at the anode as a result of this overall cell reaction can be reduced back to ferrous iron using sulfur dioxide, as follows: Solution reaction: 2Fe 3+ + SO 2 + 2H 2 O ⁇ 2Fe 2+ + 4H + + SO 4 2"
- the use of the ferrous/ferric anode reaction in copper electrowinning cells lowers the energy consumption of those cells as compared to conventional copper electrowinning cells that employ the decomposition of
- the present invention relates to an improved copper electrowinning process and apparatus designed to address, among other things, the aforementioned deficiencies in prior art electrowinning systems.
- the improved process and apparatus disclosed herein achieves an advancement in the art by providing a copper electrowinning system that, by utilizing the ferrous/ferric anode reaction in combination with other aspects of the invention, enables significant enhancement in electrowinning efficiency, energy consumption, and reduction of acid mist generation as compared to conventional copper electrowinning processes and previous attempts to apply the ferrous/ferric anode reaction to copper electrowinning operations.
- alternative anode reaction refers to the ferrous/ferric anode reaction
- alternative anode reaction process refers to any electrowinning process in which the ferrous/ferric anode reaction is employed.
- Enhancing the circulation of electrolyte in the electrowinning cell between the electrodes facilitates transport of copper ions to the cathode, increases the diffusion rate of ferrous iron to the anode, and facilitates transport of ferric iron from the anode. Most significantly, as the diffusion rate of ferrous iron to the anode increases, the overall cell voltage generally decreases, resulting in a decrease in the power required for electrowinning the copper using an alternative anode reaction process.
- the use of a flow-through anode — coupled with an effective electrolyte circulation system — enables the efficient and cost-effective operation of a copper electrowinning system employing the ferrous/ferric anode reaction at a total cell voltage of less than about 1.5 V and at current densities of greater than about 26 Amps per square foot (about 280 A/m 2 ), and reduces acid mist generation.
- the use of such a system permits the use of low ferrous iron concentrations and optimized electrolyte flow rates as compared to prior art systems while producing high quality, commercially saleable product (i.e., LME Grade A copper cathode or equivalent), which is advantageous.
- an electrochemical cell is configured such that copper electrowinning may be achieved in an alternative anode reaction process while maintaining a current density of greater than about 26 A/ft 2 (280 A/m 2 ) of active cathode.
- an electrochemical cell is configured such that the cell voltage is maintained at less than about 1.5 V during the operation of an alternative anode reaction process.
- an alternative anode reaction process is operated such that the concentration of iron in the electrolyte is maintained at a level of from about 10 to about 60 grams per liter.
- an alternative anode reaction process is operated such that the temperature is maintained at from about 110°F (about 43°C) to about 180°F (about 83°C).
- FIG. 1 is a flow diagram for an electrowinning process in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 2 illustrates an electrochemical cell configured to operate in accordance with one exemplary embodiment of the present invention
- FIG. 3 illustrates an example of a flow-through anode with an example of an in- anode electrolyte injection manifold in accordance with an aspect of another exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
- Electrowinning process 100 illustrating various aspects of an exemplary embodiment of the invention is provided.
- Electrowinning process 100 generally comprises an electrowinning stage 101, a ferrous iron regeneration stage 103, and an acid removal stage 105.
- Electrowinning stage 101 produces cathode copper (stream not shown) and a ferric-rich electrolyte stream 13. At least a portion of ferric-rich electrolyte stream 13 is introduced into ferrous iron regeneration stage 103 as electrolyte regeneration stream 15.
- Manifold circulation stream 16 comprises the portion of ferric-rich electrolyte stream 13 not sent to ferrous iron regeneration stage 103, as well as recycle streams 12 and 14 from ferrous iron regeneration stage 103 and acid removal stage 105, respectively, and serves as a flow control and fluid agitation mechanism in accordance with one aspect of the invention discussed hereinbelow.
- increasing the operating current density in an electrowinning cell increases the cell voltage.
- processes and systems configured according to various embodiments of the present invention enable the efficient and cost-effective utilization of the alternative anode reaction in copper electrowinning at a cell voltage of less than about 1.5 V and at current densities of greater than about 26 A/ft 2 (about 280 A/m 2 ). Furthermore, the use of such processes and/or systems reduces generation of acid mist and permits the use of low ferrous iron concentrations in the electrolyte and optimized electrolyte flow rates, as compared to prior art systems, while producing high quality, commercially saleable product.
- a system for operating an alternative anode reaction process includes an electrochemical cell equipped with at least one flow-through anode and at least one cathode, wherein the cell is configured such that the flow and circulation of electrolyte within the cell enables the cell to be advantageously operated at a cell voltage of less than about 1.5 V and at a current density of greater than about 26 A/ft 2 .
- an electrolyte flow manifold configured to inject electrolyte into the anode may be used, as well as exposed "floor mat” type manifold configurations and other forced-flow circulation means.
- any flow mechanism that provides an electrolyte flow effective to transport ferrous iron to the anode, to transport ferric iron from the anode, and to transport copper ions to the cathode such that the electrowinning cell may be operated at a cell voltage of less than about 1.5 V and at a current density of greater than about 26 A/ft 2 , is suitable.
- ferrous iron for example, in the form of ferrous sulfate (FeSO )
- FeSO ferrous sulfate
- the ferrous/ferric anode reaction replaces the decomposition of water anode reaction.
- the cell voltage is decreased, thereby decreasing cell energy consumption.
- enhanced circulation of electrolyte between the electrodes increases the diffusion rate of ferrous iron to the anode. As the diffusion rate of ferrous iron to the anode increases, the overall cell voltage generally decreases, resulting in a decrease in the power required for electrowinning the copper.
- a flow- through anode with an electrolyte injection manifold is incorporated into the cell as shown in FIG. 2.
- flow-through anode refers to any anode configured to enable electrolyte to pass through it. While fluid flow from the manifold provides electrolyte movement, a flow-through anode allows the electrolyte in the electrochemical cell to flow through the anode during the electrowinning process.
- electrolyte injection manifolds with bottom injection, side injection, and/or in-anode injection are incorporated into the cell to enhance ferrous iron diffusion.
- EXAMPLE 1 herein demonstrates the effectiveness of an in-anode electrolyte injection manifold for decreasing cell voltage.
- an overall cell voltage of less than about 1.5 V is achieved, preferably less than about 1.20 V or about 1.25 V, and more preferably less than about 0.9 V or about 1.0 V.
- the copper plating rate increases. Stated another way, as the operating current density increases, more cathode copper is produced for a given time period and cathode active surface area than when a lower operating current density is achieved.
- the same amount of copper may be produced in a given time period, but with less active cathode surface area (i.e., fewer or smaller cathodes, which corresponds to lower capital equipment costs and lower operating costs).
- cell voltage tends to increase due in part to the depletion of ferrous ions at the anode surface. This can be compensated for by increasing transport of ferrous ions to the anode as current density increases in order to maintain a low cell voltage.
- the prior art was limited to current densities of 26 A/ft 2 (280 A/m 2 ) and below for copper electrowinning using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction in large part because of ferrous iron transport limitations.
- Various embodiments of the present invention allow for operation at current densities above — and significantly above — 6 A/ft 2 while maintaining cell voltages of less than about 1.5 V.
- exemplary embodiments of the present invention permit operation of electrochemical cells using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction at current densities of from about 26 to about 35 A/ft 2 at cell voltages of less than about 1.0 V; up to about 40 A/ft 2 at cell voltages of less than about 1.25 V; and up to about 50 A/ft 2 or greater at cell voltages of less than about 1.5 V.
- a current density of from about 20 to about 50 amps per square foot of active cathode (about 215 A/m 2 to about 538 A/m 2 ) is maintained, preferably greater than about 26 A/ft 2 (280 A/m 2 ), and more preferably greater than about 30 A/ft 2 (323 A/m 2 ) of active cathode.
- the maximum operable current density achievable in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention will depend upon the specific configuration of the process apparatus, and thus an operating current density in excess of 50 A/ft 2 (538 A/m 2 )of active cathode may be achievable in accordance with the present invention.
