CN112862434B - Auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business - Google Patents
Auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN112862434B CN112862434B CN202110130758.7A CN202110130758A CN112862434B CN 112862434 B CN112862434 B CN 112862434B CN 202110130758 A CN202110130758 A CN 202110130758A CN 112862434 B CN112862434 B CN 112862434B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- project
- file
- processor
- list
- review
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 claims description 60
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 claims description 28
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000012550 audit Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000001960 triggered effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000000977 initiatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 abstract description 10
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 abstract description 6
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 12
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000002955 isolation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000003190 augmentative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013500 data storage Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001788 irregular Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
Abstract
The invention provides an auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business, which comprises a memory and at least one processor, wherein the processor executes instructions stored in the memory to perform project creation, editing, rechecking, auditing and approval operations, and after auditing and approval, the system enters the next step according to a trigger condition or returns to the previous step to edit again, and unique project IDs are assigned to the projects after approval is completed. The auditing system uniformly stores all node information, operation information and file versions, does not need repeated development, and does not need simultaneous operation and supervision of a plurality of different systems; the same system is adopted for the projects of different types and the files of different stages, the same process is adopted for auditing and final approval, the preset auditing processes are conveniently executed by different nodes, multidimensional auditing can be realized, and the production processes of the exploration industry can be effectively managed, so that the productivity is effectively improved, and the production cost is reduced.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of office management systems, and particularly relates to an auditing system based on a multi-dimensional complex service.
Background
Along with the rapid development of infrastructure and rail transit, the production scale of engineering investigation industry is continuously enlarged and the number of engineering is continuously increased, but the internal management still mostly adopts the traditional manual operation and management mode, and the problems of irregular management, scattered data storage, unsmooth information, high cost and the like are gradually exposed in daily production management, so the requirement of business scale development is not met. In addition, the engineering investigation industry has a plurality of scientific research projects, each project needs to execute specific reporting and examining and approving processes, at present, independent operating systems are respectively developed for different types of projects, functions of the independent operating systems cannot be mutually assisted, information cannot be shared, the information, the business processes and the application are mutually disjointed, and the problems of information island and repeated development are caused to a certain extent, so that unnecessary cost is increased, and practical working efficiency is reduced. Therefore, under the new situation that the market competition is increasingly strong, how to effectively manage the production flow, thereby improving the productivity and reducing the production cost is an urgent problem to be solved for the engineering investigation industry.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention provides an auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business.
The specific technical scheme of the invention is as follows:
the invention provides an auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business, which comprises a memory and at least one processor, wherein the memory stores instructions, triggering conditions and identity information of all nodes in an access system, and when the instructions are executed by the at least one processor, the method is implemented as follows:
creating at least one item to be checked, and editing a file in the item;
at least two times of consulting the file according to a preset flow, consulting at least one item each time, entering the next step according to the triggering condition after each time of consulting, or returning to the previous step for re-editing;
after the last reference is completed, determining the final version of the file, and assigning a unique file ID for the file;
the memory is also used for storing the whole process of the processor executing the instructions for reference, including all the operations occurring and all the versions of the file.
Further, the processor includes an application processor, a review processor, an audit processor and an approval processor which are sequentially connected in series, and the application processor executes the following instructions:
creating an item to be audited, submitting a file to be processed, initiating a re-checking request, and modifying the file in the list to be modified;
the rechecking processor executes the following instructions:
taking the rechecking request as a triggering condition, calling the file to be checked for rechecking, and adding the file into a list to be checked by taking rechecking passing information as a triggering condition after the rechecking is finished, or adding comments into the file and adding the comments into the list to be modified by taking rechecking reject information as a triggering condition;
the audit processor executes the following instructions:
taking the review passing information as a trigger condition, calling the file to carry out review, and adding the file into a list to be reviewed by taking the review passing information as a trigger condition after review, or adding endorsement in the file and returning to the list to be modified by taking the review overrule information as a trigger condition;
the approval processor executes the following instructions:
and taking the audit passing information as a trigger condition, calling the file for approval, and determining the current version as the final version of the file by taking the approval passing information as the trigger condition after approval, or adding endorsements in the file and returning to the list to be modified by taking the approval rejection information as the trigger condition.
