EP1286320A2 - Melder, Testvorrichtung zum Prüfen eines Melders und Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Melders - Google Patents
Melder, Testvorrichtung zum Prüfen eines Melders und Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Melders Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP1286320A2 EP1286320A2 EP02017893A EP02017893A EP1286320A2 EP 1286320 A2 EP1286320 A2 EP 1286320A2 EP 02017893 A EP02017893 A EP 02017893A EP 02017893 A EP02017893 A EP 02017893A EP 1286320 A2 EP1286320 A2 EP 1286320A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- concentration
- alarm
- test
- detector
- medium
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B29/00—Checking or monitoring of signalling or alarm systems; Prevention or correction of operating errors, e.g. preventing unauthorised operation
- G08B29/12—Checking intermittently signalling or alarm systems
- G08B29/14—Checking intermittently signalling or alarm systems checking the detection circuits
- G08B29/145—Checking intermittently signalling or alarm systems checking the detection circuits of fire detection circuits
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G08—SIGNALLING
- G08B—SIGNALLING OR CALLING SYSTEMS; ORDER TELEGRAPHS; ALARM SYSTEMS
- G08B17/00—Fire alarms; Alarms responsive to explosion
- G08B17/10—Actuation by presence of smoke or gases, e.g. automatic alarm devices for analysing flowing fluid materials by the use of optical means
Definitions
- the invention relates to a method for operating a detector for detecting gas, smoke or the like interfering medium, in particular a fire detector, which detector has a sensor for measuring the concentration of the interfering medium, wherein the concentration measuring signal of the sensor of a filter operation for detecting a at is subjected to an interference case occurring Störmedium-concentration pattern, and wherein upon detection of this concentration pattern of the alarm case is registered.
- the invention relates to a detector for the detection of gas, smoke or the like interfering medium, in particular fire detector, with at least one measuring signal output having a sensor for measuring the concentration of the interfering medium and with an evaluation device which is connected to the Meßsignalausgang a filter for detecting a at an interference case occurring interference medium concentration pattern, the filter output is connected to an alarm signal output of the evaluation. Furthermore, the invention relates to a test device for testing a detector for the detection of gas, smoke or the like interfering medium, with a discharge device for the disturbance medium. From US 6 198 399 B1 is already known a method of the type mentioned, in which an interior of a building is monitored for reporting an incipient fire by means of a mounted on the ceiling fire detector.
- the fire detector has a sensor for detecting a disturbing medium occurring in the vicinity of the fire, such as a fire gas and / or smoke.
- a disturbing medium occurring in the vicinity of the fire such as a fire gas and / or smoke.
- the dependent of the concentration of the interfering medium in the detection range of the sensor sensor measurement signal is supplied to an alarm filter for detecting an incipient fire occurring interference medium concentration pattern.
- the alarm filter is primarily used to distinguish in the measurement signal to be detected, attributable to a fire signal components of such signal components that are not caused by a fire, so that the alarm is triggered only when a fire.
- the alarm filter detects the alarm after the interference medium concentration has increased only with a certain delay time.
- the Dispenser is provided by an assistant with the help of Rod positioned under the fire detector, so that of the Dispensing device emitted smoke in the detection area of the Sensors of the fire detector arrives.
- the assistant checks then whether the fire detector triggers an alarm. Because the alarm filter must trigger the alarm only with a certain delay time the dispenser relatively long under the fire detector be positioned to trigger the alarm. Especially at larger fire alarm systems containing several 100 fire detectors Therefore, the testing of the fire alarm device is required with a considerable amount of time and thus too Personnel costs associated.
- the positioning is the dispenser under the fire detector for the Assistant still relatively exhausting, as this during the Positioning the rod with the arranged thereon Dispensing device must constantly hold high.
- the solution to this problem is that for testing the Operational capability of the detector in the detection range of the sensor Interference medium with one of the occurring in the event of an alarm Interference medium concentration pattern deviating interference medium concentration pattern is issued that the concentration measurement signal of the sensor in addition to the first filtering operation of a second filter operation for detecting the in the test subject to the interference medium concentration pattern occurring, and that upon recognition of this test concentration pattern, the Occurrence of an alarm case is registered.
- an interference medium concentration pattern be provided that has a shorter time than that interference medium concentration patterns occurring in the event of an alarm, so that the detector with correspondingly little time can be tested. This then results simultaneously still a small interference medium consumption, so that one for delivery the interference medium provided test device for testing a correspondingly large number of detectors can be used.
- a fast and cost effective Checking the detectors during commissioning and / or at a revision of the plant is advantageousously, in the Test both the proper functioning of the sensor as well as the facility for registering or displaying the Alarm checked.
- the Concentration measurement signal is low-pass filtered that the lowpass filtered measurement signal with an alarm concentration threshold is compared, and that the Alarm case is registered when the low-pass filtered Measurement signal exceeds the alarm concentration threshold.