- One clear advantage of processes configured in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention is that a higher current density as compared to the prior art is achievable at the same cell voltage when using a flow-through anode with forced- flow manifold electrolyte injection.
- U.S. Bureau of Mines as reported in S. P. Sandoval, et al, "A Substituted Anode Reaction for Electrowinning Copper," Proceedings of Copper 95-COBRE 95 International Conference, v. Ill, pp.
- EXAMPLE 1 herein demonstrates that cell voltages of about 1.0 N and about 1.25 N are achievable at current densities of about 35 A/ft 2 (377 A/m 2 ) and about 40 A/ft 2 (430 A/m 2 ), respectively.
- electrolyte mixing and electrolyte flow through the electrochemical cell are achieved by circulating the electrolyte through the electrochemical cell and by the generation of oxygen bubbles at the anode, which cause agitation of the electrolyte solution as the oxygen bubbles rise to the surface of the electrolyte in the cell.
- electrolyte circulation is the primary source of mixing in the electrochemical cell.
- the present inventors have achieved an advancement in the art by recognizing that an electrochemical cell configured to allow a significant increase in mass transport of relevant species between the anode (e.g., ferrous/ferric ions) and the cathode (e.g., copper ions) by enhancing electrolyte flow and circulation characteristics when utilizing the alternative anode reaction would be advantageous.
- Enhanced circulation of the electrolyte between the electrodes increases the rate of transport of ions to and from the electrode surfaces (for example, copper ions to the cathode, ferrous ions to the anode, and ferric ions away from the anode) and, as a result, generally decreases the overall cell voltage. Decreasing the cell voltage results in a decrease in the power demand for electrowinning. Enhancing circulation of the electrolyte, however, generally requires an increase in the power demand of the electrolyte pumping system. Thus, the objectives of decreasing cell voltage and increasing electrolyte circulation are preferably balanced.
- Electrochemical cell 200 in accordance with various aspects of an exemplary embodiment of the invention is provided.
- Electrochemical cell 200 generally comprises a cell 21, at least one anode 23, at least one cathode 25, and an electrolyte flow manifold 27 comprising a plurality of injection holes 29 distributed throughout at least a portion of the cell 21.
- electrochemical cell 200 comprises an exemplary apparatus for implementation of electrowinning step 101 of electrowinning process 100 illustrated in FIG. 1.
- anode 23 is configured to enable the electrolyte to flow through it.
- flow-through anode refers to an anode so configured, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Any now known or hereafter devised flow-through anode may be utilized in accordance with various aspects of the present invention. Possible configurations include, but are not hmited to, metal wool or fabric, an expanded porous metal structure, metal mesh, multiple metal strips, multiple metal wires or rods, perforated metal sheets, and the like, or combinations thereof.
- suitable anode configurations are not limited to planar configurations, but may include any suitable multiplanar geometric configuration. While not wishing to be bound by any particular theory of operation, anodes so configured allow better transport of ferrous iron to the anode surface for oxidation, and better transport of ferric iron away from the anode surface. Accordingly, any configuration permitting such transport is within the scope of the present invention.
- Anodes employed in conventional electrowinning operations typically comprise lead or a lead alloy, such as, for example, Pb-Sn-Ca.
- anodes One disadvantage of such anodes is that, during the electrowinning operation, small amounts of lead are released from the surface of the anode and ultimately cause the generation of undesirable sediments, "sludges," particulates suspended in the electrolyte, or other corrosion products in the electrochemical cell and contamination of the copper cathode product.
- copper cathode produced in operations employing a lead-containing anode typically comprises lead contaminant at a level of from about 1 ppm to about 4 ppm.
- lead-containing anodes have a typical useful life limited to approximately four to seven years.
- the anode is substantially lead-free.
- the anode is formed of one of the so-called “valve” metals, including titanium (Ti), tantalum (Ta), zirconium (Zr), or niobium (Nb).
- valve metals including titanium (Ti), tantalum (Ta), zirconium (Zr), or niobium (Nb).
- the anode may also be formed of other metals, such as nickel, or a metal alloy, intermetallic mixture, or a ceramic or cermet containing one or more valve metals.
- titanium may be alloyed with nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co), iron (Fe), manganese (Mn), or copper (Cu) to form a suitable anode.
- the anode comprises titanium, because, among other things, titanium is rugged and corrosion-resistant. Titanium anodes, for example, when used in accordance with various aspects of embodiments of the present invention, potentially have useful lives of up to fifteen years or more.
- the anode may also comprise any electro chemically active coating.
- Exemplary coatings include those provided from platinum, ruthenium, iridium, or other Group VTII metals, Group VIII metal oxides, or compounds comprising Group VIII metals, and oxides and compounds of titanium, molybdenum, tantalum, and/or mixtures and combinations thereof.
- Ruthenium oxide and iridium oxide are preferred for use as the electro chemically active coating on titanium anodes when such anodes are employed in connection with various embodiments of the present invention.
- the anode is formed of a titanium metal mesh coated with an iridium-based oxide coating.
- the anode is formed of a titanium mesh coated with a ruthenium-based oxide coating.
- anodes suitable for use in accordance with various embodiments of the invention are available from a variety of suppliers. Conventional copper electrowinning operations use either a copper starter sheet or a stainless steel or titanium "blank" as the cathode.
- the cathode is configured as a metal sheet.
- the cathode may be formed of copper, copper alloy, stainless steel, titanium, or another metal or combination of metals and/or other materials. As illustrated in FIG.
- the cathode 25 is typically suspended from the top of the electrochemical cell such that a portion of the cathode is immersed in the electrolyte within the cell and a portion (generally a relatively small portion, less than about twenty percent (20%) of the total surface area of the cathode) remains outside the electrolyte bath.
- the total surface area of the portion of the cathode that is immersed in the electrolyte during operation of the electrochemical cell is referred to herein, and generally in the literature, as the "active" surface area of the cathode. This is the portion of the cathode onto which copper is plated during electrowinning.
- the cathode may be configured in any manner now known or hereafter devised by the skilled artisan.
- the effect of enhanced electrolyte circulation on the cathode reaction is to promote effective transfer of copper ions.
- the electrolyte circulation system should promote effective diffusion of copper ions to the cathode surface.
- the crystal growth pattern can change to an unfavorable structure that may result in a rough cathode surface. Excessive cathode roughness can cause an increase in porosity that can entrain electrolyte, and thus impurities, in the cathode surface.
- an effective diffusion rate of copper is one that promotes favorable crystal growth for smooth, high quality cathodes. Higher current density requires a higher rate of copper transfer to the cathode surface. For production of high quality, commercially acceptable cathodes, the maximum practical current density is limited in part by the copper diffusion rate that promotes favorable crystal growth patterns.
- the electrolyte circulation system utilized in the electrochemical cell to facilitate the ionic transfer to or from the anode is also effective at promoting effective diffusion of copper ions to the cathode. For example, use of the flow through anode enhances the copper ion transfer to the cathode in a similar manner to the ferrous and ferric ion transfer to and from the anode.
- the copper concentration in the electrolyte for electrowinning is advantageously maintained at a level of from about 20 to about 60 grams of copper per liter of electrolyte.
- the copper concentration is maintained at a level of from about 30 to about 50 g/L, and more preferably, from about 40 to about 45 g/L.
- various aspects of the present invention may be beneficially applied to processes employing copper concentrations above and/or below these levels.
- any electrolyte pumping, circulation, or agitation system capable of maintaining satisfactory flow and circulation of electrolyte between the electrodes in an electrochemical cell such that the process specifications described herein are practicable may be used in accordance with various embodiments of the invention.
- Injection velocity of the electrolyte into the electrochemical cell may be varied by changing the size and/or geometry of the holes through which electrolyte enters the electrochemical cell.
- electrolyte flow manifold 27 is configured as tubing or piping inside cell 21 having injection holes 29, if the diameter of injection holes 29 is decreased, the injection velocity of the electrolyte is increased, resulting in, among other things, increased agitation of the electrolyte.