Further, the specific method for executing the instruction by the application processor is as follows:
a to-be-processed file is input according to an instruction of an initiated application, a magnetic patch and a quality tracking card corresponding to the file are created, and a submitter and uploading time information are filled in the magnetic patch, so that the state of the magnetic patch is modified to be submitted; setting an accessory category for the file, uploading the file, filling a rechecking person in the magnetic paste, uniformly modifying the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into a to-be-rechecked state, and adding the file into a to-be-rechecked list.
Further, the specific method for executing the instruction by the rechecking processor is as follows:
circularly traversing the files in the list to be rechecked, and calling the files belonging to the specific rechecker from the files to recheck; if the verification passes, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic patch and the quality tracking card into verification passing, so that the application processor is triggered to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic patch and the quality tracking card into a list to be verified, and the file is added into the list to be verified; and if the rechecking is not passed, calling the newly added file interface to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into rechecking revelation, adding comments, and adding the file into the list to be modified.
Further, the specific method for the auditing processor to execute the instruction is as follows:
circularly traversing the files in the list to be checked, and calling the files belonging to the specific auditor from the files to be checked; if the verification is passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic patch and the quality tracking card into verification, so that the application processor is triggered to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic patch and the quality tracking card into a to-be-verified list, and the file is added into the to-be-verified list; and if the verification is not passed, calling the newly added file interface to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into verification rejection, adding comments, and adding the file into the list to be modified.
Further, the specific method for the approval processor to execute the instruction is as follows:
circularly traversing the files in the list to be examined, and calling the files belonging to the specific examination person from the files to be examined for examination; if the verification is passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into verification passing, and the current version of the file is determined to be a final version; and if the approval is not passed, calling the newly added file interface to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into approval rejection, adding endorsements, and adding the file into the list to be modified.
Further, the processor further includes a project management processor that executes instructions to:
after annotating or editing the file each time, closing the editing function of the previous version and opening an editing mode only for the latest version;
further, the project management processor executes further instructions to:
and after the verification is passed, closing the editing function of the final version, endowing a unique identification code for the final version, taking the unique identification code as a file ID of the file, and adding the item of the file which passes the verification into an item list.
Further, the processor further includes at least one additional review processor that executes instructions for:
and invoking the final version passing the examination to carry out additional examination, storing the content of the additional examination in the quality tracking card, modifying the state of the magnetic patch into the passing of the additional examination, and determining the current version of the file as an examination version.
Further, the processor further includes an archiving processor that executes the following instructions:
and automatically archiving the final version and the censored version.
The beneficial effects of the invention are as follows: the invention provides an auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business, which comprises a memory and at least one processor, wherein the processor executes instructions stored in the memory to perform project creation, editing, rechecking, auditing and approval operations, after rechecking, auditing and approval, the next step is carried out according to a trigger condition, or the last step is returned to carry out the rechecking, unique project ID is given to the project after the approval is completed, and all operations and all modified versions occurring in the auditing process are stored in the memory. The auditing system integrates the functions of a plurality of different systems in the same system, uniformly stores all node information, operation information and file versions, does not need repeated development, and does not need simultaneous operation and supervision of the plurality of different systems; when the auditing flow is executed, the same system is adopted for different types of projects and files in different stages, and auditing and final approval are carried out through the same flow, so that different nodes can conveniently execute the preset auditing flow, and the required files can be automatically called and checked without information isolation; the same file can be inspected by a plurality of nodes, and the same node can also inspect a plurality of files at the same time, so that a multi-thread and multi-dimensional auditing process can be realized. Therefore, the system can effectively manage the production flow of the investigation industry, thereby effectively improving the productivity, reducing the production cost and being suitable for popularization and application in the investigation industry and even related industries.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a workflow diagram of an audit system based on a multi-dimensional complex business according to an embodiment;
fig. 2 is a schematic diagram of a multidimensional auditing mode of an auditing system based on multidimensional complex services according to an embodiment.