- the interference medium concentration pattern occurring in the event of an alarm can thereby avoid any interference signal components, which should not trigger an alarm, can be distinguished. Consequently the alarm case can be reliably detected and registered become.
- the Concentration measurement signal with a test concentration threshold is compared, which is greater than the alarm concentration threshold and that the alarm case registers when the concentration measurement signal is the test concentration threshold exceeds.
- the detector is then in the detection area of the Sensors emitted interference medium with a concentration higher is considered the highest in the normal operation of the detector or at If an alarm occurs, the concentration of interfering media is increased is, so that the test alarm case by comparing the Meßsignalpegels with the test concentration threshold on easily recognized and then registered.
- the concentration of Interference medium at least once alternately increased and reduced is checked in the second filter operation, if the Concentration measurement signal at least once at least one upper test concentration threshold and at least one lower test concentration threshold alternately over- and falls short, and that in recognizing this alternately supra and Falling below the occurrence of an alarm case registered becomes.
- a sequence of high and low interference medium concentrations generated which is a kind Encoding or signature based on that for the test alarm case provided interference medium concentration pattern with great precision from the rest in practical operation can distinguish occurring concentration pattern. It is this coding is preferably designed as a digital word.
- a first Verification which checks whether the Concentration measurement signal a first upper test concentration threshold exceeds, preferably is greater than the alarm threshold that a second Verification is performed, which checks whether the Concentration measuring signal in one on exceeding the first upper test concentration threshold following Time a lower test concentration threshold which is less than the first upper test concentration threshold, that a third review in which it is checked whether the concentration measurement signal in one on falling below the lower test concentration threshold following time a second exceeds the upper test concentration threshold, the larger is the lower test concentration threshold, and that the Test alarm case is registered when the concentration measurement signal at the third check, the second upper test concentration threshold exceeds.
- the test alarm case This makes it easy to quickly and reliably be detected.
- a Display is activated when the concentration measurement signal at the first check the first upper test concentration threshold exceeds.
- the the functional test of the detector Person performing can then use the ad to simple Detect that the detector is crossing the upper Test concentration threshold has detected and can then Delivery of the interfering medium according to the further course of for testing provided Störmedium-concentration pattern Taxes.
- At least one lower test concentration threshold value at least twice as big in particular at least three and a half times as large and preferred at least five times the alarm threshold.
- at least one upper test concentration threshold value at least four times as big in particular at least seven times as large and preferred at least ten times the alarm threshold. Of the Test alarm case can then be detected with even greater precision and be registered.
- the above object is related to the detector solved in that the evaluation device in addition to the first filter a second, with the measuring signal output of the sensor connected filter, which is used for detecting one of the interference medium concentration pattern occurring in the event of an alarm different, for the test of the functionality of the detector designed interference medium concentration pattern is formed, that the filter outputs of the first filter and the second Filters each connected to an input of an OR gate are and that the output of this OR gate with the Alarm signal output of the evaluation device is connected.
- the second, intended for the detection of the test alarm case Filter can then access a noise medium concentration pattern be tuned that has a shorter time than that interference medium concentration patterns occurring in the event of an alarm.
- a correspondingly short test concentration pattern be generated in the area of the detector, so that the detector tested with correspondingly little time can be.
- the second filter is connected downstream of the sensor and evaluates its measurement signal, is in the functional test of Detectors also tested the functionality of the sensor.
- the sensor may, for example, an optical measuring path and / or have a Ionisationsmeßhunt. Because the output of the second Filters via the OR gate with the alarm signal output of Evaluation device is connected in testing as well the alarm route and the device for registering or displaying the alarm case checked.
- the detector that has first filter one with the measuring signal output of the sensor connected low-pass filter on which a comparator for comparing the low-pass filtered measuring signal with a Alarm concentration threshold is followed, the Output of this comparator with the filter output of first filter is connected.
- the occurring in the event of an alarm Interference medium concentration pattern can then be of any Interference signal components that should not trigger an alarm, be differentiated.
- the detector thus enables one reliable registration or display of the alarm case.
- the second filter with a comparator circuit at least one first comparator for comparing the Concentration measurement signal having a lower test concentration threshold and at least a second Comparator for comparing the concentration measuring signal with has an upper test concentration threshold, and that these comparator circuits with a logical combination circuit for detecting at least one alternate over and over Below the upper and lower test concentration thresholds whose output with the Filter output of the second filter is connected.
- these comparator circuits with a logical combination circuit for detecting at least one alternate over and over Below the upper and lower test concentration thresholds whose output with the Filter output of the second filter is connected.
- To test the Operability of the detector can then in the detection area the sensor a sequence of high and low levels of interfering medium be generated, so that a kind of coding or signature results using the comparator circuit and the logic operation circuit detecting the test alarm case with great precision.
- the comparator circuit and / or the logic operation circuit have discrete electronic components and / or be realized in a microcomputer by software.
- a comparator output is the first Comparator circuit and / or the logic operation circuit with an input, preferably an optical one Indicator having display device connected.