- the angle of injection of electrolyte into the electrochemical cell relative to the cell walls and the electrodes may be configured in any way desired. Although an approximately vertical electrolyte injection configuration is illustrated in FIG. 2 for purposes of reference, any number of configurations of differently directed and spaced injection holes are possible.
- the electrolyte flow manifold comprises tubing or piping suitably integrated with, attached to, or inside the anode structure, such as, for example, inserted between the mesh sides of an exemplary flow- through anode.
- tubing or piping suitably integrated with, attached to, or inside the anode structure, such as, for example, inserted between the mesh sides of an exemplary flow- through anode.
- manifold 31 is configured to inject electrolyte between mesh sides 33 and 34 of anode 32.
- FIG. 3 Yet another exemplary embodiment is illustrated in FIG.
- manifold 41 is configured to inject electrolyte between mesh sides 43 and 44 of anode 42.
- Manifold 41 includes a plurality of interconnected pipes or tubes 45 extending approximately parallel to the mesh sides 43 and 44 of anode 42 and each having a number of holes 47 formed therein for purposes of injecting electrolyte into anode 42, preferably in streams flowing approximately parallel to mesh sides 43 and 44, as indicated in FIG. 4.
- the electrolyte flow manifold comprises an exposed "floor mat" type manifold, generally comprising a group of parallel pipes situated length-wise along the bottom of the cell. Details of an exemplary manifold of such configuration are disclosed in the Examples herein.
- the high flow rate and forced-flow electrolyte flow manifold is integrated into or attached to opposite side walls and/or the bottom of the electrochemical cell, such that, for example, the electrolyte injection streams are oppositely directed and parallel to the electrodes.
- Other configurations are, of course, possible.
- any electrolyte flow manifold configuration that provides an electrolyte flow effective to transport ferrous iron to the anode, to transport ferric iron from the anode, and to transport copper ions to the cathode such that the electrowinning cell may be operated at a cell voltage of less than about 1.5 V and at a current density of greater than about 26 A/ft 2 , is suitable.
- electrolyte flow rate is maintained at a level of from about 0J gallons per minute per square foot of active cathode (about 4.0 L/min/m 2 ) to about 1.0 gallons per minute per square foot of active cathode (about 40.0 L/min/m 2 ).
- electrolyte flow rate is maintained at a level of from about 0J gallons per minute per square foot of active cathode (about 4.0 L/min/m 2 ) to about 0.25 gallons per minute per square foot of active cathode (about 10.0 L/min/m 2 ).
- the optimal operable electrolyte flow rate useful in accordance with the present invention will depend upon the specific configuration of the process apparatus, and thus flow rates in excess of about 1.0 gallons per minute per square foot of active cathode (in excess of about 40.0 L/min/m 2 ) or less than about 0J gallons per minute per square foot of active cathode (less than about 4.0 L/min/m 2 ) may be optimal in accordance with various embodiments of the present invention.
- the operating temperature of the electrochemical cell e.g., the electrolyte
- better plating at the cathode is achievable.
- EXAMPLE 2 demonstrates a decrease in cell voltage with increasing electrolyte temperature.
- Conventional copper electrowinning cells typically operate at temperature from about 115°F to about 125°F (from about 46°C to about 52°C).
- the electrochemical cell is operated at a temperature of from about 110°F to about 180°F (from about 43°C to about 83°C).
- the electrochemical cell is operated at a temperature above about 115°F (about 46°C) or about 120°F (about 48°C), and preferably at a temperature below about 140°F (about 60°C) or about 150°F (about 65°C).
- temperatures in the range of about 155°F (about 68°C) to about 165°F (about 74°C) may be advantageous.
- the operating temperature of the electrochemical cell may be controlled through any one or more of a variety of means well known in the art, including, for example, an immersion heating element, an in-line heating device (e.g., a heat exchanger), or the like, preferably coupled with one or more feedback temperature control means for efficient process control.
- a smooth plating surface is optimal for cathode quality and purity, because a smooth cathode surface is more dense and has fewer cavities in which electrolyte can become entrained, thus introducing impurities to the surface.
- the current density and electrolyte flow rate parameters be controlled such that a smooth cathode plating surface is achievable, operating the electrochemical cell at a high current density may nonetheless tend to result in a rough cathode surface.
- an effective amount of a plating reagent is added to the electrolyte stream to enhance the plating characteristics — and thus the surface characteristics — of the cathode, resulting in improved cathode purity.
- plating reagent effective in improving the plating surface characteristics, namely, smoothness and porosity, of the cathode may be used.
- suitable plating reagents may include thiourea, guar gums, modified starches, polyacrylic acid, polyacrylate, chloride ion, and/or combinations thereof may be effective for this purpose.
- an effective concentration of the plating reagent in the electrolyte or, stated another way, the effective amount of plating reagent required — invariably will depend upon the nature of the particular plating reagent employed; however, the plating reagent concentration generally will be in the range of from about 20 grams of plating reagent per tonne of copper plated to about 1000 g/tonne.
- the concentration of ferrous iron in the electrolyte is naturally depleted, while the concentration of ferric iron in the electrolyte is naturally increased.
- the concentration of ferrous iron in the electrolyte is controlled by addition of ferrous sulfate to the electrolyte.
- the concentration of ferrous iron in the electrolyte is controlled by solution extraction (SX) of iron from copper leaching solutions.
- SX solution extraction
- the ferric iron generated at the anode preferably is reduced back to ferrous iron to maintain a satisfactory ferrous concentration in the electrolyte.
- the ferric iron concentration preferably is controlled to achieve satisfactory current efficiency in the electrochemical cell.
- the total iron concentration in the electrolyte is maintained at a level of from about 10 to about 60 grams of iron per liter of electrolyte.
- the total iron concentration in the electrolyte is maintained at a level of from about 20 g/L to about 40 g/L, and more preferably, from about 25 g/L to about 35 g/L.
- the total iron concentration in the electrolyte may vary in accordance with various embodiments of the invention, as total iron concentration is a function of iron solubility in the electrolyte. Iron solubility in the electrolyte varies with other process parameters, such as, for example, acid concentration, copper concentration, and temperature.
- the ferric iron concentration in the electrolyte is maintained at a level of from about 0.001 to about 10 grams of ferric iron per liter of electrolyte.
- the ferric iron concentration in the electrolyte is maintained at a level of from about 1 g/L to about 6 g/L, and more preferably, from about 2 g/L to about 4 g/L.
- the concentration of ferric iron in the electrolyte within the electrochemical cell is controlled by removing at least a portion of the electrolyte from the electrochemical cell, for example, as illustrated in FIG. 1 as electrolyte regeneration stream 15 of process 100.
- sulfur dioxide 17 may be used to reduce the ferric iron in electrolyte regeneration stream 15.
- reduction of Fe 3+ to Fe 2+ in electrolyte regeneration stream 15 in ferrous regeneration stage 103 may be accomplished using any suitable reducing reagent or method, sulfur dioxide is particularly attractive as a reducing agent for Fe 3+ because it is generally available from other copper processing operations, and because sulfuric acid is generated as a byproduct.
- sulfur dioxide Upon reacting with ferric iron in a copper-containing electrolyte, the sulfur dioxide is oxidized, forming sulfuric acid.
- the reaction of sulfur dioxide with ferric iron produces two moles of sulfuric acid for each mole of copper produced in the electrochemical cell, which is one mole more of acid than is typically required to maintain the acid balance within the overall copper extraction process, when solution extraction (SX) is used in conjunction with electrowinning.
- the excess sulfuric acid may be extracted from the acid- rich electrolyte (illustrated in FIG. 1 as stream 18) generated in the ferrous regeneration stage for use in other operations, such as, for example, leaching operations.
- the acid-rich electrolyte stream 18 from ferrous regeneration stage 103 may be returned to electrowinning stage 101 via electrolyte recycle streams 12 and 16, may be introduced to acid removal stage 105 for further processing, or may be split (as shown in FIG. 1) such that a portion of acid-rich electrolyte stream 18 returns to electrowinning stage 101 and a portion continues to acid removal stage 105.