Detailed Description
The invention will be described in further detail with reference to the accompanying drawings and the following examples. It should be noted that the following embodiments are applied to monitoring management of an investigation project, and the audit content sequentially includes a schema, an intermediate result and a final investigation report, so that the designs of the processor, the node and the audit flow are all set according to the operation habit of the investigation industry, and can be adjusted according to actual conditions in work.
Examples
As shown in fig. 1 and 2, this embodiment provides an auditing system based on a multidimensional complex service, which includes a memory 1, and an application processor 2, a review processor 3, an auditing processor 4 (which can increase the number according to the need), an approval processor 5, and an item management processor 6 that are sequentially connected in series, and when the system is applied to reporting and auditing an investigation item, the specific process is as follows:
s1: the method comprises the steps of storing executed instructions, preset triggering conditions and all nodes accessed into the system for reporting and approving operations in a memory 1, wherein the nodes specifically comprise a plurality of application nodes (nodes for reporting project applications), a plurality of review nodes (nodes for conducting review on projects before formally reporting review requests), a plurality of review nodes (nodes for conducting review on the projects) and one or more approval nodes (nodes for conducting final approval on the projects), each item in the pre-established item needs to be reported in the system in advance, and is registered and recorded in the memory 1, and personnel information such as project participants, project responsible persons and the like can be written in the memory 1 and corresponds to different nodes one by one through the identity information.
S2: the project management processor 6 confirms the review node, the review node and the review node which should participate in the review program of the corresponding project according to the record information corresponding to each project, presets the review flow for the corresponding project according to the review node, and sets the review sequence of each node.
S3: the application node creates a project to be audited through the application processor 2, edits, fills in or enters in a project outline, creates a magnetic patch and a quality tracking card corresponding to the project outline, fills in a submitter (a user of the application node) and uploading time information on the magnetic patch, and modifies the state of the magnetic patch into the state to be submitted; setting an accessory category for the project outline and uploading the accessory category, filling a rechecker on the magnetic paste, uniformly modifying the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic paste and quality tracking card into a to-be-rechecked state, adding the project outline into a to-be-rechecked list, completing submission of a rechecked request, and storing the current version of the project outline into the memory 1; each application node may create multiple projects and raise multiple review requests at the same time.
S4: the rechecking node circularly traverses the files in the list to be rechecked through the rechecking processor 3, and takes the rechecking request as a triggering condition, and invokes the file (current project outline) belonging to a specific rechecking person (rechecking person using the current rechecking node) from the list to be rechecked; if the review passes, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into the review pass, so that the application triggering processor 2 further uniformly modifies the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into a to-be-inspected list, and the project outline of the version is added into the to-be-inspected list, thereby completing the submission of the inspection request, and entering step S5; if the review is not passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline, the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into review overruling, annotating is added aiming at the defects, the project outline with the annotating is added into a list to be modified, the application processor 2 modifies the project outline, and the operation is carried out again after the modification; all versions of project schemas generated in the above process need to be stored in the memory 1, and each time a new version is generated, the project management processor 6 closes the editing function of all previous versions; each review node can review a plurality of project schematics, and each project schema can also be reviewed by a plurality of review nodes.
S5: the auditing node circularly traverses the files in the list to be audited through the auditing processor 4, and takes the auditing request as a trigger condition, and invokes the file (current project outline) of the specific auditor (the auditor using the current auditing node) from the list to be audited; if the verification is passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic patches and the quality tracking card into the verification to pass, so that the application processor 2 is triggered to uniformly modify the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic patches and the quality tracking card into to-be-verified, the project outline of the version is added into a to-be-verified list, and therefore submission of verification requests is completed, and step S6 is entered; if the verification is not passed, a newly added tape file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline, the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into verification overrules, endorsements are added aiming at the defects, the project outline with the endorsements is added into a list to be modified, the application processor 2 modifies the project outline, and the operations are carried out again after the modification; all versions of the project outline generated in the above process need to be stored in the memory, and each time a new version is generated, the project management processor 6 closes the editing function of all previous versions; each auditing node can audit a plurality of project schemas, and each project schema can also be audited by a plurality of auditing nodes.
