EP0701783B1 - Semelle pour chaussure de sécurité et chaussure de sécurité munie d'une telle semelle - Google Patents
Semelle pour chaussure de sécurité et chaussure de sécurité munie d'une telle semelle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0701783B1 EP0701783B1 EP95117396A EP95117396A EP0701783B1 EP 0701783 B1 EP0701783 B1 EP 0701783B1 EP 95117396 A EP95117396 A EP 95117396A EP 95117396 A EP95117396 A EP 95117396A EP 0701783 B1 EP0701783 B1 EP 0701783B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- sole
- foot
- arch
- shoe
- region
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Lifetime
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A43—FOOTWEAR
- A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
- A43B13/00—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units
- A43B13/14—Soles; Sole-and-heel integral units characterised by the constructive form
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A43—FOOTWEAR
- A43B—CHARACTERISTIC FEATURES OF FOOTWEAR; PARTS OF FOOTWEAR
- A43B7/00—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements
- A43B7/32—Footwear with health or hygienic arrangements with shock-absorbing means
Definitions
- the present invention relates to a sole for safety shoes, in particular according to DIN 4843 or EN344, according to the preamble of claim 1.
- the invention also relates to a sole equipped with a sole according to the invention Safety shoe.
- the standards DIN 4843 and EN 344 mentioned require a safety shoe penetration-resistant insert (e.g. according to DIN 32768) in the form of a midsole Steel to the foot especially in the construction area in front of pointed objects, such as To protect nails etc.
- the midsole must be worked into the under shoe be removed without damaging or destroying the shoe can be.
- DE 31 08 359 A1 describes a sole for safety shoes, which has a puncture-proof sheet steel insert, which is between the outer and the inner layer of the sole is arranged.
- the deposit is correct with regard to their Surface shape at least approximately matches an inner layer of the sole.
- the disadvantage of the known sole is that there is still no optimal protection in particular is present in the area of the arch of the foot, so that it is safe from penetration Insert to foot injuries caused by pointed objects can.
- DE 909 070 it is known from DE 909 070 to have one in the front part of the shoe Toe protection made of metal and a metal plate in the insole.
- the size of the metal plate corresponds to the size of the toe protection and has one bent edge that overlaps the edge of the toe protection.
- disadvantage The solution known from DE 909 070 is that only in the area of the toes, but not in the remaining sole area protection against penetrating elements is achieved.
- the invention is therefore based on the object, starting from the above State of the art to create a sole that has a significantly increased security against foot injuries especially in the arch area of the foot at the same time good comfort guaranteed.
- this object is achieved by a sole according to claim 1.
- the surface of the vertical projection of the foot is advantageous including the inner arch of the foot almost completely, but in any case very much largely, covered by the midsole from below and thus the foot optimally protected against pointed objects that penetrate the outsole.
- the midsole prevents penetration of the entire outsole, but also leads to increased security against perforation of the Shaft through pointed objects "past the outsole" in the so-called waist area the sole, since advantageously e.g. Nails or the like of the invention Extension section so that they are deflected at the foot to be led past.
- the invention is based on the one hand on the knowledge that in the conventional Safety shoes foot injuries especially in the inner metatarsal area occur. Now was assume that a corresponding increase in the Steel midsole to adversely stiffen the entire sole in the midfoot area and therefore too unfavorable Wearing properties especially with regard to the would cause the foot to roll when walking.
- the invention lies the further knowledge based on the fact that through the "established" expansion approach actually a substantial stiffening of the sole occurs in the midfoot area, but this even becomes one beneficial support and guidance of the foot leads. So was found through tests with test subjects that the Stiffening at least not as a disadvantage, in most Cases even found to be advantageous or not at all has been. Furthermore, the stiffening of the midsole leads Surprisingly, neither did it increase Risk of breakage, as would have been due to the reduced elasticity can be expected because join in the joint area the rolling motion no impermissibly high material stress on.
- the midsole is opposite one the midfoot area in particular via a double bend or via a corresponding crank in the direction move a tread of the outsole down Has heel section.
- the Heel and midfoot area practically a kind of "joint" formed, which makes for extremely good rolling comfort Walking movement leads and especially in combination with the Orthopedic support for the midfoot is very beneficial.
- a safety shoe according to the invention 1 from an upper shoe 2 and a lower shoe 4 with a Sole arrangement consisting of an outsole 6, an insole 8 and preferably a removable insole 10.
- the Outsole 6 has any profile on its underside 12 on.
- the upper shoe 2 consists - in a manner known per se - of a suitable upper material 14, usually leather, a lining 16, a metatarsal cushion 18, a lacing 20 with a dust flap 22, a front safety toe cap 24, a rear cap 26 and preferably one Ankle padding 28.
- a suitable upper material 14 usually leather, a lining 16, a metatarsal cushion 18, a lacing 20 with a dust flap 22, a front safety toe cap 24, a rear cap 26 and preferably one Ankle padding 28.
- the lower shoe 4 now has a puncture-proof insert in the form of a steel midsole 30, which is preferably in the material of the outsole 6 is embedded.
- the midsole has 30 according to the invention - starting from their usual, to the contour of the outsole 6 or the insole 8 adapted and therefore in the midfoot area with a "Waist" provided surface shape - at least in the area of Inner arch of an extension 32, which itself extends at an obtuse angle ⁇ angled upwards (see Fig. 3 and 6).
- the angle is ⁇ preferably about 90 ° to 150 °.
- FIGS Invention has the midsole 30 in the area of The outer arch of the foot has a corresponding, second extension approach 34 on which is inclined at an obtuse angle ⁇ is angled upwards.
- the angle ⁇ is also preferred in the range between 90 ° and 150 °, but does not have to the angle ⁇ agree in any case.
- the respective inner or outer arch of the foot is also arched is formed and preferably a convex has an arcuate outer edge 36 (see FIGS. 2 and 5).
- the Radius of curvature R of the outer edge 36 is preferably about 50 to 70 mm, in particular about 60 to 62 mm.
- the maximum height H of the respective extension approach 32 or 34 is the height or thickness of the respective outsole 6 adapted; with thicker outsoles it can be higher than with thinner outsoles. In the example shown is 3 in particular about 7 mm.
- the steel midsole 30 consists of a front and Metatarsal area 38 and one opposite in the direction the underside profiling 12 of the outsole 6 offset heel section 40. Between these two Sections 38 and 40 is preferably a double bend or offset 42 formed, see Fig. 1 and 4th
- the midsole 30 is made from a flat sheet metal stamped part produced, as shown by way of example in FIG. 5. Starting from this level state, the extension approach 32 and possibly also the second extension approach 34 in a suitable tool in the direction of the drawn Arrows 44 bent up. Furthermore, the heel section 40 cranked down over the bend 42.
- the invention is not based on the illustrated and described Embodiments limited, but also includes all designs having the same effect in the sense of claims 1-6.
Claims (6)
- Semelle pour chaussure de sécurité, comprenant une garniture impénétrable en forme de semelle intermédiaire en acier (30) encastrée notamment dans une semelle extérieure (6), la semelle intermédiaire (30) correspondant, en ce qui concerne sa forme superficielle, au moins approximativement à une semelle intérieure (8), caractérisée en ce que la semelle intermédiaire (30) présente à partir de son état d'abord plan au moins dans la zone de la voûte interne du pied un appendice d'extension (32), recourbé vers le haut de façon oblique à angle obtus (α) de l'ordre de 90° à 150°, qui est tourné vers l'extérieur et présente un bord externe (36) faisant saillie vers l'extérieur en forme d'arc convexe.
- Semelle selon la revendication 1, caractérisée en ce que la semelle intermédiaire (30) présente aussi dans la zone de la voûte externe du pied un appendice d'extension (34) recourbé vers le haut de façon oblique à angle obtus (β) de l'ordre de 90° à 150°.
- Semelle selon la revendication 2, caractérisée en ce que l'appendice d'extension (34) présente dans la zone de la voûte externe du pied un bord externe en forme d'arc convexe (36).
- Semelle selon l'une des revendications 1 à 3, caractérisée en ce que l'appendice d'extension interne (32) et / ou l'appendice d'extension externe (34) est / sont conçu(s) voûté(s) de façon adaptée à chacune de la voûte interne, resp. externe, du pied.
- Semelle selon l'une ou plusieurs des revendications 1 à 4, caractérisée en ce que la semelle intermédiaire (30) présente une section formant talon (40) décalée vers le bas par rapport à la zone médiane du pied (38) dans le sens d'un profilage (12) de la semelle extérieure (6).