- acid removal stage 105 excess sulfuric acid is extracted from the acid-rich electrolyte and leaves the process via acid stream 19, to be neutralized or, preferably, used in other operations, such as, for example a heap leach operation.
- the acid-reduced electrolyte stream 14 may then be returned to electrowinning stage 101 via electrolyte recycle stream 16, as shown in FIG. 1.
- ferric-rich electrolyte is contacted with sulfur dioxide in the presence of a catalyst, such as, for example, activated carbon manufactured from bituminous coal, or other types of carbon with a suitable active surface and suitable structure.
- a catalyst such as, for example, activated carbon manufactured from bituminous coal, or other types of carbon with a suitable active surface and suitable structure.
- the reaction of sulfur dioxide and ferric iron is preferably monitored such that the concentration of ferric iron and ferrous iron in the acid-rich electrolyte stream produced in the ferrous regeneration stage can be controlled.
- two or more oxidation- reduction potential (ORP) sensors are used — at least one ORP sensor in the ferric-rich electrolyte line upstream from the injection point of sulfur dioxide, and at least one ORP sensor downstream from the catalytic reaction point in the ferric-lean electrolyte.
- ORP measurements provide an indication of the ferric/ferrous ratio in the solution; however, the exact measurements depend on overall solution conditions that may be unique to any particular application. Those skilled in the art will recognize that any number of methods and/or apparatus may be utilized to monitor and control the ferric/ferrous ratio in the solution.
- the ferric-rich electrolyte will contain from about 0.001 to about 10 grams per liter ferric iron, and the ferric-lean electrolyte will contain up to about 6 grams per liter ferric iron.
- the following examples illustrate, but do not limit, the present invention.
- EXAMPLE 1 TABLE 1 demonstrates the advantages of a flow-through anode with in-anode electrolyte injection for achieving low cell voltage. An in-anode manifold produces a lower cell voltage at the same flow or decreases flow requirements at the same current density versus bottom injection.
- TABLE 1 also demonstrates that a cell voltage below 1 JO V is achievable at a current density of about 35 A/ft 2 (377 A/m 2 ) and a cell voltage below 1.25 V is achievable at a current density of about 40 A/ft 2 (430 A m 2 ).
- Test runs A-F were performed using an electrowinning cell of generally standard design, comprising three full-size conventional cathodes and four full-size flow-through anodes. The cathodes were constructed of 316 stainless steel and each had an active depth of 41.5 inches and an active width of 37.5 inches (total active surface area of 21.6 ft 2 per cathode).
- Each anode had an active width of 35.5 inches and an active depth of 39.5 inches and was constructed of titanium mesh with an iridium oxide-based coating.
- the anodes used in accordance with this EXAMPLE 1 were obtained from Republic Anode Fabricators of Strongsville, Ohio, USA. Test duration was five days (except test runs C, D, E and F, which were 60-minute tests designed to measure voltage only, at constant conditions), with continuous 24-hour operation of the electrowinning cell at approximately constant conditions. Voltage measurements were taken once per day using a handheld voltage meter and voltages were measured bus-to-bus. The stated values for average cell voltage in TABLE 1 represent the average voltage values over the six-day test period.
- Electrolyte flow measurements were performed by a continuous electronic flow meter (Magmeter), and all electrolyte flow rates in TABLE 1 are shown as gallons per minute of electrolyte per square foot of cathode plating area.
- the plating reagent utilized in all test runs was PD 4201 modified starch, obtained from Chemstar from Minneapolis, Minnesota.
- the concentration of plating reagent in the electrolyte was maintained in the range of 250-450 grams per plated ton of copper.
- Electrolyte temperature was controlled using an automatic electric heater (Chromalox). Iron addition to the electrolyte was performed using ferrous sulfate crystals (18% iron). Copper and iron concentration assays were performed using standard atomic absorption tests.
- Copper concentration in the electrolyte was maintained at a level of about 41-46 g/L using solution extraction.
- concentration of sulfuric acid in the electrolyte was maintained at a level of about 150-160 g/L using anEco-Tec sulfuric acid extraction unit (acid retardation process).
- the current to each electrowinning cell was set using a standard rectifier.
- the operating current density for each test run was calculated by dividing the total Amps on the rectifier setting by the total cathode plating area (i.e., 64.8 ft 2 ).
- Ferrous regeneration was accomplished using sulfur dioxide gas, which was injected into an electrolyte recycle stream, then passed through an activated carbon bed in order to catalyze the ferric reduction reaction.
- the reaction was controlled using ORP sensors, which measured ORP in the range of 390 to 410 mV (versus standard silver chloride reference junction). Sufficient sulfur dioxide was injected into the electrolyte recycle stream such that the ORP was maintained within the range of 390 to 410 mV.
- Average copper production rate for test runs A and B which were operated at a current density of 30 A/ft 2 , was 112 lbs. per day.
- the copper cathode produced for test runs A and B measured less than 0J ppm lead and less than 5 ppm sulfur. Copper purity did not vary overall according to the specific test conditions employed. Copper assays on test runs C-F were not performed because of the relatively short test duration.
- Test runs A, C, and E were performed using a bottom-injection "floor mat” injection manifold configuration.
- the bottom-injection manifold included eleven 1" diameter PVC pipes configured to run the length of the electrowinning cell (i.e., approximately perpendicular to the active surfaces of the electrodes). Each of the eleven pipes positioned one 3/16" diameter hole in each electrode gap (i.e., there were eleven holes approximately evenly spaced within each electrode gap).
- Test runs A, D, and F were performed using an in-anode injection manifold configuration.
- the in-anode injection manifold was configured using a distribution supply line adjacent to the electrodes, with direct electrolyte supply lines comprising 3/8" LD x Vz OD or 1/4" ID x 3/8" OD polypropylene tubing branching from the distribution supply line and leading to each anode.
- Each electrolyte supply line included five equally-spaced dropper tubes that branched from the electrolyte supply line and were positioned to inject electrolyte directly into the anode, between the mesh surfaces of the anode. No electrolyte injection occurred directly adjacent to the cathodes.
- EXAMPLE 2 TABLE 2 demonstrates that increasing temperature decreases cell voltage.
- Test runs A-C were performed using an electrowinning cell of generally standard design, comprising three full-size conventional cathodes and four full-size flow-through anodes.
- the cathodes were constructed of 316 stainless steel and each had an active depth of 41.5 inches and an active width of 37 5 inches (total active surface area of 21 6 ft 2 per cathode)
- Each anode had an active width of 35 5 inches and an active depth of 39 5 inches and was constructed of titanium mesh with an iridium oxide-based coating
- the anodes used in accordance with this EXAMPLE 2 were obtained from Republic Anode Fabricators of Strongsville, Ohio, USA.
- Test duration was six days, with continuous 24-hour operation of the electrowinning cell at approximately constant conditions. Voltage measurements were taken once per day using a handheld voltage meter and voltages were measured bus-to-bus. The stated values for average cell voltage in TABLE 2 represent the average voltage values over the six-day test period. Electrolyte flow measurements were performed by a continuous electronic flow meter (Magmeter), and all electrolyte flow rates in TABLE 2 are shown as gallons per minute of electrolyte per square foot of cathode plating area. The plating reagent utilized in all test runs was PD 4201 modified starch, obtained from Chemstar from Minneapolis, Minnesota. The concentration of plating reagent in the electrolyte was maintained in the range of 250-450 grams per plated ton of copper.
- Electrolyte temperature was controlled using an automatic electric heater (Chromalox). Iron addition to the electrolyte was performed using ferrous sulfate crystals (18% iron). Copper and iron concentration assays were performed using standard atomic absorption tests. Copper concentration in the electrolyte was maintained at a level of about 41-46 g/L using solution extraction. The concentration of sulfuric acid in the electrolyte was maintained at a level of about 150-160 g/L using an Eco-Tec sulfuric acid extraction unit (acid retardation process). The current to each electrowinning cell was set using a standard rectifier.
- the operating current density for each test run was calculated by dividing the total Amps on the rectifier setting by the total cathode plating area (i.e., 64.8 ft 2 ).