S6: the approval node circularly traverses the files in the list to be approved through the approval processor 5, and takes the approval request as a trigger condition, and invokes the file belonging to the specific approval person (the approval person using the current approval node) from the list to be approved; if the project outline passes the approval, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline, the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into the approval passing state, the current version of the project outline is determined to be the final version, and an electronic signature of an approver is added as an identity mark, and the step S7 is carried out; if the approval is not passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline, the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into approval rejection, endorsements are added aiming at the defects, the project outline with the endorsements is added into a list to be modified, the application processor 2 modifies the project outline, and the operation is carried out again after the modification; all versions of the project outline generated in the above process need to be stored in the memory, and each time a new version is generated, the project management processor 6 closes the editing function of all previous versions; each of the plurality of approval nodes may approve a plurality of project schematics, and each of the plurality of project schematics may also be approved by the plurality of approval nodes.
S7: the project management processor 6 uses the addition of the identity mark as a trigger condition, judges that the auditing flow is finished, the approval is passed, closes the editing function of the final version, generates a unique identification code (a serial number) and a project ID as the project, adds the project into a corresponding project list, and uses the archiving processor 8 to conduct automatic archiving processing, and then all personnel participating in the project and authorized to view the project can search and acquire the content of the project through the project ID.
S8: thereafter, all intermediate results (step report files) and final investigation reports (investigation reports) generated during the execution of the above-mentioned items are checked by the above-mentioned procedure, and the final checked version is stored in the memory 1.
S9: for some special items or files, the additional items may also be reviewed by an additional review processor 7; for example, in this real-time example, additional reviews may include expert reviews and construction map reviews, which are not admission items, but certification items, and the review-passed file may be augmented with "expert review-passed" or "construction map review-passed" flags and status information, indicating that the current file obtained the certification; the additional reviewed files also need to be stored in memory 1 and automatically archived by archiving processor 8.
In the above process, the memory 1 also records all the operations (the generator and object of the operation, the content of the operation, the location where the operation occurs) that occur, thereby archiving the whole process of auditing.
The system provided by the application integrates the functions of a plurality of different systems in the same system, uniformly stores all node information, operation information and file versions, does not need repeated development, and does not need simultaneous operation and supervision of the plurality of different systems; when the auditing flow is executed, the same system is adopted for different types of projects and files in different stages, and auditing and final approval are carried out through the same flow, so that different nodes can conveniently execute the preset auditing flow, and the required files can be automatically called and checked without information isolation; the same file can be inspected by a plurality of nodes, and the same node can also inspect a plurality of files at the same time, so that a multi-thread and multi-dimensional auditing process can be realized. Therefore, the system can effectively manage the production flow of the investigation industry, thereby effectively improving the productivity and reducing the production cost.
The foregoing examples illustrate only a few embodiments of the invention and are described in detail herein without thereby limiting the scope of the invention. It should be noted that it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention, which are all within the scope of the invention. Accordingly, the scope of protection of the present invention is to be determined by the appended claims.
