EP0184167A2 - Stonework impregnation device for creating a horizontal barrier against ascending humidity - Google Patents
Stonework impregnation device for creating a horizontal barrier against ascending humidity Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0184167A2 EP0184167A2 EP85115233A EP85115233A EP0184167A2 EP 0184167 A2 EP0184167 A2 EP 0184167A2 EP 85115233 A EP85115233 A EP 85115233A EP 85115233 A EP85115233 A EP 85115233A EP 0184167 A2 EP0184167 A2 EP 0184167A2
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- bottle
- tube
- masonry
- insulating liquid
- closure
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04B—GENERAL BUILDING CONSTRUCTIONS; WALLS, e.g. PARTITIONS; ROOFS; FLOORS; CEILINGS; INSULATION OR OTHER PROTECTION OF BUILDINGS
- E04B1/00—Constructions in general; Structures which are not restricted either to walls, e.g. partitions, or floors or ceilings or roofs
- E04B1/62—Insulation or other protection; Elements or use of specified material therefor
- E04B1/64—Insulation or other protection; Elements or use of specified material therefor for making damp-proof; Protection against corrosion
- E04B1/644—Damp-proof courses
- E04B1/648—Damp-proof courses obtained by injection or infiltration of water-proofing agents into an existing wall
Definitions
- the invention relates to a device for impregnating masonry to produce a horizontal barrier against rising damp according to the preamble of claim 1.
- working slots of approx. 1 m in length are alternately exposed in the masonry.
- masonry parts must remain between the working slots.
- the working slot freed from masonry is covered with a bitumen-coated aluminum sheet, polyurethane skin or lead foil in the entire thickness of the masonry.
- the start and end of the installed material are flipped up in the working slot so that the insulation layer can be connected to the insulation to be installed later.
- the insulated working slot is then bricked up again with bricks or similar material or pressed out with concrete. When pressing out with concrete, make sure that the formwork is suitable. After the freshly masonry work slots or concrete slits are firm enough to support the wall, the remaining parts of the wall are provided with work slots and laid out accordingly.
- the plastering must be carried out with renovation plaster or compacted blocking mortar in order to prevent the moisture from jumping from the lowest stones that remain moist. If the barrier is installed below the floors using this method, plastering is not possible without opening the floors, and moisture can continue to rise above the plaster in the living area. This significantly affects the utility of the process. Problems arise with curves, corners, inclines and slopes, since rigid materials are more difficult to process here, which in turn increases costs.
- the electro-osmosis process is known, in which a mortar tape at different heights of about 20 cm width is removed inside and out. The visible joints are scraped out, and a conductive ribbon cable made of polytetrafluoroethylene is laid in the joints. Alternatively, conductive probes can be drilled into the masonry. The joints now exposed and provided with a conductive ribbon cable are now plastered so that the electrodes are permanently installed. Then a power supply is connected to the electrodes. The resulting tension bridge stops rising moisture and the masonry above it can dry out. This method is also very labor-intensive, cost-intensive and also causes a large amount of dirt.
- the disadvantage is that all metals in the masonry such as dowels, fastenings for gutters, lightning rods, pipes etc. must be removed beforehand or must be insulated accordingly. Electrical systems in the vicinity of the building must be isolated to prevent the effects of electroosmosis from being questioned by leakage currents.
- the method is only suitable for buildings with no basement. It can only be carried out by a specialist company. It requires extensive plastering and painting work. In addition, constant maintenance costs for the operation of the system are necessary. The method is not suitable against rising pressurized water.
- Another known method provides for silicification of the walls.
- Unsuitable plaster is removed from the wall surfaces. Sanded joints are scraped out and the wall surfaces pre-slurried. Then oblique holes are drilled at a distance of 10 to 15 cm with a diameter of 40 to 50 mm to about 15 cm in front of the wall closure. The holes must then be cleaned with compressed air and pre-wet with lime water. Then a silicifying solution is poured into the holes one or more times until the wall is saturated. Finally, the holes are sealed with trass lime mortar or the like.
- the wall surfaces to be plastered are pre-slurried with sealing slurries and then plastered with bituminized cement mortar or the like.
- silicification barriers are mineral barriers that absorb moisture again after years.
- the object of the present invention is to provide a device for generating a horizontal barrier against rising moisture according to the preamble of claim 1, with which an optimal horizontal barrier can be generated with little effort, low costs, minimal dirt.
- the device according to the invention is characterized by an extremely simple and inexpensive construction.
- the bottle filled with the insulating liquid is simply inserted with the section of the tube protruding from the bottle into holes drilled obliquely downwards in the masonry.
- the insulating liquid flows through the cross hole into the tube and from there into the wall hole and is distributed there in the porous masonry.
- a ventilation hole is provided in the lid of the bottle, which allows air to bubble through but prevents the insulating liquid from escaping.
- the size of the longitudinal bore of the tube and the size of the transverse bore are selected so that the impregnation or filling process is ended automatically as soon as the masonry is saturated, ie as soon as insulating liquid is present in the bore provided in the masonry. It goes without saying that the spacing and depth of the holes in the masonry, depending on the wall thickness, can easily be selected such that optimal saturation of the masonry with the insulating liquid can be achieved. If the bottle runs out too quickly or too much insulating liquid is used, this is usually a sign of a "leak" in the masonry. The bottle can then be removed and inserted into another hole to be drilled without any significant additional effort.
- the bottle designed according to the invention closes groundwater pollution. It is particularly advantageous that the device according to the invention prevents the statics of the building from being impaired. It is no longer necessary to maintain certain working heights.
- the device according to the invention is particularly suitable for self-processing.
- the device according to the invention can be used practically universally for horizontal insulation against rising moisture.
- the drawing shows a bottle 2, for example made of plastic, which is closed with a screw cap 4.
- a tube 6 is sealed through the screw cap 4 and has a relatively small clear width.
- the tube has an outer section 8 and a section 10 arranged inside the bottle 2.
- the section 10 of the tube 6 is provided with a transverse bore 12 in the area of the closure 4.
- the closure 4 has a ventilation hole 14.
- the bottle shown in FIG. 1 is inserted with the outer section 8 of the tube 6 into a hole 16 drilled obliquely downwards of a masonry 18 to be renovated in order to produce a horizontal barrier.
- the insulating liquid 20 in the bottle now flows into the tube via the transverse bore 12 and flows from the section 8 of the tube 6 into the bore 16 and is distributed themselves there in the porous masonry.
- the filling process is automatically ended.
- the tube 6 is preferably made of a relatively strong and rigid plastic.
- the section 10 of the tube 6 preferably extends over the entire depth of the bottle, as a result of which an additional support effect is generated in particular for the filled bottle.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Electromagnetism (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Devices For Post-Treatments, Processing, Supply, Discharge, And Other Processes (AREA)
- Finishing Walls (AREA)
- Glass Compositions (AREA)
- Working Measures On Existing Buildindgs (AREA)
- Building Environments (AREA)
- Retaining Walls (AREA)
- Conveying And Assembling Of Building Elements In Situ (AREA)
Abstract
Description
Die Erfindung betrifft eine Vorrichtung zum Tränken von Mauerwerk zur Erzeugung einer Horizontalsperre gegen aufsteigende Feuchtigkeit gemäß Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1.The invention relates to a device for impregnating masonry to produce a horizontal barrier against rising damp according to the preamble of claim 1.
Es sind verschiedene Verfahren zur Erzeugung solcher Horizontalsperren gegen aufsteigende Feuchtigkeit bekannt.Various methods for producing such horizontal barriers against rising damp are known.
Bei einem Verfahren werden im Mauerwerk abwechselnd Arbeitsschlitze von ca. 1 m Länge freigelegt. Zwischen den Arbeitsschlitzen müssen aus statischen Gründen Mauerwerkteile stehenbleiben. Der vom Mauerwerk befreite Arbeitsschlitz wird mit einer bitumenbestrichenen Aluminiumbahn, Polyurethanhaut oder Bleifolie in der gesamten Stärke des Mauerwerks ausgelegt. Jeweils der Anfang und das Ende des eingebauten Materials wird im Arbeitsschlitz hochgeschlagen, damit die Isolierschicht mit der später einzubauenden Isolierung verbunden werden kann. Der isolierte Arbeitsschlitz wird dann mit Ziegeln oder ähnlichem Material wieder ausgemauert oder mit Beton ausgepreßt. Bei der Auspressung mit Beton ist auf eine geeignete Hinterschalung zu achten. Nachdem die frisch gemauerten Arbeitsschlitze oder ausbetonierten Schlitze fest genug sind, um die Wand zu tragen, werden die verbliebenen Mauerteile mit Arbeitsschlitzen versehen und entsprechend ausgelegt. Die hochgeklappten Enden der ersten Arbeitsschlitze werden nun mit den jetzt einzubauenden Isolierungen verbunden,und die geöffneten Mauerteile werden anschließend wie vorstehend beschrieben wieder verschlossen. Dieses bekannte Verfahren ist sehr arbeitsaufwendig und kostenintensiv. Es fällt sehr viel Schmutz an. Darüberhinaus besteht die Gefahr, daß sich Setzrisse im Mauerwerk bilden, wodurch die Statik des Gebäudes beeinträchtigt wird. Dieses Verfahren ist bei Gebäuden mit mehreren Stockwerken nicht anwendbar aus statischen Gründen. Nachteilig ist ferner, daß zumindest eine Steinhöhe über dem Erdbereich feucht bleibt, da diese Höhe als Arbeitshöhe benötigt wird. Die Anwendung dieses bekannten Verfahrens ist im wesentlichen nur für nicht unterkellerte Gebäude geeignet. Bei einer Anwendung bei Gebäuden mit Kellerräumen ist ein Erdaushub erforderlich, der erhebliche Mehrkosten verursachen würde. Zusätzlich sind erhebliche Verputzarbeiten und Malerarbeiten erforderlich. Der Verputz muß mit Sanierputz oder verdichtetem Sperrmörtel vorgenommen werden, um ein Überspringen der Feuchtigkeit von den untersten feucht bleibenden Steinen zu verhindern. Ist die Sperre nach diesem Verfahren unterhalb der Böden eingebaut, so ist ein Verputzen ohne öffnen der Böden nicht möglich, und im Wohnbereich kann Feuchtigkeit über den Putz weiterhin aufsteigen. Dies beeinträchtigt den Nutzwert des Verfahrens erheblich. Bei Rundungen, Ecken, Steigungen und Gefällen entstehen Probleme, da starre Materialien sich hier schlechter verarbeiten lassen, was wiederum kostenerhöhend wirkt.In one method, working slots of approx. 1 m in length are alternately exposed in the masonry. For structural reasons, masonry parts must remain between the working slots. The working slot freed from masonry is covered with a bitumen-coated aluminum sheet, polyurethane skin or lead foil in the entire thickness of the masonry. The start and end of the installed material are flipped up in the working slot so that the insulation layer can be connected to the insulation to be installed later. The insulated working slot is then bricked up again with bricks or similar material or pressed out with concrete. When pressing out with concrete, make sure that the formwork is suitable. After the freshly masonry work slots or concrete slits are firm enough to support the wall, the remaining parts of the wall are provided with work slots and laid out accordingly. The folded up ends of the first working slots are now connected to the insulation to be installed now, and the opened wall parts are on then closed again as described above. This known method is very labor-intensive and expensive. There is a lot of dirt. In addition, there is a risk of cracks forming in the masonry, which affects the statics of the building. For multi-storey buildings, this method cannot be used for structural reasons. Another disadvantage is that at least a stone height above the earth remains moist, since this height is required as a working height. The use of this known method is essentially only suitable for buildings without a basement. When used in buildings with basements, excavation work is required, which would cause considerable additional costs. In addition, considerable plastering and painting work is required. The plastering must be carried out with renovation plaster or compacted blocking mortar in order to prevent the moisture from jumping from the lowest stones that remain moist. If the barrier is installed below the floors using this method, plastering is not possible without opening the floors, and moisture can continue to rise above the plaster in the living area. This significantly affects the utility of the process. Problems arise with curves, corners, inclines and slopes, since rigid materials are more difficult to process here, which in turn increases costs.
Bei einem anderen Verfahren wird auf der gesamten Länge der zu erstellenden Horizontalsperre ein ca. 30 bis 40 cm breites, bis zur Geländehöhe herabreichendes Putzband entfernt, welches die Lager- oder Mauerfuge freilegt. Anschließend wird ein Gerüstrahmen im Mauerwerk verankert, der ein Schlaggerät trägt, mit dem sich seitlich überlappende Bleche in der gesamten Stärke des Mauerwerks in die Lager- oder Mörtelfuge eingetrieben werden. Auch dieses Verfahren ist sehr arbeitsaufwendig, kostenintensiv und verursacht erheblichen Schmutzanfall. Nachteilig ist, daß der Putz in den Wohnräumen zerstört wird, wenn die Geländegegebenheiten es nicht zulassen, die Sperre unterhalb der Fußböden einzubauen. Eine wirksame und nützliche Horizontalisolierung muß jedoch unterhalb von Böden verlaufen. Bei diesem Verfahren ist die Isolierung von Rundungen oder Ecken nicht möglich. Hier müssen zusätzliche chemische Horizontalsperren eingesetzt werden, will man zusätzlichen hohen Kostenaufwand durch entsprechende Zuschnitte der Bleche vermeiden. Außerdem ist es sehr schwierig, Steigungen und Gefälle durchgehend zu isolieren. Auch besteht die Gefahr, daß sich bei diesem Verfahren Setzrisse bilden. Nachteilig ist ferner, daß stets eine oder zwei Steinzeilen feucht bleiben, da die entsprechende Höhe als Arbeitshöhe benötigt wird. Auch dieses Verfahren ist auf nicht unterkellerte Gebäude begrenzt, da im Falle der Anwendung im Bereich von Kellerräumen ein Erdaushub erforderlich wird, der erhebliche Mehrkosten verursacht. Nachteilig ist auch, daß dieses Verfahren nur bei Mauern mit genormten Steinen, welche eine gleichmäßge, waagerecht verlaufende Mörtelfuge aufweisen, möglich ist.In another method, an approx. 30 to 40 cm wide plaster strip, which extends down to the ground level, is removed along the entire length of the horizontal barrier to be created, which exposes the bearing or wall joint. Subsequently, a scaffold frame is anchored in the masonry, which carries an impact device, with which overlapping metal sheets are driven into the bearing or mortar joint in the entire thickness of the masonry. This process is also very labor-intensive, cost-intensive and causes considerable dirt fit. The disadvantage is that the plaster in the living room is destroyed if the terrain does not allow the lock to be installed below the floor. However, an effective and useful H orizontalisolierung must pass below floors. Isolation of curves or corners is not possible with this method. Additional chemical horizontal barriers have to be used here if you want to avoid additional high costs by cutting the sheets accordingly. It is also very difficult to isolate slopes and gradients continuously. There is also a risk that settlement cracks will form in this process. Another disadvantage is that one or two stone rows always remain moist, since the corresponding height is required as the working height. This method is also limited to buildings that do not have a basement, since if they are used in the basement area, excavation is required, which causes considerable additional costs. Another disadvantage is that this method is only possible for walls with standardized stones that have a uniform, horizontal mortar joint.
Ferner ist das Elektroosmose-Verfahren bekannt, bei dem innen und außen ein Mörtelband in unterschiedlicher Höhe von ca. 20 cm Breite entfernt wird. Die danach sichtbaren Fugen werden ausgekratzt, und in die Fugen wird je ein leitfähiges Bandkabel aus Polytetrafluoräthylen verlegt. Alternativ dazu können auch leitfähige Sonden mittels Bohrungen in das Mauerwerk eingebracht werden. Die jetzt freigelegten und mit leitfähigem Bandkabel versehenen Fugen werden nunmehr verputzt, so daß die Elektroden fest installiert sind. Im Anschluß daran wird an die Elektroden ein Netzgerät angeschlossen. Durch die entstehende Spannungsbrücke wird aufsteigende Feuchtigkeit aufgehalten und das darüberliegende Mauerwerk kann austrocknen. Auch dieses Verfahren ist recht arbeitsaufwendig, kostenintensiv und verursacht ebenfalls einen hohen Schmutzanfall. Nachteilig ist, daß alle im Mauerwerk befindlichen Metalle wie Dübel, Befestigungen für Dachrinnen, Blitzableiter, Rohre usw. vorher entfernt werden müssen oder entsprechend isoliert werden müssen. In der Nähe des Gebäudes befindliche elektrische Anlagen müssen'u.U. isoliert werden, um zu verhindern, daß durch Kriechströme die Wirkung der Elektroosmose in Frage gestellt wird. Das Verfahren eignet sich nur bei nicht unterkellerten Gebäuden. Es ist nur durchführbar durch einen Fachbetrieb. Es erfordert umfangreiche Putz- und Malerarbeiten. Außerdem sind ständige Unterhaltungskosten für den Betrieb der Anlage notwendig. Das Verfahren ist nicht geeignet gegen aufsteigendes Druckwasser.Furthermore, the electro-osmosis process is known, in which a mortar tape at different heights of about 20 cm width is removed inside and out. The visible joints are scraped out, and a conductive ribbon cable made of polytetrafluoroethylene is laid in the joints. Alternatively, conductive probes can be drilled into the masonry. The joints now exposed and provided with a conductive ribbon cable are now plastered so that the electrodes are permanently installed. Then a power supply is connected to the electrodes. The resulting tension bridge stops rising moisture and the masonry above it can dry out. This method is also very labor-intensive, cost-intensive and also causes a large amount of dirt. The disadvantage is that all metals in the masonry such as dowels, fastenings for gutters, lightning rods, pipes etc. must be removed beforehand or must be insulated accordingly. Electrical systems in the vicinity of the building must be isolated to prevent the effects of electroosmosis from being questioned by leakage currents. The method is only suitable for buildings with no basement. It can only be carried out by a specialist company. It requires extensive plastering and painting work. In addition, constant maintenance costs for the operation of the system are necessary. The method is not suitable against rising pressurized water.
Ein weiteres bekanntes Verfahren sieht ein Verkieseln der Mauern vor. Die Wandflächen werden von ungeeignetem Putz befreit. Versandete Fugen werden ausgekratzt und die Mauerflächen vorgeschlämmt. Anschließend werden schräge Löcher im Abstand von 10 bis 15 cm mit einem Durchmesser von 40 bis 50 mm bis ca. 15 cmvor den Mauerschluß gebohrt. Die Löcher sind danach mit Preßluft zu säubern und mit Kalkwasser vorzunässen. Danach wird in die Löcher eine verkieselnde Lösung ein- oder mehrmals bis zur Sättigung der Wand eingefüllt. Schließlich werden die Bohrungen mit Trasskalkmörtel oder ähnlichem verschlossen. Die zu verputzenden Wandflächen werden mit Dichtungsschlämme vorgeschlämmt und im Anschluß daran mit bitumenvergütetem Zementmörtel oder ähnlichem verputzt. Auch dieses bekannte Verfahren ist relativ arbeitsaufwendig, kostenintensiv, und es fällt erheblicher Schmutz an. Nachteilig ist, daß dieses Verfahren nicht bei allen Baustoffen anwendbar ist, beispielsweise nicht bei Kalksandstein, Tuffstein und Naturstein. Da Verkieselungen gläshart werden, sind die erzeugten Horizontalsperren gegen Spannungsrisse empfindlich. Dadurch besteht die Gefahr geringer Lebensdauer. Außerdem stellen Verkieselungssperren mineralische Sperren dar, die nach Jahren wieder Feuchtigkeit aufnehmen.Another known method provides for silicification of the walls. Unsuitable plaster is removed from the wall surfaces. Sanded joints are scraped out and the wall surfaces pre-slurried. Then oblique holes are drilled at a distance of 10 to 15 cm with a diameter of 40 to 50 mm to about 15 cm in front of the wall closure. The holes must then be cleaned with compressed air and pre-wet with lime water. Then a silicifying solution is poured into the holes one or more times until the wall is saturated. Finally, the holes are sealed with trass lime mortar or the like. The wall surfaces to be plastered are pre-slurried with sealing slurries and then plastered with bituminized cement mortar or the like. This known method is also relatively labor-intensive, cost-intensive, and considerable dirt accumulates. It is disadvantageous that this method cannot be used for all building materials, for example not for sand-lime brick, tuff stone and natural stone. Since silicification becomes glassy hard, the horizontal barriers generated are sensitive to stress cracks. This creates the risk of a short lifespan. In addition, silicification barriers are mineral barriers that absorb moisture again after years.
Die Aufgabe der vorliegenden Erfindung besteht nun darin, eine Vorrichtung zur Erzeugung einer Horizontalsperre gegen aufsteigende Feuchtigkeit gemäß Oberbegriff des Anspruchs 1 anzugeben, mit der bei geringem Arbeitsaufwand, geringen Kosten, minimalem Schmutzanfall eine optimale Horizontalsperre erzeugt werden kann.The object of the present invention is to provide a device for generating a horizontal barrier against rising moisture according to the preamble of claim 1, with which an optimal horizontal barrier can be generated with little effort, low costs, minimal dirt.
Diese Aufgabe wird durch die Ausbildung gemäß Kennzeichen des Anspruchs 1 gelöst.This object is achieved by the training according to the characterizing part of claim 1.
Die erfindungsgemäße Vorrichtung zeichnet sich durch äußerst einfachen und preiswerten Aufbau aus. Die mit der Isolierflüssigkeit gefüllte Flasche wird einfach mit dem aus der Flasche herausragenden Abschnitt des Röhrchens in schräg nach unten gebohrte Löcher im Mauerwerk eingeführt. Die Isolierflüssigkeit strömt über die Querbohrung in das Röhrchen und von dort in die Mauerbohrung und verteilt sich dort im porösen Mauerwerk. Um ein stetiges Ausfließen zu gewährleisten, solange das Mauerwerk nicht gesättigt ist, ist im Deckel der Flasche eine Belüftungsbohrung vorgesehen, die zwar Luft durchperlen läßt, aber einen Austritt der Isolierflüssigkeit verhindert. Die Größe der Längsbohrung des Röhrchens und die Größe der Querbohrung sind so gewählt, daß der Tränk- bzw. Füllvorgang selbsttätig beendet wird, sobald das Mauerwerk gesättigt ist, d.h. sobald Isolierflüssigkeit in der im Mauerwerk vorgesehenen Bohrung ansteht. Es versteht sich, daß die Abstände und Tiefe der Löcher in dem Mauerwerk in Abhängigkeit von der Wandstärke leicht so wählbar sind, daß eine optimale Sättigung des Mauerwerkes mit der Isolierflüssigkeit erreichbar ist. Falls die Flasche zu schnell ausläuft oder auch zuviel Isolierflüssigkeit verbraucht wird, ist dies in aller Regel ein Zeichen für ein "Leck" im Mauerwerk Die Flasche kann dann entfernt werden und ohne wesentlichen Mehraufwand in ein anderes zu bohrendes Loch gesteckt werden. Die erfindungsgemäß ausgebildete Flasche, deren Auslaufverhalten somit gut kontrollierbar ist, schließt eine Grundwasserverschmutzung aus. Von besonderem Vorteil ist, daß mit der erfindungsgemäßen Vorrichtung eine Beeinträchtigung der Statik des Gebäudes ausgeschlossen ist. Die Einhaltung bestimmter Arbeitshöhen ist nicht mehr notwendig. Insbesondere ist die erfindungsgemäße Vorrichtung zur Selbstverarbeitung bestens geeignet. Die erfindungsgemäße Vorrichtung ist zur Horizontalisolierung gegen aufsteigende Feuchtigkeit praktisch universal einsetzbar.The device according to the invention is characterized by an extremely simple and inexpensive construction. The bottle filled with the insulating liquid is simply inserted with the section of the tube protruding from the bottle into holes drilled obliquely downwards in the masonry. The insulating liquid flows through the cross hole into the tube and from there into the wall hole and is distributed there in the porous masonry. In order to ensure a constant flow as long as the masonry is not saturated, a ventilation hole is provided in the lid of the bottle, which allows air to bubble through but prevents the insulating liquid from escaping. The size of the longitudinal bore of the tube and the size of the transverse bore are selected so that the impregnation or filling process is ended automatically as soon as the masonry is saturated, ie as soon as insulating liquid is present in the bore provided in the masonry. It goes without saying that the spacing and depth of the holes in the masonry, depending on the wall thickness, can easily be selected such that optimal saturation of the masonry with the insulating liquid can be achieved. If the bottle runs out too quickly or too much insulating liquid is used, this is usually a sign of a "leak" in the masonry. The bottle can then be removed and inserted into another hole to be drilled without any significant additional effort. The bottle designed according to the invention, the leakage behavior of which is thus easily controllable, closes groundwater pollution. It is particularly advantageous that the device according to the invention prevents the statics of the building from being impaired. It is no longer necessary to maintain certain working heights. The device according to the invention is particularly suitable for self-processing. The device according to the invention can be used practically universally for horizontal insulation against rising moisture.
Vorteilhafte und zweckmäßige Weiterbildungen der erfindungsgemäßen Aufgabenlösung sind in den Unteransprüchen gekennzeichnet.Advantageous and expedient developments of the task solution according to the invention are characterized in the dependent claims.
Die Erfindung soll nun anhand der beigefügten Zeichnung näher erläutert werden.The invention will now be explained in more detail with reference to the accompanying drawing.
Es zeigt :
- Fig. 1 schematisch einen Schnitt durch eine erfindungsgemäß ausgebildete Vorrichtung in Form einer Flasche und
- Fig. 2 schematisch die erfindungsgemäße Vorrichtung in Arbeitsstellung.
- Fig. 1 shows schematically a section through an inventive device in the form of a bottle and
- Fig. 2 shows schematically the device according to the invention in the working position.
Die Zeichnung zeigt eine Flasche 2, beispielsweise aus Kunststoff, die mit einem Schraubdeckel 4 verschlossen ist. Durch den Schraubdeckel 4 ist abgedichtet ein Röhrchen 6 hindurchgeführt mit einer relativ geringen lichten Weite. Das Röhrchen weist einen äußeren Abschnitt 8 und einen innerhalb der Flasche 2 angeordneten Abschnitt 10 auf. Der Abschnitt 10 des Röhrchens 6 ist im Bereich des Verschlusses 4 mit einer Querbohrung 12 ausgestattet. Der Verschluß 4 weist eine Belüftungsbohrung 14 auf.The drawing shows a
Die in der Fig. 1 dargestellte Flasche wird zur Erzeugung einer Horizontalsperre mit dem äußeren Abschnitt 8 des Röhrchens 6 in ein schräg nach unten gebohrtes Loch 16 eines zu sanierenden Mauerwerkes 18 eingeführt. Die in der Flasche befindliche Isolierflüssigkeit 20 strömt nun über die Querbohrung 12 in das Röhrchen und fließt aus dem Abschnitt 8 des Röhrchens 6 in die Bohrung 16 und verteilt sich dort in dem porösen Mauerwerk. Sobald das Mauerwerk mit Isolierflüssigkeit gesättigt ist und die Isolierflüssigkeit in dem Loch 16 so hoch ansteht, daß der Abschnitt 8 in die Isolierflüssigkeit taucht, wird der Einfüllvorgang automatisch beendet.The bottle shown in FIG. 1 is inserted with the
Das Röhrchen 6 besteht vorzugsweise aus einem relativ festem und steifem Kunststoff. Der Abschnitt 10 des Röhrchens 6 erstreckt sich vorzugsweise über die gesamte Flaschentiefe, wodurch insbesondere für die gefüllte Flasche eine zusätzliche Stützwirkung erzeugt wird.The tube 6 is preferably made of a relatively strong and rigid plastic. The
Claims (6)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
AT85115233T ATE44998T1 (en) | 1984-12-04 | 1985-11-30 | DEVICE FOR IMPRESSING MASONRY TO CREATE A HORIZONTAL BARRIER AGAINST RISING DAMP. |
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
DE3444101 | 1984-12-04 | ||
DE19843444101 DE3444101A1 (en) | 1984-12-04 | 1984-12-04 | DEVICE FOR DRINKING WALLS TO GENERATE A HORIZONTAL BARRIER AGAINST RISING MOISTURE |
Publications (3)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0184167A2 true EP0184167A2 (en) | 1986-06-11 |
EP0184167A3 EP0184167A3 (en) | 1986-09-10 |
EP0184167B1 EP0184167B1 (en) | 1989-07-26 |
Family
ID=6251805
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP85115233A Expired EP0184167B1 (en) | 1984-12-04 | 1985-11-30 | Stonework impregnation device for creating a horizontal barrier against ascending humidity |
Country Status (3)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0184167B1 (en) |
AT (1) | ATE44998T1 (en) |
DE (2) | DE3444101A1 (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0552755A2 (en) * | 1992-01-21 | 1993-07-28 | Köster Bauchemie | Method and bottle to fill in liquids in brickwork |
WO1995008679A1 (en) * | 1993-09-23 | 1995-03-30 | Isotec Franchise-Systeme Gmbh | Process for damp-proofing masonry |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
DE3912757A1 (en) * | 1989-04-19 | 1990-10-25 | Johannes Heyen | Wall draining and impregnating system - uses bottles with oblong tapering nozzles fitted loose in drill holes |
Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB986458A (en) * | 1962-03-12 | 1965-03-17 | Ernest Frankel | Improvements in or relating to pouring devices |
US4019661A (en) * | 1975-07-17 | 1977-04-26 | Janos Szabo | Liquid dispenser for selective upside down or right side up use |
EP0001114A2 (en) * | 1977-09-07 | 1979-03-21 | Karl Edmund Dr. Becker | Intravenous solution flow regulator |
FR2450758A1 (en) * | 1979-03-08 | 1980-10-03 | Valois Sa | VALVE MOUNTING DEVICE IN AN AEROSOL CONTAINER |
Family Cites Families (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB1042495A (en) * | 1963-06-06 | 1966-09-14 | Gerald Gobert | Improvements in or relating to the damp-proofing of walls and similar structures |
-
1984
- 1984-12-04 DE DE19843444101 patent/DE3444101A1/en active Granted
-
1985
- 1985-11-30 EP EP85115233A patent/EP0184167B1/en not_active Expired
- 1985-11-30 DE DE8585115233T patent/DE3571849D1/en not_active Expired
- 1985-11-30 AT AT85115233T patent/ATE44998T1/en active
Patent Citations (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB986458A (en) * | 1962-03-12 | 1965-03-17 | Ernest Frankel | Improvements in or relating to pouring devices |
US4019661A (en) * | 1975-07-17 | 1977-04-26 | Janos Szabo | Liquid dispenser for selective upside down or right side up use |
EP0001114A2 (en) * | 1977-09-07 | 1979-03-21 | Karl Edmund Dr. Becker | Intravenous solution flow regulator |
FR2450758A1 (en) * | 1979-03-08 | 1980-10-03 | Valois Sa | VALVE MOUNTING DEVICE IN AN AEROSOL CONTAINER |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
DEUTSCHE BAUZEITSCHRIFT, Band 32, Nr. 10, Oktober 1984, Seiten 1405-1408, G}tersloh, DE; J.J. K\STER: "Keller- und Wandabdichtungen" * |
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
EP0552755A2 (en) * | 1992-01-21 | 1993-07-28 | Köster Bauchemie | Method and bottle to fill in liquids in brickwork |
EP0552755A3 (en) * | 1992-01-21 | 1995-01-04 | Koester Bauchemie | Method and bottle to fill in liquids in brickwork |
WO1995008679A1 (en) * | 1993-09-23 | 1995-03-30 | Isotec Franchise-Systeme Gmbh | Process for damp-proofing masonry |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
EP0184167A3 (en) | 1986-09-10 |
DE3444101A1 (en) | 1986-06-05 |
ATE44998T1 (en) | 1989-08-15 |
EP0184167B1 (en) | 1989-07-26 |
DE3571849D1 (en) | 1989-08-31 |
DE3444101C2 (en) | 1990-03-22 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
DE2428497A1 (en) | METHOD OF SEALING CRACKS AND CAVITIES IN VARIOUS TYPES OF STRUCTURES, E.G. BUILDINGS IN THE ROCK, MADE OF CONCRETE, BRICK WALLS AND WOOD | |
EP0184167B1 (en) | Stonework impregnation device for creating a horizontal barrier against ascending humidity | |
EP0148173B1 (en) | Isolation or post isolation method, particularly for building walls and insertion element for implementing such method | |
DE8435438U1 (en) | DEVICE FOR DRINKING WALLS TO GENERATE A HORIZONTAL BARRIER AGAINST RISING MOISTURE | |
DE4333981C2 (en) | Soundproofing block bricks | |
DE2604533C3 (en) | Support structure for a reinforced concrete component, such as a solid roof slab or the like, of buildings, mounted in a sliding manner on a masonry with an optionally reinforced smoothing layer | |
EP0201757A3 (en) | Façade coating, in particular for the restoration of old buildings | |
DE3443084C1 (en) | Process for the renovation of a brick wall of a building damaged by moisture and provided with a facade plaster | |
DE3444815A1 (en) | Wall or ceiling construction of a building | |
DE834446C (en) | Process for the production of walls from prefabricated components | |
DE19954043C2 (en) | Masonry and method for the renovation of damp damaged masonry | |
EP3115520A2 (en) | Method for subsequent securing of inadequately anchored face walls of a cavity wall | |
AT374864B (en) | MOISTURE INSULATION FOR NIGHT-SIDING INSTALLATION IN EXISTING RISING WALLS, WALLS, FOUNDATIONS OR THE LIKE. | |
DE19944629C1 (en) | Vertical outer sealing barrier at a building wall is formed by a sealing gap between it and a lost shell to be filled with a mixture of loose material and a gel which sets into a gelled mass | |
EP0359033A1 (en) | Method for renewing the horizontal insulation against rising damp in building walls | |
DE1559438A1 (en) | Prefabricated house | |
DE7934763U1 (en) | Plate-shaped, sound-absorbing component for noise barriers | |
DE2815770A1 (en) | Building foundation assembly - comprises blocks whose lower base length is greater than wall thickness | |
AT203705B (en) | Process for the production of plastering on walls in cast concrete or brickwork | |
DE2155456A1 (en) | KIT OF PRECAST CONCRETE ELEMENTS FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A BASEMENT FOR A BUILDING | |
DE2316744A1 (en) | PROCESS FOR MANUFACTURING PLASTERED CEILINGS OR WALLS AND APPARATUS | |
DE2815261C2 (en) | Foundation stone | |
EP4092214A1 (en) | Plate-like wall element, prefabricated building with plate-like wall element and method for producing the wall element | |
DE10030595A1 (en) | Method to retrofit horizontal and vertical seals to buildings against water; involves displacing soil through slit that can be varied in size and shape, to form tubular hollow guide space | |
DE3318132A1 (en) | Method for retroactive installation of high-pressure-resistant and/or waterproof layers in masonry in need of repair |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A2 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PUAL | Search report despatched |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: A3 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19870511 |
|
17Q | First examination report despatched |
Effective date: 19880121 |
|
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Kind code of ref document: B1 Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Free format text: THE PATENT HAS BEEN ANNULLED BY A DECISION OF A NATIONAL AUTHORITY Effective date: 19890726 |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 44998 Country of ref document: AT Date of ref document: 19890815 Kind code of ref document: T |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3571849 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19890831 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed |
Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R.L. |
|
GBT | Gb: translation of ep patent filed (gb section 77(6)(a)/1977) | ||
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
ITTA | It: last paid annual fee | ||
EPTA | Lu: last paid annual fee | ||
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Payment date: 20001120 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: BE Payment date: 20001123 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: AT Payment date: 20001128 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Payment date: 20001130 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: CH Payment date: 20001211 Year of fee payment: 16 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LI Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20011130 Ref country code: GB Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20011130 Ref country code: CH Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20011130 Ref country code: BE Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20011130 Ref country code: AT Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20011130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: GB Ref legal event code: IF02 |
|
BERE | Be: lapsed |
Owner name: AMTMANN ALEXANDER Effective date: 20011130 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: CH Ref legal event code: PL |
|
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee |
Effective date: 20011130 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 20020730 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: LU Payment date: 20041025 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Payment date: 20041126 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PGFP | Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Payment date: 20050124 Year of fee payment: 20 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: NL Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF EXPIRATION OF PROTECTION Effective date: 20051130 |
|
NLV7 | Nl: ceased due to reaching the maximum lifetime of a patent |
Effective date: 20051130 |