- Ferrous regeneration was accomplished using sulfur dioxide gas, which was injected into an electrolyte recycle stream, then passed through an activated carbon bed in order to catalyze the ferric reduction reaction.
- the reaction was controlled using ORP sensors, which measured ORP in the range of 390 to 410 mV (versus standard silver chloride reference junction). Sufficient sulfur dioxide was injected into the electrolyte recycle stream such that the ORP was maintained within the range of 390 to 410 mV.
- the copper cathode produced for all test runs generally measured less than 0 3 ppm lead and less than 5 ppm sulfur. Copper purity did not vary overall according to the specific test conditions employed.
- Test runs were performed using a bottom- injection "floor mat” injection manifold configuration
- the bottom-injection manifold included eleven 1" diameter PVC pipes configured to run the length of the electrowinning cell (i.e., approximately perpendicular to the active surfaces of the electrodes). Each of the eleven pipes positioned one 3/16" diameter hole in each electrode gap (i.e., there were eleven holes approximately evenly spaced within each electrode gap) TABLE 2
Landscapes
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- Electrochemistry (AREA)
- Materials Engineering (AREA)
- Metallurgy (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Electrolytic Production Of Metals (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/629,497 US7378011B2 (en) | 2003-07-28 | 2003-07-28 | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction |
PCT/US2004/024162 WO2005012597A2 (en) | 2003-07-28 | 2004-07-26 | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1660700A2 true EP1660700A2 (en) | 2006-05-31 |
EP1660700B1 EP1660700B1 (en) | 2008-12-10 |
Family
ID=34103638
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP04779290A Expired - Lifetime EP1660700B1 (en) | 2003-07-28 | 2004-07-26 | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction |
Country Status (15)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (4) | US7378011B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1660700B1 (en) |
JP (2) | JP4451445B2 (en) |
AP (1) | AP1865A (en) |
AT (1) | ATE417144T1 (en) |
AU (1) | AU2004261975B2 (en) |
BR (1) | BRPI0413023B1 (en) |
CA (1) | CA2533650C (en) |
DE (1) | DE602004018333D1 (en) |
EA (1) | EA011201B1 (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA06001149A (en) |
PE (1) | PE20050637A1 (en) |
PL (1) | PL379760A1 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2005012597A2 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200600948B (en) |
Families Citing this family (55)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US7494580B2 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2009-02-24 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | System and method for producing copper powder by electrowinning using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction |
US7378011B2 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2008-05-27 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction |
AU2005224673B2 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2010-03-04 | Kennecott Utah Copper Llc | Wireless electrolytic cell monitoring powered by ultra low bus voltage |
US7470356B2 (en) * | 2004-03-17 | 2008-12-30 | Kennecott Utah Copper Corporation | Wireless monitoring of two or more electrolytic cells using one monitoring device |
US7368049B2 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2008-05-06 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction and a flow-through anode |
US20060021880A1 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2006-02-02 | Sandoval Scot P | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction and a flow-through anode |
US7452455B2 (en) * | 2004-07-22 | 2008-11-18 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | System and method for producing metal powder by electrowinning |
US7378010B2 (en) * | 2004-07-22 | 2008-05-27 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | System and method for producing copper powder by electrowinning in a flow-through electrowinning cell |
US7393438B2 (en) * | 2004-07-22 | 2008-07-01 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | Apparatus for producing metal powder by electrowinning |
EP1863944B1 (en) * | 2005-03-29 | 2009-09-30 | Cytec Technology Corp. | Modification of copper/iron selectivity in oxime-based copper solvent extraction systems |
US20070284262A1 (en) * | 2006-06-09 | 2007-12-13 | Eugene Yanjun You | Method of Detecting Shorts and Bad Contacts in an Electrolytic Cell |
FI120438B (en) | 2006-08-11 | 2009-10-30 | Outotec Oyj | A method for forming a metal powder |
US8517053B2 (en) * | 2007-04-26 | 2013-08-27 | Westinghouse Electric Company Llc | Cartridge type vortex suppression device |
MX2010007795A (en) * | 2008-01-17 | 2011-02-23 | Freeport Mcmoran Corp | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using an atmospheric leach with ferrous/ferric anode reaction electrowinning. |
EP2382174A4 (en) | 2009-01-29 | 2013-10-30 | Trustees Of The University Of Princeton | Conversion of carbon dioxide to organic products |
US8038855B2 (en) | 2009-04-29 | 2011-10-18 | Freeport-Mcmoran Corporation | Anode structure for copper electrowinning |
MD4032C2 (en) * | 2009-05-22 | 2010-11-30 | Государственный Университет Молд0 | Process for the regeneration of an electrolyte for the deposition of iron platings |
US8936770B2 (en) | 2010-01-22 | 2015-01-20 | Molycorp Minerals, Llc | Hydrometallurgical process and method for recovering metals |
FI124812B (en) * | 2010-01-29 | 2015-01-30 | Outotec Oyj | Method and apparatus for the manufacture of metal powder |
US8721866B2 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2014-05-13 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Electrochemical production of synthesis gas from carbon dioxide |
US8845877B2 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2014-09-30 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Heterocycle catalyzed electrochemical process |
US8500987B2 (en) | 2010-03-19 | 2013-08-06 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Purification of carbon dioxide from a mixture of gases |
US8845878B2 (en) | 2010-07-29 | 2014-09-30 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Reducing carbon dioxide to products |
US8961774B2 (en) | 2010-11-30 | 2015-02-24 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Electrochemical production of butanol from carbon dioxide and water |
US8568581B2 (en) | 2010-11-30 | 2013-10-29 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Heterocycle catalyzed carbonylation and hydroformylation with carbon dioxide |
US9090976B2 (en) | 2010-12-30 | 2015-07-28 | The Trustees Of Princeton University | Advanced aromatic amine heterocyclic catalysts for carbon dioxide reduction |
US9150974B2 (en) | 2011-02-16 | 2015-10-06 | Freeport Minerals Corporation | Anode assembly, system including the assembly, and method of using same |
US9605353B2 (en) | 2011-05-27 | 2017-03-28 | Blue Planet Strategies, L.L.C. | Apparatus and method for advanced electrochemical modification of liquids |
US9011669B2 (en) | 2012-09-17 | 2015-04-21 | Blue Planet Strategies, L.L.C. | Apparatus and method for electrochemical modification of liquids |
BR112014000052A2 (en) | 2011-07-06 | 2017-02-07 | Liquid Light Inc | reduction of carbon dioxide in carboxylic acids, glycols and carboxylates |
EP2729600A2 (en) | 2011-07-06 | 2014-05-14 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Carbon dioxide capture and conversion to organic products |
PL396693A1 (en) * | 2011-10-19 | 2013-04-29 | Nano-Tech Spólka Z Ograniczona Odpowiedzialnoscia | New method for electrolytes' copper removal in the copper industry |
JP2015513616A (en) * | 2012-03-06 | 2015-05-14 | リキッド・ライト・インコーポレーテッドLiquid Light Incorporated | Reduction of carbon dioxide to product |
FI125808B (en) * | 2012-03-09 | 2016-02-29 | Outotec Oyj | Anode and method for using an electrolytic cell |
PL2836460T3 (en) | 2012-04-09 | 2022-12-27 | Ohio University | Method of producing graphene |