- the person performing the function test of the detector can then easily recognize by the display that the detector exceeding the upper test concentration threshold has detected and can then the release of the interfering medium according to the further course of the interference medium concentration pattern, on which the second filter tuned is, control.
- the above object is related to the Test device achieved in that the dispensing device a Adjustment device for setting the delivery amount of the Interference medium having, with a control device for Setting a given concentration pattern of emitted interference medium is connected.
- this can be done by testing the detector provided interference medium concentration pattern with large Accuracy and thus with a correspondingly low consumption be generated by interference medium.
- the the test of the detector performing person needs the test device only on the Position detector and then release the interfering medium activate, after which this automatically with the given Test concentration pattern in the detection area of the detector is released.
- the test device thus enables easy way of checking the detector at the in Operation and / or a revision.
- the dispenser comprises at least one storage container for the disturbance medium, which has a valve with a Outlet opening for the disturbance medium is connected, wherein the Valve is drivingly connected to an actuator, the for setting the predetermined interference medium concentration pattern is connected to the control device. It can then storage container with the valve as a spray bottle be formed in which the interference medium stored under pressure is.
- the test device then enables the delivery of one the detector directed spray, which in addition Sprühmedium can be saved.
- the test device can a microcomputer in which the test interference medium concentration pattern is stored.
- a generally designated 1 detector for reporting a Emergence fire has a sensor 2 for the detection of Fire gas, smoke or the like arising in a fire Disruptive medium.
- the sensor 2 comprises in a conventional manner an optical transmitter 3 and an optical receiver 4 for Detection of the optical radiation emitted by the transmitter 3, wherein between the transmitter 3 and the receiver 4 one in the Drawing only schematically illustrated optical measuring section. 5 is formed. This is arranged in a measuring chamber, the Having inlet openings through which in the detection area of the Detector 1 located in the measuring chamber can.
- the sensor 2 has a Meßsignalausgang 6, to which a from the concentration of the interfering medium in the measuring chamber dependent Measuring signal 7 is present.
- the measuring signal output 6 is connected via a Measuring amplifier 8 with the input of an evaluation device. 9 connected to a first filter 10a and a second filter 10b whose inputs each with the measuring signal 6 of the Sensors 2 are connected.
- the first filter 10a is for detection one occurring during a fire (alarm case) Störmedium-concentration pattern and the second filter 10b for Recognition of one of those occurring during the incipient fire Interference medium concentration pattern deviating, for testing the Functionality of the detector 1 provided test interference medium concentration pattern educated. That to test the Functionality of the detector 1 provided concentration pattern has a shorter duration than that in the Alarm case occurring interference medium concentration pattern.
- Fig.1 it can be seen that the filter output 11a of the first Filter 10a with a first input of an OR gate 12 and the filter output 11b of the second filter 10b with a second Input of the OR gate 12 is connected.
- the output of this Or gate 12 is connected to an alarm signal 13 of the Evaluation device 9 connected to the forwarding of the Alarms to a leading to a fire alarm panel Detector line is connected.
- the fire alarm panel points optical and / or acoustic display means, the Occurrence of an alarm to be activated.
- the measuring signal 7 and the means of the first Filter 10a filtered measuring signal 14 in the course of a Emergence fire shown graphically.
- the time is applied, whereby the beginning of the emergence fire the time equals zero. It can be clearly seen that the about the concentration of the interfering medium in the measuring chamber corresponding signal level of the measuring signal 7 at the beginning of the Genesis is still very low and then quickly over an alarm concentration threshold 15 increases. After that the measuring signal 7 remains on average approximately at a constant level.
- Fig.2 is further seen that the first filter 10a Having low-pass characteristic and that the low-pass filtered Measurement signal 14 compared to the unfiltered measurement signal 7 smoothed is.
- An existing in the low-pass filtered measuring signal 14 Staging results from the fact that the measuring signal 7 in the in Fig. 2 scanned from the ordinate times scanned and then is digitally processed in the first filter 10a.
- Low-pass filtering is the filtered measuring signal 14 with the help a comparator with the alarm concentration threshold 15 compared. If the low-pass filtered measurement signal 14a is the alarm concentration threshold 15 is exceeded, one at the Filter output 11a of the first filter 10a pending filter output signal 16a set. On at the alarm signal output 13 pending alarm signal is then also set or active.
- test device 18 interference medium with one of the interference medium concentration patterns occurring in the event of an alarm deviating test interference medium concentration pattern issued. 4
- the measuring signal 7 during the Testing the detector 1 shown graphically.
- On the abscissa time is plotted, where in the number "3" marked time with the delivery of a first disturbance medium pulse is started. It can be clearly seen that the Measurement signal up to above an upper test concentration threshold 19, which is about ten times the alarm concentration threshold 15, rising steeply and then first remains constant for a given period of time.