Claims (9)
1. An auditing system based on a multi-dimensional complex service, characterized by comprising a memory (1) and at least one processor, said memory (1) storing instructions, trigger conditions and identity information of all nodes in an access system, said instructions, when executed by at least one of said processors, implementing the following method:
creating at least one item to be checked, and editing a file in the item;
at least two times of consulting the file according to a preset flow, consulting at least one item each time, entering the next step according to the triggering condition after each time of consulting, or returning to the previous step for re-editing;
after the last reference is completed, determining the final version of the file, and assigning a unique file ID for the file;
the memory (1) is also used for storing the whole process of the processor executing the instruction for consulting, including all the operations occurring and all the versions of the file;
the at least one processor includes: the system comprises an application processor (2), a review processor (3), an audit processor (4), an approval processor (5) and a project management processor (6) which are sequentially connected in series, wherein the number of the audit processors is increased as required, and the concrete process is as follows when the system is applied to reporting and auditing a survey project:
s1: the method comprises the steps that executed instructions, preset triggering conditions and all nodes accessed to a system for reporting and approving operations are stored in a memory (1) in advance, the nodes specifically comprise a plurality of application nodes for reporting project applications, a plurality of review nodes for review of projects before formally reporting review requests, a plurality of review nodes for review of the projects and one or more approval nodes for final approval of the projects, each item in advance needs to be reported to the system in advance, registration records are carried out in the memory (1), project participators, project charge persons and project charge person personnel information are written in the memory (1), and the identity information corresponds to different nodes one by one;
s2: the project management processor (6) confirms review nodes, review nodes and review nodes which should participate in the review program of the corresponding project according to the record information corresponding to each project, presets review flows for the corresponding project according to the review nodes, and sets the review sequence of each node;
s3: the application node creates a project to be audited through the application processor (2), edits, fills in or enters in a project outline, creates a magnetic patch and a quality tracking card corresponding to the project outline, fills in submitters and uploading time information on the magnetic patch, and modifies the state of the magnetic patch into the state to be submitted; setting an accessory category for the project outline and uploading the project outline, filling a rechecker on the magnetic paste, uniformly modifying the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic paste and quality tracking card into a to-be-rechecked state, adding the project outline into a to-be-rechecked list, completing submission of a rechecked request, and storing the current version of the project outline into a memory (1); each application node creates a plurality of projects and simultaneously lifts a plurality of review requests;
s4: the rechecking node circularly traverses the files in the list to be rechecked through the rechecking processor (3), and takes the rechecking request as a triggering condition, and invokes the files belonging to the specific rechecking person from the list to be rechecked for rechecking; if the review passes, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic patches and the quality tracking card into the review pass, so that the application triggering processor (2) further uniformly modifies the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic patches and the quality tracking card into a to-be-inspected list, and the project outline of the version is added into the to-be-inspected list, thereby completing the submission of the inspection request, and entering step S5; if the review is not passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline, the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into review overruling, annotating is added aiming at the defects, the project outline with the annotating is added into a list to be modified, the application processor (2) modifies the project outline, and the operation is carried out again after the modification; all versions of the project outline generated in the process are required to be stored in the memory (1), and each time a new version is generated, the project management processor (6) closes the editing function of all previous versions; each rechecking node rechecks a plurality of project schematics, and each project schema is rechecked by a plurality of rechecking nodes;
s5: the auditing node circularly traverses the files in the list to be audited through an auditing processor (4), and takes the auditing request as a triggering condition, and invokes the files belonging to the specific auditor from the list to be audited; if the verification is passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic patches and the quality tracking card into the verification to pass, so that the application processor (2) is triggered to uniformly modify the states of the project outline and the corresponding magnetic patches and the quality tracking card into the to-be-verified state, the project outline of the version is added into the to-be-verified list, and therefore submission of verification requests is completed, and step S6 is entered; if the verification is not passed, a newly added tape file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline, the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into verification overrules, endorsements are added aiming at the defects, the project outline with the endorsements is added into a list to be modified, the application processor (2) modifies the project outline, and the operation is carried out again after the modification; all versions of the project outline generated in the process need to be stored in a memory, and each time a new version is generated, the project management processor (6) closes the editing function of all previous versions; each auditing node audits a plurality of project schematics, and each project schema is audited by the plurality of auditing nodes;