WO2013152617A1 (en) * | 2012-04-11 | 2013-10-17 | Wang Weihua | Electrolysis apparatus with anode material storage tank |
CN103374732A (en) * | 2012-04-11 | 2013-10-30 | 王惟华 | Anode scrap-free tandem electrolyzing device with anode material storing box |
US8692019B2 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2014-04-08 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Electrochemical co-production of chemicals utilizing a halide salt |
US9267212B2 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2016-02-23 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Method and system for production of oxalic acid and oxalic acid reduction products |
US10329676B2 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2019-06-25 | Avantium Knowledge Centre B.V. | Method and system for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide employing a gas diffusion electrode |
US8641885B2 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2014-02-04 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Multiphase electrochemical reduction of CO2 |
US9175407B2 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2015-11-03 | Liquid Light, Inc. | Integrated process for producing carboxylic acids from carbon dioxide |
US20130105304A1 (en) | 2012-07-26 | 2013-05-02 | Liquid Light, Inc. | System and High Surface Area Electrodes for the Electrochemical Reduction of Carbon Dioxide |
WO2014043651A2 (en) | 2012-09-14 | 2014-03-20 | Liquid Light, Inc. | High pressure electrochemical cell and process for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide |
JP5962525B2 (en) * | 2013-01-28 | 2016-08-03 | 住友金属鉱山株式会社 | Electrolyte solution supply apparatus and method |
JP6797685B2 (en) | 2013-10-25 | 2020-12-09 | オハイオ・ユニバーシティ | Electrochemical cell containing graphene-covered electrodes |
CL2014001133A1 (en) * | 2014-04-30 | 2014-11-03 | Propipe Maqunarias Limitada | Insertable (dei) electrode device that replaces the traditional anode in electro-metal processes, which does not generate acid mist or other gases, comprising a perimeter frame arranged on both sides of the device, ion exchange membranes, strategic electrode that is a conductor or semiconductor, inlet and outlet duct, vertical electric busbars; device application procedure. |
CN104032328B (en) * | 2014-06-04 | 2016-08-31 | 杭州三耐环保科技有限公司 | A kind of environment-friendly and energy-efficient diaphragm electrolysis apparatus |
US9938632B2 (en) | 2015-02-10 | 2018-04-10 | Faraday Technology, Inc. | Apparatus and method for recovery of material generated during electrochemical material removal in acidic electrolytes |
US10544482B2 (en) | 2015-07-06 | 2020-01-28 | Sherritt International Corporation | Recovery of copper from arsenic-containing process feed |
PE20191621A1 (en) | 2017-04-14 | 2019-11-06 | Sherritt Int Corporation | LOW SOLID, LOW ACID, PRESSURIZED OXIDATIVE LEACHING OF SULFURED FEED MATERIALS |
CN109666952B (en) * | 2017-10-16 | 2020-12-04 | 中国科学院过程工程研究所 | Method for producing metallic silver by electrodeposition |
KR102409510B1 (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2022-06-14 | 일렉트로-액티브 테크놀로지즈 인크. | Bioelectrical Process Control and Methods of Use Thereof |
US11663792B2 (en) | 2021-09-08 | 2023-05-30 | Snap Inc. | Body fitted accessory with physics simulation |
US11790614B2 (en) | 2021-10-11 | 2023-10-17 | Snap Inc. | Inferring intent from pose and speech input |
Family Cites Families (104)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US2792342A (en) | 1956-01-26 | 1957-05-14 | Phelps Dodge Corp | Electrowinning of copper |
US3262870A (en) * | 1961-08-31 | 1966-07-26 | Powdered Metals Corp | Process for the extraction of copper |
GB1195871A (en) * | 1967-02-10 | 1970-06-24 | Chemnor Ag | Improvements in or relating to the Manufacture of Electrodes. |
US3616277A (en) * | 1968-07-26 | 1971-10-26 | Kennecott Copper Corp | Method for the electrodeposition of copper powder |
US3703358A (en) * | 1969-08-21 | 1972-11-21 | Gen Electric | Method of generating hydrogen with magnesium reactant |
US3711385A (en) * | 1970-09-25 | 1973-01-16 | Chemnor Corp | Electrode having platinum metal oxide coating thereon,and method of use thereof |
US3876516A (en) * | 1973-02-14 | 1975-04-08 | Continental Oil Co | Copper electrowinning process |
US3853724A (en) * | 1973-07-24 | 1974-12-10 | Goold R | Process for electrowinning of copper values from solid particles in a sulfuric acid electrolyte |
US3887396A (en) * | 1973-11-15 | 1975-06-03 | Us Energy | Modular electrochemical cell |
GB1433800A (en) * | 1973-12-27 | 1976-04-28 | Imi Refinery Holdings Ltd | Method of and anodes for use in electrowinning metals |
US3979275A (en) * | 1974-02-25 | 1976-09-07 | Kennecott Copper Corporation | Apparatus for series electrowinning and electrorefining of metal |
US3915834A (en) * | 1974-04-01 | 1975-10-28 | Kennecott Copper Corp | Electrowinning cell having an anode with no more than one-half the active surface area of the cathode |
US3956086A (en) * | 1974-05-17 | 1976-05-11 | Cjb Development Limited | Electrolytic cells |
US4098668A (en) * | 1974-08-21 | 1978-07-04 | Continental Copper & Steel Industries, Inc. | Electrolyte metal extraction |
US3972795A (en) * | 1974-09-11 | 1976-08-03 | Hazen Research, Inc. | Axial flow electrolytic cell |
US3981353A (en) * | 1975-01-16 | 1976-09-21 | Knight Bill J | Anode casting machine |
FR2314900A1 (en) * | 1975-06-18 | 1977-01-14 | Niso Ste Civile Etud Rech | PROCESS AND PLANT FOR TREATING METAL PICKLING SOLUTIONS |
SU589290A1 (en) | 1976-05-24 | 1978-01-25 | Уральский Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Политехнический Институт Имени С.М.Кирова | Plate cathode for electrolytic preparation of metallic powders |
US4129494A (en) * | 1977-05-04 | 1978-12-12 | Norman Telfer E | Electrolytic cell for electrowinning of metals |
CA1092056A (en) * | 1977-10-11 | 1980-12-23 | Victor A. Ettel | Electrowinning cell with bagged anode |
SU715900A1 (en) | 1978-01-05 | 1980-02-15 | Уральский Научно-Исследовательский И Проектный Институт Медной Промышленности | Copper powder drying method |
US4278521A (en) * | 1978-05-30 | 1981-07-14 | Dechema | Electrochemical cell |
US4219401A (en) * | 1978-08-07 | 1980-08-26 | The D-H Titanium Company | Metal electrowinning feed cathode |
US4226685A (en) * | 1978-10-23 | 1980-10-07 | Kennecott Copper Corporation | Electrolytic treatment of plating wastes |
US4292160A (en) * | 1979-08-20 | 1981-09-29 | Kennecott Corporation | Apparatus for electrochemical removal of heavy metals such as chromium from dilute wastewater streams using flow-through porous electrodes |
US4318789A (en) * | 1979-08-20 | 1982-03-09 | Kennecott Corporation | Electrochemical removal of heavy metals such as chromium from dilute wastewater streams using flow through porous electrodes |
CA1125228A (en) * | 1979-10-10 | 1982-06-08 | Daniel P. Young | Process for electrowinning nickel or cobalt |
CA1162514A (en) | 1980-01-21 | 1984-02-21 | Sankar Das Gupta | Apparatus for waste treatment equipment |
US4272339A (en) * | 1980-03-10 | 1981-06-09 | Knight Bill J | Process for electrowinning of metals |
US4373654A (en) * | 1980-11-28 | 1983-02-15 | Rsr Corporation | Method of manufacturing electrowinning anode |
US4436601A (en) * | 1981-07-24 | 1984-03-13 | Diamond Shamrock Corporation | Metal removal process |
US4399020A (en) * | 1981-07-24 | 1983-08-16 | Diamond Shamrock Corporation | Device for waste water treatment |
SU1090760A1 (en) | 1981-09-01 | 1984-05-07 | Уральский Ордена Трудового Красного Знамени Научно-Исследовательский И Проектный Институт Медной Промышленности "Унипромедь" | Method for producing copper powder |
US4515672A (en) * | 1981-11-09 | 1985-05-07 | Eltech Systems Corporation | Reticulate electrode and cell for recovery of metal ions |
US4445990A (en) * | 1981-11-12 | 1984-05-01 | General Electric Company | Electrolytic reactor for cleaning wastewater |
US4556469A (en) * | 1981-11-12 | 1985-12-03 | General Electric Environmental Services, Inc. | Electrolytic reactor for cleaning wastewater |
US4680100A (en) * | 1982-03-16 | 1987-07-14 | American Cyanamid Company | Electrochemical cells and electrodes therefor |