- Time is from the measuring signal 7, a first measured value and then we in the second filter 10b a first one Check carried out, in which the first measured value with the upper test concentration threshold 19 is compared. If the first measured value is greater than the upper test concentration threshold 19, we a first control signal 20 set for a predetermined period of time T1.
- the concentration becomes of the interfering medium in the detection range of the sensor 2 by Interrupt the disturbance medium supply below a lower test concentration threshold 21 lowered. This is about five times as large as the alarm concentration threshold 15.
- the concentration becomes the interference medium in the detection range of the sensor 2 by delivery another interference medium pulse again above the top Test concentration threshold 19 raised.
- a third measured value is sampled from the measuring signal 7, and then a third check is carried out in the second filter 10b, in which case the third measured value coincides with the upper test comparison threshold 19 is compared. If the third measurement value is greater than the upper test concentration threshold 19 and the second control signal 22 is set, a filter output 16b present at the filter output 11b of the second filter 10b is set which triggers the test alarm. This is indistinguishable at the alarm signal output 13 of the detector 1 from a real alarm case. A pending at the alarm signal output 13 alarm signal is then also set or activated via the OR gate 12. This alarm signal can be reset as needed from the fire panel. It can also be seen in FIG.
- a third control signal 23 is set simultaneously with the second control signal 22 and reset upon activation of the filter output signal 16b.
- This third control signal 23 controls a provided on the detector 1 light emitting diode or the like optical display element which indicates after the first disturbance medium pulse, that this was detected by the detector 1 and that now the second noise medium pulse of the test concentration pattern are delivered can trigger the test alarm.
- This second interference medium pulse must be detected within the time period T1 of the detector 1, so that it triggers the test alarm.
- each at least the sampling period T of the second filter 10b corresponds to a sub-scan of the To avoid measuring signal.
- the left pictured, not belonging to the test concentration pattern Störmedium pulse is shorter than the sampling period T and that this interference medium pulse is between two sampling times. It therefore remains in the filtering in the second filter 10b unconsidered.
- the interfering medium can be, for example, by means of a spray bottle delivered by hand according to the test concentration pattern become.
- the delivery of the interfering medium takes place with the aid of the test device 18 shown in FIG has a storage container 24 for the disturbance medium, in which this is stored under pressure.
- the storage container 24 is via a not shown in detail in the drawing valve an outlet port 25 connected to the interference medium.
- the valve is in drive connection with an actuator which For example, one by an electromagnet against a Resetting force adjustable armature may have.
- the Actuator is connected to the control input of a control device 26 connected to the valve for generating the predetermined Test concentration pattern is controllable.
- the control device 26 is connected to an actuator that at the embodiment of Figure 6 as an electrical button 27th is trained. When you press the button 27, the levy the interfering medium with the predetermined test concentration pattern triggered.
- the detector 1 In the method for operating the detector 1 for the detection of Gas, smoke or the like interfering medium, in particular one Fire detector, the detector 1, a sensor 2 for measuring the Concentration of the interfering medium, so the concentration measurement signal 7 of the sensor 2 of a first filtering operation for detecting an interference medium concentration pattern occurring in the event of an alarm subjected. Upon recognition of this concentration pattern the alarm is registered.
- the concentration measurement signal 7 of the sensor becomes in addition to the first filter operation a second filter operation for detecting the at the interference medium concentration pattern occurring during the test subjected. Upon detection of this test concentration pattern the occurrence of a test alarm is registered.
Landscapes
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Emergency Management (AREA)
- Fire-Detection Mechanisms (AREA)
- Fire Alarms (AREA)
- Testing Electric Properties And Detecting Electric Faults (AREA)
- Input Circuits Of Receivers And Coupling Of Receivers And Audio Equipment (AREA)
- Emergency Protection Circuit Devices (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Aus US 6 198 399 B1 kennt man bereits ein Verfahren der eingangs genannten Art, bei dem ein Innenraum eines Gebäudes zum Melden eines Entstehungsbrandes mittels eines an der Decke angebrachten Brand-Melders überwacht wird. Der Brand-Melder hat einen Sensor zur Detektion eines in der Umgebung des Brandes auftretenden Störmediums, wie zum Beispiel eines Brandgases und/oder von Rauch. Bei bekannten Brand-Meldern dieser Art wird das von der Konzentration des Störmediums im Detektionsbereich des Sensors abhängige Sensor-Meßsignal einem Alarm-Filter zum Erkennen eines Entstehungsbrandes auftretenden Störmedium-Konzentrationsmusters zugeführt. Der Alarm-Filter dient vor allem dazu, in dem Meßsignal enthaltene, zu detektierende, auf einen Brand zurückzuführende Signalanteile von solchen Signalanteilen zu unterscheiden, die nicht durch einen Brand verursacht sind, so daß der Alarm nur beim Auftreten eines Brandes ausgelöst wird. Durch den Alarm-Filter wird der Alarm nach dem Ansteigen der Störmedium-Konzentration erst mit einer gewissen Verzögerungszeit detektiert.
- Fig. 1
- ein Blockschaltbild eines Brand-Melders, der einen Sensor zur Detektion von Brandgas und/oder Rauch aufweist,
- Fig. 2
- eine graphische Darstellung eines ungefilterten und eines mittels eines Alarmfilters gefilterten Sensor-Meßsignals beim Auftreten eines Alarms, wobei strichliniert ein Alarm-Konzentrationsschwellwert eingezeichnet ist und wobei auf der Abszisse die Zeit und auf der Ordinate die Amplitude des Meßsignals aufgetragen ist,
- Fig. 3
- eine graphische Darstellung eines an einem Alarmsignalausgang eines Melders anliegenden Alarmsignales,
- Fig. 4
- eine graphische Darstellung des Meßsignals des Sensors beim Testen des Melders, wobei strichliniert Konzentrationsschwellwerte von Komparatorschaltungen eingezeichnet sind und wobei auf der Abszisse die Zeit und auf der Ordinate die Amplitude des Meßsignals aufgetragen ist,
- Fig. 5
- eine graphische Darstellung von in einer logischen Verknüpfungsschaltung eines Melders erzeugten Steuersignalen und
- Fig. 6
- eine Testvorrichtung zum Prüfen eines Melders.
Ein drittes Steuersignal 23 wird gleichzeitig mit dem zweiten Steuersignal 22 gesetzt und beim Aktivieren des Filter-Ausgangssignals 16b zurückgesetzt. Dieses dritte Steuersignal 23 steuert eine an den Melder 1 vorgesehene Leuchtdiode oder dergleichen optisches Anzeigeelement, welches nach der Abgabe des ersten Störmedium-Impulses anzeigt, daß dieser von dem Melder 1 detektiert wurde und daß nun der zweite Störmedium-Impuls des Test-Konzentrationsmusters abgegeben werden kann, um den Testalarm auszulösen. Dieser zweite Störmedium-Impuls muß innerhalb der Zeitdauer T1 von dem Melder 1 detektiert werden, damit dieser den Testalarm auslöst.
Claims (14)
- Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Melders (1) zur Detektion von Gas, Rauch oder dergleichen Störmedium, insbesondere eines Brand-Melders, welcher Melder (1) einen Sensor (2) zum Messen der Konzentration des Störmediums aufweist, wobei das Konzentrations-Meßsignal (7) des Sensors (2) einer Filteroperation zum Erkennen eines bei einem Alarmfall auftretenden Störmedium-Konzentrationsmusters unterzogen wird, und wobei beim Erkennen dieses Konzentrationsmusters der Alarmfall registriert wird, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß zum Testen der Funktionsfähigkeit des Melders (1) im Detektionsbereich des Sensors (2) Störmedium mit einem von dem bei dem Alarmfall auftretenden Störmedium-Konzentrationsmuster abweichenden Störmedium-Konzentrationsmuster abgegeben wird, daß das Konzentrations-Meßsignal des Sensors (2) zusätzlich zu der ersten Filteroperation einer zweiten Filteroperation zum Erkennen des bei dem Test auftretenden Störmedium-Konzentrationsmusters unterzogen wird, und daß beim Erkennen dieses Test-Konzentrationsmusters das Auftreten eines Alarmfalls registriert wird.
- Verfahren nach Anspruch 1, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß bei der ersten Filteroperation das Konzentrations-Meßsignal (7) tiefpaßgefiltert wird, daß das tiefpaßgefilterte Meßsignal (14) mit einem Alarm-Konzentrationsschwellwert (15) verglichen wird, und daß der Alarmfall registriert wird, wenn das tiefpaßgefilterte Meßsignal (14) den Alarm-Konzentrationsschwellwert (15) überschreitet.
- Verfahren nach Anspruch 1 oder 2, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß bei der zweiten Filteroperation das Konzentrations-Meßsignal (7) mit einem Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19, 21) verglichen wird, der größer ist als der Alarm-Konzentrationsschwellwert (15) und daß der Alarmfall registriert wird, wenn das Konzentrations-Meßsignal den Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19, 21) überschreitet.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 3, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß zum Testen der Funktionsfähigkeit des Melders (1) im Detektionsbereich des Sensors (2) die Konzentration des Störmediums wenigstens einmal wechselweise erhöht und reduziert wird, daß bei der zweiten Filteroperation geprüft wird, ob das Konzentrations-Meßsignal (7) wenigstens ein mal mindestens einen oberen Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19) und zumindest einen unteren Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (21) wechselweise über- und unterschreitet, und daß beim Erkennen dieses wechselweise Über- und Unterschreitens das Auftreten eines Alarmfalls registriert wird.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 4, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß bei der zweiten Filteroperation eine erste Überprüfung durchgeführt wird, bei der geprüft wird, ob das Konzentrations-Meßsignal (7) einen ersten oberen Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19) überschreitet, der vorzugsweise größer ist als der Alarm-Schwellwert (15), daß eine zweite Überprüfung durchgeführt wird, bei der geprüft wird, ob das Konzentrations-Meßsignal (7) in einem auf das Überschreiten des ersten oberen Test-Konzentrationsschwellwerts (19) folgenden Zeitpunkt einen unteren Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (21) unterschreitet, der kleiner ist als der erste obere Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19), daß eine dritte Überprüfung durchgeführt wird, bei der geprüft wird, ob das Konzentrations-Meßsignal (7) in einem auf das Unterschreiten des unteren Test-Konzentrationsschwellwerts (21) folgenden Zeitpunkt einen zweiten oberen Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19) überschreitet, der größer ist als der untere Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (21), und und daß der Alarmfall registriert wird, wenn das Konzentrations-Meßsignal (7) bei der dritten Überprüfung den zweiten oberen Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19) überschreitet.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 5, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß eine Anzeige aktiviert wird, wenn das Konzentrations-Meßsignal bei der ersten Überprüfung den ersten oberen Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19) überschreitet.
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 6, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß wenigstens ein unterer Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (21) mindestens zwei mal so groß, insbesondere mindestens dreieinhalbmal so groß und bevorzugt mindestens fünfmal so groß ist wie der Alarm-Schwellwert (15).
- Verfahren nach einem der Ansprüche 1 bis 7, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß wenigstens ein oberer Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19) mindestens viermal so groß, insbesondere mindestens siebenmal so groß und bevorzugt mindestens zehnmal so groß ist wie der Alarm-Schwellwert (15).
- Melder (1) zur Detektion von Gas, Rauch oder dergleichen Störmedium, insbesondere Brand-Melder, mit mindestens einem einen Meßsignalausgang (6) aufweisenden Sensor (2) zum Messen der Konzentration des Störmediums und mit einer Auswerteeinrichtung (9), die ein mit dem Meßsignalausgang (6) verbundenes Filter (10a) zum Erkennen eines bei einem Alarmfall auftretenden Störmedium-Konzentrationsmusters aufweist, dessen Filterausgang (11a) mit einem Alarmsignalausgang (13) der Auswerteeinrichtung (9) verbunden ist, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Auswerteeinrichtung (9) zusätzlich zu dem ersten Filter (10a) ein zweites, mit dem Meßsignalausgang (6) des Sensors (2) verbundenes Filter (10b) aufweist, das zur Detektion eines von dem bei dem Alarmfall auftretenden Störmedium-Konzentrationsmuster abweichenden, für den Test der Funktionsfähigkeit des Melders vorgesehenen Störmedium-Konzentrationsmuster ausgebildet ist, daß die Filterausgänge (11a, 11b) des ersten Filters (10a) und des zweiten Filters (10b) jeweils mit einem Eingang eines ODER-Glieds (12) verbunden sind, und daß der Ausgang dieses ODER-Glieds (12) mit dem Alarmsignalausgang (13) der Auswertevorrichtung (9) verbunden ist.
- Melder (1) nach Anspruch 9, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das erste Filter (10a) einen mit dem Meßsignalausgang (6) des Sensors (2) verbundenen Tiefpaßfilter aufweist, dem eine Vergleichseinrichtung zum Vergleichen des tiefpaßgefilterten Meßsignales mit einem Alarm-Konzentrationsschwellwert (15) nachgeschaltet ist, und daß der Ausgang dieser Vergleichseinrichtung mit dem Filterausgang (11a) des ersten Filters (10a) verbunden ist.
- Melder (1) nach Anspruch 9 oder 10, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß das zweite Filter (10b) ein Komparatorschaltung mit mindestens einem ersten Komparator zum Vergleichen des Konzentrations-Meßsignals (7) mit einem unteren Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (21) und zumindest einem zweiten Komparator zum Vergleichen des Konzentrations-Meßsignals (7) mit einem oberen Test-Konzentrationsschwellwert (19) aufweist, und daß diese Komparatorschaltungen mit einer logischen Verknüpfungsschaltung zum Detektieren wenigstens eines wechselweisen Über- und Unterschreitens des oberen und unteren Test-Konzentrationsschwellwerts (19, 21) aufweist, deren Ausgang mit dem Filterausgang (11b) des zweiten Filters (10b) verbunden ist.
- Melder (1) nach einem der Ansprüche 9 bis 11, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß ein Komparatorausgang der ersten Komparatorschaltung und/oder die logische Verknüpfungsschaltung mit einem Eingang einer vorzugsweise ein optisches Anzeigeelement aufweisenden Anzeigeeinrichtung verbunden ist.
- Testvorrichtung (18) zum Prüfen eines Melders (1) zur Detektion von Gas, Rauch oder dergleichen Störmedium, mit einer Abgabeeinrichtung für das Störmedium, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Abgabeeinrichtung eine Stelleinrichtung zur Einstellung der Abgabemenge des Störmediums aufweist, die mit einer Steuereinrichtung zur Einstellung eines vorgegebenen Konzentrationsmusters des abgegebenen Störmediums verbunden ist.
- Testvorrichtung (18) nach Anspruch 13, dadurch gekennzeichnet, daß die Abgabeeinrichtung wenigstens einen Speicherbehälter (24) für das Störmedium aufweist, der über ein Ventil mit einer Auslaßöffnung (25) für das Störmedium verbunden ist, und daß das Ventil mit einem Stellantrieb in Abtriebsverbindung steht, der zur Einstellung des vorgegebenen Störmedium-Konzentrationsmusters mit der Steuereinrichtung (26) verbunden ist.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE10139993 | 2001-08-16 | ||
DE10139993A DE10139993B4 (de) | 2001-08-16 | 2001-08-16 | Melder, Testvorrichtung zum Prüfen eines Melders und Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Melders |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1286320A2 true EP1286320A2 (de) | 2003-02-26 |
EP1286320A3 EP1286320A3 (de) | 2003-04-23 |
EP1286320B1 EP1286320B1 (de) | 2007-11-07 |
Family
ID=7695476
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP02017893A Expired - Lifetime EP1286320B1 (de) | 2001-08-16 | 2002-08-09 | Melder, Testvorrichtung zum Prüfen eines Melders und Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Melders |
Country Status (5)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP1286320B1 (de) |
AT (1) | ATE377816T1 (de) |
DE (2) | DE10139993B4 (de) |
ES (1) | ES2295266T3 (de) |
PT (1) | PT1286320E (de) |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3239949A1 (de) * | 2016-04-15 | 2017-11-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Verbesserte brandmeldertestvorrichtung und verfahren dafür |
CN113763665A (zh) * | 2021-11-09 | 2021-12-07 | 博兴融智科技创新发展有限公司 | 一种基于人工智能的消防报警装置 |
DE102021002143A1 (de) | 2021-01-19 | 2022-07-21 | Divis Gmbh | Messsystem |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
PL2711907T3 (pl) | 2012-09-24 | 2015-08-31 | Hekatron Vertriebs Gmbh | Sygnalizator, urządzenie testujące i sposób testowania sygnalizatora |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5945924A (en) * | 1996-01-29 | 1999-08-31 | Marman; Douglas H. | Fire and smoke detection and control system |
US6198399B1 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2001-03-06 | Martin P. Mattis | Smoke detector test device and method for manufacture |
Family Cites Families (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3842080A1 (de) * | 1988-12-14 | 1990-06-28 | Merten Gmbh & Co Kg Geb | Schaltungsanordnung fuer einen infrarot-raumueberwachungsdetektor mit wenigstens zwei gekoppelten detektoren |
GB9309115D0 (en) * | 1993-05-04 | 1993-06-16 | No Climb Prod Ltd | Smoke testing detector sensitivity testing apparatus |
DE10040570C1 (de) * | 2000-08-18 | 2002-04-18 | Bosch Gmbh Robert | Prüfvorrichtung zur Funktionsprüfung eines Temperaturfühlers eines Melders, Melder und Verfahren zur Funktionsprüfung eines Melders |
-
2001
- 2001-08-16 DE DE10139993A patent/DE10139993B4/de not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2002
- 2002-08-09 ES ES02017893T patent/ES2295266T3/es not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-08-09 PT PT02017893T patent/PT1286320E/pt unknown
- 2002-08-09 DE DE50211156T patent/DE50211156D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-08-09 EP EP02017893A patent/EP1286320B1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 2002-08-09 AT AT02017893T patent/ATE377816T1/de active
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5945924A (en) * | 1996-01-29 | 1999-08-31 | Marman; Douglas H. | Fire and smoke detection and control system |
US6198399B1 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2001-03-06 | Martin P. Mattis | Smoke detector test device and method for manufacture |
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP3239949A1 (de) * | 2016-04-15 | 2017-11-01 | Honeywell International Inc. | Verbesserte brandmeldertestvorrichtung und verfahren dafür |
US9922542B2 (en) | 2016-04-15 | 2018-03-20 | Honeywell International Inc. | Fire detector test device and methods therefor |
DE102021002143A1 (de) | 2021-01-19 | 2022-07-21 | Divis Gmbh | Messsystem |
CN113763665A (zh) * | 2021-11-09 | 2021-12-07 | 博兴融智科技创新发展有限公司 | 一种基于人工智能的消防报警装置 |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP1286320B1 (de) | 2007-11-07 |
EP1286320A3 (de) | 2003-04-23 |
DE10139993A1 (de) | 2003-03-13 |
ATE377816T1 (de) | 2007-11-15 |
ES2295266T3 (es) | 2008-04-16 |
PT1286320E (pt) | 2008-02-15 |
DE50211156D1 (de) | 2007-12-20 |
DE10139993B4 (de) | 2007-10-25 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE2857262C2 (de) | Verfahren zum Nachweis von Gasen | |
EP0636266B1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur funktionsprüfung von rauchmeldern | |
EP2339557B1 (de) | Prüfeinrichtung für Gefahrmeldeanlagen | |
CH683464A5 (de) | Optischer Rauchmelder mit aktiver Ueberwachung. | |
WO1992006387A1 (de) | Optische sensoranordnung und verfahren zu deren betrieb | |
WO2011104043A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur messung einer partikelkonzentration in kraftfahrzeugabgasen | |
EP0121048B1 (de) | Schaltungsanordnung zur Störpegel-Überwachung von Meldern, die in einer Gefahrenmeldeanlage angeordnet sind | |
DE102015012429B4 (de) | Verfahren zur Signalerfassung in einem Gasanalysesystem | |
EP1224641B1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur erkennung von rauch | |
EP0463339A2 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Failsafeprüfung einer Infrarotsensoranordnung | |
EP0465622B1 (de) | Schweissüberwachungseinrichtung | |
EP1039426A2 (de) | Vorrichtung zur Erkennung von Rauch | |
EP1286320B1 (de) | Melder, Testvorrichtung zum Prüfen eines Melders und Verfahren zum Betreiben eines Melders | |
DE4228112C1 (en) | Object detection arrangement - contains light source and receiver, comparator with comparison voltages controlled by micro-controller | |
DE4319451C1 (de) | Aus einem Sender und einem Empfänger bestehende Einrichtung zum Erfassen von Gegenständen | |
EP0197371B1 (de) | Brandmeldeanlage mit einem Absaugsystem | |
EP2711907B1 (de) | Melder, Testvorrichtung und Verfahren zum Prüfen eines Melders | |
DE4333911C2 (de) | Optischer Rauchmelder | |
EP0654771B1 (de) | Verfahren zur Vermeidung von Fehlalarmen in einem Brandmeldesystem, und Brandmeldesystem zur Durchführung des Verfahrens | |
DE4403156B4 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Durchführung des Verfahrens zur Ansteuerung eines Verbrauchers | |
DE4237311C1 (de) | Aus einem Sender und einem Empfänger bestehende Einrichtung zum Erfassen von Gegenständen | |
DE3728354C2 (de) | ||
DE102009054141A1 (de) | Verfahren zum Prüfen der Funktion eines Rauchmelders | |
DE1167229B (de) | Raumschutzanlage mit in eine Brueckenschaltung einbezogenen Messelektroden und periodischer UEberpruefung der Anlage | |
DE3909073C2 (de) |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
AX | Request for extension of the european patent |
Extension state: AL LT LV MK RO SI |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20030515 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20030612 |
|
AKX | Designation fees paid |
Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
GRAP | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR1 |
|
GRAS | Grant fee paid |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOSNIGR3 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE BG CH CY CZ DE DK EE ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE SK TR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: NOT ENGLISH |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: FG4D Free format text: LANGUAGE OF EP DOCUMENT: GERMAN |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: EP |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 50211156 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 20071220 Kind code of ref document: P |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: HANS RUDOLF GACHNANG PATENTANWALT |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: TRGR |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: SC4A Free format text: AVAILABILITY OF NATIONAL TRANSLATION Effective date: 20080201 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FG2A Ref document number: 2295266 Country of ref document: ES Kind code of ref document: T3 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071107 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed |
Effective date: 20080808 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20080208 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: EE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071107 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CY Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRESCRIBED TIME-LIMIT Effective date: 20071107 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20130826 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20130822 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: BG Payment date: 20130826 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: ES Payment date: 20130828 Year of fee payment: 12 Ref country code: MC Payment date: 20130822 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Payment date: 20130805 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20130821 Year of fee payment: 12 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: NV Representative=s name: GACHNANG AG PATENTANWAELTE, CH |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CZ Payment date: 20140806 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Payment date: 20140811 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Payment date: 20140210 Year of fee payment: 13 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: NL Ref legal event code: V1 Effective date: 20150301 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140809 Ref country code: MC Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140901 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150301 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140831 Ref country code: BG Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150331 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: PT Ref legal event code: MM4A Free format text: LAPSE DUE TO NON-PAYMENT OF FEES Effective date: 20160210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SK Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150809 Ref country code: CZ Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150809 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SK Ref legal event code: MM4A Ref document number: E 2984 Country of ref document: SK Effective date: 20150809 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: ES Ref legal event code: FD2A Effective date: 20160504 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: PT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20160210 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: ES Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20140810 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 15 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: PLFP Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: TR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20150809 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20170823 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Payment date: 20170822 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Payment date: 20180829 Year of fee payment: 17 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Payment date: 20180810 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20180809 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: IE Ref legal event code: MM4A |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180809 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20180809 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20190822 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20190820 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20190826 Year of fee payment: 18 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: SE Ref legal event code: EUG |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190810 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: IT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20190809 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R119 Ref document number: 50211156 Country of ref document: DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: AT Ref legal event code: MM01 Ref document number: 377816 Country of ref document: AT Kind code of ref document: T Effective date: 20200809 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200831 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200831 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20200809 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20210302 |