s6: the approval node circularly traverses the files in the list to be approved through the approval processor (5), and takes the approval request as a triggering condition, and invokes the files belonging to the specific approver from the list to be approved; if the project outline passes the approval, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline, the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into the approval passing state, the current version of the project outline is determined to be the final version, and an electronic signature of an approver is added as an identity mark, and the step S7 is carried out; if the approval is not passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the project outline, the corresponding magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into approval rejection, endorsements are added aiming at the defects, the project outline with endorsements is added into a list to be modified, and the project outline is modified by an application processor (2) and the operation is carried out again after the modification; all versions of the project outline generated in the process need to be stored in a memory, and each time a new version is generated, the project management processor (6) closes the editing function of all previous versions; each examining node examines a plurality of project outlines, and each project outline is also examined by the plurality of examining nodes;
s7: the project management processor (6) takes the addition of the identity mark as a trigger condition, judges that the auditing flow is finished and the approval is passed, closes the editing function of the final version, generates a unique identification code as the project ID of the project, adds the project into a corresponding project list, and carries out automatic archiving processing by the archiving processor (8), and then all personnel participating in the project and authorized to view the project find and acquire the content of the project through the project ID;
s8: thereafter, all intermediate achievements and final proposal reports generated in the execution process of the project are audited by adopting the flow, and the final audit version is stored in a memory (1);
s9: for some special items or files, an additional item review is also performed by an additional review processor (7); including expert reviews and construction map reviews, which are certification projects, and the files passing the reviews are added with marks and status information of "expert reviews pass" or "construction map reviews pass", which indicate that the current file obtains the certification; the additional reviewed files also need to be stored in memory (1) and automatically archived by an archiving processor (8).
2. The multi-dimensional complex business based auditing system of claim 1, wherein the processors comprise an application processor (2), a rechecking processor (3), an auditing processor (4) and an approval processor (5) that are sequentially connected in series, the application processor (2) executing instructions to:
creating an item to be audited, submitting a file to be processed, initiating a re-checking request, and modifying the file in the list to be modified;
the rechecking processor (3) executes the following instructions:
taking the rechecking request as a triggering condition, calling the file for rechecking, and adding the file into a list to be checked by taking rechecking passing information as a triggering condition after the rechecking is finished, or adding comments into the file and adding the comments into the list to be modified by taking rechecking overranging information as a triggering condition;
the audit processor (4) executes the following instructions:
taking the review passing information as a trigger condition, calling the file for review, adding the file into a list to be reviewed after review by taking the review passing information as a trigger condition, or adding endorsement into the file and returning to the list to be modified by taking the review overrule information as a trigger condition;
the approval processor (5) executes the following instructions:
and taking the audit passing information as a triggering condition, calling the file for approval, determining the current version as the final version of the file by taking the approval passing information as the triggering condition after approval, or adding endorsements in the file and returning to the list to be modified by taking the approval rejection information as the triggering condition.
3. The multi-dimensional complex business based auditing system of claim 2, characterized in that the application processor (2) performs the specific method of instructions as follows:
a to-be-processed file is input according to an instruction of an initiated application, a magnetic patch and a quality tracking card corresponding to the file are created, and a submitter and uploading time information are filled in the magnetic patch, so that the state of the magnetic patch is modified to be submitted; setting an accessory category for the file, uploading the file, filling a rechecking person in the magnetic paste, uniformly modifying the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into a to-be-rechecked state, and adding the file into a to-be-rechecked list.
4. A multi-dimensional complex business based auditing system according to claim 3, characterised in that the specific method by which the auditing processor (3) executes the instructions is as follows:
circularly traversing the files in the list to be rechecked, and calling the files belonging to the specific rechecker from the files to recheck; if the verification passes, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic patch and the quality tracking card into verification passing, so that the application processor (2) is triggered to further uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic patch and the quality tracking card into a list to be verified, and the file is added into the list to be verified; and if the rechecking is not passed, calling the newly added file interface to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into rechecking revelation, adding comments, and adding the file into the list to be modified.