SU1243907A1 (en) | 1983-03-03 | 1986-07-15 | Уральский ордена Трудового Красного Знамени политехнический институт им.С.М.Кирова | Method of producing copper powder by electrolysis |
SU1183566A1 (en) | 1983-06-13 | 1985-10-07 | Уральский ордена Трудового Красного Знамени политехнический институт им.С.М.Кирова | Electrolyte for producing metal powders |
US4762603A (en) * | 1983-06-24 | 1988-08-09 | American Cyanamid Company | Process for forming electrodes |
EP0129845B1 (en) | 1983-06-24 | 1988-10-26 | American Cyanamid Company | Electrodes, electro-chemical cells containing said electrodes, and process for forming and utilizing such electrodes |
US4565748A (en) * | 1985-01-31 | 1986-01-21 | Dahl Ernest A | Magnetically operated electrolyte circulation system |
US4560453A (en) * | 1985-03-28 | 1985-12-24 | Exxon Research And Engineering Co. | Efficient, safe method for decoppering copper refinery electrolyte |
ES8609513A1 (en) | 1985-06-21 | 1986-09-01 | Hermana Tezanos Enrique | Cathode for metal electrowinning. |
US4715934A (en) * | 1985-11-18 | 1987-12-29 | Lth Associates | Process and apparatus for separating metals from solutions |
SU1346697A1 (en) | 1985-12-30 | 1987-10-23 | Уральский политехнический институт им.С.М.Кирова | Method of obtaining copper powder by electrolysis |
SU1418349A1 (en) | 1986-04-23 | 1988-08-23 | Уральский политехнический институт им.С.М.Кирова | Electrolyte for producing copper powder by electrolysis |
US4789450A (en) * | 1986-12-16 | 1988-12-06 | Bateman Engineering (International) Limited | Electrolytic cell |
US4834850A (en) * | 1987-07-27 | 1989-05-30 | Eltech Systems Corporation | Efficient electrolytic precious metal recovery system |
SU1537711A1 (en) | 1987-12-15 | 1990-01-23 | Уральский политехнический институт им.С.М.Кирова | Method of producing copper powder by electrolysis |
US4863580A (en) * | 1988-08-10 | 1989-09-05 | Epner R L | Waste metal extraction apparatus |
US4960500A (en) * | 1988-08-10 | 1990-10-02 | Epner R L | Waste metal extraction apparatus |
JPH02229788A (en) * | 1989-02-28 | 1990-09-12 | Sumitomo Metal Ind Ltd | Vapor phase growth device |
JPH07502B2 (en) | 1989-03-01 | 1995-01-11 | 同和鉱業株式会社 | Metallization method for non-oxide ceramics |
SU1708939A1 (en) | 1989-06-14 | 1992-01-30 | Уральский политехнический институт им.С.М.Кирова | Method for production of copper powder |
US5006216A (en) * | 1989-12-07 | 1991-04-09 | Eltech Systems Corporation | Metal removal apparatus |
SU1813806A1 (en) | 1990-03-06 | 1993-05-07 | N Proizv Ob Edinenie Armtsvetm | Process for preparing copper powder |
DE4008684C1 (en) * | 1990-03-17 | 1991-02-07 | Heraeus Elektroden Gmbh, 6450 Hanau, De | |
US5292412A (en) * | 1990-04-12 | 1994-03-08 | Eltech Systems Corporation | Removal of mercury from waste streams |
NO172250C (en) * | 1990-05-07 | 1993-06-23 | Elkem Aluminium | DEVICE FOR CLOSING THE ANODETOPE ON A SODER BERGANODEI AN ELECTROLYCLE CELL FOR ALUMINUM PRODUCTION |
US5133843A (en) * | 1990-09-10 | 1992-07-28 | The Dow Chemical Company | Method for the recovery of metals from the membrane of electrochemical cells |
WO1992009724A1 (en) * | 1990-11-28 | 1992-06-11 | Moltech Invent Sa | Electrode assemblies and multimonopolar cells for aluminium electrowinning |
DE69119590T2 (en) * | 1991-09-28 | 1996-11-07 | Engitec Spa | Insoluble anode for electrolysis in aqueous solutions |
US5882502A (en) | 1992-04-01 | 1999-03-16 | Rmg Services Pty Ltd. | Electrochemical system and method |
JP2938285B2 (en) * | 1992-09-16 | 1999-08-23 | 同和鉱業株式会社 | Chelate resin solution for copper electrolyte |
EP0695377B1 (en) * | 1993-04-19 | 2001-06-27 | GA-TEK Inc. | Process for making copper metal powder, copper oxides and copper foil |
US5454917A (en) * | 1993-09-03 | 1995-10-03 | Cognis, Inc. | Apparatus and process for recovering metal from an aqueous solution |
GB9318794D0 (en) | 1993-09-10 | 1993-10-27 | Ea Tech Ltd | A high surface area cell for the recovery of metals from dilute solutions |
GB9321791D0 (en) | 1993-10-22 | 1993-12-15 | Ea Tech Ltd | Electrokinetic decontamination of land |
TW288145B (en) * | 1994-02-01 | 1996-10-11 | Toshiba Co Ltd | |
US5492608A (en) | 1994-03-14 | 1996-02-20 | The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Interior | Electrolyte circulation manifold for copper electrowinning cells which use the ferrous/ferric anode reaction |
US5783050A (en) | 1995-05-04 | 1998-07-21 | Eltech Systems Corporation | Electrode for electrochemical cell |
US5516412A (en) * | 1995-05-16 | 1996-05-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Vertical paddle plating cell |
US5622615A (en) * | 1996-01-04 | 1997-04-22 | The University Of British Columbia | Process for electrowinning of copper matte |
US5705048A (en) | 1996-03-27 | 1998-01-06 | Oxley Research, Inc. | Apparatus and a process for regenerating a CUCl2 etchant |
US5770037A (en) | 1996-11-21 | 1998-06-23 | Konica Corporation | Water processing method |
US5837122A (en) | 1997-04-21 | 1998-11-17 | The Scientific Ecology Group, Inc. | Electrowinning electrode, cell and process |
US6017428A (en) | 1997-07-16 | 2000-01-25 | Summit Valley Equipment And Engineering, Inc. | Electrowinning cell |
DE19731616A1 (en) | 1997-07-23 | 1999-01-28 | Henry Prof Dr Bergmann | Metal ion removal from electrolyte |
US6086691A (en) | 1997-08-04 | 2000-07-11 | Lehockey; Edward M. | Metallurgical process for manufacturing electrowinning lead alloy electrodes |
US5908540A (en) * | 1997-08-07 | 1999-06-01 | International Business Machines Corporation | Copper anode assembly for stabilizing organic additives in electroplating of copper |
CA2256929C (en) | 1997-12-28 | 2008-02-12 | Kemix (Proprietary) Limited | Electrowinning cell |
US6113758A (en) | 1998-07-30 | 2000-09-05 | Moltech Invent S.A. | Porous non-carbon metal-based anodes for aluminium production cells |
US6139705A (en) | 1998-05-06 | 2000-10-31 | Eltech Systems Corporation | Lead electrode |
AU766037B2 (en) | 1998-05-06 | 2003-10-09 | Eltech Systems Corporation | Lead electrode structure having mesh surface |
US6149797A (en) | 1998-10-27 | 2000-11-21 | Eastman Kodak Company | Method of metal recovery using electrochemical cell |
US6086733A (en) | 1998-10-27 | 2000-07-11 | Eastman Kodak Company | Electrochemical cell for metal recovery |
US6340423B1 (en) * | 1999-04-12 | 2002-01-22 | Bhp Minerals International, Inc. | Hydrometallurgical processing of lead materials using fluotitanate |
US6402930B1 (en) | 1999-05-27 | 2002-06-11 | De Nora Elettrodi S.P.A. | Process for the electrolysis of technical-grade hydrochloric acid contaminated with organic substances using oxygen-consuming cathodes |
US6451183B1 (en) | 1999-08-11 | 2002-09-17 | Electrometals Technologies Limited | Method and apparatus for electrowinning powder metal from solution |
US6319389B1 (en) * | 1999-11-24 | 2001-11-20 | Hydromet Systems, L.L.C. | Recovery of copper values from copper ores |
US6231730B1 (en) * | 1999-12-07 | 2001-05-15 | Epvirotech Pumpsystems, Inc. | Cathode frame |
RU2169443C1 (en) | 1999-12-15 | 2001-06-20 | Камский политехнический институт | Process of generation of electrolytic electric discharge and gear for its implementation |
FR2810681A1 (en) | 2000-06-27 | 2001-12-28 | Claude Andre Bedjai | Recovery of precious metal, notably gold, from a variety of wastes involves electrolytic dissolution of gold and electrolytic deposition of gold from solution on an electrode |
US6391170B1 (en) * | 2000-12-01 | 2002-05-21 | Envirotech Pumpsystems, Inc. | Anode box for electrometallurgical processes |
US6398939B1 (en) * | 2001-03-09 | 2002-06-04 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | Method and apparatus for controlling flow in an electrodeposition process |
WO2004079840A2 (en) | 2003-02-28 | 2004-09-16 | Evat, Inc. | Three-dimensional flow-through electrode and electrochemical cell |
US7494580B2 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2009-02-24 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | System and method for producing copper powder by electrowinning using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction |
US7378011B2 (en) * | 2003-07-28 | 2008-05-27 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction |
US7368049B2 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2008-05-06 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction and a flow-through anode |
US20060021880A1 (en) * | 2004-06-22 | 2006-02-02 | Sandoval Scot P | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction and a flow-through anode |
US7378010B2 (en) * | 2004-07-22 | 2008-05-27 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | System and method for producing copper powder by electrowinning in a flow-through electrowinning cell |
US7393438B2 (en) * | 2004-07-22 | 2008-07-01 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | Apparatus for producing metal powder by electrowinning |
US7452455B2 (en) * | 2004-07-22 | 2008-11-18 | Phelps Dodge Corporation | System and method for producing metal powder by electrowinning |
-
2003
- 2003-07-28 US US10/629,497 patent/US7378011B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2004
- 2004-07-26 JP JP2006521998A patent/JP4451445B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-07-26 WO PCT/US2004/024162 patent/WO2005012597A2/en active Search and Examination
- 2004-07-26 AP AP2006003531A patent/AP1865A/en active
- 2004-07-26 AU AU2004261975A patent/AU2004261975B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2004-07-26 MX MXPA06001149A patent/MXPA06001149A/en active IP Right Grant
- 2004-07-26 PE PE2004000717A patent/PE20050637A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2004-07-26 PL PL379760A patent/PL379760A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2004-07-26 EP EP04779290A patent/EP1660700B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-07-26 DE DE602004018333T patent/DE602004018333D1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2004-07-26 AT AT04779290T patent/ATE417144T1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-07-26 CA CA2533650A patent/CA2533650C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2004-07-26 EA EA200600285A patent/EA011201B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2004-07-26 BR BRPI0413023-5B1A patent/BRPI0413023B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2006
- 2006-02-01 ZA ZA200600948A patent/ZA200600948B/en unknown
-
2008
- 2008-05-23 US US12/126,552 patent/US7704354B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2008-12-11 US US12/332,641 patent/US7736475B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2009
- 2009-02-16 JP JP2009033312A patent/JP2009161860A/en active Pending
-
2010
- 2010-04-01 US US12/752,933 patent/US8187450B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO2005012597A2 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
JP4451445B2 (en) | 2010-04-14 |
JP2009161860A (en) | 2009-07-23 |
US20050023151A1 (en) | 2005-02-03 |
US7736475B2 (en) | 2010-06-15 |
BRPI0413023B1 (en) | 2013-08-06 |
WO2005012597A3 (en) | 2005-09-15 |
EA200600285A1 (en) | 2006-08-25 |
PE20050637A1 (en) | 2005-09-09 |
BRPI0413023A (en) | 2006-10-03 |
ATE417144T1 (en) | 2008-12-15 |
ZA200600948B (en) | 2007-04-25 |
MXPA06001149A (en) | 2006-04-24 |
WO2005012597A2 (en) | 2005-02-10 |
PL379760A1 (en) | 2006-11-13 |
US8187450B2 (en) | 2012-05-29 |
US20080217169A1 (en) | 2008-09-11 |
EP1660700B1 (en) | 2008-12-10 |
US7704354B2 (en) | 2010-04-27 |
WO2005012597B1 (en) | 2005-12-08 |
US20090145749A1 (en) | 2009-06-11 |
AP2006003531A0 (en) | 2006-02-28 |
US7378011B2 (en) | 2008-05-27 |
JP2007500790A (en) | 2007-01-18 |
AP1865A (en) | 2008-07-07 |
US20100187125A1 (en) | 2010-07-29 |
CA2533650A1 (en) | 2005-02-10 |
AU2004261975A1 (en) | 2005-02-10 |
DE602004018333D1 (en) | 2009-01-22 |
EA011201B1 (en) | 2009-02-27 |
CA2533650C (en) | 2010-06-15 |
AU2004261975B2 (en) | 2010-02-18 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP1660700B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction | |
US7368049B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction and a flow-through anode | |
ZA200600968B (en) | Single point battery watering system including battery refill valves incorporating flame arrestors | |
US20080047839A1 (en) | Method and apparatus for electrowinning copper using the ferrous/ferric anode reaction and a flow-through anode | |
EP2209932B1 (en) | Double contact bar insulator assembly contacting adjacent cells for electrowinning of a metal | |
Awe et al. | Electrowinning of antimony from model sulphide alkaline solutions | |
WO1997043463A1 (en) | Steel pickling process in which the oxidation of the ferrous ion formed is carried out electrolytically | |
Zheng et al. | Separation and recovery of Cu and As from copper electrolyte through electrowinning and SO2 reduction | |
US4276133A (en) | Method for continuous electrolytic descaling of steel wire by non-contact current flow | |
JP4501726B2 (en) | Electrowinning of iron from acidic chloride aqueous solution | |
US6309531B1 (en) | Process for extracting copper or iron | |
CA2517379C (en) | Method for copper electrowinning in hydrochloric solution | |
JP4952203B2 (en) | Method for preventing formation of floating slime in electrolytic copper refining | |
JP4701943B2 (en) | Electrowinning of iron from acidic chloride aqueous solution | |
Wilcox et al. | The kinetics of electrode reactions III practical aspects | |
JP5612145B2 (en) | Method for producing electrolytic copper | |
KR100297955B1 (en) | Apparatus and Process for Regeneration a Used Acid Cupric Chloride Etchant | |
WO2012051446A2 (en) | Improved electrowinning process | |
JPS6152398A (en) | Out-of-system reduction treatment of metallic ion | |
Brown et al. | The primary limitation of electrowinning technology for effluent recovery is that the traditional design does not lend itself to the treatment of low metal concentrations. Solution metal concentrations in conventional electrowinning operatiods are usually in the order of 30-50 g/L while most effluent streams contain less than 10 g/L and frequently less than 1 g/L. | |
Dreisinger et al. | Electrochemical Refining | |
AU2015210369A1 (en) | Production method for electrolytic copper |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20060216 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
DAX | Request for extension of the european patent (deleted) | ||
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20070222 |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR HU IE IT LI LU MC NL PL PT RO SE SI SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 602004018333 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20090122 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: LEMAN CONSULTING S.A. |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 Ref country code: PL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 |
|
NLV1 | Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090321 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 Ref country code: RO Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090310 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090310 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090511 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20090911 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20090726 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090311 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: HU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20090611 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20110725 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20081210 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20110725 Year of fee payment: 8 Ref country code: MC Payment date: 20110722 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20110722 Year of fee payment: 8 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20120727 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20120823 Year of fee payment: 9 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120731 Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 602004018333 Country of ref document: DE Effective date: 20130201 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20130726 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST Effective date: 20140331 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130726 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20120726 Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20130731 |