- Chaussure de sécurité composée d'une sous-chaussure (4) et d'une sur-chaussure (2), caractérisée par une semelle (6, 30) selon l'une ou plusieurs des revendications 1 à 5.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE29509095U DE29509095U1 (de) | 1995-06-01 | 1995-06-01 | Sohle für Sicherheitsschuhe sowie damit ausgestatteter Sicherheitsschuh |
DE29509095U | 1995-06-01 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0701783A1 EP0701783A1 (fr) | 1996-03-20 |
EP0701783B1 true EP0701783B1 (fr) | 1999-09-22 |
Family
ID=8008868
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP95117396A Expired - Lifetime EP0701783B1 (fr) | 1995-06-01 | 1995-11-05 | Semelle pour chaussure de sécurité et chaussure de sécurité munie d'une telle semelle |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0701783B1 (fr) |
JP (1) | JPH08322605A (fr) |
DE (2) | DE29509095U1 (fr) |
Family Cites Families (6)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE909070C (de) * | 1952-06-14 | 1954-04-12 | Dunlop Rubber Co | Schuh od. dgl. Fussbekleidung mit Zehenschutz |
FR1088502A (fr) * | 1953-11-18 | 1955-03-08 | Vredestein Rubber | Chaussure |
FR1350139A (fr) * | 1962-12-14 | 1964-01-24 | Baudou S A R L | élément de protection ou de renforcement perfectionné, pour chaussures |
CA1141950A (fr) * | 1979-12-17 | 1983-03-01 | Hans R. Scherz | Bottine de securite |
DE3027601C2 (de) * | 1980-07-21 | 1982-06-24 | Herbert Dr.-Ing. 8032 Lochham Funck | Formsohle mit durchtrittssicherer Einlage |
DE3108359C2 (de) * | 1981-03-05 | 1985-10-17 | Herbert Dr.-Ing. 8032 Lochham Funck | Sohle für Sicherheitsschuhe |
-
1995
- 1995-06-01 DE DE29509095U patent/DE29509095U1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-11-05 DE DE59506879T patent/DE59506879D1/de not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-11-05 EP EP95117396A patent/EP0701783B1/fr not_active Expired - Lifetime
- 1995-11-30 JP JP7311453A patent/JPH08322605A/ja active Pending
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
DE59506879D1 (de) | 1999-10-28 |
DE29509095U1 (de) | 1995-08-17 |
EP0701783A1 (fr) | 1996-03-20 |
JPH08322605A (ja) | 1996-12-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
EP0015482B1 (fr) | Semelle de support du pied | |
DE102017122278A1 (de) | Sohlenstruktur für schuhe und schuhe mit dieser sohlenstruktur | |
CH639831A5 (de) | Schuhsohle fuer sicherheitsschuhe. | |
DD294627B5 (de) | Sportschuh mit elastischer Einlage im Absatz | |
WO1998051178A1 (fr) | Semelle interieure de chaussure | |
WO1998019572A1 (fr) | Semelle de chaussure ou semelle exterieure, chaussure pourvue de cette semelle | |
EP0074568A1 (fr) | Chaussure | |
DE3706069A1 (de) | Sohle fuer einen sportschuh | |
AT403757B (de) | Optimierte schaftgestaltung für hohe schuhe und stiefel | |
EP3815562B1 (fr) | Semelle adaptée pour être utilisée dans une chaussure de sécurité | |
DE3027601C2 (de) | Formsohle mit durchtrittssicherer Einlage | |
EP0167937A1 (fr) | Chaussure, en particulier chaussure de sport | |
EP0701783B1 (fr) | Semelle pour chaussure de sécurité et chaussure de sécurité munie d'une telle semelle | |
DE2426727A1 (de) | Schuhwerk, insbesondere stiefel, der in seinem oberteil einen verschluss und zur unfallverhuetung mindestens einen mittelfussschutz aufweist | |
DE3106729A1 (de) | Austauschbare einlegesohle fuer sport- und freizeitschuhe | |
DE19754730A1 (de) | Fußbett | |
EP1097650B1 (fr) | Semelle interieure et son application dans la fabrication d'une chaussure | |
DE19623361C1 (de) | Sicherheitsschuh | |
EP0749705B1 (fr) | Structure de la partie inférieure d'une chaussure, en particulier d'une chaussure de sécurité | |
DE10211362B4 (de) | Sportschuh | |
DE19928502C9 (de) | Sicherheitsschuh | |
EP1062885B1 (fr) | Chaussure de sécurité | |
AT403004B (de) | Orthopädische einlage | |
DE8419408U1 (de) | Orthopädische Einlegesohle und mit dieser Einlegesohle versehenes Schuhwerk | |
DE2536443C3 (de) | Unfallverhütungsschuhwerk |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A1 Designated state(s): DE FR NL |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19960214 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: JUNKER, FRIEDEL Inventor name: GOETZE, KARL |
|
RBV | Designated contracting states (corrected) |
Designated state(s): DE FR NL |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: JUNKER, FRIEDEL Inventor name: GOETZE, KARL |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19970605 |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAG | Despatch of communication of intention to grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS AGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAH | Despatch of communication of intention to grant a patent |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: EPIDOS IGRA |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
RIN1 | Information on inventor provided before grant (corrected) |
Inventor name: JUNKER, FRIEDEL Inventor name: GOETZE, KARL |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): DE FR NL |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 59506879 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19991028 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20011122 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20011127 Year of fee payment: 7 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030601 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20030731 |
|
NLV4 | Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee |
Effective date: 20030601 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 59506879 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: QUERMANN STURM WEILNAU PATENTANWAELTE PARTNERS, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 59506879 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE QUERMANN, STURM, WEILNAU, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 59506879 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: HOFFMANN - EITLE, DE |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 59506879 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: QUERMANN STURM WEILNAU PATENTANWAELTE PARTNERS, DE Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R082 Ref document number: 59506879 Country of ref document: DE Representative=s name: PATENTANWAELTE QUERMANN, STURM, WEILNAU, DE |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20141201 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: DE Ref legal event code: R071 Ref document number: 59506879 Country of ref document: DE |