5. The multi-dimensional complex business based auditing system of claim 4, wherein the auditing processor (4) performs the instructions in the following specific way:
circularly traversing the files in the list to be checked, and calling the files belonging to the specific auditor from the files to be checked; if the verification is passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic patch and the quality tracking card into verification, so that the application processor (2) is triggered to further uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic patch and the quality tracking card into to-be-verified, and the file is added into a to-be-verified list; and if the verification is not passed, calling the newly added file interface to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into verification rejection, adding comments, and adding the file into the list to be modified.
6. The multi-dimensional complex business based auditing system of claim 5, in which the particular method by which the approval processor (5) executes the instructions is as follows:
circularly traversing the files in the list to be examined, and calling the files belonging to the specific examination person from the files to be examined for examination; if the verification is passed, a newly added file interface is called to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into verification passing, and the current version of the file is determined to be a final version; and if the approval is not passed, calling the newly added file interface to uniformly modify the states of the file, the magnetic paste and the quality tracking card into approval rejection, adding comments, and adding the file into the list to be modified.
7. The multi-dimensional complex business based auditing system of any one of claims 2-6, wherein the processor further comprises a project management processor (6), the project management processor (6) executing instructions for:
after annotating or editing the file each time, the editing function of the previous version is closed, and the editing mode is only opened for the latest version.
8. The multi-dimensional complex business auditing system of claim 7, wherein the processor further comprises at least one additional auditing processor (7) that executes instructions that:
and invoking the final version passing the examination to carry out additional examination, storing the content of the additional examination in the quality tracking card, modifying the state of the magnetic patch into the passing of the additional examination, and determining the current version of the file as an examination version.
9. The multi-dimensional complex business based auditing system of claim 8, wherein the processor further comprises an archiving processor (8) that executes instructions to:
and automatically archiving the final version and the censored version.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110130758.7A CN112862434B (en) | 2021-01-29 | 2021-01-29 | Auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110130758.7A CN112862434B (en) | 2021-01-29 | 2021-01-29 | Auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN112862434A CN112862434A (en) | 2021-05-28 |
| CN112862434B true CN112862434B (en) | 2024-03-01 |
Family
ID=75987109
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202110130758.7A Active CN112862434B (en) | 2021-01-29 | 2021-01-29 | Auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN112862434B (en) |
Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2000030000A2 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2000-05-25 | Triport Technologies, Inc. | Centralized system and method for managing enterprise operations |
| CN101739409A (en) * | 2008-11-26 | 2010-06-16 | 英业达集团(天津)电子技术有限公司 | Management system and method of electronic files |
| CN103530762A (en) * | 2013-09-23 | 2014-01-22 | 吉安市施工图设计文件审查中心 | Electronic examination system and examination method for construction drawing |
| CN106982251A (en) * | 2017-03-10 | 2017-07-25 | 中国地质大学（武汉） | Project field work data reporting method and system are reconnoitred based on mobile device |
| CN108764843A (en) * | 2018-05-29 | 2018-11-06 | 方凤祥 | A kind of contract management system and contract audit method |
| CN109034904A (en) * | 2018-08-02 | 2018-12-18 | 河北汉丰造价师事务所有限公司 | A kind of Engineering Cost Consulting service implementation method |
| CN109858751A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2019-06-07 | 中国大唐集团科学技术研究院有限公司 | Power engineering Evaluating Projects System |
| CN110796432A (en) * | 2019-10-22 | 2020-02-14 | 南京华盾电力信息安全测评有限公司 | Group enterprise business auditing process management method and system |
