EP1145142A2 - Rechnersystem und methode zur anzeige von daten in einem interaktiven geteilten kreisdiagramm - Google Patents
Rechnersystem und methode zur anzeige von daten in einem interaktiven geteilten kreisdiagrammInfo
- Publication number
- EP1145142A2 EP1145142A2 EP99955950A EP99955950A EP1145142A2 EP 1145142 A2 EP1145142 A2 EP 1145142A2 EP 99955950 A EP99955950 A EP 99955950A EP 99955950 A EP99955950 A EP 99955950A EP 1145142 A2 EP1145142 A2 EP 1145142A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- majority
- data
- sizes
- pie chart
- record
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Withdrawn
Links
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/903—Querying
- G06F16/9038—Presentation of query results
Definitions
- the first factor concerns the amount of data to be displayed.
- the authors of these diagrams weigh the communicative advantages of a tabular or graphic representation against the cognitive demands of the reader. In this case, a tabular representation is generally preferred.
- the continued use of the data by the reader becomes important, particularly the level of accuracy that the reader demands. If relationships are more important than precise values, the best way to present the data is on a chart.
- readers with a general but no specific interest in a topic can view a diagram to get the essential message. In contrast, readers who have worked hard on a topic can view the data in detail.
- the object of the present invention is to display as much information as possible to the user in an organized manner so that the user can Can view and understand information as easily as possible, whereby the type and amount of information to be displayed is not restricted.
- the object is achieved by a computer system and a method for the visual display of data in an interactive divided pie chart.
- the pie chart can display multiple sets of dependent variables in relation to at least two other variables such as time and location.
- the split pie chart is divided into two sections, each corresponding to a different time period, but depending on the what is graphically possible, any number of sections can be used.
- Each section is divided into wedges according to different variables and their values in the two different periods.
- the sizes of the sections are chosen to show the relative sizes of the total of the two data sets.
- the diagram itself is arranged geographically on a graphic image of a map.
- the computer system of the present invention is connected via an interface to a data store in which the values for the various variables are stored. The user shapes the variables of the pie chart
- the user interface can then in turn query the data store to retrieve data.
- the data memory outputs those values that are input for the
- Figure 1 a computer system in which the present invention can be implemented
- Figure 2 is a block diagram illustrating a software subsystem for controlling the operation of the computer system of Figure 1
- Figure 3 is a block diagram of the present invention
- Figure 4 is a flow chart of the operations of the present invention
- Figure 5 the components of the divided circular object with its variables and methods
- Figure 6 an exemplary data table to which the present invention can be applied
- Figure 7 is a flow chart illustrating the creation of the split pie chart
- Figure 8 is an illustration of a split pie chart of the present invention.
- Figure 9 an exemplary table with three sets of sales figures
- Figure 10 is a flowchart showing the additional calculation that occurs when constructing a split pie chart with more than two sets of data points;
- Figure 11 an example of a pie chart that is divided into three;
- Figure 12 is a pie chart of the present invention including the geographically variable feature;
- Figure 13 is a flow diagram of the process of creating a pie chart containing the geographic variable;
- Figure 14 is a flow diagram illustrating the additional calculation performed to produce a split pie chart with the third dimension of width;
- Figure 15 the divided pie chart with a third dimension;
- Figure 16 is a split pie chart in which each wedge has its own width;
- Figure 17 is a flow chart showing the creation of a split pie chart taking Stevens' law into account;
- FIG. 18 the present invention, with line markings arranged around the circumference of the divided pie chart;
- FIG. 19 the present invention, with the line markings arranged in a circle around the circumference of the larger part.
- the invention may be embodied in a computer system such as the system of Figure 1, which comprises: a central processor 102, a main memory 104, an input / output controller 106, a keyboard 108, a display device 110, a visual display 112 and a data memory 114.
- Data store 114 can be any of a number of known database systems, such as Microsoft Access, dbase, Oracle, Sybase, etc. This can be a spreadsheet, a relational database, or a multidimensional database.
- a computer software system is provided to direct the operation of the computer system.
- the software system which is stored in a system memory 202 and on a mass storage device or a disk storage device, contains a kernel or an operating system 204, which in this special embodiment is Windows 95.
- One or more application programs 206 can be loaded for execution by the system (transferred from disk to main memory).
- a database management system client 208 runs in the system memory 202.
- the system also contains a user interface 210 for receiving user commands and data as input and for displaying result data, eg. B. on a data monitor or a visual display, as output.
- the present invention discloses a visual display means for a computer system that allows the user to view graphical data in an interactive split pie chart. The display of information on the visual display can be changed by the user by selecting the corresponding symbols in the user interface 210. Although the user can select the display style by keyboard input, the use of a mouse as the display device 110 is preferred in the practice of the present invention.
- Control and display of a display device 110 controlled by a mouse and one of several push buttons which can be selected by a user are known as graphic displays.
- the user can use the interactive pie chart Change the displayed data by clicking and dragging the mouse display device 110 over the corresponding field generated and displayed in the user interface 210.
- the interactive split pie chart is changed to reflect the new data.
- the system of the present invention is shown in Figure 3. It comprises a user interface 302, a subsystem 304 for formulating data queries, a first communication means 306 for transferring the data queries to a database management system (DBMS) 308, a database memory 310 and a second communication means 312 for transferring data from the database memory 310 to one Visual display system 314 and display 316.
- DBMS database management system
- Figure 4 is a flow diagram illustrating the process steps of the present invention.
- the selection 402 of the type of data to be compared takes place, for example sales figures for a specific product series.
- the choice 404 of the periods for which the data are compared takes place. In the present example, only two periods are used as examples.
- the user can also make a choice 406 for a particular geographic area for which the comparison is needed.
- the computer system formulates queries 408 based on the decisions made by the user.
- the system generates SQL (Sequential Query Langage) statements to query a data storage mechanism in which the data is stored.
- SQL Simple Query Langage
- These queries are transmitted 410 to the database management system to retrieve the data from the database memory 310.
- the data is sent back 412 to the visual display system to create the split pie chart. testify 414.
- the database memory is preferably either a spreadsheet, a relational database, or a multidimensional database.
- Figure 5 illustrates the components of the
- the LineColor variable 504 sets the color of chart lines.
- the LineWidth variable 506 defines the width of diagram lines in pixels.
- the MaxRadius variable 508 defines the maximum radius of the diagram in pixels. A value of zero indicates that the radius of the diagram has no restrictions.
- the MinRadius variable 510 defines the smallest radius of the diagram in pixels.
- the Origin OffsetAngle variable 512 specifies the angle in degrees from which to start drawing the graph.
- the RadialOffset variable 514 sets the angle in radians from which to start drawing the graph.
- the ValuePerUnitArea variable 516 defines the numerical value represented by a single pixel.
- the StevensFactor variable 518 specifies the factor by which the values must be scaled in order to take into account the perception effect known as Stevens' law.
- the CrustColor variable 504 sets the color of chart lines.
- the LineWidth variable 506 defines the width of diagram lines in pixels.
- the 520 specifies the color to use when drawing to outline the entire part.
- the CrustWidth variable 522 defines in pixels the width of the lines with which the outline of the entire part is drawn.
- the tick interval variable 524 specifies the number of tick marks that should be drawn for each part, and can be in a preselected arbitrary range e.g. B. from 0 to 12.
- the TickColor variable 526 specifies the color to be used to draw line marks. In the TicksFollowSplits variable 528 is a true / false value that determines how line marks are drawn.
- the AddSlice method 530 adds a data point to the diagram.
- the AutoScale method 532 calculates a value for the ValuePerUnitArea property.
- Render method 534 draws the diagram.
- Figure 6 shows an exemplary data table that is sent back to the visual display system to which the present invention could be applied.
- Column 602 contains a list of product series: mobile telephones 604, entertainment - audio / video 606, computer hardware 608, computer software 610, other 612 and the total 614.
- the second column 616 lists the two financial years for which the current one Example applies: 1997 and 1998.
- the value in cell 620 row 1 denotes the value of the mobile phone sales in 1997 and in cell 620 row 2 the value of the mobile phone sales in 1998.
- FIG. 7 is a flow chart illustrating the generation of the pie chart. First, the data is entered 702 in the visual display system.
- the visual display system separates 704 the different data records, in this case the data records corresponding to the two years. Then the ratio of each value to the total is calculated 706. These ratios are converted 708 to proportions for each part and the segments are graphed 710. The display system then calculates 712 the relative value of the two totals from the two different time periods as a fraction of each other . Finally, the sizes of the two parts are set 714 to represent this fraction.
- the present invention calculates the percentage of total sales attributable to mobile phone sales in 1997 and computes 8, a proportionally sized segment 802. The present invention performs this calculation for each of the product series for 1997 to create the entire left portion 804 of the divided pie chart 806.
- the present invention calculates the percentage of total sales made by mobile phone sales for 1998 and creates a proportionally sized segment 808 in the right half 810 of split pie chart 806. The present invention performs this calculation equally for each of the 1998 product lines create the full right part 810 of the split pie chart 806. Finally, the present invention calculates the relative size of total sales from 1998 compared to 1997 and increases or decreases the corresponding half to reflect this ratio in order to achieve the object of the invention, which is to provide a split pie chart. to provide the same purpose.
- the present invention is not limited to comparisons of only two sets of data points. It is also possible to compare sales from several different time periods with one another, whereby the number of time periods is not limited.
- Figure 9 is an example table giving an example with three sets of sales figures. The same process described above is applied to scenarios where the user wants to compare multiple sets of data points.
- Figure 10 is a flow chart illustrating the additional process steps for this.
- the data is entered 1002 in the visual display system.
- the system calculates 1004 the total number of data records.
- the pie chart is then in the same Number of parts of the same size divided into radians 1006.
- Figure 11 is an example of a pie chart divided into three parts.
- the radial size of the parts can also represent a comparison.
- the system determines the relative size of the total size from each year 1008 and the sizes of the parts 1010.
- the pie chart is then divided 1012 into a number of parts that reflect the number of records.
- the radial size of the parts can also reflect the relative values of the data set totals.
- the radial fractions are calculated 1014 from the relative sizes of the totals from the different data sets.
- the size of the part is determined 1016 and the pie chart is proportionally divided 1012.
- the present invention can place pie chart 1202 on a computer generated map 1204 so that the data of the previous example corresponds to the location of the pie chart on the map.
- the user can request multiple comparisons 1206, 1208, 1210 simultaneously for different geographic areas.
- FIG. 13 shows a flowchart of the process sequence for creating a pie chart, which includes the geographical variable. If the data in that
- Visual display system can be entered 1302, an additional geographic location variable is also entered.
- the system then converts 1304 the physical location (location) into corresponding coordinates on the map using a lookup table 1306, calls the
- the present invention then simultaneously generates a plurality of divided pie charts which are arranged on the map generated by a computer.
- the invention can also Draw your split pie charts to show a relation between the pie charts themselves.
- the relationship between the two sides of the pie chart can be compared based on their sizes. If there are several divided pie charts in different geographic areas, the total value of the pie charts can be compared by comparing the relative sizes of the whole charts e.g. B. can be compared by looking.
- the pie charts 1206, 1208, 1210 have different total areas. These areas reflect the total value of sales in each of these regions and the relative value of sales within each region from year to year.
- the divided pie chart can have a width whose value corresponds to a further variable. For example, if a user wants to compare profitability between different years, the width variable can be assigned to represent this value. Since profitability is not a function of total revenue, the width variable gives the user a more accurate picture of the company's financial performance, the sales of which are shown in the table of Figure 6.
- Figure 14 is a flow chart illustrating the additional computation performed to create this split pie chart embodiment. The data is first entered into the visual display system 1402. According to the example given, the system calculates the absolute profitability of each year based on the income and general costs for this year 1404. The system then compares 1406 the absolute profitability values from the two periods and calculates them as Shares from each other.
- each part is then set 1408 to reflect the share sizes according to their calculated values. Therefore, each half of the pie chart can be given its own width to provide another element of the comparison.
- the profitability of each segment can be calculated 1410 itself. In the previous example, the profitability of each wedge can be calculated as a percentage.
- the multiple profitability values can then be calculated 1412 as portions of one another to create segments of different widths. Each segment is drawn with a width that reflects its relative profitability compared to other product lines and compared to other years.
- FIG. 15 shows the split pie chart described above with the added width.
- FIG. 16 shows the split pie chart described above in which each segment has its own width.
- Figure 17 is a flow chart illustrating the
- the data is entered into the visual display system 1704.
- the programmer determines 1702 which particular correction factor is to be used. This factor is then in the display system 1706 entered.
- the steps to create the pie chart are the same as listed above, with the exception of one step.
- the segment sizes are calculated 1708, and then the sizes are entered 1710 into Stevens' power law to obtain the corrected values of the segment sizes.
- the sizes of the parts are set 1712 according to the Stevens law formula depending on the correction factor b entered by the programmer.
- the relative sizes of the segments can also be increased or decreased, including this factor to precisely display the perceived amount to the user.
- the total area of the pie charts itself can be adjusted with regard to Stevens' law.
- line markings can be arranged around the circumference of the divided pie chart as a visual aid for determining precise sizes.
- the variables for generating the line markings are described in FIG. 5 and shown in FIG. 18, the line markings being arranged directly on the circumference of the divided pie chart.
- Figure 19 illustrates the present invention with the line marks arranged around the circumference of the larger segment of a true circle.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Processing Or Creating Images (AREA)
- Image Generation (AREA)
- Digital Computer Display Output (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Claims
Applications Claiming Priority (3)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US09/186,672 US6320586B1 (en) | 1998-11-04 | 1998-11-04 | System an method for the visual display of data in an interactive split pie chart |
US186672 | 1998-11-04 | ||
PCT/EP1999/008396 WO2000026812A2 (de) | 1998-11-04 | 1999-11-02 | Rechnersystem und methode zur anzeige von daten in einem interaktiven geteilten kreisdiagramm |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP1145142A2 true EP1145142A2 (de) | 2001-10-17 |
EP1145142A3 EP1145142A3 (de) | 2002-08-07 |
Family
ID=22685850
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP99955950A Withdrawn EP1145142A3 (de) | 1998-11-04 | 1999-11-02 | Rechnersystem und methode zur anzeige von daten in einem interaktiven geteilten kreisdiagramm |
Country Status (7)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US6320586B1 (de) |
EP (1) | EP1145142A3 (de) |
JP (1) | JP3735684B2 (de) |
AU (1) | AU775248B2 (de) |
CA (1) | CA2334865C (de) |
IL (1) | IL140747A (de) |
WO (1) | WO2000026812A2 (de) |
Families Citing this family (62)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6359635B1 (en) * | 1999-02-03 | 2002-03-19 | Cary D. Perttunen | Methods, articles and apparatus for visibly representing information and for providing an input interface |
CA2320615A1 (en) * | 2000-09-20 | 2002-03-20 | David J. P. Baar | A system and method for portfolio analysis |
US6664964B1 (en) * | 2000-11-10 | 2003-12-16 | Emc Corporation | Correlation criteria for logical volumes |
US7692653B1 (en) * | 2001-10-01 | 2010-04-06 | Versata Development Group, Inc. | System and method for presenting statistics |
US7046248B1 (en) | 2002-03-18 | 2006-05-16 | Perttunen Cary D | Graphical representation of financial information |
US6900808B2 (en) | 2002-03-29 | 2005-05-31 | Sas Institute Inc. | Graphical data display system and method |
US7308421B2 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2007-12-11 | Vendavo, Inc. | System and method for grouping products in a catalog |
US7233928B2 (en) * | 2002-04-12 | 2007-06-19 | Vendavo, Inc. | Rule-based system for determining price adjustments in a product catalog |
US7281218B1 (en) * | 2002-04-18 | 2007-10-09 | Sap Ag | Manipulating a data source using a graphical user interface |
US20030225734A1 (en) * | 2002-06-04 | 2003-12-04 | Evan Witt | Interactive diagram in markup language page |
US7912792B2 (en) * | 2002-07-12 | 2011-03-22 | Vendavo, Inc. | Systems and methods for making margin-sensitive price adjustments in an integrated price management system |
US7089261B2 (en) | 2002-07-25 | 2006-08-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Programmable use of data extracted from common presentation files |
AU2003282819A1 (en) * | 2002-10-15 | 2004-05-04 | Factoryware, Inc. | Graphical overall equipment effectiveness system and method |
US20040088208A1 (en) * | 2002-10-30 | 2004-05-06 | H. Runge Bernhard M. | Creating and monitoring automated interaction sequences using a graphical user interface |
US7015912B2 (en) * | 2003-01-13 | 2006-03-21 | Vendavo, Inc. | System and method for the visual display of data in an interactive zebra chart |
EP1492018A1 (de) * | 2003-06-27 | 2004-12-29 | Sap Ag | Ein rechnerimplementiertes Verfahren und System zum Zugriff, Verarbeiten und Ausgeben von Daten |
US20040267644A1 (en) * | 2003-06-27 | 2004-12-30 | Richard Feco | Computer-implemented method and system for accessing, processing, and outputting data |
US20050216525A1 (en) * | 2004-03-26 | 2005-09-29 | Andre Wachholz-Prill | Defining target group for marketing campaign |
US7640198B1 (en) | 2004-05-28 | 2009-12-29 | Vendavo, Inc. | System and method for generating and displaying indexed price modeling data |
US20060004861A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2006-01-05 | Albanese Michael J | System and method for displaying price modeling data |
US8458060B2 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2013-06-04 | Vendavo, Inc. | System and method for organizing price modeling data using hierarchically organized portfolios |
US20050278227A1 (en) * | 2004-05-28 | 2005-12-15 | Niel Esary | Systems and methods of managing price modeling data through closed-loop analytics |
US7454412B2 (en) * | 2004-06-16 | 2008-11-18 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Compiling values that relate to aggregate data |
US7176923B2 (en) * | 2004-06-18 | 2007-02-13 | Sap Rechnungsprufung | Method and system to generate chart models |
US7275211B2 (en) * | 2004-07-02 | 2007-09-25 | Cognos Incorporated | Rendering page sets |
US20070016435A1 (en) * | 2004-08-05 | 2007-01-18 | William Bevington | Visualization tool |
US8396814B1 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2013-03-12 | Vendavo, Inc. | Systems and methods for index-based pricing in a price management system |
US7613626B1 (en) | 2004-08-09 | 2009-11-03 | Vendavo, Inc. | Integrated price management systems with future-pricing and methods therefor |
US20060031179A1 (en) * | 2004-08-09 | 2006-02-09 | Vendavo, Inc. | Systems and methods for making margin-sensitive price adjustments in an integrated price management system |
US20060047574A1 (en) * | 2004-08-27 | 2006-03-02 | Shankar Sundaram | Methods and systems for managing hierarchically organized objects in a pricing adjustment system |
US7437352B2 (en) * | 2004-09-24 | 2008-10-14 | International Business Machines Corporation | Data plotting extension for structured query language |
US7360697B1 (en) | 2004-11-18 | 2008-04-22 | Vendavo, Inc. | Methods and systems for making pricing decisions in a price management system |
US7961188B2 (en) | 2005-12-05 | 2011-06-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Persistent formatting for interactive charts |
US8819083B2 (en) * | 2005-12-29 | 2014-08-26 | Sap Ag | Creating new database objects from existing objects |
US8560946B2 (en) * | 2006-03-22 | 2013-10-15 | Vistracks, Inc. | Timeline visualizations linked with other visualizations of data in a thin client |
US20090259522A1 (en) * | 2006-05-02 | 2009-10-15 | Jamie Rapperport | System and methods for generating quantitative pricing power and risk scores |
US8301487B2 (en) * | 2006-05-02 | 2012-10-30 | Vendavo, Inc. | System and methods for calibrating pricing power and risk scores |
US7680686B2 (en) * | 2006-08-29 | 2010-03-16 | Vendavo, Inc. | System and methods for business to business price modeling using price change optimization |
US8321781B2 (en) * | 2007-02-08 | 2012-11-27 | Microsoft Corporation | User interface pane for an interactive chart |
US7737979B2 (en) * | 2007-02-12 | 2010-06-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Animated transitions for data visualization |
US7904355B1 (en) | 2007-02-20 | 2011-03-08 | Vendavo, Inc. | Systems and methods for a revenue causality analyzer |
US20090183101A1 (en) * | 2008-01-10 | 2009-07-16 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method, Apparatus and Program Storage Device for Providing a Gauge for Displaying Data that Includes Historical-Based Data |
US8412598B2 (en) | 2008-02-06 | 2013-04-02 | John Early | Systems and methods for a causality analyzer |
US7460122B1 (en) * | 2008-02-22 | 2008-12-02 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for graphical display of CPU utilization |
US20090315891A1 (en) * | 2008-06-18 | 2009-12-24 | Fyi Corporation | Method and system for automatic range determination of data for display |
US20100083184A1 (en) * | 2008-09-30 | 2010-04-01 | Apple Inc. | Selective grouping and manipulation of chart components |
US8176096B2 (en) * | 2008-12-18 | 2012-05-08 | Microsoft Corporation | Data visualization interactivity architecture |
US20130110853A1 (en) * | 2011-10-31 | 2013-05-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Sql constructs ported to non-sql domains |
CN103186700B (zh) | 2011-12-28 | 2016-01-27 | 国际商业机器公司 | 基于环形角度的数据展示方法和系统 |
WO2013126887A2 (en) * | 2012-02-24 | 2013-08-29 | Jerry Wolfe | System and method for providing flavor advisement and enhancement |
US9015591B2 (en) | 2012-06-13 | 2015-04-21 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Dynamic visualization generation and implementation |
US9163492B2 (en) * | 2012-10-23 | 2015-10-20 | Halliburton Energy Services, Inc. | Methods and systems using a fluid treatment polar graph |
EP2915059B1 (de) * | 2012-10-30 | 2021-05-26 | Ent. Services Development Corporation LP | Analyse von daten mit computeranzeige |
US20150035823A1 (en) | 2013-07-31 | 2015-02-05 | Splunk Inc. | Systems and Methods for Using a Three-Dimensional, First Person Display to Convey Data to a User |
US10380799B2 (en) | 2013-07-31 | 2019-08-13 | Splunk Inc. | Dockable billboards for labeling objects in a display having a three-dimensional perspective of a virtual or real environment |
US10139989B2 (en) | 2013-12-13 | 2018-11-27 | Sap Se | Mapping visualization contexts |
US9684983B2 (en) | 2014-04-30 | 2017-06-20 | International Business Machines Corporation | Three dimensional visualization of big data |
US20170091967A1 (en) * | 2015-09-25 | 2017-03-30 | Sap Se | Animating transitions to circular data visualizations |
JP7217103B2 (ja) * | 2018-07-31 | 2023-02-02 | シスメックス株式会社 | 生活習慣の改善に関するアドバイス情報を生成する方法及び情報処理装置 |
USD1006820S1 (en) | 2020-07-10 | 2023-12-05 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Electronic device with display screen and graphical user interface |
USD1009070S1 (en) | 2020-07-10 | 2023-12-26 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Electronic device with display screen and graphical user interface |
USD983810S1 (en) | 2020-07-10 | 2023-04-18 | Schlumberger Technology Corporation | Electronic device with display screen and graphical user interface |
Family Cites Families (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5491779A (en) * | 1992-04-03 | 1996-02-13 | Bezjian; Richard D. | Three dimensional presentation of multiple data sets in unitary format with pie charts |
US5608899A (en) * | 1993-06-04 | 1997-03-04 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method and apparatus for searching a database by interactively modifying a database query |
US5513271A (en) * | 1993-11-24 | 1996-04-30 | Xerox Corporation | Analyzing an image showing a proportioned parts graph |
US5619631A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1997-04-08 | Binaryblitz | Method and apparatus for data alteration by manipulation of representational graphs |
-
1998
- 1998-11-04 US US09/186,672 patent/US6320586B1/en not_active Expired - Lifetime
-
1999
- 1999-11-02 JP JP2000580119A patent/JP3735684B2/ja not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-11-02 AU AU12692/00A patent/AU775248B2/en not_active Ceased
- 1999-11-02 CA CA002334865A patent/CA2334865C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 1999-11-02 WO PCT/EP1999/008396 patent/WO2000026812A2/de not_active Application Discontinuation
- 1999-11-02 IL IL14074799A patent/IL140747A/xx not_active IP Right Cessation
- 1999-11-02 EP EP99955950A patent/EP1145142A3/de not_active Withdrawn
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
See references of WO0026812A2 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
WO2000026812A2 (de) | 2000-05-11 |
WO2000026812A8 (de) | 2000-09-21 |
AU1269200A (en) | 2000-05-22 |
JP3735684B2 (ja) | 2006-01-18 |
US6320586B1 (en) | 2001-11-20 |
AU775248B2 (en) | 2004-07-22 |
EP1145142A3 (de) | 2002-08-07 |
IL140747A0 (en) | 2002-02-10 |
CA2334865C (en) | 2007-03-20 |
JP2003530608A (ja) | 2003-10-14 |
IL140747A (en) | 2005-09-25 |
CA2334865A1 (en) | 2000-05-11 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
WO2000026812A2 (de) | Rechnersystem und methode zur anzeige von daten in einem interaktiven geteilten kreisdiagramm | |
DE69031851T2 (de) | Graphische Anordnung zur Anzeige von räumlich verteilten, zeitvarianten Daten | |
DE69526752T2 (de) | Verfahren zum automatischen anzeigen von kartensymbolen | |
DE60205750T2 (de) | Lenkung der aufmerksamkeit des benutzers auf bestimmte icons, denen sich ein zeiger nähert, in interaktiven benutzerschnittstellen | |
DE69129712T2 (de) | Arbeitsraumanzeigen | |
DE69534331T2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Hervorhebung der Einzelheit einer Baumstruktur | |
EP0910829B1 (de) | Datenbanksystem | |
DE69900213T2 (de) | Verfahren und Gerät um Ansichten von hierarchisch zusammengefassten Daten herzustellen und anzuzeigen | |
DE3781892T2 (de) | Datenverarbeitungsanlage zur automatischen veraenderung von datenformaten. | |
EP2050023B1 (de) | Verfahren zum analysieren und/oder testen zumindest einer benutzeroberfläche, datenverarbeitungseinrichtung und computerprogrammprodukt | |
DE3910338A1 (de) | Vorrichtung und verfahren zur umsetzung eines attributs von anzeigedaten in einen code | |
DE10251440A1 (de) | Reproduzierbare Auswahl von Elementen in einer Hierarchie | |
DE112012006038T5 (de) | Blutdruckbezogene Information-Anzeigeeinrichtung | |
DE4040348A1 (de) | Vorrichtung zur designauswertung | |
DE102012219284A1 (de) | Interaktive vergleichende Analyse von Datenvisualisierungen mehrerer Objekte | |
DE69430413T2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Lösung von Termen einer numerischen Folge | |
DE10017551C2 (de) | Verfahren zur zyklischen, interaktiven Bildanalyse sowie Computersystem und Computerprogramm zur Ausführung des Verfahrens | |
DE69808582T2 (de) | Verfahren zur Dimensionierung eines auf einem Bildschirm angezeigten graphischen Objekts | |
WO2000054167A2 (de) | Such- und navigationseinrichtung für hypertext-dokumente | |
DE69529544T2 (de) | Vorrichtung und Verfahren zum direkten Berechnen von Koordinaten eines abzuschneidenden Gebiets | |
DE69806421T2 (de) | Verfahren und Vorrichtung zur Darstellung eines Datenbereichs zur Wertauswahl vom Benutzer in diesem Bereich über eine graphische Benutzerschnittstelle | |
DE69132205T2 (de) | Graphische Definition eines Bereiches bei der Auswahl von Daten eines Datenbankfeldes | |
DE69429402T2 (de) | Verfahren und System zur Herstellung von Tabellenabbildungen mit Fokus- und Kontextzonen, die direkte und indirekte Datenrepresentationen darstellen | |
DE102016218892A1 (de) | Verfahren zu einem Darstellen von medizinischen Befundungsdaten und/oder von Informationen zu medizinischen Befundungsdaten sowie eine medizinische Befundungsvorrichtung | |
CN112347183B (zh) | 一种数据显示装置、方法、设备及介质 |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
XX | Miscellaneous (additional remarks) |
Free format text: DERZEIT SIND DIE WIPO-PUBLIKATIONSDATEN A3 NICHT VERFUEGBAR. |
|
PUAK | Availability of information related to the publication of the international search report |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009015 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH CY DE DK ES FI FR GB GR IE IT LI LU MC NL PT SE |
|
R17D | Deferred search report published (corrected) |
Effective date: 20000921 |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 20010605 |
|
RAP1 | Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred) |
Owner name: SAP AG |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 20071116 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: THE APPLICATION IS DEEMED TO BE WITHDRAWN |
|
18D | Application deemed to be withdrawn |
Effective date: 20080327 |