| CN111210104A (en) * | 2019-12-11 | 2020-05-29 | 中兵勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Construction drawing digital combined collaborative inspection system and method based on cloud platform |
| CN111666464A (en) * | 2020-06-05 | 2020-09-15 | 深圳市艾泰克工程咨询监理有限公司 | Project document cooperation management system and method based on cloud service |
-
2021
- 2021-01-29 CN CN202110130758.7A patent/CN112862434B/en active Active
Patent Citations (10)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2000030000A2 (en) * | 1998-11-12 | 2000-05-25 | Triport Technologies, Inc. | Centralized system and method for managing enterprise operations |
| CN101739409A (en) * | 2008-11-26 | 2010-06-16 | 英业达集团(天津)电子技术有限公司 | Management system and method of electronic files |
| CN103530762A (en) * | 2013-09-23 | 2014-01-22 | 吉安市施工图设计文件审查中心 | Electronic examination system and examination method for construction drawing |
| CN106982251A (en) * | 2017-03-10 | 2017-07-25 | 中国地质大学（武汉） | Project field work data reporting method and system are reconnoitred based on mobile device |
| CN108764843A (en) * | 2018-05-29 | 2018-11-06 | 方凤祥 | A kind of contract management system and contract audit method |
| CN109034904A (en) * | 2018-08-02 | 2018-12-18 | 河北汉丰造价师事务所有限公司 | A kind of Engineering Cost Consulting service implementation method |
| CN109858751A (en) * | 2018-12-26 | 2019-06-07 | 中国大唐集团科学技术研究院有限公司 | Power engineering Evaluating Projects System |
| CN110796432A (en) * | 2019-10-22 | 2020-02-14 | 南京华盾电力信息安全测评有限公司 | Group enterprise business auditing process management method and system |
| CN111210104A (en) * | 2019-12-11 | 2020-05-29 | 中兵勘察设计研究院有限公司 | Construction drawing digital combined collaborative inspection system and method based on cloud platform |
| CN111666464A (en) * | 2020-06-05 | 2020-09-15 | 深圳市艾泰克工程咨询监理有限公司 | Project document cooperation management system and method based on cloud service |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
| Title |
|---|
| A study of BIM collaboration requirements and avaliable feature in existing model collaboration systems;MT Shafiq, 等;《Journal of Information Technology in Construction》;第18卷;第148-161页 * |
| 固定资产投资审计系统的设计与集成;周建东;《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库信息科技辑》(第2期);第I138-659页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN112862434A (en) | 2021-05-28 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN106326122B (en) | A kind of software unit testing case management system | |
| CN102236672B (en) | A kind of data lead-in method and device | |
| US9047164B2 (en) | Calculating defect density by file and source module | |
| CN107423214A (en) | Software regression testing use-case acquisition methods, device and storage medium and electronic equipment | |
| US8645906B2 (en) | Method for enforcing change policy based on project state | |
| CN103761189B (en) | Test case management method and system | |
| CN109784758B (en) | Engineering quality supervision early warning system and method based on BIM model | |
| CN103310315A (en) | Automatic process approval tool based on workflows | |
| CN110609740A (en) | Method and device for determining dependency relationship between tasks | |
| CN106910004A (en) | A kind of overall process blower fan workmanship monitoring system based on workflow | |
| CN105279138B (en) | A kind of information research report automatic creation system | |
| CN114493249A (en) | Road construction full-period management method, system, terminal and storage medium for road engineering supervision | |
| CN112862434B (en) | Auditing system based on multi-dimensional complex business | |
| CN110147941A (en) | Content of examination acquisition methods, Stakeholder Evaluation method and device | |
| CN111143432A (en) | Data analysis early warning system and method for event processing result | |
| CN111767205A (en) | Online detection method and system supporting task splitting | |
| CN111126946A (en) | Modeling method and device for data tracing of information system | |
| CN105573984A (en) | Socio-economic indicator identification method and device | |
| CN114911773A (en) | Universal meta-model design method | |
| CN115525575A (en) | Data automation testing method and system based on Dataworks platform | |
| Ekanayake et al. | Performance Evaluation of Google Spreadsheet over RDBMS through Cloud Scripting Algorithms | |
| CN114676061A (en) | Knowledge graph-based automatic firmware detection method | |
| CN113657854A (en) | Man-machine cooperation intelligent audit analysis method for incomplete data | |
| CN110689326A (en) | Supplier information auditing and recommending method | |
| CN112465364B (en) | Management system for index library |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |